Exploring the Economic Feasibility of Implementation of Sustainable Agrotourism Project in Bergerden Agropark to Attract Greenhouse Entrepreneurs for Investment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exploring the Economic Feasibility of Implementation of Sustainable Agrotourism Project in Bergerden Agropark to Attract Greenhouse Entrepreneurs for Investment Exploring the Economic Feasibility of Implementation of Sustainable Agrotourism Project in Bergerden Agropark to Attract Greenhouse Entrepreneurs for Investment Research Project Submitted to Larenstein University of Applied Science in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters in Agricultural Production Chain Management, specialization Horticulture Chain Management By: Ehsan Kamalipour September 2012 Wageningen The Netherlands © Copyright Ehsan Kamalipour 2012. All rights reserved Acknowledgment First, I thank the omnipotent power over nature's forces for his grace and mercies in my life and the opportunity to pursue a Master degree in the Netherlands. I wish to express my sincere thanks to my dissertation committee and my Supervisor, Mr. Jan Hoekstra who has patiently guided me through my degree programme and the dissertation process. I place on record, my sense of gratitude to Dr. Robert Baars, as the Coordinate of Master Programme, Mr. Marco Verschuur, as the Coordinator of Professional Master Programme Agricultural Production Chain Management as well as Dr. Tracey Campbell, as the Coordinator of Agricultural Production Chain Management specialisation Horticulture Chains for their constant encouragement. I would like express my deep gratitude to Dr. Rik Eweg who introduced Bergerden Agropark project to me and also linked me to the key persons. I also thank all interviewees, especially Mr. Thijs Zee, the project manager and Mr. Stef Huisman, an innovative greenhouse entrepreneur, in Bergerden Agropark for their patience and support. I am grateful to my beloved friends and classmates especially Dr. Aziz Hedayati, Mr. Kuan Hong U and Mr. Stijn van Gils for their support and encouragement during thesis period. Finally, I place on record, my sense of gratitude to one and all who directly or indirectly, have lent their helping hand in this venture. Ehsan Kamalipour Wageningen The Netherlands i Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my treasured parents and my only brother who have supported me all the way since the beginning of my studies. ii Table of Contents Acknowledgment ................................................................................................................... i Dedication ............................................................................................................................. ii List of figures ........................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... v List of Boxes ......................................................................................................................... v List of Annexes .................................................................................................................... vi List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................ vi Summery ............................................................................................................................. vii Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1Background and history .......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Problem owner ................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Problem Statement ........................................................................................... 2 1.3.1 Research Justification ................................................................................... 2 1.3.2 Hypothesis ......................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Research Objective ........................................................................................... 3 1.5 Research Questions .......................................................................................... 3 1.5.1 Main Question ................................................................................................... 3 1.5.2 Sub questions ................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Reading Guide ......................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2: Literature Review ............................................................................................ 5 2.1 Dutch greenhouse industry and Bergerden Agroparks ..................................... 5 2.1.1 Dutch Greenhouse Industry ............................................................................ 5 2.1.2 Bergerden Agropark Project ........................................................................... 5 2.2 Tourism ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Agrotourism ..................................................................................................... 12 2.3 Important factors in implementing an agrotourism project ............................. 15 2.3.1 Starting a greenhouse business ................................................................... 15 2.3.2 Starting a agrotourism business................................................................... 16 Chapter 3: Methodology .................................................................................................. 17 3.1 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 17 3.1.1 Research Scope ............................................................................................. 18 3.2. Conceptual framework ........................................................................................ 18 3.3. Research Framework .......................................................................................... 19 3.4. Research limitation .............................................................................................. 20 iii 3.5 Data analysis ......................................................................................................... 20 3.5.1 Interviews ......................................................................................................... 21 3.5.2. Questionnaire ................................................................................................. 21 Chapter 4: Result .............................................................................................................. 22 4.1 Bergerden Agropark ............................................................................................. 22 4.1.1 Suppliers and producers ............................................................................... 22 4.1.2 Collectors and Processors ............................................................................ 24 4.1.3 Customers ....................................................................................................... 24 4.1.4. Supply Chain map ......................................................................................... 25 4.1.5 Influencer and Supporter ............................................................................... 25 4.1.6 Tourism ............................................................................................................ 26 4.2 Stakeholders’ perspective towards implementing greenhouse tourism in the area ..................................................................................................................................... 28 4.2.1 Greenhouse owners ....................................................................................... 28 4.2.2 Visitors Perspectives ...................................................................................... 29 4.2.3 Government perspective ............................................................................... 31 4.3 Bergerden Agropark and Sustainability ............................................................. 32 4.3.1 Environmental Performance ......................................................................... 32 4.3.2 Social performance ........................................................................................ 32 4.3.3 Economic performance .................................................................................. 32 4.4 Touristic features of Bergerden Agropark ......................................................... 33 4.5 Attributes of Bergerden Agroparks for new greenhouse entrepreneurs ...... 33 Chapter 5 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 35 5.1 Current situation of Bergerden Agropark .......................................................... 35 5.1.1 Sustainability ................................................................................................ 36 5.2 Government Perspective ............................................................................... 36 5.3 Visitors Perspective ........................................................................................ 36 5.4 Greenhouse owner perspective .................................................................... 37 5.5 Feasibility of sustainable implementation of greenhouse tourism ........... 38 Chapter 6: Conclusion and
Recommended publications
  • Inhoudsopgave
    1e Voortgangsrapportage 2018 Pagina 1 Inhoudsopgave Inleiding ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Moties ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Moties ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Programma's ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Veiligheid............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 17 Sociaal Domein ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Vitale en aantrekkelijke stad ...............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Naar Actueel En Gefocust Economisch Beleid in Lingewaard ROA 18
    Naar actueel en gefocust economisch beleid in Lingewaard ROA 18 maart Donderdag 18 maart 2021 Evert-Jan de Kort, Lukas Meuleman & Marijn Gradussen Aanpak Oriënterende gesprekken met circa 10 ondernemers 9 maart: sessie college 18 maart: ROA Economisch beleid staat niet op zichzelf Omgevingsvisie* Concept Versterken compacte College en aantrekkelijke centra in uitvoeringsprogramma 2018- Lingewaard 2020 2022 Plan COVID-19 Nota Toerisme & Recreatie: Gemeentelijk Mobiliteitsplan Lingewaard & Overbetuwe 2017* 2016-2022 Wegencategoriseringsplan Strategische Agenda Nota Wonen 2020-2025 Inclusieve Arbeidsmarkt 2019 Beleidskader Energietransitie Verbeterplan dienstverlening 2020 aan ondernemers 2019 Visie op het middengebied Overbetuwe & Lingewaard 2020 RES 1.0 Concept Regionaal Programma Werklocaties regio Arnhem-Nijmegen 2020 *momenteel (een update) aan het opstellen Snapshot economisch Lingewaard: indrukken uit analyses en gesprekken Speciaalzaken als kracht voor kleine centra – maar toekomst door corona Wat zeggen ondernemers ons? mogelijk onzeker Centra compacter Huidige logistieke Open staan voor wat maken om grootschaligere leefbaarheid te markt verzadigd voor uitzendkrachten – logistieke bedrijvigheid behouden potentie in zakelijke – in combinatie met dienstverlening kleinere bedrijven Hoor ook de stem van bescheiden Meer profilering op het gebied van ondernemers – Kansen door goede recreatie – niet te samenwerking met verbinding met spoor bescheiden! iedereen en weg (Rotterdam – Duitsland) Ondernemers Dienstverlening naar identificeren
    [Show full text]
  • Indeling Van Nederland in 40 COROP-Gebieden Gemeentelijke Indeling Van Nederland Op 1 Januari 2019
    Indeling van Nederland in 40 COROP-gebieden Gemeentelijke indeling van Nederland op 1 januari 2019 Legenda COROP-grens Het Hogeland Schiermonnikoog Gemeentegrens Ameland Woonkern Terschelling Het Hogeland 02 Noardeast-Fryslân Loppersum Appingedam Delfzijl Dantumadiel 03 Achtkarspelen Vlieland Waadhoeke 04 Westerkwartier GRONINGEN Midden-Groningen Oldambt Tytsjerksteradiel Harlingen LEEUWARDEN Smallingerland Veendam Westerwolde Noordenveld Tynaarlo Pekela Texel Opsterland Súdwest-Fryslân 01 06 Assen Aa en Hunze Stadskanaal Ooststellingwerf 05 07 Heerenveen Den Helder Borger-Odoorn De Fryske Marren Weststellingwerf Midden-Drenthe Hollands Westerveld Kroon Schagen 08 18 Steenwijkerland EMMEN 09 Coevorden Hoogeveen Medemblik Enkhuizen Opmeer Noordoostpolder Langedijk Stede Broec Meppel Heerhugowaard Bergen Drechterland Urk De Wolden Hoorn Koggenland 19 Staphorst Heiloo ALKMAAR Zwartewaterland Hardenberg Castricum Beemster Kampen 10 Edam- Volendam Uitgeest 40 ZWOLLE Ommen Heemskerk Dalfsen Wormerland Purmerend Dronten Beverwijk Lelystad 22 Hattem ZAANSTAD Twenterand 20 Oostzaan Waterland Oldebroek Velsen Landsmeer Tubbergen Bloemendaal Elburg Heerde Dinkelland Raalte 21 HAARLEM AMSTERDAM Zandvoort ALMERE Hellendoorn Almelo Heemstede Zeewolde Wierden 23 Diemen Harderwijk Nunspeet Olst- Wijhe 11 Losser Epe Borne HAARLEMMERMEER Gooise Oldenzaal Weesp Hillegom Meren Rijssen-Holten Ouder- Amstel Huizen Ermelo Amstelveen Blaricum Noordwijk Deventer 12 Hengelo Lisse Aalsmeer 24 Eemnes Laren Putten 25 Uithoorn Wijdemeren Bunschoten Hof van Voorst Teylingen
    [Show full text]
  • Afvalstoffenplan Lingewaard
    Project “Inzameling huishoudelijk afval Lingewaard” Onderzoeksrapport d.d. 16 november 2012 1 2 0. SAMENVATTING......................................................................................................................... 5 1. INLEIDING ................................................................................................................................ 11 2. BENCHMARK ............................................................................................................................ 12 3. SAMENSTELLING RESTAFVAL ................................................................................................... 15 4. HUIDIGE SITUATIE, ALTERNATIEVEN EN REACTIES .................................................................. 17 4.1 Restafval .................................................................................................................................. 17 4.2 Grof huishoudelijk afval........................................................................................................... 21 4.3 GFT-afval .................................................................................................................................. 24 4.4 Glas .......................................................................................................................................... 27 4.5 Oud-papier en karton .............................................................................................................. 30 4.6 Textiel .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Wonen Lingewaard
    Nota Wonen 2020-2025 www.lingewaard.nl NOTA WONEN 2020-2025 Inhoud Samenvatting Wat doen we daarvoor? In de nota wordt een groot aantal acties genoemd om dit doel te bereiken. Samen met bewoners, zorginstellingen, 1. Inleiding 4 Wat willen we bereiken? ontwikkelaars en andere overheden zullen we de samen- Wij willen onze huidige en nieuwe inwoners de kans geven werking moeten zoeken om tot resultaten te komen. 2. Onze visie op wonen: 5 binnen de gemeente een wooncarrière te doorlopen. We zien Met de corporaties en huurdersorganisaties leggen we stip op de horizon 2030 het als onze taak om naar vermogen al onze inwoners passend deze vast in nieuwe prestatieafspraken. 2.1. 2030: forse uitbreiding aanbod, 5 en goed te huisvesten in een aantrekkelijk woonmilieu. verbeterde doorstroming Passend huisvesten houdt in dat het woningaanbod is 2.2. 2030: goede mix van doelgroepen 5 afgestemd op de fnanciële mogelijkheden die mensen hebben. Wat mag het kosten? en woningtype Voorwoord Goede huisvesting betekent dat ook in het betaalbare Deze beleidsnota heeft geen directe fnanciële gevolgen. 2.3. Samen met ... 5 segment sprake is van een goede kwaliteit en toekomstwaarde Wel zijn er verschillende gewenste acties genoemd waar 2.4. 2030: weer stap verder in verduurzaming 5 van de woningen. Focus ligt op versneld bouwen, fexibel uiteindelijk budget voor nodig is. Op dit moment is de 2.5. Van visie naar thema’s, focus op 5 Met trots presenteer ik de nieuwe Nota Wonen van nieuwbouwprogramma, actiever regisseren, doelgroepen hoogte van het aanvullende budget nog niet in te schatten. versnelde nieuwbouw de gemeente Lingewaard.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Time and Comfort in Bicycle Appraisal
    The value of time and comfort in bicycle appraisal A stated preference research into the cyclists’ valuation of travel time reductions and comfort improvements in the Netherlands Jeroen van Ginkel University of Twente Faculty of Engineering Technology Civil Engineering & Management City Region Arnhem Nijmegen Nijmegen, 9 December 2014 Examination Committee: Prof. Dr. Ing. Karst Geurs Dr. Ing. Lissy La Paix Sjors van Duren MSc. Title: THE VALUE OF TIME AND COMFORT IN BICYCLE APPRAISAL Subtitle: A stated preference research into the cyclists’ valuation of travel time reductions and comfort improvements in the Netherlands Status: Master thesis, final report Data: December 9, 2014 Pages: 90 pages (excluding appendices) Author: Jeroen van Ginkel [email protected] +31681149316 Educational institution: University of Twente Faculty of Engineering Technology (CTW) Centre for Transport Studies (CTS) Organization: City Region Arnhem Nijmegen Mobility department President supervising committee: Prof. Dr. Ing. K.T. Geurs Daily supervisor University of Twente: Dr. Ing. L.C. La Paix Puello Supervisor City Region Arnhem Nijmegen: S. van Duren Msc II Master Thesis The value of time and comfort in bicycle appraisal Executive Summary Due to the recent attention from the government in reducing congestion by investing in cycling infrastructure, there is a growing need for knowledge on cycling and assessment tools. A cost- benefit analysis tool is available to assess cycling infrastructure investments, but important key figures such as the value of time are missing. The aim of this research is to fill one of the gaps in bicycle appraisal by setting the following research objective: “The objective of this research is to estimate the valuation of travel time savings and comfort improvements for cycling.” The cyclists’ value of time and comfort were not estimated before in the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Gemeente Lingewaard.Indd
    Municipality Designs New Storage Strategy and Eliminates Tape, Chooses ExaGrid for Its Integration with Veeam CUSTOMER SUCCESS STORY Customer Overview Gemeente Lingewaard is a municipality in the eastern Netherlands made up of eight villages, including Angeren, Bemmel, Doornenburg, Gendt, Haalderen, Huissen, Loo, and Ressen. Lingewaard lies within the Gelderse Poort National Landscape, a popular area for hiking and cycling known for its beautiful river scenery, and is well known for its greenhouse horticulture district. “My assigned customer support engineer has a high level of Lengthy Wait Time with Tape knowledge about my system and Marc de Ruiter, the system engineer at environment, so when I speak Gemeente Lingewaard, had been backing to him, he doesn’t act as if I am up user data (which has longer retention speaking in riddles, which I have requirements) to tape disk-to-disk-to-tape experienced with other vendors.” (D2D2T) strategy using NetApp NDMP. He was frustrated with the overall maintenance Marc de Ruiter involved with tape, as well as the amount of System Engineer time the tape library was in use for backup. Sometimes, it took more than three days to comply with a restore request. “I had to Key Benefi ts: wait until the backup to tape had run. Then, fi nally, I could make the restore to satisfy the Disk-based storage eliminates customer,” remarked de Ruiter. storage strategy to put the various devices the manual maintenance of tape and software to use. ExaGrid’s customer ExaGrid customer support helps In Search of the Right Solution support staff reviewed the strategy and optimize backup process Switching from NetApp to Atlantis USX as a recommended a change that seemed Integration of ExaGrid with storage solution proved cost eff ective.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Transit Oriented Development
    Measuring Transit Oriented Development Implementing a GIS-based analytical tool for measuring existing TOD levels PEDRAM FARD March, 2013 SUPERVISOR S: Dr. ir. M.H.P. Zuidgeest Ir. M.J.G. Brussel Measuring Transit Oriented Development Implementing a GIS-based analytical tool for measuring existing TOD levels PEDRAM FARD Enschede, The Netherlands, March, 2013 Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation of the University of Twente in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geo-information Science and Earth Observation. Specialization: Urban Planning and Management SUPERVISORS: Dr. ir. M.H.P. (Mark) Zuidgeest Ir. M.J.G. (Mark) Brussel THESIS ASSESSMENT BOARD: Prof. dr. ir. M.F.A.M. van Maarseveen (Chair) Dr. C.J.C.M. Martens (External Examiner, Radboud University Nijmegen) ADVISOR: Ph.D. Yamini Singh DISCLAIMER This document describes work undertaken as part of a programme of study at the Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation of the University of Twente. All views and opinions expressed therein remain the sole responsibility of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of the Faculty. ABSTRACT Transit Oriented Development (TOD) as a promising planning concept tries to ensure a more sustainable development through integrating land use and transport systems. However, lacking a spatially explicit measurement tool is a recognized drawback associated with the TOD concept. This issue hinders stakeholders, decision makers and practitioners from getting a correct perception of the existing levels of TOD-ness for areas which they are interested to develop, upgrade or maintain.
    [Show full text]
  • Kernkwaliteiten NHW Pannerden Tiel
    Kernkwaliteiten Nieuwe Hollandse Waterlinie ten zuiden van de Lek DEEL II - Fort Pannerden & inundatiekanaal Tiel handboek voor beschermen én ontwikkelen 2 | Kernkwaliteiten Nieuwe Hollandse Waterlinie COLOFON Opdrachtgever: Nieuwe Hollandse Waterlinie - Pact van Loevestein Samenwerking: gemeenten Culemborg, Geldermalsen, Lingewaal, Zaltbommel, Werkendam, Woudrichem, Vianen, Leerdam, Gorinchem, Lingewaard, Tiel, de provincies Gelderland, Noord-Brabant en Zuid-Holland en Dienst Landelijk Gebied Inhoud, tekst en beeld: Kees van der Velden - landschapsarchitect Materiaal: beeldenbank NHW, GIS competence Center DLG, Rijksdienst Cultureel Erfgoed, Chris Will, Douwe Koen, Jaap de Zee, Richard Trenning, Gerard Burgers, Atlas Nieuwe Hollandse Waterlinie, Kees van der Velden en internet Pact van Loevestein, september 2015 Kernkwaliteiten Nieuwe Hollandse Waterlinie | 3 Kernkwaliteiten Nieuwe Hollandse Waterlinie ten zuiden van de Lek DEEL II - Fort Pannerden & inundatiekanaal Tiel handboek voor beschermen én ontwikkelen inundatiekom Culemborgerwaard inundatiekom Tielerwaard inundatiekom Bommelerwaard inundatiekom Land van Altena Kernkwaliteiten Nieuwe Hollandse Waterlinie | 5 DEEL II Kernkwaliteiten ten zuiden van de Lek In het eerste deel bent u meegenomen in de achtergronden en hoofdlijnen van de Nieuwe Hollandse Waterlinie. In deel II worden de kernkwaliteiten ten zuiden van de Lek meer expliciet gemaakt. Hierbij komen zowel de streekeigen kernkwaliteiten van de Waterlinie - met het inundatiestelsel, de accessen en de hoofdverdedigingslijn met
    [Show full text]
  • The Strategic Capacity of Regions in the Netherlands
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The power to collaborate : How judicious use of power accelerates the strategic capacity of regions in the Netherlands Haran, N. Publication date 2010 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Haran, N. (2010). The power to collaborate : How judicious use of power accelerates the strategic capacity of regions in the Netherlands. Eburon. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:25 Sep 2021 4 ______________________________________________ BRIDGES OVER RIVERS: THE STRATEGIC CAPACITY OF CITY REGION ARNHEM-NIJMEGEN The city region of Arnhem-Nijmegen is a Regional Collaborative Association (RCA) situated in the east of the Netherlands. In this RCA, some 20 neighboring municipalities collaborate in order to form an “Attractive international competitive region with the best economic performance after the Randstad” (Stadsregio Arnhem- Nijmegen 2007a p.14) The Arnhem-Nijmegen RCA (also referred to here as “city region”) is made up of the cities Arnhem (pop.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Municipalities: Who Is Your Partner in Crime?
    Universiteit Leiden ICT in Business Comparing Municipalities: Who is your partner in crime? Name: Thijs van der Velden Student-no: s1645676 Date: 17/08/2017 1st supervisor: Dr. Cor Veenman 2nd supervisor: Prof. Dr. Aske Plaat MASTER'S THESIS Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science (LIACS) Leiden University Niels Bohrweg 1 2333 CA Leiden The Netherlands Master's Thesis Comparing Municipalities: Who is your partner in crime? Supervisor: Author: Dr. Cor Veenman Thijs van der Velden 2nd Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Aske Plaat Abstract In the Netherlands, each municipality is strongly encouraged to write an Integral Safety Plan (ISP). An ISP is a document that contains problems, goals, and priorities related to safety. This research proposes a method to select an effective and relevant ISP for a municipality out of all available ISPs. It focused on the ISPs of the 390 municipalities in the Netherlands, and aimed to determine ways to assist/support a new written ISP by suggesting relevant ISPs to municipalities in order to learn effective methods from the suggested ISPs. This was done by scoring all currently existing ISP's to get the best performing plans, focusing on crime statistics. Two dimension-reduction techniques were applied to descriptive statistics of the municipalities, and the best performing technique (t-SNE) was used. The municipalities were then clustered with K-means in the t-SNE space to retrieve groups of similar municipalities. In addition, k-nearest neighbor algorithm was used to find the K most similar municipalities from a starting point. This research showed a solution to score ISPs and two solutions to find similar municipalities in order to suggest relevant ISPs.
    [Show full text]
  • Lingewaard Besluit Raad
    g e m e e i lingewaard Besluit raad Besluitnummer 2019/62 Onderwerp 2e herstelplan Komplannen Lingewaard Zaaknummer collegevoorstel 91693 De raad van de gemeente Lingewaard; gelezen het voorstel van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente Lingewaard d.d. 7 mei 2019; gehoord de behandeling tijdens de Politieke Avond d.d. 20 juni 2019; gelet op het bepaalde in artikel 3.1 van de Wet ruimtelijke ordening; besluit: 1. De Reactienota zienswijzen (en ambtshalve aanpassingen) bestemmingsplan "Herstelplan Kommen Lingewaard” vast te stellen; 2. Het bestemmingsplan “2e Herstelplan Kommen Lingewaard” overeenkomstig het ontwerp zoals ter inzage heeft gelegen c.q. digitaal beschikbaar is gesteld langs elektronische weg (planidentificatienummer NL.IMR0.1705.223-VG01) en in analoge vorm met inachtneming van de wijzigingen die zijn opgenomen in de Reactienota Zienswijzen vast te stellen. Aldus vastgesteld in zijn openbare vergadering van 27juni 2019. De raad voornoemd, de griffier, P.J. Peters Behoort bij besluit van de raad d.d. 27 juni 2019, . lo\<$ ((o£ gemeente Mij bekend de griffier, lingewaard P. J. Peters Reactienota Zienswijzen (en ambtshalve wijzigingen) Ontwerp bestemmingsplan 2e herstelplan Komplannen Lingewaard Gemeente Lingewaard 1. Inleiding Het ontwerp bestemmingsplan “2e Herstelplan Komplannen Lingewaard ” heeft op grond van het bepaalde in de Wet ruimtelijke ordening met ingang van 7 maart 2019 gedurende 6 weken ter inzage gelegen. Gedurende de termijn van ter inzage legging zijn twee zienswijzen ingediend. In hoofdstuk 2 zijn de ingediende zienswijzen samengevat en beantwoord. De namen en adresgegevens van particuliere insprekers mogen vanwege de Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming niet digitaal publiek worden gemaakt. In de digitale publicatie is deze daarom anoniem verwerkt.
    [Show full text]