Use of Force

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Use of Force USE OF FORCE GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UN BASIC PRINCIPLES ON THE USE OF FORCE AND FIREARMS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS August 2015 Amnesty International Dutch Section Police and Human Rights Programme Amnesty International PO Box 1968 1000 BZ Amsterdam The Netherlands T (0031) (0)20-626 44 36 F (0031) (0)20-624 08 89 E [email protected] I www.amnesty.nl All rights reserved. This publication is copyright but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected]. Printed in the Netherlands ISBN 978-90-6463-368-3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS These Guidelines could not have been produced without the help of the many people who gave their time and expertisetoassistAmnestyInternationalinitspreparation. The main work was carried out by a project team of three people: Anja Bienert (drafting), Maggie Maloney and Sarah Masters (legal and equipment related input, editing and proof reading). Furthermore, Daniela Grosche carried out extensive research and established an impressive database of examples from various countries. Liana Rodrigues did an amazing amount of work in carrying out additional research, checking upon the validity of documents, and proof reading. Carline Westervelt supported the team in the most valuable manner in orga- nizationalandothermatters. The following experts shared their great expertise, and provided valuable input and feedback during several reviewphases:IanChappell,AnitaDanka,KathleenHardy,John-ErikJensen,JanSwaan,andGaryWhite. There were many other people who contributed by giving feedback, input on specific questions or by sharing examplesandreferencedocuments. From Amnesty International these were: Lawrence Amesu, Ulrike Beck, Covadonga de la Campa, Ahmed Elzobier, Rebecca Emery, Aymeric Elluin, Sofia García, Audrey Gaughran, Avner Gidron, Abdullahi Halakhe, Paul Heath, Papang Hidayat, Mariana Labastie, Cesar Marín, Marek Marczynski, Sabrina Mathani, Justin Mazzola, Maya Pastakia, Ana Piquer, Rasha Abdul Rahmin, Mary Rayner, Oliver Sprague, Rachel Ward, Jan Wetzel, Patrick Wilcken, Rosalia Vega, Katie Wood, Carlos Zazueta (and many others who contributed anony- mously). Outside Amnesty International, we are particularly grateful to Otto Adang, Martin Herrnkind, Christof Heyns, Andre Konze, Luciana Pol, Manuel da Silva, and Omega Research Foundation for their input, feedback and advice. Finally, we received excellent support by the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) helping us to find and translate countrylegislation,operationalproceduresandmanualsandtocheckontheirvalidity. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 9 I. Background of these Guidelines 9 II. The purpose of these Guidelines 10 III. The structure of this document 12 IV. Scope of these Guidelines 14 INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE USE OF FORCE AND FIREARMS 17 I. Legality (legal basis) 17 II. Necessity 18 III. Proportionality 18 IV. Accountability 19 V. Conclusion 20 DEFINITION OF TERMS 21 STANDARDS CITED AND ABBREVIATIONS USED 25 PART ONE | GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UN BASIC PRINCIPLES ON THE USE OF FORCE AND FIREARMS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS 29 PART TWO | EXPLANATORY TEXT 41 SECTION A | REQUIREMENTS OF THE DOMESTIC LEGAL FRAMEWORK 43 | 1 | THE USE OF FORCE IN GENERAL 45 1.1 The power to use force (principle of legality) 46 1.2 The need to resort to force and minimum force (principle of necessity) 47 1.3 Prohibition of excessive harm (principle of proportionality) 49 | 2 | LETHAL FORCE 51 2.1 The “protect-life”-principle 53 2.2 Definition of firearm 54 2.3 Threshold for the use of firearms 54 2.3.1 Potentially lethal use of a firearm 55 2.3.2 Intentional lethal use of a firearm 59 2.4 Other forms of lethal force 61 2.5 Protection of third persons 61 2.6 Warning 62 | 3 | ACCOUNTABILITY 63 3.1 Introduction 65 3.2 Criminal investigation process 66 3.2.1 Criminal liability: no exemption 66 3.2.2 Unlawful orders by superior: no defence 68 3.2.3 Responsibility of commanding and superior officers 69 3.2.4 Conduct of criminal investigations 71 3.2.5 Penalties 74 3.3 Disciplinary investigation 75 3.3.1 Purpose and conduct of the investigation 75 3.3.2 Penalties and other measures 76 3.4 Independent, impartial external oversight 76 3.4.1 Purpose 76 3.4.2 Mandate and powers 77 3.5 Reporting and control 79 3.5.1 Reporting 79 3.5.2 Other control measures: Identification of law enforcement officials/body-worn cameras 80 3.6 Victims’ rights 82 3.6.1 Medical assistance and notification of family or friends 82 3.6.2 The right to complain and to be involved in the proceedings 83 3.6.3 Compensation/Reparation 84 CONCLUDING REMARKS ON SECTION A 85 SECTION B | THE OPERATIONAL FRAMEWORK 87 | 4 | THE GENERAL CONCEPT OF THE USE OF FORCE 89 4.1 General considerations 91 4.2 Overarching principle: avoid the need to resort to the use of force 93 4.3 Element of precaution and decision making 95 4.3.1 Planning and preparation 95 4.3.2 Equipment 97 4.3.3 Time and place of intervention 98 4.3.4 Protection of groups or persons at risk 100 4.3.5 Protection of third persons 101 4.3.6 Medical attention and other life saving measures 101 4.4 Differentiated response and minimize damage 102 4.5 Proportionality: retreat must be an option 105 | 5 | THE USE OF LETHAL FORCE, IN PARTICULAR THE USE OF FIREARMS 107 5.1 When to use a firearm 110 5.1.1 Definition of “use of a firearm” 110 5.1.2 Reaffirmation of the “protect-life”-principle 111 5.2 Warnings to be given 113 5.3 How to use a firearm 115 5.4 Protection of third persons 118 5.5 Types of weapons and ammunition 120 5.6 Who may use a firearm: authorization, certification, training 123 5.6.1 Authorization of firearms for different law enforcement duties 123 5.6.2 Certification and training 124 5.7 Control and reporting 126 | 6 | LESS LETHAL WEAPONS: TESTING AND DEPLOYMENT 131 6.1 Terminology and scope of this chapter 132 6.2 Decision making process 133 6.2.1 Definition of operational needs and gaps 134 6.2.2 Testing 135 6.3 Instructions 140 6.4 Training 142 6.5 Piloting, re-evaluation and reporting 144 | 7 | USE OF FORCE IN PUBLIC ASSEMBLIES 147 7.1 General concept: facilitation and dialogue 149 7.2 Unlawful assemblies 152 7.3 Dealing with violence 153 7.4 Tactical options and limits 155 7.4.1 Containment 155 7.4.2 Less lethal weapons 157 7.4.3 Firearms 159 7.4.4 Deployment of military forces 160 7.5 Reporting, accountability and lessons learned 161 | 8 | USE OF FORCE IN DETENTION 163 8.1. General concept 165 8.2 Means of restraint 167 8.3 Use of firearms 169 8.4 Dealing with large-scale violent disorder in detention facilities 170 | 9 | HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 171 9.1 Selection 172 9.2 Training 173 9.2.1 Physical training and use of equipment 174 9.2.2 Communication skills 175 9.2.3 Risk assessment and decision making 176 9.2.4 Mental training and stress management 176 9.2.5 First aid training 176 9.2.6 Concluding remarks on training 177 9.3 Coaching and counselling 178 | 10 | SUPERIOR AND COMMAND RESPONSIBILITY 179 10.1 General considerations 180 10.2 Chain of command 181 10.3 Reporting, supervision and control 182 CONCLUDING REMARKS ON SECTION B 188 SECTION C | FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 189 ANNEX I – BASIC PRINCIPLES (BPUFF) 191 ANNEX II – REFERENCE LIST 195 | 9 INTRODUCTION “Themeansmaybelikenedtoaseed,theendtoatree;andthereisjustthesameinviolable connectionbetweenthemeansandtheendasthereisbetweentheseedandthetree. Wereapexactlyaswesow.” [M.K.Gandhi,HindSwaraj.Chap.XVI] I. Background of these Guidelines Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 3 “Everyonehastherighttolife,libertyandsecurityofperson.” International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 6 “1. Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarilydeprivedofhislife.” Article 9 “1.Everyonehastherighttolibertyandsecurityofperson.” In order to be able to fulfil their responsibilities of maintaining law, safety and public order and preventing and detecting crime, law enforcement officials are granted a number of powers, including the power to use forceandfirearms. Explanatory note: The term law enforcement official includes any security forces, including military forces, i who exercise police powers, especially the power of arrest and detention. For reasons of readability, the term ‘police’ is sometimes used, however still in the broader sense to include other law enforcement personnel exer- cising police powers. See also: Commentary a) and b) to Art. 1 Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials. This power is often referred to as the state’s “monopoly of force”, that is, in so far as law enforcement officials are given the power to use force and firearms, this power is granted to them for the fulfilment of their duties to enforce the law. This power therefore comes with obligations and responsibilities, in particular with regard to the human rights that may be affected by the use of these powers and which the state and its agents are obliged to respect and protect. In the end, the legitimacy of and public trust in the law enforcement authority and the state as a whole are at risk when force and firearms are used in an excessive, arbitrary, abusive or oth- erwise unlawful manner.
Recommended publications
  • Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights* of February 3, 2010
    Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights* of February 3, 2010 Provisional Measures Regarding Peru Matter of Ramírez-Hinostroza et al. HAVING SEEN: 1. The Order issued by the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter, the “Inter-American Court”, the “Court” or the “Tribunal”) of July 22, 2005 as well as the Orders issued by the Inter-American Court on September 21, 2005, February 7, 2006, July 4, 2006 and May 17, 2007. By means of the last Order, the Tribunal decided, inter alia: 1. To order the State to maintain the measures it might have adopted and to adopt, forthwith, such measures as may be necessary to protect the life and personal integrity of Mr. Luis Alberto Ramírez-Hinostroza, his wife Susana Silvia Rivera-Prado, and his three daughters: Yolanda Susana Ramírez-Rivera, Karen Rose Ramírez-Rivera and Lucero Consuelo Ramírez- Rivera, granted by Order of September 21, 2005. 2. To extend the scope of the measures and to order the State to adopt, forthwith, such measures as may be necessary to protect the life and personal integrity of Messrs. Raúl Ángel Ramos De la Torre and Cesar Manuel Saldaña-Ramírez, Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza’s counsels. 2. The briefs of July 6 and October 17, 2007, May 2 and December 19, 2008 and February 9 and 17, March 31, May 20 and August 24, 2009, as well as other additional briefs, by means of which the Republic of Peru (hereinafter, the “State” or “Peru”) informed on: a) the protective measures adopted in relation to the beneficiaries; b) the investigation into the facts that gave rise to the adoption of the provisional measures, and c) the investigations conducted against Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • POLICING REFORM in AFRICA Moving Towards a Rights-Based Approach in a Climate of Terrorism, Insurgency and Serious Violent Crime
    POLICING REFORM IN AFRICA Moving towards a rights-based approach in a climate of terrorism, insurgency and serious violent crime Edited by Etannibi E.O. Alemika, Mutuma Ruteere & Simon Howell POLICING REFORM IN AFRICA Moving towards a rights-based approach in a climate of terrorism, insurgency and serious violent crime Edited by Etannibi E.O. Alemika, University of Jos, Nigeria Mutuma Ruteere, UN Special Rapporteur, Kenya Simon Howell, APCOF, South Africa Acknowledgements This publication is funded by the Ford Foundation, the United Nations Development Programme, and the Open Societies Foundation. The findings and conclusions do not necessarily reflect their positions or policies. Published by African Policing Civilian Oversight Forum (APCOF) Copyright © APCOF, April 2018 ISBN 978-1-928332-33-6 African Policing Civilian Oversight Forum (APCOF) Building 23b, Suite 16 The Waverley Business Park Wyecroft Road Mowbray, 7925 Cape Town, ZA Tel: +27 21 447 2415 Fax: +27 21 447 1691 Email: [email protected] Web: www.apcof.org.za Cover photo taken in Nyeri, Kenya © George Mulala/PictureNET Africa Contents Foreword iv About the editors v SECTION 1: OVERVIEW Chapter 1: Imperatives of and tensions within rights-based policing 3 Etannibi E. O. Alemika Chapter 2: The constraints of rights-based policing in Africa 14 Etannibi E.O. Alemika Chapter 3: Policing insurgency: Remembering apartheid 44 Elrena van der Spuy SECTION 2: COMMUNITY–POLICE NEXUS Chapter 4: Policing in the borderlands of Zimbabwe 63 Kudakwashe Chirambwi & Ronald Nare Chapter 5: Multiple counter-insurgency groups in north-eastern Nigeria 80 Benson Chinedu Olugbuo & Oluwole Samuel Ojewale SECTION 3: POLICING RESPONSES Chapter 6: Terrorism and rights protection in the Lake Chad basin 103 Amadou Koundy Chapter 7: Counter-terrorism and rights-based policing in East Africa 122 John Kamya Chapter 8: Boko Haram and rights-based policing in Cameroon 147 Polycarp Ngufor Forkum Chapter 9: Police organizational capacity and rights-based policing in Nigeria 163 Solomon E.
    [Show full text]
  • Mwazighe, Charles Lenjo Title Legal Responses to Terrorism: Case Study of the Republic of Kenya Publisher Monterey, Ca
    Author(s) Mwazighe, Charles Lenjo Title Legal responses to terrorism: case study of the Republic of Kenya Publisher Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School Issue Date 2012-12 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10945/27876 This document was downloaded on October 10, 2013 at 15:48:27 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS LEGAL RESPONSES TO TERRORISM: CASE STUDY OF THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA by Charles Lenjo Mwazighe December 2012 Thesis Co-Advisors: Thomas C. Bruneau Carolyn C. Halladay Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2012 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS LEGAL RESPONSES TO TERRORISM: CASE STUDY OF THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA 6. AUTHOR(S) Charles Lenjo Mwazighe 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning For, Selecting, and Implementing Technology Solutions
    q A GUIDEBOOK for Planning for, Selecting, and Implementing Technology Solutions FIRST EDITION March 2010 This guide was prepared for the Nation-al Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, by the Weapons and Protective Systems Technologies Center at The Pennsylvania State University under Cooperative Agreement 2007-DE-BX-K009. It is intended to provide information useful to law enforcement and corrections agencies regarding technology planning, selection, and implementation. It is not proscriptive in nature, rather it serves as a resource for program development within the framework of existing departmental policies and procedures. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors/editors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Institute of Justice. They should not be construed as an official Department of Justice position, policy, or decision. This is an informational guidebook designed to provide an overview of less-lethal devices. Readers are cautioned that no particular technology is appropriate for all circumstances and that the information in this guidebook is provided solely to assist readers in independently evaluating their specific circumstances. The Pennsylvania State University does not advocate or warrant any particular technology or approach. The Pennsylvania State University extends no warranties or guarantees of any kind, either express or implied, regarding the guidebook, including but not limited to warranties of non-infringement, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. © 2010 The Pennsylvania State University GUIDEBOOK for LESS-LETHAL DEVICES Planning for, Selecting, and Implementing Technology Solutions FOREWORD The National Tactical Officers Association (NTOA) is the leading author- ity on contemporary tactical law enforcement information and training.
    [Show full text]
  • Squatting – the Real Story
    Squatters are usually portrayed as worthless scroungers hell-bent on disrupting society. Here at last is the inside story of the 250,000 people from all walks of life who have squatted in Britain over the past 12 years. The country is riddled with empty houses and there are thousands of homeless people. When squatters logically put the two together the result can be electrifying, amazing and occasionally disastrous. SQUATTING the real story is a unique and diverse account the real story of squatting. Written and produced by squatters, it covers all aspects of the subject: • The history of squatting • Famous squats • The politics of squatting • Squatting as a cultural challenge • The facts behind the myths • Squatting around the world and much, much more. Contains over 500 photographs plus illustrations, cartoons, poems, songs and 4 pages of posters and murals in colour. Squatting: a revolutionary force or just a bunch of hooligans doing their own thing? Read this book for the real story. Paperback £4.90 ISBN 0 9507259 1 9 Hardback £11.50 ISBN 0 9507259 0 0 i Electronic version (not revised or updated) of original 1980 edition in portable document format (pdf), 2005 Produced and distributed by Nick Wates Associates Community planning specialists 7 Tackleway Hastings TN34 3DE United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)1424 447888 Fax: +44 (0)1424 441514 Email: [email protected] Web: www.nickwates.co.uk Digital layout by Mae Wates and Graphic Ideas the real story First published in December 1980 written by Nick Anning by Bay Leaf Books, PO Box 107, London E14 7HW Celia Brown Set in Century by Pat Sampson Piers Corbyn Andrew Friend Cover photo by Union Place Collective Mark Gimson Printed by Blackrose Press, 30 Clerkenwell Close, London EC1R 0AT (tel: 01 251 3043) Andrew Ingham Pat Moan Cover & colour printing by Morning Litho Printers Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • National Police Service Badges of Rank and Insignia
    APPENDIX 31(gg): NATIONAL POLICE SERVICE BADGES OF RANK AND INSIGNIA S/NO RANK INSIGNIA DESCRIPTION Shoulder Badge : Crossed scimitar sword and swagger cane surrounded by a laurel wreath, surmounted by two lion badges. 1. Inspector General Gorget Patches: Red velvet, 4 cm wide and 9.5 cm long pointed at the top with one vertical row of three gold embroidered oak leaves (without acorn), small golden Service button 2 cm. from point of the patch. Cap Peak: Two rows of twisted oak leaf gold lace. Lanyard: National Police Service colours. Aiguillettes: Gold coloured aiguillettes when wearing cereminial dress. The name ‘National Police Service’ is inscribed at the base of the cloth badge. Shoulder Badge : Crossed scimitar sword and swagger cane surrounded by a laurel wreath, surmounted by a military pattern star and a lion badge. Gorget Patches:Black/maroon velvet, 4 cm wide and 9.5 cm long pointed at the top with one vertical row of three silver embroidered oak leaves 2. Deputy Inspector General (without acorn). A small silver/gold Service button 2 cm. from point of the patch. Cap Peak:Two rows of twisted oak leaf silver/golden lace. Lanyard: Respective Service colours. Aiguillettes: Silver/gold coloured aiguillettes when wearing cereminial dress. The name of the respective service is inscribed at the base of the cloth badge. 1 Shoulder Badge: A crossed scimitar sword and a swagger cane surrounded by a laurel wreath surmounted by a lion badge. Gorget Patches: Black/maroon velvet, 4cm wide and 9.5 cm long pointed 3. Senior Assistant Inspector at the top with one vertical row of three silver/golden embroided oak General leaves (without acorn).
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2390.Book
    Treaty Series Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations VOLUME 2390 2006 Annexes A, C Recueil des Traités Traités et accords internationaux enregistrés ou classés et inscrits au répertoire au Secrétariat de l’Organisation des Nations Unies UNITED NATIONS • NATIONS UNIES Treaty Series Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations VOLUME 2390 Recueil des Traités Traités et accords internationaux enregistrés ou classés et inscrits au répertoire au Secrétariat de l’Organisation des Nations Unies United Nations • Nations Unies New York, 2010 Copyright © United Nations 2010 All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Copyright © Nations Unies 2010 tous droits réservés Imprimé aux États-Unis d’Amérique Volume 2390, Table of Contents Table of Contents ANNEX A Ratifications, accessions, subsequent agreements, etc., concerning treaties and international agreements registered in October 2006 with the Secretariat of the United Nations 4789. Multilateral: Agreement concerning the Adoption of Uniform Technical Prescriptions for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts which can be fitted and/or be used on Wheeled Vehicles and the Conditions for Reciprocal Recognition of Approvals Granted on the Basis of These Prescriptions. Geneva, 20 March 1958 Succession: Montenegro ............................................................................... 3 Regulation No. 1. Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicle headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing beam and/or a driving beam and equipped with filament lamps of category R2 and/or HS1. 8 August 1960 Succession: Montenegro........................................................................ 4 Regulation No. 2. Uniform provisions concerning the approval of incandescent electric lamps for headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing beam or a driving beam or both.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya 2020 OSAC Crime & Safety Report
    Kenya 2020 OSAC Crime & Safety Report This is an annual report produced in conjunction with the Regional Security Office at the U.S. Embassy in Nairobi. OSAC encourages travelers to use this report to gain baseline knowledge of security conditions in Kenya. For more in-depth information, review OSAC’s Kenya-specific page for original OSAC reporting, consular messages, and contact information, some of which may be available only to private-sector representatives with an OSAC password. Travel Advisory The current U.S. Department of State Travel Advisory at the date of this report’s publication assesses Kenya at Level 2, indicating travelers should exercise increased caution. Do Not Travel to: Kenya-Somalia border and some coastal areas due to terrorism. Areas of Turkana County due to crime. Reconsider Travel to: Nairobi neighborhoods of Eastleigh and Kibera at all times due to crime and kidnapping. Be especially careful when traveling after dark anywhere in Kenya due to crime. Review OSAC’s report, Understanding the Consular Travel Advisory System. Overall Crime and Safety Situation Crime Threats The U.S. Department of State has assessed Nairobi as being a CRITICAL-threat location for crime directed at or affecting official U.S. government interests. The greatest threats continue to be road safety and crime. Violent and sometimes fatal criminal attacks, including home invasions, burglaries, armed carjackings, and kidnappings can occur at any time and in any location. Criminals frequently use weapons during the commission of their crime. Most criminals rob victims of their possessions and release them unharmed, if they are completely cooperative.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Strategic Stakeholders' Engagement Influence on The
    Available at https://ajoeijournals.org/ STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT African Journal of Emerging Issues ISSN ONLINE: XXX-XXXX EFFECT OF STRATEGIC STAKEHOLDERS’ ENGAGEMENT INFLUENCE ON THE STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION IN THE ADMINISTRATION POLICE SERVICE 1*Ishaq Buya, 2Dr. Fridah Simba, 3Dr. Anwar Ahmed 1PhD Candidate, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology 2Lecturer, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology 3Lecturer, Technical University of Mombasa, Kenya ABSTRACT Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of strategic stakeholders engagement influence on the strategy implementation in the Administration police service in Kenya. Statement of the Problem: For organizations to achieve their goals and objectives, it is necessary for them to adjust to their environment through strategy. It is therefore imperative for the Police service to comprehend their resources and the forces that shape organizational competition. As a way of meeting these increasing demands, the police globally have embraced the issues of strategic stakeholders’ engagement. However, a significant number of strategic initiatives fail during their implementation since it has been recognized as the biggest challenge for organizations. Kenya’s Vision 2030 lays emphasis on security as crucial pillars for economic growth implying the police play a crucial role in creating the conditions in which development can take place. The Administration Police Service in trying to better its service delivery has so far drawn up three strategic plans with 2013-2017 being the current plan under implementation. 1 However, there has been little change in the structure, accountability and attitude of the police service to match these plans. Study Methodology: This study adopted a descriptive research design.
    [Show full text]
  • Toolkit on Police Integrity New Chapter 000*:Layout 1 2/24/12 12:01 PM Page 2
    Toolkit_cover 2/22/12 6:30 PM Page 1 Toolkit www.dcaf.ch on Police Integrity new_chapter_000*:Layout 1 2/24/12 12:01 PM Page 1 Toolkit on Police Integrity new_chapter_000*:Layout 1 2/24/12 12:01 PM Page 2 DCAF The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) is an international foundation whose mission is to assist the international community in pursuing good governance and reform of the security sector. The Centre develops and promotes norms and standards, conducts tailored policy research, identifies good practices and recommendations to promote democratic security sector governance, and provides in-country advisory support and practical assistance programmes. DCAF gratefully acknowledges the support of the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the production of the Toolkit. The views expressed are those of the authors alone and do not in any way reflect the views of the institutions referred to or represented within this Toolkit. Cover pictures (top to bottom, left to right): © OSCE/Mikhail Evstafiev © 2007 Joi Ito. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license © Danish Police (politi.dk) © 2009 Beijing Patrol. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license © KEYSTONE/AP Photo/Schalk van Zuydam © UN Photo/Christopher Herwig ©DCAF, 2012 All rights reserved. ISBN 978-92-9222-190-4 Design, layout and printing: Valeur, Slovak Republic Published by DCAF (Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces) PO Box 1360 1211 Geneva 1 Switzerland www.dcaf.ch new_chapter_000*:Layout 1 2/24/12 12:01 PM Page 3 Acknowledgements Pierre Aepli, Senior Police Advisor DCAF (until March 2011) initiated the project, developed the concept and coordinated the writing of the nine chapters of the toolkit.
    [Show full text]
  • Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts, Components and Ammunition To, from and Across the European Union
    Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union REGIONAL ANALYSIS REPORT 1 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union REGIONAL ANALYSIS REPORT UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 © United Nations, 2020. All rights reserved, worldwide. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copy- right holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. UNODC would appreciate receiving a copy of any written output that uses this publication as a source at [email protected]. DISCLAIMERS This report was not formally edited. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNODC, nor do they imply any endorsement. Information on uniform resource locators and links to Internet sites contained in the present publication are provided for the convenience of the reader and are correct at the time of issuance. The United Nations takes no responsibility for the continued accuracy of that information or for the content of any external website. This document was produced with the financial support of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect
    [Show full text]
  • Főnixmadár Afrika Szarván – Az As-Sabáb Tevékenysége 2015–2017
    FŐNIXMADÁR AFRIKA SZARVÁN – AZ AS-SABÁB TEVÉKENYSÉGE 2015–2017 Marsai Viktor Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem, Budapest FŐNIXMADÁR AFRIKA SZARVÁN – AZ AS-SABÁB TEVÉKENYSÉGE 2015–2017 Szerző: Marsai Viktor Lektorálta: Dr. Nagyné Rózsa Erzsébet A kézirat lezárásának dátuma: 2018. május 29. Kiadó: Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem Közigazgatási Továbbképzési Intézet www.uni-nke.hu Felelős kiadó: Prof. Dr. Kis Norbert rektorhelyettes Címe: 1083 Budapest, Üllői út 82. A kiadvány a KÖFOP-2.1.2-VEKOP-15. „A jó kormányzást megalapozó közszolgálat-fejlesztés” című projekt keretében készült el és jelent meg. © Marsai Viktor, 2020 © Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem Közigazgatási Továbbképzési Intézet, 2020 A mű szerzői jogilag védett. Minden jog, így különösen a sokszorosítás, terjesztés és fordítás joga fenntartva. A mű a kiadó írásbeli hozzájárulása nélkül részeiben sem reprodukálható, elektronikus rendszerek felhasználásával nem dolgozható fel, azokban nem tárolható, azokkal nem sokszorosítható és nem terjeszthető. TARTALOMJEGYZÉK Bevezetés 5 Főnixmadár a hamuból 7 Visszatérés a ,,bozótba” – Légo és következményei 13 2016 – az as-Sabáb dominanciájának éve 20 Befejezés 29 Bibliográfia 31 Függelék 46 „Szomáliában jelenleg három olyan szereplő van, amely működő közigazgatást tart fenn: Szomáliföld, Puntföld és az as-Sabáb.”1 BEVEZETÉS2 A szomáliai as-Sabáb3 kétségkívül napjaink egyik legadaptívabb és legpusztítóbb dzsihádista szervezete. Több mint egy évtizedes fennállásuk során – a jelenlegi szervezetet állítólag 2005 táján alapította néhány Afganisztánból hazatérő szomáliai harcos és kelet-afrikai al- Káida tag4 – a radikálisok uralták Mogadishu mellett csaknem teljes Közép- és Dél-Szomá- liát, ugyanakkor megtapasztalták a vereségeket és a pusztító amerikai dróntámadásokat is. Leszámítva a mag-al-Káidát, talán nincs olyan, a nemzetközi szereplők többsége által, terrorcsoportnak definiált szervezet, amelynek ennyi csúcs- és középvezetőjét likvidálták volna az elmúlt években.
    [Show full text]