DOCSLIB.ORG

The Gehenna Controversy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Gehenna Controversy Walter Balfour, Bernard Whitman 1833-1834 Contents Contents . i An Inquiry into the Scriptural Import of the words Sheol, Hades, Tartarus and Gehenna, translated Hell in the Common English Version, by Walter Balfour 1 Facts stated respecting Gehenna, showing that it does not express a place of endless punishment in the New Testament. 1 All the texts in which Gehenna occurs, considered. 6 Additional facts stated, proving that Gehenna was not used by the sacred writers to express a place of endless misery. 41 Friendly letters to a Universalist on divine rewards and punish- ments: Letter VI, by Bernard Whitman 59 A letter to the Rev. Bernard Whitman, on the term Gehenna, by Walter Balfour 77 Explanation of Matthew v. 29, 30, and the similar Texts, by Hosea Ballou 139 i An Inquiry into the Scriptural Import of the words Sheol, Hades, Tartarus and Gehenna, translated Hell in the Common English Version Walter Balfour Revised, with essays and notes, by Otis A. Skinner Boston: published by A. Tompkins. 1854. SECTION II: Facts stated respecting Gehenna, showing that it does not express a place of endless punishment in the New Testament. Before we consider the texts, where Gehenna occurs in the New Testament, it is of importance to notice the following facts. They have been altogether overlooked, or but little attended to in discussions on this subject. 1st. The term Gehenna is not used in the Old Testament to designate a place of endless punishment. Dr. Campbell declares positively that it has no such mean- ing there. All agree with him; and this should lead to careful inquiry whether in the New Testament it can mean a place of endless misery. This has been too long believed without examination. The admitted fact that it has no such sense in the Old Testament ought to create the suspicion that its sense is misunderstood in the New. 2d. Those who believe Gehenna designates a place of endless punishment in the New Testament, entirely overlook its meaning in the Old. All admit its literal original signification to be the valley of Hinnom. But not one of them takes the least notice that Gehenna was used also by Jeremiah, as a source of imagery or emblem, to describe the punishment God threatened to the Jewish nation. But why overlook this sense of it in the Old Testament? Is it not possible, yea, is it not probable, that this may be its sense in the New? All critics admit the language of the New 1 2 Facts stated respecting Gehenna Testament is derived from the Old, and ought to be interpreted by it. 3d. Those who believe Gehenna in the New Testament designates a place of end- less punishment give it this sense on mere human authority. Dr. Campbell, above, says, Gehenna came gradually to assume this sense, and at last came to be confined to it. But no divine authority is referred to for the change. Professor Stuart refers to the later Jews, the Rabbinical writers, as authority: and finally tells us, \Gehenna came to be used as a designation of the infernal regions, because the Hebrews sup- posed that demons dwelt in this valley." But who can believe the term Gehenna in the New Testament is used in a sense which originated in a silly, superstitious notion? 4th. The word Gehenna only occurs twelve times in the New Testament. The following are all the texts. Matt. 5: 22, 29, 30, and 18: 9; Mark 9: 43-47; Luke 12: 5; Matt. 10: 28, and 23: 15; 33; James 3: 6. The rendering of Gehenna in these texts is uniformly hell in the common version. The fact that Gehenna is only used twelve times in the New Testament deserves notice; for Dr. Campbell and others say, this is the only word in the Bible which designates a place of endless punish- ment. If this is true, the place of endless punishment is only mentioned twelve times. But, really, Gehenna was not used even twelve times. It occurs eleven times in the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke, which all know are only three histories of the same discourses in which Gehenna was used by our Lord. Viewing the subject in this light, few words of such importance occur so seldom in the New Testament as the word Gehenna. I notice this, to show the difference between our Lord and modern preachers as to the frequency of their use of the word hell. Allowing it used twelve times in the New Testament, this is not so often as many preachers use it in a single sermon. 5th. The word Gehenna is used by our Lord, and by James, but by no other person in the New Testament. Any person who can read English may satisfy himself of this fact, by reading the texts referred to above. John wrote the history of our Lord, as well as Matthew, Mark and Luke; but he does not use Gehenna either in his gospel or epistles. What is more remarkable, Luke, though he uses Gehenna once in his gospel, does not use it in Acts, which contains the history of the apostles' preaching for thirty years. Paul, Peter and Jude are entirely silent about Gehenna, which is very strange, if it designated a place of endless punishment. The writings of those persons who do not use it form two thirds of the New Testament. But, surely, it is a very natural expectation, warranted by the frequent mention of other important subjects, that all the writers in the New Testament should often speak of Gehenna, if it means a place of endless misery. And if they believed this, yet were silent about it, they were not so faithful as most modern preachers. But can any man believe that our Lord's disciples understood him to mean by Gehenna a place of endless misery, yet most of them never said a word about it in their preaching, or in their letters to the churches? Is it at all probable that they would lay aside the term used by our Lord to designate such a place, and adopt some other language to express it? We strongly doubt this. 2 Facts stated respecting Gehenna 3 6th. All that is said about Gehenna in the New Testament was spoken to Jews, and to Jews only. No Gentile is ever threatened with Gehenna punishment. Any person can satisfy himself of this by simply reading the texts where Gehenna is used, with their respective contexts. It is of no consequence to decide to whom the gospels were originally addressed, for, in the eleven places where our Lord used the term Gehenna, it is certain he was speaking to Jews. And in the only place where it occurs, it is certain James wrote to the twelve tribes which were scattered abroad. James 1: 1, comp. chap. 3: 6. It forms no objection to this fact, \that our Lord's ministry was among the Jews, and not among the Gentiles, hence he could not say to the Gentiles as to the Jews, `How can ye escape the damnation of hell (Gehenna)?" The apostles' ministry was among the Gentiles; but they never say anything to them about Gehenna in any shape whatever, which shows that the \damnation of Gehenna" only concerned the Jews. This fact is of great importance in the present investigation. Let us, then, attach what sense we please to the term, it is certain that Jews are the only persons concerned in its punishment. As proof of this it may be observed, that Matthew, Mark and Luke, are thought to have written their gospels for the use of the Jews, and in them Gehenna is used. It seems certain that John wrote his gospel for the use of the Gentiles, for he explains Jewish places, names, and customs, altogether unnecessary in writing to Jews. But it deserves especial notice that John does not mention Gehenna, and omits all the discourses of our Lord in which he spoke of it. If the damnation of Gehenna or hell only concerned the Jews, we see a good reason for such an omission; but if it equally concerned the Gentiles, how shall any man account for the omission on rational and scriptural principles? If Jews and Gentiles were alike concerned in the punishment of Gehenna, why were not both alike admonished concerning it? How, I ask, could the Gentiles avoid the punishment of Gehenna, seeing no sacred writer said anything to them about it? Does not this very omission prove that the New Testament writers did not mean by Gehenna a place of endless misery, but that it designated the temporal punishment which Jeremiah predicted to the Jewish nation? To the above it may possibly be objected, \Were not all the Scriptures writ- ten for the benefit of mankind? Why, then, make this distinction between Jews and Gentiles?" Answer: \Whatsoever was written aforetime was written for our instruction." But notwithstanding this, who does not make this very distinction? As Gentiles, we may derive much instruction from Matt., chaps. 23d and 24th; but all allow that these two chapters had a particular reference to the Jews. In the first, some of the most important things occur which our Lord ever delivered respecting Gehenna. Who denies that the words, \Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers," had a special reference to the Jews as a nation? By why not also the very next words, \Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" And as this is the only instance where our Lord ever threatened the unbelieving Jews with the \damnation of Gehenna," and no sacred writer ever threatened the Gentiles with it, who can doubt this punishment only respected Jews? This fact ought to lead all to suspect that our Lord, by Gehenna, meant the temporal pun- ishment coming on the Jewish nation, and not a place of endless punishment.
Recommended publications
  • This Alien Legacy RIGHTS the Origins of “Sodomy” Laws in British Colonialism WATCH

    This Alien Legacy RIGHTS the Origins of “Sodomy” Laws in British Colonialism WATCH

    HUMAN This Alien Legacy RIGHTS The Origins of “Sodomy” Laws in British Colonialism WATCH This Alien Legacy The Origins of “Sodomy” Laws in British Colonialism Copyright © 2008 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-419-2 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org December 2008 1-56432-419-2 This Alien Legacy The Origins of “Sodomy” Laws in British Colonialism I. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 Three Trials ......................................................................................................... 1 Colonial Laws and Contemporary Defenders ........................................................ 4 II. “Sodomy,” Colonialism, and Codification ........................................................... 13 III. Colonial Power on the Street and over the Body ..............................................
  • The King As Warrior in Samuel-Kings

    The King As Warrior in Samuel-Kings

    THE KING AS WARRIOR IN SAMUEL-KINGS by SAM MEIER The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210 It is becoming increasingly complex to speak of the Deuteronomistic (Dtr) historians, the boundaries of their works, and the theological and historical issues of significance to them. Noth's assertion that the Dtr His­ tory was penned by a single historian using written sources is no longer widely accepted despite continued attempts to perceive a broad unity to the work. 1 The fracturing of the work's unity has multiplied the number of ancient Israelites who now bear the epithet Dtr with a distinguishing numeral (DtrL Dtr2) or letter (DtrH, DtrP, DtrN).2 Large blocks of mate­ i:ial within the history still lack a consensus as to origin: the narratives associated with David's rise to kingship, for example, are explained by a variety of source analyses. 3 Even the context and date of the succession history is suspect, with some even affirming that it is both post-Dtr and antimonarchic (Van Seters 1983, pp. 277-291). It is evident that considerable work remains to be done in identifying with confidence the varied trajectories of the Dtr work(s) (cf. Ackroyd, 1985, 301-305). The problem is further compounded by the numerous sources, whose content may (or may not) be related to the primary and changing interests of the Dtr historians. In a work of such broad scope encompassing diverse sociological, political and religious ideologies, identifying what is I. McKenzie (1991) presents with sensitive nuancing the most recent apologetic for Noth's basic thesis with appropriate modifications.
  • The Babylonian Talmud

    The Babylonian Talmud

    The Babylonian Talmud translated by MICHAEL L. RODKINSON Book 10 (Vols. I and II) [1918] The History of the Talmud Volume I. Volume II. Volume I: History of the Talmud Title Page Preface Contents of Volume I. Introduction Chapter I: Origin of the Talmud Chapter II: Development of the Talmud in the First Century Chapter III: Persecution of the Talmud from the destruction of the Temple to the Third Century Chapter IV: Development of the Talmud in the Third Century Chapter V: The Two Talmuds Chapter IV: The Sixth Century: Persian and Byzantine Persecution of the Talmud Chapter VII: The Eight Century: the Persecution of the Talmud by the Karaites Chapter VIII: Islam and Its Influence on the Talmud Chapter IX: The Period of Greatest Diffusion of Talmudic Study Chapter X: The Spanish Writers on the Talmud Chapter XI: Talmudic Scholars of Germany and Northern France Chapter XII: The Doctors of France; Authors of the Tosphoth Chapter XIII: Religious Disputes of All Periods Chapter XIV: The Talmud in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries Chapter XV. Polemics with Muslims and Frankists Chapter XVI: Persecution during the Seventeenth Century Chapter XVII: Attacks on the Talmud in the Nineteenth Century Chapter XVIII. The Affair of Rohling-Bloch Chapter XIX: Exilarchs, Talmud at the Stake and Its Development at the Present Time Appendix A. Appendix B Volume II: Historical and Literary Introduction to the New Edition of the Talmud Contents of Volume II Part I: Chapter I: The Combination of the Gemara, The Sophrim and the Eshcalath Chapter II: The Generations of the Tanaim Chapter III: The Amoraim or Expounders of the Mishna Chapter IV: The Classification of Halakha and Hagada in the Contents of the Gemara.
  • Deconstructing Sodom and Gomorrah: a Historical Analysis Of

    Deconstructing Sodom and Gomorrah: a Historical Analysis Of

    Deconstructing Sodom and Gomorrah: A Historical Analysis of the Mythology of Black Homophobia A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Lance E. Poston December 2018 © 2018 Lance E. Poston. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Deconstructing Sodom and Gomorrah: A Historical Analysis of the Mythology of Black Homophobia by LANCE E. POSTON has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Katherine Jellison Professor of History Joseph Shields Interim Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT POSTON, LANCE E., PH.D., December 2018, History Deconstructing Sodom and Gomorrah: A Historical Analysis of the Mythology of Black Homophobia Director of Dissertation: Katherine Jellison This dissertation challenges the widespread myth that black Americans make up the most homophobic communities in the United States. After outlining the myth and illustrating that many Americans of all backgrounds had subscribed to this belief by the early 1990s, the project challenges the narrative of black homophobia by highlighting black urban neighborhoods in the first half of the twentieth century that permitted and even occasionally celebrated open displays of queerness. By the 1960s, however, the black communities that had hosted overt queerness were no longer recognizable, as the public balls, private parties, and other spaces where same-sex contacts took place were driven underground. This shift resulted from the rise of the black Civil Rights Movement, whose middle-class leadership – often comprised of ministers from the black church – rigorously promoted the respectability of the race.
  • Same-Sex Desire and Jewish Community: Queering Biblical Texts in Canadian and American Jewish Literature Shlomo Gleibman York University

    Same-Sex Desire and Jewish Community: Queering Biblical Texts in Canadian and American Jewish Literature Shlomo Gleibman York University

    Same-Sex Desire and Jewish Community: Queering Biblical Texts in Canadian and American Jewish Literature Shlomo Gleibman York University It has been asserted that queer subjectivity can be realized in identifications with 249 certain images of mainstream culture, sometimes to a far greater extent than in “con- ventional” forms of gay life (Sedgwick, Tendencies; Butler, Bodies; Munoz; Halperin, How). These nonlinear, nonnormative identifications and disidentifications partici- pate in the formation of multiple, hybrid identities through working on, with, and against a dominant cultural form (Munoz 3-8, 30). This essay looks at Jewish queer narratives in their relation to mainstream Jewish culture, as examples of contem- porary forms of Jewish literary imagination in North America. I am interested in exploring the ways Jewish queer culture workers read a queer valence that is already present within Jewish intellectual life in its traditional form-potentially or in actual- ity in individual experiences, and imaginatively, as a rhetorical trope in some modes of literature. The queer possibilities in reading classical Jewish texts could be better under- stood in light of the Foucauldian theory of polyvalence of discourse, developed in The History of Sexuality. This theory regards discourse as never unified or fixed, but rather as “a series of discontinuous segments, not uniform nor stable, multiplicity of discursive elements that can come into play in various strategies” (Foucault 100). In this sense, the queer valence present in classical Jewish texts and in traditional patterns of studying these texts does not constitute “homoeroticism” as a uniform narrative or as a coherent element of a larger narrative; rather, this “queer kernel” could name a play of multiple “discontinuous segments” that lend themselves to cer- tain modes of reception.
  • Keter As a Jewish Political Symbol

    Keter As a Jewish Political Symbol

    KETER AS A JEWISHPOLITICAL SYMBOL: ORIGINS AND IMPLICATIONS Stuart A. Cohen The use of theHebrew term keter (lit. "crown") to describe agencies of Jewish autonomous rule is first apparent in tanna'itic texts, and especially inMishrtah, Avot 4:13. This article examines the reasons for that innova tion, and examines the categories of rulership to which the term was ap plied. It is suggested that keter reflected an identifiable notion of "sovereignty" and its exercise. In early rabbinic usage, it became a vehicle which conveyed a unique view of the constitutionally correct ordering of Jewish political life. The only Old Testament references to the royal headdress desig nated the keter (lit. "crown") are to be found in the Book of Esther, where the term describes a non-Jewish (Persian) emblem of distinction. Admittedly, the root KTR is indigenously Hebrew; it occurs in Judges 20:43 (meaning "to surround") and in IKings 7:16,17; Jer. 52:22 (meaning "cornice"). But not until the early rabbinic period does the term appear a to have been used to depict the crown as specifically Jewish badge of office. Once that step had been taken, however, the process of semantic accommodation seems to have been both swift and extensive. For one thing, authors of early rabbinic texts frequently (although not invari ably) employed the noun keter as a primary depiction of the royal headdress, preferring it to other crown synonyms which were of more distinguished biblical pedigree. Secondly, and more interestingly, they considerably modified and extended the application of that term it self. As early as Mishnah, Avot 4:13, keter no longer designated (as it did in Esther) exclusively royal authority.
  • Deuteronomy- Kings As Emerging Authoritative Books, a Conversation

    Deuteronomy- Kings As Emerging Authoritative Books, a Conversation

    DEUTERONOMY–KinGS as EMERGING AUTHORITATIVE BOOKS A Conversation Edited by Diana V. Edelman Ancient Near East Monographs – Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente Society of Biblical Literature Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente (UCA) DEUTERONOMY–KINGS AS EMERGING AUTHORITATIVE BOOKS Ancient Near East Monographs General Editors Ehud Ben Zvi Roxana Flammini Editorial Board Reinhard Achenbach Esther J. Hamori Steven W. Holloway René Krüger Alan Lenzi Steven L. McKenzie Martti Nissinen Graciela Gestoso Singer Juan Manuel Tebes Number 6 DEUTERONOMY–KINGS AS EMERGING AUTHORITATIVE BOOKS A CONVERSATION Edited by Diana V. Edelman Society of Biblical Literature Atlanta Copyright © 2014 by the Society of Biblical Literature All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permit- ted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Offi ce, Society of Biblical Literature, 825 Houston Mill Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA. Library of Congress Control Number: 2014931428 Th e Ancient Near East Monographs/Monografi as Sobre El Antiguo Cercano Oriente series is published jointly by the Society of Biblical Literature and the Universidad Católica Argentina Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Políticas y de la Comunicación, Centro de Estu- dios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente. For further information, see: http://www.sbl-site.org/publications/Books_ANEmonographs.aspx http://www.uca.edu.ar/cehao Printed on acid-free, recycled paper conforming to ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R1997) and ISO 9706:1994 standards for paper permanence.
  • Defeat of Good Counsel 2 Sam 17.1-14

    Defeat of Good Counsel 2 Sam 17.1-14

    Defeat Of Good Counsel 2 Sam 17.1-14 1. Paradox a. good advice v. bad advice b. worldly v. spiritual c. timeless struggle of good and evil d. 2 Sam 16.23 - was as if a man had enquired at the oracle of God 2. Quality of advice a. Jas 3.13-15 - this wisdom descendeth not from above b. Matt 10.16 - wise as serpents harmless as doves c. 1 Tim 6.6 - godliness with contentment d. 2 Pet 2.3 - with feigned words make merchandise of you e. Rom 16.18 - by good words and fair speeches f. Mk 8.36 - what shall it profit a man 3. Purpose a. 2 Sam 17.1-2 - to defeat David b. Lk 16.8 - children of this world are wiser in their generation than the children of light c. 1 John 2.18-19 - had they been of us they would have continued d. 2 Tim 4.3-4 - heap to themselves teachers having itching ears e. Titus 1.10-11 - for filthy lucre’s sake f. 2 Pet 2.15 - gone after the way of Balaam g. Jude 11 - the error of Balaam 4. True defeat a. 2 Sam 15.31 - turn the counsel of Ahitophel into foolishness who will go b. 2 Thess 2.11-12 - will send them strong delusions that they might believe a lie c. 2 Sam 17.23 - Ahitophel saw that his counsel was not taken - hung himself d. Acts 5.38-39 - to fight against God e. Acts 9.3-5 - it is hard to kick against the pricks 6/10/07 p.m.
  • 1 Absalom Hans Sachs Published by Adelbert Von Keller. Sixth Volume. for the Literary Association in Stuttgart According To

    1 Absalom Hans Sachs Published by Adelbert Von Keller. Sixth Volume. for the Literary Association in Stuttgart According To

    1 Absalom Hans Sachs Published by Adelbert von Keller. Sixth Volume. For the Literary Association in Stuttgart According to the Resolution of the Committee from July 1867 Printed by Il. Laupp in Tübingen 1872. 2 Absalom Protector Of the Literary Association in Stuttgart: His Majesty the King. Administration: President: Dr. A. v. Keller, professor at the royal university Tübingen. Treasurer: Professor dr Kommerell, chairman of the secondary school in Tübingen. Society Board: Privy Court Councilor dr Bartsch, proper professor at the general university in Heidelberg. K. Baron v. Cotta in Stuttgart. Librarian dr Klüpfel in Tübingen. Oberstudienrat [teacher] dr Haßler, conservator of the fatherland art and antique art monuments in Ulm. Dr Holland, professor at the royal university in Tübingen. Dr G knight v. Karajan, president of the royal academy in Vienna. Dr e. v. Kausler, vice director of the royal house and state archive in Stuttgart. Dr Klüpfel, librarian at the royal university in Tübingen. Director dr O. v. Klumpp in Stuttgart. Dr Maurer, proper professor at the royal university in Munich. Dr Menzel in Stuttgart. Dr Simrock, proper professor at the royal university in Bonn. Dr Waitz, proper professor at the royal university in Göttingen. 3 Absalom [86] A tragedy [for] 14 persons to act in. The insurgent Absolom with his father, King David: It has five acts. Act I. The herald1 enters and speaks: May God’s mercy be with you! We will act a tragedy [because of our] good mood and to please you. We wish to sing2 About how the devout King David suffered Sorrow, distress and unrest By Absolom, his own son, Who wanted to destroy him.
  • Chanukah Is the Festival of Lights Instead of One Day Of

    Chanukah Is the Festival of Lights Instead of One Day Of

    Epistemology of Tefila(Class 34) - 12/10/2020 —— TOPIC: Chanukah - is The Festival of lights, instead of one day of presents we have 8 crazy nights —Part 2 Recap 1. PRAYERS FOR CHANUKAH PAGE NUMBERS IN SIDDUR RCA ARTSCROLL THE KOREN Ma’ariv/Evening Service Al HaNissim/For the miracles 274 - 276 273 Had’lakat Ner Chanukah/Candle Lighting Brachot/Blessings 782 897 Hanerot Halalu/These lights 782 899 Maoz Tzur/Oh mighty Rock 782 - 784 899 - 901 Shacharit/Morning Service Al HaNissim/For the miracles 112 - 114 131 Hallel 632 - 642 733 - 743 Kriyat HaTorah/Torah Reading 948 - 952 1116 - 1121 Lam’natzeach/For the conductor 152 - OMIT 173 - OMIT Mincha/Afternoon Service Al HaNissim/For the miracles 244 - 246 227 Birkat Hamazon/Grace After Meals Al HaNissim/For the miracles 186 981 Page 1 of 5 2. Main addition is Al HaNissim/For the miracles in our Amidah for Ma’ariv, Shacharit, Mincha, and Birkat Hamazon. 3. We light candles every night, from left to right with a bracha starting with one and adding one additional candle each night until we have 8. 4. We sing the hymn Haneirot halalu while we light the candles and remember that the candles remind us of the miracle and are holy. 5. During the time of lighting canldles we take the time to off from our work, to rest, sing songs, play dreidel, and educate our children about the miracle. Class Strategy 1. Maoz Tzur/O mighty Rock — (RCA Artscroll page 782 -784, The Koren page 899 - 901) Rav Munk(page 409) after all the lights are burning it is customary to sing Maoz Tzur/O mighty Rock which was written Mordechai Ben Yitchak before 1250 but mor than that no exact details of the author are known.
  • The Books of 1 & 2 Samuel

    The Books of 1 & 2 Samuel

    Supplemental Notes: The Books of 1 & 2 Samuel compiled by Chuck Missler © 2003 Koinonia House Inc. Audio Listing 1 Samuel 1 - 3 Introduction. Background. Hannah, a Godly Mother. Saul, a Careless Father. 1 Samuel 4 - 6 Philistines capture ark of God; God’s glory departs from Israel; God provoked with Philistines because of the Ark; Ark returned to Israel. 1 Samuel 7 - 9 Summary of Samuel’s ministry; Israel demands a king; Samuel warns Acknowledgments about a king; God Chooses Saul as king. These notes have been assembled from speaking notes and related 1 Samuel 10 - 12 materials which had been compiled from a number of classic and contemporary commentaries and other sources detailed in the bibliog- Saul privately anointed king; Saul publicly installed as king of Israel; raphy, as well as other articles and publications of Koinonia House. Saul defeats the Ammonites. While we have attempted to include relevant endnotes and other references, we apologize for any errors or oversights. 1 Samuel 13 - 16 The complete recordings of the sessions, as well as supporting dia- Saul’s self-seeking and cowardice; Saul intrudes into priest’s office and grams, maps, etc., are also available in various audiovisual formats from is rejected by God; Israel is helpless before the Philistines; Jonathan’s the publisher. bold assault; Subsequent victory of Israel; Saul’s rash order overridden. 1 Samuel 17 - 20 David slays Goliath; David beloved by Jonathan; Jealous Saul attempts to slay David; David Marries Saul’s Daughter; David is protected from Saul; Saul angry with Jonathan. 1 Samuel 21 - 26 David seeks safety from Saul at Gath; Saul slays priests; David saves Keilah from the Philistines; Samuel dies and is mourned.
  • Rabbinical Assembly Tikkun Source Materials Shavuot 5780

    Rabbinical Assembly Tikkun Source Materials Shavuot 5780

    Rabbinical Assembly Tikkun Source Materials Shavuot 5780 This packet contains source sheets to accompany both the pre-recorded sessions currently available on YouTube at www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAUaYjTp5xS5DF06maAV4pbiqlM_tOpxS as well as the live tikkun, beginning on Thursday, May 28th at 9 PM EDT at www.tinyurl.com/RATikkun. Thank you to all of our colleagues who are sharing their Torah to enrich our celebration of Shavuot. Table of Contents Pre-recorded Sessions Moses and Ezekiel: Should Revelation be Hidden or Revealed? ................................................................ 1 Rabbi Abby Sosland Semi-Conscious States of Spirituality .......................................................................................................... 6 Rabbi Danny Nevins The Earthy Jerusalem and the Heavenly Jerusalem: Incident, Imagination and Imperative .................... 9 Rabbi Michael Knopf Theology and Revelation ........................................................................................................................... 16 Rabbi Ahud Sela My Teacher ................................................................................................................................................. 19 Rabbi Ed Bernstein When do we say Shema? You are the real distinction ............................................................................. 24 Rabbi Philip Weintraub How to Hug - Closeness in a Time of Social Distancing: What is Love? .................................................... 27 Rabbi Eric Yanoff