AE47810E0128 Metro

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AE47810E0128 Metro JANUARY 2018 RFP No. AE47810E0128 Volume I – Technical Proposal (Appendices) Systems Engineering and Support Services Submitted by: Resumes Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128 TABLE OF CONTENTS Margaret (Meg) Cederoth, AICP, LEED AP | sustainability interface ....................................... R-49 Michael Harris-Gifford | program manager | corridor lead/ TO Andrew Cho | communications...................... R-50 manager | independent systems integration review team . R-1 Wilson Chu, EIT | ducktbank design .................. R-51 Jeff Goodling | deputy project manager | project controls lead | value engineering ............................ R-3 Joe Cochran | train control ......................... R-52 John Schnurbusch, PE | OCS manager ................ R-5 John Cockle, ASP | safety certification ................ R-53 Anh Le | communications manager | corridor lead/ TO Phil Collins | communications | independent systems manager ........................................ R-7 integration review team ............................ R-54 Barry Lemke | train control design lead................. R-9 Ramesh Daryani, PMP | systems integration . R-55 David Hetherington, PE | traction power manager ....... R-11 Ruperto Dilig, PE | independent quality manager ........ R-56 Davy Leung | RF engineering lead.................... R-13 Kurt Drummond, PE | communications................ R-57 Paul Mosier | operations and planning lead ............ R-15 Jeffrey Dugard | train control........................ R-58 Abbas Sizar, PE | corridor lead/TO manager ............ R-17 Anthony Durney | safety manager | train control ......... R-59 Guido Eyzaguirre | systems integration lead | rail activation and Saral Dwivedi, PE | train control ..................... R-60 start-up lead | corridor lead/TO manager | independent Harold Edris | safety verification & validation ........... R-61 systems integration review team ..................... R-19 Michael Edwards | systems project controls ............ R-62 Gulzar Ahmed, PE | systems safety assurance lead....... R-21 Don Emerson | alternative delivery strategy............. R-63 Scott Rodda, PE | vehicle interface lead ............... R-23 David Bradly Fewell | CADD ........................ R-64 Mahesh Patel | corridor lead/ TO manager | systems Rouduner Fishburn, PE | electrical ................... R-65 integration | independent systems integration review team ... R-25 Andrew (Andy) Frohn, CQM, CQA | vehicle interface ..... R-66 Arvind Patel | corridor lead/ TO manager | traction power R-27 Matiwos Gebre | train control ....................... R-67 Joe Bayat | corridor lead/TO manager................. R-29 Rameshwar Godara, PE | traction power ............... R-68 Bill Lucci | corridor lead/ TO manager | independent Jalal Gohari, PE | EMI ............................. R-69 systems integration review team ..................... R-31 Jack Gonsalves | BRT ............................. R-70 Cliff Henke | corridor lead/ TO manager . R-33 Tim Groom | CADD............................... R-71 Steven Adkins | OCS.............................. R-35 Joshua Groom | CADD ............................ R-72 Vineet Agrawal, PE | train control .................... R-36 Behnam Hakimi | systems project controls | scheduling... R-73 Jorge Aguilar, PE | traction power | electrical ........... R-37 Sylvia Hall, PE | corrosion control ................... R-74 Fernando Atienza | CADD .......................... R-38 William Heacox | communications ................... R-75 Maseeh Azhand | communications ................... R-39 Hector Hernandez | CADD.......................... R-76 Jon Bailey | traction power support................... R-40 Caleb Hill | traction power.......................... R-77 Julio Bautista | electrical ........................... R-41 Robert Hillenbrand | train control .................... R-78 Saundra Baxter | project administration ............... R-42 Pavan Hotha, EIT | scheduling ...................... R-79 Pradeep Bhartiya | communications .................. R-43 Michael Hsiao, PE | OCS .......................... R-80 Rick Blake | RAMS | rail activation & start-up | David Jackson | communications .................... R-81 communications . R-44 D. Austin Jenkins | operations and planning lead ........ R-82 Michael Boraks, PE | rail activation & start-up .......... R-45 Craig Jurkiewicz | CADD........................... R-83 Gregory Brown | scheduling ........................ R-46 Rachel Knowles | train control....................... R-84 Michael Butler, PE | communications ................. R-47 Ashok Kothari, PE | principal-in-charge ............... R-85 Manuel Castro, PE, CEM, ENV SP | mechanical/ HVAC/ tunnel Kwaku Larbi | traction power support ................. R-86 ventilation | plumbing & fire protection................ R-48 Table of Contents TOC-1 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128 John Lau | OCS.................................. R-87 Henry Pena | communications ..................... R-122 Sheldon Leader | communications ................... R-88 Erik Peterson, EIT | train control .................... R-123 Sebastien Lechelle | traction power support ............ R-89 Anh Pham | electrical ............................ R-124 Silas Li, LEED AP | mechanical/ HVAC/ tunnel ventilation . R-90 Truc Pham | traction power | ductbank design.......... R-125 Chengwen Liu, PhD, PE, SE | OCS ................... R-91 Kevin Pittleko | train control ....................... R-126 Zheng Liu | communications........................ R-92 Edward Poon, EIT | rail activation & start-up........... R-127 Olivia Lopez | document control ..................... R-93 Nap Purificacion | CADD.......................... R-128 Rik Lor | independent systems integration review team manager | David Pyatt | overhead contact system support......... R-129 alternative delivery strategy......................... R-94 Rosetta Ramirez, EIT | rail activation and start-up support R-130 Gordon MacDonald | independent systems integration review Philippe Rapin | alternative delivery strategy........... R-131 lead/overhead contact system ....................... R-95 Krishan (Kris) Sabherwal, PE | traction power.......... R-132 Lucine Malekian | safety verification & validation ........ R-96 Barry Sam | communications | independent systems Cody Margetts, PE | traction power support ............ R-97 integration review team ........................... R-133 Jerry Marquez | electrical .......................... R-98 Dave Schlesinger | operations & planning ............ R-134 Ponchito (Ponch) Mateo | traction power | electrical | ductbank John Schlick, PE | OCS........................... R-135 design......................................... R-99 Andrew Schultz | train control ...................... R-136 Lope Mayola | traction power ...................... R-100 Leslie Schumaker, PMP | scheduling ................ R-137 Anthony McIntyre | train control .................... R-101 Abdulhaque Shaikh | traction power ................. R-138 Hortencia McKeown | document control .............. R-102 Andre Shamoon, PE | train control .................. R-139 Cindy McLeod | safety verification and validation....... R-103 Bruce Shewchuk, PE | constructability review.......... R-140 Pat McNamee | cost management/ estimating | constructability review............................ R-104 Sheri Soldatke, PE | rail activation & start-up .......... R-141 Joseph Metzler | operations & planning .............. R-105 Gino Spadafore | rail activation & start-up ............ R-142 Alex Mezey | overhead contact system support......... R-106 John Spellman, PE | train control | independent systems integration review ............................... R-143 Philip (Phil) Minch | train control | CPUC application/ traffic interface.................................. R-107 Marlene Stevens | project administration ............. R-144 Anthony Minikon II | train control ................... R-108 David Stewart | train control ....................... R-145 Omidreza (Reza) Moghbeli | corrosion control ......... R-109 Stoil Stoilov, PE | traction power.................... R-146 Soham Mookerjea, PMP | communications ........... R-110 Lurae Stuart | RAMS | safety certification ............. R-147 Raylene Moreno, PE | plumbing & fire protection....... R-111 Smitesh Sukumar, EIT | communications ............. R-148 Edwin Mortlock | train control...................... R-112 Stefan Svensson | train control ..................... R-149 Zafer Mudar, PE | CPUC application/ traffic interface .... R-113 Dora Terry | corrosion control ...................... R-150 Alan Murphy | OCS | independent systems integration Axel Thibodeau, PE | overhead contact system support .. R-151 review team.................................... R-114 Ileana Tutos, EIT | specifications .................... R-152 Ermias Negash | OCS ............................ R-115 Andrew Vallejo | DSDC/office field engineering ........ R-153 Dong Nguyen, PE | train control .................... R-116 Chintan Varia | electrical .......................... R-154 Sean O’Gorman | mechanical/ HVAC/ tunnel ventilation .. R-117 Angel Velazquez | train control ..................... R-155 Mary Cay O’Malley | rail activation and start-up support.. R-118 Jack Wang, PE | rail activation & start-up ............. R-156 James Okazaki, PE | CPUC application/ traffic interface .. R-119 Vickie Wheeler, PE | specifications .................. R-157 Chris Ortega | train control ........................ R-120
Recommended publications
  • Planners Guide to Chicago 2013
    Planners Guide to Chicago 2013 2013 Lake Baha’i Glenview 41 Wilmette Temple Central Old 14 45 Orchard Northwestern 294 Waukegan Golf Univ 58 Milwaukee Sheridan Golf Morton Mill Grove 32 C O N T E N T S Dempster Skokie Dempster Evanston Des Main 2 Getting Around Plaines Asbury Skokie Oakton Northwest Hwy 4 Near the Hotels 94 90 Ridge Crawford 6 Loop Walking Tour Allstate McCormick Touhy Arena Lincolnwood 41 Town Center Pratt Park Lincoln 14 Chinatown Ridge Loyola Devon Univ 16 Hyde Park Peterson 14 20 Lincoln Square Bryn Mawr Northeastern O’Hare 171 Illinois Univ Clark 22 Old Town International Foster 32 Airport North Park Univ Harwood Lawrence 32 Ashland 24 Pilsen Heights 20 32 41 Norridge Montrose 26 Printers Row Irving Park Bensenville 32 Lake Shore Dr 28 UIC and Taylor St Addison Western Forest Preserve 32 Wrigley Field 30 Wicker Park–Bucktown Cumberland Harlem Narragansett Central Cicero Oak Park Austin Laramie Belmont Elston Clybourn Grand 43 Broadway Diversey Pulaski 32 Other Places to Explore Franklin Grand Fullerton 3032 DePaul Park Milwaukee Univ Lincoln 36 Chicago Planning Armitage Park Zoo Timeline Kedzie 32 North 64 California 22 Maywood Grand 44 Conference Sponsors Lake 50 30 Park Division 3032 Water Elmhurst Halsted Tower Oak Chicago Damen Place 32 Park Navy Butterfield Lake 4 Pier 1st Madison United Center 6 290 56 Illinois 26 Roosevelt Medical Hines VA District 28 Soldier Medical Ogden Field Center Cicero 32 Cermak 24 Michigan McCormick 88 14 Berwyn Place 45 31st Central Park 32 Riverside Illinois Brookfield Archer 35th
    [Show full text]
  • Kapālama Canal Catalytic Project
    KAPĀLAMA CANAL CATALYTIC PROJECT EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT OCTOBER 2016 2 • EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT - OCTOBER 2016 KAPĀLAMA CANAL CATALYTIC PROJECT Prepared by : with assistance from: KAPĀLAMA CANAL CATALYTIC PROJECT EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT - OCTOBER 2016 • 3 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Project Background and Location 4 2 Site Analysis 2.1 General Observations 6 2.2 Nimitz Highway to Dillingham Boulevard 10 2.3 Dillingham Boulevard to North King Street 12 2.4 North King Street to the H-1 Freeway 15 2.5 The H-1 Freeway to Houghtailing Street 17 2.6 Bridges 18 2.7 Architecturally Significant Structures 20 3 Civil Study Areas 3.1 Flood Capacity and Channel Design 22 3.2 Utilities 23 3.3 Stormwater Runoff and Drainage 25 3.4 Water Quality and Pollutant Sources 26 3.5 Canal Management and Maintenance 26 3.6 Tides 27 3.7 Sea Level Rise and Climate Change 27 3.8 Bathymetric and Topographic Surveys 28 3.9 Design Standards 28 3.10 Ecology & Marine Resources 29 4 Related Planning Studies 4.1 Primary Urban Center Development Plan for 2025 30 4.2 Kalihi-Palāma Action Plan 31 4.3 Kalihi Neighborhood Transit-Oriented Development Plan 33 4.4 Kapālama Canal: A Conceptual Plan Study 36 5 Jurisdiction, Land Ownership, and Regulations 5.1 Jurisdiction 37 5.2 Landowners 37 5.3 Landowner Development Plans 38 5.4 Revised Ordinances of Honolulu 39 5.5 Chapter 343 Hawai‘i Revised Statutes 40 5.6 Land Use Considerations 41 5.7 Other Required Permits/Regulatory Approvals 42 6 Community Design 43 7 References 46 7.1 Civil References 47 Appendix A : Cultural and Historical Brief A-1 Appendix B : Community Stakeholders B-1 Appendix C : Geotechnical Work Plan C-1 4 • EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT - OCTOBER 2016 KAPĀLAMA CANAL CATALYTIC PROJECT 1 Introduction 1.1 Project Background & Location The Kapālama Canal Catalytic Project is based on various community plans supported by the City & County of Honolulu.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Ridership Report
    Monthly Ridership Report October 2013 Prepared by: Chicago Transit Authority Planning and Development Planning Analytics 3/4/2014 Table of Contents How to read this report...........................................................................................i Monthly notes.........................................................................................................ii Executive Summary.............................................................................................. iv Monthly Summary..................................................................................................1 Bus Ridership by Route.........................................................................................2 Rail Ridership by Entrance....................................................................................8 Average Rail Daily Boardings by Line..................................................................24 How to read this report Introduction This report shows how many customers used the combined CTA bus and rail systems for the year. Ridership statistics are given on a system-wide and route/station-level basis. Ridership is primarily counted as boardings, that is, customers boarding a transit vehicle (bus or rail). On the rail system, there is a distinction between station entries and total rides, or boardings. The official totals on the Monthly Summary report show the total number of boardings made to CTA vehicles. How are customers counted? Rail On the rail system, a customer is counted as an entry each time
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Assessment of Urban Transport Systems in Bangkok
    Assessment Urban Transport System: Bangkok, Thailand Siradol Siridhara Mahidol University BLAK Bangkok Metro and Vicinity Population 16.43 million Bkk Population 5.56 million Employment 10.42 million Income 39,459 baht/hh Bangkok Metro and Vicinity 35 million trips per day. ≈ 70% by private vehicles. Average Speeds Morning peak hour 10.7 kph Evening peak hour 14.2 kph Key Players Regulators, Project Owners & Operators Rail Bus Regulators Project Owners Project Operators 3 Current Rail Network Current Network: 5 Lines, 97 Stations, 142.9 km Light Green Line 32 stations 39.5 km Dark Green Line 13 stations 14.7 km Blue Line 26 stations 47.0 km Purple Line 16 stations 23.6 km Airport Rail Link 8 Stations 28.6 km Total 153.4 km Green Blue Purple Red Ridership (approx.) 1500000 trips/day4 Future Rail Network Future Network: Approx. 540 km Light Green Line 55 stations 66.5 km Dark Green Line 20 stations 22.5 km Blue Line 42 stations 55.0 km Purple Line 32 stations 42.8 km Orange Line 30 stations 35.4 km Pink Line 30 stations 36.0 km Yellow Line 23 stations 30.4 km Brown Line 23 stations 21.0 km Gold Line 4 stations 2.7 km Grey 39 stations 26.0 km Light Blue Line 19 stations 30.0 km Light Red Line 55 stations 58.5 km Dark Red Line 20 stations 80.8 km Airport Rail Link 14 Stations 49.5 km Total 504 km 5 Assessment Urban Transport System: Bangkok SUTI01 Extent to Which Transport Plans Cover Public Transport, Intermodal Facilities and Infrastructure for Active Modes MIN SCORE MAX 0 11 16 No Aspects Explanation Score 1 Walking Networks Little attention has been paid to pedestrian network planning, although the awareness of maintenance of walkways and other pedestrian facilities have 2 been raised from the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Maple Grove Transit 2016 “Expressbusservice”
    Maple Grove Transit 2016 “Express Bus Service” Customer Survey Report of Results December 2016 Prepared by: 2955 Valmont Road • Suite 300 • Boulder, Colorado 80301 • t: 303-444-7863 • www.n-r-c.com Maple Grove Transit “Express Bus Service” Customer Survey December 2016 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 Survey Background ...................................................................................................................4 Survey Results ...........................................................................................................................4 Appendix A: Verbatim Responses to Open-ended Survey Questions .................................... 34 Appendix B: Select Results Compared by Respondent Race/Ethnicity .................................. 92 Appendix C: Copy of Survey Questionnaire .......................................................................... 107 National Research Center, Inc. Report of Results Prepared by Maple Grove Transit “Express Bus Service” Customer Survey December 2016 List of Tables Table 1: Question 1................................................................................................................................................ 4 Table 2: Question 2 ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Table 3: Question 3 Compared by Question 1 ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • VR Annual Report 1963
    1963 VICTORIA VICTORIAN RAILWAYS REPORT OF THE VICTORIAN RAILWAYS COMMISSIONERS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30th JUNE, 1963 PRESENTED TO BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT PURSUANT TO ACT 7 ELIZABETH 11. No. 6355 By Authority: A. C. BROOKS. GOVERNMENT PRINTER, MELBOURNE. No. 19.-[68. 3n.].-12005/63. CONTENTS PAGE CoMMISSIONERs' REPORT l HEADS OF BRANCHES 2:3 APPENDICEs-­ APPENDIX Balance-sheet l 24 Financial Results (Totals), Summary of 2 26 Financial Results (Details), Summary of 2A 27 Reconciliation of Railway and Treasury Figures (Revenue and Working Expenses), 3 2H Working Expenses, Abstract of 4 2n Working Expenses and Earnings, Comparative Analysis of 5 :30 Total Cost of Each Line and of Rolling Stock, &c. 6 :p- General Comparative Statement for Last Fifteen Years 7 :3H Statistics : Passengers, Goods Traffic, &c. 8 41 Mileage : Train, Locomotive, and Vehicle 9 42 Salaries and Wages, Total Amount Paid 10 44 Staff Employed in Years Ended 30th June, 1963 and 1962 ll 45 Locomotives, Coaching Stock, Goods and Service Stock on Books 12 46 Railway Accident and Fire Insurance Fund ... 13 49 New Lines Opened for Traffic or Under Construction, &c. 14 iiO Mileage of Railways and Tracks 15 ;)] Railways Stores Suspense Account 16 iiz Railway Renewals and Replacements Fund 17 52 Depreciation-Provision and Accrual 18 52 Capital Expenditure in Years Ended 30th June, 1963 and 1962 19 ii3 Passenger Traffic and Revenue, Analysis of ... 20 ii4 Goods and Live Stock Traffic and Revenue, Analysis ot 21 55 Traffic at Each Station 22 ii6 His Excellency Sir Rohan Delacombe, Governor of Vi ctoria, and Lady Delacombe about to entrain at Spencer Street for a visit to western Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission 36.Pdf 25.71 Kb
    Glen Mills Glen Waverley 12 June 2009 The Secretary Select Committee on Train Services Parliament House Spring Street Melbourne Vic 3002 Dear Sir, Thank you for the opportunity to present this submission to the Inquiry into Train Services and to express views on any aspects of the factors leading to and causes of failures in the provision of metropolitan and V/Line train services. Further comments by the author about public transport in Melbourne have been published by the Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Committee Inquiry into the Investment of Commonwealth and State Funds in Public Passenger Transport Infrastructure and Services which may be found at http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/rrat_ctte/public_transport/submissions/sublist.htm. Click on Submission No.168 to view the documents. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. GENERAL 2. INFRASTRUCTURE 2.1 Ballast 2.2 Concrete Sleepers 2.3 CWR 2.4 Double Track 2.5 Flat Junctions 2.6 Modal Interchanges 2.7 Signalling 2.8 Speed Restrictions 2.9 Stations 2.10 Substations 2.11 Third Track 3. ROLLING STOCK 3.1 Air-conditioning 3.2 Cab Ends 3.3 Standback 3.4 Train Length 4. TIMETABLES 4.1 Express Trains 4.2 Frequency 4.3 Off Peak 4.4 Stopping Patterns 4.5 Underground Loop 5. BUSES AND TRAMS 6. CONCLUSION ___________________________________________________________________ 1. GENERAL There are many little items when added together may contribute significantly to create a catastrophe. Operating the train system with as many independent lines as possible will minimise the cascading effects if a problem develops anywhere on the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Future Planning of Railway Networks in the Arabs Gulf Countries
    M. E. M. Najar & A. Khalfan Al Rahbi, Int. J. Transp. Dev. Integr., Vol. 1, No. 4 (2017) 654–665 INVESTIGATION FUTURE PLANNING OF RAILWAY NETWORKS IN THE ARABS GULF COUNTRIES MOHAMMAD EMAD MOTIEYAN NAJAR & ALIA KHALFAN AL RAHBI Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East College, Muscat, Oman ABSTRACT Trans-border railroad in the Arabian Peninsula dates back to the early 20th century in Saudi Arabia. Over the recent decades due to increasing population and developing industrial zones, the demands are growing up over time. The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is now embarking on one of the largest modern cross-border rail networks in the world. This is an ambitious step regarding the planning and establishment of the rail network connecting all the six GCC countries. This railway network will go through at least one city in each country to link the cities of Kuwait in Kuwait, Dammam in Saudi Arabia, Manama in Bahrain, Doha in Qatar, the cities of Abu Dhabi and Al Ain in the United Arab Emirates and Sohar and then Muscat in Oman in terms of cargo and passengers. The area of investigation covers different aspects of the shared Arabian countries rail routes called ‘GCC line’ and their national rail network. The aim of this article is to study the existing future plans and policies of the GCC countries shared line and domestic railway network. This article studies the national urban (light rail transportation (LRT), metro (subways) and intercity rail transportation to appraise the potential of passenger movement and commodity transportation at present and in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District Programming 2019-2023 105TH
    Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District Programming 2019-2023 Working Copy 105TH/VINCENNES T-111 Ends on 12/31/2025 Fund / Project Balances 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Fund Balance 1. FY 2018 Year End Available Fund Balance $2,307,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,307,500 Subtotal $2,307,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,307,500 Net Revenue $2,307,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,307,500 Revenue 1. Property tax $0 $929,900 $929,900 $929,900 $1,013,200 $1,013,200 $4,816,100 Subtotal $0 $929,900 $929,900 $929,900 $1,013,200 $1,013,200 $4,816,100 Net Revenue $2,307,500 $929,900 $929,900 $929,900 $1,013,200 $1,013,200 $7,123,600 Transfers Between TIF Districts 1. From 119th/I-57 (RDA - Renaissance Beverly Ridge) $0 $706,800 $353,400 $353,400$353,400 $353,400 $2,120,400 Subtotal $0 $706,800 $353,400 $353,400 $353,400 $353,400 $2,120,400 Net Revenue $2,307,500 $1,636,700 $1,283,300 $1,283,300 $1,366,600 $1,366,600 $9,244,000 Current Obligations 1. Program administration $0 ($21,800) ($22,500) ($23,400)($28,500) ($33,700) ($129,900) 2. RDA - Renaissance Beverly Ridge ($1,039,200) ($1,586,800) ($1,043,400) ($1,043,400)($1,043,400) ($1,043,400) ($6,799,600) 3. Residential St Resurfacing - Ward 34 ($43,200) $0 $0 $0$0 $0 ($43,200) 4. Lighting - arterial - West Pullman ($41,000) $0 $0 $0$0 $0 ($41,000) Subtotal ($1,123,400) ($1,608,600) ($1,065,900) ($1,066,800) ($1,071,900) ($1,077,100) ($7,013,700) Net Revenue $1,184,100 $28,100 $217,400 $216,500 $294,700 $289,500 $2,230,300 Proposed Projects 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2886 North Milwaukee
    RESTAURANT 2083 SQUARE FEET COMPLETELY OPPORTUNITY +1300 BASEMENT REHABBED Seeking experienced restaurant Spacious and lexible layout with a This property is being completely operator for a new concept restaurant hood built-in and will be completed by Fall 2018 Owner Nick Katsafados 312.375.9683 2886 NORTH [email protected] MILWAUKEE ADDITIONAL BUILDOUT PROVIDE FLEXIBLE BUILD OUT FOR GREAT RESTATURANT CONCEPT. ATTRACTIVE FAÇADE COMPLETELY RENOVATED FACADE WITH LARGE WINDOWS COMMUNITY MINDSET SEEKING LONG TERM VALUE-ADD TO THE LOCAL COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD Located in Avondale within a 6-minute walking 04 distance of the Logan Square blue line, this corridor is the next exciting part of the booming Milwaukee development. DEMOGRAPHICS Avondale North Side, Chicago, Cook County, Illinois 06 with a population of 92,109. There are 46,194 male residents living in Avondale and 45,915 female resi- dents. Total household expenditures in Avondale are above the national average. Excellent Traffic Counts: 13,100 VPD along Milwaukee Avenue. ARCHITECTURE Beautiful old red brick building built in 1918 (100 08 years old) lovingly restored with a dramatic blend of modern touches to bring the best of both worlds together. Contents 08 PAGE 2 | 2886 N MILWAUKEE ABOUT COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE THE OWNER LISTING BY Nicholas Katsafados NICHOLAS ARCHITECT KATSAFADOS Technical Building Consultants LLC Real Estate Investor 20 year real es- tate professional, Nicholas is a Chi- cago native with a special interest in Amixed use buildings in emerg- ing areas of Chicago undergo- ing revitalization. These older buildings are beautiful and often times a pleasure to re- store. Often completing pro- jects in areas like Bridgeport, Wicker Park, Humboldt Park, Logan Square and now Avon- dale.
    [Show full text]
  • Addendum 3.1
    ADDENDUM 3.1 SECTION 00 73 00 SPECIAL CONDITIONS ADDENDUM 3.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: Special Conditions SC-1.01 through SC-11.04 are numbered to correspond to the General Conditions. SC-1.01 DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................... 3 SC-2.04 CONTRACTOR’S PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION ...... 3 SC-3.02 COORDINATION WITH OTHERS ........................................................... 4 SC-6.01 CONTRACT TIME ................................................................................ 21 SC-7.08 PERMITS, FEES, AND NOTICES ........................................................ 36 SC-7.11 OWNERSHIP OF WORK PRODUCT ................................................... 38 SC-9.02 SCHEDULE OF VALUES ..................................................................... 42 SC-10.02 DELAYS ................................................................................................ 44 SC-11.04 PARTNERING ....................................................................................... 46 APPENDIX A KING COUNTY METRO TRACK ACCESS PERMIT PROCESS .......... 48 APPENDIX B TRACK ALLOCATION REQUEST/WORK PERMIT FORM .................. 51 APPENDIX C DOWNTOWN TUNNEL/STATION ACCESS PERMIT/WORK PERMIT REQUEST FORM .................................................................................. 53 Northgate & East Link Extensions Section 00 73 00 RFFP No. CN 0115-14 Systems GC/CM Special Conditions Link Contract N830/E750 DECEMBER 2017 CO 001 MARCH 2018 CO 008 JUNE 2018 CO 016
    [Show full text]
  • Charoen Nakhon Thailand
    NAVARANG ASSET PRESENT CHAROEN NAKHON THAILAND About Best Health & Culture Restaurants Wellness Heritage CHAROEN Instagramable NAKHON Coffee Culture ATTRACTIONS! And more ... VOL. 01 MAY 2021 01 CHAROEN NAKHON How to get there? From 40 Suvarnabhumi international mins airport From 20 Sukhumvit rd mins (Siam-Asoke) From 5 BTS Krung mins Thon Buri Charoen Nakhon is located along Thailand’s most majestic river “The Chao Praya”. Widely regarded as Bangkok’s most popular trade route and cultural heritage site. From cool art and lifestyle hubs, ‘trendy cafes, and superb street eats to iconic riverside hotels, not to forget the unique shopping districts, life on Charoen Nakhon has never been more attractive. With the new BTS Gold Line on rails, Charoen Nakhon is one of the most desirable neighborhoods of Bangkok. 02 CHAROEN NAKHON About Charoen Nakhon There are few places in the world that make it possible for The riverside neighborhood can visitors to see its urban areas via boat. Charoen Nakhon is a be reached via a handful of BTS charming neighborhood situated in the Thonburi community on stations, or by boat, which is the western banks of the Chao Phraya River. Thonburi was the oftentimes a faster and more capital of Thailand for a short time in 1768, after Ayutthaya authentic way to see the city. was destroyed by the Burmese. After the capital was moved While many tourists who venture across the river, Thonburi became a separate city, but now it is this way come to stay in one of one of many districts that make up the city of Bangkok.
    [Show full text]