Kanal İstanbul: Pipedream Or Politics? Actuelles De L‟Ifri
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Actuelles de l‟Ifri Kanal İstanbul: This paper examines Kanal İstanbul, a plan proposed Pipedream or Politics? by recently re-elected Turkish Prime Minister Christian Keller Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to bypass the Bosphorus Strait by creating a canal west of Istanbul. stanbul has a history of grandeur. From the Byzantines to the Ottomans, Christian Keller, a recipient of the I the city of Istanbul has been designed as, in the words used by Emperor 2011 James A. Baker III Institute for Napoleon, the capital of the world. There was a sense of grandeur, too, when Public Policy / Leadership Rice Summer Mentorship Experience Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan announced the construction of a canal Fellowship, is an intern at Ifri in the Energy Program. He studies Political to bypass the Bosphorus Straits, the maritime highway that bisects the City of Science and Policy Studies, with a concentration in urban politics and Istanbul and brings ships from the Mediterranean to the Black Sea and vice public policy, at Rice University. versa. Named Kanal İstanbul, Erdoğan proposed the project during his re- Ifri is a research center and a election campaign less than two months before the general election as a way forum for debate on the major to relieve stress from Turkey‟s prized city and solve some of the nation‟s most international political and economic issues. Headed by pressing issues. Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non governemental and non profit organization. As an indepen- dent think tank, Ifri sets its own The Bosphorus agenda, publishing its findings regurlarly for an international audience. Using an interdis- ciplinary approach, Ifri brings The Bosphorus Strait is a narrow, often-winding waterway which connects together political and economic decision-makers, researchers, Russia and Eastern Europe on the Black Sea to the Mediterranean by way of and internationally renowed experts to animate its debate the Marmara Sea. It is 31 kilometers long, its width varying from 0.75 to 3.7 and research activities. With kilometers and its depth from 36.5 to 124 meters1. Heavy traffic along the offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the Bosphorus makes it one of the world‟s busiest maritime chokepoints, as fifty rare French think tank to have positionned itself at the very thousand ships pass through the strait each year, around 150 per day, 10% of heart of the European debate. which are oil tankers2. One hundred forty million tons of oil and four million The opinions and remaining 3 tons of natural gas pass through the strait each year , mostly travelling from errors are the responsibility of the authors alone. Russian Black Sea ports to the Mediterranean, making the Bosphorus one of ISBN: 978-2-86592912-2 the most important energy corridors in the world. The 1936 Montreux Treaty, © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2011 the oldest international maritime agreement still in existence today, which regulates the Bosphorus, allows “complete freedom of passage and navigation in the Straits” during peacetime while heavily limiting military vessels4. A 1994 Christian Keller / Kanal İstanbul: Pipedream or Politics? addendum1 to the treaty strictly regulates how many ships and of what size may pass through at a time and bars all international ships from passing during inclement weather. This corollary was added after decades of accidents that caused delays, deaths and damages to Istanbul and the tankers involved. Between 1953 and 2002 there were 461 major accidents reported5, but there has been a major decline in serious accidents since the implementation of the new regulations. The Bypass Plan When drumming up support for his idea for a Bosphorus bypass, Kanal İstanbul, Prime Minister Erdoğan actually built off of the fear of the recurrence of such accidents. He spoke of ending the great threat to Istanbul and its people posed by oil, gas and chemical exporting vessels, while simultaneously creating jobs and reinforcing Turkey‟s preeminent role as Eurasia‟s energy transit hub. The proposed Kanal İstanbul would begin on the Marmara coast at Silivri and end at a Black Sea port near Yalıköy, spanning 40-50 kilometers, and the canal would connect several small, serpentine rivers running through Thrace. At 150 meters wide and 25 meters deep, it would be large enough for very large crude carriers (VLCCs) to pass through and transport twice as much as oil per load as Suezmax carriers, currently the largest tankers allowed to pass through the Bosphorus. The canal would be finished by 2023, the centenary of the Republic of Turkey. Erdoğan announced that the project, which he called “crazy and magnificent,” would cost USD 10 billion6. The money, however much, would come from the same types of public-private partnerships that fund current infrastructure and energy projects, such as the Marmaray rail tunnel2 and the Samsun-Ceyhan oil pipeline. Challenges to the Canal First, the cost of the project has been hotly debated. Erdoğan‟s projection of USD 10 billion is seen by many to be too low once all things are considered. Historically, canals are difficult to price and expensive once they are open: the Suez Canal ended up costing twice its original estimate; the Panama Canal cost roughly USD 14 billion in 2007 dollars7 using the combined resources of the French, American and Panamanian governments; and its ongoing expansion 1 The addendum came after a particularly serious accident in 1994 between two Cypriot-flagged carriers. Twenty-seven died, 9 000 tonnes of oil were dumped into the Straits, and 20 000 tonnes of oil burned for four days. This was the worst accident since 1979 when 43 people died, 94 600 tonnes of oil spilled, and the week-long fire was large enough to turn the Kadiköy Port black from its smoke. Erdogan mentioned the latter during his announcement of Kanal Istanbul. 2 The trans-Bosphorus underground Marmaray rail tunnel is Erdogan‟s current grand infrastructure project. The tunnel, its completion currently delayed by four years, will carry Istanbul‟s commuters from Thrace to Anatolia and stem maritime traffic along the Bosphorus by commuters. At an estimated USD 2.5 billion, the Marmaray is being financed by the Japanese International Cooperation Agency and the European Investment Bank. 2 Christian Keller / Kanal İstanbul: Pipedream or Politics? alone will cost around USD 5.25 billion8. While the technology may have improved, the environmental and engineering problems remain just as costly on projects such as these. Secondly while Erdoğan is surely willing to reinforce Turkey‟s role as energy hub, the need for an alternative oil transport route remains doubtful. Turkey is well-regarded as an important energy hub due to its strategic location near Central Asia, the Middle East and the Black Sea. The transportation of Black Sea oil is one of the most important energy and security challenges of Turkey. Turkey has two relatively small domestic crude oil pipelines, Ceyhan-Kırıkkale and Batman-Dörtyol, which pump 135 kb/d and 86.4 kb/d respectively9. Turkey‟s two major international pipelines, Kirkuk-Ceyhan and Baku-Tblisi- Ceyhan, pumped 0.47 mb/d from Iraq and 1.2 mb/d from the Caucasus in 2009, respectively10. Yet both of these international pipelines pale in comparison to the 2004-2008 average of 2.6-2.8 mb of oil transported through the crowded Bosphorus each day11. Kanal İstanbul could alleviate the pressure and reduce delays for ships, sometimes up to three weeks12. Alternative routes nevertheless exist to export Black Sea oil, and many new transit projects are on the table. The Odessa-Brody pipeline in Ukraine could provide an uncomplicated path for exportation, given the pipeline runs only in Ukraine and is thereby not governed by any international agreements. Yet this pipeline currently runs in reverse, bringing Russian oil to the Black Sea rather than taking oil away from it. Other proposed pipelines, such as the Pan-European pipeline from Romania to Italy and two Bulgarian pipelines leading to Albania and Greece, could also provide relief to traffic along the Bosphorus. Turkey and Russia have agreed to build a 550 kilometer pipeline from Samsun on Turkey‟s Black Sea coast to Ceyhan, the Marmaran oil hub, with an expected capacity of 1 mb/d13. Even if the capacity of the Samsun-Ceyhan line were increased to 1.5 mb/d, there would still be over one million barrels of oil going through the Bosphorus, so clearly no one pipeline is the answer. Yet, if some combination of the above pipelines is brought to fruition, the hazardous cargo moving through the strait could be significantly reduced. The idea would affect the energy policies of other actors in the region also. Erdoğan‟s call to end “commercial traffic in the strait completely with Kanal İstanbul” did not go over well abroad14. The announcement indeed drew an immediate negative response from Turkey‟s biggest energy partner in the region, Russia. Moscow fears that the canal would have an undermining effect on its current pipeline projects, and that the construction of the canal would bring higher prices on Bosphorus transit in order to make the canal a more viable option. In addition to affecting diplomatic relations, it could also have the opposite effect on energy transport that it intended. Higher prices for shipping could actually encourage Russia to move more of its oil exports away from the Black Sea region to the Baltic Sea, as it is already doing with a proposed 3 Christian Keller / Kanal İstanbul: Pipedream or Politics? pipeline to bypass Belarus via the Baltic15. Turkey‟s prospects as a global energy hub would be further undermined.