DOCSLIB.ORG

THE ARMY LAWYER Headquarters, Department of the Army

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE ARMY LAWYER Headquarters, Department of the Army THE ARMY LAWYER Headquarters, Department of the Army Department of the Army Pamphlet 27-50-366 November 2003 Articles Military Commissions: Trying American Justice Kevin J. Barry, Captain (Ret.), U.S. Coast Guard Why Military Commissions Are the Proper Forum and Why Terrorists Will Have “Full and Fair” Trials: A Rebuttal to Military Commissions: Trying American Justice Colonel Frederic L. Borch, III Editorial Comment: A Response to Why Military Commissions Are the Proper Forum and Why Terrorists Will Have “Full and Fair” Trials Kevin J. Barry, Captain (Ret.), U.S. Coast Guard Afghanistan, Quirin, and Uchiyama: Does the Sauce Suit the Gander Evan J. Wallach Note from the Field Legal Cultures Clash in Iraq Lieutenant Colonel Craig T. Trebilcock The Art of Trial Advocacy Preparing the Mind, Body, and Voice Lieutenant Colonel David H. Robertson, The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center & School, U.S. Army CLE News Current Materials of Interest Editor’s Note An article in our April/May 2003 Criminal Law Symposium issue, Moving Toward the Apex: New Developments in Military Jurisdiction, discussed the recent ACCA and CAAF opinions in United States v. Sergeant Keith Brevard. These opinions deferred to findings the trial court made by a preponderance of the evidence to resolve a motion to dismiss, specifically that the accused obtained and presented forged documents to procure a fraudulent discharge. Since the publication of these opinions, the court-matial reached the ultimate issue of the guilt of the accused on remand. The court-martial acquitted the accused of fraudulent separation and dismissed the other charges for lack of jurisdiction. These unpublished results do not appear to affect the value of the Brevard opinions as legal precedent. Editor, Captain Heather J. Fagan Technical Editor, Charles J. Strong The Army Lawyer (ISSN 0364-1287, USPS 490-330) is published monthly tion (17th ed. 2000) and Military Citation (8th ed. 2003). Manuscripts will be by The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School, Charlottesville, Vir- returned upon specific request. No compensation can be paid for articles. ginia, for the official use of Army lawyers in the performance of their legal responsibilities. Individual paid subscriptions to The Army Lawyer are avail- The Army Lawyer articles are indexed in the Index to Legal Periodicals, the able for $45.00 each ($63.00 foreign) per year, periodical postage paid at Char- Current Law Index, the Legal Resources Index, and the Index to U.S. Govern- lottesville, Virginia, and additional mailing offices (see subscription form on the ment Periodicals. The Army Lawyer is also available in the Judge Advocate inside back cover). POSTMASTER: Send any address changes to The Judge General’s Corps electronic reference library and can be accessed on the World Advocate General’s Legal Center and School, 600 Massie Road, ATTN: ALCS- Wide Web by registered users at http://www.jagcnet.army.mil/ArmyLawyer. ADA-P, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903-1781. The opinions expressed by the authors in the articles do not necessarily reflect the view of The Judge Advocate Address changes for official channels distribution: Provide changes to the General or the Department of the Army. Masculine or feminine pronouns Editor, The Army Lawyer, The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and appearing in this pamphlet refer to both genders unless the context indicates School, 600 Massie Road, ATTN: ALCS-ADA-P, Charlottesville, Virginia another use. 22903-1781, telephone 1-800-552-3978, ext. 396 or electronic mail to [email protected]. The Army Lawyer welcomes articles from all military and civilian authors on topics of interest to military lawyers. Articles should be submitted via elec- Issues may be cited as ARMY LAW., [date], at [page number]. tronic mail to [email protected] or on 3 1/2” diskettes to: Editor, The Army Lawyer, The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School, U.S. Army, 600 Massie Road, ATTN: ALCS-ADA-P, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903-1781. Articles should follow The Bluebook, A Uniform System of Cita- Articles Military Commissions: Trying American Justice Kevin J. Barry, Captain (Ret.), U.S. Coast Guard....................................................................................................................... 1 Why Military Commissions Are the Proper Forum and Why Terrorists Will Have “Full and Fair” Trials: A Rebuttal to Military Commissions Trying American Justice Colonel Frederic L. Borch, III .................................................................................................................................................... 10 Editorial Comment: A Response to Why Military Commissions Are the Proper Forum and Why Terrorists Will Have “Full and Fair” Trials Kevin J. Barry, Captain (Ret.), U.S. Coast Guard...................................................................................................................... 17 Afghanistan, Quirin, and Uchiyama: Does the Sauce Suit the Gander Evan J. Wallach........................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Note from the Field Legal Cultures Clash in Iraq Lieutenant Colonel Craig T. Trebilcock...................................................................................................................................... 48 The Art of Trial Advocacy Preparing the Mind, Body, and Voice Lieutenant Colonel David H. Robertson, The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center & School, U.S. Army ......................... 51 CLE News......................................................................................................................................................................................... 55 Current Materials of Interest ......................................................................................................................................................... 65 Individual Paid Subscriptions to The Army Lawyer ........................................................................................................................ Inside Back Coverg NOVEMBER 2003 THE ARMY LAWYER • DA PAM 27-50-366 • In Memoriam • On behalf of The Judge Advocate General’s Corps, we respectfully dedicate this issue to the memories of Chief Warrant Officer Five Sharon T. Swartworth, Warrant Officer of the Corps and Sergeant Major Cornell Winston Gilmore, Ser- geant Major of the Corps. The soldier above all others prays for peace, for it is the soldier who must suffer and bear the deepest wounds and scars of war. - General Douglas MacArthur Military Commissions: Trying American Justice1 Kevin J. Barry Captain, U.S. Coast Guard (Retired) The Department of Defense (DOD) General level of due process that is characteristic of American criminal Counsel’s “Military Commission Instruc- justice, and the United States could lose the moral high ground tions,” issued on 30 April 2003, renew the it has long enjoyed as a world leader working to ensure funda- concerns that surrounded the President’s 13 mental fairness in criminal adjudications. November 2001 military order and again cast serious doubt on the ability of military commissions to be viewed as fundamentally President’s Military Order—13 November 2001 fair and to meet American standards of jus- tice. When the President issued the Military Order (PMO) on 13 November 2001, it immediately precipitated a storm of criti- cism. The order—applicable only to non-U.S. citizens that the On 30 April 2003, the DOD General Counsel issued eight President determined either to be members of al Qaida, or to “Military Commission Instructions,” the third event in the pro- have played a role in international terrorism, or to have har- cess of establishing the structure and regulations for the trials of bored any such person—raised doubts about the application of individuals the President has designated as subject to trial by the presumption of innocence, whether the usual criminal stan- military commission.2 Because they depart materially from dard of “beyond a reasonable doubt” would apply, and whether court-martial practice and procedure, these instructions renew acquittals could be reversed. It also clearly prohibited judicial the doubts created by the initial military order issued by the review of convictions.5 It appeared to allow trials to be con- President on 13 November 20013 about whether military com- ducted in secret—with the possibility that those accused could missions established under that order would—or could—meet be denied access to the evidence used against them at trial—and basic standards of American justice.4 Unless substantially to set aside normal rules of evidence in favor of a generic “pro- modified to more closely reflect current court-martial princi- bative value to a reasonable person” standard.6 It also provided ples and rules, these military commissions will not achieve the for conviction and sentencing—even the death sentence—by 1. The current article is an expanded and updated version of an article that previously appeared under a similar title in The Federal Lawyer and is used with permis- sion. The changes and updates are set forth primarily in the expanded footnotes in this article. See Kevin J. Barry, Military Commissions: American Justice on Trial, 50:6 FED. LAW. 24 (2003). 2. Procedures for Trials by Military Commissions of Certain Non-U.S. Citizens in the War Against Terrorism, 68 Fed. Reg. 39,374-99 (July
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States
    No. ________ In the Supreme Court of the United States KHALED A. F. AL ODAH, ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI DAVID J. CYNAMON THOMAS B. WILNER MATTHEW J. MACLEAN COUNSEL OF RECORD OSMAN HANDOO NEIL H. KOSLOWE PILLSBURY WINTHROP AMANDA E. SHAFER SHAW PITTMAN LLP SHERI L. SHEPHERD 2300 N Street, N.W. SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP Washington, DC 20037 801 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. 202-663-8000 Washington, DC 20004 202-508-8000 GITANJALI GUTIERREZ J. WELLS DIXON GEORGE BRENT MICKUM IV SHAYANA KADIDAL SPRIGGS & HOLLINGSWORTH CENTER FOR 1350 “I” Street N.W. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS Washington, DC 20005 666 Broadway, 7th Floor 202-898-5800 New York, NY 10012 212-614-6438 Counsel for Petitioners Additional Counsel Listed on Inside Cover JOSEPH MARGULIES JOHN J. GIBBONS MACARTHUR JUSTICE CENTER LAWRENCE S. LUSTBERG NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY GIBBONS P.C. LAW SCHOOL One Gateway Center 357 East Chicago Avenue Newark, NJ 07102 Chicago, IL 60611 973-596-4500 312-503-0890 MARK S. SULLIVAN BAHER AZMY CHRISTOPHER G. KARAGHEUZOFF SETON HALL LAW SCHOOL JOSHUA COLANGELO-BRYAN CENTER FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 833 McCarter Highway 250 Park Avenue Newark, NJ 07102 New York, NY 10177 973-642-8700 212-415-9200 DAVID H. REMES MARC D. FALKOFF COVINGTON & BURLING COLLEGE OF LAW 1201 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. NORTHERN ILLINOIS Washington, DC 20004 UNIVERSITY 202-662-5212 DeKalb, IL 60115 815-753-0660 PAMELA CHEPIGA SCOTT SULLIVAN ANDREW MATHESON DEREK JINKS KAREN LEE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SARAH HAVENS SCHOOL OF LAW ALLEN & OVERY LLP RULE OF LAW IN WARTIME 1221 Avenue of the Americas PROGRAM New York, NY 10020 727 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Detention
    NYSBA REPORT ON EXECUTIVE DETENTION, HABEAS CORPUS AND THE MILITARY COMMISSIONS ACT OF 2006 NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION’S COMMITTEE ON CIVIL RIGHTS MAY 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY.............................................................................. 1 A. The Guantanamo Detainees....................................................................... 2 B. Report Summary ........................................................................................ 7 I. HISTORY OF HABEAS CORPUS..................................................................... 12 A. The Origins of Habeas Corpus: England ................................................. 12 B. Extra-Territorial Application of Habeas Corpus at Common Law.......... 15 C. Early American Habeas Law ................................................................... 17 D. Early American Extension of Habeas Corpus to Aliens and Alien Enemy Combatants .................................................................................. 20 E. American Suspension of Habeas Corpus................................................. 23 F. World War II and the Extension of Habeas Corpus to Enemy Aliens ....................................................................................................... 28 G. Relevant Post-World War II Habeas Developments ............................... 33 H. Adequate and Effective Habeas Substitute.............................................. 37 II. LAWS OF WAR REGARDING ENEMY COMBATANTS PRE- SEPTEMBER 11TH ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Daily Egyptian, September 13, 1985
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC September 1985 Daily Egyptian 1985 9-13-1985 The aiD ly Egyptian, September 13, 1985 Daily Egyptian Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/de_September1985 Volume 71, Issue 20 Recommended Citation , . "The aiD ly Egyptian, September 13, 1985." (Sep 1985). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Daily Egyptian 1985 at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in September 1985 by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. KGB defector reveals spy network Gus Bode LONDON CUPI ) - The chief diplomats, officials and Danish intelligence. dievski's defection, Haosp.n of the Soviet KGB spy journalists, who were given " I would say that he has said. " It has been very im­ operation in London has three weeks to leave the been the West's most im- portant for our common defected to the West , un­ country. 0rtant source of in­ security to have this in­ masking at least 25 Soviet f,ormation," Hansen said in a formation." he said. ffQ agents, the government an· WITHIN HOURS of the television Interview. •'There nounced Thursday. Denmark announcement, Danish Justice has been a close connection said the defector was a long­ Minister Erik Nigg Hansen hetween Gordievski and the Gordievski served in various time Western double agent. said in Copenhagen tha t Danish intelligence 'for a long diplomat.ic posts in The defection of Oleg Gor­ Gordievski. who served 10 time. He has given us a wealth Copenhagen from 1966 to 1970, ~ 46, dievski, and the exposure of years as a Soviet diploma t in of information." and again from 1972 to 1978, Qu.
    [Show full text]
  • Retired Military Officers in Support of Petitioners
    Nos. 03-334, 03-343 In the Supreme Court of the United States __________ SHAFIQ RASUL, ET AL., Petitioners, v. GEORGE W. BUSH, ET AL., Respondents. __________ FAWZI KHALID ABDULLAH FAHAD AL ODAH, ET AL., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF RETIRED MILITARY OFFICERS IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS MIRNA ADJAMI JAME S C. SCHROEDER Midwest Immigrant and Counsel of Record Human Rights Center GARY A. ISAAC 208 South LaSalle St. STEPHEN J. KANE Chicago, IL 60603 JON M. JUENGER (312) 660-1330 Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP 190 South LaSalle St. Chicago, IL 60603 (312) 782-0600 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTEREST OF THE AMICI CURIAE ............1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................2 ARGUMENT .............................3 I. The United States Has Played A Leading Role In Developing International Standards To Safeguard The Rights Of Captured Prisoners. 3 II. The Geneva Conventions And U.S. Military Regulations Implementing The Conventions Require That A Competent Tribunal Determine The Status Of Captured Prisoners. ..........6 III. These Cases Raise Issues Of Extraordinary Significance .........................8 A. The Judicial Branch Has A Duty To Act As A Check On The Executive Branch, Even In Wartime ..................8 B. Failure To Provide Any Judicial Review Of The Government’s Actions Could Have Grave Consequences For U.S. Military Forces Captured In Future Conflicts ..... 11 CONCLUSION ........................... 20 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page Cases: Brown v. United States, 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 110 (1814) .............................. 10 Chandler v.
    [Show full text]
  • Detainees at Guantanamo Bay
    Order Code RS22173 Updated July 20, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Detainees at Guantanamo Bay name redacted Legislative Attorney American Law Division Summary After the U.S. Supreme Court held that U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear legal challenges on behalf of more than 500 persons detained at the U.S. Naval Station in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba in connection with the war against terrorism, the Pentagon established administrative hearings, called “Combatant Status Review Tribunals” (CSRTs), to allow the detainees to contest their status as enemy combatants. This report provides an overview of the CSRT procedures and summarizes court cases related to the detentions and the use of military commissions. The relevant Supreme Court rulings are discussed in CRS Report RS21884, The Supreme Court and Detainees in the War on Terrorism: Summary and Analysis. This report will be updated as events warrant. In Rasul v. Bush,124 S.Ct. 2686 (2004), a divided Supreme Court declared that “a state of war is not a blank check for the president”and ruled that persons deemed “enemy combatants” have the right to challenge their detention before a judge or other “neutral decision-maker.” The decision reversed the holding of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which had agreed with the Bush Administration that no U.S. court has jurisdiction to hear petitions for habeas corpus by or on behalf of the detainees because they are aliens and are detained outside the sovereign territory of the United States. Lawyers have filed more than a dozen petitions on behalf of some 60 detainees in the District Court for the District of Columbia, where judges have reached opposing conclusions as to whether the detainees have any enforceable rights to challenge their treatment and detention.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuremberg Icj Timeline 1474-1868
    NUREMBERG ICJ TIMELINE 1474-1868 1474 Trial of Peter von Hagenbach In connection with offenses committed while governing ter- ritory in the Upper Alsace region on behalf of the Duke of 1625 Hugo Grotius Publishes On the Law of Burgundy, Peter von Hagenbach is tried and sentenced to death War and Peace by an ad hoc tribunal of twenty-eight judges representing differ- ent local polities. The crimes charged, including murder, mass Dutch jurist and philosopher Hugo Grotius, one of the principal rape and the planned extermination of the citizens of Breisach, founders of international law with such works as Mare Liberum are characterized by the prosecution as “trampling under foot (On the Freedom of the Seas), publishes De Jure Belli ac Pacis the laws of God and man.” Considered history’s first interna- (On the Law of War and Peace). Considered his masterpiece, tional war crimes trial, it is noted for rejecting the defense of the book elucidates and secularizes the topic of just war, includ- superior orders and introducing an embryonic version of crimes ing analysis of belligerent status, adequate grounds for initiating against humanity. war and procedures to be followed in the inception, conduct, and conclusion of war. 1758 Emerich de Vattel Lays Foundation for Formulating Crime of Aggression In his seminal treatise The Law of Nations, Swiss jurist Emerich de Vattel alludes to the great guilt of a sovereign who under- 1815 Declaration Relative to the Universal takes an “unjust war” because he is “chargeable with all the Abolition of the Slave Trade evils, all the horrors of the war: all the effusion of blood, the The first international instrument to condemn slavery, the desolation of families, the rapine, the acts of violence, the rav- Declaration Relative to the Universal Abolition of the Slave ages, the conflagrations, are his works and his crimes .
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Gazette Indicated a to -_____-- [ILY GAZII1[ *Call a Family Member Who Also Could Be Hazardous to Your Resident Was Charged Over $31 -S
    DAILY S GAZETTE Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Vol. 41 - No. 172 -- U.S. Navy's only shore-based daily newspaper -- Wednesday, September It. t8 Benefits to affect future entrants By Mr. Casper Weinberger tion, the Congress, in its recent action on the pending .nthe past few months, there defense authorization bill, has has been considerable specula- mandated a reduction of $2.9 tion about potential changes to billion to the military the military retirement system. retirement fund. At the same The speculation, often well time, the Congress has directed intentioned but ill informed, the Department of Defense to has been based on criticism from submit options to make changes both the public and private in the retirement system for sectors about the perceived future entrants to achieve this generosity of the system. mandated reduction. The Joint Chiefs of Staff and Nonetheless, we will continue I have steadfastly maintained to insist that whatever changes that any recommendation for the Congress finally makes must change must take account of -- not adversely affect the combat first, the unique, dangerous and readiness of our forces, or vital contribution to the safety violate our firm pledges. of all of us that is made by our I want to emphasize to you service men and women: and the again, in the strongest terms, effect on combat readiness of that the dedicated men and women tampering with the effect on now serving and to those who combat readiness of tampering have retired before them, will th the retirement system. be fully protected in any nourrently we must honor the options we are required to absolute commitments that have submit to the Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • D.D.C. Apr. 20, 2007
    Case 1:06-cv-01707-GK Document 20 Filed 04/20/2007 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) RUZATULLAH, et al.,) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 06-CV-01707 (GK) ) ROBERT GATES, ) Secretary, United States Department of ) Defense, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ) RESPONDENTS’ REPLY TO PETITIONERS’ REPLY AND OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED PETITION Respondents respectfully submit this reply brief in response to Petitioners’ Reply and Opposition to Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Petition. In their opening brief, respondents demonstrated that this Court has no jurisdiction to hear the present habeas petition because the petition, filed by two alien enemy combatants detained at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan, falls squarely within the jurisdiction-limiting provision of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (“MCA”), Pub. L. No. 109-366, 120 Stat. 2600 (2006). Respondents also demonstrated that petitioners do not have a constitutional right to habeas relief because under Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (1950), aliens detained abroad, such as petitioners, who have no significant voluntary connections with this country, cannot invoke protections under the Constitution. Subsequent to respondents’ motion to dismiss, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decided Boumediene v. Bush, 476 F.3d 981 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 127 S.Ct. 1478 (2007), which removes all doubt that the MCA divests federal courts of jurisdiction to review petitions for writs of habeas corpus filed by aliens captured abroad and detained as enemy Case 1:06-cv-01707-GK Document 20 Filed 04/20/2007 Page 2 of 22 combatants in an overseas military base.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice in the Justice Trial at Nuremberg Stephen J
    University of Baltimore Law Review Volume 46 | Issue 3 Article 4 5-2017 A Court Pure and Unsullied: Justice in the Justice Trial at Nuremberg Stephen J. Sfekas Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr Part of the Fourteenth Amendment Commons, International Law Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Sfekas, Stephen J. (2017) "A Court Pure and Unsullied: Justice in the Justice Trial at Nuremberg," University of Baltimore Law Review: Vol. 46 : Iss. 3 , Article 4. Available at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr/vol46/iss3/4 This Peer Reviewed Articles is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Baltimore Law Review by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A COURT PURE AND UNSULLIED: JUSTICE IN THE JUSTICE TRIAL AT NUREMBERG* Hon. Stephen J. Sfekas** Therefore, O Citizens, I bid ye bow In awe to this command, Let no man live Uncurbed by law nor curbed by tyranny . Thus I ordain it now, a [] court Pure and unsullied . .1 I. INTRODUCTION In the immediate aftermath of World War II, the common understanding was that the Nazi regime had been maintained by a combination of instruments of terror, such as the Gestapo, the SS, and concentration camps, combined with a sophisticated propaganda campaign.2 Modern historiography, however, has revealed the
    [Show full text]
  • The Personal Jurisdiction of Military Commissions1 (August 9, 2008)
    Taking Liberties: The Personal Jurisdiction of Military Commissions1 (August 9, 2008) Madeline Morris2 with Yaniv Adar, Margarita Clarens, Joshua Haber, Allison Hester-Haddad, David Maxted, James McDonald, George (‘Wes’) Quinton, Dennis Schmelzer, and Jeffrey Ward I. Introduction On September 11, 2001, Al Qaeda operatives attacked civilian and military targets on US territory, causing thousands of deaths and billions of dollars of economic loss. The next day, the United Nations Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1368 characterizing the attack by Al Qaeda as a “threat to international peace and security” and recognizing the right of states to use armed force in self defense.3 NATO, for the first time in its history, invoked the obligation of collective self defense under Article 5 of the NATO Treaty.4 On September 14, the US Congress passed the Authorization for the Use of Military Force, authorizing the President to use “all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks. .” 5 Terrorism, conceived until then as crime, was reconceived—as war. On November 13, 2001, invoking the law of war, President Bush announced that enemy combatants in the US “war on terror” would be subject to trial by military commission—a form of military tribunal last convened in the aftermath of World War II. Issuing a Presidential Military Order (PMO), he stated: 1 © Madeline Morris 2007. 2 Professor of Law, Duke Law School. 3 S.C. Res. 1368, U.N. SCOR, 56th Sess., 4370th mtg., U.N. Doc. S/RES/1368 (Sept. 12 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • High Command Case: a Study in Staff and Command Responsibility
    JOHN JAY DOUGLASS* Colonel, JAGC High Command Case: A Study in Staff and Command Responsibility Less than twenty-five years after the conclusion of the major World War I1war crimes trials, international jurists, historians and the general public are not clear as to, nor are they apparently concerned with, the authority, procedure or even the significant legal decisions of the war crimes trials held both in Europe and the Far East following World War 11.1 Even a mere twenty-five years of experience indicates there will be other trials of those accused of criminal acts in war. Such trials, as well as international lawmakers, should well review the German High Command Trial before the United States Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in October 1948. The lessons of this trial may well be the most important of those from any of the trials held following World War 11. The thrust of this trial and its results relate to the authority of command- ers of military forces for actions of their troops and their personal respon- sibility, as well as the responsibility of staff officers in senior staff positions, for'actions taken by them or carried on under their direction. As a result of recent developments within the United States, arising from the war in Vietnam, it is worthwhile to review the German High Command Trial and to analyze its relationship to the present state of the law. The legal question of criminal responsibility of military commanders and staff officers who do *Commandant (Dean), The Judge Advocate General's School, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Love Lane Bidder Can't Meet Price
    «0 - MANCHESTER HERALD. Tuesday. Sept. 10, 1985 KIT ‘N’ CARLYLE ®by Lgrry Wright MANCHESTER SPORTS WEATHER HOMES FOCUS HELP WANTED FOR SALE INESS & SERVICE DIRECTORY OH No! «*T MACC, hospital get When it’s lunchtime, 11 EC football again Clear, cool tonight; i l M • H i staying cool Thursday KfflflCIS PAiNTINR/ CAT' mental health grants mother knows best 11 senior dominated PAPERIN8 Dental Receptionist — By Owner — 3 year old, OFFQKO N ... page 2 Someone to work Sotur- l4S0 sq.ft., 7 room, 2</2 ... page 4 1 ... page 171 I ... page 11 dovs only. Monchester Pt. bath Raised Ranch. One Odd lobs. Trucking. Interior Pointing 8, Wal­ Corpontry and rofttodol office. Please send re­ Good Quality Bockhoe acre lot near East Hart- Horn* repairs. You nome lpapering — (^11 even­ Ing sorvlces— Qimpibto sume to Box T , c/o Man­ ford/Glastonbury line. ond 6kCdvotlng Work. NEuy, W, we do It. Free estf- ings, Gary McHugh, home repairs ond remo­ chester Herald. Quiet cul-de-sac, 2 car Bockhoe, excavation and snow plowing. No prob­ mafes. insured. 643-0304. 643-9321. deling. Quality work. Ref­ garage, flreolaced family • >. ... : . , .. • ... lem, Call Independent erences. licensed and In­ Hairstylist — Three full room and appliances. John Deerr'— • Painting sured. Calf 646411^. time for busy Manchester Construction Co., 456- Lawnmowers repaired - Asking $119,950. Call 649- FreeVlck up and delivery. contractor, Interior, exte­ salon, no following neces­ 0593. 10 percent senior dis­ rior, Insured. QuoMty All types remodeling or sary. Good benefits. Call count. Expert service. work, otf season- rotes. r(K>otrs -r- Complete kit­ SO Manager, Command Per­ Immaculate 3 bedroom Free estimates.
    [Show full text]