DOCSLIB.ORG

Annex Ii Index of Cases Reported Or Cited in These Volumes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annex Ii Index of Cases Reported Or Cited in These Volumes J» ■ i, J L-, UJ> O'- ' / C , " i ANNEX II INDEX OF CASES REPORTED OR CITED IN THESE VOLUMES (References given in italics arc to reports. References not in italics are to citations. The figures in roman and in arabic figures refer to volumes and pages respectively.) Abbaye Ardcnnc Trial (Trial of Brigadier Kurt~ 111 6 9 ; Meyer). ✓ IV 85, 89, 997-110 5 , ; *X1I 123: ✓ X V 62, ¿4, 106,109, 133 - Ahlbrecht ......................................................... X I 89-90 « Almelo Trial (Trial or Otto Sandrock and 3 others)✓ / 35-45,1 0 6 ; ✓ 11 127; w V 1 0 ; . XI 46,50; . X IV 15 ; * X V 47, 97, 108, 184 Allfuldisch, Hans, and 60 others (sec Mauthausen Concentration Camp case). Altstötter, Josef, and others (sec Justkc Trial) .. Ambcrgcr, Karl (sec Dreierwalde Case) - Armour Packing Company v. United States .. s W 54 - Awochi, Washio ..............................................^Xlll 122-4 ; X V 121 » Back, P e t e r ........................................................ ✓/// 60-1 x Bauer, August ..............................................«'IX 65 v Bauer, Carl, Ernst Schramcck and Herbert Falten*Vlll 15-21; v X V 82 v'Baus, Christian ..............................................s l X 68-71 Becker, Friedrich, and others (sec Flossenberg Concentration Camp Trial) t'Becker, Gustav, and 19 others ........................ JVU 67-73,15 ✓ Belsen Trial (Trial of Josef Kramer and 44 others)..11 1-152;✓ ✓ III 6 3 ,6 6 ,6 9 .7 0 ,7 2 ,7 4 ; ✓ IV 79,86 ; ✓ V 14, 15, 23 ; ✓ IX 66 ; ✓ X 68, 173 ; ✓ XI 9,10,11,71,83; ✓ X V 45, 59, 61, 65, 67, 83, 86, 87, 92, 93, 97, 121. 157. 160, 187, 197 - Benz, Karl, and a n o t h e r ................................. ✓ IX 65 v Bommer, Alois and Anna, and their daughters . * I X 62-6 Brandt, Karl, and 22 others (sec Doctors' Trial) v Bruns, Richard Wilhelm Hermann, and 2 others ✓ /// 15-22 %/VIII 86; yXV 179,200 v Buck, Karl, and 10 others ✓ V 39-44,49. 57, 58, 81 ; ✓ X V 109 ' .'Buch, Willy .. ✓ IX 65 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c7337b/ A N N B X II 211 V' Buhler, Joseph SX 1V ✓Buiy, Albert, and Hafner, Wilhelm *' 23-48 s i n 62-4 IV 39 XIV 128. 129 . XI 62-3; XV 105 11176-80: XV 177, 185 • IV 44 " Coleman v. Tennessee ✓ IV Collins r. McDonald 66 IV 39,44 * Commonwealth v. Jordan .. IV 10 - Cummings v. Missouri ., .* * * ’ S IV 54 ' ^ T™*1(Trial of Weiss, Martin Gottfried and✓ IV 78 : outers) 1 X I 5-17; y x v - Dealy v. United States ........................ 93. 94. 95. •IV 44 “ Diroct Sales Companyvs United States - x 40 Director of Public Prosecutionsv. Beard ." ' III 80 — Doctors’ Trial (Trial of Karl Brandt and 22✓ IV othcn)91-3; ' VI 104 ; 'VII 49, 52, 63 ; XIII 33, 55 ; XV 61. 72. 90, -Donnelly v. United S t a t e s ........................ IV 55 / Dostlcr Case (Trial of General Anton Dostler) / 22-34, 120 III 105. Ill ; IV 78 ; V 22,42 ; VIII 86 ; XI 57; XV 62. 177 - Dover Castle Case I 9-10, 31 ; VIII 8 / Dreicrwalde Case (Trial of Karl Ambcrgcr) ✓ 1 81-7, 107, 1 II 130, 138 ; III 2 2 ; IV 113: XI 5 0 .7 4 ; XV 186 -Dynes v. Hoover IV 39 Eck, Heinz, and 4 others (sec Peleus Trial) pif -Einsatzgruppen Trial (Trial of Otto Ohlendorf and/V III 86. 88, 9 0 ; -IX 32, 33.47.49.51,57 ; X 48, 172. 174, 176 ; ✓ XV 88. 110-11, 122, 135. 137, 156, 158. 166, 174-5, 179, 182 v'Eisentraeger, Lothcr.................................. ..... *X iV 8-22 XV 131 V Erb, E d u a r d ........................................................ ^ X V 15 — Esau, Abraham Robert .................................. X V 128-9 Espinosa, J o a q u i n............................................. X V 46 y Essen Lynching Case (Trial of Hcyer, Erich, and 6 88-91/ ; others) II152 ; III 69, 7 6 ; XI 51, 76, 7 7 ; XV 8-9, 51-2, 57, 59, 97 y Falkenhorst, Nickobus vo n...................................•'VIII 9 0 ; 18-30 ^Xll 104, 122 ; 'XV 133 — Fenarese .. .. .. •• •• •• VII 69,71 -Fischer, Ludwik, and others...................................X IV 42-5 ‘ ~ Foerstcr. Albert ............................................. XIV 46 _/FIesch, Gerhard Friedrich E r n........................ s t SV1 111-21) y / X I V 73 ; PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c7337b/ 212 ANNEX II Flick Trial (Trial of Fricdcrich Flick and others).. *^VI4 0 ; */VllI 5 2 ; ^¡X 1-59; ' X 41. 47, 54-6, 57, 60, 64, 67, 146, 157, 160. 161, 166, 170, 172, 174,175,176 ; *^XII 9 5 ,1 1 0 ; ✓ XIII 61 ; ^ X V 19, 24, 56, 58. 59-60. 70. IM , 120. 125-30. 134-8. 152, 156, 166, 171, 172, 183, 185-6 Flcmcnbcrg Concentration Camp Trial (Friedrich .✓ X V47,95 Bccker and others) Fong Yarc Ting v. United S t a t e s........................ II 75, 149 .< Frames. Lucicn .............................................. X V 45 - Fucrstein, Valentin, and others ........................ X V 173 , Gallina..................................................................... VII 69 v Gerbsch, W i l h e l m.............................................. Xlll 131-7; XV 185 Gcrike, Heinrich, and 7 others (see Velpke Children’s Home case). -Goering. Hermann Wilhelm, and 23 others (Trial <11151 ; by the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal) VI4,33,36,37,40-3,63; 65-71, 77, 84-5, 105-10; VII 6, 8, 19-24, 40, 60, 87 ; VIII 20, 52-3 ; IX 5, 16-29 (passim), 33-40 (passim), 44, 47-51, 52, 55-7, 80 ; 5, 3CM0, 43, 48, 54, 57, 58-61, 103-27, 131-3, 145-6, 152-3, 157, 159, 166, 168, 170; XI 17, 61 ; XII 16, 59, 60-2, 64, 66. 67, 71, 87-8,93, 103, 119 ; XIII 4, 28-35, 38. 40, 42, 43, 49-66, 68, 107, 108, 111. 112, 141 ; XIV 4,34-5,41 -2,46,47-8,93,97. 117, 120-2, 136, 142, 143; XV 3, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17-9, 20, 54, 59, 60, 84, 90, 98, 99. 104, 110, 120, 133, 135-7, 141-4, 148, 150-4, 159, 166, 168, 169, 201-2 v Goeth, Amon Leopold VII 1- 1 0; XIII 113 ; XIV 28, 40 ; XV 122,200 v Golkel, Karl Adam, and 13 others .. ✓ IV 80 ; V 45-53; XV 50-1, 198-9 J Grcifelt Trial (Trial of Ulrich Greifelt and others)✓ IX 35 ,57 ; ✓XI 102; xm 1-69 \ xv122, 123, 161 Greiser, Artur, VII 6, xm 70-117; xiv24, 29, 40, 46 ; xv117, 122-3, 130, 138, 149, 150, 200 Grumpelt, Gerhart (see Scutlled U-Boat Trial) Hadamar Trial (Trial of Alfons Klein and 6 others) i 46-54, 113 ; ii 152; ui 105 ; XI 10,51 ; XV 61, 86, 94 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c7337b/ A N N E X II 213 J Hagendorf, Heinz .. ...................................Xlll 146-3; u t X V 133 / Hangobl, Joseph ............................................. X IV 86-8 X V 82 v- Hans, Oscar (Trial by Norwegian Court) .. V 80,82-93 X V 164 -Hans, Oscar fTrial by British COurt) .. .. X V I, 61, 198 -Hashinoto, C h o g o............................................. X V 43 - Hatada, Minoru, and 2 others ........................ X V 132 -Hatakoyama, Kunito .................................. VII 61 “ Haw k v. Olson ............................................. IV 55 -Hebestreit. Horst ............................................. X V 91 , Hcering, A m o ........................' .. .. XI 11.79-80; XII 105; X V 8, 83, 101 *■ Heithamp, Hans ............................................. X V 47 ^Heyer, Erich, and 6 others (sec Essen Lynching Trial) »'High Command Trial (Trial of Leeb. Wilhelm von, VIII 8 0 ,9 0 ; and others) IX X 109', 141 ; XI 2 .2 9 ; yXll I-127 ; XIV 7,158 ; XV 10. 13, 15, 19, 62, 70. 74-5, 77-8, 100-6, 120,124, 133, 150, 157. 159, 166-7, 171-2, 175-6. 177, 180, 183-4, 187, 189 - Hiranaka,Teruma, and another .. .. .. VII61 -llisakasu, T a n a k a............................................. V 9.66-81; XV 14. 47, 69-70 y/ Hoess, Rudolf Franz F e r d i n a n d ........................ VII II-26, 53 ; XIII 113 ; XIV 28, 40, 4 2 ; ;XV 122, 153. 200 % /Holstein, Franz, and 23 others ........................Vlll 22-33, 85 ; XV 180 _ Holzcr, Robert, and 2 others ....................... V 15-6.21 ; XV 173 - Homma, In re 105. 110, 111. 121 ; II 126. 129 ; III 103, 113 ^/Hostages Trial (Trial of List, Wilhelm, and others)Vlll 14,34-92; 29. 32 ; X 175 : / XII 61,80,84,108, 109,112.115. 116, 119, 122, 125, 126 ; XIV 7, 130-1, 158 ; XV 5-7, 10. II. 14-5. 21-2. 26-7. 47. 71. 75-7. 80-2, 112. 133. 149, 166. 169. 175, 177-80, 184, 188, 197-8 -Hotazo, Artachi ........................................... XI 60 - LG. Farben Trial (Trial of Carl Krauch and others) 9j V 3 ; 39, 49, 57 ; .V 1-63, 160, 161, 163,165. 167, 168, 172, 174, 175, 176 XII 100 XIII 63 XV 9,15. 18.19,55,60.104,120, 125-30, 135, 138-49, 153, 156-7, 166, 171, 185-6 -Ikeba, Toma, and o t h e r s.................................. VH 61 .Imamura, H itoshl............................................. ' » 87 - Imamura, Kazuhiko .. ................................... xi> 101 . isayamn, llarukei, and 7 o t h e r s ........................ 60-5, 71, 72, 73, 74, 77 ; 103 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c7337b/ A N N E X 11 -Jaluit Atoll Case (Trial of Rear-Admiral Nisukc 1 71-9,113; Masuda and 4 others) 1U 60,103 ; V 15.18 ; X I 30. 72, 73 ; XV 8, 14, 139 * Jenaud, Case of .............................................. IV 44,33 j Jcpson, Gustav ........................ • • • < XV 20. 46. 172-3 , Justice Trial (Trial of Josef Altstötter and other»).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SS-Totenkopfverbände from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia (Redirected from SS-Totenkopfverbande)
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history SS-Totenkopfverbände From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from SS-Totenkopfverbande) Navigation Not to be confused with 3rd SS Division Totenkopf, the Waffen-SS fighting unit. Main page This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. No cleanup reason Contents has been specified. Please help improve this article if you can. (December 2010) Featured content Current events This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding Random article citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2010) Donate to Wikipedia [2] SS-Totenkopfverbände (SS-TV), rendered in English as "Death's-Head Units" (literally SS-TV meaning "Skull Units"), was the SS organization responsible for administering the Nazi SS-Totenkopfverbände Interaction concentration camps for the Third Reich. Help The SS-TV was an independent unit within the SS with its own ranks and command About Wikipedia structure. It ran the camps throughout Germany, such as Dachau, Bergen-Belsen and Community portal Buchenwald; in Nazi-occupied Europe, it ran Auschwitz in German occupied Poland and Recent changes Mauthausen in Austria as well as numerous other concentration and death camps. The Contact Wikipedia death camps' primary function was genocide and included Treblinka, Bełżec extermination camp and Sobibor. It was responsible for facilitating what was called the Final Solution, Totenkopf (Death's head) collar insignia, 13th Standarte known since as the Holocaust, in collaboration with the Reich Main Security Office[3] and the Toolbox of the SS-Totenkopfverbände SS Economic and Administrative Main Office or WVHA.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ARMY LAWYER Headquarters, Department of the Army
    THE ARMY LAWYER Headquarters, Department of the Army Department of the Army Pamphlet 27-50-366 November 2003 Articles Military Commissions: Trying American Justice Kevin J. Barry, Captain (Ret.), U.S. Coast Guard Why Military Commissions Are the Proper Forum and Why Terrorists Will Have “Full and Fair” Trials: A Rebuttal to Military Commissions: Trying American Justice Colonel Frederic L. Borch, III Editorial Comment: A Response to Why Military Commissions Are the Proper Forum and Why Terrorists Will Have “Full and Fair” Trials Kevin J. Barry, Captain (Ret.), U.S. Coast Guard Afghanistan, Quirin, and Uchiyama: Does the Sauce Suit the Gander Evan J. Wallach Note from the Field Legal Cultures Clash in Iraq Lieutenant Colonel Craig T. Trebilcock The Art of Trial Advocacy Preparing the Mind, Body, and Voice Lieutenant Colonel David H. Robertson, The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center & School, U.S. Army CLE News Current Materials of Interest Editor’s Note An article in our April/May 2003 Criminal Law Symposium issue, Moving Toward the Apex: New Developments in Military Jurisdiction, discussed the recent ACCA and CAAF opinions in United States v. Sergeant Keith Brevard. These opinions deferred to findings the trial court made by a preponderance of the evidence to resolve a motion to dismiss, specifically that the accused obtained and presented forged documents to procure a fraudulent discharge. Since the publication of these opinions, the court-matial reached the ultimate issue of the guilt of the accused on remand. The court-martial acquitted the accused of fraudulent separation and dismissed the other charges for lack of jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice in the Justice Trial at Nuremberg Stephen J
    University of Baltimore Law Review Volume 46 | Issue 3 Article 4 5-2017 A Court Pure and Unsullied: Justice in the Justice Trial at Nuremberg Stephen J. Sfekas Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr Part of the Fourteenth Amendment Commons, International Law Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Sfekas, Stephen J. (2017) "A Court Pure and Unsullied: Justice in the Justice Trial at Nuremberg," University of Baltimore Law Review: Vol. 46 : Iss. 3 , Article 4. Available at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr/vol46/iss3/4 This Peer Reviewed Articles is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Baltimore Law Review by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A COURT PURE AND UNSULLIED: JUSTICE IN THE JUSTICE TRIAL AT NUREMBERG* Hon. Stephen J. Sfekas** Therefore, O Citizens, I bid ye bow In awe to this command, Let no man live Uncurbed by law nor curbed by tyranny . Thus I ordain it now, a [] court Pure and unsullied . .1 I. INTRODUCTION In the immediate aftermath of World War II, the common understanding was that the Nazi regime had been maintained by a combination of instruments of terror, such as the Gestapo, the SS, and concentration camps, combined with a sophisticated propaganda campaign.2 Modern historiography, however, has revealed the
    [Show full text]
  • High Command Case: a Study in Staff and Command Responsibility
    JOHN JAY DOUGLASS* Colonel, JAGC High Command Case: A Study in Staff and Command Responsibility Less than twenty-five years after the conclusion of the major World War I1war crimes trials, international jurists, historians and the general public are not clear as to, nor are they apparently concerned with, the authority, procedure or even the significant legal decisions of the war crimes trials held both in Europe and the Far East following World War 11.1 Even a mere twenty-five years of experience indicates there will be other trials of those accused of criminal acts in war. Such trials, as well as international lawmakers, should well review the German High Command Trial before the United States Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in October 1948. The lessons of this trial may well be the most important of those from any of the trials held following World War 11. The thrust of this trial and its results relate to the authority of command- ers of military forces for actions of their troops and their personal respon- sibility, as well as the responsibility of staff officers in senior staff positions, for'actions taken by them or carried on under their direction. As a result of recent developments within the United States, arising from the war in Vietnam, it is worthwhile to review the German High Command Trial and to analyze its relationship to the present state of the law. The legal question of criminal responsibility of military commanders and staff officers who do *Commandant (Dean), The Judge Advocate General's School, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Belsen, Dachau, 1945: Newspapers and the First Draft of History
    Belsen, Dachau, 1945: Newspapers and the First Draft of History by Sarah Coates BA (Hons.) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Deakin University March 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge the opportunities Deakin University has provided me over the past eight years; not least the opportunity to undertake my Ph.D. Travel grants were especially integral to my research and assistance through a scholarship was also greatly appreciated. The Deakin University administrative staff and specifically the Higher Degree by Research staff provided essential support during my candidacy. I also wish to acknowledge the Library staff, especially Marion Churkovich and Lorraine Driscoll and the interlibrary loans department, and sincerely thank Dr Murray Noonan for copy-editing this thesis. The collections accessed as part of an International Justice Research fellowship undertaken in 2014 at the Thomas J Dodd Centre made a positive contribution to my archival research. I would like to thank Lisa Laplante, interim director of the Dodd Research Center, for overseeing my stay at the University of Connecticut and Graham Stinnett, Curator of Human Rights Collections, for help in accessing the Dodd Papers. I also would like to acknowledge the staff at the Bergen-Belsen Gedenkstätte and Dachau Concentration Camp Memorial who assisted me during research visits. My heartfelt gratitude is offered to those who helped me in various ways during overseas travel. Rick Gretsch welcomed me on my first day in New York and put a first-time traveller at ease. Patty Foley’s hospitality and warmth made my stay in Connecticut so very memorable.
    [Show full text]
  • Effizienz Und Mord: Das Kz System 1943 1945
    98 | 99 EFFIZIENZ UND MORD: DAS KZ&SYSTEM 1943&1945 Stefan Hördler Ende Dezember 1943 sandte der SS-Hygieniker und Funktionskader desertierten, Wehrmacht, Polizei, SS-Sturmbannführer Karl Groß seine Vorschläge Feuerwehr, Volkssturm, Parteifunktionäre, SA, für eine eDzientere Organisation des Lagerbetrie- Reichsarbeitsdienst und Hitlerjugend sollten KZ- bes an den Amtschef D III (Sanitätswesen des KZ- HäNlinge beaufsichtigen und massakrierten nicht Systems) im SS-WirtschaNs-Verwaltungshaupt- selten – teils unter Beteiligung der ZiVilbeVölke- amt (SS-WVHA): „Um eine unnötige Belastung rung – aus Furcht oder aus niederen Beweggrün- des Betriebes mit körperlich mangelhaNem Men- den angeblich lästige, gefährliche, erschöpNe oder schenmaterial und eine dadurch bedingte Anhäu- flüchtende Gefangene. In summa bedeutete diese fung Von [A]rbeitsunfähigen zu Vermeiden, wäre Phase eine Aufgabe Vertrauter Machtstrukturen, eine entsprechend strenge Auswahl der HäNlinge gesicherter Machträume und eingeübter Hand- (ärztliche Musterung) Vor Arbeitseinstellung un- lungs- und Tagesabläufe. Die „Todesmärsche“ führ- bedingt zu empfehlen“. Weiter heißt es, dass „schon ten die bis dahin gültigen räumlichen und zeitli- jetzt an die Errichtung eines Ausweichlagers für chen Regeln ad absurdum. 2 arbeitsunfähige HäNlinge zu denken [sei], da deren Anzahl ständig steigen wird.“ Nicht zuletzt sei der Bau eines Krematoriums zu beschleunigen. „Hier- DAS KZ&SYSTEM IN DER ZWEITEN bei ist sofort an ausreichenden Verbrennungsraum KRIEGSHÄLFTE zu denken.“ 1 Was Groß nach seiner Visite des Buchenwal- Neben mehreren Zehntausend ungleich großen der Außenlagers Dora als menschenVerachtende sogenannten Arbeitserziehungslagern, Jugend- Handlungsanleitung für die reibungslose Auf- schutzlagern, Zigeunerlagern, Kriegsgefangenen- rechterhaltung des Lagerbetriebes formulierte, lagern, Zwangsarbeitslagern, Durchgangslagern, sollte 1944 zu einer Maxime für die Rationalisie- Ghettos und anderen HaNstätten stellten die Lager rung des gesamten KZ-Systems werden.
    [Show full text]
  • Some International Law Problems Related to Prosecutions Before the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
    SOME INTERNATIONAL LAW PROBLEMS RELATED TO PROSECUTIONS BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA W.J. FENRICK* I. INTRODUCTION The presentation of prosecution cases before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (the Tribunal) will require argument on a wide range of international law issues. It will not be possible, and it would not be desirable, simply to dust off the Nuremberg and Tokyo Judgments, the United Nations War Crimes Commission series of Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, and the U.S. government's Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No.10 and presume that one has a readily available source of answers for all legal problems. An invaluable foundation for legal argument before the Tribunal is provided by Pictet's Commentaries on the 1949 Geneva Conventions, the International Committee of the Red Cross' (ICRC) Commentaries on the Additional Protocols of 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, the few cases decided since 1950, old case law, and various learned articles and treatises. They must be reviewed and analyzed. At the same time, however, just as the prosecutors in the post-1945 war crimes trials argued successfully that customary law had evolved after 1907 and 1929, so it is reasonable to presume that customary law has evolved since the Geneva Convention of 1949 and the Additional Protocols of 1977. It is essential to pay due heed to the principles of nullum crimen sine lege and nulla poena sine lege.1 One must, however, distinguish * Senior Legal Advisor, Office of the Prosecutor, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide Studies and Prevention: an International Journal
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 13 Issue 1 Revisiting the Life and Work of Raphaël Article 2 Lemkin 4-2019 Full Issue 13.1 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp Recommended Citation (2019) "Full Issue 13.1," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 13: Iss. 1: 1-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.13.1 Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol13/iss1/2 This Front Matter is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSN 1911-0359 eISSN 1911-9933 Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 13.1 - 2019 ii ©2019 Genocide Studies and Prevention 13, no. 1 iii Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/ Volume 13.1 - 2019 Editorials Christian Gudehus, Susan Braden, Douglas Irvin-Erickson, JoAnn DiGeorgio-Lutz, and Lior Zylberman Editors’ Introduction ................................................................................................................1 Benjamin Meiches and Jeff Benvenuto Guest Editorial: Between Hagiography and Wounded Attachment: Raphaël Lemkin and the Study of Genocide ...............................................................................................................2 Articles Jonathan
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Table of Contents (PDF Download)
    Contents Preface xxiii Abbreviations and Acronyms xxvii Acknowledgments xxxiii Foreword xxxvii part I Why 1 chapter 1 Foundations 3 A. Purposes 5 1. Protection of Civilians and Others Hors de Combat 7 Constitutional Review of Additional Protocol II 8 2. Minimize Unnecessary Suff ering 9 3. Mission Fulfi llment 10 B. Key Sources of LOAC 11 1. Treaties 11 2. Customary International Law 13 David J. Bederman, International Law Frameworks 13 C. Jus ad Bellum vs. Jus in Bello 16 1. Jus ad Bellum 16 2. Jus ad Bellum in an Age of Counterterrorism 21 3. Separation of Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello 23 Prosecutor v. Fofana and Kondewa 25 Questions for Discussion 27 xi xii Contents D. Intersection with and Distinction from Human Rights Law 30 Th eodor Meron, Th e Humanization of Humanitarian Law 30 Legality of the Th reat or Use of Nuclear Weapons 32 Fourth Periodic Report of the United States of America to the United Nations Committee on Human Rights Concerning the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 34 Questions for Discussion 37 chapter 2 Basic Principles 39 Jean Pictet, Development and Principles of International Humanitarian Law 39 A. Military Necessity 40 Th e United States of America v. Wilhelm List et al. (Th e Hostages Trial) 42 Questions for Discussion 44 B. Humanity 45 Questions for Discussion 47 C. Distinction 48 Legality of the Th reat or Use of Nuclear Weapons 50 Constitutional Review of Additional Protocol II 52 Questions for Discussion 53 D. Proportionality 56 Questions for Discussion 59 chapter 3 Historical Development of LOAC 61 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Reports of Trial of War Criminals, Volume VII, English Edition
    LAW REPORTS ~......, o F Jl~IT&~jll!ID1§AI; llFFA1RS TRIALS OF WAR CRIMINALS Selected and prepared by THE UNITED NATIONS WAR C RIM ESC 0 M M IS S ION VOLUME VII LONDON PUBLISHED FOR THE UNITED NATIONS WAR CRIMES COMMISSION BY HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE 194 8 Price 5S. od. net LAW REPORTS OF TRIALS OF WAR CRIMINALS SELECTED AND PREPARED BY THE UNITED NATIONS WAR CRIMES COMMISSION One of the aims of this series of Reports is to relate in summary form the course of the most important of the proceedings taken against persons accused ofcommitting war crimes during the Second World War, apart from the major war criminals tried by the Nuremberg and Tokyo International Military Tribunals, but including those tried by United States Military Tribunals at Nuremberg. Of necessity, the trials reported in these volumes are examples only, since the trials conducted before the various Allied Courts number well over a thousand. The trials selected for reporting, however, are those which are thought to be of the greatest interest legally and in which important points of municipal and international law arose and were settled.. Each report, however, contains not only the outline of the proceedings in the trial under review, but also, in a separate section headed" Notes on the Case ", such comments of an explanatory nature on the legal matters arising in that trial which it has been thought useful to include. These notes provide also, at suitable points, general summaries an.d analyses of the decisions of the courts on specific points of law derived primarily from a study of relevant trials already reported upon in the series.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazi War Crimes, US Intelligence and Selective Prosecution at Nuremberg
    Nazi War Crimes, US Intelligence and Selective Prosecution at Nuremberg Controversies regarding the role of the Office of Strategic Services Nazi War Crimes, US Intelligence and Selective Prosecution at Nuremberg provides a balanced but critical discussion of the contribution of American intelligence officials to the Nuremberg war crimes trials process. It discusses the role of such officials in mobilising the unique resources of a modern intelligence agency in order to provide a range of important trial evidence and undertake controversial plea-bargaining negotiations. The book also reviews recently declassified US intelligence documents to provide new details of how senior Nazi war criminals, such as SS-General Karl Wolff, were provided with effective immunity deals, partly as a reward for their wartime cooperation with US intelligence officials, including Allen Dulles, former CIA Director. This historical case study suggests that both war crimes prosecutors and intelligence officials can engage in mutually beneficial collaborations. The proviso, Michael Salter argues, is that both sides need to recognise and appreciate the problems that may arise from the fact that these institutitions are required to operate according to different, and in some cases contradictory, agendas. Michael Salter is Professor of Law at Lancashire Law School, UK. Nazi War Crimes, US Intelligence and Selective Prosecution at Nuremberg Controversies regarding the role of the Office of Strategic Services Michael Salter First published 2007 by Routledge-Cavendish 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN, UK Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge-Cavendish 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016 A GlassHouse book Routledge-Cavendish is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2007 Michael Salter This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Military Occupation', the Journal of Modern History, Vol
    University of Birmingham International law and the transformation of war, 1899-1949 Gumz, Jonathan DOI: 10.1086/698960 License: Other (please specify with Rights Statement) Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Gumz, J 2018, 'International law and the transformation of war, 1899-1949: the case of military occupation', The Journal of Modern History, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 621-660. https://doi.org/10.1086/698960 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: © 2018 by The University of Chicago General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]