DE NEDERLANDSE NAMEN. Van De Kleine Vlinders

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DE NEDERLANDSE NAMEN. Van De Kleine Vlinders DE NEDERLANDSE NAMEN van de kleine vlinders (microlepidoptera) in Nederland en België Nederlandse namen van de microlepidoptera Eindredactie: T.S.T. Muus & J.H.H. Zwier Samenstelling: Namens de Nederlandse Entomologische Vereniging, C. Gielis F. Groenen M.C.M. Jansen K.J. Huisman J.C. Koster T.S.T. Muus E.J. van Nieukerken M.J. van der Straten J.H.H. Zwier [email protected] 30 oktober 2009 Voorzijde: Thisanotia chrysonuchella, door J.C. Koster. Fotografie in deze uitgave door T.S.T. Muus. 2 Nederlandse namen van de microlepidoptera Inhoud 1. Inleiding.................................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Richtlijnen en methodiek ......................................................................................................................... 5 3. Bronnen.................................................................................................................................................... 9 4. Naamlijst van de Nederlandse soorten.................................................................................................. 10 Micropterigidae – oermotten ........................................................................................................... 10 Eriocraniidae – purpermotten........................................................................................................... 10 Opostegidae – oogklepmotten ......................................................................................................... 10 Nepticulidae – dwergmineermotten................................................................................................. 10 Heliozelidae – zilvervlekmotten ........................................................................................................ 12 Adelidae – langsprietmotten ............................................................................................................ 12 Incurvariidae – witvlekmotten.......................................................................................................... 13 Prodoxidae – yuccamotten ............................................................................................................... 13 Tischeriidae – vlekmijnmotten.......................................................................................................... 13 Tineidae – echte motten ................................................................................................................... 13 Lypusidae – schijn‐zakdragers............................................................................................................ 14 Psychidae – zakdragers..................................................................................................................... 14 Douglasiidae – lepelmotten .............................................................................................................. 15 Bucculatricidae – ooglapmotten....................................................................................................... 15 Gracillariidae – mineermotten .......................................................................................................... 15 Yponomeutidae – spinselmotten...................................................................................................... 18 Ypsolophidae – spitskopmotten........................................................................................................ 19 Plutellidae – springmotten................................................................................................................ 19 Glyphipterigidae – parelmotten........................................................................................................ 19 Heliodinidae – roestmotten .............................................................................................................. 20 Bedelliidae – venstermineermotten.................................................................................................. 20 Lyonetiidae – sneeuwmotten............................................................................................................ 19 Oecophoridae – sikkelmotten........................................................................................................... 20 Chimabachidae – kortvleugelmotten................................................................................................ 22 Elachistidae – grasmineermotten ..................................................................................................... 22 Agonoxenidae – kwastmotten.......................................................................................................... 23 Coleophoridae – kokermotten.......................................................................................................... 23 Batrachedridae – smalvleugelmotten............................................................................................... 25 Momphidae – wilgenroosjesmotten................................................................................................. 25 Cosmopterigidae – prachtmotten..................................................................................................... 26 Scythrididae – dikkopmotten............................................................................................................ 26 Autostichidae – dominomotten ........................................................................................................ 26 Blastobasidae – spaandermotten ..................................................................................................... 26 Gelechiidae – palpmotten................................................................................................................. 26 Tortricidae – bladrollers.................................................................................................................... 29 Choreutidae – glittermotten............................................................................................................. 38 Schreckensteiniidae – gevorkte motten ........................................................................................... 38 Epermeniidae – borstelmotten ......................................................................................................... 38 Alucitidae – waaiermotten ............................................................................................................... 38 Pterophoridae – vedermotten .......................................................................................................... 38 Pyralidae – lichtmotten..................................................................................................................... 39 Crambidae – grasmotten.................................................................................................................. 41 5. Appendix van de Belgische soorten........................................................................................................ 44 3 Nederlandse namen van de microlepidoptera 1. Inleiding Op 27 september 2003 organiseerde de Nederlandse Entomologische Vereniging een studiemiddag over Nederlandse insectennamen met de mooie titel: “Letterzetter of weeskind? ” De inleiders op deze bijeenkomst hadden allemaal op de een of andere manier ervaring met het geven van Nederlandse namen aan de dieren uit de groepen waarin ze zich gespecialiseerd hadden. Enkele van de deelnemers vroegen zich af waarom die naamgeving toch eigenlijk nodig was: er waren toch wetenschappelijke namen. Uit de discussie, die hierop ontstond, kwam een aantal argumenten naar voren die aangeven waarom het gebruik van Nederlandse namen toch wenselijk zou kunnen zijn: - De natuurbescherming is gediend met Nederlandse namen, omdat er een weerzin is tegen de zogenaamd moeilijke wetenschappelijke namen en dat mag geen hinderpaal zijn bij het beschermen van deze dieren; - Beleidsambtenaren c.q. rapportschrijvers vragen er om voor het schrijven van hun adviezen; - Er is duidelijk een vraag uit de “markt” op dit gebied en die mogen we niet negeren. Zo vraagt men bv. tijdens een excursie bijna altijd naar een Nederlandse naam; - In Engeland, Duitsland en Zweden is een lange traditie in het gebruik van namen in de eigen taalen waarom zou dat hier niet kunnen. Hoe je ook over Nederlandse namen en over het gebruik daarvan denkt, hier staan toch op zijn minst argumenten, die het overdenken waard zijn. Daar komt nog bij dat de digitale fotografie en de computer steeds meer ingang vonden. Mensen willen bij hun foto’s graag een naam hebben en dan het liefst geen wetenschappelijke naam. Vaak bedenken zij ook zelf namen, die niet altijd even gelukkig zijn. In de hierboven genoemde bijeenkomst bleek dat bij de naamgeving verschillende opvattingen waren. De een ging niet verder dan de familie of het genus en de ander daalde af tot op het soortniveau, waarbij wel rekening gehouden werd met de naam van de familie of het genus. Sommigen gingen te rade bij streektalen, anderen waren alert op nieuwe namen die spontaan tijdens excursies of bij bv. een plaag ontstonden. De inleiders drukten de leden van de N.E.V. op het hart het voortouw te nemen voordat anderen dat zouden doen. Een aantal mensen, dat de microlepidoptera tot studieterrein gekozen heeft, neemt nu het initiatief door deze lijst te publiceren in de hoop dat dit uiteindelijk het definitieve richtsnoer zal zijn bij het gebruik van Nederlandse namen voor
Recommended publications
  • Supplementmaterial S2.Pdf
    Mitt. Münch. Ent. Ges. 106 Suppl. S2 1-10 München, 15.02.2016 Systematische, revidierte und kommentierte Checkliste der Schmetterlinge Bayerns (Insecta: Lepidoptera) Alfred HASLBERGER & Andreas H. SEGERER Supplementmaterial S2 Zusammenstellung der in vorliegender Arbeit publizierten regionalen Neu- und Wiederfunde. S2.1 Neufunde für die Bayerischen Alpen und/oder das Alpenvorland (AVA) Nr. FauEu Überfamilie Familie Art 0016 431725 Eriocranioidea Eriocraniidae Dyseriocrania subpurpurella (HAWORTH, 1828) 0026 431739 Eriocranioidea Eriocraniidae Eriocrania semipurpurella (STEPHENS, 1835) 0058 431808 Nepticuloidea Nepticulidae Stigmella aceris (FREY, 1857) 0080 431900 Nepticuloidea Nepticulidae Stigmella myrtillella (STAINTON, 1857) 0089 431932 Nepticuloidea Nepticulidae Stigmella splendidissimella (HERRICH-SCHÄFFER, 1855) 0125 432021 Nepticuloidea Nepticulidae Ectoedemia decentella (HERRICH-SCHÄFFER, 1855) 0133 432060 Nepticuloidea Nepticulidae Ectoedemia hannoverella (GLITZ, 1872) 0158 432282 Adeloidea Heliozelidae Heliozela resplendella (STAINTON, 1851) 0182 432335 Adeloidea Adelidae Adela cuprella (DENIS & SCHIFFERMÜLLER, 1775) 0202 432387 Adeloidea Incurvariidae Incurvaria pectinea HAWORTH, 1828 0230 432437 Tischerioidea Tischeriidae Coptotriche marginea (HAWORTH, 1828) 0331 433122 Tineoidea Tineidae Nemapogon granella (LINNAEUS, 1758) 0355 432916 Tineoidea Tineidae Monopis weaverella (SCOTT, 1858) 0371 433010 Tineoidea Tineidae Tinea columbariella WOCKE, 1877 0373 433015 Tineoidea Tineidae Tinea trinotella THUNBERG, 1794 0394 433489
    [Show full text]
  • Motyle (Lepidoptera) Parku Krajobrazowego Cysterskie Kompozycje Krajobrazowe Rud Wielkich
    ROCZNIK MUZEUM GÓRNOŚLĄSKIEGO W BYTOMIU PRZYRODA Vol. 26 (online 001): 1–40 ISSN 0068-466X, eISSN 2451-0467 (online) Bytom, 10.04.2020 Jacek Maroń1, Adam Larysz2 Motyle (Lepidoptera) Parku Krajobrazowego Cysterskie Kompozycje Krajobrazowe Rud Wielkich http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3747209 1 ul. Kuglera 9, 44-207 Rybnik, Polska, e-mail: [email protected] 2 Dział Przyrody, Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomu, pl. Jana III Sobieskiego 2, 41-902 Bytom, Polska, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The Butterflies and Moths (Lepidoptera) of the Cysterskie Kompozycje Krajobrazowe Rud Wielkich Landscape Park. The paper presents the research on Lepidoptera in Cysterskie Kompozycje Krajobrazowe Rud Wielkich Landscape Park between 1982 and 2019. The material was collected at nine selected sites, mainly in various forest environments. Overall, 1162 species in 66 families were recorded and listed, including 26 species new to the Province of Silesia. Key words: Lepidoptera, list of species, Cysterskie Kompozycje Krajobrazowe Rud Wielkich Landscape Park, biodiversity. WSTĘP Park Krajobrazowy Cysterskie Kompozycje Krajobrazowe Rud Wielkich (PK CKKRW) położony jest w południowo-zachodniej części województwa śląskiego i zajmuje wschodnią część Kotliny Raciborskiej oraz północne fragmenty Płaskowyżu Rybnickiego. Powstał na mocy Rozporządzenia Wojewody Katowickiego Nr 181/93 z dnia 23 listopada 1993 roku. Powierzchnia Parku wynosi 493,87 km², a strefa ochronna to obszar 140,10 km². Dominują tu drzewostany sosnowe, rosnące na siedliskach borowych, wykształconych na glebach bielicowych, a także wprowadzone sztucznie na siedliska żyznych lasów liściastych. Najbogatszym przyrodniczo terenem w obrębie Parku jest kompleks leśno-stawowy Łężczok w okolicach Raciborza, będący jedynym rezerwatem w granicach Parku. MATERIAŁ I METODY PROWADZENIA BADAŃ Stopień poznania entomofauny PK CKKRW jest niezadawalający, a dane dotyczące występowania poszczególnych gatunków są fragmentaryczne i rozproszone.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Tineidae
    Beitr. Ent. Keltern ISSN 0005 - 805X 56 (2006) 1 S. 213-229 15.08.2006 Some new or poorly known tineids from Central Asia, the Russian Far East and China (Lepidoptera: T in e id a e ) With 18 figures R e in h a r d G a e d ik e Summary Results are presented of the examination of tineid material from the Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki (FMNH) and the Institute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Zoological Museum Novosibirsk (SZMN). As new species are described Tinea albomaculata from China, Tinea fiiscocostalis from Russia, Tinea kasachica from Kazachstan, and Monopis luteocostalis from Russia. The previously unknown male of Tinea semifulvelloides is described. New records for several countries for 15 species are established. Zusammenfassung Es werden die Ergebnisse der Untersuchung von Tineidenmaterial aus dem Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki (FMNH), und aus dem Institute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Zoological Museum Novosibirsk (SZMN) vorgelegt. Als neu werden beschrieben Tinea albom aculata aus China, Tinea fuscocostalis aus Russland, Tinea kasachica aus Kasachstan und Monopis luteocostalis aus Russland. Von Tinea semifitlvelloides war es möglich, das bisher unbekannte Männchen zu beschreiben. Neufunde für verschiede­ ne Länder wurden für 15 Arten festgestellt. Keywords Tineidae, faunistics, taxonomy, four new species, new records, Palaearctic region. My collègue L a u r i K a il a from the Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki (FMNH) was so kind as to send me undetermined Tineidae, collected by several Finnish entomologists during recent years in various parts of Russia (Siberia, Buryatia, Far East), in Central Asia, and China.
    [Show full text]
  • Schutz Des Naturhaushaltes Vor Den Auswirkungen Der Anwendung Von Pflanzenschutzmitteln Aus Der Luft in Wäldern Und Im Weinbau
    TEXTE 21/2017 Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit Forschungskennzahl 3714 67 406 0 UBA-FB 002461 Schutz des Naturhaushaltes vor den Auswirkungen der Anwendung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln aus der Luft in Wäldern und im Weinbau von Dr. Ingo Brunk, Thomas Sobczyk, Dr. Jörg Lorenz Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften, Institut für Forstbotanik und Forstzoologie, Tharandt Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes Impressum Herausgeber: Umweltbundesamt Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau Tel: +49 340-2103-0 Fax: +49 340-2103-2285 [email protected] Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt Durchführung der Studie: Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften, Institut für Forstbotanik und Forstzoologie, Professur für Forstzoologie, Prof. Dr. Mechthild Roth Pienner Straße 7 (Cotta-Bau), 01737 Tharandt Abschlussdatum: Januar 2017 Redaktion: Fachgebiet IV 1.3 Pflanzenschutz Dr. Mareike Güth, Dr. Daniela Felsmann Publikationen als pdf: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen ISSN 1862-4359 Dessau-Roßlau, März 2017 Das diesem Bericht zu Grunde liegende Vorhaben wurde mit Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit unter der Forschungskennzahl 3714 67 406 0 gefördert. Die Verantwortung für den Inhalt dieser Veröffentlichung liegt bei den Autorinnen und Autoren. UBA Texte Entwicklung geeigneter Risikominimierungsansätze für die Luftausbringung von PSM Kurzbeschreibung Die Bekämpfung
    [Show full text]
  • Sborník SM 2013.Indb
    Sborník Severočeského Muzea, Přírodní Vědy, Liberec, 31: 67–168, 2013 ISBN 978-80-87266-13-7 Příspěvek k fauně motýlů (Lepidoptera) severních Čech – I On the lepidopteran fauna (Lepidoptera) of northern Bohemia – I Jan Šumpich1), Miroslav Žemlička2) & Ivo Dvořák3) 1) CZ-582 61 Česká Bělá 212; e-mail: [email protected] 2) Družstevní 34/8, CZ-412 01 Litoměřice 3) Vrchlického 29, CZ-586 01 Jihlava; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Faunistic records of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) found at nine localities of northern Bohemia (Czech Republic) are presented. In total, 1258 species were found, of which 527 species were recorded in Želiňský meandr (Kadaň environs), 884 species in the Oblík National Nature Reserve (Raná environs), 313 species in the Velký vrch National Nature Monument (Louny environs), 367 species in the Třtěnské stráně Nature Monument (Třtěno environs), 575 species in Eváňská rokle (Eváň environs), 332 species in Údolí Podbrádeckého potoka (Mšené-lázně environs), 376 species in Vrbka (Budyně nad Ohří environs), 467 species in Holý vrch (Encovany environs) and 289 species in Skalky u Třebutiček (Encovany environs). The records of Triaxomasia caprimulgella (Stainton, 1851), Cephimallota praetoriella (Christoph, 1872), Niphonympha dealbatella (Zeller, 1847), Oegoconia caradjai Popescu- Gorj & Capuse, 1965, Fabiola pokornyi (Nickerl, 1864), Hypercallia citrinalis (Scopoli, 1763), Pelochrista obscura Kuznetsov, 1978, Thymelicus acteon (Rottemburg, 1775), Satyrium spini (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775), Pseudo- philotes vicrama (Moore, 1865), Polyommatus damon (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775), Melitaea aurelia Nickerl, 1850, Hipparchia semele (Linnaeus, 1758), Chazara briseis (Linnaeus, 1764), Pyralis perversalis (Herrich-Schäffer, 1849), Gnophos dumetata Treitschke, 1827, Watsonarctia casta (Esper, 1785), Euchalcia consona (Fabricius, 1787), Oria musculosa (Hübner, 1808) and Oligia fasciuncula (Haworth, 1809) are exceptionally significant in a broader context, not only in terms of the fauna of northern Bohemia.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Forest Insect Disturbance Under Climate Change
    PREDICTING FOREST INSECT DISTURBANCE UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE Allan L. Carroll University of British Columbia Department of Forest Sciences 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z4 Tel: 1-604-822-3360 Fax: 1-604-822-9102 Email: [email protected] 1 ABSTRACT This paper comprises a review of literature regarding climate change impacts to forest insect disturbances. Its primary objectives were three-fold. First, commonalities were sought among systems regarding the effects associated with altered temperature and/or precipitation patterns on forest insect herbivores, the proximate and ultimate form of the response by the insects, and the outcome in terms of forest disturbance. Second, a general framework within which to assess future disturbances to temperate and boreal forests by insect herbivores was constructed. Finally, uncertainty regarding predictions of the extent/severity of forest insect disturbances under climate change into the future was discussed. 2 INTRODUCTION There is now ample evidence that recent climatic changes have affected a broad range of organisms in a manner consistent with expectations from a warming environment (reviewed by Walther et al. 2002, Parmesan and Yohe 2003, Root et al. 2003, Hickling et al. 2006, Post et al. 2009, Robinet and Roques 2010, Wolken et al. 2011). In fact, evidence has accumulated indicating direct effects of anthropogenic climate change on every continent, in every ocean and in most major taxonomic groups (Parmesan 2006). Among the major taxonomic groups in which impacts of global warming have been most frequently documented are the insects. Terrestrial insects are sensitive indicators of changes to the condition of abiotic and biotic systems (McGeoch 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Travaux Scientifiques Du Parc National De La Vanoise : BUVAT (R.), 1972
    ISSN 0180-961 X a Vanoise .'.Parc National du de la Recueillis et publiés sous la direction de Emmanuel de GUILLEBON Directeur du Parc national et Ch. DEGRANGE Professeur honoraire à l'Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble Ministère de l'Environnement Direction de la Nature et des Paysages Cahiers du Parc National de la Vanoise 135 rue du Docteur Julliand Boîte Postale 706 F-73007 Chambéry cedex ISSN 0180-961 X © Parc national de la Vanoise, Chambéry, France, 1995 SOMMAIRE COMPOSITION DU COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE ........................................................................................................ 5 LECTURE CRITIQUE DES ARTICLES .......................................................................................................................... 6 LISTE DES COLLABORATEURS DU VOLUME ..................................................................................................... 6 EN HOMMAGE : ]V[arius HUDRY (1915-1994) ........................................................................................... 7 CONTRIBUTIONS SCIENTIFIQUES M. HUDRY (+). - Vanoise : son étymologie .................................................................................. 8 J. DEBELMAS et J.-P. EAMPNOUX. - Notice explicative de la carte géolo- gique simplifiée du Parc national de la Vanoise et de sa zone périphé- rique (Savoie) ......................................................................................................,.........................................^^ 16 G. NlCOUD, S. FUDRAL, L. JUIF et J.-P. RAMPNOUX. - Hydrogéologie
    [Show full text]
  • Insekt-Nytt • 37 (4) 2012
    Insekt-Nytt • 37 (4) 2012 Insekt-Nytt presenterer populærvitenskape lige Insekt-Nytt • 37 (4) 2012 oversikts- og tema-artikler om insekters (inkl. edderkoppdyr og andre landleddyr) økologi, Medlemsblad for Norsk entomologisk systematikk, fysiologi, atferd, dyregeografi etc. forening Likeledes trykkes artslister fra ulike områder og habitater, ekskursjons rap por ter, naturvern-, Redaktør: nytte- og skadedyrstoff, bibliografier, biografier, Anders Endrestøl his to rikk, «anek do ter», innsamlings- og prepa re- rings tek nikk, utstyrstips, bokanmeldelser m.m. Redaksjon: Vi trykker også alle typer stoff som er relatert Lars Ove Hansen til Norsk entomologisk forening og dets lokal- Jan Arne Stenløkk av de linger: årsrapporter, regnskap, møte- og Leif Aarvik ekskur sjons-rapporter,­­ debattstoff etc. Opprop og Halvard Hatlen kon taktannonser er gratis for foreningens med lem- Hallvard Elven mer. Språket er norsk (svensk eller dansk) gjerne med et kort engelsk abstract for større artik ler. Nett-redaktør: Hallvard Elven Våre artikler refereres i Zoological record. Insekt-Nytt vil prøve å finne sin nisje der vi Adresse: ikke overlapper med vår forenings fagtidsskrift Insekt-Nytt, v/ Anders Endrestøl, Norwegian­­ Journal of Entomology. Origi na le NINA Oslo, vitenskapelige undersøkelser, nye arter for ulike Gaustadalléen 21, faunaregioner og Norge går fortsatt til dette. 0349 Oslo Derimot tar vi gjerne artikler som omhandler Tlf.: 99 45 09 17 «interessante og sjeldne funn», notater om arters [Besøksadr.: Gaustadalléen 21, 0349 Oslo] habitatvalg og levevis etc., selv om det nødven- E-mail: [email protected] digvis ikke er «nytt». Sats, lay-out, paste-up: Redaksjonen Annonsepriser: 1/2 side kr. 1000,– Trykk: Nordberg Aksidenstrykkeri AS, Oslo 1/1 side kr.
    [Show full text]
  • Vorarlbergs (Österreich) - Erkenntnisse Und Rückschlüsse : Supplement 2 1-29 Huemer, P
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Inatura Forschung online Jahr/Year: 2015 Band/Volume: 15_Supp2 Autor(en)/Author(s): Huemer Peter, Hebert Paul D. N. Artikel/Article: DNA-Barcoding der Schmetterlinge (Lepidoptera) Vorarlbergs (Österreich) - Erkenntnisse und Rückschlüsse : Supplement 2 1-29 Huemer, P. & Hebert, P.D.N. (2015): «DNA-Barcoding der Schmetterlinge (Lepidoptera) Vorarlbergs (Österreich) - Erkenntnisse und Rückschlüsse». inatura – Forschung online, Nr. 15, Suppl. 2: 29 S. DNA-Barcoding der Schmetterlinge (Lepidoptera) Nr. 15 - 2015 Vorarlbergs (Österreich) - Erkenntnisse und Suppl. 2 Rückschlüsse : Supplement 2 Peter Huemer1 & Paul D. N. Hebert2 1 Dr. Peter Huemer, Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen, Tiroler Landesmuseen Betriebsges.m.b.H., Feldstr. 11a, A-6020 Innsbruck. E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Prof. Dr. Paul D. N. Hebert, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada. Anhangstabelle 2 Minimale genetische Distanzen zum jeweils Nächsten Nachbarn für 1497 Schmetterlingsarten aus Vorarlberg Familie Art Nächster Nachbar (NN) Distanz NN Adelidae Adela albicinctella Adela cuprella 2,51 Adelidae Adela cuprella Adela albicinctella 2,51 Adelidae Adela reaumurella Adela cuprella 7,15 Adelidae Cauchas rufimitrella Adela reaumurella 9,91 Adelidae Nematopogon metaxella Nematopogon schwarziellus 7,78 Adelidae Nematopogon pilella Nematopogon robertella 8,1 Adelidae Nematopogon
    [Show full text]
  • Heggeneset I Seljord, Telemark – En Hotspot for Sommerfugler
    Insekt-Nytt • 42 (1) 2017 Insekt-Nytt presenterer populærvitenskape lige Insekt-Nytt • 42 (1) 2017 oversikts- og tema-artikler om insekters (inkl. edderkoppdyr og andre landleddyr) økologi, Medlemsblad for systematikk, fysiologi, atferd, dyregeografi etc. Norsk entomologisk forening Likeledes trykkes artslister fra ulike områder og habitater, ekskursjons rap por ter, naturvern-, Redaktør: nytte- og skadedyrstoff, bibliografier, biografier, Anders Endrestøl his to rikk, «anek do ter», innsamlings- og prepa re- rings tek nikk, utstyrstips, bokanmeldelser m.m. Redaksjon: Vi trykker også alle typer stoff som er relatert Lars Ove Hansen til Norsk entomologisk forening og dets lokal- Jan Arne Stenløkk av de linger: årsrapporter, regnskap, møte- og Leif Aarvik ekskur sjons-rapporter,­­ debattstoff etc. Opprop og Halvard Hatlen kon taktannonser er gratis for foreningens med lem- Hallvard Elven mer. Språket er norsk (svensk eller dansk) gjerne med et kort engelsk abstract for større artik ler. Nett-redaktør: Hallvard Elven Våre artikler refereres i Zoological record. Insekt-Nytt vil prøve å finne sin nisje der vi Adresse: ikke overlapper med vår forenings fagtidsskrift Insekt-Nytt, v/ Anders Endrestøl, Norwegian­­ Journal of Entomology. Origi na le NINA Oslo, vitenskapelige undersøkelser, nye arter for ulike Gaustadalléen 21, faunaregioner og Norge går fortsatt til dette. 0349 Oslo Derimot tar vi gjerne artikler som omhandler Tlf.: 99 45 09 17 «interessante og sjeldne funn», notater om arters [Besøksadr.: Gaustadalléen 21, 0349 Oslo] habitatvalg og levevis etc., selv om det nødven- E-mail: [email protected] digvis ikke er «nytt». Sats, lay-out, paste-up: Anders Endrestøl Annonsepriser: 1/2 side kr. 1000,– Trykk: Gamlebyen Grafiske AS, Oslo 1/1 side kr.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Effects on Eruptive Forest Insects: a R Eview and Synthesis of Empirical Evidence
    CLIMATE CHANGE EFFECTS ON ERUPTIVE FOREST INSECTS: A REVIEW AND SYNTHESIS OF EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FRST 498 AMBERLY MARCINIAK ABSTRACT Global climate change is affecting ecosystems through warming temperatures, changing precipitation, and increasing climatic variability. One of the major impacts is the alteration of forest disturbance regimes, including forest insect outbreaks that cause landscape-scale tree mortality and significantly affect the composition, function, and socioeconomic value of forests. Many studies have been conducted and models created to predict how future climate change may affect forest insects, but it may also be useful to determine how insects have already responded in order to detect where knowledge may be lacking and which species may be of most concern in future forest management. For this thesis, research papers providing empirical evidence to show a definitive climate change effect on an eruptive forest insect were identified and reviewed. The selected papers were then synthesized into a predictive framework for the likely responses of specific forest insect groups or species to changes in temperature or precipitation. Bark beetles and defoliators were the two functional groups for which evidence was found. All evidence pointed to bark beetle species responding positively to warming temperatures and decreasing precipitation through range expansion and increases in outbreak extent and severity. Evidence was less straightforward for defoliators, as some species, but not all, showed a negative response to warmer
    [Show full text]