Secondary Victimization Policies & Practices
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Phase 3 Report on Implementing the Oecd Anti-Bribery Convention in Luxembourg
PHASE 3 REPORT ON IMPLEMENTING THE OECD ANTI-BRIBERY CONVEN TION IN LUXEMBOURG June 2011 This Phase 3 Report on Luxembourg by the OECD Working Group on Bribery evaluates and makes recommendations on Luxembourg’s implementation of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and the 2009 Recommendation of the Council for Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions. It was adopted by the Working Group on 23 June 2011. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 5 A. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 7 1. The on-site visit ................................................................................................................................. 7 2. Structure of the report ....................................................................................................................... 8 3. Economic situation ............................................................................................................................ 8 4. Bribery of foreign public officials -
EDU Letter Template
Europol Public Information Management Board Membership September 2017 Chairperson Mr Priit Pärkna Intelligence Management and Investigation Estonian Police and Border Guard Board Member State MB member Department/Agency/Ministry Alternate MB member Department/Agency/Ministry Austria Ms Regine International Police Cooperation - Mr Christian Wandl International Police Cooperation Wieselthaler- Federal Police Ministry of Interior Buchmann Ministry of Interior Belgium Mr Peter De International Police Cooperation - Mr Frederik Van Oost International Police Cooperation - Buysscher Federal Police Federal Police Ministry of Interior Ministry of Interior Bulgaria Mr Valentin International Operational Cooperation Ms Kremena Peneva Head of LB Bulgaria Vasilev Kostov Directorate Platikanova-Nenova Ministry of Interior Croatia Mr Ante Orlović Criminal Police Directorate Mr Dalibor Jurić Sector for Criminal Police Support Cyprus Mr Demetris European Union and International Ms Maria Charalambous European Union and International Demetriou Police Cooperation Directorate Police Cooperation Directorate Czech Republic Ms Šárka International Police Cooperation - Mr Václav Rukner International Police Cooperation - Havránková Police Presidium Police Presidium Ministry of Interior Ministry of Interior Estonia Mr Ivo Kolk Head of Intelligence Management Ms Mirja Virve Estonian Liaison Bureau Bureau Police and Border Guard Board Finland Mr Timo Antero National Police Board Ms Marja Kartila National Police Board Saarinen Ministry of Interior Ministry of Interior -
Participants Pearls in Policing Conference 2013 • Mr. Aalbersberg
Participants Pearls in Policing Conference 2013 Mr. Aalbersberg (Pieter-Jaap), Chief Constable, Amsterdam Regional Division, The Netherlands Mr. Abu Bakar (Khalid), Inspector General, Royal Malaysia Police, Malaysia Mr. Arunachalam (Su), Deputy Inspector General of Police, CBI, ACB, Chennai, India Mr. Beraia (Irakli), Director of Reforms and Development Agency, Georgia Mr. Blair (William), Chief of Police, Toronto Police Service, Canada Mr. Bouman (Gerard), Commissioner of the National Police of the Netherlands (NPN), The Netherlands Professor Bruggeman (Willy), Professor of Police Science, Benelux University & President of the Belgian Federal Police Board, Belgium (Academic) Ms. Coninsx (Michèle), President, Eurojust Mr. Danino (Yochanan), Commissioner, National Israeli Police, Israel Professor Haberfeld (Maria), Professor and Chair of the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, United States of America (Academic) Mr. Højbjerg (Jens Henrik), Commissioner, Denmark Professor Hoogenboom (Bob), Professor of Forensic Business, Nyenrode University, The Netherlands (Academic) Mr. Humlegård (Odd Reidar), National Commissioner, National Police, Norway Mr. Khoo Boon Hui, former Interpol President Mr. Leijtens (Hans), Commander, Royal Netherlands Marechaussee, The Netherlands Mr. Lewis (Chris), Commissioner, Ontario Provincial Police, Canada Mr. LO Wai-Chung (Stephen), Director of Crime & Security, Hong Kong Police Force, Hong Kong Ms Merckx (Gwen), Chief Constable, Belgian Local Police, Belgium Mr. Nettgen (Romain), Director General, Grand Ducal Police, Luxembourg Mr. Ng (Peter), Commissioner, Singapore Police Force (SPF), Singapore Mr. Pearce (Trevor), Director General, Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA), United Kingdom Mr. Pérez (Emile), Head of the International Department, National Police, France Mr. Perkins (Kevin), Deputy Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), United States of America Mr. Prasarnrajkit (Watcharapol), Deputy Commissioner General, Royal Thai Police, Thailand Mr. -
Private Police in the Public Safety Domain: Purpose and Practice Carl Dwain Terry Regis University
Regis University ePublications at Regis University All Regis University Theses Fall 2014 Private Police in the Public Safety Domain: Purpose and Practice Carl Dwain Terry Regis University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.regis.edu/theses Part of the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Terry, Carl Dwain, "Private Police in the Public Safety Domain: Purpose and Practice" (2014). All Regis University Theses. 216. https://epublications.regis.edu/theses/216 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by ePublications at Regis University. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Regis University Theses by an authorized administrator of ePublications at Regis University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Regis University College for Professional Studies Graduate Programs Final Project/Thesis Disclaimer Use of the materials available in the Regis University Thesis Collection (“Collection”) is limited and restricted to those users who agree to comply with the following terms of use. Regis University reserves the right to deny access to the Collection to any person who violates these terms of use or who seeks to or does alter, avoid or supersede the functional conditions, restrictions and limitations of the Collection. The site may be used only for lawful purposes. The user is solely responsible for knowing and adhering to any and all applicable laws, rules, and regulations relating or pertaining to use of the Collection. All content in this Collection is owned by and subject to the exclusive control of Regis University and the authors of the materials. It is available only for research purposes and may not be used in violation of copyright laws or for unlawful purposes. -
English 2012.Pdf?MOD=AJPERES
Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized GOOD PRACTICE HANDBOOK Public Disclosure Authorized Use of Security Forces: Assessing and Managing Risks and Impacts Guidance for the Private Sector in Emerging Markets Public Disclosure Authorized COPYRIGHT The material in this publication is copyrighted. IFC encourages the dissemination of the content for educational purposes. Content from this publication may be used freely without prior permission, provided that clear attribution is given to IFC and that content is not used for commercial purposes. DISCLAIMER The findings, interpretations, views, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of the International Finance Corporation (IFC) or of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The purpose of the Good Practice Series is to share information about private sector approaches for addressing a range of environmental and social issues that IFC believes demonstrate one or more elements of good practice in these areas. Information about these approaches may be taken from publicly available or other third party sources. IFC and/or its affiliates may have financial interests in or other commercial relationships with certain of the companies. While IFC believes that the information provided is accurate, the information is provided on a strictly “as-is” basis, without assurance or representation of any kind. IFC may not require all or any of the described practices in its own investments, and in its sole discretion may not agree to finance or assist companies or projects that adhere to those practices. Any such practices or proposed practices would be evaluated by IFC on a case-by-case basis with due regard for the particular circumstances of the project. -
Urban Security Files
Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée parlementaire AS/ENA/SECU (2002) 06 30 January 2003 aenasecu02_06 Urban security files Synthetic files by country prepared by Mr Michel MARCUS (expert) according to the attached questionnaire (see appendix) CONTENTS Albania ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Andorra ................................................................................................................................4 Armenia ................................................................................................................................5 Austria .................................................................................................................................. 5 Belgium................................................................................................................................. 6 Bulgaria................................................................................................................................8 Cyprus .................................................................................................................................. 9 Czech Republic................................................................................................................... 10 Denmark ............................................................................................................................. 12 Estonia............................................................................................................................... -
ESPON Qol – Quality of Life Measurements and Methodology
ESPON QoL – Quality of Life Measurements and Methodology Annex 9 to the Final Report Case study: Luxembourg Applied Research Final Report 30th October 2020 Final Report This applied research activity is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Project team Carlo Sessa, Giorgia Galvini, Institute of Studies for the Integration of Systems – ISINNOVA (Italy) Oriol Bioscal, Harold del Castillo, MCRIT (Spain) Herta Tödtling-Schönhofer, Alina Schönhofer, Metis (Austria) Daniel Rauhut, Teemu Makkonen, University of Eastern Finland – UEF (Finland) Maarten Kroesen, TUDelft (Netherlands) Author of the case study Dr Thomas Stumm, EureConsult (Luxembourg) Project Support Team Sabine Stölb LE GOUVERNEMENT DU GRAND-DUCHÉ DE LUXEMBOURG Ministère de l’Énergie et de l’Aménagement du territoire Département de l’aménagement du territoire Janja Pečar REPUBLIKA SLOVENIJA URAD RS ZA MAKROEKONOMSKE ANALIZE IN RAZVOJ Anna Lea Gestsdóttir Byggðastofnun Icelandic Regional Development Institute ESPON EGTC: Project Expert: Sandra Di Biaggio Financial Expert: Caroline Clause Information on ESPON and its projects can be found on www.espon.eu. The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. © ESPON, 2020 Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON EGTC in Luxembourg. -
EMN Ad-Hoc Query on Intra-Schengen Border Monitoring
EMN Ad-Hoc Query on Intra-Schengen border monitoring and border control Requested by Dylano de Wilde on 4th June 2018 Border Responses from Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Sweden, United Kingdom, Norway (20 in total) Disclaimer: The following responses have been provided primarily for the purpose of information exchange among EMN NCPs in the framework of the EMN. The contributing EMN NCPs have provided, to the best of their knowledge, information that is up-to-date, objective and reliable. Note, however, that the information provided does not necessarily represent the official policy of an EMN NCPs' Member State. Background information: Over the past couple of years, the Schengen area has come to face several challenges. In particular in response to a range of terrorist attacks as well as the so-called European refugee “crisis”. Member states have used a variety of measures to enhance the monitoring of cross border mobility. These measures are not exclusively taken at the external border of the European Union, but also increasingly at the physical borders between two Schengen States. By, for instance, temporarily reintroducing border checks under Article 29 of the Schengen Border Code (SBC) or by using the possibility to carry out police or immigration checks in a region around the physical border under Article 23 SBC. In the light of one of the core principles of the European Union and the Schengen Agreement, the principle of free movement, the temporary introduction of border checks under article 29 SBC is to be seen as a last resort that can only be justified by exceptional circumstances. -
1 Thomas Feltes the Use of Force, Especially in Firearms, in Police
Thomas Feltes The use of force, especially in firearms, in police actions Lecture Seminário Internacional Qualidade da Atuaçao do Sistema de Defesa Social Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 23. ‐ 24.11.2009 1. Introduction During the opening session of the first Meeting of Public Security Ministers of the Americas, held in October 2008, the secretary general of the Organization of American States emphati‐ cally claimed that “security‐related issues have become one of the principal threats to stabili‐ ty, the strengthening of democracy, and the development potential of our region.”1 This statement highlighted the fundamental role that citizen security plays in the consolida‐ tion of Latin America’s democracies – and as a consequence of that, the role police has to play in this context. One of the most basic obligations of any democratic state is to guarantee the security of its population and preserve public order within a framework of respect for due process, univer‐ sally recognized human rights, and the rule of law. The lack of citizen security affects quality of life, opportunities for development, and rights as diverse as the right to freedom from harm and the right to property. In most of our countries, especially poor and lower class people suffer from crime on one side, but also target of police violence on the other side. This will widen the gap between the police and the people. But a police force can only be as strong and as successful as their cooperation with the people and the local citizens are. A “war on crime”, as declared by US‐Presidents years ago, is like the “war on drugs” a war against our own children, youngsters and looser in our society. -
OSAC Country Security Report Bahrain
OSAC Country Security Report Bahrain Last Updated: September 3, 2021 Travel Advisory The current U.S. Department of State Travel Advisory at the date of this report’s publication assesses that travelers should reconsider travel to Bahrain due to COVID-19. Review OSAC’s report, Understanding the Consular Travel Advisory System. The Institute for Economics & Peace Global Peace Index 2021 ranks Bahrain 102 out of 163 worldwide, rating the country as being at a Medium state of peace. Crime Environment The U.S. Department of State has assessed Manama as being a LOW-threat location for crime directed at or affecting official U.S. government interests. The U.S. Department of State has not included a Crime “C” Indicator on the Travel Advisory for Bahrain. The crime emergency line in Bahrain is 999. Review the State Department’s Crime Victims Assistance brochure. Crime: General Threat The targeting of non-citizen residents of Bahrain for crime is uncommon. Harassment of women and sexual assault does occur, although not all victims report cases to the police. Other reported crimes include, but are not limited to, various types of immigration and residency fraud, ATM/credit card theft, prostitution, white collar fraud, embezzlement, possession or trafficking of illegal narcotics, and property theft. Violent crime is rare, and firearms are illegal in Bahrain. Crime: Areas of Concern In 2012, the U.S. Embassy designated geographic boundaries (known as “red zones”) as restricted travel areas. In 2013, the Embassy introduced “yellow zones,” designated for daylight travel only. The Embassy is constantly assessing the nationwide security situation to reevaluate the restricted zones. -
Annual Report 2015
CHAPTER IV.A THE USE OF FORCE A. Introduction 1. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “Inter-American Commission, “Commission” or “IACHR”) learned that during 2015, due to the arbitrary and excessive use of force, hundreds of persons throughout the hemisphere have lost their lives, suffered violations of their integrity, or faced several obstacles to the exercise of other human rights and freedoms. This situation, which constitutes a cause of concern for the Commission, has also been the subject of pronouncements by international human rights organs such as the Human Rights Committee, the Committee against Torture, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions (hereinafter “Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial executions”), the Special Rapporteur on torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (hereinafter “Special Rapporteur on torture”), the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association, as well as various international and domestic civil society organizations.1 2. In particular, from late 2014 to the date of the adoption of this report, the IACHR observes that force has often been used in a manner incompatible with international standards. The civilian police agents or their special groups, the armed forces, and private security agents have deployed their force in different contexts, such as social protests and public demonstrations, immigration and anti-crime operations, and evictions, among others, -
3639 ISS Monograph 146.Indd
TTHEHE PPRIVATERIVATE SSECURITYECURITY SSECTORECTOR IINN AAFRICAFRICA COUNTRY SERIES EDITED BY SABELO GUMEDZE ISS MONOGRAPH SERIES • No 146, JULY 2008 CONTENTS ABOUT THE EDITOR AND AUTHORS iii FOREWORD iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii LIST OF ACRONYMS xii CHAPTER ONE 1 Private and public security in Uganda Solomon Wilson Kirunda CHAPTER 2 35 Private and public security in post-war Democratic Republic of Congo Meike de Goede CHAPTER 3 69 Private and public security in South Africa Raenette Taljaard APPENDIX A 99 List of South African PMCs and PSCs APPENDIX B 103 Mercenarism iii ABOUT THE EDITOR AND AUTHORS Editor • Sabelo Gumedze, BA Law, LLB, University of Swaziland, LLM in Human Rights and Democratization in Africa, University of Pretoria, Diploma in International Protection of Human Rights, Åbo Akademi University, Senior Researcher, Institute for Security Studies, Attorney of the High Court of Swaziland. Authors • Solomon Wilson Kirunda, LLM, University of the Western Cape, LLB (Hons) Makerere University, Postgraduate Diploma in Legal Practice, Law Development Centre, Uganda. • Meike de Goede, MA in African History, Lieden University, MA (cum laude) in Conflict Studies and Human Rights, Utrecht University. • Raenette Taljaard, BA Law, RAU/UJ, BA (Hons) Political Science (cum laude), RAU/UJ), MA (Political Science: International Relations) (cum laude), (RAU/UJ), MSc Public Administration and Public Policy (cum laude), LSE, Yale World Fellow, Life Fellow of the Centres for Leadership and Public Values at the Graduate School of Business at UCT and the Terry Sanford Institute of Public Policy at Duke University; Young Global Leader of the World Economic Forum iv FOREWORD This monograph on private security in Africa is the part-result of a two- year research project, Regulation of the Private Security Sector in Africa, of the Institute for Security Studies (ISS), Pretoria, South Africa.