In Need of Vision Nathen M. Baker Thesis Submitted to the Faculty Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In Need of Vision Nathen M. Baker Thesis Submitted to the Faculty Of Syria: In Need of Vision Nathen M. Baker Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In Political Science Paul C. Avey Priya Dixit Timothy W. Luke 26 April 2019 Blacksburg, VA Keywords: Syria; Presidential Leadership; Presidential Vision; Vision in Foreign Policy; American Foreign Policy Copyright © 2019, Nathen M. Baker Syria: In Need of Vision Nathen M. Baker ABSTRACT Possessing a vision to correct problems is an area of interest for leadership and political studies, as presumably vision provides the goal to orient upon and overcome problems, and should apply at all levels of leadership. The worsening situation in Syria since the end of the Cold War begs the questions of whether any recent U.S. President tried to address the issues in the relationship with Syria, and what was the vision the President sought to achieve. This study reviews Presidential rhetoric from President’s News Conferences, major speeches and Executive Orders for a vision to ascertain the intended direction for U.S. policy for Syria. Also, the study reviews the leadership styles of the five Presidents for consistency and effectiveness in conveying a foreign policy message. Broadly, the study concludes that the Presidents need more than a strategy to engage other nation to fix problems. They need an achievable outcome to aim the U.S. government towards and to effectively broadcast their vision to a broad audience. It takes an appreciation for history, realistic expectations and an eye for the future to form a vision for a coherent way forward. Unfortunately, the Presidents in this study did not give the appropriate time or resources to correct the pervasive problems in Syria. Their overall policies ranged from incoherent to stagnant, therefore hampering the U.S. ability to guide progress fixing the situation. Syria: In Need of Vision Nathen M. Baker GENERAL AUDIENCE ABSTRACT The pervasive problems within Syria are some of the more important U.S. foreign policy issues that require guidance and direction to overcome. The worsening situation in Syria since the end of the Cold War begs the questions of whether any recent U.S. President tried to address the issues in the relationship with Syria. Broadly, the study concludes that it takes more than a strategy to engage another nation and fix problems. It takes an appreciation for history, realistic expectations and an eye for the future to form a vision for a coherent way forward. Additionally, Presidents require the ability to effectively communicate their vision to a broad audience. Unfortunately, it appears the Presidents in this study did not give the appropriate time or resources to correct the problems, and therefore hampered the U.S. President’s ability to guide progress to fix the situation. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Huge thanks to my thesis panel for their gems of wisdom and patience while I prolonged the completion of this thesis. Their understanding and guidance gave me valuable suggestions to focus and understand more. None of this was possible without the love and support from my wife and children. They endured through the entire project. I owe them an immeasurable debt of gratitude and appreciation for their perseverance. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................1 2. History and Position of Affairs in Syria ..........................................................................6 2.1. Recent U.S. Policy Towards Syria ..........................................................................21 3. U.S. Presidential Role in Foreign Policy .......................................................................26 6.1. Presidential Role in National Interest .....................................................................30 4. Theoretical Framework ..................................................................................................42 5. Methods and Evidence ...................................................................................................55 6. Research and Analysis ...................................................................................................62 6.1. President George H. W. Bush .................................................................................63 6.2. President William J. Clinton ...................................................................................69 6.3. President George W. Bush ......................................................................................84 6.4. President Barack H. Obama ....................................................................................98 6.5. President Donald J. Trump ...................................................................................131 7. Conclusions ..................................................................................................................143 7.1. Implications...........................................................................................................154 8. Bibliography ................................................................................................................164 v Chapter 1 – INTRODUCTION As the head of the Executive Branch and with the broad authorities granted to the office, the President of the United States remains largely responsible for directing action and guiding policy in the foreign arena. As a result, he remains the subject of much leadership analysis and constant scrutiny over what actions he intends to take to resolve foreign policy matters. Unfortunately, "the question of the extent to which leaders matter in international politics is as familiar as it is impossible to fully answer" (Jervis 2013, 154). It remains difficult to conclude that any single decision-maker, even the President of the United States, can remain relevant and influence the world in a grand manner, especially a world so tightly connected and influenced by rapidly evolving events. There is simply too much nuance and not enough time for one person to fully comprehend every situation. The question about Presidential relevancy remains especially prominent as it pertains to the U.S. policies directed at Syria since the end of the Cold War. Though five very different men have held the office as President since the end of the Cold War, very few of their collective policies directed toward Syria progressed toward a resolution of the long-standing issues between the United States and Syria. The stagnation in progress begs the question of whether the U.S. has ever possessed a good vision to improve the relationship between the U.S. and Syria. As with any good research, "the best way to examine the problems of international political theory is to pose a central question and identify the answers that can be given to it" (Waltz 2001, 12). The primary question this research attempts to answer involves why the President hasn’t been able to direct necessary change toward 1 fixing numerous issues in Syria. In order to answer that question, the research tries to determine what the President wanted to achieve as an outcome with respect to Syria. Since effective leaders portray their intended outcomes through vision, this research focuses on discovering the strategic vision the President outlined for dealing with Syria. Did any of the five Presidents outline a vision or ultimate goal to reach with Syria that could address the negative trend? Subsequently, this research provides insight and understanding on the degree that presidential leadership, through expression of strategic vision, has a role in outlining and enforcing American foreign policy. As it turns out, this research does not conclude that having vision will make the President successful, but it does trend toward the conclusion that without a vision for the future, the President and the foreign policy apparatus will flounder and struggle with consistency. The lack of Presidential vision in Syria hasn’t necessarily created poor policies; however, the prolonged stagnation in policy has created an environment where a coherent policy in Syria may not be sufficient. Correcting the pervasive problems has become more difficult because it’s difficult to understand the objective that the Presidents sought. Despite their often-differing perspectives, one thing has remained constant through all five Presidents; none have conveyed a vision for what they wanted to accomplish as it pertains to resolving differences with Syria. The analysis shows, more often than not, that the recent Presidents are too heavily mired in the daily minutia of the issues within Syria to convey their thoughts and vision on where the U.S. should proceed and how their relationship should develop. Outlining a future for these items would enhance the Syrian nation and place them on a more equal footing with the United States and the international community. More importantly, it would offer the opportunity for 2 the Syrian population to overcome the ravages of war and ceaseless violence. This research presents an incredible opportunity to view vision as a leadership tool that may offer a mechanism to break out of stagnancy and pursue higher goals in Syria, such as economic advancements, trade partnerships and greater diplomatic collaboration on the world stage. One of the primary reasons why solving the Syria problem is important is because the world needs less nations that sponsor
Recommended publications
  • International Journal of Social Inquiry Cilt / Volume 13 Sayı / Issue 1 2020 Ss./Pp
    Methodological Diversity of Research on Leaders and International Conflict: a Review International Journal of Social Inquiry Cilt / Volume 13 Sayı / Issue 1 2020 ss./pp. 27-59 METHODOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF RESEARCH ON LEADERS AND INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT: A REVIEW Öner AKGÜL* 27 Makale Geliş Tarihi-Received: 10.07.2019 Makale Kabul Tarihi-Accepted: 12.03.2020 IJSI 13/1 Doi: 10.37093/ijsi.746406 Haziran June 2020 ABSTRACT Why leaders decide to go to war or when they decide to make peace? It can be one of the most common questions of classical thinkers and current scholars of international relations. The basic idea behind this question is to find out a solution to the war phenomenon. However, the other question is how we understand and explain the behaviors of leaders and their inner circles? Do rationality, strategic calculations or only cognitive variables sufficiently explain the violent behaviors? This research discusses how different methodologies can contribute to theorizing or understand the international conflict behaviors of leaders. In this context, on a qualitative basis, psychobiography, psychohistory, leadership trait analysis, integrative complexity method are explained along with the quantitative findings and theories of leaders and international conflict. The methodological diversity provides both deep insights about specific leaders’ war decisions and general theories that can contribute to the scientific study of international conflict. I argue that the field is open to any new methodology. Keywords: Leaders, International Conflict, Methodology, Personality, Data. Jel Codes: D72, D74, F51, H56 * Asst. Prof., Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of International Relations, Kırşehir/Türkiye.
    [Show full text]
  • "Al-Assad" and "Al Qaeda" (Day of CBS Interview)
    This Document is Approved for Public Release A multi-disciplinary, multi-method approach to leader assessment at a distance: The case of Bashar al-Assad A Quick Look Assessment by the Strategic Multilayer Assessment (SMA)1 Part II: Analytical Approaches2 February 2014 Contributors: Dr. Peter Suedfeld (University of British Columbia), Mr. Bradford H. Morrison (University of British Columbia), Mr. Ryan W. Cross (University of British Columbia) Dr. Larry Kuznar (Indiana University – Purdue University, Fort Wayne), Maj Jason Spitaletta (Joint Staff J-7 & Johns Hopkins University), Dr. Kathleen Egan (CTTSO), Mr. Sean Colbath (BBN), Mr. Paul Brewer (SDL), Ms. Martha Lillie (BBN), Mr. Dana Rafter (CSIS), Dr. Randy Kluver (Texas A&M), Ms. Jacquelyn Chinn (Texas A&M), Mr. Patrick Issa (Texas A&M) Edited by: Dr. Hriar Cabayan (JS/J-38) and Dr. Nicholas Wright, MRCP PhD (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace) Copy Editor: Mr. Sam Rhem (SRC) 1 SMA provides planning support to Combatant Commands (CCMD) with complex operational imperatives requiring multi-agency, multi-disciplinary solutions that are not within core Service/Agency competency. SMA is accepted and synchronized by Joint Staff, J3, DDSAO and executed by OSD/ASD (R&E)/RSD/RRTO. 2 This is a document submitted to provide timely support to ongoing concerns as of February 2014. 1 This Document is Approved for Public Release 1 ABSTRACT This report suggests potential types of actions and messages most likely to influence and deter Bashar al-Assad from using force in the ongoing Syrian civil war. This study is based on multidisciplinary analyses of Bashar al-Assad’s speeches, and how he reacts to real events and verbal messages from external sources.
    [Show full text]
  • JITLE° American, Jordanian, and Other Middle Eastern National Perceptions
    1/4 DOCUMENT RESUME ED 229 297 SO 014 604 AUTHOR Szalay, Lorand g.; Strohl, Jean Bryson JITLE° American, Jordanian, and Other Middle Eastern National Perceptions. INSTITUTION Institute of Comparative Social and ,C,ultural Studies, Inc., Washington, D.C. SPONS AGENCY Defense Nuclear Agency (DOD), Washington, DC. PUB.DATE Feb 81 /CONTRACT DNA001-79-C-0341-P00001 NOTE 25716%; Appendix I may not reproduce clearly due to small prinetype of various charts. PUB TYPE Reports -/Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC11 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Anxiety; Comparative Analysis; *Cross Cultural Studies; Foreign Countries; *Foreign Policy; Group Unity; Higher Education; Individualism; *International Relations; Na,tionalism; Peace; *Psychological Patterns; Research Methodology; Social Science Research; *Student Attitudes IDENTIFIERS' Egypt; Israel; *Jordan; United States ABSTRACT International perceptions of Jordanian university students are compared with those of American, Egyptian, apd Israeli students. The sample consisted of 50 students from each country; results concentrate on Jordanian perceptions. Assessments were based on the Associative Group Analysis (AGA) which reconstructs perceptions and attitudes.characteristic of national/cultural groups from their free word associations. Jordanians tended td. ix conflict-ridden and laden with perceived threats and fears of 'aggressive, expansionist.intentions. When compared to a 1977 assessment, 4n increase in their longing for peace, less concern with military threat, more concern with violence and security, and a deterioration in their image of the ited States was evident. Egyptian and I.sraeli perceptions were ilar to the Jordanian emphasis on group and family unity, while Americans valued, individualism and autonomy. The document also discusses the role of. psychological disposition in international relations and in shaping - political events, needs and problems identified-by public policy 4 offices, and strategies for social science research on foreign populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Leadership—Perspectives and Practices
    Public Leadership Perspectives and Practices Public Leadership Perspectives and Practices Edited by Paul ‘t Hart and John Uhr Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/public_leadership _citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Public leadership pespectives and practices [electronic resource] / editors, Paul ‘t Hart, John Uhr. ISBN: 9781921536304 (pbk.) 9781921536311 (pdf) Series: ANZSOG series Subjects: Leadership Political leadership Civic leaders. Community leadership Other Authors/Contributors: Hart, Paul ‘t. Uhr, John, 1951- Dewey Number: 303.34 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by John Butcher Images comprising the cover graphic used by permission of: Victorian Department of Planning and Community Development Australian Associated Press Australian Broadcasting Corporation Scoop Media Group (www.scoop.co.nz) Cover graphic based on M. C. Escher’s Hand with Reflecting Sphere, 1935 (Lithograph). Printed by University Printing Services, ANU Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2008 ANU E Press John Wanna, Series Editor Professor John Wanna is the Sir John Bunting Chair of Public Administration at the Research School of Social Sciences at The Australian National University. He is the director of research for the Australian and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG).
    [Show full text]
  • Full Vite(Withour Teach)
    STANLEY A. RENSHON 168 West 86th Street (14C) Home Phone: (212) 362-2889 New York, New York 10024 Office Phone: (212) 817-8689 Email: [email protected] SR/GC Web page: http://www.gc.cuny.edu/Page-Elements/Academics-Research- Centers-Initiatives/Doctoral-Programs/Political-Science/Faculty-Bios/Stanley-Renshon SR/GC-Book list: http://www.gc.cuny.edu/Page-Elements/Academics-Research-Centers- Initiatives/Doctoral-Programs/Political-Science/Books/American-Politics PRESENT POSITION Professor, Political Science -The City University of New York and Developer and Coordinator, Interdisciplinary Program in the Psychology of Political Behavior, The City University of New York Graduate School and Certified Psychoanalyst, since 1993 TRAINING Ph.D. - University of Pennsylvania - 1972 (Political Science) M.A. - University of Pennsylvania - 1971 (Political Science) Summer Program-University of Michigan, Interuniversity Consortium for Political Research-Advanced Quantitative Methods M.A. - School of International Service, American University -1968 (International Relations) B.A. - Rutgers University - 1966 (Political Science) POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING 1993 Certificate in Psychoanalysis 1 1988-91 Psychoanalytic Training, Training and Research Institute for Self-Psychology 1982-88 Doctoral training in Clinical Psychology, Long Island University 1977-80 Special Postdoctoral Student in Clinical Psychology, City University Ph.D. Program in Clinical Psychology 1972-73 NIMH Postdoctoral Fellow in Psychology and Politics, Yale University AREAS OF RESEARCH INTEREST Citizenship, Immigration and American National Identity; The Presidency [Political Leadership and Decision Making]; International Politics and Decision Making American National Security in the Post 9/11 World GRANTS, AWARDS, HONORS 2008/2009 Weiler Foundation Grant: Non-citizen Voting and the Integration of New Immigrants.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership Style and Diversionary
    Syracuse University SURFACE Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Political Science - Dissertations Affairs 2011 Leadership Style And Diversionary Theory Of Foreign Policy: The Use Of Diversionary Strategies By Middle Eastern Leaders During And In The Immediate Aftermath Of The Gulf War Kilic Bugra Kanat Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/psc_etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Kanat, Kilic Bugra, "Leadership Style And Diversionary Theory Of Foreign Policy: The Use Of Diversionary Strategies By Middle Eastern Leaders During And In The Immediate Aftermath Of The Gulf War" (2011). Political Science - Dissertations. 104. https://surface.syr.edu/psc_etd/104 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science - Dissertations by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract The diversionary theory of war is one of the most speculated about and debated theories in foreign policy literature. The theory argues that government leaders who are confronted with public antagonism over domestic economic, social, and political problems sometimes start wars to divert their populaces‘ attention from domestic problems and therefore to survive politically. Numerous foreign policy conflicts have been interpreted as being diversionary in nature and it has been commonplace for analysts to examine the domestic politics and problems of countries that engage in international conflict. Specifically, the use of force by US Presidents against external actors, such as U.S. President George H.W. Bush‘s operation against Grenada and the First Gulf War, and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding New Middle Eastern Leadership: an Operational Code
    PRQXXX10.1177/1065912917721744Political Research QuarterlyÖzdamar and Canbolat 721744research-article2017 Article Political Research Quarterly 1 –13 Understanding New Middle Eastern © 2017 University of Utah Reprints and permissions: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Leadership: An Operational Code DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917721744 10.1177/1065912917721744 Approach journals.sagepub.com/home/prq Özgür Özdamar1 and Sercan Canbolat2 Abstract Political Islam and Islamist organizations have broadly gained strength across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) in the post-Cold War era. Following the Arab uprisings, the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), generally viewed as the world’s largest and most influential Islamist organization, has shaped the wider landscape of MENA politics. This study examines MB leadership by comparing M. Morsi of Egypt, R. Ghannouchi of Tunisia, and K. Meshaal of Gaza as examples of Islamist leaders to explain their political belief systems and predict their foreign-policy behavior. We use the operational code approach, a content-analysis software and statistical tests to conduct the study. Results show that the three leaders’ foreign policy beliefs are analogous to the averages of world leaders. Results also partially support the hypothesis that their foreign-policy propensities are similar to each other. We conclude that despite the conventional portrayal of MB leadership, these leaders use negotiation and cooperation to settle their differences in foreign affairs, and the best way to approach them is to engage
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership Trait Analysis, Foreign Policy & Emerging Powers
    Leadership Trait Analysis, Foreign Policy & Emerging Powers A CASE OF MODI’S INDIA Praneet Khandal, S1885081| MSc. International Relations & Diplomacy | 23 May, 2018 Word Count: 16,777 This thesis is submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in International Relations & Diplomacy joint programme of Leiden University & Clingendael, the Netherlands Institute of International Relations. Supervisor: Dr. Corinna Jentzsch Second Reader: Dr. Siniša Vuković Acknowledgments Firstly, I am grateful to Dr. Corinna Jentzsch of the Institute of Political Science at Leiden University who ensured that this thesis was kept on track and who was always available for any questions. I would also like to thank Dr. Siniša Vuković who was the second reader for this thesis and provided assistance whenever it was needed. Social Science Automation graciously provided a one-year academic license for the ‘Profiler Plus’ textual analysis computer program and the team was always responsive to all the queries. I also appreciate Dr. Nicolas Blarel’s efforts in providing constructive comments at a crucial stage of this study. This study would not have been possible without the constant encouragement of my friends, fellow students and the MIRD team as well. A special mention to Francesca, Annechris, Jimena, Aayushi, Vishwesh, Maurice and Shaurya who were always available for any emotional support and help I needed. Lastly, I would like to thank my mother, Aruna Sharma for being a constant support throughout the programme and especially during these last few months. 1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Topic and Research Question .................................................................................. 4 1.2 Societal and Academic Relevance .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Hine Bibliography of Resources on Servant Leadership 3Rd Edition
    The Hine Bibliography of Resources on Servant Leadership 3rd Edition, Revised and Expanded Compiled by Valentine K. Muyumba and Betsy N. Hine September, 2015 1 Foreword The Hine Bibliography of Resources on Servant-Leadership, last published in 2008, has been revised and expanded significantly. New material since the 2008 edition is marked with an *. Editor, Betsy Hine, is being joined by Valentine Muyumba, Head of Technical Services at Indiana State University to finish this big job which includes updating the print monographs, updating the non-print monographs (media such as DVDs, CDs, etc.), updating the theses and dissertations, adding journal and periodical articles and adding chapters in books. We wanted to make this revised and expanded edition as complete as possible but it’s likely that we have omitted some publications. Since this is now an electronic publication it is a dynamic document and will continue to be updated regularly. If you have published or have seen published any new books, media, articles or chapters in books, or if you have completed a master’s thesis or doctoral dissertation, please let us know right away via email at the following: For books: [email protected] For articles, media, chapters in books or theses and dissertations: [email protected] We may already know about your contribution to the literature but don’t assume we do! Please let us know the citation in APA format that includes complete pagination, ISBN and whether it has a bibliography or references or index, glossary, etc., and whether it is also available as an e-book.
    [Show full text]
  • Know Thy Enemy Profiles of Adversary Leaders and Their Strategic Cultures
    Know Thy Enemy Profiles of Adversary Leaders and Their Strategic Cultures Edited by Barry R. Schneider and Jerrold M. Post, eds. US Air Force Counterproliferation Center Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama KNOW THY ENEMY Profiles of Adversary Leaders and Their Strategic Cultures Edited by Barry R. Schneider and Jerrold M. Post USAF Counterproliferation Center 325 Chennault Circle Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-6427 July 2003 (Second Edition) Disclaimer The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Government, Department of Defense, or the USAF Counterproliferation Center. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (207) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20401-0001 ISBN 0-9747403-0-6 ii Contents Chapter Page Disclaimer .............................................................................................. ii Acknowledgments...................................................................................v 1 Deterring International Rivals From War and Escalation .......................1 Barry R. Schneider 2 Killing In The Name of God: Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda...........17 Jerrold M. Post 3 The Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic Radicalism................................41 Gary M. Servold 4 Struggle for the Control of Pakistan: Musharraf Takes On the Islamist Radicals ...........................................85
    [Show full text]
  • Amended Thesis 30-3-17 a Theology of Leadership
    A Theology of Leadership: from Social Justice for Transformation by Deborah Robertson DipTch (WAIT), BA (UWA), BEd (ECU), DipRE (Catholic Pastoral Institute, WA), BTheol (Hons)(Murdoch), MEd (Deakin), MEd (Policy) (UniMelb), EdD (Murdoch), GradCertHE (ACU). A thesis submitted to Murdoch University to fulfil the components for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the discipline of Theology Perth, WA, 2016 Author’s Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. Deborah Robertson iii Abstract In response to leadership in contemporary workplaces being under pressure from a neoliberal agenda, in which workers are often seen as economic subjects rather than persons entitled to fulfilling work, the purpose of this thesis was to develop a theology of leadership for Christian leaders. The study is placed within the theological sub-discipline of practical theology understood as bringing together, rather than being separate from, other sub-disciplines of theology such as systematic and moral theology. The intent of this practical theology is to support Christian leaders in enacting a theology of leadership that deepens their understanding of the kingdom of God and "what it means to be a people of God". Existing theology of leadership literature is explored to establish the elements of a theology of leadership. A conceptual framework is developed comprised of the three core concepts of purpose, people and praxis, within which are contained twelve essences. The content of this framework led to an investigation of Christian social teaching, as well as secular social justice, leadership and organisational literature, to judge whether these areas can fulfil and expand the elements of a theology of leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis Of
    AUTHORITARIAN RESPONSE TO POPULAR REVOLUTIONS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE PARANOID PERSONALITY IN LEADERSHIP DECISION-MAKING By DAMIAN RAMIREZ A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY School of Politics, Philosophy, & Public Affairs DECEMBER 2016 © Copyright by DAMIAN RAMIREZ, 2016 All Rights Reserved © Copyright by DAMIAN RAMIREZ, 2016 All Rights Reserved To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation of DAMIAN RAMIREZ find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. _______________________________ Martha L. Cottam, Ph.D., Chair _______________________________ Thomas Preston, Ph.D. _______________________________ Otwin Marenin, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I could probably fill an equivalent amount of pages of this dissertation just thanking the people who have helped, or prodded, me to reach this point in my life to where I am writing an acknowledgements section to a dissertation. However, no matter the amount of pages I could write, they would have to begin with thanking my committee chair Dr. Martha Cottam and other committee members Dr. Otwin Marenin and Dr. John Thomas Preston for the guidance that has helped me get to this point. Even if I never step inside a classroom again, I am a better person for having learned how to think analytically from them. Just as important is my indebtedness to Dr. Nicholas Lovrich for his mentorship while I was an undergraduate at Washington State University considering going to a graduate school and his continued mentorship after I had decided to pursue further studies while remaining at WSU.
    [Show full text]