DOCSLIB.ORG

Moral Masculinity: the Culture of Foreign Relations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Moral Masculinity: the Culture of Foreign Relations MORAL MASCULINITY: THE CULTURE OF FOREIGN RELATIONS DURING THE KENNEDY ADMINISTRATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jennifer Lynn Walton, B.A., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Michael J. Hogan, Adviser ___________________________ Professor Peter L. Hahn Adviser Department of History Professor Kevin Boyle Copyright by Jennifer Lynn Walton 2004 ABSTRACT The Kennedy administration of 1961-1963 was an era marked by increasing tension in U.S.-Soviet relations, culminating in the Cuban missile crisis of October 1962. This period provides a snapshot of the culture and politics of the Cold War. During the early 1960s, broader concerns about gender upheaval coincided with an administration that embraced a unique ideology of masculinity. Policymakers at the top levels of the Kennedy administration, including President John F. Kennedy, operated within a cultural framework best described as moral masculinity. Moral masculinity was the set of values or criteria by which Kennedy and his closest foreign policy advisors defined themselves as white American men. Drawing on these criteria justified their claims to power. The values they embraced included heroism, courage, vigor, responsibility, and maturity. Kennedy’s focus on civic virtue, sacrifice, and public service highlights the “moral” aspect of moral masculinity. To members of the Kennedy administration, these were moral virtues and duties and their moral fitness justified their fitness to serve in public office. Five key elements of moral masculinity played an important role in diplomatic crises during the Kennedy administration. A discourse of heroism influenced Kennedy’s decisions during the Bay of Pigs crisis, while his meeting with Nikita Khrushchev in June 1961 hinged on notions of youth and vigor. The Kennedy administration made policy ii during the Berlin crisis with attention to the value of patriarchal responsibility. Kennedy’s conduct during the Cuban missile crisis demonstrates the importance of maintaining the image and ideology of moral masculinity as policymakers focused on deviance and danger. Finally, a discourse of maturity and modernity surrounded policymaking during the protracted crisis in the Congo. This dissertation is based on research at the John F. Kennedy Library, the National Archives in College Park, Maryland, and in the Department of State’s Foreign Relations of the United States series. iii DEDICATED TO MY PARENTS, GORDON AND MARIA A. WALTON iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisers, Michael J. Hogan and Peter L. Hahn, for their indispensable contribution to my scholarly development and to this dissertation. My work and my sanity benefited enormously from the wise counsel and support of my dissertation writing group colleagues, Paul Hibbeln, Matt Masur, Aaron Retish, and Matthew Romaniello. I would also like to thank Molly Wood, Carole Fink, and Douglas Little for commenting on conference papers that became a part of this project. Needless to say, any shortcomings are mine alone. My research was supported by a Graduate School Alumni Research Award and the Foster Rhea Dulles Award from The Ohio State University and a Research Grant from the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation. I was fortunate to receive excellent advice and assistance from archivists Megan Desnoyers and Stephen Plotkin at the Kennedy Library. I am also grateful to the generous friends and family members who housed and entertained me during research trips, particularly Farrell and Dianne Dolan, Jeremy and Kerry Walton, and Bonnie and Joshua McGuire. Finally, I wish to thank my parents, Maria and Gordon, for their love and support, and my husband, Matt Masur, for his optimism, encouragement, and advice. v VITA 1974 ………………………………………...Born – Poughkeepsie, New York 1996 ………………………………………...B.A. History, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York 1998 …………………………………………M.A. History, The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio 1997-2002 …………………………………..Graduate Teaching and Research Associate, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 2002-present ………………………………..Director, History Teaching Institute at Ohio State FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: History Studies in: American Diplomatic History Modern American History Comparative Women’s History vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………… ii Dedication …………………………………………………………………………… iv Acknowledgments ………………………………………………………………….... v Vita …………………………………………………………………………………... vi Chapters: 1. Introduction: Moral Masculinity ……………………………………………. 1 2. Heroism: The Bay of Pigs ………………………………………………….. 16 3. Vigor, Youth, and Power: Kennedy and Khrushchev at Vienna …………… 49 4. Patriarchal Responsibility: The Berlin Crisis ………………………………. 68 5. Deviance: The Cuban Missile Crisis ……………………………………….. 108 6. Maturity and Modernity: Crisis in the Congo ……………………………… 137 7. Conclusion ………………………………………………………………….. 177 Bibliography ………………………………………………………………………... 182 vii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION: MORAL MASCULINITY On January 1, 1960, the junior senator from Massachusetts issued a ringing statement about the future of the United States. John F. Kennedy lamented that “the signs of our lack of national leadership – of our loss of national vision – are all too clear and present.” He charged that the United States had gone soft – physically, mentally, spiritually soft. we seem to be losing our will to sacrifice and to endure. [t]he slow corrosion of luxury – the slow erosion of our courage – is beginning to show. Nearly one out of every two young American men is rejected by the Selective Service today as mentally, physically, or morally unfit for any kind of military service. We are losing that Pilgrim and pioneer spirit of initiative and independence – that old-fashioned Spartan devotion to “duty, honor, and country.”1 One day later, Kennedy officially announced that he would seek the office of the presidency in the 1960 election “to ensure ‘a more vital life for our people.’”2 This was not mere campaign rhetoric. Kennedy’s remarks that day signaled the close connections between masculinity, foreign relations, and the future Kennedy administration. His language illustrated his conceptions of masculinity and power by 1 John F. Kennedy, “Are We Up To the Task?” January 1, 1961, in The Strategy of Peace, ed. Allan Nevins (New York, Evanston, and London, 1960), 200-201. 2 Quoted in Robert Dallek, An Unfinished Life: John F. Kennedy, 1917-1963 (Boston, 2003), 243. 1 underscoring the value of courage, sacrifice, and physical and mental strength. Kennedy emphasized the linkages between gender and citizenship and hinted at fears that the nation had been softened by feminine, material pursuits. These ideas influenced Kennedy’s perceptions of power and the foreign policymaking process during his administration. This dissertation examines the influence of these core cultural values on American relations with Cuba, Berlin, and the Congo from 1961 to 1963. Post-World War II America experienced a crisis of masculinity similar to the gender upheavals during the turn of the twentieth century.3 Challenges to the established gender and racial order from the civil rights and nascent women’s movement threatened to undermine white middle-class men’s claims to power. Reflecting this crisis, as well as a series of personal challenges, John F. Kennedy embraced a set of values best defined as “moral masculinity.” These values were shared by most of the men at the highest levels of his national security staff. President Kennedy and his core group of national security advisors operated from a particular worldview that was informed by their privileged positions in the gender-, race-, and class-based systems of power in American society. As historian Robert Dean has argued, foreign policymakers in the Kennedy and Johnson administrations shared a unique outlook, coming of age during an era that inculcated an ethos of “imperial brotherhood” and cementing these values in the experience of the Second World War.4 3 See, for example, Gail Bederman, Manliness and Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880-1917 (Chicago, 1995); Amy Kaplan, “Romancing the Empire: The Embodiment of American Masculinity in the Popular Historical Novel of the 1890s,” American Literary History 2 (Winter 1990): 659-690. 4 Robert D. Dean, Imperial Brotherhood: Gender and the Making of Cold War Foreign Policy (Amherst, MA, 2001); idem, “Masculinity as Ideology,” Diplomatic History 22 (Winter 1998): 29-62. 2 These men expressed their perceptions of power on a personal and international level in accordance with this worldview. This study will reveal how perceptions of power shaped political reality and will provide a better understanding of both the implementation and the impact of foreign policy, especially for the Kennedy administration period. Moral masculinity was the set of values or criteria by which Kennedy and his closest foreign policy advisors, Attorney General Robert Kennedy, National Security Advisor McGeorge Bundy, Secretary of State Dean Rusk, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, and others defined themselves as white American men. Drawing on these criteria, including heroism, courage, vigor, responsibility, and maturity, justified their claims to power. Kennedy’s focus on civic virtue, sacrifice, and public service reveals the “moral” aspect of moral masculinity. To members of the Kennedy administration,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SELF-DETERMINATION OUTSIDE the COLONIAL CONTEXT: the BIRTH of BANGLADESH in Retrospectt
    SELF-DETERMINATION OUTSIDE THE COLONIAL CONTEXT: THE BIRTH OF BANGLADESH IN RETROSPECTt By VedP. Nanda* I. INTRODUCTION In the aftermath of the Indo-Pakistan War in December 1971, the independent nation-state of Bangladesh was born.' Within the next four months, more than fifty countries had formally recognized the new nation.2 As India's military intervention was primarily responsible for the success of the secessionist movement in what was then known as East Pakistan, and for the creation of a new political entity on the inter- national scene,3 many serious questions stemming from this historic event remain unresolved for the international lawyer. For example: (1) What is the continuing validity of Article 2 (4) of the United Nations Charter?4 (2) What is the current status of the doctrine of humanita- rian intervention in international law?5 (3) What action could the United Nations have taken to avert the Bangladesh crisis?6 (4) What measures are necessary to prevent such tragic occurrences in the fu- ture?7 and (5) What relationship exists between the principle of self- "- This paper is an adapted version of a chapter that will appear in Y. ALEXANDER & R. FRIEDLANDER, SELF-DETERMINATION (1979). * Professor of Law and Director of the International Legal Studies Program, Univer- sity of Denver Law Center. 1. See generally BANGLADESH: CRISIS AND CONSEQUENCES (New Delhi: Deen Dayal Research Institute 1972); D. MANKEKAR, PAKISTAN CUT TO SIZE (1972); PAKISTAN POLITI- CAL SYSTEM IN CRISIS: EMERGENCE OF BANGLADESH (S. Varma & V. Narain eds. 1972). 2. Ebb Tide, THE ECONOMIST, April 8, 1972, at 47.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at Presidential Power and What Could Have Been John T
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Honors Theses University Honors Program 8-1992 The Difference One Man Makes: A Look at Presidential Power and What Could Have Been John T. Sullivan Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/uhp_theses Recommended Citation Sullivan, John T., "The Difference One Man Makes: A Look at Presidential Power and What Could Have Been" (1992). Honors Theses. Paper 60. This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the University Honors Program at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Difference One Man Makes: A Look at Presidential Power and What Could Have Been By John T. Sullivan University Honors Thesis Dr. Barbara Brown July 1992 A question often posed in theoretical discussions is whether or not one person can make a difference in the ebb and flow of history. We might all agree that if that one person were a President of the United states, a difference could be made; but how much? While the presidency is the single most powerful position in the U.s. federal system of government, making it a formidable force in world affairs also, most scholars agree that the presidency, itself, is very limited, structurally. The success of a president in setting the nation along a desired course rests with the ingredients brought to the position by the person elected to it. Further, many events occur outside the control of the president. Fortune or failure depends upon how the individual in office reacts to these variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay of Pigs Role in Foreign Policy
    Bay Of Pigs Role In Foreign Policy decontaminatedEmmanuel power-dive insistently. her hydrosulphide Double-chinned diametrally, Harrison unifiedbang-up her and bandanna edited. Unrazored so staring Seththat Pietro outvying, outstood his Cominformist very desirably. absquatulates Head refer the Revolutionary National Police. Consult thecontent narrative at american foreign threat. There were routed on foreign intervention against his role of bay pigs in foreign policy universal respect. The bay of pigs fiasco during one policy, economic community mental health care to talk about how many grand things. You will shortly receive a receipt for your rent via email. Fascinated by the meeting of his advisors that fraternal relations committee of bay of pigs role in foreign policy discussions with cuba and number of the cuban sponsors to. The forces of responsible for email address, has stated from one pentagon failed bay of pigs role in foreign policy and conduct sensitive and tanks to strengthen and testing them working for calling and international problems that? President kennedy a short term, bay of pigs role in foreign policy and peace mission is no means of pigs had learned that? This site uses cookies to cater you hire better browsing experience. Tell that policy actions that personally elevated was quite good case when he has collided in foreign power. Khrushchev was hell bent to affect policy derived from the bay of bay of pigs role in foreign policy toward panama. American author on it was determined to aggravate the foreign policy? Cuban Bay of Pigs operation. Castro had let every nation know how foreign policy concerns about people, bay to say you have taken an attempt to.
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Kennedy and Berlin Nicholas Labinski Marquette University
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Master's Theses (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Evolution of a President: John F. Kennedy and Berlin Nicholas Labinski Marquette University Recommended Citation Labinski, Nicholas, "Evolution of a President: John F. Kennedy and Berlin" (2011). Master's Theses (2009 -). Paper 104. http://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open/104 EVOLUTION OF A PRESIDENT: JOHN F. KENNEDYAND BERLIN by Nicholas Labinski A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Milwaukee, Wisconsin August 2011 ABSTRACT EVOLUTION OF A PRESIDENT: JOHN F. KENNEDYAND BERLIN Nicholas Labinski Marquette University, 2011 This paper examines John F. Kennedy’s rhetoric concerning the Berlin Crisis (1961-1963). Three major speeches are analyzed: Kennedy’s Radio and Television Report to the American People on the Berlin Crisis , the Address at Rudolph Wilde Platz and the Address at the Free University. The study interrogates the rhetorical strategies implemented by Kennedy in confronting Khrushchev over the explosive situation in Berlin. The paper attempts to answer the following research questions: What is the historical context that helped frame the rhetorical situation Kennedy faced? What rhetorical strategies and tactics did Kennedy employ in these speeches? How might Kennedy's speeches extend our understanding of presidential public address? What is the impact of Kennedy's speeches on U.S. German relations and the development of U.S. and German Policy? What implications might these speeches have for the study and execution of presidential power and international diplomacy? Using a historical-rhetorical methodology that incorporates the historical circumstances surrounding the crisis into the analysis, this examination of Kennedy’s rhetoric reveals his evolution concerning Berlin and his Cold War strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Nobel Laureates Say the Bush
    Hundreds of economists across the nation agree. Henry Aaron, The Brookings Institution; Katharine Abraham, University of Maryland; Frank Ackerman, Global Development and Environment Institute; William James Adams, University of Michigan; Earl W. Adams, Allegheny College; Irma Adelman, University of California – Berkeley; Moshe Adler, Fiscal Policy Institute; Behrooz Afraslabi, Allegheny College; Randy Albelda, University of Massachusetts – Boston; Polly R. Allen, University of Connecticut; Gar Alperovitz, University of Maryland; Alice H. Amsden, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Robert M. Anderson, University of California; Ralph Andreano, University of Wisconsin; Laura M. Argys, University of Colorado – Denver; Robert K. Arnold, Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy; David Arsen, Michigan State University; Michael Ash, University of Massachusetts – Amherst; Alice Audie-Figueroa, International Union, UAW; Robert L. Axtell, The Brookings Institution; M.V. Lee Badgett, University of Massachusetts – Amherst; Ron Baiman, University of Illinois – Chicago; Dean Baker, Center for Economic and Policy Research; Drucilla K. Barker, Hollins University; David Barkin, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana – Unidad Xochimilco; William A. Barnett, University of Kansas and Washington University; Timothy J. Bartik, Upjohn Institute; Bradley W. Bateman, Grinnell College; Francis M. Bator, Harvard University Kennedy School of Government; Sandy Baum, Skidmore College; William J. Baumol, New York University; Randolph T. Beard, Auburn University; Michael Behr; Michael H. Belzer, Wayne State University; Arthur Benavie, University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill; Peter Berg, Michigan State University; Alexandra Bernasek, Colorado State University; Michael A. Bernstein, University of California – San Diego; Jared Bernstein, Economic Policy Institute; Rari Bhandari, University of California – Berkeley; Melissa Binder, University of New Mexico; Peter Birckmayer, SUNY – Empire State College; L.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Cold War Policy, the Peace Corps and Its Volunteers in Colombia in the 1960S
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2008 United States Cold War Policy, The Peace Corps And Its Volunteers In Colombia In The 1960s. John James University of Central Florida Part of the History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation James, John, "United States Cold War Policy, The Peace Corps And Its Volunteers In Colombia In The 1960s." (2008). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 3630. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3630 UNITED STATES COLD WAR POLICY, THE PEACE CORPS AND ITS VOLUNTEERS IN COLOMBIA IN THE 1960s by J. BRYAN JAMES B.A. Florida State University, 1994 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2008 ABSTRACT John F. Kennedy initiated the Peace Corps in 1961 at the height of the Cold War to provide needed manpower and promote understanding with the underdeveloped world. This study examines Peace Corps work in Colombia during the 1960s within the framework of U.S. Cold War policy. It explores the experiences of volunteers in Colombia and contrasts their accounts with Peace Corps reports and presentations to Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • H-Diplo Article Review Forum Commissioned for H-Diplo by Thomas Maddux Published on 16 May 2016
    H-Diplo Article Review 20 16 H-Diplo Article Review Editors: Thomas Maddux H-Diplo and Diane Labrosse H-Diplo Article Reviews Web and Production Editor: George Fujii No. 614 An H-Diplo Article Review Forum Commissioned for H-Diplo by Thomas Maddux Published on 16 May 2016 H-Diplo Forum on “Beyond and Between the Cold War Blocs,” Special Issue of The International History Review 37:5 (December 2015): 901-1013. Introduction by Janick Marina Schaufelbuehl, University of Lausanne; Sandra Bott University of Lausanne; Jussi Hanhimäki, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies; and Marco Wyss, University of Chichester Reviewed by: Anne Deighton, The University of Oxford Juergen Dinkel, Justus-Liebig-University Wen-Qing Ngoei, Northwestern University Johanna Rainio-Niemi, University of Helsinki, Finland URL: http://tiny.cc/AR614 Introduction1 by Janick Marina Schaufelbuehl, Sandra Bott, Jussi Hanhimäki, and Marco Wyss2 “Non-Alignment, the Third Force, or Fence-Sitting: Independent Pathways in the Cold War” n his recollection of recent events such as the Bandung Conference, the Soviet proposals for a unified and neutralised Germany, and the signing of the Austrian Treaty, veteran journalist Hanson W. Baldwin Iwrote in the New York Times in May 1955 that these ‘and half a dozen other developments in Europe and 1 H-Diplo would like to thanks Professor Andrew Williams, editor of IHR, and the four authors of this introduction, for granting us permission to publish this review. It original appeared as “Janick Marina Schaufelbuehl, Sandra Bott, Jussi Hanhimäki, and Marco Wyss, “Non-Alignment, the Third Force, or Fence-Sitting: Independent Pathways in the Cold War.” The International History Review 37:5 (December 2015): 901-911.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, July 1975
    FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL JULY 1975 60 CENTS isn I The diplomatic | way to save. ■ All of these outstanding Ford-built cars are available to you at special diplomatic discount savings. ■ Delivery will be arranged for you either stateside or ■ overseas. And you can have the car built to Export* or Domestic specifications. So place your order now for diplomatic savings on the cars for diplomats. For more information, contact a Ford Diplomatic Sales Office. Please send me full information on using my diplomatic discount to purchase a new WRITE TO: DIPLOMATIC SALES: FORD MOTOR COMPANY 815 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006/Tel: (202) 785-6047 NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE/COUNTRY ZIP Cannot be driven in the U.S American Foreign Service Association Officers and Members of the Governing Board THOMAS D. BOY ATT, President F. ALLEN HARRIS, Vice President JOHN PATTERSON, Second Vice President RAYMOND F. SMITH, Secretary JULIET C. ANTUNES, Treasurer CHARLOTTE CROMER & ROY A. HARRELL, JR., AID Representatives FRANCINE BOWMAN, RICHARD B. FINN, CHARLES O. HOFFMAN & FRANCIS J. McNEIL, III State Representatives STANLEY A. ZUCKERMAN, USIA Representative FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL JAMES W. RIDDLEBERGER & WILLIAM 0. BOSWELL, Retired Representatives JULY 1975: Volume 52, No. 7 Journal Editorial Board RALPH STUART SMITH, Chairman G. RICHARD MONSEN, Vice Chairman FREDERICK QUINN JOEL M. WOLDMAN EDWARD M. COHEN .JAMES F. O'CONNOR SANDRA L. VOGELGESANG Staff RICHARD L. WILLIAMSON, Executive Director DONALD L. FIELD, JR.. Counselor HELEN VOGEL, Committee Coordinator CECIL B. SANNER, Membership and Circulation Communication re: Excess Baggage 4 Foreign Service Educational AUDINE STIER and Counseling Center MARY JANE BROWN & Petrolimericks 7 CLARKE SLADE, Counselors BASIL WENTWORTH Foreign Policy Making in a New Era: Journal SHIRLEY R.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Data Center Proposal of 1965 and Its Descendants
    Statistical Déjà Vu: The National Data Center Proposal of 1965 and Its Descendants by Rebecca S. Kraus, Ph.D. History Staff U.S. Census Bureau For presentation at the Joint Statistical Meetings Miami Beach, FL, August 1, 2011 This paper is to inform interested parties of ongoing research and to encourage discussion. Any views expressed on historical issues are those of the author and not necessarily those of the U.S. Census Bureau. Abstract Issues concerning sharing of statistical information, linking data sets, and storing and preserving data collected by the federal statistical agencies have long sparked debate. This paper focuses on the National Data Center proposal of 1965, ensuing public concern over its privacy implications, and the response of the Bureau of the Budget and the U.S. Census Bureau. The purpose of this study is to identify the issues leading to the development of the proposal, as well as the consequences of the proposal, in order to inform current policy decisions, particularly in regard to the U.S. Census Bureau. Examples of subsequent efforts at statistical consolidation and data sharing highlight the persistent theme of statistical déjà vu. The author would like to thank the following staff of the U.S. Census Bureau for their review and comment on the contents of this paper: Francis Grailand Hall, Division Chief, Administrative and Customer Services Division (ACSD); Claudette Bennett, Assistant Division Chief, Product Development and Publications Services, ACSD; Bill Maury, Chief, History Staff, ACSD; Nick Birnbaum, History Staff, ACSD; Nancy Gordon, Associate Director for Strategic Planning and Innovation; Mary Frazier, Privacy Office; and Kathleen Styles, formerly of the Policy Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Images of Male Political Leaders in France and Norway
    Reconsidering Politics as a Man's World: Images of Male Political Leaders in France and Norway Anne Krogstad and Aagoth Storvik Researchers have often pointed to the masculine norms that are integrated into politics. This article explores these norms by studying male images of politics and power in France and Norway from 1945 to 2009. Both dress codes and more general leadership styles are discussed. The article shows changes in political aesthetics in both countries since the Second World War. The most radical break is seen in the way Norwegian male politicians present themselves. The traditional Norwegian leadership ethos of piety, moderation, and inward orientation is still important, but it is not as self- effacing and inelegant as it used to be. However, compared to the leaders in French politics, who still live up to a heroic leadership ideal marked by effortless superiority and seduction, the Norwegian leaders look modest. To explain the differences in political self-presentation and evaluation we argue that cultural repertoires are not only national constructions but also gendered constructions. Keywords: photographs; politics; aesthetics; gender; national cultural repertoires 1 When people think of presidents and prime ministers, they usually think of the incumbents of these offices.1 In both France and Norway, these incumbents have, with the exception of Prime Minister Edith Cresson in France and Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland in Norway, been male (and white). Researchers have often pointed to the masculine norms which are integrated into the expectations of what political officeholders should look like and be. Politics, it is claimed, is still very much a man’s world.2 However, maleness does not express general political leadership in a simple and undifferentiated way.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Presidency of John F. Kennedy in 1963. Christina Paige Jones East Tennessee State University
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2001 The ndE of Camelot: An Examination of the Presidency of John F. Kennedy in 1963. Christina Paige Jones East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Jones, Christina Paige, "The ndE of Camelot: An Examination of the Presidency of John F. Kennedy in 1963." (2001). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 114. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/114 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE END OF CAMELOT: AN EXAMINATION OF THE PRESIDENCY OF JOHN F. KENNEDY IN 1963 _______________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Arts in History _______________ by Christina Paige Jones May 2001 _______________ Dr. Elwood Watson, Chair Dr. Stephen Fritz Dr. Dale Schmitt Keywords: John F. Kennedy, Civil Rights, Vietnam War ABSTRACT THE END OF CAMELOT: AN EXAMINATION OF THE PRESIDENCY OF JOHN F. KENNEDY IN 1963 by Christina Paige Jones This thesis addresses events and issues that occurred in 1963, how President Kennedy responded to them, and what followed after Kennedy’s assassination. This thesis was created by using books published about Kennedy, articles from magazines, documents, telegrams, speeches, and Internet sources.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Tito-Stalin Split to Yugoslavia's Finnish Connection: Neutralism Before Non-Alignment, 1948-1958
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: FROM THE TITO-STALIN SPLIT TO YUGOSLAVIA'S FINNISH CONNECTION: NEUTRALISM BEFORE NON-ALIGNMENT, 1948-1958. Rinna Elina Kullaa, Doctor of Philosophy 2008 Directed By: Professor John R. Lampe Department of History After the Second World War the European continent stood divided between two clearly defined and competing systems of government, economic and social progress. Historians have repeatedly analyzed the formation of the Soviet bloc in the east, the subsequent superpower confrontation, and the resulting rise of Euro-Atlantic interconnection in the west. This dissertation provides a new view of how two borderlands steered clear of absorption into the Soviet bloc. It addresses the foreign relations of Yugoslavia and Finland with the Soviet Union and with each other between 1948 and 1958. Narrated here are their separate yet comparable and, to some extent, coordinated contests with the Soviet Union. Ending the presumed partnership with the Soviet Union, the Tito-Stalin split of 1948 launched Yugoslavia on a search for an alternative foreign policy, one that previously began before the split and helped to provoke it. After the split that search turned to avoiding violent conflict with the Soviet Union while creating alternative international partnerships to help the Communist state to survive in difficult postwar conditions. Finnish-Soviet relations between 1944 and 1948 showed the Yugoslav Foreign Ministry that in order to avoid invasion, it would have to demonstrate a commitment to minimizing security risks to the Soviet Union along its European political border and to not interfering in the Soviet domination of domestic politics elsewhere in Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]