Shared Voices Magazine 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shared Voices Magazine 2013 The UArctic Magazine SHARED VOICES 2013 Regional, European and Art and Design Global Student Mobility Strengthened by Global mobility is Northern Cultures 06 increasingly important, The Thematic Network but regional mobility should 21 on Arctic Sustainable not be forgotten either. Arts and Design examines how art can help communicate cultural identities in the changing Arctic. Academic Mobility SubZero in Canada Communicating Arctic In remote areas 12 Research Thematic 10 interconnectivity Network: When art and science and partnerships are meet, traditional scientific the key to successful communication becomes education, as Canadian visually inspiring. institutions can attest. Editorial Team Outi Snellman, Lars Kullerud, Scott Forrest, Hannele Palviainen Editor in Chief Field schools in the North: Outi Snellman An Alaskan perspective Managing Editor Scott Forrest From introducing Graphic Design & Layout Puisto Design & Advertising, 27 Arctic perspectives www.puistonpenkki.fi to overcoming challenges, Cover Graphic Alexander Markus Lembke international field schools serve Print Run many educational purposes. 3 000 Printer Erweko Oy, 2013 Printed on Munken Pure by Arctic Paper Cover 170g/m2, contents 90g/m2 The UArctic Magazine Shared Voices 2013 UArctic International Secretariat University of Lapland Box 122 96101 Rovaniemi Finland [email protected] Tel. +358-16-341 341 Fax. +358-16-362 941 www.uarctic.org This magazine has been made possible by funding from the governments of Norway and Denmark, and the University of Lapland. 04 Letter from the President 20 Student Profile: Lars Kullerud Hilkka Kemppi The Nordic Model 05 The True Impact of 21 Art and Design Strengthened Marit Nybakk Circumpolar Mobility by Northern Cultures strongly believes 08 Outi Snellman Timo Jokela that Nordic cooperation has never been better and more 06 Regional, European and 22 Arctic Yearbook & Calotte efficient than now. Global Student Mobility Academy: Pushing Ideas & Bernd Wächter Dialogue Across Borders Lassi Heininen, Heather Exner-Pirot & 07 Student Profile: Joël Plouffe Laura Aineslahti 23 Thematic Network on 08 The Nordic Model Northern Governance Nicolai Stampe Qvistgaard Greg Poelzer Towards a 10 Academic Mobility in Canada 24 Student Profile: Northern Brand Denis Bevington Natasha Letchford UArctic members 11 Student Profile: 25 Towards a Northern Brand 25 face common Harry Borlase Ute Vogel & Astrid Revhaug challenges in recruiting international students to their 12 SubZero 26 Circumpolar Studies study programs. Antti Tenetz and Mobility Claudia Fedorova 13 Student Profile: Shawn Jantzen 27 Field Schools in the North: An Alaskan Perspective 14 Will the Melting of Arctic Frozen John Eichelberger Methane Increase Greenhouse Gas Emissions? 28 The Verdde Program Jürgen Mienert Laila Aleksandersen Nutti 16 Student Profile: 29 Student Profile: Gunver Justesen Aura Pieski 17 Mobility in Thematic Networks 30 Student Profile: Kirsi Latola Ekaterina Evseeva 18 People and the Arctic 31 Capitalizing on Extractive Industries the IPY Legacy Florian Stammler Øyvind Paasche UArctic for 2012 Annual Report in the centerfold 4 Letter from the President By Lars Kullerud, President, University of the Arctic his year marks the do even more to engage with the the Circumpolar North to engage end of our current world outside the Circumpolar with actors and regions outside Strategic Plan 2009- North. A new Arctic moment the North that nevertheless hold 2013, and much of is upon us. The world, and a strong interest and influence in Tthe past year has been focussed particularly Circumpolar North, is the region’s future. on where UArctic is headed in a period of rapid change. The as an organization. For the drivers of change include climate The University of the Arctic will development of our new Strategic change, increased global socio- work to strengthen knowledge Plan, we have undertaken both economic interdependence and and capacity to meet the needs of internal and external evaluations accelerating use and spread of the North and the world. UArctic on our activities and organization, information and communication believes that a sustainable future as well as extensive member technologies allows even sparsely for the North and its people lies in consultation, which formed the populated areas to be the centre of a competent northern population, basis of extensive deliberations development. The growing global a strong northern knowledge base, and planning by our Board of population will be increasingly and partnerships with the non- Governors. The advice provided dependent on northern natural Arctic world. Key elements of by the University of the Arctic’s resources. For our members, this vision include strengthening very competent External Review Internationalization, new use of the voice of the Arctic in the Team (report available on the technology and organizational world as well as the world’s UArctic website) was particularly changes stimulate new ways of understanding of the Arctic, and helpful for the development working in higher education and to cooperate across borders in our new UArctic Strategic Plan research. The world influences the North to leverage experience, 2020, to be completed by the and is dependent on the Arctic; knowledge, competence, end of the year. As a result of what we do in the Arctic investment and influence. these processes, it is clearer than influences the world. ever that UArctic shall develop As UArctic begins another further as an organization for The familiar words “In the North, chapter in its relatively short its members, and be the extra For the North, and by the North” story, I look forward particularly networking resources and carry an important message: to the exciting opportunities infrastructure necessary to make sustainable development of the for networking and cooperation our members better able to serve Arctic can only be achieved with across the Circumpolar North their students and the region. a competent northern population and across the globe that aim able to make its own wise at a sustainable North in an Another outcome of the Strategic decisions. However, it is equally interdependent world. Plan discussions, is that we must clear that it is to the benefit of Editorial 5 Alaska Fairbanks Vancouver Island U University of U of Alaska Anchorage Yukon College U of Northern BC University of Alberta NE Federal U ASIAC Ukhta State T Komi State Pedagogical Syktyvkar State University north2north 2012 Northern Arctic Federal University student mobility University of Saskatchewan Northern State Medical University MIBO The width of the bars Murmansk SHU correspond to the number Murmansk STU of students U of Regina State Polar Academy U of Manitoba The True Impact Herzen SPU Lakehead U Sámi Education Inst Out In Saint Mary’s U Rovaniemi U Memorial U of Applied Sciences Russia 53 14 Newfoundland Finland 40 20 University University of Lapland of Circumpolar of Nordland Sweden 26 13 University of Oulu Norway 32 51 Oulu U of Applied Sciences Canada 9 57 By Outi Snellman, Universityin Svalbard Centre University of Helsinki USA 7 12 Vice-President Administration, UArctic Kemi-Tornio U of Applied Sciences Graphic Hugo Ahlenius / Nordpil University of Turku Total 167 167 Luleå U of Technology Mobility Umeå University Harstad University College Stockholm U Finnmark University of Tromsø Mid Sweden U University College n this issue of Shared The vision of north2north, as community. I would argue that, parts of the world. These Voices we focus on with the whole of UArctic, was for example, Ekaterina from students and teachers will have mobility. UArctic’s to build the future generation of northern Siberia already had learned a lot during their week student mobility program, leaders for the North who can quite an impact in the student in Lapland, but perhaps they north2northI , has now been help the North seize control of community in Alaska when also already will have changed running for ten years with a its own destiny. she studied there, making the – perhaps the seed to do total of 1,275 students having campus and even the Fairbanks something lasting for the North benefitted of this circumpolar Ten years is not a very long community just a little bit more is already planted. program. time for assessing impact of circumpolar. She left Alaska a such a program, when the different person with an open When Scott Forrest, a young Already when UArctic was just numbers are relatively small. mind for the Arctic, and she exchange student from UNBC, an idea on the drawing board In terms of the total student has since then gone on to create Canada, knocked on my door of the planning committee it population in the eight Arctic a lot of change around her over 15 years ago and asked was clear that mobility, for states, the number of students either in attitude or in formal if there was something he both students and faculty, going on exchange to another structures. could help out with in the would need to be at the core of Arctic state, let alone into a international office, little did UArctic’s activities. In order northern-relevant program, Mobility in UArctic has he know. Scott travelled to the to build a northern identity and will always be a drop in the many forms, from the North, and ended up staying. a region people would need bucket – it would be hard to organized student mobility That initial exchange had a to have personal connections make very strong conclusions in north2north to exchanges tremendous impact of all of to different “Norths” – either on the impact of the program of faculty between member Scott’s future choices: career, through directly having stayed based on a strict statistical institutions, particularly in family, home, even citizenship. in another northern place or analysis quite yet. This is why Thematic Networks. This But I would argue that the through personal experiences we chose to look at impact year’s cover photo illustrates impact he has had on the with someone from another from the perspective of the mobility within a new Thematic organizations he has worked northern region.
Recommended publications
  • Innst. S. Nr. 361 (2008–2009) Innstilling Til Stortinget Fra Valgkomiteen
    Innst. S. nr. 361 (2008–2009) Innstilling til Stortinget fra valgkomiteen Innstilling fra valgkomiteen om valg av medlem- Varamedlemmer: For Brørby: Reidar San- mer og varamedlemmer til den forberedende full- dal. For Kristoffersen: Signe Øye. For Arnesen: maktskomité Torny Pedersen. For Nybakk: Sigvald Oppebøen Hansen. For Sjøli: Ingjerd Schou. For Voie: Jan Olav Olsen. For Flåtten: Bent Høie. For Meling: Kari Lise Til Stortinget Holmberg. For Jensen: Per Sandberg. For Solholm: Carl I. Hagen. For Andersen: Heidi Grande Røys. For Reikvam: Geir-Ketil Hansen. For Molvær Grimstad: BAKGRUNN Åse Wisløff Nilsen. For Gløtvold: Inger S. Enger. Etter forretningsordenen § 23 skal Stortinget i siste samling i valgperioden, etter innstilling fra valg- Ved valget i Stortinget 16. juni 2005 ble Berit komiteen, innen sin midte velge en komité for forelø- Brørby valgt som komiteens leder og Sonja Irene pig prøving av fullmaktene til representanter og vara- Sjøli valgt som nestleder. representanter i det nye storting (forberedende full- Stortinget valgte 1. oktober 2005 en fullmaktsko- maktskomité). Det velges personlige varamedlem- mité med 16 medlemmer. Denne komiteen, som er mer til komiteens medlemmer. valgt for perioden 2005–2009, består av følgende Samtidig skal Stortinget også velge komiteens medlemmer: leder og nestleder. Antallet medlemmer i den forberedende full- Berit Brørby, leder. Lodve Solholm, første nestle- maktskomité var tidligere fastsatt til 15, men den der. Sonja Irene Sjøli, andre nestleder. Bendiks H. bestemmelsen er nå tatt ut slik at Stortinget kan fast- Arnesen. Svein Flåtten. Trine Skei Grande. Carl I. sette medlemstallet på fritt grunnlag. Stortinget valgte 16. juni 2005 følgende stor- Hagen. Siv Jensen. Asmund Kristoffersen.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratorio Sulla Qualità Delle Istituzioni Universitarie
    Laboratorio sulla qualità delle istituzioni universitarie Rapporto per la Fondazione Cariplo a cura di Marino Regini Università degli Studi di Milano Dipartimento di Studi del Lavoro e del Welfare (DSLW) e Italian Centre for Research on Universities & HE Systems (UNIRES) Contributi di: Gabriele Ballarino, Sabrina Colombo, Fiammetta Corradi, Loris Perotti INDICE 1. Introduzione 2. Internazionalizzazione: le strategie adottate in Europa e le soluzioni praticabili in Lombardia 3. Formazione alla ricerca: l’organizzazione del livello post-graduate in Europa e il caso lombardo 4. Regno Unito: strategie di internazionalizzazione e formazione alla ricerca 5. Germania: strategie di internazionalizzazione e formazione alla ricerca 6. Olanda: strategie di internazionalizzazione e formazione alla ricerca Appendice I: i nove atenei studiati A. University of Warwick B. University of Manchester C. University of Liverpool D. Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg E. Albert-Ludwig Universität Freiburg F. Konstanz Universität G. Universiteit van Amsterdam H. Universiteit Utrecht I. Universiteit Leiden Appendice II: le schede per la rilevazione dei dati Riferimenti bibliografici NOTA. Il presente rapporto di ricerca dal titolo “Laboratorio sulla qualità delle istituzioni universitarie” fa parte di un progetto più ampio su “La qualità del sistema d’istruzione lombardo. Misurazioni, confronti internazionali e proposte”, commissionato al Dipartimento di Studi del Lavoro e del Welfare (DSLW) e al Centro Interdipartimentale di ricerca su Lavoro, Formazione e Welfare (WTW) dell’Università di Milano, che comprende anche i sotto-progetti su: 1) Valore di segnalazione del voto di diploma e grading standard nelle scuole secondarie superiori; 2) La produttività e l’eccellenza scientifica delle università lombarde; 3) Fondazioni e promozione dell’eccellenza nel sistema educativo: esperienze di successo nel Regno Unito e negli USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Alsace Direction De La Coopération Et Des Relations Internationales 1, Place Du Wacken B.P
    > L'ESPACE DU RHIN SUPÉRIEUR / UNE RÉGION EUROPÉENNE D'AVENIR Présentation générale de la coopération transfrontalière > DER OBERRHEIN / ZUKUNFTSREGION IN EUROPA Präsentation der grenzüberschreitenden Zusammenarbeit Éditeur/Herausgeber Région Alsace Direction de la Coopération et des Relations Internationales 1, place du Wacken B.P. 91006 – 67070 STRASBOURG Cedex [email protected] RESPONSABLE/VERANTwortlicher Pierre Meyer COmITÉ de Rédaction/RedaktionskomITEE Martha Schwarze, Schweiz Alfons Bank, Deutschland Catherine Goure-Rauch, Frankreich TRADUCTION/Übersetzung REmerciemENTS/DANK Angela Tschorsnig, Karlsruhe Aux structures et porteurs de projets de l’espace du Rhin Catherine Goure-Rauch Supérieur pour la mise à disposition de textes, de photos et de matériel d’information. LECTURE/Lektoren Den Einrichtungen und Projektträgern des Oberrheins für die Comité d’Organisation du 11e Congrès Tripartite Bereitstellung von Texten, Fotos und Informationsmaterial. Direction de la Communication de la Région Alsace Au comité de rédaction pour l’excellente coopération. RÉALISATION DU documENT/Design Dem Redaktionskomitee für die hervorragende Agence Citeasen Zusammenarbeit. 24, avenue des Vosges 67000 STRASBOURG Au Comité d’organisation du 11e Congrès tripartite pour sa participation efficace. PHOTOS couverture/Fotos Dem Organisationskomitee des 11. Dreiländerkongresses Conseil de l’Europe, EUCOR, für die wertvolle Mitarbeit. Regierungspräsidium Freiburg, Stadt Freiburg, Région Alsace (Rothan-Airdiasol, Parent), SNCF Aux stagiaires France Messier, Simone Stippich, Marion Grzegrzulka, Christelle Wolf, Rozenn Courtois, Claudia Bucher et Annaïck Dangelser pour leur contribution à la Juin 2008/Juni 2008 réalisation de cette brochure. Den Praktikanten France Messier, Simone Stippich Marion Grzegrzulka, Christelle Wolf, Rozenn Courtois, Claudia Bucher und Annaïck Dangelser für Ihren Beitrag zur Erstellung dieser Broschüre. Au secrétariat commun du Programme Interreg Rhin Supérieur pour son apport utile.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Progress Towards the ERA
    T Monitoring progress towards the ERA Editors: Luisa Henriques and René van Bavel Authors: Claire Nauwelaers and René Wintjes Table of Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................3 Executive Summary.............................................................................................................4 1 Evolution towards ERA: general trends and country­specific situations .......................7 1.1 National mobility initiatives...................................................................................11 1.2 Transnational strategic partnerships and opening up of universities ...................23 1.3 Opening up of national research programmes.....................................................38 1.4 Joint R&D initiatives at country level....................................................................45 2 Proposal for an ERA Monitoring system.....................................................................51 2.1 Key questions for ERA Monitoring.......................................................................51 2.2 State­of­Play with indicators under the 4 Topics..................................................54 3 Conclusions ................................................................................................................59 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................61 List of Tables .....................................................................................................................62
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-University Networks: Rhetorics Vs
    Mae C. Fastner Inter-university Networks: Rhetorics vs. Reality Objectives and Activities of Members of the European Consortium of Innovative Universities Master’s Thesis Public Administration // Policy and Governance Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences Supervisors: Prof. Dr. Hans Vossensteyn, Dr. Harry de Boer, Renze Kolster (M. Phil.) Candidate number: s1578634 March 14th, 2016 Abstract This qualitative study investigates higher education institutions’ engagement in inter-university networks. Inter-university networks are defined as formal, multilateral, multi-purpose and voluntary cooperative arrangements between higher education institutions from multiple countries which are coordinated by an additional administrative layer. This paper seeks to understand to what extent the activities universities perform within inter-university networks actually match their objectives towards these networks. Adopting a multiple-case study design including five European universities of the European Consortium of Innovative Universities (ECIU), the study builds on the resource dependence theory which predicts that higher education institutions use inter-university networks strategically solely for the achievement of their objectives. The goal of the study is to test the resource dependence theory’s expectation that higher education institution’s objectives towards their inter-university network engagements and the activities which they perform within such networks are aligned with each other. The empirical evidence includes primary data collected mainly through semi-structured interviews. The thesis begins with setting out the research focus and design, followed by an introduction to the phenomenon of inter-university networks including a description of their characteristics and factors of success and failure. Subsequently, the theoretical framework based on the resource dependence theory is outlined and a theoretical expectation guiding the research is developed.
    [Show full text]
  • European Project Manager Euridoc – Tri-National Doctoral Programme
    1 Job offer Publication date: 12.05.2021 European Project Manager EURIdoc – tri-national doctoral programme 1. Job status Temporary contract (2 years), part time or full time (80-100%), according to the experience; Affiliation: Coordination Office of Eucor – The European Campus in Strasbourg, France; Earliest starting date of the contract: 1st September 2021; 2. Context EURIdoc, the Eucor Upper Rhine Immunology doctoral programme, is a 4-year PhD programme supported by the European Union under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action COFUND-DP of the Horizon 2020 programme. The 28 PhD candidates will be recruited by the participating Eucor member universities of Basel, Freiburg, Karlsruhe and Strasbourg. EURIdoc was created by the immunologists of Basel, Freiburg and Strasbourg, who have been actively collaborating since 2017 as the Upper Rhine Immunology Group (URI, urigroup.eu). The programme will officially start on September 1st, 2021 and run for 5 years. The programme is coordinated by Eucor – The European Campus, a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC). The aim of the grouping is to consolidate and to extend the cooperation beyond borders in Research and Training in the tri-national Upper Rhine Area. The Eucor Strasbourg Coordination Office is in charge of the administrative affaires of EURIdoc in close coordination with the scientific leaders in Strasbourg, Freiburg and Basel. The job is offered in this context and should ensure the operational management of the project. 3. Mission The Project Manager will steer the implementation of the EURIdoc project under the responsibility of the director of the EGTC Eucor and Coordinator of the project, as well as the Scientific Leader of the project, Christopher Mueller.
    [Show full text]
  • Talepunkter PK Jun 2013
    De fire viktigste representantforslagene Høyre, Frp og KrF støtter: 1. Øke den statlige finansieringen av videreutdanning for lærere (Dok 8:145 S (2009- 2010)). 2. En helhetlig gjennomgang av vilkårene for enkeltpersonforetak/selvstendig næringsdrivende (Dok 8:85 (2009-2010)). 3. Styrking av miljø- og klimaarbeidet i kommunene (Dok. 8:114 (2009-2010)). 4. En bedre rusbehandling. 24timers behandlingsgaranti etter avrusning. (Dok. 8:56 (2009-2010). Fire representantforslag fremmet av Venstre hvor Høyre, Frp og KrF i ettertid har støttet forslaget: 1. Femårig mastergradsbasert lærerutdanning (Dok. 8:70 (2012-2013)). 2. Tiltakspakke for å begrense og bekjempe fattigdom blant barn (Dok 8:2 (2009-2010)). 3. 25 % reduksjon i næringslivets administrative kostnader knyttet til regler og skjemavelde (Dok 8:174 (2009-2010) 4. Et bedre kollektivtilbud i byområdene med hyppigere avganger og lavere takster. (Dok 8:113 (2009-2010). Fire representantforslag Venstre skal ha gjennomslag for i en ny regjering. 1. Øke antallet med doktorgrad og sikre flere karriereveier i skolen (Dok 8:27 (2012- 2013)) 2. Omfordeling av barnetrygden (Dok. 8:9 (2012-2013)) 3. Kapitalreform for økt innovasjon og entreprenørskap (Dok 8:72 (2011-2012)) 4. Vern av havområdene utenfor Lofoten, Vesterålen og Senja (Dok 8:35 (2012-2013)) 30 Venstre-gjennomslag ved et nytt flertall I Stortingsperioden 2009-2013 har Venstres to stortingsrepresentanter fremmet totalt 75 egne representantforslag. 18 i sesjonen 2009-2010. 24 i sesjonen 2010-2011, 19 i sesjonen 2011-2012 og 14 i sesjonen 2012-2013. I tillegg har Venstres representanter sammen med andre partier fremmet ytterligere 44 representantforslag (hvorav 29 er felles fra alle fire opposisjonspartiene).
    [Show full text]
  • Eucor – the European Campus
    June 6th, 2017 ESC Conference of dissemination Münster, Germany Philippe Portelli - University of Strasbourg Eucor The european campus: European student card experimental site Eucor The european campus University of Strasbourg Philippe PORTELLI – 2017-06-06 1 | About EUCOR - the European Campus. 2 | Experimenting the european student card 3 Eucor – the european campus : experimental site for the european student card Université de Strasbourg 1 | Eucor – The european campus About EUCOR • 5 universities in France, Germany and Switzerland : → Basel, Karlsruhe, Freiburg-in- Breisgau, Haute-Alsace, Strasbourg • Main actor engaged in research and higher education in the Upper Rhine Trination Metropolitan Region since 1989 • 2016 : Creation of a European Grouping for Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) « Eucor – The European Campus » → 1st EGTC carried by universities 4 Eucor – the european campus : experimental site for the european student card Université de Strasbourg 1 | About EUCOR A strategic flagship project 5,5 million euros from the European Union, 3 Interreg- projects : • Building Eucor – The European Campus: Cross-border structures • Research cluster in sustainability • Establishment of a trinational graduate academy focusing on risk management (together with the University of Coblence-Landau) 5 Eucor – the european campus : experimental site for the european student card Université de Strasbourg 1| About EUCOR Objectives • Expanding into an internationally attractive science and research area without walls nor borders • Attracting the
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Parliamentary Assembly VISIT to WASHINGTON D.C. and SAN FRANCISCO, UNITED STATES 9 – 13 JULY 2012
    JOINT PCTR / STC 091 JOINT 12 E rev. 1 Original: English NATO Parliamentary Assembly SUB-COMMITTEE ON TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONS (PCTR), SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE (STC) AND SUB-COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY (STCEES) VISIT TO WASHINGTON D.C. AND SAN FRANCISCO, UNITED STATES 9 – 13 JULY 2012 DRAFT PROGRAMME AND LIST OF PARTICIPANTS International Secretariat 26 June 2012 091 JOINT 12 E rev. 1 1 SUNDAY 8 JULY WASHINGTON D.C. Arrival of participants Individual transfer to hotel Accommodation The Westin Georgetown 2350 M St NW Washington, DC, 20037 Phone: +1 202-429-0100 Preferential Rate: 217 USD (Including internet, excluding breakfast, subject to 14.5% taxes) Reservations: https://www.starwoodmeeting.com/StarGroupsWeb/res?id=1204184 072&key=3E9D8 Contact numbers Rebecca Chandler: +32 472 500 075 Henrik Bliddal: +32 475 752 725 Steffen Sachs: +32 477 310 620 18:00 - 19:00 Registration desk open in the hotel lobby Collection of documents, badges and payment of bus fees MONDAY 9 JULY WASHINGTON D.C. 7:30 – 08:15 Registration desk open in the hotel lobby Collection of documents, badges and payment of bus fees 8:30 Meet in the hotel lobby and departure of bus Please note that passports should be carried at all times 9:00 Arrival at Department of State (21st Street entrance) Upon arrival all passports and belongings will be checked by security 9:30 Meetings at the Department of State Topics (tbc): Nuclear Weapons: Current Arms Control, Disarmament, and Non- Proliferation Issues NATO after the Chicago Summit: the Future of Transatlantic Relations, Missile Defence Developments in the MENA Region 12:30 Light lunch at members’ own expense (Department of State) 13:15 Bus departure to the Department of Defense 13:45 Arrival at Department of Defense 2600 Defense Pentagon (River Entrance) 14:00 Meetings at the Department of Defense Topics (tbc): Afghanistan and Pakistan NATO operations 091 JOINT 12 E rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Innst. 26 S (2015–2016) Innstilling Til Stortinget Fra Valgkomiteen
    Innst. 26 S (2015–2016) Innstilling til Stortinget fra valgkomiteen Innstilling fra valgkomiteen om valg av medlem- Medlemmer mer og varamedlemmer til Nordisk råd 1. Marit Nybakk, 2. Knut Storberget, 3. Sonja Mandt, 4. Jorodd Asphjell, 5. Per Rune Henriksen, 6. Ruth Grung, 7. Gunvor Eldegard, 8. Michael Tetz- Til Stortinget schner, 9. Svein Harberg, 10. Øyvind Halleraker, 11. Heidi Nordby Lunde, 12. Bente Stein Mathisen, 13. Norunn Tveiten Benestad, 14. Kristian Norheim, 15. Bakgrunn Ingebjørg Amanda Godskesen, 16. Sivert Bjørnstad, Artikkel 47 i samarbeidsavtalen av 23. mars 1962 17. Rigmor Andersen Eide, 18. Per Olaf Lundteigen, 19. André N. Skjelstad, 20. Torgeir Knag Fylkesnes mellom Danmark, Finland, Island, Norge og Sverige lyder: Varamedlemmer «Rådet består av 87 valgte medlemmer, regje- For nr. 1–7: Kjell-Idar Juvik, Irene Johansen, ringsrepresentanter og representanter for Færøyenes Kåre Simensen, Hege Haukeland Liadal, Stein Erik og Grønlands landsstyrer og Ålands landskapsstyrel- Lauvås, Odd Omland, Jette F. Christensen se. For nr. 8–13: Trond Helleland, Siri A. Meling, Av medlemmene velger Danmarks folketing 16, Helge Orten, Olemic Thommessen, Ove Trellevik, Finlands riksdag 18, Islands allting 7, Norges storting Bengt Morten Wenstøb og Sveriges riksdag hver 20 samt Færøyenes lagting og Grønlands og Ålands landsting hver 2. Videre vel- For nr. 14–16: Morten Wold, Harald T. Nesvik, ger hver forsamling et tilsvarende antall suppleanter. Oskar J. Grimstad Valg av medlemmer og suppleanter foretas årlig For nr. 17: Olaug V. Bollestad og gjelder for tiden inntil neste valg. Ved valgene For nr. 18: Heidi Greni skal forskjellige politiske meningsretninger gis rep- For nr. 19: Pål Farstad resentasjon i rådet.
    [Show full text]
  • Erasmus Innen Layout 1
    ERASMUS+ FACT SHEET Academic Year 2021/2022 Name of Institution Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg / University of Freiburg D FREIBUR01 – ECHE 1531010 PIC: 999841760 - OID: E10208635 Country Germany Institutional Katharina Aly Coordinator Erasmus+ Institutional Coordinator University of Freiburg Fahnenbergplatz 79085 Freiburg Germany E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +49 761 203 4376 E-mail Nomination, bilateral agreements, general information and assistance: [email protected] Summer term Winter term Academic Calendar 1st April – 30th September 1st October – 31st March Nomination Deadline 25th November 10th June Application Deadline 30th November 15th June Language German (B2 or higher), C1 for German department classes Requirements (if any) Please contact the Freiburg departmental Erasmus+ coordinators: https://www.studium.uni-freiburg.de/en/counseling/exchange-programs-and- studying-abroad/erasmus Housing Will be made available via the registration platform. Silvia Kühnle International Office Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg Fahnenbergplatz 79085 Freiburg Germany E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +49 761 203 4267 Course Catalogue www.uni-freiburg.de/go/vvz Course Availability in Offered by some departments. Please check our course catalogue. English Additional Information University website: www.uni-freiburg.de Nomination procedure: Please nominate your student directly to [email protected]. Please respect the deadlines of 25th November for spring and 10th June for the winter term. After
    [Show full text]
  • Årsmøtehefte Nr. 6
    Årsmøtehefte nr. 6 Årsberetning 2008-2010 Oslo Arbeiderpartis årsmøte 19.-20. mars 2010 Innhold Forord 5 1. Medlems- og partilagsituasjonen 6 2. Organisasjon og politikk 9 2.1 Partikontoret 9 2.2 Representantskapet 10 2.3 Partistyret 11 2.4 Bystyregruppa 14 2.6 Samarbeid med bydelsutvalgene 18 2.5 Stortingsbenken 18 2.6 AUF i Oslo 20 2.7 DNAs Landsmøte 2009 22 3. Økonomi 24 4. Lags - og medlemspleie 25 4.1 Partikontoret 25 4.2 Studieutvalget 25 4.3 Faglig-politisk utvalg 27 4.4 Kvinnenettverket 27 4.5 1. mai 2008/2009 29 5. Stortingsvalgkampen 2009 31 Vedlegg 1. Valgresultat 35 3 Høydepunkter i 2008-2009 Stortingsvalget 2009 Forord 113.140 stemmer Vi banket på 140.240 dører. Vi delte ut 139.520 roser. Vi fikk 113.140 stemmer, noe som utgjør 35 % av 35 % stemmene i Oslo. Sammenliknet med 2005 er det en framgang på 3,5 prosentpoeng. Stortingsvalgkampen 2009 viste at vi er en sterk organisasjon. Og nå må vi styrke organisasjonen 6 stortingsrepresentanter ytterligere frem mot kommunevalgkampen i 2011! Medlemsutviklingen i Oslo Arbeiderparti er motiverende: fra 31.12.2008 til 31.12.2009 har vi hatt en medlemsvekst på nesten 10 %. 440 flere personer 10 % flere medlemmer har sluttet seg til partiet. Dette er viktige ressurser for organisasjonen vår. Oslo Arbeiderparti må bruke det gode valgresultatet 2009 og den gode medlemsutviklinga til å bygge en AUF i Oslo gjennomfører tidenes skolevalg enda sterkere organisasjon fram mot kommunevalget i 2011. Potensialet er stort. Bare 4 % av våre velgere i 2009 er medlemmer av partiet.
    [Show full text]