DOCSLIB.ORG

Index to Cecidology up to Vol. 31 (2016)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Index to Cecidology Up to Vol. 31 (2016) This index has been based on the contents of the papers rather than on their actual titles in order to facilitate the finding of papers on particular subjects. The figures following each entry are the year of publication, the volume and, in brackets, the number of the relevant issue. Aberbargoed Grasslands: report of 2011 field meeting 2012 27 (1) Aberrant Plantains 99 14(2) Acacia species galled by Fungi in India 2014 29(2) Acer gall mites (with illustrations) 2013 28(1) Acer galls: felt galls re-visited 2005 20(2) Acer saccharinum – possibly galled by Dasineura aceris new to Britain 2017 32(1) Acer seed midge 2009 24(1) Aceria anceps new to Ireland 2005 20 (1) Aceria geranii from North Wales 1999 14(2) Aceria heteronyx galling twigs of Norway Maple 2014 29(1) Aceria ilicis (gall mite) galling holm oak flowers in Brittany 1997 12(1) In Ireland 2010 25(1) Aceria mites on sycamore 2005 20(2) Aceria populi galling aspen in Scotland 2000 15(2) Aceria pterocaryae new to the British mite fauna 2008 23(2) Aceria rhodiolae galling roseroot 2013 28(1): 2016 31(1) Aceria rhodiolae in West Sutherland 2014 29(1) Aceria tristriata on Walnut 2007 22(2) Acericecis campestre sp. nov. on Field Maple 2004 19(2) Achillea ptarmica (sneezewort) galled by Macrosiphoniella millefolii 1993 8(2) Acorn galls on red oak 2014 29(1) Acorn stalks: peculiar elongation 2002 17(2) Aculops fuchsiae – a fuchsia-galling mite new to Britain 2008 23 (1) Aculus magnirostris new to Ireland 2005 20 (1) Acumyia acericola – the Acer seed midge 2009 24(1) Adelges galls on Spruce 2014 29(1) African Nematode Gall (Subanguina guizotiae) on the Isle of Wight 2014 29(1) Agapanthus – a new gall midge 2016 31 (1) Agathomyia wankowiczi (Diptera: Platypezidae) galling fungi 1991 6(2): 1994 9(1): 2014 29(1) Agrobacterium tumefasciens: gall induction & host-range 1988 3(2) Alder galled by Taphrina amentorum 1999 14(2), 2001 16(1) Alders galled by Taphrina alni 2010 25(1) Aleppo Galls & Ink 1992 7(1) Algae as gall-causers: at least 6 British species of marine algae cause galls on other seaweeds 1993 8(2) Algae: a checklist of galls on these organisms 2009 24(2) Algae galled by crustaceans 1994 9(1) Algae: a possible fungus gall on Vaucheria 2006 21(2) Amorophora rubi on bramble 1999 14 (1) Andricus aestivalis (the sexual generation of A. lucidus) established in Britain 2002 17(1) Andricus ambiguus in Britain (not A. corruptrix) 2001 16 (1) Andricus ambiguus - the ambiguus/corruptrix controversy continues 2002 17(1) Andricus aries: New to Britain? 1999 14 (1) in North Essex 2002 17(2) in Shropshire 2010 25(1) in The Netherlands 2004 19 (1) recent range expansion in Continental Europe 2001 16(2) sexual generation occurs on Turkey oak 2001 16(2) spreading around London 2000 15(2) 1 Andricus corruptrix on the increase 1997 12(1) in Norfolk 1999 14 (1) in the West Midlands 1998 13 (2) it’s not Andricus corruptrix after all 2001 16 (1) rare or merely rarely seen? 1992 7(1) sticking up for Andricus corruptrix - the corruptrix/ambiguus controversy continues 2002 17(1) Andricus cryptobius possibly new to Britain 2015 30 (2) Andricus curvator on the increase 1998 13(2) Andricus curvator: some unusual examples 2004 19 (1) Adricus gemmeus new to Britain 2009 24(1) Andricus gemmeus – an up-date 2011 26(1) Andricus glandulae (at Leicester) 2011 26(1) Andricus grossulariae agamic gall picture 2003 18 (2) reaches Suffolk 2005 20(2) a form new to UK (agamic galls on catkins) 2008 23(2) Galling Quercus castaneifolia and Q. suber 2013 28(2) Inquilines and Parasitoids 2011 26(1) Population fluctuations in Norfolk 2011 26(1); 2014 29(1) Andricus kollari: Breeding the Sexual & Asexual Generations 1987 2(1) gall distinguished from that of A. lignicola 2001 16(2) galls attacked by aphids 1995 10(2) galls & their occupants - inquilines and parasites 1998 13 (2) prolongation of the agamic stage in NE Scotland 1995 10(1) Mini-marbles 2003 18 (1) 2003 18 (2) Andricus kollari-lignicola-corruptrix - Species or Races? 1987 2(2) Andricus lignicola: Breeding the Sexual & Asexual Generations 1987 2(1) gall distinguished from that of A. kollari 2001 16(2) Andricus lucidus (Hartig) confirmed in Britain, with a list of recorded inquilines & parasitoids 1992 7(1) on Hampstead Heath 2000 15(2) in Regent’s Park 2001 16 (1) Andricus mayri (the asexual generation of A. grossulariae) established in Britain 2002 17(1) Andricus quercuscalicis parasitoids of the sexual & parthenogenetic generations 1988 3(1) in The Netherlands & Belgium 1995 10(1) Inquilines and parasitoids in Northumberland 2005 20 (1): 2006 21 (1) Pammene fasciana (Lep. Tortricidae) as an inquiline in agamic galls 2001 16(2) Parasitoids recorded from the knopper galls of A. quercuscalicis 2003 18 (2) Andricus seminationis at Leicester 2011 26(1) Andricus sieboldi life cycle 2015 30(1) Andricus spp: their effect on structure & longevity of oak catkins 1997 12(1) Andricus spp: identification of sexual generation galls on Turkey oak 2000 15(2) Andricus spp invading Britain - a call for data 2001 16 (1) Angelica galled by the aphid Cavariella konoi 1994 9(1) Antirrhinum: the effect of its rust gall (Puccinia antirrhinii) on cultivation 1993 8(1) Aphelonyx cerricola : one of our newcomers 2005 20(2) parasitoids reared from its galls 2002 17(2) Aphid Galls: & hover-flies 1987 2(2): 1989 4(1) Checklist of aphids causing galls in Britain 2004 19(2) & ladybirds 1987 2(1) Aphid Galls in Ireland 1997 12(1) natural history & what makes them attractive for study? 1996 11(1) on Lombardy poplar 1997 12(2) induced by Tetraneura species in Britain and France 2003 18(1) on Walnut 1998 13(2) with reference to the problems of definition 1994 9(2) Aphid galls of Currants 2013 28(2) Aphids & their Galls: a general introduction 1994 9(1) Aphids feeding on galls of Andricus kollari 1995 10(2) Aphids on aspen leaves 2002 17(2) 2 Aphids associated with the galls of other insects 2008 23 (1) Aquilegia Flower Bud Gall Midge 2011 26(1) Argyresthia retinella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae): a gall-causer on birch 1992 7(2) Artacris macrorhynchus galls on a horticultural form, ‘Brilliantissimum’, of sycamore 1995 10(1) the distribution of galls on sycamore leaves 1995 10(1) Arthrocnodax species (Cecidomiidae) As Predators in Galls of Eriophyid Mites 2014 29(2) Ascidia on Philadelphus 1995 10(1) Ash: an unusual root growth 1988 3(2) domatia for mites? 1994 9(2) As Others See Us 2016 31(1) Aspen galled by Aceria populi in Scotland 2000 15(2) Aspen leaves galled by the aphid Chaitophorus tremulae 2002 17(2) Asphondylia pilosa (Cecidomyiidae) on broom (Cytisus scoparius) in Europe and N. America 2002 17(2) Aulacidea follioti (Cynipidae) new to Britain 1994 9(2): 1999 14 (1) Bacteria altering reproduction in Gall Wasps 2000 15(1) Bagnall, Richard Siddoway (1884-1962): his contribution to Cecidology 1993 8(2) Baizongia pistaciae & other galls in Southern France 1990 5(2) Bayeriola salicariae: new British records on purple loosestrife 2007 22 (1) Bedeguar Gall: notes on fluctuations in abundance 1994 9(1) Bonanza 2016 31(1) Insect populations in individual galls 1999 14 (1) It’s a Small World, full of Surprises 2008 23(1) Keys to insects occurring in bedeguar galls 2002 17(1) Project started by the Insect and Invertebrate Group 2001 16(2) Project: Progress to Date 2005 20(2) Project: Some Practical Tips 2003 18(1) Project: Tying it up 2008 23(2) Bedstraws galled by the midge Schizomyia galiorum in Cornwall 2012 27 (1) Beech oranges: galling of southern beeches by the fungus Cyttaria gunnii 2011 26(2) Beta vulgaris galled by Peronospora farinosa f. sp. betae 2007 22 (2) Betula gall midges 1989 4(2) Biblical Cecidology: some biblical references to galls 1988 3(2) Binomials Applied to British Plant Galls 2014 29(1) Biorhiza pallida: some thoughts on fluctuations in abundance 1996 11(2) How many mothers does it take to make an oak apple? 2001 16(1) Birch Galls Caused by Mites 1989 4(3): 2007 22 (1) Bird Cherry galled by Taphrina padi in Scotland 1995 10(2) galled by Taphrina padi in Suffolk 2002 17(2) Birds (Woodpeckers) Exploiting Fungal Galls in India 2014 29(2) Bird’s-foot trefoil galled by the fungus Physoderma potteri 2012 27 (1) Blackthorn galled by the fungus Taphrina pruni 1993 8(2): 2002 17(2) Black Currant galled by the aphid Hyperomyzus lactucae 1994 9(2) Bladder Galls of Vasates quadripedes (Eriophyidae) on silver maple (Acer saccharinum) 2002 17(1): 2002 17(2) Blennocampa galls on wild rose 1988 3(1) Bloodwood Apples 2008 23(2) Book Reviews Choix de zoocécidies de la Belgique 2015 30 (2) Leaf Mines and Leaf Miners (György Csóka) 2003 18 (2) Plant Problems (Stefan Buczacki) 2004 19 (1) Biology, Ecology, and Evolution of Gall-inducing Arthropods 2005 20(2) Gall Midges of Germany (Skuhrava et al) 2015 30(1) Guide des Galles de France et d’Europe (Dauphin) 2014 29(1) Vegetative Key to the British Flora (Poland & Clement) 2009 24(2) Veldgids Plantengallen (A Field Guide to Plant Galls) (R.J. Koops) In Dutch. 2014 29(1) Bowthorpe Oak and its galls 2005 20(2) BPGS Constitution 2007 22 (1) Brachyneurina peniophorae (Cecidomyiidae) on fungi 1992 7(2) 3 Bracken galled by Paltodora cytisella (Lep. Gelechiidae) 2000 15(2) Breeding Gall-causers 1989 4(1): 1989 4(2) Broad-leaved Pepperwort - inflorescence galled by Aceria drabae 1991 6(1): 1992 7(1) Broom galled by the mite Eriophyes genistae 1994 9(1) Broom galled by the gall midge Asphondylia pilosa in Europe and N.
Recommended publications
  • Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Cynipoidea

    Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Cynipoidea

    Biodiversity Data Journal 5: e8049 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.5.e8049 Taxonomic Paper Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Cynipoidea Mattias Forshage‡, Jeremy Bowdrey§, Gavin R. Broad |, Brian M. Spooner¶, Frank van Veen# ‡ Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden § Colchester and Ipswich Museums, Colchester, United Kingdom | The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom ¶ Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom # University of Exeter, Penryn, United Kingdom Corresponding author: Gavin R. Broad ([email protected]) Academic editor: Pavel Stoev Received: 05 Feb 2016 | Accepted: 06 Mar 2017 | Published: 09 Mar 2017 Citation: Forshage M, Bowdrey J, Broad G, Spooner B, van Veen F (2017) Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Cynipoidea. Biodiversity Data Journal 5: e8049. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e8049 Abstract Background The British and Irish checklist of Cynipoidea is revised, considerably updating the last complete checklist published in 1978. Disregarding uncertain identifications, 220 species are now known from Britain and Ireland, comprising 91 Cynipidae (including two established non-natives), 127 Figitidae and two Ibaliidae. New information One replacement name is proposed, Kleidotoma thomsoni Forshage, for the secondary homonym Kleidotoma tetratoma Thomson, 1861 (nec K. tetratoma (Hartig, 1841)). © Forshage M et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 2 Forshage M et al Introduction This paper continues the series of updated British and Irish Hymenoptera checklists that started with Broad and Livermore (2014a), Broad and Livermore (2014b), Liston et al.
  • Supplementmaterial S2.Pdf

    Supplementmaterial S2.Pdf

    Mitt. Münch. Ent. Ges. 106 Suppl. S2 1-10 München, 15.02.2016 Systematische, revidierte und kommentierte Checkliste der Schmetterlinge Bayerns (Insecta: Lepidoptera) Alfred HASLBERGER & Andreas H. SEGERER Supplementmaterial S2 Zusammenstellung der in vorliegender Arbeit publizierten regionalen Neu- und Wiederfunde. S2.1 Neufunde für die Bayerischen Alpen und/oder das Alpenvorland (AVA) Nr. FauEu Überfamilie Familie Art 0016 431725 Eriocranioidea Eriocraniidae Dyseriocrania subpurpurella (HAWORTH, 1828) 0026 431739 Eriocranioidea Eriocraniidae Eriocrania semipurpurella (STEPHENS, 1835) 0058 431808 Nepticuloidea Nepticulidae Stigmella aceris (FREY, 1857) 0080 431900 Nepticuloidea Nepticulidae Stigmella myrtillella (STAINTON, 1857) 0089 431932 Nepticuloidea Nepticulidae Stigmella splendidissimella (HERRICH-SCHÄFFER, 1855) 0125 432021 Nepticuloidea Nepticulidae Ectoedemia decentella (HERRICH-SCHÄFFER, 1855) 0133 432060 Nepticuloidea Nepticulidae Ectoedemia hannoverella (GLITZ, 1872) 0158 432282 Adeloidea Heliozelidae Heliozela resplendella (STAINTON, 1851) 0182 432335 Adeloidea Adelidae Adela cuprella (DENIS & SCHIFFERMÜLLER, 1775) 0202 432387 Adeloidea Incurvariidae Incurvaria pectinea HAWORTH, 1828 0230 432437 Tischerioidea Tischeriidae Coptotriche marginea (HAWORTH, 1828) 0331 433122 Tineoidea Tineidae Nemapogon granella (LINNAEUS, 1758) 0355 432916 Tineoidea Tineidae Monopis weaverella (SCOTT, 1858) 0371 433010 Tineoidea Tineidae Tinea columbariella WOCKE, 1877 0373 433015 Tineoidea Tineidae Tinea trinotella THUNBERG, 1794 0394 433489
  • Motyle (Lepidoptera) Parku Krajobrazowego Cysterskie Kompozycje Krajobrazowe Rud Wielkich

    Motyle (Lepidoptera) Parku Krajobrazowego Cysterskie Kompozycje Krajobrazowe Rud Wielkich

    ROCZNIK MUZEUM GÓRNOŚLĄSKIEGO W BYTOMIU PRZYRODA Vol. 26 (online 001): 1–40 ISSN 0068-466X, eISSN 2451-0467 (online) Bytom, 10.04.2020 Jacek Maroń1, Adam Larysz2 Motyle (Lepidoptera) Parku Krajobrazowego Cysterskie Kompozycje Krajobrazowe Rud Wielkich http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3747209 1 ul. Kuglera 9, 44-207 Rybnik, Polska, e-mail: [email protected] 2 Dział Przyrody, Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomu, pl. Jana III Sobieskiego 2, 41-902 Bytom, Polska, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The Butterflies and Moths (Lepidoptera) of the Cysterskie Kompozycje Krajobrazowe Rud Wielkich Landscape Park. The paper presents the research on Lepidoptera in Cysterskie Kompozycje Krajobrazowe Rud Wielkich Landscape Park between 1982 and 2019. The material was collected at nine selected sites, mainly in various forest environments. Overall, 1162 species in 66 families were recorded and listed, including 26 species new to the Province of Silesia. Key words: Lepidoptera, list of species, Cysterskie Kompozycje Krajobrazowe Rud Wielkich Landscape Park, biodiversity. WSTĘP Park Krajobrazowy Cysterskie Kompozycje Krajobrazowe Rud Wielkich (PK CKKRW) położony jest w południowo-zachodniej części województwa śląskiego i zajmuje wschodnią część Kotliny Raciborskiej oraz północne fragmenty Płaskowyżu Rybnickiego. Powstał na mocy Rozporządzenia Wojewody Katowickiego Nr 181/93 z dnia 23 listopada 1993 roku. Powierzchnia Parku wynosi 493,87 km², a strefa ochronna to obszar 140,10 km². Dominują tu drzewostany sosnowe, rosnące na siedliskach borowych, wykształconych na glebach bielicowych, a także wprowadzone sztucznie na siedliska żyznych lasów liściastych. Najbogatszym przyrodniczo terenem w obrębie Parku jest kompleks leśno-stawowy Łężczok w okolicach Raciborza, będący jedynym rezerwatem w granicach Parku. MATERIAŁ I METODY PROWADZENIA BADAŃ Stopień poznania entomofauny PK CKKRW jest niezadawalający, a dane dotyczące występowania poszczególnych gatunków są fragmentaryczne i rozproszone.
  • The Dorset Heath 2013 So Once Again You Have Me As Editor

    The Dorset Heath 2013 So Once Again You Have Me As Editor

    NewsletterThe ofD theo Dorsetrset Flora H eGroupath 201 4 Chairman and VC9 Recorder Robin Walls; Secretary Laurence Taylor Editorial: John Newbould It would appear that the group had no complaints about the layout and content of the Dorset Heath 2013 so once again you have me as editor. The year was somewhat difficult for me as somehow, whenever I had to leave the room in Yorkshire Naturalists’ Union committee meetings in 2011, they managed to appoint me President for 2013 resulting in extra commitments in that county. During April 2013, Dorset hosted the National Forum for Biological Recording’s annual conference at the R.N.L.I. College at Poole. What a fabulous conference venue and the overnight accommodation was excellent. NFBR then joined Dorset naturalists with a joint meeting based at Studland helping to survey for the Cyril Diver project. Once again, duties took me away as I seem to be the conference administrator. The Flora Group had an interesting year, with variable numbers at field meetings. Never-the-less some important recording has been achieved including members engaging with recording bryophytes for the first time, one meeting to record fungi near Hardy’s Cottage, which thanks to the expertise of Bryan Edwards was very successful. We also had a few members try their hand at lichen recording In June 2014, I have been tasked by the Linnean Society to organise their annual field trip, which will be in June starting with a day on Portland and Chesil on the Saturday with Ballard Down and Studland on the Sunday.
  • Torix Rickettsia Are Widespread in Arthropods and Reflect a Neglected Symbiosis

    Torix Rickettsia Are Widespread in Arthropods and Reflect a Neglected Symbiosis

    GigaScience, 10, 2021, 1–19 doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab021 RESEARCH RESEARCH Torix Rickettsia are widespread in arthropods and Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/gigascience/article/10/3/giab021/6187866 by guest on 05 August 2021 reflect a neglected symbiosis Jack Pilgrim 1,*, Panupong Thongprem 1, Helen R. Davison 1, Stefanos Siozios 1, Matthew Baylis1,2, Evgeny V. Zakharov3, Sujeevan Ratnasingham 3, Jeremy R. deWaard3, Craig R. Macadam4,M. Alex Smith5 and Gregory D. D. Hurst 1 1Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, Wirral CH64 7TE, UK; 2Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, University of Liverpool, 8 West Derby Street, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK; 3Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G2W1, Canada; 4Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Balallan House, 24 Allan Park, Stirling FK8 2QG, UK and 5Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Summerlee Science Complex, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada ∗Correspondence address. Jack Pilgrim, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. E-mail: [email protected] http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2941-1482 Abstract Background: Rickettsia are intracellular bacteria best known as the causative agents of human and animal diseases. Although these medically important Rickettsia are often transmitted via haematophagous arthropods, other Rickettsia, such as those in the Torix group, appear to reside exclusively in invertebrates and protists with no secondary vertebrate host. Importantly, little is known about the diversity or host range of Torix group Rickettsia.
  • Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States

    Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States

    Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States September 1993 OTA-F-565 NTIS order #PB94-107679 GPO stock #052-003-01347-9 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States, OTA-F-565 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1993). For Sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office ii Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop, SSOP. Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN O-1 6-042075-X Foreword on-indigenous species (NIS)-----those species found beyond their natural ranges—are part and parcel of the U.S. landscape. Many are highly beneficial. Almost all U.S. crops and domesticated animals, many sport fish and aquiculture species, numerous horticultural plants, and most biologicalN control organisms have origins outside the country. A large number of NIS, however, cause significant economic, environmental, and health damage. These harmful species are the focus of this study. The total number of harmful NIS and their cumulative impacts are creating a growing burden for the country. We cannot completely stop the tide of new harmful introductions. Perfect screening, detection, and control are technically impossible and will remain so for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, the Federal and State policies designed to protect us from the worst species are not safeguarding our national interests in important areas. These conclusions have a number of policy implications. First, the Nation has no real national policy on harmful introductions; the current system is piecemeal, lacking adequate rigor and comprehensiveness. Second, many Federal and State statutes, regulations, and programs are not keeping pace with new and spreading non-indigenous pests.
  • Ants Inhabiting Oak Cynipid Galls in Hungary

    Ants Inhabiting Oak Cynipid Galls in Hungary

    North-Western Journal of Zoology 2020, vol.16 (1) - Correspondence: Notes 95 Ants inhabiting oak Cynipid galls in Hungary Oaks are known to harbour extremely rich insect communi- ties, among them more than 100 species of gall wasps (Hy- menoptera: Cynipidae) in Europe (Csóka et al. 2005, Melika 2006). Some gall wasp species are able to induce large and structurally complex galls that can sometimes be abundant on oaks, providing attractive shelters for several arthropod taxa including ant species. Ants are among the most important players in many ecosystems and they are also considered to act as ecosystem engineers (Folgarait, 1998). They are also famous for having ecological or physical interactions with a great variety of other organisms, such as gall wasps. Ants are known to tend Figure 1. Inner structure of the asexual Andricus quercustozae gall in- aphid colonies on the developing galls and, as general pred- habited by ants. ators, they prey on arthropods approaching the protected aphid colonies. Some oak cynipid galls secrete honeydew on their surface. This sweet substrate attracts ants and, in re- turn, the ants protect the galls from predators and parasi- toids (Abe, 1988, 1992; Inouye & Agrawal 2004; Nicholls, 2017). Beyond this obvious ecological interaction between gall wasps and ants, this association continues after the gall wasp’s life cycle has ceased. Certain galls are known to serve as either temporary or permanent shelter for many ant species. Some galls (e.g. An- dricus hungaricus (Hartig), Andricus quercustozae (Bosc), Aphelonyx cerricola (Giraud)) are large enough even for re- productive ant colonies. The advantages of galls as nesting logs are multifaceted.
  • 76361163.Pdf

    76361163.Pdf

    Minnesota Galls. A Thesis. Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of I.taster of Arts. by Charlotte ~augh. B.A. .: .::.::·.. ::··:·::··:·:··.: .. .. .. ... .:··.:·· ... University of Minnesota. .. : : .~ : ... : .. : ..... : : . ' .. : = ~ ·~: =~: =~: :·· :·· :··. ·:· ..... :.:;: :-~:·~ :· ···.:: • • • • • • .# • •• • •• • • • •.. .• ·~ May, 1913. .: .:·.... ... :•,. · ..:.. :·:.. ·... .: •• • •el • • • • • • • Prefe.ae In this work the objeot we.s to make the classi­ fying of insaat galls possible for a person without ex­ teasive otaniaal knowledge. With this in view, a key has been made, refer- ring ta deacriptiona and illustrationa. The key is based on obvious aharaoters and the descriptions made from direct atudy of specimens. exaept where a reference is cited.:. The illuatrationa give, in eaah case, a type view and a longisection. Only a smal.l proportion of the galls inaluded in the key are deaaribed and illustrated here, but the arrangement of the aompleted work is indic~ted in the plant list. This is an alphabetical tabulation of host plants, with the gal.1.s occurring upon them. The galls one each plant are grouped e.caording to the part affeated, and those one each organ accordi~ to the fi ,, 9~.0 , c. .~o a. : :",:" < c \re .-f< ~c: ~fc c'<~! ~ •,• ',,,•:' tion of the gall-maker. ' '., :, :.':' :.': ': '. :'., ~.... '.:, :. c t • • • • • • • c: r::lJc.- ( .-•••••... '••• .. ......... · The bibliograpey inal.udes refere.nce'a iw.IJ.t,:Y..' ..' .. '.' · .(' . .... ... ... .. ... .. a:rrtiales or books giving descriptions of Minnesht~ · ~~ir~; : or papers of general interest. Table of Contents. I. Key to speoies. II. Descriptions with illustrations. III. List of plants and galls ooourring on them. IV. Bibliography. Plant list. Antennarie.. Bud. l. Asynapta antennariae. Arrow-Wood· (Viburnum) Leaf.
  • Plant Health Карантин Растений

    Plant Health Карантин Растений

    КАРАНТИН РАСТЕНИЙ СЕНТЯБРЬ НАУКА И ПРАКТИКА 3/25/2018 РУССКО-АНГЛИЙСКИЙ ЖУРНАЛ ВОЗБУДИТЕЛЬ ПРОЛИФЕРАЦИИ ЯБЛОНИ CANDIDATUS PHYTOPLASMA MALI стр. 4 ФИТОСАНИТАРНЫЙ РИСК РАСТИТЕЛЬНОЯДНЫХ КЛЕЩЕЙ (ARACHNIDA: ACARIFORMES) стр. 13 ИДЕНТИФИКАЦИЯ ВОЗБУДИТЕЛЯ РАКА КАРТОФЕЛЯ SYNCHYTRIUM ENDOBIOTICUM С ПРИМЕНЕНИЕМ МОЛЕКУЛЯРНЫХ МЕТОДОВ ДИАГНОСТИКИ стр. 27 ДИАГНОСТИКА НЕПОВИРУСА КОЛЬЦЕВОЙ ПЯТНИСТОСТИ ТОМАТА (ToRSV) МЕТОДОМ КЛАССИЧЕСКОЙ ПЦР стр. 41 CANDIDATUS PHYTOPLASMA MALI APPLE PROLIFERATION PATHOGEN page 9 PHYTOSANITARY RISK OF HERBIVOROUS MITES (ARACHNIDA: ACARIFORMES) page 20 IDENTIFICATION OF THE AGENT OF POTATO WART DISEASE SYNCHYTRIUM ENDOBIOTICUM USING MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC METHODS page 35 TOMATO RINGSPOT VIRUS DIAGNOSIS (ToRSV) USING CONVENTIONAL PCR page 46 RUSSIAN-ENGLISH JOURNAL PLANT HEALTH SEPTEMBER ISSN 2306-9767 ISSN RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 3/25/2018 «КАРАНТИН РАСТЕНИЙ. НАУКА И ПРАКТИКА» ДВУЯЗЫЧНЫЙ НАУЧНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ №3 (25) 2018 г. Главный редактор: Мартин Уорд — РЕДАКЦИЯ: А.Я. Сапожников, Генеральный директор ЕОКЗР Волкова Е.М. — кандидат директор ФГБУ «ВНИИКР» биологических наук, Ханну Кукконен — директор заведующая лабораторией Шеф-редактор: подразделения фитосанитарного сорных растений Светлана Зиновьева, надзора, EVIRA (Финляндия) начальник отдела по связям Волков О.Г. — начальник с общественностью Сагитов А.О. — доктор отдела биометода и СМИ ФГБУ «ВНИИКР» биологических наук, Кулинич О.А. — доктор Генеральный директор ТОО биологических наук, Выпускающий редактор: «Казахский НИИ защиты начальник отдела лесного карантина Ольга Лесных и карантина растений» e-mail: [email protected] Приходько Ю.Н. — кандидат сельскохозяйственных наук, Сорока С.В. — кандидат Редакционная коллегия начальник научно-методического сельскохозяйственных наук, журнала «Карантин растений. отдела фитопатологии директор РУП «Институт Наука и практика»: защиты растений» НАН Скрипка О.В. — кандидат Швабаускене Ю.А. — заместитель Республики Беларусь биологических наук, ведущий Руководителя Россельхознадзора научный сотрудник лаборатории Джалилов Ф.С.
  • Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) 321-356 ©Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; Download Unter

    Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) 321-356 ©Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; Download Unter

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomofauna Jahr/Year: 2007 Band/Volume: 0028 Autor(en)/Author(s): Yefremova Zoya A., Ebrahimi Ebrahim, Yegorenkova Ekaterina Artikel/Article: The Subfamilies Eulophinae, Entedoninae and Tetrastichinae in Iran, with description of new species (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) 321-356 ©Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Entomofauna ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR ENTOMOLOGIE Band 28, Heft 25: 321-356 ISSN 0250-4413 Ansfelden, 30. November 2007 The Subfamilies Eulophinae, Entedoninae and Tetrastichinae in Iran, with description of new species (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) Zoya YEFREMOVA, Ebrahim EBRAHIMI & Ekaterina YEGORENKOVA Abstract This paper reflects the current degree of research of Eulophidae and their hosts in Iran. A list of the species from Iran belonging to the subfamilies Eulophinae, Entedoninae and Tetrastichinae is presented. In the present work 47 species from 22 genera are recorded from Iran. Two species (Cirrospilus scapus sp. nov. and Aprostocetus persicus sp. nov.) are described as new. A list of 45 host-parasitoid associations in Iran and keys to Iranian species of three genera (Cirrospilus, Diglyphus and Aprostocetus) are included. Zusammenfassung Dieser Artikel zeigt den derzeitigen Untersuchungsstand an eulophiden Wespen und ihrer Wirte im Iran. Eine Liste der für den Iran festgestellten Arten der Unterfamilien Eu- lophinae, Entedoninae und Tetrastichinae wird präsentiert. Mit vorliegender Arbeit werden 47 Arten in 22 Gattungen aus dem Iran nachgewiesen. Zwei neue Arten (Cirrospilus sca- pus sp. nov. und Aprostocetus persicus sp. nov.) werden beschrieben. Eine Liste von 45 Wirts- und Parasitoid-Beziehungen im Iran und ein Schlüssel für 3 Gattungen (Cirro- spilus, Diglyphus und Aprostocetus) sind in der Arbeit enthalten.
  • National Oak Gall Wasp Survey

    National Oak Gall Wasp Survey

    ational Oak Gall Wasp Survey – mapping with parabiologists in Finland Bess Hardwick Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 2 1.1. Parabiologists in data collecting ............................................................................. 2 1.2. Oak cynipid gall wasps .......................................................................................... 3 1.3. Motivations and objectives .................................................................................... 4 2. Material and methods ................................................................................................ 5 2.1. The volunteers ........................................................................................................ 5 2.2. Sampling ................................................................................................................. 6 2.3. Processing of samples ............................................................................................ 7 2.4. Data selection ........................................................................................................ 7 2.5. Statistical analyses ................................................................................................. 9 3. Results ....................................................................................................................... 10 3.1. Sampling success .................................................................................................
  • The Population Biology of Oak Gall Wasps (Hymenoptera:Cynipidae)

    The Population Biology of Oak Gall Wasps (Hymenoptera:Cynipidae)

    5 Nov 2001 10:11 AR AR147-21.tex AR147-21.SGM ARv2(2001/05/10) P1: GSR Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2002. 47:633–68 Copyright c 2002 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved THE POPULATION BIOLOGY OF OAK GALL WASPS (HYMENOPTERA:CYNIPIDAE) Graham N. Stone,1 Karsten Schonrogge,¨ 2 Rachel J. Atkinson,3 David Bellido,4 and Juli Pujade-Villar4 1Institute of Cell, Animal, and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, The King’s Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom; e-mail: [email protected] 2Center of Ecology and Hydrology, CEH Dorset, Winfrith Technology Center, Winfrith Newburgh, Dorchester, Dorset DT2 8ZD, United Kingdom; e-mail: [email protected] 3Center for Conservation Science, Department of Biology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, United Kingdom; e-mail: [email protected] 4Departamento de Biologia Animal, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Avenida Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Spain; e-mail: [email protected] Key Words cyclical parthenogenesis, host alternation, food web, parasitoid, population dynamics ■ Abstract Oak gall wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae, Cynipini) are characterized by possession of complex cyclically parthenogenetic life cycles and the ability to induce a wide diversity of highly complex species- and generation-specific galls on oaks and other Fagaceae. The galls support species-rich, closed communities of inquilines and parasitoids that have become a model system in community ecology. We review recent advances in the ecology of oak cynipids, with particular emphasis on life cycle characteristics and the dynamics of the interactions between host plants, gall wasps, and natural enemies. We assess the importance of gall traits in structuring oak cynipid communities and summarize the evidence for bottom-up and top-down effects across trophic levels.