DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding New Middle Eastern Leadership: an Operational Code

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Understanding New Middle Eastern Leadership: an Operational Code PRQXXX10.1177/1065912917721744Political Research QuarterlyÖzdamar and Canbolat 721744research-article2017 Article Political Research Quarterly 1 –13 Understanding New Middle Eastern © 2017 University of Utah Reprints and permissions: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Leadership: An Operational Code DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917721744 10.1177/1065912917721744 Approach journals.sagepub.com/home/prq Özgür Özdamar1 and Sercan Canbolat2 Abstract Political Islam and Islamist organizations have broadly gained strength across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) in the post-Cold War era. Following the Arab uprisings, the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), generally viewed as the world’s largest and most influential Islamist organization, has shaped the wider landscape of MENA politics. This study examines MB leadership by comparing M. Morsi of Egypt, R. Ghannouchi of Tunisia, and K. Meshaal of Gaza as examples of Islamist leaders to explain their political belief systems and predict their foreign-policy behavior. We use the operational code approach, a content-analysis software and statistical tests to conduct the study. Results show that the three leaders’ foreign policy beliefs are analogous to the averages of world leaders. Results also partially support the hypothesis that their foreign-policy propensities are similar to each other. We conclude that despite the conventional portrayal of MB leadership, these leaders use negotiation and cooperation to settle their differences in foreign affairs, and the best way to approach them is to engage in a Rousseauvian assurance game that emphasizes international social cooperation. Results also suggest important implications in terms of mainstream international relations theories. Keywords operational code analysis, leadership, political psychology, foreign policy decision making, the Middle East, Muslim Brotherhood, political Islam, Rachid Ghannouchi, Khaled Meshaal, Mohamed Morsi Introduction We argue that the conviction that MENA states are run by belligerent leaders does not rely on systematic and The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) is one of the reproducible data and analysis. We therefore ask the fol- most conflict-prone regions in world politics. The region lowing: Are the political beliefs of the Islamist leaders has experienced a long cycle of political violence, includ- hostile or cooperative? What are the political instruments ing interstate wars, domestic conflicts, and terrorism, they use to achieve their aims—coercion or cooperation? which can be traced back to the demise of the Ottoman What are their leadership types and strategies—will they Empire and the Western incursion in the wake of World bully their opponents or resolve their differences diplo- War I. The Arab uprisings that began in Tunisia in matically? What is the best strategic approach toward December 2010 and spread across the region increased these leaders that will result in their cooperation? What is hopes for democratic transition and an open economy. the relevance of such operational code analysis in terms Instead, we have observed Islamist politicians coming to of broader IR theories? power in relatively free elections and the old establish- To answer these questions, we focus on political Islam ment’s harsh reactions to these electoral victories, fol- as arguably one of the most powerful forces shaping poli- lowed by civil wars, coups, and third-party interventions. tics in the region. We assert that one should understand In the rest of the world, governments have struggled to political Islam and its leadership patterns if one needs to interact with the new regional leadership and have faced conduct business with MENA leaders. Specifically, we criticism for tolerating Islamism as a nondemocratic ide- ology. For example, former US President Barack Obama 1Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey was accused of secretly favoring the Muslim Brotherhood 2University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA (MB), which was labeled as a terrorist organization by the US and Saudi governments as well as by both the Corresponding Author: Özgür Özdamar, Department of International Relations, Bilkent Mubarak and Sisi regime in Egypt, and considered to be University, A Building No: 306, Ankara 06800, Turkey. inimical toward Christianity (Gertz 2015). Email: [email protected] 2 Political Research Quarterly 00(0) focus on three regional leaders affiliated with the MB, on Leites’ study by dividing the questions into two catego- which holds the distinction of being the largest and most ries: philosophical and instrumental. The first group of powerful Islamist group operating in the Muslim world questions enables researchers to determine a leader’s per- (Leiken and Brooke 2007). MB’s political beliefs stem ceptions of the political universe and the role of the “Other” from a combination of religious, nationalist, and anticolo- that the leader confronts. Answers to the second group of nial provenances. Despite its significance in MENA and questions reveal an image of the leader’s “Self” to provide world politics, the MB’s political leadership pattern and a map of his or her means to achieve foreign-policy goals its foreign policy are understudied within the interna- (George 1979; Walker 1990). Together, the two sets of tional relations (IR) discipline. Studies that do analyze beliefs account for leaders’ tendencies and attitudes toward the MB lack “realistic empathy,” because the field of foreign policy making (Schafer and Walker 2006b). Middle Eastern studies is fraught with the Western Building on George’s framework, Holsti (1977) con- world’s political and cultural biases (Karaosmanoglu and structed an operational code typology. He established six Aydinli 2012; White 1991).1 operational codes (A, B, C, D, E, F), which Walker (1983; This article attempts to help bridge these gaps in the lit- 1990) later reduced to four groups (A, B, C, DEF). Holsti’s erature by contributing to operational code applications typology is based on the nature (temporary or permanent) beyond North America (George 1969; Holsti 1977; Leites and the source (individual/society/international system) of 1951, 1953; Walker, Schafer, and Young 1998) to the conflict in the political world, and it is derived from the MENA and its typical leaders. As a representative set of leader’s master beliefs, which are reflected in the answers Islamist ideology and MB pedigree, we focus on Mohamed to the P-1, I-1, and P-4 questions. Morsi of Egypt, Rachid Ghannouchi of Tunisia, and Khaled The contemporary operational code analysis uses an Meshaal of Gaza. In the next section, we review operational automated content-analysis method called the Verbs in code analysis, a highly respected leadership assessment Context System (VICS), introduced by Walker, Schafer, method, as a tool for analyzing the political belief systems and Young (1998). This method retrieves patterns of of this new generation of Islamist leaders. Subsequent sec- beliefs from a leader’s public statements and then draws tions explain the case selection, research design, and results. inferences about the leader’s operational code (Schafer The concluding section provides the crux of Islamist for- and Walker 2006b; Walker, Schafer, and Young 1998). eign policy under the new MENA leaders’ stewardship by Schafer and Walker (2006b) further developed preference presenting their general behavioral patterns and the analy- orderings regarding the outcomes of settlement, dead- sis’ significance in terms of mainstream IR theories. lock, domination, and submission between Self and Other derived from the indices for their master operational code Operational Code Analysis: Theory beliefs (P-1, I-1, P-4) by introducing a Theory of and Hypotheses Inferences about Preferences (TIP). It compares the sub- ject’s master belief scores (P-1, I-1, and P-4) with the Operational code analysis is a classic leadership asses- average scores for the 164 speeches uttered by a norming ment approach to foreign policy within the psychological group of thirty-five world political leaders. The compari- paradigm, focusing on a leader’s political belief system or sons by TIP are utilized to deduce a leader’s likely con- more broadly on a set of beliefs emanating from a soci- flict and cooperation strategies (see Table 1). ety’s cultural matrix, which are embedded in a leader’s The signs and indices for all master beliefs enable character (Schafer and Walker 2006b; Walker 2000; researchers to observe whether a particular leader’s P-1 Walker, Schafer, and Young 1998). Accordingly, political and I-1 beliefs are below (<) or above (>) the mean score leaders’ beliefs are used as causal mechanisms to account for the norming sample of world leaders. The signs for for their foreign-policy decisions (George 1969; Schafer the P-4a and P-4b indices designate whether these beliefs and Walker 2006b; Walker 1983). The operational code are more than one standard deviation below (<) or above construct was originally developed by Nathan Leites (>), or whether they are within (=) one standard deviation (1951, 1953) as a political strategy to examine the deci- of the mean for the norming sample. For example, an sion-making style of the Soviet Politburo. Leites explained individual leader with a higher P-4a value than one stan- the Soviet Union’s precarious relations and uncommon dard deviation above (>) the mean for the norming group bargaining behavior with US leadership by analyzing is expected to give more historical control to Self than to Lenin’s belief system. Other. If a leader has an average P-4a score located within Alexander George (1969) translated Leites’ study (=) one standard deviation, he or she gives approximately results into a set of questions whose answers reveal a lead- equal amount of historical control to Self and Other. er’s perceptions about the political universe, the role of the When the P-4a score of a leader is more than one standard leader in that universe, and various instrumental means for deviation below (<) the mean score for the norming exercising power. George (1969, 1979) further elaborated group, it is predicted that such a leader will attribute more Özdamar and Canbolat 3 Table 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Journal of Social Inquiry Cilt / Volume 13 Sayı / Issue 1 2020 Ss./Pp
    Methodological Diversity of Research on Leaders and International Conflict: a Review International Journal of Social Inquiry Cilt / Volume 13 Sayı / Issue 1 2020 ss./pp. 27-59 METHODOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF RESEARCH ON LEADERS AND INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT: A REVIEW Öner AKGÜL* 27 Makale Geliş Tarihi-Received: 10.07.2019 Makale Kabul Tarihi-Accepted: 12.03.2020 IJSI 13/1 Doi: 10.37093/ijsi.746406 Haziran June 2020 ABSTRACT Why leaders decide to go to war or when they decide to make peace? It can be one of the most common questions of classical thinkers and current scholars of international relations. The basic idea behind this question is to find out a solution to the war phenomenon. However, the other question is how we understand and explain the behaviors of leaders and their inner circles? Do rationality, strategic calculations or only cognitive variables sufficiently explain the violent behaviors? This research discusses how different methodologies can contribute to theorizing or understand the international conflict behaviors of leaders. In this context, on a qualitative basis, psychobiography, psychohistory, leadership trait analysis, integrative complexity method are explained along with the quantitative findings and theories of leaders and international conflict. The methodological diversity provides both deep insights about specific leaders’ war decisions and general theories that can contribute to the scientific study of international conflict. I argue that the field is open to any new methodology. Keywords: Leaders, International Conflict, Methodology, Personality, Data. Jel Codes: D72, D74, F51, H56 * Asst. Prof., Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of International Relations, Kırşehir/Türkiye.
    [Show full text]
  • "Al-Assad" and "Al Qaeda" (Day of CBS Interview)
    This Document is Approved for Public Release A multi-disciplinary, multi-method approach to leader assessment at a distance: The case of Bashar al-Assad A Quick Look Assessment by the Strategic Multilayer Assessment (SMA)1 Part II: Analytical Approaches2 February 2014 Contributors: Dr. Peter Suedfeld (University of British Columbia), Mr. Bradford H. Morrison (University of British Columbia), Mr. Ryan W. Cross (University of British Columbia) Dr. Larry Kuznar (Indiana University – Purdue University, Fort Wayne), Maj Jason Spitaletta (Joint Staff J-7 & Johns Hopkins University), Dr. Kathleen Egan (CTTSO), Mr. Sean Colbath (BBN), Mr. Paul Brewer (SDL), Ms. Martha Lillie (BBN), Mr. Dana Rafter (CSIS), Dr. Randy Kluver (Texas A&M), Ms. Jacquelyn Chinn (Texas A&M), Mr. Patrick Issa (Texas A&M) Edited by: Dr. Hriar Cabayan (JS/J-38) and Dr. Nicholas Wright, MRCP PhD (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace) Copy Editor: Mr. Sam Rhem (SRC) 1 SMA provides planning support to Combatant Commands (CCMD) with complex operational imperatives requiring multi-agency, multi-disciplinary solutions that are not within core Service/Agency competency. SMA is accepted and synchronized by Joint Staff, J3, DDSAO and executed by OSD/ASD (R&E)/RSD/RRTO. 2 This is a document submitted to provide timely support to ongoing concerns as of February 2014. 1 This Document is Approved for Public Release 1 ABSTRACT This report suggests potential types of actions and messages most likely to influence and deter Bashar al-Assad from using force in the ongoing Syrian civil war. This study is based on multidisciplinary analyses of Bashar al-Assad’s speeches, and how he reacts to real events and verbal messages from external sources.
    [Show full text]
  • JITLE° American, Jordanian, and Other Middle Eastern National Perceptions
    1/4 DOCUMENT RESUME ED 229 297 SO 014 604 AUTHOR Szalay, Lorand g.; Strohl, Jean Bryson JITLE° American, Jordanian, and Other Middle Eastern National Perceptions. INSTITUTION Institute of Comparative Social and ,C,ultural Studies, Inc., Washington, D.C. SPONS AGENCY Defense Nuclear Agency (DOD), Washington, DC. PUB.DATE Feb 81 /CONTRACT DNA001-79-C-0341-P00001 NOTE 25716%; Appendix I may not reproduce clearly due to small prinetype of various charts. PUB TYPE Reports -/Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC11 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Anxiety; Comparative Analysis; *Cross Cultural Studies; Foreign Countries; *Foreign Policy; Group Unity; Higher Education; Individualism; *International Relations; Na,tionalism; Peace; *Psychological Patterns; Research Methodology; Social Science Research; *Student Attitudes IDENTIFIERS' Egypt; Israel; *Jordan; United States ABSTRACT International perceptions of Jordanian university students are compared with those of American, Egyptian, apd Israeli students. The sample consisted of 50 students from each country; results concentrate on Jordanian perceptions. Assessments were based on the Associative Group Analysis (AGA) which reconstructs perceptions and attitudes.characteristic of national/cultural groups from their free word associations. Jordanians tended td. ix conflict-ridden and laden with perceived threats and fears of 'aggressive, expansionist.intentions. When compared to a 1977 assessment, 4n increase in their longing for peace, less concern with military threat, more concern with violence and security, and a deterioration in their image of the ited States was evident. Egyptian and I.sraeli perceptions were ilar to the Jordanian emphasis on group and family unity, while Americans valued, individualism and autonomy. The document also discusses the role of. psychological disposition in international relations and in shaping - political events, needs and problems identified-by public policy 4 offices, and strategies for social science research on foreign populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Leadership—Perspectives and Practices
    Public Leadership Perspectives and Practices Public Leadership Perspectives and Practices Edited by Paul ‘t Hart and John Uhr Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/public_leadership _citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Public leadership pespectives and practices [electronic resource] / editors, Paul ‘t Hart, John Uhr. ISBN: 9781921536304 (pbk.) 9781921536311 (pdf) Series: ANZSOG series Subjects: Leadership Political leadership Civic leaders. Community leadership Other Authors/Contributors: Hart, Paul ‘t. Uhr, John, 1951- Dewey Number: 303.34 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by John Butcher Images comprising the cover graphic used by permission of: Victorian Department of Planning and Community Development Australian Associated Press Australian Broadcasting Corporation Scoop Media Group (www.scoop.co.nz) Cover graphic based on M. C. Escher’s Hand with Reflecting Sphere, 1935 (Lithograph). Printed by University Printing Services, ANU Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2008 ANU E Press John Wanna, Series Editor Professor John Wanna is the Sir John Bunting Chair of Public Administration at the Research School of Social Sciences at The Australian National University. He is the director of research for the Australian and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG).
    [Show full text]
  • Full Vite(Withour Teach)
    STANLEY A. RENSHON 168 West 86th Street (14C) Home Phone: (212) 362-2889 New York, New York 10024 Office Phone: (212) 817-8689 Email: [email protected] SR/GC Web page: http://www.gc.cuny.edu/Page-Elements/Academics-Research- Centers-Initiatives/Doctoral-Programs/Political-Science/Faculty-Bios/Stanley-Renshon SR/GC-Book list: http://www.gc.cuny.edu/Page-Elements/Academics-Research-Centers- Initiatives/Doctoral-Programs/Political-Science/Books/American-Politics PRESENT POSITION Professor, Political Science -The City University of New York and Developer and Coordinator, Interdisciplinary Program in the Psychology of Political Behavior, The City University of New York Graduate School and Certified Psychoanalyst, since 1993 TRAINING Ph.D. - University of Pennsylvania - 1972 (Political Science) M.A. - University of Pennsylvania - 1971 (Political Science) Summer Program-University of Michigan, Interuniversity Consortium for Political Research-Advanced Quantitative Methods M.A. - School of International Service, American University -1968 (International Relations) B.A. - Rutgers University - 1966 (Political Science) POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING 1993 Certificate in Psychoanalysis 1 1988-91 Psychoanalytic Training, Training and Research Institute for Self-Psychology 1982-88 Doctoral training in Clinical Psychology, Long Island University 1977-80 Special Postdoctoral Student in Clinical Psychology, City University Ph.D. Program in Clinical Psychology 1972-73 NIMH Postdoctoral Fellow in Psychology and Politics, Yale University AREAS OF RESEARCH INTEREST Citizenship, Immigration and American National Identity; The Presidency [Political Leadership and Decision Making]; International Politics and Decision Making American National Security in the Post 9/11 World GRANTS, AWARDS, HONORS 2008/2009 Weiler Foundation Grant: Non-citizen Voting and the Integration of New Immigrants.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership Style and Diversionary
    Syracuse University SURFACE Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Political Science - Dissertations Affairs 2011 Leadership Style And Diversionary Theory Of Foreign Policy: The Use Of Diversionary Strategies By Middle Eastern Leaders During And In The Immediate Aftermath Of The Gulf War Kilic Bugra Kanat Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/psc_etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Kanat, Kilic Bugra, "Leadership Style And Diversionary Theory Of Foreign Policy: The Use Of Diversionary Strategies By Middle Eastern Leaders During And In The Immediate Aftermath Of The Gulf War" (2011). Political Science - Dissertations. 104. https://surface.syr.edu/psc_etd/104 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science - Dissertations by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract The diversionary theory of war is one of the most speculated about and debated theories in foreign policy literature. The theory argues that government leaders who are confronted with public antagonism over domestic economic, social, and political problems sometimes start wars to divert their populaces‘ attention from domestic problems and therefore to survive politically. Numerous foreign policy conflicts have been interpreted as being diversionary in nature and it has been commonplace for analysts to examine the domestic politics and problems of countries that engage in international conflict. Specifically, the use of force by US Presidents against external actors, such as U.S. President George H.W. Bush‘s operation against Grenada and the First Gulf War, and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership Trait Analysis, Foreign Policy & Emerging Powers
    Leadership Trait Analysis, Foreign Policy & Emerging Powers A CASE OF MODI’S INDIA Praneet Khandal, S1885081| MSc. International Relations & Diplomacy | 23 May, 2018 Word Count: 16,777 This thesis is submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in International Relations & Diplomacy joint programme of Leiden University & Clingendael, the Netherlands Institute of International Relations. Supervisor: Dr. Corinna Jentzsch Second Reader: Dr. Siniša Vuković Acknowledgments Firstly, I am grateful to Dr. Corinna Jentzsch of the Institute of Political Science at Leiden University who ensured that this thesis was kept on track and who was always available for any questions. I would also like to thank Dr. Siniša Vuković who was the second reader for this thesis and provided assistance whenever it was needed. Social Science Automation graciously provided a one-year academic license for the ‘Profiler Plus’ textual analysis computer program and the team was always responsive to all the queries. I also appreciate Dr. Nicolas Blarel’s efforts in providing constructive comments at a crucial stage of this study. This study would not have been possible without the constant encouragement of my friends, fellow students and the MIRD team as well. A special mention to Francesca, Annechris, Jimena, Aayushi, Vishwesh, Maurice and Shaurya who were always available for any emotional support and help I needed. Lastly, I would like to thank my mother, Aruna Sharma for being a constant support throughout the programme and especially during these last few months. 1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Topic and Research Question .................................................................................. 4 1.2 Societal and Academic Relevance .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Hine Bibliography of Resources on Servant Leadership 3Rd Edition
    The Hine Bibliography of Resources on Servant Leadership 3rd Edition, Revised and Expanded Compiled by Valentine K. Muyumba and Betsy N. Hine September, 2015 1 Foreword The Hine Bibliography of Resources on Servant-Leadership, last published in 2008, has been revised and expanded significantly. New material since the 2008 edition is marked with an *. Editor, Betsy Hine, is being joined by Valentine Muyumba, Head of Technical Services at Indiana State University to finish this big job which includes updating the print monographs, updating the non-print monographs (media such as DVDs, CDs, etc.), updating the theses and dissertations, adding journal and periodical articles and adding chapters in books. We wanted to make this revised and expanded edition as complete as possible but it’s likely that we have omitted some publications. Since this is now an electronic publication it is a dynamic document and will continue to be updated regularly. If you have published or have seen published any new books, media, articles or chapters in books, or if you have completed a master’s thesis or doctoral dissertation, please let us know right away via email at the following: For books: [email protected] For articles, media, chapters in books or theses and dissertations: [email protected] We may already know about your contribution to the literature but don’t assume we do! Please let us know the citation in APA format that includes complete pagination, ISBN and whether it has a bibliography or references or index, glossary, etc., and whether it is also available as an e-book.
    [Show full text]
  • Know Thy Enemy Profiles of Adversary Leaders and Their Strategic Cultures
    Know Thy Enemy Profiles of Adversary Leaders and Their Strategic Cultures Edited by Barry R. Schneider and Jerrold M. Post, eds. US Air Force Counterproliferation Center Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama KNOW THY ENEMY Profiles of Adversary Leaders and Their Strategic Cultures Edited by Barry R. Schneider and Jerrold M. Post USAF Counterproliferation Center 325 Chennault Circle Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-6427 July 2003 (Second Edition) Disclaimer The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Government, Department of Defense, or the USAF Counterproliferation Center. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (207) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20401-0001 ISBN 0-9747403-0-6 ii Contents Chapter Page Disclaimer .............................................................................................. ii Acknowledgments...................................................................................v 1 Deterring International Rivals From War and Escalation .......................1 Barry R. Schneider 2 Killing In The Name of God: Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda...........17 Jerrold M. Post 3 The Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic Radicalism................................41 Gary M. Servold 4 Struggle for the Control of Pakistan: Musharraf Takes On the Islamist Radicals ...........................................85
    [Show full text]
  • Amended Thesis 30-3-17 a Theology of Leadership
    A Theology of Leadership: from Social Justice for Transformation by Deborah Robertson DipTch (WAIT), BA (UWA), BEd (ECU), DipRE (Catholic Pastoral Institute, WA), BTheol (Hons)(Murdoch), MEd (Deakin), MEd (Policy) (UniMelb), EdD (Murdoch), GradCertHE (ACU). A thesis submitted to Murdoch University to fulfil the components for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the discipline of Theology Perth, WA, 2016 Author’s Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. Deborah Robertson iii Abstract In response to leadership in contemporary workplaces being under pressure from a neoliberal agenda, in which workers are often seen as economic subjects rather than persons entitled to fulfilling work, the purpose of this thesis was to develop a theology of leadership for Christian leaders. The study is placed within the theological sub-discipline of practical theology understood as bringing together, rather than being separate from, other sub-disciplines of theology such as systematic and moral theology. The intent of this practical theology is to support Christian leaders in enacting a theology of leadership that deepens their understanding of the kingdom of God and "what it means to be a people of God". Existing theology of leadership literature is explored to establish the elements of a theology of leadership. A conceptual framework is developed comprised of the three core concepts of purpose, people and praxis, within which are contained twelve essences. The content of this framework led to an investigation of Christian social teaching, as well as secular social justice, leadership and organisational literature, to judge whether these areas can fulfil and expand the elements of a theology of leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis Of
    AUTHORITARIAN RESPONSE TO POPULAR REVOLUTIONS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE PARANOID PERSONALITY IN LEADERSHIP DECISION-MAKING By DAMIAN RAMIREZ A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY School of Politics, Philosophy, & Public Affairs DECEMBER 2016 © Copyright by DAMIAN RAMIREZ, 2016 All Rights Reserved © Copyright by DAMIAN RAMIREZ, 2016 All Rights Reserved To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation of DAMIAN RAMIREZ find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. _______________________________ Martha L. Cottam, Ph.D., Chair _______________________________ Thomas Preston, Ph.D. _______________________________ Otwin Marenin, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I could probably fill an equivalent amount of pages of this dissertation just thanking the people who have helped, or prodded, me to reach this point in my life to where I am writing an acknowledgements section to a dissertation. However, no matter the amount of pages I could write, they would have to begin with thanking my committee chair Dr. Martha Cottam and other committee members Dr. Otwin Marenin and Dr. John Thomas Preston for the guidance that has helped me get to this point. Even if I never step inside a classroom again, I am a better person for having learned how to think analytically from them. Just as important is my indebtedness to Dr. Nicholas Lovrich for his mentorship while I was an undergraduate at Washington State University considering going to a graduate school and his continued mentorship after I had decided to pursue further studies while remaining at WSU.
    [Show full text]
  • Armed Groups
    Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen 24 Disrupting and Influencing Leaders of Armed Groups Elena Mastors and Jeffrey H. Norwitz INTRODUCTION The United States has a superb capability to collect and analyze information about the rest of the world. Yet many decision makers still fail to adequately understand the leaders of armed groups. Dealing with and attempting to influence or disrupt the activities of these shadowy leaders cannot be achieved without understanding what makes them tick. Most of us don’t have direct access to leaders of armed groups or their close associ- ates. Thus, we have to work with indirect information such as speeches, letters, books, media interviews, and what associates say about these leaders. This is particularly true about al-Qaida. This chapter does not subcribe to a singular type of leadership analysis. We contend that if we only use one approach, we can miss some very instructive information about Dr. Elena Mastors is currently an associate professor in the National Decision Making Department at the Naval War College. Previously, she held various senior intelligence and policy positions in the Office of the Under Secre- tary of Defense for Intelligence and received numerous performance awards from the Defense Intelligence Agency. Dr. Mastors earned a BA in political science from Eckerd College and a political science MA from the Uni- versity of South Florida. She received her PhD in political science with a concentration in international relations and political psychology from Washington State University, where she focused on leadership, conflict, and terror- ism. She writes frequently on understanding leaders and group dynamics, from a political-psychological perspec- tive.
    [Show full text]