DOCSLIB.ORG

Geological Resource Analysis of Shale Gas and Shale Oil in Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geological Resource Analysis of Shale Gas and Shale Oil in Europe Draft Report for DG JRC in the Context of Contract JRC/PTT/2015/F.3/0027/NC "Development of shale gas and shale oil in Europe" European Unconventional Oil and Gas Assessment (EUOGA) Geological resource analysis of shale gas and shale oil in Europe Deliverable T4b mmmll Geological resource analysis of shale gas/oil in Europe June 2016 I 2 Geological resource analysis of shale gas/oil in Europe Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................. 3 Abstract ........................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 7 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 8 Item 4.1 Setup and distribute a template for uniformly describing EU shale plays to the National Geological Surveys .........................................................................12 Item 4.2 Elaborate and compile general and systematic descriptions of the shale plays from the NGS responses ....................................................................................15 T01, B02 - Norwegian-Danish-S. Sweden – Alum Shale .........................................16 T02 - Baltic Basin – Cambrian-Silurian Shales ......................................................22 T03 - South Lublin Basin, Narol Basin and Lviv-Volyn Basin – Lower Paleozoic Shales ......................................................................................................................37 T04 - Moesian Platform and Kamchia Basin ..........................................................41 T05 - Ukraine – Dnieper-Donets Basin Lower Carboniferous Black Shales ................59 T06 - Poland – Lower Carboniferous shales of the Fore-Sudetic Monocline Basin .......63 T07a - Hungary – Kössen Marl, Zala Basin ...........................................................70 T07b - Hungary – Tard Clay, Hungarian Palaeogene Basin .....................................76 T07c - Pannonia, Mura-Zala Basin - Haloze-Špilje Fm. Shale ..................................82 T08 - Vienna Basin – Mikulov Marl .....................................................................86 T09 - Lombardy Basin (Italy) – Triassic – E. Cretaeous shales ...............................96 T10, T22, T23, T24, T33 - Northwest European Carboniferous Basin (Central Europe) .................................................................................................................... 103 T11 - Emma, Umbria-Marche Basins (Italy) – Triassic – E. Cretaceous shales ........ 116 T12 - Ribolla Basin (Italy) – Argille Lignitifere ................................................... 128 T13 - Ragusa Basin (Italy) – Triassic shales ...................................................... 132 T14 - Dinarides – Lemeš .................................................................................. 137 T15a – Cantabrian Massif ................................................................................ 141 T15b – Basque-Cantabrian Basin ...................................................................... 145 T16 - Guadalquivir .......................................................................................... 151 T17 - Ebro ..................................................................................................... 155 T18 - Duero ................................................................................................... 159 T19 – Iberian Chain ........................................................................................ 162 T20 – Catalonian Chain ................................................................................... 167 T21 - Pyrenees ............................................................................................... 170 T25 - Northwest European Basin (Central Europe) – Mesozoic shales .................... 176 T26 – Paris Basin and Autun Basin – Permo-Carboniferous and Jurassic shales ....... 190 T27 - Aquitaine .............................................................................................. 196 T28 - South Eastern basin ............................................................................... 199 T30 – Lusitanian Basin, Portugal ....................................................................... 203 T31, T32 – Southern Germany – Mesozoic shales ............................................... 210 T34 - Midland Valley Scotland .......................................................................... 213 T35 – Czech Republic – Lower Carboniferous shales of the Culm Basin .................. 219 T36 - Caltanissetta Basin (Italy) – Messinian shales ........................................... 224 B01 - Transilvanian Basins – Neogene Shales ..................................................... 227 June 2016 I 3 Geological resource analysis of shale gas/oil in Europe This report is prepared by Susanne Nelskamp and the TNO EUOGA team, (TNO- Geological Survey of the Netherlands) in March 2017, as part of the EUOGA study (EU Unconventional Oil and Gas Assessment) commissioned by JRC-IET. The report is based on information gathered from European National Geological Surveys (NGS’) between February and December 2016. The report is a draft version and a final version will be issued later as part of the project. The information and views set out in this study are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. No third-party textual or artistic material is included in the publication without the copyright holder’s prior consent to further dissemination and reuse by other third parties. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. June 2016 I 4 Geological resource analysis of shale gas/oil in Europe Citation to this report is Nelskamp, S., 2017. Geological resource analysis of shale gas and shale oil in Europe. Report T4b of the EUOGA study (EU Unconventional Oil and Gas Assessment) commissioned by JRC-IET. Invited Countries Completed EUOGA association status questionnaire Austria Yes Participant Belgium Yes Participant Bulgaria Yes Participant Croatia Yes Participant Cyprus no No known resources Czech Republic Yes Participant Denmark Yes Participant Estonia Yes No known resources Finland Yes No known resources France Yes Participant Germany No The NGS are not able to participate in EU tenders Greece No The NGS have decided not to participate Hungary Yes Participant Ireland Yes The NGS have decided not to participate Italy Yes Participant Latvia Yes Participant Lithuanian Yes Participant Luxembourg No No known resources Malta Yes No known resources Netherlands Yes Participant Norway Yes No known resources on-shore Poland Yes Participant Portugal Yes Participant Romania Yes Participant Slovakia Yes The NGS have decided not to participate Slovenia No Participant Spain Yes Participant Sweden Yes Participant Switzerland No The NGS have decided not to participate United Kingdom Yes Participant Ukraine yes Participant Overview of countries invited to participate in EUOGA and their association to the project. June 2016 I 5 Geological resource analysis of shale gas/oil in Europe Abstract Within task 4 of the EUOGA Project the geological descriptions of the different basins within Europe and the potential shale gas targets in the basin were collected and summarized. A general template for the description was developed, and, based on the information provided by the National Geological Surveys (NGS), completed for each submitted basin and formation. In addition to the geological descriptions, general hydrocarbon play indicators were assessed in order to indicate whether a shale formation is present and whether it contains technically recoverable hydrocarbon resources (hereafter: chance of success). This assessment was performed in a consistent and uniform manner for each formation and involved a semi-quantitative scoring of critical data for assessing (1) the presence and characteristics of the shale formation, (2) overall sedimentological and structural complexity influencing hydrocarbon generation and distribution, (3) the probability of an existing shale gas/oil system (organic content, maturity, proven hydrocarbon generation) and (4) geological factors influencing the technical recoverability of hydrocarbon resources contained in the shale (depth of the formation and mineralogical composition). The results from Task 4 are used as a basis for the quantitative volume assessment of potential shale hydrocarbon resources under Task 7. June 2016 I 6 Geological resource analysis of shale gas/oil in Europe Executive Summary Task 4 delivered the geological descriptions and unconventional hydrocarbon play characteristics of 82 shale formations occurring within 38 sedimentary basins across Europe. National Geological Surveys (NGS) participating in the EUOGA project provided all public data and information available from their respective countries, using a common description template developed by the EUOGA project team members. Further input was obtained from the data retrieval under Task 5 and Task 6. The analysis of the basins includes (1) the general description
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Post-Carboniferous Stratigraphy, Northeastern Alaska by R
    Post-Carboniferous Stratigraphy, Northeastern Alaska By R. L. DETTERMAN, H. N. REISER, W. P. BROSGE,and]. T. DUTRO,JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 886 Sedirnentary rocks of Permian to Quaternary age are named, described, and correlated with standard stratigraphic sequences UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1975 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Detterman, Robert L. Post-Carboniferous stratigraphy, northeastern Alaska. (Geological Survey Professional Paper 886) Bibliography: p. 45-46. Supt. of Docs. No.: I 19.16:886 1. Geology-Alaska. I. Detterman, Robert L. II. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional Paper 886. QE84.N74P67 551.7'6'09798 74-28084 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02687-2 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract __ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ __ 1 Stratigraphy__:_Continued Introduction __________ ----------____ ----------------____ __ 1 Kingak Shale ---------------------------------------- 18 Purpose and scope ----------------------~------------- 1 Ignek Formation (abandoned) -------------------------- 20 Geographic setting ------------------------------------ 1 Okpikruak Formation (geographically restricted) ________ 21 Previous work and acknowledgments ------------------ 1 Kongakut Formation ----------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Microremains from the Lower Silurian of Siberia and Central Asia: Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeobiogeography
    Journal of Micropalaeontology, 30: 97–106. 2011 The Micropalaeontological Society Vertebrate microremains from the Lower Silurian of Siberia and Central Asia: palaeobiodiversity and palaeobiogeography ŽIVILĖ ŽIGAITĖ1,2,*, VALENTINA KARATAJŪTĖ-TALIMAA3 & ALAIN BLIECK1 1UFR Sciences de la Terre, FRE 3298 du CNRS ‘Géosystèmes’, Université Lille – 1, F-59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex, France 2Department of Evolution and Development, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18A, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden 3Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Vilnius University, M.K.Ciurlionio 21/27, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT – The biostratigraphic and palaeogeographical distributions of early vertebrate microfossils from a number of Lower Silurian localities in northwestern Mongolia, Tuva and southern Siberia were reviewed. Vertebrate microremains showed high taxonomic diversity, comprising acanthodians, chon- drichthyans, putative galeaspids, heterostracans, mongolepids, tesakoviaspids, thelodonts and possible eriptychiids. The majority of taxa have lower stratigraphic levels of occurrence compared to other Silurian palaeobiogeographical provinces, such as the European-Russian or Canadian Arctic. Vertebrate micro- remains are numerous within the samples, which may indicate warm-water low-latitude palaeobasins with rich shelf faunas. This disagrees with the recent interpretations of the territory as a northern high-latitude Siberian palaeocontinent. The palaeobiogeographical distribution of vertebrate taxa indicates an endemic palaeobiogeographical province of connected epeiric palaeoseas with external isolation during the early Silurian. In previous works separation between Tuvan and Siberian palaeobiogeographical provinces has been suggested. After careful revision of the vertebrate microfossil record of the region, we find that differences in a few vertebrate taxa do not provide not strong enough evidence to reliably distinguish these provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DEVELOPMENT of MESOZOIC SEDIMENTARY IBASINS AROUND the MARGINS of the NORTH ATLANTIC and THEIR HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL D.G. Masson and P.R
    INTERNAL DOCUMENT IIL THE DEVELOPMENT OF MESOZOIC SEDIMENTARY IBASINS AROUND THE MARGINS OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC AND THEIR HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL D.G. Masson and P.R. Miles Internal Document No. 195 December 1983 [This document should not be cited in a published bibliography, and is supplied for the use of the recipient only]. iimsTit\jte of \ OCEANOGRAPHIC SCIENCES % INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHIC SCIENCES Wormley, Godalming, Surrey GU8 5UB (042-879-4141) (Director: Dr. A. S. Laughton, FRS) Bidston Observatory, Crossway, Birkenhead, Taunton, Mersey side L43 7RA Somerset TA1 2DW (051-653-8633) (0823-86211) (Assistant Director: Dr. D. E. Cartwright) (Assistant Director: M.J. Tucker) THE DEVELOPMENT OF MESOZOIC SEDIMENTARY BASINS AROUND THE MARGINS OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC AND THEIR HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL D.G. Masson and P.R. Miles Internal Document No. 195 December 1983 Work carried out under contract to the Department of Energy This document should not be cited in a published bibliography except as 'personal communication', and is supplied for the use of the recipient only. Institute of Oceanographic Sciences, Brook Road, Wormley, Surrey GU8 SUB ABSTRACT The distribution of Mesozoic basins around the margins of the North Atlantic has been summarised, and is discussed in terms of a new earliest Cretaceous palaeogeographic reconstruction for the North Atlantic area. The Late Triassic-Early Jurassic rift basins of Iberia, offshore eastern Canada and the continental shelf of western Europe are seen to be the fragments of a formerly coherent NE trending rift system which probably formed as a result of tensional stress between Europe, Africa and North America. The separation of Europe, North America and Iberia was preceded by a Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous rifting phase which is clearly distinct from the earlier Mesozoic rifting episode and was little influenced by it.
    [Show full text]
  • Microtectonic Measurements and Interpretation of the Mesozoic Formations in the Villány Hills and Görcsöny–Máriakéménd Ridge, Hungary
    Central European Geology, Vol. 53/1, pp. 21–42 (2010) DOI: 10.1556/CEuGeol.53.2010.1.2 Microtectonic measurements and interpretation of the Mesozoic formations in the Villány Hills and Görcsöny–Máriakéménd Ridge, Hungary Attila Petrik Department of Regional Geology Eötvös Lóránd University, Budapest Within the framework of a National Research Fund project, different types of scientific investigations were carried out with the aim of a comprehensive paleogeographic reconstruction of the Tisza structural unit. As part of this project microtectonic measurements in the area of the Villány Hills and Görcsöny–Máriakéménd Ridge were carried out. Several publications have already appeared concerning the structural development of the Mecsek–Villány area (Csontos and Bergerat 1988, 1993; Benkovics 1997; Csontos et al. 2002), but in these the Villány Hills and their surroundings played a secondary role compared to the Mecsek Mountains. The goal of the present study was to establish the limits of the structural phases and determine their relative and absolute ages. An important issue has been to clarify to what degree the suggested events of structural deformation could be integrated into regional geologic processes. The tectonic conditions of the area of interest were studied through description and analysis of structural elements of 12 investigated quarries within it. Calculated stress field data were also analyzed. Seven quarries in the Villány Hills, five in the Görcsöny–Máriakéménd area, the data of over 650 striae, 550 joints, various ductile deformation elements (folds, flexures) as well as stylolites, were recorded. Integrating these structural elements into the regional geologic processes was of significant importance. Introduction and geologic background The Tisza Unit (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • New Insights on the Marseille-Aubagne Oligocene Basins (France)
    Nury, D., Villeneuve, M., Arlhac, P., Gärtner, A., Linnemann, U., Châteauneuf, J.J., Riveline, J. and Hippolyte, J.C., 2016. New insights on the Marsei- lle-Aubagne Oligocene basins (France). Boletín Geológico y Minero, 127 (2/3): 483-498 ISSN: 0366-0176 New insights on the Marseille-Aubagne Oligocene basins (France) D. Nury(1), M. Villeneuve(2), P. Arlhac(3), A. Gärtner(4), U. Linnemann(4), J.J. Châteauneuf(5), J. Riveline(6) and J.C. Hippolyte(2) (1) MCF honoraire, 48, impasse des Micocoules, 13390, Auriol, France. [email protected] (2) Cerege, case 67, 3 place Victor Hugo, 13331, Marseille, France. [email protected] (3) MCF honoraire, 2208, chemin de Cuges, 83740, La Cadière d’Azur. [email protected] (4) Senckenberg Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Museum für Mineralogie und Geologie, Königsbrücker Landstrasse 159, D 01109, Dresden, Germany. Email:[email protected] [email protected] (5) BRGM. 8, Quai du Chatelet, 45000 , Orléans, France. [email protected] (6) UPMC – ISTEP UMR 7193, laboratoire de biominéralisations et environnements sédimentaires, case 116, 4, Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05. [email protected] ABSTRACT The Marseille-Aubagne Basins, which extend from Marseille to Roquevaire, occupy more than fifty per cent of the Marseille-Aubagne geological map, with approximately one million people living in this area. Despite this geological importance they are still poorly known. The first synthetic view was delivered in the 1935 geological map. Studied by Bonifay, the Quaternary deposits have been included in the 1969 geological map. Nevertheless, the Oligocene formations remained unmodified until Nury, who provided a lot of very detailed stratigraphic data.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Procedia
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Energy Procedia Energy Procedia 00 (2008) 000–000 www.elsevier.com/locate/XXX GHGT-9 Possibilities for geological storage and mineral trapping of industrial CO2 emissions in the Baltic region Alla Shogenovaa, Saulius Šliaupab,c, Kazbulat Shogenova, Rasa Šliaupieneb, Raisa Pomerancevad, Rein Vahera, Mai Uibue, Rein Kuusike aInstitute of Geology, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajete tee5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia bInstitute of Geology and Geography, T. Sevcenkos 13, Lt-03223, Vilnius, Lithuania cVilnius University,Universiteti St.3, LT-01513, Vilnius, Lithuania dLatvian Environment, Geology & Meteorology Agency, Maskavas St. 165, LV-1019, Riga, Latvia eLaboratory of Inorganic Materials, Ehitajete tee5, Tallinn 19086, Estonia Elsevier use only: Received date here; revised date here; accepted date here Abstract Industrial CO2 emissions and possibilities for geological storage of CO2 in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania were studied within the framework of EU GEOCAPACITY and CO2NET EAST projects supported by European Commission Sixth Framework Programme (FP6). Twenty-two large industrial sources produced 14.5 Mt of CO2 in Estonia, 1.9 Mt in Latvia and 4.8 Mt in Lithuania in 2007. The two greatest Estonian power stations, using oil-shale, produced 9.4 and 2.7 Mt of CO2. The Baltic States are located within the Baltic sedimentary basin, the thickness of which varies from 100 m in NE Estonia up to 1900 m in SW Latvia and 2300 m in western Lithuania. The most prospective formation for the geological storage of CO2 is the Cambrian reservoir, with an estimated potential of 300 Mt of CO2 in 15 large structures located in Latvia.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008
    godišnje izvješće annual report 2008 Sachsova 2, HR-10000 Zagreb Hrvatska (Croatia) Tel.: (+385 1) 6160-749 Fax.: (+385 1) 6144-718 www.hgi-cgs.hr ISBN 978-953-6907-19-9 ISSN 1846-629X Avanić Radovan +385 1 6160 708 [email protected] Zavod za geologiju Badnjević Edin +385 1 6160 754 Stručne službe Bakrač Koraljka +385 1 6160 706 [email protected] Zavod za geologiju Banović Jarmila +385 1 6160 744 [email protected] Zavod za mineralne sirovine NAKLADNIK – PUBLISHER: Hrvatski geološki institut – Croatian Geological Survey Bastalić Nada +385 1 6160 712 [email protected] Zavod za hidrogeologiju i inženjersku geologiju Belak Mirko +385 1 6160 722 [email protected] Zavod za geologiju Sachsova 2, HR-10000 Zagreb, Hrvatska (Croatia) Bergant Stanislav +385 1 6160 732 [email protected] Zavod za geologiju Brkić Željka +385 1 6160 700 [email protected] Zavod za hidrogeologiju i inženjersku geologiju Buljan Renato +385 1 6160 806 [email protected] Zavod za hidrogeologiju i inženjersku geologiju Colussi Kristijan +385 1 6160 754 Stručne službe ZA NAKLADNIKA – FOR THE PUBLISHER: Crnogaj Stjepan +385 1 6160 751 [email protected] Zavod za mineralne sirovine Ravnatelj (Director) Josip HALAMIĆ Dedić Željko +385 1 6160 746 [email protected] Zavod za mineralne sirovine Devčić Zorka +385 1 6160 742 Stručne službe Dmitrović Aco +385 1 6160 800 [email protected] Stručne službe Dolić Stjepan +385 1 6160 704 [email protected] Zavod za hidrogeologiju i inženjersku geologiju
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Orogeny the Geologic Development of the Mediterranean
    Alpine Orogeny The geologic development of the Mediterranean region is driven by the Alpine-Himalayan orogeny, a suturing of Gondwana-derived terranes with the Eurasion craton. In broad terms, this is a Mesozoic and Cenozoic convergent zone that extends from the Spain to Southeastern Asia and may extend along the southwest Pacific as far as New Zealand (Rosenbaum and Lister, 2002). The Alpine orogeny was caused by the convergence of the African and European plates (Frisch, 1979; Tricart, 1984; Haas et al., 1995) with peak collisional phases occurring at different times: Cretaceous in the Eastern Alps and Tertiary in the Western Alps (Schmid et al., 2004). Note: prior to the opening of the Paleotethys sea, the Variscan orogenic belt developed in central Europe then the Laurussian and Gondwana converged in the Devonian and Late Carboniferous. Although the location of the suture Extent of the Alpine-Himalayan orogenic belt is not clear, the orogenic belt was extensive, (Rosenbaum and Lister, 2002). running from the Bohemian Massif to the Alpine-Carpathian-Dinarides belt (). The Paleotethys sea existed in the Triassic but closed in the early Mesozoic due to convergence along the Cimmerian (and Indosinian) suture zone. The Paleotethys (or Tethys I) has been described as a wedge- shaped ocean that opened to the east, separating Eurasia from Africa, India, and Australia (Laurasia and Gondwana). Very little evidence of the Paleotethys exists today which has caused some to question its existence (Meyerhoff and Eremenko, 1976) The Tethys opened as Pangea broke up in the Early Jurassic and Africa moved east relative to Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • A Template for an Improved Rock-Based Subdivision of the Pre-Cryogenian Timescale
    Downloaded from http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021 Perspective Journal of the Geological Society Published Online First https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2020-222 A template for an improved rock-based subdivision of the pre-Cryogenian timescale Graham A. Shields1*, Robin A. Strachan2, Susannah M. Porter3, Galen P. Halverson4, Francis A. Macdonald3, Kenneth A. Plumb5, Carlos J. de Alvarenga6, Dhiraj M. Banerjee7, Andrey Bekker8, Wouter Bleeker9, Alexander Brasier10, Partha P. Chakraborty7, Alan S. Collins11, Kent Condie12, Kaushik Das13, David A. D. Evans14, Richard Ernst15,16, Anthony E. Fallick17, Hartwig Frimmel18, Reinhardt Fuck6, Paul F. Hoffman19,20, Balz S. Kamber21, Anton B. Kuznetsov22, Ross N. Mitchell23, Daniel G. Poiré24, Simon W. Poulton25, Robert Riding26, Mukund Sharma27, Craig Storey2, Eva Stueeken28, Rosalie Tostevin29, Elizabeth Turner30, Shuhai Xiao31, Shuanhong Zhang32, Ying Zhou1 and Maoyan Zhu33 1 Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK 2 School of the Environment, Geography and Geosciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK 3 Department of Earth Science, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA 4 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada 5 Geoscience Australia (retired), Canberra, Australia 6 Instituto de Geociências, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil 7 Department of Geology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India 8 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside,
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix – Overview Table of the Chance of Success of All Assessed Basins and Formations
    Appendix – Overview table of the chance of success of all assessed basins and formations ID ineral ineral Basin index Country code Screening Basin name Shale name Mapping Status Sedimentary Variability Structural Complexity Data Availability System HC Maturity Variability Depth M Composition B1 RO 1041 Transylvania Moderate Moderate Moderate Poor Possible Biogenic Average to No data deep B1 RO 1042 Transylvania Moderate Moderate Moderate Poor Possible Biogenic Average to No data deep B2 SE 1017 Fennoscandian Alum Shale Moderate Low High Moderate Possible Moderate Shallow Unknown Shield B2 SE 1017 Fennoscandian Alum Shale Moderate Low High Moderate Possible Moderate Shallow Unknown Shield B2 SE 1017 Fennoscandian Alum Shale Moderate Low High Moderate Possible Moderate Shallow Unknown Shield O1 RO 0 Black_sea Moderate Moderate Low Good Proven Moderate Shallow to No data deep O1 BG 1060 Kamchia basin Oligocene shale Moderate Moderate Low Good Proven Moderate Shallow to No data deep T1 SE 1015 Norwegian- Alum Moderate Low High Moderate Possible Moderate Shallow to Unknown Danish-Scania average to deep T1 SE 1015 Norwegian- Alum Moderate Low High Moderate Possible Moderate Shallow to Unknown Danish-Scania average to deep T1 SE 1016 Norwegian- Alum Moderate Low High Moderate Possible Moderate Shallow to Unknown Danish-Scania average to deep T1 SE 1016 Norwegian- Alum Moderate Low High Moderate Possible Moderate Shallow to Unknown Danish-Scania average to deep T1 DK 1019 Norwegian- Alum Moderate Low High Moderate Possible Moderate Shallow to
    [Show full text]
  • Geologia Della Sicilia - Geology of Sicily IV - Vulcanismo - Volcanism
    Geologia della Sicilia - Geology of Sicily IV - Vulcanismo - Volcanism BRANCA S. (*) 1. - VuLCANISMO QuATERNARIO DELLA ratterizzavano questo settore dell’Altipiano Ibleo SICILIA ORIENTALE (SChMINCkE et alii, 1997). La prosecuzione dell’at- tività vulcanica verso nord durante il Pleistocene La fase più recente del vulcanismo ibleo è da- inferiore-medio è evidenziata da anomalie magne- tata Pliocene inferiore-Pleistocene inferiore, ed è tiche (GRASSO & BEN-AVRAhAM, 1992) e da dati caratterizzata da un’attività vulcanica sia sottoma- di pozzi perforati dall’AGIP (LONGARETTI et alii, rina che subaerea ad affinità da alcalina a subalca- 1991; TORELLI et alii, 1998) in corrispondenza della lina (CARBONE et alii, 1986, 1987; CARVENI et alii, Piana di Catania, che mostrano la presenza di 1991; SChMINCkE et alii, 1997). grossi corpi di vulcaniti, con spessori di alcune Le vulcaniti affiorano estesamente lungo il centinaia di metri, che si approfondiscono verso bordo settentrionale dell’Avampaese Ibleo mo- nord per la presenza di sistemi di faglie dirette. In strando una leggera migrazione verso nord rispetto particolare, le vulcaniti più recenti in sottosuolo, alle manifestazioni vulcaniche del Miocene supe- attribuite al Pleistocene inferiore (LONGARETTI et riore (CARBONE et alii, 1982c). Le vulcaniti plioce- alii, 1991), sono localizzate nella parte più setten- niche del margine occidentale dell’Altipiano Ibleo, trionale della Piana di Catania in prossimità della sono rappresentate da una potente successione, periferia meridionale dell’Etna fra Paternò e Cata- costituita da prevalenti ialoclastiti e da brecce vul- nia. Tali vulcaniti presentano una composizione canoclastiche e colate a pillow. Lungo il bordo basaltica ad affinità sia tholeiitica che alcalina orientale del plateau si rinvengono prevalentemente (LONGARETTI & ROCChI, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristic Jurassic Mollusks from Northern Alaska
    Characteristic Jurassic Mollusks From Northern Alaska GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 274-D Characteristic Jurassic Mollusks From Northern Alaska By RALPH W. IMLAY A SHORTER CONTRIBUTION TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 274-D A study showing that the northern Alaskan faunal succession agrees with that elsewhere in the Boreal region and in other parts of North America and in northwest Europe UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1955 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - BMMH§ts (paper cover) Price $1.00 CONTENTS Page Abstract_________________ 69 Introduction _________________ 69 Biologic analysis____________ 69 Stratigraphic summary. _______ 70 Ages of fossils________________ 73 Comparisons with other faunas. 75 Ecological considerations___ _ 75 Geographic distribution____. 78 Summary of results ___________ 81 Systematic descriptions__ _. 82 Literature cited____________ 92 Index_____________________ 95 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates &-13 follow Index] PLATE 8. Inoceramus and Gryphaea 9. Aucella 10. Amaltheus, Dactylioceras, "Arietites," Phylloceras, and Posidonia 11. Ludwigella, Dactylioceras, and Harpoceras. 12. Pseudocadoceras, Arcticoceras, Amoeboceras, Tmetoceras, Coeloceras, and Pseudolioceras 13. Reineckeia, Erycites, and Cylindroteuthis. Page FIGXTKE 20. Index map showing Jurassic fossil collection localities in northern Alaska.
    [Show full text]