The Dorset Heath 2013 So Once Again You Have Me As Editor
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Dorset History Centre
GB 0031 D40E Dorset History Centre This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 12726 The National Archives DORSET RECORD OFFICE H. M. C. 12726 D40E Deposited by Thos. ooornbs £ Son, Solicitors^ NATIONA L REGISTER 15th May, 1967. OF ARCHIVES (See also NRA 16221 WESLEY FAMILY PAPERS, Dorset R.O. D40 G) pfr u Bundle No. Date Description of Documents No. of nocumenti DORSET"" 1. 1798 "Report on the Coast of Dorsetshire, 1793" by Wm. Morton 1 vol. Pitt, for purpose of planning defence. Largely on pos sible landing places, present armament; suggestions as to stationing guns and troops. At back: table showing guns serviceable, unserviceable and wanting. At front: map of Dorset reduced from Isaac Taylor's 1" map and published by \i, Faden in 1796. 2. 1811 Dorset 1st ed. 1" O.S. map showing coast from Charmouth 1 to Bindon Hill. - 3. 1811 Dorset 1st ed. 1" O.S. map, sheet XV, showing Wimborne 1 and Cranborne area and part of Hampshire. BUCKLAID NEWTON 4. 1840 Copy tithe map. 1 CHARMINSTER ND 5. Extract from tithe map, used in case Lord Ilchester v. 1 Henning. DCRCHESTER 6. (Post 1834) Map , undated. (Goes with survey in Dorchester 3orough 1 records which is dated 1835 or after). Shows properties of Corporation, charities, schools. 7. - 1848 Map, surveyed 1810, corrected 1848 by F.C. Withers. 4 Indicates lands belonging to Earl of Shaftesbury, Robert Williams, the Corporation; shows parish boundaries.(2 copies). Survey showing proprietors, occupiers, descri ption of premises, remarks. -
MOD Heritage Report 2011 to 2013
MOD Heritage Report 2011-2013 Heritage in the Ministry of Defence Cover photograph Barrow Clump, Crown Copyright CONTENTS Introduction 4 Profile of the MOD Historic Estate 5 Case Study: RAF Spadeadam 6 World Heritage Sites 7 Condition of the MOD Historic Estate 8 Scheduled Monuments 8 Listed Buildings 9 Case Study: Sandhurst 10 Heritage at Risk 11 Case Study: Otterburn 12 Estate Development and Rationalisation 13 Disposals 13 Strategy, Policy and Governance 14 Management Plans, Heritage Assessments 14 Historic Crashed Aircraft 15 Case Study: Operation Nightingale 16 Conclusion 17 Annex A: New Listed Building Designations 19 New Scheduled Monument Designations 20 Annex B: Heritage at Risk on the MOD Estate 21 Annex C: Monuments at Risk Progress Report 24 MOD Heritage Report 2011-13 3 Introduction 1. The MOD has the largest historic estate within Government and this report provides commentary on its size, diversity, condition and management. This 5th biennial report covers the financial years 11/12 and 12/13 and fulfils the requirement under the DCMS/ English Heritage (EH) Protocol for the Care of the Government Estate 2009 and Scottish Ministers Scottish Historic Environment Policy (SHEP). It summarises the work and issues arising in the past two years and progress achieved both in the UK and overseas. 2. As recognised in the 2011 English Heritage Biennial Conservation Report, the MOD has fully adopted the Protocol and the requirements outlined in the SHEP. The requirements for both standards have been embedded into MOD business and reflected within its strategies, policies, roles and responsibilities, governance, management systems and plans and finally data systems. -
National Oak Gall Wasp Survey
ational Oak Gall Wasp Survey – mapping with parabiologists in Finland Bess Hardwick Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 2 1.1. Parabiologists in data collecting ............................................................................. 2 1.2. Oak cynipid gall wasps .......................................................................................... 3 1.3. Motivations and objectives .................................................................................... 4 2. Material and methods ................................................................................................ 5 2.1. The volunteers ........................................................................................................ 5 2.2. Sampling ................................................................................................................. 6 2.3. Processing of samples ............................................................................................ 7 2.4. Data selection ........................................................................................................ 7 2.5. Statistical analyses ................................................................................................. 9 3. Results ....................................................................................................................... 10 3.1. Sampling success ................................................................................................. -
The Population Biology of Oak Gall Wasps (Hymenoptera:Cynipidae)
5 Nov 2001 10:11 AR AR147-21.tex AR147-21.SGM ARv2(2001/05/10) P1: GSR Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2002. 47:633–68 Copyright c 2002 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved THE POPULATION BIOLOGY OF OAK GALL WASPS (HYMENOPTERA:CYNIPIDAE) Graham N. Stone,1 Karsten Schonrogge,¨ 2 Rachel J. Atkinson,3 David Bellido,4 and Juli Pujade-Villar4 1Institute of Cell, Animal, and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, The King’s Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom; e-mail: [email protected] 2Center of Ecology and Hydrology, CEH Dorset, Winfrith Technology Center, Winfrith Newburgh, Dorchester, Dorset DT2 8ZD, United Kingdom; e-mail: [email protected] 3Center for Conservation Science, Department of Biology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, United Kingdom; e-mail: [email protected] 4Departamento de Biologia Animal, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Avenida Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Spain; e-mail: [email protected] Key Words cyclical parthenogenesis, host alternation, food web, parasitoid, population dynamics ■ Abstract Oak gall wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae, Cynipini) are characterized by possession of complex cyclically parthenogenetic life cycles and the ability to induce a wide diversity of highly complex species- and generation-specific galls on oaks and other Fagaceae. The galls support species-rich, closed communities of inquilines and parasitoids that have become a model system in community ecology. We review recent advances in the ecology of oak cynipids, with particular emphasis on life cycle characteristics and the dynamics of the interactions between host plants, gall wasps, and natural enemies. We assess the importance of gall traits in structuring oak cynipid communities and summarize the evidence for bottom-up and top-down effects across trophic levels. -
Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks. -
Naturalist April 2013 1082
April 2013 Volume 138 Number 1082 Yorkshire Union The Naturalist Vol. 138 No. 1082 April 2013 Contents Page Editorial 1 John Newbould: President of the YNU 2012-2013 2 Aqua�c plants in Yorkshire canals R. Goulder 4 An interes�ng plant gall on Gorse Derek Parkinson 16 Andricus gemmeus – a new gall for Yorkshire Tom Higginbo�om 17 A provisional Vascular Plant Red Data List for VC63 ‐ an evalua�on of current status 18 G.T.D. Wilmore The Gledhow Valley Woods Nest Box Scheme Mar�n Calvert 31 Onset of Summer Plumage in Black‐headed Gulls at Doncaster Lakeside, based on 35 field observa�ons January to March 2012* Colin A. Howes and John A. Porter Notes on Sowerby’s Beaked Whale strandings on the Yorkshire coast* 38 D.E. Whi�aker Seals at Teesmouth: a historical review Colin A. Howes and Robert Woods 42 Rosemary Beetle Chrysolina americana ‐ a new beetle record for Mid‐west Yorkshire 49 G. Boyd Field Note ‐ Rhododendron lea�opper in VC64 Mark Darwell and John Bowers 50 Recording in VC65 July 2012 John Newbould, Adrian Norris and Bill Ely 52 Botanical Report for 2012 Phyl Abbo� 62 YNU Excursions 2013 70 Project: The Yorkshire Flat Hedgehog Survey Colin A. Howes 78 Project: Parasi�sm of Coleophora serratella Derek Parkinson 79 YNU Calendar April ‐ August 2013 80 Book review: p77 YNU No�ce: p79 An asterix* indicates a peer‐reviewed paper Front cover: Hound’s‐tongue Cynoglossum officinale, one of the rare na�ve plants proposed for VC63’s Red Data List of plants (see p21). -
Phylogeny of the Genus Lotus (Leguminosae, Loteae): Evidence from Nrits Sequences and Morphology
813 Phylogeny of the genus Lotus (Leguminosae, Loteae): evidence from nrITS sequences and morphology G.V. Degtjareva, T.E. Kramina, D.D. Sokoloff, T.H. Samigullin, C.M. Valiejo-Roman, and A.S. Antonov Abstract: Lotus (120–130 species) is the largest genus of the tribe Loteae. The taxonomy of Lotus is complicated, and a comprehensive taxonomic revision of the genus is needed. We have conducted phylogenetic analyses of Lotus based on nrITS data alone and combined with data on 46 morphological characters. Eighty-one ingroup nrITS accessions represent- ing 71 Lotus species are studied; among them 47 accessions representing 40 species are new. Representatives of all other genera of the tribe Loteae are included in the outgroup (for three genera, nrITS sequences are published for the first time). Forty-two of 71 ingroup species were not included in previous morphological phylogenetic studies. The most important conclusions of the present study are (1) addition of morphological data to the nrITS matrix produces a better resolved phy- logeny of Lotus; (2) previous findings that Dorycnium and Tetragonolobus cannot be separated from Lotus at the generic level are well supported; (3) Lotus creticus should be placed in section Pedrosia rather than in section Lotea; (4) a broad treatment of section Ononidium is unnatural and the section should possibly not be recognized at all; (5) section Heineke- nia is paraphyletic; (6) section Lotus should include Lotus conimbricensis; then the section is monophyletic; (7) a basic chromosome number of x = 6 is an important synapomorphy for the expanded section Lotus; (8) the segregation of Lotus schimperi and allies into section Chamaelotus is well supported; (9) there is an apparent functional correlation be- tween stylodium and keel evolution in Lotus. -
Dorset and East Devon Coast for Inclusion in the World Heritage List
Nomination of the Dorset and East Devon Coast for inclusion in the World Heritage List © Dorset County Council 2000 Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum June 2000 Published by Dorset County Council on behalf of Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum. Publication of this nomination has been supported by English Nature and the Countryside Agency, and has been advised by the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and the British Geological Survey. Maps reproduced from Ordnance Survey maps with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence Number: LA 076 570. Maps and diagrams reproduced/derived from British Geological Survey material with the permission of the British Geological Survey. © NERC. All rights reserved. Permit Number: IPR/4-2. Design and production by Sillson Communications +44 (0)1929 552233. Cover: Duria antiquior (A more ancient Dorset) by Henry De la Beche, c. 1830. The first published reconstruction of a past environment, based on the Lower Jurassic rocks and fossils of the Dorset and East Devon Coast. © Dorset County Council 2000 In April 1999 the Government announced that the Dorset and East Devon Coast would be one of the twenty-five cultural and natural sites to be included on the United Kingdom’s new Tentative List of sites for future nomination for World Heritage status. Eighteen sites from the United Kingdom and its Overseas Territories have already been inscribed on the World Heritage List, although only two other natural sites within the UK, St Kilda and the Giant’s Causeway, have been granted this status to date. -
Community Level Consequences of Adaptive Management Through Climate Matching: Oak Galls As a Model System
Community level consequences of adaptive management through Climate Matching: oak galls as a model system Frazer H. Sinclair Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh 2011 1 Declaration This thesis is submitted to the University of Edinburgh in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Science and Engineering. Aspects of the presented work were made possible by collaboration and data sharing with individuals and institutions, details of which are presented below. Chapter 2. The French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA) provided various phenotypic and genotypic data from oak provenance trials that are under their management. All presented analyses of these data are my own. Chapter 3. INRA allowed access to their established oak provenance trial at the forest of Petite Charnie in Sarthe, Northwest France. Insect surveys at the trial were conducted by me, and by volunteers under my supervision. All presented analyses of these data are my own. Chapter 4. Insect specimens were collected by me from the oak provenance trial at Petite Charnie with the permission of INRA. Approximately 1/3 of DNA extractions and PCR reactions were conducted by Konrad Lohse, Julja Ernst, and Juan Carlos Ruiz Guajardo. All presented analyses are my own. Chapter 5. Insect specimens were sourced from the Stone laboratory collections at the University of Edinburgh. Unpublished DNA sequence data from 6 parasitoid individuals were provided by Konrad Lohse. All presented analysis of this data is my own. Unless otherwise stated, the remaining work and content of this thesis are entirely my own. -
Torymus Sinensis Against the Chestnut Gall Wasp Dryocosmus Kuriphilus in the Canton Ticino, Switzerland
| January 2011 Evaluating the use of Torymus sinensis against the chestnut gall wasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus in the Canton Ticino, Switzerland Authors Aebi Alexandre, Agroscope ART Schoenenberger Nicola, Tulum SA and Bigler Franz, Agroscope ART Torymus sinensis against the chestnut gall wasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus | January 2011 1 Zürich/Caslano, January 2011 Authors’ affiliation: Alexandre Aebi and Franz Bigler Nicola Schoenenberger Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon TULUM SA Research Station ART Via Rompada 40 Biosafety 6987 Caslano Reckenholzstrasse 191 Switzerland 8046 Zürich Tel: +41 91 606 6373 Switzerland Fax: +41 44 606 6376 Tel: +41 44 377 7669 [email protected] Fax: +41 44 377 7201 [email protected] This work was financed by the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) This work was done in collaboration with B. Bellosi and E. Schaltegger (TULUM SA) Cover figure: Empty chestnut gall in Stabio, February 2010 (Picture:TULUM SA) All maps used in figures and appendices (except Fig. 6): ©swisstopo, license number: DV053809.1 Map in figure 6: © Istituto Geografico, De Agostini 1982–1988 ISBN 978-3-905733-20-4 © 2010 ART 2 Torymus sinensis against the chestnut gall wasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus | January 2011 Table of contents Table of contents Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 2. Mission and methods 7 3. Presence and degree of infestation of Dryocosmus kuriphilus in Switzerland 9 4. Invasion corridors of Dryocosmus kuriphilus towards Switzerland 11 5. Potential economic and ecological damage caused by Dryocosmus kuriphilus in Switzerland 14 6. Release of the parasitoid Torymus sinensis in the Piedmont Region, Italy 17 7. Potential benefits and damage due to the release of Torymus sinensis 18 8. -
Lulworth Cove Circular Via Tyneham and Durdle Door Lulworth Cove Circular – Wool Station Start and Finish
Lulworth Cove Circular via Tyneham and Durdle Door Lulworth Cove Circular – Wool Station Start and Finish 1st walk check 2nd walk check 3rd walk check 1st walk check 2nd walk check 3rd walk check 24th July 2019 Current status Document last updated Tuesday, 27th August 2019 This document and information herein are copyrighted to Saturday Walkers’ Club. If you are interested in printing or displaying any of this material, Saturday Walkers’ Club grants permission to use, copy, and distribute this document delivered from this World Wide Web server with the following conditions: • The document will not be edited or abridged, and the material will be produced exactly as it appears. Modification of the material or use of it for any other purpose is a violation of our copyright and other proprietary rights. • Reproduction of this document is for free distribution and will not be sold. • This permission is granted for a one-time distribution. • All copies, links, or pages of the documents must carry the following copyright notice and this permission notice: Saturday Walkers’ Club, Copyright © 2008-2019, used with permission. All rights reserved. www.walkingclub.org.uk This walk has been checked as noted above, however the publisher cannot accept responsibility for any problems encountered by readers. Lulworth Cove Circular via Tyneham and Durdle Door Start & Finish: Lulworth Cove bus stop Lulworth Cove bus stop, map reference SY 822 800, is 178 km south west of Charing Cross, 16m above sea level and in Dorset. Length: 22.2 km (13.8 mi). Cumulative ascent/descent: 974m. For a shorter walk and an Alternative Start or Finish at Wool Station, see below Walk options. -
Landscape Type: Chalk Ridge/Escarpment Backdrops To, and Give Views Of, Much of the Surrounding AONB
The North, West and South Escarpments and the Purbeck Ridge form dramatic Landscape type: Chalk Ridge/Escarpment backdrops to, and give views of, much of the surrounding AONB. Although in geological Character areas: Purbeck Ridge terms an escarpment is slightly different to a ridge, they have been grouped • together for this assessment as they share very similar characteristics and management North Dorset Escarpment requirements. With an undeveloped and open character, this landscape type • with its steep sides, supports important patches of chalk grasslands and hanging • South Dorset Escarpment woodlands. These dramatic landscapes have been captured by the romantic paintings • West Dorset Escarpment and writings of Wilsdon Steer, Moffat Linder, Daniel Defoe and Lamora Birch. Landscape change Planning guidelines • Policy driven farming changes over the last sixty years have resulted in • Maintain the undeveloped character of the scarp and the contrast with the concentration of stock levels. This has limited the availability of livestock to ridge base farmsteads. Any new development should be small scale and should graze land of low agricultural value along the scarp face. In places, this has respect the distinct nucleated form along the surrounding edges of the area and resulted in low grazing pressure and increased scrub encroachment on the should not extend onto the lower slopes. Encourage the use of native species steeper slopes. along property boundaries. • Some historical loss of chalk grassland as a result of intensive arable agricultural • Conserve the rural character of the narrow sunken and open lanes and protect practices have fragmented grassland habitats with issues of soil erosion. sensitive banks from further erosion.