The Norwegian Experience

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Norwegian Experience A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Bjerkholt, Olav Working Paper Markets, models and planning: The Norwegian experience Memorandum, No. 2005,14 Provided in Cooperation with: Department of Economics, University of Oslo Suggested Citation: Bjerkholt, Olav (2005) : Markets, models and planning: The Norwegian experience, Memorandum, No. 2005,14, University of Oslo, Department of Economics, Oslo This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/63196 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu MEMORANDUM No 14/2005 Markets, models and planning: the Norwegian experience Olav Bjerkholt ISSN: 0801-1117 Department of Economics University of Oslo This series is published by the In co-operation with University of Oslo The Frisch Centre for Economic Department of Economics Research P. O.Box 1095 Blindern Gaustadalleén 21 N-0317 OSLO Norway N-0371 OSLO Norway Telephone: + 47 22855127 Telephone: +47 22 95 88 20 Fax: + 47 22855035 Fax: +47 22 95 88 25 Internet: http://www.oekonomi.uio.no/ Internet: http://www.frisch.uio.no/ e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] List of the last 10 Memoranda: No 13 Diderik Lund An analytical model of required returns to equity under taxation with imperfect loss offset. 42 pp. No 12 Hilde C. Bjørnland and Kai Leitemo Identifying the Interdependence between US Monetary Policy and the Stock Market. 34 pp. No 11 Kari Due-Andresen Tax evasion and labour supply in Norway in 2003: Structural models versus flexible functional form models. 44 pp. No 10 Steinar Holden and Fredrik Wulfsberg Downward Nominal Wage Rigidity in the OECD. 39 pp. No 09 Kjell Arne Brekke, Karine Nyborg and Mari Rege The Fear of Exclusion: Individual Effort when Group Formation is Endogenous. 23 pp. No 08 Geir B. Asheim and Bertil Tungodden A new equity condition for infinite utility streams and the possibility of being Paretian. 14 pp. No 07 Hilde Bojer Income inequality and the economic position of women in Norway 1970 – 2002. 24 pp. No 06 Øystein Jørgensen, Tone Ognedal and Steinar Strøm Labor supply when tax evasion is an option. 30 pp. No 05 Rolf Golombek and Michael Hoel The Kyoto agreement and Technology Spillovers. 22 pp. No 04 Cathrine Hagem and Hege Westskog Dominant Agent and Intertemporal Emissions Trading. 35 pp. A complete list of this memo-series is available in a PDF® format at: http://www.oekonomi.uio.no/memo/ Mai, 2005, Rev. Markets, models and planning: the Norwegian experience by Olav Bjerkholt Abstract After World War II economic policy in Europe comprised considerable elements of planning. The paper discusses how this shift was related to the conceived failure of the free enterprise economy to provide full employment in the interwar period and to the war experience. The Norwegian post-war planning had a more integrated and comprehensive character and a more structured format than in most other countries in Western Europe. Some major aspects of the Norwegian planning system and the models developed to support it are discussed, with particular emphasis on the roles played by key economists. Keywords: Economic planning; planning models; national budgeting; Marshall Plan; JEL-Codes: A11; O21; P41; 2 1. Introduction* The topic of “markets vs. planning” can be dealt with as a purely theoretical topic based upon a general equilibrium representation of the economy, perhaps with market failures, external effects, bargaining, or other imperfections, and use of devices of economic planning, e.g. price mechanisms and other mechanism designed for planning purposes, possibly considering problems created by agents having rational expectations, time consistency problems and other limits to planning. Rather contrary to that I will deal with these topics within a concrete historical context, which is that of the economic policy in post-war Norway. The setting is the shift from the interwar free enterprise system, with limited government intervention and not too well functioning markets via wartime controls and regulation towards a system of comprehensive economic planning, without large-scale nationalization of the means of production. The presentation will have a historical narrative with some key actors, some of them famous, and not too much theoretical discussion. Some of the referenced works offer a more elaborate and detailed presentation. A similar shift towards more government intervention and planning took part in several countries. Perhaps it could be ventured that economic planning in Norway had a more integrated and comprehensive character and a more structured format than in most other countries in Western Europe, but the drift went in the same direction, particularly in the early years. Why did this happen? Was it influenced by theoretical discussions? Was it the result of a political shift towards the left with more planning oriented parties coming to power? Was it in some way the outcome of a reaction to the war? It could be some contribution from each of these, but in my view it was above all a reaction to the dismal failure of the economic system of the interwar years. But then, what was the role of economists in this process? Who called the shots, who gave the signals? There had been indeed theoretical discussions on the international arena of the possibilities of more or less perfectly functioning planning systems, based upon competitive principles within a general equilibrium framework, but these did not seem to have exerted much influence in Norway. There was indeed a political swing to the left after liberation in Norway, as also happened in other countries, which undoubtedly nourished the interest in pursuing alternatives to the poorly functioning capitalistic system of the pre-war years, a situation that no one wanted back. The ruling political force in post-war Norway, the Labour Party, after it had shed its revolutionary past in the 1920s, had embraced national planning as part of a democratic development. During its government form 1935 it had promoted a more comprehensive role for the state. The topic is really too big for a single lecture but I will thus touch upon why comprehensive planning became the chosen way of conducting economic policy, in this context I deal with the role and impact of the Marshall Plan. The concrete embodiment of * Lecture at Norwegian School of Business Administration and Economics in course MET510 Vitenskapsteori, 13 May 2005. 3 the planning aspects of economic policy was shaped differently in different countries, but I have to limit the discussion to cover only Norway and only main features. I will try to get the setting of post-war economic policy reasonably clear and then discuss some aspects of the design of economic planning and policy. I will mention some key economists who contributed in this setting, and the narrative will be a mix of economic history and the history of Norwegian economics. Finally, I will say something about what was achieved in terms of the results of economic policy, point out elements of economic policy, which survived beyond what we can call the economic planning period in post- war economic policy, and make some further remarks on the more recent theoretical discourse on the possibilities and limitations of planning. 2. The dismal failure of the economy in the interwar period. Let us first have a bird’s-eye view of the dominant features of economic development in the industrial world before and after World War II (WWII). Table 1 below put the key figures in the perspective of the entire time span from 1870 to 1990. Table 1. Average growth rates for 16 industrialized countries.* Growth rates % 1870-1913 1913-1950 1950-1973 1973-1990 GDP 2.5 2.0 4.9 2.6 GDP/cap 1.4 1.2 3.8 2.1 Real capital 3.4 2.0 5.8 4.2 Export volumes 3.9 1.0 8.6 4.7 Unemployment % 4.5 7.5 2.6 5.7 Inflation % 0.4 -0.7 4.1 7.3 * The 16 countries are Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Great Britain, Sweden, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, USA. Kilde: A. Maddison: Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991. Look closely at these numbers, they may all seem small, but they have massive significance as the averages of the overwhelming part of the industrial world for long spans of time. The shift downwards form 1870-1913 to 1913-1950 is very marked in these numbers, in particularly with regard to trade. The shift from 1913-1950 to the post- war period of 1950-1973 is even more distinct. Look at the dramatic shifts in the growth of real capital and in exports. The individual countries naturally followed somewhat different paths. The interwar figures cover the miserable record of the UK economy in the 1920s, coinciding with the roaring twenties of the US economy.
Recommended publications
  • An Energy Demand Model for Western Europe Reports 95/24
    95/ aoe eos ei uakk, Moe Aaseu, Wima eekaa a i o Osoo SEEM - A Eegy ema Moe o Wese Euoe Saisisk seayå • Saisics oway Oso- Kogsige 1995 Saaeg i aee Symos i aes Symo a ka ikke oekomme Caegoy o aicae Ogae mage aa o aaiae Ogae mage oeøig aa o ye aaiae ••• a ka ikke oeiggøes o o uicaio u i Mie e 0 ess a 0 o ui a e uke eee emoye 0 Mie e 00 ess a 0 og ui a e uke eee emoye 00 oeøige a oisioa o eimiay igue u i e oee seie eak i e omogeeiy o a eica seies u i e aee seie eak i e omogeeiy o a oioa seies I ee sie oige ugae eise sice e eious issue r IS 82--48- ISS 0806-206 Emegue 0 0 Meoe moee okumeaso 8: Ae essus- og miøeme Emeo Eegieesøse Kaoukso Moee esig Eo ige esig ykk: ac uigykk Asac ei uakk, Moe Aaseu, Wima eekaa a i o Osoo SEEM - A Eegy ema Moe o Wese Euoe eos 95/ • Saisics oway 1995 is eo ocumes a eegy ema moe o 13 Wes-Euoea couies eiee o e o aicua iees o owegia eegy eos Eac couy is eae as a seaae ock i a ema moe ie we ae o cocee wi e suy o imay eegy Suy o ema eecic owe is owee moee I eac couy ee ae si ema secos owe oucio Mauacuig iusies a Seices iusies ouseos asoaio a Oe secos A seco moes ca e oug o as aias o e ue sae aoac ece om ema i e seco Oe aciiies wic is eogeeousy gie aamees i e moe wee ay caiae usig esimaes eoe i e ieaue a ay esimae y Saisics oway a EC - oicy Suies e esimaio esus ae eoe i a aei Keywos Eegy ema seco moes owe oucio Ackowegeme iacia suo om Saoi a e uc Miisy o aig is gaeuy ackowege 3 Reports 95/24 SEEM - A Eegy ema Moe o Wese Euoe Coes 1 Ioucio 7 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of European Integration History Revue D
    00_Editorial_01.book Seite 1 Dienstag, 22. Mai 2001 9:16 09 JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION HISTORY REVUE D’HISTOIRE DE L’INTÉGRATION EUROPÉENNE ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR GESCHICHTE DER EUROPÄISCHEN INTEGRATION edited by the Groupe de liaison des professeurs d’histoire contemporaine auprès de la Commission européenne 2001, Volume 7, Number 1 00_Editorial_01.book Seite 2 Dienstag, 22. Mai 2001 9:16 09 The Liaison Committee of Historians came into being in 1982 as a result of an important international symposium that the Commission had organized in Luxembourg to launch historical research on Euro- pean integration. The committee is composed of historians of the European Union member countries who work on contemporary history. The Liaison Committee: – gathers and conveys information about work on European history after the Second World War; – advises the European Union on research projects concerning contemporary European history. Thus, the Liaison Committee was commissioned to make publicly available the archives of the Community institutions; – enables researchers to make better use of the archival sources; – promotes research meetings to get an update of work in progress and to stimulate new research: seven research conferences have been organized and their proceedings published. The Journal of European Integration History – Revue d’histoire de l’intégration européenne – Zeitschrift für Geschichte der europäischen Integration is in line with the preoccupations of the Liaison Committee. Being the first history journal to deal exclusively with the history of European Integration, the Journal offers the increasing number of young historians devoting their research to contemporary Europe, a permanent forum. The Liaison Committee is supported by the European Commission, but works completely independ- ently and according to historians’ critical method.
    [Show full text]
  • 1705802 Project ID
    THE WORLD BANK GROUP ARCHIVES PUBLIC DISCLOSURE AUTHORIZED Folder Title: General Development Project - Norway - Loan 0115 - P037467 - Negotiations - Volume 2 Folder ID: 1705802 Project ID: P037467 Dates: 3/31/1955 – 4/19/1955 Fonds: Records of the Europe and Central Asia Regional Vice Presidency ISAD Reference Code: WB IBRD/IDA ECA Digitized: 7/19/2018 To cite materials from this archival folder, please follow the following format: [Descriptive name of item], [Folder Title], Folder ID [Folder ID], World Bank Group Archives, Washington, D.C., United States. The records in this folder were created or received by The World Bank in the course of its business. The records that were created by the staff of The World Bank are subject to the Bank’s copyright. Please refer to http://www.worldbank.org/terms-of-use-earchives for full copyright terms of use and disclaimers. THE WORLD BANK Washington, D.C. © International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / International Development Association or The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org II -NQRWA.Y - Negotiations (l.l.~NO)- ~~ 1H1 11111111111111rm1rn mrn1111r ~~· 1705802 General Development Pr . Al 995-063 Other #· 4 DECLASSIFIED Negotiations - Volum e 2 o1ect- Norway- Loan 011.5 - P037467Box# _ 1709718 WITH RESTRICTIONS WBG Archives • s t • .. C 0 • p y April 15, 1955 Dear Mro Perouse: I refer to our discussion this afternoon about para­ graph 31 of the President's Report and RecOlllll.endations on the proposed loan of $25 million to the Kingdom of Norway. As I mentioned then, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Norwegian Planning 1945-1975 Utviklingstendensar I Norsk Planlegging Gjennom 30 År S
    ARTIKLER FRA STATISTISK SENTRALBYRÅ NR. 84 TRENDS IN NORWEGIAN PLANNING 1945 - 1975 By Petter Jakob Bjerve UTVIKLINGSTENDENSAR I NORSK PLANLEGGING GJENNOM 30 ÅR OSLO 1.976 ISBN 82-537-0610-3 EAçE This article is a translation of a presentation which first was published in Norwegian in the volume: National Accounts, Models and Ana- lysis. To Odd Aukrust in honour of his sixtieth birthday. Samfunnsøkonomiske studier No. 26. Central Bureau of Statistics, Oslo, 16 June 1976 Petter Jakob Bjerve FORORD Aikkee e ei omseig a ei amsiig av utviklingstenden- sar i norsk planlegging gjennom 30 år som først vart offentleggjort i boka: Nasjonalregnskap,' modeller og analyse. En artikkelsamling til Odd Aukrusts 60-årsdag. Samfunnsøkopomiske studier nr. 26. Saisisk Seayå, Oso, 6, ui 6 Petter Jakob ee ES I OWEGIA AIG 4 ee ako ee COES age I. Moe ecoomeic aig eciques 6 aig eciques 460 6 e MOIS moes 60 9 Oe moes 6 II. Moe comeesie aioa uges , 2 aioa uges 46 . , 22 aioa uges 462 , 2 aioa uges 6 , 2 Oea eiew 26 Geae emasis o ogem aig 28 Moe comeesie ogem ogammes 2 ee co-ordination of e aioa uge a e ogem ogamme 2 e esecie aayses 4 I. ia commes 35 5 More than ten years ago I attempted to describe some of the most important trends in quantitative economic planning in Norway during the post-war period a 4] . 1) A new decade has now passed and a new review may be of interest. The presentation will be limited to macroeconomic plans. Preparation of industrial plans, regional plans, or other sector plans, as well as planning designed to increase the efficiency of activities in the government sector , will not be discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Mastergradsoppgave HIS 350 Jostein
    NEDBYGGING OG NEDLEGGING I TEKSTILINDUSTRIEN PÅ VESTLANDET Arne fabrikker og Salhus Tricotagefabrik MASTEROPPGAVE I HISTORIE AHKR høstsemester 2009 Jostein Knutsen studentnummer 125947 Innholdsfortegnelse Forord ………………………………………………………………………………. s. 3 Kapittel 1. Innledning, problemstilling og kildemateriale…………………………….s. 4 DEL 1. Mot større enheter: 1960-1972 Kapittel 2. Lokal tekstilindustri i møte med et globalt marked………………………s.16 Kapittel 3. Arne Fabrikker og Norionfusjonen……………………………………….s. 26 Kapittel 4. På terskelen til en ny tid………………………………………………….s. 43 DEL 2. Fra Optimisme til pessimisme: 1973-1979 Kapittel 5. Fusjoner, en blindvei? ……………………………………………………s.52 Kapittel 6. Opp og ned i Salhus på 1970-tallet………………………………………..s.69 Kapittel 7. En garanti til besvær……………………………………………………….s.75 DEL 3 Fra industristeder til forsteder 1980- 1989 Kapittel 8. Salhus og Ytre Arne 1985………………………………………………..s.93 Kapittel 9. Industristeder blir forsteder……………………………………………….s.106 Kapittel 10. Omstilt, rasjonalisert på veg mot stupet………………………………….s. 110 Kapittel 11. Ny krise og nedlegging 1986-1989………………………………..….….s.119 Oppsummering og konklusjon…………………………………………………………s.125 English summary…………………………………………………………………….....s.128 Litteraturliste…………………………………………………………………………....s.129 Offentlige dokumenter og kilder ……………………………………………………..s. 130 Aktuelle internettadresser ……………………………………………………………..s. 131 2 Forord Jeg arbeidet tidligere med formidling og dokumentasjon ved Norsk Trikotasjemuseum i Salhus, der ett spørsmål som gikk igjen fra ulike typer publikum var hvorfor Salhus Tricotagefabrik var blitt lagt ned og hva det var som førte til nedbyggingen av tekstilindustrien på Vestlandet. Til tider kunne dette innebære at det oppstod forklaringsproblemer både overfor meg selv og publikum. Dette ledet noen ganger til interessante diskusjoner. Jeg har under arbeidet med den oppgaven hatt dette i tankene og har forsøkt å gjøre det hele så forståelig som mulig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the Oslo School
    Nordic Journal of Political Economy Volume 33 2007 Article 1 The Rise and Fall of the Oslo School ‡ Ib E. Eriksen* Tore Jørgen Hanisch † Arild Sæther * University of Agder, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Kristiansand, Norway ‡ University of Agder, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Kristiansand, Norway † University of Agder, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Kristiansand, Norway This article can be dowloaded from: http://www.nopecjournal.org/NOPEC_2007_a01.pdf Other articles from the Nordic Journal of Political Economy can be found at: http://www.nopecjournal.org The Rise and Fall of the Oslo School 1 Ib E. Eriksen, Tore Jørgen Hanisch1, Arild Sæther The Rise and Fall of the Oslo School2 Abstract In 1931 Ragnar Frisch became professor at the University of Oslo. By way of his research, a new study programme and new staff he created the ”Oslo School”, characterised by mathematical modelling, econometrics, economic planning and scepticism towards the market economy. Consequently, detailed state economic planning and governance dominated Norwegian economic policy for three decades after WWII. In the 1970s the School’s dominance came to an end when the belief in competitive markets gained a foothold and the economy had poor performance. As a result a decentralized market economy was reintroduced. However, mathematical modelling and econometrics remain in the core of most economic programmes. JEL classification: B23, B29,B31, B59, O21, P41, P51 1. Introduction The main purpose of this presentation is to tell the story of how Ragnar Frisch founded the so-called Oslo School in economics, and secondly, to outline the main features of this School and investigate its major influence on the Norwegian post-war economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Stortingsvalget 1965. Hefte II Oversikt
    OGES OISIEE SAISIKK II 199 SOIGSAGE 6 EE II OESIK SOIG EECIOS 6 l II Gnrl Srv SAISISK SEAYÅ CEA UEAU O SAISICS O OWAY OSO 66 Tidligere utkommet. Statistik vedkommende Valgmandsvalgene og Stortingsvalgene 1815-1885: NOS III 219, 1888: Medd. fra det Statist. Centralbureau 7, 1889, suppl. 2, 1891: Medd. fra det Statist. Centralbureau 10, 1891, suppl. 2, 1894 III 245, 1897 III 306, 1900 IV 25, 1903 IV 109. Stortingsvalget 1906 NOS V 49, 1909 V 128, 1912 V 189, 1915 VI 65, 1918 VI 150, 1921 VII 66, 1924 VII 176, 1927 VIII 69, 1930 VIII 157, 1933 IX 26, 1936 IX 107, 1945 X 132, 1949 XI 13, 1953 XI 180, 1957 XI 299, 1961 XII 68, 1961 A 126. Stortingsvalget 1965 I NOS A 134. MARIENDALS BOKTRYKKERI A/S, GJØVIK Forord I denne publikasjonen er det foretatt en analyse av resultatene fra stortings- valget 1965. Opplegget til analysen er stort sett det samme som for stortings- valget 1961 og bygger på et samarbeid med Chr. Michelsens Institutt og Institutt for Samfunnsforskning. Som tillegg til oversikten er tatt inn de offisielle valglister ved stortingsvalget i 1965. Detaljerte talloppgaver fra stortingsvalget er offentliggjort i Stortingsvalget 1965, hefte I (NOS A 134). Statistisk Sentralbyrå, Oslo, 1. juni 1966. Petter Jakob Bjerve Gerd Skoe Lettenstrom Preface This publication contains a survey of the results of the Storting elections 1965. The survey appears in approximately the same form as the survey of the 1961 elections and has been prepared in co-operation with Chr. Michelsen's Institute and the Institute for Social Research.
    [Show full text]
  • On Institutions – Fundamentals of Confidence and Trust
    ON INSTITUTIONs – FUNDAMENTALS of CONFIDENCE AND TRUST A COLLECTION of ARTICLES BASED ON PRESENTATIONS AT A SEMINAR ARRANGED BY NoRGES BANK AND THE NoRWEGIAN ACADEMY of SCIENCE AND LETTERS ON 12 NoVEMBER 2013 NoRGES BANKS SKRIFTSERIE OCCASIONAL PAPERS NO. 47 Norges Banks skriftserie / Occasional Papers can be ordered by e-mail: [email protected] or from Norges Bank, Subscription Service P.O.Box 1179 Sentrum N-0107 Oslo ©Norges Bank 2013 The text may be quoted or referred to, provided that due acknowledgement is given to the authors and Norges Bank. Views and conclusions expressed in this paper are the responsibility of the authors alone. Previously issued in this series: (Prior to 2002 this series also included doctoral dissertations written by staff members of Norges Bank. These works are now published in a separate series: ”Doctoral Dissertations in Economics”.) Nr. 1 Leif Eide: Det norske penge- og kredittsystem, Oslo 1973, No. 25 Ingunn M. Lønning: Controlling Inflation by use of the utgått, erstattet med nr. 23 Interest Rate: The Critical Roles of Fiscal Policy and No. 1 Leif Eide: The Norwegian Monetary and Credit System, Government Debt, Oslo 1997 (Doct.d.) Oslo 1973, replaced by No. 23/24 No. 26 ØMU og pengepolitikken i Norden, Oslo 1998 Nr. 2 En vurdering av renteutviklingen og rentestruk turen i No. 27 Tom Bernhardsen: Interest Rate Differentials, Capital Norge, Oslo 1974 Mobility and Devaluation Expectations: Evidence from No. 3 Arne Jon Isachsen: The Demand for Money in Norway, European Countries, Oslo 1998 (Doct.d.) Oslo 1976 No. 28 Sentralbanken i forandringens tegn.
    [Show full text]
  • UQFL87 Colin Clark Papers
    FRYER LIBRARY Manuscript Finding Aid UQFL87 Colin Clark Papers Size 36 boxes Contents Correspondence; own publications and writings; book reviews; newspaper cuttings; slides; index cards. Collection reflects interests and involvement in politics, agriculture, economics, economic policy, demography, public finance, international data, religion and ancient history. Correspondence includes letters to and from John Maynard Keynes and B.A. Santamaria. Collection also includes photocopies of papers in Colin Clark Collection, Brasenose College, Oxford. Date range 1907 to 1986 (bulk of collection 1931 to 1986) Biography Colin Clark was born on 2 November 1905 in London. He was educated at Winchester College and Oxford and Cambridge Universities. He graduated first in chemistry and then in economics. He described himself as ‘an academic economist with a considerable international reputation.’ He was a prodigious author of economic texts, articles and papers. He was an economic adviser to various governments in the United Kingdom, India and Australia. From 1938 to 1953 he advised the Treasury Department of the Queensland Government. In 1978, he joined the Economics Department of the University of Queensland as a research consultant, where he remained for eleven years. His memory has been perpetuated in the annual Colin Clark Memorial Lecture at the University of Queensland. Notes Unrestricted access Index to collection See also Box 22B Code Description Box no. PO Politics Australia 1A Wentworth Politics: Wentworth RE Incomes 1B S [Service Industries] 1B James Clark letterbook 1907 to 1909 2A R Religion 2B PU Public Finance 2B ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Last updated: 23/03/2021 © University of Queensland 1 FRYER LIBRARY Manuscript Finding Aid Code Description Box no.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of Minority Governments
    Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design Volume 3 Article 1 10-17-2018 Taxonomy of Minority Governments Lisa La Fornara [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijcd Part of the Administrative Law Commons, American Politics Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Comparative Politics Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legislation Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Rule of Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation La Fornara, Lisa (2018) "Taxonomy of Minority Governments," Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design: Vol. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijcd/vol3/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Taxonomy of Minority Governments LISA LA FORNARA INTRODUCTION A minority government in its most basic form is a government in which the party holding the most parliamentary seats still has fewer than half the seats in parliament and therefore cannot pass legislation or advance policy without support from unaffiliated parties.1 Because seats in minority parliaments are more evenly distributed amongst multiple parties, opposition parties have greater opportunity to block legislation. A minority government must therefore negotiate with external parties and adjust its policies to garner the majority of votes required to advance its initiatives.2 This paper serves as a taxonomy of minority governments in recent history and proceeds in three parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Opiskelijakirjaston Verkkojulkaisu 2007
    Opiskelijakirjaston verkkojulkaisu 2007 Reprinted from "The European Idea: The Scandinavian answer. Norwegian attitudes towards a Closer Scandinavian Economic Cooperation 1947-1959" by Ingrid Sogner from Scandinavian Journal of History, www.tandf.no/sjhist, 1993,18(4), 307-327, by permission of Taylor & Francis Tämä aineisto on julkaistu verkossa oikeudenhaltijoiden luvalla. Aineistoa ei saa kopioida, levittää tai saattaa muuten yleisön saataviin ilman oikeudenhaltijoiden lupaa. Aineiston verkko-osoitteeseen saa viitata vapaasti. Aineistoa saa opiskelua, opettamista ja tutkimusta varten tulostaa omaan käyttöön muutamia kappaleita. www.opiskelijakirjasto.lib.helsinki.fi [email protected] 307 The European Idea: The Scandinavian Answer Norwegian Attitudes Towards a Closer Scandinavian Economic Cooperation 1947-19591 Ingrid Sogner In 1947 the Norwegian government proposed to extend economic cooperation between the Nordic countries. 2 This suggestion launched twelve years of thorough investigations; the options considered included the establishment of a Scandinavian customs union - a suggestion never to be realized. In 1959 EFTA was instead established, with the three Scandinavian countries included among the seven founding countries. Contemporary observers claimed that the Scandinavian cus- toms union henceforth ". at most would serve as a subject for dissertations for future researchers on Nordic cooperation".3 This article is based on my dissertation on the plans for a Scandinavian customs union, and the Norwegian attitude towards these. Norway has been judged, both by contemporaries and in hindsight by researchers, to be the most reluctant among the Scandinavian countries towards Scandinavian cooperation and a Scandinavian customs union. This conclusion will be discussed and modified in this article. My argument is that Norway throughout this period pursued a fairly consistent and positive policy towards closer Scandi- Ingrid Sogner, born 1964, Cand.
    [Show full text]
  • The Centre for European and Asian Studies
    Nick Sitter, PSA 2004, p.1 The Centre for European and Asian Studies REPORT 2/2004 ISSN 1500-2683 Beyond Government and Opposition? The European Question, Party Strategy and Coalition Politics in Norway Nick Sitter A publication from: Centre for European and Asian Studies at Norwegian School of Management Elias Smiths vei 15 PO Box 580 N-1302 Sandvika Norway Paper prepared for the UK Political Studies Association conference, 2004 BEYOND GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION? THE EUROPEAN QUESTION, PARTY STRATEGY AND COALITION POLITICS IN NORWAY Nick Sitter Department of Public Governance, The Norwegian School of Management BI The British application for membership of the European Economic Community in July 1961 came less than two months before the election that cost the Labour party its parliamentary majority and inaugurated four decades of minority and coalition government. Not only did the British application place the controversial question of whether to apply for EEC membership on the Norwegian Labour (and now minority) administration’s agenda, it introduced a question that has cast a shadow over coalition politics ever since. Participation in European integration has long divided both the centre-right and centre-left wings of the party system, and with the 2005 election a year and a half away it continues to do so more than ever. With the leaders of the two mainstream centre-left and -right parties both declaring that application for membership of the European Union is more important than coalition politics, and their respective potential coalition partners prioritising opposition to EU membership, the scene is set for intense coalition games and negotiations in the run-up to the 2005 elections and in all likelihood yet another minority government that builds alliances in different directions on economic and foreign policy questions.
    [Show full text]