DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Systems Integration of an Extravehicular Activity Space Suit Augmented Reality Display System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Human Systems Integration of an Extravehicular Activity Space Suit Augmented Reality Display System Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1-1-2018 Human Systems Integration of an Extravehicular Activity Space Suit Augmented Reality Display System Paromita Mitra Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td Recommended Citation Mitra, Paromita, "Human Systems Integration of an Extravehicular Activity Space Suit Augmented Reality Display System" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 2517. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/2517 This Graduate Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact scholcomm@msstate.libanswers.com. Template C v3.0 (beta): Created by J. Nail 06/2015 Human systems integration of an extravehicular activity space suit augmented reality display system By TITLE PAGE Paromita Mitra A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering. in the Department of Aerospace Engineering. Mississippi State, Mississippi August 2018 Copyright by COPYRIGHT PAGE Paromita Mitra 2018 Human systems integration of an extravehicular activity space suit augmented reality display system By APPROVAL PAGE Paromita Mitra Approved: ____________________________________ Keith Koenig (Major Professor) ____________________________________ Gregory D. Olsen (Committee Member) ____________________________________ Cindy L. Bethel (Committee Member) ____________________________________ David S. Thompson (Graduate Coordinator) ____________________________________ Jason M. Keith Dean College of Engineering Name: Paromita Mitra ABSTRACT Date of Degree: August 10, 2018 Institution: Mississippi State University Major Field: Aerospace Engineering. Major Professor: Keith Koenig Title of Study: Human systems integration of an extravehicular activity space suit augmented reality display system Pages in Study 38 Candidate for Degree of Master of Science During an extravehicular activity (EVA), the role of an astronaut involves a multitude of complex tasks. Whether that task is a science experiment aboard the International Space Station, or traversing extraterrestrial terrain – attention, communication, and instruction are essential. As an aid, augmented reality (AR) can portray suit informatics and procedures within line-of-sight while minimizing attentional loss. Currently, there exists little research highlighting the human systems considerations to qualify AR systems for space suit applications. This study quantifies user interface (UI) and human performance measures for an AR prototype on the Mark III space suit. For user testing, 21 military pilots and personnel (11 men, 10 women) evaluated UI search tasks and completed a series of AR-instructed EVA dexterity tasks in an elevated luminosity, background clutter, and workload scenario. UI results suggest correlations for readability and usability; whereas, human performance results provide situational awareness, workload, and task performance data. DEDICATION I dedicate this Master’s Thesis to my father, Dr. Amal K. Mitra, mother, Ratna Mitra, and brother, Amlan Mitra. The opportunity to be educated as an American was granted by my incredibly hard-working family. I am forever grateful for the love and support I have received from them. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge and thank Dr. Keith Koenig, Dr. Cindy Bethel, and Dr. Gregory Olsen for their academic support. To Dr. Koenig, my sincerest gratitude for helping instill curiosity, a passion for aerospace, your wisdom, and providing me with this incredible graduate experience. To Dr. Bethel, thank you for maturing my interests in the field of human machine interaction. To Dr. Olsen, thank you for connecting me to my first NASA opportunity where I began this collaborative research. To the undergraduate research team, Heather Carreon, Cayla Hummel, Anna Marie Dulaney, and Johnnie Sublet – thank you so very much for all of the hard work, dedication, hours spent, and man power you gave to this research effort. Special thanks to Chris Gerty, Lucas Kinion, Christie Sauers, and the xEMU Project at NASA Johnson Space Center without whom this study would be impossible. And to my best friend, Timothy Michael McGrath – thank you for being my partner in science, motivation, and biggest support. I adore you. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION .................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. vi LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... vii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................1 1.1 xEMU Space Suit ......................................................................................2 II. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................3 2.1 Objectives ..................................................................................................3 2.2 Hardware ...................................................................................................4 2.2.2 Mark III Space Suit Hard Upper Torso ...............................................5 2.2.3 Augmented Reality Hardware .............................................................6 2.2.4 Cuff Checklist ......................................................................................8 2.3 User Interface ............................................................................................8 2.3.1 User Interface Elements ......................................................................8 2.3.2 Task Procedures .................................................................................12 2.4 Human Metrics ........................................................................................12 2.4.1 Human Performance ..........................................................................13 2.4.2 Anthropometry ..................................................................................13 2.5 Test Participants ......................................................................................14 2.6 EVA Test Environment ...........................................................................15 2.7 Task Measures .........................................................................................16 2.7.1 Primary Task (Task Board) ...............................................................16 2.7.2 Secondary Task (Count-up Clock) ....................................................17 2.8 Study Protocol .........................................................................................17 2.8.1 Helmet Fit and Anthropometry .........................................................17 2.8.2 Phase A: User Interface Assessment .................................................18 2.8.3 Phase B: Human Performance Assessment .......................................19 III. METRICS AND ANALYSIS .............................................................................20 iv 3.1 Phase A: User Interface Metrics ..............................................................20 3.1.1 Readability .........................................................................................20 3.1.2 Usability ............................................................................................21 3.1.3 Open-Ended Questions ......................................................................21 3.2 Phase B: Human Performance Metrics ....................................................21 3.2.1 Workload ...........................................................................................21 3.2.2 Situational Awareness .......................................................................22 3.2.3 Time on Task .....................................................................................23 3.2.4 Task Accuracy ...................................................................................23 3.2.5 Anthropometry Metrics .....................................................................23 3.3 Analysis ...................................................................................................23 3.3.1 Data Size and Distribution .................................................................24 IV. RESULTS ............................................................................................................26 4.1 Phase A: User Interface Results ..............................................................26 4.1.1 Readability .........................................................................................26 4.1.2 Usability ............................................................................................28 4.2 Phase B: Human Performance Results ....................................................32 4.2.2 Workload ...........................................................................................32 4.2.3 Situational Awareness .......................................................................33
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anastasi 2032
    Shashwat Goel & Ankita Phulia ​Anastasi 2032 Table of Contents Section Page Number 0 Introduction 2 1 Basic Requirements 4 2 Structural Design 15 3 Operations 31 4 Human Factors 54 5 Business 65 6 Bibliography 80 Fletchel Constructors 1 Shashwat Goel & Ankita Phulia ​Anastasi 2032 0 Introduction What is an underwater base doing in a space settlement design competition? Today, large-scale space habitation, and the opportunity to take advantage of the vast resources and possibilities of outer space, remains more in the realm of speculation than reality. We have experienced fifteen years of continuous space habitation and construction, with another seven years scheduled. Yet we have still not been able to take major steps towards commercial and industrial space development, which is usually the most-cited reason for establishing orbital colonies. This is mainly due to the prohibitively high cost, even today. In this situation, we cannot easily afford the luxury of testing how such systems could eventually work in space. This leaves us looking for analogous situations. While some scientists have sought this in the mountains of Hawaii, this does not tell the full story. We are unable to properly fathom or test how a large-scale industrial and tourism operation, as it is expected will eventually exist on-orbit, on Earth. This led us to the idea of building an oceanic base. The ocean is, in many ways, similar to free space. Large swathes of it remain unexplored. There are unrealised commercial opportunities. There are hostile yet exciting environments. Creating basic life support and pressure-containing structures are challenging.
    [Show full text]
  • Concept Study of a Cislunar Outpost Architecture and Associated Elements That Enable a Path to Mars
    Concept Study of a Cislunar Outpost Architecture and Associated Elements that Enable a Path to Mars Presented by: Timothy Cichan Lockheed Martin Space timothy.cichan@lmco.com Mike Drever Lockheed Martin Space mike.drever@lmco.com Franco Fenoglio Thales Alenia Space Italy franco.fenoglio@thalesaleniaspace.com Willian D. Pratt Lockheed Martin Space william.d.pratt@lmco.com Josh Hopkins Lockheed Martin Space josh.b.hopkins@lmco.com September 2016 © 2014 Lockheed Martin Corporation Abstract During the course of human space exploration, astronauts have travelled all the way to the Moon on short flights and have logged missions of a year or more of continuous time on board Mir and the International Space Station (ISS), close to Earth. However, if the long term goal of space exploration is to land humans on the surface of Mars, NASA needs precursor missions that combine operating for very long durations and great distances. This will allow astronauts to learn how to work in deep space for months at a time and address many of the risks associated with a Mars mission lasting over 1,000 days in deep space, such as the inability to abort home or resupply in an emergency. A facility placed in an orbit in the vicinity of the Moon, called a Deep Space Transit Habitat (DSTH), is an ideal place to gain experience operating in deep space. This next generation of in-space habitation will be evolvable, flexible, and modular. It will allow astronauts to demonstrate they can operate for months at a time beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO). The DSTH can also be an international collaboration, with partnering nations contributing elements and major subsystems, based on their expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Jenkins 2000 AIRLOCK & CONNECTIVE TUNNEL DESIGN
    Jenkins_2000 AIRLOCK & CONNECTIVE TUNNEL DESIGN AND AIR MAINTENANCE STRATEGIES FOR MARS HABITAT AND EARTH ANALOG SITES Jessica Jenkins* ABSTRACT For a manned mission to Mars, there are numerous systems that must be designed for humans to live safely with all of their basic needs met at all times. Among the most important aspects will be the retention of suitable pressure and breathable air to sustain life. Also, due to the corrosive nature of the Martian dust, highly advanced airlock systems including airshowers and HEPA filters must be in place so that the interior of the habitat and necessary equipment is protected from any significant damage. There are multiple current airlocks that are used in different situations, which could be modified for use on Mars. The same is true of connecting tunnels to link different habitat modules. In our proposed Mars Analog Challenge, many of the airlock designs and procedures could be tested under simulated conditions to obtain further information without actually putting people at risk. Other benefits of a long-term study would be to test how the procedures affect air maintenance and whether they need to be modified prior to their implementation on Mars. INTRODUCTION One of the most important factors in the Mars Habitat design involves maintaining the air pressure within the habitat. Preservation of breathable air will be an extremely vital part of the mission, as very little can be found in situ. Since Mars surface expeditions will be of such long duration, it is imperative that the airlock designs incorporate innovative air maintenance strategies. For our proposed Earth Analog Site competition, many of the components of these designs can be tested, as can the procedures required for long-duration habitation on Mars.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi Duty (MD) Airlock
    Multi Duty (MD) Airlock ■ Versatile airlock can be connected to many different types of storage and conveying devices ■ Square flanged inlet and outlet ■ Highly reliable, rugged design delivers low maintenance service ■ Sealed bearings require no lubrication and provide years of service ■ Available in a wide range of sizes ■ Special options extend service life in challenging applications Application Outboard press fit bearings provide better protection, resulting With tens of thousands of installations throughout the world, the in longer service life. Special wear resistant MD designs are Schenck Process MD airlock is a highly universal airlock used designed to be placed in abrasive environments. Field tests of to meter dry bulk materials under feeding devices, such as bins, these designs show a lifespan up to eight times longer than a hoppers, mixers, screw conveyors and sifters. standard MD airlock. Providing rugged service, the MD is suitable for use in dilute Operating Principle phase vacuum, pressure or combination vacuum/pressure The airlock reliably meters products into conveying lines or pneumatic conveying systems. Low mounting height is ideal storage areas. With open end rotors, the product comes in for space restricted applications. With a low profile and a wide contact with the endplates of the housing. With closed end flange width, the MD airlock is able to match drill hole patterns rotors, the product is confined within the pockets of the rotor. of many competitor’s valves for easy replacement. Features Equipment Rated up to 15 psi pressure differential The MD has a cast housing and endplates with a square flange. Standard temperature rating is 200 ºF (93 °C) The rotor and housing are precision machined to obtain a high Optional high-temperature rated to 450 ºF (232 °C) degree of accuracy and close tolerances.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Term's Project ENAE 483/788D
    Discussion of Next Term • Final design project information • Discussion of final exam • Discussion of grading for group projects • Other useful information © 2013 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu U N I V E R S I T Y O F Next Term’s Project ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design MARYLAND 1 Notes • Due date for project 5 postponed to time of final exam Monday 12/16 • Slides for Tuesday’s class (Sensors and Actuators) posted to Piazza site • Reminders: – Final exam limited single 8.5”x11” sheet of notes – Bring a calculator – Given honest attempt, final will only be counted if it improves overall grade U N I V E R S I T Y O F Next Term’s Project ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design MARYLAND 2 ENAE 483/788D Final Exam Questions • Orbital mechanics • Rocket performance • Reliability • Life support • Power systems • Structural design • Thermal analysis • Cost analysis • Propulsion systems • Systems engineering U N I V E R S I T Y O F Next Term’s Project ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design MARYLAND 3 Grading Rubrik for Group Projects • 10 - essentially perfect • 9 - excellent • 8 - very good • 7 - good • 6 - okay • 5 - minor deficiencies • 4 - significant deficiencies • 3 or below - major deficiencies U N I V E R S I T Y O F Next Term’s Project ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design MARYLAND 4 Fall Term Project Organization Systems Crew Systems Power, Propulsion, and Loads, Structures, and Avionics and Engineering Thermal Mechanisms Software A1 B1 C1 D1 E1 A2
    [Show full text]
  • 13.012 Marine Hydrodynamics for Ocean Engineers Fall 2004 Quiz #1 Student Name: ˆ4 10
    13.012 Marine Hydrodynamics for Ocean Engineers Fall 2004 Quiz #1 Student name: _____________________________________ This is a closed book examination. You are allowed 1 sheet of 8.5” x 11” paper with notes. For the problems in Section A, fill in the answers where indicated by ____________, or in the provided space. When a list of options is presented ([…],[…],[….] etc), circle all the options (all, none, one or more) that apply. Use the following constants unless otherwise specified: 2 3 -6 2 Gravity: g = 10 m/s water density: ρw = 1000 kg/m kinematic viscosity: νw = 1x10 m /s 3 -6 2 Seawater density: ρw = 1025 kg/m kinematic viscosity: νsw = 1x10 m /s 3 -5 2 Air density: ρa = 1 kg/m kinematic viscosity: νa = 1x10 m /s Assume the fluid is incompressible unless otherwise defined. Give all answers in SI units (kg, m, s). All numerical answers MUST have the proper units attached. Part A (30%): 1) A 1 m3 block of aluminum, specific gravity 2.7, is tethered to a piece of cork, specific gravity 0.24. The volume of cork required to keep the block neutrally buoyant in seawater is _______________ and the volume required in fresh water is _______________. Assume both the aluminum and cork are fully submerged and that the weight of the tether is negligible. h 2) The velocity field V= 4 xyiˆ + 10 y2 ˆj+ C zykˆ is valid for C = _____________. The vorticity in this flow field is ω = ______________. This flow field is [irrotational][rotational]. 3) The two linearized boundary conditions at the free surface for linear progressive free-surface gravity waves are _________________ and __________________.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Description Filename Keywords Media Code Time CD Track Index AIR PRESSURIZED AIR BLAST, SCI FI Air 8005 01 1 Air, Ga
    Media Title Description FileName Keywords Time CD Track Index Code Air, Gases & Steam;Space 8005- AIR PRESSURIZED AIR BLAST, SCI FI Air 8005_01_1 :01 8005 1 1 Doors, Hatches & Airlocks 01-01 Air, Gases & Steam;Space 8005- AIR PRESSURIZED AIR BLAST, SCI FI Air 8005_01_2 :01 8005 1 2 Doors, Hatches & Airlocks 01-02 Air, Gases & Steam;Space 8005- AIR PRESSURIZED AIR BLAST, SCI FI Air 8005_02_1 :02 8005 2 1 Doors, Hatches & Airlocks 02-01 Air, Gases & Steam;Space 8005- AIR PRESSURIZED AIR BLAST, SCI FI Air 8005_02_2 :01 8005 2 2 Doors, Hatches & Airlocks 02-02 Air, Gases & Steam;Space 8005- AIR PRESSURIZED AIR BLAST, SCI FI Air 8005_03_1 :01 8005 3 1 Doors, Hatches & Airlocks 03-01 Air, Gases & Steam;Space 8005- AIR PRESSURIZED AIR BLAST, SCI FI Air 8005_03_2 :01 8005 3 2 Doors, Hatches & Airlocks 03-02 Air, Gases & Steam;Space 8005- AIR PRESSURIZED AIR BLAST, SCI FI Air 8005_04_1 :01 8005 4 1 Doors, Hatches & Airlocks 04-01 Air, Gases & Steam;Space 8005- AIR PRESSURIZED AIR BLAST, SCI FI Air 8005_04_2 :01 8005 4 2 Doors, Hatches & Airlocks 04-02 Air, Gases & Steam;Space 8005- AIR PRESSURIZED AIR BLAST, SCI FI Air 8005_05_1 :01 8005 5 1 Doors, Hatches & Airlocks 05-01 Air, Gases & Steam;Space 8005- AIR PRESSURIZED AIR BLAST, SCI FI Air 8005_05_2 :01 8005 5 2 Doors, Hatches & Airlocks 05-02 Air, Gases & Steam;Space 8005- AIR PRESSURIZED AIR BLAST, SCI FI Air 8005_05_3 :04 8005 5 3 Doors, Hatches & Airlocks 05-03 Air, Gases & Steam;Space 8005- AIR PRESSURIZED REVERSE AIR POP, SCI FI Air 8005_06_1 :01 8005 6 1 Doors, Hatches & Airlocks 06-01
    [Show full text]
  • GNM Silent Killers.Qxd:Layout 1
    “A truly engrossing chronicle.” Clive Cussler JAMES P. DELGADO SILENT KILLERS SUBMARINES AND UNDERWATER WARFARE FOREWORD BY CLIVE CUSSLER © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com SUBMARINES AND UNDERWATER WARFARE JAMES P. DELGADO With a foreword by Clive Cussler © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS Foreword 6 Author’s Note 7 Introduction: Into the Deep 11 Chapter 1 Beginnings 19 Chapter 2 “Sub Marine Explorers”: Would-be Warriors 31 Chapter 3 Uncivil Warriors 45 Chapter 4 Missing Links 61 Chapter 5 Later 19th Century Submarines 73 Chapter 6 Transition to a New Century 91 Chapter 7 Early 20th Century Submariness 107 Chapter 8 World War I 123 Chapter 9 Submarines Between the Wars 143 Chapter 10 World War II: the Success of the Submarine 161 Chapter 11 Postwar Innovations: the Rise of Atomic Power 189 Chapter 12 The Ultimate Deterrent: the Role of the 207 Submarine in the Modern Era Chapter 13 Memorializing the Submarine 219 Notes 239 Sources & Select Bibliography 248 Index 260 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com FOREWORD rom the beginning of recorded history the inhabitants of the earth have had a Fgreat fascination with what exists under the waters of lakes, rivers, and the vast seas. They also have maintained a great fear of the unknown and very few wished to actually go under the surface. In the not too distant past, they had a morbid fear and were deeply frightened of what they might find. Only three out of one hundred old-time sailors could swim because they had no love of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Comments on the TA06 Roadmap Relevant to EVA Technology
    Some Comments on the TA06 Roadmap Relevant to EVA Technology Edward Hodgson Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation Overview • There is a lot to like – Many promising technology directions with game changing potential – The broad vision of component subsystem development leading to ground integration and validation testing ultimately on ISS is sound. • EVA system may be too narrowly viewed • Some areas need more definition • A few possible gaps are noted • The elephant in the room EVA System May be too Narrowly Viewe d • Includes not only PGA , PLSS , PAS as noted. • Airlock & servicing systems, Tools, Mobility & positioning aids – Int ersecti ons (& over lap ?) w ith ECLSS and TA07 – Critical requirements drivers and enablers for noted technologies in PGA, PLSS, PAS Some Areas Need More Definition Need Approach Path to flight Time? Cost? Value? Better / faster pressure garment development Enhanced suit / human computer models Validated - Applied - ??? ? ? Y Identify, evaluate, integrate, test, multifunctional Coupon tests, ground tests, integrated More effective suits - lower mass, lower materials flight tests N? N? Y expendables, less injury, more durable… Game changing architectures, suit configurations and mobility elements - using Adv.Mat ??????? ? ? Y LEA suits donned extremely quickly, integrated crew escape & crew survival , suit restraint, seat interface & support. ??????? ??????? N? ? Y Long duration suited ops in contingency - waste management, food & drink, etc. ??????? ??????? ? ? Y ?????? (Solutions apply to different Better emergency
    [Show full text]
  • Eva-Exp-0031 Baseline
    EVA-EXP-0031 BASELINE National Aeronautics and EFFECTIVE DATE: 04/18/2018 Space Administration EVA OFFICE EXTRAVEHICULAR ACTIVITY (EVA) AIRLOCKS AND ALTERNATIVE INGRESS/EGRESS METHODS DOCUMENT The electronic version is the official approved document. ECCN Notice: This document does not contain export controlled technical data. Revision: Baseline Document No: EVA-EXP-0031 Release Date: 04/18/2018 Page: 2 of 143 Title: EVA Airlocks and Alternative Ingress Egress Methods Document REVISION AND HISTORY PAGE Revision Change Description Release No. No. Date EVA-EXP-0031 Baseline Baseline per CR# EVA-CR-00031 04/18/2018 Document dated 03/07/2018 submitted and approved through DAA process/DAA # TN54054 approved April 9, 2018 EVA-REF-001 DAA Pre Baseline 03/12/2015 33134 Draft EVA-RD-002 05/14/2015 SAA 12/15/2015 DRAFT The electronic version is the official approved document. ECCN Notice: This document does not contain export controlled technical data. Revision: Baseline Document No: EVA-EXP-0031 Release Date: 04/18/2018 Page: 3 of 143 Title: EVA Airlocks and Alternative Ingress Egress Methods Document Executive Summary This document captures the currently perceived vehicle and EVA trades with high level definition of the capabilities and interfaces associated with performing an Extravehicular Activity (EVA) using an exploration EVA system and ingress/egress methods during future missions. Human spaceflight missions to Cislunar space, Mars transit, the moons of Mars (Phobos and Deimos), the Lunar surface, and the surface of Mars will include both microgravity and partial-gravity EVAs, and potential vehicles with which an exploration EVA system will need to interface.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Notice
    Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyright Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 STAATSKOERANT, 29 JANUARIE 2010 No.32907 3 GOVERNMENT NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR No. R. 41 29 January 2010 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT, 1993 DIVING REGULATIONS 2009 The Minister of Labour has under section 43 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993 (Act No. 85 of 1993), and after consultation with the Advisory Council for Occupational Health and Safety, made the regulations in the Schedule SCHEDULE Definitions 1. In these Regulations, any word or expression to which a meaning has been assigned in the Act shall have the meaning so assigned and, unless the context otherwise indicates­ "air" means normal compressed air suitable for breathing while diving; "airlock operator" means a person registered as an airlock operator for compressed air work contemplated in regulation 13, who enables compressed air workers to enter and exit a pressurised working area on the other side of the personnel lock (such as a caisson, tunnel or shaft), but does not include operators of chambers during diving operations involving class I, II, III, IV, V and VI divers; "assistant life-support technician" means a person registered as an assistant life­ support technician contemplated in regulation 7(1), who assists a life support technician with his duties of life support and treatment in chambers and has been trained in all aspects of saturation life support; Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyright Authority
    [Show full text]
  • MAC RAM Airlock
    RAM AIRLOCK INSTALLATION, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL MAC EQUIPMENT, INC. P.O. BOX 205 SABETHA, KS 66534 SALES, PARTS & SERVICE: 1-888-821-2476 www.macequipment.com Publication: MAN1014C Revision Date: 09/01/08 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1-1 Proper Handling of the Airlock .............................2 DESCRIPTION PAGE Figure 1-2 Typical RAM Airlock.............................................2 General Introduction.............................................................. 2 Figure 2-1 Lockout and Tagout of Safety ................................................................................... 2 Electrical Service and Compressed Air.................3 Principle of Operation............................................................ 5 Figure 2-2 Shear Hazard.......................................................3 Installation............................................................................. 6 Figure 2-3 Shear Hazard Points............................................3 Initial Start-Up Procedure...................................................... 10 Figure 2-4 Chain Drive Hazard..............................................3 Maintenance .................................................................... 11 Figure 2-5 Open Inlet and Outlet Throats..............................4 Troubleshooting .................................................................... 13 Figure 2-6 Typical Location of Safety Decals ........................4 Spare Parts..........................................................................
    [Show full text]