DOCSLIB.ORG

Initial Assessment of the ISF Iceland Northern Shrimp Fishery (Inshore and Offshore)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Initial Assessment of the ISF Iceland Northern Shrimp Fishery (Inshore and Offshore) FINAL REPORT Initial assessment of the ISF Iceland Northern shrimp fishery (inshore and offshore) Icelandic Sustainable Fisheries Report No.: 2017-032, Rev. 1 Document No.: Date: 2018-10-02 Certificate code: to be determined / xxx Report type: Final Report DNV GL – Business Assurance Report title: Initial assessment of the ISF Iceland Northern shrimp fishery (inshore and offshore) DNV GL Business Assurance Customer: Icelandic Sustainable Fisheries, Grandagarður Norway AS 16, 101 Reykjavík Veritasveien 1 Contact person: Kristinn Hjalmarsson 1322 HØVIK, Norway Date of issue: 2018-10-02 Tel: +47 67 57 99 00 Project No.: PRJC-569364-2017-MSC-NOR http://www.dnvgl.com Organisation unit: Food & Beverage Report No.: 2017-032, Rev.1 Certificate No.: Objective: Assessment of the Iceland Northern Shrimp fishery against MSC Fisheries Standards v2.0. Prepared by: Verified by: Stefan Midteide, Project Manager Sigrun Bekkevold Julian Addison, Expert, Principle 1 Lucia Revenga, Expert Principle 2, Team leader Geir Hønneland, Expert, Principle 3 Copyright © DNV GL 2014. All rights reserved. This publication or parts thereof may not be copied, reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, whether digitally or otherwise without the prior written consent of DNV GL. DNV GL and the Horizon Graphic are trademarks of DNV GL AS. The content of this publication shall be kept confidential by the customer, unless otherwise agreed in writing. Reference to part of this publication which may lead to misinterpretation is prohibited. DNV GL Distribution: Keywords: ☒ Unrestricted distribution (internal and Marine Stewardship Council, Iceland, Northern external) shrimp ☐ Unrestricted distribution within DNV GL ☐ Limited distribution within DNV GL after 3 years ☐ No distribution (confidential) ☐ Secret Rev. No. Date Reason for Issue Prepared by Verified by 0 2018-02-28 Preliminary Draft Report for Client Stefan Midteide, Julian Addison, Lucia review Revenga and Geir Hønneland 1 2018-06-26 Peer Review Draft Report 2018-08-16 Public Comment Draft Report 2018-10-02 Final Report [yyyy-mm-dd] Public Certification Report DNV GL – Report No. 2017-032, Rev. 1 – www.dnvgl.com MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template V2.0 – issued 8 April 2015 Template approval date: Page 1 Table of contents ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................... 5 STOCK ASSESSMENT REFERENCE POINTS ...................................................................................... 6 MSC ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ........................................................................................... 6 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Main strengths and weaknesses of the client’s operation 7 1.2 Determination / draft determination 8 2 AUTHORSHIP AND PEER REVIEWERS .............................................................................. 10 2.1 Assessment team 10 2.2 Peer reviewers 12 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE FISHERY ...................................................................................... 13 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment (UoA) and scope of certification sought 13 3.2 Overview of the fishery 18 3.3 Principle One: Target Species Background 23 3.4 Principle Two: Ecosystem Background 51 3.5 Principle Three: Management System Background 79 4 EVALUATION PROCEDURE .............................................................................................. 82 4.1 Harmonised Fishery Assessment 82 4.2 Previous assessments 83 4.3 Assessment Methodologies 84 4.4 Evaluation Processes and Techniques 85 5 TRACEABILITY .............................................................................................................. 90 5.1 Eligibility Date 90 5.2 Traceability within the Fishery 90 5.3 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody 93 5.4 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) to Enter Further Chains of Custody 93 6 EVALUATION RESULTS .................................................................................................. 94 6.1 Principle Level Scores 94 6.2 Summary of PI Level Scores 94 6.3 Summary of Conditions 95 6.4 Recommendations 96 6.5 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement 96 6.6 Changes in the fishery prior to and since Pre-Assessment 96 7 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 97 APPENDIX 1 SCORING AND RATIONALES .................................................................................... 103 Appendix 1.1 Performance Indicator Scores and Rationale 103 Principle 1 103 Principle 2 128 Principle 3: All UoAs. 184 Appendix 1.3 Conditions 202 DNV GL – Report No. 2017-032, Rev. 1 – www.dnvgl.com MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template V2.0 – issued 8 April 2015 Template approval date: Page 2 ................................................................................................................................ 212 DNV GL – Report No. 2017-032, Rev. 1 – www.dnvgl.com MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template V2.0 – issued 8 April 2015 Template approval date: Page 3 APPENDIX 2 PEER REVIEW REPORTS .......................................................................................... 213 APPENDIX 3 STAKEHOLDER SUBMISSIONS ................................................................................. 214 APPENDIX 5 OBJECTIONS PROCESS ........................................................................................... 216 APPENDIX 6 VESSEL LIST ......................................................................................................... 217 APPENDIX 7 CLIENT ACCEPTANCE OF REPORT ............................................................................. 218 DNV GL – Report No. 2017-032, Rev. 1 – www.dnvgl.com MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template V2.0 – issued 8 April 2015 Template approval date: Page 4 ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS ACOM Advisory Committee on fisheries Management (ICES) CAB Conformity Assessment Body CFP Common Fisheries Policy CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora EC European Commission EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone EMODnet European Marine Observation and Data Network ERS Electronic Recording and Reporting System EU European Union FAO Food and Agriculture Organization GT Gross Tonnage HAFRO Marine and Freshwater Research Institute (in Icelandic) HCR Harvest Control Rule ICES International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICJ International Court of Justice ISBF Introduced Species Based Fisheries ISF Icelandic Sustainable Fisheries ITQ Individual Transferable Quota ITLOS International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature IWC International Whaling Commission LTMS Long-Term Management Strategy MCS Monitoring, Control and Surveillance MFRI Marine and Freshwater Research Institute (of Iceland) NAMMCO North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission NEAFC The North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission NEA North-East Atlantic NE North East NGO Non-Governmental Organisation OSPAR Oslo-Paris Convention (Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic) PCA Permanent Court of Arbritation RAC Regional Advisory Council RSW Refrigerated SeaWater SAM State-Space Assessment Model SIMWG Stock Identification Methods Working Group (ICES) TAC Total Allowable Catch TBC To be confirmed UK United Kingdom UN United Nations UNCLOS United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea UNFSA United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement VMS Vessel Monitoring System VPA Virtual Population Analysis WWF World Wildlife Fund DNV GL – Report No. 2017-032, Rev. 1 – www.dnvgl.com MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template V2.0 – issued 8 April 2015 Template approval date: Page 5 STOCK ASSESSMENT REFERENCE POINTS Blim Minimum biomass below which recruitment is expected to be impaired or the stock dynamics are unknown. Bmsy Biomass corresponding to the maximum sustainable yield (biological reference point); the peak value on a domed yield-per-recruit curve. Bpa Precautionary biomass below which SSB should not be allowed to fall to safeguard it against falling to Blim. Btrigger Value of spawning stock biomass (SSB) that triggers a specific management action. CI Confidence Interval CPUE Catch per unit effort: The quantity of fish caught (in number or in weight) with one standard unit of fishing effort; e.g weight of fish taken per hour of trawling. considered an index of fish biomass (or abundance). Sometimes referred to as catch rate. F Instantaneous rate of fishing mortality Flim Limit reference point for fishing mortality (mean over defined age range) Fpa Precautionary buffer to preclude true fishing mortality being at Flim when the perceived fishing mortality is at Fpa. Fmax F where total yield or yield per recruit is highest (biological reference point) Fmsy F giving maximum sustainable yield (biological reference point) HCR Harvest Control Rules MSY Maximum Sustainable Yield MSY Precautionary biomass level at which the management plan initiates specific harvest Btrigger control rules to minimise the risk of further decline in biomass and concomitant risk to recruitment. SSB Spawning Stock Biomass TAC Total Allowable Catch yr Year MSC ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CAB Conformity Assessment Body CR Certification Requirements ETP Endangered, Threatened and Protected species FCR Fisheries certification Requirements LTL Low Trophic Level (species) MSC Marine
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Íbúakönnun Á Íslandi
    ÍBÚAKÖNNUN Á ÍSLANDI Staða og mikilvægi búsetuskilyrða 19 landsvæða á landsbyggðunum frá Hornafirði í austri að Skagafirði í norðri Vífill Karlsson Samtök sveitarfélaga á Vesturlandi Skýrsla SSV Nr. 1 2018 Maí 2018 ISSN 1670-7923 EFNISYFIRLIT 1 Samantekt .................................................................................................................................................................... 8 2 Inngangur ................................................................................................................................................................. 10 3 Aðferð og gögn ........................................................................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Aðferðir í úrvinnslu innan hvers landshluta .................................................................................... 13 3.2 Aðferðir í samanburði á milli allra landshluta ................................................................................. 15 4 Niðurstöður íbúakannana á 19 landsvæðum ............................................................................................ 16 4.1 Almenn velferð íbúanna, ánægja þeirra og framtíðaráform ...................................................... 16 4.1.1 Aðferð: Meðaltöl og frávik afstöðu kvenna, ungra og þeirra sem búa í sveit ............ 16 4.1.2 Hamingja ................................................................................................................................................ 17
    [Show full text]
  • Strætó.Is Bus.Is
    HÓLMAVÍK AKUREYRI REYKHOLT Melahverfi Akranes - Akratorg STYKKISHÓLMUR Akranes - Kirkjubraut Akranes - Þjóðbraut Borgarnes - N1 Akranes - Bæjarskrifstofur Kjalarnes - Kjalarnes - Kjalarnes - Akranes - Garðabraut Esjuskáli Esjugrund Klébergsskóli Akranes - Jaðarsbakki Akranes - Bresaflöt Esjurætur Skeljatangi Arnartangi STRÆTÓ.IS Þverholt Skei›holt Kelduskóli/Korpa Korpúlfssta›ir Bollatangi Brekkutangi Esjumelar Brúnasta›ir Bakkasta›ir Klapparhlí› FMOS Varmárskóli Leirvogstunga Skálatún Tröllaborgir Vættaborgir Jötnaborgir Strætóvegur Bar›asta›ir HÁHOLT v/Vættaborgir Mosavegur Goðaborgir Hulduborgir Borgarholtsskóli Kelduskóli/Vík Dofraborgir Go›aborgir Ásland Tjaldanes Mosfell Lundur Skólavegur Laufengi Egilshöll Borgavegur Dvergaborgir SPÖNG Jónsteigur Skarfagar›ar Kænugar›ar Borgavegur Borgavegur Úlfarsbraut SkyggnistorgSkyggnisbraut Úlfarsá Sundagar›ar Hé›insgata Hrafnista Hjallavegur Sægar›ar Víkurvegur Völuteigur Dalbraut Gullengi Mosarimi Lyngrimi Lambhagav./Mímisbrunnur Úlfarsbraut Fiskisló› Laugarnestangi Mi›gar›ur Keldnaholt Reykjalundur Lambhagav./Reynisvatnsvegur Fellsvegur Dælustö›varvegur Kirkjusandur Kirkjusandur Flétturimi Grunnsló› Höf›atorg Nóatún Hótel Cabin Borgartún Sund Holtagar›ar Hallsvegur Húsasmi›jan Reynisvatn Reykjabyggð LaugardalslaugLaugarásvegur Hrafnista Dragavegur Rimaflöt Gufunesbær Þúsöld Biskupsgata Hólsvegur Hólsvegur Dalhús Vallarhús BrekkuhúsVölundarhús Grandagar›ur Tún Teigar Gagnvegur Fíladelfía Hátún Laugardalshöll Lei›hamrar Vegghamrar Grandi LÆKJARTORG Harpa HLEMMUR MaríubaugurIngunnarskóliPrestastígur
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland: a Laboratory for Non-Indigenous Ascidians
    BioInvasions Records (2020) Volume 9, Issue 3: 450–460 CORRECTED PROOF Research Article Iceland: a laboratory for non-indigenous ascidians Alfonso A. Ramos-Esplá1,*, Joana Micael2, Halldór P. Halldórsson3 and Sindri Gíslason2 1Research Marine Centre of Santa Pola (CIMAR), University of Alicante, 03080 Alicante, Spain 2Southwest Iceland Nature Research Centre (SINRC), 245 Suðurnesjabær, Iceland 3University of Iceland, Sudurnes Research Center, 245 Suðurnesjabær, Iceland *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Citation: Ramos-Esplá AA, Micael J, Halldórsson HP, Gíslason S (2020) Abstract Iceland: a laboratory for non-indigenous ascidians. BioInvasions Records 9(3): 450– Non-indigenous species (NIS) represent a serious problem worldwide, where ascidians 460, https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2020.9.3.01 are one of the most important taxa. However, little has been done to document the non-indigenous ascidians in Iceland, and over the past decade only two species had Received: 30 October 2019 been recorded prior to the present study, Ciona intestinalis in 2007 and Botryllus Accepted: 19 March 2020 schlosseri in 2011. To increase the knowledge of this taxon, extensive sampling Published: 7 May 2020 was carried out in shallow waters around Iceland, during the summer 2018, in ports Handling editor: Noa Shenkar and on ropes of a long-line mussel aquaculture. In total, eleven species were identified, Thematic editor: Stelios Katsanevakis four native and seven NIS, of which Diplosoma listerianum, Ascidiella aspersa, Copyright: © Ramos-Esplá et al. Botrylloides violaceus, Molgula manhattensis and Ciona cf. robusta, are now reported This is an open access article distributed under terms for the first time in Iceland.
    [Show full text]
  • Pálsson, Grétar Már. 2015
    Impact on households and critical infrastructures from electricity failure Two case studies and a survey on public preparedness Grétar Már Pálsson Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Iceland 2015 Impact on households and critical infrastructures from electricity failure Two case studies and a survey on public preparedness Grétar Már Pálsson 30 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of a Magister Scientiarum degree in Civil Engineering Advisors Dr. Björn Karlsson Böðvar Tómasson Faculty Representative Sveinn Júlíus Björnsson Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Reykjavik, May 2015 Impact on households and critical infrastructures - Two case studies and a survey on public preparedness. 30 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of a Magister Scientiarum degree in civil engineering Copyright © 2015 Grétar Már Pálsson All rights reserved Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland VR II, Hjarðarhaga 2-6 107, Reykjavik Iceland Telephone: 525 4600 Bibliographic information: Grétar Már Pálsson, 2015, Impact on households and critical infrastructures - Two case studies and a survey on public preparedness, Master’s thesis, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iceland, pp. 76. Printing: Háskólaprent, Fálkagata 2, 107 Reykjavík Reykjavik, Iceland, May 2015 Abstract This thesis studies the impact from electricity failure in Iceland on households and critical infrastructures. Households and critical infrastructures electricity dependence is discussed along with a theoretical identification of impacts towards these two subjects from electricity failure. Risk Assessment Plans for Iceland, Norway and Sweden are compared. The main focus of the comparison relates to how the countries focus on electricity, information and communication technologies and the role of the general public in these plans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best of Iceland
    04_178416-ch01.qxp 5/29/08 8:59 AM Page 1 1 The Best of Iceland On each trip to Iceland, we are always struck by how often other travelers are—or intend to be—repeat visitors. Many come year after year, never exhausting Iceland’s endless variations of magnificent scenery and adventure. Returning travelers immedi- ately recognize the crisp, invigorating polar air, and what W. H. Auden called “the most magical light of anywhere on earth.” Iceland’s astonishing beauty often has an austere, primitive, or surreal cast that arouses reverence, wonderment, mystery, and awe. Lasting impressions could include a lone tuft of wildflowers amid a bleak desert moonscape or a fantastical promenade of icebergs calved into a lake from a magisterial glacier. The Icelandic people—freedom-loving, egalitarian, self-reliant, and worldly—are equally exceptional. They established a parliamentary democracy over a millennium ago, and today write, publish, purchase, and read more books per capita than any peo- ple on earth. Reykjavík, their capital, has become one of the world’s most fashionable urban hot spots. In November 2007, the U.N. named Iceland the world’s best coun- try to live in, based on life expectancy, education levels, medical care, income, and other criteria. 1 The Best Natural Wonders • Glymur: Iceland’s tallest waterfall is • Blue Lagoon: The central activity nimble and graceful: Streamlets at this spa—Iceland’s top tourist descend like ribbons of a maypole attraction—is bathing in a shallow, into a fathomless canyon mantled in opaque, blue-green lagoon amid a bird nests and lush mosses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Most Experienced Whale Watching Company in Iceland!
    The most experienced whale watching company in Iceland! 2010 www.northsailing.is www.gamlibaukur.is www.schooner.is WHALE WATCHING PIONEERS AWARDED FOR EXCELLENCE As a pioneer in whale watching, In the past 14 years, we have had the North Sailing has been awarded both pleasure of sharing our experience with domestically and internationally. Owned more than 250 thousand whale watchers and operated by three generations of a in over seven thousand trips. local family, North Sailing was the first company in Iceland to organise and offer QUALITY regular Whale Watching tours. At North Sailing, there are no compromise solutions. Vessels, safety equipment, buildings, and last but not least, services are of the highest quality possible at all times. It is our mission to ensure that the visitors leave happy and Silver Otter Award satisfied with our service 1996 and the experience. SAF SAFETY THE ICELANDIC TRAVEL INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION We operate according to the highest INNOVATION AWARD safety standards. All crew members 2007 regularly attend courses and training in 2003 maritime safety and life saving. Our vessels undergo strict inspections in compliance with the rules and regulations EXPERIENCE of The Icelandic Maritime Administration The North Sailing crews are experienced as well as those of Loyd’s Register of and service minded sailors. Our skippers, Shipping. some of them fishermen for decades, have an average experience of 10 years in whale watching on Skjálfandi Bay. PreservinG National HeritaGE The North Sailing story started with A RECIPÉ FOR SUCCESS the restoration of the wooden fishing - NOT JUST OURS boat Knörrinn, and saving it from destruction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vogar Fissure Swarm, Reykjanes Peninsula, Iceland: Aseismic Kinematics of an Oblique Rift Zone
    Bates College SCARAB Honors Theses Capstone Projects Spring 5-2011 The ogV ar Fissure Swarm, Reykjanes Peninsula, Iceland: Aseismic Kinematics of an Oblique Rift Zone Keegan Timothy Runnals Bates College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scarab.bates.edu/honorstheses Recommended Citation Runnals, Keegan Timothy, "The oV gar Fissure Swarm, Reykjanes Peninsula, Iceland: Aseismic Kinematics of an Oblique Rift Zone" (2011). Honors Theses. 6. http://scarab.bates.edu/honorstheses/6 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Capstone Projects at SCARAB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of SCARAB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Vogar Fissure Swarm, Reykjanes Peninsula, Iceland: Aseismic Kinematics of an Oblique Rift Zone An Honors Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Geology Bates College In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By Keegan Timothy Runnals Lewiston, Maine March, 2011 Abstract Exposure of the Mid-Atlantic ridge in Iceland offers a unique place to study hotspot-ridge interactions along an oblique rift zone. The Reykjanes Peninsula is a left lateral shear zone characterized by a series of NE striking en echelon fissure swarms oblique to the rift axis, and N-S trending dextral strike slip faults. This study focuses on the Vogar fissure swarm in southwest Iceland, in order to better constrain the mode of deformation within it. Movement of the faults and fissures that make up the fissure swarm is thought to either be related to seismic events along the ridge, or occur aseismically due to dike injections during eruptive episodes.
    [Show full text]
  • Living and Working in Iceland Grímsey
    Living and working in Iceland Grímsey 85 Raufarhöfn 85 Kópasker Reykjafjörður Þórshöfn Bolungarvík Suðureyri 61 Hnífsdalur 76 65 Flateyri Ísafjörður Siglufjörður Lundarskóli 64 Bakkafjörður 91 Súðavík Krossnes 624 76 Ólafsfjörður Húsavík 635 61 Sólgarðar 85 Gjögur Hrísey 82 745 Dalvík Grenivík 622 Reykjanes 643 Litli-Árskógssandur 83 60 Þingeyri Hofsós Hauganes 745 Húsabakki Árskógsskóli Heiðarbær Selárlaug Hjalteyri Hafralækjarskóli Vopnafjörður Skagaströnd 82 61 619 Laugarhóll/Klúka 85 744 Laugar Bíldudalur Þelamörk Svalbarðseyri Tálknafjörður 63 Hólmavík Sauðárkrókur Hólar 615 1 87 74 76 Stórutjarnir Drangsnes 60 Reykjahlíð 1 Reykjafjörður 711 Blönduós Akureyri Patreksfjörður Illugastaðir 612 Borgarfjörður Djúpidalur eystri 1 75 Birkimelur Kristnes 614 Laugaland Skútustaðir 94 Varmahlíð Hrafnagil 62 Húnavellir 607 711 Reykhólar 68 1 Króksfjarðarnes Steinsstaðir Eiðar Hvammstangi 72 F88 60 Fellabær Seyðisfjörður Laugabakki 93 1 Egilsstaðir Laugar Reykir Neskaupstaður F72 Borðeyri 92 590 Hallormsstaður 92 F98 F82 Eskifjörður Stykkishólmur Búðardalur F28 Reyðarfjörður 96 58 F78 Fáskrúðsfjörður Rif F37 Hellissandur Ólafsvík 1 Grundarfjörður Stöðvarfjörður F28 54 60 574 F72 Lýsuhóll Lauga- Breiðdalsvík gerðis- skóli Djúpivogur Varmaland Húsafell Reykholt 54 Klepp- járns- reykir 50 1 Borgarnes Hvanneyri 53 Hreppslaug Brautartunga 52 50 F28 F35 F37 Heiðarborg Hlaðir Nesjahverfi Akranes 51 Geysir Hlíðarlaug 1 Höfn Grundarhverfi 48 1 30 Laugarvatn 37 36 36 Reykjavík Reykholt Þjórsárdalur Seltjarnarnes Mosfellsbær Kópavogur Garðabær Flúðir Garður Álftanes Ljósifoss Laugarás Hafnafjörður 31 45 Sandgerði Árnes Keflavík 41 Hvera- Hraun 32 Skaftafell 1 gerði Brautarholt 26 Vogar Svínafell 44 Njarðvík 30 Hafnir 39 43 Selfoss 1 Laugaland Bláa Lónið 38 34 Eyrar- 42 Þorlákshöfn bakki Stokkseyri Rauða- Hella Grindavík lækur 25 F22 Kirkjubæjarklaustur Hvolsvöllur 204 Seljavellir Skógar Vestmannaeyjar Vík 0 10 20 30 km Welcome to Iceland Moving to a new country takes courage.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Assessment of the ISF Iceland Northern Shrimp Fishery (Inshore and Offshore)
    PUBLIC COMMENT DRAFT REPORT Initial assessment of the ISF Iceland Northern shrimp fishery (inshore and offshore) Icelandic Sustainable Fisheries Report No.: 2017-032, Rev. 1 Document No.: Date: 2018-08-16 Certificate code: to be determined / xxx Report type: Public Comment Draft Report DNV GL – Business Assurance Report title: Initial assessment of the ISF Iceland Northern shrimp fishery (inshore and offshore) DNV GL Business Assurance Customer: Icelandic Sustainable Fisheries, Grandagarður Norway AS 16, 101 Reykjavík Veritasveien 1 Contact person: Kristinn Hjalmarsson 1322 HØVIK, Norway Date of issue: 2018-08-16 Tel: +47 67 57 99 00 Project No.: PRJC-569364-2017-MSC-NOR http://www.dnvgl.com Organisation unit: Food & Beverage Report No.: 2017-032, Rev.1 Certificate No.: Objective: Assessment of the Iceland Northern Shrimp fishery against MSC Fisheries Standards v2.0. Prepared by: Verified by: Stefan Midteide, Project Manager [Name] [title] Julian Addison, Expert, Principle 1 Lucia Revenga, Expert Principle 2, Team leader Geir Hønneland, Expert, Principle 3 Copyright © DNV GL 2014. All rights reserved. This publication or parts thereof may not be copied, reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, whether digitally or otherwise without the prior written consent of DNV GL. DNV GL and the Horizon Graphic are trademarks of DNV GL AS. The content of this publication shall be kept confidential by the customer, unless otherwise agreed in writing. Reference to part of this publication which may lead to misinterpretation is prohibited. DNV GL Distribution: Keywor ds: ☒ Unrestricted distribution (internal and Marine Stewardship Council, Iceland, Northern external) shrimp ☐ Unrestricted distribution within DNV GL ☐ Limited distribution within DNV GL after 3 years ☐ No distribution (confidential) ☐ Secret Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Coprophilous Fungi from Iceland
    ACTA BOT. ISL. 14: 77-102, 2004 Coprophilous fungi from Iceland Michael J. Richardson 165 Braid Road, Edinburgh EH10 6JE U.K. ABSTRACT: Eighty-one species of coprophilous fungi were recorded from 32 herbivore dung samples collected from Iceland in July 2002 and incubated in moist chambers. Almost half of the species are apparently new records for Iceland. Collections are described and the occurrence and distribution of species is discussed. The species richness of the Icelandic coprophilous mycota (lat. 64-66oN) is slightly higher than in northern UK (lat. 55-59oN). KEY WORDS: ascomycetes, basidiomycetes, biogeography, diversity, ecology, fimicoles. INTRODUCTION During a visit to Iceland in July 2002, 32 samples of herbivore dung were collected and, on return to the UK, incubated in a damp chamber. The coprophilous zygomycetes, ascomycetes and basidiomycetes which developed were recorded. There is already a quite extensive list of Icelandic coprophils. ROSTRUP (1903) contains records of 25-30 coprophilous species, LARSEN (1932) compiled records of all fungi from his own collections and those of others, especially Ólafur Davíðsson, and these include about 50-60 coprophils. CHRISTENSEN (1941) recorded agarics, including some Coprinus species. Van BRUMMELEN (1967) examined material of three Ascobolus species, but no Saccobolus, from Iceland, and LUNDQVIST (1972) listed the occurrence of nine species of Sordariaceae, of which he verified five. LAUBE (1971) also recorded some ascomycetes. These records are brought together, with others, including a list by AAS (pers. comm. to Helgi Hallgrímsson 15.12.1993, of fungi identified from a foray of the Extra Nordic Mycological Congress, 4-7th of August 1993) as part of a check-list of the Icelandic mycota by HALLGRÍMSSON & EYJÓLFSDÓTTIR (2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Samanburður Á Orkukostnaði Heimila Árið 2020
    SAMANBURÐUR Á ORKUKOSTNAÐI HEIMILA ÁRIÐ 2020 Samanburður á orkukostnaði heimila Líkt og undanfarin ár, hefur Byggðastofnun fengið Orkustofnun til að reikna út kostnað á ársgrundvelli, við raforkunotkun og húshitun á sömu fasteigninni, á nokkrum þéttbýlisstöðum og í dreifbýli. Viðmiðunareignin er einbýlishús, 140 m2 að grunnfleti og 350m3. Almenn raforkunotkun er sú raforka sem er notuð í annað en að hita upp húsnæði, s.s. ljós og heimilistæki, en miðað er við 4.500 kWst í almennri rafmagnsnotkun og 28.400 kWst við húshitun án varmadælu og 14.200 kWst með varmadælu. Gert er ráð fyrir að „loft í vatn“ varmadæla skili 50% sparnaði á raforku til húshitunar en orkusparnaðurinn er þó háður ýmsum þáttum (sjá í kaflanum Fyrirvari og aðrar upplýsingar). Árlegir útreikningar eru nú til frá árinu 2013 og eru uppfærðir eftir því sem ástæða þykir til. Við útreikninga þessa er almenn rafmagnsnotkun og fastagjald tekin saman annarsvegar og hitunarkostnaður hins vegar. Gjöldin eru reiknuð út samkvæmt gjaldskrá þann 1. september 2020. Auk staðanna sem miðað var við síðustu ár hafa 22 nýir staðir nú bæst við og ná tölur fyrir þá alla aftur til 2014. Staðirnir eru Bifröst, Brautarholt á Skeiðum, Drangsnes, Garður, Grenivík, Hofsós, Hrafnagil, Hrísey, Hvanneyri, Kjalarnes, Kópasker, Laugar í Reykjadal, Laugarvatn, Ólafsfjörður, Reykhólar, Reykjahlíð, Sandgerði, Skagaströnd, Stokkseyri, Varmahlíð, Vík í Mýrdal og Vogar. Á höfuðborgarsvæðinu eru í meginatriðum fjögur svæði m.t.t. orkukostnaðar. Sami kostnaður er í Reykjavík, Kópavogi og austurhluta Garðabæjar þar sem Veitur ohf. eru með sérleyfi fyrir flutning og dreifingu á rafmagni sem og til reksturs hitaveitu. Það sem er frábrugðið í Hafnarfirði og vesturhluta Garðabæjar (þ.m.t.
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland Philatelic Magazine
    iceland Philatelic magazine An independent journal for collectors of Iceland stamps and postal history EDITOR Brian Flack E-mail address Issue 31/January 2019 [email protected] 1 Iceland Philatelic Magazine Contents Page News 3 Oh, The Things you can learn from Stamp Collecting! William F. Pálsson Airmail cover. 4 M, Schumacher A true manuscript cancel in the 1940s or …..? 5 Feast your eyes on this one. Brúsholt B1a Eivind Kolstad 5 Late use of Norðtunga B1a (Issue 30) 5 Interesting I GILDI cover emerges after more than 40 years – but it is philatelic! Ebbe Eldrup & Ellis Glatt 6 A Danish short cut by a writer in a hurry. Leif Fuglsig 7 Roller cancels Part 3 8 Forgangs-Bréf 11 Iceland Gazetteer Part 23 Árnessýsla David Loe 12 Þjótandi location 19 Cancellation questions for Reykjahlíð and Reynihlíð (Issue 30) 20 Unusual Destinations – L 21 Strange Póstkrafa rate 23 An appeal to our fellow Collectors of Icelandic Crown Cancellations Steinar Fridthorsson 24 Mystery solved - It is REGISTERED LIVERPOOL 24 A bridge cancel question (Ölfusárbrú-Selfoss) (Issue 28) 25 Buy it now before it is too late (ISK 72) 25 1932 Airmail to South Africa 26 Gleðileg Jól 2018 Páll Pálsson 26 Please let me have your articles if you want them in the next issue which will be March 2019. If you need help with translations let me know. The editor will help with the English if necessary. [email protected] 2 News/Comment May I wish all our readers a Happy New Year 2019. The magazine has passed the 3 year mark, and the readership has crept up to 144 during the past year.
    [Show full text]