Proceedings of the International Workshop Monitoring Tailor-Made

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proceedings of the International Workshop Monitoring Tailor-Made PROCEEDINGS MTM-III - OPENING AND INTRODUCTION OPENING AND INTRODUCTION A.R. van Bennekom Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment RIZA, P.O. Box 17, 8200 AA Lelystad, The Netherlands Mr Chairman, ladies and gentlemen, Welcome to the third international workshop Monitoring Tailor-Made. The subject of our workshop is information for sustainable water management. Sustainable water management is a matter of balancing. There are many stakeholders that share the same water resources and decision makers have to find a balance between all these interests. To support good decisions, that integrate between all interests, water management policy needs good, integrated information. Decisions have to balance ecological, economic and sociological factors that influence the quality and quantity of the water, and consequently the required information should integrate these disciplines. In this workshop we will be discussing what kind of information water management policy needs to be able to make decisions, and how such information can be obtained. WATER CRISIS Good information is becoming ever more important. There is a water crisis today. But the crisis is not about having too little water to satisfy our needs. It is a crisis of managing water so badly that billions of people, and the environment, suffer badly (Cosgrove and Rijsberman 2000). Managing water in a sustainable way requires good information. The problem as described by the Prince of Orange is that we have too little, too much or too polluted water. At the second World Water Forum, this is extensively discussed, and it was concluded in the Ministerial Declaration of The Hague on Water Security in the 21st Century that an integrated water resources management is needed, accounting for social, economic and environmental factors and integrating surface water, groundwater and the ecosystems through which they flow. We will not discuss the water crisis here, but it underlines the importance of our work; without suitable and solid information about these social, economic and environmental factors and without knowledge of the status of surface waters, their linking to groundwaters and their relation to the surrounding ecosystems, sustainable water management is not possible. In this workshop we will discuss how we can come to integrated information, how we should deal with transboundary issues, how we can make policy makers and scientists communicate and how we can make scientists from different disciplines communicate and come to an integration of techniques. I will discuss these items one by one and to the end, I will come to covering idea of this all: Tailor-Made Monitoring. INTEGRATED WATER ASSESSMENT There is not really a shortage of data. Of course there are regions in the world that can be described as data-poor. But it is not a matter of having too little data. Usually there is data on water quality and quantity, there is data on ecology, economics and sociology, but the issue is that we can not combine these data into useful information. Data are collected for a specific reason and are less suitable for use in an other context. Therefore, we must find an approach to collect data that can be integrated into suitable information for water management. This implies integration of different scientific disciplines in the domains of the natural sciences and socio- economic sciences. Can we link biological data to industrial production data and is it possible to combine data about recreation with chemical data? Such are the questions we are facing. Integrated water assessment is also concerned with integrating information on groundwater and surface water systems. Both systems have different properties, but they are both part of the same hydrological cycle and influence each other. It was concluded from the workshop Monitoring Tailor-Made II that the same concepts in monitoring strategies are applicable for groundwater and surface water. The differences are mostly related to differences in physical characteristics (Van Luin and Ottens 1997). The same goes for the ecosystems surrounding water bodies. Water management cannot deal with these systems separately. This also requires an integrated approach; on a spatial scale. 10 PROCEEDINGS MTM-III - OPENING AND INTRODUCTION TRANSBOUNDARY ISSUES Then there is the matter that water bodies require an integrated approach crossing borders. Water bodies, being groundwaters or surface waters, do not stop at administrative borders. Management of a water body therefore requires a transboundary approach. Countries sharing a water body must tune their water management. This necessitates co-operation between different countries and harmonisation of different approaches towards the balancing of socio-economic and ecological values, as I discussed earlier. Such a process is full of pitfalls. It requires mutual trust, much communication and, not in the least, patience. Water management is largely regulated through legal systems. These legal systems put obligations on the collection of information. But such obligations tend to be inflexible and do not account for specific local situations. And across the border, there is another legal system, having other requirements. We should ask ourselves if we can use information to influence developments in policy and legislation, and maybe use it to come to a harmonised system between countries. POLICY MAKERS AND SCIENTISTS One of the big problems we are facing in producing information is that information producers, like scientists, often do not speak the same ‘language’ as information users, like policy makers and the public (Helsel 1997). Information users tend to oversimplify and have unrealistic expectations, whereas information producers fail to address the management needs (MacDonald 1994). So one of the issues is to bring these professional groups together and have them approaching water management in an integrated way. The step of specification of information needs is a crucial one in this respect. And at the other end of the information cycle the step of information utilisation is just as essential. These are issues that need more and more fundamental discussion. TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS This is the age of information. Technology provides us with numerous possibilities to unlock information in a way that was never though possible before. But are we using these possibilities, and can we use technology to support water management? We use databases to store the data, we use sophisticated software to analyse data, we use models to make prediction and analyse water management, and we use GIS to make surveyable maps. But integration of all these techniques is seldom done. How can we integrate such techniques. And can we find examples of integration of techniques that really worked? MONITORING TAILOR-MADE This brings us to the workshops Monitoring Tailor-Made. The previous, succesfull, workshops were in 1994 and 1996. In these workshops we discussed tailor-made monitoring. But after these two workshops do we know what tailor-made monitoring is? The theory says that tailor- made monitoring is providing the right information to support management decisions. Tailor- made information is effective: the information product is tailored to the questions, and efficient: the information is provided at a reasonable and affordable price (Adriaanse 1997). But that is theory. In practice, tailor-made monitoring is not fully developed. The 1994 workshop Monitoring Tailor-Made I concluded that a better fit should be found between the information produced and the water management needs (Adriaanse et al. 1995). A better fit yes, but how? In the 1996 workshop Monitoring Tailor-Made II this notion was developed into the conclusion that a lack of methodologies to deal with the upper ‘information’ parts of the monitoring cycle is hindering the linking of information to policy. A stronger participation of policy makers and public, and involvement of other than the traditional disciplines were recommended to improve monitoring information (Van Luin and Ottens 1997). This is where we left four years ago. And now many of you are here again to discuss the progress we made since 1996. And many new people are here, also from disciplines that are new to this workshop, to add your experience. Monitoring Tailor-Made II made special effort to involve groundwater professionals. You seem to have settled, as you are well represented again. 11 PROCEEDINGS MTM-III - OPENING AND INTRODUCTION Now Monitoring Tailor-Made III made an effort to involve professionals from the socio- economic sciences I hope this will prove to be lasting as well. The workshop Monitoring Tailor-Made is intended to provide a stage for the exchange of knowledge and experiences in integrating across scientific disciplines, professional groups, and administrative borders. I hope you all will use this opportunity to discuss and learn. I wish you interesting, fruitful and, not in the least, very enjoyable days here in Nunspeet. REFERENCES Adriaanse, M., J. Van de Kraats, P.G. Stoks, and R.C. Ward (eds.) (1995) Conclusions Pages 345 - 346 in Proceedings of the international workshop Monitoring Tailor-made. Beekbergen, The Netherlands. Adriaanse, M. (1997) Tailor-made guidelines: a contradiction in terms? Pages 391 - 399 in: J.J. Ottens, F.A.M. Claessen, P.G. Stoks, J.G. Timmerman and R.C. Ward (eds.) Proceedings of the international workshop Monitoring Tailor-Made II. Nunspeet, The Netherlands. Cosgrove, W.J. and F.R. Rijsberman (2000) World water vision; making water everybody’s business. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, UK. Helsel, D.R. (1997) The value of water quality information for national environmental policy. Pages 47 - 52 in: J.J. Ottens, F.A.M. Claessen, P.G. Stoks, J.G. Timmerman, and R.C. Ward (eds.) Proceedings of the international workshop Monitoring Tailor-made - II. Nunspeet, The Netherlands. MacDonald, L.H. (1994) Developing a monitoring project. Journal of soil and water conservation, May - June 1994, p. 221 - 227. Van Luin, A.B. and J.J. Ottens. (1997) Conclusions and recommendations. Pages 401 - 403 in: J.J. Ottens, F.A.M.
Recommended publications
  • Nederlands-Duitse Grenswateren Deutsch-Niederlândische Grenzgewâsser
    Nederlands-Duitse Grenswateren Deutsch-Niederlândische Grenzgewâsser ATLAS 4 - • :y :...., Uh • Permanente Nederlands-Duitse Grenswa terenco in in issie Stiîndige Deutsch-Niederlündische Grenzgewisserko in in i ssio ii ATLAS Uitgave: Ausgabe: Permanente Nederlands-Duitse Stândige Deutsch-Niederindische Grenswaterencommissie G renzgewasserkommission Redactie: Redaktion: Rijkwaterstaat, Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat Rijkwaterstaat, Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat & Ministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und & Ministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit Reaktorsicherheit Vormgeving van de kaarten: Gestaltung der Karten: Meetkundige Dienst, Meetkundige Dienst, Thematische Geo-Informatie, Delft Thematische Geo-Informatie, Delft Vormgeving van de omslag en de binnenkant Gestaltung des Umschlags und der Innenseite en productie: und produktion: Meetkundige Dienst, Grafische Technieken, Delft Meetkundige Dienst, Grafische Technieken, Delft Oplage: 900 Auflage: 900 Copyright: Copyright: © Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, 1998. © Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, 1998, Meer Informatie: Weitere Informationen: Permanente Nederlands-Duitse Standige Deutsch-Niederlândische Grenswaterencommissie Grenzgewâsserkommission Secretariaat: Sekretariat: Ministerie voor Verkeer en Waterstaat Ministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Rijkswaterstaat, HKW-AI Reaktorsicherheit Postbus 20906 Postfach 12 06 29 NL-2500 EX Den Haag D-53048 Bonn Nederland Deutschland viii \'vrk,t'r in Directoraat-Generaal Rijkswaterstaa kv) 4~ Bundesumweitministerium ATLAS INHOUD IN HALT pagina/seite Inhoud Inhalt 3 1. Voorwoord 1. Vorwort 5 2. Inleiding Einleitung 7 Kaarten van de subcommissies 3. Karten der Unterausschüsse 9 A Maas - Roer A Maas-Rur 10 B Maas - Niers 8 Maas-Niers 12 C Duffel - Oude Rijn C Düffelt - Oude Rijn 14 D Berkel D Berkel 16 E Vecht - Dinkel E Vechte - Dinkel 18 F Bourtanger Veen F Bourtanger Moor 20 G Eems-Dollard G Ems-Dollart 22 3 ATLAS VOORWOORD VORWORT Water houdt zich niet aan grenzen.
    [Show full text]
  • Grenzüberschreitende Studie Und Wissenstransfer Living Vecht-Dinkel MR03 Von Der Planung Bis Zur Umsetzung Grenzüberschreitender Wasserprojekte
    Faculteit der Managementwetenschappen Centre for Urban Research (CentUR) Geografie, Planologie en Milieu 1 Dezember 2020 Grenzüberschreitende Studie und Wissenstransfer Living Vecht-Dinkel MR03 Von der Planung bis zur Umsetzung grenzüberschreitender Wasserprojekte Henk-Jan Kooij Huub Ploegmakers Sander Meijerink Dieses Projekt wird mit Mitteln aus dem INTERREG V A-Programm Deutschland-Nederland gefördert 1 Vorwort von Breun Breunissen Die Partner im Vechte-Dinkel-System stehen in den kommenden Jahren vor großen Aufgaben in Bezug auf Hochwasserschutz, Überflutungen und Wasserknappheit. Schließlich profitieren Landschaft, Landwirtschaft und Bewohner von günstigen Bedingungen. Allerdings können Interessen widersprüchlich sein, weshalb es nicht immer einfach ist, Lösungen zu finden. In den letzten Jahren wurden in den Grenzregionen verschiedene Projekte im Bereich Wasser und Natur gemeinsam durchgeführt. Aufgrund der Lage des Einzugsgebiets von Vechte und Dinkel gibt es keine feste Struktur für die Zusammenarbeit innerhalb solcher Projekte, sondern eine Vielzahl von Behörden und Partnern, die über die Grenzen hinweg kooperieren, um ein natürlicheres, widerstandsfähigeres Flusssystem zu schaffen. Aus Erfahrung wissen wir inzwischen, dass der Ansatz nicht immer derselbe ist. Wie verliefen diese Kooperationen, wer war beteiligt, welche materiellen und finanziellen Ressourcen standen zur Verfügung? Eine noch wichtigere Frage lautet: Was können wir von diesen bereits realisierten Projekten im Vechte-Dinkel-System, der Verbindungsachse zwischen
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Resource Analysis of Shale Gas and Shale Oil in Europe
    Draft Report for DG JRC in the Context of Contract JRC/PTT/2015/F.3/0027/NC "Development of shale gas and shale oil in Europe" European Unconventional Oil and Gas Assessment (EUOGA) Geological resource analysis of shale gas and shale oil in Europe Deliverable T4b mmmll Geological resource analysis of shale gas/oil in Europe June 2016 I 2 Geological resource analysis of shale gas/oil in Europe Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................. 3 Abstract ........................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 7 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 8 Item 4.1 Setup and distribute a template for uniformly describing EU shale plays to the National Geological Surveys .........................................................................12 Item 4.2 Elaborate and compile general and systematic descriptions of the shale plays from the NGS responses ....................................................................................15 T01, B02 - Norwegian-Danish-S. Sweden – Alum Shale .........................................16 T02 - Baltic Basin – Cambrian-Silurian Shales ......................................................22 T03 - South Lublin Basin, Narol Basin and Lviv-Volyn Basin – Lower Paleozoic Shales ......................................................................................................................37
    [Show full text]
  • De Dinkel:Krom of Recht?
    DE DINKEL:KROMO F RECHT? Door:JaapJell e Feenstra Se Paul Vertegaal UitgaverNederlandseJeugdbon d voorNatuurstudie , Natuurbeschermingskommissie Jeugdbonden voorNatuurstudie . Utrecht,november1976 . (E)Vanweg e veolvoorkomendmLsbrui k van natuurwetenschappelijke inventarisatiegegevens vannatuuramateur s door beleidsinstan- ties en commerciële planbureaus,is gehele en/of gedeeltelijke overname van natuurwetenschappelijke gegevens en/of figuren uit dit rapport pas mogelijkn a verkregen toestemming van de uitgevers en deauteurs . INHOUD Voorplaat Titelblad Inhoud bJ.z. I Deel l:Hetwer k enhe t gehied . 1 Hoofdstuk 1.Voorwoord 1 Hoofdstuk 2.Verantwoordinge nDankzeggin g 2 Hoofdstuk 3.Topografiee n limant 3 1.Ligginge ngroott e 3 -2.Klimr.pt 3 De.slI I - 5 Hoofdstuk l.Dewordingsgeschiedeni svn nhet landscha p 5 1.Inleiding 5 2.Degeologisch e geschiedenis 5 3.De eerytemense n 7 4-.Deagrarisch e révoluti 3 8 5.Vanverrijkin gto tver 'rrain g 11 Deal III:beschrijvingva nd ehuidig e landschapsekologischetoestan d 14 Hoofdstuk l.IIethuidig e Twentse landschap 14 1.Inleidin g 14 2.Beschrijvingde rlandvschapstype s 14 3.Hetlandscha p vanhs_ -Boven-Dinkelda li nhet byzonde r 16 Hoofdstuk 2.Geomorfologiei nhe tDinkelda l 17 Hoofdstuk 3.Devegetati e 20 l.De vegetatiesi ne no she tDinkelda l 20 2.Devegetati eaa nd eRüenbergerbee k 22 Hoofdstuk 4.hoopkeverse nKortschildkever s aand eDinkelstrandje s2 3 Hoofdstuk 5.Debetekeni sva nee nlaag!andbee k 24 1.Inleiding 24 2.La?glnndbeek envariati e 24 3.Verstoringi nd eDinke l 25 /.Kanalisatie-gevolgen. 26 Hoofdstul-:6.He
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for a Stratigraphic Basis for the Anthropocene
    Evidence for a Stratigraphic Basis for the Anthropocene Colin N. Waters, Jan Zalasiewicz, Mark Williams, Simon J. Price, Jon R. Ford and Anthony H. Cooper Abstract The Anthropocene was proposed as a term (Crutzen and Stoermer 2000) before consideration was given to the nature of the key signatures, contrasting with standard procedures for defining such units. The term is being widely used in both popular and scientific publications before a decision is made as to whether it warrants formalisation and definition of a Global Stratigraphic Section and Point (GSSP). The deliberate human modification of the landscape and its subsurface, and the creation of human-generated novel sedimentary deposits, minerals, and landforms, are characteristic features of the development of Earth’s surface and near surface, which has accelerated in the past two centuries. The large-scale intentional excavation, transportation, and deposition of mixtures of rock and soil to form anthropogenic deposits and landforms represent a new geological process that could be used as a diagnostic signature of the Anthropocene. Keywords Anthropocene Á Stratigraphy Á Anthropogenic deposits Stratigraphic Issues Related to Anthropogenic Deposits The ground surface and deposits immediately beneath are an open system prone to modification through urban redevelopment, agricultural ploughing, and soil for- mation. This system may be the product of several phases of ongoing evolution and therefore dating this interval is problematic. The history of excavation in C. N. Waters (&) Á S. J. Price Á J. R. Ford Á A. H. Cooper British Geological Survey, Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK e-mail: [email protected] J.
    [Show full text]
  • Fischwanderung in Deltarhein-Ost Für Eine
    FISCHWANDERUNG IN DELTARHEIN‐OST FÜR EINE GRENZÜBERSCHREITENDE, ABGESTIMMTE FISCHWANDERUNGSPLANUNG ABSCHLUSSBERICHT AGDR‐ARBEITSGRUPPE FISCHWANDERUNG MÄRZ 2017 I. IMPRESSUM ERSTELLT DURCH: Niederlande Deutschland LAVES (Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Waterschap Vechtstromen Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit) Waterschap Rijn en IJssel Bezirksregierung Münster 2 UNTERSTÜTZT DURCH: Niederlande Deutschland Provincie Overijssel AG WuB Westfalen und Lippe Rijkswaterstaat Water, Verkeer en Leefomgeving Kreis Borken Rijkswaterstaat Midden‐Nederland Kreis Coesfeld Rijkswaterstaat Oost‐Nederland Kreis Steinfurt Sportvisserij Nederland Kreis Wesel Waterschap Drents‐Overijsselse Delta Landesfischereiverband Weser‐Ems Landesfischereiverband Westfalen und Lippe Landkreis Grafschaft Bentheim Finanziell unterstützt durch NLWKN (Niedersächsischer Landesbetrieb für RBO Rijn‐Oost Wasserwirtschaft, Küsten‐ und Naturschutz) Meppen Vechteverband‐ULV 114 Vechte GPRW – Koordinierungsbüro Mit Erlaubnis des NLWKN wurden Inhalte des Berichts „FGE Ems – Herstellung der Durchgängigkeit für Fische und Rundmäuler in den Vorranggewässern der internationalen Flussgebietseinheit Ems (2012)“ verwendet. AUFTRAGGEBER: Steuerungsgruppe Deltarhein (SGDR II. INHALTSVERZEICHNIS I. IMPRESSUM ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 II. INHALTSVERZEICHNIS ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stroomgebiedbeheerplan Rijn 2016-2021 Stroomgebiedbeheerplan Rijn 2016-2021 Inhoud
    Stroomgebiedbeheerplan Rijn 2016-2021 Stroomgebiedbeheerplan Rijn 2016-2021 Inhoud Inleiding 4 1 Beschrijving stroomgebied 5 1.1 Inleiding 5 1.2 Algemene beschrijving 6 1.3 Methode 7 1.3.1 Oppervlaktewater 7 1.3.2 Grondwater 8 1.3.3 Beschermde gebieden 8 1.4 Aanwijzing waterlichamen en beschermde gebieden 9 1.4.1 Oppervlaktewater 9 1.4.2 Grondwater 10 1.4.3 Beschermde gebieden 10 1.5 Typologie en status 11 1.5.1 Typologie 11 1.5.2 Status 11 2 Doelstellingen 13 2.1 Inleiding 13 2.2 Methode 14 2.2.1 Oppervlaktewater 14 2.2.2 Grondwater 17 2.2.3 Beschermde gebieden 18 2.2.4 Uitzonderingen 18 2.3 Doelen 18 2.3.1 Oppervlaktewater 18 2.3.2 Grondwater 19 2.3.3 Beschermde gebieden 19 2.4 Uitzonderingen 21 3 Monitoring en toestand 23 3.1 Inleiding 23 3.2 Methode 23 3.2.1 Oppervlaktewater 23 3.2.2 Grondwater 25 3.3 Toestand 25 3.3.1 Oppervlaktewater 25 3.3.2 Grondwater 31 4 Belastingen 35 4.1 Inleiding 35 4.2 Methode 36 4.2.1 Oppervlaktewater 36 4.2.2 Grondwater 37 4.3 Significante belastingen 38 4.3.1 Oppervlaktewater 38 4.3.2 Grondwater 44 2 | Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu 4.4 Klimaatverandering 45 4.5 Kennisleemten 46 5 Maatregelen 49 5.1 Inleiding 49 5.2 Voortgang uitvoering stroomgebiedbeheerplan 2009 50 5.3 Maatregelen vanaf 2016 54 5.3.1 Communautaire waterbeschermingswetgeving 54 5.3.2 Overige basismaatregelen 54 5.3.3 Gebiedsgerichte maatregelen 55 5.3.4 Extra maatregelen 57 5.4 Prognose van effecten van maatregelen 57 5.4.1 Oppervlaktewater 57 5.4.2 Grondwater 60 6 Economische analyse 63 6.1 Inleiding 63 6.2 Methode 64 6.3 Ontwikkeling
    [Show full text]
  • En Beheersvisie Stroomgebied Glanerbeek (Eenlaaglandbeek in Zuid-Oosttwente) Hoofdrapport
    INRICHTINGS- EN BEHEERSVISIE STROOMGEBIED GLANERBEEK (EENLAAGLANDBEEK IN ZUID-OOSTTWENTE) HOOFDRAPPORT J.W.H, van der Straten N. ter Linde januari 1995 LANDBOUWUNIVERSITEIT WAGENINGEN Vakgroep Waterkwaliteitsbeheer en Aquatische Oecologie Projectleider : Drs. J.J.P. Gardeniers WATERSCHAP REGGE EN DINKEL ALMELO Afd. Oppervlaktewater, Bureau Onderzoek Watersystemen Projectleider : Dhr. M. Zonderwijk Rapport No. 001/95 GEGEVENS UITSLUITEND VOOR INTERN GEBRUIK OVERNAME IS SLECHTS TOEGESTAAN NA OVERLEG MET DE PROJECTLEIDERS Illustratie voorkant: "Drie Werelden", M.C. Escher. VOORWOORD Voor U ligt het verslag van het 6 maands doctoraal afstudeervak Aquatische Oecologie dat in de periode juni tot en met december 1994 uitgevoerd is bij de vakgroep Waterkwa­ liteitsbeheer en Aquatische Oecologie van de Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen. Het onderzoek betrof het stroomgebied van de Glanerbeek, een laaglandbeek in zuid-oost Twente. In opdracht van het Waterschap Regge en Dinkel te Almelo is een inrichtings- en beheersvisie opgesteld voor dit gebied. Hiervoor is de huidige situatie op tal van aspecten geïnventariseerd en zijn chemische en biologische monsters genomen. Tevens is het bestaande en toekomstige beleid voor het onderzoeksgebied onderzocht. Uiteindelijk is een streefbeeld voor het onderzoeksgebied ontwikkeld en is een daarbij behorend pakket van maatregelen samengesteld dat kan bijdragen aan het ontwikkelen van een natuurlijker beekdalsysteem. Graag zouden wij op deze plaats van de gelegenheid gebruik willen maken om een aantal mensen te bedanken, die ons gedurende het onderzoek en tijdens het maken van dit verslag hebben geholpen. Allereerst gaat onze dank uit naar onze begeleider Dhr. J.J.P. Gardeniers voor de algehele ondersteuning tijdens het onderzoek en de hulp bij het interpreteren en bedis­ cussiëren van de onderzoeksresultaten.
    [Show full text]
  • Download D5.1-2
    Deliverable D5.1-2: DPSIR chains in rivers: observed and predicted effects on BQEs Collaborative Project (large-scale integrating project) Grant Agreement 226273 Theme 6: Environment (including Climate Change) st th Duration: March 1 , 2009 – February 29 , 2012 Deliverable D5.1-2: Driver-Pressure-Impact and Response- Recovery chains in European rivers: observed and predicted effects on BQEs Lead contractor: University of Duisburg-Essen (UDE) Contributors: Christian K. Feld, Veronica Dahm, Armin Lorenz (UDE), Maxime Logez, Anahita Marzin, Virginie Archaimbault, Jérôme Belliard, Christian Chauvin, François Delmas, Didier Pont (CEMAGREF), Andreas Melcher, Helga Kremser, Susanne Muhar, Stefan Schmutz, Torsten Schulze, Martin Seebacher, Andreas Zitek (BOKU), Christian Wolter (FVB-IGB), Piet F.M. Verdonschot, H. Michels, Hanneke E. Keizer-Vlek (ALTERRA) Due date of deliverable: Month 30 Actual submission date: Month 32 Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme (2007-2013) Dissemination Level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Page 1/227 Deliverable D5.1-2: DPSIR chains in rivers: observed and predicted effects on BQEs Content Non-technical summary .................................................................................................................9 Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Gheorghe Duca Editor Management of Water Quality in Moldova Water Science and Technology Library
    Water Science and Technology Library Gheorghe Duca Editor Management of Water Quality in Moldova Water Science and Technology Library Volume 69 Editor-in-Chief Vijay P. Singh, College Station, TX, USA Editorial Advisory Board M. Anderson, Bristol, UK L. Bengtsson, Lund, Sweden J. F. Cruise, Huntsville, USA U. C. Kothyari, Roorkee, India S. E. Serrano, Philadelphia, USA D. Stephenson, Gaborone, Botswana W. G. Strupczewski, Warsaw, Poland For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/6689 Gheorghe Duca Editor Management of Water Quality in Moldova 123 Editor Gheorghe Duca Academy of Sciences of Moldova Chisinau Moldova ISSN 0921-092X ISBN 978-3-319-02707-4 ISBN 978-3-319-02708-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02708-1 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013958219 Ó Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeozoic Formations from Dobrogea and Pre-Dobrogea – an Overview
    Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences (Turkish J. Earth Sci.), Vol.A. 21, SEGHEDI 2012, pp. 669–721. Copyright ©TÜBİTAK doi:10.3906/yer-1101-20 First published online 11 December 2011 Palaeozoic Formations from Dobrogea and Pre-Dobrogea – An Overview ANTONETA SEGHEDI National Institute of Marine Geology and Geoecology, 23−25 Dimitrie Onciul Street, 024053 Bucharest, Romania (E-mail: [email protected]) Received 19 January 2011; revised typescript received 02 November 2011; accepted 11 December 2011 Abstract: An overview of lithological, palaeontological and geochronological evidence existing for the Palaeozoic formations from Dobrogea and Pre-Dobrogea has enabled a better understanding of the Palaeozoic history of these areas. Th e Lower Palaeozoic of Pre-Dobrogea, in places in continuity with the pelitic-silty facies of the underlying Vendian (Ediacaran) deposits, was one of the peri-Tornquist basins of Baltica, suggesting that the Scythian Platform in the Pre-Dobrogea basement represents the rift ed margin of the East European Craton. In North Dobrogea two types of Palaeozoic succession have formed in diff erent tectonic settings. Deep marine Ordovician–Devonian deposits, including pelagic cherts and shales, associated with turbidites, and facing Devonian carbonate platform deposits of the East European Craton, form northward-younging tectonic units of an accretionary wedge, tectonically accreted above a south-dipping subduction zone. South of the accretionary prism, the basinal to shallow marine Silurian–Devonian deposits of North Dobrogea, showing a similar lithology to the East Moesian successions, accumulated on top of low- grade Cambrian clastics with Avalonian affi nity indicated by detrital zircons. Late Palaeozoic erosion was accompanied by deposition of continental alluvial, fl uvial and volcano-sedimentary successions, overlying their basement above an imprecise Carboniferous gap.
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration and Mining, Issue 1.1
    Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration and Mining, Issue 1.1 Geology – Applied and Environmental Geophysics 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference (SGEM 2019) Albena, Bulgaria 28 June – 6 July 2019 Conference Proceedings Volume 19, Issue 1.1, Part A ISBN: 978-1-5108-8988-0 Printed from e-media with permission by: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 Some format issues inherent in the e-media version may also appear in this print version. Copyright© (2019) by International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences (SGEM) All rights reserved. Printed by Curran Associates, Inc. (2019) For permission requests, please contact International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences (SGEM) at the address below. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences (SGEM) 51 Alexander Malinov Blvd. fl 4, Office B5 1712 Sofia, Bulgaria Phone: +359 2 405 18 41 Fax: +359 2 405 18 65 [email protected] Additional copies of this publication are available from: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 USA Phone: 845-758-0400 Fax: 845-758-2633 Email: [email protected] Web: www.proceedings.com https://www.sgem.org Contents CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS CONTENTS GEOLOGY 1. ABOUT GENESIS OF KARST CALDERA OF DENUDATION-TECTONIC LANDFORM. GEORGIA, CAUCASUS, Dr.Zaza Lezhava., Dr.Lasha Asanidze., Dr.Kukuri Tsikarishvili.,Dr George Gaprindashvili., PhD Stud Nino Chikhradze, Georgia .............................................................................................................................. 3 2. ABOUT THE PROSPECT OF GOLD-PLATINOID MINERALIZATION IN BLACK SHALE IN THE EAST AND SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN, Chief Researcher Zhunusov A.A., Senior Researcher Rassadkin V.V.,Master student Uralbayev E. A., Kazakhstan........................................................................................... 11 3. ACCURACY INCREASE OF INDICATOR KRIGING, Prof. Ph. D. in engineering science Georgy Abramyan, PhD student Albert Abramyan, Russia ..........
    [Show full text]