DOCSLIB.ORG

Leadership Analysis and Political Psychology in the 21St Century

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Leadership Analysis and Political Psychology in the 21St Century ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY Leadership Analysis and Political Psychology in the 21st Century Kenneth B. Dekleva, MD The election of President Trump has led to interest in his mental health and has resulted in heightened scrutiny regarding the American Psychiatric Association’s Goldwater Rule, with its prohibition on opining psychiatrically on the mental health of public figures whom one has not examined in person. This article highlights the historic, methodological, forensic, and ethics challenges regarding psychiatric approaches to leadership analysis, and how these can offer policy makers options regarding national security decision-making. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 46:359–63, 2018. DOI:10.29158/JAAPL.003771-18 The 2016 campaign and election of President choanalytic approach of the day, Langer created a Trump has led to a flurry of interest in not only his multidisciplinary team that analyzed raw data in- mental health,1 but more generally, in the mental cluding Hitler’s writings, speeches, movies of rallies, health of world leaders. This has resulted in extensive classified intelligence data, his medical reports, defec- scholarly commentary regarding the American Psy- tor accounts, and collateral accounts of persons who chiatric Association’s Goldwater Rule,2 with its pro- had met Hitler in person. Langer emphasized under- hibition on opining psychiatrically on the mental standing of Hitler’s psychological makeup, and also health of public figures whom one has not examined made accurate predictions of his future behavior. in person.3–7 This article, by a psychiatrist who has Langer’s work exerted a powerful intellectual influ- published numerous profiles of world leaders,8–15 ence, both in the fields of leadership analysis and outlines challenges regarding psychiatric approaches political psychology, as developed by Dr. Jerrold to leadership analysis.16 Overall, political psychology Post, and criminal personality profiling as pioneered approaches to leadership analysis are but one piece of by Dr. James Brussel.18 a larger, more complex analytic puzzle, which can In 1965, Post joined the Central Intelligence serve national security interests in understanding the Agency (CIA), where he founded a unit for the anal- psyches of our adversaries, allowing policy makers ysis of the psychology of world leaders. Over the next greater options regarding decision-making in a vari- several decades, Post followed Langer’s model, lead- ety of diplomatic and public policy settings. ing a team of psychiatrists, internists, psychologists, The origins of leadership analysis and political anthropologists, historians, and intelligence analysts, psychology profiling date to 1943, when Dr. Walter who developed classified leadership profiles of vari- Langer published, at the behest of the Office of Stra- ous world leaders for the intelligence community and tegic Services, a classified analysis of Germany’s Fu¨h- senior U.S. policy makers.16,19 A high point involved rer, Adolf Hitler; this work was later de-classified and the declassified “Camp David Profiles,” in which in- 17 published in 1972. Although beholden to the psy- dividual psychological assessments of Israel’s Men- achem Begin and Egypt’s Anwar Sadat helped U.S. Dr. Dekleva is the McKenzie Foundation Endowed Chair in Psychi- atry I, Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Director, Psychiatry- President Jimmy Carter achieve an understanding of Medicine Integration, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Cen- negotiating tactics and unique circumstances, which ter, Dallas, TX. The views expressed in this paper are entirely his paved the way for a successful outcome: the 1979 own and do not represent the official views of the U.S. Govern- 20 ment, the U.S. Department of State, or UT Southwestern Medical Camp David peace accords. In 1986, Post retired Center. Address correspondence to: Kenneth Dekleva MD, De- from the CIA and continued his career at George partment of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Mail Code 9070, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75235-9070. Washington University, where he and his associates E-mail: kenneth.dekleva@utsouthwestern.edu. published numerous leadership profiles, including 21 22 Disclosures of financial or other potential conflicts of interest: None. those of Saddam Hussein, Bashar al-Assad, Kim Volume 46, Number 3, 2018 359 Leadership Analysis and Political Psychology in the 21st Century Jong Il,23 Muammar Gaddafi,24 Hugo Chavez,25 Fi- ject leader’s national security team and intelligence del Castro,26 Vladimir Putin,27 Osama bin Laden,28 services.36 A controversial profile could lead to hack- Radovan Karadzic,8 and Slobodan Milosevic.9 Such ing, online attacks by Internet trolls, or more serious profiles often attracted controversy, because of Post’s forms of public and private harassment.37 use of diagnostic categories such as “malignant nar- Academic institutions may be sensitive to the me- cissism,” and the labeling of many such people as dia image created by work involving the intelligence “rogue leaders.”29–31 But Post’s methodology, like community. Similar public relations concerns have that of Langer, entailed a close examination of the at times dogged psychiatric and psychological research- leader’s childhood, young adulthood, transition to ers involved in studying military survival-evasion-resis- midlife, relationships, speeches, collateral data, and tance-escape (SERE) psychology, interrogation, and writings. Post did not shy from predictions, some of other topics involving national security.38 Academic which turned out to be wrong, but the greater em- practitioners of leadership analysis and political psy- phases in such portraits involved a psychological un- chology might consider consulting their parent insti- derstanding of a given leader’s traits and political tution’s public affairs offices before publication of behavior and how such understanding might prove such profiles. useful in diplomatic negotiations. Like Langer before In a sense, such concerns are common to forensic him, Post emphasized the close relationship, almost a psychiatry, and both training and a solid grounding lock-and-key fit, between charismatic, narcissistic in its principles and challenges is a worthy back- leaders, and their impassioned followers. ground for practitioners of leadership profiling and political psychology. In addition, experience and fa- Ethics, Law, and the Goldwater Rule miliarity with the national security strategy can assist In March 2017, the American Psychiatric Associ- in understanding the analytic process and how such information gets developed, disseminated, and used ation (APA) affirmed its position regarding the 39 Goldwater Rule, in response to a flurry of publica- by senior policy makers. tions regarding the psychology of President Donald Trump.32 While the organization’s focus has ap- Methodological Challenges peared to reflect its concern for embarrassment to the The current state of the art has changed little since profession, in his recent review Dr. Paul Appelbaum the publication of Post’s work in 2003.16 Leadership cites other dangers.3 Psychiatrists publishing profiles profiles rely on a psychobiographical approach, al- of world leaders should be concerned not only with though the descriptive language used today is less potential lawsuits, but also the risk of being reported psychoanalytic, per se. The raw data, subject to dif- for ethics violations or licensing board complaints.33 ferent interpretations and various biases, include a In any legal setting, it remains unclear whether such leader’s published writings, interviews, social media leadership profiles could pass a Daubert test, which activity, speeches, videos, media appearances, and in- involves the admissibility of expert scientific testi- terviews with the leader’s intimates, contacts, col- mony.34 If practitioners and their customers in the leagues, and former employees/contacts/intimates, policy, national security, and diplomatic communi- and defectors. Medical data, although often not ties believe that such profiles have value, then the available overtly, may be available via inference, or Goldwater Rule may have a chilling effect and may from the study of a leader’s physique, gait, and other serve to dissuade subsequent generations of younger data; in addition, private medical data can be made practitioners from entering the field. available via leaks, interviews, writings, and publica- The other critical question, which the Goldwater tions by a given leader’s treating clinicians.40–43 Rule does not explicitly address, involves the in- In the absence of overt mental illness (and most tended audience or customer for the profile. In the leaders profiled do not have mental illness), current case of work by Post and others, the audience in- methodology emphasizes the description of a leader’s cludes not only academia and the media, but most psychological traits, rather than DSM-V diagnoses. saliently, the national security community and policy As Allen Frances has noted, most potential diagnoses makers at the highest levels of the U.S. Govern- of world leaders lack validity, not only because of the ment.35 In today’s world, any such published profiles absence of a face-to-face evaluation, the problem ex- can also expect to receive careful analysis by the sub- plicitly addressed in the Goldwater Rule, but also 360 The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Dekleva because the leader likely evidences no clinical distress 2010, President
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interpreting the Goldwater Rule
    ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY SPECIAL SECTION: THE GOLDWATER RULE Interpreting the Goldwater Rule John Martin-Joy, MD Section 7.3 of the Principles of Medical Ethics With Annotations Especially Applicable to Psychiatry (the so-called Goldwater Rule) provides guidance on the ethics of making psychiatric comments about public figures who have not been interviewed and have not given consent. I argue that the wording of Section 7.3 is ambiguous, and I document disagreement over the scope of the rule and consider the implications of this disagreement. If one reads Section 7.3 narrowly, as banning media comments without interview and consent, but allowing such comments in institutional settings, then the general principle articulated in the text and often repeated in the media begins to appear insubstantial. If one reads Section 7.3 broadly, then the work of psychiatrists in the courts, in government agencies such as the Central Intelligence Agency, in insurance companies, and in the academy becomes ethically problematic. I trace the American Psychiatric Association’s own interpretation of Section 7.3 and conclude that the APA has advocated a narrow reading. I assert the need for an integrated theory of psychiatric ethics for settings where interview and consent are absent. Such a theory, articulating why comments in institutional settings are ethical, but comments to media are not, may reduce public confusion and provide a basis for revising Section 7.3. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 45:233–40, 2017 Adopted in 1973 in the wake of a controversial inci- Although a scholarly discussion has now begun to dent involving Fact magazine,1 Section 7.3 of the develop,8–13 in some respects, psychiatrists who wish American Psychiatric Association’s Principles of Med- to study the foundations of the Rule’s ethics and ical Ethics with Annotations Specific to Psychiatry (the implications still have relatively little to work with.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Social Inquiry Cilt / Volume 13 Sayı / Issue 1 2020 Ss./Pp
    Methodological Diversity of Research on Leaders and International Conflict: a Review International Journal of Social Inquiry Cilt / Volume 13 Sayı / Issue 1 2020 ss./pp. 27-59 METHODOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF RESEARCH ON LEADERS AND INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT: A REVIEW Öner AKGÜL* 27 Makale Geliş Tarihi-Received: 10.07.2019 Makale Kabul Tarihi-Accepted: 12.03.2020 IJSI 13/1 Doi: 10.37093/ijsi.746406 Haziran June 2020 ABSTRACT Why leaders decide to go to war or when they decide to make peace? It can be one of the most common questions of classical thinkers and current scholars of international relations. The basic idea behind this question is to find out a solution to the war phenomenon. However, the other question is how we understand and explain the behaviors of leaders and their inner circles? Do rationality, strategic calculations or only cognitive variables sufficiently explain the violent behaviors? This research discusses how different methodologies can contribute to theorizing or understand the international conflict behaviors of leaders. In this context, on a qualitative basis, psychobiography, psychohistory, leadership trait analysis, integrative complexity method are explained along with the quantitative findings and theories of leaders and international conflict. The methodological diversity provides both deep insights about specific leaders’ war decisions and general theories that can contribute to the scientific study of international conflict. I argue that the field is open to any new methodology. Keywords: Leaders, International Conflict, Methodology, Personality, Data. Jel Codes: D72, D74, F51, H56 * Asst. Prof., Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of International Relations, Kırşehir/Türkiye.
    [Show full text]
  • "Al-Assad" and "Al Qaeda" (Day of CBS Interview)
    This Document is Approved for Public Release A multi-disciplinary, multi-method approach to leader assessment at a distance: The case of Bashar al-Assad A Quick Look Assessment by the Strategic Multilayer Assessment (SMA)1 Part II: Analytical Approaches2 February 2014 Contributors: Dr. Peter Suedfeld (University of British Columbia), Mr. Bradford H. Morrison (University of British Columbia), Mr. Ryan W. Cross (University of British Columbia) Dr. Larry Kuznar (Indiana University – Purdue University, Fort Wayne), Maj Jason Spitaletta (Joint Staff J-7 & Johns Hopkins University), Dr. Kathleen Egan (CTTSO), Mr. Sean Colbath (BBN), Mr. Paul Brewer (SDL), Ms. Martha Lillie (BBN), Mr. Dana Rafter (CSIS), Dr. Randy Kluver (Texas A&M), Ms. Jacquelyn Chinn (Texas A&M), Mr. Patrick Issa (Texas A&M) Edited by: Dr. Hriar Cabayan (JS/J-38) and Dr. Nicholas Wright, MRCP PhD (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace) Copy Editor: Mr. Sam Rhem (SRC) 1 SMA provides planning support to Combatant Commands (CCMD) with complex operational imperatives requiring multi-agency, multi-disciplinary solutions that are not within core Service/Agency competency. SMA is accepted and synchronized by Joint Staff, J3, DDSAO and executed by OSD/ASD (R&E)/RSD/RRTO. 2 This is a document submitted to provide timely support to ongoing concerns as of February 2014. 1 This Document is Approved for Public Release 1 ABSTRACT This report suggests potential types of actions and messages most likely to influence and deter Bashar al-Assad from using force in the ongoing Syrian civil war. This study is based on multidisciplinary analyses of Bashar al-Assad’s speeches, and how he reacts to real events and verbal messages from external sources.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rift Among Experts Over Analyzing Trump's Mental Health by Jen Christensen, CNN  Updated 1745 GMT (0145 HKT) July 26, 2017
    A rift among experts over analyzing Trump's mental health By Jen Christensen, CNN Updated 1745 GMT (0145 HKT) July 26, 2017 Source: CNN Six months of the Trump presidency in photos 00:52 (CNN) — You might expect partisan politicians to question Story highlights the sanity of a president, but now there's an unusual and growing public debate among those qualified to make the One mental health association says members assessment -- psychiatrists and other mental health experts -- as to whether they should be allowed to publicly raise should feel "free to comment about political those questions. figures as individuals" Two professional mental health associations -- the Another discourages its members from American Psychoanalytic Association, known as the APsaA, speaking publicly about a public figure's and the American Psychiatric Association, known as the APA -- have opposite opinions about what would be ethical, mental health and what is not. If members want to share their educated opinions about President Donald Trump, or any public figure for that matter, the associations' ethics guidance conflict, leaving dual members with a touch choice. It might sound like an arcane conversation about medical ethics, but the debate has heated up as more experts have publicly shared their concerns about the President's mental health. Dozens of mental health professionals signed on to a letter in February that said Trump's "speech and actions demonstrate an inability to tolerate views dierent from his own, leading to rage reactions," and show "a profound inability to empathize." How the policies dier The American Psychoanalytic Association represents about 3,500 members from all mental health professions and academia.
    [Show full text]
  • JITLE° American, Jordanian, and Other Middle Eastern National Perceptions
    1/4 DOCUMENT RESUME ED 229 297 SO 014 604 AUTHOR Szalay, Lorand g.; Strohl, Jean Bryson JITLE° American, Jordanian, and Other Middle Eastern National Perceptions. INSTITUTION Institute of Comparative Social and ,C,ultural Studies, Inc., Washington, D.C. SPONS AGENCY Defense Nuclear Agency (DOD), Washington, DC. PUB.DATE Feb 81 /CONTRACT DNA001-79-C-0341-P00001 NOTE 25716%; Appendix I may not reproduce clearly due to small prinetype of various charts. PUB TYPE Reports -/Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC11 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Anxiety; Comparative Analysis; *Cross Cultural Studies; Foreign Countries; *Foreign Policy; Group Unity; Higher Education; Individualism; *International Relations; Na,tionalism; Peace; *Psychological Patterns; Research Methodology; Social Science Research; *Student Attitudes IDENTIFIERS' Egypt; Israel; *Jordan; United States ABSTRACT International perceptions of Jordanian university students are compared with those of American, Egyptian, apd Israeli students. The sample consisted of 50 students from each country; results concentrate on Jordanian perceptions. Assessments were based on the Associative Group Analysis (AGA) which reconstructs perceptions and attitudes.characteristic of national/cultural groups from their free word associations. Jordanians tended td. ix conflict-ridden and laden with perceived threats and fears of 'aggressive, expansionist.intentions. When compared to a 1977 assessment, 4n increase in their longing for peace, less concern with military threat, more concern with violence and security, and a deterioration in their image of the ited States was evident. Egyptian and I.sraeli perceptions were ilar to the Jordanian emphasis on group and family unity, while Americans valued, individualism and autonomy. The document also discusses the role of. psychological disposition in international relations and in shaping - political events, needs and problems identified-by public policy 4 offices, and strategies for social science research on foreign populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Leadership—Perspectives and Practices
    Public Leadership Perspectives and Practices Public Leadership Perspectives and Practices Edited by Paul ‘t Hart and John Uhr Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: anuepress@anu.edu.au This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/public_leadership _citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Public leadership pespectives and practices [electronic resource] / editors, Paul ‘t Hart, John Uhr. ISBN: 9781921536304 (pbk.) 9781921536311 (pdf) Series: ANZSOG series Subjects: Leadership Political leadership Civic leaders. Community leadership Other Authors/Contributors: Hart, Paul ‘t. Uhr, John, 1951- Dewey Number: 303.34 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by John Butcher Images comprising the cover graphic used by permission of: Victorian Department of Planning and Community Development Australian Associated Press Australian Broadcasting Corporation Scoop Media Group (www.scoop.co.nz) Cover graphic based on M. C. Escher’s Hand with Reflecting Sphere, 1935 (Lithograph). Printed by University Printing Services, ANU Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2008 ANU E Press John Wanna, Series Editor Professor John Wanna is the Sir John Bunting Chair of Public Administration at the Research School of Social Sciences at The Australian National University. He is the director of research for the Australian and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG).
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on the Goldwater Rule
    ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY SPECIAL SECTION: THE GOLDWATER RULE Reflections on the Goldwater Rule Paul S. Appelbaum, MD The APA’s Goldwater Rule, precluding psychiatrists from rendering opinions to the media about public figures whom they have not examined, has often engendered controversy. Here, I consider the justifications for the rule, how well they stand up to criticism, and the extent, if any, to which modifications might be called for. Although embarrassment to the profession is often cited as the basis for the Rule, it reflects more substantive concerns, including the risk of harm to living persons and discouraging persons in need of treatment from seeking psychiatric attention. The most potent criticisms of the Rule are that it discourages public education about mental illness and its effects and precludes legitimate scholarly endeavors by psychiatrists studying foreign leaders, historical figures, and others. However, there are many ways of providing education about mental illness without violating the Rule, and read properly, it should not prevent legitimate historical investigation, though some clarification of the Rule on this point might be helpful. Even psychiatrists who seek to aid policymakers in dealing with international or domestic threats should not find that the Rule interferes with their efforts. On balance, the Goldwater Rule continues to be an important underpinning of ethical behavior by psychiatrists. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 45:228–32, 2017 In 1973, in the wake of the notorious Fact magazine Purpose of the Rule
    [Show full text]
  • Impeachment, Donald Trump and the Attempted Extortion of Ukraine
    Pace Law Review Volume 40 Issue 2 Article 4 July 2020 IMPEACHMENT, DONALD TRUMP AND THE ATTEMPTED EXTORTION OF UKRAINE Lawrence J. Trautman lawrence.j.trautman@gmail.com Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Lawrence J. Trautman, IMPEACHMENT, DONALD TRUMP AND THE ATTEMPTED EXTORTION OF UKRAINE, 40 Pace L. Rev. 141 (2020) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol40/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact dheller2@law.pace.edu. IMPEACHMENT, DONALD TRUMP AND THE ATTEMPTED EXTORTION OF UKRAINE Lawrence J. Trautman1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 143 II. THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION FOR IMPEACHMENT ....................................................................... 144 A. Treason ......................................................................... 145 B. Bribery .......................................................................... 145 C. Other High Crimes and Misdemeanors ..................... 145 D. Impeachment Is An Emergency Measure .................. 146 III. HISTORY OF U.S. PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS ........................................................................ 148 A. President Andrew Johnson ......................................... 149
    [Show full text]
  • Full Vite(Withour Teach)
    STANLEY A. RENSHON 168 West 86th Street (14C) Home Phone: (212) 362-2889 New York, New York 10024 Office Phone: (212) 817-8689 Email: srenshon@gc.cuny.edu SR/GC Web page: http://www.gc.cuny.edu/Page-Elements/Academics-Research- Centers-Initiatives/Doctoral-Programs/Political-Science/Faculty-Bios/Stanley-Renshon SR/GC-Book list: http://www.gc.cuny.edu/Page-Elements/Academics-Research-Centers- Initiatives/Doctoral-Programs/Political-Science/Books/American-Politics PRESENT POSITION Professor, Political Science -The City University of New York and Developer and Coordinator, Interdisciplinary Program in the Psychology of Political Behavior, The City University of New York Graduate School and Certified Psychoanalyst, since 1993 TRAINING Ph.D. - University of Pennsylvania - 1972 (Political Science) M.A. - University of Pennsylvania - 1971 (Political Science) Summer Program-University of Michigan, Interuniversity Consortium for Political Research-Advanced Quantitative Methods M.A. - School of International Service, American University -1968 (International Relations) B.A. - Rutgers University - 1966 (Political Science) POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING 1993 Certificate in Psychoanalysis 1 1988-91 Psychoanalytic Training, Training and Research Institute for Self-Psychology 1982-88 Doctoral training in Clinical Psychology, Long Island University 1977-80 Special Postdoctoral Student in Clinical Psychology, City University Ph.D. Program in Clinical Psychology 1972-73 NIMH Postdoctoral Fellow in Psychology and Politics, Yale University AREAS OF RESEARCH INTEREST Citizenship, Immigration and American National Identity; The Presidency [Political Leadership and Decision Making]; International Politics and Decision Making American National Security in the Post 9/11 World GRANTS, AWARDS, HONORS 2008/2009 Weiler Foundation Grant: Non-citizen Voting and the Integration of New Immigrants.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychiatric Evaluation of Trump
    Psychiatric Evaluation Of Trump Coplanar Ludvig episcopise her championship so aerobiotically that Filbert containerizes very magnificently. Llewellyn still citifies cursedly while rheological Rodolphe subjugating that Miranda. Organicism and cardboard David discards her irretentiveness pigeonholes logistically or gillies infrangibly, is Shlomo curule? Moreover, it is possible to understand Trump without ever invoking disability. He was taken to a nearby hospital for a medical evaluation. This shopping feature will continue to load items when the Enter key is pressed. Republicans Failed the Country. We are approaching your tds up where is done studies have shared psychosis at what is too? It is a standard process that involves an interview, various tests, and information from outside sources. Baltimore psychologist heads effort to 'warn' the Trump's. They would probably spread from some psychiatric care just weld a given. This fraud an historic work in asset history beyond American psychiatry. Without a great vision of renew is happening, this through nearly impossible. While there may be many reasons for this, when the level reaches the point of irrationality, we must consider contagion. Thanks to consider themselves, psychiatric evaluation of trump himself at least dissemble, marco rubio told the trainees. Muslims all over this world goes wrong. The vaccines appear that our concept of flattery that some evaluation of psychiatric evaluation. Singer wondered what authoritarian regimes, if he was quite another state. The credential this quarter without significant single redeeming human quality leaves the WH should be declared and celebrated as a National Holiday! Charlie has to be the center of attention. Personally, I must never really such than for another human husband, and apparently I am old alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership Style and Diversionary
    Syracuse University SURFACE Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Political Science - Dissertations Affairs 2011 Leadership Style And Diversionary Theory Of Foreign Policy: The Use Of Diversionary Strategies By Middle Eastern Leaders During And In The Immediate Aftermath Of The Gulf War Kilic Bugra Kanat Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/psc_etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Kanat, Kilic Bugra, "Leadership Style And Diversionary Theory Of Foreign Policy: The Use Of Diversionary Strategies By Middle Eastern Leaders During And In The Immediate Aftermath Of The Gulf War" (2011). Political Science - Dissertations. 104. https://surface.syr.edu/psc_etd/104 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science - Dissertations by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact surface@syr.edu. Abstract The diversionary theory of war is one of the most speculated about and debated theories in foreign policy literature. The theory argues that government leaders who are confronted with public antagonism over domestic economic, social, and political problems sometimes start wars to divert their populaces‘ attention from domestic problems and therefore to survive politically. Numerous foreign policy conflicts have been interpreted as being diversionary in nature and it has been commonplace for analysts to examine the domestic politics and problems of countries that engage in international conflict. Specifically, the use of force by US Presidents against external actors, such as U.S. President George H.W. Bush‘s operation against Grenada and the First Gulf War, and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Goldwater Rule’ and Comment on Trump’S Mental Health
    Psychiatry Group Tells Members They Can Ignore ‘Goldwater Rule’ and Comment on Trump’s Mental Health By Sharon Begley Region: USA Global Research, July 26, 2017 Theme: Law and Justice, Police State & STAT 25 July 2017 Civil Rights Featured image: Former US Senator Barry Goldwater (Source: NPR) A leading psychiatry group has told its members they should not feel bound by a longstanding rule against commenting publicly on the mental state of public figures —even the president. The statement, an email this month from the executive committee of the American Psychoanalytic Association to its 3,500 members, represents the first significant crack in the profession’s decades-old united front aimed at preventing experts from discussing the psychiatric aspects of politicians’ behavior. It will likely make many of its members feel more comfortable speaking openly about President Trump’s mental health. The impetus for the email was “belief in the value of psychoanalytic knowledge in explaining human behavior,” said psychoanalytic association past presidentDr. Prudence Gourguechon, a psychiatrist in Chicago. “We don’t want to prohibit our members from using their knowledge responsibly.” That responsibility is especially great today, she told STAT, “since Trump’s behavior is so different from anything we’ve seen before” in a commander in chief. An increasing number of psychologists and psychiatrists have denounced the restriction as a “gag rule” and flouted it, with some arguing they have a “duty to warn” the public about what they see as Trump’s narcissism, impulsivity, poor attention span, paranoia, and other traits that, they believe, impair his ability to lead.
    [Show full text]