John F. Kennedy and the Advisory Effort for Regime Change in South

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

John F. Kennedy and the Advisory Effort for Regime Change in South Imperial Camelot: John F. Kennedy and the Advisory Effort for Regime Change in South Vietnam, 1962-1963 A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Millersville University of Pennsylvania In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By Shane M. Marino © 2018 Shane M. Marino May 2018 This Thesis for the Master of Arts Degree by Shane Michael Marino has been approved on behalf of the Graduate School by Thesis Committee: Dr. John M, McLarnon III (Signature on file) Research Advisor Dr. Tracey Weis (Signature on file) Committee Member Dr. Abam B. Lawrence (Signature on file) Committee Member May 10, 2018 Date ii ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS IMPERIAL CAMELOT: JOHN F. KENNEDY AND THE ADIVSORY EFFORT FOR REGIME CHANGE IN SOUTH VIETNAM, 1962-1963 By Shane M. Marino Millersville University, 2018 Millersville, Pennsylvania Directed by Dr. John McLarnon This thesis uses government documents, oral histories, and secondary sources to explore changes in the Kennedy administration’s Vietnam policy to determine the factors that contributed to the decision to support a coup d’état in 1963 that overthrew the President of the Republic of Vietnam and subsequently led to his assassination. The thesis specifically looks to connect administrative changes in organization and personnel to changes in policy that ultimately determined the fate of the Ngo Dinh Diem regime. In general, this thesis reveals that rejection of military intervention led to the adoption of a kind of political aggression that envisioned covert regime change as an acceptable alternative to the use of combat troops. Ultimately, this thesis raises the question of whether political aggression may, in the end, be just as destructive as military aggression. Signature of Investigator: ___Shane M. Marino__ Date: __May 10, 2018__ iii Introduction On the morning of January 28, 1961, Deputy Special Assistant for National Security Affairs Walter W. Rostow alerted President John Fitzgerald Kennedy to a report on Vietnam from United States Air Force Brigadier General Edward G. Lansdale. After reading the memorandum, Kennedy remarked to Rostow that “This is the worst yet. Ike never briefed me about Vietnam.”1 The president then ordered Rostow to follow up on the report and summon Lansdale to the White House. This brief exchange at the outset of the Kennedy presidency was instructive of circuitous nature of foreign policy in 1961-63: briefed on an issue by a representative of the National Security Council (NSC), Kennedy then requested that departments of State and Defense work cooperatively on a plan to save South Vietnam from being overrun by Communist insurgents. That effort, however, would expose incompatibilities in outlooks of the military establishment and foreign service, as well as differences between the president and the men whom he entrusted to faithfully execute his vision for counterinsurgency. When Kennedy found his staff to be highly dysfunctional, he effected changes in organization and personnel that restored the State Department’s authority in foreign policy and ensured that the NSC would adhere to Kennedy’s preference for nonmilitary solutions. Yet, while Kennedy empowered certain elements in the Washington establishment, he failed control their excesses and indiscretions. Vietnam policy in the Kennedy administration testifies to the indispensability of strong executive leadership in crafting workable policies out of bitter controversies. The situation in Vietnam in the early 1960s would surely have tested the mettle of even the most experienced leaders, but Kennedy seemed to be either distant or absent from the policymaking process, creating a situation in which internal politics determined the character of foreign policy. With the 1 president on the sidelines, the various wings of the executive bureaucracy vied for influence through and endless stream of proposals and counterproposals that simultaneously undermined the effectiveness of policies that needed to carefully balance the interests of two nations whose people lived worlds apart from each other. After failures in the Caribbean and Southeast Asia damaged the reputation of military and intelligence community, the Department of Defense and Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) found themselves playing second fiddle in foreign policy to the NSC and State Department. By 1962, the latter were under the control of ambitious men emboldened by the president’s elevation of them to positions of dominance, creating a dangerous situation in which decisions of high international significance might be undertaken without executive approval. A study of the political and diplomatic history of the Kennedy administration vis a vis its Vietnam policy reveals that the decision to overthrow of the Saigon regime in Vietnam in November 1963 was a direct product of Kennedy’s administrative style and geopolitical vision. 2 I Points of Divergence Two separate yet interrelated aspects of South Vietnam’s security and national development came to sharply divide Ngo Dinh Diem, the President of the Republic of Vietnam, from his American allies in 1962-63. The first grew out of out a policy dispute that had emerged in 1961 as the central point of contention among both Diem and his allies as well as between American leadership in the White House, State Department, and military establishment. In the early fall of 1961, President John F. Kennedy dispatched a fact-finding mission under the leadership of General Maxwell D. Taylor and Walter W. Rostow, Kennedy’s Deputy Special Assistant for National Security Affairs. The main purpose of the Taylor-Rostow mission was to consider, among other things, the advisability of military intervention on Saigon’s behalf. Various schemes for deployment of combat forces had dominated policy discussions in the spring and summer, as a wide cross-section of Kennedy’s advisors pressed the need for troops to secure the Republic of Vietnam and ensure the Diem regime’s viability. Middle and high-level authorities from the NSC and JCS, as well as the Defense and State departments, incessantly advocated for an infusion of American military power into South Vietnam, either directly or indirectly, unilaterally or multilaterally. Kennedy had always exhibited hesitancy to accept his advisors’ militant prescriptions, and a steady stream of memoranda and position papers written in support of such measures made the president even more determined to formulate a dynamic approach to South Vietnam. With that view in mind, Kennedy dispatched an interdepartmental study group to Saigon in the fall of 1961 for a frontline analysis.2 3 The Taylor-Rostow mission spent a week in Saigon during late October and submitted its recommendations to Kennedy at the beginning of the following month. What emerged from the negotiations that formalized the mission’s policy as National Security Action Memoranda (NSAM)-111 was a recurrent disagreement over the character of intervention. Running back to the previous administration, a debilitating degree of discord existed between officials in both Washington and Saigon over whether to continue aid deliveries to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) on an unconditional basis. Although South Vietnam’s president, Ngo Dinh Diem, had never enjoyed a truly stable position, a combination of external and internal crises invigorated certain elements in the State Department and intelligence community that believed Diem had to either be forced to reform or removed from power if the RVN was to survive. Over the course of 1959-1961, glaring deficiencies in leadership moved some American officials to seriously question Diem’s ability to unify his people and defeat the Viet Cong. First, at the Fifteenth Plenum of the Workers’ Party of Viet-Nam (Đảng lao động Việt Nam) in January 1959, the party’s Central Committee proposed Resolution 15, a revolutionary policy of reunification that authorized political agitation and the use of military force to liberate South Vietnam and adjoin it to its northern neighbor. Resumption of an armed struggle suspended at Geneva in 1954 became official policy when the Central Committee approved Resolution 15 in May 1959. Subsequently, at the Third National Congress in September 1960, the party explicitly joined revolution in South Vietnam to the ongoing effort of building socialism in the North. To lead this struggle, the party elected Lê Duẩn as its first secretary, a party official who had spearheaded the push for a policy of reunification upon returning from a secret inspection of South Vietnam the previous year. Finally, in December of 1960, the Vietnamese Communists established the National Liberation Front (NLF), a secret organization 4 designed as the vehicle for the clandestine prosecution of armed uprising in South Vietnam aimed at uniting disaffected Vietnamese and toppling the Diem regime. Through this, the Communists sought to depose Diem and unify the two Vietnams while avoiding an open breach of the Geneva Accords, thus maintaining the perception that the conflict was a civil war. What followed was a gradually expanding insurgency fueled by the infiltration of guerilla bands into South Vietnam through neutral Laos. Much of this fighting force was comprised of refugees from South Vietnam who had escaped to the North during the ceasefire of 1954. Over the course of 1959-63, tens of thousands crossed the seventeenth parallel, returned to their homelands, and renewed the war from which they had fled.3 The second factor that damaged faith in Diem’s viability was the reemergence of open hostility between the premier and his military leadership. Just as Ho Chi Minh and Lê Duẩn were inaugurating the insurgency, Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) commanders were scheming to depose Diem on their own. The roots of discord between Saigon and the military ran deep, but the proximal cause stemmed from Diem’s autocratic tendencies and incompetence as a military administrator. In the first case, Diem had exhibited effectiveness in eliminating opponents within the political apparatus, government bureaucracy, and ARVN command structure during 1956-59.
Recommended publications
  • The Rhetorical Antecedents to Vietnam, 1945-1965
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette College of Communication Faculty Research and Publications Communication, College of 9-1-2018 The Rhetorical Antecedents to Vietnam, 1945-1965 Gregory R. Olson Marquette University George N. Dionisopoulos San Diego State University Steven R. Goldzwig Marquette University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/comm_fac Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Olson, Gregory R.; Dionisopoulos, George N.; and Goldzwig, Steven R., "The Rhetorical Antecedents to Vietnam, 1945-1965" (2018). College of Communication Faculty Research and Publications. 511. https://epublications.marquette.edu/comm_fac/511 The Rhetorical Antecedents to Vietnam, 1945–1965 Gregory A. Olson, George N. Dionisopoulos, and Steven R. Goldzwig 8 I do not believe that any of the Presidents who have been involved with Viet- nam, Presidents Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, or President Nixon, foresaw or desired that the United States would become involved in a large scale war in Asia. But the fact remains that a steady progression of small decisions and actions over a period of 20 years had forestalled a clear-cut decision by the President or by the President and Congress—decision as to whether the defense of South Vietnam and involvement in a great war were necessary to the security and best interest of the United States. —Senator John Sherman Cooper (R-KY), Congressional Record, 1970 n his 1987 doctoral thesis, General David Petraeus wrote of Vietnam: “We do not take the time to understand the nature of the society in which we are f ght- Iing, the government we are supporting, or the enemy we are f ghting.”1 After World War II, when the United States chose Vietnam as an area for nation building as part of its Cold War strategy, little was known about that exotic land.
    [Show full text]
  • The President's Desk: a Resource Guide for Teachers, Grades 4
    The President’s Desk A Resource Guide for Teachers: Grades 4-12 Department of Education and Public Programs With generous support from: Edward J. Hoff and Kathleen O’Connell, Shari E. Redstone John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum Table of Contents Overview of The President’s Desk Interactive Exhibit.... 2 Lesson Plans and Activities................................................................ 40 History of the HMS Resolute Desk............................................... 4 List of Lessons and Activities available on the Library’s Website... 41 The Road to the White House...................................................................... 44 .......................... 8 The President’s Desk Website Organization The President at Work.................................................................................... 53 The President’s Desk The President’s Desk Primary Sources.................................... 10 Sail the Victura Activity Sheet....................................................................... 58 A Resource Guide for Teachers: Grades 4-12 Telephone.................................................................................................... 11 Integrating Ole Miss....................................................................................... 60 White House Diary.................................................................................. 12 The 1960 Campaign: John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Scrimshaw..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 2) FOIA Appeals Log for Calendar Year 2017 3) Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Log for Calendar Year 2017
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com Central Imeltigence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 16 January 2019 Mr. John Greenewald, Jr. 27305 West Live Oak Road Suite #1203 Castaic, CA 91384 Reference: F-20 18-00766 Dear Mr. Greenewald: This is a final response to your 28 January 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for copies of the following: 1) FOIA Case Log for calendar year 2017 2) FOIA Appeals Log for calendar year 2017 3) Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Log for calendar year 2017 Enclosed are copies of the FOIA and the MDR case logs, consisting of 97 pages, for the calendar year 2017. Please note the case logs are unavailable in electronic format. The information includes the date the case was created, the case number, and the subject of the request, which includes cases in Item 2. Because you are entitled to the first 100 pages free, there is no charge for processing this request. With respect to Item 2, the Agency does not maintain or create appeals log containing only FOIA appeals, which would require us to create a new record in response to a FOIA request. If you have questions regarding our response, you may seek assistance from CIA's FOIA Public Liaison.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 IHBB Canadian Championships Set – Bowl Round 3
    IHBB Canadian Championships Set Bowl 2018-2019 Bowl Round 3 Bowl Round 3 First Quarter (1) Donald Tusk presides over the council that oversees this organization. Four members of this organization are legally obliged to join the Schengen Area, where internal borders are not enforced. This organization was created in 1993 with the signing of the Treaty of Maastricht. Consisting of over 25 member states and over 500 million people, for ten points, name this united organization of nations on a namesake continent. ANSWER: European Union (accept EU) (2) The first leader of this dynasty placed his grandfather on imperial records as the official founder of this dynasty under the name Taizu. This dynasty was defeated by the Tran Dynasty at the Battle of Bach Dang and also failed in an invasion of Java. The last emperor of this dynasty, Toghon Temur, was overthrown by a rebellion named for a piece of headgear. Marco Polo visited, for ten points, what Chinese dynasty founded by Kublai Khan? ANSWER: Yuan Dynasty (3) After an assassination attempt, this man quickly built an effective metal detector to attempt to find the bullet lodged in James Garfield. Elisha Gray is sometimes credited as the actual originator of this man’s most famous invention whose first use involved this man asking his associate Thomas Watson “come here! I want you!” For ten points, name this Scottish-Canadian inventor of the telephone. ANSWER: Alexander Graham Bell (4) Medea attempted to arrange for this man’s death by having him kill the Marathonian Bull, and he earlier completed the Six Labours.
    [Show full text]
  • The Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations Review
    PASSPORT THE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIANS OF AMERICAN FOREIGN RELATIONS REVIEW VOLUME 52, NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 2021 IN THIS ISSUE A Conversation with David Langbart Principles in Power: A Roundtable FDR and the Transformation of Power ...AND MORE Passport THE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIANS OF AMERICAN FOREIGN RELATIONS REVIEW Editor Andrew L. Johns, Brigham Young University Assistant Editor Brionna Mendoza, The Ohio State University Production Editor Julie Rojewski, Michigan State University Editorial Advisory Board Kelly McFarland, Georgetown University (2019-2021) Michael Brenes, Yale University (2020-2022) Amanda Demmer, Virginia Tech (2021-2023) Founding Editors Mitchell Lerner, The Ohio State University (2003-2011) William J. Brinker, Tennessee Technological University (1980-2003) Nolan Fowler, Tennessee Technological University (1973-1980) Gerald E. Wheeler, San Jose State College (1969-1973) Cover Image: December, 1942. Franklin D. Roosevelt being presented a globe by the United States Army at the White House in Washington, D.C. Courtesy of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library & Museum. Photo ID: Photo ID: 61244. Passport Editorial Office: SHAFR Business Office: Andrew Johns Amy Sayward, Executive Director Department of History Department of History Brigham Young University Middle Tennessee State University 2161 JFSB, Provo, UT 84602 1301 East Main Street, Box 23 [email protected] Murfreesboro, TN 37132 801-422-8942 (phone) [email protected] 801-422-0275 (fax) 615-898-2569 Passport is published three times per year (April, September, January), by the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations, and is distributed to all members of the Society. Submissions should be sent to the attention of the editor, and are acceptable in all formats, although electronic copy by email to [email protected] is preferred.
    [Show full text]
  • Air America in South Vietnam I – from the Days of CAT to 1969
    Air America in South Vietnam I From the days of CAT to 1969 by Dr. Joe F. Leeker First published on 11 August 2008, last updated on 24 August 2015 I) At the times of CAT Since early 1951, a CAT C-47, mostly flown by James B. McGovern, was permanently based at Saigon1 to transport supplies within Vietnam for the US Special Technical and Economic Mission, and during the early fifties, American military and economic assistance to Indochina even increased. “In the fall of 1951, CAT did obtain a contract to fly in support of the Economic Aid Mission in FIC [= French Indochina]. McGovern was assigned to this duty from September 1951 to April 1953. He flew a C-47 (B-813 in the beginning) throughout FIC: Saigon, Hanoi, Phnom Penh, Vientiane, Nhatrang, Haiphong, etc., averaging about 75 hours a month. This was almost entirely overt flying.”2 CAT’s next operations in Vietnam were Squaw I and Squaw II, the missions flown out of Hanoi in support of the French garrison at Dien Bien Phu in 1953/4, using USAF C-119s painted in the colors of the French Air Force; but they are described in the file “Working in Remote Countries: CAT in New Zealand, Thailand-Burma, French Indochina, Guatemala, and Indonesia”. Between mid-May and mid-August 54, the CAT C-119s continued dropping supplies to isolated French outposts and landed loads throughout Vietnam. When the Communists incited riots throughout the country, CAT flew ammunition and other supplies from Hanoi to Saigon, and brought in tear gas from Okinawa in August.3 Between 12 and 14 June 54, CAT captain
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Van Tekst
    Memoires 1979-A Willem Oltmans bron Willem Oltmans, Memoires 1979-A. Papieren Tijger, Breda 2010 Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/oltm003memo26_01/colofon.php © 2013 dbnl / Willem Oltmans Stichting 7 Inleiding Recently I was invited by the television company Het Gesprek to join the host Frits Barend on the programme Dossier BVD. The programme is designed to take a retrospective look at guests who had appeared on the now legendary show, Barend en van Dorp and Willem Oltmans had been a frequent guest. Clips were shown, discussed, and questions followed. Once again the re-occurring theme reared its head. ‘Would Willem be remembered as a great journalist or as a charlatan?’ Without presumption I say that I probably knew Willem better than anyone else, and the word ‘charlatan’ does not enter my vocabulary. I saw Willem as a man who hated lies, hypocrisy and cover-ups. His diaries, meticulously notated, and which he himself referred to as ‘my brain’, speak for themselves. Willem was also capable of being Spartan with detail when the noted facts were painful to him. 19th of May 1979, thirteen years exactly to the day that we first met, he writes of a painful incident and refers to it simply as ‘a sort of rape’. I was the subject of that rape and the same uninvited, explosive sexual attack was forced on me again two weeks later in the home of his mother. We never spoke of it, and so I find it a revealing characteristic of the complex Oltmans brain that he chose to acknowledge his darker sides and demons, albeit without any emotion.
    [Show full text]
  • An Nbc News White Paper Vietnam Hindsight Part Ii
    AN NBC NEWS WHITE PAPER VIETNAM HINDSIGHT PART II: THE DEATH OF DIEM BROADCAST: WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 22, 1971 10:00 - 11:00 CREDITS Opening Title: NBC NEWS WHITE PAPER VIETNAM HINDSIGHT PART II: DEATH OF DIEM Credits: NBC NEWS WHITE PAPER VIETNAM HINDSIGHT Copyright c The National Broadcasting Co., Inc. 1971 All Rights Reserved Produced and Written By FRED FREED Directed by PAMELA HILL Associate Producers ALVIN DAVIS PAMELA HILL Researcher HELEN WHITNEY Production Assistant BARBARA SPENCE Film Researcher JACK GOELMAN Unit Manager KLAUS HEYS Supervising Film Editor DARROLD MURRAY Film Editors MARY ANN MARTIN STUART M. ROSENBERG DAVID J. SAUL JEAN BAGLEY Cameramen STEVE PETROPOULOS WILLIAM RICHARDS Sound JAMES ZOLTOWSKI JOSE VALLE JOHN SINGLETON JEROME GOLD HENRY ROSSEAU IRVING GANS SHELLY FIELMAN Still Pictures by JACQUES LOWE BLACK STAR MAGNUM GEORGES TAMES - THE NEW YORK TIMES THE JOHN F. KENNEDY LIBRARY YOICHI CKOMOTO HORST ?HAAS PEOPLE WHO WERE INTERVIEWED FOR VIETNAM HINDSIGHT IN ORDER OF THEIR APPEARANCE AND POSITION HELD AT THE TIME GEORGE BALL Under-Secretary of State 1961-1966 MAXWELL TAYLOR- Military Adviser to JFK 1961 Chairman of the Joint Chiefs 1962- 64 JOHN KENNETH GALBRAITH Ambassador to India 1961-63 DAVID HALBERSTAM Correspondent - New York Times - Vietnam 1962-63 WALT M. ROSTOW Deputy Special Assistant to the President for National Security 1961-64 MME. NHU Wife of Ngo Dinh Nhu, sister-in-law of Ngo Dinh Diem ARTHUR SCHLESINGER Special Assistant to the President 1961-64 PAUL HARKINS US Military Commander - Vietnam 1962-64 • JOHN VANN American Military Adviser in Vietnam MICHAEL FORRESTAL Senior Member - White House National Security Staff 1962-66 ROGER HILSMAN Assistant Secretary of State for Far Eastern Affairs 1963-64 ■ RUFUS PHILLIPS American AID Mission - Vietnam -2- FREDERICK NOLTING U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and References
    Notes and References 1 Finding the HRight Key:" Kennedy and the New Pacific Community 1. William J. Lederer and Eugene Burdick, The Ugly American (New York, 1960), pp. 163, 233. 2. "The United States and Our Future in Asia," Excerpts from the Remarks of Senator John F. Kennedy (Hawaii, 1958), JFK Library, Senate Files. 3. Ibid. Championing America's virtue and image abroad, as weil as Amer­ ican self-interest, always remained a difficult task for Kennedy. See Ronald Nurse, "America Must Not Sleep: The Development of John F. Kennedy's Foreign Policy Attitudes, 1947-1960" (Ph.D. dissertation: Michigan State University, 1971), James Dorsey, "Vietnam 'a can of snakes,' Galbraith told JFK," Boston Globe (28 January 1974), Stephen Pelz, "John F. Kennedy's 1961 Vietnam War Decisions," lournal of Strategie Studies (December 1981), lan McDonald, "Kennedy Files Show President's Dismay at CIA Power," The Times (London, 2 August 1971), JFK Library, Excerpts from Biographical Files. 4. Secretary of State Dean Rusk to Kennedy, 2 February 1961, and "The New Pacific" (Speech in Hawaii, August 1960), JFK Library, POFlBox 111 and Senate Files. 5. John F. Kennedy, Public Papers of the President, 1961) (Washington, D.C., 1961), pp. 174-5. These comments were made during the Presi­ dent's push to create the "Alliance for Progress" program for the Latin AmericaniCaribbean states. 6. Kennedy, Public Papers ofthe President, 1961, p. 399. 7. Ibid., 1963, p. 652. 8. Kennedy's early cabinet meetings on foreign affairs topics often became energetic discussions on how to win the Cold War. A winning strategy, wh ether in allied favor or not, was acceptable.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremy Corbyn, the UK Electoral System and of Course Donald Trump, with a Cogent Analysis of Why He Has Come to Power
    The Archive Dear Readers, We sincerely hope that you enjoy, this, the seventh issue of The Archive and that it reflects the hard work that has gone into all the articles from everyone who has contributed. As editors, we’ve really enjoyed putting together this compilation of the best that our school’s historians and political commentators have to offer. It is undoubtedly of great value that so many students are willing to go above and beyond their specifications in order to get a better understanding of areas of history and politics that interest them. This issue promises to impress with its wide range of topics covered by students from different year groups. On the history side our articles span from ancient warfare all the way to the civil rights movement and the Vietnam war. On the other hand, politics students have covered a wide range of topics as well such as the life of Jeremy Corbyn, the UK electoral system and of course Donald Trump, with a cogent analysis of why he has come to power. As editors we obviously owe a great debt of thanks to all the excellent students who have contributed. However, over and above this, we must thank Mr P.G. Neal for being the impetus without which this paper would not be possible. Finally, we must also thank Dr Byrne for her valuable help and advice as proof-reader, and to Mrs O Donnell who has aided us greatly in formatting and distributing the paper. Anomi Fernando and Jack Walker Editors “Let Slip The Dogs Of War” - Animals In Ancient Warfare Hugo Thompson, 4 Fox A wide variety of animals were used in ancient warfare, from tiny bees to huge elephants.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Log, 2010-2016
    Description of document: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Log, 2010-2016 Requested date: 24-October-2016 Released date: 21-November-2016 Posted date: 12-December-2016 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Request Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 Fax: 703-613-3007 The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. Central Intelligence Agency Washington. D.C. 20505 21 November 2016 Reference: F-2017-00161 This is a final response to your 24 October 2016 Freedom of Information Act request for copies of the Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Log maintained by the Central Intelligence Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Harkins, Paul D
    Courtesy of the National Archives and Records Service Lyndon Baines Johnson Library The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project GENERAL PAUL D. HARKINS Interviewed by: Ted Gittinger Initial interview date: November 10, 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS Early career Boston National Guard West Point Fort Bliss horse cavalry school Fort Riley, Kansas - Cavalry School - Instructor Fort Myer, Virginia - F Troop - Third Cavalry Second Armored Division North Africa Landing, World War II - Deputy Chief of Staff Operation Torch Western Task Force Sicily invasion Europe - Third Army General Patton When the Third Cracked Europe West Point - Assistant Commandant Pentagon - Chief of Plans 1951 Korea - Eighth Army - Chief of Staff Commander of Forty-fifth Division Infantry Pentagon - MAAG Chief International Branch Izmir, Turkey - Greek and Turkish Commander Armies in NATO - Commander 1 Hawaii - Deputy Army Commander Vietnam situation General Maxwell advice Vietnam - Commander of U.S. forces President Kennedy Appointment - Four Stars North Vietnam Training Infrastructure Strategic Hamlet Program Farmgate program Combat Fighting units Diem Tran Van Don Big Minh Presidential palace bombed Laos U.S. raid Harriman plan Ho Chi Minh Trail Communists Saigon, Vietnam Ambassador Nolting Embassy country team Ambassador Lodge Ambassador Diem’s coup Buddhists versus Catholics Thich Tri Quang Ambassador Richardson Fact finding visits U.S. policy Viet Cong activity Nhu and Diem Murders U.S. reaction to Assessment of progress Effect on military situation Big Minh Regime Popularity 2 Tran Thieu Khiem Embassy Reassignments Trueheart Nes Lodge General Nguyen Khanh Background Assessment U.S. policy Halberstam reports Press relations U.S. reporters Return to U.S.
    [Show full text]