DOCSLIB.ORG

Comprehensive WASH Needs Assessment Lal Wa Sar Jangal District Ghor Province, Afghanistan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comprehensive WASH Needs Assessment Lal Wa Sar Jangal District Ghor Province, Afghanistan Lal wa Sar Jangal Comprehensive WASH Needs Assessment Comprehensive WASH Needs Assessment Lal wa Sar Jangal District Ghor Province, Afghanistan September/October 2016 Prepared by: Rosanna Keam, WASH Specialist, WV Afghanistan Supported by: Shoaib Wasiqi (M&E Officer), Anley Mihret Melesse (M&E and Program Quality Coordinator), Faraidoon Osmani (Associate Program Officer), Mojtaba Esmatzada (M&E Advisor), Fairadoon Barekzay (Badghis Zonal Manager) Dated: 5th December 2016 1 Lal wa Sar Jangal Comprehensive WASH Needs Assessment Acknowledgments First and foremost, WV Afghanistan would like to acknowledge the community members, community and religious leaders, and partners who took part in the assessment. In particular, WV Afghanistan wishes to acknowledge the generous support of several organizations including Catholic Relief Services in Lal for providing office space and services during the field data collection phase of the assessment, Help International for providing Ms. Sima Soja and Mr. Zia Jafari to support the initial scoping and data collection for the assessment, and DACAAR for conducting water quality testing at survey sites. WV Afghanistan would like to recognize the technical Monitoring and Evaluation expertise of Shoaib Wasiqi (M&E Officer), Anley Mihret Melesse (M&E and Program Quality Coordinator), Mojtaba Esmatzada (M&E Advisor), and Abdullaq Zia (external M&E contractor) for their support for phases 2 and 3 of the assessment. WV Afghanistan also wishes to recognize Faraidoon Osmani, Faraidoon Barekzay, Rosanna Keam and Dwain Hindriksen for providing continuous oversight of the assessment process, as well as Ahmad Seyar Haqmal for providing technical input during the initial scoping phase of the assessment, and the Mojtaba Niknam for providing security and logistical support during the assessment design and implementation. Finally, WV Afghanistan would also like to thank WVUS for the financial support for this assessment, as well as Brian Hilton, Food Security Advisor from WV Australia for providing technical insight during the initial scoping phase of the assessment. 2 Lal wa Sar Jangal Comprehensive WASH Needs Assessment Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Background ........................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General ................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Population ........................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Environment and hydrological context ............................................................................................... 9 2.3.1. River Basins ................................................................................................................................. 9 2.3.2. Climate and Precipitation.......................................................................................................... 12 2.3.3. Environmental Concerns ........................................................................................................... 13 2.4 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) ........................................................................................... 13 2.5 Education .......................................................................................................................................... 16 2.6 Economy ............................................................................................................................................ 16 2.7 Health ................................................................................................................................................ 16 2.8 Protection ......................................................................................................................................... 19 2.9 Agriculture, Livelihoods and Energy ................................................................................................. 19 2.10 Security and Accessibility ................................................................................................................ 19 2.11 Infrastructure .................................................................................................................................. 20 2.12 Partners and Governance Structures .............................................................................................. 21 3. Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... 23 3.1 Qualitative Study ............................................................................................................................... 23 3.2 Quantitative Study ............................................................................................................................ 24 3.3 Sampling Strategy ............................................................................................................................. 24 4. Limitations ............................................................................................................................................... 26 5. Results & Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 27 5.1 General .............................................................................................................................................. 27 5.2 Water ................................................................................................................................................ 29 5.3 Sanitation .......................................................................................................................................... 41 5.4 Hygiene ............................................................................................................................................. 45 5.5 Health ................................................................................................................................................ 48 5.6 Environment, Food Security & Livelihoods ....................................................................................... 53 5.7 Education .......................................................................................................................................... 62 3 Lal wa Sar Jangal Comprehensive WASH Needs Assessment 5.8 Cross-cutting themes ........................................................................................................................ 64 5.8.1 Gender ....................................................................................................................................... 64 5.8.2 Peacebuilding & Governance ..................................................................................................... 65 5.8.3 Child Protection ......................................................................................................................... 65 5.8.4 Disasters ..................................................................................................................................... 65 6. Conclusions & Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 67 7. Sources .................................................................................................................................................... 71 8. Appendices .............................................................................................................................................. 72 8. Annex A ................................................................................................................................................... 73 4 Lal wa Sar Jangal Comprehensive WASH Needs Assessment Acronyms ACF Action Contre La Faim ACTD Afghanistan Centre for Training and Development ANSF Afghan National Security Forces AOG Armed Opposition Group ARCS Afghan Red Crescent Society CLTS Community Led Total Sanitation CRS Catholic Relief Services CSO Central Statistics Office DACAAR Danish Committee for Aid to Afghan Refugees DAIL Department of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock DRRD Department of Rural Rehabilitation and Development ETP Evapotranspiration Potential FGD Focus Group Discussion IAM International Assistance Mission JMP Joint Monitoring Programme KIG Key Informant Group KII Key Informant Interview LEPCO Leprosy Control MRRD Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development MUNCH Maternal and Under five Nutrition and Child Health NGO Non-Governmental Organization NSP National Solidarity Program ODF Open Defecation Free ORS Oral Rehydration Salts ORT Oral Rehydration Therapy PHAST Participatory Hygiene and Sanitation Transformation PRA Participatory Rural Appraisal SDG Sustainable Development Goal TDS Total Dissolved Solids UNFPA United Nations Population Fund UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund VIP Ventilated Improved Pit WASH Water, Sanitation and Hygiene WHO World Health Organization WV World Vision WVA World Vision Afghanistan 5 Lal wa Sar Jangal Comprehensive WASH Needs Assessment 1. Introduction In September and October 2016, WV Afghanistan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Poppy Free” Provinces: a Measure Or a Target?
    Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Case Study Series WATER MANAGEMENT, LIVESTOCK AND THE OPIUM ECONOMY “Poppy Free” Provinces: A Measure or a Target? This report is one of seven multi-site case studies undertaken during the second stage of AREU’s three-year study “Applied Thematic Research into Water Management, Livestock and the Opium Economy” (WOL). David Mansfield Funding for this research was provided by the European Commission. May 2009 Editor: Emily Winterbotham Layout: AREU Publications Team © 2009 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the publisher, the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Permission can be obtained by emailing [email protected] or by calling (+93)(0)799 608 548. “Poppy Free” Provinces: A Measure or a Target? About the Author David Mansfield is a specialist on development in drugs-producing environments. He has spent 17 years working in coca- and opium-producing countries, with over ten years experience conducting research into the role of opium in rural livelihood strategies in Afghanistan. About the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) is an independent research organisation based in Kabul. AREU’s mission is to conduct high-quality research that informs and influences policy and practice. AREU also actively promotes a culture of research and learning by strengthening analytical capacity in Afghanistan and facilitating reflection and debate. Fundamental to AREU’s vision is that its work should improve Afghan lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 2013–1124
    Prepared in cooperation with the Afghan Geological Survey under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Defense Task Force for Business and Stability Operations Topographic and Hydrographic GIS Datasets for the Afghan Geological Survey and U.S. Geological Survey 2013 Mineral Areas of Interest Open-File Report 2013–1124 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photo showing mountainous terrain and the alluvial floodplain of a small tributary in the upper reaches of the Kabul River Basin located northeast of Kabul Afghanistan, 2004 (Photograph by Peter G. Chirico, U.S. Geological Survey). Topographic and Hydrographic GIS Datasets for the Afghan Geological Survey and U.S. Geological Survey 2013 Mineral Areas of Interest By Brittany N. Casey and Peter G. Chirico Open-File Report 2013–1124 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND RELATIONS in BAMYAN PROVINCE Findings from a 15 Village Case Study
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics Case Studies Series LAND RELATIONS IN BAMYAN PROVINCE Findings from a 15 village case study Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit By Liz Alden Wily February 2004 Funding for this study was provided by the European Commission, the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan and the governments of Sweden and Switzerland. © 2004 The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU). All rights reserved. This case study report was prepared by an independent consultant. The views and opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of AREU. About the Author Liz Alden Wily is an independent political economist specialising in rural property issues and in the promotion of common property rights and devolved systems for land administration in particular. She gained her PhD in the political economy of land tenure in 1988 from the University of East Anglia, United Kingdom. Since the 1970s, she has worked for ten third world governments, variously providing research, project design, implementation and policy guidance. Dr. Alden Wily has been closely involved in recent years in the strategic and legal reform of land and forest administration in a number of African states. In 2002 the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit invited Dr. Alden Wily to examine land ownership problems in Afghanistan, and she continues to return to follow up on particular concerns. About the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) is an independent research organisation that conducts and facilitates action-oriented research and learning that informs and influences policy and practice.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND RELATIONS in BAMYAN PROVINCE Findings from a 15 Village Case Study
    Case Studies Series LAND RELATIONS IN BAMYAN PROVINCE Findings from a 15 village case study Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit By Liz Alden Wily February 2004 Funding for this study was provided by the European Commission, the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan and the governments of Sweden and Switzerland. © 2004 The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU). All rights reserved. This case study report was prepared by an independent consultant. The views and opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of AREU. About the Author Liz Alden Wily is an independent political economist specialising in rural property issues and in the promotion of common property rights and devolved systems for land administration in particular. She gained her PhD in the political economy of land tenure in 1988 from the University of East Anglia, United Kingdom. Since the 1970s, she has worked for ten third world governments, variously providing research, project design, implementation and policy guidance. Dr. Alden Wily has been closely involved in recent years in the strategic and legal reform of land and forest administration in a number of African states. In 2002 the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit invited Dr. Alden Wily to examine land ownership problems in Afghanistan, and she continues to return to follow up on particular concerns. About the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) is an independent research organisation that conducts and facilitates action-oriented research and learning that informs and influences policy and practice. AREU also actively promotes a culture of research and learning by strengthening analytical capacity in Afghanistan and by creating opportunities for analysis, thought and debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Attacks on Education in Afghanistan Briefing Paper | November 2018
    Attacks on Education in Afghanistan Briefing Paper | November 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Since 2001, Afghanistan’s government has made significant progress in expanding access to education and enabling thousands of children to enroll in school. However, these gains are now at risk. The numbers of children who are out of school are once again rising. The ongoing conflict, increasing insecurity, and, specifically, attacks on education are among the main drivers behind this reversal in enrollment. The current year, 2018, has seen attacks on students, teachers, and schools accelerate dramatically, particularly in areas of the country under the control of or contested by non-state armed groups. The use of schools for election-related purposes has also contributed to large numbers of attacks on education. The Government of Afghanistan has taken some positive steps towards protecting education, particularly by endorsing the Safe Schools Declaration. In the process, it faces extreme challenges. All parties to the conflict must strictly refrain from any attack on education and avoid using schools for either political or military purposes. Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack GCPEA Secretariat: 350 5th Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, New York 10118-3299 Phone: 1.212.377.9446 · Email: [email protected] www.protectingeducation.org Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack ATTACKS ON EDUCATION IN AFGHANISTAN | Briefing Paper | November 2018 educational facilities used for voter registration or polling centers.21 Finally, Afghan National Defence and Security OVERVIEW OF EDUCATION IN AFGHANISTAN Forces and international military forces have been responsible for damage to schools and school closures because of 22 Since 2001, Afghanistan’s government, supported by international donors and international agencies, has made airstrikes, mortars, crossfire.
    [Show full text]
  • Länderinformationen Afghanistan Country
    Staatendokumentation Country of Origin Information Afghanistan Country Report Security Situation (EN) from the COI-CMS Country of Origin Information – Content Management System Compiled on: 17.12.2020, version 3 This project was co-financed by the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund Disclaimer This product of the Country of Origin Information Department of the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum was prepared in conformity with the standards adopted by the Advisory Council of the COI Department and the methodology developed by the COI Department. A Country of Origin Information - Content Management System (COI-CMS) entry is a COI product drawn up in conformity with COI standards to satisfy the requirements of immigration and asylum procedures (regional directorates, initial reception centres, Federal Administrative Court) based on research of existing, credible and primarily publicly accessible information. The content of the COI-CMS provides a general view of the situation with respect to relevant facts in countries of origin or in EU Member States, independent of any given individual case. The content of the COI-CMS includes working translations of foreign-language sources. The content of the COI-CMS is intended for use by the target audience in the institutions tasked with asylum and immigration matters. Section 5, para 5, last sentence of the Act on the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum (BFA-G) applies to them, i.e. it is as such not part of the country of origin information accessible to the general public. However, it becomes accessible to the party in question by being used in proceedings (party’s right to be heard, use in the decision letter) and to the general public by being used in the decision.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDERSTANDING and ADDRESSING CONTEXT in RURAL AFGHANISTAN How Villages Differ and Why
    Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Issues Paper Series UNDERSTANDING AND ADDRESSING CONTEXT IN RURAL AFGHANISTAN How Villages Differ and Why Adam Pain and Paula Kantor December 2010 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Issues Paper Series UNDERSTANDING AND ADDRESSING CONTEXT IN RURAL AFGHANISTAN: How Villages Differ and Why Adam Pain and Paula Kantor Funding for this research was provided by the Economic December 2010 and Social Research Council (ESRC), UK AREU Issues Paper Series Editing: Shannon Mathieu Layout: Oliver Lough Cover Photograph: AREU File Photograph AREU Publication Code: 1046E © 2010 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Some rights reserved. This publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted only for non-commercial purposes and with written credit to AREU and the author. Where this publication is reproduced, stored or transmitted electronically, a link to AREU’s website (www. areu.org.af) should be provided. Any use of this publication falling outside of these permissions requires prior written permission of the publisher, the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Permission can be sought by emailing [email protected] or by calling +93 (0) 799 608 548. UnderstandingSecuring andLife Addressingand Livelihoods Context in Rural in Rural Afghanistan: Afghanistan: The How Role Villages of Social Differ Relationships and Why About the Authors Adam Pain has worked on issues of rural livelihoods in the Himalayan region for the last 20 years. He is a senior research fellow at the Department of International Development, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom, and a visiting professor of rural development at the Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Uppsala.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Report November 2010 - June 2011 (PART II)
    Report Afghanistan: Security Report November 2010 - June 2011 (PART II) Report Afghanistan: Security Report November 2010 – June 2011 (PART II) LANDINFO – 20 SEPTEMBER 2011 1 The Country of Origin Information Centre (Landinfo) is an independent body that collects and analyses information on current human rights situations and issues in foreign countries. It provides the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (Utlendingsdirektoratet – UDI), Norway’s Immigration Appeals Board (Utlendingsnemnda – UNE) and the Norwegian Ministry of Justice and the Police with the information they need to perform their functions. The reports produced by Landinfo are based on information from both public and non-public sources. The information is collected and analysed in accordance with source criticism standards. When, for whatever reason, a source does not wish to be named in a public report, the name is kept confidential. Landinfo’s reports are not intended to suggest what Norwegian immigration authorities should do in individual cases; nor do they express official Norwegian views on the issues and countries analysed in them. © Landinfo 2011 The material in this report is covered by copyright law. Any reproduction or publication of this report or any extract thereof other than as permitted by current Norwegian copyright law requires the explicit written consent of Landinfo. For information on all of the reports published by Landinfo, please contact: Landinfo Country of Origin Information Centre Storgata 33A P.O. Box 8108 Dep NO-0032 Oslo Norway Tel: +47 23 30 94 70 Fax: +47 23 30 90 00 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.landinfo.no Report Afghanistan: Security Report November 2010 – June 2011 (PART II) LANDINFO – 20 SEPTEMBER 2011 2 SUMMARY The security situation in most parts of Afghanistan is deteriorating, with the exception of some of the big cities and parts of the central region.
    [Show full text]
  • Transition to Afghan Lead: Inteqal
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization Media Backgrounder Transition to Afghan lead: Inteqal Inteqal - the Dari and Pashtu word for Transition – is the process by which security responsibility for Afghanistan is gradually transitioned from NATO/ISAF to Afghan leadership. Key dates: 28 August 2008: Lead security responsibility for Kabul city transferred to Afghan Forces 19 November 2009: President Karzai, having won a second Presidential term, expresses his ambition to see the Afghan National Security Forces take the lead security responsibility across Afghanistan by the end of 2014 20 July 2010: Kabul Conference. The Joint Afghan-NATO Inteqal Board (JANIB) is established as the mechanism to assess districts and provinces for transition 20 November 2010: NATO Lisbon Summit. The Inteqal process is agreed between the Afghan Government and NATO Bamyan Provincial Governor Dr. Sarabi 22 March 2011: Afghan New Year. President Karzai announces the first set of Afghan districts and provinces to start the addresses attendees during the Transition ceremony in Bamyan Province. Transition process 17 July 2011: First Transition ceremony takes place, in Bamyan province October 2011: Afghan Government to announce the second tranche of Transition “Afghanistan’s Transition Tranche 1 On 22 March 2011, President Karzai announced the first set of Afghan districts and provinces to start Transition. This decision drew future is clear: on the assessment and recommendations of the Afghan Government and NATO/ISAF through the Joint Afghan-NATO Inteqal a country led Board (JANIB). Based upon operational, political and economic considerations, the following areas were identified for inclusion in the first ‘tranche’ by Afghans, of Transition: Bamyan province (all districts), Panjshir province (all districts), Kabul province (all districts except Surobi), as well as the municipalities of Mazar-e-Sharif (Balkh province), Herat (Herat province), Lashkar Gah (Helmand province) and Mehtar Lam defended by (Laghman province).
    [Show full text]
  • Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR)
    SIGAR SIGAR SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL Special Inspector General for JAN 30 FOR AFGHANISTAN RECONSTRUCTION Afghanistan Reconstruction 2019 | 2530 Crystal Drive REPORT QUARTERLY SIGAR Arlington, VA 22202 www.sigar.mil QUARTERLY REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS UNITED STATES FRAUD, WASTE, OR ABUSE MAY BE REPORTED TO SIGAR’S HOTLINE By phone: Afghanistan Cell: 0700107300 DSN: 318-237-3912 ext. 7303 All voicemail is in Dari, Pashto, and English. By phone: United States Toll-free: 866-329-8893 | DSN: 312-664-0378 30, 2019 JANUARY All voicemail is in English and answered during business hours. By fax: 703-601-4065 By e-mail: [email protected] By Web submission: www.sigar.mil/investigations/hotline/report-fraud.aspx 1 SIGAR Report Fraud, Waste or Abuse The National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2008 (Pub. L. No. 110- 181) established the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR). SIGAR’s oversight mission, as defined by the legislation, is to provide for the independent and objective • conduct and supervision of audits and investigations relating to the programs and operations funded with amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for the reconstruction of Afghanistan. • leadership and coordination of, and recommendations on, policies designed to promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in the administration of the programs and operations, and to prevent and detect waste, fraud, and abuse in such programs and operations. • means of keeping the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense fully and currently informed about problems and deficiencies relating to the administration of such programs and operation and the necessity for and progress on corrective action.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Storage Transforms Potato Crop
    AGRICULTURAL BEHAVIOR CHANGE: BRIEF 1 AFGHANISTAN: POTATOES Improved storage transforms potato crop Figure 1: Traditional potato storage pit. The potato is the only cash crop available to most households in the Central Highlands of Afghanistan. Production is restricted by an inability to effectively store both seed and Highlights ware (eating) potatoes, with the result that poor‑quality seed is used at planting and Storage losses fell to less than 5 percent from more most of the crop must be sold at harvest when prices are low. than 40 percent Traditional practices Crop yields in the subsequent year rose by Farmers traditionally store potatoes not intended for immediate household consumption between 15 and 88 percent in pits dug in or near the field at harvest. Potatoes are placed in the pit and the tubers Farmers adapted the covered with a thick layer of soil to prevent freezing (Figure 1). Due to snow cover, pits practice for the storage of cannot be opened for inspection or partial removal of the tubers during the winter, so ware potatoes there is a risk of extensive damage due to water penetration, frost and disease. The value of potatoes doubled in the 6 months of Assessments confirmed the general perception that winter storage losses of potatoes storage ranged from 40 percent to as much as 100 percent, together with a serious loss in quality There was a high replication rate within for the remaining potatoes. The losses were due to the living potato tuber respiring in store, target villages and giving off heat and moisture, enabling the development of bacterial and fungal decay.
    [Show full text]
  • The ANSO Report (16-31 January 2011)
    The Afghanistan NGO Safety Office Issue: 66 16-31 January 2011 ANSO and our donors accept no liability for the results of any activity conducted or omitted on the basis of this report. THE ANSO REPORT -Not for copy or sale- Inside this Issue COUNTRY SUMMARY Central Region 2 The targeting of military and less than the 60% growth While the circumstances 6 Northern Region political leadership by both noted in the January 2009- surrounding the murder of Western Region 11 sides of the conflict was a 2010 rate comparison. a female NGO staff mem- regular feature of reporting in While this can be attributed ber in Parwan this period Eastern Region 14 2010. Early indicators sug- to a variety of factors, the remain unclear, it does Southern Region 19 gest that this year will follow key variables are the sus- mark the first casualty for in a similar vain, supported tained IMF/ANSF opera- the community this year. 24 ANSO Info Page by the killing of the Kanda- tional levels over the past As well, it accounts for the har Deputy Provincial Gov- few months as well as the first NGO incident to oc- ernor (IED strike) this pe- ‘saturation’ that has been cur outside of the North. YOU NEED TO KNOW riod. This incident also reached in many of the key Last year, this region ac- marks the most senior local contested areas. Nonethe- counted for over 40% of • Targeting of the political & official hit since the death of less, the January figures all NGO incidents, and military leadership by both parties of the conflict the Kunduz Provincial Gov- provides a glimpse into the January figures are sugges- ernor in October of last year.
    [Show full text]