DOCSLIB.ORG

Challenges of ERAU's First Suborbital Flight Aboard Blue Origin's New

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Challenges of ERAU's First Suborbital Flight Aboard Blue Origin's New Research Note • DOI: 10.2478/gsr-2019-0001 GSR • 7 • 2019 • 1-12 Gravitational and Space Research Challenges of ERAU’s First Suborbital Flight Aboard Blue Origin’s New Shepard M7 for the Cell Research Experiment In Microgravity (CRExIM) Pedro J. Llanos1, Kristina Andrijauskaite2, Vijay V. Duraisamy3, Francisco Pastrana4, Erik L. Seedhouse1, Sathya Gangadharan3, Leonid Bunegin5, Mariel Rico6 1Department of Applied Aviation Sciences , Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU), Daytona Beach, FL; 2Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center (UTHSCSA), San Antonio, TX; 3Department of Mechanical Engineering, ERAU, Daytona Beach, FL; 4Department of Aerospace Engineering, ERAU, Daytona Beach, FL; 5Department of Anesthesiology, UTHSCSA, San Antonio, TX; 6NanoRacks, Internal Pressurized Payloads, Houston, TX Abstract Cell Research Experiment In Microgravity (CRExIM) was launched aboard Blue Origin’s New Shepard suborbital vehicle on Tuesday, December 12, 2017, from the West Texas Launch Site in Van Horn, Texas. One of the aims of this science experiment was to assess the effects of microgravity on murine T-cells during suborbital flight. These cells were placed in a NanoLab with a data logger that sensed the acceleration, temperature, and relative humidity during preflight, flight, and postflight operations. Some discrepancies in sensor measurement were noticed, and these errors were attributed partly to the difference in sampling rates and partly to the different locations of the sensors, which made it difficult to obtain highly accurate measurements of the accelerations and to correlate both sets of data. This paper discusses the setbacks and lessons learned, which made our team find new alternatives while meeting all milestones as mandated by NanoRacks and Blue Origin. This manuscript highlights these alternatives that led to the success of the mission and gives recommendations that will enable customers to alleviate some of these challenges in future flights. Keywords Suborbital flight • Cell biology • Blue Origin • New Shepard • Sensors • Microgravity Introduction In early 2016, the Department of Applied Aviation Sciences flights), and NS3 (three flights) up to December 31, 2018. This (AAS) at the Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU) research project was a joint collaboration among scientists at was granted a suborbital flight opportunity to work on a the College of Aviation and the College of Engineering at ERAU, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio research project. The Spaceflight Operations team in the AAS (UTHSCSA), and the Medical University of South Carolina department was already developing other suborbital payloads (MUSC), who worked on the preparation of the translational as part of the Arete STEM Project (ARETE) to demonstrate science research project aimed at investigating the effect of joint commercial spaceflight activities. The main aim of this microgravity on the T-cells of a murine model. research was to investigate the effect of microgravity on Suborbital space research is emerging as a popular platform T-cells and to understand how this research could be used to conduct scientific experiments. It has many advantages to develop T-cell-based therapeutics for cancer patients. compared to researching on the International Space Station, A second goal was to monitor the environment that T-cells such as cost-effectiveness, rapid turnaround, and an encountered during suborbital flight. The data recorded will opportunity to validate payloads before investing in more be used to better understand the behavior and functionality costly space laboratory environments. During the past 5 y, we of the T-cells when exposed to different stressors. With these have witnessed the emergence of new private stakeholders, aims in mind, this flight opportunity on Blue Origin’s New which stiffens the competition for suborbital launches as part Shepard crew capsule (CC) was originally scheduled at the of launch-testing technologies and STEM science payloads end of 2016 to early 2017; however, the flight did not occur across several universities. Currently, several companies until December 12, 2017. This suborbital flight was referred to have reusable vehicles and offer suborbital flights, including as Mission 7 (M7) aboard the first launch of the New Shepard Blue Origin’s New Shepard and EXOS Aerospace Systems & 3 rocket (or NS3) with a new CC 2.0. There have been three Technologies’ Suborbital Autonomous Rocket with GuidancE New Shepard vehicles labeled NS1 (single flight), NS2 (five (SARGE) vehicle. Other emerging suborbital research platforms † Corresponding author: Pedro J. Llanos E-mail: [email protected] 1 Gravitational and Space Research Figure 1. Life support system for T-cells. include the Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo vehicle, American December 8, 2017. Vector Space Systems’ Vector-R vehicle, and New Zealand’s During this time, the T-cells were kept in an incubator at about Electron launch vehicle, which will be launching suborbital 34°C–35°C. The incubator, assembled at UTHSCSA, was a payloads in the near future. Some international companies, lunch box (Figure 1). While in Van Horn, the T-cells were kept such as Europe’s first reusable suborbital rocket, PLD Space’s at 28–29°C for 3 d. Thus, 8 ft3/d or 226.53 L/d or 9.86 L/h or Arion 1, which have performed dozens of hot firings of their 0.164 L/min of gas mixture was required to keep the T-cells in liquid rocket engine successfully, are planning to conduct test the proper gas environment. flights in 2019 and to fly new research-oriented science-and- On the L–2 d (December 9, 2017), the team met at the Payload technology hardware (Llanos et al., 2018). Processing Facility (PPF) at the West Texas Launch Site Although we have been unveiling answers for decades, (WTLS). Here, the T-cells were kept at about 25.5°C during we are still lacking a comprehensive understanding of the the day and at about 28.0°C during the night in an electrical effects of space travel on human physiology (Alwood et al., heater. The life support system provided enough gas mix for 2017). There have been many initiatives by the National a day instead of 3 d since the team decided that placing the Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to accelerate T-cells in the electrical heater for a controlled temperature this research, such as the release of the Space Biology Plan environment was more important than having the T-cells in for 2016–2025, aimed at investigating the biological effects the proper gas mix due to the extreme cold temperatures in of long-term exposure to space environment (Tomko et al., Van Horn (–5–0°C). 2016). Therefore, our scientific findings will build upon current On the L–1 d (December 10, 2017), the team estimated the research to expand the knowledge on microgravity effect on new mass of the payload to be 441 g (initial mass of NanoLab T-cells. It will also establish a baseline for us to compare future was 498 g), which was less than that anticipated in previous findings from subsequent suborbital flights aboard various feasibility studies (Vela et al., 2017). This met the mass research platforms. In this study, we addressed the various requirement of <500 g. NanoRacks provided polycarbonate challenges encountered during the preparation of the in vitro standoffs placed on the outside of the NanoLab, which is a biological payload aboard New Shepard from the operational customer-developed payload package with dimensions of perspective. 10.16 cm × 10.16 cm × 20.00 cm (CubeSat Form Factor; NanoRacks, 2016), to help with flight vibrations. This added an additional 90.4 g. The NanoLab’s final weight was 532 g Materials And Methods (including the standoffs). On December 11, 2017 (intended launch day), the payload The T-cells were processed at the UTHSCSA on December was handed off to NanoRacks inside the PPF at 02:45. At 5, 2017, with the understanding that the launch was going to 02:40, the New Shepard vehicle was rolled out from the take place on December 11, 2017. T-cells were transported Vehicle Processing Facility. Fifteen minutes later, Blue Origin during a 6-h drive from UTHSCSA to Van Horn (Texas) on rolled out the payload from the PPF after being handed off by 2 Pedro J. Llanos et al.: Challenges of ERAU’s First Suborbital Flight Aboard Blue Origin’s... Figure 2. Temperature and relative humidity profiles on the day of the scrubbed Blue Origin launch (December 11, 2017). NanoRacks. The approximate temperature of the cells was the Eppendorf tubes and downloading the data from the data about 26.9°C or about 1° lower than the temperature set in logger. the electrical heater (28°C). At 03:35, the Blue Origin team Temperature at the WTLS was about 4°C at the time the loaded the payload into the CC. Our sensitive payload sat on vehicle was sitting on the launch pad. Early that morning, the the launch pad for about 6–8 h (Lewis, 2017) prior to liftoff. We temperature was even lower, around –2°C. One of the first expect to have later handover times in the near future. Teams actions by the team was to analyze the temperature profile were given a few hours of rest before leaving for the viewing from the data logger (Figure 2) for this scrubbed launch. site at 08:15. At 08:30, our team was notified that the CC had The highest temperature was 18.23°C, lowest temperature an internal temperature of 11°C. Launch was postponed for was 12.80°C, and average temperature was 14.60°C. These 1 h (initial launch time was 11:00). At 09:00, our team was temperatures are not desirable (too cold) for the T-cells – notified that fuel was being loaded into the vehicle, and a this issue was informed to the Blue Origin team immediately weather balloon was released to measure the winds aloft.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mitchell Thomas JOS Article
    H-SC Journal of Sciences (2017) Vol. VI Thomas Mars: A prospect for settlement Mitchell H. Thomas’17 Department of Biology, Hampden-Sydney College, Hampden-Sydney, VA 23943 The exploration of Mars was once left to the imagination. However, in recent years, the topic of exploring Mars has become more realistic and increasingly popular in news articles and scientific communities. Technology developed in the previous half-century have already allowed humans to send rovers to Mars in order to retrieve some basic data about the planet. Current technological advancements are resulting in reusable rockets that could one day travel between Earth and Mars. Exploration and colonization of Mars are important for the development of research on the planet and the search for life. Current data is limited, but shows that the conditions on Mars could have supported life in the past. To further our knowledge of the red planet, The atmosphere surrounding Earth is nearly organizations like NASA and companies like SpaceX one-hundred times denser than that of Mars and its are developing plans to colonize Mars. Many composition is crucial to life. According to NASA, the obstacles stand in the way before humans can reach Earth’s atmosphere is comprised of 78% Nitrogen, and colonize the red planet. However, Mars is the 21% Oxygen, and 1% Other. On Mars, the sparse best option for interplanetary colonization and the atmosphere is comprised of nearly 96% Carbon most feasible way to research current and future life Dioxide, less than 2% Argon, less than 2% Nitrogen, on a planet other than Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Final EA for the Launch and Reentry of Spaceshiptwo Reusable Suborbital Rockets at the Mojave Air and Space Port
    Final Environmental Assessment for the Launch and Reentry of SpaceShipTwo Reusable Suborbital Rockets at the Mojave Air and Space Port May 2012 HQ-121575 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation; Finding of No Significant Impact AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) SUMMARY: The FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST) prepared a Final Environmental Assessment (EA) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA; 42 United States Code 4321 et seq.), Council on Environmental Quality NEPA implementing regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations parts 1500 to 1508), and FAA Order 1050.1E, Change 1, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of issuing experimental permits and/or launch licenses to operate SpaceShipTwo reusable suborbital rockets and WhiteKnightTwo carrier aircraft at the Mojave Air and Space Port in Mojave, California. After reviewing and analyzing currently available data and information on existing conditions and the potential impacts of the Proposed Action, the FAA has determined that issuing experimental permits and/or launch licenses to operate SpaceShipTwo and WhiteKnightTwo at the Mojave Air and Space Port would not significantly impact the quality of the human environment. Therefore, preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement is not required, and the FAA is issuing this FONSI. The FAA made this determination in accordance with all applicable environmental laws. The Final EA is incorporated by reference in this FONSI. FOR A COPY OF THE EA AND FONSI: Visit the following internet address: http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/environmental/review/permits/ or contact Daniel Czelusniak, Environmental Program Lead, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave., SW, Suite 325, Washington, DC 20591; email [email protected]; or phone (202) 267-5924.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Human Space Flight Safety Record As of July 20, 2021
    U.S. Human Space Flight Safety Record (As of 20 July 2021) Launch Type Total # of Total # People Total # of Total # of People on Died or Human Space Catastrophic Space Flight Seriously Flights Failures6 Injured3 Orbital (Total) 9271 17 1664 3 Suborbital 2332 3 2135 2 (Total) Total 1160 20 379 5 § 460.45(c) An operator must inform each space flight participant of the safety record of all launch or reentry vehicles that have carried one or more persons on board, including both U.S. government and private sector vehicles. This information must include— (1) The total number of people who have been on a suborbital or orbital space flight and the total number of people who have died or been seriously injured on these flights; and (2) The total number of launches and reentries conducted with people on board and the number of catastrophic failures of those launches and reentries. Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation Footnotes 1. People on orbital space flights include Mercury (Atlas) (4), Gemini (20), Apollo (36), Skylab (9), Space Shuttle (852), and Crew Dragon (6) a. Occupants are counted even if they flew on only the launch or reentry portion. The Space Shuttle launched 817 humans and picked up 35 humans from MIR and the International Space Station. b. Occupants are counted once reentry is complete. 2. People on suborbital space flights include X-15 (169), M2 (24), Mercury (Redstone) (2), SpaceShipOne (5), SpaceShipTwo (29), and New Shepard System (4) a. Only occupants on the rocket-powered space bound vehicles are counted per safety record criterion #11.
    [Show full text]
  • Virgin Galactic Th E First Ten Years Other Springer-Praxis Books of Related Interest by Erik Seedhouse
    Virgin Galactic Th e First Ten Years Other Springer-Praxis books of related interest by Erik Seedhouse Tourists in Space: A Practical Guide 2008 ISBN: 978-0-387-74643-2 Lunar Outpost: The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on the Moon 2008 ISBN: 978-0-387-09746-6 Martian Outpost: The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on Mars 2009 ISBN: 978-0-387-98190-1 The New Space Race: China vs. the United States 2009 ISBN: 978-1-4419-0879-7 Prepare for Launch: The Astronaut Training Process 2010 ISBN: 978-1-4419-1349-4 Ocean Outpost: The Future of Humans Living Underwater 2010 ISBN: 978-1-4419-6356-7 Trailblazing Medicine: Sustaining Explorers During Interplanetary Missions 2011 ISBN: 978-1-4419-7828-8 Interplanetary Outpost: The Human and Technological Challenges of Exploring the Outer Planets 2012 ISBN: 978-1-4419-9747-0 Astronauts for Hire: The Emergence of a Commercial Astronaut Corps 2012 ISBN: 978-1-4614-0519-1 Pulling G: Human Responses to High and Low Gravity 2013 ISBN: 978-1-4614-3029-2 SpaceX: Making Commercial Spacefl ight a Reality 2013 ISBN: 978-1-4614-5513-4 Suborbital: Industry at the Edge of Space 2014 ISBN: 978-3-319-03484-3 Tourists in Space: A Practical Guide, Second Edition 2014 ISBN: 978-3-319-05037-9 Erik Seedhouse Virgin Galactic The First Ten Years Erik Seedhouse Astronaut Instructor Sandefjord , Vestfold , Norway SPRINGER-PRAXIS BOOKS IN SPACE EXPLORATION ISBN 978-3-319-09261-4 ISBN 978-3-319-09262-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-09262-1 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014957708 © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Planes and Space Tourism: the Industry and the Regulation of Its Safety
    Space Planes and Space Tourism: The Industry and the Regulation of its Safety A Research Study Prepared by Dr. Joseph N. Pelton Director, Space & Advanced Communications Research Institute George Washington University George Washington University SACRI Research Study 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………… p 4-14 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. p 16-26 2.0 Methodology…………………………………………………………………….. p 26-28 3.0 Background and History……………………………………………………….. p 28-34 4.0 US Regulations and Government Programs………………………………….. p 34-35 4.1 NASA’s Legislative Mandate and the New Space Vision………….……. p 35-36 4.2 NASA Safety Practices in Comparison to the FAA……….…………….. p 36-37 4.3 New US Legislation to Regulate and Control Private Space Ventures… p 37 4.3.1 Status of Legislation and Pending FAA Draft Regulations……….. p 37-38 4.3.2 The New Role of Prizes in Space Development…………………….. p 38-40 4.3.3 Implications of Private Space Ventures…………………………….. p 41-42 4.4 International Efforts to Regulate Private Space Systems………………… p 42 4.4.1 International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety… p 42-43 4.4.2 The International Telecommunications Union (ITU)…………….. p 43-44 4.4.3 The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS).. p 44 4.4.4 The European Aviation Safety Agency…………………………….. p 44-45 4.4.5 Review of International Treaties Involving Space………………… p 45 4.4.6 The ICAO -The Best Way Forward for International Regulation.. p 45-47 5.0 Key Efforts to Estimate the Size of a Private Space Tourism Business……… p 47 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 January 2017 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 i Contents About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2017) Publication produced for FAA AST by The Tauri Group under contract. NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 GENERAL CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 Launch Vehicles 9 Launch and Reentry Sites 21 Payloads 35 2016 Launch Events 39 2017 Annual Commercial Space Transportation Forecast 45 Space Transportation Law and Policy 83 Appendices 89 Orbital Launch Vehicle Fact Sheets 100 iii Contents DETAILED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .
    [Show full text]
  • Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. (SPCE) Putting the Zero in Zero-G
    June 2021 Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. (SPCE) Putting the Zero in Zero-G We are short shares of Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc., often described as the only publicly traded space-tourism company. After going public in October 2019 by way of a merger with a “blank check” company, Virgin Galactic has seen its share price and trading volume soar. It’s become a retail darling, with day traders captivated by images of billionaires donning space suits, blasting off from launchpads, and looking down on the blue marble of Earth. But Virgin Galactic’s $250,000+ commercial “spaceflights” – if they ever actually happen, after some 17 years of delays and disasters – will offer only the palest imitations of these experiences. In lieu of pressurized space suits with helmets – unnecessary since so little time will be spent in the upper atmosphere – the company commissioned Under Armour to provide “high-tech pajamas.” In lieu of vertical takeoff, Virgin’s “spaceship” must cling to the underside of a specialized airplane for the first 45,000 feet up, because its rocket motor is too weak to push through the lower atmosphere on its own. In lieu of the blue-marble vista and life in zero-g, Virgin’s so-called astronauts will at best be able to catch a glimpse of the curvature of Earth and a few minutes of weightlessness before plunging back to ground. This isn’t “tourism,” let alone Virgin’s more grandiose term, “exploration”; it’s closer to a souped- up roller coaster, like the “Drop of Doom” ride at Six Flags.
    [Show full text]
  • Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor
    ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 6 April-June 2020 CONTENTS FOCUS ..................................................................................................................... 6 The Crew Dragon mission to the ISS and the Commercial Crew Program ..................................... 6 SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 7 EUROPE ................................................................................................................. 7 COVID-19 and the European space sector ....................................................................... 7 Space technologies for European defence ...................................................................... 7 ESA Earth Observation Missions ................................................................................... 8 Thales Alenia Space among HLS competitors ................................................................... 8 Advancements for the European Service Module ............................................................... 9 Airbus for the Martian Sample Fetch Rover ..................................................................... 9 New appointments in ESA, GSA and Eurospace ................................................................ 10 Italy introduces Platino, regions launch Mirror Copernicus .................................................. 10 DLR new research observatory ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Suborbital Payload Spaceflight Aboard Blue Origin's New Shepard
    Suborbital Payload Spaceflight Aboard Blue Origin’s New Shepard Vehicle Benjamin Lewis Blue Origin, Kent, Washington, USA; [email protected] Abstract payload. This dedicated controller can be Blue Origin’s New Shepard spacecraft offers a programmed to meet the specific needs of the large-format crew capsule, capable of carrying a payload and provides power, payload data logging, wide variety of high-altitude and microgravity high frequency flight telemetry logging and relay, payloads above the Karman Line (100 km). The digital and analog I/O, and camera control. The IPC spacecraft supports unique payload configurations allows researchers to connect via an Ethernet cable ranging from externally mounted hardware to large, to program the IPC and run benchtop mission custom structures inside a shirt-sleeve environment. simulations for payload development and testing. New Shepard also features a standardized payload locker architecture. This enables low cost access to NanoLabs and Custom Payloads flight, streamlined integration and approval, and fast New Shepard offers payload capabilities beyond the reflight for experiment or technology iteration. This standard locker system. The NanoLab form factor is poster will present the payload system architecture, ideal for payloads with lower volume and power interfaces, integration process, and operations for requirements, or customers who are budget payloads aboard New Shepard. constrained. NanoLabs range from elementary school-designed hardware to cutting-edge scientific New Shepard Payload Mission Overview research. Large custom payloads can be mounted Payloads are typically installed four days ahead of in place of payload stacks. The crew capsule is launch, though time sensitive payloads can be easily reconfigurable and able to accommodate any integrated 6-8 hours prior to liftoff with load combination of crew members, payload stacks, and timelines just minutes prior to launch planned for custom payloads.
    [Show full text]
  • A New British Space Age
    A New British Space Age A Response to the Royal Astronomical Society Report on Human Spaceflight Dr J. Duncan Law-Green Department of Physics & Astronomy University of Leicester T: 0116 252 2589 [email protected] 3 Jan 2007 Artist’s impression of the Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo suborbital spaceplane and WhiteKnightTwo carrier aircraft in flight. Image © Virgin Galactic. Summary: The recent Royal Astronomical Society report on human spaceflight (“Report of the Commission on the Scientific Case for Human Space Exploration”, Close et al. 2005) highlighted the scientific and cultural value of human spaceflight, and noted that this is a field of endeavour that has historically been neglected in the United Kingdom. It recommended that the UK Government invest sufficient additional funds in the European Space Agency to allow the training of a small number of UK astronauts. Total additional expenditures in the range of £50 million to £120 million over five years have been quoted. This author agrees with the positive assessment of Close et al. of the value of human spaceflight to the United Kingdom, but disagrees with the emphasis of the policy recommendations made so far. A number of relatively modest investments in UK commercial spaceflight would potentially deliver the same or greater scientific, cultural and economic returns, more promptly and at less overall expense than the proposed ESA funding. This document outlines a number of potential projects to: enhance the UK's space technology base, improve cooperation with allied nations on commercial spaceflight, increase outreach and public involvement with UK space projects, preserve and protect the UK's space history, benefit UK science education and enhance the UK's international reputation in innovation and engineering excellence.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Options and Optimization of Suborbital Space Tourism Vehicles
    Chair of Astronautics Architectural Options and Optimization of Suborbital Space Tourism Vehicles Author: Markus Guerster Master Thesis, RT-MA 2017/2 Supervisors Prof. Edward F. Crawley Prof. Ulrich Walter Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Institute of Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology Technical University of Munich Dr. Christian Hock Christian Bühler CEO Institute of Astronautics in -tech industry GmbH Technical University of Munich Chair of Astronautics “I wanted to be involved in something that has an outside chance of doing some good. If there is not something meaningful in what you are doing above and beyond any commercial returns, then I think life is a bit hollow.” Elon Musk, 2013 II Chair of Astronautics Erklärung Ich erkläre, dass ich alle Einrichtungen, Anlagen, Geräte und Programme, die mir im Rahmen meiner Masterarbeit von der TU München bzw. vom Lehrstuhl für Raumfahrttechnik zur Verfügung gestellt werden, entsprechend dem vorgesehenen Zweck, den gültigen Richtlinien, Benutzerordnungen oder Gebrauchsanleitungen und soweit nötig erst nach erfolgter Einweisung und mit aller Sorgfalt benutze. Insbesondere werde ich Programme ohne besondere Anweisung durch den Betreuer weder kopieren noch für andere als für meine Tätigkeit am Lehrstuhl vorgesehene Zwecke verwenden. Mir als vertraulich genannte Informationen, Unterlagen und Erkenntnisse werde ich weder während noch nach meiner Tätigkeit am Lehrstuhl an Dritte weitergeben. Ich erkläre mich außerdem damit einverstanden, dass meine Masterarbeit vom Lehrstuhl auf Anfrage fachlich interessierten Personen, auch über eine Bibliothek, zugänglich gemacht wird. Ich erkläre außerdem, dass ich diese Arbeit ohne fremde Hilfe angefertigt und nur die in dem Literaturverzeichnis angeführten Quellen und Hilfsmittel benutzt habe. Garching, den 28. April 2017 Name: Markus Guerster Matrikelnummer: 03628540 III Chair of Astronautics Zusammenfassung Der Ansari X-Prize legte den Grundstein für den suborbitalen Weltraumtourismus.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Space Transportation State of the Industry UNOOSA ICAO Symposium August 2017 Highlights
    Commercial Space Transportation State of the Industry UNOOSA ICAO Symposium August 2017 Highlights • U.S. Regulatory Approach • International Perspective • Economics of Commercial Space Transportation • Research and Development • Air and Space Traffic Management • Collaborations Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation August 2017 | 2 Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration- Statutory Authority 51 U. S. C. Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, as amended) • Authorizes the FAA* to license commercial launch and reentry activities and the operation of launch and reentry sites as carried out by U.S. citizens or within the United States. • Directs the FAA to: • Exercise this responsibility consistent with public health and safety, safety of property, and the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States, and • Encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries by the private sector. * The Secretary of Transportation’s licensing authority has been delegated to the Administrator of the FAA and further assigned to the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation (AST) Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation August 2017 | 3 AST Organization Associate Administrator Chief of Staff Deputy Associate Administrator Communications Legislative Affairs Director of Director of Special Projects Strategic Operations Space Integration Policy International Outreach Space Traffic Management Interagency
    [Show full text]