DOCSLIB.ORG

Tätigkeitsbericht Für Die Jahre 2015 – 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tätigkeitsbericht Für Die Jahre 2015 – 2017 TÄTIGKEITSBERICHT FÜR DIE JAHRE 2015 – 2017 Direktoren Prof. Dr. Armin von Bogdandy Prof. Dr. Anne Peters Heidelberg 3 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS cc) Richterauswahl zu EGMR und EuGH ............................................................................... 31 dd) Corte costituzionale und BVerfG als gegenläufige Typen ................................................... 31 ee) Unionsrecht und abstrakte Normenkontrolle in Italien ...................................................... 32 ff) Autorität des EuGH dank institutionellem Recht ................................................................. 32 gg) Die Leitentscheidung ....................................................................................................... 33 hh) Solidaritätskonflikte in der Eurozone vor Gericht .............................................................. 34 ii) Gesetzgebungsauftrag aus Straßburg? ............................................................................... 35 jj) BVerfG und US Supreme Court: ein systemtheoretischer Vergleich..................................... 35 I. STRUKTUR UND GLIEDERUNG DES INSTITUTS ������������� 17 kk) The Greek Judiciary ........................................................................................................ 36 A. Struktur und Tätigkeitsschwerpunkte .................................................................................. 18 ll) Challenges of the Judiciary in the XXI Century .................................................................... 36 B. Büro Berlin .............................................................................................................................. 19 b) Verfassungskrisen im europäischen Rechtsraum ................................................................... 37 C. Fachbeirat und Kuratorium ................................................................................................... 21 aa) Autoritäre Entwicklungen ................................................................................................. 37 D. Alumni und Heidelberger Gesellschaft ............................................................................... 22 bb) Rule of Law and State Reform in Greece ......................................................................... 38 cc) Die Verfassungsaufsicht der Europäischen Union ............................................................ 39 4 5 dd) Europäisches Asylrecht und Asylsystem .......................................................................... 39 ee) A Legal Reconstruction of Trilogues ................................................................................. 40 c) Die europäische Finanzkrise.................................................................................................. 41 aa) Domestic Coordination of EU Policies in Times of Crisis .................................................... 41 bb) Eurozone Conditionality ................................................................................................... 41 cc) Handlungsformen der Europäischen Finanzaufsicht ........................................................ 42 dd) Depolitisiertes redistributives Entscheiden ....................................................................... 42 II. FORSCHUNGSPROGRAMM ����������������������� 25 3. Internationale öffentliche Gewalt .................................................................................................. 43 A. Der gemeinsame Forschungsrahmen ................................................................................... 26 a) Strukturwandel der internationalen Gerichtsbarkeit ................................................................ 43 B. Die Forschung im Team von Bogdandy ............................................................................... 26 aa) International Judicial Legitimacy. New Voices and Approaches ........................................ 43 1. Die Forschungskonzeption .......................................................................................................... 26 bb) Gegen die Einheit des Völkerrechts bei ICTY und EGMR .................................................. 43 2. Der europäische Rechtsraum – Projekte ...................................................................................... 30 cc) Challenging the Authority of Human Rights Courts ........................................................... 44 a) Justizforschung ..................................................................................................................... 30 b) Grundlagen .......................................................................................................................... 44 aa) Gerichtsbarkeit im Ius Publicum Europaeum Projekt ........................................................ 30 aa) IPA@10 ............................................................................................................................... 44 bb) Die Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law ....................................................... 31 bb) Paradigmen öffentlicher Ordnung........................................................................................ 45 cc) Human Rights Obligations of International Organisations .................................................. 46 f) Law and Truth ........................................................................................................................ 66 dd) Citizens at the Border...................................................................................................... 47 g) Transatlantic Economic Governance and International Law of Nascent Distributed Ledger Technologies ............................................................................................................. 67 ee) Die Fremdheit des Rechts in der Globalisierung ............................................................... 48 3. Individual Rights and Needs under International Law ................................................................... 68 c) IPA und Global Governance .................................................................................................. 49 a) Humans in International Law ................................................................................................. 68 aa) International Health Governance ...................................................................................... 49 b) Direct Rights and Obligations of Individuals under the International Law of Armed Conflict ..... 69 bb) The Global Governance of Pandemics ............................................................................. 49 c) Corruption and Human Rights ............................................................................................... 70 cc) Stability in the Financial Sector through Deliberation ........................................................ 50 d) Just Satisfaction under Art. 41 ECHR: a Quantitative Analysis ................................................ 70 dd) Democracy and Financial Order – Legal Perspectives ...................................................... 51 e) Sovereign Debt Crisis Resolution and ESC Rights from the ee) Ein inkrementeller Ansatz zur Restrukturierung von Staatsschulden ................................. 52 Perspective of International Law ............................................................................................ 72 ff) International Food Security Law ......................................................................................... 52 f) Extraterritorialität und soziale Menschenrechte – Eine Untersuchung gg) Labour Governance by International Economic Institutions ............................................... 53 extraterritorialer Pflichten von Staaten anhand des Sozialpakts .............................................. 72 hh) Law of International Monetary Policy Coordination ........................................................... 54 g) State Responsibility in the Realm of Human Rights Conventions ............................................ 73 4. ICCAL: Transformativer Konstitutionalismus in Lateinamerika ....................................................... 55 4. Maintaining Peace and Security in Europe and Beyond ................................................................ 73 a) Gerichte und lateinamerikanischer Konstitutionalismus .......................................................... 55 a) Illegalität im Ius Contra Bellum .............................................................................................. 74 aa) Implementierung von Entscheidungen der interamerikanischen b) Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of War and Peace ............................................................. 75 Menschenrechtsinstitutionen ........................................................................................... 55 c) Transnational Public Security Law ......................................................................................... 76 6 bb) Handbuch Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in Lateinamerika .................................................. 55 7 d) The OSCE Legal Framework .................................................................................................. 77 cc) Transformative Adjudication: the IACtHR ......................................................................... 56 e) EU Civilian Crisis Management: Law and Practice of Accountability ........................................ 78 dd) Das Prinzip der Komplementarität und der Inter-Amerikanische Gerichtshof für f) The Security
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Laboratorio Sulla Qualità Delle Istituzioni Universitarie
    Laboratorio sulla qualità delle istituzioni universitarie Rapporto per la Fondazione Cariplo a cura di Marino Regini Università degli Studi di Milano Dipartimento di Studi del Lavoro e del Welfare (DSLW) e Italian Centre for Research on Universities & HE Systems (UNIRES) Contributi di: Gabriele Ballarino, Sabrina Colombo, Fiammetta Corradi, Loris Perotti INDICE 1. Introduzione 2. Internazionalizzazione: le strategie adottate in Europa e le soluzioni praticabili in Lombardia 3. Formazione alla ricerca: l’organizzazione del livello post-graduate in Europa e il caso lombardo 4. Regno Unito: strategie di internazionalizzazione e formazione alla ricerca 5. Germania: strategie di internazionalizzazione e formazione alla ricerca 6. Olanda: strategie di internazionalizzazione e formazione alla ricerca Appendice I: i nove atenei studiati A. University of Warwick B. University of Manchester C. University of Liverpool D. Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg E. Albert-Ludwig Universität Freiburg F. Konstanz Universität G. Universiteit van Amsterdam H. Universiteit Utrecht I. Universiteit Leiden Appendice II: le schede per la rilevazione dei dati Riferimenti bibliografici NOTA. Il presente rapporto di ricerca dal titolo “Laboratorio sulla qualità delle istituzioni universitarie” fa parte di un progetto più ampio su “La qualità del sistema d’istruzione lombardo. Misurazioni, confronti internazionali e proposte”, commissionato al Dipartimento di Studi del Lavoro e del Welfare (DSLW) e al Centro Interdipartimentale di ricerca su Lavoro, Formazione e Welfare (WTW) dell’Università di Milano, che comprende anche i sotto-progetti su: 1) Valore di segnalazione del voto di diploma e grading standard nelle scuole secondarie superiori; 2) La produttività e l’eccellenza scientifica delle università lombarde; 3) Fondazioni e promozione dell’eccellenza nel sistema educativo: esperienze di successo nel Regno Unito e negli USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Alsace Direction De La Coopération Et Des Relations Internationales 1, Place Du Wacken B.P
    > L'ESPACE DU RHIN SUPÉRIEUR / UNE RÉGION EUROPÉENNE D'AVENIR Présentation générale de la coopération transfrontalière > DER OBERRHEIN / ZUKUNFTSREGION IN EUROPA Präsentation der grenzüberschreitenden Zusammenarbeit Éditeur/Herausgeber Région Alsace Direction de la Coopération et des Relations Internationales 1, place du Wacken B.P. 91006 – 67070 STRASBOURG Cedex [email protected] RESPONSABLE/VERANTwortlicher Pierre Meyer COmITÉ de Rédaction/RedaktionskomITEE Martha Schwarze, Schweiz Alfons Bank, Deutschland Catherine Goure-Rauch, Frankreich TRADUCTION/Übersetzung REmerciemENTS/DANK Angela Tschorsnig, Karlsruhe Aux structures et porteurs de projets de l’espace du Rhin Catherine Goure-Rauch Supérieur pour la mise à disposition de textes, de photos et de matériel d’information. LECTURE/Lektoren Den Einrichtungen und Projektträgern des Oberrheins für die Comité d’Organisation du 11e Congrès Tripartite Bereitstellung von Texten, Fotos und Informationsmaterial. Direction de la Communication de la Région Alsace Au comité de rédaction pour l’excellente coopération. RÉALISATION DU documENT/Design Dem Redaktionskomitee für die hervorragende Agence Citeasen Zusammenarbeit. 24, avenue des Vosges 67000 STRASBOURG Au Comité d’organisation du 11e Congrès tripartite pour sa participation efficace. PHOTOS couverture/Fotos Dem Organisationskomitee des 11. Dreiländerkongresses Conseil de l’Europe, EUCOR, für die wertvolle Mitarbeit. Regierungspräsidium Freiburg, Stadt Freiburg, Région Alsace (Rothan-Airdiasol, Parent), SNCF Aux stagiaires France Messier, Simone Stippich, Marion Grzegrzulka, Christelle Wolf, Rozenn Courtois, Claudia Bucher et Annaïck Dangelser pour leur contribution à la Juin 2008/Juni 2008 réalisation de cette brochure. Den Praktikanten France Messier, Simone Stippich Marion Grzegrzulka, Christelle Wolf, Rozenn Courtois, Claudia Bucher und Annaïck Dangelser für Ihren Beitrag zur Erstellung dieser Broschüre. Au secrétariat commun du Programme Interreg Rhin Supérieur pour son apport utile.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Voices Magazine 2013
    The UArctic Magazine SHARED VOICES 2013 Regional, European and Art and Design Global Student Mobility Strengthened by Global mobility is Northern Cultures 06 increasingly important, The Thematic Network but regional mobility should 21 on Arctic Sustainable not be forgotten either. Arts and Design examines how art can help communicate cultural identities in the changing Arctic. Academic Mobility SubZero in Canada Communicating Arctic In remote areas 12 Research Thematic 10 interconnectivity Network: When art and science and partnerships are meet, traditional scientific the key to successful communication becomes education, as Canadian visually inspiring. institutions can attest. Editorial Team Outi Snellman, Lars Kullerud, Scott Forrest, Hannele Palviainen Editor in Chief Field schools in the North: Outi Snellman An Alaskan perspective Managing Editor Scott Forrest From introducing Graphic Design & Layout Puisto Design & Advertising, 27 Arctic perspectives www.puistonpenkki.fi to overcoming challenges, Cover Graphic Alexander Markus Lembke international field schools serve Print Run many educational purposes. 3 000 Printer Erweko Oy, 2013 Printed on Munken Pure by Arctic Paper Cover 170g/m2, contents 90g/m2 The UArctic Magazine Shared Voices 2013 UArctic International Secretariat University of Lapland Box 122 96101 Rovaniemi Finland [email protected] Tel. +358-16-341 341 Fax. +358-16-362 941 www.uarctic.org This magazine has been made possible by funding from the governments of Norway and Denmark, and the University of Lapland. 04 Letter from the President 20 Student Profile: Lars Kullerud Hilkka Kemppi The Nordic Model 05 The True Impact of 21 Art and Design Strengthened Marit Nybakk Circumpolar Mobility by Northern Cultures strongly believes 08 Outi Snellman Timo Jokela that Nordic cooperation has never been better and more 06 Regional, European and 22 Arctic Yearbook & Calotte efficient than now.
    [Show full text]
  • International Students Pursuing Higher Education
    DEPARTAMENTO DE EDUCACIÓN COMPARADA E HISTORIA DE LA EDUCACIÓN FACULTAD DE FILOSOFÍAY CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACIÓN UNIVERSIDAD DE VALENCIA INTERNATIONALISATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A COMPARATIVE VIEW OF CROSS-BORDER TYPES 1 & 2 EDUCATION AND THEIR IMPACT ON DEVELOPING AND DEVELOPED COUNTRIES Jacqueline M. Taylor Trabajo de Investigación del Programa de Doctorado 120F. Director: Dr. Luis Miguel Lázaro Lorente Valencia, mayo de 2014 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The journey has been longer than initially anticipated, and certainly a memorable one. Embarking on this journey was made possible when the Department of Comparative Education and the History of Education accepted my letter of application. Thus, I express my gratitude for having had the opportunity to pursue my studies within the department and by extension, the University of Valencia. The journey has been both challenging and very rewarding due to all the persons who have made this a worthwhile experience. I begin by expressing thanks to Dr. Luis Miguel Lázaro Lorente for having accepted to be director of my Doctoral thesis. His ongoing encouragement to publish articles and to co-author a chapter, as well as his administrative assistance in providing the necessary documents required of the department for the renewal of my student visa annually is greatly appreciated. I am also grateful for the interest in my progress shown by each person in the Secretary Office of the department, Dr. Joan Marie Senet and Dr. Maria Jesús Martinez Usarralde throughout the years. I also wish to thank all my classmates, especially Ana Garcia, who has enriched my international student experience. I would like to thank my all friends who have encouraged me along this trajectory; but special thanks to Noemi Martinez, Loida Sanchez, Danny Moreno and David Guaita who have been with me on this journey from the beginning and who have been most encouraging and very supportive when I needed it most.
    [Show full text]
  • Jagiellonian University
    NJUsletter ISSN: 1689-037X TWO PRESIDENTIAL VISITS 69 SPRING/ SUMMER RECTORIAL ELECTIONS 2020 IN RESPONSE TO COVID-19 JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY Faculty of Law and Administration Faculty of Philosophy Faculty of History Faculty of Philology Faculty of Polish Studies Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer Science Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Faculty of Chemistry Faculty of Biology Faculty of Geography and Geology Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology Faculty of Management and Social Communication Faculty of International and Political Studies Faculty of Medicine Faculty of Pharmacy Faculty of Health Sciences Founded in 1364 3 16 faculties campuses 35,922 students, including 4,743 international, over 90 nationalities PhD students Each = 2,000 students = International students 2,356 94 158 8,342 study specialities employees, including programmes 4,509 academics USOS data as of 31.07.2020 In this issue... UNIVERSITY NEWS 2 French President Emmanuel Macron visits the Jagiellonian University Editor: 4 Education means being a complete person JU International 2 Relations Office – Maltese President lecturing at JU 4 6 New JU authorities © Dział Współpracy 7 100th Anniversary of Pope John Paul II’s Międzynarodowej UJ, 2020 birth Publications Officer: FEATURES Agnieszka Kołodziejska-Skrobek 9 JU in touch with the world 10 Coimbra Group 3-Minute Thesis Language consultant: 11 UNA.TEN Maja Nowak-Bończa 6 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Design: Dział Współpracy 14 UNA EUROPA 1Europe kick-off meeting Międzynarodowej UJ 16 International Students 2020 Gala 17 Polish-Brazilian botanical co-operation Translation: 19 DIGIPASS in Amsterdam Agnieszka Kołodziejska-Skrobek 20 From an ex-native speaker: On Becoming Polish 11 Edited in Poland by: Towarzystwo Słowaków STUDENT LIFE w Polsce www.tsp.org.pl 21 Bonjour – Hi.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Progress Towards the ERA
    T Monitoring progress towards the ERA Editors: Luisa Henriques and René van Bavel Authors: Claire Nauwelaers and René Wintjes Table of Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................3 Executive Summary.............................................................................................................4 1 Evolution towards ERA: general trends and country­specific situations .......................7 1.1 National mobility initiatives...................................................................................11 1.2 Transnational strategic partnerships and opening up of universities ...................23 1.3 Opening up of national research programmes.....................................................38 1.4 Joint R&D initiatives at country level....................................................................45 2 Proposal for an ERA Monitoring system.....................................................................51 2.1 Key questions for ERA Monitoring.......................................................................51 2.2 State­of­Play with indicators under the 4 Topics..................................................54 3 Conclusions ................................................................................................................59 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................61 List of Tables .....................................................................................................................62
    [Show full text]
  • Transatlantic Relations and Security Governance
    THE TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONSHIP AND THE FUTURE GLOBAL GOVERNANCE ISSN 2281-5252 WORKING PAPER 41 | OCTOBER 2014 Historically, the system designed to ensure largely as a consequence of Europe’s modest international security has its roots in the evo- hard power and lack of strategic cohesion. On lution of the European-centred the contrary, if centripetal dynamics balance of power into the prevail, the Europeans can make transatlantic-promoted use not only of their indi- liberal order. Because vidual assets to address the liberal order functional threats is so depend- such as terrorism ent on Western and regional crises (US) power, but also exploit the emerging Transatlantic Relations the soft power multipolar- potential of the ity undeni- and Security Governance EU, whereby ably poses a US power gains challenge to greater out- it. Yet, even reach and im- the most res- pact. Because US tive among power is still so the non-West- Riccardo Alcaro and strong and the US- ern powers such European partnership as China and Rus- Ondrej Ditrych still enduring, the capac- sia have a stake in its ity of transatlantic relations endurance, meaning that to shape security governance multipolarity is not intrinsically in- has not vanished. Multipolarity has compatible with the liberal order. If centrifu- made the use of that capacity a more compli- gal dynamics prevail, the transatlantic ability cated exercise, but not necessarily a less effec- to shape security governance will diminish, tive one. THIS PROJECT HAS RECEIVED FUNDING FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION’S SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FOR RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION UNDER GRANT AGREEMENT NO 612782 Transatlantic Relations and Security Governance Riccardo Alcaro and Ondrej Ditrych* EU US Governance International security Multipolarity Introduction “Governance” is a term of recent conceptualisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-University Networks: Rhetorics Vs
    Mae C. Fastner Inter-university Networks: Rhetorics vs. Reality Objectives and Activities of Members of the European Consortium of Innovative Universities Master’s Thesis Public Administration // Policy and Governance Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences Supervisors: Prof. Dr. Hans Vossensteyn, Dr. Harry de Boer, Renze Kolster (M. Phil.) Candidate number: s1578634 March 14th, 2016 Abstract This qualitative study investigates higher education institutions’ engagement in inter-university networks. Inter-university networks are defined as formal, multilateral, multi-purpose and voluntary cooperative arrangements between higher education institutions from multiple countries which are coordinated by an additional administrative layer. This paper seeks to understand to what extent the activities universities perform within inter-university networks actually match their objectives towards these networks. Adopting a multiple-case study design including five European universities of the European Consortium of Innovative Universities (ECIU), the study builds on the resource dependence theory which predicts that higher education institutions use inter-university networks strategically solely for the achievement of their objectives. The goal of the study is to test the resource dependence theory’s expectation that higher education institution’s objectives towards their inter-university network engagements and the activities which they perform within such networks are aligned with each other. The empirical evidence includes primary data collected mainly through semi-structured interviews. The thesis begins with setting out the research focus and design, followed by an introduction to the phenomenon of inter-university networks including a description of their characteristics and factors of success and failure. Subsequently, the theoretical framework based on the resource dependence theory is outlined and a theoretical expectation guiding the research is developed.
    [Show full text]
  • European Project Manager Euridoc – Tri-National Doctoral Programme
    1 Job offer Publication date: 12.05.2021 European Project Manager EURIdoc – tri-national doctoral programme 1. Job status Temporary contract (2 years), part time or full time (80-100%), according to the experience; Affiliation: Coordination Office of Eucor – The European Campus in Strasbourg, France; Earliest starting date of the contract: 1st September 2021; 2. Context EURIdoc, the Eucor Upper Rhine Immunology doctoral programme, is a 4-year PhD programme supported by the European Union under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action COFUND-DP of the Horizon 2020 programme. The 28 PhD candidates will be recruited by the participating Eucor member universities of Basel, Freiburg, Karlsruhe and Strasbourg. EURIdoc was created by the immunologists of Basel, Freiburg and Strasbourg, who have been actively collaborating since 2017 as the Upper Rhine Immunology Group (URI, urigroup.eu). The programme will officially start on September 1st, 2021 and run for 5 years. The programme is coordinated by Eucor – The European Campus, a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC). The aim of the grouping is to consolidate and to extend the cooperation beyond borders in Research and Training in the tri-national Upper Rhine Area. The Eucor Strasbourg Coordination Office is in charge of the administrative affaires of EURIdoc in close coordination with the scientific leaders in Strasbourg, Freiburg and Basel. The job is offered in this context and should ensure the operational management of the project. 3. Mission The Project Manager will steer the implementation of the EURIdoc project under the responsibility of the director of the EGTC Eucor and Coordinator of the project, as well as the Scientific Leader of the project, Christopher Mueller.
    [Show full text]
  • Eucor – the European Campus
    June 6th, 2017 ESC Conference of dissemination Münster, Germany Philippe Portelli - University of Strasbourg Eucor The european campus: European student card experimental site Eucor The european campus University of Strasbourg Philippe PORTELLI – 2017-06-06 1 | About EUCOR - the European Campus. 2 | Experimenting the european student card 3 Eucor – the european campus : experimental site for the european student card Université de Strasbourg 1 | Eucor – The european campus About EUCOR • 5 universities in France, Germany and Switzerland : → Basel, Karlsruhe, Freiburg-in- Breisgau, Haute-Alsace, Strasbourg • Main actor engaged in research and higher education in the Upper Rhine Trination Metropolitan Region since 1989 • 2016 : Creation of a European Grouping for Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) « Eucor – The European Campus » → 1st EGTC carried by universities 4 Eucor – the european campus : experimental site for the european student card Université de Strasbourg 1 | About EUCOR A strategic flagship project 5,5 million euros from the European Union, 3 Interreg- projects : • Building Eucor – The European Campus: Cross-border structures • Research cluster in sustainability • Establishment of a trinational graduate academy focusing on risk management (together with the University of Coblence-Landau) 5 Eucor – the european campus : experimental site for the european student card Université de Strasbourg 1| About EUCOR Objectives • Expanding into an internationally attractive science and research area without walls nor borders • Attracting the
    [Show full text]
  • Erasmus Innen Layout 1
    ERASMUS+ FACT SHEET Academic Year 2021/2022 Name of Institution Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg / University of Freiburg D FREIBUR01 – ECHE 1531010 PIC: 999841760 - OID: E10208635 Country Germany Institutional Katharina Aly Coordinator Erasmus+ Institutional Coordinator University of Freiburg Fahnenbergplatz 79085 Freiburg Germany E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +49 761 203 4376 E-mail Nomination, bilateral agreements, general information and assistance: [email protected] Summer term Winter term Academic Calendar 1st April – 30th September 1st October – 31st March Nomination Deadline 25th November 10th June Application Deadline 30th November 15th June Language German (B2 or higher), C1 for German department classes Requirements (if any) Please contact the Freiburg departmental Erasmus+ coordinators: https://www.studium.uni-freiburg.de/en/counseling/exchange-programs-and- studying-abroad/erasmus Housing Will be made available via the registration platform. Silvia Kühnle International Office Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg Fahnenbergplatz 79085 Freiburg Germany E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +49 761 203 4267 Course Catalogue www.uni-freiburg.de/go/vvz Course Availability in Offered by some departments. Please check our course catalogue. English Additional Information University website: www.uni-freiburg.de Nomination procedure: Please nominate your student directly to [email protected]. Please respect the deadlines of 25th November for spring and 10th June for the winter term. After
    [Show full text]
  • Participation of Students with an Immigrant Background in European Higher Education
    Participation of students with an immigrant background in European Higher Education Contents Chapter 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................1 1.1 The EQUNET report in context ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 A focus on immigration .................................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2 Factors influencing the chances of immigrant and non-immigrant groups to access Higher Education in the EU countries ................................................................................................................................5 2.1 Language .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Social background ............................................................................................................................................ 9 2.3 Educational aspirations .................................................................................................................................. 11 2.4 Legal status ..................................................................................................................................................... 13 2.5 Gender ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]