DOCSLIB.ORG

The History of the Mongol Conquests Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The History of the Mongol Conquests Pdf, Epub, Ebook THE HISTORY OF THE MONGOL CONQUESTS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK J. J. Saunders | 296 pages | 22 Feb 2001 | University of Pennsylvania Press | 9780812217667 | English | Pennsylvania, United States The History of the Mongol Conquests PDF Book Read more In doing so, he avoided the mountainous area south of the Caspian Sea. Jalal al-Din, although a great warrior, was more of a freebooter than a king. I definitely thought this book came out in - until I got a copy from work that was published in Next winter, 6 Dec , Kiev fell to the Mongols and was reduced to ashes. Had Shah Muhammad's manners been better, the western world might never have learned to tremble at the name of Genghis Khan. Instead, he occupied Persia and Khurasan, two long-standing bases of Khwarazmian support. Toghta Noyan then reunited with his superior, Chaghatai Noyan. Gaian was a fortress of considerable strength. Other editions. Same Day Delivery. It also ensured that it was easy to create an army in short time and gave the khans access to the daughters of local leaders. An appendix devoted to a study of the history of the feathered headdress confirms that the group originated in the Mesopotamian region. Bodyguards had existed among the nomadic rulers of the nomads before Genghis Khan, but they did not become a permanent and important institution until he established his keshik. Yet, he lived only two years after completing his conquests. The two smaller contingents, led by Jula and Yissaur, rode into regions of Arran and eastern Armenia. Chormaqan ordered the assault to begin. The Mongols had some military geniuses as leaders in the beginning and were known for religious tolerance once things settled down, but for administration, they had to rely on othersChinese, Persians, Turks, and even Europeans. The empire sent invasions in every direction, ultimately connecting the East with the West with the Pax Mongolica , or Mongol Peace, which allowed trade, technologies, commodities, and ideologies to be disseminated and exchanged across Eurasia. The History of the Mongol Conquests J. In the Mongol dominions stretched over the vast regions between the Caspian and China seas, bordering in the north on the sparsely populated forest belt of Siberia and in the south on the Pamirs , Tibet , and the central plains of China. Help us improve this page. They lost the Khwarazmian sultan, but he did not escape unscathed. Their city Bulghar, near modern Kazan was taken and sacked by Subedei. Chapter 4: Chinggis Khan A bried outline of the life and conquests of GK, more or less along mainstream lines, but focuses more on the reasons behind his success. Why did the Mongols begin their conquests? Don't get me wrong, it does give a very good overview of all the Mongol campaigns and goes well beyond the scope I assumed it would, which was a very welcome find. Shamans in ecstatic trances learned the will of the deity. The subjugation of the Bashkirs followed on the slopes of teh Urals. Skip to main content. The History of the Mongol Conquests Writer Bodyguards had existed among the nomadic rulers of the nomads before Genghis Khan, but they did not become a permanent and important institution until he established his keshik. More filters. Such is quite a task to set, but the author has proven to have a broad and reasonably deep understanding of the era already. Genghis Khan considered it briefly and then granted Chormaqan promotion to lead the campaign, while Qongqai and Qongtaqar would remain in the keshik. Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article requires login. The Mongols spread panic ahead of them and induced population displacement on an unprecedented scale. Error rating book. Had Shah Muhammad's manners been better, the western world might never have learned to tremble at the name of Genghis Khan. While he completed his conquest of Georgia, Chormaqan received Prince Avak at his camp by Lake Sevan and accepted his surrender on the condition that he provide tribute and also participate in the campaign against his countrymen. Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide. Bumin was clearly a leader of merit, but his personality is dim, and he lived but a few months to enjoy his triumph. His followers were rewarded for their valor with luxury goods, horses, and enslaved people seized from the cities they conquered. It all collapsed within a century. Other units departed southward towards Mardin, Nusaybin, and Khabur. This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Since the Mongols depended on trade for goods that they desperately needed — such as grain, craft, and manufactured articles — cessation of trade, or at least the diminution of trade, could have been catastrophic for them. Thus he dispersed his primarily mounted army, so that the available pasturage could accommodate its horses. Series of yams along main routes; envoys and emissaries showed pass and were given a meal and allowed rest, and given fresh mounts to continue their journey. Although the city fell to the Mongols and much of its populace was massacred, the citadel continued to hold out. Invention of the stirrup footnote p. Dene October rated it really liked it Apr 04, They built the greatest contiguous empire the world has ever known. It manages to provide vivid historical accounts such as that of the making of Genghis Khan and his upbringing or the Mongol circuit of the Caspian Sea, which are told in a way that provides breathtaking context and even suspense while maintaining academic tone and integrity. Saunders is pretty good. Chormaqan had no intention of laying waste the entire country, however. Advance troops after crossing the Caucasus even penetrated into southern Russia and raided cities in Crimea Crossing the Amu Darya River in and entering Kurasan without encountering any opposition, Chormaqan passed through it quickly. Mongolic : archaic tongue probably rose in the region NE of Lake Baikal, but although the conquests of GK made it known over a wide area, never displaced Turkish D. In the Arabs, with some aid from the Karluks, destroyed the forces of Hsien-chih, and the Chinese relinquished for ever their hold on the land later to be known as Western Turkestan. Only in Russia, where disunity and confusion reigned, did the Mongol rule last years. The Chin emperor committed suicide. When this had exhausted them, they ran again in their former fashion. The subjugation of the Bashkirs followed on the slopes of teh Urals. The History of the Mongol Conquests Reviews In addition to the light cavalry, there was a contingent of heavy cavalrymen who carried lances as well as the composite bow favored by the Mongols. The first mention of Chormaqan was during the Mongol invasion of the Khwarazmian empire in Was known to the arabs by the 13th c. The first issue to be resolved was another war and a recalcitrant vassal. By , Genghis and his Mongol armies had killed Shah Muhammad, chased his son into exile in India , and utterly destroyed the once-mighty Khwarezmid Empire. This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Jalal al-Din had defeated Mongol forces on several occasions during the war of Language may have been similar to Huns. I only saw one line about how it caused chaos for a time. Jeff rated it liked it Jan 18, The Mongol Empire expanded through brutal raids and invasions, but also established routes of trade and technology between East and West. They connected ideas, materials, and people in new and exciting ways that allowed for innovations. It was not until , when Sultan Jalal al-Din, an old nemesis of the Mongols, returned to revive Khwarazmian power in Persia, that Chormaqan finally got his marching orders. Starting with the mission of Bumin was clearly a leader of merit, but his personality is dim, and he lived but a few months to enjoy his triumph. Thus he dispersed his primarily mounted army, so that the available pasturage could accommodate its horses. The constant presence of troops across the empire also ensured that people followed Yassa edicts and maintained enough stability for goods and for people to travel long distances along these routes. Additional Information. Several limitations appear at this point, however. Haynes rated it really liked it May 03, The History of the Mongol Conquests Read Online There were even rumors that the caliph himself had written to Genghis Khan, asking for assistance against the Khwarazmian Empire. Shah Muhammad responded by cutting off the Mongol diplomats' heads—a grave breach of Mongol law—and sending them back to the Great Khan. He did not expect the Mongols, who wintered at Rai, to advance against him. Finally the commanders of 10 sent their eldest son, three companions, and a younger brother. One element that makes The History of the Mongol Conquests such a useful introduction is its lengthy historiography of western scholarship concerning the Mongols. The History of the Mongol Conquests by J. Alarmed and angry, Genghis Khan sent three diplomats to Shah Muhammad to demand restitution for the caravan and its drivers. Same Day Delivery. Next winter, 6 Dec , Kiev fell to the Mongols and was reduced to ashes. Ebi Piltan rated it liked it Nov 25, Three main factors drove the creation of the Mongol Empire. Pax Mongolica : Also known as the Mongol Peace, this agreement allowed trade, technologies, commodities, and ideologies to be disseminated and exchanged across Eurasia. Although the city fell to the Mongols and much of its populace was massacred, the citadel continued to hold out.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Timothy May on Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World
    Jack Weatherford. Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World. New York: Crown Publishers, 2004. xxxv + 312 pp. $25.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-609-61062-6. Reviewed by Timothy May Published on H-World (March, 2005) The name of Genghis Khan is often associated cluding with an epilogue, notes, glossary, and bib‐ with destruction, although the image of Genghis liography. Preceding all of these is a genealogical Khan has been rehabilitated somewhat in the table showing Genghis Khan, his sons, and the west. The western world, saturated in media dis‐ successor khanates. In addition to showing the tortion and a reluctance to accept changes in per‐ rulers of the empire, the terms of the regents are ceptions of history, has been rather averse in ac‐ designated. The latter is something that is often cepting Genghis Khan's activities as pivotal in remiss in these sorts of tables, but a welcome ad‐ world history and the shaping of the modern dition here. There is an odd segment of the table world. Thus, the publication of Jack Weatherford's though. All of the Khanates or states resulting book, Genghis Khan and the Making of the Mod‐ from the split of the Mongol Empire are shown ern World, is a welcome addition to the literature except the Chaghatayid Khanate of Central Asia. on the Mongols. In its place is the Moghul Empire of India. Indeed, The author, Jack Weatherford, the Dewitt the Moghul Empire has connections back to the Wallace Professor of Anthropology at Macalester Mongols (Moghul is Persian for Mongol), but the College, has written several books targeted for the founder of the Moghul Empire, Babur, was him‐ non-academic world and writes in a very engag‐ self a Timurid, the dynasty of the Emir Timur, ing style.
    [Show full text]
  • Theocracy Metin M. Coşgel Thomas J. Miceli
    Theocracy Metin M. Coşgel University of Connecticut Thomas J. Miceli University of Connecticut Working Paper 2013-29 November 2013 365 Fairfield Way, Unit 1063 Storrs, CT 06269-1063 Phone: (860) 486-3022 Fax: (860) 486-4463 http://www.econ.uconn.edu/ This working paper is indexed on RePEc, http://repec.org THEOCRACY by Metin Coşgel* and Thomas J. Miceli** Abstract: Throughout history, religious and political authorities have had a mysterious attraction to each other. Rulers have established state religions and adopted laws with religious origins, sometimes even claiming to have divine powers. We propose a political economy approach to theocracy, centered on the legitimizing relationship between religious and political authorities. Making standard assumptions about the motivations of these authorities, we identify the factors favoring the emergence of theocracy, such as the organization of the religion market, monotheism vs. polytheism, and strength of the ruler. We use two sets of data to test the implications of the model. We first use a unique data set that includes information on over three hundred polities that have been observed throughout history. We also use recently available cross-country data on the relationship between religious and political authorities to examine these issues in current societies. The results provide strong empirical support for our arguments about why in some states religious and political authorities have maintained independence, while in others they have integrated into a single entity. JEL codes: H10,
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Empires of Asia the Great Empires of Asia
    The Great Empires of Asia The Great Empires of Asia EDITED BY JIM MASSELOS FOREWORD BY JONATHAN FENBY WITH 27 ILLUSTRATIONS Note on spellings and transliterations There is no single agreed system for transliterating into the Western CONTENTS alphabet names, titles and terms from the different cultures and languages represented in this book. Each culture has separate traditions FOREWORD 8 for the most ‘correct’ way in which words should be transliterated from The Legacy of Empire Arabic and other scripts. However, to avoid any potential confusion JONATHAN FENBY to the non-specialist reader, in this volume we have adopted a single system of spellings and have generally used the versions of names and titles that will be most familiar to Western readers. INTRODUCTION 14 The Distinctiveness of Asian Empires JIM MASSELOS Elements of Empire Emperors and Empires Maintaining Empire Advancing Empire CHAPTER ONE 27 Central Asia: The Mongols 1206–1405 On the cover: Map of Unidentified Islands off the Southern Anatolian Coast, by Ottoman admiral and geographer Piri Reis (1465–1555). TIMOTHY MAY Photo: The Walters Art Museum, Baltimore. The Rise of Chinggis Khan The Empire after Chinggis Khan First published in the United Kingdom in 2010 by Thames & Hudson Ltd, 181A High Holborn, London WC1V 7QX The Army of the Empire Civil Government This compact paperback edition first published in 2018 The Rule of Law The Great Empires of Asia © 2010 and 2018 Decline and Dissolution Thames & Hudson Ltd, London The Greatness of the Mongol Empire Foreword © 2018 Jonathan Fenby All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced CHAPTER TWO 53 or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, China: The Ming 1368–1644 including photocopy, recording or any other information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Zhanat Kundakbayeva the HISTORY of KAZAKHSTAN FROM
    MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN THE AL-FARABI KAZAKH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Zhanat Kundakbayeva THE HISTORY OF KAZAKHSTAN FROM EARLIEST PERIOD TO PRESENT TIME VOLUME I FROM EARLIEST PERIOD TO 1991 Almaty "Кazakh University" 2016 ББК 63.2 (3) К 88 Recommended for publication by Academic Council of the al-Faraby Kazakh National University’s History, Ethnology and Archeology Faculty and the decision of the Editorial-Publishing Council R e v i e w e r s: doctor of historical sciences, professor G.Habizhanova, doctor of historical sciences, B. Zhanguttin, doctor of historical sciences, professor K. Alimgazinov Kundakbayeva Zh. K 88 The History of Kazakhstan from the Earliest Period to Present time. Volume I: from Earliest period to 1991. Textbook. – Almaty: "Кazakh University", 2016. - &&&& p. ISBN 978-601-247-347-6 In first volume of the History of Kazakhstan for the students of non-historical specialties has been provided extensive materials on the history of present-day territory of Kazakhstan from the earliest period to 1991. Here found their reflection both recent developments on Kazakhstan history studies, primary sources evidences, teaching materials, control questions that help students understand better the course. Many of the disputable issues of the times are given in the historiographical view. The textbook is designed for students, teachers, undergraduates, and all, who are interested in the history of the Kazakhstan. ББК 63.3(5Каз)я72 ISBN 978-601-247-347-6 © Kundakbayeva Zhanat, 2016 © al-Faraby KazNU, 2016 INTRODUCTION Данное учебное пособие is intended to be a generally understandable and clearly organized outline of historical processes taken place on the present day territory of Kazakhstan since pre-historic time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Khitans: Corner Stone of the Mongol Empire
    ACTA VIA SERICA Vol. 6, No. 1, June 2021: 141–164 doi: 10.22679/avs.2021.6.1.006 The Khitans: Corner Stone of the Mongol Empire GEORGE LANE* The Khitans were a Turco-Mongol clan who dominated China north of the Yangtze River during the early mediaeval period. They adopted and then adapted many of the cultural traditions of their powerful neighbours to the south, the Song Chinese. However, before their absorption into the Mongol Empire in the late 13th century they proved pivotal, firstly in the eastward expansion of the armies of Chinggis Khan, secondly, in the survival of the Persian heartlands after the Mongol invasions of the 1220s and thirdly, in the revival and integration of the polity of Iran into the Chinggisid Empire. Da Liao, the Khitans, the Qara Khitai, names which have served this clan well, strengthened and invigorated the hosts which harboured them. The Liao willingly assimilated into the Chinggisid Empire of whose formation they had been an integral agent and in doing so they also surrendered their identity but not their history. Recent scholarship is now unearthing and recognising their proud legacy and distinct identity. Michal Biran placed the Khitans irrevocably and centrally in mediaeval Asian history and this study emphasises their role in the establishment of the Mongol Empire. Keywords: Khitans, Liao, Chinggids, Mongols, Ilkhanate * Dr. GEORGE LANE is a Research Associate at the School of History, Religion & Philosophy, SOAS University of London. 142 Acta Via Serica, Vol. 6, No. 1, June 2021 The Khitans: Corner Stone of the Mongol Empire The Turco-Mongol tribe that first settled the lands of northern China, north of the Huai River and adopted and adapted the cultural traditions of their domineering neighbour to the south, has only recently been acknowledged for their importance to the evolution of mediaeval Asian history, due in large part to the work of Michal Biran of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    [Show full text]
  • Karakhanid Khanate Karakhanids Took Over Transoxania in 999 and Completed Their Conquest of Khotan MICHAL BIRAN Seven Years Later
    1 Karakhanid Khanate Karakhanids took over Transoxania in 999 and completed their conquest of Khotan MICHAL BIRAN seven years later. Being orthodox Sunni The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel Hanafi Muslims, the Karakhanids met with little opposition in Transoxania, and they The Karakhanid Khanate was the first Muslim stressed their loyalty to the Abbasid caliph Turkic dynasty that ruled in Central Asia, in Baghdad as a major component in their c.955–1213. The designations Karakhanids legitimacy. From the outset, however, the (Qarakhanids; Chinese: Halahan, the black empire was bifurcated, and the western khan, or prestigious khans) or Ilak-khanid (prince- entitled Boghra (camel) Kara Khaqan and khans) are modern constructions derived ruling from Samarqand, was answerable to from the titulature on the dynasty’s coins. his eastern counterpart, who bore the title Contemporaneous literary sources usually Arslan (lion) Kara Khaqan, and ruled from refer to the Karakhanids as al-Khaqaniya Balasaghun (in Kirgizstan) and Kashgar. Var- (the Khaqan, or supreme ruler, house), al- ious other members of the ruling clan held muluk al-khaniyya al-atrak (the khanal kings lesser titles and appanages. The Karakhanid of the Turks) or Al-i Afrasiyab (the house of hierarchy was akin to a game of “musical Afrāsiyāb, the king of Turan in the Persian chairs,” as aspirants moved up the ranks while epos, the Shahnama), and as Heihan or Dashi changing their honorifics and sometimes in Chinese. even their fiefs. In consequence, tracking Historical information on the Karakhanids the careers of the dynasty’s rulers is a rather is extremely sketchy due to the lack or non- daunting task.
    [Show full text]
  • American Oriental Society
    American Oriental Society FOUNDED 1842 Constituent of the American Council of Learned Societies And the International Union of Orientalists ABSTRACTS OF COMMUNICATIONS PRESENTED AT THE TWO HUNDRED AND TWENTY-SIXTH MEETING Boston, Massachusetts March 18–21, 2016 c American Oriental Society 2016 New Haven CT and Ann Arbor MI A. Ancient Near East I: Special Joint Session: Ancient Near East/South & Southeast Asia. (Organized by Craig Melchert and Anthony Yates, University of California, Los Angeles) Craig Melchert and Anthony Yates, University of California, Los Angeles, Chairs (1:00 p.m.–5:00 p.m.) Alcott Room ∗ 1. Gaˇsper Beguˇs, Harvard University Caland System in Tocharian The Proto-Indo-European derivational paradigm or “Caland System” has been thoroughly studied in Greek, Latin, and Indo-Iranian, but has received little atten- tion in other branches of the family. The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap: building on previous work by Nussbaum (1976) and Fellner (ms.), I investigate the Caland System in Tocharian and put forth an analysis of nine lexical items that I argue belonged to the Caland paradigm. I show that interpreting these Tocharian lexical items in this way offer new insight into the system on both a morphological and semantic level. The newly identified Tocharian Caland vocabulary includes six adjectives and three nouns: (i) TB l¯are ‘dear’; (ii) TB pr¯ake ‘firm, hard’; (iii) TB aikare, ‘empty’, TA ekro ‘poor’; (iv) TB ´sr¯ay (pl.) ‘old’; (v) TB m¯aka, TA m¯ak ‘many, much’; (vi) TB moko, TA mok ‘old, elder’; (vii) TB taupe ‘mine’; (viii) kare ‘worth, rank, dignity’; (ix) TB kr¯am¨ar ‘weight, heaviness’.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Genghis Khan: History's Greatest Empire Builder'
    H-War May on Lococo, 'Genghis Khan: History's Greatest Empire Builder' Review published on Saturday, November 22, 2008 Paul Lococo. Genghis Khan: History's Greatest Empire Builder. Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books, 2008. ix + 91 pp. + 4 pp. of plates. $21.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-57488-571-2; $13.95 (paper), ISBN 978-1-57488-746-4. Reviewed by Timothy May Published on H-War (November, 2008) Commissioned by Brian G.H. Ditcham Ghengis Khan, History's Greatest Empire builder Genghis Khan, or more accurately Chinggis Khan, is undoubtedly one of the most fascinating people in military history. Thus it is not surprising that Potomac Books has included him in their Military Profile series along with General Patton and Alexander the Great. As with all of the books in the series, the volume is not an in-depth study presenting new revelations, but rather a concise introduction to a key figure in military history accompanied by some analysis of the topic's activities. Paul Lococo Jr. adeptly summarizes the life and career of Chinggis Khan, an impressive feat for the brevity of the book. The book is divided in to seven chapters. The first is a standard chapter on the geographical, political, and social state of Mongolia in the medieval period. This is followed by a chapter on the early years of Chinggis Khan and a chapter on the wars that unified Mongolia under Chinggis Khan. Chapter 4 provides a lucid discussion of the military revolution of Chinggis Khan. Chapters 5 through 7 focus on Chinggis Khan's military conquests outside of Mongolia.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Science Journal 2014;11(4S) Http
    Life Science Journal 2014;11(4s) http://www.lifesciencesite.com The role of historic-linguistic factor in development of Turkic civilization in meddle ages Yermekova Tynyshtyk Nurdauletovna1, Odanova Sagira Amangeldiyevna1, Issabekova Uldar Keldibekovna2, Abdirassilova Gulmira Kalybaevna1,3 1Kazakh State Women’s Teacher Training University, 050000, 99, str. Aiteke Bi, Almaty, Kazakhstan 2Turkic academy, 010000 Kazakhstan, Astana str. Tauelsizdik ,57 3The Republic of Turkey University Niyde, 050000 99, str. Aiteke Bi, Almaty, 050000, Kazakhstan Abstract. The process of world globalization requires Turkic-speaking nations of common root to unite in social- economy, cultural-spiritual points. Unification of intellectual values of the Turkic world will roll general Turkic mind and being, consolidate spiritual balance and historical integrity between Turkic nations, raise social-cultural potential of modern Turkic nations, strengthen historical roots, and justify special place of the Turkic civilization among human civilization. Additionally, if we don’t hold historical root of Kazakh nationin the situation of encountering of international civilizations there is a risk of spiritual-cultural development’s going wrong way. There are nations who couldn’t follow caravan of time and step into new era with the rest of the world. This worldwide process which can have good or bad influence on the future of our independent country requires us to be exceptionally responsible for every action related to our nation. The independence of our country gives us opportunity to restudy common cultural heritage of Turkic nations, as well as to know its true nature, use them for the benefit of nation, reconsider and analyzespiritual values based on those relics.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinship and Religious Identities in Medieval Central Asia (8Th-13Th C
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations Arts & Sciences Spring 5-15-2018 Kinship and Religious Identities in Medieval Central Asia (8th-13th c. CE): Tracing Communities of Mortuary Practice and Biological Affinity Elissa Anne Bullion Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Bullion, Elissa Anne, "Kinship and Religious Identities in Medieval Central Asia (8th-13th c. CE): Tracing Communities of Mortuary Practice and Biological Affinity" (2018). Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1516. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/1516 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Arts & Sciences at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Department of Anthropology Dissertation Examination Committee: Michael D. Frachetti, Chair Kari Allen Sarah Baitzel Tristram R. Kidder Erik Trinkaus Hayrettin Yucesoy Kinship and Religious Identities in Medieval Central Asia (8th-13th c. CE): Tracing Communities of Mortuary Practice and Biological Affinity
    [Show full text]
  • 8 the Ghurids
    ISBN 978-92-3-103467-1 The region of Ghur and Islamization . 8 THE GHURIDS* K. A. Nizami Contents The region of Ghur and the beginnings of Islamization ................ 182 The rise of the Ghurids as an independent power .................... 185 The apogee of the Ghurid sultanate ........................... 186 The Bamiyan amirate .................................. 189 The Ghurid sultanate as a world power ......................... 190 The political and social organization of the Ghurid state ................ 191 Cultural developments ................................. 194 The region of Ghur and the beginnings of Islamization The mountainous region situated to the east and south-east of Herat and the south of Gharchistan and Guzgan was known as Ghur. It comprised the basins of the upper Hari Rud, the Farah Rud, the Rud-i Ghur and the Khash Rud together with the intervening mountain chains.1 Geographic configurations had a profound influence on historical and cultural developments in Ghur. Geography led to the fragmentation of political power as the entire region could not be controlled from one centre. Each fortress exercised inde- pendent sway over the area immediately under its control and patriarchal traditions struck deep roots. It was as late as the time of Qutb al-D¯ın Muhammad (d. 1146–7) that a por- tion of Ghur – the petty principality of Warshada on the Hari Rud – developed a capital at Firuzkuh.2 Ghur had no compact or continuous areas of habitation, but only scattered * See Map 5. 1 Kohzad,¯ 1951–4. 2 Vercellin, 1976, pp. 337–40. 182 ISBN 978-92-3-103467-1 The region of Ghur and Islamization . population pockets. The landscape was studded with fortified places and towers where people could defend themselves.3 Cultural movements in the neighbouring areas had only a peripheral impact on the region.
    [Show full text]
  • 89 930.23 the Islamization of the Golden Horde: New
    GOLDEN HORDE REVIEW. 1. 2016 89 + 930.23 THE ISLAMIZATION OF THE GOLDEN HORDE: NEW DATA 1 Il’nur Mirgaleev Sh.Marjani Institute of History, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan, 5 entrance Kremlin, Kazan 420014, Russian Federation E-mail: [email protected] The author of this article points out that although the Golden Horde was cre- ated as the result of conquests that terminated the existence of such Muslim states as the Khwarazmian Empire and Volga Bulgaria, nevertheless Muslims perceived the territory of the Golden Horde as “Dar al-Islam”, that is the “territory of Mus- lims”. In the author’s view, the reasons for this lie in the fact that Jochi himself and Batu were in close contact with the Baghdad Caliphate, whence the first Sufi missionaries came, who together with the Central Asian missionaries engaged in spreading Islam among the population of the Golden Horde, and especially among the Tatar elite. Particularly successful in this were Qalandars, Sufis from Anatolia. Islamization took place not only among the sedentary and, first of all, urban population, but the similar transformations happened also among nomadic population of the Golden Horde. Even during the reign of non-Muslim rulers in the Golden Horde, who came to power after khan Berke, the process of Islamization was not interrupted. The author believes that Sufis had been active from the first days of the Golden Horde, and they documented their vision of the Golden Horde history. In the author’s opinion, the history outlined in original Turkic-Tatar sources, for example written by Ötemish Hajji and Abdulgaffar Kyrymi, transmit exactly this “Islamized” history of the Jochids.
    [Show full text]