DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental and Social Management Framework for Bosnia and Herzegovina

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental and Social Management Framework for Bosnia and Herzegovina SAVA AND DRINA RIVERS CORRIDORS INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK FOR BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA February 2020 SAVA AND DRINA RIVERS CORRIDORS INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ESMF BIH Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................1 2 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................5 2.1 Brief Project Description .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Objectives ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Components .................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.3 Implementation Arrangements ...................................................................................................... 6 2.1.4 Timeline and Budget ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Objectives of this Environmental and Social Management Framework .................................................. 7 2.3 Basic Information About the Country ...................................................................................................... 8 3 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROJECT AREA ..................................................9 3.1 Drina River Basin ...................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1.1 Geographic, Topographic and Geological Characterization............................................................ 9 3.1.2 Climate .......................................................................................................................................... 10 3.1.3 Climate Change ............................................................................................................................. 11 3.1.4 Water Quality................................................................................................................................ 12 3.1.5 Biodiversity and Protected Areas ................................................................................................. 14 3.1.6 Cultural and Historical Heritage .................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Sava River Basin ...................................................................................................................................... 18 3.2.1 Geographic, Topographic and Geological Characterization.......................................................... 18 3.2.2 Climate .......................................................................................................................................... 19 3.2.3 Climate Change ............................................................................................................................. 19 3.2.4 Water Quality................................................................................................................................ 20 3.2.5 Biodiversity and Protected Areas ................................................................................................. 22 3.2.6 Cultural and Historical Heritage .................................................................................................... 27 4 BASELINE SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROJECT AREA ................................................ 28 4.1 Demography ........................................................................................................................................... 28 4.1.1 Demography in the Drina Basin .................................................................................................... 28 4.1.2 Demography in the Sava Basin ..................................................................................................... 28 4.2 Rural and Urban Areas ........................................................................................................................... 29 4.2.1 Rural and Urban Areas in the Drina Basin..................................................................................... 29 4.2.2 Rural and Urban Areas in the Sava Basin ...................................................................................... 29 4.3 Key Economic Indicators ........................................................................................................................ 29 4.4 Local Economy of the Project Area ........................................................................................................ 30 4.4.1 Local Economy of the Drina Basin ................................................................................................. 30 i SAVA AND DRINA RIVERS CORRIDORS INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ESMF BIH 4.4.2 Local Economy of the Sava Basin .................................................................................................. 30 4.5 Impacts of Climate Change and Water Pollution on Local Economy ..................................................... 30 4.6 Employment ........................................................................................................................................... 31 4.6.1 Employment in the DRB ................................................................................................................ 32 4.6.2 Employment in Sava Basin Area ................................................................................................... 33 4.7 Poverty ................................................................................................................................................... 33 4.8 Labor Conditions .................................................................................................................................... 33 5 LEGAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................................................................................. 35 5.1 The World Bank Requirements .............................................................................................................. 35 5.1.1 The World Bank Environmental and Social Framework (2016) .................................................... 35 5.1.2 Other Applicable Criteria and Guidelines ..................................................................................... 40 5.2 Overview of Environmental and Social Requirements in BiH................................................................. 40 5.2.1 Environmental Assessment Procedure ......................................................................................... 40 5.2.2 Waste Management Regulations.................................................................................................. 44 5.2.3 Water Management Regulations .................................................................................................. 45 5.2.4 Construction Regulations .............................................................................................................. 47 5.2.5 Regulations on Working Conditions ............................................................................................. 48 6 INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE .................................................................................................................. 50 6.1 BiH Level Institutions .............................................................................................................................. 50 6.2 FBiH Level Institutions ............................................................................................................................ 50 6.3 RS Level Institutions ............................................................................................................................... 51 6.4 BD Level Institutions ............................................................................................................................... 52 7 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SUBPROJECTS ..................................................... 53 7.1 ESSs Relevant to the Program ................................................................................................................ 53 7.2 Preliminary Identification of Potential E&S Impacts with Proposed Mitigation Measures ................... 54 7.3 Environmental and Social Requirements ............................................................................................... 61 7.4 Environmental and Social Screening Process (Step-by-Step) ................................................................. 62 7.5 Labor Management ................................................................................................................................ 64 7.6 Monitoring and Reporting ...................................................................................................................... 64 7.7 Demining of the Right Bank of the Sava River ........................................................................................ 65 8 PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS PROCESS ........................................................................................................ 69 ANNEXES
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project SUN: a Study of the Illicit Cigarette Market In
    Project SUN A study of the illicit cigarette market in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland 2017 Results Executive Summary kpmg.com/uk Important notice • This presentation of Project SUN key findings (the ‘Report’) has been prepared by KPMG LLP the UK member firm (“KPMG”) for the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies (RUSI), described in this Important Notice and in this Report as ‘the Beneficiary’, on the basis set out in a private contract dated 27 April 2018 agreed separately by KPMG LLP with the Beneficiary (the ‘Contract’). • Included in the report are a number of insight boxes which are written by RUSI, as well as insights included in the text. The fieldwork and analysis undertaken and views expressed in these boxes are RUSI’s views alone and not part of KPMG’s analysis. These appear in the Foreword on page 5, the Executive Summary on page 6, on pages 11, 12, 13 and 16. • Nothing in this Report constitutes legal advice. Information sources, the scope of our work, and scope and source limitations, are set out in the Appendices to this Report. The scope of our review of the contraband and counterfeit segments of the tobacco market within the 28 EU Member States, Switzerland and Norway was fixed by agreement with the Beneficiary and is set out in the Appendices. • We have satisfied ourselves, so far as possible, that the information presented in this Report is consistent with our information sources but we have not sought to establish the reliability of the information sources by reference to other evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants. The tasks were laid out in specific Terms of Reference. At a Regional Workshop in Budapest from 27 to 29 January 1998, the national teams and the group of international consultants discussed in detail the methodological approach and the content of the National Reviews to assure coherence of results.
    [Show full text]
  • Drina River Basin Nexus Assessment - Phase II National Consultation Meeting KTH – Royal Institute of Technology: Emir Fejzić Youssef Almulla Dr
    Drina River Basin nexus assessment - Phase II National Consultation meeting KTH – Royal Institute of Technology: Emir Fejzić Youssef Almulla Dr. Vignesh Sridharan Dr. Francesco Gardumi 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 1 Agenda Key questions Scenarios Approach The river basin Preliminary results Hydro power plant cascade 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 2 Key questions to be addressed in Phase II • What role can renewables (hydro and non-hydro) in the Drina basin play in achieving the UNFCCC Nationally Determined Contributions? • What benefits does an increased share of non-hydro RES bring in terms of GHG emissions reduction and reduced stress on hydro power especially considering the need for flood containment measures. o To what extent may hydro power plants provide environmental services (e.g. environmental flows and flood control), and what impact does that have on their potential generation? • What are the effects of climate induced variability on hydropower generation? • What role could non-hydro RES play if the proposed plans for HPP development in the DRB are executed? • What effects can the Emission Trading Scheme, as part of the EU integration pathway, have on hydro and non-hydro RES development in the riparian countries? • In which way can hydro and non-hydro RES be impacted by the implementation of energy efficiency measures (demand- and supply-side)? 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 3 Scenarios proposed in Phase II • Reference scenario o Current policies, including INDC • Carbon pricing scenario o Effects
    [Show full text]
  • Tara-Drina National Park
    Feasibility study on establishing transboundary cooperation in the potential transboundary protected area: Tara-Drina National Park Prepared within the project “Sustaining Rural Communities and their Traditional Landscapes Through Strengthened Environmental Governance in Transboundary Protected Areas of the Dinaric Arc” ENVIRONMENT FOR PEOPLE A Western Balkans Environment & Development in the Dinaric Arc Cooperation Programme Author: Marijana Josipovic Photographs: Tara National Park archive Proofreading Linda Zanella Design and layout: Imre Sebestyen, jr. / UNITgraphics.com Available from: IUCN Programme Office for South-Eastern Europe Dr Ivana Ribara 91 11070 Belgrade, Serbia [email protected] Tel +381 11 2272 411 Fax +381 11 2272 531 www.iucn.org/publications Acknowledgments: A Special “thank you” goes to: Boris Erg, Veronika Ferdinandova (IUCN SEE), Dr. Deni Porej, (WWF MedPO), Ms. Aleksandra Mladenovic for commenting and editing the assessment text. Zbigniew Niewiadomski, consultant, UNEP Vienna ISCC for providing the study concept. Emira Mesanovic Mandic, WWF MedPO for coordinating the assessment process. 2 The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, WWFMedPO and SNV concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, WWF MedPO and SNV. This publication has been made possible by funding from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Belgrade, Serbia in collaboration with WWFMedPO and SNV Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    BOSNIA FORESTRY PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized IMPACT OF FOREST TRUCK ROAD CONSTRUCTION ON THE ENVIRONMENT IN REPUBLIKA SRPSKA (EIA Study) Public Disclosure Authorized Banja Luka, August 2001 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized I 'FILECO'pY1 e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction and background This report represents the summary on environment impact assessment of forest road construction, within Forestry project in BiH financed by World Bank. Funds for road construction should be taken from remaining funds under IDA. Roads and locations, for which projects are elaborated, are as follows: 1. "Brankusa - section 115" in SFE "Ostrelj - Drinic" - Drinic 2. "Maksimovica potok" in SFE "telinac" - Celinac 3. "Mala Inova" in SFE "Borja" - Teslic 4. "Livade - Bad" in SFE "Maglic" - Srbinje 5. "Sipasno - Zlatac - Lokve" in SFE "Botin" - Nevesinje EIA studies are elaborated for all roads. These studies are about justification of road construction from aspect of positive, but also negative applications on the environment. Studies and executive summary have been elaborated by: 1. Mr Zoran Govedar and 2. Dipi. Ing. Ljubo Maric The Government of Republic of Srpska, by construction of new forest roads in mentioned SFEs, intends to influence on increasing of road infrastructure and openness of the forests. In that way the costs will be reduced and working efficiency increased in the most expensive phase of forest exploitation, which is skidding of wood assortments (transportation phase). Besides that road construction would increase other operational capacities in SFEs regarding protection, regeneration and nursering of forests, as well as other common useful forest functions (tourism, recreation, hunting, collection of secondary forest products and others).
    [Show full text]
  • Support to Water Resources Management in the Drina River Basin
    Confluence of Lim River and Drina River, Republika Srpska, Bosnia & Herzegovina Summary of key facts related to HPPs in country reports Belgrade, January 25, 2016 Outlook on presentation • Electricity generation and consumption structure in Serbia • High voltage grid in Serbia • General situation of hydropower in Drina river basin • Existing hydropower plants in Drina river basin • Conceivable hydropower plants in Drina river basin • Recommendations 2 Production and consumption in Serbia 2010 2030 Production Consumption 3 Production and consumption in Bosnia 2010 2030 Consumption Origin of electricity 4 Production and consumption in Montenegro 2010 2030 Origin of electricity Consumption 5 High voltage grids Serbia Bosnia & Herzegovina Montenegro - Max. 400 kV - Max. 400 kV - Max. 400 kV - Ring structure - No ring structure - No ring structure - 6 links to foreign grids - 30 links to foreign grids - 11 links to foreign grids 6 Existing HPPs in Drina river basin SAVA 9 HPPs existing in Drina river basin DRINA CEHOTINA UVAC TARA PIVA LIM 7 Potential HPPs in Drina river basin 37 HPPs conceivably developable in Drina river basin 8 Existing / potential HPPs in Drina river basin Existing HPPs Conceivable HPPs BiH 1 + 2 BiH 9 + 7 Montenegro 1 Montenegro 17 Serbia 5 + 2 Serbia 4 + 7 Total 9 Total 37 1’964 MW Planned HPPs BiH 9 + 7 Montenegro 6 Serbia 3 + 7 Total 25 1’494 MW +76% power 9 Serbia – Present / conceivable HPPs • 2015: 7 HPPs in operation Total = 1’289 MW - Drina River : 2 HPPs Zvornik (96 MW), Bajina Basta HPP (368 MW) *) - Uvac River : 3 HPPs Radoinja (103 MW), Kokin Brod (21 MW), Uvac (36 MW) - Lim River : 1 HPPPotpeć (51 MW) - Pumped-storage PP Bajina Basta PSPP (614 MW) Environmental flow Up to 60 m3/s • 10 projects of new HPPs Total power 781 MW Total cost Ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastropods in the Basin of the River Fojni^Ka
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Ribarstvo 66, 2008, (3), 119 —129 A.^i~i} –Mo~i} et al.: Gastropods in the basin of the river Fojni~ka ISSN 1330 –061X UDK: 594.3(28)(497.6) CODEN RIBAEG Original scientific paper GASTROPODS IN THE BASIN OF THE RIVER FOJNI^KA A. ^i~i} –Mo~i} 1, R. [krijelj 2, S. \ug 2 Summary The first detailed investigation of Gastropods in the basin of river Fojni~ka has been carried out in 2001 –2002. The material has been sam - pled five times during four seasons (October 2001 –September 2002) at 11 sites in the following waterways: the rivers Fojni~ka, Draga~a, @eljeznica, Kre{evka and Lepenica. Measurement of certain physical and chemical parameters (BOD 5, water temperature, pH value, amount of dissolved ox- ygen, saturation with oxygen and one time measurement of concentration of nitrates and phosphates) has been carried out together with collecting of macroinvertebrates of zoobenthos. Since the knowledge of biodiversity of Gastropods in Bosnia and Herzegovina is at the very low level, the main objective of this paper is to give an overview of distribution of Gas- tropods communities in the Fojni~ka river basin. In these investigations, 11 taxa of Gastropods and 1468 individuals have been determined. The Gastropods made 16% of total settlement of macroinvertebrates of zoobenthos. Dominant species at investigated sites was Ancylus fluviatilis , while species Acicula sp. , Saxurinator sp . and Valvata piscinalis were just sporadically recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Impact Study
    Interreg IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme Croatia-Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Final revised versions that incorporates inputs from consultations with the public and relevant authorities Zagreb, May 2015 IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme Croatia–Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 Strategic Environmental Impact Study Document quality information Authors of SEA Jiří Dusík, Dipl. Engineer - Water Resource Engineering Study Marta Brkić, B.Sc. Agronomy - Landscape Architect Ivana Šarić, B.Sc. Biology Jelena Fressl, B.Sc. Biology M.Sc. Konrad Kiš, B.Sc. Forestry Ivan Juratek, B.Sc. Agronomy - Landscape Architect Vjeran Magjarević, B. Sc. Phys. Tomislav Hriberšek, B.Sc. Geology Ines Geci, B.Sc. Geology Mario Pokrivač, B.Sc. Traffic, Occupational Safety Specialist Authors of Ivana Šarić, B.Sc. Biology Appropriate Jelena Fressl, B.Sc. Biology Assessment M.Sc. Konrad Kiš, B.Sc. Forestry Tajana Uzelac Obradović, B.Sc. Biology Project name Ex-ante evaluation and Strategic Environmental Assessment for Interreg IPA Cross-Border Cooperation Programme Croatia–Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 Document name Strategic Environmental Impact Study Version and Final draft incorporating comments after public consultations (20 May dates 2015) Reference U070_14 Managing Directorate for Managing Cooperation Programmes and Regional authority Development within the Agency for Regional Development Sent to Service for Managing Cooperation Programmes Sent on (date): 20 May 2015 Contact
    [Show full text]
  • Drina Euroregion
    Crossing the borders. Studies on cross-border cooperation within the Danube Region Case Study of cross-border cooperation along the Serbian–Croatian border Drina Euroregion Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 2. The development of the cross-border cooperation .............................................................. 7 2.1 Establishment of the Drina Euroregion ......................................................................... 8 3. Determination of geographical confines ............................................................................ 11 3.1 The Serbian–Bosnian border section of the Drina Euroregion .................................. 11 3.2 The Serbian–Croatian border section of the Drina Euroregion ................................. 12 3.3 The Croatian–Bosnian border section of the Drina Euroregion ................................ 12 3.4 The Montenegrin–Bosnian border section of the Drina Euroregion......................... 13 3.5 The Montenegrin–Serbian border section of the Drina Euroregion ......................... 14 3.6 Geographic features of the Drina Euroregion area .................................................... 15 3.7 Administrative units – members ................................................................................. 20 4. Organisational and institutional structure, operation ......................................................... 28 Assembly ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Disaster Situation Report 25Th May 2014
    United Nations / Ujedinjene nacije / Уједињене нације Office of the Resident Coordinator / Ured rezidentnog koordinatora / Уред резидентног координатора Bosnia and Herzegovina / Bosna i Hercegovina / Босна и Херцеговина Bosnia and Herzegovina – Flood Disaster Situation Report 25th May 2014 HIGHLIGHTS/KEY PRIORITIES: o Most water levels went down and water levels of Sava river basin are decreasing slowly, at a pace of less than 1cm / hour. o Mainly rural areas around Samac, Brcko, Orasje and Bijeljina are still covered with water; response activities ongoing and no life saving activities o Doboj, Olovo, Zavidovici, Zenica, Maglaj are intensively working on disinfection, sanitation, and cleaning o Around a 3,000 landslides have been reported. More than 1,000 landslides have been reported in Tuzla Canton alone. o Total number of reported casualties still cannot be confirmed (23 and in some reports up to 33) o Estimated 40,000 people have been displaced (ref. coordinators at Entity and District levels – shared through MoS Coordination Centre and the Red Cross). Estimated number of people in collective centers is between 2,600 and 3,000 o Elektroprivreda BiH reported that the electrical power grid is still severely affected in some areas (areas of Zenica-Doboj Canton, Doboj, Samac) and is being restored. o BH MAC reports that Doboj, Maglaj, Olovo, Una-Sana Canton and Posavina regions at the basin of Bosna, Krivaja and Usora rivers have so far been identified as mine and UXOs suspected areas: . Ammo depot in Orasje affected and presents a threat. BH MAC and UNDP are updating maps on mine locations. o Border crossing in Bosanski Samac, Brcko and Raca are still closed for traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceylon Government
    THE CEYLON GOVERNMENT No. 8,739-FRIDAY, APRIL 25, 1941. Published by Authority. PART I —GENERAL. ■ {Separate paging is given to each Part in order that it nwy-.ba^filed separately.) ,iT* ’’ " PAGE PAGE . 4§6 Proclamations by the Governor Municipal Council Notices . 495 Appointments by the Governor X ' 486 A- Notices calling for Tendeis . 496 Appointments, &c., of Registrars A . 487 IA “ Excise Ordinance ” Notices Government Notifications . 1 ■' . 487 Sales of Toll and Other Rents Revenue and Expenditure Returns r .. — Notices to Mariners Currency Commissioners’ Notices -A’ . — Patents Notifications Unofficial Announcements * . 492 Road Committee Notices .. r .. Miscellaneous Departmental Notices 492 Trade Mark Notifications .. - 494 Meteorological Returns Local Government Notices .. 495 Books registered under Ordinance No. 1 of 1885 SUPPLEMENT (1) List of Registrars of Births and Deaths in Ceylon (under the Births and Deaths Registration Ordinance) holding office on January 1, 1941. (2) List of Registrars of General Marriages m Ceylon (under the Marriage Registration Ordinance) holding office on January 1, 1941 (3) List of Registrars of Kandyan Marriages m Ceylon (under the Kandyan Marriage Ordinance) holding office on January 1, 1941. (4) List of Officiating Priests m Ceylon (under the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Registration Ordinance) holding office on January 1, 1941. (3) List of alfBuildings registered for the solemnization of Christian Marriages and not cancelled up to January 1, 1941. PRINTED AT THE CEYLON GOVERNMENT PRESS, COLOMBO. 4 8 5 -------- J. N A 2921-985 (4/41) A 1 486 Part I. (General) — CEYLON GOVERNMENT GAZETTE — April 25, 1941 PROCLAMATIONS BY TflE GOVERNOR. No. 229 o f 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins
    STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the
    [Show full text]