DOCSLIB.ORG

25D the Soncino Babylonian Talmud

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
25D the Soncino Babylonian Talmud KESUVOS – 78a-112a 25d The Soncino Babylonian Talmud KKEETTHHUUBBOOTTHH Book IV Folios 78a-112a CHAPTERS VIII-XIII TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH WITH NOTES BY R A B B I D R . S A M U E L DAICHES Barrister at Law AND R E V . D R . I S R A E L W. SLOTKI, M.A., Litt.D. UNDER THE EDITORSHIP OF R A B B I D R I. EPSTEIN B.A., Ph.D., D. Lit. Reformatted by Reuven Brauner, Raanana 5772 www.613etc.com 1 KESUVOS – 78a-112a Kethuboth 78a VOID; [PROPERTY, HOWEVER,] WHICH IS UNKNOWN TO THE HUSBAND SHE MAY CHAPTER VIII NOT SELL, BUT IF SHE HAS SOLD IT OR GIVEN IT AWAY HER ACT IS LEGALLY MISHNAH . IF A WOMAN CAME INTO THE VALID. POSSESSION 1 OF PROPERTY BEFORE SHE WAS BETROTHED, BETH SHAMMAI AND GEMARA . What is the essential difference BETH HILLEL AGREE THAT SHE MAY 2 between the first clause 14 in which they 15 do SELL IT OR GIVE IT AWAY AND HER ACT IS not differ and the succeeding clause 16 in LEGALLY VALID. IF SHE CAME INTO THE which they differ? 17 — The school of R. POSSESSION OF THE PROPERTY AFTER Jannai replied: In the first clause it was into SHE WAS BETROTHED, BETH SHAMMAI her possession that the property had come; 18 SAID: SHE MAY SELL IT, 2 AND BETH in the succeeding clause 16 the property came HILLEL SAID: SHE MAY NOT SELL IT; 2 BUT into his possession. 19 If, however, [it is BOTH AGREE THAT IF SHE HAD SOLD IT maintained] that the property 'came into his OR GIVEN IT AWAY HER ACT IS LEGALLY possession' why is HER ACT LEGALLY VALID. R. JUDAH STATED: THE SAGES VALID when SHE HAD SOLD [THE ARGUED BEFORE R. GAMALIEL, 'SINCE PROPERTY] OR GIVEN IT AWAY? — THE MAN 3 GAINS POSSESSION OF THE This then [is the explanation:] In the first WOMAN DOES HE NOT ALSO GAIN clause the property has beyond all doubt POSSESSION OF HER PROPERTY?' 4 HE come into her possession. 18 In the succeeding REPLIED, 'WE ARE EMBARRASSED 5 WITH clause, [however, the property] might be said REGARD TO [THE PROBLEM OF] HER NEW [to have come either] into her, or into his POSSESSIONS 6 AND DO YOU WISH TO possession; 20 [hence,] 21 she may not properly INVOLVE US [IN THE PROBLEM OF] HER sell [the property, but] IF SHE HAD SOLD OLD ONES 7 ALSO?' IF SHE CAME INTO THE IT OR GIVEN IT AWAY HER ACT IS POSSESSION OF PROPERTY AFTER SHE LEGALLY VALID. WAS MARRIED, BOTH 8 AGREE THAT, EVEN IF SHE HAD SOLD IT OR GIVEN IT AWAY, R. JUDAH STATED: [THE SAGES] THE HUSBAND MAY SEIZE IT FROM THE ARGUED BEFORE R. GAMALIEL. The BUYERS. [IF SHE CAME INTO POSSESSION] question was raised: Does R. Judah 22 refer to BEFORE SHE MARRIED. 9 AND the case of direct permissibility 23 or also to SUBSEQUENTLY MARRIED, R. GAMALIEL one of ex post facto? 24 SAID: IF SHE 10 HAD SOLD IT OR GIVEN IT AWAY HER ACT IS LEGALLY VALID. R. 1. Lit., 'to whom there fell'. HANINA B. AKABIA STATED: THEY 2. After her betrothal and before her marriage. V. infra . ARGUED BEFORE R. GAMALIEL, SINCE THE 3. Through betrothal. MAN 11 GAINED POSSESSION OF THE 4. The application of this argument is explained WOMAN SHOULD HE NOT ALSO GAIN in the Gemara. POSSESSION OF HER PROPERTY?' HE 5. Lit., 'ashamed'. REPLIED, 'WE ARE EMBARRASSED WITH 6. In failing to discover a reason why a husband (as stated infra ) is entitled to seize the REGARD TO [THE PROBLEM OF] HER NEW property which his wife had sold or given POSSESSIONS AND DO YOU WISH TO away even though she obtained it after INVOLVE US [IN THE PROBLEM OF] HER marriage. OLD ONES ALSO? 12 R. SIMEON DRAWS A 7. Property into the possession of which she DISTINCTION BETWEEN ONE KIND OF came while she was only betrothed. 8. Beth Shammai and Beth Hillel. PROPERTY AND ANOTHER: PROPERTY 9. [I.e., either before or after she was betrothed THAT IS KNOWN 13 TO THE HUSBAND [THE (Rashi), v. Tosaf.]. WIFE] MAY NOT SELL, AND IF SHE HAS 10. After her marriage. SOLD IT OR GIVEN IT AWAY HER ACT IS 11. By marriage. 2 KESUVOS – 78a-112a 12. Cf. supra p. 490, on. 5-7. annulment of her vows?' 11 'Master', they said 13. This is explained in the Gemara. to him, '[this is quite feasible if] she effected a 14. Of our MISHNAH. 12 15. Beth Shammai and Beth Hillel, sale before she married; what, [however, 16. Property obtained AFTER SHE WAS will be your ruling where] she was married BETROTHED. and effected the sale 13 subsequently?' — 17. In both cases surely, she sells or gives away 'This woman also', he replied, 'may sell or after betrothal when her property presumably give away, and her act is valid'. 'Since, belongs to the man who betrothed her. Cf. 14 infra note 10. however', they argued, 'he gained 15 18. Before betrothal she is the legal possessor of possession of the woman should he not also whatever is given to her. gain possession of her property?' 16 — 'We 19. Because, as it is assumed at present, after are quite embarrassed', he replied, 'about betrothal the man is the legal owner of all that [the problem of] her new possessions and you the woman may have. 20. The Kinyan of betrothal being regarded as wish to involve us [in the problem of] her old 17 that of a doubtful marriage, since it is ones also!' uncertain whether marriage will follow. 21. According to Beth Hillel. But, surely, we learned, [IF SHE CAME 22. In the argument he reported in the name of INTO POSSESSION] BEFORE SHE the Sages to invalidate her sale. 23. I.e., the ruling of Beth Shammai that if she MARRIED, AND SUBSEQUENTLY obtained property after she was betrothed she MARRIED, R. GAMALIEL SAID: IF SHE is fully entitled to sell it or to give it away. HAD SOLD IT OR GAVE IT AWAY 18 HER 24. Where it is the unanimous opinion of Beth ACT IS LEGALLY VALID! 19 — R. Zebid Shammai and Beth Hillel THAT IF SHE HAD replied, Read: She may sell or give away, and SOLD IT OR GIVEN IT AWAY HER ACT 20 IS LEGALLY VALID. her act is valid. R. Papa replied: There is no difficulty, 21 for one 22 is the view of R. Judah Kethuboth 78b on R. Gamaliel's opinion 23 whilst the other 24 is the view of R. Hanina b. Akabia on R. Gamaliel's opinion. 25 Come and hear what was taught in the following. R. Judah stated: They argued Is R. Hanina b. Akabia then in agreement before R. Gamaliel, 'Since the one woman 1 is with Beth Shammai? 26 — It is this that he his wife and the other 2 is his wife, just as a meant: Beth Shammai and Beth Hillel did sale by the former 3 is invalid so also should a not differ at all on this point. 27 sale by the latter 4 be invalid'. He replied, 'We are in an embarrassed condition with regard Both Rab and Samuel stated: Whether a to [the problem of] her new possessions and woman came into the possession of property you wish to involve us [in the problem of] her before she was betrothed or whether she old ones also?' 5 Thus 6 it may be inferred that came into possession after she was betrothed he referred to a case of ex post facto also. her husband may, [if she sold it] after she This is conclusive. 7 married, take it away from the buyers. In agreement with whose view [is this ruling], It was taught: R. Hanina b. Akabia said, It which is neither in agreement with that of R. was not such a reply 8 that R. Gamaliel gave Judah nor with that of R. Hanina b. Akabia? to the Sages, 9 but it was this that he replied, — They adopted the ruling of our Masters; '[There is] no [comparison]; if you say [the for it was taught: Our Masters took a recount ruling] 10 is to apply to a married woman [of votes, and decided that] whether a woman whose husband is entitled to her finds, to her came into the possession [of property] before handiwork and to the annulment of her vows, she was betrothed or whether she came into will you say it also applies to a betrothed its possession after she was betrothed, her woman whose husband is not entitled either husband may, [if she sold it] after she to her finds or to her handiwork or to the married, take it away from the buyers. 28 3 KESUVOS – 78a-112a AFTER SHE WAS MARRIED, BOTH 12. While she was only betrothed. AGREE. May it be suggested that here we 13. Of property that came into her possession 29 before her marriage. are learning Of the enactment of Usha, for 14. By the Kinyan of marriage. R. Jose the son of R. Hanina stated: It was 15. I.e., the right to her finds and handiwork and enacted at Usha that if a woman sold during to the invalidation of her vows. the lifetime of her husband Melog 30 16. To the usufruct of which a husband is entitled property, 31 and died, the husband 32 may seize during her lifetime. If her sale is valid her 33 husband would inevitably be deprived of his it from the buyers! — Our Mishnah [deals right to the usufruct.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mishnah: the New Scripture Territories in the East
    176 FROM TEXT TO TRADITION in this period was virtually unfettered. The latter restriction seems to have been often compromised. Under the Severan dynasty (193-225 C.E.) Jewish fortunes improved with the granting of a variety of legal privileges culminating in full Roman citizenship for Jews. The enjoyment of these privileges and the peace which Jewry enjoyed in the Roman Empire were·· interrupted only by the invasions by the barbarians in the West 10 and the instability and economic decline they caused throughout the empire, and by the Parthian incursions against Roman Mishnah: The New Scripture territories in the East. The latter years of Roman rule, in the aftermath of the Bar Kokhba Revolt and on the verge of the Christianization of the empire, were extremely fertile ones for the development of . The period beginning with the destruction (or rather, with the Judaism. It was in this period that tannaitic Judaism came to its restoration in approximately 80 C.E.) saw a fundamental change final stages, and that the work of gathering its intellectual in Jewish study and learning. This was the era in which the heritage, the Mishnah, into a redacted collection began. All the Mishnah was being compiled and in which many other tannaitic suffering and the fervent yearnings for redemption had culmi­ traditions were taking shape. The fundamental change was that nated not in a messianic state, but in a collection of traditions the oral Torah gradually evolved into a fixed corpus of its own which set forth the dreams and aspirations for the perfect which eventually replaced the written Torah as the main object holiness that state was to engender.
    [Show full text]
  • The Babylonian Talmud
    The Babylonian Talmud translated by MICHAEL L. RODKINSON Book 10 (Vols. I and II) [1918] The History of the Talmud Volume I. Volume II. Volume I: History of the Talmud Title Page Preface Contents of Volume I. Introduction Chapter I: Origin of the Talmud Chapter II: Development of the Talmud in the First Century Chapter III: Persecution of the Talmud from the destruction of the Temple to the Third Century Chapter IV: Development of the Talmud in the Third Century Chapter V: The Two Talmuds Chapter IV: The Sixth Century: Persian and Byzantine Persecution of the Talmud Chapter VII: The Eight Century: the Persecution of the Talmud by the Karaites Chapter VIII: Islam and Its Influence on the Talmud Chapter IX: The Period of Greatest Diffusion of Talmudic Study Chapter X: The Spanish Writers on the Talmud Chapter XI: Talmudic Scholars of Germany and Northern France Chapter XII: The Doctors of France; Authors of the Tosphoth Chapter XIII: Religious Disputes of All Periods Chapter XIV: The Talmud in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries Chapter XV. Polemics with Muslims and Frankists Chapter XVI: Persecution during the Seventeenth Century Chapter XVII: Attacks on the Talmud in the Nineteenth Century Chapter XVIII. The Affair of Rohling-Bloch Chapter XIX: Exilarchs, Talmud at the Stake and Its Development at the Present Time Appendix A. Appendix B Volume II: Historical and Literary Introduction to the New Edition of the Talmud Contents of Volume II Part I: Chapter I: The Combination of the Gemara, The Sophrim and the Eshcalath Chapter II: The Generations of the Tanaim Chapter III: The Amoraim or Expounders of the Mishna Chapter IV: The Classification of Halakha and Hagada in the Contents of the Gemara.
    [Show full text]
  • Keter As a Jewish Political Symbol
    KETER AS A JEWISHPOLITICAL SYMBOL: ORIGINS AND IMPLICATIONS Stuart A. Cohen The use of theHebrew term keter (lit. "crown") to describe agencies of Jewish autonomous rule is first apparent in tanna'itic texts, and especially inMishrtah, Avot 4:13. This article examines the reasons for that innova tion, and examines the categories of rulership to which the term was ap plied. It is suggested that keter reflected an identifiable notion of "sovereignty" and its exercise. In early rabbinic usage, it became a vehicle which conveyed a unique view of the constitutionally correct ordering of Jewish political life. The only Old Testament references to the royal headdress desig nated the keter (lit. "crown") are to be found in the Book of Esther, where the term describes a non-Jewish (Persian) emblem of distinction. Admittedly, the root KTR is indigenously Hebrew; it occurs in Judges 20:43 (meaning "to surround") and in IKings 7:16,17; Jer. 52:22 (meaning "cornice"). But not until the early rabbinic period does the term appear a to have been used to depict the crown as specifically Jewish badge of office. Once that step had been taken, however, the process of semantic accommodation seems to have been both swift and extensive. For one thing, authors of early rabbinic texts frequently (although not invari ably) employed the noun keter as a primary depiction of the royal headdress, preferring it to other crown synonyms which were of more distinguished biblical pedigree. Secondly, and more interestingly, they considerably modified and extended the application of that term it self. As early as Mishnah, Avot 4:13, keter no longer designated (as it did in Esther) exclusively royal authority.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israel Koschitzky Virtual Beit Midrash
    The Israel Koschitzky Virtual Beit Midrash Special Holiday Shiur Yeshivat Har Etzion CHANUKA AND PURIM: A STUDY OF THEIR DIFFERENCES by Rabbi Nathaniel Helfgot I - Introduction From a purely halakhic point of view, we generally regard Chanuka and Purim as equal in status. Both festivals are de-rabanan (rabbinically mandated), and the issue of "pirsum ha-nes" (publicizing the miracle) is central to both of them. This trend of thought finds expression in the Rambam's Mishneh Torah. As opposed to the other festivals, the halakhot of which are all dealt with individually - e.g. Hilkhot Shevitat He-asor (Yom Kippur), Hilkhot Chametz U-matza (Pesach) etc., the Rambam gives a joint heading to the laws of Chanuka and Purim: Hilkhot Megilla Ve- Chanuka. The first two chapters deal with the laws of Purim, and the third and fourth chapters deal with the laws of Chanuka. In addition, the Rambam further emphasizes the connection between these two festivals in his laws of Chanuka. In 3:3 he writes: And these days are called Chanuka, and eulogies and fasting are forbidden on them as on the days of Purim. And it is a mitzva to light candles on these days based on divrei soferim, as is the reading of the Megilla. And further on, in halakha 4, the Rambam draws the following parallel: All those obligated to hear the reading of the Megilla are also obligated to light candles on Chanuka. II - Differences Based on "Divrei Kabbala" Clearly, though, these quotations do not reflect the whole picture. The most obvious difference between Chanuka and Purim is that in contrast to Chanuka, on Purim we have a text - Megillat Ester, which is part of the kitvei kodesh.
    [Show full text]
  • Divine Science: Reevaluating Rambam's View of Ma'aseh
    Divine Science: Reevaluating Rambam’s View of Ma’aseh Merkavah Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Jay and Jeanie Schottenstein Honors Program Yeshiva College Yeshiva University September 2020 Yehuda Goldfeder Mentor: Dr. Jonathan Dauber, Jewish Studies Divine Science: Reevaluating Rambam’s View of Ma’aseh Merkavah By: Yehuda Goldfeder Advisor: Dr. Jonathan Dauber Introduction Esoteric traditions within Judaism Overview of Aristotelian Physics and Metaphysics Understanding the Position of the Rambam Merkavah According to the Rambam Two Schools of Interpretation Fundamental Issues with Rambam's Position The Easy Way Out Does Not Suffice Why Not Reject His Opinion? A Closer Read of The Guide: Metaphysics is just the start Were Chazal Really Philosophers? Only some of Chazal engaged in speculation: Their Speculation Employed different methods: Angels as a Paradigm of Different Methodologies Summation of his view of Chazal and its accuracy Setting the Stage: The plausibility of his reconstruction An Overview of the Cosmology of Chazal: Celestial Spheres and Heavenly Bodies Correspondence between Chazal’s and Rambam’s Cosmology Classical Elements in Rabbinic Literature The Merkavah Theory in Full View Rambam’s Theory of Prophecy Jacob’s Ladder Hekhalot as a corrupted but surprisingly accurate precursor: The structure of the Guide: Significance of Prophetic Error: A final assessment: Not so unlikely Moving Towards a Non proof based Metaphysics A general approach to antiquated science in divine literature Conclusion Introduction Within Judaism, the areas of Cosmology and Cosmogony are most often where a perceived clash is found between science and religion. Among those who accept the validity of both the Torah and science, various solutions have been posed to these problems, and they generally fall under one of two categories.
    [Show full text]
  • Chanukah Is the Festival of Lights Instead of One Day Of
    Epistemology of Tefila(Class 34) - 12/10/2020 —— TOPIC: Chanukah - is The Festival of lights, instead of one day of presents we have 8 crazy nights —Part 2 Recap 1. PRAYERS FOR CHANUKAH PAGE NUMBERS IN SIDDUR RCA ARTSCROLL THE KOREN Ma’ariv/Evening Service Al HaNissim/For the miracles 274 - 276 273 Had’lakat Ner Chanukah/Candle Lighting Brachot/Blessings 782 897 Hanerot Halalu/These lights 782 899 Maoz Tzur/Oh mighty Rock 782 - 784 899 - 901 Shacharit/Morning Service Al HaNissim/For the miracles 112 - 114 131 Hallel 632 - 642 733 - 743 Kriyat HaTorah/Torah Reading 948 - 952 1116 - 1121 Lam’natzeach/For the conductor 152 - OMIT 173 - OMIT Mincha/Afternoon Service Al HaNissim/For the miracles 244 - 246 227 Birkat Hamazon/Grace After Meals Al HaNissim/For the miracles 186 981 Page 1 of 5 2. Main addition is Al HaNissim/For the miracles in our Amidah for Ma’ariv, Shacharit, Mincha, and Birkat Hamazon. 3. We light candles every night, from left to right with a bracha starting with one and adding one additional candle each night until we have 8. 4. We sing the hymn Haneirot halalu while we light the candles and remember that the candles remind us of the miracle and are holy. 5. During the time of lighting canldles we take the time to off from our work, to rest, sing songs, play dreidel, and educate our children about the miracle. Class Strategy 1. Maoz Tzur/O mighty Rock — (RCA Artscroll page 782 -784, The Koren page 899 - 901) Rav Munk(page 409) after all the lights are burning it is customary to sing Maoz Tzur/O mighty Rock which was written Mordechai Ben Yitchak before 1250 but mor than that no exact details of the author are known.
    [Show full text]
  • Adas Torah Journal of Torah Ideas
    • NITZACHONניצחון Adas Torah Journal of Torah Ideas VOLUME 1:1 • PESACH - SHAVUOS 5774 • LOS ANGELES Nitzachon Adas Torah Journal of Torah Ideas Volume 1:1 Pesach – Shavuos 5774 Adas Torah 1135 South Beverly Drive Los Angeles, CA 90035 www.adastorah.org [email protected] (310) 228-0963 Rabbi Dovid Revah, Rav and Mara D’Asra Michael A. Horowitz, President Nitzachon Editorial Team Michael Kleinman, General Editor Yaakov Siegel, General Editor Penina Apter, Copy Editor Rabbi Andi Yudin, Copy Editor Rob Shur, Design and Layout www.rbscreative.com VOLUME 1:1 • PESACH - SHAVUOS 5774 דברי חכמים Rabbi Dovid Revah: Celebrating the Torah: Explaining the Special Nature of Seuda on Shavuos ..................................................................................... p. 13 Guest Contributor Rabbi Asher Brander: Erev Pesach, Matza, & Marriage: The Curious Halacha of Matza Non-Consumption ..................................................................................... p. 17 PESACH Dr. David Peto: Talmud Torah and Seder Night ..................................................................................... p. 37 Eli Snyder: Questions upon Questions: The Thematic Implications of the Mah Nishtana ..................................................................................... p. 47 Rabbi Yaakov Siegel: All of Nature is Miraculous or All Miracles are Natural: Opposing Views on Yetzias Mitzrayim ..................................................................................... p. 51 Yossi Essas: Arami Oved Avi ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Gehenna Controversy
    The Gehenna Controversy Walter Balfour, Bernard Whitman 1833-1834 Contents Contents . i An Inquiry into the Scriptural Import of the words Sheol, Hades, Tartarus and Gehenna, translated Hell in the Common English Version, by Walter Balfour 1 Facts stated respecting Gehenna, showing that it does not express a place of endless punishment in the New Testament. 1 All the texts in which Gehenna occurs, considered. 6 Additional facts stated, proving that Gehenna was not used by the sacred writers to express a place of endless misery. 41 Friendly letters to a Universalist on divine rewards and punish- ments: Letter VI, by Bernard Whitman 59 A letter to the Rev. Bernard Whitman, on the term Gehenna, by Walter Balfour 77 Explanation of Matthew v. 29, 30, and the similar Texts, by Hosea Ballou 139 i An Inquiry into the Scriptural Import of the words Sheol, Hades, Tartarus and Gehenna, translated Hell in the Common English Version Walter Balfour Revised, with essays and notes, by Otis A. Skinner Boston: published by A. Tompkins. 1854. SECTION II: Facts stated respecting Gehenna, showing that it does not express a place of endless punishment in the New Testament. Before we consider the texts, where Gehenna occurs in the New Testament, it is of importance to notice the following facts. They have been altogether overlooked, or but little attended to in discussions on this subject. 1st. The term Gehenna is not used in the Old Testament to designate a place of endless punishment. Dr. Campbell declares positively that it has no such mean- ing there. All agree with him; and this should lead to careful inquiry whether in the New Testament it can mean a place of endless misery.
    [Show full text]
  • Narratology, Hermeneutics, and Midrash
    Poetik, Exegese und Narrative Studien zur jüdischen Literatur und Kunst Poetics, Exegesis and Narrative Studies in Jewish Literature and Art Band 2 / Volume 2 Herausgegeben von / edited by Gerhard Langer, Carol Bakhos, Klaus Davidowicz, Constanza Cordoni Constanza Cordoni / Gerhard Langer (eds.) Narratology, Hermeneutics, and Midrash Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Narratives from the Late Antique Period through to Modern Times With one figure V&R unipress Vienna University Press Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. ISBN 978-3-8471-0308-0 ISBN 978-3-8470-0308-3 (E-Book) Veröffentlichungen der Vienna University Press erscheineN im Verlag V&R unipress GmbH. Gedruckt mit freundlicher Unterstützung des Rektorats der Universität Wien. © 2014, V&R unipress in Göttingen / www.vr-unipress.de Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Das Werk und seine Teile sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung in anderen als den gesetzlich zugelassenen Fällen bedarf der vorherigen schriftlichen Einwilligung des Verlages. Printed in Germany. Titelbild: „splatch yellow“ © Hazel Karr, Tochter der Malerin Lola Fuchs-Carr und des Journalisten und Schriftstellers Maurice Carr (Pseudonym von Maurice Kreitman); Enkelin der bekannten jiddischen Schriftstellerin Hinde-Esther Singer-Kreitman (Schwester von Israel Joshua Singer und Nobelpreisträger Isaac Bashevis Singer) und Abraham Mosche Fuchs. Druck und Bindung: CPI Buch Bücher.de GmbH, Birkach Gedruckt auf alterungsbeständigem Papier. Contents Constanza Cordoni / Gerhard Langer Introduction .................................. 7 Irmtraud Fischer Reception of Biblical texts within the Bible: A starting point of midrash? . 15 Ilse Muellner Celebration and Narration. Metaleptic features in Ex 12:1 – 13,16 .
    [Show full text]
  • Making Jews Modern in the Polish Borderlands
    Out of the Shtetl Making Jews Modern in the Polish Borderlands NANCY SINKOFF OUT OF THE SHTETL Program in Judaic Studies Brown University Box 1826 Providence, RI 02912 BROWN JUDAIC STUDIES Series Editors David C. Jacobson Ross S. Kraemer Saul M. Olyan Number 336 OUT OF THE SHTETL Making Jews Modern in the Polish Borderlands by Nancy Sinkoff OUT OF THE SHTETL Making Jews Modern in the Polish Borderlands Nancy Sinkoff Brown Judaic Studies Providence Copyright © 2020 by Brown University Library of Congress Control Number: 2019953799 Publication assistance from the Koret Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. Open access edition funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities/ Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program. The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non- Commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License: https://creativecom- mons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. To use this book, or parts of this book, in any way not covered by the license, please contact Brown Judaic Studies, Brown University, Box 1826, Providence, RI 02912. In memory of my mother Alice B. Sinkoff (April 23, 1930 – February 6, 1997) and my father Marvin W. Sinkoff (October 22, 1926 – July 19, 2002) CONTENTS Acknowledgments....................................................................................... ix A Word about Place Names ....................................................................... xiii List of Maps and Illustrations .................................................................... xv Introduction:
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Rabbis on the Road: Exposition En Route in Classical Rabbinic Texts Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/76x5105d Author Haber, Ruth Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Rabbis on the Road: Exposition En Route in Classical Rabbinic Texts by Ruth Ellen Haber A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Joint Doctor of Philosophy with the Graduate Theological Union in Jewish Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Daniel Boyarin, chair Professor Dina Stein Professor Michael Nylan Fall 2014 Abstract Rabbis on the Road: Exposition En Route in Classical Rabbinic Texts by Ruth Ellen Haber Joint Doctor of Philosophy in Jewish Studies with the Graduate Theological Union University of California, Berkeley Professor Daniel Boyarin, Chair Throughout classical rabbinic texts, we find accounts of sages expounding Scripture or law, while “walking on the road.” We may well wonder why we find these sages in transit, rather than in the usual sites of Torah study, such as the bet midrash (study house) or ʿaliyah (upper story of a home). Indeed, in this corpus of texts, sages normally sit to study; the two acts are so closely associated, that the very word “sitting” is synonymous with a study session or academy. Moreover, throughout the corpus, “the road” is marked as the site of danger, disruption and death. Why then do these texts tell stories of sages expounding en route? In seeking out the rabbinic road, I find that, against these texts’ pervasive notion of travel danger runs another, competing motif: the road as the proper – even necessary – site of Torah study.
    [Show full text]
  • Pachad David
    Ha’azinu Weekly Bulletin on the Parshah September 23rd 2017 3rd of Tishri 5778 717 Pachad David Published by Mosdot Orot Chaim U’Moshe in Israel Under the auspices of Moreinu v’Rabbeinu Hagaon Hatzaddik Rabbi David Chananya Pinto, shlita Son of the tzaddik and miracle-worker Rabbi Moshe Ahron Pinto, zt”l, and grandson of the holy tzaddik and miracle-worker Rabbi Chaim Pinto, zy”a MaskilMASKIL L'David LÉDAVID Weekly talk on the Parshah given by Moreinu v’Rabbeinu Hagaon Hatzaddik Rabbi David Chananya Pinto, shlita Man’s Mission in This World “Listen, O heavens, and I will speak! of Israel and the World to Come.” The suffering creates the bond to Eretz Yisrael by causing them And let the earth hear the words of to strengthen their spiritual (heavenly) component my mouth!” and weakening the physical (earthly) portion. In (Devarim 32:1) this way they will merit the Land of Israel, where The commentaries ask, what is the connection Hashem’s “Eyes” are always focused. between the heavens and earth and the admon- Chazal say (Berachot 33b), “Everything is in ishment for Am Yisrael? the Hand of Heaven except the fear of Heaven.” There are those who explain that the heavens This sounds surprising, since if everything is in and earth are an allegory to man; man is com- the Hands of Heaven, meaning all great things posed of two parts – the upper part, which is and small things one needs, whether physical or spiritual, and the lower part, which is physical. spiritual, then how come the thing that is most This is similar to the account of Yiravam ben Nevat, Heavenly, which is the fear of Heaven is not in the Chevrat Pinto NYC when Hashem “seized” him and urged him, “Re- Hands of Heaven? 207 West 78th Street • New York NY 10024 • U.S.A pent, then I, you, and the son of Yishai [i.e.
    [Show full text]