DOCSLIB.ORG

Cecil Spaceport Master Plan 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cecil Spaceport Master Plan 2012 March 2012 Jacksonville Aviation Authority Cecil Spaceport Master Plan Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Project Background ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 History of Spaceport Activities ........................................................................................ 1-3 1.3 Purpose of the Master Plan ............................................................................................ 1-3 1.4 Strategic Vision .............................................................................................................. 1-4 1.5 Market Analysis .............................................................................................................. 1-4 1.6 Competitor Analysis ....................................................................................................... 1-6 1.7 Operating and Development Plan................................................................................... 1-8 1.8 Implementation Plan .................................................................................................... 1-10 1.8.1 Phasing Plan ......................................................................................................... 1-10 1.8.2 Funding Alternatives ............................................................................................. 1-11 CHAPTER 2 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Project Background ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 Commercial Space .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.2 Suborbital, Orbital, Point-to-Point ............................................................................ 2-2 2.1.3 Commercial Opportunities ....................................................................................... 2-3 2.2 History of Spaceport Activities ........................................................................................ 2-4 2.3 Purpose of the Master Plan ............................................................................................ 2-4 2.3.1 Goals and Objectives .............................................................................................. 2-5 2.3.2 Elements of the Master Plan ................................................................................... 2-5 2.4 Existing Conditions ......................................................................................................... 2-6 2.5 Anticipated Activities ...................................................................................................... 2-7 2.6 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 2-8 CHAPTER 3 Cecil Spaceport Strategic Vision .............................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Vision and Mission Statement ........................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.1 Strategic Visioning Session ..................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Participants ............................................................................................................. 3-2 3.2 Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats ............................................................. 3-2 3.2.1 Strengths................................................................................................................. 3-2 3.2.2 Weaknesses ........................................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.3 Opportunities ........................................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.4 Threats .................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.3 Public Workshop ............................................................................................................ 3-3 3.4 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3-4 March 2012 Jacksonville Aviation Authority Cecil Spaceport Master Plan CHAPTER 4 Market Analysis ....................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 Space Tourism Market ................................................................................................... 4-2 4.3 Space Science Market ................................................................................................... 4-2 4.4 Vehicles ......................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.4.1 SpaceShipTwo ........................................................................................................ 4-3 4.4.2 XCOR Lynx ............................................................................................................. 4-6 4.4.3 Stratolaunch ............................................................................................................ 4-8 4.4.4 Other vehicles ......................................................................................................... 4-9 4.5 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 4-10 CHAPTER 5 Competitor Analysis ................................................................................................. 5-1 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Overview ........................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.3 Competitors .................................................................................................................... 5-3 5.3.1 Current U.S. Spaceports ......................................................................................... 5-3 5.3.2 Proposed/Planned U.S. Spaceports: ..................................................................... 5-10 5.3.3 International Spaceports ....................................................................................... 5-12 5.4 Competitive Position .................................................................................................... 5-15 5.4.1 Geographic Location ............................................................................................. 5-16 5.4.2 Facilities ................................................................................................................ 5-17 5.4.3 Economics ............................................................................................................ 5-18 5.4.4 Demographics ....................................................................................................... 5-19 5.5 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 5-20 CHAPTER 6 Operating and Development Plan ............................................................................ 6-1 6.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Airfield Requirements ..................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2.1 Existing Runways .................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2.2 Runway Requirements ............................................................................................ 6-3 6.2.3 Existing Taxiways .................................................................................................... 6-4 6.2.4 Taxiway Requirements ............................................................................................ 6-4 6.2.5 FAA-Approved Oxidizer Loading Areas ................................................................... 6-6 6.2.6 Fuel/Oxidizer Loading Requirements ...................................................................... 6-8 6.2.7 Fuel/Oxidizer Storage Requirements ..................................................................... 6-12 6.3 RLV Operator Requirements ........................................................................................ 6-15 6.3.1 Hangar/Facility Requirements ............................................................................... 6-16 6.3.2 Apron and Airfield Access Requirements .............................................................. 6-16 6.3.3 Visitor Center ........................................................................................................ 6-17 March 2012 Jacksonville Aviation Authority Cecil Spaceport Master Plan 6.3.4 Engine Test Facility ............................................................................................... 6-17 6.3.5 Specialty Facilities ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • County by County Allocations
    COUNTY BY COUNTY ALLOCATIONS Conference Report on House Bill 5001 Fiscal Year 2014-2015 General Appropriations Act Florida House of Representatives Appropriations Committee May 21, 2014 County Allocations Contained in the Conference Report on House Bill 5001 2014-2015 General Appropriations Act This report reflects only items contained in the Conference Report on House Bill 5001, the 2014-2015 General Appropriations Act, that are identifiable to specific counties. State agencies will further allocate other funds contained in the General Appropriations Act based on their own authorized distribution methodologies. This report includes all construction, right of way, or public transportation phases $1 million or greater that are included in the Tentative Work Program for Fiscal Year 2014-2015. The report also contains projects included on certain approved lists associated with specific appropriations where the list may be referenced in proviso but the project is not specifically listed. Examples include, but are not limited to, lists for library, cultural, and historic preservation program grants included in the Department of State and the Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program Small Projects grant list (FRDAP) included in the Department of Environmental Protection. The FEFP and funds distributed to counties by state agencies are not identified in this report. Pages 2 through 63 reflect items that are identifiable to one specific county. Multiple county programs can be found on pages 64 through 67. This report was produced prior
    [Show full text]
  • Northrop Grumman
    Northrop Grumman Northrop Grumman Corporation Type Public (NYSE: NOC) 1927 (in 1994, company took on Founded current name), Denver, Colorado Headquarters Los Angeles, California Ronald Sugar, Chairman and Key people CEO Industry Aerospace and defense Aircraft carriers, military aircraft, satellites, missile defense Products systems, advanced electronic sensors and systems, Information Technology, ships, and systems Revenue $30.15 Billion USD (2006) Net income $1.59 Billion USD (2006) Employees 123,600 (2007) Website NorthropGrumman.com Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE: NOC) is an aerospace and defense conglomerate that is the result of the 1994 purchase of Grumman by Northrop. The company is the third largest defense contractor for the U.S. military[1], and the number-one builder of naval vessels. Northrop Grumman employs over 122,000 people worldwide[2]. Its 2006 annual revenue is reported at US$30 billion. Northrop Grumman ranks #73 on the 2007 Fortune 500 list of U.S. industrial companies.[3] Products and services Some of the most expensive vehicles in the world, such as this B-2 Spirit strategic bomber, are made by Northrop Grumman and purchased by the United States government. Naval 1 Northrop Grumman's many products are made by separate business units. Newport News Shipbuilding manufactures all U.S. aircraft carriers, and is the only company capable of building Nimitz-class supercarriers. It also produces a large percentage of U.S. nuclear submarines. A separate sector, Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, produces amphibious assault ships and many other commercial and military craft, including icebreakers, tankers, and cargo ships. In a partnership with Science Applications International Corporation, Northrop Grumman provides naval engineering and architecture services as well as naval maintenance services Aerospace A BQM-74 Chukar unmanned aerial drone launches from a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillwood Reports Prospect Wants Smaller Space at Alliance Florida
    WEDNESDAY September 30, 2020 PUBLIC LEGAL jaxdailyrecord.com • 35 cents NOTICES BEGIN ON PAGE 3 JACKSONVILLE Daily Record THE MATHIS REPORT Tim Baker’s JACKSONVILLE Hillwood reports prospect wants companies targeted in smallerDail space aty Alliance Re FloridacordJEA probe Attorneys leading the JACKSONVILLE city’s investigation produced a list of eight additional witnesses to interview before Dec. 31. BY MIKE MENDENHALL Daily RecordSTAFF WRITER KAREN BRUNE MATHIS EDITOR The City Council committee investigating JEA’s 2019 attempt “Positive discussions with JACKSONVILLE to privatize voted Sept. 28 to seek subpoenas for companies linked the prospect were ongoing,” to Mayor Lenny Curry’s former developer says in its political consultant Tim Baker. The Council Special Investiga- quarterly update to the city. tory Committee wants records from Baker’s consulting compa- Hillwood, the developerDail of Alliance- MORE HILLWOODy DEVELOPMENTSRecordnies Bold City Strategic Partners Florida at Cecil Commerce Center, told and Data Targeting Research LLC. the city Sept. 28 that it continues to AllianceFlorida at Cecil Commerce Center developer Hillwood also told the city The political consultant refused work with a prospect that wants to lease that during the second quarter, it: to provide the a 270,000-square-foot build-to-suit records dur- ■ facility at the West Jacksonville busi- Received and responded to an reporting period, discussions with the ing sworn tes- ness park. initial inquiry from an unidentified prospect were continuing. timony ear- The unidentified prospect initially prospect interested in leasing about lier this month ■ wanted a 500,000-square-foot cen- 200,000 square feet of industrial Continued discussions, which with Council’s ter when discussions began in March, space.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace-America-April-2019.Pdf
    17–21 JUNE 2019 DALLAS, TX SHAPING THE FUTURE OF FLIGHT The 2019 AIAA AVIATION Forum will explore how rapidly changing technology, new entrants, and emerging trends are shaping a future of flight that promises to be strikingly different from the modern global transportation built by our pioneers. Help shape the future of flight at the AIAA AVIATION Forum! PLENARY & FORUM 360 SESSIONS Hear from industry leaders and innovators including Christopher Emerson, President and Head, North America Region, Airbus Helicopters, and Greg Hyslop, Chief Technology Officer, The Boeing Company. Keynote speakers and panelists will discuss vertical lift, autonomy, hypersonics, and more. TECHNICAL PROGRAM More than 1,100 papers will be presented, giving you access to the latest research and development on technical areas including applied aerodynamics, fluid dynamics, and air traffic operations. NETWORKING OPPORTUNITIES The forum offers daily networking opportunities to connect with over 2,500 attendees from across the globe representing hundreds of government, academic, and private institutions. Opportunities to connect include: › ADS Banquet (NEW) › AVIATION 101 (NEW) › Backyard BBQ (NEW) › Exposition Hall › Ignite the “Meet”ing (NEW) › Meet the Employers Recruiting Event › Opening Reception › Student Welcome Reception › The HUB Register now aviation.aiaa.org/register FEATURES | APRIL 2019 MORE AT aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org The U.S. Army’s Kestrel Eye prototype cubesat after being released from the International Space Station. NASA 18 30 40 22 3D-printing solid Seeing the far Managing Getting out front on rocket fuel side of the moon drone traffi c Researchers China’s Chang’e-4 Package delivery alone space technology say additive “opens up a new could put thousands manufacturing is scientifi c frontier.” of drones into the sky, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role and Training of NASA Astronauts in the Post-Shuttle Era
    The Role and Training of NASA Astronauts in the Post-Shuttle Era Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board ∙ Air Force Studies Board ∙ Division on Engineering & Physical Sciences ∙ September 2011 As the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) retires the Space Shuttle and shifts involvement in International Space Station (ISS) operations, changes in the role and requirements of NASA’s Astronaut Corps will take place. At the request of NASA, the National Research Council (NRC) addressed three main questions about these changes: What should be the role and size of Johnson Space Center’s (JSC) Flight Crew Operations Directorate (FCOD); what will be the requirements of astronaut training facilities; and is the Astronaut Corps’ fleet of training aircraft a cost-effective means of preparing astronauts for NASA’s spaceflight program? This report presents an assessment of several issues driven by these questions. This report does not address explicitly the future of human spaceflight. Background Corps—defined in this report as the number he United States has been launching as- of astronauts qualified to fly into space. As Ttronauts into space for more than five of May 2011, the Astronaut Corps consist- decades and, for a majority of those years, ed of 61 people, compared with a peak size astronauts have been selected and trained of nearly 150 people in 2000. NASA uses a through NASA’s Astronaut Corps. Since its model for projecting minimum ISS manifest inception in 1959, the Astronaut Corps— requirements. Using the model on the next which is based at the Lyndon B. Johnson page, NASA has projected that the Astronaut Space Center (JSC) in Houston, Texas—has Corps will need a minimum of 55-60 astro- experienced periodic fluctuations in size and nauts to meet ISS crew requirements through training emphasis based on various program 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notice with Attachments
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS POST OFFICE BOX 4970 JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32232 REPLY TO June 21, 2018 ATTENTION OF Regulatory Division North Permits Branch Jacksonville Permits Section PUBLIC NOTICE Permit Application Number SAJ-2003-02536(SP-MRE) TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Jacksonville District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1344) as described below: APPLICANT: Jacksonville – Cecil Commerce Center, LLC c/o Hillwood 3000 Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas 75219 WATERWAY AND LOCATION: The project would affect waters of the United States (wetlands) associated with Rowell Creek. The project site is located within the Cecil Commerce Center (CCC), contiguous to 103rd Street (Perimeter Road), in portions of Sections 11, Township 3 South, Range 23 East, Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida. APPROXIMATE CENTRAL COORDINATES: Latitude 30.247904°, Longitude -81.873443° PROJECT PURPOSE: Basic: The basic project purpose is commercial development. Overall: The overall project purpose is the establishment of an industrial warehouse facility within the CCC. PROJECT HISTORY: In 1998, the U.S. Department of the Navy (Navy) compiled an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the Disposal and Reuse of Naval Air Station Cecil Field. As a result of actions by the Navy, the Jacksonville Economic Development Commission and the Jacksonville Port Authority proposed the redevelopment of the property. In 2000, the Corps circulated a public notice conveying the conceptual revitalization and development of Naval Air Station Cecil Field as the CCC.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts: Vehicles, Technologies and Spaceports
    Commercial Space Transportation 2006 Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts: Vehicles, Technologies and Spaceports January 2006 HQ003606.INDD 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts About FAA/AST About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 49 United States Code, Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA/AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA/AST is directed to encour- age, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA/AST’s web site at http://ast.faa.gov. Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation i About FAA/AST 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts Contents Table of Contents Introduction . .1 Significant 2005 Events . .4 Space Competitions . .6 Expendable Launch Vehicles . .9 Current Expendable Launch Vehicle Systems . .9 Atlas 5 - Lockheed Martin Corporation .
    [Show full text]
  • Human Behavior During Spaceflight - Videncee from an Analog Environment
    Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research Volume 25 Number 1 JAAER Fall 2015 Article 2 Fall 2015 Human Behavior During Spaceflight - videnceE From an Analog Environment Kenny M. Arnaldi Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, [email protected] Guy Smith Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, [email protected] Jennifer E. Thropp Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/jaaer Part of the Applied Behavior Analysis Commons, Experimental Analysis of Behavior Commons, and the Other Astrophysics and Astronomy Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Arnaldi, K. M., Smith, G., & Thropp, J. E. (2015). Human Behavior During Spaceflight - videnceE From an Analog Environment. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 25(1). https://doi.org/ 10.15394/jaaer.2015.1676 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Arnaldi et al.: Human Behavior During Spaceflight - Evidence From an Analog Environment Introduction Four years after the launch of Sputnik, the world’s first artificial satellite, Yuri Gagarin became the first human to reach space (National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA], 2011a). The United States soon followed on the path of manned space exploration with Project Mercury. Although this program began with suborbital flights, manned spacecraft were subsequently launched into orbit around the Earth (NASA, 2012). With President Kennedy setting the goal of landing a man on the moon, NASA focused on short-duration orbital flights as a stepping-stone to lunar missions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role and Training of NASA Astronauts In
    Co-chairs: Joe Rothenberg, Fred Gregory Briefing: October 18-19, 2011 Statement of Task An ad hoc committee will conduct a study and prepare a report on the activities of NASA’s human spaceflight crew office. In writing its report the committee will address the following questions: • How should the role and size of the activities managed by the Johnson Space Center Flight Crew Operations Directorate change after space shuttle retirement and completion of the assembly of the International Space Station (ISS)? • What are the requirements of crew-related ground-based facilities after the space shuttle program ends? • Is the fleet of aircraft used for the training the Astronaut Corps a cost-effective means of preparing astronauts to meet the requirements of NASA’s human spaceflight program? Are there more cost-effective means of meeting these training requirements? The NRC was not asked to consider whether or not the United States should continue human spaceflight, or whether there were better alternatives to achieving the nation’s goals without launching humans into space. Rather, the NRC’s charge was to assume that U.S. human spaceflight would continue. 2 Committee on Human Spaceflight Crew Operations • FREDERICK GREGORY, Lohfeld Consulting Group, Inc., Co-Chair • JOSEPH H. ROTHENBERG, Swedish Space Corporation, Co-Chair • MICHAEL J. CASSUTT, University of Southern California • RICHARD O. COVEY, United Space Alliance, LLC (retired) • DUANE DEAL, Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies, Inc. • BONNIE J. DUNBAR, President and CEO, Dunbar International, LLC • WILLIAM W. HOOVER, Independent Consultant • THOMAS D. JONES, Florida Institute of Human and Machine Cognition • FRANKLIN D. MARTIN, Martin Consulting, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Reusable Launch Vehicles Exos Aerospace Is Making
    Reusable Launch Vehicles Exos Aerospace is making SPACEavailable…TM The 4 FAA/AST The other 6 of 10 Licensed Reusable EXOS AEROSPACE is… “Non-Reusable Rocket Launch Rocket” Launch Providers Providers companies of companies of 1 4 IN THE 1 10 in the United WORLD with a licensed States with an Active reusable rocket. Launch License $ <10% reuse cost Access to space $$ 25% reuse cost is too inflexible Air Launch Provides for increased flexibility $$ reuse cost… % unknown (Exos, Virgin Orbit, Lockheed Martin) Reusability Enables increased ROI through cost reductions (Exos, SpaceX, Blue Origin) 1- Ignition 2- Clean Lox Ethanol Engine (launch) Apogee SARGE Flight 1 3- Drogue Return to 4.- Canopy Return from reenter the atmosphere Rocket flight 3 Our team has built hundreds of rocket engines and dozens of suborbital flying vehicles designed for reusability TEAM’S PAST EXPERIENCE Vehicle Evolution (20+ Years) Armadillo 4 Launches and 3 Rocket Racing st J Aerospace Lunar recoveries on 1 League SARGE vehicle Founded by Lander development SARGE a st John Carmack Challenge 1 Today program Super Mod Aug 2018 – Oct 2019 SARGE-LW Place g u a r 2000 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2015 2020 Apr 2020 Air Force X-Prize Lunar lander 2010-2013 Stig Exos Aerospace Hypersonic Challenge2009 flies to 95km acquires assets of Contract Competition Armadillo Aerospace Armadillo prize $ w/Pixel and and brings on the team Testing SARGE R2 J Texel Round 1 winner- NASA with new management for return to flight Winners Morpheus Sale supporting commercial post COVID 19 a objectives
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis of Scaled Hypersonic Re-Entry Vehicles
    Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis of Scaled Hypersonic Re-Entry Vehicles A project presented to The Faculty of the Department of Aerospace Engineering San Jose State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering by Simon H.B. Sorensen March 2019 approved by Dr. Periklis Papadopoulous Faculty Advisor 1 i ABSTRACT With the advancement of technology in space, reusable re-entry space planes have become a focus point with their ability to save materials and utilize existing flight data. Their ability to not only supply materials to space stations or deploy satellites, but also in atmosphere flight makes them versatile in their deployment and recovery. The existing design of vehicles such as the Space Shuttle Orbiter and X-37 Orbital Test Vehicle can be used to observe the effects of scaling existing vehicle geometry and how it would operate in identical conditions to the full-size vehicle. These scaled vehicles, if viable, would provide additional options depending on mission parameters without losing the advantages of reusable re-entry space planes. 2 Table of Contents Abstract . i Nomenclature . .1 1. Introduction. .1 2. Literature Review. 2 2.1 Space Shuttle Orbiter. 2 2.2 X-37 Orbital Test Vehicle. 3 3. Assumptions & Equations. 3 3.1 Assumptions. 3 3.2 Equations to Solve. 4 4. Methodology. 5 5. Base Sized Vehicles. 5 5.1 Space Shuttle Orbiter. 5 5.2 X-37. 9 6. Scaled Vehicles. 11 7. Simulations. 12 7.1 Initial Conditions. 12 7.2 Initial Test Utilizing X-37. .13 7.3 X-37 OTV.
    [Show full text]
  • Alachua County
    FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 5 - YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN ($ IN THOUSANDS) TENTATIVE FY 2022 - 2026 (12/02/2020 15.48.40) ALACHUA COUNTY Item No Project Description Work Description Length 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Highways: State Highways Item No Project Description Work Description Length 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 4135171 D2-ALACHUA COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES/SYSTEM .000 1,103 OPS 1,157 OPS 4358891 SR120(NW 23 AVE) & SR25(US441)(NW 13 ST) TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPDATE .005 94 ROW 214 ROW 165 ROW 762 CST 4437011 SR20 EAST ON-RAMP IN HAWTHORNE RR CROSSING #625010J RAILROAD CROSSING .146 432 RRU 4395331 SR20 FROM: EAST OF US301 TO: PUTNAM C/L LANDSCAPING 1.399 85 PE 1,229 CST 4436951 SR20 W ON-RAMP IN HAWTHORNE RR CROSSING NUMBER 927690S RAILROAD CROSSING .118 362 RRU 4432581 SR20(SE HAWTHORN ROAD) FROM: CR325 TO: WEST OF US301 RESURFACING 5.340 8,528 CST 4355641 SR200(US301) @SR24 CSXRR BR.NO260001 & SR25(US441) PED OVRPS BR.260003 BRIDGE - PAINTING .097 919 CST 4470321 SR222 (39TH AVE) FROM NW 92ND CT TO NW 95TH BLVD RESURFACING 3.293 719 PE 6,995 CST 4373771 SR226(SW 16TH AVE) AT SW 10TH TERRACE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT .004 354 CST 4479641 SR24 FROM SR222 TO SR200(US301) RESURFACING 10.706 2,414 PE 16,633 CST 4358911 SR25(US441) @ SR24(SW ARCHER RD) TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPDATE .006 552 PE 37 ROW 261 ROW 848 CST 4344001 SR25(US441) @ SW 14TH DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPDATE .037 1,037 CST 4470331 SR25(US441) FROM SR331(WILLISTON ROAD) TO SR24(ARCHER ROAD) RESURFACING 2.032 4,377 CST 2078502 SR26 CORRIDOR
    [Show full text]