DOCSLIB.ORG

Suborbital Payload Spaceflight Aboard Blue Origin's New Shepard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Suborbital Payload Spaceflight Aboard Blue Origin's New Shepard Suborbital Payload Spaceflight Aboard Blue Origin’s New Shepard Vehicle Benjamin Lewis Blue Origin, Kent, Washington, USA; [email protected] Abstract payload. This dedicated controller can be Blue Origin’s New Shepard spacecraft offers a programmed to meet the specific needs of the large-format crew capsule, capable of carrying a payload and provides power, payload data logging, wide variety of high-altitude and microgravity high frequency flight telemetry logging and relay, payloads above the Karman Line (100 km). The digital and analog I/O, and camera control. The IPC spacecraft supports unique payload configurations allows researchers to connect via an Ethernet cable ranging from externally mounted hardware to large, to program the IPC and run benchtop mission custom structures inside a shirt-sleeve environment. simulations for payload development and testing. New Shepard also features a standardized payload locker architecture. This enables low cost access to NanoLabs and Custom Payloads flight, streamlined integration and approval, and fast New Shepard offers payload capabilities beyond the reflight for experiment or technology iteration. This standard locker system. The NanoLab form factor is poster will present the payload system architecture, ideal for payloads with lower volume and power interfaces, integration process, and operations for requirements, or customers who are budget payloads aboard New Shepard. constrained. NanoLabs range from elementary school-designed hardware to cutting-edge scientific New Shepard Payload Mission Overview research. Large custom payloads can be mounted Payloads are typically installed four days ahead of in place of payload stacks. The crew capsule is launch, though time sensitive payloads can be easily reconfigurable and able to accommodate any integrated 6-8 hours prior to liftoff with load combination of crew members, payload stacks, and timelines just minutes prior to launch planned for custom payloads. The vehicle allows for custom future flights. Payload power and data begin hardware mounting such as window or externally approximately five minutes ahead of liftoff. After mounted sensors. liftoff, the vehicle ascends vertically for approximately 150 seconds before main engine Payload Integration Process cutoff. Several seconds later, the capsule separates Blue Origin offers a light-weight, flexible payload form the booster and experiences microgravity for a integration and approval process. The process period of about three minutes. The microgravity requires two technical document submissions: a environment on previous flights has been observed Payload Data Package at L-5 months and a to be extremely quiet – on the order of a few milli- Payload Safety Package at L-3 months. Combined G’s. The booster maneuvers toward its landing pad, with the simple locker interface, customers are able restarts its engine, and deploys landing gear ahead to move from payload concept to flight within a of a rocket-powered vertical landing. The capsule matter of months. Blue provides a Payload reenters and lands under three-parachute canopy Processing Facility for storage, flight preparations, with the assistance of a retro-thrust system to and post-mission processing of experiments. reduce landing loads. Customers typically arrive two days prior to payload integration for final checkouts. After flight, time Payload Locker Platform sensitive payloads can be returned to the facility New Shepard features a payload locker architecture within an hour of landing. Reflights do not require which is designed to enable streamlined access to re-review and enable even shorter timelines. suborbital flight. The system consists of single and double sized payload lockers which are installed Conclusions into six stacks arranged radially around the crew The New Shepard vehicle has successfully flown capsule. Each locker has a standard internal bolt payload missions and demonstrated world-class pattern which serves as the structural interface to microgravity quality. Blue Origin has developed a the payload. A front access door and easily robust system which enables efficient, cost-effective removable top panel allow for hardware installation access to flight for a broad range of payloads and and fast access during pre and post flight customers. We look forward to fostering this next operations. Each locker features an Integrated frontier in suborbital space research. Payload Controller (IPC) which provides the avionics interface between New Shepard and the .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mitchell Thomas JOS Article
    H-SC Journal of Sciences (2017) Vol. VI Thomas Mars: A prospect for settlement Mitchell H. Thomas’17 Department of Biology, Hampden-Sydney College, Hampden-Sydney, VA 23943 The exploration of Mars was once left to the imagination. However, in recent years, the topic of exploring Mars has become more realistic and increasingly popular in news articles and scientific communities. Technology developed in the previous half-century have already allowed humans to send rovers to Mars in order to retrieve some basic data about the planet. Current technological advancements are resulting in reusable rockets that could one day travel between Earth and Mars. Exploration and colonization of Mars are important for the development of research on the planet and the search for life. Current data is limited, but shows that the conditions on Mars could have supported life in the past. To further our knowledge of the red planet, The atmosphere surrounding Earth is nearly organizations like NASA and companies like SpaceX one-hundred times denser than that of Mars and its are developing plans to colonize Mars. Many composition is crucial to life. According to NASA, the obstacles stand in the way before humans can reach Earth’s atmosphere is comprised of 78% Nitrogen, and colonize the red planet. However, Mars is the 21% Oxygen, and 1% Other. On Mars, the sparse best option for interplanetary colonization and the atmosphere is comprised of nearly 96% Carbon most feasible way to research current and future life Dioxide, less than 2% Argon, less than 2% Nitrogen, on a planet other than Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Human Space Flight Safety Record As of July 20, 2021
    U.S. Human Space Flight Safety Record (As of 20 July 2021) Launch Type Total # of Total # People Total # of Total # of People on Died or Human Space Catastrophic Space Flight Seriously Flights Failures6 Injured3 Orbital (Total) 9271 17 1664 3 Suborbital 2332 3 2135 2 (Total) Total 1160 20 379 5 § 460.45(c) An operator must inform each space flight participant of the safety record of all launch or reentry vehicles that have carried one or more persons on board, including both U.S. government and private sector vehicles. This information must include— (1) The total number of people who have been on a suborbital or orbital space flight and the total number of people who have died or been seriously injured on these flights; and (2) The total number of launches and reentries conducted with people on board and the number of catastrophic failures of those launches and reentries. Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation Footnotes 1. People on orbital space flights include Mercury (Atlas) (4), Gemini (20), Apollo (36), Skylab (9), Space Shuttle (852), and Crew Dragon (6) a. Occupants are counted even if they flew on only the launch or reentry portion. The Space Shuttle launched 817 humans and picked up 35 humans from MIR and the International Space Station. b. Occupants are counted once reentry is complete. 2. People on suborbital space flights include X-15 (169), M2 (24), Mercury (Redstone) (2), SpaceShipOne (5), SpaceShipTwo (29), and New Shepard System (4) a. Only occupants on the rocket-powered space bound vehicles are counted per safety record criterion #11.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Policy Directive 1 New Shepard Flies Again 5
    BUSINESS | POLITICS | PERSPECTIVE DECEMBER 18, 2017 INSIDE ■ Space Policy Directive 1 ■ New Shepard fl ies again ■ 5 bold predictions for 2018 VISIT SPACENEWS.COM FOR THE LATEST IN SPACE NEWS INNOVATION THROUGH INSIGNT CONTENTS 12.18.17 DEPARTMENTS 3 QUICK TAKES 6 NEWS Blue Origin’s New Shepard flies again Trump establishes lunar landing goal 22 COMMENTARY John Casani An argument for space fission reactors 24 ON NATIONAL SECURITY Clouds of uncertainty over miltary space programs 26 COMMENTARY Rep. Brian Babin and Rep. Ami Ber We agree, Mr. President,. America should FEATURE return to the moon 27 COMMENTARY Rebecca Cowen- 9 Hirsch We honor the 10 Paving a clear “Path” to winners of the first interoperable SATCOM annual SpaceNews awards. 32 FOUST FORWARD Third time’s the charm? SpaceNews will not publish an issue Jan. 1. Our next issue will be Jan. 15. Visit SpaceNews.com, follow us on Twitter and sign up for our newsletters at SpaceNews.com/newsletters. ON THE COVER: SPACENEWS ILLUSTRATION THIS PAGE: SPACENEWS ILLUSTRATION FOLLOW US @SpaceNews_Inc Fb.com/SpaceNewslnc youtube.com/user/SpaceNewsInc linkedin.com/company/spacenews SPACENEWS.COM | 1 VOLUME 28 | ISSUE 25 | $4.95 $7.50 NONU.S. CHAIRMAN EDITORIAL CORRESPONDENTS ADVERTISING SUBSCRIBER SERVICES Felix H. Magowan EDITORINCHIEF SILICON VALLEY BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TOLL FREE IN U.S. [email protected] Brian Berger Debra Werner Paige McCullough Tel: +1-866-429-2199 Tel: +1-303-443-4360 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Fax: +1-845-267-3478 +1-571-356-9624 Tel: +1-571-278-4090 CEO LONDON OUTSIDE U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Planes and Space Tourism: the Industry and the Regulation of Its Safety
    Space Planes and Space Tourism: The Industry and the Regulation of its Safety A Research Study Prepared by Dr. Joseph N. Pelton Director, Space & Advanced Communications Research Institute George Washington University George Washington University SACRI Research Study 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………… p 4-14 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. p 16-26 2.0 Methodology…………………………………………………………………….. p 26-28 3.0 Background and History……………………………………………………….. p 28-34 4.0 US Regulations and Government Programs………………………………….. p 34-35 4.1 NASA’s Legislative Mandate and the New Space Vision………….……. p 35-36 4.2 NASA Safety Practices in Comparison to the FAA……….…………….. p 36-37 4.3 New US Legislation to Regulate and Control Private Space Ventures… p 37 4.3.1 Status of Legislation and Pending FAA Draft Regulations……….. p 37-38 4.3.2 The New Role of Prizes in Space Development…………………….. p 38-40 4.3.3 Implications of Private Space Ventures…………………………….. p 41-42 4.4 International Efforts to Regulate Private Space Systems………………… p 42 4.4.1 International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety… p 42-43 4.4.2 The International Telecommunications Union (ITU)…………….. p 43-44 4.4.3 The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS).. p 44 4.4.4 The European Aviation Safety Agency…………………………….. p 44-45 4.4.5 Review of International Treaties Involving Space………………… p 45 4.4.6 The ICAO -The Best Way Forward for International Regulation.. p 45-47 5.0 Key Efforts to Estimate the Size of a Private Space Tourism Business……… p 47 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. (SPCE) Putting the Zero in Zero-G
    June 2021 Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. (SPCE) Putting the Zero in Zero-G We are short shares of Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc., often described as the only publicly traded space-tourism company. After going public in October 2019 by way of a merger with a “blank check” company, Virgin Galactic has seen its share price and trading volume soar. It’s become a retail darling, with day traders captivated by images of billionaires donning space suits, blasting off from launchpads, and looking down on the blue marble of Earth. But Virgin Galactic’s $250,000+ commercial “spaceflights” – if they ever actually happen, after some 17 years of delays and disasters – will offer only the palest imitations of these experiences. In lieu of pressurized space suits with helmets – unnecessary since so little time will be spent in the upper atmosphere – the company commissioned Under Armour to provide “high-tech pajamas.” In lieu of vertical takeoff, Virgin’s “spaceship” must cling to the underside of a specialized airplane for the first 45,000 feet up, because its rocket motor is too weak to push through the lower atmosphere on its own. In lieu of the blue-marble vista and life in zero-g, Virgin’s so-called astronauts will at best be able to catch a glimpse of the curvature of Earth and a few minutes of weightlessness before plunging back to ground. This isn’t “tourism,” let alone Virgin’s more grandiose term, “exploration”; it’s closer to a souped- up roller coaster, like the “Drop of Doom” ride at Six Flags.
    [Show full text]
  • Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor
    ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 6 April-June 2020 CONTENTS FOCUS ..................................................................................................................... 6 The Crew Dragon mission to the ISS and the Commercial Crew Program ..................................... 6 SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 7 EUROPE ................................................................................................................. 7 COVID-19 and the European space sector ....................................................................... 7 Space technologies for European defence ...................................................................... 7 ESA Earth Observation Missions ................................................................................... 8 Thales Alenia Space among HLS competitors ................................................................... 8 Advancements for the European Service Module ............................................................... 9 Airbus for the Martian Sample Fetch Rover ..................................................................... 9 New appointments in ESA, GSA and Eurospace ................................................................ 10 Italy introduces Platino, regions launch Mirror Copernicus .................................................. 10 DLR new research observatory ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Space Transportation State of the Industry UNOOSA ICAO Symposium August 2017 Highlights
    Commercial Space Transportation State of the Industry UNOOSA ICAO Symposium August 2017 Highlights • U.S. Regulatory Approach • International Perspective • Economics of Commercial Space Transportation • Research and Development • Air and Space Traffic Management • Collaborations Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation August 2017 | 2 Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration- Statutory Authority 51 U. S. C. Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, as amended) • Authorizes the FAA* to license commercial launch and reentry activities and the operation of launch and reentry sites as carried out by U.S. citizens or within the United States. • Directs the FAA to: • Exercise this responsibility consistent with public health and safety, safety of property, and the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States, and • Encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries by the private sector. * The Secretary of Transportation’s licensing authority has been delegated to the Administrator of the FAA and further assigned to the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation (AST) Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation August 2017 | 3 AST Organization Associate Administrator Chief of Staff Deputy Associate Administrator Communications Legislative Affairs Director of Director of Special Projects Strategic Operations Space Integration Policy International Outreach Space Traffic Management Interagency
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Options and Optimization of Suborbital Space Tourism Vehicles Markus Guerster Edward F
    Architectural Options and Optimization of Suborbital Space Tourism Vehicles Markus Guerster Edward F. Crawley System Architecture Lab, MIT System Architecture Lab, MIT 77 Massachusetts Avenue. 77 Massachusetts Avenue. Cambridge, MA 02139 Cambridge, MA 02139 857-999-6103 617-230-6604 [email protected] [email protected] Abstract— Since the creation of the Ansari X-Prize, a significant The birth of the suborbital space tourism dates to May 1996, technical and commercial interest has developed in suborbital where the Ansari XPrize was launched by the Ansari family. space tourism. An obvious question arises: what system This competition challenged teams all around the world to architecture will provide the best combination of cost and safety build a reusable, private-funded and manned spaceship. The for the performance defined by the prize? The objective of this first team carrying three people to 100 km above the Earth’s paper is to address this question, by defining the design space and searching comprehensively through it with respect to surface twice within two weeks received the $10 million launch mass (a proxy for cost) and safety. We have identified 33 price. 26 teams from 7 nations proposed their concept. architectures and visualized them in a single table. Of these, 26 Finally, the Mojave Aerospace Ventures team, which was led have not earlier been proposed. A genetic algorithm optimized by Burt Rutan and his company Scaled Composites and each of these 33 architectures for launch mass and safety. The financed from Paul Allen, won the competition on October 4, launch mass was calculated by a design framework consisting of 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Commercial Suborbital Flight Providers for Flight Opportunities About Flight Opportunities
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPACE TECHNOLOGY MISSION DIRECTORATE A Guide to Commercial Suborbital Flight Providers for Flight Opportunities About Flight Opportunities light Opportunities facilitates rapid demonstration of promising technologies for space exploration, discovery, and the expansion of space commerce Fthrough suborbital testing with industry flight providers, thereby maturing capabilities needed for NASA missions and commercial applications while strategically investing in the growth of the U.S. commercial spaceflight industry. About this Document In this document you will find information about commercial flight providers who have conducted successful flights for research payloads supported by Flight Opportunities. Some of these companies are contracted by NASA to provide commercial suborbital flight testing for NASA-developed technologies. Others have been chosen by academic, research, and industry organizations using funds awarded through NASA’s Space Technology Research, Development, Demonstration and Infusion (SpaceTech-REDDI) Tech Flights solicitation or previous solicitations. Awardees receive a grant or enter into a collaborative agreement that allows them to purchase flights directly from a U.S. commercial flight vendor that best meets their needs for flight testing a promising space technology. While the flight providers highlighted in this document have been selected by Tech Flights grantees in recent years, other commercial flight providers not covered herein may also be eligible under the criteria set forth in the Tech Flights solicitation. Interested organizations and principal investigators should read the full eligibility criteria for flight providers in the Tech Flights solicitation available on NASA’s NSPIRES website. More information about the flight profiles featured in this document can be found in the respective Payload User Guides, which are available from individual flight providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges of ERAU's First Suborbital Flight Aboard Blue Origin's New
    Research Note • DOI: 10.2478/gsr-2019-0001 GSR • 7 • 2019 • 1-12 Gravitational and Space Research Challenges of ERAU’s First Suborbital Flight Aboard Blue Origin’s New Shepard M7 for the Cell Research Experiment In Microgravity (CRExIM) Pedro J. Llanos1, Kristina Andrijauskaite2, Vijay V. Duraisamy3, Francisco Pastrana4, Erik L. Seedhouse1, Sathya Gangadharan3, Leonid Bunegin5, Mariel Rico6 1Department of Applied Aviation Sciences , Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU), Daytona Beach, FL; 2Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center (UTHSCSA), San Antonio, TX; 3Department of Mechanical Engineering, ERAU, Daytona Beach, FL; 4Department of Aerospace Engineering, ERAU, Daytona Beach, FL; 5Department of Anesthesiology, UTHSCSA, San Antonio, TX; 6NanoRacks, Internal Pressurized Payloads, Houston, TX Abstract Cell Research Experiment In Microgravity (CRExIM) was launched aboard Blue Origin’s New Shepard suborbital vehicle on Tuesday, December 12, 2017, from the West Texas Launch Site in Van Horn, Texas. One of the aims of this science experiment was to assess the effects of microgravity on murine T-cells during suborbital flight. These cells were placed in a NanoLab with a data logger that sensed the acceleration, temperature, and relative humidity during preflight, flight, and postflight operations. Some discrepancies in sensor measurement were noticed, and these errors were attributed partly to the difference in sampling rates and partly to the different locations of the sensors, which made it difficult to obtain highly accurate measurements of the accelerations and to correlate both sets of data. This paper discusses the setbacks and lessons learned, which made our team find new alternatives while meeting all milestones as mandated by NanoRacks and Blue Origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessible Version
    United States Government Accountability Office T estimony Before the Subcommittee on Aviation, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives For Release on Delivery Expected at 10:00 a.m. EST Wednesday, June 22, 2016 COMMERCIAL SPACE Industry Developments and FAA Challenges Statement of Gerald L. Dillingham, Ph.D., Director, Physical Infrastructure Issues Accessible Version GAO-16-765T June 22, 2016 COMMERCIAL SPACE Industry Developments and FAA Challenges Highlights of GAO-16-765T, a testimony before the Subcommittee on Aviation, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The U.S. commercial space launch In 2015, GAO reported that during the last decade, U.S. commercial space industry has changed considerably launch companies conducted fewer orbital launches in total than companies in since the enactment of the Commercial Russia or Europe, which are among their main foreign competitors. However, the Space Launch Amendments Act of U.S. commercial space launch industry has expanded recently. In 2015, U.S. 2004. FAA is required to license or companies conducted eight orbital launches, compared with none in 2011. In permit commercial space launches; addition, in 2015, U.S. companies conducted more orbital launches than however, to allow space tourism to companies in Russia, which conducted five, or Europe, which conducted six. develop, the act prohibited FAA from regulating crew and spaceflight In 2015, GAO reported that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)—which is participant safety before 2012—a responsible for protecting the public with respect to commercial space launches, moratorium that was extended to 2023.
    [Show full text]
  • View E-Magazine
    STELLAR CHRONICLE EDITORIAL With the launch of “STELLAR CHRONICLE” a Quarterly E Magazine, the UL Space Club is embarking on yet another ambitious voyage. A voyage fuelled by the enormous enthusiasm and youthful exuberance of its members and well-wishers. Complementing the other activities of the club, Stellar Chronicle intends to facilitate a platform for exploring, expressing, and conveying the views, observations and creative outputs of the club members and well-wishers amidst a wider audience. I am sure that this objective will eminently be fulfilled, considering the track record of the club powered by the effervescent youth and the galaxy of patrons it has. More than 50 years of Human activities in space has resulted in a continuing flow of social benefits improving the quality of life on earth. Critical knowledge and capabilities for developing Satellite Telecommunications, Global Positioning, Earth Observation, Weather forecasting, Manned spaceflight etc. have emerged. Space exploration has sparked new scientific and technological ingenuity and innovation not to mention the better understanding of our universe and the solar system that has accrued. A new perspective on our individual and collective place in the universe has evolved. It will therefore be our endeavour to bring to you in the form of articles and excerpts, the history of space exploration as also technology as it unfolds. We are fortunate to have a galaxy of eminent space scientists and technologists as also other science and technology domain veterans amidst us, to hold our hands in this onerous task. I take this opportunity to seek their continued support and guidance, as also, invoke their blessings.
    [Show full text]