Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment in the Sava River Basin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment in the Sava River Basin PRELIMINARY FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT IN THE SAVA RIVER BASIN July, 2014 Date Document Revision History Document Author/Reviser 23 September 2013 Initial draft – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ PEG FP 17 December 2013 Draft 2 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić, M. Babić Mladenović 30 January 2014 Draft 2.1 – reviewed at 23rd PEG FP meeting Secretariat/ PEG FP 20 March 2014 Draft 3 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić, A. Bezdrob 14 April 2014 Draft 3.1 – sent as doc. for 24th PEG FP meeting Secretariat/ PEG FP 02 June 2014 Draft 4 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić 10 June 2014 Draft 4.1 – sent to PEG FP for approval Secretariat/ PEG FP (no comments) 18 June 2014 Draft 5 – sent to ISRBC Secretariat/ ISRBC 01 July 2014 ISRBC accepted and approved publishing on web ISRBC International Sava River Basin Commission Kneza Branimira 29 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia T: + 385 1 488 69 60 F: + 385 1 488 69 86 [email protected] www.savacommission.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE SAVA RIVER BASIN .................................................................. 3 3 OVERALL APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 4 3.1 SLOVENIA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 3.2 CROATIA .............................................................................................................................................................................. 6 3.3 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ............................................................................................................................................ 7 3.3.1 Federation of B&H ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 3.3.2 Republika Srpska ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.4 SERBIA ................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 4 SIGNIFICANT PAST FLOODS AND POTENTIAL FUTURE FLOODS ............................................ 10 4.1 SIGNIFICANT PAST FLOODS ........................................................................................................................................... 11 4.2 POTENTIAL ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF FUTURE FLOODS..................................................................................... 17 4.2.1 The Sava River ............................................................................................................................................................. 18 4.2.2 Tributaries to the Sava River ................................................................................................................................. 19 5 AREAS WITH POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT FLOOD RISK ................................................................. 22 5.1 SLOVENIA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 22 5.2 CROATIA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 22 5.3 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ......................................................................................................................................... 22 5.4 SERBIA .............................................................................................................................................................................. 23 6 ADDRESSING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ..................................................................... 24 7 TRANSBOUNDARY COORDINATION AND INFORMATION EXCHANGE .................................. 25 8 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 26 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................... 27 MAPS .................................................................................................................................................................. 28 FIGURES Figure 1: The 1896 Drina flood in Višegrad ......................................................................................................... 11 Figure 2: The 1964 flood in Zagreb ......................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 3: May 2014 flood in the Sava River Basin ............................................................................................. 17 TABLES Table 1: Type of floods .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Table 2: Important flood prone areas of the Sava River ................................................................................. 20 ABBREVIATIONS APSFR Area with Potential Significant Flood Risk EC European Commission FASRB Framework Agreement on the Sava River Basin FB&H Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina GIS Geographic Information System ICPDR International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River ISRBC International Sava River Basin Commission PEG FP Permanent Expert Group for Flood Prevention PFRA Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment RoS Republic of Srpska (Republika Srpska) UNECE United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment in the Sava River Basin 1 INTRODUCTION Floods are natural phenomena which cannot be prevented. Besides, some human activities and climate change contribute to an increase in the likelihood and adverse impacts of flood events. The assessment of flood risk is therefore a basis for decision-making in flood management at international, national, regional and local levels. The Sava River Basin countries have had a long tradition of different activities in flood management, including both structural and non-structural measures. A comprehensive elaboration of flood management in the basin has been given in the Sava River Basin Analysis report (ISRBC, 2009)1. The report provides basic information on flood prone areas, a detailed description of flood defence system including design criteria and current level of protection, overview of flood forecasting capabilities, commanding responsibilities in the countries and it provides an insight in the common actions coordinated by the Sava Commission. Common goals of the Framework Agreement on the Sava River Basin (FASRB)2 contracting Parties3 in flood management are elaborated in more details in the Protocol on Flood Protection to the FASRB4. The Protocol defines framework for cooperation and implementation of the activities aimed at creating the conditions for sustainable flood protection in the Sava River Basin. The Protocol emphasises the importance of coordinated measures, works and activities for the reduction of flood risks throughout a river basin, and operation in accordance with “no harm rule” principle. Therefore, in order to contribute to reduction of adverse consequences of floods, especially for human health and life, the environment, cultural heritage, economic activity and infrastructure associated with floods, it was agreed that countries in the Sava River Basin will cooperate on the following tasks: . Preparation of the Program for development of the Flood Risk Management Plan in the Sava River Basin; . Undertaking of Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment; . Preparation of flood maps; . Development of Flood Risk Management Plan in the Sava River Basin; . Establishment of the Flood forecasting, warning and alarm system in the Sava River Basin; . Exchange of information significant for sustainable flood protection; . Implementation of all measures and activities of mutual interest, originating from the abovementioned planning documents or activities, or other mutually agreed measures and activities. In the execution of these tasks, the Sava countries should cooperate on the basis of the Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks (EU Floods Directive), taking into account the Action Programme on Sustainable Flood Protection in the Danube River Basin and taking into account the good practices in cooperation in the field of flood protection in the Sava River Basin. The Third and the Fourth Meeting of the Parties to the FASRB (held in Ljubljana on 1 June 2011 and in Sarajevo on 31 May 2013, respectively), recognized great efforts and work of the Sava Commission and the Parties invested so far in the field of flood management, and supported further cooperation in undertaking of all tasks envisaged by the Protocol, even before its formal entry into force. 1 Sava River Basin Analysis Report: http://www.savacommission.org/dms/docs/dokumenti/documents_publications/publications/other_publications/sava_river_basin_an
Recommended publications
  • Plitvice Lakes National Park, 96 Pp; I
    WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION - IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION PLITVICE LAKES EXTENSION (CROATIA) 1. DOCUMENTATION i) IUCN/WCMC Data Sheet: ii) Literature consulted: S. Bozicevic. (undated) The Plitvice Lakes, Plitvice Lakes National Park, 96 pp; I. Pevalak. 1968. The biodynamics of the Lakes of Plitvice and their protection; S. Bozicevic (ed). 1998. The Plitvice Lakes National Park – Natural History, Guide, Photomonography 96pp, Plitvice Lakes National Park; M. Schneider-Jacoby. 1996. A view from abroad: Nature Preservation in Croatia – An investment in the future of the country, Turizam Vol 44, No 11/12; B. Stilinovic and S. Bozicevic. 1988. The Plitvice Lakes – A natural phenomenon in the middle of the Dinaric Karst in Croatia, European Water Management, Vol 1, No 1. iii) Consultations: three external reviewers; Ministry of Environmental Protection and Physical Planning, Zagreb; Plitvice Lakes National Park, Plitvicka Jezero. iv) Field Visit: Michael Smart, March, 2000. 2. SUMMARY OF NATURAL VALUES The area inscribed on the World Heritage List in 1979 as Plitvice Lakes National Park (PLNP) covered 19,462ha. In 1997, the area of the National Park was extended by the Croatian Parliament to 29,482ha. The Croatian authorities have now proposed that the World Heritage site be extended to include this enlargement of the park by 10,020ha. PLNP is situated in the karst area of Croatia. It consists of a series of lakes in the valley of the Bijela rijeka (White River) and Crna rijeka (Black River), which join to become the Korana River, which flows into the River Kupa and eventually into the River Sava. The lakes are formed by barriers of travertine (or tufa) across the valley which create deep highly oligotrophic lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Airac Aip Amdt
    SRBIJA / CRNA GORA AIRAC AIP SERBIA / MONTENEGRO KONTROLA LETENJA SRBIJE I CRNE GORE SMATSA doo BEOGRAD / AMDT SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES SMATSA llc 6/21 SLUŽBA ZA VAZDUHOPLOVNO INFORMISANJE / AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICE Trg Nikole Pašića 10, P.B. 640, 11000 Beograd, Serbia, AFS: LYBBYOYX 6 MAY TEL: + 381 11 321 8056, 321 8051 FAX: + 381 11 324 0456 e-mail: [email protected] Stupa na snagu / Effective Date 17 JUN 21 1. Sadržaj 1. Contents 1.1 Lokacijski indikator: LYEV – Uvođenje 1.1 Location indicator: LYEV – Introduction 1.2 AD BEOGRAD/Nikola Tesla: Parking pozicije – Izmene 1.2 BEOGRAD/Nikola Tesla AD: ACFT stands – Changes (prethodno objavljeno NOTAM-ima) (previously published by NOTAM) 1.3 AD BEOGRAD/Nikola Tesla: Navigacioni postupci – 1.3 BEOGRAD/Nikola Tesla AD: Navigation procedures – Izmene Changes 1.4 Uređivačke izmene 1.4 Editorial changes 2. Uklonite sledeće stranice 17 JUN 21 / 3. Uložite sledeće stranice 17 JUN 21 / On 17 JUN 21 remove the following pages: On 17 JUN 21 insert the following pages: GEN 0.2–1/2 20 MAY 21 GEN 0.2–1/2 17 JUN 21 GEN 0.4–1/6 20 MAY 21 GEN 0.4–1/6 17 JUN 21 GEN 0.5–1/2 20 MAY 21 GEN 0.5–1/2 17 JUN 21 GEN 2.4–1/2 28 JAN 21 GEN 2.4–1/2 17 JUN 21 GEN 3.2–11/14 20 MAY 21 GEN 3.2–11/14 17 JUN 21 GEN 3.2–15/16 22 APR 21 GEN 3.2–15/16 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 2.1–1/2 25 MAR 21 AD 2 LYBE 2.1–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 2.2–1/2 25 MAR 21 AD 2 LYBE 2.2–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.2–1/2 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.2–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.2–5/6 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.2–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.4–1/2 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.4–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.4–5/6 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.4–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.5–1/2 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.5–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.5–5/6 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.5–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.1–1/2 28 JAN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.1–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.1–5/6 28 JAN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.1–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.2–1/2 28 JAN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.2–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.2–5/6 28 JAN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.2–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 9.1–1/2 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 9.1–1/2 17 JUN 21 4.
    [Show full text]
  • From Urban Geodiversity to Geoheritage: the Case of Ljubljana (Slovenia)
    Jure Tičar eT al. QUAESTIONES GEOGRAPHICAE 36(3) • 2017 FROM URBAN GEODIVERSITY TO GEOHERITAGE: THE CASE OF LJUBLJANA (SLOVENIA) Jure Tičar, Blaž Komac, maTiJa Zorn, maTeJa FerK, mauro HrvaTin, roK ciglič Anton Melik Geographical Institute, Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ljubljana, Slovenia Manuscript received: March 31, 2017 Revised version: June 19, 2017 Tičar J., Komac B., Zorn M., FerK M., HrvaTin M., ciglič R., 2017. From urban geodiversity to geoheritage: the case of Ljubljana (Slovenia). Quaestiones Geographicae 36(3), Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, pp. 37–50. 7 figs, 1 table. aBsTracT: The city of Ljubljana lies at the intersection of various geomorphological regions that have strongly influ- enced its spatial organization. Prehistoric settlements were built on marshland, a Roman town was built on the first river terrace of the Ljubljanica River, and in the Middle Ages a town was built in a strategic position between the Lju- bljanica River and Castle Hill. The modern city absorbed all usable space between the nearby hills. This paper reviews some relief features in Ljubljana, their influence on the city’s spatial development, and urban geoheritage. The results indicate new possibilities for urban geoheritage tourism in the Slovenian capital and its surroundings. Key words: geoheritage, geomorphology, urbanization, spatial growth, Ljubljana Corresponding author: Jure Tičar, [email protected] Introduction connecting the diversity of geomorphological and geological elements with their interpretation During the 1990s, geologists and geomorphol- and recreation (Necheş 2016). Consenquently ogists started using the term geodiversity to de- many geoparks dedicated to protect and to pro- scribe the diversity of nonliving nature (Sharples mote the nonliving elements of nature are being 1993, Wiedenbein 1994, Zwolinski 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation FORESTS
    CROATIA Climate and vegetation Geographic position of Croatia- Central European-mediterranean country Basic information about Croatia The land area 56594 km2 The teriritorial waters 31.067 km2 Lenght of coast 1777 km Number of islands, islets and reefs 1185 The highest point above the sea level 1831 m Number of countys 21 Number of cities and municiplalities 127 - 429 Population 4.290.612 Population on km2 78,1 Number of inhabited islands 48 Language Croatian Script Latin Political system Parliamentary democracy GDP per capita in 2012 10203 Breaking up Croatia into Counties Natural-geographic areas of Croatia Panonian-peripanonian region(includes 55% of the territory and 66% of the population) Mediterranean or Croatian coastal region(includes 31% of the territory and 31% of the population) Mountainous or Dinaric region (includes 14% of the territory and 3% of the population) Climate Climactic characteristics of Croatia are a result of its location in the mid-latitude, the influence of the Mediterranean and Atlantic seas as well as the shape and relief (mountains along the coast and Panonian plain). - moderate continental climate - Mediterranean climate - mountainous climate Vegetation FORESTS (climazonal vegetation) Mediterannean region covers approximately 40% of Croatia’s surface, here we find 17 forest communities; Eurosiberian-North American region covers about 60% of Croatia’s surface, where there are 45 forest communities. NON-FOREST VEGETATION Created by human activity – lawns, meadows, pastures, underbrush Spatial distribution
    [Show full text]
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999
    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Land Use Analyses
    The relevance of farming and farmland for maintaining the landscape and biodiversity of the Sava floodplains Final report of Task C of the Life 3 rd countries project Protection of Biodiversity of the Sava River Basin Floodplains Wageningen International December 2009 WageningenInternational The relevance of farming and farmland for maintaining the landscape and biodiversity of the Sava floodplains Final report of Task C of the Life 3 rd Countries Program Protection of Biodiversity of the Sava River Basin Floodplain (LIFE06 TCY INT 246 ) The following report is based on the reports of the Land Use Working Group The editors of the three country reports are: Croatia- Ivana Ilijas, Jasna Jeremic, Andreja Ribaric State Institute for Nature Protection of Croatia Serbia- Alen Kis, Laslo Galambos, Dejan Bakovic, Klara Szabados and Milos Vukelic; Institute for Nature Conservation Serbia Bosnia and Herzegovia- Tihomir Predic- Agricultural Institute Banja Luka ABSTRACT Author(s) Zingstra, Henk ( final edit), Alen Kis, Andreja Ribaric, Dejan Bakovic, Ivana Ilijas, Jasna Jeremic, Laslo Galambos, Klara Szabados, Milos Vukelic, Tihomir Predic ; The relevance of farmland and farming for the protection of the landscape and biodiversity of the Sava Floodplains, Final Report of Task C of the EU-LIFE06 TCY INT 246 Project. Photos: Institute for Nature Conservation of Croatia, Agricultural Institute Banja Luka. Keywords: Land use, agriculture, agri environment, flood protection, nature conservation. © 2009 Wageningen International P.O. Box 88; 6700 AB Wageningen; The Netherlands No part of this publication may be reproduced or published in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system without the written permission of Wageningen International.
    [Show full text]
  • Raspored I Rezultati Utakmica
    RASPORED I REZULTATI UTAKMICA NEDELJA, 23.12.2018. STARIJI VETERANI 23.12.2018. 16:00 NAŠA KUJNA (SR. MITROVICA) 2:4 RESPEKT (SR. MITROVICA) NEDELJA, 23.12.2018. MLAĐI VETERANI 23.12.2018. 17:00 GARNIZON (SR. MITROVICA) 6:2 FK POLETARAC ( LAĆARAK) NEDELJA, 23.12.2018. SENIORI 23.12.2018. 18:00 VAHALI (ZASAVICA 2) 5:1 OZREN NAMEŠTAJ (VOGANJ) 23.12.2018. 19:00 ASTERIX TODOR (SR. MITROVICA) 2:8 MAX BET (SR. MITROVICA) 23.12.2018. 20:00 I–CARGO (SR. MITROVICA) 4:2 FK PLANINAC (LEŽIMIR) PONEDELJAK, 24.12.2018. PIONIRI 24.12.2018. 10:00 FK LSK (LAĆARAK) 0:2 EKONOMIK IMPEX (SR. MITROVICA) PONEDELJAK, 24.12.2018. KADETI 24.12.2018. 10:45 FK BORAC (MARTINCI) 1:10 PAUN (SR. MITROVICA) POSLOVNO-SPORTSKI CENTAR PINKI 22000 Sremska Mitrovica, Svetog Dimitrija 36, +381 22 611 555 www.pscpinki.org.rs PONEDELJAK, 24.12.2018. OMLADINCI 24.12.2018. 11:45 FK MITROS (SR. MITROVICA) 2:7 REKREATIVO (SR. MITROVICA) 222 24.12.2018. 12:45 ZLATNI KLAS (SR. MITROVICA) 2:5 OKTAGON BET (SR. MITROVICA) 24.12.2018. 16:00 BAVET FISH CORP (KUZMIN) 4:7 FERUM (ŠID) PONEDELJAK, 24.12.2018. SENIORI 24.12.2018. 17:00 POLICIJSKA UPRAVA (SR.MITROVICA) 13:4 FK SLOBODA (ŠAŠINCI) 24.12.2018. 18:00 JKP KOMUNALIJE (SR. MITROVICA) 5:2 STEFAN I DRUGARI (MANĐELOS) 24.12.2018. 19:00 EKIPA BEZ BRIGE (SR. MITROVICA) 7:1 ZEKA BULJUBAŠA (RAVNJE) 24.12.2018. 20:00 FK BUDUĆNOST (SALAŠ NOĆAJSKI) 3:9 LAKI SPIN (SR. MITROVICA) UTORAK, 25.12.2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Molluscs of the Mrežnica River
    NAT. CROAT. VOL. 28 No 1 99-106 ZAGREB June 30, 2019 original scientific paper / izvorni znanstveni rad DOI 10.20302/NC.2019.28.9 AQUATIC MOLLUSCS OF THE MREŽNICA RIVER Luboš Beran Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Regional Office Kokořínsko – Máchův kraj Protected Landscape Area Administration, Česká 149, CZ–276 01 Mělník, Czech Republic (e-mail: [email protected]) Beran, L.: Aquatic molluscs of the Mrežnica River. Nat. Croat. Vol. 28, No. 1., 99-106, Zagreb, 2019. Results of a malacological survey of the Mrežnica River are presented. The molluscan assemblages of this river between the boundary of the Eugen Kvarternik military area and the inflow to the Korana River near Karlovac were studied from 2013 to 2018. Altogether 29 aquatic molluscs (19 gastropods, 10 bivalves) were found at 9 sites. Theodoxus danubialis, Esperiana esperi, Microcolpia daudebartii and Holandriana holandrii were dominant at most of the sites. The molluscan assemblages were very similar to assemblages documented during previous research into the Korana River. The populations of the endangered bivalves Unio crassus and Pseudanodonta complanata were recorded. An extensive population of another endangered gastropod Anisus vorticulus was found at one site. Physa acuta is the only non-native species confirmed in the Mrežnica River. Key words: Mollusca, Unio crassus, Anisus vorticulus, Mrežnica, faunistic, Croatia Beran, L.: Vodeni mekušci rijeke Mrežnice. Nat. Croat. Vol. 28, No. 1., 99-106, Zagreb, 2019. U radu su predstavljeni rezultati malakološkog istraživanja rijeke Mrežnice. Sastav mekušaca ove rijeke proučavan je na području od Vojnog poligona Eugen Kvarternik do njenog utoka u Koranu blizu Karlovca, u razdoblju 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER Opening of Honorary Consulate in Michigan
    UN Day: Letters to Santa Consulate Gen. Diplomats in in in NYC Schools Seattle, WA is Closing page 3 > page 7 > page 8 > NEWSLETTER OCTOBER 26, 2012, VOLUME 8, NUMBER 40 Opening of Honorary Consulate in Michigan On October 2223, Ambassador Roman Kirn and Consul General in Cleveland Honorary Consul of Slovenia Yousif B. Ghafari speaking at the opening, next to him Ambassador Roman Kirn and Congressman John David Dingell. Jure Žmauc visited the State of Michigan to open The offi cial opening of Representative from Michigan, a new Honorary Consulate, the consulate was attended John David Dingell. Ambassador headed by the former U.S. by the mayor of Dearborn Kirn was also a guest on the Paul Ambassador to Slovenia and John O`Reilly, local consuls, W. Smith radio show on Detroit’s a respectable businessman, Slovenian community and the WJR radio. Smith is known for Yousif B. Ghafari. The media, and was celebrated with hosting a number of notable Honorary Consulate is a fl ag-raising ceremony. people, including politicians, located in Dearborn, near During his visit, authors and business leaders Detroit, which is the center Ambassador Kirn also met within the automotive industry. of the American automotive with the Governor of Michigan, Furthermore, industry. Richard Dale Snyder and U.S. Ambassador Kirn spoke at the Embassy of Slovenia 2410 California Street, NW twitter.com/SLOembassyUSA Washington, D.C. 20008, USA T: +1 202 386 66 01 E: [email protected] facebook.com/SLOembassyUSA washington.embassy.si Ambassador Kirn and Ambassador Ghafari with Governor of Michigan Richard Dale Snyder, Consul General Jure Žmauc and participants of the business meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenian Alps
    SLOVENIAN ALPS Mangart, Photo by Bor Rojnik Slovenian Alps are truly remarkable, easily discovered by road as well as by trails suitable for hikers and cyclists. Marvellous panoramas, blooming meadows, alpine pastures and forests are surely never to be forgotten and are one of the most fascinating tourist spots in Slovenia. The high summits of the Julian Alps, the Karavanken chain and the Kamnik-Savinja Alps, open up amazing panoramas of the surrounding territory. It is hardly to find such a blooming meadows, alpine pastures and forests, elsewhere in the world within easy reach. The Julian Alps are a mountain range of the great Alps that stretches from northeastern Italy to Slovenia. They cover an estimated 4400 km², of which 1542 km² lies in Slovenia, and rise to 2,864 m at Mount Triglav, the highest peak in Slovenia. The entire mountain range constitutes about 150 mountains and is divided into two sections - the Western Julian Alps and the Eastern Julian Alps. 1 The Triglav National Park, boasting a number of peculiarities, is the largest and the earliest protected natural heritage site in the country. It is located in the north-west of Slovenia, more precisely in the Julian Alps. The park was named after the highest mountain of Slovenia, the Triglav, which is located nearly at the center of the park. It is the only National Park in Slovenia and among the earliest European parks. Pokljuka, is the southernmost highland marsh in Europe and a natural habitat of sphagnum moss. Near Kranjska Gora you can find nature reserve, the Zelenci, whom lakes provide Sava Dolinka with its source.
    [Show full text]
  • Sava River Position Paper Prepared by Euronatur Supported by Croatian Society for Bird and Nature Protection (HDZPP) and Birdlife Slovenia (DOPPS)
    Sava River Position Paper Prepared by EuroNatur Supported by Croatian Society for Bird and Nature Protection (HDZPP) and BirdLife Slovenia (DOPPS) Introduction EuroNatur has been dedicated to nature conservation and the sustainable use of natural resources in the Sava River Basin for the last 25 years. In our role as an official observer of the Sava Commission EuroNatur has been following the processes of the Commission and the ongoing development of the Sava River Basin Management Plan with attention. Hereby we would like to comment on some questions related to further infrastructural development and regulation of the Sava River, which are urgent and alarming from our point of view. Moreover, we are offering recommendations and suggestions regarding these issues. Comments on the focus of the Sava Commission (ISRBC) The International Sava River Basin Commission (ISRBC) has been established for the purpose of realization of the following goals: I. Establishment of an international regime of navigation on the Sava River II. Establishment of sustainable water management III. Undertaking of measures to prevent or limit hazards Although the second goal includes the availability of “water in sufficient quantity and of appropriate quality for the preservation, protection and improvement of aquatic eco-systems (including flora and fauna and eco-systems of natural ponds and wetlands)” no working group was implemented that is adequately dealing with such issues as the monitoring and protection of the Sava River and connected aquatic ecosystems. Most publications that were elaborated by the ISRBC so far miss a clear reference to biodiversity and nature conservation topics, but deal with navigation and water management issues.
    [Show full text]
  • ACTIVE FLOOD DEFENCE in CROATIA: Regulatory Framework, Roles & Responsibilities
    Workshop on Flood Risk Management measures & links to EU WFD November 11-12, 2015, Zagreb, Croatia ACTIVE FLOOD DEFENCE IN CROATIA: regulatory framework, roles & responsibilities Zoran Đurokovi ć, M.Sc.C.E. Croatian Waters Main Flood Protection Centre Head of Main Centre ∗ Climate change has intensified in recent years worldwide, including Croatia ∗ Extremely dry and wet periods have been alternating frequently in the last approximately 15 years ∗ Damage from extreme hydrological events is increasing ∗ “Average” or “normal” years are becoming increasingly rarer ∗ The frequency of high water waves and extreme water levels including floods is increasing ∗ There are almost no longer any rules concerning the occurrence of high water waves ∗ Forecasting climate models indicate increasingly frequent extreme climate events, both globally and locally ∗ Only in the last 15 years or so, the major part of the Croatian territory has experienced frequent extreme hydrological events which caused droughts in the years 2000, 2003, 2011 and 2012, but also floods in the years 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 ∗ Heavy damage is recorded, primarily in agriculture, but settlements, infrastructure and industrial facilities are also at risk ∗ Still, unlike in many other countries, major fatalities and disastrous damage in the urban areas have been avoided in Croatia ∗ Floods are natural phenomena which cannot be completely prevented. However, flood risks can be reduced to an acceptable level through constant development of flood
    [Show full text]