DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2015 CHAPTER IV.A THE USE OF FORCE A. Introduction 1. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “Inter-American Commission, “Commission” or “IACHR”) learned that during 2015, due to the arbitrary and excessive use of force, hundreds of persons throughout the hemisphere have lost their lives, suffered violations of their integrity, or faced several obstacles to the exercise of other human rights and freedoms. This situation, which constitutes a cause of concern for the Commission, has also been the subject of pronouncements by international human rights organs such as the Human Rights Committee, the Committee against Torture, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions (hereinafter “Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial executions”), the Special Rapporteur on torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (hereinafter “Special Rapporteur on torture”), the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association, as well as various international and domestic civil society organizations.1 2. In particular, from late 2014 to the date of the adoption of this report, the IACHR observes that force has often been used in a manner incompatible with international standards. The civilian police agents or their special groups, the armed forces, and private security agents have deployed their force in different contexts, such as social protests and public demonstrations, immigration and anti-crime operations, and evictions, among others, in which the lack of training, coordination, supervision, and control have caused irreparable harm to life and integrity. The intolerance of certain states in the face of dissent and public displays of social discontent and the historical practice of keeping certain groups invisible would appear to be related to the arbitrary and excessive use of force that has been observed to the detriment of protestors, human rights defenders, journalists and other media workers, LGBTI persons, migrants and others in human mobility, Afrodescendants, indigenous peoples and their members, and other vulnerable communities mired in poverty, including their children and adolescents. Of special concern to this Commission is the ever more common trend towards the use of force to contain social protests and public demonstrations that seek to give an outlet to discontent and demands that refer, inter alia, to the construction of large infrastructure works, exploitation of natural resources by private companies, and struggles to vindicate fundamental rights. 3. In addition, the IACHR notes with concern the tendency in some states of the region to delegate order and security tasks to the military forces, and even to declare states of emergency in response to scenarios of social protest or to address rising crime. The IACHR laments that the obligation to investigate, prosecute, and punish those responsible for the illegitimate use of force continues to be a task pending in some states. Despite the efforts made by certain states in the area of order and security, on occasion they 1 For example: Amnesty International (AI), and Use of Force: Guidelines for implementation of the UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials August 2015; Human Rights Watch (HRW), Callous and Cruel: Use of force against inmates with mental disabilities in US jails and prisons. May 12, 2015; Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, On the Front Lines of Ferguson, A Year Later. August 12 2015; Programa Venezolano de Educación – Acción en Derechos Humanos (PROVEA), Situación de los Derechos Humanos en Venezuela. Informe Anual Enero/Diciembre 2014; Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales (CELS), Derechos Humanos en Argentina, Informe anual 2015; Coordinadora Nacional de Derechos Humanos (CNDDHH), La Criminalización de la Protesta Social, Informe Anual 2014-2015, Foro Penal Venezolano, Detenciones por motivos políticos, torturas y otros crueles, inhumanos y degradantes. Asesinatos (2014-2015); Commission for Memory of the Province of Buenos Aires (CPM), El sistema de la crueldad IX sobre el sistema de encierro y las políticas de seguridad en la provincia de Buenos Aires, Informe Anual 2015; Coalition of non-governmental organizations of Venezuela, academic institutions, and organized civil society, Informe alternativo al cuarto informe periódico de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela sobre el cumplimiento del Pacto Internacional de Derechos Civil y Políticos al Comité de Derechos Humanos de la Organización de la Naciones Unidas. June 2015. have been insufficient to guarantee the rational use of force on an exceptional basis, as per international standards. 4. The methodology used for producing this report was to analyze the events that occurred in the region from late 2014 to December 2015; that information was obtained in the public hearings of this Commission held during its 153rd, 154th, and 156th regular periods of sessions, as well as from the requests for information in keeping with the powers conferred on this Commission by Article 41 of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter, American Convention or ACHR) and Article 18 of its Statute. In addition, information has been garnered from various United Nations mechanisms whose mandate is related to the topic of this study, from reports by international and local civil society organizations, and from press reports. As part of the specific methodology used for this report, in late July 2015 the IACHR published a questionnaire about i) access to water and ii) use of force, that was sent to the member states of the OAS, civil society organizations, and other users of the inter-American human rights system. That questionnaire was answered by a total of 15 member states of the OAS2 and by 26 civil society organizations, academics, and individuals.3 5. In addition, the Commission notes that the initiatives, practices, and events presented in this report are not exhaustive as regards the situation of any specific country, but rather are representative of an issue identified regionally. As for the structure of the information presented in this chapter of the Annual Report, this introduction is followed by five main sections. First is an analysis of the principles regarding use of force and how they have or have not been considered in the relevant legislative reforms and other regulatory provisions that have been adopted during the period under examination. Second is a discussion of the actors involved and the situations in which force is used, analyzing aspects related to the officers entrusted with the use of force, the means used, and the training those officers have received. Third is a discussion of the specific contexts that highlight the situation of insecurity brought about by the arbitrary and excessive use of force, and its impact on human rights. Such situations include, for example, the use of force in social protests and demonstrations, immigration control operations and evictions, and states of emergency. This report will also address the situation of especially vulnerable groups. In addition is a recounting of the aspects related to judicial oversight of the use of force, as regards administrative and judicial supervision and investigations carried out regarding human rights violations resulting from deployment of the use of force. Throughout this chapter the Commission provides examples of positive measures adopted by member states in this area. Finally, various recommendations are made to ensure that the use of force is in keeping with international human rights standards. 2 The Commission wishes to express its gratitude for the information received from the following states: Argentina, Bolivia Chile, Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Trinidad and Tobago, United States, Uruguay, and Venezuela. 3 In addition, the Commission is grateful for the information received from civil society organizations, networks of civil society organizations, and other private actors, to wit: Argentina: Asociación Pensamiento Penal (APP), and Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales (CELS); Brazil: Força Sindical, Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Human Rights Clinic, Faculdade Damas; Chile: Observadores y Defensores de los Derechos Humanos; Colombia: Colombia Diversa, the Public Actions Group of the Universidad Icesi of Cali and the Law School at the Universidad de San Buenaventura, Medellín campus, Instituto de Victimología Bartolomé de las Casas of the city of Tunja, Corporación Jurídica Yira Castro (CJYC); Costa Rica: International Human Rights Clinic at Santa Clara University School of Law, Red Water Pond Road Community Association (RWPRCA), 22 students from the course on Principles of Public International Law at the Universidad de Costa Rica, Guanacaste campus, the Centro de Derecho Ambiental y de los Recursos Naturales (CEDARENA); Cuba: Directorio Cubano Democrático; Guatemala: Peace Brigades International –Guatemala Project, Unidad para la Protección de Defensoras y Defensores de Derechos Humanos Guatemala (UDEFEGUA); Honduras: Asociación para una Ciudadanía Participativa (ACI PARTICIPA); Paraguay: Coordinadora Derechos Humanos Paraguay (CODEHUPY); Peru: Instituto de Defensa Legal (IDL), Coordinadora Nacional de Derechos Humanos (CNDDHH); United States: Latino Justice PRLDEF, Philip D. Althouse, Attorney, International Human Rights Clinic at Santa Clara University School of Law, Red Water Pond Road Community
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights* of February 3, 2010
    Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights* of February 3, 2010 Provisional Measures Regarding Peru Matter of Ramírez-Hinostroza et al. HAVING SEEN: 1. The Order issued by the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter, the “Inter-American Court”, the “Court” or the “Tribunal”) of July 22, 2005 as well as the Orders issued by the Inter-American Court on September 21, 2005, February 7, 2006, July 4, 2006 and May 17, 2007. By means of the last Order, the Tribunal decided, inter alia: 1. To order the State to maintain the measures it might have adopted and to adopt, forthwith, such measures as may be necessary to protect the life and personal integrity of Mr. Luis Alberto Ramírez-Hinostroza, his wife Susana Silvia Rivera-Prado, and his three daughters: Yolanda Susana Ramírez-Rivera, Karen Rose Ramírez-Rivera and Lucero Consuelo Ramírez- Rivera, granted by Order of September 21, 2005. 2. To extend the scope of the measures and to order the State to adopt, forthwith, such measures as may be necessary to protect the life and personal integrity of Messrs. Raúl Ángel Ramos De la Torre and Cesar Manuel Saldaña-Ramírez, Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza’s counsels. 2. The briefs of July 6 and October 17, 2007, May 2 and December 19, 2008 and February 9 and 17, March 31, May 20 and August 24, 2009, as well as other additional briefs, by means of which the Republic of Peru (hereinafter, the “State” or “Peru”) informed on: a) the protective measures adopted in relation to the beneficiaries; b) the investigation into the facts that gave rise to the adoption of the provisional measures, and c) the investigations conducted against Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2390.Book
    Treaty Series Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations VOLUME 2390 2006 Annexes A, C Recueil des Traités Traités et accords internationaux enregistrés ou classés et inscrits au répertoire au Secrétariat de l’Organisation des Nations Unies UNITED NATIONS • NATIONS UNIES Treaty Series Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations VOLUME 2390 Recueil des Traités Traités et accords internationaux enregistrés ou classés et inscrits au répertoire au Secrétariat de l’Organisation des Nations Unies United Nations • Nations Unies New York, 2010 Copyright © United Nations 2010 All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Copyright © Nations Unies 2010 tous droits réservés Imprimé aux États-Unis d’Amérique Volume 2390, Table of Contents Table of Contents ANNEX A Ratifications, accessions, subsequent agreements, etc., concerning treaties and international agreements registered in October 2006 with the Secretariat of the United Nations 4789. Multilateral: Agreement concerning the Adoption of Uniform Technical Prescriptions for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts which can be fitted and/or be used on Wheeled Vehicles and the Conditions for Reciprocal Recognition of Approvals Granted on the Basis of These Prescriptions. Geneva, 20 March 1958 Succession: Montenegro ............................................................................... 3 Regulation No. 1. Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicle headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing beam and/or a driving beam and equipped with filament lamps of category R2 and/or HS1. 8 August 1960 Succession: Montenegro........................................................................ 4 Regulation No. 2. Uniform provisions concerning the approval of incandescent electric lamps for headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing beam or a driving beam or both.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Force
    USE OF FORCE GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UN BASIC PRINCIPLES ON THE USE OF FORCE AND FIREARMS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS August 2015 Amnesty International Dutch Section Police and Human Rights Programme Amnesty International PO Box 1968 1000 BZ Amsterdam The Netherlands T (0031) (0)20-626 44 36 F (0031) (0)20-624 08 89 E [email protected] I www.amnesty.nl All rights reserved. This publication is copyright but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected]. Printed in the Netherlands ISBN 978-90-6463-368-3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS These Guidelines could not have been produced without the help of the many people who gave their time and expertisetoassistAmnestyInternationalinitspreparation. The main work was carried out by a project team of three people: Anja Bienert (drafting), Maggie Maloney and Sarah Masters (legal and equipment related input, editing and proof reading). Furthermore, Daniela Grosche carried out extensive research and established an impressive database of examples from various countries. Liana Rodrigues did an amazing amount of work in carrying out additional research, checking upon the validity of documents, and proof reading. Carline Westervelt supported the team in the most valuable manner in orga- nizationalandothermatters.
    [Show full text]
  • Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts, Components and Ammunition To, from and Across the European Union
    Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union REGIONAL ANALYSIS REPORT 1 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union REGIONAL ANALYSIS REPORT UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 © United Nations, 2020. All rights reserved, worldwide. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copy- right holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. UNODC would appreciate receiving a copy of any written output that uses this publication as a source at [email protected]. DISCLAIMERS This report was not formally edited. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNODC, nor do they imply any endorsement. Information on uniform resource locators and links to Internet sites contained in the present publication are provided for the convenience of the reader and are correct at the time of issuance. The United Nations takes no responsibility for the continued accuracy of that information or for the content of any external website. This document was produced with the financial support of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Security Sector in Latin America and the Caribbean 363.1098 Report on the Security Sector in Latin America and the Caribbean
    Report on the Security Sector in Latin America and the Caribbean 363.1098 Report on the Security Sector in Latin America and the Caribbean. R425 / Coordinated by Lucia Dammert. Santiago, Chile: FLACSO, 2007. 204p. ISBN: 978-956-205-217-7 Security; Public Safety; Defence; Intelligence Services; Security Forces; Armed Services; Latin America Cover Design: Claudio Doñas Text editing: Paulina Matta Correction of proofs: Jaime Gabarró Layout: Sylvio Alarcón Translation: Katty Hutter Printing: ALFABETA ARTES GRÁFICAS Editorial coordination: Carolina Contreras All rights reserved. This publication cannot be reproduced, partially or completely, nor registered or sent through any kind of information recovery system by any means, including mechanical, photochemical, electronic, magnetic, electro-visual, photocopy, or by any other means, without prior written permission from the editors. First edition: August 2007 I.S.B.N.: 978-956-205-217-7 Intellectual property registration number 164281 © Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, FLACSO-Chile, 2007 Av. Dag Hammarskjöld 3269, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile [email protected] www.flacso.cl FLACSO TEAM RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE REPORT ON THE SECURITY SECTOR Lucia Dammert Director of the Security and Citizenship Program Researchers: David Álvarez Patricia Arias Felipe Ajenjo Sebastián Briones Javiera Díaz Claudia Fuentes Felipe Ruz Felipe Salazar Liza Zúñiga ADVISORY COUNCIL Alejandro Álvarez (UNDP SURF LAC) Priscila Antunes (Universidad Federal de Minas Gerais – Brazil) Felipe
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Arcón© Method
    Introduction to the Arcón© Method Canine Catastrophe Rescue consists of using dogs to find people that have been accidentally buried for whatever reason (explosions, earthquakes, structural flaws, hurricanes, tornadoes, avalanches, landslides, etc.). Arcón is a system to train and intervene in catastrophes with canine rescue teams. It was created by Jaime Parejo after twelve years of study and research. The method was deemed finished in October 1994, and he chose the name Arcón in honour of his pet and pioneering student. The Arcón Method’s proven success in rescue operations has led it to win numerous major official awards both nationally and internationally, such as the First Prize for Research granted by the Spanish Royal Canine Society and the Sasakawa Certificate of Distinction from the United Nations. The first canine rescue unit that Jaime Parejo officially assembled using this system was for the firefighters of Seville (Spain) back in 1996, where he is currently chief of this unit. Since then, official guides, instructors and rescue dogs have been trained and certified for important firefighting squads and police corps in a number of countries where there is a heightened risk of disasters (Colombia, El Salvador, Ecuador, Chile…). The Arcón Method is primarily based on a set of seven innovative behavioural techniques which complement each other and have an effective impact on three fundamental, interrelated parameters in search operations: autonomy, motivation and concentration. The moulding processes (reinforcement of successive approximations to the desired response) that characterise traditional canine search training methods and which are still currently used, are excessively limited to basic or primary learning processes (classical conditioning, operant conditioning, avoidance, extinction, generalisation, discrimination, cognitive perspectives, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Private Police in the Public Safety Domain: Purpose and Practice Carl Dwain Terry Regis University
    Regis University ePublications at Regis University All Regis University Theses Fall 2014 Private Police in the Public Safety Domain: Purpose and Practice Carl Dwain Terry Regis University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.regis.edu/theses Part of the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Terry, Carl Dwain, "Private Police in the Public Safety Domain: Purpose and Practice" (2014). All Regis University Theses. 216. https://epublications.regis.edu/theses/216 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by ePublications at Regis University. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Regis University Theses by an authorized administrator of ePublications at Regis University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Regis University College for Professional Studies Graduate Programs Final Project/Thesis Disclaimer Use of the materials available in the Regis University Thesis Collection (“Collection”) is limited and restricted to those users who agree to comply with the following terms of use. Regis University reserves the right to deny access to the Collection to any person who violates these terms of use or who seeks to or does alter, avoid or supersede the functional conditions, restrictions and limitations of the Collection. The site may be used only for lawful purposes. The user is solely responsible for knowing and adhering to any and all applicable laws, rules, and regulations relating or pertaining to use of the Collection. All content in this Collection is owned by and subject to the exclusive control of Regis University and the authors of the materials. It is available only for research purposes and may not be used in violation of copyright laws or for unlawful purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Victimization Policies & Practices
    EUROPEAN CRIME PREVENTION NETWORK EUCPN Toolbox Series No. 7 Preventing Secondary Victimization policies & practices In the framework of the project ‘‘The development of the observatory function of the European Centre of Expertise on Crime Prevention within the EUCPN’. EUCPN Secretariat, March 2016, Brussels With financial support from the Prevention of and Fight against Crime Programme of the European Union European Commission – Directorate-General Home Affairs Preventing Secondary Victimization Policies & practices Preface The seventh toolbox in the series published by the EUCPN Secretariat focuses on the topic chosen by the Latvian presidency, namely Secondary Victimization. In recent years the Latvian police has taking huge steps in making the police officers aware of the phenomena and providing them with a guideline in how to prevent Secondary Victimization. They wanted to share the knowledge of this experience with the other Member States of the network and see if there were other good practices that they could use. The toolbox is divided into three parts: policy and legislation, a guideline of good and promising practices and examples from practices. All 3 parts of the toolbox are important however the most emphasis is put on the second part. Within this part of the toolbox, the focus is on the different steps of the justice system a victim has to go through. The EUCPN Secretariat made a ‘matrix’ which shows the different steps of the justice system. For each step in the judicial system, we have tried to formulate the most pressing needs of the victims, the EU minimal standards provided through the legislations discussed in part 1 and we have also formulated good practices gathered in the Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • English 2012.Pdf?MOD=AJPERES
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized GOOD PRACTICE HANDBOOK Public Disclosure Authorized Use of Security Forces: Assessing and Managing Risks and Impacts Guidance for the Private Sector in Emerging Markets Public Disclosure Authorized COPYRIGHT The material in this publication is copyrighted. IFC encourages the dissemination of the content for educational purposes. Content from this publication may be used freely without prior permission, provided that clear attribution is given to IFC and that content is not used for commercial purposes. DISCLAIMER The findings, interpretations, views, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of the International Finance Corporation (IFC) or of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The purpose of the Good Practice Series is to share information about private sector approaches for addressing a range of environmental and social issues that IFC believes demonstrate one or more elements of good practice in these areas. Information about these approaches may be taken from publicly available or other third party sources. IFC and/or its affiliates may have financial interests in or other commercial relationships with certain of the companies. While IFC believes that the information provided is accurate, the information is provided on a strictly “as-is” basis, without assurance or representation of any kind. IFC may not require all or any of the described practices in its own investments, and in its sole discretion may not agree to finance or assist companies or projects that adhere to those practices. Any such practices or proposed practices would be evaluated by IFC on a case-by-case basis with due regard for the particular circumstances of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Agreements Between Peru's National Police
    Executive Summary Report: Agreements between the National Police and the extractive companies in Peru. Analysis of the relationships that allow human rights violations and that break the principles of a Democratic Constitutional State. © EarthRights International Avenida Reducto 1354, Miraflores Lima, Perú © Instituto de Defensa Legal Avenida Felipe Pardo y Aliaga 272, San Isidro Lima, Perú © Coordinadora Nacional de Derechos Humanos Jirón José Pezet y Monel 2467, Lince Lima, Perú Coordination: Juliana Bravo Valencia, Juan Carlos Ruiz Molleda and Ana María Vidal Carrasco Research team: Juliana Bravo Valencia, Katherine Paucar Quispe, Sara Mejía Muñoz and Miguel Barboza López from EarthRights Internacional; and Juan Carlos Ruiz Molleda, Álvaro Másquez Salvador and Maritza Quispe Mamani from the Instituto de Defensa Legal. Research assistants: Nathalie Alegre Velarde and Avery Kelly from EarthRights Internacional Design and layout: EarthRights International Photos: EarthRights International, Jorge J. Chávez, CNDDHH Cover: José Carlos Plaza Lima, Perú March 2019 ORGANIZACIONES RESPONSABLES Este trabajo ha sido realizado de manera conjunta entre las siguientes organizaciones: Coordinadora Nacional EarthRights Instituto de Defensa de Derechos Humanos Internacional (ERI) Legal (IDL) (CNDDHH) ERI es una organización no IDL es una institución de la La Coordinadora Nacional de gubernamental sin fines de sociedad civil peruana que tiene Derechos Humanos es una lucro que combina el poder de como fin la promoción y defensa plataforma conformada por 82 la ley y los pueblos en defensa de los derechos humanos, la organizaciones que promueven y de los derechos humanos y el democracia y la paz en el país protegen los derechos humanos medioambiente, definidos como y América Latina.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Thomas Feltes the Use of Force, Especially in Firearms, in Police
    Thomas Feltes The use of force, especially in firearms, in police actions Lecture Seminário Internacional Qualidade da Atuaçao do Sistema de Defesa Social Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 23. ‐ 24.11.2009 1. Introduction During the opening session of the first Meeting of Public Security Ministers of the Americas, held in October 2008, the secretary general of the Organization of American States emphati‐ cally claimed that “security‐related issues have become one of the principal threats to stabili‐ ty, the strengthening of democracy, and the development potential of our region.”1 This statement highlighted the fundamental role that citizen security plays in the consolida‐ tion of Latin America’s democracies – and as a consequence of that, the role police has to play in this context. One of the most basic obligations of any democratic state is to guarantee the security of its population and preserve public order within a framework of respect for due process, univer‐ sally recognized human rights, and the rule of law. The lack of citizen security affects quality of life, opportunities for development, and rights as diverse as the right to freedom from harm and the right to property. In most of our countries, especially poor and lower class people suffer from crime on one side, but also target of police violence on the other side. This will widen the gap between the police and the people. But a police force can only be as strong and as successful as their cooperation with the people and the local citizens are. A “war on crime”, as declared by US‐Presidents years ago, is like the “war on drugs” a war against our own children, youngsters and looser in our society.
    [Show full text]
  • OSAC Country Security Report Bahrain
    OSAC Country Security Report Bahrain Last Updated: September 3, 2021 Travel Advisory The current U.S. Department of State Travel Advisory at the date of this report’s publication assesses that travelers should reconsider travel to Bahrain due to COVID-19. Review OSAC’s report, Understanding the Consular Travel Advisory System. The Institute for Economics & Peace Global Peace Index 2021 ranks Bahrain 102 out of 163 worldwide, rating the country as being at a Medium state of peace. Crime Environment The U.S. Department of State has assessed Manama as being a LOW-threat location for crime directed at or affecting official U.S. government interests. The U.S. Department of State has not included a Crime “C” Indicator on the Travel Advisory for Bahrain. The crime emergency line in Bahrain is 999. Review the State Department’s Crime Victims Assistance brochure. Crime: General Threat The targeting of non-citizen residents of Bahrain for crime is uncommon. Harassment of women and sexual assault does occur, although not all victims report cases to the police. Other reported crimes include, but are not limited to, various types of immigration and residency fraud, ATM/credit card theft, prostitution, white collar fraud, embezzlement, possession or trafficking of illegal narcotics, and property theft. Violent crime is rare, and firearms are illegal in Bahrain. Crime: Areas of Concern In 2012, the U.S. Embassy designated geographic boundaries (known as “red zones”) as restricted travel areas. In 2013, the Embassy introduced “yellow zones,” designated for daylight travel only. The Embassy is constantly assessing the nationwide security situation to reevaluate the restricted zones.
    [Show full text]