AE47810E0128 Metro

JANUARY 2018

RFP No. AE47810E0128 Volume I – Technical Proposal (Appendices) Systems Engineering and Support Services

Submitted by: Resumes Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

TOC-1 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

John Lau | OCS ...... R-87 Henry Pena | communications ...... R-122 Sheldon Leader | communications ...... R-88 Erik Peterson, EIT | train control ...... R-123 Sebastien Lechelle | traction power support ...... R-89 Anh Pham | electrical ...... R-124 Silas Li, LEED AP | mechanical/ HVAC/ tunnel ventilation . R-90 Truc Pham | traction power | ductbank design ...... R-125 Chengwen Liu, PhD, PE, SE | OCS ...... R-91 Kevin Pittleko | train control ...... R-126 Zheng Liu | communications ...... R-92 Edward Poon, EIT | rail activation & start-up ...... R-127 Olivia Lopez | document control ...... R-93 Nap Purificacion | CADD ...... R-128 Rik Lor | independent systems integration review team manager | David Pyatt | overhead contact system support . . . . . R-129 alternative delivery strategy ...... R-94 Rosetta Ramirez, EIT | rail activation and start-up support R-130 Gordon MacDonald | independent systems integration review Philippe Rapin | alternative delivery strategy ...... R-131 lead/overhead contact system ...... R-95 Krishan (Kris) Sabherwal, PE | traction power ...... R-132 Lucine Malekian | safety verification & validation . . . . . R-96 Barry Sam | communications | independent systems Cody Margetts, PE | traction power support ...... R-97 integration review team ...... R-133 Jerry Marquez | electrical ...... R-98 Dave Schlesinger | operations & planning ...... R-134 Ponchito (Ponch) Mateo | traction power | electrical | ductbank John Schlick, PE | OCS ...... R-135 design ...... R-99 Andrew Schultz | train control ...... R-136 Lope Mayola | traction power ...... R-100 Leslie Schumaker, PMP | scheduling ...... R-137 Anthony McIntyre | train control ...... R-101 Abdulhaque Shaikh | traction power ...... R-138 Hortencia McKeown | document control ...... R-102 Andre Shamoon, PE | train control ...... R-139 Cindy McLeod | safety verification and validation . . . . R-103 Bruce Shewchuk, PE | constructability review ...... R-140 Pat McNamee | cost management/ estimating | constructability review ...... R-104 Sheri Soldatke, PE | rail activation & start-up ...... R-141 Joseph Metzler | operations & planning ...... R-105 Gino Spadafore | rail activation & start-up ...... R-142 Alex Mezey | overhead contact system support . . . . . R-106 John Spellman, PE | train control | independent systems integration review ...... R-143 Philip (Phil) Minch | train control | CPUC application/ traffic interface ...... R-107 Marlene Stevens | project administration ...... R-144 Anthony Minikon II | train control ...... R-108 David Stewart | train control ...... R-145 Omidreza (Reza) Moghbeli | corrosion control . . . . . R-109 Stoil Stoilov, PE | traction power ...... R-146 Soham Mookerjea, PMP | communications ...... R-110 Lurae Stuart | RAMS | safety certification ...... R-147 Raylene Moreno, PE | plumbing & fire protection . . . . R-111 Smitesh Sukumar, EIT | communications ...... R-148 Edwin Mortlock | train control ...... R-112 Stefan Svensson | train control ...... R-149 Zafer Mudar, PE | CPUC application/ traffic interface . . . R-113 Dora Terry | corrosion control ...... R-150 Alan Murphy | OCS | independent systems integration Axel Thibodeau, PE | overhead contact system support . . R-151 review team ...... R-114 Ileana Tutos, EIT | specifications ...... R-152 Ermias Negash | OCS ...... R-115 Andrew Vallejo | DSDC/office field engineering . . . . . R-153 Dong Nguyen, PE | train control ...... R-116 Chintan Varia | electrical ...... R-154 Sean O’Gorman | mechanical/ HVAC/ tunnel ventilation . . R-117 Angel Velazquez | train control ...... R-155 Mary Cay O’Malley | rail activation and start-up support . . R-118 Jack Wang, PE | rail activation & start-up ...... R-156 James Okazaki, PE | CPUC application/ traffic interface . . R-119 Vickie Wheeler, PE | specifications ...... R-157 Chris Ortega | train control ...... R-120 Thomas Wieselmann | train control ...... R-158 Rick Pearman | CADD ...... R-121 Chris Wightman, PE | systems project controls . . . . . R-159

Table of Contents

TOC-2 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Ryan Williams, PE, CPENG | communications . . . . . R-160 Jordan Wine | train control ...... R-161 Charles (Charlie) Wright | vehicle interface ...... R-162 Ray Wright | communications ...... R-163 Viktoriya Yanitskaya | operations & planning ...... R-164 Gabrielle (Gabbi) Yates | subcontract administration . . . R-165 Nazila Zohadi | corrosion control ...... R-166

Table of Contents

TOC-3 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Michael Harris-Gifford | program manager | corridor lead/ TO manager | independent systems integration review team Michael Harris-Gifford has more than 30 years of professional experience in senior roles for transit and bus systems design projects involving multi-disciplinary teams . His experience with rail transportation and power distribution has focused on transit systems design,

management and operations . He brings experience designing systems in more than 15 light KEY PERSONNEL rail transit and commuter rail projects in Southern California and throughout the United States, including projects for the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), North County Transit District (NCTD), Tri-County Commuter Rail Authority (Tri- Rail), St . Louis Metro, New York City Transit (NYCT) and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) . Prior to joining WSP, Michael served as the executive officer for Wayside Systems & Engineering for Metro . He was responsible for overseeing Metro’s Wayside Systems and Engineering departments as well as design and construction teams for rail lines, traction substations, signals, communication systems and vehicle acquisition for Metro’s Wayside State of Good Repair program . 30 17 Michael brings proven experience in managing scope, engineering, schedule and budget on Years of Years of Metro multiple capital projects simultaneously while leading systems design reviews, integrated Experience Experience testing and rail activation on all Metro lines . During his tenure at Metro he was responsible for up to 230 Metro personnel, overall management for 28 projects and managing more than Firm 10 subconsultants and contractors . Michael understands systems from all angles, including WSP systems and track maintenance . He has managed multiple disciplines while being a lead Location engineer for systems on multiple projects . He has developed rail vehicle specifications and Los Angeles, CA managed facilities interface with systems . Education “Under the leadership of Mr. Michael Harris-Gifford, Executive Officer of our BS, Engineering Science Wayside Systems department, his team has been replacing track circuits Professional Credentials over the last several months with minimum disruption to revenue service, Will be taking the PE in April and I am pleased to inform you that prior to commencing revenue operations 2018, Chartered Engineer: UK this morning, we removed and replaced the last Alstom Generation 2 audio frequency track circuit from our rail system. I wish to take the opportunity of thanking the NTSB and FTA for their cooperation in directing and resolving this issue, as well as congratulating the signals staff for a job well done!” – Arthur Leahy, former CEO of Metro, in a letter to NTSB Chair Deborah Hersman

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Regional Connector | Los Angeles County, CA (2017-2018): Systems Integration Manager . Michael is responsible for managing all interfaces with Metro’s existing rail network, including systems design and construction issues, rail activation, integrated testing and the development of a new system-wide operations plan for light rail operations . Additionally, Michael is the lead reviewer for all systems submittals, including overhead conductor rail, traction power, train control and communications, and systems facilities interface . Michael manages a team of five systems engineers on this project . Metro Transit Blue Line Extension | Minneapolis, MN (2016-2017): Traction Power Lead Designer . Michael developed the final design for traction power substations for Metro Transit’s Blue Line extension, as well as for its Southwest Extension . A key feature of Michael’s work was to provide maintenance insight and knowledge to ensure the procurement better serves Metro Transit’s maintenance and training needs . Metro Regional Connector, Purple Line Extensions, Southwest Yard and Crenshaw Line | Los Angeles County, CA (2010-2016): Executive officer, and Wayside Systems and Engineering . Michael was responsible for reviewing all systems design and construction for these new rail lines on behalf of rail operations . Michael managed scope and budget for 21 Metro capital improvement projects and led systems review and activation for Foothill Phase 2B, Expo 2, Santa Monica yard, SW Yard, Crenshaw, Regional Connector and Purple Line Extension (Westside) . Resumes

R-1 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Metro Wayside Systems Maintenance and LESSONS LEARNED Engineering | Los Angeles, CA (2008-2016): Department Head . Michael was responsible for all of Metro’s track, train control, communications, traction power and station power systems, comprising approximately 160 track miles . Michael’s staff included approximately 230 inspectors, supervisors, managers and engineers . He led several safety improvement programs for his staff, including the development of arc-flash protection equipment and procedures for traction power, and the development of wayside worker protection procedures . Michael’s annual budget responsibility was nearly $70 million in operating and $40 million in capital . Michael worked closely regional connector with, and gained the respect of, staff at the California Public One of my achievements while at Metro that I believe has, and Utilities commission . will continue to have, lasting benefit for wayside maintenance Metro Eastside Extension, Exposition Line Phase is the introduction of arc-flash protective measures, 1 and Phase 2, and Foothill Extension Phase 2A | Los standards and procedures for Traction Power. Traction Power Angeles County, CA (2008-2016): Executive officer, and maintenance is a dangerous business. I introduced four Wayside Systems and Engineering . Michael was responsible critical measures during my tenure; arch-flash rated uniforms for overseeing all systems design, construction, testing and for TP workers; analysis and procedures to set arc-flash activation for these new rail lines . Michael’s duties included protective standards for common maintenance activities; certification of wayside systems for revenue service . For the mandating arc-flash proof Gas Insulated Switchgear for Phase 2 extension and Foothill projects, Michael developed 34.5kV circuits; and requiring future rail projects to include the design and specifications for Metro-furnished traction substations . arc-flash analysis in design. At the project delivery level, my work for WSP on the Metro Rail Vehicle Acquisition and Engineering | Los Regional Connector project has brought renewed focus Angeles, CA (2005-2008): Department Head . Michael was responsible for 21 engineers and warranty specialists . on the integration and cutover of new construction to The department provided engineering and warranty services Metro’s existing rail system. My deep knowledge of Metro’s for Metro’s existing fleet of approximately 260 rail vehicles, infrastructure has enabled me to assist Metro’s project team, as well as day-to-day support to rail fleet maintenance . The and the contractor to fully prepare for integration and cutover department is responsible for the development of programs for through thorough pre-planning. vehicle overhaul and for new vehicle acquisition . Michael lead development of Metro’s P3010 LRV procurement . systems and MEP requirements into a DB contract . He oversaw final design, construction and testing by the DB contractor . Metro Gold Line Eastside Extension DB | Los Angeles County, CA (2004-2008): Systems Lead . Michael NCTD Oceanside-Escondido Rail Project CM, North was responsible for oversight and review of the final design County San Diego, CA (2001-2005): Activation and and construction of traction power, catenary, signaling and Start-Up Manager . Michael’s duties included organization and communications systems . Michael was also responsible for management of integrated testing activities for all contractors, acceptance of track, signal and traction power systems for including the vehicle supplier . He was also responsible placement into revenue service . for developing NCTD’s system safety program plan, safety certification process and construction management of Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction communications systems . Authority | Los Angeles County, CA (2004-2008): Engineering Manager . Michael was responsible for the design Tri-County Commuter Rail Authority Segment 5 Double- and engineering for this LRT project . Michael was responsible Tracking | Florida (1999-2003): Design-Build Manager . for overseeing and coordinating preliminary engineering, Michael was responsible for development of all facilities and including alignment design, coordination with freight and systems contract requirements for this $330 million Central commuter rail operations, grade crossing design and cost Florida Regional Transit Authority project . Michael’s work estimating . He also managed the overall scheduling and included operations simulation to develop phased construction progress of design, and final environmental impact statement plans . and report tasks . NJT Riverline | Camden, NJ (1997-1999): Lead Engineer Pasadena Blue Line Construction Authority | Los Angeles responsible for systems engineering . County, CA (2000-2003): Systems Design Manager . Michael GEC Alsthom Transportation | England (1997-1999): was responsible for systems design and integration for the Systems Engineer . Michael was responsible for systems design Metro Gold Line, including traction power, catenary, signaling, for various DB, DB operate and maintain (DBOM) and Public grade crossings, control center and communications systems . Private Partnership (P3) transit projects . Michael was responsible for the integration and coordination of

Resumes

R-2 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Jeff Goodling | deputy project manager | project controls lead | value engineering

Jeff brings more than 30 years of experience overseeing all phases of transport projects on three continents . Jeff has spent most of his career in the public sector at TriMet and at Transport for New South Wales . As a result, he understands both an owner’s and consultant perspective . He has led production of dozens of RFPs and was the Project Manager on the first DB project delivered by TriMet . This depth of experience combined with his leadership skills, vision, and creativity have resulted in the delivery of projects earning widespread appreciation from the communities they have transformed, the system’s operators, and those who use the service . Some of his work includes the design, delivery and commissioning of light rail in Portland, Oregon; planning the light rail project for Perth (Western Australia); and managing the engineering and project management contract for Mumbai’s metro rail system . He was also the Project Director of Sydney’s $2 .1 billion LRT . 36 Years of “I feel privileged to have a career in public transit, where I feel that my Experience efforts make it easier for people to access jobs, and improve their social lives. I’m motivated to assist Metro on this project because it will lead to Firm an even greater transit system, and thereby improve the lives of Metro’s WSP customers.” Location Los Angeles, CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Education Edmonton LRT P3 Detailed Design | Alberta, Canada (2016-2017): Project Director Architecture and Lead Designer . Jeff and his team supported the successful P3 Joint Venture during bid phase and the detailed design . Jeff was responsible for the Edmonton Valley Line, Phase 1 DB-finance-operate-maintain (DBFOM) project, which includes a cable-stayed bridge, twin-bore tunnel, a maintenance facility, a large station complex, 11 stops and a 1-mile elevated guideway . As the Project Director, Jeff’s duties included establishing project controls to ensure that the civil and systems designs were integrated and for coordinating the work of numerous subconsultants . Sydney Light Rail | Sydney, Australia (2013-2015): Project Director and Board Member . Jeff reported to the Transport Secretary with responsibility for the delivery of the $2 .1 billion (AUD), 7 .4-mile Sydney Light Rail Project . First announced by the New South Wales government in December 2012, this P3 project reached financial close in February 2015 . The project includes the creation of a 1-kilometer pedestrianized and wire-free zone along George Street in the heart of Sydney’s central business district . Jeff had overall responsibility for the project from route selection to award of the P3 Contract and Financial Close . Jeff’s duties included establishing the project team including the project controls function and establishing the subconsultant contract for the development of the performance specifications for the project’s systems elements . Perth Inner City Light Rail Conceptual Design Study | Perth, Australia (2012- 2013): Project Director . Jeff led the engineering team that was seconded to Western Australia’s Department of Transportation and charged with the conceptual design of a 13 .7-mile-long light rail network through Perth’s central business district, including trackway, utilities, stations, maintenance depot, systems and urban design . Mumbai Metro One Mumbai | India (2010-2012): Project Director . Jeff was responsible for the management of the engineering and project management contract . The project included a 7 .8-mile-long fully elevated, PPP, metro rail system including 12 stations and a maintenance depot, which is the first modern mass transit system to be built in Mumbai . Jeff’s duties included establishment and management of several subconsultant contracts, including those for the design of the project’s system’s elements . As a result, Jeff was also responsible for the integration of the civil and systems elements . Resumes

R-3 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

TriMet I-205 Light Rail Green Line Design- LESSONS LEARNED Build | Portland, OR (2003-2010): Project Director . Reporting to the Executive Director of Capital Projects, Jeff had sole responsibility for the I-205 Green Line Light Rail Project, which included preliminary engineering, preparation of the RFP, negotiation and award of the DB contract, construction management, commissioning (including Safety Certification) and turnover to operations . This project is TriMet’s first conscious effort to comprehensively incorporate sustainable practices in a light rail project . The DB contract included utilities, structures, trackway, stations, traction electrification, Sydney Light Rail communications, CCTV, signals, over 2,000 surface and The following were key issues the project wanted to address: structured park-and-ride spaces, signage and landscaping . Unreliable journey times TriMet Economic Stimulus Program I Portland, OR A confusing bus network (2009-2010): Project Director . Jeff was responsible for the Congestion that is reducing Sydney’s productivity and identification of potential projects, working with executive staff urban amenity to reach consensus on needed improvements and determining Lack of capacity in the current transport system to support appropriate budget allocations, forming partnerships with local growth governments regarding shared funding arrangements, and Lessons Jeff Learned: determining delivery methods within an extraordinarily short timeframe . The scope and schedule of the early works must be established to allow plenty of time for the early work TriMet Interstate MAX Yellow Line I Portland, OR (2001- performed to be accurately reflected in the tender for the 2003): Design Manager . Jeff’s specific duties included ensuring main works package compliance with the environmental impact statement, organizing Early engagement with and finalization of key third party partnering sessions, ensuring compliance with the Americans agreements that affect the design and scope needs to be a with Disabilities Act, and developing and evaluating proposals priority and execution of both the final design and the construction contract . This $350-million Interstate MAX Light Rail Project Negotiating traffic management assumptions with the included preparation of the design criteria, preparation of the roads authority should begin as soon as possible request for design consultant proposals, and the negotiation, This early engagement with the Roads Authority, award and management of the design consultant contract . While specifically about the degree of traffic priority that the Jeff was not responsible for the design of the system elements, LRT’s can take advantage of, will ensure that accurate travel his duties included ensuring that the civil and systems elements times, ridership and thus, fleet and depot sizes are planned were integrated . for It will also ensure that the scope of the required traffic TriMet, Manager of Design Development Department mitigation (including those improvements necessary I Portland, OR (1998-2010): Creating Manager . Jeff was for the bus network – both during construction and responsible for the design and construction of TriMet’s facilities, after operation of the LRT) is clearly understood and such as the Alternative Transportation Program operations incorporated into the tender documents and maintenance facilities, track renewals, park-and-ride lots, as well as expansions and improvements to the bus and rail The investigation and relocation of utilities cannot begin maintenance depots . Specific responsibilities included: soon enough . No single thing can de-risk the main contract more than assuring a clear understanding of the Recruitment, hiring, mentoring, goal setting, evaluation and utilities along the alignment promotion of staff Training staff in the use of TriMet’s Resident Engineer Tunnel Specific Manual into one covering all TriMet Manual, WBS System, and creation of monthly Project facilities Reports to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Writing TriMet’s Inspectors Manual Determining appropriate project delivery method (i .e ,. Low Managing the creation of TriMet’s Standard Drawings Bid, CMGC, Design-Build) Intergovernmental agreements Drafted the second edition of TriMet’s Design Criteria Manual, which transformed the manual from a Westside Resumes

R-4 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

John Schnurbusch, PE | OCS manager

John has more than 10 years of experience in the fields of civil and systems engineering . He has experience in a wide variety of Overhead Catenary System (OCS) designs, including fixed and auto-tensioned systems . He further supports project design and construction delivery

teams by providing interdisciplinary coordination and integration between OCS, traction KEY PERSONNEL power, communications, signaling, civil, structural, stations and utility disciplines; along with change control management .

“With experience designing and delivering OCS for light rail extensions throughout the region, I will bring an unwavering commitment to providing a safe, reliable and efficient design conforming to the best aspects of LA Metro’s existing system.” 10 2 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Years of Years of Metro Metro Regional Connector | Los Angeles County, CA (2014-Present): OCS Experience Experience Engineer of Record responsible for RFC-level design of the above-ground catenary and underground rigid rail systems to support the vital Regional Connector project . Responsibilities Firm include design of a temporary shoofly to facilitate ongoing construction activities, with direct Mott MacDonald coordination with City engineers regarding solutions to complicated pole placement in their right- Location of-way, along with continued construction support in review of product submittals and RFIs . Los Angeles, CA Education Sound Transit, Operations and Maintenance Facility East | Bellevue, WA MS, Civil Engineering/CM; (2017-Present): Serving as a third party Systems Design Review and Integration Lead to BS, Mechanical Engineering manage reviews of the systems discipline design components for the new maintenance and storage yard . Also provide detailed review of the OCS design and integration between the Professional Credentials various systems elements and other interfacing disciplines . Professional Engineer (Civil): CA #83201 I-225 Corridor LRT, Denver Regional Transportation Department (RTD), Denver, CO (2012-2017): OCS designer responsible for RFC-level design of a full-catenary, auto- tensioned light rail extension . Primarily responsible for detail design of OCS layouts, support assemblies, and sectionalization; including the resolution of numerous complicated design interactions between existing bridges, constrained track areas, special trackwork and traffic integration . Also assisted in the development of civil and drainage site plans for TPSS sites . Sound Transit, Seattle University Link (U-Link) Light Rail | Seattle, WA (2013- 2017): OCS Designer providing construction support for design refinement of tunnel and station attachments during the pre-construction phase of the U-Link project . California High Speed Rail, Fresno-Bakersfield and Bakersfield-Palmdale Segments, California High Speed Rail Authority | Fresno, CA (2007-2015): Discipline Lead for 15% design of traction power systems . Primarily responsible for the development of traction power and communications systems layouts along approximately 180 miles of high speed rail corridor, including coordination with trackwork, rail structures, roadway crossings, existing utilities and environmental considerations . Also responsible for writing a report to evaluate the availability of High Voltage power feeds at necessary locations along the Bakersfield-Palmdale Segment, including proposed connection points to the existing power infrastructure and for interfacing with the client’s project management and engineering management teams on compliance with evolving project design criteria . South Link LRT Extension, Sound Transit | Seattle, WA (2010-2012): Provided AutoCAD support and performed OCS loading calculations for preliminary design of the 1 8-. mile LRT extension to be installed entirely on aerial guideway .

Resumes

R-5 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Green Line to the River District, Sacramento Regional LESSONS LEARNED Transit District (RTD) | Sacramento (2009-2011): Assisted the Lead OCS Engineer by providing AutoCAD drafting support and performing calculations pertaining to OCS support structures, including poles, foundations, cantilever, headspans and bridle networks . UTA Airport TRAX Line Utah Transit Authority (UTA) | Salt Lake City, UT (2009): Assisted the Lead OCS Engineer with AutoCAD drafting support for the OCS system, including assembly details, system layouts and master overlap drawings . Regional Connector TRansit corridor The Regional Connector project has proven to be a technical challenge at all levels, and with regard to OCS, especially challenging when it came to the design of the temporary shoofly. Tight clearances between roadways, utilities, tracks and the TBM launch pit required detailed coordination with each of the affected disciplines. Many permutations were considered, and an efficient solution of integrating the OCS supports with the TBM launch pit bridge piles was ultimately selected. John and his team developed a solution that provided an effective support scheme that served the needs of the OCS, while simultaneously eliminating any detrimental impacts to the TBM launch pit or the wastewater system; clearly demonstrating that an integrated approach that involves all of the affected parties from the beginning will yield the best solutions to such complex challenges.

Resumes

R-6 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Anh Le | communications manager | corridor lead/ TO manager

Anh Le has worked for multiple transit agencies over the past 13 years as a communications engineer . His experience includes voice and data communications engineering for a wide variety of infrastructure and access network applications, such as carrier grade ethernet,

multi-protocol label switching (MPLS)-based systems, and virtual private local area networks KEY PERSONNEL (LAN); cable transmission systems; optical network systems and topologies used to support rail and transit signaling and communications, including closed-circuit television (CCTV), public address and visual message signs (PA/VMB), intrusion detection and access control, emergency management, gas monitoring, fire alarm systems, telephone and Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems; wireless systems engineering, including broadband data and spread spectrum systems; and RF propagation modeling of very high frequency (VHF) and ultra-high frequency (UHF) land mobile radio systems . He also has knowledge of time division multiple access (TDMA), Motorola IDENs, code division 13 8 multiple access (CDMA), and other digitally coded modulation schemes . His data network Years of Years of Metro experience includes T1, synchronous optical networking (SONET), and transmission Experience Experience control protocols/internet protocols (TCP/IP), and he is deeply familiarity with the design of voice-over IP (VoIP) telephone systems, including systems integration plan (SIP) and Firm H .323 . Through his experiences, he has developed a solid understanding of radio frequency WSP propagation principles, cellular theory, radio frequency engineering tools and cell-site Location hardware . Los Angeles, CA Education “Working beside Metro and assisting them in achieving their goal of BS, Electrical Engineer expanding our rail system in Los Angeles has been my goal as well. I am committed to supporting Metro on all systems efforts as communications and task order manager. ”

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Regional Connector Transit Corridor | Los Angeles, CA (2011-2018): Communications Engineer . Anh is providing engineering for a new self-healing redundant Native Ethernet OC-48 optical fiber network that connects three underground stations to rail operations control and a node at the pocket track to the existing OC-192 node at the terminus of the Metro Red Line HRT at Union Station . This enables LAN data, train signaling, voice, SCADA, PA/VMS, intrusion detection and access control, fire alarm and CCTV communication with the Rail Operations Center . The work includes deleting an existing node and relocating the existing fiber to the new duct bank in the alignment connection between the Regional Connector and the Gold Line LRT station at 1st/ Alameda Avenue . The very narrowband 6¼ kHz digital radio system was employed with a distributed antennas system (DAS) in the design for the tunnel stations to provide the radio at net -89dBm . The radio base station and repeater sites were selected by a thorough evaluation of the power and link budget . Anh worked with other disciplines—such as civil, electrical, mechanical, traction power and signals—and coordinated with Metro staff to develop a sound and coherent communications system design . He is currently overseeing final design by the DB Contractor . Anh is currently overseeing final design of all communications systems for the project . Metro Purple Line Extension | Los Angeles, CA (2011-2018): Lead Design Engineer for the communications design . Anh is responsible for the communications transmission system (CTS), PA/VMS, intrusion detection, access control, SCADA, fire alarm, CCTV, public branch exchange (PBx) telephone system, ticket vending machine (TVM), grounding, uninterruptable power supply (UPS) and radio systems for Metro . Anh is currently overseeing final design by the DB contractor for Section 1 .

Resumes

R-7 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

SANDAG Mid-Coast Corridor Transit | San Diego, CA LESSONS LEARNED (2011-2017): Lead Design Engineer for the communications FIGURE 9.6.1 b UNDERGROUND RADIO SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE 2 BLOCK DIAGRAM design package . Anh’s work includes the following subsystems: RADIO SYSTEM 2 WITH ASSOCIATED CP, STATION FFBDA & HE RADIO SYSTEM 1 WITH ASSOCIATED CP, STATION FFBDA & HE EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTED UNDER PROJECT #2 EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTED UNDER PROJECT #1 HE2 ANTENNA SYSTEM HE1 ANTENNA SYSTEM

CTS, PA/VMS, intrusion detection and fire alarm, CCTV, HEADEND 2 (HOT STAND-BY) HEADEND 1 (PRIMARY)

CRA/OFR BASE STATION BASE STATION CRA/OFR grounding, UPS and radio systems . Anh also is responsible SYSTEM SYSTEM RAIL OPERATIONS CENTER (ROC) SYSTEM SYSTEM

HE FAILOVER DEDICATED FIBER CABLE FIBER INTERFACE DEDICATED FIBER CABLE FAILOVER FOR RADIO SYSTEM 2 FOR RADIO SYSTEM 1 FDP 2 FDP 1 FAILOVER for providing support to upgrade the back-end equipment at RF / FO CONTROLLER PRIMARY & REDUNDANT FIBER FOR SIGNALS RF / FO FROM HE2 TO HE1 WHEN HE1 FAILS CONTROLLER

PR HE PR HE STATION DAS PRIMARY & REDUNDANT FIBER FOR SIGNALS STATION DAS central control to support Mid-Coast system tie-in . Anh will FROM HE1 TO HE2 WHEN HE2 FAILS

. . . continue to oversee construction in the beginning of 2018 . PR PR . . . PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR . . . FFBDA FFBDA FFBDA FFBDA FFBDA FFBDA FFBDA FFBDA FFBDA FFBDA . . .

HE2 STATION/ CP CP OR STATION OTHER CP CP CP OR STATION OTHER CP HE1 STATION/ TUNNEL TUNNEL

SANDAG Green Line LRT Station Platform NOTES : FIBER OPTICAL CABLE

RADIATING CABLE Modification | San Diego, CA (2012-2015): Quality AT GRADE ANTENNA CP CROSS PASSAGE FFBDA FIBER-FED BIDIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIER

MetroRF RADIO Purple FREQUENCY line extension (PlE) OTHER FACILITY SUCH AS CUT & COVER , VENT SHAFTS, MIDWAY AUXILIARY OTHER Control . Anh performed reviews of the communications and AREAS, AUXILIARY ROOMS, EMERGENCY, ETC CRA CHANNELIZED REPEATER AMPLIFIER OFR ON-FREQUENCY REPEATER electrical station design plans . He verified that the design In 2016,HE HEAD END both Metro Engineering and Fire Life Safety layout, location and the conduit schedule were specific to the departments expressed concern to PLE Project that radio client’s design criteria and that codes were met . system headend on PLE at La Brea station is subject to single point of failure. PLE Section 1 project appointed Anh DART Green Line LRT | Dallas, TX (2007-2009): Le to work with the Contractor to change the design and to Communications Engineer . Anh worked closely with the mitigate the single point of failure issue. He worked with the communications task manager to implement communications designer to put in a second radio headend on PLE Section systems design and construction oversight support for 2 to provide a complete fail safe system for the PLE. Metro the 19 aerial and at-grade stations for the 26 .5-mile-long was very receptive of the solution and has been rail extension . He used the high-speed OC-12 redundancy using the solution on PLE as the guideline for other communications link for all communications nodes to ongoing projects to follow. communicate with the existing operation control center . He designed the fire alarm, intrusion detection, outside plan Metropolitan Council Southwest Light Rail Transit cabling, wayside telephone, PA/VMS, fare collection LAN, and Blue Line | Minneapolis, MN (2016-ongoing): power, and grounding communications systems . He reviewed Communication Design . Ahn is supporting the communications the communications subsystem submittals for the preliminary system design for both projects . His responsibilities include design, final design, test procedures, field test result, and led design oversight and quality control for the communications first article inspection . He conducted field inspection of the drawings, specifications, cost estimates, calculations and design foundations of the communications houses, conduit stub-ups reports for the various design phases . and grounding . He also inspected for proper termination of the outside cable plant to the demarcation cabinets, pulled backbone fiber cable to the fiber distribution panel, recorded deficiency items and monitored construction progress . DART Lake Highlands Station | Dallas, TX (2007-2009): Communications Engineer . Anh successfully completed a communications system design package for the addition of this LRT station to the existing DART Blue Line . His duties included design of the communications network to integrate station subsystems, including SCADA, telephones, fire alarm and intrusion detection, CCTV, PA/VMS, and fare collection LAN with the existing communications system via DART’s SONET node . He resolved wayside conduits and wireway coordination with the signals and station electrical disciplines to effect a sustainable engineering solution . Eagle P3 Project | Denver, CO (2012-2015): Quality Control . Anh supported construction oversight and reviewed and approved the communications system design, design simulation reports, test procedures and test reports . He also reviewed and provided responses for various communications-related RFIs, reviewed change orders and attended design resolution meetings during the design and construction phases . Anh provided cost estimates for various change orders .

Resumes

R-8 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Barry Lemke | train control design lead

With 38 years of rail experience, Barry Lemke has worked in all types of rail systems from conception to design and construction, as well as O&M . He has worked throughout the United States on train control systems for over 20 transit, commuter and freight train control systems . This diverse experience gives Barry deep insight into the performance and characteristics of train control systems in the United States . Barry has acted in the

lead systems role with many elements outside of train control . This gives him a unique ICAL SPECIALIST LEAD perspective of how the train control system interacts and resides as part of a complete system to maximize performance, maintainability and above all safety . TECHN

“My focus and energy is maintained within the team. I am passionate in my work and I ride for the brand!” 38 4 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Years of Years of Metro Experience Experience Metro Purple Line Extension Westside Section 3 | Los Angeles, CA (2014- 2017): Senior Train Control Designer . Barry provided assistance in technical oversight of Segment 3, with focus on train control . Additional work included train control design and Firm development of a system integration matrix . Barry continues to support all three sections, WSP most recently conducting safe braking and headway calculations related to interim terminal Location operations for Section 2 . Los Angeles, CA Education Metro Crenshaw/LAX Line | Los Angeles, CA (2010-2016): Train control Basic and Advanced Electronics, Engineering Specialist . Barry was responsible for providing preliminary engineering and DB U S. . Navy documents for this extension to the LA Green Line . Design services were for an automatic train control system and highway at-grade crossings . The LA Green Line is a unique system in that it uses on-board topographical mapping and wayside control, creating a partial moving block or advanced train control system . A challenging portion was the adaptation of going from exclusive, to semi-exclusive, and to street operations . Barry conducted extensive data gathering and research in order to specify the scope of work, performance requirements and interfaces as the existing system was somewhat obsolete . Poindexter Drive At-Grade Rail-Crossing Design | Charlotte, NC (2012): Senior Train Control Designer . Barry was responsible for the design and system coordination of the Poindexter Drive at-grade rail crossing . He provided design for a complete system, including incorporation/integration into the existing train control system . Charlotte Streetcar Project, Starter System | Charlotte, NC (2011-2013): Senior Train Control Designer . Barry was responsible for the design of interlocking and at-grade crossings for a rail extension from an existing light rail system . The current system uses Automatic Train Protection (ATP) with at-grade crossings . The system has several historic trolley cars that run on ATP and uses a pantograph to be able to operate on the light rail system . The challenge was to modify the on-board equipment to be able to go from ATP mode to street running . Bascom Ave. At-Grade Crossing Improvements | San Jose, CA (2012): Senior Train Control Designer . Barry was responsible for design of crossing improvements on Bascom Ave . The upgrade provided 4-quad gates and moving the gates perpendicular to the rails as opposed to the road . The existing configuration caused the gate arms to be excessively long . Diridon Station Train Control Improvements | San Jose, CA (2012): Senior Train Control . Barry provided construction oversight of cutover and retesting of interlocking equipment . The main challenge was that the bus bridge was accidentally set from Union Station which was between interlockings . This required a coordinated effort between the contractor, construction management and rail operations . This team effort minimized the impact to the cutover and was successfully completed ahead of schedule . Resumes

R-9 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Light Rail Airport Extension | Salt Lake City, UT (2011- LESSONS LEARNED 2012): Senior Train Control Designer . Barry was responsible for the design of the train control, at-grade crossing and fiber optic system for an extension of the light rail system to the airport . This was both ABS and street running . One challenge was going from the center of North Temple under street running to ABS on the airport property . This required an at-grade crossing with a very acute angle, which required a combined effort among design, UTA and City Traffic . Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) | Sonoma Marin Counties, CA (2007): Senior Train Control Designer . Barry performed Utah Light Rail preliminary engineering for 50 miles of Automatic Block Signal In the early days of the Utah Salt Lake light rail system, there System on over 100 highway at-grade crossings . The main was a major configuration change. To respond to that major challenge was in dealing with joint operation of a local Short configuration change, the vendor currently under contract Line . The freight operator insisted on operating at 49 mph so it requested a change of technology in exchange for the new could maintain the same speed in dark territory . The Short Line configuration. This configuration would completely change also insisted on using a braking profile more accustomed to a the block layout of the train control system without additional mainline railroad . This was a direct impact to DMU headways cost. This alternative was to provide an encoded track circuit due to the predominant single tracking with passing sidings . known as ElectroCode. This system was to be equipped with a device to allow it to work on electrified territory known as Yucca Mountain Evaluation | Battle Mountain and Elko, Electrified ElectroCode. NV (2007): Lead Specialist . Barry acted on behalf of Lander and Eureka counties in a number of rail corridor assessments of We looked at what it would take to change the signaling the Carlin Spur and Union Pacific right-of-way in support of the and discussed options with the vendor. The client had one Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Depository rail corridor . main stipulation: we had to prove this product in theory, demonstration, and operation. The first task was to review the Regional Rail Project | Raleigh and Durham, NC (2005): actual schematic of the new device known as an EECode box. Signal Engineering Specialist . Barry was responsible for Satisfied of the theory, they performed the demonstration, providing final design of the onboard cab signaling equipment, and placed it in service. It worked flawlessly, and is continues designed for a diesel multiple unit providing a form of positive to do so. Since that time, these devices have been used train control . throughout the county. On December 4, 1999, the Salt Metro Gold Line Eastside Extension | Los Angeles, Lake City Light Rail System went into service with the first CA (2004-2005): Senior Train Control Designer . Barry was Electrified Electro Code to be in service in the United States. responsible for providing design and submittal review of The lesson is to address adversity and seek for solutions and construction submittals during construction . Barry provided alternatives. At the same time, be wary that the alternative design services through construction . meets the objective and needs of the system’s operations. Positive Train Control (PTC) Project, Springfield, IL The system has to meet the operational requirements, is (2002): Signal Engineering Specialist . Barry was responsible maintainable with a high level of reliability, and above all for providing signal engineering services for development of the provide a level of safety that exceeds the requirements of a PTC system . Responsibilities included developing a route and public transportation system. aspect chart to establish a baseline for software development, performing plan reviews and providing testing support .

Resumes

R-10 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

David Hetherington, PE | traction power manager

David Hetherington has 16 years of experience in operational rail simulations and designing AC and DC traction supply systems for railways and tramways electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), grounding and bonding arrangements and stray current corrosion control . He has nine years of experience as a project manager responsible for delivering power simulation studies, high level strategies and plans, specifications, and technical designs . David has experience gained on a range of projects and traction systems from 750 V dc, 1 5. kV dc, 3 kV dc, 25 kV ac (rail return, booster transformer and auto transformer) and 50 kV ac . These projects range from LRT tramways, metros, suburban railways, high speed rail, and freight railways . TECHNICAL SPECIALIST LEAD “I am committed to bringing my knowledge and experience not only in traction power, but also in railway systems to ensure a complete holistic design is achieved to minimize Request for Information and changes from 16 3 the contractor during construction. Years of Years of Metro Experience Experience RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro, Regional Connector Transit Corridor, Design-Build | Los Angeles Firm County, CA (2014-Present): Engineer for the traction power detailed design for the Mott MacDonald Regional Connector tunnel through downtown Los Angeles . This includes the detailed Location electrical design of the supporting HV network, substations, DC equipment and overhead Los Angeles, CA equipment . Responsible for the accommodation of the TPSS and associated DC equipment Education in the stations, including design of embedded conduit, raceways and ensuring sufficient M Eng. ,. Electrical Engineering maintenance access for the larger equipment . and Applied Electronics Metro, Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor Design-Build | Los Angeles, CA Professional Credentials (2014-Present): Technical Advisor providing expert advice to the project manager on Professional Engineer proposed changes to the traction power system during the detailed design stage for the project . (Electrical): CA #21284 LA Streetcar, Inc., Preliminary Engineering | Los Angeles, CA (2015-2016): Responsible for the preliminary design of the traction power system for LA Streetcar through downtown Los Angeles . This includes undertaking site surveys and assessing the available possible sites for the TPSS in conjunction with the Load Flow Analysis to propose the number and position of TPSS for the project . Responsible for liaising with LADWP for the sites and submitting load applications to agree the incoming power supplies for the TPSS and yard . Denver Regional Transportation District (RTD), I-225 LRT Corridor | Denver, CO (2014-Present): Leading the traction power design team in the production of the substation layouts and managing the EMC studies required for the extension for the I-225 Rail Line project . This project is a 10 .5-mile light rail extension from the existing Nine Mile Station through the City of Aurora to the Peoria Station . Greenline Southeast Transitway | Calgary, Canada (2013-2014): Responsible for the preparation of the traction power part of the Design Guidance Manual (DGM) for the project . The DGM outlines the overall strategies to be adopted during the conceptual design with regards to such issues as undertaking simulations and interpreting the results for the sizing and placing of TPSSs, stray current control strategy, grounding and bonding strategy, preferred types of equipment and electrical protection . Responsible for supervising the traction power conceptual design for the Greenline Southeast Transitway in accordance with the DGM . North West Rail Link Design-Build | Sydney, Australia (2014-2016): Technical Advisor providing expert advice on the differences between AT and BT 25 kV traction systems . David is also providing assessment through TRAIN simulations on the pros and cons of each traction system and advising the JV on the type of system to adopt and the size and location of equipment .

Resumes

R-11 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

London Underground (LU), Croxley Rail Link Traction LESSONS LEARNED Power Design | London (2013-2016): Project Manager and CRE (Contractor’s Responsible Engineer) responsible for the detailed design of the traction power . The scope of the project involves extending the LU Metropolitan Line from Croxley and linking into the Network Rail infrastructure to allow the LU S8 stock to run into Network Rail Watford Junction station . This detailed design includes upgrades to the supporting 11 kV network, upgrading existing LU and NR substations, a new substation for LU and upgrades to the LU and NR DC networks . The detailed design also includes liaising with manufacturers LA Streetcar, Inc., Preliminary Engineering, Los and producing a fully detailed out and coordinated design that Angeles, CA can then by priced by the main Contractor . As part of the preliminary design process David needed Crossrail, Liverpool Street Enabling Works | London to co-ordinate between LA Streetcar, the design team and (2007-2010): Traction Power Team Leader that was responsible LADWP to find sites for the substations that were agreeable for the design of the permanent LV supply derived from the to all parties. This was particularly challenging in the center new traction substation and from the Distribution Network to LA to find property that could be used for a substation, Operator, relocating the switchrooms, the cable management close enough to the Streetcar to be technically suitable, system associated with the relocation of the LV switchrooms able to be served by LADWP at the required voltage and and the cable management system associated with the financially viable to be bought and used for this purpose. relocation of the traction substation . At Liverpool Street station David brings this specific experience to the team and his a Communications Equipment Room (CER), several electrical ability to work across disciplines in developing the traction switchrooms, stations operation room (SOR) and the traction power design to minimize rework and design change as the substation need relocating to make room for Crossrail . This was design progresses. made more difficult by the requirement for a “temporary” LV power supply to power the CER prior to the completion of the new LV switchrooms and traction substation . Docklands Light Railway (DLR) , Stratford International Extension | London (2008-2010): Traction Lead that was responsible for the high voltage and traction power design of the Stratford International Extension of the DLR system . This involved not only the technical design of the traction power system, but ensuring the design integrated with every other engineering discipline involved in the project . Responsibility for production and client sign off of 13 Acceptance in Principle documents, six reports, eight Acceptance for Construction documents and several technical specification documents . Following on from obtaining client acceptance of these documents was the close liaison with the Contractor in ensuring the equipment purchased and installed met with the specifications and documents produced by Mott MacDonald . Further work entailed including the responsibility for conducting rail to earth resistance tests on the slab track (pre and post pour) and ballasted track to ensure the Contractor’s work met design and DLR standards .

Resumes

R-12 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Davy Leung | RF engineering lead

Davy Leung is a radio subsystem project engineer, communications system project team lead and senior principal technical specialist . He is experienced in radio and wireless communications system design, integration, testing, commissioning and maintenance for many radio communications system projects in rail and transit industries . During project implementation and execution, his project engineering duties have included reviewing and revising specifications; performing radio system design, radio coverage and interference ICAL SPECIALIST LEAD analysis; supporting and verifying submittal documents; and supervising and coordinating the work of project teams of engineers, technical personnel and subcontractors . His additional responsibilities have included participating in estimating and bid proposal process TECHN specialized in rail and transit radio system, radio project scheduling, progress report, design meetings, technical review and comment process and support, client meetings, preparing subcontractor agreements and budgets, FCC licensing management, supervising field 40 14 acceptance and integration testing and commissioning, performing feasibility studies, and Years of Years of Metro preparing final contract documents and construction cost estimates . He has experience Experience Experience in project and technical management on research and product development for advanced wireless system design and radio products . Firm WSP “I am committed to teaming up with Metro and WSP Technical Excellence Location teams to design, upgrade, retrofit, integrate and deliver next generation Los Angeles, CA Metro Radio System and network with redundancy, location diversity, Education resiliency to failure, high reliability and excellence in safety and MS, Engineering; BS, Electrical operation.” Engineering

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Purple Line Extension Westside I Los Angeles, CA (2012-present): Radio and Communications System Project Engineer and Senior Principal Specialist . Davy is providing the following: radio system design, including coverage analysis and link calculation, inter-modulation and system noise analysis; EMI/EMC and interference analysis; traffic analysis, antenna system design and system architecture design configured with redundant head-end radio equipment for underground radio and advanced wireless communications systems; radio system integration testing and commissioning; support of submittals, feasibility study, radio system reliability and availability study, project scheduling and budget estimating . Metro Regional Connector | Los Angeles County, CA (2016-present): Radio and Communications System Project Engineer and Senior Principal Specialist . Davy is providing the following services: Radio system design, including coverage analysis and link calculation, inter-modulation and system noise analysis; EMI/EMC and interference analysis; traffic analysis, system noise analysis, antenna system design and system architecture design configured with redundant head-end radio equipment for underground radio and advanced wireless communications systems; radio system integration testing and commissioning; support of submittals; feasibility study, radio system reliability and availability study, project scheduling and budget estimating . Metro Crenshaw/ LAX Line Signaling | Los Angeles County, CA (2015): Radio Expert and Senior Radio Engineer . Davy was invited to propose an alternative solution to the contractor on an underground radio system for this project with detailed design and estimate . Metro Expo Phase 1 | Los Angeles County, CA (2009-2011): Senior Radio Project Engineer . Davy proposed and implemented a unique system configuration to resolve the TX (Transmit) to RX (Receive) antenna isolation and system stability problem for a short trench tunnel system . A challenging TX carrier noise and interference was resolved and was

Resumes

R-13 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128 compliant with FCC requirements with optimized cost . Davy also LESSONS LEARNED provided a complete radio system design, including separate TX and RX head-end equipment and interface . The project was completed with all of the required submittal documents . Davy performed the Factory Acceptance Test, the Local Field Acceptance Test and the System Integration Test . Metro Gold Line Eastside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA (2006-2008): Senior Radio Project Engineer . Davy completed a turn-radio system design and implementation . Davy completed the Local Field Acceptance Test, the System Integration Test and the Coverage Test with a specially assigned Metro Purple Line Westside Extension 1, 2 and 3 testing team from Metro and the contractor within three weeks (PLE) to meet the very unusual and challenging project integration On the Metro PLE, radio system for each PLE Section 1, 2 schedule and to ensure the Metro Eastside line could open and 3 had to be designed and built by multiple contractors. without any revenue loss . Each PLE section was required to provide radio coverage for their associated tunnel segments/Cross Passages and Metro Blue Line | Los Angeles County, CA (2002- underground stations. Each PLE section could lose radio 2004): Senior Radio Project Engineer . Davy completed the turn- coverage due to Head-end (HE) equipment failure or above key Pasadena radio system design and implementation . Davy ground antenna structure damage or destroyed by vandalism closed out the Local Field Acceptance Test, System Integration or mother-nature or vehicle impact causing complete loss of Test, Coverage Test and associated submittals within project all off-air HE channels. schedule . One of the solutions was redundant Head End configuration Senior Telecommunications Engineer. Various Projects: using Primary HE and Hot-standby (redundant) HE separately Davy performed radio system design, including coverage located within each PLE Section. Should the primary HE planning, analysis and prediction, inter-modulation and system fail the Hot-Standby HE shall be activated and be failover- noise analysis; third order intercept analysis; EMI/EMC and switched by ROC to provide radio coverage to underground interference analysis; traffic analysis and system configuration stations and tunnel/Cross passages areas. The main design for 220 MHz/450 MHz/700MHz/800MHz/900 MHz train disadvantage was the radio system cost would be more than control radio systems; TETRA system analog and digital (P25) double due to hot-standby HE equipment redundancy and trunked radio systems; microwave back-haul data radio link; RF/Fiber Converter and switching equipment redundancy tunnel radio systems; and in-building RF distribution systems . at remote cross-passage locations to support fiber diversity Projects included: operation. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority PTC I Boston, WSP proposed a more flexible and cost-effective alternative MA (2015-2016) radio configuration for PLE Section 1, 2 and 3 as one unified Florida Sunrail Dispatch and Radio System I Orlando, FL Metro PLE project. Each PLE Radio system was designed to (2013- 2014) be equipped with redundant RF/Fiber converter and switching Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority PTC equipment to support fiber diversity at all remote locations Radio Network and System I Philadelphia, PA (2013- 2014) and with stand-alone Head End Failover Switching System (HEFSS) to provide redundant Head End and fiber diversity Tri-Met AVL- P25 Radio System I Portland, Oregon (2009- and redundancy switching between PLE1 & 2 and between 2011) PLE 2 & 3 to provide each PLE radio system with redundant Australia Fortescue Metals Group FMG Train Control and head end system protection. Signaling Project I Australia (2009 -2011) Tren Urbano LRT I San Juan, Puerto Rico (2001 – 2004)

Resumes

R-14 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Paul Mosier | operations and planning lead

Paul Mosier has extensive experience in all rail modes, including light rail transit, heavy rail transit, high speed, intercity, and commuter rail . As an operations and service planning lead, he understands capital construction in a high-density service environment, operations and maintenance planning, computer simulation modeling, resource planning, budget planning, cost control and labor/management relations .

Paul has served in senior management positions with responsibility over line managers, labor forces and professional staff, and for directing transit/commuter service operations and maintenance on high-density lines for the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR), then the TE CHNICAL SPECIALIST LEAD largest commuter railroad in North America . His responsibilities included oversight of major terminal operations, including Penn Station in New York City, where he managed the joint facility contract with Amtrak and played a major role in the planning and implementation of 42 the Penn Station Central Control Project . He served as LIRR’s operations and maintenance Years of representative on the Penn Station Central Control Steering Committee and as a member Experience of the Penn Station Central Control Facilities Board of Directors . He also participated in the joint Amtrak/LIRR tunnel life safety operations and engineering assessments of the Firm Penn Station environs and all tunnel approaches, and served as a founding member of the WSP Penn Station Tunnel Life Safety Task Force . In addition, he directed the development and Location implementation of the terminal operations plan, transition plan and final project staging for Newark, NJ construction and commissioning of the J .D . Caemmerer West Side Storage and Maintenance Education Facility (total project cost in 1986 was $192 million) in Manhattan . During his tenure with Graduate Certificate, the LIRR, Paul also served as Director of Operations Planning and developed a strategy Transportation Planning to integrate the planning processes for all areas of operations (transportation, equipment Program; Graduate Certificate, maintenance, engineering, stations and police), resulting in an integrated, synergistic Advanced Labor Relations operating, maintenance and service plan . Studies; Graduate Certificate, Executive Management Program; “I am passionate about developing and implementing innovative solutions Graduate Certificate, Advanced to improve the operations of public rail transit services. Providing transit Transportation Management customers with safe, clean, reliable, on-time and courteous service is Program; BA, Philosophy paramount; I am excited and committed to assisting Metro in this endeavor.”

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Purple Line Extension | Los Angeles, CA (2017): Senior Advisor . Paul and his team were brought to review a multitude of operational dynamics associated with implementation of phase 2 of the purple line and operation of constellation station . Caltrain Joint Powers Board (JPB) | San Carlos, CA (2007-ongoing): Project Manager for Rail Operations Planning, Maintenance Planning and Systems Engineering . Major task initiatives included construction staging plans, operations and service plans, train schedule analysis, and performance analysis of the operations and maintenance contractor(s) . California High-Speed Rail Authority California High-Speed Rail—Program Management, Tier 2 Preliminary Engineering and EIR/EIS) Phase | CA (2008- 2012): Reported to the Project Director as Manager—Operations and Maintenance . Paul was responsible for the development of ridership demand-based service designs; operations planning; computer simulation modeling; rolling stock and infrastructure maintenance planning; and terminals, stations and yard and maintenance facilities conceptual designs . Provided guidance and direction to the engineering management team, regional section managers and regional section engineering teams . Developed high-speed train system requirements for operations, maintenance and safety to inform the Federal Railroad Administration regulatory approval process . He was responsible for supporting coordination Resumes

R-15 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128 with the BNSF Railway, Union Pacific Railroad, Caltrain, LESSONS LEARNED Metrolink, Amtrak, NCTD Coaster and other agencies and stakeholders . California High-Speed Rail Authority California High- Speed Rail Program—Program Management, Tier 1 Programmatic Environmental Phase | CA (2001-2008): Task Manager—Operations Planning and Engineering . Paul directed the development of operating strategies and engineering criteria for a new rail system capable of achieving speeds up to 220 mph, spanning over 800 route miles . Computer modeling/simulation of this network was used to inform and No.7 Subway Extension optimize the system configuration for delivering maximum Recognizing a need for the client, Paul and his team worked throughput and capacity for a variety of scheduled services (i e. ,. to develop a computer simulation model that accurately express, semi-express, regional) with the shortest feasible trip replicates the signaling systems for the New York City transit times . In addition, simulation modeling was applied to analyze lines. Working in partnership with a computer developer, opportunities to integrate “blended” services on shared-use we were able to combine our signaling expertise and their corridors between Los Angeles and San Diego, and San Jose programming software to enhance the capabilities of the and San Francisco . program. The team was able to use this program on the project to optimize the design of the line extension and the Valley Metro Speed Enhancement Study | Phoenix, AZ end of the station. (2013-2015): Senior Technical Advisor . Paul developed a rail operation simulation model of the Valley Metro Light Rail system stock investments required to meet the demand for service on to accurately replicate the entire LRT network’s rail infrastructure, each of the LIRR branches . Rail network simulation modeling equipment performance, operating characteristics and vehicular was used to confirm the feasibility of future operating and traffic signaling system to evaluate the feasibility of introducing service plans . express or semi-express service . No. 7 Subway Extension Project | New York City Transit SANDAG Mid-Coast LRT Extension Project | San Diego, (NYCT), New York City (2007-2015): Task Manager— Rail CA (2011-2016): Senior Technical Advisor . Paul oversaw the operations . Paul directed work to apply dynamic rail simulation operations and service planning tasks for this project to extend modeling to the flushing line subway network and extension the San Diego Trolley system . Computer simulation modeling to 34th Street, to determine maximum practical capacity with was used to analyze infrastructure configuration and train control the existing fixed block and future CBTC moving block signal system alternatives to determine the feasibility of supporting system . future Mid-Coast and San Diego Trolley service . FRA Northeast Corridor (NEC) “Future” Project- Metropolitan Transportation System/San Diego Trolley Tier 1 Programmatic EIS and Service Development Blue Line Rehabilitation Study | San Diego, CA (2008- Plan | Washington D.C. (2013-2017): Operations Planning 2010): Principal-in-Charge . Paul assessed the condition of the Manager . Paul was responsible for directing the development Blue Line infrastructure and produced a rehabilitation program of operations and service plans to inform a wide range of NEC plan . A computer simulation model of the San Diego Trolley high-speed rail alternatives analysis and contribute to the system was developed to inform the preparation of an operating preparation of a long-term investment program for improving plan with construction staging scenarios that would allow the and growing NEC rail service to accommodate future commuter delivery of reliable passenger service during implementation of and intercity rail ridership as part of the regional transportation the rehabilitation program . system in the Northeast . LIRR Positive Train Control Impact Study | New York Arizona DOT and FRA Phoenix to Tuscon HSR, Tier 1 (2015-ongoing): Senior Technical Advisor and QA/QC Programmatic Environmental Phase | Arizona (2014- Manager . Paul developed a computer simulation model 2015): Senior Technical Advisor . Paul provided guidance for that replicates the performance of LIRR operations after full establishing conceptual design criteria for alignment alternatives implementation of PTC, identify any adverse operational impacts and the evaluation of those alternatives for a new/proposed and develop solutions and mitigations . intercity passenger service between Phoenix and Tuscon . LIRR Network Strategy Study | New York (2015-2017): Senior Technical Advisor . Paul evaluated market demand and identified service goals and initiatives that could lead to an increase in LIRR ridership volumes and market share . The Network Strategy Study inventoried infrastructure and rolling Resumes

R-16 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Abbas Sizar, PE | corridor lead/TO manager

Abbas Sizar has more than 32 years of experience in engineering design and management of rail/transit systems projects involving train control, communications, traction power, and operations control systems . Abbas is an expert in conceptual, preliminary, and final designs, construction management, safety certifications, system integration, and commissioning . His diverse project experience includes 12 years of testing and commissioning of electrified rail systems, including electrical systems for fixed facilities (stations, maintenance shops, yards, and administration buildings), traction power, train control, communications, SCADA, rail vehicles, operations control center, and intrusion and fire alarms systems . TECHNICAL SPECIALIST LEAD

“I am committed to bring to Metro the knowledge, the experience and the skills I gained through working on dozens of Systems projects in US and internationally to bring; the safest, the most reliable, the most cost effective 32 2 and the latest state-of-the-art transit system to Metro and its riders.” Years of Years of Metro Experience Experience RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Rail Operation Support Bench | Los Angeles, CA (2017-present): Project Firm Manager responsible for leading a team of engineers performing on-site engineering and Mott MacDonald evaluation surveys of Metro’s existing fiber optic cabling system for the Red and Purple lines . Location Abbas is also responsible for developing recommendations for the business opportunities for Los Angeles, CA leasing of dark fiber on the Red and Purple lines . Education MS, Electrical Engineering; Metro Regional Connector Transit Corridor Design-Build | Los Angeles, CA M BA. Courses; B .E ,. Electrical (2015-2017): Principal Systems Engineer for design of communications systems that Engineering include a fiber optic backbone, CCTV, passenger information system; intrusion detection; passenger, maintenance, emergency, passenger assistance phones; radio system, and Professional Credentials SCADA . This $935 million project entails 1 .87-miles of new rail system that will connect Professional Engineer (Electrical) Blue and Gold lines to LA Metro’s existing system in the downtown area . The project includes CA #21314 a 1-mile bore tunnel and .87-mile of cut-and-cover tunnels, three multi-level underground stations, and systems components . LA Street Car, Inc. Downtown Los Angeles Streetcar Preliminary Design, | Los Angeles, CA (2016-2017): Senior Systems Manager responsible for developing preliminary engineering of signaling and communications designs for the streetcar operation at street grade with mix traffic . The project is a 3 .8-mile streetcar route connecting to major downtown activity centers, and is designed to provide minimum disruption to the traffic and the local businesses along the route . Capital Metro, Railroad General Engineering Consultant | Austin, TX (2016-present): Deputy Project Manager for providing engineering and project management services for the implementation of a Positive Train Control (PTC) system . Abbas’ responsibilities included developing the Project Management Plan; PTC project schedule; project procurement documents; supporting technical specifications; zone speed analysis, train braking and train operations simulations programs; E-ATC Concept of Operations; and for developing various FRA/PTC submissions (PTCIP, PTCSP) for the project . Abbas was also responsible for providing engineering and project management services for the implementation of upgrades to the existing Centralized Traffic Control (CTC) system as part of TIGER V grant project . The CTC upgrades included 20 Control points (sidings and crossovers – with 24 power switches 10 power derails); 11 controlled intermediate locations; four controlled approach locations; and 13 electrical lock locations . In addition, there were 73 automatic road crossing warning systems involved . Sound Transit, University Link Design/Construction | Seattle, WA (2013-2015): Construction Manager overseeing construction of systems and track work . The project is 3 .5 Resumes

R-17 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128 miles of underground twin bored tunnels with two underground LESSONS LEARNED stations . The track work includes direct fixation track, floating slab track sections, high resilient rail fasteners, and movable frog special trackwork . The traction power substations consist of two traction power substations with nominal voltage of 1500VDC . The Communications System includes a fiber optic backbone network system; CCTV; paging system; intrusion detection; passenger, maintenance, emergency, passenger assistance phones; radio system; and SCADA . The SCADA system includes three separate SCADA systems for the train control, building management, and emergency ventilation Sound Transit University Link Systems Construction systems . Management, WA Abbas has been instrumental in orchestrating his engineering and construction teams to deliver on time and within budget rail systems projects. As Resident Engineer for the Sound Transit University Link Systems Construction Management project, Abbas played a significant role in completing the project ahead of schedule and under budget; engineering; and acquiring new clients. Abbas makes these achievements by 1) building a strong team of engineers consisting of both in-house engineers as well as outside sub-consultants, and a combination of younger engineers and seasoned professionals; 2) engaging a high performing marketing team; and 3) motivating the teams, and orchestrating their talents to achieve superb results.

Resumes

R-18 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Guido Eyzaguirre | systems integration lead | rail activation and start-up lead | corridor lead/TO manager | independent systems integration review team

Guido Eyzaguirre has more than 39 years of experience in trackwork and systems design, integration, equipment procurement, installation, and start-up of rail transit projects . He has designed traction power supply systems, third rail systems, catenary and power systems, and has run computer models to determine substation locations and ratings . He has been responsible for track procurement and installation in several projects in the USA and abroad . On the Red Line Extension Project, Guido was the Area Manager for Systems on Segment 1-3 . He was responsible for managing systemwide procurement of all track and system elements

such as rail, special trackwork, rail fasteners, contact rail, coverboard, traction power, escalators, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST/ LEAD elevators, emergency fans, air handling units, auxiliary power transformers and UPSs .

“I look forward to bringing my 36 years of rail systems experience and 17 39 17 year successful partnership with Metro to the project. My goal is to facilitate Years of Years of Metro seamless integration of track and systems elements with the existing Experience Experience system, while simultaneously integrating the civil, structural, and facilities elements, as well.” Firm Mott MacDonald RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Location Metro Regional Connector Transit Corridor Design-Build | Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles, CA (2014-Present): Design Manager and Systems Integration Coordinator responsible for Education overseeing the design of the design packages for traction power, traction power distribution, B .E ., Mechanical Engineering and communications . Also responsible for coordination with all stations and facilities to ensure proper integration of the overall design . The Regional Connector extension will create an underground trunk line connecting the existing Metro Gold Line, Metro Blue Line, and Metro Exposition Line Light Rail Transit (LRT) systems through downtown Los Angeles . Metro Crenshaw/LAX Transit Rail Corridor Design-Build | Los Angeles, CA (2010-Present): Systems Engineer responsible for preparation of Power Study (Computer Simulation using TOM Software) and OCS design for the Advance Conceptual Engineering . Prepared operational studies to develop running times, terminal train operations, and train schedules . Prepared Operations and Maintenance Manual used for Preliminary Engineering . The LA Metro Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor extends approximately 8 .5 miles from the existing Metro Green Line at Imperial Highway to the Exposition Line (opened April 2012) at Exposition Boulevard . The Crenshaw corridor currently has poor connections to Metro’s LRT; the extension will improve public transit and mobility with connections to the existing Metro Green Line and Metro Expo Line . Portions of five jurisdictions are in the corridor—the cities of El Segundo, Hawthorne, Inglewood, and Los Angeles, and portions of unincorporated Los Angeles County . The construction value is approximately $2 .1 billion . Metro Red Line, Segments One, Two, Two A and Three | Los Angeles, CA (1986-2000): Area Manager for Systems responsible for the procurement of all systemwide equipment such as rail, special trackwork, rail fasteners, all emergency ventilation equipment, air handling units, elevators/escalators, traction power equipment and contact rail/coverboard . Responsible for installation of track and systems, overseeing testing and commissioning of all systems and rail activation of overall project . Responsible to manage all construction Safety Certification . Sound Transit University Link Systems Construction Management | Seattle, WA (2015): Systems Resident Engineer representing the Owner, Sound Transit, for the General Contractor/ Construction Manager (GC/CM) Contract for design and supply of Track and Systems for the Link Project . Represented the Owner in the selection of GC/CM and the subcontractors to design and install the track and all systems elements made up of Traction

Resumes

R-19 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Power, OCS, 26KV Power Distribution System in stations LESSONS LEARNED and tunnels, Train Signals and Communications, and SCADA Systems . University Link project extends Sound Transit’s Central Link LRT Line 3 .2 miles north from the end of the Pine Street Stub Tunnel in downtown Seattle to the University of Washington . The project includes two cut-and-cover stations, one at Capitol Hill and the other at the University of Washington, which involve deep excavations in a busy and confined urban setting . The construction cost was estimated at $125 million . Utah Transit Authority (UTA), Medical Center LRT Extension | Salt Lake City, UT (2002-2003): Guido Metro Regional Connector, Los Angeles, CA performed various roles where he provided testing and To minimize service disruption, Mott MacDonald worked commissioning for the University extension project, UTA, as closely with Regional Connector Consultant (RCC) team well as the Medical Center Extension . He oversaw the design to develop various staging scenarios for a temporary of passenger stations and substations for the DB project . Gold Line shoofly track. This complex early work required Responsibilities included performing traction power load-flow careful planning to ensure that all design and construction simulations; validating substation spacing and requirements; considerations were addressed during development of the providing engineering support during construction; and testing shoofly program, so that RCC could meet contractual bus and commissioning the overhead catenary, traction power, bridge milestone dates and return the Gold line to normal signaling (LRV and ATMS), and communication and corrosion service. Development of the shoofly required integration controls . Project roles included Systems/Facilities Coordination of the following elements, including interfacing with the Manager, responsible for managing the interaction among existing Metro Gold Line Track work; OCS, traction power, systems contracts and various facilities, including overseeing train control and communications systems; communication utility relocation . As Systems Integration Manager, responsible system cutover to provide uninterrupted communications for systems integration testing and start-up . on the Gold Line for the duration of the bus bridge; south entrance relocation including fare collection, ticket vending Sacramento Regional Transit District (RTD), and other station entrance features; and site civil work, Amtrak/Folsom Light Rail | Sacramento, CA (2000 – including temporary and permanent utility relocations. 2004): The 13-mile Amtrak Folsom LRT Extension runs from the Mather Field Station to historic downtown Folsom . The system includes eight passenger stations, twelve traction power substations, a train control system, and a backbone fiber optic distribution system . Project roles included: Construction Manager . Responsible for the construction management of the civil, systems and station contracts . Resident Engineer . Responsible for utility coordination, the installation of traction power substations, the traction power distribution system, the train control system, the highway grade crossing protection system, the traffic control system, and the fiber optic backbone system . System Integration Manager . Responsible for monitoring the testing, commissioning, and start-up of completed system segments . Prepared documentation for certification by the California Public Utility Commission .

Resumes

R-20 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Gulzar Ahmed, PE | systems safety assurance lead Gulzar Ahmed is a senior supervising engineer with a breadth of experience in the design, installation, testing and safety certification of transit engineering projects . Gulzar has been responsible for system safety, fire/life safety and system assurance compliance for transit projects, including Reliability, Availability and Maintainability (RAM) requirements, safety codes and standards enforcement, RAM testing and safety and security certification . His

responsibilities have included preparing, monitoring and reviewing RAM and safety hazard AL SPECIALIST LEAD analyses of system designs and project safety certification reports . Gulzar has provided his expertise in RAM and analyzing security risks and hazards for a variety of clients, including the Florida DOT for Sun Rail and RTD on the Eagle P3 Project . He has a strong understanding of CPUC’s requirements and has led the development of the safety certification TECHNIC process to support transit agencies in compliance with CPUC regulations .

“Safety continues to play a critical role in the success of Metro projects and 48 14 my understanding and commitment to safety is aligned with Metro. I look Years of Years of Metro forward to continuing to share my passion on future projects.” Experience Experience

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Firm WSP Metro Purple Line Westside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: Location (2011-present): Lead Safety Engineer . Gulzar prepared a safety report as part of the Los Angeles, CA draft EIS/EIR . He analyzed proposed project alternatives, determined safety impacts and Education recommended mitigation measures . Gulzar developed RAM quantitative and qualitative MS, Production Management/ requirements for incorporation into technical specifications . He also prepared the Project Manufacturing Technology; System Safety and RAM Plan, performed fire/life safety design reviews, station emergency BS, Mechanical Engineering exiting calculations and safety certified Advance Preliminary Engineering design . In addition, Gulzar was instrumental in performing the Preliminary Hazard Analysis and verified Professional Credentials implementation of hazard resolutions in the design of the project . Professional Engineer (Mechanical): CA #M25193 Metro Gold Line Eastside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA (2000-2003): ASQ Certified Reliability Lead System Safety and Assurance Engineer . Gulzar was responsible for safety and security Engineer (CRE, Certification certification . Gulzar performed Security Risk Analysis (SRA) and prepared a SRA report #04775) and safety certification plan for the DB project . As part of the safety certification process, he prepared Criteria Conformance Checklists and verified facilities and systems specifications and design for conformance to the design criteria . Lastly, he developed RAM quantitative and qualitative requirements for incorporation into technical specifications . Metro Red Line | Los Angeles, CA (1996-2000): Lead System Safety and Assurance Engineer . Gulzar was responsible for system assurance and safety certification of the Metro Red Line rapid transit system . Gulzar performed, monitored and reviewed reliability and safety analyses of the system design; participated in hazard resolution committee meetings; prepared design criteria and specification conformance checklists; reviewed transit system design drawings to verify implementation of fire/life safety criteria and applicable NFPA requirements; checked hydraulic calculations and design of fire sprinkler systems; performed and reviewed station emergency exiting calculations for compliance with fire/life safety criteria requirements; completed test reports of safety tests conducted as part of system integration tests for safety certification of the transit system; participated in safety certification and activation of rail system for revenue service; and assisted in the preparation of the final safety certification report . Denver Eagle P3 Project | Denver, Colorado (2010-2016): System Safety Support . The Eagle P3 Project concession agreement requires DTP to DB-finance-operate-maintain (DBFOM) the East Rail Line, Gold Line, Northwest Electrified Segment (segment 1 of the Northwest Rail Line) and Commuter Rail Maintenance Facility project under a single contract . Metro Blue Line LRT | Long Beach to Los Angeles, CA (1985-1989, 2002-2003): Senior System Safety and Assurance Engineer . Gulzar was responsible for the performance, Resumes

R-21 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128 evaluation and verification of the RAMS of transit system LESSONS LEARNED elements, including rail vehicles, electronic signaling system and fiber optic communications system . He prepared a system assurance program plan and determined RAMS quantitative and qualitative requirements for incorporation into technical specifications; participated in safety certification and followed quality assurance guidelines for an effective implementation of a coordinated audit program; and monitored and reviewed RAMS analyses of the system design . Central Phoenix/East Valley Light Rail System, Phoenix, AZ (2003): Safety and System Assurance Engineer . Gulzar Sound Transit South Link LRT Project prepared draft system safety and system security program plans Implementation of system safety requirements on a project and performed threat and vulnerability analysis . require a disciplined program of hazard identification, control Salt Lake City Light Rail Transit System, UT (1999): Lead and verification. Working on numerous rail transit projects System Safety Engineer . Gulzar participated in safety certification I have learned that system safety is most effective when it and start-up of light rail system for the Utah Transit Authority . is integrated into design, construction, testing and start-up Centerline, Orange County Transportation Authority Light activities. Rail Transit System, CA (2003-2005): Safety and System project system safety discipline on system hazard analyses and Assurance Engineer . Gulzar was responsible for fire/life safety, safety certification of system elements . RAMS and safety certification . Gulzar developed fire/life safety, system safety and system assurance criteria . In addition, he Honolulu High-Capacity Transit Project, Honolulu, HI assisted in the development of the safety certification plan and (2008-2009): Safety Engineer . Gulzar developed fire/life safety, verified compliance of the preliminary engineering design with fire and intrusion alarm and system assurance (RAM) criteria . the criteria . Developed intrusion detection specifications . Reviewed and completed final document of PHA . SANDAG Mid-Coast Corridor Transit, San Diego, CA (2010-2010): System Safety Engineer . Gulzar developed a draft Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Project, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, San Jose, CA (2004-2008): Safety and Security Management Plan for the LRT project . Safety Engineer . Gulzar assisted in the development of a safety Sound Transit EastLink Extension (Seattle to South certification plan and developed a certifiable elements list . He Bellevue LRT Project), Seattle, WA (2009-2014): Safety also developed a structured approach to the use of computers Manager . Gulzar performed PHA of tunnel sections of the for criteria requirements identification and conformance project . Gulzar identified hazards related to twin-track operation verification as part of the safety certification process . in a single tunnel without fire wall separation between the tracks . SVRT Yard and Shops, San Jose, CA (2004-2005): Task In addition, he completed the Fault Tree Analysis of a specific Manager for Fire/Life Safety and System Safety and Security . scenario of a vehicle fire in a tunnel . Furthermore, he prepared Gulzar developed system safety and security criteria for the a PHA report and presented the findings to Sound Transit Safety yard and shops . Gulzar performed threat and vulnerability and and the Seattle Fire Department . To perform the project elements preliminary hazard analyses and prepared a fire/life safety study PHA, he conducted a two-day workshop to identify unique report to guide in the development of cost-effective, code- hazards of the project . Prepared PHA report listing hazards and compliant, reliable design . proposed resolutions . San Francisco MUNI Central Subway, San Francisco, CA Sound Transit South Link Project (SeaTac Airport Station (2005-2009): Safety Engineer . Gulzar developed fire/life safety to South 200th Street D-B Contract) Seattle, WA (2009): and safety and security criteria . In addition, Gulzar performed Gulzar performed PHA of project system elements . He was also PHA and developed the Safety and Security Certification Plan . responsible for leading and verifying the Critical Catastrophic Lastly, he prepared safety and security criteria conformance Items List and implementing hazard resolutions for accurate checklists for safety and security certification of design . project safety certification . He supported Sound Transit’s safety group to ensure compliance with safety regulations . Sound Transit Sounder Lakewood Layover Yard Expansion, Lakewood, WA (2014-2015): Gulzar performed Preliminary Hazard Analysis and developed safety technical requirements for the DB contract package . California High-Speed Rail, CA (2009-2014): Gulzar developed guidelines for the preparation of safety analyses . He performed PHA of high-speed train vehicles and worked with

Resumes

R-22 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Scott Rodda, PE | vehicle interface lead

Scott has over 40 years of professional experience in the transportation industry, focusing on program management, rail systems development, vehicle interfacing, and systems engineering and integration . Scott has worked as a consultant for numerous transit agencies, including the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and played a key role in several large rail and bus implementation programs . The programs he has led have ranged from small bus procurements to large scale, highly complex rail system implementation programs .

“Dating back to 1983, I have worked on numerous projects for Metro. I am TE CHNICAL SPECIALIST LEAD proud to be a part of the transformation of the Los Angeles area to enable efficient and effective rail and bus transportation. This Systems Engineering engagement will be my highest priority” 43 12 Years of Years of Metro RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Experience Experience Metro New P3010 Light Rail Vehicle (LRV) Procurement & Rail Car Refurbishment Programs | Los Angeles, CA (May 2012 to November 2014): Firm Project Manager . Scott provided program management services on Metro’s New P3010 Light Virginkar & Associates, Inc . Rail Vehicle procurement and Rail Car Refurbishment programs . This involved analysis of Location schedules, preparation and review of project control documents, cost estimates, progress Fullerton, CA reports, and support for Metro in other project management activities . He supported Metro’s Education FTA responsibilities for various activities such as reporting the car manufacturer progress, BS, Mechanical Engineering establishing risk factors and areas of concern, and preparing a detailed risk register with risk Professional Credentials mitigation strategies . PE, Mechanical, CA, No . Southern New Jersey DMU Light Rail System (River Line) | Riverside, NJ M21721 (December 2002 to October 2004): Systems Integrator . Scott managed systems integration activities on this complex project . His work involved interfacing with the FRA to ensure compliance with FRA rules and regulations as the rail line is adjacent to the ROW of an operating railroad . He managed signal system deployment, DMU car procurement, station and track work interfaces, and a last-minute requirement imposed by FRA to implement an intrusion-detection system . He managed the accelerated procurement for the wide load detection system that met FRA’s requirements . BART Procurement of Geometry Car from MERMEC of Italy | Oakland, CA (June 2016 to Present): Senior Consultant . Scott is currently supporting BART with their procurement of a Geometry Car . He attends design reviews and comments on submittals, which have included: car layout diagrams, electrical schematics, weight calculations, brake system, and truck design . As BART intended to run this car in revenue service, Scott took a critical look at adapting an automatic train control (ATC) system to allow safe operation in mixed traffic . He developed initial interface diagrams and a flowchart of the steps needed to adapt the ATC system . BART Implementation of CBTC System | Oakland, CA (July 2015 to August 2016): Revenue Vehicle Integration Lead . In this role he attended stakeholder meetings and developed the Rolling Stock Impacts Analysis . He also reviewed the status of BART’s maintenance vehicles that traverse the rails to determine how CBTC could be adapted and he developed a draft report on the interfaces needed for adaption . Metro Pre-Award Buy America Audits | Los Angeles, CA (September 2016 to July 2017): Buy America Auditor . Scott supported Pre-Award Buy America audits for Metro’s procurement of new subway cars, buses, and a midlife overhaul of light rail vehicles . He examined the material provided by the manufacturers, discussed discrepancies and drafted the report for Metro . Resumes

R-23 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

FTA Project Management Oversight (PMO) | Grantee LESSONS LEARNED for Miami Dade Transit HRV Refurbishment Program, Miami, FL (June 2001 - November 2002 ): Task Order Manager . Scott provided Project Management Oversight (PMO) services on Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) grantee Miami-Dade Transit’s (MDT) Heavy Rail Vehicle (HRV) refurbishment program . This involved reviews of MDT’s procurement documents, design submittals and planning documents; and periodic on-site monitoring . He also attended meetings with consultants, MDT and FTA staff, and made observations about program progress and viability . One of his findings was that technical specifications were too prescriptive and had cost drivers that would result in bids above the engineer’s estimate . MDT proceeded with the RFP, but his findings came true and the program was canceled . Baltimore Light Rail Vehicle WMATA Rail & Bus Programs | Washington D.C. The planned opening date for the initial launce of the (January 1999 - January 2002): Program Manager . Scott Maryland Transit Administration’s light rail system dictated an provided engineering support on WMATA’s rail vehicle and bus extremely aggressive schedule for the procurement of LRVs. programs . He provided client liaison, project management and Based on his lessons learned from numerous rail vehicle program coordination . He was a hands-on manager, involved procurements and his leadership abilities, Scott was asked in the development of the 6000 Series new car specification to structure a fast track procurement to enable delivery of the as this was a high priority for WMATA and had key roles in LRVs in time for the planned revenue service. To meet this the development of specifications for the rehabilitation of the schedule, the procurement specifications were completed in a 2000/3000 Series cars . He managed bus procurements and record 60 days and the NTP to the LRV contractor was issued provided support for ongoing issues needing engineering in four months using a best-value methodology. The LRVs solutions . were delivered on time and proved to be reliable in service. BART Rehabilitation of Rail Vehicles | Oakland, CA (April 1996 - January 2002): Project Manager . For BART’s rehabilitation program of the original 439 rail vehicles, Scott participated in the preparation of performance based specifications, and planned & executed a best value procurement that resulted in a very low cost to BART . During the design and production stages, he actively participated in partnering aspects of the program and coordinated field quality inspection staff . He also completed a schedule review and made recommendations to improve schedule performance . In the end, all rehabilitated cars were delivered on time . BART New Car Procurement | Oakland, CA (February 2009 - March 2011): Interim Project Manager . This new car procurement replaced the entire fleet of rail transit vehicles for BART’s system . He participated in the development of the performance based specifications and met with prospective suppliers during specification development as well as the source selection period . As part of his responsibilities, he provided periodic updates and made presentations to BART executive management, and reviewed strategies for the most effective techniques to pursue this procurement . He also selected an auditor for the Pre-Award Buy America audit and reviewed the report in detail prior to submittal to BART .

Resumes

R-24 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Mahesh Patel | corridor lead/ TO manager | systems integration | independent systems integration review team

Mahesh Patel brings more than four decades of extensive experience managing large- scale transit projects involving conceptual planning, design, installation, testing and commissioning . He has expertise with all transit systems, from conceptual engineering to final design and construction, and start-up of subsystems, such as ATP; ATO; ATS; traction power; OCS; third-rail power; communication systems such as SCADA, fiber optics, telephone, radio, PA, VMS, and CCTV; fire alarm systems; and fare collection . Mahesh has managed the design and/or systems integration and start-up for more than 300 miles of rail systems nationwide and has worked on every Metro line in operation . His project responsibilities have included managing the systems design group in preparation of bid documents and interface design; reviewing subcontractor design efforts; certifying fire/life safety systems; and providing design support during construction, rail 46 35 activation/commissioning and coordinating with numerous local and state agencies . Years of Years of Metro Experience Experience “Since moving to California more than thirty years ago, I’ve worked alongside Metro. I look forward to sharing the lessons I’ve learned and Firm challenges, we as a team have solved, on this new contract. ” WSP Location RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Los Angeles, CA Metro Purple Line Extension Westside | Los Angeles County, CA (2007-2017): Education Systems Design Manager . Mahesh was responsible for the systems engineering components, BS, Electrical Engineer including traction power, train control, communications, system-wide electrical and safety/security systems . The project is currently under construction, and WSP is providing engineering services during construction . Our team, under Mahesh’s direction, evaluated the communications and traction power system to support 2- to 25-minute headways in the trunk system . Metro Regional Connector | Los Angeles County, CA (2008-2017): Systems Design Manager . Mahesh was responsible for the systems engineering components, including train control, traction power, OCS and communications, as well as the interface with central control and fare collection . WSP is currently providing engineering services during construction . Metro Expo Line Phase 2 (DB) | Los Angeles County, CA (2011-2016): Systems Design Manager . Mahesh was responsible for this LRT line that connects Santa Monica with Culver City, Exposition Park, University of Southern California and downtown Los Angeles . The systems design included low-profile OCS, traction power supply and distribution . The scope also included detailed alignment/trackwork engineering, structure design, major utility relocation studies and requirements, third-party engagement issue identification/resolution and station design and site plans . Metro Gold Line Eastside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA (2004-2009): Systems Manager . Mahesh was responsible for overseeing the development of performance- based system specifications for train control, communications, traction power and distribution, and security systems . WSP was also responsible for monitoring testing and validating results, commissioning and start-up of operations . WSP provided the preliminary engineering and final design for the 1 .8-mile tunnel . The project opened six months ahead of schedule and under budget . Metro Rail System Engineering Management Consultant (EMC)/MRTC | Los Angeles County, CA (1984-2003): Working in conjunction with the Metro Rail Transit Consultants (MRTC) JV, Mahesh served as the Systems Division Manager responsible for managing budget, schedule and planning of the division from preliminary engineering to Resumes

R-25 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128 preparation of bid documents . One of Mahesh’s assignments LESSONS LEARNED was to integrate, test and commission the operation of the Blue, Red, Green, and all future Metro rail lines from one location at the ROC . Project-specific roles included: Red Line (16 .2-mile, 25-station heavy rail with ATP, ATS and ATO systems): For Segment 1, Mahesh was responsible for train control design and served as deputy division manager supporting services during construction . For Segments 2 and 3, Mahesh was the deputy division manager for systems and performed similar work during design, including systems interfaces; engineering support Gold line Pasadena during construction; and managing staff efforts involving The DB contractor on the Gold Line Pasadena originally the design, installation, testing and commissioning of designed the line to have a local control system. When this all systems . Systems included traction power; OCS; became an issue, Metro reached out to Mahesh, who was communication systems, including SCADA, radio, PA, working on the Gold Line Eastside Extension at the time, to VMS, and CCTV; fiber-optics; the fire alarm system strategize a resolution. Mahesh and his team advised Metro and central control facility; the train control system; the to create a change order to the contractor that would modify ventilation control systems; and the fare collection system . the wayside SCADA equipment allowing it to connect to the Central Control Center for a future integration contract. Gold Line Pasadena Extension (13 .6-mile; 14-station manually operated light rail extension to the light rail Metro Valley Metro Central Phoenix/East Valley LRT | Phoenix, Blue Line with ATP and ATS systems): Systems manager AZ (2005-2007): Mahesh was responsible for supporting for a team providing design services for a light rail transit system staff on services during construction of the $1 4-billion. system that operates within the cities of Los Angeles, LRT system . The 20-mile, 22-station manually operated line Pasadena and South Pasadena . The vehicles are regular will run primarily at-grade, with track embedded in city streets high-floor LRVs . Mahesh was responsible for traction with mixed LRT and vehicular traffic with ATP and ATS systems . power; OCS; communication systems, including SCADA, The subsystems include traction power with OCS, train control, radio, PA, VMS, and CCTV; fiber-optics; the fire alarm communication systems including SCADA (with central control system and central control facility; the train control system; location), fiber-optic cable system, PA, VMS, CCTV, radio, fire and the fare collection system . alarm system; fare collection system and LRVs . During the Green Line (20-mile; 14-station light rail): Managed preliminary engineering phase, Mahesh served as systems services during construction for the train control system division manager, responsible for managing the preliminary and communications system . He was responsible for design, budget, schedule and staffing plan . Mahesh was managing the testing and commissioning of the system . responsible for traction power, OCS, communication systems, including SCADA, radio, PA, VMS, CCTV, fiber-optic system, Blue Line (22-mile/22-station light rail line): Manager fire alarm system and central control facility, train control for signaling system design on the light rail Los Angeles- system . to-Long Beach Blue Line . Mahesh managed subcontractor work related to signal system design and preparation of San Diego MTS Blue Line Rehabilitation and the bid documents for the WSP-led general engineering Improvements | San Diego, CA (2006-2008): Mahesh consultant joint venture and directed design support during provided systems design review and client support for this LRV construction of the $877-million Metro Blue Line, which system . WSP provided assessment services for the infrastructure began operations in 1990 . systems conditions analysis and prepared a series of reports outlining recommendations based on MTS studies to date, SANDAG Mid-Coast Corridor Transit | San Diego, dynamic network simulation modeling and best management CA (2008-2018): Systems Design Manager . Mahesh was practices known to date . MTS is planning to perform major responsible for the oversight of the systems engineering rehabilitation work on the Blue Line between 12th and Imperial components, including traction power, train control, and San Ysidro . The rehabilitation of the line would prepare communications, overhead catenary systems and safety/security the system for eventual low-floor LRT operations and repair or systems . The Mid-Coast Corridor extends from the Old Town replacement of failing and worn wayside, track, traction power Transit Center north to the UTC Transit Center and includes the and signaling elements . major activity centers at UCSD and University Towne Centre in the North University City area, and will link to downtown San Diego .

Resumes

R-26 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Arvind Patel | corridor lead/ TO manager | traction power

Arvind Patel has a broad range of expertise in electrical design for rapid transit systems and facilities, ranging from wayside electrification and substations to vehicle maintenance shops and industrial and commercial projects . His specialization covers both AC and DC design with particular emphasis on rail rapid transit projects . Arvind has been instrumental with providing traction power design for nearly every Metro rail line and brings a strong understanding of Metro’s operations and maintenance functions .

Arvind’s 36 years of diverse experience has provided him with the required skills to perform electrical engineering design, analysis and reviews and prepare studies and budgets for all project design phases, from conceptual to preliminary and final design . His experience includes design of electrical systems with power distribution; wayside electrification; relay protection; substations; grounding; emergency generators, fire alarm and other specialty 36 29 systems; calculation of load demand; voltage drops and short-circuit withstands; selection of Years of Years of Metro electrical equipment, devices and feeders; preparation of design criteria, reports, conceptual Experience Experience plans and outline specifications; construction plans, specifications, and cost estimates; field investigations and inspections; technical reviews and design direction; and evaluation of bids Firm and international tenders . WSP Location “I have been involved with the majority of Metro’s rail lines during my career Los Angeles, CA and bring a strong familiarity of Metro’s design criteria which is paramount Education in supporting future improvements to the system.” BS, Electrical Engineering (Electronics); BS, Electrical RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Engineering (Electrical) Metro Exposition LRT Phase 2 | Los Angeles County, CA (2010-2015): Senior Traction Power Engineer . Arvind provided technical support to the DB team, including providing specifications and design at the 60 percent level . Design package included single line diagrams, metering and relay diagrams, substation site plans, substation duct bank layouts, substation ground grid layouts, utility metering switchgear and ETS system . Metro Regional Connector | Los Angeles County, CA (2009-2012): Senior Traction Power Engineer . Arvind was responsible for providing technical support to the lead systems engineer for preparing traction power substation single line diagrams and equipment layout for substations as part of the conceptual engineering report . He also supported coordination with LADWP and Southern California Edison involving the tie-in to existing substations . Metro Purple Line Westside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: (2011-2013): Senior Traction Power Engineer . Arvind was responsible for developing traction power substation single line diagrams and preparing advanced conceptual engineering report for submittal to Metro as part of the Phase 1 engineering effort . Metro Gold Line Pasadena Foothill Extension | Los Angeles County, CA (2010- 2012): Senior Traction Power Engineer . Arvind was responsible for assisting the systems manager in developing the scope of services for the systems DB proposal effort . Metro Gold Line Eastside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA (2004-2009): Senior Traction Power Engineer . Arvind was responsible for preparing the preliminary engineering design package for traction power . He also prepared the outline specifications, development of substation drawings and interfacing with right-of-way personnel for property requirements . He developed the single line diagrams and interfacing with local utility companies for power requirements . He provided design inputs to the OCS and traction power simulation personnel . He was responsible for preparing the system description for the preliminary engineering submittal . Through his coordination of the DB effort with the yard Resumes

R-27 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128 operation personnel for a variety of traction power interfaces with LESSONS LEARNED existing equipment, the team was able to accommodate light rail vehicles in the existing Metro Red Line (heavy rail) yard . Metro Green Line | Los Angeles County, CA (1988- 1994): Test Engineer . Arvind supported the systems integration, testing, SCADA, ventilation and fire/life safety systems and start-up of the systems . This LRT was the first in the U S. . to use programmable logic controllers for the traction power substations — eliminating the traditional hard-wired control system and providing ease of maintenance and troubleshooting . Metro blue line expansion Metro Blue Line Division 11 Facility Expansion | Los Arvind was critical to the introduction of programmable Angeles County, CA (1994-1997): Design Engineer . Arvind logic controllers (PLC)’s to Metro’s Blue Line Expansion was responsible for supporting the DB contractor on issues project. This work involved the design of this system which that arise in the field . He developed the design of the DC power eliminated and improved the quality of maintenance for the system for the new vehicle inspection shop . His duties also systems by reducing the total number of hard wire lines included attendance at design review meetings between the supporting the systems connection to the central control contractor and Metro . system. Metro Red Line Segment Two Field Support to Rail Activation (Start-Up) Group | Los Angeles County, CA facilities and traction power systems and equipment; prepared (1998-2000): Arvind developed a tracking matrix for integrated test procedures for Phase I and Phase II integrated testing; test procedures and testing to monitor daily testing progress . developed test data sheets for facilities and traction power He attended Rail Activation Group, track allocation and facilities systems; and provided test support to the rail activation group interface meetings with the resident engineer, construction for the central control facility . Arvind was also responsible for manager and contractors on a weekly basis . He was responsible receiving and acknowledging all SCADA alarm points at the train for the start-up and integration testing of all systems on the automatic control system (TRACS) for all the station equipment, Metro Red Line Segment Two subway system prior to turnover, including emergency trip stations, ventilation, fire detection, including safety certification . Systems included SCADA, traction intrusion, fare machines, radio, fiber optic cable transmission, power, communications, train control and fire detection . Arvind CCTV, sprinklers and traction power . developed test plans and procedures for complete system BART Extension to San Jose | San Francisco and San integration testing to determine whether the system was built to Jose, CA (2014-2015): Senior Traction Power Engineer . specifications . This entailed comprehensive electrical testing, Arvind provided design support for the main line traction including procedure writing, workaround, troubleshooting, power substations and the yard traction power system . His design change recommendations and verifying adherence to responsibilities included the design of the raceway system at the final accepted design in accordance with contract specifications, main line substations and in the yard, as well as coordination NEC and NFPA code requirements . with other subconsultant designers and production supervision Metro Red Line, Segment Three | Los Angeles for the 65 percent submittal CAD drawings . Arvind attended County, CA (1999-2000): Traction Power Design Engineer . regular coordination meetings and interfaced with all disciplines Arvind was responsible for developing electrical drawings for associated with the project . traction power substations . His duties included witnessing Central Phoenix/East Valley LRT Final Design | Phoenix, testing of 34 .5-kV and 750-V DC cables at the supplier’s AZ (2005-2007): Project Unit Manager for the traction facilities . He also provided support to local factory acceptance electrification system . Arvind was responsible for DSDC for testing for SCADA equipment on Segment 2B; coordinated the Valley Metro Light Rail Project . His duties included design fire detection design; and reviewed submittals for systems support to the resident engineer; attending weekly meetings with interface data terminations and serial interface points for the traction electrification systems contractor; and reviewing facilities and traction power equipment . Arvind supported the submittals, RFIs, RFCs and responding to questions on traction construction management team as a witness to local factory power from designers in the field . acceptance testing for emergency trip station/blue light stations (ETS/BLSE) and programmable logic controller (PLC) systems for the stations . He attended rail activation group meetings and furnished detailed reports to the client on the as-built conditions of the fire protection and intrusion detection systems . In addition, he assisted the resident engineer in resolving design and construction issues associated with field installation of Resumes

R-28 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Joe Bayat | corridor lead/TO manager

Joe Bayat has 40 years of outstanding experience and worldwide knowledge of railways and road technology systems infrastructure for light rail, high speed trains, and road tunnels . His expertise encompasses complex integrated systems, station structures, traction power, ATC, signaling and communications systems . His proven track record of delivery and achievements, includes leadership and management of numerous major metro rail and road tunnel projects, delivering multidisciplinary infrastructure systems for design and construction projects for underground and over-ground infrastructures, civil works and station structures, traction power, ATC, communications systems, MEP, HV/LV power distribution, and operational control centers for both new-build and upgrades, with particular emphasis on full project lifecycle .

“I have extensive experience in DB of major railways infrastructure and 40 0 systems projects and during the past 40 years have delivered or made Years of Years of Metro significant contribution for delivering some of the most iconic metro rail Experience Experience project worldwide including CLK express line in Hong Kong, Jubilee Line Extension, Cross Rail, and Northern Line Extension in UK and currently the Firm Silicon Valley BART extension. Apart from my outstanding technical and Mott MacDonald managerial experience, I have always been committed to bring the best DB Location practices to the project.” Los Angeles, CA Education RELEVANT EXPERIENCE MS, Systems Engineering; SVRT Phase I, Silicon Valley Berryessa Extension (SVBX), Santa Clara Valley BS, Electrical Engineering Transportation Authority (VTA) | San Jose, CA (2017-Present): Deputy Project Professional Credentials Manager responsible for providing technical and project management services, including Chartered Engineer, UK integration and test and commissioning of project wide systems, resolution of multidisciplinary systems at stations, development of interface management plan in particular between the existing terminus station and the new extension . As part of a Joint Venture, Mott MacDonald is responsible for project management support services, including engineering management and project cost control, maintenance of trend log and estimating changes, performing independent cost estimates of proposed changes, and schedule controls and document control for the entire SVRT Program . Mott MacDonald was also responsible for the design of the tunnel segment (SVSX) throughout downtown San Jose . This project requires multiple ongoing coordination efforts with BART, Santa Clara Valley Water District, and the cities of Milpitas and San Jose . London Underground Northern Line Extension | London, England (2013-2016): Project Director leading design of a fully integrated multi-disciplinary rail system, including track, ATC signaling, communications systems, SCADA, systems safety, integration and interfacing, and quality assurance . The project is to extend the existing Northern Line with twin bore tunnels, two additional sidings, two new stations, and continued ATC re-signaling, which increases the line capacity from 24 tph to 30 tph at the initial stage, and ultimately to 34 tph . Highways England (HE) A4 Roundhill & Southwick Tunnel MEP Refurbishment Program | United Kingdom (2013-2016): The project involves renewing all safety critical tunnel systems, including tunnel ventilation, tunnel lighting, LV panels, LV distribution boards, emergency power generators, SCADA, CCTV, AID, Signs and Signals and mechanical and electrical enabling works within BIM environment, and as part of HE collaborative and integrated team . Mott MacDonald provides program management for this five-year contract that encompasses development, construction, and delivery of the project, in addition to providing design and systems assurance, contract and site supervision, testing and commissioning; and handover to HE’s Area Service Provider, scheduled for 2021 .

Resumes

R-29 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Baku Metro Rail | Baku, Azerbaijan (2012-2014): Project LESSONS LEARNED Director responsible for the Mott MacDonald M&E and systems Assurance teams providing concept design and performance specification of all safety related tunnel systems, including tunnel ventilation, emergency lighting, LV distribution, earthing and bonding, and mechanical and electrical systems . This project is part of a new expansion for Baku Metro Rail including 12 new stations where the first 3 are planned to be delivered into service by 2015 and the remainder plus two train depots are under construction ready for delivery in the following years . Mott MacDonald provided mechanical/electrical and systems VTA, SVRT Phase I SVBX, San Jose, CA assurance services, concept design, performance specification The co-location approach is proving to be valuable on of all safety related tunnel systems, and tunnel design and SVBX with Joe Bayat’s support, currently months away from coordination of all multidisciplinary rail systems . operations. As issues arise, they are quickly vetted between VTA, BART project and operations personnel, the Project Manager, and the DB team, facilitated by co-location. With the “one team” focus, decisions are made and implemented based on “what’s right for the project”, which helps to keep the project moving forward .

Resumes

R-30 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Bill Lucci | corridor lead/ TO manager | independent systems integration review team

Bill brings more than 42 years of experience in Systems Engineering and Management roles for rail transit and other transportation projects . His experience includes Project Management, Department Management, Project Management Oversight, Preliminary Engineering, Detailed Design, Cost Estimating, Fire / Life Safety and Security participation, Owner Representative, Proposal Evaluation, Design Review, and Testing and Commissioning . In addition to numerous projects for Metro and Construction Authorities (Exposition/ Mid- Cities and Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension, his experience includes major rail projects in diverse cities, such as Atlanta, Baltimore, Pittsburgh and Taipei, Taiwan .

“I will commit my time to the Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services project to the fullest extent, as project needs warrant.” 42 32 Years of Years of Metro RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Experience Experience Metro Purple Line Westside Extension Section 1 (DB) | Los Angeles, CA (9/15 – 4/16): Assistant Systems Manager responsible for providing support and filling-in for Firm the Project’s System Manager, including technical support and advice from previous Parsons transportation projects with this client . The first phase of the project will lay a 3 .9-mile Location extension from the current terminus at Wilshire/Western in the city of Los Angeles to three Los Angeles, CA new stations in the cities of Los Angeles and Beverly Hills: Wilshire/ La Brea, Wilshire/ Education Fairfax, and Wilshire/ La Cienega . The project will increase regional mobility and improve BS, Electrical Engineering connectivity throughout the Metro system . Parsons is serving as the lead designer to the joint venture . Metro Crenshaw/ LAX Line | Los Angeles County, CA (12/13 – 8/15): Deputy Systems Manager providing Systems Engineering Management services for the design / build of the 8 .5 mile LRT Line . The alignment includes aerial structures, at-grade sections with gated and street-running grade crossings, and underground cut-and-cover and tunnel sections . The Crenshaw Line will connect with Revenue Service of the existing Metro Green Line at the south end and provide transfer capability with the Expo Line to the north . Systems work includes Traction Power, Overhead Contact System, comprehensive Communications Systems, preliminary Automated Train Control design; along with integration with Metro’s Rail Operations Control, Light Rail Vehicles, Universal Fare System and Metro Green Line . Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension 2A | Los Angeles County, CA (4/11 – 12/13): Initially as Systems Manager, and then as Director of Systems for the Agency, was responsible for the design, construction and commissioning of the Phase 2A Systems elements; elements included the complete array of communications systems, signaling/train control, traction electrification and fare collection . Phase 2A extended the existing, doubletrack Pasadena Gold Line approximately 11 miles eastward to Azusa . The extension was entirely at-grade, included six new stations, and 37 highway or pedestrian grade crossings and transit yard . A portion of the line was constructed in a shared corridor with the BNSF freight tracks . The project included relocation of the tracks, along with an upgrade of the freight rail signaling system . The communications systems included closed circuit television, public address, visual message signs, telephone system, fire detection system, intrusion detection systems, fiber optic cable transmission system, integration with Metro’s supervisory control and data acquisition system and central control and provisions for the radio system . Bill also provided Environmental and Conceptual design work for the Phase 2B Extension .

Resumes

R-31 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Metro Expo Phase 1 | Los Angeles County, CA LESSONS LEARNED (8/04 – 3/10): Began as Systems Manager for the Preliminary Engineering Team, and then as the Chief Systems Engineer for the Agency during the buildout of the line . Expo 1 was the initial Expo line between Downtown Los Angeles and Culver City; Expo 2 extended the line westward to Santa Monica . Expo I was approximately 11 miles of double-track LRT with 10 new stations, and shared tracks with the Metro Blue Line from the Flower Street Junction, through Pico Station, and into the underground 7th/ Metro Station terminus . Systems elements Metro Red Line included Train Control, Traction Power, Overhead Catenary Having recently returned to Los Angeles and Metro projects System, and the full array of Communications subsystems from an overseas assignment, Bill switched from Train (CCTV, PA, VMS, Fire Detection, Intrusion Detection, SCADA Control to Fire and Emergency Management design. During interface, CTS, and radio systems antenna facility) . Participation Final Design of the initial Red Line segment, it became with the Fire/Life Safety Committee and Safety Certification was apparent that there was an issue with coordinating controls also included . Bill also provided conceptual design work for the of the emergency ventilation fans from both Central Control Expo II extension . via the SCADA System and the Emergency Management Long Beach Metro Blue Station Enhancement DB Panels in the underground stations. Bill was asked to assess Project | Los Angeles County, CA (6/00 - 12/01): Systems the interface designs, and developed a revised fan control Project Manager responsible for the complete systems design, scheme that segregated the inputs to the ventilation system, design support during construction, and testing for the retrofit thus preventing conflicts from the two control points. and adjustment of Communications and Fare Collection Systems Integration is crucial. equipment associated with extension of the station platforms . Systems Lead, Bill reviewed plans, cost estimates and systems Metro Rail Projects, including Metro Red Line designs in advance of Federal Grants, and monitoring during Segments 1, 2A, 2B and 3; and Capital Projects | Los Final Design and construction of projects receiving grants . Angeles, CA: (4/89 – 2/99): Communications Systems Discipline Manager responsible for the process control Communications Disciplines at EMCs . He supervised engineers preparing contract specification packages, provided design services during construction for -- SCADA, Fire and Emergency Management, Gas Monitoring, Variable Message Signs and Communications Installation contracts . Technologies implemented via these contracts included open architecture SCADA, programmable logic controllers, touchscreen video controls at the Fire Services Emergency Panels and Intelligent Fire Alarm systems in the subway stations . Bill served as Systems Lead for the initial Red Line Segment’s “Fast Track Team”, a design task force of engineers charged with resolving systems design and field issues during the final stages of the Contractors’ detailed design and initial stages of system startup . He also served as Systems Lead for the 7th/ Metro Station Early Opening “Tiger Team”, a design task force of engineers and construction personnel charged with establishing and implementing a plan to allow Metro Blue Line Operations into the underground 7th/Metro Station while construction on the MRL continued on the lower level of the station . FTA Project Management Oversight Consultant (PMOC) | United States (1/00 – 7/04): Systems Engineering Lead for the PMOC Team on CTA Blue Line and Brown Line Heavy Rail Rehabilitation Projects, NCTD’s Oceanside- Escondido Commuter Rail Project, San Diego MTDB’s Mission Valley East Project, and proposed Raleigh/Durham LRT . As

Resumes

R-32 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Cliff Henke | corridor lead/ TO manager

Cliff Henke brings more than 37 years of experience in public transportation, technology mapping, standards development, procurement, funding, government relations and marketing . More specifically, he has focused on corridor planning, bus rapid transit, light rail, and vehicle procurements for various agencies . Cliff has written, presented and managed local, national and international conferences and publications on a broad range of urban transportation topics, including the technological changes in buses and connected and autonomous vehicles and their effects on the industry . Cliff also helped lead industry efforts regarding Buy America and other changes in the recent federal legislation and co-authored the introductory sections of APTA’s authorization recommendations . As a former journalist, Cliff has authored more than 2,000 articles published in a variety of transportation, technology, urban planning and business publications . His most recent work includes “Buy America: Current State, Future Prospects; Analyzing the Potential Impact of 37 15 a New Environment,” Passenger Transport, January 13, 2017; “The Uber Effect: Will New Years of Years of Metro Ride Services Reinvent Transit?” METRO Magazine, September 2015; “Considerations for Experience Experience Converting BRT to Light Rail,” and “International Comparisons of Economic Development Effects of Light Rail and BRT,” papers published in the proceedings of the International Firm Conference on Urban Transport Systems, Paris, France, November 2013; and “International WSP BRT Case Studies” and “BRT and the Link to Economic Development,” moderator and Location presenter at two related sessions, Rail-Volution, Seattle, October 2013 . Los Angeles, CA Education “From the U.S. rail renaissance to advanced technology buses, L.A. has BA, Organizational Management been at the cutting edge of transit innovation for decades and I have been proud to be a part of it. This project is yet another great opportunity to continue to be part of the industry’s technology forefront.”

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study | Los Angeles County, CA (2012- 2014): Project Manager . This project was for an extensive study to recommend new BRT corridors for the County’s next program of investments, which already has the world’s largest BRT network operated by four agencies in the service area . Economic development, TOD and streetscape enhancement standards were also provided in the recommendations . Funding sources and options were analyzed . The Final Report and recommendations were adopted by the Metro Board in February 2014 . California High-Speed Rail Authority, California High-Speed Train (Fly California) Program | CA (December 2007-April 2008): Policy and Planning Support . Cliff developed a technical memorandum to the Federal Railroad Administration describing how a multi-track approval process would take place among regional, state and national regulatory and policy authorities . He developed project status articles and other communication documents for interested publications and assisted in quality assurance activities in development of the introductory Basis of Design Report documents for the same oversight authorities . King County Metro Transit | Seattle, WA (2016-2017): Task Lead for Zero-Emission Bus Implementation Plan and Feasibility Study . Cliff provided recommendations on two Metro initiatives . First was technical analysis for a procurement of 40-foot zero-emission buses, including specifics on service deployment, infrastructure, and legal and other considerations based on final procurement decision . The second is a report, delivered in March 2017 for the King County Council, that describes an industry-leading and innovative roadmap to a fully zero-emission transit bus fleet by 2040, a Council legislative mandate .

Resumes

R-33 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Maryland Department of Transportation | Baltimore, MD LESSONS LEARNED (2014-2016): Advisor, BRT Policy Handbook . Assisted with development of the nation’s first in-depth BRT policy guide for state and local agencies and other stakeholders in the state . Advised the client team in developing technical standards, evaluation criteria and stakeholder roles and responsibilities, recent state and federal changes in transportation policies affecting BRT development and a framework for evaluating potential BRT projects in the state . Community Transit On-Call BRT Technical Assistance Services | Everett, WA(2007-2008): Task Lead . Cliff was SAN FRANCISCO’S AND WATERLOO’S BRT RAIL the task lead for several requested analyses, including BRT peer CONVERSION STRATEGIES cities review analyzing corridor characteristic similarities and San Francisco’s and Waterloo’s experiences in designing differences of several arterial and dedicated BRT systems in their BRT projects serve as illustrative examples of what the U .S . (analysis completed March 2008), options in design cities must consider in designing a BRT running way to and service criteria and strategies to achieve level boarding accommodate light rail transit (LRT) at some point in the (technical memo completed August 2007) and best practices future. San Francisco County’s Proposition K specifically and design criteria recommendations for wayfinding signage for envisioned that the city’s Geary Boulevard Corridor, one of BRT stations (technical memo completed January 2008) . the busiest corridors in the city, accommodate a “BRT service with exclusive lanes and dedicated stations…designed and Maryland Transit Administration | Baltimore, MD (2014- built to rail-ready standards.” However, the San Francisco 2016): Subtask Lead . Corridor Cities Transitway, vehicle County Transportation Authority staff concluded that light procurement support, vehicle and systems design criteria and rail was not financially possible within the provisions of the other related technical assistance for a 15-mile BRT project in referendum’s 30-year Expenditure Plan and thus drafted the Montgomery County, extending from Clarksburg to the Shady plan in a way that required all center-running BRT design Grove Metro Station in Rockville . Phase I is 9 miles from alternatives to be “rail-ready”; that is, convertible at some Metropolitan Grove to Shady Grove . indefinite point beyond that 30-year horizon. I was selected Skoda North American Market Strategy Study | U.S. and to lead a study that looked at several possible conversion Canada (2015-2015): Deputy Project Manager . Cliff was scenarios. responsible for a market research and strategic advisory study More recently, I was asked to examine how Waterloo for a major railcar manufacturer based in the Czech Republic . Region in Ontario could most cost-effectively and efficiently The study analyzed market characteristics, domestic technology achieve a similar conversion to light rail on a BRT project trends and forecasted growth trends for both the Canadian and there that was to become Phase 2 of its Ion LRT Project. U .S . rail public transport and intercity markets . What I learned in both projects is that political timing and Metropolitan Transportation Agency | New York (2014): commitment are essential to success. While San Francisco Best Practices Analyst . Cliff provided technical support for had no definite date in mind for an LRT conversion, it could investigating best practices in rail service delivery innovations only commit to a BRT design that did not preclude future and innovative financing best practices . Investigated best LRT, primarily because installation of the required LRT practices in Paris metro system’s program for converting from systems infrastructure – duct banks, manholes, catenary manned to automated operation; also investigated best practices poles, substation foundations, etc. – were so costly as in value capture strategies around major urban transport stations to impractically narrow the cost and implantation time in London and various locations in continental Europe . advantages that the selected BRT alternative enjoyed over rail. Because the Waterloo project’s BRT segment had a political commitment to convert to LRT in the near future, the additional investments of systems infrastructure and LRT-type station designs made much more sense.

Resumes

R-34 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Steven Adkins | OCS

Steven Adkins is a principle engineer with 23 years of experience in project management, design, and construction management of OCS used in rail transit projects. His design 23 1 experience includes OCS support structures and profiles, erection diagrams, sectionalization, Years of Years of Metro bonding and grounding, specification preparation, and construction cost estimation. Steven Experience Experience also has construction management experience which includes the installation of new OCS and modifications to existing OCS while maintaining railroad operations, as well as the Firm review and approval of contractors’ submittals, testing, commissioning, and system start-up. Parsons Location RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Pittsburgh, PA Metro Blue Line Signal System Rehabilitation | Los Angeles, CA: Parsons, as Education a subcontractor, is providing fully integrated and functional train control/communications BS, Mechanical Engineering systems. Steven is responsible for design drawings and quality control reviews of OCS design drawings. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District, NICTD Positive Train Control Systems Integrator | Chicago, IL to South Bend, IN: Steven was responsible for the mobilization project management activities, including leading weekly team meetings, coordinating the completion of subcontractor subagreements and supporting the project manager in managing the contract requirements. This turnkey project includes the deployment of an interoperable PTC system. NICTD operates a 90-mile-long commuter rail line with service from Chicago, Illinois, to South Bend, Indiana, which also accommodates freight traffic in the region. The 15 miles from Millennium Station in Chicago to Kensington Interlocking is Metra territory; the remaining 75 miles is NICTD-owned territory that will constitute the NICTD subdivision. Parsons’ scope of work includes designing, furnishing, installing, testing, and commission a complete communications-based wayside system and upgrading more than 70 train sets. This PTC project will ensure NICTD’s compliance with the Rail Safety Improvement Act. Parsons is scheduled to be in revenue service demonstration by second quarter of 2018, with interoperability testing with Metra in the same approximate time frame. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Houston LRT Expansion DB | Houston, TX: As Principal OCS Engineer, Steven was responsible for reviewing and approving contractors’ submittals and completing as-built markups of the design drawings during the design support during construction phase of the project. This Parsons-led joint venture project involved designing and constructing three LRT corridors, which entailed civil works components, associated LRT communications, and traction power systems. The total length of the project was approximately 15 miles and included 23 stations. The project scope also included roadway betterments, stations, guideway, an operations center, two facilities, and several major and minor bridges.

Resumes

R-35 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Vineet Agrawal, PE | train control

Vineet Agrawal has 20 years of experience in systems engineering, equipment manufacturing, and software development. Currently, he leads Auriga’s Western Region Rail/Transit Systems 20 5 Practice. He is involved in managing several rail and transit projects such as San Francisco Years of Years of Metro Municipal Transportation Agency as needed specialized engineering services contract and Experience Experience Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART). Vineet has worked as a systems lead with several transit agencies including Metro, Metrolink, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), BART, Firm SFMTA, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Caltrain, Denver RTD, Massachusetts Auriga Corporation Bay Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, and Utah Transit. Authority. Location San Francisco, CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Education Metro Crenshaw/LAX Line | Los Angeles County, CA: As Deputy Systems Design MS, Electrical Engineering Manager, Vineet responsible for preparing plans for traction power, communications, train BS, Electrical Engineering control, and overhead catenary system during design confirmation phase. Vineet’s various Professional Credentials direct reports worked all the way through design and ongoing construction. Professional Engineer San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency On-Call Engineering, University of (Electrical): CA #E19572 California, San Francisco (UCSF) Platform Extension Task Order | San Francisco, CA: Train Signals Lead for the for vital train signals work for UCSF platform extension. The work includes PS&E for vital train signal system for a double crossover, single crossover, and a relocated UCSF platform. The design included preparing plans, specifications, and cost estimate. Utah Transit Authority Light Rail Station Relocation | Salt Lake City, UT: Systems Lead during the construction phase to relocate the existing UTA Transit Express (TRAX) Airport Station from its current location. The scope included PS&E for OCS and traction power and preliminary design for train signaling and communications systems. OCTA, OC Street Car | Orange County, CA: Systems Lead during the construction phase. The scope of work included PS&E for traction power, OCS, train signaling, communications, fare collection, system integration, and system safety. BART to Warm Springs (WSX Project) | Fremont, CA: Safety Oversight Lead was responsible for hazard analyses, vulnerability tracking matrices, safety checklists, certificates of conformance, attend safety and security certification committee meetings, facilitate the safety audits, and supporting documentation (test results). Full Implementation of the Positive Train Control System, North County Transit District (NCTD) San Diego Subdivision | San Diego, CA: Senior communications advisor that provided oversight during the project. NCTD implementation of positive train control is planned as an interoperable Electronic Train Management System (I-ETMS) compatible overlay upon the existing Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) approved Centralized Traffic Control system. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, BART Silicon Valley Rapid Transit (SVRT) Core System Improvements Study | San Josae, CA: As Project Lead, Vineet developed conceptual level plans and cost that established the BART System Integration Modifications needed to mitigate impacts from the addition of the SVRT Berryessa rail extension project to the BART core system. The systems studied were traction power system, including AC and DC subsystems, communications, and train control system including communication based train control. Central Subway Preliminary Engineering, San Francisco Municipal Railway (MUNI) | San Francisco, CA: As Systems Integration Lead, Vineet was responsible for system integration during the preliminary system design for MUNI Third Street Light Rail Project for Phase II.

Resumes

R-36 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Jorge Aguilar, PE | traction power | electrical

Jorge Aguilar is a registered electrical engineer with 46 years of experience in the design, construction, and management of various electrical distribution projects, including passenger 46 transportation, high voltage switchyards, substations and transmission systems, national Years of laboratory facilities, industrial facilities, co-generation and combined cycle plants, geothermal Experience plants, petroleum refineries, water treatment plants, and fossil and nuclear power plants. Firm RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Virginkar & Associates, Inc. SANDAG Traction Power Substation Replacement | San Diego, CA: QA/QC Lead for Location the submittals and Requests for Information (RFI) regarding the design of the traction power Fullerton, CA substation replacement for the Metropolitan Transit System Orange and Blue Lines. Education BART 480 Volt Switchgear Replacement | San Francisco Bay Area, CA: Assistant BS, Electrical Engineering Project Manager that was responsible for assist BART’s Project Manager in the replacement Professional Credentials of 480 Volt switchgear for 26 train stations. Specific responsibilities included coordination, Professional Engineer supervision, and approval of main contractor activities in the performance of the construction (Electrical), CA #E8757 work, as well as coordination, supervision, review, and approval of the design engineering activities for the project. BART West Dublin/Pleasanton Station | San Francisco Bay Area, CA: Design Electrical Engineer that was responsible for the design of electrical distribution systems for this complex project. Jorge prepared single line diagrams and panel schedules, designed the underground duct bank system, prepared circuit and raceway schedules, designed exposed conduit system for power, lighting, SCADA, and communications systems. Jorge also directed the preparation of lighting calculations and load flow and short circuit calculations using computer programs. Electrical Master Plan | Port of Long Beach, CA: Project Engineer that was responsible for researching, obtaining, and documenting engineering information on the existing electrical distribution, cranes, and reefers located port-wide, for use in the preparation of an Electrical Master Plan that included land electrification of the parked vessels. He directed, delegated, and supervised the field work of several electrical engineering subconsultants in the performance of their work in support of the Master Plan. Jorge’s participation included providing recommendations to the Port for changes to the existing electrical distribution system. For the construction of new substations and transmission lines he recommended the locations, size, and estimated costs. Replacement of Substation, Switchgear and Motor Control Centers, Lawrence Livermore National Library | Livermore, CA: Electrical Engineer that participated in the design and replacement of 13.8kV substation and 480-volt switchgear and motor control centers for Building 291 for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. He also prepared all the electrical engineering design documents for the replacement of electrical safety related equipment for Building 332. High Voltage Distribution System Power Management Automation, Compania Hidro-Electrica de San Francisco (CHESF) | San Francisco, CA: Construction Manager. Mr. Aguilar served as Construction Manager for the General Electric Company for the automation of systems for several high voltage substations, switchyards, and transmission lines of CHESF in Brazil. His duties included utilization of state-of-the-art GE microprocessor type protective relays with MMI communication capability. Lamar Power, Fluor Daniel | Paris, TX: Electrical Engineer that supervised the design of the electrical and control systems. The project consisted of four 180 MW gas turbines and two 140 MW steam turbines, and included the use of 24 kV generator breakers. Jorge coordinated the construction work with the prime constructor Fluor Daniel and several subcontractors. Resumes

R-37 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Fernando Atienza | CADD

Fernando has over 12 years of professional experience in the traffic/transportation industry. traffic engineering design expertise includes preparing/designing new traffic signal 12 10 installation, traffic signal modification, temporary traffic signal, traffic handling design, Years of Years of Metro roadway signing and striping, fiber optic communication and interconnect, street lighting, Experience Experience Intelligent Traffic System and closed-circuit television. In addition, years of experience in field check and coordination for the projects. Firm Intueor Consulting, Inc. Fernando is expert in AutoCAD and MicroStation. He is also expert in LADOT, L.A. County Location and Caltrans CADD and design standards. Los Angeles, CA Education RELEVANT EXPERIENCE AutoCAD Certification Metro Purple Line Westside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: Fernando is the project senior designer and he is responsible for the preliminary designs of traffic signal modification, traffic handling, temporary traffic signal plans. Also provides numerous stages for traffic handling design and temporary traffic signal plans for subway extension excavation support and tunnel along Wilshire Boulevard. Metro Wilshire Boulevard BRT Project | City of Los Angeles, CA: Fernando is the project engineer and he is responsible for the conceptual designs of traffic handling and signing & striping plans. Also provides numerous stages for traffic handling design and traffic signal modification plans in various locations for Wilshire Boulevard. Metro Orange Line Extension Project, Lassen Street R/R Overcrossing | City of Los Angeles, CA: Fernando is the project engineer and he is responsible for the designs and field check of signing, and striping, interconnect, and traffic signal plans in various locations. Also provides numerous stages for traffic handling design and temporary traffic signal plans for street improvement of busway extension. Metro Orange Line Extension Project, Canoga Avenue and Busway | Los Angeles, CA: Fernando is the project engineer and he is responsible for the preliminary designs and field check of signing and striping, new traffic signal, and traffic signal modification plans for street improvement of busway extension in various locations for 17 intersections. Metro Mid/City Exposition LRT Project | City of Los Angeles, CA: Fernando is the project engineer, he is responsible for the designs and field check of traffic handling design, and temporary traffic signal plans for Flower Street and Exposition Boulevard Corridors. Metro Orange Line “San Fernando Valley Bus Rapid Design-Build Project” | City of Los Angeles, CA: Fernando is the transportation designer, he is responsible for the designs and fieldwork of temporary street lighting, temporary traffic signal, traffic handling designs, signing and striping, and new traffic signal plans for 35 intersections for street improvement and busway. Metro Gold Line Eastside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: Fernando is the project engineer and he responsible for the designs and field check of new traffic signal and modification, signing and striping, and CCTV/fiber optic interconnect plans for 3rd Street from Indiana Avenue to Atlantic Boulevard for 16 intersections for street improvement of light rail transit. West L.A. Improvement and Mitigation Project | City of Los Angeles, CA: Fernando is the project engineer and he is responsible for the designs and field check of traffic signal modification plans for 52 intersections in various locations. Metro Blueline Grade Crossing Improvement, City of Los Angeles, CA: Fernando is the project engineer and he is responsible for the designs and field check of traffic handling design in various locations. Resumes

R-38 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Maseeh Azhand | communications

Maseeh Azhand has 15 years of RF engineering experience. In addition to RF engineering, he has worked in the fields of automation and instrumentation for more than 10 years, 15 designing, commissioning, and optimizing control systems. Maseeh is a creative problem Years of solver and is comfortable with VBA Excel macros. His experience in RF engineering includes Experience RF cell planning for multiple technologies, including UMTS, Wi-Fi, GSM, GPRS, and PTC; Link Budget analysis, capacity analysis, model tuning, nominal design, detailed cell planning Firm (with ATOLL, AriesoACP, Mentum PlaNET Ev, EDX_SignalPro, iBwave), and RF plumbing. Parsons Maseeh’s UMTS/GSM optimization experience includes pilot pollution reduction, frequency Location planning, parameter optimization, and capacity analysis. Seattle, WA Education RELEVANT EXPERIENCE MS, Computer Science; BS, Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Metrolink Positive Train Control Electronics Engineering System | Los Angeles, CA: As Senior RF Engineer, Maseeh designed the first PTC network in the country, with over 400 PTC220 sites, as well as WLAN for Metrolink (using Mentum PlaNET Ev. and iBwave). He increased team performance and productivity by developing several Excel-based VBA macros to process data, such as drive test data, model tuning, GPS, spectrum analysis, performance, and systemwide acceptance tests, as well as other tools for BER study, link budget, capacity and throughput analysis, model tuning, and frequency and slot planning. Maseeh challenged the shortage of the required test tools for the new PTC technology by developing test procedures with the available tools to verify the performance of the network. AT&T, UMTS/LTE Overlay Design | Atlanta, GA: Maseeh developed an Access database to organize the storage and use of data and increased team performance and productivity for the deliverable documents. He developed several Excel-based VBA macros, including Secured Tilt Database and Antenna Parser to update Atoll projects, and Automatic RFDS Creator, significantly increasing team performance and productivity. AT&T UMTS1900/850 Design Optimization | Bellevue and Seattle, WA; GSM1900/UMTS1900 Cell Planning | Central Oregon; and UMTS1900 Network Pre-Optimization | Grand Junction and Aspen Clusters, CO: Maseeh mentored the design team in the use of the Atoll planning tool. General design tasks for new sites included issuing search rings, generating RFDSs (including RF plumbing diagrams), visiting sites, drive testing some sites as needed, conducting technical site surveys, approving/rejecting candidates, and working with the site acquisition team to find solutions for the problematic sites. Maseeh prepared the documentation to support the RF group’s point of view to justify the need for a site in the zoning hearing. He led the drive test team to collect data and processed drive test data in Actix to detect pilot pollution, handover drops, drops due to interference, wrong orientation, and cross feeder antenna. Maseeh corrected neighbor lists to improve handover success rate, and issued Actix reports.

Resumes

R-39 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Jon Bailey | traction power support

Jon Bailey has performed simulations for load flow analyses on DC traction power systems and distribution systems, and has experience in electrical design work and controls systems. <1 HIs additional experience includes designing and plotting lighting systems as well as other Years of low voltage electrical projects for residential buildings. He has performed fault current Experience analyses on low voltage power systems. Firm RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Mott MacDonald Load Flow Study, Toronto Transit Commission | Toronto, Canada (TTC): Traction Location Power Support for this project that involves building a model in the TRAIN program of the Pleasanton, CA 30km Yonge–University–Spadina Line and interconnecting parts of the Bloor Danforth and Education Sheppard Lines, validating this model against recorded data, undertaking various simulations BS, Electrical/Electronics to assess traction power loadings with ATC and then handing the model over to TTC for their Engineering use. Responsibility included building the simulation model of the Yonge–University–Spadina Line, to evaluate if existing traction power supply and distribution system is capable to support the ATC headway reduction and identify power supply requirements for all levels of operation. E&J Gallo Winery, Ambient Temperature Sensors | Modesto, CA: Four, 3,000-degree fahrenheit furnaces were used to melt glass and heat the surrounding ambient temperature of the facility. John was part of a team that tested and created an infrastructure for implementation of wireless ambient temperature sensors to measure ambient temperatures of the facility in different zones and to sent feedback to a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) that can be monitored. E&J Gallo Winery, Laser Wall Measurement | Modesto, CA: Due to the wall movement of a glass melting furnace burning at 3,000-degree fahrenheit was beginning to collapse, this project was to design a system for laser measurement devices to measure the side wall movement of the furnaces and send feedback to a PLC to be monitored. In addition, project included designing an encasement to protect the laser sensor from extreme temperatures from the furnaces. California State University, Sacramento Classroom/Lab Experience | Sacramento, CA: John helped design a case study using the ETAP software program to prove the desensitization to power relays are a result of an increase in high levels of penetration in a distribution system due to an increase of photo voltaic. This project included the design and modification of an IEEE 13-bus distribution system to test load flow and short circuit analysis at different locations of the distribution system to show relay desensitization.

Resumes

R-40 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Julio Bautista | electrical

Julio Bautista has over 30 years of experience in design and construction management for rail transit systems, highways and avionics including a wide variety of experience in 30 10 engineering implementation, integration, test data analysis and field service. Years of Years of Metro Experience Experience RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Expo Phase 1 and Phase 2 (DB) | Los Angeles County, CA: Field Oversight Firm Engineer of all system related construction including critical and essential power,universal fare D’Leon Consulting Engineers systems,public address,fire alarm,OCS,train control,street lighting,traffic signal and duct banks. Corporation Management of systems related progress payments and material on hand inspections. Julio was Location responsible for change orders and RFI and design review for the project. Los Angeles, CA Metro Red Line | Los Angeles County, CA: Systems Wide Engineer And Education Construction Manager for the 14 year multi-segment design and construction of the heavy BS, Electrical Engineering rail subway system which tunnels under downtown Los Angeles through the Hollywood Hills and includes 16 underground passenger stations, over 15 miles of twin tunnels, 22 facility contracts, and 25 systems procurement and installation contracts. Metro, Capital Improvement Projects Support | Los Angeles County, CA: Project Superintendent that was responsible for managing the design and construction of Capital Improvement Projects for Metro that included the design of raising diagrams to reroute systems electrical feeds and communications set up schedules, coordinating with subcontractors for the extension and construction of elevator shafts and stairs at Wilshire/Vermont Metro Red Line Station. Alameda Corridor Systems Program Management | Los Angeles County, CA: Responsible for systems construction management for various systems on the Alameda Corridor project including the design, procurement, installation and testing of the Automatic Equipment Identification System. Responsible for the scheduling and coordination of the installation of systems with service company planners and facilities engineers, preparing and negotiating contract changes, surveying and designing to meet additional site requirements, negotiating costs for additional systems with the procurement and installation contractors, and enforcing specification compliance. Julio was also the Systems Field Engineer for the Metro Red Line Segments 1, 2a, 2b and 3. AIMCS | El Monte, CA: Quality Control Engineer that ensured all safety plans and procedure were followed, maintain and confirm sidewalk layout matching other existing conditions, verified soil compaction was performed on a regular basis, forms and configuration matching existing sidewalks and driveways met the specification requirements. Julio monitored and verified materials and construction installation procedures followed maintained and record daily inspection reports, material deliveries and performed visual inspections of the end product. Julio was also the Inspector for the roadway addition for the slow bus lane on Santa Anita Avenue and Slow lane on Valley Blvd., He inspected verified plans and specifications procedures; verified demolition and grading for the expanded traffic lanes; curb and gutter; new median; sidewalks; pedestrian ramps; removed and replaced water valves; concrete pads; added new water pipes and new right of way; roadway lanes; relocation of light poles; signal lights; water valves; and layout of new underground ductwork; vault; pull boxes; and retrofitting signal lights; and loops.

Resumes

R-41 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Saundra Baxter | project administration

Saundra Baxter has 35 years of experience providing public agencies with administrative and document control support. Her work includes three years of Metro project experience, 30 3 six years with OmniTrans transit agency, and over five years with the County of Riverside in Years of Years of Metro risk management and claims. With a bachelor degree, and a strong understanding of Metro Experience Experience processes, Saundra can support the administrative needs of any major capital project. Firm RELEVANT EXPERIENCE LKG-CMC, Inc. Metro Red Line | Los Angeles County, CA: Administrative/Logistical Support Location to project staff and for recording and distributing meeting minutes and action items. Los Angeles, CA She maintained, updated and posted documents to the Project Solve web collaboration Education system and posted inspectors’ daily reports and submittals/CDRLS to the Metro Program BS, Business Administration Management Information System (PMIS) and forwarded reports weekly to the Metro Auditor. She created, formatted and distributed correspondence, transmittals, reports and other documents. Saundra also assisted project staff to format reports, deliverables and other documents, checked project documents for format and grammar, reviewed materials prepared by others for the project manager’s signature, and compared submittals to the original contract and reported discrepancies. Omnitrans, SBX Bus Rapid Transit Project, San Bernardino, CA: Document Control Analyst for the $191 million FTA Small Starts project that consisted of a 15.7-mile 16 station BRT from San Bernardino to Loma Linda. Saundra developed, revised and implemented the document control plan (DCP), closeout plan and procedures from environmental through commissioning phases, processed and distributed documents, developed and implemented an electronic document control system utilizing Microsoft Access and Excel, trained project staff on the system and DCP requirements, established and maintained a hard copy document control system and implemented the project SSI protocol. She designed and implemented a baseline configuration management system including revision control and controlled distribution, established and maintained a project library including deliverables, contracts, and baseline documents. Saundra oversaw construction management consultants’ document control activities, conducted on site reviews of construction phase documents and ensured project document control system and documents complied with FTA requirements. She prepared documents for FTA Project Management Oversight (PMO) Consultant. meetings, participated in PMO document control reviews, coordinated with project staff to resolve issues identified in PMO reviews and assisted in preparation of the response to PMO findings, coordinated FTA meetings and progress reports, created analytical charts and Input for FTA Quarterly Progress Reports, made presentations, and provided monthly dashboard input for FTA reviews. Omnitrans, SBX Bus Rapid Transit Project | San Bernardino, CA: Administrative Secretary that designed and maintained action item tracking system; assembled and prepared data and information for project reports; established and maintained a filing system for agreements and purchase orders; processed invoices; assisted Public Relations; and provided administrative support. County of Riverside, Risk Management/General Liability, CA: Office Assistant III and Liability Claims Technician/Substitute that Saundra performed office administration duties including recording new and existing claims, subrogation and insurance; filed and recorded documents; and researched and retrieved county transportation records and statistics. She also represented the County of Riverside in County Court with subrogation cases; updated, stored and retrieved confidential records; and recorded subrogation data and insurance records.

Resumes

R-42 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Pradeep Bhartiya | communications

Over all 13 years’ qualitative work experience in project management/contractual matters, designing, installation, testing & commissioning, interface with other systems & other 13 departments and operation & maintenance division. Years of Experience RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Link Express Gandhinagar-Ahmedabad Ltd (MEGA) | India: Senior Engineer. Firm Reviewing of Technical specifications of telecom system for MEGA project as per detailed WSP project report and system requirement. Location Orange, CA Providing Telecom related input to other systems: Rolling Stock, Traction, Signaling, AFC, Power Scada, MEP, Civil, and Track work. Education BEng Preparing Bid process along with queries asked by Bidders and provide suitable justification to Bidders in tender submission process. Tender evaluation of Telecom’s bidders (IFCQR, Technical and Financial) and preparation of related quarries. Developing Interface requirement specifications design and drawings between telecom system to Rail systems (S&T, AFC, PSD, PST & RS), MEP/E&M services and civil infrastructure (Station, Depot and Viaduct). For stations and depots, calculate power load for UPS capacity and heat dissipation capacity of air conditioning of SCR, TER and UPS room. Reviewing of Depots and Stations, architectural and E&M/MEP design layouts in respect of telecom system. Reviewing of Ergonomic studies for OCC, BCC and other operation & maintenance rooms/areas. Liaison and coordination with external agencies (BSNL, Rail-Tel, Railways, RVNL, etc) for shifting/re-routing of utilities/services and vetting of financial matters

Navi Mumbai Metro Line -1 | India: Senior Manager. Preparing Interface Requirement Specification documents between Telecom system to Rail systems (S&T, AFC, PST & RS), MEP/E&M services and Civil Infrastructure (Station, Depot and Viaduct). Fulfilling all the primary design interface requirements timely. Detailed interface between S&T (ESP & CATS) and CCTV Detailing and Preparation of message list between CATS and PAS/PIDS System – message announcement & message display (dual time arrival & departure). Detailed interface between CBTC-DCS and GE-BTN System, AFC and TDS & GE-BTN System, PST-SCADA and TDS, Telephone & GE-BTN System, and RS and Tetra-Radio & VTS System. Preparing and developing of all interface related documents and drawings (BMS, S&T, Civil, AFC, RS, PST, & E&M) Detailing of Interface Requirement Specification documents within Telecom system (all Telecom sub-system). Preparing, Developing, Populating and signing off the detailed interface documents. Resettling any closed interface requirement due to any unforeseen change or up gradation and cost estimation if any new requirement comes. Reviewing of Ergonomic studies for OCC, BCC and other operation & maintenance rooms/areas.

Resumes

R-43 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Rick Blake | RAMS | rail activation & start-up | communications

Rick has 40+ years of professional experience in the rail transit industry. He started his transit career at the Bay Area Rapid Transit District, with increasingly responsible jobs in the 40 2 Transportation Department. He then worked on three major design and construction projects, Years of Years of Metro including two overseas assignments, after which he worked on a wide variety of transit Experience Experience projects in rail transit operations area Firm RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Intueor Consulting, Inc. BART | San Francisco, CA: On BART’s Train Control Modernization Program, Rick is Location working on the Systems Engineering and Integration team on O&M Planning, Stakeholder San Francisco, CA Management, and Agency Survey/Assessment. Education Federal Transit Administration | San Juan, Puerto Rico: Rick was part of the FTA’s BS, Mathematics Project Management Oversight team in San Juan, Puerto Rico. This task was initially to provide oversight of the Operations and Maintenance component of the Tren Urbano heavy- rail system, but was expanded to include identifying problems and suggesting solutions for the operation and maintenance of San Juan’s bus and ferry systems. Federal Transit Administration | TX: Rick initially created a Security Manpower Planning Model for DART (Dallas) and VIA (San Antonio), which allows transit agencies to accurately determine their police staffing needs based on various parameters set by the agencies, and calculates the cost to provide different levels of service. The FTA then expanded the project and Rick developed a more complex generic model that is adaptable and usable by virtually any rail or bus transit agency in the US. San Francisco Municipal Railway (Muni) | San Francisco, CA: Rick coordinated the operations and maintenance planning effort required to accept and integrate a new communications-based signaling system into the Muni operating organization. This work also included providing assistance with operational analyses, updating rules and procedures, incorporating necessary changes to the Control Center, assisting with integrated systems testing, providing recommendations for stocking of spare parts and tools, and coordinating initiation of warranty administration. He was the project manager for Muni’s Operations Control Center remodeling project, and conducted several service studies. BART | San Francisco, CA: Rick was responsible for defining potential rail alignments along the I-680 corridor to connect two BART stations with a diesel-powered passenger service. He identified the alignments, created cost estimates, devised operating plans, and prepared reports and maps for presentation to policy agencies and stakeholders. Federal Transit Administration: Rick was part of a Booz Allen team assembled by the FTA to provide security and emergency management planning and technical assistance for the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), in Las Vegas, NV, the Capital Metro in Austin, TX, and Utah Transit Authority (UTA) in Salt Lake City. This work included on-site inspections and interviews, followed by the preparation of presentations and reports Port Authority of New York and New Jersey | NY and NJ: Rick helped assure the operational and safety readiness of the JFK AirTrain Project, a design-build-operate-maintain project at New York’s JFK International Airport which commenced service in the fourth quarter of 2003. This effort included assessment of operating personnel (with a major emphasis on the Operations Center staff), along with development and review of rules and procedures, operating manuals, documentation, and training.

Resumes

R-44 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Michael Boraks, PE | rail activation & start-up

Michael Boraks is the Program Director for Rail for Parsons in Southern California with 33 years of experience in the design and management of multi-disciplinary public works 33 projects with an emphasis on transportation projects and specific expertise in the design and Years of delivery of rail and transit projects. Michael also has both broad and in-depth understanding Experience and experience in all aspects of multi-disciplinary projects including areas critical to project success. Michael’s expertise spans the complete project life cycle from project planning Firm and programming to preliminary engineering and environmental clearance, construction Parsons document preparation, construction assistance, start-up and testing and project closeout. Location Irvine, CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Education Port of Long Beach, POLB Pier E Intermodal Yard Design | Long Beach, CA: BS, Civil Engineering Parsons Project Manager for the new 12-track, on-dock intermodal facility is part of POLB’s Professional Credentials Middle Harbor Terminal development project to combine Piers E and F into a 350-acre PE, CA, Civil, 48834 mega terminal known as Middle Harbor Termina. Michael is leading the track and civil design elements of this $15M project. This project will add over 11,000 feet of on-dock rail intermodal loading and storage capacity as well as provide a missing 2,500 foot long piece of double track of the Port’s mainline extension to Pier’s G and J. The project is expected to begin construction in mid-2018. Port of Long Beach, Terminal Island Wye Track Realignment | Long Beach, CA: Michael is the Design Project Manager for the Intermodal Yard sub-project of this final portion of the 10-year, multi-phased, $1.5B program. The new 12-track, on-dock intermodal facility is part of POLB’s Middle Harbor Terminal development project to combine Piers E and F into a 350-acre mega terminal known as Middle Harbor Terminal. The project features include electrified wide-span rail-mounted gantry cranes and provisions for crane and rail yard automation. The scope includes final design of concrete beam crane rail foundation, track alignment, grading, drainage, in-ground compressed air, track control, and worker protection systems and support buildings. A simulation modeling of the rail yard operations is being performed to evaluate design features. Michael leads the team of rail, civil and drainage engineers in the coordinated design of Phase 3 of the project. In coordination with the Port of Long Beach’s own civil design team, Michael managed the Parsons’ effort to deliver construction documents for over $40M of the combined $150M bid price for Phase 3 of the program. City of San Marcos, Marcos Street At-Grade Bike and Pedestrian Crossing: Project Manager for the creation of a new at-grade pedestrian crossing of the SPRINTER railroad. As an agent of the City, Michael led the advanced conceptual design and public outreach process for this new crossing of the SPRINTER tracks. He prepared a formal application to the CPUC and ultimately obtained approval of the new at-grade pedestrian crossing. Following approval by the CPUC and the Railroad, Michael led the preparation of construction documents, and coordinated with the Railroad (North County Transit District) for their portion of the construction project. The project also required a traffic signal modification plan, an electrical plan and new electrical service point for the railroad, safety lighting, railroad warning device and other system and safety enhancements including a video surveillance system Subsequent to the design phase, Mike acted as the construction manager for the construction of the new at-grade crossing.

Resumes

R-45 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Gregory Brown | scheduling

Gregory Brown has more than 30 years of project controls and scheduling experience on major transit, commuter rail, main line railroad, highways and airports ranging in value 30 1 from $50 million to more than $5 billion, and includes work for Metro. His major projects Years of Years of Metro have been delivered in a variety of methods including design-build, design-bid-build and Experience Experience construction management at-risk (CMAR), and his positions have included scheduling manager, project controls engineer, estimating manager and project manager. He brings Firm direct experience as a Scheduling Engineer on the $718 million Metro Green light rail LKG-CMC, Inc. and with Caltrans on the I-105/I-405 freeway; Scheduling and Estimating Manager of the Location $750 million Metro Blue Line project (Hiawatha) / Minneapolis - St. Paul; Project Controls Phoenix, AZ Manager on the $270 South Sacramento Corridor Extension light rail project; Scheduling Education Manager on the $5.5 billion Honolulu Rail Transit Project. BS, Construction Engineering Management RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Professional Credentials Metro Green Line Light Rail | Los Angeles, CA: Senior Planning and Scheduling HAZMAT Engineer that developed the first approved master schedule and established a revenue service date for a $900 million 22-mile line based on the controlling factors of real estate acquisition, equipment deliveries, and site access. Monitored impacts of redesigns, unforeseen site conditions and environmental issues; developed workarounds. Also served as Caltrans’ contact for a 16-mile rail section constructed in median of the I-105 Century Freeway. Valley Metro Rail Program Management | Phoenix, AZ: Project Controls Lead for this $704 million 5-mile 8-station FTA New Starts South Central Extension of the light rail system line runs along Central Ave. from downtown Phoenix south to Baseline Radd. Develop, maintain and update the program schedule and review and comment on final design and CMAR consultant schedules. Maintain risk register, trend log and change order log. Work with program controls staff to produce monthly cost reports and coordinate and facilitate the development of independent cost estimates for contract changes and prepare Finding of Fact (FOF) for the Project Manager. Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation (HART), Honolulu Rail Transit | Honolulu, HI: Scheduling Manager for the east section of the CE&I contract on the $5.5 billion 20-mile elevated rail line with 21 stations connecting bedroom communities with downtown Honolulu and the Honolulu International Airport including design-build and design-bid-build contracts. This included primary activities during this early phase of construction have been preparing independent cost estimates for upcoming construction contracts, identifying value engineering savings, and development of Alternate Technical Concepts. In collaboration with HART, re-planned the Project Master Schedule for the eastern 10 miles. Metro Blue Line (Hiawatha) Light Rail Transit | Minneapolis, MN: Scheduling and Estimating Manager. Scheduling and Estimating Manager for an integrated team of consultants, DOT personnel, and Metro Transit management for Minnesota’s largest public works project. Gregory was instrumental in delivering this $750 million 12-mile light rail starter line, which included a $330 million design-build contract and a 1.8-mile tunnel bore underneath an operating airport. The line included 12 stations - two at the airport, two-park- and ride lots and an operations and maintenance facility. In addition to the design-build contract, separate contracts were procured for the airport tunnels and vehicles. The line partially opened four months ahead of schedule and fully opened 27 days ahead of schedules and within budget.

Resumes

R-46 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Michael Butler, PE | communications

Michael Butler is a licensed electrical engineer with over 30 years of experience in engineering, construction, transportation and telecommunications consulting, including 30 design and implementation project management. Micheal is also skilled in engineering Years of administration, contracting, negotiation, construction administration, program planning, Experience budget control and staffing, management reports. Firm RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Auriga Corporation San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, Central Subway Program Location Management | San Francisco, CA: Communications Support that is reviewing, San Jose, CA approving, and testing the of integrations of the contractor’s work and submissions. Overall, Education Auriga Corporation is performing project management for the design of the public safety and BS, Engineering operational radio systems in the new subway and communications and SCADA systems for Professional Credentials the existing and new San Francisco subways. Professional Engineer Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), Warm Springs Extension (WSX) | Fremont, CA: (Electrical): CA #E18593; Communications Support that managed the design, the RF coverage analysis, production CO #E043628 of the design report, and specifications and CAD drawings created by Auriga Corporation’s engineering team. Overall, Auriga Corporation are part of the program management team that designed the Public Safety Radio distribution system in the Fremont tunnel, including vent structures, south track section, and power/train control yard, of the new extension. Chevron Refinery and Research Center Communication Systems Upgrade | Richmond, CA: Communications Support that managed a datacenter and network system design project, including communications upgrade of the 2400+ node, 20-square-mile refinery network. Michael managed other projects that included the seismic retrofit, critical power, and management and administration of design and construction firms. Michael also managed the budget control supervision and accountability. RCM Capital Management Data Center Relocation Design-Build | San Francisco, CA: Communications Support that managed the data-center relocation to San Francisco’s financial district. Michael negotiated with architects and building management. He supervised engineers, programmers, technicians, and trades. The scope of work included the VoIP and wireless systems planning and implementation management; data network expansion; and system planning, implementation and training. City of Anaheim Traffic Surveillance/Signal Control Network Design- Build | Anaheim, CA: Michael managed the project for the design-build of a video and traffic signal control system along a severely congested corridor in Anaheim (Katella Avenue). It included design of fiber-optic cable/video system with signal control data, distributed along Katella Avenue and the side streets, and the head end equipment. City of Vallejo, Freeway Service Patrol Management System | Vallejo, CA: Michael managed design and bid document production for a real time, mobile, data acquisition and control system, including special mobile radio (SMR), geographic information systems (GIS), global positioning system (GPS) and mobile data terminal (MDT) integration. Michael tested vehicle-based GPS system for Sony and ETAK.

Resumes

R-47 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Manuel Castro, PE, CEM, ENV SP | mechanical/ HVAC/ tunnel ventilation | plumbing & fire protection

Manuel is a licensed mechanical engineer in the State of California with over 20 years of 23 1 experience in design-build contracting and consulting. His project experience includes Years of Years of Metro mission critical infrastructure data center, central plant design, commercial, educational Experience Experience facilities and transit stations project. Manuel’’s engineering and design experience includes developing conceptual through construction designs, conducting field investigations, peer Firm reviews, generating as-built documentation, engineering and designing new and retrofit WSP mechanical systems, commissioning AHU, Chillers, Pumps, VAV, fire dampers, trouble Location shooting mechanical systems, developing piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&ID Los Angeles, CA identifying and evaluating energy efficiency projects), and designing controls for HVAC, Education boilers and other mechanical systems. MS, Mechanical Engineering; Master Commercial Heating RELEVANT EXPERIENCE and Ventilation Technology; BS, SANDAG Mid Coast Corridor Transit | San Diego, CA: Lead Mechanical Engineer Mechanical Engineering responsible for designing HVAC and Plumbing systems and controls on ancillary spaces. Professional Credentials Provided an N+1 system in HVAC mechanical system. Professional Engineer: CA Sound Transit Northlink Station Project | Seattle, WA: Lead Mechanical Engineer (#M-31659); Certified Energy responsible for designing HVAC and Plumbing systems and controls in an N+1 systems on Manager (CEM); Envision ancillary spaces, office and garage. Sustainability Professional (ENV SP) BART Warm Spring Extension GEC | Fremont, CA: Lead HVAC peer reviewer on HVAC design system of stations ancillary rooms. Provided construction support and performed mechanical system punchlists. Performed witnessed and approval test of tunnel dampers for tunnel emergency ventilation. SMFTA Central Subway Station Design | San Fransisco, CA: Responsible in providing peer reviews in HVAC design and construction support. Sound Transit Eastlink Final Design | Seattle, WA: Lead Engineer responsible for designing stations HVAC sytem on ancillary spaces. Provided construction support. Northlink Station Project | Seattle, WA: Lead Mechanical Engineer responsible for designing HVAC and Plumbing system on ancillary spaces and chilled water system. Lynwood North Corridor Project | Seattle, WA: Lead Mechanical Engineer responsible for designing HVAC system on ancillary spaces, office and garage. LAWA APM Project Los Angeles Airport, CA: Lead Mechanical Engineer responsible for providing technical requirements n mechanical provision for APM. Coordinated multiple discipline to respond to comments and modification on each technical disciplines. Tillman Building HVAC design | Van Nuys, CA: Lead Mechanical Engineer responsible in the provision of mechanical system assessment and HVAC system design. Provided HVAC alternative mechanical systems and energy analysis to determine which HVAC alternative is viable to replace existing mechanical system. Chabot Las Positas CUP Chiller addition | Las Positas, CA: Lead Mechanical responsible for the design in adding a 500 ton centrifugal chiller, pumps and cooling tower on existing central plant cooling system. Performed cooling load analysis and sequence of operation strategy for the new chiller during off-peak and on-peak operations. UTAH Transit Authority Project | Salt Lake City, UT: Lead Mechanical Engineer responsible for bus transit fuel installation system design.

Resumes

R-48 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Margaret (Meg) Cederoth, AICP, LEED AP | sustainability interface

Margaret is a supervising urban planner with more than a decade of experience working 19 in the areas of transportation and sustainability planning, land use and international Years of planning. Her expertise includes sustainability strategies for transportation infrastructure Experience projects, new starts transit planning and funding submittals, master planning infrastructure programs, LEED evaluation of infrastructure projects, environmental planning and National Firm Environmental Policy Act documentation, as well as international urban development WSP throughout North Africa and the Middle East. Meg has provided sustainability and LEED Location training and charettes to WSP project and client staff in the U.S., U.K. and United Arab Los Angeles, CA Emirates (UAE). She is adept with a variety of computer applications, including Arc GIS, Education Microsoft Office Products, Adobe InDesign and numerous other software applications. Meg’s Master, Urban and Regional project management experience includes managing a diverse team of experts, as well as Planning; BA, Middle Eastern managing tasks for major projects, such as the Master Institute of Science and Technology, History Anacostia Waterfront Transportation Infrastructure Master Plan, the Lower Georgia Avenue Professional Credentials Streetscape Project, and a regional study for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit American Institute of Certified Authority (WMATA). Meg is currently developing a sustainable design toolkit for WSP’s Planners (AICP) ; Leadership sustainability practice. in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Accredited RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Professional California High Speed Rail | CA: Sustainability manager for HSR program. Oversee and implement policy development on sustainability issues, including materials choices, construction practices and renewable energy. Create appropriate implementation mechanisms, including design criteria and manuals and procurement language. Managed and drafted an implementation plan for obtaining renewably generated energy for train operations. California HSR Program | CA: Developed a draft sustainable materials policy and implementation plan reflecting program sustainability. Implementation includes coordinating with agency and program staff to confirm specifications and reflect the use of recycled products in major construction materials. Caltrain Stations and Facilities Sustainable Design Criteria | CA: Developed and refined a set of sustainable design criteria and guidance for Caltrain facilities. These incorporated industrial and government standards on a full range of sustainability criteria for project design, construction, operations and maintenance. Dubai Purple Line | Dubai, UAE: Conducted a week-long sustainability review and workshop session for the planning and client staff for this 30-mile heavy rail project. Developed workshop presentations, handouts and materials on global sustainability initiatives and processes related to rail systems and energy strategies, and drafted a sustainability strategy and action matrix for the project. Current phase is implementing the action plan, including potential scope for LEED certification of maintenance facilities, and construction waste management. Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE: Served as the sustainability manager within the project management team. Worked with the design and construction team to develop and coordinate appropriate strategies, established sustainability targets and benchmarks, wrote a sustainability strategy, and implemented and coordinated sustainability actions with both the design and construction team. This work included writing LEED-compliant requests for proposals, specifications and scopes, and determining reporting mechanisms, as well as conducting sustainability reviews and workshops. This work also includes educating and supervising the contractor regarding sustainability issues and materials research, including writing technical memorandum on sustainability topics, regular training on site and regular site review. Resumes

R-49 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Andrew Cho | communications

Andrew Cho is the founder and principal consultant of Enabled Consultants, a consulting practice specializing in IT infrastructure systems and network architecture, design, 25 engineering, and project management services. Andrew has extensive design and Years of implementation experience in various IT infrastructure fields including the areas of Experience communications, network engineering, and data center design. Prior to founding Enabled Consultants, he held a variety of technical and senior IT management positions at several Firm multi-national electronics manufacturing companies. Enabled Consultants Location RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Anaheim, CA Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Signa/Communications Design Education Services/MPLS Network Migration | Los Angeles, CA: Network Architect responsible B.A., Rhetoric for managing migration of entire MPLS network in support of Positive Train Control backhaul and associated projects. Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Signal and Communications Design Services Los Angeles Union Station Field and Office Customer Information Systems and CAD Systems Support | Los Angeles, CA: Network Architect designed and built a customer information system for Los Angeles Union Station electronic signage. Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Signal and Communications Design Services, Los Angeles Union Station Customer Information Systems Improvements | Los Angeles, CA: Network Architect expanded functionality of customer information system across entire SCRRA system/all stations. Southern California Regional Rail Authority Project Management, Construction Management, Staff Assistance Services, Rail Corridor Crossings and Encroachment, and Engineering Staff Assistance for PVL | Los Angeles, CA: Network Architect that provided as-needed IT service in support of preparation of revenue services on the Perris Valley Line expansion. Southern California Regional Rail Authority Project Management, Construction Management and Staff Assistance Services, Rail Corridor C&E, Engineering Staff Assistance for Downtown San Bernardino Passenger Rail Project IT Support | Los Angeles, CA: Network Architect provided as-needed IT service in support of preparation of revenue services on the Downtown San Bernardino passenger rail project. Southern California Regional Rail Authority Positive Train Control Communication and Signal Systems Design and Engineering Services Security Data Network Initial Study and Specifications | Los Angeles, CA: Network Architect that produced initial design and report for separate security data network for SCRRA video surveillance camera system. Southern California Regional Rail Authority Positive Train Control Communication and Signal Systems Design and Engineering Services, Communications Standards Review and Update | Los Angeles, CA: Network Architect that reviewed and provided comments for update of current SCRRA communications standards document.

Resumes

R-50 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Wilson Chu, EIT | ducktbank design

Wilson Chu has 6 years of experience and has been involved with two major Design-Built rail transit projects, including LAX/ Crenshaw and Westside Subway Extension 1 projects. 6 4 My Primary duty is assisting senior engineer to design engineer plan by using CAD Years of Years of Metro software, engineering calculation, and project coordination with teams. Wilson provides Experience Experience load calculation, sized cable, transformer, breaker, panel, and provided panel schedule, and drafted electrical drawing by using AutoCAD and Revit. Firm Parsons RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Location Metro, Blue Line Signal Systems Rehabilitation (DB) | Pasadena, Pasadena, CA CA: As a subcontractor, Parsons is providing fully integrated and functional train Education control/communications systems. The work includes design, procurement and BS, Electrical Engineering manufacturing, supplying, commissioning, and integration for all items for a fully functional Professional Credentials train control system. Wilson coordinated with the client to meet project schedule and design Engineer-in-Training, CA, goals and provided technical assistance and direction to design personnel. Performed 160115 the duct bank system design for the project and provided engineering plans and detailed drawings using MicroStation. Complied with local and state agency regulations to complete the design. Provided engineering calculations and a report to ensure the safety of the design. Performed the power distribution design for a proposed communication and signal house by utilizing an existing traction power substation. Conducted a field visit to observe and evaluate current conditions in order to perform the design. Provided a single-line diagram for sizing proposed electrical equipment and prepared load calculations. Metro, Westside Subway Extension 1 | Los Angeles, CA: Wilson assisted senior systems engineers with duct bank design and systems plan development by coordinating with electrical, communications, and structure groups in meetings. Produced an in-station communications system cable plan and conduit fill calculations by coordinating with the communications and electrical groups. Performed electromagnetic interference studies, prepared a report, and produced duct bank calculations, a conduit schedule, and a cable plan for a tunnel. Drafted all design drawings using MicroStation and Revit for the duct bank system to correspond to other groups. Metro, Crenshaw/LAX Line | Los Angeles, CA: Wilson assisted senior engineers with the duct bank design and coordinated with different groups to develop a systems plan. Held responsible charge for generating the conduit schedule, the cable plan, and duct bank calculations by using train control, communications, and traction power reference drawings. Checked specifications of duct bank system materials and cost estimates for the entire project. Created detailed drawings using MicroStation and designed electrical pull boxes in accordance with the National Electrical Code. Collaborated with communications engineers to develop equipment layouts and generated a conduit plan and a cable schedule.

Resumes

R-51 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Joe Cochran | train control

Joseph Cochran brings six years of experience in the railroad and transit signaling industry and signal engineer. He is skilled in signal system design engineering of freight, 6 2 commuter and light rail transit signal systems. Experience includes projects on Metro, Years of Years of Metro Port Authority Trans-Hudso (PATH), New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA), Dallas Area Experience Experience Rapid Transit (DART), SunRail, Trinity Railway Express (TRE), and several other short line railroads. Joseph’s area of expertise includes Bentley/AutoDesk CADD Automation; material Firm acquisition/handling; ProjectWise; route and aspect chart; highway crossing design; factory Innovative Solutions in Signaling and field test support; standards and practices; document management; signal systems Location design; technical writing; and track and line drawings. Louisville, KY Education RELEVANT EXPERIENCE BS, Mechanical Engineering Metro Gold Line | Los Angeles County, CA: Signal Engineering that supported rail improvements, new aspect scheme, control line modifications, and replacement of vehicle detection systems. Joseph supported the upgrade vehicle detections system with the U1400 vehicle loop detectors. LACMTA Metrolink, Raymer to Bernson Double Track Expansion Project, Van Nuys-Northridge-Chatsworth, CA: Signal Engineering that supported two new control points, three intermediate signal locations, rehabilitation of grade crossing warning systems, and Positive Train Control ready wayside signal system. Port Authority Trans-Hudson PATH: Design and Implementation of a microprocessor (iVPI) based signal system that would work with the CBTC system being installed. Joseph was also part of the restoration team that was tasked with getting service back online after Hurricane Sandy flooded the tunnels at Hoboken Station it included installation of the iVPI system, testing digicode track circuits, switches and signals. The equipment used included GCP 3000, GCP 4000, PMD, HXP, XP4, VHLC, Electrocode, iVPI, Style C, Wheel Detectors, vehicle detector loops, PLC simulation.

Resumes

R-52 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

John Cockle, ASP | safety certification

John Cockle has 29 years of success in rail safety and operations. He has planned, developed, managed and implemented system safety and security programs, rules 29 compliance and training programs, and operations management programs for freight and Years of passenger railroads. John has railroad construction PM experience for short line railroad Experience and marine terminal infrastructure. He has coordinated with internal department leads as well as external stakeholders, state and local agencies, FRA and Amtrak. John has also Firm worked for several railroads in roles of increasing responsibility including rail safety officer, Parsons superintendent of operations, trainmaster/terminal manager and train dispatcher. John started Location out his career in the Engineering Department at Burlington Northern Railroad and served 11 Oakland, CA years as Roadmaster/Track Inspector for Richmond Pacific Railroad. Education BS, cum laude, RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Geography/Transportation, Parsons, System Safety Specialist - Rail | Oakland, CA: John manages System Safety Professional Credentials for the Seattle Streetcar C3 project, is lead Safety technician for TriMet’s Safety Management Associate Safety Professional System support (performing an audit of the TriMet On-Track Safety program and updating the (ASP) 2013 – present WES Commuter Rail SSPP for FRA compliance), and manages the System Safety efforts for the following projects: BART CBTC safety certification, and ventilation strategy and system safety for DTX Downtown Rail Extension in San Francisco. John was also responsible for managing the system safety and safety assurance aspects of the Caltrain PTC/CBOSS project, and providing operational support, through Spring 2017. This included managing the hazard analyses program to support the FRA safety case for revenue service demonstration and the PTC Safety Plan, and managing the safety certification program to assure that the system is designed, constructed, and implemented in a safe and secure manner. Parsons Brinckerhoff, Principle Technical Specialist, Safety | San Francisco, CA: System Safety Manager for the California High-Speed Rail Program, John was responsible for system safety and developing processes for ensuring that the project is designed, built, tested and placed into operation in a safe and secure manner. Activities included: development of a safety and security policy statement for the project; rewriting the safety and security management plan; development of a hazard management program based on FRA, FTA, and international guidance; establishment of internal and external safety committees; completion of preliminary and site-specific hazard analyses; establishment of a fire & life safety program with outreach to authorities having jurisdiction such as FRA, the California Office of the State Fire Marshal and local emergency response jurisdictions; development of a hazard management program focused on tunnel structures; and oversight of regulatory approvals for the California High-Speed Rail Program. Other projects included safety certification work for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit project in San Diego and hazard analysis for the Washington State DOT’s Cascade Corridor reroute in Tacoma.

Resumes

R-53 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Phil Collins | communications | independent systems integration review team

Phil has been a key contributor to several public safety, utility, transportation and communication projects involving CAD/AVL, APC, SCADA, wide area simulcast P25 digital 40 20 radio including AC Transit, BART, Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District, Years of Years of Metro Orange County Transportation Authority, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Experience Experience Sacramento DOU, San Francisco MUNI, Sam Trans and UP Express, Toronto. Phil was responsible for the management of projects involving the integration of video security, tunnel Firm fire and environment management systems, SCADA, distributed antenna systems, fiber optic, Intueor Consulting, Inc. microwave, radio, wireless LAN, and data communications technologies Location Los Angeles, CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Education Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)| CA: Phil is supporting the Authority BA, Industrial Technology with the procurement of a replacement CAD/AVL system that includes a new radio system. A component of the assessment evaluated the Silicon Valley Interoperable Radio Authority’s (SVIRA) P25 700 MHz simulcast radio system for use by VTA, updating a specification to incorporate use of SVRIA prior to RFP release, provide CAD vendor evaluation, contract conformance support, integration oversight for VTA with the CAD vendor and SVRIA, implementation and testing oversight. Metro Gold Line Eastside Extension Phases 1 and 2 | Los Angeles County, CA: Phil supported the Construction Management effort for Microwave Interference Analysis, Factory Acceptance, Individual Field Acceptance, Integrated Field Acceptance and System Integration Testing of the Wayside Communications Equipment for the six station LRT line extension. Systems include CCTV, PA, Variable Message Signs, Carrier Transmission Systems, Telephone, Fire Alarm Management, SCADA, Seismic Alarm Detection Stations, Emergency Trip Stations and Blue Light Stations. Metro Safety, Red and Purple Line Radio Replacement Design | Los Angeles, CA: Technical Support for the assessment, design and specification for a replacement radio system for the heavy rail tunnel communications system. This includes upgrading the operational channels to include 700MHz for LAPD, LA-RICS and Band 14 Public Safety broadband. Metro Technical Support for the Advanced Transportation Management System | Los Angeles, CA: Phil provided technical support in the development and implementation of a SMART Bus system for Metro. He was the lead RF engineer for the communication system portion of the project assessment and technical specification. The system incorporates security video systems and WiFi on all revenue vehicles for transfer of video and data at 12 bus divisions. In a follow-on task, a feasibility study for narrow banding the five-site, seven channel UHF simulcast data system was provided. Phil provided technical support in the development and implementation of a Bus Signal Priority system for the communication system portion of the Crenshaw corridor pilot project assessment and coordination with the signal controllers and transportation management centers under the jurisdiction of several different agencies. The system incorporated WiFi on all revenue vehicles to communicate directly with the signal controllers in some jurisdictions and commercial wireless to connect to TMCs. Foothill Transit | West Covina, CA: Phil provided technical support for the implementation of the FHT SmartBus System. He assisted in the development of a Needs Assessment at Foothill Transit to determine needs for a CAD/AVL system to manage the bus fleet. He then assisted in the development of the technical specifications, vendor selection, and contract conformance for the procurement of the SmartBus System. Phil provided testing oversight for all elements of the system. The system incorporated a four site narrow band, wide area data system and WiFi on all revenue vehicles for bulk data transfer at the two divisions.

Resumes

R-54 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Ramesh Daryani, PMP | systems integration

Ramesh Daryani hasa over 25 years of experience in IT and transit consulting involving project management; Smart Card deployment, modernizing of faregates, ticket vending 25 machines, mobile fare collection devices, network design and implementation; web site Years of design, development and implementation; and database development, implementation and Experience performance tuning. Currently, he is managing a real-time train status monitoring system for Santa Clara Valley Transportation Agency. Previously, he served as a Project Manager Firm for Clipper/TransLink Rollout and implementation activities at San Francisco Municipal Auriga Corporation Transportation Agency. In addition, he assisted in the development of two web site designs Location and development projects, for Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. He has also Milpitas, CA served as a Project Manager for data warehouse design, development, and implementation Education project for the Orange County Transportation Authority to facilitate route analysis and M.B.A., Industrial Management intelligent scheduling. BS, Computer Science RELEVANT EXPERIENCE B.TECH, Mechanical Engineering San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA)/Cable Car Division, Professional Credentials Implementation of Automated Fare Collection (AFC) Equipment and Hand PMP, Project Management Held Units | San Francisco, CA: Project Manager that performed the following Institute implementation services: Coordinated with Contractor (Cubic), Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and SFMTA staff in installation of Automated Fare Collection (AFC) equipment in subway and Hand Held Units in the Cable Car Division. Coordinated with Contractor (Cubic), MTC, and SFMTA staff in installation of Clipper Readers nd Driver Consoles on all the revenue vehicles and installation of network equipment at all the yards. Assisted Central Control, Digital Shop, Revenue and Finance, and Station agents in scheduling and training on Ticket Vending Machines, Faregates, and Agent Control Terminals. Arranged Funding from MTC for Clipper support staff. Coordinated the training of Operations Staff, Revenue Staff, Finance Staff and Conductors on the use of various Clipper Devices at SFMTA. SFMTA, TransLink/Clipper Devices Implementation San Francisco, CA: Project Coordination for implementation of TransLink/Clipper devices at SFMTA. Ramesh performed the following services: Assisted with the planning, implementation of TransLink®/Clipper marketing and public information campaigns. Worked with SFMTA staff to support pre-revenue ready and soft launch TransLink® implementation activities. Coordinated with Contractor (Cubic), Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and SFMTA staff in fleet-wide installation of TransLink/Clipper Patron Devices and Driver consoles on all revenue vehicles. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Agency, Automatic Train Control | San Jose, CA: Systems Integration Support that helped develop real-time train status monitoring system for automate train tracking functions while integrating dispatch and Yard maps functions to VTA’s CAD/AVL system, and feeding data to predictive engines.

Resumes

R-55 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Ruperto Dilig, PE | independent quality manager 29 <1 Years of Years of Metro Ruperto Dilig brings 29 years of experience in project management, engineering, quality Experience Experience management, inspection/quality assurance and document control, in both private and public sector roles. Currently, Ruperto has served on Metro’s Regional Connector project, Riverside County Transportation Commission SR-91, and Caltrans’ SR 60/SR 91/SR 215 Interchange, Firm and various other Caltrans bridges and structures assignments. LKG-CMC, Inc. Location RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Los Angeles, CA Metro Regional Connector | Los Angeles County, CA (2017-Present): Education Engineering Support/Document Control Lead for the $1.55 billion FTA New Starts project BS, Civil Engineering that included a 1.9-mile underground light rail system connecting the Metro Gold Line to the Professional Credentials Metro Blue/Red/Purple Line 7th Street/Metro Center Station in downtown Los Angeles. Registered Civil Engineer, License No. 57648, Manilla, RCTC SR 91 Corridor Improvements (DB) | Corona, CA: Document Control Philippines Manager for the $1.2 billion design-build project included two new express lanes from Orange/ Riverside County line to the I-15, and general purpose lanes, revamped interchanges, bridges, ramps and local streets. Ruperto and other members of the firm were brought in by the design-build team to lead the Quality Management team, and develop and implement the projects’ Quality Management program for design and construction. The team managed the document control for materials and inspection and its proactive approach to this function was crucial to an efficient project close-out. The project became a revenue generating facility in March of 2017. Overall project duties included the management of project documentation standards and processes required in each stage of the QA document lifecycle. Ruperto maintained various document logs to aid in tracking, receipt and distribution of project documents (e.g., construction drawings, submittals, DCNs, RFIs, NCRs, as-built drawings, and punch list). He collaborated with document owners to initiate changes and improve existing workflows to verify compliance with the reporting requirements of the Client/Owner. Ruperto also interfaced with various entities including RCTC, Caltrans, City of Corona, County of Riverside, U.S. DOT, and Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Additionally, Ruperto developed reports, dashboards, and metrics for monitoring key performance indicators; assisted in the development of guidelines for the project closeout; and supervised, designed and implemented detailed work instructions for day-to-day activities of QA Document Control staff. Caltrans District 8 PPM/ CM | Riverside, CA: Document Control Specialist that developed a project document control system that included tracking and monitoring of action items, review comments, issues, Right-of-Way Acquisition Summary Reports, change orders, meetings, and other project related items. Ruperto provided meaningful information using project management tools such as critical path schedule, budget, and look-ahead schedules. He turned-over closeout documents (both electronic and paper-based) to the client and developed complex expenditure reports by creating resource loaded schedule to assist in monitoring and budget forecasting. Caltrans District 8 SR-60/SR-91/SR-215 Interchange Program Riverside, CA: Assistant Project Manager for the $300 million project that includes four miles of HOV lanes and widened freeways on I-215, SR-60, and SR-91. It included roadway widening, structures, retaining, and sound walls, extensive drainage improvements, traffic safety improvements, new signals, and unique landscaping features. Ruperto provided project management support services to Caltrans District 8 senior project managers for various projects in the San Bernardino and Riverside counties. He developed project document control system to track and monitor key performance project indicators, action items, issues and other project related items. Ruperto also assisted in coordinating with various functional units such as design, construction and environmental.

Resumes

R-56 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Kurt Drummond, PE | communications Kurt Drummond is nationally recognized as an expert in the field of mission-critical and public safety land-mobile radio communication systems, packet digital radio and wide-area networks. His Engineering Design expertise has been sought by diverse Agencies such as 26 22 Metro, Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), Port Authority of New York Years of Years of Metro and New Jersey (PANYNJ), Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (PCJPB), and others for Experience Experience design and consultation in support of mission-critical land-mobile communication networks. These networks include Public Safety Agency-Police, Fire, and EMS, Railroad Train Control Firm Communications for Positive Train Control and Centralized Traffic Control and subway RF Networks, Inc. communication systems. Location Burbank, CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Education Metro Red Line and Metro Purple Line Subway Radio System MS, Electrical Engineering Design | Los Angeles County, CA: Designer and Systems Integrator of Metro’s Red and BS, Electronics Engineering Purple line radio and communication systems used to support mission-critical voice and Professional Credentials data communications on these subway lines in Los Angeles County. These subway lines Professional Engineer served public safety and the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) and Los Angeles Fire (Electrical): CA #E16247 Department (LAFD). The subway lines also served Metro’s railroad voice and data operations through a maze of approximately 20 miles of subway tunnels and passenger stations and seamlessly integrated with the existing LAPD/LAFD/Metro infrastructures above and below ground. This radio system has reliably served the needs of the Metro and the various stakeholders for the past 20 years. Metro Red Line and Metro Purple Line Subway Radio System Design | Los Angeles County, CA: Principal Designer for the current upgrade of the 22 year old Metro Red and Purple line radio and communication systems. This upgrade is intended to solve the issues related to the maintenance of a “state of good repair” caused by failed components whose replacements are no longer available while simultaneously leveraging “state-of-the-art” design and technology to support the next 25 years of use. Southern California Regional Railroad Authority, Metrolink VVSG Communications Backhaul | Los Angeles, CA: Designer, Principal Engineer and Systems Integrator for mission-critical communication back-haul network covering over 10,000 square miles of territory, and utilizing diverse state-of-the art technologies to connect Central Offices to tens of base stations and hundreds of field devices in a wide area RF network. This network currently supports the Metrolink commuter railroad’s mission critical Centralized Traffic Control and Positive Train Control operations, and is also leveraged to support business critical services such as passenger information systems. Network traffic includes Packet Digital data, Circuit Digital data, Voice and Data Radio, SCADA, and utilized technologies as diverse as packet digital Microwave radio, Ethernet radio, SONET, Gigabit-Ethernet, in hardened, resilient topologies providing availabilities in excess of 99.999% for the network backbone. Designer of CCTV network to monitor back-haul infrastructure. Southern California Regional Railroad Authority/Metrolink, Positive Train Control | Los Angeles, CA: Author of the first Positive Train Control (PTC) technical specifications, nationwide which was used for the successful design and integration of the PTC communication system used by Metrolink in the Los Angeles basin. Kurt was responsible for the review and oversight of all elements of the Positive Train Control communication system design, construction, integration and testing performed by the Contractor. Las Vegas Metro Police Department (LVMPD), LVMPD Radio Replacement | Las Vegas, NV: For the LVMPD, was sought as the subject matter expert for the development of the Technical Specifications and Conceptual Design of a new mission-critical packet-digital trunked radio network, operating County-wide to support over 6,000 Las Vegas Metro Police Officers. Assisted with the review and support services for the replacement of the Agency’s radio system during construction and integration. Resumes

R-57 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Jeffrey Dugard | train control

Jeffrey Duggard has 24 years of experience in preliminary system engineering. He has obtained extensive experience in designing, programming, checking, testing, and 24 1 commissioning crossing/wayside signal systems for Class 1 and transit railroads. Prior to Years of Years of Metro his rail experience, he had four years of aviation electronics in the US Air Force. He is highly Experience Experience skilled in VHLC & ElectrologIXS Programming; factory/field test procedures; relay/solid state system design; route/aspect charts; field test/commissioning; design program verification; Firm AutoCAD/Microstation; VitalSim Program Validation; Microlok Programming; and control Innovative Solutions in Signaling lines/code charts. Over the last five years, Jeff has provided design wayside /crossing signal Location locations for various railroads that include CSX Transportation, Norfolk Southern, Union Jacksonville, FL Pacific Railroad, Southern Pacific Railroad, Florida East Coast Railroad, and Indiana Rail Education Road Company. Electronics Instruction, Chanute A.F.B., Rantoul, Illinois RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Charlotte Area Transportation System, Blue Line Extension | Charlotte, NC: Train Control support that was responsible for designing and checking wayside and crossing signal locations. Valley Metro, Central Mesa Line Extension | Phoenix, AZ: Train Control support that designed and checked wayside and crossing signal locations. As a subconsultant, Jeff and his team provided hardware design and processor programming for Valley Metro Rail’s Central Mesa Extension. This extension of an existing EMU light rail line connected the downtown hubs of Phoenix, Mesa, and Tempe in Arizona. The existing light rail line utilized Alstom’s IVPI vital controller, whereas GE’s Electrologixs was proposed for the extension, so a project challenge was in the interface between the two systems. Innovative Solutions managed a sub consultant who designed the interface and supported its field verification. Design included several interlocking areas with PF track circuits within interlockings and AF tracks between interlockings. Revenue service began six months ahead of schedule. Utah Transportation Authority (UTA), TRAX State of Good Repair | Salt Lake City, UT: Train Control support that designed and checked wayside and crossing signal locations.: Denver Regional Transportation District (RTD), Various Rail Systems Projects | Denver, CO: Lead Engineer Responsible for coordinating all TCS and ACS interface application engineering. Jeff designed and checked wayside/crossing signal locations; programmed and rack tested VHLC and EC5 program; and provided field support before and during equipment commissioning.

Resumes

R-58 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Anthony Durney | safety manager | train control

Anthony Durney has 15 years of experience in signaling inspection throughout all phases of the construction and installation process, including projects located in California, 15 Massachusetts, and Washington. Inspection and installation services have included wayside Years of signals, switches, terminal shunts, train control signals, and crossing/control point houses. Experience He has interpreted signal prints, performed wire modifications and terminations, layouts for new signal equipment, and served as a liaison for other trades on multiple rail projects. He Firm has also served as a Railroad Signalman and provided plant inspections. Virginkar & Associates, Inc. Location RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Fullerton, CA San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, Various Projects | San Education Bernardino County, CA: Railroad Signalman with responsibilities that included reading San Bernardino Valley College, and interpreting signal prints, performing wire modifications/terminations on existing San Bernardino, CA (Present) crossing houses; layout for new signal equipment; layout and installation for new crossing San Diego State University, San houses and control point houses; wayside signals; switches; termination shunts; island Diego, Courses approaches; and preparation for cutovers. Metrolink, Southern California Regional Rail Authority | Los Angeles, CA: Railroad Signalman/Inside Wireman with responsibilities that included reading, interpreting prints, and terminating cable as per print, and installing equipment in crossing/control point houses for the movement of commuter/freight trains. He also performed termination of electrical cable for signals; highway crossings; switches; circuits; narrow band shunts; tunable joint couplers; test relays; measured and marked approach lengths; cutovers of outdated equipment to updated equipment; inspected work and checked installations; and red-lined prints for updating of equipment. Additionally, Anthony had daily interaction with inspectors and signal engineers. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Greenbush Line | Boston, MA: Inspector that interpreted and red-lined blueprints, installed cable for highway grade crossings, signals, switches, relays, and batteries, communication loops, set signals and foundations, bonding, shunts and cutovers. Anthony performed inspections throughout all phases of the construction and /installation process, and had extensive interaction with other inspectors and homeowners. Tacoma Rail Inspection Services Tacoma, Tacoma Rail, WA: Inspector interpreted and red-lined blueprints, installed cable for highway grade crossings, signals, switches, relays, and batteries, communication loops, set signals and foundations, bonding, shunts and cutovers. Anthony performed inspections throughout all phases of the construction/installation process, and had extensive interaction with other inspectors and homeowners. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Vasona Light Rail | San Jose, CA: Inspector that interpreted and red-lined blueprints, installed cable for highway grade crossings, signals, switches, relays, and batteries, communication loops, set signals and foundations, bonding, shunts and cutovers. Anthony performed inspections throughout all phases of the construction/installation process and had extensive interaction with other inspectors and homeowners. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail Road | San Bernardino, CA: Anthony’s responsibilities with a traveling team were primarily directional boring. As the Assistant Signalman, his tasks included delivery of equipment and personnel to sites, equipment set up, back reamers, locater, backhoe, water trucks, mixing machine, recovery pits, boring and placing necessary conduit for future cable installation. Other duties performed were installation of signal cable, signal foundations, crossing foundations, highway crossing, and control point houses.

Resumes

R-59 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Saral Dwivedi, PE | train control

Saral is an electronics engineer with 12 years of qualitative work experience in project management, design review, testing & commissioning, of different signaling system & their 12 1 maintenance. He is adept in swiftly ramping up projects with competent cross-functional Years of Years of Metro skills and on time execution. Saral is currently working as a supervising engineer with WSP Experience Experience USA Inc., associated with LA Metro extension of purple line Section 1, Section 2 and Section 3 reporting to the Systems Lead. Firm WSP RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Location Metro Purple Line Westside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: Supervising Orange, CA Engineer, Train Control. The Purple Line Extension, formerly known as the Westside Subway Education Extension and the Subway to the Sea, is a new heavy rail subway corridor in Los Angeles Bachelors in Electronics and County, extending the Metro Purple Line from its current terminus at Wilshire/Western Communications Engineering station in Los Angeles to the Westside region at Westwood/VA Hospital. The extension of Professional Credentials this line consists of 9 Miles and 7 stations. Currently under construction, the corridor will Professional Engineer: CA become part of the Los Angeles County Metro rail system. (awaiting license number) Design of control lines and its review Calculation of SBD, CBD. Modification in Metro rail design criteria as per the present line and the contract Modification in specification as per the present line and the contract Calculation of run time and different headways Reviewed submittal schedule and works plan as per project requirement. Analysis and review of interconnection drawings as per interface specifications; wiring diagrams as per specifications, assessing power distribution for vital and non-vital functions. Associated with different interfaces required for signaling and train control gears with other system installation, testing and commissioning, Review of Book wiring of LA Purple line extension and installation drawings. Review of Boolean equations and Relay logic. Reviewed RAMS plan and system hazard logs. Review of Fixed block architecture and its interfaces with other systems, Fixed Block design document such as Management Plan, Preliminary Design Review document, and Fixed Block Detailed Design. Exposer of EN50126, EN50128, EN 50129 and AREMA etc Review of different test plan and procedure.

Mumbai Metro Line 1 | India: General Manager. Line 1 of Mumbai Metro Rail consists of 12 stations in span of approx. 12 Kms. It was the first Metro rail project of MMRDA under PPP. Signaling system of Siemens and Telecommunication system by Thales. Responsible for operation and maintenance of complete signaling and telecommunication system of Mumbai Metro Line 1. Responsible for maintaining 16 RSTs and made available for operations. Responsible for handling DLP and monitoring signaling failures both RSTs and wayside. Analysis of reliability and availability of signaling system, if it matches with the project requirement based on the day today failure. Responsible to approve any variation To close all open item of project in line with RAMS requirement of the project.

Resumes

R-60 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Harold Edris | safety verification & validation

Harold Edris has over 40 total years of experience in operations, engineering, project management, systems integration, and safety certification and analysis; and 30 years with 40 the Maryland Transit Administration, including Manager of Systems Engineering. Harold has Years of provided project management oversight consulting services for numerous Federal Transit Experience Administration grantee projects and has supported several light rail and commuter rail projects. Firm Virginkar & Associates, Inc. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Location Light Rail Vehicle (LRV) Mid-Life Overhaul | Maryland Transit Administration Fullerton, CA (MTA), Baltimore, MA: System Safety Specialist that prepared matrices for Safety Education Certification for the overhaul program. For the planned Light Rail Systems (Purple Line), he M.B.A. also prepared design criteria documentation, position papers on fare collection and LRVs, BS, Mechanical Engineering technical specifications for LRVs and fare system for a P3 solicitation, and drafted fare policy for the Purple Line. In addition, Harold provided technical review support for vehicles during the evaluation process and continues to provide technical support for vehicles, fare systems, and operations. DC Transit Oversight Committee (TOC), Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) | Washington, DC: Harold performed the Triennial Safety Review of the signals department and prepared appropriate reports as part of the oversight process. Project Management Oversight (PMOC) | Federal Transit Administration (FTA) | Various Agencies: Senior Consultant that is reviewing technical and project control documents, performs on-site reviews, prepares reports, and attends design and construction meetings to ensure that the grantee has the necessary procedures and controls for successful project completion. Additionally, he provides oversight of systems (i.e. signals, communication, traction power systems, and Operations Control Center) design, systems construction, and systems integration, including systems integrated/ activation/start-up operations testing for several rail projects across the country which are in various stages of implementation. These grantee projects have included: TriMet Light Rail and Commuter Rail Vehicles, Fare Collection, Rail Activation and Start-Up of Wilsonville-Beaverton Commuter Rail and South Corridor Light Rail Extension | Portland, OR: Senior Consultant reviewed maintenance and operations plans, schedules, and budgets related to Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) commuter cars furnished by Colorado Rail Car, Inc. and light rail cars furnished by Siemens Transportation Systems, Inc., and Systems (signals and traction power), activation/start-up, system integration, and safety certification. He provided input for monthly FTA reports and prepared spot reports. He provided technical review of submissions (design reviews). Harold performed similar duties for the Portland-Milwaukie Light Rail Extension Project; he has also provided technical input (vehicles and systems) in evaluating the Portland Street Car extension project for FTA scope, budget, and schedule. Mr. Edris provided review and monitoring of start-up activities and assisted in performing readiness for operation review. Denver Union Station Eagle Commuter Rail P3 and Southeast Light Rail Extension, Regional Transportation District | Denver, CO: Senior Consultant that reviewed safety and security certification processes and monitored systems integration. He provided input for monthly progress reports for both safety and security, as well as systems design and construction progress. Mr. Edris reviewed and provided reporting on safety plans for both the Union Station and Eagle projects. He provided input for monthly FTA reports and prepared spot reports.

Resumes

R-61 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Michael Edwards | systems project controls

With more than 27 years of experience during all phases of a project from planning through construction, and including Metro, Michael has proven success in development 27 1 and implementation of project plans, QC plans and procedures, project controls, schedule Years of Years of Metro turnarounds, and cost controls from preliminary design through operational turnover. Experience Experience Bringing systems experience, his projects have included rail transit, environmental, power, highways, and airports. Michael has performed as well as supervised and coordinated the Firm work of project controls and scheduling staff; qualitative and statistical analysis, process LKG-CMC, Inc. improvement; and QAQC oversight. He has also advised contract managers and lead Location engineers on constructability; wrote construction plans for Systemwide work including Los Angeles, CA interfaces with construction and operations, and development of master schedules, reviewing Education contract documents for constructability; reviewed contractors’ baseline and monthly schedule MS, Urban Studies, updates; wrote schedule basis as well as quantity and cost estimates, development of design Concentration in Community interface matrixes, and wrote schedule specifications and times of completion. Development RELEVANT EXPERIENCE BS, Construction Technology Metro Red Line | Los Angeles County, CA: Senior Scheduler that wrote the schedule basis, revised the Master Project Schedule, Updated and maintained the Revised Master Project Schedule. He also developed the Design Interface Matrix and wrote Schedule Specifications and Times of Completion. BART Extension Program | San Francisco, CA: Systems Implementation Planner that wrote the construction plan for all systemwide contracts including interfaces with civil construction and operations, and developed the master schedules; wrote the times of completion and schedule specifications for all systemwide contracts (trackwork, sonet, station communications & SCADA, traction power, automatic train control); reviewed the Contractors’ baseline and monthly schedule updates; and interacted with BART and GEC design, construction, and operations staff, advised management on concerns and alternatives, and supervised scheduling staff. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) Capital Program | Atlanta, GA: Senior Scheduler that administered the Track Allocation Schedule Program (scheduling and coordination of contractors along activated and revenue areas of the MARTA system; developed detailed system installation and start-up schedules; reviewed Contractors’ baseline and monthly schedule updates; prepared program-wide weekly look-ahead schedules starting from the availability of wayside to trackwork through the revenue service date; prepared and updated graphical presentations; analyzed delay impacts, and recommended work-around alternatives; updated the master project schedule that included design, construction, and start-up phases; improved scheduling procedures and specifications; implemented the use of resource allocation in development of schedules for construction contracts; developed productivity rates from as-built schedules; trained new staff in the planning and scheduling of transit projects; developed master plans and schedules for future rail development such as the North Springs Line and the Proctor Creek Branch. Boston Central Artery/Tunnel, Boston, MA: Lead Planner that Edwards Worked on systems contracts (including power, lighting, traffic controls and the world’s largest highway tunnel ventilation system; electronic traffic management and incident response system); coordination of construction with Boston’s daily traffic operations and staged openings of completed sections of the project; and developed alternatives for turn-over of tunnel sections and ramps lacking completed walls and roofs due to the need to keep the existing elevated highway in operation until after substantial completion of the project (the elevated highway remaining in service, while the new highway is being built directly underneath). He also advised contract managers and lead engineers on construct-ability and schedule issues as well as operational/community impacts. Resumes

R-62 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Don Emerson | alternative delivery strategy

Don is an expert on federal funding programs and requirements for transit. He has served as a strategic advisor to numerous transit agencies, state departments of transportation and 48 30 others across the United States and Canada. Focusing on the FTA’s Capital Investment Grant Years of Years of Metro program (New Starts, Small Starts, Core Capacity), Don has helped many clients across Experience Experience the U.S. secure approvals and grants for their projects. His service area has an outstanding record helping clients to secure other competitive grants including TIGER, FASTLANES, Bus Firm and Bus Facilities and Transit Oriented Development Planning. WSP Location Don also has extensive experience in transit, highway and multimodal transportation San Francisco, CA planning and project development. His specialties include the development of transportation Education planning policies, corridor planning, the evaluation of alternatives and the preparation of Master of Urban Affairs; BS, implementation strategies. Civil Engineering

Prior to joining WSP, Don managed the FTA office responsible for New Starts and NEPA and spent a dozen years with the Federal Highway Administration in various planning and environmental positions.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Purple Line Westside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: Advisor to Metro on strategies to advance $5 billion Metrorail extension through the FTA New Starts and NEPA process. Helped Metro to secure FTA approval of the project into Preliminary Engineering, a Recommended for full-funding grant agreement (FFGA) rating and a FFGA for Sections 1 and 2. Managed the preparation of the Cost and Funding and the Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives chapters for the Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report. California High Speed Rail | Sacramento, CA: Manager for ridership and revenue forecasting, overseeing the travel demand modeling subcontractor and interpreting the technical results to support business planning, station planning and project design. Drafted policies, for station access and connectivity and use of business plan model and station planning tool. SANDAG Mid Coast Corridor Transit | San Diego, CA: Advisor to SANDAG on strategies to advance this $2 billion LRT extension through the FTA New Starts and NEPA process. Developed strategy for collaborating with FTA. Managed preparation of the application leading to Preliminary Engineering approval by FTA in September 2011. Contributed to preparation of and the Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Report, focusing on travel markets to be served, transit system performance deficiencies and optional operating strategies. Prepared the purpose and need, alternatives considered and evaluation chapters for the Draft Supplemental EIS. Developed work scope for advancing the project into Engineering under MAP-21 and New Starts submittal for FY17 funding. BART Transbay Core Capacity Project | Oakland, CA: Helped BART identify a package of investments that would be eligible and competitive for funding as a Core Capacity project. Package includes additional vehicles, additional storage capacity, additional traction power and a communications based train control system. Prepared successful application for FTA approval into Project Development. Managing work order through which WSP is providing guidance and support to BART during the project development phase. Work order includes assistance with project scope, environmental documentation, cost estimate, financial plan, project management plans and risk assessment.

Resumes

R-63 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

David Bradly Fewell | CADD

David Bradley Fewell has 24 years of experience in CAD work and is an expert drafter and designer capable of providing drawings in a number of CAD packages with extensive 24 experience in both Bentley and AutoDesk formats working within the railroad and transit Years of signaling industry. His experience includes drafting and managing drafting staff for the Experience design of freight, commuter, and light rail signal systems. He is skilled in configuration management of CAD drawings including version control and archiving. David has experience Firm in multiple CAD standards, and competent in the development of CAD standards for Innovative Solutions in Signaling customers and is able to integrate CAD drawing files with files from other formats. David’s Location area of expertise includes: Bentley/AutoDesk System Expert and ProjectWise process; Louisville, KY project/construction management; material acquisition; crossing design; integration of signal Education systems; route and aspect charts; standards and practices; ISO 9001/Six Sigma; factory test A.S., Architectural Design support; track and line drawings; and ProjectWise process Drafting RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Trinity Railway Express Double-Tracking | Dallas, TX: CAD Support that revised existing drawings and developed new drawings for various double-tracking projects. He assured accuracy of details on CAD drawings and developed blocks for new products deployed on the project. David provided configuration management of drawings through the design, as-wired and as-built phases of the project. He maintained drawings via a strict backup regime during the project and archived drawings upon completion of the project. Union Pacific Railroad Crossing Design | CA: CAD Support that reviewed customer typical to assure that the proper drawings were used as a basis of the project. David maintained version control of drawings and to assure that customer originals are safely archived during the design process. He used customer provided spreadsheets to properly size battery banks to account for electronics and lighting loads at the crossing. David also managed distribution of plans following the approval of final design; return construction drawings to the customer for archival. Additionally, David provided verification of material listings for short line crossing design by checking material listings against material shown in CAD drawings. He verified manufacturer part numbers and verified that materials were correct for the application. Metro Tucker Interlocking | St. Louis, MO: CAD Support that verified requirements against the standards and assured that ISiS CAD system met the requirements of the customer’s CAD standard.

Resumes

R-64 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Rouduner Fishburn, PE | electrical

Rouduner Fishburn has over 40 years of systems engineering project experience in the transportation and power generation industries. He has been involved with project 40 5 management, quality assurance/ quality control, and design support on various light rail, Years of Years of Metro heavy rail, commuter rail, and bus transit systems. In addition, Rouduner has extensive Experience Experience experience in SCADA, public address (PA), closed circuit television (CCTV), and variable message signage (VMS). Firm Virginkar & Associates, Inc. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Location Metro, System-Wide Engineering and Analysis Project | Los Angeles County, Fullerton, CA CA: Project Engineer that prepared the electrical design for the power distribution system to Education illuminate artwork in the Metro Red Line’s Wilshire/Normandie Station. He met with the Metro M.B.A., Engineering art staff and Metro engineers to establish and set placement of the light boxes displaying the M.Sc, Systems Engineering art, located the power source, and described and specified the electrical equipment, conduit, BS, Engineering fittings, and parts required to connect the light boxes. Professional Credentials Metro Long Beach Metro Blue Line Station Enhancement Design-Build | Los Professional Engineer Angeles, CA: Lead Systems Designer that provided design support and specified (Electrical): CA #E11662 modifications to the Blue Line CCTV, public address, variable message sign and patron’s telephone systems. He was responsible for creating and overseeing production of design drawings, equipment specifications, and bills of material. The overall goal of the station enhancement project was to enhance the systems equipment at 19 Blue Line stations. Rouduner also prepared test plans and procedures, led the acceptance and systems integration test teams, and submitted the final test report. Metro Blue Line Four-Quad Gate | Los Angeles, CA: Senior Consultant that provided preliminary engineering, performed field surveys, provided systems test support, and produced technical specifications for the grade crossing warning equipment casings for conduit, cable and signaling equipment. Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority Light Rail Vehicle (LRV) Midlife Rebuild | New York, NY: Senior Consultant that wrote and assembled the system assurance section of the specification, which defined the requirements for the quality program plan, quality manual, system safety program plan, reliability program plan, the maintainability program plan, and other submittals. Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Configuration Management and Technical Support Study | Orange, CA: Senior Consultant developed a business framework for the Transit Technical Services (TTS) Department of OCTA. During this study, he interviewed staff, reviewed documentation, presented results, and made recommendations to improve procedures used by TTS. These evaluations included fleet management and planning, fleet performance analysis, equipment procurement, new technology evaluation and implementation, air quality and alternative fuels analysis, QA/QC procedures as well as the control and distribution of regulatory documents. In addition, he documented work processes for revenue and non-revenue vehicle procurement, contract management, warranty technical support, bus fleet management, and budget & personnel management. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (GCRTA), Breda LRV Overhaul | Cleveland, OH: Senior Consultant that prepared quality inspection guidelines for GCRTA’s personnel performing inspections on LRVs that were undergoing rehabilitation. The guidelines captured VAI’s accumulated rail vehicle inspection experience including component source and First Article Inspections (FAIs) and vehicle baseline, teardown and overhaul inspections. The guidelines also included inspection of car bodies, trucks, propulsion systems, friction braking, and HVAC systems, as well as Static and Dynamic Testing.

Resumes

R-65 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Andrew (Andy) Frohn, CQM, CQA | vehicle interface

Andrew has more than 35 years of experience managing and reviewing projects for rail transit equipment, operations, and facilities, as well as quality programs and system 36 10 integration for major railroad agencies. Prior to joining WSP, Andrew worked for LIRR for Years of Years of Metro more than 20 years, where he managed the implementation of a Life-Cycle Planning Program Experience Experience (Overhaul) for all fleets, was the project manager for overhaul programs for the LIRR M-3 and M-1 electric multi-unit (EMU) cars, and was instrumental in the implementation of a Firm reliability-centered maintenance program. He was a key member of the M-7 EMU vehicle WSP fleet procurement project team from specification development and design to testing and Location commissioning, as director of quality assurance. Andrew has extensive experience working Los Angeles, CA as a project quality manager with various California rail agencies, including Metro, San Education Joaquin Regional Rail Commission, California High-Speed Rail Authority, Riverside MBA, Quality Management; BS, County Transportation Commission, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Industrial Engineering Central Subway, Bay Area Rapid Transit, and Southern California Regional Rail Authority Professional Credentials (SCRRA/ Metrolink), to name a few. Certified Quality Manager: RELEVANT EXPERIENCE American Society for Quality (#CQM-11638); Certified Quality Metro Consulting Services for HRV Acquisition | Los Angeles, CA: Project manager Auditor: American Society for responsible for the development of a performance based technical specification as well as Quality (#CQA-39071) industry review and procurement support during the acquisition of 64 new heavy rail vehicles for Metro’s Red Line and Purple Line extension. Andrew is working with Metro staff and other stakeholders, including vehicle contractors, to develop a needs summary, then develop the summary into a high-level scope of work that will define the desired functionality of the new vehicles. Recommendations and suggestions from vehicle contractors include manufacturing capabilities; potential technical challenges, schedule impacts, and alternative approaches; and recent innovations in heavy rail design. MBTA Orange and Red Lines Vehicle Procurement | MA: Quality manager providing project management and technical services in the specification development and procurement phases of the MBTA’s acquisition of 152 cars for the Orange Line and 74 for the Red Line, as part of the client’s fleet replacement effort. Andrew assisted in developing specification sections for quality requirements, as well as documentation and manuals. For those materials, he prepared specific formatting guidelines and mandates. Andrew has supported the procurement phase by reviewing contractor’s quality plans, participating in supplier audits and managing the quality program for the MBTA. HART Honolulu Rail Transit | Honolulu, HI: Design quality assurance manager overseeing a full range of quality control and quality assurance tasks for the $5.2 billion Honolulu rail transit project for HART. The project includes procurement of all rolling stock, systems, facilities, and infrastructure. Andrew is monitoring the various contractor’s design and construction activities, reviewing quality plans, and assisting in the continued development of internal project procedures and work instructions to support the project quality program. For both the design-build and design-bid-build contracts, he is planning and performing audits of final designers, design-builders, contractors, and subconsultants to verify compliance with the quality management system. LIRR M-3 Overhaul Support | Long Island, NY: Project manager for the vehicle engineering and documentation specialists during this project to develop overhaul and back shop procedures for new systems and components installed under the M-3 car overhaul program. The overhaul of LIRR’s 172-car M-3 EMU fleet was to replace certain critical components and subsystems with new ones of much higher reliability and subsequently lower maintenance costs. Andrew also oversaw the preparation of modified wiring schematic roadmaps for systems including inverter, 230-VAC blower motors, HVAC panels, A Car B-end ducting, door operators, radio/ PA, vacuum toilets, and automatic train control’s micro-cab system. Resumes

R-66 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Matiwos Gebre | train control

Matiwos Gebre has 6 years of experience in systems control, digital communication, and signal processing. His experience includes C/C++ and MATLAB programming utilizing 6 2 Unix/Linux systems. Matiwos has more than two years of experience on PTC system Years of Years of Metro integration, testing, and troubleshooting. He assumed responsibility for programming Experience Experience an onboard PTC system that is vital in facilitating communication between the onboard PTC system and the office PTC system. His lab and field PTC testing support includes Firm the following; writing and modifying PTC functional integration and formal qualification Parsons (FIT/FQT) test procedure contract data requirements lists (CDRL); performing PTC FIT/FQT Location tests in Parsons’ PTC lab; analyzing and finding solutions to field FIT/FQT testing problems Chicago, IL by utilizing PTC simulators and logs; and monitoring PTC initialization and departure Education processes as well as PTC predictive, reactive, and emergency enforcements. MS, Electrical Engineering; BS, Electronic Engineering RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension 2A | Los Angeles County, CA: The project included final design and construction of 11.5 miles of track, utilities, crossings, and systems; six passenger stations; 12 new light rail and three new freight railroad bridges; and a 25-acre light rail maintenance facility that will include a storage yard and a full maintenance and repair shop. Matiwos investigated and analyzed double line or control line design problems and provided routing chart design support for the LRT maintenance and operation facility. He also participated in the quality assurance/quality control processes, such as checking, back checking, and verifying. Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Metrolink Positive Train Control System | Los Angeles, CA: This project includes designing, furnishing, and installing PTC technology on Metrolink’s 512-mile regional commuter rail system. As the prime contractor leading a vendor/integrator team, Parsons manages the overall program and provides design, testing, integration, and commissioning services. Matiwos supports Parsons’ Metrolink PTC project team at Rancho Cucamonga in all areas of the project, from testing PTC functionality to configuration management. His experience includes Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) server usage, Linux Bash Programming, PTC onboard system functionality, deploying interoperable train control messaging (ITCM) to onboard systems, programming, and modifying topologies or model files. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Amtrak PTC System Integrator Interoperable Electronic Train Management System | Philadelphia, PA: Parsons was awarded a design, furnish, and test contract to provide PTC system for the Northeast Corridor (NEC) from Newark, New Jersey, to Washington, D.C., including the Harrisburg Line. Matiwos used C# and Visual Basic to assist in testing and debugging the system integration software that helps monitor the I-ETMS project work. He discovered different kinds of bugs that crash the SI application software, analyzed and investigated interfaces that link different systems and subsystems, and provided a complete user manual of the SI application software. This project has provided him an in-depth knowledge of PTC. He was responsible for managing PTC operation and maintenance documentation and provided training presentation for the project. He also provided quality assurance/quality control for PTC documents.

Resumes

R-67 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Rameshwar Godara, PE | traction power

Before joining WSP, Rameshwar was associated with Hyderabad (India) Metro Rail Project known to be the world’s largest PPP project. Rameshwar is a Professional Engineer (USA), 22 Chartered Engineer (Engineering council, UK) and Member of Institution of Engineering Years of and Technology. He has been a member of prestigious Indian Railway Service of Electric Experience Engineers of Government of India and headed a lot of important positions in technical management of construction projects, maintenance organizations. Rameshwar has almost Firm 25 years of experience dedicated to Rail/ Metro Transport system with specific professional WSP experience in project planning, detailed design, project facilitation, execution, dealing with Location government regulators like Electrical Inspectors, Commissioner of Railway Safety, RDSO Orange, CA etc., Interface management and commissioning of the projects for Electric traction system Education for distribution of Traction power for 25 kVac and 750/1500Vdc, OCS, Third Rail, SCADA. MBA, Finance; Bachelor of He also rich experience in Power Distribution System, Building Services, E&M, Energy Engineering, Electrical Management, Energy audits & Efficiency, Building Management System / SCADA system, Professional Credentials Electric Traction power distribution and design & construction of OCS, Third rail and its Professional Engineer: CA (#E- power distribution at different voltages 22242) RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Hyderabad Metro Rail Project | India: Headed Power supply, SCADA and Traction team of Hyderabad Metro Rail from GC side. Responsible for design review and construction supervision of Power Supply, SCADA & Traction module of 71.6 Route Kilometres of elevated Hyderabad Metro Rail Project. The responsibility included review of basic design of OETS, Power Supply, SCADA including simulation studies for power, EMI/EMC, Earthing and bonding, obtaining clearances form statutory bodies of the Government like Research Design and Standards Organization, Electrical Inspector & Commissioner of Metro Rail Safety. Rameshwar played lead role in forming the GC’s team and then in a span of 3 years two 132/33/25 kV receiving substations, 22 nos. 33/.415 kV Auxiliary sub stations, 80 TKMs of OETS and their SCADA was put into operation and other 2 Receiving substations and 10 Auxiliary Sub stations were made ready for commissioning. Maintenance and Operation of Electric Locomotives, Electrical Multiple Units, Secunderabad Division of Indian Railways | India: Worked with Indian Railways at Secunderabad, heading the Electrical loco operations of Secunderabad Division, which is one of the largest Divisions of Indian Railways with originating loading of 70 MTs a year, 300 passenger carrying trains daily, with an average daily Freight loco holding of 150 nos.Two minor workshops for loco maintenance were being managed. The responsibility included leading a team of 2 senior managers and 40 managers directly reporting to Rameshwar for management of app. 3000 odd crew, their trainings, refreshers, medical examinations, their rest periods, working hours, promotions etc. Rameshwar was also responsible for standardizing specifications, procurement, tender evaluations, contract management for various service and other contracts, and trouble shooting and minor maintenance of Traction Locos. Maintenance and Construction of Traction Distribution Assets, Secunderabad Division of Indian Railways | India: Head of Traction distribution for of one of the largest divisions of Indian Railways having approximately 2500 Kilometres of Electrified Track with 17 Traction substations, 55 switching stations and two SCADA systems. The main job included maintenance of these assets and liaisoning with DISCOMs for different items whose power bills were of app. Rs.20 Crores a month. One of the SCADA systems having 58 controlled stations was installed from estimation to tendering to final commissioning. Responsibility included leading a team of 100 engineers and 600 staff, carrying out many construction activities related to system improvements especially for introduction of Engine on load at 9 sidings by suitably designing and modifying the OHE at these sidings; the design of which was latter accepted as standard for Railways. Resumes

R-68 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Jalal Gohari, PE | EMI

Jalal is a senior supervising engineer with extensive experience in power system design and protection. He has planned and supervised electrical engineering and design of domestic 48 1 and international power and energy projects in transmission, distribution, generation, and Years of Years of Metro transportation. Experience Experience

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Firm Metro Expo Phase 2 (DB) | Los Angeles County, CA: Ground grid calculation and WSP design for the seven traction power substations. Ampacity calculations for the ductbanks and Location cables. Newark, NJ California High Speed Rail | CA: WSP is providing a broad array of program management Education services of the 800-mile-long high-speed rail project with trains projected to run at 220 mph BS, Electrical Engineering between San Francisco and Los Angeles (Anaheim) with extensions towards Sacramento and Professional Credentials San Diego. This is a 2x25 kV autotransformer feed type of traction (TP) supply system. Jalal Professional Engineer: CA (#E- has been responsible for preparation of full-Line power diagrams for each of the substations, 13798), NY, MA, MN, NJ, CT, paralleling stations, and switching stations that will bring power to the network’s overhead PA, RI, LA catenary system. He is also providing calculations of overhead catenary conductor Ampacity, ratings for the OCS, as well as reviewing and commenting on TP and OCS-related design modifications. North Metro Rail Line | Denver, CO: Prepare Arc Flash, Ground Grid design, relay coordination, and other misc. studies for the project. Waterloo Rapid Transit | Canada: Prepared electromagnetic studies for the project at the request of Hydro One utility company, and review of Electromagnetic Interference Plan prepared by other consultants. Maryland Transit Authority | MD: On call systems engineering projects, testing, commissioning, and oversight of the contractor in rehabilitation of several traction power substations. Metrolinx | Toronto Canada: Electromagnetic measurements, and Ground grid calculation and design of passenger stations, review of one line and full line diagrams. Greater Cleveland Rail Transit Administration | OH: Investigated the fire incident at Brook Park TPSS that was the result of intense lightning activity. Cause of incident was the failure of the surge arrestors to operate properly, because of poor ground mat termination. Arc was initiated in the switchgear compartment that was fueled by the catenary supply, since the protective relays could not clear the fault remotely. NYCT, 207th and 148th Street Yards | NY: Remediation of the positive and negative cable damage from storm. Long Island Railroad East Side Access Program | NY: Interdisciplinary coordination of electrical, structural, signals, and communications, including grounding & bonding, ground grid design, ductbank design and ac and dc power system Ampacity calculations for the Amtrak power supply through a micro-tunnel. Hudson-Bergen Light Rail Transit | NJ: Responsible for electrical utility interface and design coordination, including the effect of utility outages on reliability of service.

Resumes

R-69 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Jack Gonsalves | BRT

Jack brings 35 years of diverse engineering experience ranging from public works improvements design to heavy civil construction management. Jack specializes in the 35 design of multimodal transit facilities, including BRT, LRT, transit stations, and associated Years of infrastructure. In addition to transit design and project management work nationwide, Jack’s Experience work has included serving as project manager for the first BRT line in Oregon, Lane Transit District’s award-winning Franklin Emerald Express BRT. He currently serves as senior advisor Firm and project manager on transit development projects across the United States. WSP Location Nationally recognized as an expert in BRT technology, Jack brings enthusiasm for BRT’s Portland, OR potential and extensive knowledge in its application to crowded urban environments. He Education has traveled to Europe and Latin America with FTA staff to view BRT transportation systems BS, Civil Engineering and learn how to evaluate and implement this emerging technology in the United States. Professional Credentials As part of APTA’s BRT Standards Working Group, Jack co-authored BRT design standards. Professional Engineer: OR, AZ, Additionally, Jack brings relationships with bus transit leaders nationwide and insight into WA BRT research and policy through his involvement on the TRB Committee on Bus Transit Systems.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE TriMet Ruby Junction Maintenance Facility Expansion | Gresham, OR: Project manager for the final design and design services during construction of TriMet’s planned light rail operations and maintenance facility expansion at Ruby Junction. This expansion supports the Portland to Milwaukee light rail line and provides additional train storage, maintenance bays and operational equipment. The overall project was delivered on time and $14,000 under budget. TriMet South/North Transit Corridor Study | Portland, OR: For the engineering and alignment definition study prepared for TriMet, Jack developed and analyzed LRT bridge design options across the Columbia River. This task included developing vertical profiles not to exceed a 5-percent grade and writing a design report for alternative vertical alignments and fixed bridge types for the future LRT line. The horizontal alignment was established adjacent to and downstream of the existing interstate bridges. Jack developed costs that indexed incremental cost of the structure against height of vertical clearance above water. TriMet Westside MAX | Portland, OR: lead civil engineer responsible for the design of surface improvements for the station, ventilation structures and portal areas for a 3-mile section of this 12-mile, $750 million facility. This section includes twin 20-foot-diameter tunnel bores as deep as 280 feet through the Portland West Hills and passes through a $15 million transit station serving Washington Park Zoo, the deepest transit station in North America. Jack supervised engineers and technicians for the design of all civil elements, including utility relocations, detour design, demolition plans, grading, drainage and erosion control, arterial design, and park-and-ride facilities. Community impact was a special concern. Jack participated in coordination meetings with numerous jurisdictional agencies and neighborhood groups. Earlier, Jack prepared plans and specifications for utility relocations on Line Section 5A, including relocation of utilities of the east portal. Fresno Area Express Blackstone/Kings Canyon BRT | Fresno, CA: Project manager for program management for a 15-mile, $48 million BRT project. WSP’s responsibilities include managing the project schedule and budget, refining conceptual designs, overseeing the project design and engineering, conducting value engineering, developing the BRT system brand, managing community outreach, and coordinating with FTA to develop a Small Starts Grant Agreement.

Resumes

R-70 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Tim Groom | CADD

Tim Groom has over 30 years of experience in preparing conceptual, preliminary and final design-build construction documents for transit and transportation projects. 30 6 Years of Years of Metro RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Experience Experience Metro Red Line | Los Angeles County, CA: CAD Designer that prepared CAD files for the Contractor’s as-built drawings using Civil3D and REVIT-3D. Overall, D’Leon Firm Consulting Engineers Corporation (DLCE) provided support services for the all underground D’Leon Consulting Engineers alignments (tunnel and underground stations) along Flower Street and Hope Street all the Corporation way to Alameda Boulevard (Little Tokyo). Prepared and identified all major utilities including: Location gas, water, power, storm drain, sanitary sewer and communication lines to accommodate Los Angeles, CA relocation. Education Metro Expo Phase 1 | Los Angeles County, CA: CAD Design Lead for preparing A.A., Natural Science electronic files for structures platforms; overcrossings; utilities; traction power; fiber optic Engineering and GIS Training, train control and civil portion; parking lots; and grading and drainage once the first phase Various College Courses was completed. Overall, DLCE was responsible for redesigning major utility lines and coordinating with the design-build contractor on utility identification pot-holing. DLCE took a leading role in producing a majority of engineering plans through 100 percent design levels. DLCE was also responsible for street improvements designs and plans, roadway reconstruction at the rail crossing at: Vermont Avenue, Western Avenue, Crenshaw Boulevard, and Fairfax Avenue. Our staff prepared construction drawings with the latest civil engineering software. SR-125 Freeway Extension Design-Build | Los Angeles, CA: CAD Design lead that prepared CAD documents In Micro station for the.2-mile, privately-developed southern extension of SR 125, extending from San Miguel Road in Bonita, CA near the Sweetwater Reservoir to SR 905 in Otay Mesa, near the International Borde. DLCE was involved in the preparation of the environmental planning study and provided design support to the design- build concessionaire. This included highway and local streets and roads geometric design, grading, estimating and utility identification/relocation. Also played a major role in the preparation of final plan, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for existing local roads. Southern California Regional Rail Authority (Metrolink), Los Angeles, CA: Using Microstation, Tim was responsible for all in-house CAD work. He was responsible for creation of standards drawings such as Concrete Rail Bridges & Details and Communications Standards. Extensive GIS Mapping using ArcView GIS software from ESRI in Redlands. Received special performance award from Safety Department in June 2000 for school safety GIS map data.

Resumes

R-71 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Joshua Groom | CADD

Josh is a CADD Technician at Intueor Consulting, a technology and strategy consulting firm dedicated to serving the urban transit/transportation industry. He has over 12 years (over 12 8 15+ projects) of hands-on drafting experience, and is very well conversant in engineering Years of Years of Metro disciplines including Civil/Structural/Electrical/Mechanical. He also has many years of Experience Experience experience plotting and organizing construction drawings, as well as archiving materials for Document Control services. Firm Intueor Consulting, Inc. Josh’s drafting/designing experience includes transit and highway projects for Federal, State Location and Local entities in the public sector and various industry segments in the private sector. Los Angeles, CA He has assisted with a wide range of projects in varying dollar values from a few thousand Education dollars in private projects to the billion+ budget projection of the Regional Connector. His CADD Apprenticeship and experience encompasses a breadth of assignments including feasibility studies, bid options, Certification infrastructure planning, design-build organization, and assisting in quality control of archive documents.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Regional Connector | Los Angeles County, CA: Josh is currently assisting with CADD, including preparation and organization of station exhibit drawings, track exhibits, utilities, and manhole locations for meetings with city discipline leads and the design-build contractor. Metro Expo Phase 2 (DB) | Los Angeles County, CA: Josh assisted with CADD / document control / archiving drawings at the field office in downtown Los Angeles and on site in the Santa Monica area. Metro Gold Line Eastside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: Josh assisted with CADD / document control / archiving drawings at the field office in downtown LA and on site in East LA. BART | San Francisco, CA: Josh assisted with transit related CADD / document control / archiving drawings for the URS / Washington Group project team. Caltrans/South Bay Expressway (SR-125 South Toll Road) | San Diego, CA: Josh assisted with highway CADD / document control / archiving drawings for the URS / Washington Group project team. Suncor Energy Inc Fort Hills Oil Sands Project | Alberta, Canada: Josh assisted with CADD / document control / archiving drawings, as well as organization of bid documents for URS in Irvine. Various Document Control-related duties, URS | San Bernardino, CA: Josh assisted with document control tasks including preparation of indexes and archiving materials, cataloging drawings and storage. Various drafting duties for other local transit and infrastructure projects, mostly with LA Metro in the Southern California Area.

Resumes

R-72 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Behnam Hakimi | systems project controls | scheduling

Behnam is a senior project control specialist with WSP’s Project Controls Technical Resource Center. He is currently participating in the Regional Connector Project as a senior 32 2 scheduler and previously served on the California High-Speed Rail Project, Louisiana TIMED Years of Years of Metro Managers Program Controls Group, BART Silicon Valley Extension, Orange County Great Experience Experience Park Development Projects, California’s CenterLine Project, and the Tren Urbano Project in Puerto Rico. Behnam gained extensive experience in project controls with emphasis on cost Firm and schedule. He is also familiar with several software packages, including Primavera’s P6 WSP and Expedition, Microsoft Office Project, Visio, Visual Basic, Access, Excel, PowerPoint and Location Word, as well as programming languages, including BASIC, Fortran, Cobol, Pascal and C. Sacramento, CA He also holds a facility manager account on ProjectSolve2. Education MBA Candidate, Information RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Systems; BA, Translation Metro Regional Connector | Los Angeles County, CA: Provided design scheduling support for Metro’s 2-mile tunnel project to connect several train lines during the PE and EIR/EIS phase using Primavera P6 for scheduling and Excel software for variance and trend analysis reports, as well as Slope/Linear Diagram. California High-Speed Rail Project | Sacramento, CA: Provided scheduling support for program management team and ten project sections during the PE EIR/EIS phase using Primavera P6 for scheduling and fiscal year cost/schedule analysis, Org Plus for EPS & WBS development, and Excel software for variance and trend analysis reports. BART Extension to Silicon Valley | San Jose, CA: Provided scheduling support for the development of the systems installation and testing schedule Louisiana Transportation Infrastructure Model for Economic Development Program Management | Baton Rouge, LA: Provided scheduling support for 125 project segments using Primavera Project Management 5.0 and P3 software for scheduling and Excel software for variance and trend analysis reports. CenterLine Project Preliminary Engineering Services | Orange County, CA: Provided scheduling and cost controls as well as maintaining extensive action items and deliverables lists. Israel Railways Limited Financial Management Oversight | Israel: Provided cost, schedule and document control and implemented earned value system for performance measurement analysis, using Primavera’s P3 software. Tren Urbano Project | Puerto Rico: Senior project scheduler responsible for providing schedule and cost analysis to the project team. Behnam collected schedules from team members from various locations, including Paris, Sacramento, Boston, Portland, New Jersey, Atlanta and San Juan, for analysis and integration into the master schedule containing over 5,000 activities with six levels for the work breakdown structure (WBS) on a monthly basis. He then produced cost and schedule reports and variance analysis for submittal to the management team for decision making and progress payments reporting purposes. Amtrak North End Electrification Project | MA: Project controls engineer responsible for developing and maintaining a drawing control system for over 10,000 drawings with more than ten levels for WBS. Behnam also prepared the design schedule and provided data processing support to make the civil engineering data available to the systems’ computer programs.

Resumes

R-73 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Sylvia Hall, PE | corrosion control

Sylvia Hall, PE has 43 years of experience in corrosion evaluation and corrosion control of a variety of concrete pressure pipe including prestressed concrete cylinder pipe, bar-wrapped 43 concrete cylinder pipe, reinforced concrete cylinder pipe, and mortar-lined and -coated steel Years of pipe, , as well as evaluation of other reinforced concrete structures. She is highly experienced Experience in the various forms of corrosion control such as coatings, cathodic protection, corrosion inhibitors, material selection, and concrete and mortar mix design provides the necessary Firm requirements to solve your corrosion issues. Universal Corrosion Services, LLC RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Location Illinois State Toll Highway Authority Pipelines Corrosion Control | Chicago, IL: Rancho Cucamonga, CA Reviewed cathodic protection plans and specifications for new prestressed concrete cylinder Education pipelines and provided recommendations. M.B.A. South Tahoe Public Utility District (STPUD) | South Lake Tahoe, CA: Principal/ MS, Chemistry Senior Corrosion Engineer that planned, reviewed data, and prepared report for external Professional Credentials corrosion direct assessment of ductile iron, asbestos cement, and mortar-coated Professional Engineer steel pipelines. (Corrosion Engineer): Massachusetts Port Authority (MassPort) Conley Terminal Bridge Corrosion CA #CR1021 Control| East Boston, MA: Senior Corrosion Engineer/Project Manager that designed NACE International, Cathodic a corrosion control system for steel/reinforced concrete marine pilings on Conley Protection Specialist (CP4) No. Terminal Bridge. 5982 URBACA/ConAgua, Pipelines Corrosion Control | Mexico: Senior Engineer/Project Manager that reviewed cathodic protection plans for new 47-mile- long, 99-inch diameter polyurethane-coated steel pipeline. Tarrant Regional Water District, Steel Pipe Corrosion Control | Fort Worth, TX: Senior Corrosion Engineer/Project Manager that reviewed cathodic protection, polyurethane coating, and insulating joint plans and specification for 400 miles 108-inch diameter steel and PCCP pipeline (IPL). Orange County Water District | Orange, CA: Senior Corrosion Engineer/Project Manager that evaluated the mortar lining condition in the steel pipeline exposed to tertiary- treated wastewater. Ameron International/National Oilwell Varco| South Gate, CA: Research Development Director that was responsible for the following: Evaluated cathodic protection systems for prestressed concrete cylinder pipelines and steel pipelines. Conducted numerous condition assessment of concrete pressure pipe. Designed, developed, and implemented product development, testing, and evaluation projects for concrete, steel, and fiberglass pipe and poles and protective coatings and linings. Designed and conducted numerous corrosion-related projects, such as: Cathodic protection criteria for prestressing wire and steel in concrete; stray current effect on steel in concrete; cathodic disbondment of coatings on steel; and corrosion monitoring of concrete pressure pipelines

Resumes

R-74 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

William Heacox | communications

William Heacox is a senior systems inspector with over 26 years of experience in communications, including networks, routers, switches, patch panels and cabling. He has 26 worked on signals; positive train control; communications; SCADA, signals intelligence Years of (SIGINT); telecommunications; telemetry; terrestrial microwave; video wave propagation Experience devices; local area networks (LAN) and wide area networks (WAN); alternating/direct currents (AC/DC) motor drives and controllers; process controllers; programmable logic controllers Firm (PLC), time division multiple access (TDMA), code division multiple access (CDMA), Virginkar & Associates, Inc integrated circuits and test equipment; and RF communication, breakers and relays. He Location brings over 12 years of experience in various forms of traction power, working on Metro’s Seattle, WA systems that were powered through an overhead wire system. William has expertise in electronics, mechanical, hydraulic, and pneumatic systems and troubleshooting complicated Education systems. He is computer literate in MS Office suite, AutoCAD, and various drawing software Electrical/Electronic Engineering, packages. Nuclear Engineering, Physics and Thermodynamics, Naval RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Nuclear Power School Amtrak, Point Defiance Bypass Centralized Traffic Control/Positive Train A.S., Electronics Engineering Control | Seattle, WA: QA Inspection Support that is performing inspection services for the electrical systems at various field locations on the Point Defiance Bypass, which will reroute Amtrak passenger trains to an inland rail line through DuPont, Lakewood, and Tacoma. Sound Transit currently uses a portion of this route for their Sounder commuter rail service. Sound Transit, Seattle Sound Transit Positive Train Control | Seattle, WA: Quality Control Inspector and Positive Train Control Field Inspector that provided quality inspection services of Positive Train Control equipment on-board Seattle Sounder commuter cab cars and locomotives, witnessing vehicle inbound and outbound testing, and final validation testing. William also provided inspection of cable and conduit installation in various locations. His duties included inspecting signal house Positive Train Control mounting, wiring, re-wiring, track asset validation and verification, and all related documentation. He has also performed site inspections on Positive Train Control antenna tower foundations and pole installations. Sound Transit, Link Light Rail for General Electric Transportation Services | Seattle, WA: Systems Engineer that participated in the $55 million light rail transit project, completing Sound Transit’s tunnel radio 700/800 MHz within the Metropolitan Area Network. He was responsible for design verification and qualification of an RF hardware subsystem. He managed and monitored installation work, including Formal Test and Inspection of finished product. He assisted employees tasked with yard signaling installation, Positive Train Control systems, design, drawings, fiber, and interconnections network. He inspected and guided installation work, including formal test and inspection of finished product. William also managed radio control and interface devices, servers, local and remote storage devices, fiber cable installation, fire-life-safety systems, SCADA, PLC hardware, sub-system and module interfacing, integrated public address system, including SCUs, amps, security systems, access control system; including card readers, intrusion detectors and cabling, workstations, station installations (passenger boarding station infrastructure), electronic signage, CCTV, network interfacing and devices, VoIP phones, equipment rack integration, and equipment cooling. Sound Transit, Light Rail Vehicle (LRV) Traction Motors and Gear Box Rehabilitation | Seattle, WA: Quality Control Inspector that provided inspection services on Sound Transit’s LRV Traction Motors and Gear Box Rehabilitation Project at Sound Transit’s contractor Cascade Machinery and Electric, Inc. William inspected work for process, quality, and workmanship. He performed test witnessing and records documentation. He also facilitated corrections and improvements, and guided the contractor on governmental contractual procedures. Resumes

R-75 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Hector Hernandez | CADD

Hector is a senior supervising CADD designer and technical specialist with WSP responsible for project and software setup, maintenance of project directories, computer administration, 25 9 lead document production and ensuring compliance to CADD standards. He has extensive Years of Years of Metro experience in AutoCAD, Softdesk, Microstation V7-V8, V8i, ProjectWise SS3 Descartes, Experience Experience Inroads, Civil 3D, I-plot, Autodesk Impression and Revit Architecture. Hector’s project experience includes topographic analyses, highway design, architectural design and Firm structural drawings, raster data and 3D drawings for major investment studies. WSP Location RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Orange, CA Metro Expo Phase 2, Stage A | Los Angeles County, CA: Technical specialist Education supporting a diversity of disciplines for the 6-mile LRT extension. The disciplines include BS, Architecture train control and communications, right-of-way matrix calculation, utility relocation analysis and CAD management support render presentations. Metro Expo Phase 2 (DB) | Los Angeles County, CA: Technical specialist responsible for implementing CAD standards (Metro, LADOT, Los Angeles Bureau of Street Lighting and data sharing with ProjectWise with the project office and subconsultants outside of the project office, responsible of setting up AutoCAD and password file formatting to meet client standards and share with Microstation, technical support of AutoCAD users, structural bridge, architecture platforms, mechanical-electrical-plumbing and OCS, traffic signalizing and street lighting as well of Microstation support to other disciplines and ProjectWise administrator. Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension 2B | Los Angeles County, CA: Providing engineering technical support for the 11-mile LRT extension. Assisting in train control and communications layout drawings, street crossing analysis, architectural 3D model of LRT site station and parking structures, and electronic data transfer. SANDAG Mid Coast Corridor Transit | San Diego, CA: Providing LRT extension services such as engineering utility data collection and CAD, architecture LRT platform design (Revit Architecture) and 3D Platform models for the 12 platforms along the extension. CHSRA California High-Speed Rail Corridor Evaluation | CA: Responsible for the setup of files and data transfers between consultants and for presentations. WSP provided engineering and environmental services in identifying potential high-speed rail routes in the Central Valley, Bay Area. Hector utilized Microstation and raster images with Descartes. OCTA Centerline Light Rail Project | Orange County, CA: Prepared right-of-way cost estimates and studied and provided engineering support in the development of the EIS for a proposed 28-mile light rail system within central Orange County. Honolulu High Capacity Transit Corridor Project | Honolulu, HI: Structural CADD lead for the Orange office in the production of engineering documents for this 34-mile corridor, including a 20-mile elevated fixed-guideway, for the City and County of Honolulu. Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC) | Anaheim, CA: Technical specialist in support of the construction documents for different phases of the project, including data coordinator and engineering design of the Douglass Road street improvements and ARTIC site facilities.

Resumes

R-76 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Caleb Hill | traction power

Caleb Hill is an electrical engineer with experience in power distribution and lighting systems for bus transit facilities and metrorail stations, and designing ground grids for traction power 11 2 substations. Additionally he has experience designing traction power systems for heavy rail. Years of Years of Metro He has experience developing and editing AutoCAD drawings, BIM with Revit 2016, electrical Experience Experience surveying and design for elevator and escalator pits and wellways, metrorail station cooling systems, and drainage pumping stations. His experience also includes preparing electrical Firm cost estimates for these projects. Caleb has also created and managed Microsoft Access Parsons databases for personnel management, payroll tracking, and major event planning. Caleb has Location experience in rehabilitation of electrical systems for bus transit maintenance facilities, design Denver, CO of new electrical power distribution systems for metrorail stations, metro station cooling Education systems, drainage pumping stations, elevators, and escalators, design of ground grids for BS, Electrical Engineering traction power substations, and design of traction power distribution systems for metrorail stations.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Purple Line Westside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: The first phase of this project will lay a 3.9-mile extension from the current terminus to three new stations. As Electrical Engineer, Caleb aids in the design of the traction power system for the Wilshire/Fairfax station, including traction power substation design. Caleb also provides assistance and instruction to new Revit users. He is responsible for creating, editing, and managing Revit BIM models for the traction power team for all stations. Bay Area Rapid Transit District, BART General Engineering Services | San Francisco, CA: Caleb’s responsibilities included performing field surveys of BART facilities to gather data on the existing power system. Caleb also used the collected data to create a model of the BART power system using ETAP software and to perform short circuit, load flow, arc flash, and protective device coordination studies on the BART power system. Parsons is providing on-call general engineering services to BART. Services are structured according to project development, engineering and design services, advanced technologies, procurement services, emergency response, and design support during construction. Seattle Department of Transportation, Center City Connector Streetcar Final Design | Seattle, WA: Caleb’s responsibilities as Electrical Design Engineer included design of lighting and electrical distribution system for a building addition on an existing streetcar maintenance facility. Caleb also modeled electrical components and created electrical sheets in Revit 2016 for submittal to the client as construction documents. Parsons provided the City of Seattle with the 60 percent design for the 1.5-mile-long streetcar line and is preparing to deliver final design. Parsons is the sole prime contractor responsible for program and project management for delivery of the project engineering.

Resumes

R-77 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Robert Hillenbrand | train control

Rob Hillenbrand has nine years of experience in design drafting in architectural, structural, and railroad signal engineering. Rob has worked on wayside plans including control points, 9 interlockings, intermediate signals, electric locks, and handthrow switches. He has accurately Years of and efficiently converted plans to current design software as needed by the scope of a Experience project using programs created by the Rani Engineering team. Rob is also experienced with architectural, civil, and structural drawings for new and remodel residential, transit projects, Firm and commercial development. Rani Engineering, Inc. Location RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Minneapolis, MN Region of Waterloo ION Light Rail Signal Engineering | Ontario, Canada: Project Education Manager who led design services for application engineering of hardware plans in A.A.S., Architectural Drafting and conjunction with the Waterloo light rail transit project. The project included creating and Estimating internally checking detail design plans for multiple interlockings and grade crossing warning systems. Coordinated with engineering project leader to ensure consistent drawings and adherence to project standards. Green Line Extension | Minneapolis, MN: Senior Designer who created existing conditions drawings from information gathered from the field and other groups of the design team. Coordinated with all teams in the project to provide detailed drawings. Followed quality control procedures to ensure accuracy of data incorporated into drawings. Positive Train Control Upgrade of Subdivision (Freight) | Multiple Contracts in Western U.S. State: Senior Designer who designed wayside plans on several subdivisions with a Class I railroad. Projects have included creating plans to upgrade or replace wayside signals equipment such as control points, interlockings, intermediate signals, electric locks, and handthrow switches and removing poleline to effectively interface Positive Train Control with existing signal systems. Converted plans to the current design software as needed by scope of project. Coordinated with grade crossing designers, material procurement group, and programming group. Upgrade of Subdivision (Freight) From APB to Centralized Traffic Control | Multiple Contracts in Western U.S. States: Senior Designer who designed wayside plans for a subdivision that already had Positive Train Control installed. Work included creating plans to upgrade or replace wayside signals equipment such as control points, intermediate signals, electric locks, and handthrow switches to effectively interface Centralized Traffic Control with existing signal and Positive Train Control systems. Converted plans to the current design software as needed by scope of project. Coordinated with grade crossing designers, material procurement group, and programming group. Positive Train Control Upgrade of Subdivision, Commuter and Freight | Multiple Contracts in Western U.S. States: Senior Designer who created plans to replace wayside signals equipment and grade crossings, updated profiles and construction overviews, new aspect charts, and creating Positive Train Control mapping files to effectively interface Positive Train Control with existing signal systems. Designed high speed turnouts and crossovers with split-box logic controllers for ICS (Independently Controlled Switch) to accommodate frequent commuter and freight traffic.

Resumes

R-78 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Pavan Hotha, EIT | scheduling

Pavan is working as an Engineer/Consultant for Program/Project Management and Controls Practice at Intueor. He is currently playing the role of a Project Analyst in providing Project 5 1 Management services for an Agency wide Program Controls System implementation (for Years of Years of Metro Capital Projects). Experience Experience

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Firm Capital Program Control System (CPCS), San Francisco Municipal Transportation Intueor Consulting, Inc. Agency (SFMTA) | San Francisco, CA: Pavan is presently working on CPCS Location implementation project for one of the nation’s leading transit operators. The CPCS project is San Francisco, CA a development and implementation of an Agency wide Project Controls System. The system Education is an integration of five software packages: Primavera P6 v8.1 (including Progress Reporter MS, Civil and Environmental module), Primavera Contract Management v13.1, EcoSys EPC v6.10, Microsoft SharePoint Engineering; BTech, Civil 2010, Open Text with the existing legacy systems. Pavan is also providing interim training Engineering to the end users and providing support services for P6, EPC, CM and SharePoint. He is Professional Credentials currently playing a key role in assisting the client and implementing change management. EIT: CA (#EIT-140944) As an Analyst, he is responsible for organizing and conducting the regular meetings, making sure the Contractor is following the Contractual requirements in delivering the required contract deliverables, reviewing and providing comments on the contract deliverables, analyzing implementation costs and schedules, creating and maintaining issue logs, risk registers, preparing the monthly status reports, administering SharePoint for project related documents and assisting the client in reviewing and negotiating all requests for customization and supplemental work. In addition to working as an Analyst in overseeing the Contractor’s work in implementing the CPCS, he is also actively involved in the following activities: Conducting Business Requirements gathering sessions with key stakeholders. Writing business requirements to assist the functional/technical teams to configure/customize software solutions. Active Liaison between functional/business teams and technical teams. Part of negotiations team during procurement of software. Reviewing, providing comments to the Functional and Technical design documents. Performing Fit-Gap Analysis and assisted the team in configuring Capital Project/Program requirements that are met out of box by COTS. Business Advancement Program (BAP) Project: Pavan worked on BAP Phase II implementation project for one of the nation’s leading transit operators. He joined this project during the implementation stage for PeopleSoft Financials on Capital Projects and Maximus Enterprise Asset Management information systems. As a part of the process, Pavan performed hands-on work to assist various operations staff and BAP Implementation team members in their functions for User Acceptance Testing (UAT) of the re-engineered business processes. Specifically, Pavan assisted the team in Capital Projects Data conversion, cleansing, and migration into Oracle/PeopleSoft Projects Module. He also assisted the team in the testing of Capital Projects Procure-to-Pay lifecycle, involving, Projects Funds Setup/Distribution, Contracts/Purchase orders setup, Invoice/Voucher processing and capturing all costs information for Grants billing. Project Controls Organizational Assessment: Pavan was a contributing member of the Intueor team that worked on the Capital Project Delivery and Project Controls Process and Organizational Assessment for a large Transit Authority. This study focused on understanding the Authority’s capabilities as an organization in Program controls on Capital Projects. Pavan and the assessment team interviewed the staff to learn about the Authority’s working culture, their issues and general understanding of Capital Project business processes while gathering, documenting and organizing data for analysis and presentation to stakeholders. Resumes

R-79 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Michael Hsiao, PE | OCS

Michael has extensive experience in many light rail, street car and commuter rail projects, which include San Diego Mid-Coast LRT Project, LA Expo 2 LRT Project, LA Regional 24 12 Connector LRT Project, Central Phoenix/East Valley LRT Project, Orange County LRT Years of Years of Metro Project, LA Eastside LRT projects, Sacramento Del Paso and 12th Street Double Track LRT Experience Experience Project, Cincinnati Streetcar Project, Seattle Street Car Project, San Francisco Muni Street Car Project, Denver North Metro Rail Line Project, Caltrain Electrification Project, California Firm High-Speed Rail Project. WSP Location Michael has extensive experience in engineering design, construction management, and San Francisco, CA contract administration of major public works projects. He has served in the capacities of Education structural engineer, OCS design manager, track engineer, system engineer, project engineer, MS, Civil Engineering; BS, planning construction engineer, assistant resident engineer, assistant construction engineer, Survey Engineering and resident engineer. His experience includes major light rail, industrial rail, people mover, Professional Credentials and heavy transit projects including OCS, track alignment, track work, traction power, train Professional Engineer: CA (#C- control system, bridges, retaining walls, tunneling, and civil works. 48378), AZ, OH

Michael ensures his designs meet design criteria, are consistent with other design projects, are constructible and cost-efficient, meet all safety requirements, and are coordinated with all affected parties. He has served in construction management positions representing the owner, general design consultant, and general contractor in the U.S. and overseas. Michael has also created several computer automation programs to deliver high-quality project designs.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Blue Line Division 11 Shop Yard Expansion | Los Angeles County, CA: OCS engineer as part of design-builder group responsible for OCS design and foundation design of Division 11 Shop Yard Expansion. Coordinated with design-builder and original geotechnical engineer for foundation design. Saved money in soil test and minimized the construction cost by utilizing existing poles and foundations. Metro Expo Phase 2 (DB) | Los Angeles County, CA: OCS design lead engineer responsible for OCS design, coordination and specifications. Worked as part of the design- build team to provide OCS foundation layout, pole layout and design package in fast-track situation. Metro Regional Connector | Los Angeles County, CA: OCS design lead engineer responsible for OCS design, coordination and specifications. Provided OCS design package for design-build bid package. Metro Eastside LRT Project | Los Angeles County, CA: Structural engineer and OCS engineer responsible for pole, foundation and OCS design. Provided calculations of allowable bending moment and rake for pole and foundation and created hanger length table, radial load table, wire stringing tension and sag, and OCS specifications. Analyzed pantograph security, pantograph clearance, and overhang and center throw of vehicle for pole and track clearance. California High Speed Rail | Anaheim to San Francisco, CA: OCS designer manager. The California High-Speed Rail project will operate on its own dedicated track and reach speeds of 220 miles per hour running over 800 miles of route connecting San Francisco and Sacramento in Northern California with Los Angeles/Anaheim and San Diego in the south. WSP is providing the California High-Speed Rail Authority with program management services, including planning, oversight of the environmental review/preliminary engineering (30% design), construction management, testing and commissioning for the line and every other phase up to revenue service.

Resumes

R-80 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

David Jackson | communications

Dave has more than 25 years of systems engineering experience in the transportation industry, focusing on fleet management, scheduling systems, customer information systems, 25 3 radio systems, and wireless data networking/CCTV systems. Dave has been involved in Years of Years of Metro the development of strategic plans for technology as well as the design and deployment of Experience Experience technology systems. Firm RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Intueor Consulting, Inc. Santa Clara Valley Regional Transportation Authority (SCVTA) | CA: Dave is the lead Location investigator assisting SCVTA in the replacement of the Computer Aided Dispatch/Automatic Des Moines, IA Vehicle Location System, voice and data radio systems including integration with Education maintenance management, scheduling, crew dispatch and Enterprise Resource Planning BS, Mechanical Engineering (ERP) systems for both fixed route and light rail applications. Metro Comprehensive Assessment of Bus and Rail Operation Control Centers: Project Manager on the Comprehensive Assessment of Bus and Rail Operation Control Centers, a feasibility study for the potential integration of combining the Bus and Rail Operations Centers for LACMTA. Helped develop, draft, and edit a report that outlines Human Performance evaluations of bus and rail operations as well as focuses on the re-engineering of operational processes and provides innovative technology solutions that can be used by LACMTA. To perform this study and provide analysis on the combination of the operations centers, participated in observational studies, process and procedural reviews, designing a comprehensive survey delivered to LACMTA employees, and workshops of key personnel and agency stakeholders. Des Moines Area Regional Transit Authority (DART) Mobile Ticketing applications, and Fare Collection System Project | Des Moines, IL: Dave is the project manager for DART’s Mobile Ticketing applications, and Fare Collection System Project which is planning to replace obsolete GFI farebox and swipe card systems with state of the art hosted new technology ticketing system and new fareboxes. The project also includes fare policy analysis and redesign to incentivize customers to use re-useable media in lieu of cash, tokens and paper monthly and weekly passes. San Mateo County Transportation Districtadio and Mobile Systems Upgrade | San Mateo, CA: Dave was the project manager for this project to replace a voice radio communications system and upgrade and expand the mobile data system. Prior to this design, procurement, implementation support project, Dave performed a study to address FCC Narrowbanding requirements and identified obsolete systems. This study included the development of alternatives for voice and data radio communications that can be deployed prior to the FCC 2013 mandated for narrowbanding as well as position the District to meet the FCC 2018 deadlines while minimizing capital costs for the entire program DART Paratransit Scheduling and Dispatching System Replacement Project | Des Moines, IL: Dave was the project manager for this project which includes a needs analysis of current systems and operations as well as the development of a concept of operations for the new system functionality. Intueor developed a scope of work and technical specification for the procurement of this new system. Detroit Department of Transportation, Detroit, MI: Dave is currently helping the Detroit DOT modernize their current Intelligent Transportation System. He is performing needs assessments, requirement gathering and analysis, documenting full architecture of software and hardware system components, and working with agency stakeholders to build an RFP that will allow them to acquire an up to date solution that is comprehensive enough to facilitate all of their business needs.

Resumes

R-81 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

D. Austin Jenkins | operations and planning lead

D. Austin Jenkins has over 40 years of experience in providing rail operations, rail activation, and rail operational design review consulting services for streetcar, light rail, and commuter 40 rail systems throughout the U.S. Years of Experience RELEVANT EXPERIENCE EMBARK, Modern Streetcar Rail Operations | Oklahoma City, OK: Operations and Firm Planning Lead that provided Rail Operations consultation, design review, and other services Mott MacDonald to the EMBARK (Oklahoma City) Modern Streetcar Director and executive staff. Location Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART), Rail Operations Project | Dallas, TX: Interim Vice Los Angeles, CA President of Rail Operations that supported DART’s Executive Management team with rail Education operations, streetcar, and organizational issues. Foothill Community and San Jose City College, Courses Denver Regional Transportation District (RTD), Various Rail Systems Projects | Denver, CO: Operation and Maintenance Lead for RTD’s rail system during dramatic system growth, including operational responsibility over the FasTracks rail system. Austin was responsible for overseeing 400 operating employees with a $53 million annual operating budget. Successfully, Austin led the activation and operational opening of RTD’s West Rail Line (Denver to Golden) 2013. He successfully gained authorization for the purchase of 12 new Siemens Light Rail vehicles. Austin also negotiated the purchase of the OKTAL Light Rail system training simulator that was delivered in mid-2015. During his time with RTD, he played a significant role in reorganizing RTD’s Rail Department, created and gained funding for the Maintenance Training section; and he improved safety awareness through vigorous annual retraining and improvements to operational discipline. King County Metro Transit, Various Rail Systems Projects | Seattle, WA: Served as the first Rail Manager at King County, with responsibility for operation and maintenance of the Link Light Rail system and the South Lake Union Streetcar. Austin formed the department, hired the initial operational leadership team, and led successful contract negotiations with ATU. Austin was responsible for the operation and maintenance of Sound Transit’s Link Light Rail system and the South Lake Union Streetcar. He developed the organizational structure, hired senior management staff, and negotiated the first KCM-ATU Local 1001 Labor contract. Austin participated in intergovernmental agency negotiations (KCM-Sound Transit, KCMCity of Seattle) and numerous ongoing national, regional and local Fire, Police, emergency service agencies. Seattle Monorail, Construction and Operation Services | Seattle, WA: Director of Operations that provided rail transit operations expertise to the project leadership team during the Seattle Monorail’s attempt to construct and operate a 15-mile elevated monorail system through Seattle. Overall, Austin was responsible for providing operational expertise during the RFP development and design-build-operate-maintain (DBOM) project proposal selection period. He participated in negotiations with selected team and worked with City of Seattle, King County Metro and relevant emergency services agencies during project planning stages. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Tasman West/I-880 Rail Line Extension | San Jose, CA: Operations and Planning Lead responsible for the daily operation of the light rail system. Austin also served as Rail Activation Manager for the Tasman West and I-880 rail line extensions.

Resumes

R-82 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Craig Jurkiewicz | CADD

Craig Jurkiewicz brings over 20 years of CADD experience. He is highly skilled in the following programs: BIM/Revit; AutoCAD 2014; MicroStation V8i (SS3); Revit 2014; 20 10 ProjectWise (SS4); HVAC; structural, mechanical, detailed drawings; working and as-built Years of Years of Metro drawings; isometric drawings; orthographic projection drawings; installation drawings; and Experience Experience Windows NT and XP. Firm RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Mott MacDonald Metro, Regional Connector Transit Corridor, Design-Build | Los Angeles Location County, CA: CAD/BIM Lead that used Revit 2014 to create and modify HVAC models for Los Angeles, CA the stations of this project. Craig was responsible for assisting production manager with Education running clash detection reports using Navisworks and resolving the clashes with HVAC. HIs A.S., Computer Aided Design responsibility also included trouble shooting and assisting all disciplines on an as need and Drafting (CADD) basis, also keeping the AutoDesk glue models up to date. Metro, Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor Design-Build | Los Angeles, CA:CAD Specialist for the plan and profiles for elevated and underground guide ways, typical sections and mechanical/vent structures, right of way, electrical single line diagrams and structures. Using Microstation V8i, Craig created custom linestyles specific for this project. LA Streetcar, Inc., Preliminary Engineering | Los Angeles, CA: CAD Lead that was responsible for the preliminary engineering of creating the track layout sheets. As Lead CADD coordinator, Craig shared the work load with other CAD users to ensure that all deadlines were met. His duties also included coordinating with sub-contractors and keeping the files organized and the title blocks up to date with all companies’ information. California High Speed Rail, Fresno-Bakersfield and Bakersfield-Palmdale Segments, California High Speed Rail Authority | Fresno, CA: CAD Specialist that was responsible for producing plans for alignments, plan and profile tunnel plans, electrical single line diagrams, and geotechnical reports. Sound Transit, East Link | Seattle, WA: CAD Lead that created an HVAC model for the light rail project using Revit. Craig used this model to cut sections and create plans. Once the Xref files were exported we were able to create sheets for submittal. San Diego Central Courthouse, San Diego County | San Diego, CA: CAD Specialist that created sections and details for the new County Courthouse. Craig showed various methods of grouting so the client would have options. San Diego County plans to build a new multi-story Central Courthouse on a site across Union Street from the existing Courthouse. It is required that the basement of new courthouse be connected to the basement of the existing Central Jail by an Inmate Tunnel, passing under the present courthouse building, at close proximity to the underside of the foundations of this structure. The tunnel will cross the line of the active San Diego Fault, and provisions will be incorporated in the structural tunnel lining design to insure damage is restricted to the primary fault zone and that the internal pedestrian walkway is not interrupted.

Resumes

R-83 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Rachel Knowles | train control

Rachel Knowles has five years of experience working as a CAD Technician for civil engineering and rail systems projects. She specializes in creating 3D surfaces, plan 5 production, and exhibits. She has experience in Positive Train Control mapping for a Class 1 Years of Railroad. She is also an expert in intermediate signals, control points, and interlockings. She Experience has successfully completed Signals Training I, II, and III. bio Firm RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Rani Engineering, Inc. Metro Blue Line | Los Angeles County, CA: CAD Technician responsible for using Location AutoCAD Civil 3D to create existing ground surfaces, operation and maintenance plans, Minneapolis, MN construction phasing plans, and overall plan production. Prepare visual aids and exhibits for Education public meetings. Field work to measure necessary walls, curbs, and acquire photos of fences. BA, Psychology Document soil boring locations. Project coordination within office and with simultaneous projects. Collaborate with team to ensure standardization across project. Positive Train Control Upgrade of Subdivision, Commuter and Freight | Multiple Contracts in Western U.S. States: Positive Train Control Signals Designer for more than 60 railroad projects across the United States. Analyze data from plan sets, programs, and client websites. Compile necessary data into Positive Train Control mapping files to effectively interface Positive Train Control with existing signal systems. Projects include designing signalized locations such as control points, interlockings, and intermediate signals. Coordinates with clients on a daily basis to send completed Positive Train Control files to the field. Rachel used Positive Train Control Configuration Suite, AutoVue, and ProjectWise Interplot software programs. BNSF, Beardstown Centralized Traffic Control | Beardstown, IL: Crossing Designer for the Beardstown Centralized Traffic Control project. Designed all new railroad crossings using MicroStation. Calculated angles of crossings, battery power requirements, approach distances, and selected frequencies. Verified foundation placement, track circuits, and cable layout. Created crossing disable procedures for each crossing location. Rachel use : MicroStation software.

Resumes

R-84 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Ashok Kothari, PE | principal-in-charge

Ashok is a senior vice president and a veteran project director and is the WSP Global Projects Director with extensive experience in program management on mega transit 47 7 programs worldwide. He has provided guidance and performed peer reviews to infrastructure Years of Years of Metro projects throughout the U.S., India, Australia, and the Middle East and is currently providing Experience Experience oversight and guidance to large infrastructure projects, including Qatar Rail, Strategic Program Manager Group, Doha Qatar; Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd Red Line Firm project, a 14.6-mile LRT system in Tel Aviv, Israel; and in San Diego, California as principal- WSP in-charge on the SANDAG Mid-Coast Corridor LRT project. Location Los Angeles Ashok is currently serving as project director on the $6.2 billion Purple Line Westside Education Extension Project in Los Angeles where WSP is serving as the general engineering and MS, Structural Engineering; BS, planning consultant. He previously served as the Head of Programme Management Civil Engineering East London Line Project (ELLP) for modification of the East London Line of London Professional Credentials Underground to a London Overground railway system and the upgrade of the North London Professional Engineer: CA (#C- Railway. This project is a key component of an extensive rehabilitation and extension 48378) program, and its successful delivery on schedule by 2010 was integral to servicing the city’s Olympic program. As part of Transport for London’s Integrated Project Team, Ashok led the delivery/construction management group providing oversight for the ELLP program.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Purple Line Westside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: Project director for a subway system that, when built, will provide a high-capacity, high-speed, dependable alternative for those travelling to LA”s “second downtown”. WSP is serving as the general engineering and planning consultant. Under his leadership, the project has completed the Final EIS/EIR, Advanced Conceptual Engineering (ACE) and Preliminary Engineering phases of the project, and he is currently managing the Advanced Engineering (APE) and Implementation phases of the project providing Engineering Management Services. Ashok leads the 100+ member Westside Subway Extension team for this project to extend the Metro Purple subway line approximately nine miles from its current terminus at Wilshire/Western Station to a new western terminus in West Los Angeles. East London Line Project | London: Head of program management responsible for Program Management of the Integrated Project Team for the $1.8 billion design-build project which includes redevelopment and extension of the existing ELL system, addition of four new stations, management of interfaces and agreements with Network Rail and London Underground for their related works, and procurement for and management of delivery of 20 four car units of rolling stock for phase one of the ELLP and 11 four car units for phase two of ELLP. Redevelopment activities include refurbishment of approximately 10 existing bridges, replacement of 11 bridge decks including a signature bridge on the Regent’s Canal, and archaeological and ecological works in preparation for the main works. Phase one of the ELLP included updating and extending the existing system, adding four new stations, and procuring and managing delivery for rolling stock for phases one and two of the ELLP Project with an option for phases one and two of the North London Line service. BART System | San Francisco, CA: Program manager for GEC services for the BART Warm Springs Extension Project, a $680 million design-build extension project that will add 5.4 miles to the existing system. Prominent features of the project include two at-grade stations, 1 mile of subway constructed under a lake, elevated structures, storage track with a rail car wash facility, a two-vehicle maintenance shop building, and a transportation building. GEC responsibilities included support of the supplemental environmental impact report process, establishment of the project schedule and contract packaging, preliminary design, procurement of design-build contractors, quality assurance oversight, and design support during construction. Resumes

R-85 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Kwaku Larbi | traction power support

Kwaku Larbi brings over 15 years of experience in the railway industry working on a variety of projects in electrification and systems engineering. His specific experience is in power 15 supply scheme developments at the conceptual, outline, and detailed design stages. Ensuring Years of projects are designed, specified and delivered to meet programs, to a high level of quality Experience and in accordance with applicable industry standards. Additional, Kwaku’s design experience is in both HV systems and traction power AC and DC systems. Significant experience has FFirm been gained in the application of a systems engineering approach on rail projects, which Mott MacDonald includes an appreciation of electromagnetic compatibility and interference issues, from site Location measurements and assessments on major projects. Los Angeles, CA Education RELEVANT EXPERIENCE B.Eng., Electronic/Electrical Wessex Capacity Improvement Program/Power Upgrade | United Kingdom: Engineering Lead Electrical Engineer responsible for a 33kV fast feeder Form A design from Staines to Hounslow Junction; also with remit for oversight of the ETE designs associated to approximately 90km of track. Croxley Rail Link, London Underground (LU) | United Kingdom: Project Manager and Contractor’s Responsible Engineer (CRE) responsible for the detailed design of the traction power scope of the project. The scope of the project involves extending the LU Metropolitan Line from Croxley and linking into the Network Rail infrastructure to allow the LU S8 stock to run into Network Rail Watford Junction station.This project consists of the upgrade and/or extension of the existing 11kV AC and 630V (soon to be 750V) DC traction systems belonging to both LU and NR. Network Rail Power Supply Upgrade | United Kingdom: CRE Electrical Lead responsible for the Form EB design submission to Network Rail; and the provision of construction support to BAM Nuttall. Project consists of the deployment of two 140MVA circuits form New Cross Grid substation to Rotherhithe switching station via the highway; and one 32MVA supply from Rotherhithe switching station to Brockley substation via the railway corridor. The power supplies for this project are being delivered through two 275/33kV AC transformers from National Grid. Mott MacDonald deliverables for this project are directly conveyed to Network rail through BAM Nuttall who is the principal contactor for this project. Northern Line Extension, London Underground | London: Lead engineer responsible for the HV and Traction Power System Tender Design for the new northern line extension from Kennington station to Battersea. Design included for a new 22kV HV AC 3 phase network, the extension of the DC traction power supply system and the LV AC 3 phase system. Network Rail, Electrification and Plant Design Group | United Kingdom: Protection Engineer responsible for the review of DC protection settings on Sussex and Wessex to accommodate 12-car trains; the production of 25kVAC protection settings on the West Anglia Switchgear renewals project, and the production of the settings files for the Alstom P438 relays. Network Rail, Protection Study Settings | United Kingdom: Responsible for a pilot study on Network Rail routes 66kVAC, 33kVAC, and 11kVAC to verify grading and protection settings, review protection standards and to review protection settings custodianship: Docklands Light Railway, Olympic Resilience Modeling | United Kingdom: Responsible for a study of the Docklands Light Railway (DLR) traction infrastructure both on the 750V DC and 11kVAC systems. The aim of the study was to determine what, if any adjustments are required for support of the final timetabled service for the Olympics. This assessment was specifically aimed at equipment/system outages and any subsequent contingency required for mitigation. Of key importance were the issues of substation loading, line voltage, accessible voltage and DC protection settings.

Resumes

R-86 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

John Lau | OCS

John has more than four decades of experience in railroad and transit electrification design. He has been responsible for OCS project management over shoulder review, detail design, 43 30 wiring, installation layout, scheduling, sectionalizing, structural steel detailing, contract Years of Years of Metro document preparation and construction cost estimating. At WSP he provides technical and Experience Experience engineering support during construction to ensure that projects are on schedule. John’s project experience includes the design of catenary supports in tunnels, pole layouts, Firm cantilever, cross-span and portal catenary arm configurations, catenary detail design, bills WSP of materials and cost estimates. He is experienced in using the Spider program for complex Location intersections and ACAD applications for all aspects of design contract drawings for fixed- San Francisco, CA termination and auto-tensioned for light rail or 25kv commuter rail catenaries and trolley bus Education street systems. BS, Structural Steel/Design and Engineering RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Blue Line | Los Angeles County, CA: Responsible for support engineering, coordinating design within design procedures, cost estimating and ensuring that all drawings were up to specified requirements. He prepared the overhead system layout for the pole locations and the overhead configurations for cross-span and bracket arms. Metro Green Line | Los Angeles County, CA: Responsible for preliminary and final design of the OCS; coordinated civil work and track alignment related to OCS; reviewed shop drawings from suppliers; and provided technical guidance during installation. California High Speed Rail | CA: Engineering management team member responsible for the (OCS) requirement, technical memorandum, directive and standard drawings for train speeds of 220 miles per hour, with 25kV 60Hz AC electrification. Responsibilities include review and coordination with regional designers on issues related to the overhead contact system. The project is over 800 track-miles (between San Francisco and San Diego). WSP, as the project program manager, oversees the regional consultants performing 30% preliminary engineering. SANDAG Blue Line Catenary Improvement Project | San Diego, CA: Design engineer responsible for the over-shoulder review and comments related to the overhead contact system design. WSP is providing transit design and planning work for the Blue Line and Coaster projects. Sound Transit University Link | Tacoma and Seattle, WA: Design engineer responsible for the intersection catenary pole relocation. WSP provided design management support services for this 3-mile extension of light rail in twin-bored tunnels with two cut-and-cover stations connecting downtown Seattle with Capitol Hill and the University of Washington campus. Metro Eastside LRT Project, Division 21 Facility Expansion | CA: Design engineer responsible for the design of new OCS wires and support equipment, including pole/foundation to service the storage tracks 14 and 16 for the enhancement of the existing body shop building. Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Project, BART to San Jose Extension | Santa Clara County, CA: Design engineer responsible for preliminary engineering, including the setting up of simulation models for various traction power options. Also responsible for the traction power conduit routing and details for the preparation for final engineering. The project’s corridor is approximate 35 miles of double track with electric contact rail (3rd rail), extending the route from Warm Spring to Santa Clara.

Resumes

R-87 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Sheldon Leader | communications

Sheldon Leader has over 43 years of technology and communications systems experience and is active in the design and development of Telecommunication, SCADA, Security, 43 and Networking systems. He has worked with the state and local and federal government, Years of transportation, transit, hospital, university, and financial customers throughout the U.S. Experience and Canada. Sheldon has worked with clients to understand concerns, problems and requirements in order to develop practical and cost-effective technology solutions for Firm deployments. Systems experience include: Automated Toll Collection communication Auriga Corporation networks; Fiber Cable Deployment; Traffic Management Centers; E 911 Operation Centers; Location Transit Computer-Aided-Dispatch/Automatic-Vehicle-Location (CAD/AVL) systems; San Jose, CA Computer aided dispatch and wireless communications systems for public safety; fiber optic Education communication networks; wireless communication systems; 10 GigE Fiber Backbone and BS, Journalism/ Radio-TV Core system network; university and hospital systems to provide secure access to sensitive laboratory facilities; Wireless systems to provide patient data to hospital emergency room staff. Significant work experience merging legacy and new technologies – especially for networks.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Traction Power Substation Systems and Energy Management | San Jose, CA: Senior Telecommunications Engineer, assigned to work as a Resident Engineer to support deployment of CCTV systems at various locations. Edwards & Kelcey, Inc | West Chester, PA: Project Manager and Principal Engineer for various telecommunication projects. Shel was a member of the executive team responsible for developing a fiber optic deployment business. Provided technical support for deployment of fiber optic cable within the Conrail/Amtrak rail corridor from Boston, MA to Richmond, VA. Managed the Microwave Systems Group. Telecommunication engineering support for the EZ-Pass Toll Collection System in Delaware and New Jersey. ITP/Fleet.Net | Boca Raton, FL: Senior Vice President/Founder that managed the engineering department for development of communication and computing devices which would monitor internal vehicle systems status. Successfully produced a prototype device which would connect with cellular networks and relay vehicle location and systems status to fleet operations. Negotiated agreement with AT&T and AT&T Wireless to place services in mobile telephone switching offices. Raytheon E&C Intelligent Transportation Systems | Langhorne, PA: Program Manager responsible for development of fiber optic network along I-95 (Philadelphia) to support traffic management operations. Also provided technical support for RF systems projects.

Resumes

R-88 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Sebastien Lechelle | traction power support

Sebastian Lechelle brings 17 years of experience in leading numerous power system studies resulting in the verification, validation and optimisation of traction power supply system 17 design for light-rail, urban, suburban and intercity railways worldwide. This includes: loading Years of studies; earthing & bonding studies; energy studies; power quality studies; EMC assurance Experience (including signalling compatibility); reliability, availability, maintainability & safety (RAMS) assurance. This is supported and enhanced by research and development work in the Firm field of rail system simulation software. Managerial experience includes: team and project Mott MacDonald management; quality management systems & audits; marketing, business development and Location bid management; market studies; business growth strategy. Los Angeles, CA Education RELEVANT EXPERIENCE M.B.A. Core Valley Lines Traction Power Supply Load Flow Simulation Studies | United MS, General Engineering Kingdom: Project Director for the Core Valley Lines traction power load flow simulation Professional Credentials studies. Transport for Wales (TfW) is procuring the electrification of the Core Valley Lines Chartered Engineer (CVL) north of Cardiff through a competitive dialogue with four bidders concurrently developing electrification solutions. Working on behalf of TfW, Mott MacDonald is assessing the electrification system designs proposed by the bidders. This includes traction power load flow analysis using Mott MacDonald’s TRAIN software and medium voltage AC load flow using ETAP software. The simulation results are assessed against design requirement criteria and recommendations on the suitability of the proposed traction power solutions are formulated to TfW. Chicago Transit Authority, TRAIN Modeling | Chicago, IL: Project Director for the TRAIN modeling of the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) Red line using TRAIN, Mott MacDonald’s proprietary rail system performance simulator. The scope of the model included the entire Brown Line, the Blue Line from the Logan Square station through the Loop to the Western station, the Pink Line out to the Western station, the Green Line from the Pulaski station through the Loop to the southern terminals at the Cottage Grove and Ashland/63rd stations, the Orange Line from the Loop out to the Ashland station, and the Purple Line from the Loop to the Howard station. Jakarta Light rail transit Preliminary Design | Indonesia: Project Director for the preliminary design of the 3rd rail 750V DC traction power supply for Lines 1+7 of the Jakarta light rail transit. London Trams 2030 Strategy | United Kingdom: Project Director for the London Trams 2030 power study, which aims to develop a strategy for the provision of traction power to support the expected expansion of the London Trams network and the increases in services operating on it, up to 2030. Wessex Capacity Improvement Program/Power Upgrade | United Kingdom: Team Leader coordinating a multi-disciplinary team of designers delivering the GRIP 3 option selection for a new 33kV fast feeder between Staines TSS and Hounslow TSS; GRIP 4 electrical track equipment upgrades on various Wessex routes totalling over 89km of route length. South Coast Line Wayside Energy Storage System (WESS) Feasibility Study, Transport for New South Wales (TfNSW) | Australia: Lead Engineer for a feasibility study to introduce supercapacitor-based WESS on the South Coast line of the Sydney Trains network. The study included the development of a specification for the procurement of WESS by TfNSW. Sydney Light Rail Energy Study | Australia: Provision of technical expert advice for the assessment of energy consumption for the future CBD and South East Light Rail extension in Sydney. Resumes

R-89 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Silas Li, LEED AP | mechanical/ HVAC/ tunnel ventilation

Silas is a technical director with WSP with extensive experience in all phases of project delivery for ventilation and fire life safety systems, and is particularly skilled in the 32 application of Subway Environment Simulation (SES), Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Years of Egress Modeling and Environmental Control System (ECS) design for transit, rail and road Experience tunnel projects. Silas has worked on many transportation projects in the U.S. and abroad, and is recognized as an international expert on tunnel ventilation and fire life safety. Firm WSP Silas chairs the ventilation task group of Fixed Guideway Transit and Passenger Rail Systems Location Committee - NFPA 130, and he also serves as an international member of the technical New York, NY advisory committee of BHR international conference. He is the leading author of the upgrades Education of the SES software contributing to the success of numerous projects worldwide, and MS, Building Services received the 2015 knowledge sharing award on behalf of the SES leadership team. Silas Engineering; Associateship, was also selected as a member of the NYC Building Code Revision team, Fire Protection Mechanical Engineering Technical Committee. Professional Credentials LEED Accredited Professional; RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Professional Engineer: NY NYCT, Second Avenue Subway Phase 2 | Manhattan, NY: Mechanical design leader responsible for all mechanical systems for the extended preliminary design of three underground stations and connecting tunnels. Sound Transit, North Link Light Rail Transit, Seattle, Washington: task leader responsible for SES and CFD analyses for the design of the tunnel and station ventilation systems. The Sound Transit North Link includes a 3.3-mile-long underground system, two new stations (Roosevelt and Brooklyn) and their connecting tunnels. Second Avenue Subway Phase 1 for NYCT | New York: Provided technical supports for mechanical site engineers during construction of subway ventilation system and performed a study to reduce mold in the tunnels. Maryland Transit Administration, Baltimore Red Line Light Rail Transit System | Baltimore, MD: Ventilation engineer who led the tunnel ventilation analysis and design of five underground stations and connecting tunnels. Tunnel ventilation capacity was determined by using SES and CFD programs. Space requirements for tunnel equipment were identified. Brookfield Office Properties, Dyer Avenue Overbuild | Manhattan, NY: Task leader responsible for CFD analysis for the design of the Dyer Avenue Tunnel under the overbuild decks. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), Harrison Station Upgrade | Harrison, NJ: Task leader responsible for CFD analysis for the natural ventilation design of Harrison Station. NYCT No. 7 Subway Line Extension, West Platform Screen Door Feasibility Study | NY: Ventilation engineer who participated in the SES, CFD and station air- conditioning analyses. Design work included airflow schematics covering all modes of operation of the Environmental Control System. PANYNJ Call-in Contract | NY & NJ: Project manager responsible for the smoke management engineering work on this task order contract. Tasks included the following: 1) Port Authority Midtown Bus Parking and Storage Facility CFD analysis, 2) Port Authority Trans-Hudson (PATH) Exchange Place Station widening of corridors ventilation analysis, 3) Review of CFD analysis for PATH Newport Station, 4) Specification review of Holland Tunnel adjustable speed drives and risk analysis, 5) PANYNJ Midtown Bus Parking and Storage Facility.

Resumes

R-90 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Chengwen Liu, PhD, PE, SE | OCS

Chengwen is a supervising structural engineer and professional associate with WSP specializing in computational solid and structural mechanics, structural engineering, and 12 3 earthquake engineering. He has more than 10 ten years of professional experience in the Years of Years of Metro analysis, design, assessment and construction aspects of structural engineering of various Experience Experience types of structures, including cut-and-cover and bored tunnels, highway and light rail bridges, underground transit stations, high-speed railway infrastructures and industrial Firm facilities. His experience also includes reinforced concrete design, steel design, temporary WSP shoring and excavation support design, and seismic assessment and design. Location San Francisco, CA Chengwen’s professional experience in linear and nonlinear dynamic analysis, static Education nonlinear pushover analysis, dynamic soil-structure interaction analysis, seismic response PhD, Structural Mechanics; spectrum analysis, staged construction analysis, structural thermal analysis includes the MS, Solid Mechanics; BS, use of finite element computational programs of ADINA, SAP2000, CSiBridge, RISA-3D, Engineering Mechanics GT STRUDL, and ANSYS. With academic emphasis in computational solid and structural Professional Credentials mechanics, he developed and implemented finite element/meshfree based numerical Professional Engineer: CA (#C- methods for the analysis and design of piezoelectric structures. He also has strong computer 73376); (#S-6030) programming skills in C/C++, Fortran and Matlab.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Expo Phase 2 (DB) | Los Angeles County, CA: Performed overhead catenary system foundation and anchorage calculations and designs. Review of shop drawing submittals and providing response to contractor’s request for information. California High-Speed Rail | CA: Assisting lead structural engineer for the engineering management team to develop structural design criteria for preliminary and final design. Developed three dimensional finite element models to perform simulations of derailed freight train interacting with intrusion protection barrier walls. With computer program ADINA, the entire train-ground-barrier system was directly modeled with nonlinear large displacement elements and contact elements to simulate motions, frictions and impacts. Tasks included: Performing finite element modeling and analyses to assess track displacements under high-speed train moving loads, permanent settlement of track foundation system under repeated train loading, and performance of transition zones between bridge and subgrade under train moving loads. Conducting conceptual design and structural evaluation of bridges and viaducts, and investigation of different slab track systems. Performing finite element modeling and simulation of dynamic interaction between high- speed train moving pantograph and overhead contact line system. Sound Transit Link Light Rail, East Link | Seattle, WA: Developed three-dimensional finite element models and performed seismic analyses with CSiBridge for D-2 Roadway bridges, and supervised seismic evaluations. The curved D-2 Roadway consists of a ten- span, 1,433-foot-long concrete box-girder bridge, a 10-span, 1,660-foot-long steel bridge, and two adjoining three-span and five-span ramps. Performed seismic capacity analyses of two seven-span, 1,300-foot-long existing reinforced concrete bridges with three-dimensional nonlinear finite element models with ADINA. San Francisco Central Subway Construction | San Francisco, CA: providing design support during construction for three underground stations (Union Square/Market Street Station, Chinatown Station, and Yerba Buena/Moscone Station) with an overall construction cost of $840 million. Reviewing contractor’s calculations and designs of temporary shoring and excavation support systems, calculations and designs of steel framing connections, and shop drawings. Investigating and providing responses to contractor’s requests for information, and solving technical issues arising during field construction. Resumes

R-91 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Zheng Liu | communications

Zheng Liu has 29 years of experience in transit and power system planning, design and engineering, and integration testing and commissioning. He has a diverse range of 29 1 experience, including communications and telecommunications; networking; synchronous Years of Years of Metro optical network and synchronous digital hierarchy backbones; central and station local Experience Experience area networks and wide area networks; network management; supervisory control and data acquisition; programmable logic controllers and remote terminal units; public address and Firm visual message sign passenger information systems; radio, telephone, and closed-circuit Parsons television systems; serial interfaces; channel banks; digital access cross connections; Location modems; central control facilities; software and graphics; computer-aided dispatch; Oakland, CA talking signs; traction power substations; passenger stations; power networks and element Education management systems; and power plants and substations. Zheng has served in the capacity BS, Electrical Engineering of principal communications engineer, communications manager, senior engineer, field superintendent and engineer, and project manager on numerous new starts, line extensions, rehabilitation and retrofit transit system projects, and power system projects.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Blue Line Signal System Rehabilitation | Los Angeles, CA: Parsons, as a subcontractor, is providing fully integrated and functional train control/communications systems. As Principal Communications Engineer, Zheng provides preliminary design and direct sub-consultant to finish 100% design. The systems include Fiber optic communications backbone SONET interface, SCADA system, Fire Detection and Alarm system, Intrusion Detection and Controlled Access system, CCTV system, and Telephone system. Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, Caltrain Positive Train Control | San Carlos, CA: This project included design, furnishing, installation and testing of the PTC system that will monitor and control train movements through main line switches, prevent train-to train collisions, over-speed derailments, and incursions into established work zone limits. Zheng tested fiber optic Ethernet backbone networks and control center mesh networks. Provide underground fiber optic cable installation as-build drawings, control center and networks as-build drawings. Transbay Joint Powers Authority, Caltrain Downtown Extension Preliminary Engineering Term 3 | San Francisco, CA: The project involves conceptual and preliminary engineering to extend Caltrain’s commuter service 1.3 miles. The project will also provide the northerly terminal for California’s planned high-speed rail system. Zheng was responsible for coordinating the DTX design with TTC designer. Reviewed Transbay transit center building design and provided comments to the TTC design team, regarding the DTX (the train Box in the bottom of TTC) requirements. Reviewed Draft DTX Design Guidance Criteria. The project includes fiber communications backbone, telephone, access control, closed circuit television, public address, visual message sign, talking sign, supervisory control and data acquisition, two way radio, and voice/fire alarm systems.

Resumes

R-92 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Olivia Lopez | document control

Olivia Lopez has more than 18 years of configuration management/document control and design and construction project administration experience including work on the Los Angeles 18 3 County Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor project. She Years of Years of Metro manages and maintains information and files for several projects in the construction phase; Experience Experience and is proficient in SharePoint and electronic project management and tracking systems including Contract Management, Constructware and Prolog. Olivia accurately documents Firm incoming and outgoing project related information; and is proficient in MS Office and LKG-CMC, Inc. construction administration tracking programs, highly organized, and able to multi-task with Location accuracy to verify all project deadlines are met. Los Angeles, CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Crenshaw/LAX Line | Los Angeles County, CA: Document Control/Configuration Management that is responsible for entering, distributing, and managing documents using Metro’s Project Management Information System (PMIS) which uses Contract Management and SharePoint software. She maintains and updates document control systems and databases for multiple engineering/construction projects on the $2 billion Crenshaw project; processes and tracks design document, submittal and RFI reviews; coordinates and obtains approvals on a variety of documents; prepares contract documents; and issues and distributes status and tracking reports. Olivia interfaces with construction authorities and third party agencies; provides training in document control systems and procedures; develops, tracks, processes and distributes change orders; coordinates with client and project staff to review the proposed change and determine final language; incorporates changes and forwards the final document to the contract administrator to route for approval; and distributes the approved change orders. Los Angeles World Airports, Capital Improvement Program | Los Angeles, CA: Document Control Technician that assisted the team in all matters relative to document control and control and distribution in Prolog, on projects valuing nearly $600 million. She processed project documents and maintained document control files in accordance with project document control procedures; established and maintained files and received and indexed into Prolog; controlled indexing, scanning linking and distribution of documents in Prolog (included internal to LAXDP and external to project participants); prepared transmittals, distributed documents and assisted project staff in retrieving documents through Prolog software; and conducted periodic quality assurance audits on document files. Design Consultant Firm, Various Projects | Los Angeles, CA: Construction Administrative Support/Document Control that processed, tracked and maintained files and daily records of numerous project submittals and RFIs for processing. She processed and expedited documents efficiently to meet time constraints; processed transmittals for submittals and RFIs using Expedition software; and promptly routed submittals/RFIs to consultants/contractors for review and answers. Olivia generated weekly submittal and RFI logs for project architect construction meetings; managed and maintained accurate records of submittals, RFIs, construction meeting minutes, bulletins, change order logs, and payment applications. She established working relationships with supervising project architects, clients, consultants and contractors; worked in Constructware and Prolog software programs to create an efficient way to track and process construction information; and attended various construction administration webinar training seminars. Design Consultant Firm | Los Angeles, CA: Administrative Assistant that provided administrative support to principals, project architects, office managers, and the construction administrative department, which included the use of MS Office and Expedition software. Her duties included documenting meeting minutes, memorandums, professional correspondence, and spreadsheets. Resumes

R-93 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Rik Lor | independent systems integration review team manager | alternative delivery strategy

Rik is a senior engineering manager with WSP and has vast experience in the management, 17 design, project integration, construction, testing and commissioning of rail transit projects. Years of As the West Region systems manager, he is responsible for meeting management, Experience budget and financial goals; project management oversight; quality of services; contract administration; staffing; and overall functioning of the offices and staff in the region. In Firm addition, Rik meets with area managers to discuss the approach, teaming and strategy for WSP winning new work; provides staffing recommendations for projects; and participates in red Location team reviews of proposals and presentations. San Francisco, CA Education Rik has also been a deputy project manager (preliminary engineering design) for transit MS, Civil Engineering; BS, Civil and multimodal corridor environmental documents. His environmental planning experience Engineering includes assisting the planning project manager in the review of categorical exclusions, Professional Credentials environmental assessments and environmental impact statements on a number of projects. In Professional Engineer: CO, WA, his previous position as a client manager, Rik has successfully managed high-profile projects OR with substantial political interactions and public scrutiny.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Regional Transportation District, Eagle P3 Project | Denver, CO: Deputy project manager responsible for project and engineering management oversight of the $2.4 billion commuter rail project. The Eagle, a public-private partnership (P3) project, is a new 36 miles of electrified commuter rail (including 13 stations) that will connect downtown Denver to Denver International Airport and various suburbs. Specific managerial and technical duties included: Providing leadership and direction to the multi-corridor Eagle P3 Project Responsible for all aspects of engineering, design and quality: review and approval of management plans and revisions, design criteria, design variances, design and construction submittals, and design changes throughout the project Managing the RTD multidisciplinary engineering team during preliminary design (through the NEPA process), final design, construction, and testing & commissioning Maintaining interfaces throughout the project Performing and evaluating design and procurement documents prepared by consultants and contractors as well as performing quality oversight during design and construction Evaluating rail project delivery options and developing RFP as well as contractor proposals including on-call contracts Overseeing the project budget to insure that project is completed as designed/approved and within the defined baseline budget Negotiating change orders with design consultants and contractors Negotiating inter-government agreements (IGA) with project third party stakeholders Coordinating projects with third party stakeholders Evaluating construction non-compliant work performed by contractors and determining RTD’s position North Metro Rail Line (NMRL) Project | Denver, CO: Deputy project manager of integration responsible for project and integration management for the $343 million commuter rail project. The NMRL is a new 12 miles of electrified commuter rail (including six stations) that will connect downtown Denver to the northern suburbs. Specific duty includes leading a diverse team of engineers and technical specialist to ensure that all elements (civil-civil, civil-system and engineering-O&M) of the project is properly integrated and constructed within the project and is fully compactable with adjacent RTD projects. Resumes

R-94 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Gordon MacDonald | independent systems integration review lead/ overhead contact system

Gordon MacDonald has extensive experience in rail systems design and construction 41 7 management including overhead contact system (OCS), traction power, track, signals Years of Years of Metro and communications for both high speed and light rail systems. He also has in-depth Experience Experience experience in systems integration between various systems and third parties, and start-up and commissioning of light rail transit systems. Gordon is considered as one of the leading Firm systems experts in North America. He recently served as the Systems Design Lead for I-225 Mott MacDonald Light Rail Extension Design-Build in Denver. He also worked on the OCS design for the Location 2x25kV Northeast Corridor Northend Electrification Project where he was responsible for Los Angeles, CA OCS design at all major interlocking between Washington, DC, and New York, including Education field survey of existing systems, detailed design of OCS layouts, structure erection diagrams, FTC, Electrical Engineering sectionalizing and feeder arrangements, re-profiling at overhead bridges for higher speeds, construction staging and construction cost estimates.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Crenshaw/LAX Line | Los Angeles County, CA: Systems Design Lead for the nine-year, $2.1 billion Crenshaw light rail transit extension project for LA Metro. The 8.5- mile light rail transit will serve the communities of South Central Los Angeles, Inglewood, and Westchester, providing a north/south connection between two existing light rail transit systems and a future connection to Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). It will include at-grade, aerial, and subway alignments serving seven passenger stations. The Crenshaw line will also connect with a proposed People Mover System owned by Los Angeles World Airports, which serves approximately 50 million passengers per year. The project has an expected completion date of January 2019. The contract includes several phases of work; the first phase consists of completion of advanced conceptual engineering in support of the Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) for the line. Future phases of the project will include preliminary engineering and preparation of procurement documents for both design/build and design/bid/build for above-ground and subway sections; construction management support; and activation and startup. Denver Regional Transportation District (RTD), I-225 Light Rail Transit Corridor | Denver, CO: Systems Design Manager responsible for all rail systems design for the design build I-225 Rail Line project: 10.5-mile Light Rail extension from the existing Nine Mile Station through the City of Aurora to the Peoria Station. This system design includes; Traction Power substations, Signaling, OCS, Communications, System-wide Electrical, Cathodic Protection, Safety Certification, and System Integration. Sound Transit, University Link | Seattle, WA: OCS Design Manager responsible for OCS and interface with other designers including traction power system, train signal and communications system, civil/systems/utilities interface, and systems integration. Sound Transit, University Link Light Rail Extension | Seattle, WA: OCS Design Manager responsible for the engineering of OCS and interface with other designers including traction power system, train signal and communications system, civil/systems/utilities interface, and systems integration. Downtown East Valley Light Rail Transit Extension, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), San Jose, CA: Systems Design Manager responsible for preliminary engineering of all systems elements and interfaces including traction power system analysis; OCS and traction power substation design; train signal and communications design; civil/systems/utilities interface and control; design and systems integration; coordinate VTA Engineering, Operations and Maintenance interface; coordinating vehicle storage and maintenance facility requirements.

Resumes

R-95 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Lucine Malekian | safety verification & validation

Lucine Malekian has 9 years of experience involving planning, testing, engineering support during construction management, and design certification of rail transit projects, including 9 2 the Metrolink Positive Train Control and Foothill Goldline Extension Phase 2A projects. She Years of Years of Metro is responsible for testing Computer Aided Dispatch and Customer Information systems and Experience Experience generating test reports. Lucine also supports the operation dispatchers team during the live operations to assist with the new software and report defect results to project management, Firm client, and subcontractor. For design certifications she verifies the safety and security Parsons contractual requirements by reviewing Design Specifications and drawings to assure the Location requirements have been identified. Additionally, Lucine participates in the audit sessions to Pasadena, CA answer design questions. Education BS, Civil Engineering RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension 2A | Los Angeles County, CA: Lucine was responsible for the verification of the Design Safety and Security checklists. She managed engineering services during construction to assure most cost effective engineering solutions are selected to mitigate current construction issues. Lucine approved RFI’s and submittals as received from the Authority and the JV partner to seek the best solutions. She managed the budget, tracked costs, and forecasted labor hours/cost, and provided estimate change orders. For safety and security certification, Lucine reviewed specifications/drawings, certified the design of the project, and oversaw test coordiantion and activities. She led the fire, life, and safety meetings with the Authority, Metro and the appropriate city jurisdictions to assure design safety criteria are met. Lucine also oversaw test coordination, activities, and schedule; reviewed FAT, LFAT, and SIT test result to assure all defects were resolved for the final project certification; managed Computer Aided Dispatch as-built progress and reviewed drawings before submittal for approval; and, identified “out-of-scope” tasks and work with the Authority to issue change orders. Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Metrolink Positive Train Control System | Los Angeles, CA: This project includes designing, furnishing, and installing PTC technology on Metrolink’s 512-mile regional commuter rail system. As the prime contractor leading a vendor/integrator team, Parsons managed the overall program and provides design, testing, integration, and commissioning services. As Task Lead/Manager, Lucine was responsible for the design, installation, and test of the Customer Information System as an additional scope to Metrolink PTC and was responsible for design, installation, test in the lab and production system to prove software improvements and acceptance. Lucine worked closely with the subcontractor to assure design and deliverables meet expectations and contractual requirements. She conducted Computer Aided Dispatch software testing and assisted Metrolink dispatchers with the software during the live operations and testing.

Resumes

R-96 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Cody Margetts, PE | traction power support

Cody Margetts has 7 years of experience in traction power systems and system-wide electrical ductbank and cable work on rapid transit projects. He has performed simulations 7 3 for load flow analyses on both DC and AC traction power systems, and has experience Years of Years of Metro designing safe ground grids for traction power substations and other facilities. Cody’s other Experience Experience experience includes designing and plotting lighting systems as well as other low voltage electrical projects for commercial buildings. He has performed fault current analyses on low Firm voltage power systems. Mott MacDonald Location RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Los Angeles, CA Metro, Regional Connector Transit Corridor, Design-Build | Los Angeles Education County, CA: Traction Power Support for the 1.8 mile underground light rail transit line that BS, Electrical Engineering travels through downtown Los Angeles and will connect to the existing Blue and Exposition Professional Credentials light rail transit lines to the Eastside and Pasadena Gold Lines. Cody used load flow analysis Professional Engineer using the TRAIN software to verify that the proposed traction power substation configuration (Electrical), CA #21275 and overhead contact system would provide sufficient power to the tunnels, as well as each of the connected alignments. Metro, Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor Design-Build | Los Angeles, CA: Traction Power Engineer providing preliminary engineering services for an 8.5-mile light rail design- build project. This expansion will connect to the existing Green Line and continue north to the Exposition Line. Work included conducting load flow simulations and preparing traction power drawings for 10 traction power substations and related electrical systems. Used TRAIN software to build, modify, and update a simulation model of the Crenshaw Line in order to perform the load flow analysis, verifying requirements for the traction power system. Denver Regional Transportation District (RTD), I-225 Light Rail Transit Corridor | Denver, CO: Traction Power Support for the I-225 Corridor is a 10.5-mile expansion line. Cody’s work has included cable and conduit design for system wide electrical plans and using TRAIN software to build a simulation model of the I-225 Corridor to perform the load flow analysis, verifying requirements for the traction power system. In addition, ground grid calculations for each of the 10 traction power substation facilities have been calculated and verified to follow the IEEE Standard 80 for safe AC substation ground grid design. California High Speed Rail, Fresno-Bakersfield Segment, California High Speed Rail Authority | Fresno, CA: Traction Power Engineer that assisted in the preparation of preliminary engineering drawings. Cody established sites for traction power substations and facilities between Fresno and Bakersfield for this dual 25 kV AC system. He also conducted field investigations of potential traction facility sites. Green Line Light Rail Expansion, Sacramento Regional Transit | Sacramento, CA: Electrical Engineer providing services associated with this Light Rail project including traction power and signals. Work included assisting in traction power substation commissioning, the review of contractor submittals, and making recommendations and preparation of testing documents. Eastridge Transit Center,/Bus Operations, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority | San Jose, CA: The Eastridge Mall Transit Center is being redesigned for the expanding busing operation within the region. Changes include new shelters and lighting in the bus loading zone, and adding Electrical Vehicle (EV) charging stations in the adjoining Park-n-Ride. Work for this project has included selecting and placing the electrical equipment to be used, including light types and EV chargers, based on design criteria required lighting levels, available locations, and voltage drop calculations.

Resumes

R-97 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Jerry Marquez | electrical

Gerard (Jerry) Marquez has more than 30 years of experience in various fields of transportation construction. Jerry is currently assigned as a Construction Manager on 31 the SR 91 Corridor Improvement project. In addition, Mr. Marquez has over 25 years of Years of experience on California State roadways, adhering to Caltrans’ procedures, Standard Plans, Experience and Specifications. Mr. Marquez is proficient in the installation and testing of ETTM Systems, Intelligent Traffic Systems, traffic signal construction, highway lighting, and ramp metering Firm Parsons RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Location Metrolink/SCRRA, Mid-City Exposition LRT (DB) | Los Angeles, CA: As Field Corona, CA Engineer, Jerry’s responsibilities included a thorough understanding of duct bank plans, scheduling, and coordinating FFP underground crews involved in the installation of CS and traction power duct bank systems; scheduling surveys; assisting with shooting and verifying elevations; installing pull boxes, necessary pull ropes, and mandrel conduits; placement of precast signal and wayside case foundations; excavations, including 15 ft. deep boring pits; supporting bore contractors; and excavation, termination, and placement of concrete for overhead catenary foundations. He also coordinated with other disciplines, such as grading crews and rail and catenary contractors to ensure efficiency and safety; working closely with on-grade station crews; installing CS manholes; necessary lighting; UFS; and communication conduits through the station footings prior to placing concrete. The project had more than three million man-hours without lost time injuries. Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Metrolink Positive Train Control System | Los Angeles, CA: This project includes designing, furnishing, and installing PTC technology on Metrolink’s 512-mile regional commuter rail system. As the prime contractor leading a vendor/integrator team, Parsons managed the overall program and provides design, testing, integration, and commissioning services. Jerry’s duties included managing a subcontractor, installing wayside equipment at over 160 wayside locations along the Metro Link right-of-way. He was responsible for observing installations, testing and acceptance of this equipment by the owner Metrolink. Additional duties included, managing a group up to six Parsons’ testers, performing various testing roles along the right-of-way. Various types of tests include wayside messenger upgrades, feature validation, signal validation as well as brake testing on the Metrolink locomotives. Jerry also wrote test cases, coordinated and verified various types of testing, and submitted each case for payment. RCTC SR 91 Corridor Improvement | Corona, CA: Jerry coordinated with the ETTM System Integrator (Cofiroute USA). He managed the installation of ETTM Infrastructure, including ETTM Changeable Message Signs, CCTV Cameras, ETTM Communication Conduit Network, Toll Zones and Toll Utility Buildings. In addition, Jerry coordinated and inspected the construction build out of the Anaheim Data Center TOC and Customer Service Center.

Resumes

R-98 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Ponchito (Ponch) Mateo | traction power | electrical | ductbank design

Ponchito is a highly experienced electrical design/field engineer with over 34 years of working experience. He has worked on various projects with positions as the Consultant 34 4 Engineer, for contractors as their Field Engineer, as well as a Project Engineer. Currently, he Years of Years of Metro is assigned as a Traction Power Engineer for various WSP projects. His skills also include Experience Experience proficiency in Micro-Station and AutoCAD design. Firm RELEVANT EXPERIENCE WSP Metro Gold Line Eastside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: Location Performed as the field quality control and engineering manager. Responsibilities included Orange, CA reviewing and approving contract drawings and coordination with field supervisor and Education subcontractors on any outstanding field issues. Also reviewed vendor’s product data BS, Electrical Engineering prior to submittals. Other duties included site visitation to ensure that all conduits were installed in accordance with the approved shop drawings and attended weekly design and construction meetings. Performed as the project engineer and was responsible for the design of the two underground stations and six at-grade stations for power distribution, lighting, signal and communications. Duties included sizing all electrical equipment, load analysis, lighting, and voltage drop calculations, as well as to ensure that all code and regulations were implemented. Also reviewed shop drawing submittals as well as product data submittals for client approval. The position required extensive coordination with various disciplines.

Metro Red Line | Los Angeles County, CA: Performed as the project engineer responsible for the design of the power distribution, lighting, and controls for the Metro Red Line project underground stations. Additionally, involved in Metro Red Line Segment I construction support (Fast Track Team) to support contractors for any construction problems that arose. Reviewed shop drawing and product data submittals as well as preparation of test procedures. Metro Orange Line BRT | San Diego, CA: Performed as the project engineer and was responsible for the design of the power distribution, lighting, and signal/communications for the BRT Orange Line Stations. Tasked to ensure that the applicable codes and other regulations were implemented properly. Duties included sizing of all electrical equipment, load analysis and voltage drop calculations. Performed extensive coordination with various disciplines and contractors. Conducted approval of submittals and included site visitation if problems arose during construction as well as attended construction meetings. Metro Purple Line Westside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: Traction Power Engineer for Division 20 Turn Back Facility and Expo II Extension. SANDAG Mid Coast Corridor Transit | San Diego CA: Traction Power Engineer.

Resumes

R-99 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Lope Mayola | traction power

Lope has 38 years of experience with rail transit projects involving management, design, construction and start-up/rail activation, including assignments as electrical/mechanical 38 8 systems manager, lead design engineer for traction power and overhead contact/third rail Years of Years of Metro systems, test and commissioning manager, and resident engineer for construction, both Experience Experience in the U.S. and abroad. He has participated in the design, construction, start-up and rail activation of Metro’s Blue Line, Green Line and Red Line projects. Firm WSP RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Location Metro Regional Connector (AA/EIR/EIS) | Los Angeles County, CA: Lead Los Angeles, CA systems design engineer for the advanced conceptual engineering for the Metro Regional Education Connector transit corridor and the Westside Subway Extension projects. BS, Electrical Engineering Metro Red Line | Los Angeles County, CA: Professional Credentials Engineer-in-Training: CA Design engineer for the heavy rail Metro Red Line North Hollywood Extension. Designed (XE073160); Electrical Engineer: traction power substations and contact (third) rail; prepared power calculations, contract Philippines drawings and specifications; ensured that the design met project design and performance criteria; and conducted design review meetings. Also provided construction support, which included shop drawing submittal review, responding to contractor’s RFI and RFC, witnessing factory and field testing, and reviewing facility contractor’s station traction power lift drawings; prepared rail activation systems integration procedures and test data sheets; and conducted systems integration testing and prepared test report packages for systems safety certification. Traction power design engineer for the heavy rail Metro Red Line Eastside Extension substations, including 34.5-kv trainway feeder for station facility electrical. Designed traction power equipment and raceway layouts; prepared power calculations, contact rail sectionalization and layout; reviewed station facility electrical design and coordination with mechanical, architectural, safety group and other disciplines; and ensured that the design met project design and performance criteria. Metro Blue Line | Los Angeles County, CA: Systems field engineer for substations and OCS. Provided field engineering support for installation of the traction power substations and OCS and provided inspection (quality control), redesign to suit field conditions, construction activity reporting, witnessing equipment testing and reviewing vendor submittals and reports. Also prepared work change orders and provided facilities start-up and rail activation support. Systems design coordinator for the traction power system design, including both substations and OCS. Work included interfacing systems with civil section designers and providing assistance in technical matters. Reviewed various contract packages, prepared engineering design sketches and assisted as liaison for power companies. Metro Green Line | Los Angeles County, CA: OCS design project engineer for the OCS design. Provided design coordination with traction power substation and facilities contracts; conducted design review meetings; and prepared design review comment responses. Also reviewed design drawings and specifications related to the OCS; assisted project scheduler on OCS-related project milestones; assisted construction managers with reviewing shop drawings, requests for information and requests for changes from the contractor; prepared change notices and construction contract close-out; and provided facilities start-up and rail activation support.

Resumes

R-100 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Anthony McIntyre | train control

Anthony McIntyre has 17 years of progressively responsible experience in the passenger rail industry as an Inspector in Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QC/QA), including 17 signaling and train control testing. He is also skilled in providing configuration support, Years of troubleshooting, and computer installations. Experience

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Firm Metro Signaling Systems, Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) | Baltimore, MD: Virginkar & Associates, Inc Field Inspectorthat is providing logistics support for the Metro Signaling System contract at Location various locations. His duties are to assess the MTA signaling system by visually inspecting Baltimore, MD train control room equipment, track circuit, witness cable testing, relays, power supply, alarm Education systems, and the communication system. He also inspects wayside equipment, mini bonds, Certificate in Computer Hardware program station stop, M3 switch, YM2 Switches, duct banks, and cable connections. Mr. McIntyre reviews standard operating procedures, and witnesses some of MTA functional testing and work orders. Quality Assurance Inspections, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) | Washington, D.C.: Inspector with responsibilities that include installing chokes on GRS ATP Modules, testing for parasitic oscillation using multi-channel oscilloscope and multi-meter. He disconnected telephone lines inside junction boxes on wayside equipment, performed megger testing, inspected the work area, and updated the book of plans. Anthony upgraded track systems by installing weezy bonds and cross-over loop cable and local cable to junction boxes. He also performed verification testing on WMATA’s track system. Anthony also performed tasks on the owners side that included oversight of inspections on all field modification and engineering modification changes related to HP-4 actuators. He also performed First Article Inspections (FAIs) and inspected all related Wabco parts. WMATA 6K Series Inspection Services, WMATA | Washington, D.C.: Quality Inspector that performed incoming inspections on WMATA 6000 Series vehicles. Additionally, he oversaw WMATA 6000 Series engineering modifications and provided weekly and daily reports. Automatic Train Control (ATC) Systems, WMATA | Washington, D.C.: Test Engineer for engineering services related to automatic train control systems. He worked on upgrades of train signal systems by testing AF track circuits, bonds, relays, energy distribution, and alarm circuits. WMATA 2K/3K Vehicle Inspections/Quality Contral, WMATA | Washington, D.C.: Quality Control Inspector that performed incoming, outbound and final inspections on the WMATA 2K/3K vehicles. He ensured that all Field Modification Inspections (FMIs) and Engineering Modification Inspections (EMIs) were carried out and all trains were ready for service from the Alstom side, including verifying paperwork was in order before releasing trains to WMATA. Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles, S.A. | Greenbelt, MD: Quality Control (QC) Inspector that performed in-process, source, hold-point, FAI, final and retrofit inspections. He provided written procedures for testing, results record keeping, checking test equipment calibration and certification. He was responsible for verifying that all field and engineering modification instructions were done to specification. Primus Industries, Inc., Hunt Valley, MD: Quality Inspector, that performed overhaul inspections and upgrades of rail passenger cars, electric trains and their components. He maintained preliminary and final inspection reports on trains, incoming supplies, and files of documents related to rail passenger cars. Anthony communicated with clients on a regular basis. Resumes

R-101 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Hortencia McKeown | document control

Hortencia McKeown has more than 30 years of experience in managing, processing and verifying document compliance in the construction, mining, aerospace, and other industries. 30 1 Currently on a LA Metro assignment, she has coordinated and supervised contract change Years of Years of Metro and document control activities for major capital projects including the $5.1 billion Northrop Experience Experience B-2 Bomber assignment. Hortencia’s extensive experience in processing RFIs, change orders, drawings and O & M manuals and maintaining associated logs using a broad variety Firm of software. She also maintained document control systems for drawings, specifications, LKG-CMC, Inc. permits, warranties and closeout documents; and controlled the configuration of drawings Location and specifications and released documents for revision and controlled distribution lists. Los Angeles, CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Crenshaw/ LAX Line | Los Angeles County, CA: Senior Configuration Management Analyst for the $307 million Southwestern Yard facility that will become a consolidated maintenance facility that will serve both the Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor when completed and the current Metro Green Line system. As Senior Configuration Management Analyst, Hortencia is responsible for coordinating and supervising contract change and document control activities for major capital projects. Her duties include managing the document control process and files for all project documents including correspondence, design documents, reports, meeting minutes and other records. She is maintaining document control logs and action item logs, log design/document comments, and report on status of open items. Hortencia is also distributing documents and maintaining controlled distribution lists; preparing various reports, minutes, and records regarding contract change issues; and assisting in preparing project closeout documentation. Chevron Westside Produced Water Program | Fellows, CA: Document Control Specialist for the $7.2 million project design, engineering, procurement, supply, construction and commissioning of the plant. As part of the consultant engineering/conbstruction management team, Hortencia performed quality checks and released documents into CORWORX Chevron management system and eRoom; maintained files and records; received daily reports and forwarded to contracts, updated, logged, uploaded to Project Online system; processed transmittal of information and expedited submittals; applied Project Online and SharePoint knowledge to manage electronic files; processed all RFIs and change orders, entered documents into the Project Online document control system, distributed, tracked and developed status report for weekly client meetings; processed all Instructions to Proceed (ITP) with work in SharePoint; maintained action item logs; implemented configuration management and maintained controlled distribution lists. Rare Earth Mining Project, Mountain Pass, CA: Document Control Specialist/Quality Assurance Document Control for this $10.5 million mining project, Hortencia controlled processing of project related files and tracked electronic documents, maintained all county permits and drawings, and uploaded all documentations and drawings into SharePoint as part of the engineering/construction management team. She tracked and expedited submittals from subcontractors and suppliers; maintained action item logs, implemented configuration management and maintained controlled distribution lists; logged documents for internal communications; and assisted with project closeout. Northrop Corporation, B-2 Bomber Design/Construction, Palmdale, CA: Document Control Specialist/Administrative Assistant that Hortencia released engineering drawings and updated any changes; duplicated all documents for production department; developed procedure manual as requested by management; updated all documentation in system, created files, scanned documents, established security, and maintained document control room; maintained action item logs; and implemented configuration management and maintained controlled distribution lists. Resumes

R-102 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Cindy McLeod | safety verification and validation

Cindy is a multi-faceted lead systems engineer in the Transit and Rail Technical Excellence Center with WSP. Her career reflects strong technical expertise, initially as a design engineer 10 and more recently as a systems engineer. She has developed a wide engineering skill set, and Years of is adept at requirements analysis and management, requirements traceability, specification Experience development, interface analysis and design, systems integration, test and evaluation, quality management, user acceptance testing, risk management, and systems design and Firm documentation. WSP Location Working for consulting companies over the past decade, Cindy has had the opportunity to San Francisco, CA make significant contributions to a wide range of big budget short- and long-term projects, Education and has built a reputation along the way for quality and efficiency. She brings extensive MS, Electrical Engineering; BS, international and domestic experience. After several years working in the U.S. defense Electrical Engineering and aerospace industry, Cindy moved to Australia, where she worked predominantly on rail projects. Over the past few years, she has taken on more senior roles and worked more closely with clients, allowing her to build on her naturally strong leadership and communication skills.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE California High-Speed Rail Project | CA: Lead systems engineer for the planned 800- mile high-speed rail line connecting San Francisco and Los Angeles. Cindy is supporting the verification and validation of engineering and systems integration for project development. RailUnited Group Limited (UGL) | Melbourne, Australia: Worked as a systems engineer on the Regional Rail Link project, which required the construction of new rail infrastructure and substantial modification of existing rail infrastructure across 50km of rail corridor. The work included new construction and modification of formation, track, structures, train control, signaling, information and communications technology (ICT) and communications systems, overhead traction power systems, level crossings and various associated building and station platforms. Cindy worked on the client’s site and was responsible for systems engineering activities for, and general oversight of communications and ICT. Key responsibilities included analyzing business requirements, developing all systems related documentation, managing the documentation in DOORs, and ensuring that there was full traceability to the test documents. Additional details on some of Cindy’s work at UGL include: Undertook systems requirements specification analysis, managed requirements in DOORS and ensured completeness and correctness. Liaised with the design teams (COMMS and ICT) to assist in selecting the most appropriate design and ensured all applicable procedures, standards of behavior and expectations were understood and followed. Oversaw and reviewed the work of RAMS engineers to ensure that design specifications met all the systems and safety requirements Developed sub-system requirements and scope of work to interface with system components (internal and external) and existing system infrastructure. Prepared requirements verification plans and integration strategies, mapped full traceability from requirements to test documents, and checked compliance with requirements. Provided assistance and guidance to the testing and commissioning and operational readiness staff on the technical aspects of the project. Ensured that all necessary steps were taken to meet the project’s environmental and sustainability requirements.

Resumes

R-103 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Pat McNamee | cost management/ estimating | constructability review

Pat has extensive construction and conceptual scheduling and estimating experience on dozens of complex, high-profile bridge, highway/roadway, marine transit and tunnel projects 40 throughout the U.S. His 20 years in a supervisory role, in addition to his engineering Years of knowledge and his experience with 6 major national heavy civil contractors, makes him a Experience highly sought-after Transit capital cost estimator. His estimates, from budgetary through engineering, are consistently within the mean of bid results. Pat works closely with his Firm estimating peers and staff to produce consistent estimating and scheduling results with high WSP client satisfaction from CAHSR, CCCTA, BATA, ACTA, BART, POLB, SANDAG, LA Metro, Location Sound Transit, MTA and Caltrans. He is proficient in Timberline, HSCC, On-Screen Takeoff, Antioch, CA P6, Microsoft Project, and Microsoft Office. Education BS, Construction Engineering RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Management California High Speed Rail | CA: Senior supervising estimator and scheduler for the PDT Professional Credentials and the RDP on various design build project. The 500-mile high speed rail corridor will Certified Professional Estimator provide service from San Francisco to Anaheim. As the estimating manager for the project (CPE) delivery team, WSP is responsible for estimating all aspects of the program, including but not limited to alternative analysis, capital funding, engineers estimates, change control and other project studies. Managing a team of 4 estimators, the PDT and RDP scope is primarily guideway, stations, systems and includes 3rd party cost evaluation. This $50 Billion program is projected for revenue service in 2025. Working with other regional consulting organizations, Pat and his staff continue to study a variety of alternative alignments to determine preferred economical routes for the HSR train. SANDAG Mid Coast Corridor Transit | San Diego CA: Supervising estimator and scheduler for the DEIS/FEIS, PE and Final Design Phases of this $1.7 Billion, 10-mile rail extension for SANDAG. Pat is assembling the cost estimates for all the planning, preliminary engineering and final design estimates for the program. The program contract delivery model is a CMGC Contract and the estimate Pat creates for the GMP is being used to negotiate with the contractor. Pat worked closely with SANDAG agency representatives and the WSP team on this rail extension. Honolulu High Capacity Transit Corridor Project | HI: Supervising estimator & scheduler for an AA/DEIS study and for the Program Management Oversight team for a 23-mile corridor from the University of Hawaii, Manoa to Kapolei. Pat developed the AA planning study and the DEIS/FEIS estimates, and he continued his role as estimating and scheduling manager for the $5.3 Billion program management team providing the preliminary engineering and the FFGA for use by the agency for FTA approval for the design build contracts. Pat and his staff have continued providing project controls estimating support for the GEC in review of various design estimates, construction change orders and contract packaging estimating. He has worked successfully with other firm disciplines that include transportation planners, environmental analysis’s, engineers, other consultants, and agency staff. BART Warm Springs Extension GEC | CA: Supervising controls manager for the design- build contracts for BART’s $634M Warm Springs Extension, a 5.4-mile new double trackway extending southward from the existing Fremont Station with one new passenger station at Warm Springs in Southern Fremont. In 2016, the project will be complete and revenue service will begin. Pat continues to work on the project in the construction phase providing estimating and scheduling services.

Resumes

R-104 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Joseph Metzler | operations & planning

Joseph Metzler is a highly experienced rail and transit technical specialist and executive with 44 years of operations experience. He possesses a substantial portfolio of railroad 44 1 transportation skills ranging from operations planning management to developing on-line Years of Years of Metro operating strategies in order to maintain a superior level of safety and performance during Experience Experience highly visible, complex customer impact capital projects. He has developed methodologies for O&M costing for high speed rail in the U.S. He has also written technical specifications Firm for the procurement of signal train control systems and participated in the development of Parsons technical and operating specifications for PTC. Location San Jose, CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Education Tri-Rail, Train Dispatch Product Procurement, Implementation, and Harvard TQM Courses, Commissioning | Pompano Beach to West Palm Beach, FL: Joseph was responsible Columbia Business School; for writing the technical specifications for a train dispatch SCADA system capable of operating Rutgers University, Executive traffic on the South Florida Rail Corridor between West Palm Beach and Miami, Florida. The Leadership; Management Train requirements included including the provisioning of an Operations Control Center (OCC) in Accident Cause-Finding Seminar the Pompano Beach SFRTA HQ and auxiliary OCC’s in West Palm Beach and Hialeah Yard. Additional requirements for communications systems, voice recording and UPS back-up systems were also part of the procurement. Joseph also served as the representative for the Agency during the implementation phases of the contract assuring that all of the technical specifications were met and ensuring that the contractor supplied “as built” data and source code as required. Orange County Transit Authority (OCTA) Program Management for Metrolink Service Expansion | Orange County, CA: As Program Manager, Joseph was responsible for creating 30-minute train service on the Metrolink Orange County Subdivision between Fullerton Junction and Laguna Niguel station. The project components include creating a train simulation model of service assumption viability and deliverability validation against the background of a fully realized operating plan. Another important project component is the oversight of Metrolink of the rehabilitation of over 50 highway and pedestrian grade crossings in Orange County in order for them to meet Federal and State CPUC standards for quiet zone status. The project includes a study of the use of wayside horns at pedestrian crossings to be used as the basis of a city application to the CPUC for reduced decibel levels. California High Speed Rail Project Program Management | Statewide, CA: As Program Task Leader, Joseph was responsible for planning train operations, maintenance of rolling stock and infrastructure, and the safety and security programs for this mega-project. Joseph has worked with the UIC (International Union of Railways) and other international high speed rail groups to determine maintenance regimes for both rolling stock and infrastructure for the project. His team developed a suite of business modeling tools for an integrated cost assessment of service plans including O&M and capital asset renewal modules. These tools have enhanced the Authority’s ability to forecast costs. Joseph has worked extensively with the FRA and all of the State of California rail service providers, including the State Class 1 freight services to develop capacity models used to determine future service impacts resulting from the statewide integration of high speed rail. Joseph’s team is responsible for maintaining all the ConOps documentation for the High-Speed Rail program.

Resumes

R-105 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Alex Mezey | overhead contact system support

Alex Mezey is a mechanical engineer with over 5 years of experience in program management on large government civil projects and design experience on metropolitan light rail projects. 5 3 Alex’s design experience includes work on traction power systems, overhead contact Years of Years of Metro systems, system-wide electrical and communications networks, and operations analysis. Experience Experience

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Firm Metro, Regional Connector Transit Corridor, Design-Build | Los Angeles Mott MacDonald County, CA: Alex is responsible for analyzing operations of system during service outages Location using OpenTrack simulation software by building full schematic model. He is responsible Los Angeles, CA for designing overhead contact system for temporary shoofly track as part of construction Education staging, in addition to mainline system including overhead conductor rail installation below BS, Mechanical Engineering ground. Leading role in design unit management and all coordination efforts with other design units, the contractor (client) and the transit authority (Metro). Transitioned into design work on communications team, including developing entire SCADA I/O database for project, and further designing the system-wide ductbank design and outside plant cable system. Metro, Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor Design-Build | Los Angeles, CA: Alex developed preliminary design for OCS for Southwest Rail Yard for estimation purposes, and evaluated traction power product submittals. Metro, Fiber Optic Assessment, Los Angeles County, CA: Responsible for return on investment research on installation of new fiber optics cabling in Red and Purple Lines for the purpose of dark fiber leasing to commercial clients, and for the authoring of the entire preliminary report to client. Denver Regional Transportation District (RTD), I-225 Light Rail Transit Corridor | Denver, CO: Alex built a 3D model of the traction power substation from the ground up using SolidWorks in order to better visualize the distribution of equipment and to verify clearances; Aided in design of overhead contact system, including placing poles, creating overlaps, adjusting offsets, staggers, and cantilever angles, along with updating schedules and verifying layout drawings; aided in system-wide electrical design including routing new conduit, adding and moving manholes and handholes, updating schedules, and verifying layout drawings; Acted as submittal coordinator and worked as an interface between contractor, design manager, and our design team to guarantee that reviews of construction submittals, RFIs, NCRs, and IDR sets were completed and returned on-time. Caltrain Electrification Project, PCJPB | San Francisco Bay Area, CA: Alex was heavily involved in proposal work including creating a detailed spreadsheet and Google Earth model of the alignment with information including road crossings, potential overhead line conflict locations, tunnels, fences (for grounding considerations), signal gantries, MSE walls, traction power facilities and associated access roads, WPC locations, disconnect switches, signal houses, storage areas, access points and tracing all electrified tracks including new/removed/relocated/crossover tracks. Purple Line Maintenance Facility Electrification, MTA, Baltimore, MD: Alex aided in editing and preparing engineering drawings for submission. Kahului Airport Tram System, Hawai’i DOT, Kahului, HI: Alex designed overhead contact system for proposal and aided in creating supporting technical documentation. San Antonio Streetcar, VIA, San Antonio, TX: Alex created detailed reproduction of proposed system in Google Earth for proposal purposes.

Resumes

R-106 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Philip (Phil) Minch | train control | CPUC application/ traffic interface

Phil possesses 40 years of experience as a signal engineer working on light rail, heavy rail and freight rail in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. He has extensive knowledge of railway 40 9 signal control systems, including interlocking, central train control, railroad grade crossings, Years of Years of Metro light rail, commuter rail, subway, and metro systems. He is highly experienced in the design, Experience Experience testing, developing and trouble shooting for railway signal systems electrical and electronic equipment. Phil is thoroughly familiar with a wide variety of signaling software and strongly Firm understands the railway operating rules, FRA rules, American Railway Engineering and WSP Maintenance-of-Way Association standards and instructions applicable to railway and rail Location transit systems. Los Angeles, CA Education RELEVANT EXPERIENCE BS, Electrical Engineering Metro Purple Line Westside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: Supported creation of advance conceptual engineering report and developed a series of drawings for the proposed West Hollywood branch of the Project that will extend the terminus of the Purple Line at Wilshire Boulevard and Western Avenue to the city of Santa Monica. Reviewed plans created in the advanced conceptual engineering stage. Metro Regional Connector | Los Angeles County, CA: Reviewing plans for the light rail line that will connect Metro’s Blue Line at Seventh Street and Flower Street to the Gold Line in the city’s Little Tokyo district. Responsibilities include determining the equipment and programming needed to interface train controls for the three lines. SANDAG Mid Coast Corridor Transit | San Diego CA: Performed engineering services for SANDAG, design review, and monitoring for a new 11-mile extension of the light rail system. SANDAG San Diego Trolley Blue Line Extension | San Diego, CA: Performing review of the train control circuit plans for the San Diego Metropolitan Transit System’s planned 15- mile extension of the Blue Line Trolley from downtown San Diego to the city of San Ysidro on the Mexican border. Metro, Eastside In-Roadway Lights Demonstration Project | Los Angeles, CA: Shared project management duties on this project for twelve street crossings of light rail tracks. Created the design for four-quadrant gates before the project scope was changed. OCTA, Del Obispo Crossing | San Juan Capistrano, CA: Studied possible solutions for unwanted crossing signal activation and created a report to the authority. OCTA Audible Warning System | San Clemente, CA: Created plans and specifications for audible warning systems to be added to pedestrian crossing signals at seven crossings of a heavily used beachfront trail. BART, Warm Springs Extension | Fremont, CA: Independent review of train control design by others for a 5-mile BART line extension. WSDOT, Cascades High Speed Rail Program, Point Defiance Bypass Project | Tacoma, WA: Performed design review services for 21.4-mile rail corridor. Reviewed train control circuits and calculations by others. Sound Transit, Lynnwood Link | King County, WA: Provided preliminary engineering for an 8.4- mile extension of the Seattle area light rail system. Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), 95th Street Rehabilitation | Chicago, IL: Design of the new 96th Street Interlocking at south end of CTA’s blue line rapid transit.

Resumes

R-107 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Anthony Minikon II | train control

Anthony Minikon has over 26 years of combined experience in Communications and Railroad Signaling Systems Design, Installation and Integration. He is widely regarded as an 26 1 expert, one-of-a-kind Systems Integrator, based on his highly specialized skills in the areas Years of Years of Metro of RF and Fiber Optic Communications, Ethernet Networking, Computer Aided Dispatch Experience Experience (CAD), Back Office Servers (BOS) and Signal Systems all of which are leveraged to solve some of the most complex technical issues affecting the daily operations of commuter Firm railroads. He provided Engineering Design and Support services on critical projects for major RF Networks, Inc. Railroad such as PCJPB (Caltrain, CA.), Southern California Regional Rail Authority, North Location County Transit District, and Belt Railroad in Cicero, Illinois. Burbank, CA Education RELEVANT EXPERIENCE BS, Electrical Engineering Metro Red Line and Purple Line Subway Radio System | Los Angeles County, CA: Current member of the design team for the Red and Purple line radio system upgrades. The radio and communication systems is used to support mission-critical voice and data communications on these subway lines in Los Angeles County. These subway lines served public safety (LAPD and LAFD) as well as LACMTA railroad voice and data operations through a maze of approximately 20 miles of subway tunnels and passenger stations and seamlessly integrated with the existing LAPD/LAFD/Metro infrastructures above and below ground. Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Positive Train Control Program | Los Angeles, CA: Systems Engineer responsible for the design of the IP network, the design of failover schemes and the systems integration and testing of each of the four network elements - Microwave Radio, Fiber Optic, Ethernet Radio and Gigabit Ethernet/SONET networks. Anthony performed in the role of Systems Integrator and Test lead to integrate, acceptance-test, and cut-over these four network elements into a single high-performance communications backhaul network that provides an IP or a RF Network connection to every control point, base station and passenger station over the 3,000 square miles of Metrolink territory. This communications backhaul network will be used to support the high-availability requirements of the Metrolink Positive Train Control Program. Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (PCJPB)/Caltrain, Central Control Facility | San Jose, CA: Anthony was lead on the Rail Operation Control System where he served as PCJPB’s Lead Engineer on the development, testing and system integration of various component associated with each project. He developed the ATCSoE scheme required for the integration of the ARINC FEP into the PCJPB existing Code Field Network. He was handpicked to lead the CCF Relocation Project where he designed the seamless transition of each individual system from the Butcher Building to the CCF. Other projects for the PCJPB included the Vital Stop-Bits Project, the 2nd ATCS Project, the Remote Reboot Alarms Project and the Voice Radio 2nd Channel Project.

Resumes

R-108 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Omidreza (Reza) Moghbeli | corrosion control

Omidreza “Reza” Moghbeli brings 21 years of experience in corrosion and metallurgical engineering; material/coating selection and assessments; cathodic protection design; failure 21 analysis; and internal corrosion monitoring. Reza is also specialized in pipeline surveys Years of and external corrosion direct assessment (ECDA) and integrity data evaluation and quality Experience management. He brings experience project management and construction supervision in oil and gas industry (refineries and pipelines) and water industry. Currently, he holds four Firm registered patents dealing with cathodic protection systems. Universal Corrosion Services, LLC RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Location Universal Corrosion Services, LLC | Rancho Cucamonga, CA: As Principal Engineer, Rancho Cucamonga, CA Reza has completed the following assignments: Education MS, Metallurgical Engineering Southern California Gas - Performed data analysis for Field Signature Corrosion (Corrosion and Material Monitoring (FSM) and internal and external corrosion monitoring coupons/probes. Protection) Andeavor/Tesoro - Performed Close Interval Potential Survey (CIPS) data analysis and BS, Metallurgical Engineering provided pipeline recommendations for DOT compliance. Cucamonga Valley Water District - Provided recommendations for rehabilitation of metallic structures in a 16MG potable water reservoir based on visual inspection results and pit depth measurements. TerranearPMC - Impressed Current CP system evaluation and design improvements. Various Engineering Services | Southern CA: As Lead Engineer, Reza has completed the following assignments: Eastern Municipal Water District - Provided as needed Metallurgical/Corrosion Engineering Services, Failure Analysis, CP System Evaluation. Provided supervision on all corrosion monitoring and Cathodic Protection surveys. PG&E - Cathodic protection design review, evaluation, and basis of design for cathodic protection replacement. Metro Blue Line - Performed resistance tests on tracks and grounding systems and provided report/recommendations. Long Beach Water Department - Cathodic protection survey and design for specified critical water and recycled water pipelines. Inland Empire Utilities Agency/East Recycled Water Pipeline Corrosion Assessment - Performed corrosion test station survey to assess the need for cathodic protection systems. Inland Empire Utilities Agency - Performed corrosion inspection for Carbon Canyon water treatment center. Various Engineering Services | National/International Assignments: As Lead Engineer, Reza has completed the following assignments: Monarch Water, Illinois - Designed internal cathodic protection system for ion exchange vessels. Engineered Storage Product Company, Illinois - Cathodic protection design template and installation procedures for internal protection of the bolted tanks. Albian Sands Energy, Inc. | Expansion 1 Project/EPCM, Alberta, Canada - Performed cathodic protection design, coating selection, and wrote specifications for intersite/underground pipelines. Designed internal and external cathodic protection systems for all storage tanks, process vessels, and intersite pipelines. Resumes

R-109 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Soham Mookerjea, PMP | communications

Soham Mookerjea, PMP, is a systems engineer with over eight years of engineering experience. His expertise lies in systems engineering, project management, fare collection 8 systems, positive train control, software design, development and implementation, testing Years of and quality assurance/quality control. Soham has vast experience working with transit Experience agencies such as Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Metro North Railroad, Sacramento Area Council of Governments, Santa Clara Valley Firm Transportation Authority, and San Francisco Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Soham is Auriga Corporation PMP and K2 BlackPerl Core certified. Location San Jose, CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Education Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, BART Silicon Valley Berryessa MS, Chemical Engineering Extension Program | Milpitas, CA: Systems Engineer that is reviewing BART’s train BS, Chemical Engineering control system, reviewing test plans, positive train control static, dynamic and field Professional Credentials modification investigation test oversight, and preparation of daily reports documenting test PMP, Project Management results and discrepancies. Institute Clever Devices CAD/AVL(VTA) System Integration | San Jose, CA: Systems Engineering and Software Development support to Clever Devices for VTA’S CAD/AVL project to develop an Interface Application to provide real-time arrival information at bus stop signs. Scope of work includes development of Functional and Performance Requirements, Software Design Document, Proof of Concept, Software Development and Implementation, Integration, Testing and Maintenance. San Francisco Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Twin Peaks Crossover ATCS Signaling | San Francisco, CA: Systems Engineer responsible for reviewing the existing Advanced Train Control Systems (ATCS) configurations, develop requirements specifications, operational technical concept and technical specifications. Sacramento Area Council of Governments, Connect Card Systems Integration | San Francisco, CA: Systems Resident Engineer responsible for the management of testing and providing technical troubleshooting of software and hardware (network/communications) systems for the card-based eFare system. Coordinated with engineers to investigate, resolve and close project tickets, and implemented upgrades and enhancements to the current fare collection systems to optimize system performance and behavior. Metro North Railroad Real Time Data Links Design | New York, NY: Systems Engineer that provided design support and conformed plans and specifications to enhance both the software and hardware systems (i.e. PA/VIS) to improve data collection and generate more accurate/real-time train predictions. Tasks included analysis of technologies for tracking train location, development of a Concept of Operations, 60%, 90% and 100% technical specifications deliverables for the real-time train data system. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Automated Train Tracking System | San Jose, CA: Systems Engineer for the design and development of an Automated Train Tracking System interface for real-time arrival predictions of VTA light rail vehicles. The project required updating and migration of the existing Yard Map and Dispatcher Applications, and development of a real-time GUI application for live train tracking, using the SharePoint 2010 platform.

Resumes

R-110 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Raylene Moreno, PE | plumbing & fire protection

Raylene is a senior engineer with experience in fire protection and plumbing design/review, HVAC design, fluid-thermal modeling and analysis, and fire alarm system design review 6 and inspection. She is proficient in Microsoft Office (Word, PowerPoint, Excel, Publisher, Years of Access), CAD (AutoCAD, MicroStation), Revit MEP, Hydraulic Analysis with PIPE-FLO, Experience Stress Analysis with AutoPIPE and CAEPIPE, Mathcad, CFD with Fire Dynamics Simulator, PyroSim, and COMSOL, and Evacuation Modeling with Pathfinder. Firm WSP RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Location California High Speed Rail | CA: Performed preliminary fire life safety egress analysis Los Angeles, CA using CFD analysis to evaluate egress requirements. Performed preliminary pressure Education transient analysis for system layout. MS, Mechanical Engineering; Sound Transit East Link Project, Seattle to South Bellevue | Seattle, WA: BS, Civil and Environmental Responsible for performing fire protection, plumbing, HVAC, and emergency ventilation Engineering design, including hydraulic analysis, heat load analysis, system layout, and pipe support Professional Credentials analysis and design for Mount Baker Ridge and Mercer Island Lid railway tunnels and Mercer Professional Engineer: CA (#M- Island Station. Additional responsibilities include acting as lead mechanical engineer for 36751); CA (#FP-1923) Mercer Island Station for construction support activities. BART Warm Springs Extension Line, Track, Station, and Systems, Fremont, CA: WSP is performing GEC services for subway extension and at-grade station. Responsibilities include fire protection and plumbing design review, calculation review, submittal review and field inspection. Sound Transit Northgate Link Project, University of Washington to Northgate, Seattle, WA: Responsible for performing fire protection and plumbing design, including hydraulic analysis, system layout, pipe support analysis and design and 3D modeling, stairway ventilation analysis, and construction submittal and RFI review for double-track light rail transit line and three stations between the University of Washington station and the Northgate Station. Additional responsibilities include acting as lead mechanical engineer for construction support activities for Roosevelt Station. SBCTA, Redlands Passenger Rail Maintenance Facility Design | San Bernardino, CA: Performed plumbing and fire protection design for a new two-bay maintenance facility which will accommodate servicing of diesel multiple units. WSDOT SR520 Montlake Lid | Seattle, WA: Performed preliminary fire life safety egress analysis for the Montlake Lid as part of the SR520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Program. Utilized CFD analysis to evaluate tunnel egress requirements and provided recommendations to the client. WSDOT, I5 - SR16 Interchange – Construct HOV Connections | WA: As lead engineer for fire suppression system design task, performed system design, including hydraulic analysis, for fire suppression system layout on three design-build bridge projects. Also performed review of construction submittals and RFIs. BART Earthquake Safety Program, Transbay Tube Pumping System Upgrade | San Francisco, CA: Responsible for performing site inspections, piping system hydraulic and stress analysis and design of pumping system upgrades. Virginia Department of Transportation, Midtown Tunnel Project | Norfolk- Portsmouth, VA: Project included cut-and-cover and immersed tunnel sections that cross below the Elizabeth River. Performed thermal and hydraulic analysis for fixed fire suppression systems throughout the tunnel. CFD was utilized to determine that heat tracing was unnecessary which significantly reduced costs for the client. Additional responsibilities included contractor’s submittal review. Resumes

R-111 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Edwin Mortlock | train control

Edwin (Ed) Mortlock has 38 years of professional experience in transit and railroad signaling and train control applications focusing on automated systems. He is a qualified 38 electrical engineer with extensive multidisciplinary experience in the design, construction, Years of maintenance, and operation of transit and mainline railroad systems. Ed is a recognized Experience expert in the planning and implementation of advanced technology train control systems. Firm RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Parsons BART Train Control Modernization Program | San Francisco CA: Parsons is leading Location a team developing a consensus with operations, maintenance, and other user groups for the Miami, FL replacement of the existing, aging signal system with CBTC. In addition to technical support Education to the program, Ed was the Procurement Manager leading a small team of specialists in BS, Electrical Engineering determining the optimal procurement strategy and preparing packages for three phases of Professional Credentials supplier engagement; RFI, and Industry Review, and RFQ/RFP. Chartered Engineer, UK 407992 Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Caltrain Communications-Based Overlay PE, Ontario, Canada, Signal System PTC | San Francisco CA: This project included design, furnishing, 100514644-01 installation and testing of the PTC system that will monitor and control train movements through main line switches, prevent train-to train collisions, over-speed derailments, and incursions into established work zone limits. As systems engineer, Ed was responsible for management of RAMS, handling the RFI process for Parsons and its technical subcontractors to the client, reviewing technical design documentation under preparation, managing the assembly of the Preliminary Design Review documentation package, and serving as the technical point-of-contact with the supplier of the on-board and wayside PTC subsystems. BART General Engineering Services | San Francisco CA: Services were organized around new vehicle procurement, Hayward Maintenance Complex upgrades, state of good repair of existing tracks and facilities, traction power, and the Operations Control Center. Ed was Project Manager for the services contract. His tasks included setting up a joint venture, managing the JV, controlling budget, work breakdown structure, preparation of work plans, managing task progress and financial performance, submitting invoices and reports, and managing subconsultants. Metropolitan Transportation Authority Canarsie Line Resignaling, New York, NY: This project provided engineering services to New York City Transit to re-signal the Canarsie Line with CBTC system and developed new train control system standards. Ed provided management and technical services on the pilot program, which included system design services; development of procurement documentation; support of the supplier selection and the client through installation, test, commission, and reliability demonstrations of the pilot CBTC on the New York City subway. The CBTC system on the first line section went into passenger service in January 2006, the full-line operation under CBTC was cutover in November the same year. The contract was extended to include additional scope, managing the equipping of additional vehicles to operate on the L Line, and a number of technical upgrades to the pilot CBTC system.

Resumes

R-112 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Zafer Mudar, PE | CPUC application/ traffic interface

Zafer offers diverse project management and technical experience in various areas with special emphasis on rail transit design, public works projects and highway design. His 24 15 experience includes railway design, street design, highway engineering, highway drainage, Years of Years of Metro hydrology, and hydraulic studies. His specific civil engineering experience includes railway Experience Experience alignment, dry utilities design (power, telecom, gas), street improvement design; sewer, water, and storm drain design; road alignment studies; at-grade and grade-separated Firm interchange design; and preliminary grading studies for industrial, commercial, and WSP residential sites; and communications systems and intelligent transportation systems Location field elements design. As project manager, he delivered projects on time, on schedule and Los Angeles, CA under budget and negotiated contract modifications for scope and schedule. Zafer’s project Education engineering duties have involved developing project plans, preparing specifications and cost MBA; BS, Civil Engineering estimates, as well as coordinating and communicating with clients and sub consultants. In Professional Credentials addition, he is proficient in civil engineering software programs such as Inroads, MX-Road, Professional Engineer: CA (#C- and is also proficient in using CAD/drafting packages such as Microstation and AutoCAD, 64154), LA along with various hydrology and hydraulics software such as AES, HEC-2, MORA, and WSPG-W.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Regional Connector | Los Angeles County, CA: Task manager who successfully managed scope, schedule, and budget for engineering task, and coordinated civil, structural, utilities, drainage, architecture, and systems elements. He also reviewed deliverables for this project which connects the Pasadena Gold line and the Eastside Gold Line to the Long Beach Blue Line and Exposition Line with a budget of $1,330,152. Metro Purple Line Westside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: Task manager responsible for subsurface utility engineering design for 8 underground subway stations. Managed scope, schedule, budget for this task; directed and monitored the subcontractors’ work activities with regard to conformance with established contract criteria and design directives and design/control quality program requirements; managed subcontractors to established budget; monitored progress and costs and prepared monthly progress reports on these matters; and conducted progress and coordination meetings. Managed preparation of composite existing utility plans and design of utility relocations in order to meet a very aggressive schedule for obtaining Record of Decision from of FTA. Managed preparation of advanced utility relocation contract package for Section-1 stations and helped Metro advertise these packages on time to meet overall construction schedule. Metro Blue Line Divsion 11 Expansion Project | Los Angeles County, CA: Project engineer, performed preliminary alignment for the vehicle shop and checked clearances for compliance with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority design criteria. Metro Gold Line Eastside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: Project engineer responsible for track alignment and civil design during construction. Mr. Müdar conducted a realignment study for Indiana Station, processed deviations for track alignment and modified horizontal and vertical alignment as necessary, responded to contractors RFIs; reviewed submittals for construction; and reviewed plans for the design/build portion of the project. Metro Gold Line Eastside LRT, Division 21 Body Shop | Los Angeles County, CA: Task manager responsible from coordination of civil, structural, utilities, drainage, architecture, and systems elements. Performed preliminary and final design of track alignment for the body shop and checked clearances for compliance with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority design criteria.

Resumes

R-113 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Alan Murphy | OCS | independent systems integration review team

Alan Murphy has 56 years of experience involving the planning, design, construction, and construction management of railroad maintenance facilities, railroad electrification systems, 56 7 and high-voltage power distribution projects. His experience includes light and commuter Years of Years of Metro rail, streetcars and trolleys, and heavy haul industrial rail projects. Alan has special expertise Experience Experience in overhead catenary design, constructability, construction staging, and implementation planning of railroad electrification projects. Alan’s experience includes traction power Firm systems design and the design and construction management of OCS, conductor rail, and Parsons third rail systems. His experience covers AC/DC systems with voltages from 600 volts DC Location to 50 kilovolts AC including 2 x 25 kv Autotransformer systems. The systems have included Richardson, TX single-wire trolley poles, streetcars, light rail systems, high-speed passenger, and heavy Education haul freight lines. Alan has also been involved in the design and construction management Higher National Certificate, of traction power distribution for light and heavy rail maintenance facilities for Valley Electrical/ Mechanical Transportation Authority, Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Sacramento Regional Transit District, Engineering New York City Transit Authority, New Jersey Transit, and Denver’s Regional Transportation District.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension 2A | Los Angeles County, CA: As OCS/Traction Power Design Manager, Alan managed production of designs for the OCS and traction power systems for the main line and maintenance yard, including traction power simulations, ground grid designs, and shop DC distribution. The project included final design and construction of 11.5 miles of track, utilities, crossings, and systems; six passenger stations; 12 new light rail and three new freight railroad bridges; and a 25-acre light rail maintenance facility that includes a storage yard and a full maintenance and repair shop. Denver RTD I-25 Southeast Corridor Transportation Expansion (DB) (I-25 T-REX) | Denver, CO: Alan served as OCS Design Manager and was responsible for the design and construction support of OCS, traction power, and system-wide electrical and power distribution. The project was being constructed concurrently with major highway reconstruction and required coordination with more than 50 elevated structures, cut-and- cover box section tunnels, and bridges with minimum vertical clearance requiring innovative profiling and attachment designs to ensure system integrity while maintaining construction flexibility. The fast-track design was performed concurrently with many other disciplines in systems and highway design and required close coordination with the discipline task leaders to produce the most efficient overall design. Valley Metro Rail Central Mesa LRT Extension (DB) | Mesa, AZ: As Catenary Design Manager, Alan managed the design of a low-profile OCS for the Mesa extension to the East Valley LRT. Valley Metro Rail built an extension of the Central Phoenix/East Valley LRT line. The DB project includes four stations on Main Street, a park-and-ride facility, embedded double track, three traction power substation sites, signals interlocking, crossovers and train and traffic signals, communications, OCS, and four signal building sites. Parsons provided design services and all design management.

Resumes

R-114 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Ermias Negash | OCS

With more than 15 years of experience in design and construction industry, Ermias Negash have has provided structural engineering services for overhead catenary support structures 15 1 traction power substation and provided design and development OCS design plans in Years of Years of Metro California and Maryland. Besides his experience in OCS and OCS-related structures, he Experience Experience has performed design work in building structures and inspection and field engineering work on construction projects. Proficient in the use of STAAD.Pro, LPILE, RAM Concept, RAM Firm Connection, SAP 2000, AutoCAD, Microstation. Proficient in the use of industry codes ACI, Parsons AISC, IBC, ASCE. Location Baltimore, MD RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Education Metro Blue Line Signal System Rehabilitation | Los Angeles, CA: Parsons, as MS, Structural Engineering; a subcontractor, is providing fully integrated and functional train control/ communications BS, Civil Engineering systems. Ermias is providing services for the development of design of catenary support Professional Credentials structures and for the design and development of OCS design plans. PE: DC Metropolitan Transportation Authority, East Side Access, Tunnel Engineering and Systems Engineering Consultant | New York, NY: Parsons is providing all design services required to provide a fully functional, four-mile underground extension of the Long Island Rail Road into Grand Central Terminal, including all mitigating measures identified in the final environmental impact statement. The project work includes all signaling, communications, traction power, overhead catenary, trackwork, and third-rail systems, as well as all auxiliary power, station ventilation, fire suppression, fire alarm, and security systems. Ermias, as OCS Engineer, reviewed and compared as-built drawings with field survey data and completed a quality control review for a submittal. Maryland Mass Transit Administration, Central Light Rail Line Double-Track, CM and Inspection Services | Baltimore, MD: Parsons provided construction phase engineering and technical services during construction. Ermias performed a catenary pole relocation study to determine the possible removal existing OCS pole and down guy. Maryland State Highway Administration, Carroll Avenue Bridge Rehab | Takoma Park, MD: As Field Engineer, Ermias assisted the project manager in leading skilled tradesmen in performing the construction activities per the drawing, coordinating and leading quality control for concrete, prepare daily reports for MOT and Erosion and sediment control, analyzing and resolving field construction issues and supervised and lead the construction crew on assigned tasks Maryland Mass Transit Administration, MARC Martins State Airport | Middle River, MD: Ermias served as Structural-Civil Engineer and performed structural analysis and design of catenary support structures and designed and developed OCS design plans and reviewed submittal drawings.

Resumes

R-115 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Dong Nguyen, PE | train control

Dong Nguyen is a high caliber systems engineer with 21 years of experience in systems engineering and systems integration in major active transit railroads, including heavy 21 3 rail, commuter rail and light rail. His extensive experience in a variety of signaling system Years of Years of Metro designs includes system design, detailed circuit design, application software development, Experience Experience test plan, test procedure preparation and implementation, and factory and field testing. Dong’s background includes block design, interim and tie-in design, cutover plans, testing Firm and commissioning, overall system architecture development, application engineering, Parsons data preparation design, implementation, documentation, integration, and verification and Location validation. New York, NY Education RELEVANT EXPERIENCE MS, Computer Engineering; BS, Metro Blue Line Signal System Rehabilitation | Los Angeles, CA: Parsons, as Electrical Engineering a subcontractor, is providing fully integrated and functional train control/communications Professional Credentials systems. As Lead Signal Engineer, Dong is working closely with the design and construction PE, CA, Electrical, 21704 teams, subcontractors, Metro, and stakeholders, while leading block design, control lines development, route and aspect charts design, tie-in design, cutover plans, testing, and commissioning of train control systems. Also responsible for coordinating with these teams while leading installation, field testing, troubleshooting, modifying, and commissioning of train control systems. Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension 2A | Los Angeles County, CA: As Signaling System Integration Test Manager, Dong was responsible for all signalling system integration testing activities for the Metro Gold Line Foothill Phase 2A Extension, which included the tie- in cutover at the existing Sierra Madre Villa Station. Dong was also responsible for finalizing the signaling system engineering documents. The work included engineering documents that are approved for test and commissioning, such as control lines, mainline double line diagrams, mainline route & aspect charts, M&O yard double line diagrams, M&O yard route & aspect charts, and interface with the existing Gold Line. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, MARTA Train Control and SCADA Systems Update | Atlanta, GA: Dong managed all project engineering activities and was responsible for overall system architecture, development, design, application engineering, data preparation, and V&V for this project. Dong had in-depth knowledge of the existing train control systems and served as MARTA’s approved Train Control Signal Engineer. Dong also served as the systems integrator and was responsible for all systems integration activities, which included field testing, troubleshooting, modifying, commissioning and integrating the new Alstom’s Integrated Vital Interlocking System (iVPI®) train control systems into the existing relay-based train control systems. This work included engineering documents that were Issued/Released for Construction, such as tie-in design, systems integration plan, and site-specific installation and cutover plans for this active mass transit system of similar size and complexity to the CTA RPM Phase One project.

Resumes

R-116 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Sean O’Gorman | mechanical/ HVAC/ tunnel ventilation

Sean has more than 10 years experience in mechanical engineering. He has developed a speciality in the design of mechanical systems for transportation infrastructure; in particular 16 tunnel ventilation and fire-life safety (FLS) analysis and design. Sean’s project experience Years of extends to mechanical systems design of environmental control systems (ECSs) and thermal Experience comfort for rail station environments. His analysis experience includes simulation of tunnel ventilation systems using software such as the Subway Environment Simulation (SES) Firm Computer Program. Sean also has extensive experience in road tunnel analysis using the WSP recommendations of the World Road Association (PIARC). Sean has been responsible for Location individual system design, as well as broader mechanical and electrical design management, Sydney, Australia the latter of which includes leading multidisciplinary design teams on complex major Education projects. Masters of Commerce; Bachelors of Engineering, Mechanical RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Professional Credentials Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) Atlantic Yards Reconfiguration and Overbuild, Certified Professional Engineer: Greenland Forest City Partners | Brooklyn, NY: Project manager for the reconfiguration Australia of LIRR Vanderbilt Yards including replacement of track, traction power, facilities power, communications and signaling. Project includes modifications to retaining wall and foundation structures. Project also includes design of mechanical and electrical systems for the “covered yard” configuration and coordination of civil and structural components for the overbuild platform. North West Rail Link (NWRL), Rapid Transit Tender Support and Enabling Works, Transport for New South Wales (NSW) | Sydney, NSW, Australia: Project manager and mechanical and fire-life safety subject matter expert responsible for project management of WSP involvement for: ECRL enabling works conceptual design; rapid transit extension to St. Leonard’s conceptual design; and NWRL PPP contract tender support and fire engineering assessment of Brownfield stations at Chatswood, Epping and St. Leonards, as well as shared operator rail corridor due to refurbishment for rapid transit system. Sean also performed a tender review and assessment of NWRL PPP for tunnel ventilation, FLS, station ECS and thermal comfort, fire systems, platform screen doors and hydraulics. Sydney Metro Network, Sydney Metro Authority | Sydney, NSW, Australia. Stage 2 Reference Design: senior tunnel ventilation engineer who designed tunnel ventilation system, performed SES modeling, developed smoke management strategy, and coordinated design for proposed 14.9-mile underground metro system with 11 new underground stations. Stage 1 Reference Design: senior tunnel ventilation engineer who designed tunnel ventilation system, performed SES modeling, developed smoke management strategy, and coordinated design for proposed 3.7-mile underground metro system with six new underground stations in Sydney CBD. NWRL, Rapid Transit Reference Design, Transport for NSW | Sydney, NSW, Australia: Mechanical manager responsible for managing the reference design and contract documentation of mechanical systems including tunnel ventilation, FLS, ECS including thermal comfort and station cooling options, platform screen doors (including business case development and options), fire protection, plumbing, drainage and vertical transport. Project included a Greenfield 14.3-mile long rapid transit system including 9.3 miles of tunnels and 5 miles of at-grade and elevated rail incorporating eight new stations. Project also included conversion of ECRL Brownfield 9.9 miles of existing tunnels and four underground stations to new rapid transit system. Museum Station Easy Access Upgrade Reference Design, Transport Projects Division | Sydney, NSW, Australia: Mechanical engineer responsible for design verification of mechanical services (HVAC) works for the station upgrades. Resumes

R-117 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Mary Cay O’Malley | rail activation and start-up support

Mary Cay O’Malley has more than 28 years of experience in project management and engineering design, with a focus on design-build delivery in the transportation sector. She 28 brings excellent knowledge and expertise in mega project management, with a strong focus Years of on design-build project pursuits and implementation, including management of large design Experience teams that include dozens of firms and hundreds of individuals. She works closely with contractor-partners and owners to deliver quality infrastructure improvements. Firm Mott MacDonald Over the course of her career, she has contributed significantly to high-profile projects such Location as the I-495 Capital Beltway HOT Lanes P3 Project in Virginia, the I-25 Southeast Corridor Los Angeles, CA Transportation Expansion (T-REX) Design-Build Project in Colorado, and The New I-64 Education Design-Build Project in Missouri. Currently, Mary Cay is the Project Delivery Leader for MS, Transportation Engineering Mott MacDonald’s North America group. Her work focuses on providing guidance to teams BS, Civil Engineering working on some of the firm’s largest projects to ensure efficient, successful delivery. She BS, Surveying assists project teams on the pursuit and implementation of design-build projects, including development of contracts, selecting and working with team members, development of Professional Credentials budgets, schedules, and quality processes. Mary Cay also leads an effort to create design- Professional Engineer build guidelines for the firm. (Civil): OH #PE61780; IL #PE062-053026; MO RELEVANT EXPERIENCE #PE030256; CO #PE36835; OR Operations/Project Management Specialist, Various Assignments, U.S.: Mary has #PE74110PE; VA #PE045396; been responsible for managing and directing large transportation projects to assist with the WA #PE485652011 development of new pursuits and projects. She provides guidance and support to design Professional Surveyor: and design‐build teams, focusing on the successful start-up of newly awarded projects. She OH #PS7435 provides executive review of statements of qualifications and proposals. She manages the firms Best Practices to ensure consistency and quality in delivery. Projects included Dulles Metro Phase 2 Rail Expansion Design-Build Project in metro DC, Regina Bypass P3 in Saskatchewan, and SH183 Reconstruction Design-Build in Dallas. Sound Transit, East Link Light Rail Extension | Seattle, WA: Served as Design Manager for the final design of 11 miles of new double track light rail through Bellevue and Redmond, Washington. The project included 8 new stations. A portion of the project was converted to design‐build and the design team coordinated with a contractor team on a GC/CM segment. Her project responsibilities included negotiating scope and budgets, development of the design management plan, guiding development of the quality plan, and managing the entire design team, which included over 30 subconsultant firms. Transportation Expansion Project (T‐REX) | Denver, CO: Served as Deputy Design Manager for the $1.67 billion Southeast Corridor design‐build project in Denver, Colorado. The project included the reconstruction of 17 miles of interstate and construction of 19 miles of new double track light rail and 13 new transit stations. She was responsible for coordinating the design, quality, post design, budget, schedule, and change order efforts of the 300‐person design team, including over 40 design subconsultants. Also, while serving as a joint venture partner with the contractor, ensured fully integrated design and construction processes. The design was on time and within budget and the entire project was delivered 22 months ahead of the client’s required schedule. Eagle P3 Commuter Rail Pursuit | Denver, CO: Mary Cay was the proposed Design Manager for this project. During the pursuit phase, she was responsible for leading efforts for the pursuit of a new 35-mile commuter rail line in the metropolitan Denver Area. The design- build portion of this Public-Private Partnership was estimated at $1.5 billion.

Resumes

R-118 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

James Okazaki, PE | CPUC application/ traffic interface

James Okazaki has 47 years of experience in traffic engineering, transportation planning and transit operations. During the past 10 years as a private subconsultant, he has worked on 47 30 Metro’s various metro rail projects, primarily serving as a third party coordinator. Previously, Years of Years of Metro James worked 34 years for the City of Los Angeles and retired as the Assistant General Experience Experience Manager. Firm RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Rani Engineering, Inc. Metro Purple Line Westside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: James worked Location as a subconsultant as part of Metro’s design-build contracting team. He worked primarily Los Angeles, CA as the Third Party Coordinator working closely with the City of Los Angeles, City of Beverly Education Hills, and the various utility companies. MS, Engineering Metro Crenshaw/LAX Line | Los Angeles County, CA: James performed as the BS, Engineering Third Party Coordinator and Administrator for Metro. He assisted Metro in coordinating and Professional Credentials conducting the Field Diagnostic Meetings with the City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, Professional Engineer (Traffic): and the City of Inglewood and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), and CA #TR520 prepared the Hazard Analysis Report, and also prepared the Applications for Grade Crossing Authorization to the CPUC and obtained their approval. Participated in addressing the protest at the CPUC about not grade separating Centinela Ave. in the City of Inglewood. Metro Blue Line Safety Improvement Program | Los Angeles County, CA: James worked directly as a consultant to help Metro develop pedestrian gates with emergency swing gates for all 27 at-grade crossings along the Blue Line Corridor from Los Angeles to Long Beach. James prepared Technical Reports on options for grade crossing improvements at complex crossings to address City and CPUC concerns, before the GO 88-B documents were produced. Metro Expo Phase 1 and Phase 2 (DB) | Los Angeles County, CA: James worked directly as a consultant to the Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority (Expo Authority). He prepared the Applications for Grade Crossing Authorization (Phase I) for CPUC approvals, and assisted the Authority in the preparation of GO-143 B for Phase 2 of the Project. James participated in addressing the protest at the CPUC about not grade separating Farmdale Avenue. in the City of Los Angeles. He also worked as the Third Party Coordinator with the City of Los Angeles, Culver City, and the City of Santa Monica, Caltrans and the CPUC. Organized and conducted the Field Diagnostic Meetings and prepared the Hazard Analysis Reports to the CPUC for Phase 2 of the Expo Transit Project. Participated in addressing the protest at the CPUC about not grade separating Farmdale Ave. in the City of Los Angeles. Los Angeles World Airport, Ground Access Study | Los Angeles, CA: James worked directly for LAWA and participated on studies on how to extend the Green Line to LAX or a People Mover, and participated in other highway studies to improve traffic flow to and around the Airport, and performed third party coordination with local agencies and Caltrans. Participate in the widening project of the northbound Sepulveda Boulevard Off-ramp for the Century Freeway. Los Angeles Community College Transportation Projects | Los Angeles, CA: James worked as a subconsultant to Diana Ho Consulting Group, working for the Los Angeles Community College District to study how to improve transportation systems at West LA College, Mission College, and Harbor College, including implementing a new shuttle service for WLA College during construction of new parking facilities at the campus, in collaboration with Culver City Bus and Metro.

Resumes

R-119 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Chris Ortega | train control

Chris Ortega is a Systems Engineer with experience primarily in train control and railroad signal systems. His responsibilities include circuit design, field survey, programming, 4 1 technical writing, quality checking, simulation, field testing, and staging of various freight, Years of Years of Metro light rail, and street rail car train control systems for BART, Union Pacific, BNSF, Caltrain, Experience Experience and others. These systems include PTC, ATCS, CTC, AFO/PSO circuits, and numerous grade crossing systems. Firm Parsons RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Location Metro Blue Line Signal System Rehabilitation | Los Angeles, CA: Parsons, as Oakland, CA a subcontractor, is providing fully integrated and functional train control/communications Education systems. As Train Control Engineer, Chris is verifying track data with existing Metro drawings BS, Electrical Engineering to construct a track database; designing control lines for four new interlockings using new safe braking model; and, managing the CAD efforts to redraw and update existing Metro drawings. BART, Train Control Modernization Program | Oakland, CA: BART is replacing their existing track circuit based signaling system with CBTC technology. The CBTC system will replace 104 miles of fixed block signaling and 45 stations. Chris was responsible for the design procedure for building a track database for CBTC simulation and he verified data with existing BART drawings. BART, General Engineering Services | San Francisco, CA: General engineering services delivered include overall State of Good Repair upgrades for existing infrastructure, facilities, and systems including the Oakland 19th Street Station Modernization, Hayward Maintenance Complex upgrades, parking improvements at the Pittsburgh/Bay Point Station, Traction Power System Study, eBART Tie-in Support, and the Operations Control Center modernization. For the TCR Survey, Chris performs documentation and equipment surveys at BART Train Control Rooms. He evaluates the condition of the train control equipment plans and notes any discrepancies or poor practices in the plans and installation of train control equipment. For the SOP update, Chris provided analysis of FRA, AREMA, and other applicable train control standards. Seattle Department of Transportation, Center City Connector Streetcar Final Design | Seattle, WA:The Seattle Streetcar-Center City Connector, a modern streetcar line in Seattle’s downtown, links the existing South Lake Union and First Hill Streetcar lines. The Seattle Streetcar-Center City Connector will serve the City of Seattle’s three intermodal hub areas: Westlake Intermodal Hub, Colman Dock Intermodal Hub, and King Street Intermodal Hub. Parsons provided the City of Seattle with the 60 percent design for the 1.5-mile-long streetcar line and is preparing to deliver final design. Parsons is the sole prime contractor responsible for program and project management for delivery of the project engineering. Chris was responsible for updating train control-related items in project specifications, estimate, and drawings and addressing client comments and concerns from previous submittals.

Resumes

R-120 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Rick Pearman | CADD

Rick Pearman has over 30 of experience in preparing steel and concrete structural plans; petro-chemical plant design plans; roadway improvement plans; grading; paving and 30 10 drainage projects; parking lot layouts; state highway projects; large diameter sewer; water Years of Years of Metro and utility relocation projects; light rail and subway station projects; and heavy rail trench Experience Experience projects and large earthwork moving projects to accommodate construction of public works infrastructure Firm D’Leon Consulting Engineers RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Corporation Metro Purple Line Westside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: Principal Location Utilities Designer that prepared the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and Los Angeles, CA City of Beverly Hills water relocation plans for the proposed Constellation, Rodeo Drive, Education UCLA/Westwood, and VA Hospital stations and light rail transit alignment. Utility work Civil Engineering and GIS involved relocation of water mains and fire hydrants and creation of all related plan, profile Training and detail sheets using Microstation V8i, Inroads, and ACAD Civil 3D software. Incorporated RFP revisions and created As-Built record drawings for all utility based work on Beverly Hills Westside Subway Extension Wilshire/La Cienega and Fairfax Stations. Metro Expo Phase 2 (DB) | Los Angeles County, CA: Sr. CAD Designer that prepared L os Angeles Department of Water and Power’s water relocation plans for the proposed 6.6 mile light rail transit alignment from Culver City to Santa Monica, CA. Utility work involved relocation of water mains and fire hydrants and creation of all related plan and detail sheets using Microstation V8i software. Metro Expo Phase 1 | Los Angeles County, CA: Sr. CAD Designer responsible for creating and submitting street improvement drawings for roadway group using in-roads and Microstation software. Rick designed curb ramps and flow-lines in curbs and gutters along surface streets and intersections. He also adjusted street elevations using quarter point profiles to achieve proper surface water drainage. Rick was also responsible for creating and submitting drawings for roadway and utilities group using In-roads and Microstation software. LAWA Enabling Project | Los Angeles, CA: Sr. CAD Designer preparing the drawings for utility relocation and matrix of conflicts using Micro Station and In-Roads software. The project consists of the investigation for existing facilities above and underground off of the LAX Central Terminal Area for the developments of the future 96th Street Station at Aviation Blvd. Port of Long Beach Mid-Harbor Expansion | Long Beach, CA: Principal Designer that used Bentley Power Inroads V8i (Series 3) to design the existing, proposed subgrade, and proposed finished grade digital terrain models for the Phase 2 portion of the POLB expansion project. Rick also used Inroads to design the 3D composite utility model. This model included the proposed water, storm drain, and communications ductwork systems. Rick also used Bentley Power Inroads V8i to create all drawings for Pier B St, Pier C St, and Queensway Bridge street improvement paving plans and traffic control drawings. SR-91 CIP Design-Build | Riverside, CA: Sr. CAD Designer responsible for interpreting utility as-built plans and preparing utility relocation plans involving power transmission and distribution systems, gas mains, telephone trunk lines, oil pipelines, water and sewer mains, cable TV and City fiber optic communication systems. Also responsible for preparing utility pothole plans, utility relocation plans and utility agreement exhibits for bid documents prepared for the SR-91 design build RFP.

Resumes

R-121 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Henry Pena | communications

Henry has spent the last 16 years in the Telecommunications industry designing, implementing and providing solutions on Fiber Optic and Wireless Networks. He has 16 proven skills in technologies including; Broadband; Fiber to the Home; Hybrid Fiber/Coax; Years of Telephone Copper; Wireless Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Long- Experience Term Evolution (LTE) and Cabling (Outside/Inside Plant). Henry has supervised numerous projects and trained several teams on Fiber Optic cable installation, splicing and testing Firm performance. He offers extensive knowledge of communication systems and experience in WSP delivering the right solutions to every project. Location Orange, CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Education MobileNet Services | Irvine, CA: Served as RF Engineer for UMTS and LTE pre- MS, Electrical Engineering; BS, launch/post-launch data analysis and optimization. Initiated drive route packages using Electrical Engineering predictions coverage through verification of satisfactory key performance indicators through Anova Reports of post-launch drives. Other responsibilities included planning and data analysis (tools used: Actix, RFDS, CSS, MapInfo, Google Earth, and Tilt Calculators). Market Lead for Utah and Montana markets on UMTS and LTE pre-launch and post-launch optimization. Supervised 5 drive teams in the field and 3 engineers in office delivering 60 UMTS/LTE sites per month. Trained associate engineers on RF theory, Actix/MapInfo programs, and internal tools made in Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) macros. Also, trained in event analysis using Level3 messaging and Hand Over (HO) call flows used for verification/optimization process of UMTS and LTE networks. Created tools in VBA excel to efficiently extract information from the network to check neighbors, Primary Scrambling Code/Physical Cell ID , location, Azimuths, CellRef, DownLink (DL) frequency and information from the sites of interest.

Inversiones Desnetel | Lima, Peru: Served as fiber optic and hybrid fiber coax network designer. Provided troubleshooting of fiber optic backbone and testing for calibration of optical and RF levels for nodes and hubs. Networking experience included: TCP/IP, DHCP, DNS, FTP, HTTP, LAN and WAN routers. Provided oversight of fiber optic network design of 150 optical nodes. Included coaxial RF design based on “fiber to the last active” architecture. Trained technical personnel on fiber optic concepts, equipment, splicing, testing and troubleshooting. Positioned client as main provider of Internet solutions and cable modems in Peru for the Community Antenna Television (CATV) industry.

WKD Cable TV Consultants | Miami, FL: Performed as technical sales consultant for CATV. Provided technical support on RF products to include amplifiers, nodes, optical transmitters and addressable systems. Led the largest sale companywide for 20,000 cable modems order.

Resumes

R-122 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Erik Peterson, EIT | train control

Erik Peterson has six years of experience in rail signal engineering, specializing in grade crossing design. He has designed, checked, and trained client staff in highly complex 6 crossing design, including multiple overlapping crossings and interfacing crossings with Years of wayside equipment and traffic signals. He is proficient with the newest generation of grade Experience crossing prediction/motion detection equipment as well as previous generations. Erik’s main goal is to consistently find the most cost-effective method of design that meets safety Firm standards. Rani Engineering, Inc. Location RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Minneapolis, MN Metro Blue Line Extension | Minneapolis and Northwestern Communities, Education MN: Project Engineer who provided design services for systemwide electrical plans and BS, Mechanical Engineering signal engineering for the Bottineau light rail transit project. Responsibilities included Professional Credentials interdisciplinary coordination for the design of the systems deliverable of the civil Engineer-in-Training construction package. The project included creating design plans for multiple interlockings and grade crossing warning systems. Region of Waterloo ION Light Rail Signal Engineering | Ontario, Canada: Project Engineer who provided design services for application engineering of hardware plans in conjunction with the Waterloo light rail transit project. The project included creating design plans for multiple interlockings and grade crossing warning systems. Upgrade of Subdivision (Freight) From Absolute Permissive Block to Centralized Traffic Control | Multiple Contracts in Western U.S. States: Project Engineer who provided engineering safety checks of highway crossing plans. Checked all new grade crossings and upgrading grade crossings with new equipment. Worked with client to provide seamless integration between project phases and wayside signals. Worked closely with project lead on preliminary design of subdivision. Coordinated with wayside signal designers and material procurement group. Washington State Freight Mobility Plan (WSDOT) Task 9 | Western Washington State: Project Engineer who provided design of highway crossing plans for Task 9. Work included designing all new grade crossings and upgrading grade crossings with new equipment to streamline performance and interface efficiently with new wayside signals and railroad operation changes. Completed work ahead of accelerated deadlines. Coordinated with wayside signal designers and material procurement group. Positive Train Control Upgrade of Subdivision Commuter and Freight | Multiple Contracts in Western U.S. States: Project Engineer who designed grade crossings and wayside equipment to meet railroad and FRA standards. Grade crossing design included all new grade crossings as well as upgrading and replacing grade crossing equipment. Wayside signal design included electric locks and intermediate signals. Collaborated with designers to set frequencies and coordinate equipment placement. Found cost effective solutions to save the railroad money while meeting safety requirements. Minnesota Commercial Railway Redraws, Minnesota Commercial Railway | Twin Cities Metropolitan Region, MN: Project Engineer who checked highway crossing plans redrawn into Microstation from paper copies. Work included verifying that all existing information was shown as well as identifying potential safety issues. Developed CADD standards to ensure uniform plans can be created from numerous styles of existing plans.

Resumes

R-123 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Anh Pham | electrical

Anh Pham is a senior electrical engineer with over 30 years of experience in electrical engineering and design, construction support, field engineering for new and upgraded 30 power transmission and distribution systems, including high voltage substations, protection Years of and control relays, SCADA and substation automation. Experience with the preparation of Experience design and construction packages for the installation and modification of utility high voltage substations including physical layouts, sections and elevations, grounding, conduits, AC/DC Firm schemes, one line/three line diagrams, protective relaying (elementary and wiring diagrams, Auriga Corporation logic diagrams), panels and relay racks arrangement, SCADA systems Location San Jose, CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Education National Electric Grid of Kyrgyzstan (NEGK) Feasibility Study 500 kV Datka BS, Electrical Engineering Kemin Transmission Line | Uzbekistan: Senior Electrical Engineer responsible for Professional Credentials protection and control engineering and design for switchyard and substation projects up to Professional Engineer and including 500kV. Responsible for all project related electrical engineering, design, and (Electrical): CA #19346 construction support activities. Includes specifying high-voltage substation protection and control equipment for projects; design and/or modification of relaying and metering one line diagrams, three line diagrams, protection and control schematics, relay panel general arrangement drawings, DC and AC auxiliary systems, SCADA systems and automation; relay settings and coordination studies; testing and commissioning when required. Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD), Substation Design | Sacramento, CA: Senior Substation Design Engineer responsible for physical, protection and control engineering and design for switchyard and substation projects up to and including 230kV. Responsible for all project related electrical engineering, design, and construction, technical procurement support activities. Responsible for review substation projects designed by other engineers and/or contractors, QA/QC, vendor drawings, BOMs, procurement specifications. Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD), Rancho Seco PV Interconnection Project | Sacramento, CA: Senior Substation Design Engineer for the detailed engineering and design for a new 230 kV line from the proposed Rancho Seco Solar Farm II Facility to the Rancho Seco Switchyard. Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) Franklin Electric Transmission Substation Design | Sacramento, CA: Senior Substation Design Engineer for the detail engineering and design of the new 230kV/69kV Franklin substation. The electrical design consisted of developing, reviewing, integrating, and finalizing drawings needed to install new Franklin substation with 230kV one-and-a half bus configuration. Global Energy Services | CA: Engineer that esigned electrical power systems for both commercial and industrial developments; Performed Load Flow Study, Short-Circuit Calculation; Protective Coordination, Arc Flash Analysis via SKM Power Tools software; Designed and reviewed various distribution substation projects for clients, coordinated contractors working on projects, follow up and approval from clients.

Resumes

R-124 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Truc Pham | traction power | ductbank design

Truc is a Traction Power engineer of the transit systems team; she has worked for WSP since April 2016. Based on the fundamentals within electrical engineering she is learning systems 1 design and infrastructure for variety of railway based projects. She has a great ability to learn Years of new skills and apply them on the job, especially with utilizing computer assisted design and Experience simulation software. Her academic studies included coursework covering three phase power systems that helps her analyze complex problems and offer effective and efficient resolutions Firm in a timely manner for every assigned projects. WSP Location RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Orange, CA Blue Line LRT (BLRT) Extension Project | Minneapolis, NJ: BLRT is a 13-mile long Education extension of the existing Blue Line, formerly known as the Hiawatha LRT. When complete, BS, Electrical Engineering Blue Line Extension will begin from the present-end-of-line Target Field Station and proceed to the north to Oak Grove Parkway Station. Traction power will provide 15 new substations and existing S17, via installation of a new DC feeder circuit breaker in S17, new DC frame- mounted disconnect switches, and new DC feeders to BLRT’s OCS and rails passing nearby. She was assigned to work on site plan designs, by routing ductbanks to the respective manholes/handholes and into the alignment towards the OCS feeder poles. For each substations as well work on cable and conduit that correlated to each site. She has been assisting her senior traction power engineers with any given tasks and provide general support for design projects and proposals. This gives her an opportunity to gain design knowledge in the preparation of design products of the selection and installation of traction power equipment. With the use of computer aided design software such as AutoCAD and Microstation she is able assist and carry out the designs in a timely manner. BLRT is a stepping stone for her develop and review designs from the ground up with the guidance of her senior engineering staff. This project has helped her interact with all engineering disciplines, construction managers, and clients.

Resumes

R-125 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Kevin Pittleko | train control

Kevin Pittleko has 12 years of experience in transportation engineering, rail signal engineering, water resources, and surveying. His experience includes both public and private 12 sector work in preliminary and final design, which has included wayside signals design, Years of Positive Train Control upgrade, roadway, water resources, utilities and surveys. Specific Experience skills he brings to the team is his experience in designing road alignments and profiles, cross sections, roadway drainage and utility coordination. He has significant hydraulic and Firm water resource experience for roadways in rural areas. Kevin is an experienced manager and Rani Engineering, Inc. coordinator as he previously led the wayside signals design group at Rani Engineering. Location Minneapolis, MN RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Education Washington State Freight Mobility Plan (WSDOT) Task 9 | Western Washington BS, Civil Engineering State: Senior Engineer who managed design of plans of wayside signals for Task 9. Work included design of high speed turnouts and crossovers and Positive Train Control to accommodate frequent commuter and freight traffic and increase rail capacity and safety. Completed work ahead of accelerated deadlines. Coordinated design with grade crossing designers and material procurement group. Positive Train Control Upgrade of Subdivision, Commuter and Freight | Multiple Contracts in Western U.S. States: Senior Engineer/Wayside Signal Design Lead who provided design and internal checking of wayside signal plans. Checked plans to upgrade or replace wayside signals equipment such as control points, interlockings, intermediate signals, electric locks, and handthrow switches and removing poleline to effectively interface Positive Train Control with existing signal systems. Kevin converted plans from older formats to the current design software as needed by scope of project. Coordinated with grade crossing designers, material procurement group, and programming group. Upgrade of Subdivision (Freight) From Absolute Permissive Block to Centralized Traffic Control | Multiple Contracts in Western U.S. States: Senior Engineer who worked on a compressed schedule to internally check wayside plans that were designed to replace Absolute-Permissive Block (APB) signaling system, including interlockings, overlaps, and handthrow switches, with Centralized Traffic Controlled signaling system, including control points, upgraded or new intermediate signals, and electric locks. The subdivision was converted from 3-aspect APB to 4-aspect Centralized Traffic Control and prior-designed (but uninstalled) Positive Train Control equipment was updated to current standards. Interfacing was required where work was adjacent to older ElectroCode locations. 16th St. NW Transit Priority Planning Study | Washington D.C.: Senior Engineer responsible for existing conditions site assessment and documenting and reporting on a BRT roadway corridor for the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and District Department of Transportation’s 16th Street NW Transit Priority Study. Scope included recording and documenting the 2.5-mile corridor’s roadway conditions and bus stop facilities. The scope also included a report summarizing the findings of the condition assessment for presentation to WMATA and DDOT.

Resumes

R-126 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Edward Poon, EIT | rail activation & start-up

Edward Poom has 17 years of experience in construction inspection in California. He is experienced in providing civil, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, controls, and fire alarm 17 system inspection services for a variety of construction projects, including complex transit Years of systems. He assists owners and their representatives to meet the requirements of the Experience California Title 24 Administrative code and to serve as their liaison with the Division of State Architects (DSA) or the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD). Firm Edward works with the owner’s design professionals to ensure that project plans and Cornerstone Concilium, Inc. specifications have been implemented and a quality construction project has been achieved. Location San Francisco, CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Education Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART)/Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), BS, Civil Engineering Silicon Valley Berryessa Extension | Milpitas/San Jose, CA: Field Engineer for this Professional Credentials $2.1 billion project that extends the BART system from the new station in the Warm Springs Engineer-in-Training district in the City of Fremont to two new stations in Milpitas and San Jose. Edward’s responsibilities include providing inspection and witness testing for mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems for Milpitas and Berryessa Stations and other power substations, fire alarm and fire sprinkler systems installation, and seismic bracing system installation. BART Warm Springs Extension Project | Fremont, CA: Project Inspector for this project that extends the BART system from the existing Fremont Station South to a new station in the Warm Springs district in Fremont, with an underground subway portion under the Fremont Central Park. Edward’s responsibilities included providing inspection and witness testing for mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems for the Warm Springs Station and other power substations, solar panels system installation, subway ventilation fans installation, fire alarm and fire sprinkler systems installation, and seismic bracing system installation. BART, Pleasant Hill Garage Structure | Pleasant Hill, CA: Project Inspector responsible for performing inspections of all portions of the construction for compliance with requirements of construction documents and rules & regulations of California Codes. Reviews all construction documents and reports for deviations in the construction processes. Prepares all necessary reports, including accurate dailies, progress of construction and issue reports to architect, owner, & state department offices. BART, Richmond BART Station Parking Structure Improvements | Richmond, CA: Project Inspector responsible for performing inspections of all portions of the construction for compliance with requirements of construction documents and rules & regulations of California Codes. Reviews all construction documents and reports for deviations in the construction processes. Prepares all necessary reports, including accurate dailies, progress of construction and issue reports to architect, owner, & state department offices. Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, Bed Building 1, Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development | San Jose, CA: Project Inspector responsible for performing inspections of all portions of the construction for compliance with requirements of construction documents and rules & regulations of California Codes. Reviews all construction documents and reports for deviations in the construction processes. Prepares all necessary reports, including accurate dailies, progress of construction and issue reports to architect, owner, & state department offices. Stanford Medical Center/Lucile Packard Children Hospital North Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Expansion, OSHPD | Palo Alto, CA: Project Inspector responsible for performing inspections of all portions of the construction for compliance with requirements of construction documents and rules and regulations of California Codes. Reviews all construction documents and reports for deviations in the construction processes. Prepares all necessary reports, including accurate dailies, progress of construction and issue reports to architect, owner and state department offices. Resumes

R-127 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Nap Purificacion| CADD

Nap Purificacion has extensive AutoCAD experience in civil, structural, electro/mechanical drafting, plumbing, tunnel projects and light rail designs. He is an experienced CAD Design 22 10 Drafter responsible for drafting of layout plans, schedules, details for ductbank and traction Years of Years of Metro power drawings. Experience Experience

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Firm Metro, Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor Design-Build | Los Angeles, CA: CAD Mott MacDonald Design Drafter responsible for drafting of signal & communication details and substation Location single line diagram drawings. Pleasanton, CA Metro Gold Line Eastside Extension Phase 2 | Los Angeles County, CA: CAD Education Design Drafter responsible for drafting of signal & communication details, substation relay BS, Industrial Education/Drafting and metering, substation equipment and ductbank layout and communications station block diagram. Denver Regional Transportation District (RTD), I-225 Light Rail Transit Corridor | Denver, CO: CAD Design Drafter responsible for drafting of OCS layout plans, schedules, details and annotations for the 10.5-mile expansion line that will connect to the Southeast Corridor alignment and will travel along the I-225 highway to the future Peoria Smith Station. California High Speed Rail, Bakersfield-Palmdale Segment, California High Speed Rail Authority | Fresno, CA: CAD Design Drafter that was responsible for the drafting of OCS layout plans and annotations for the Bakersfield to Palmdale segment of the high speed rail project. Green Line DNAMOS-1 Design Build Project, Sacramento Regional Transit, Sacramento, CA: CAD Design Drafter responsible for drafting of layout plans, schedules, details for Ductbank and Traction Power drawings. Santa Ana River Interceptor Replacement Project, Orange County Sanitary District (OCTA), Orange, CA: CAD Design Drafter responsible for shaft design of Microtunneling Details and Signal Communication Details. Airport West Light Rail Transit Project, Utah Transit Authority, Salt Lake City, UT: CAD Design Drafter responsible for drafting drawings such as legends, symbols, schedules and abbreviations. Performed drafting of plans and profiles, and detail drawings. Sound Transit TES, University Link Light Rail, Sound Transit, Seattle, WA: CAD Design Drafter responsible for drafting of layout plans, schedules, details and annotations. Jordan River Service Center, Utah Transit Authority (UTA), Salt Lake City, UT: CAD Design Drafter responsible for the drafting of OCS layout plans and details. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Program, San Jose, CA: CAD Design Drafter responsible for the drafting of layout plans and annotations. Central Phoenix/East Light Rail Transit Valley, Valley Metro Rail, Phoenix, AZ: CAD Design Drafter responsible for drafting of OCS layout plans, schedule and detail drawings. Sound Transit TES, Central Link Light Rail/Sound Transit, Seattle, WA: CAD Design Drafter responsible for drafting of OCS layout plans, schedule and headspan structure erection diagram and detail drawings.

Resumes

R-128 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

David Pyatt | overhead contact system support

David Pyatt has more than 29 years of overhead line electrification (OLE) extensive experience including design from feasibility to construction design; installation construction planning and 29 site supervision; and testing and commissioning for both AC and DC electrification systems for Years of various projects in the United States, Canada, and United Kingdom. Experience

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Firm I-225 Rail Line Project, Regional Transportation District (RTD) | Denver, CO: Mott MacDonald OCS Principal Engineer responsible for providing specialist design services for the I-225 Location extension. Also provided OCS technical advice to local engineers and help develop design Los Angeles, CA solutions for issues found during the design and construction activities. Education AMT Jonction de l’Est, CN, Montreal, Canada: Review of the design documentation BS, Mechanical Engineering and completed installation for the OCS modifications associated with the grade separation project. As Lead Engineer, I was responsible for production and coordinated of updated OCS designs to complete the rectification work of the existing and installation of the remaining equipment. Acted as on site OCS supervisor, during construction and rectification work, responsible for construction design, final inspection/acceptance and testing and commissioning. Responsible for updating all design documentation to final as-built status. Obtained temporary PE license form the Ordre des ingénieurs du Québec for the project. Sound Transit University Link, Sound Transit | Seattle, WA: OCS Lead Engineer responsible for providing revised OCS design for U-Link extension due to electrical services installed in the tunnel soffit. Carried out review of Contractor submissions including materials, installation procedures and testing and commissioning. Portland Light Rail Transit Expansion/Construction Management | Portland, USA: OCS Lead Engineer responsible for providing site engineering design services for expansion of yard including design review and production of structure erection documents. Also provided OCS technical advice and produced design solutions for issues found during construction. Portland Street Car, Affordable Electric | Portland, OR: Provided OCS professional design services for the SW Moody Ave project. Scope included review/approval of contractors work plan, field and acceptance testing, pre-energization test plans, integrated system testing and inspection and safety certification sign off. San Carlos Street Improvement, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) | San Jose, CA: Lead Engineer for VTA work on City of San Jose’s San Carlos Street Improvement Project. Project includes moving numerous OCS Poles in complex 4 block section of the existing Light rail transit system. Scope includes design and construction interface with City and VTA Operations, as well as construction staging. California High-Speed Rail Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Support, California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) | CA: Providing electrification design services, based on a 2x25 kV overhead contact system (OCS), associated with several sections of the project, which spans 800 miles, within the California area for trains speeds up to 220 mph. Presently in preliminary engineering phases, work to date has included establishing OCS and traction power facility interface requirements in accordance with the system design requirements. Buffalo Metro, Niagara Falls Transport Authority I Buffalo, CA: Lead Engineer for NFTA metro project refurbishment including OCS condition survey and report, Design Rationale Report giving recommendations and technical support during tendering process. Acting Site Supervisor responsible for final inspection and witnessing of testing and commissioning.

Resumes

R-129 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Rosetta Ramirez, EIT | rail activation and start-up support

Rosetta Ramirez has more than 28 years of experience in rail transit including light rail transit, commuter rail, and heavy rail, and has managed the design and construction of 28 10 systems, civil, and track type projects. Rosetta managed the start-up of two major rail Years of Years of Metro transit lines in Los Angeles and four extensions in San Jose, California, which included Experience Experience all integrated testing and safety certification. She has managed the integration of safety and security into transit projects, from the preparations of Preliminary Hazard Analyses Firm (PHA) and Threat and Vulnerability Analyses (TVAs), through development of Safety and Mott MacDonald Security certification programs in accordance with FTA guidelines. She has an extensive Location understanding of safety requirements and procedures for the design and construction of Los Angeles, CA rail signals, communications, traction power, and OCS systems, and familiarity of their Education integration with EMU vehicles. She has performed safety hazard analyses and vulnerability M.B.A. analysis workshops for the Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor Design-Build Project to identify BS, Mechanical Engineering and categorize hazards or potential hazards associated with the operations of the proposed Professional Credentials rail system. Her electrification experience includes 12 KV, 21 KV, 16.34 KV, and 34.5 KV Engineer-in-Training on multiple projects for LA Metro and the VTA. She is also experienced in the design, procurement, and permitting of rehabilitation projects involving active major commuter railroad. Rosetta has served in a variety of project roles including contract manager, project manager, resident engineer, deputy project manager, and inspector. Additionally, she has strong communication skills, and is a self-starter capable of successful interaction at all professional levels.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro, Regional Connector Transit Corridor, Design-Build | Los Angeles County, CA: Safety Certification responsible for creating the safety certification checklist and preliminary hazard analysis. Regional Connector is a 1.9-mile dual-track rail system with three new stations that will connect the existing Metro Gold Line, Metro Blue Line, and Metro Exposition Line light rail transit systems through downtown Los Angeles. Key project elements include four major underground cut and cover sections and three transit stations, twin EPB TBM-driven tunnels, all systems necessary for operation, 18,000 LF of wet utilities and 6,000 LF of dry utilities, and direct fixation track composed of 115-pound running rail. When completed, the line will allow for a single seat ride throughout Los Angeles County and will link LA Metro’s entire 80-station system to Southern California’s regional passenger rail system, Metrolink, that services 55 stations. Metro, Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor Design-Build | Los Angeles, CA: Safety Certification/Rail Systems Designer that developed the safety certification checklist for the rail project and performed a Preliminary Hazardous Analysis (PHA) and Vulnerability Analysis (TVA) workshops as the Owner’s Engineer. She conducted a comprehensive review of LA Metro’s Design Criteria and other current industry regulations, codes, and practices and applied these to the developed checklist for design and construction for the design- builder to execute. The certifiable elements list was based on LA Metro criteria and additional subsystems added based on the Project specific elements. A single form document was created for each element of the design and construction conformance checklist. For the PHA, Rosetta performed an analysis of the generic hazard groups and evaluated their threat to the system, and provided recommendations for control. This PHA is the first step in the system safety process to identify and categorize hazards or potential hazards associated with the operations of the proposed rail system. Denver Regional Transportation District (RTD), I-225 Light Rail Transit Corridor | Denver, CO: Safety Security Support, reviewed PHA for both Civil and System and provide comments. Attend monthly Fire Life Safety and Safety and Security Meeting.

Resumes

R-130 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Philippe Rapin | alternative delivery strategy

Philippe Rapin has more than 15 years of experience in Strategy and Alternative Delivery/P3 advisory. Philippe has developed a strategic understanding of numerous Asset Classes such 15 as road and rail transportation projects, real estate, maritime, airports and power facilities. Years of Focusing mostly on risk analysis and risk transfer his role is usually bridging the engineering Experience world with the commercial, finance and legal components. Working typically at the inception of multi-million-dollar projects, Philippe excels at working within all layers of an organizational Firm structure to align the corporate goals to the practical implementation of a project. Currently, Mott MacDonald Philippe serves as Mott MacDonald’s sub-Divisional Manager for the Infrastructure Finance, Location Management Consultancy America Division. Specialized services include P3/infrastructure Los Angeles, CA finance technical and procurement advisory in the jurisdictions of the United States, Canada, Education U.S., Central and Latin America, and Caribbean, with transactions ranging from $50 million to MSC., Technology Management $5 billion. Projects in this role include:

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Ports America Group, Inc., 10 Year Asset Validation Engineering Services I NJ: Project Manager and Strategic Advisor for one of the largest U.S. terminal operator and stevedore, operating in more than 42 ports and 80 locations, with operations in every major port in the nation. Philippe and his team have worked for Ports America on various confidential projects across their current portfolio of terminals including: West Basin Container Terminal at the Port of Los Angeles, Port Newark Container Terminal at the Port of New York and New Jersey, the Port of New Orleans, Seagirt Terminal at the Port of Baltimore, and Huskey Terminal at the Port of Tacoma. Services provided by Philippe and his team have included asset assessment and valuation for Container terminals, gate facilities, buildings, and cargo handling equipment; capacity analysis for existing and planned upgrades for terminals; conceptual planning and design for RoRo and container terminals; and cost estimating for new design and maintenance of facilities and equipment Philadelphia Regional Port Authority, Southport Development Technical Advisory, I PA: Project Manager that provides lead strategy/procurement advisory services to the Port Authority’s team which was exploring alternative development options for South Port. Philippe reviewed the options against the Port’s objectives and acceptable risk profile to structure the transaction in an acceptable manner to both the Authority and the private sector. The assignment continued with the preparation of RFQ and tendering documents, including performance mechanism and finished with a recommendation for the selection of a prime candidate. Port of Calais Expansion, P3/Lender’s Technical Advisory I France: Project Director for the $1 billion USD Port of Calais expansion P3 project has successfully reached financial close. The Port is the fourth largest port in France with the highest amount of passenger traffic. Mott MacDonald served as technical advisor to the P3 consortium’s lender through financial close, with an on-going role in project monitoring through the design and construction phases. Mott MacDonald assessed the project risk profile to advise the lenders on potential technical issues relating to project contract.

Resumes

R-131 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Krishan (Kris) Sabherwal, PE | traction power

Krishan Sabherwal a rail systems engineer with more than 27 years of experience of serving the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority with traction power systems engineering. 27 He has been involved with design, testing and commissioning of light rail transit traction Years of power substations and project management light rail transit systems such as rail grinding, Experience track geometry survey (TGR), stray current and ultrasonic testing of rail, bridge management systems and inspections, LED/traction power system-wide energy efficiency program, Firm and more. Krishan led the outstanding Retro Commissioning Program Management team, Auriga Corporation resulting in considerable annual savings of over six million electrical kWh units amounting Location to approximately $800,000 and avoiding over three million pounds of Co2 greenhouse San Jose, CA gases. Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) awarded VTA a Certificate of Recognition for his efforts. Education Krishan has also been the recipient of GOLD Level Recognition of the American Public Graduate Degree, Transportation Association (APTA). He studied Electrical & Instrumentation Engineering at Electrical Engineering and the Faraday House Engineering College, affiliated with IEE, London, England. Electronic/ Instrumentation Control Systems RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Traction Power Substation Systems and Energy Management | San Jose, CA: Rail Systems Engineer that provided management and technical expertise engineering maintenance of medium-high voltage traction power substations and energy consumption operating with an annual budget of approximately $4 million. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Rail Projects Way Power/Signal | San Jose, CA: Rail Systems Engineer/Project Manager that provided knowledge of ultrasonic testing of rail, rail grinding program, light rail bridges and structural inspection program, and stray current testing of rails etc. Santa Clara County/Caltrans, Light Rail Transit Traction Power Substations for Guadalupe Corridor | San Jose, CA: Consultant Electrical Engineer for the design review, testing, installation & commissioning, systems integration of light rail transit 12/21 KV of Siemens traction power substations during the construction phase at the Guadalupe Corridor of San Jose. Made frequent trips at Siemens Plant in Atlanta for testing integrity and threshold parameters of substations prior to their shipments. Provided field-engineering expertise for installing high voltage power distribution throughout the Guadalupe Corridor in San Jose. Provided coordination and oversee the electrical contractors work during the installation process of power systems including the electrical utility systems. Applied engineering principals and knowledge for the solution of engineering problems. Shared and applied superior abilities in providing training and engineering support to assigned staff, coordinating and taking technical decisions. Communicated effectively with other utility departments of cities and other agencies as needed during the construction environment. Provided quality assurance of light rail vehicles during their assembly process at the San Jose manufacturing facility and restructured the documentation system.

Resumes

R-132 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Barry Sam | communications | independent systems integration review team

Dieu (Barry) Sam is a Principal Project Engineer with 31 years of experience involving design 31 25 and management of major projects for LRT, HRT, and BRT systems. He has been responsible Years of Years of Metro for preparation of final design documents and systems integration and testing for projects Experience Experience for Metro Rail Systems (including Metro Blue LRT, Metro Green LRT, Metro Red HRT, Metro Eastside Extension LRT, Metro Mid-City Exposition LRT, and Metro Foothill Extension LRT). Firm Parsons RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Location Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension 2A | Los Angeles County, CA: Barry Pasadena, CA was responsible for managing the systems integration through design and construction Education phase, and also serve as test manager during the system commissioning phase to ensure BS, Electrical Engineering a fully operational system. Work involved extensive reconfiguration of the train control, communications and electrification systems in an operating Metro Gold Line. Barry was also responsible for liaising and interfacing with other design disciplines as required to ensure an integrated systems design and to support construction management activities. As part of the construction engineering effort, Barry developed site-specific installation drawings, along with complete book of installation standards. After completion of construction, he assisted the start-up team with systemwide testing and systems commissioning. Metro Expo Phase 2 (DB) | Los Angeles County, CA: Barry was responsible for preparing contract drawings, specifications, and construction cost estimates as they relate to station communications subsystems, including public address, closed circuit television, telephone, variable message sign, and ticket vending machine systems, as well as the expansion of the existing control center to include new workstations and displays for the Expo Line. He performs system analyses, design, development, and interface requirements to ensure proper integration of station communications subsystems with other system-wide elements; i.e. optical/cable transmission, control center, and supervisory control and data acquisition systems. Barry is also responsible for liaising and interfacing with other design disciplines as required to ensure an integrated systems design and to support construction management activities. He provides project management support, which includes interfacing with the contractor and client for the purposes of advancing the design and procurement and support test and commissioning activities. Metro Red Line | Los Angeles County, CA: Barry was responsible for the design of and construction support for the transit automatic control and supervisory control and data acquisition systems. His tasks included specifications and criteria preparation, including system analysis, design, development, testing, and installation requirements in accordance with specific Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, National Electrical Code, and National Fire Protection Association requirements and bid proposal evaluations. Barry provided contract document reviews for quality and technical conformance, coordinated and monitored project progress, developed data points and functional interface descriptions based on design specifications of each system, and developed and implemented start-up and systems integration plans and production of integrated test procedures.

Resumes

R-133 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Dave Schlesinger | operations & planning

Dave Schlesinger is a nationally-recognized and published rail professional with experience and expertise in the areas of training, safety, maintenance, and rail operations. His decade- 21 10 long experience with Metro includes delivery, commissioning acceptance, maintenance and Years of Years of Metro repair of heavy and light rail vehicles; investigation of bus and rail accidents; and working Experience Experience with and interacting with all aspects of rail operations including mainline, yard, and dispatch. Dave has a unique and in depth understanding of the rail transit industry nationwide, having Firm managed and presented courses, led training exercises, and participated in extensive, behind Parsons the scenes tours of over forty transit rail & bus agencies as well as commuter and freight Location railroads. Ontario, CA Education RELEVANT EXPERIENCE MS, Transportation Parsons Senior Technical Consultant | Nationwide: Dave is responsible for managing, Management; BS, Business developing, budgeting, and scheduling expert-level training for the largest transit bus radio project in the nation as well as multiple Positive Train Control projects for both passenger and freight railroads. Dave is leading the team that is assessing changes needed at the BART to prepare the agency for their new train control system. Dave is an expert on computer based train simulators and is currently leading the development and delivery of this complex equipment for three projects. He has created federally-compliant training programs and safety plans and has led the development of key project deliverables such as operations and maintenance manuals, computer based training and e-learning. Dave is an expert on FRA, FTA, and state rail regulations, including the CPUC. He is the Parsons corporate lead on Roadway Worker Protection and is authoring a company-wide training plan per federal requirements. United States Department of Transportation, Transportation Safety | Nationwide: As Course Manager and Instructor, Dave managed world class rail, safety, and security training for rail and transit agencies, domestically and internationally. He was the project manager for the development of “rail 101”, advanced rail accident investigation, and system safety courses. Dave provided subject matter expertise and support for the rail and transit industry nationwide on start-up, operations, organizational, safety, and training issues. Metro, Rail Fleet Services Supervisor and Quality Assurance Engineer | Los Angeles, CA: Dave conducted accident investigations covering all aspects of Metro rail, including yard and mainline operations, wayside as well as system and vehicle maintenance. He was a key member of rail fleet services that ensured rail vehicles were properly operated, repaired and maintained. Dave also worked on several other pivotal agency projects, including activation of new rail alignments, maintenance and revenue vehicle procurement and safety, wheel-rail interface issues, traction power failures, large-scale emergency drills, and CPUC regulatory analysis and compliance. Metro Red Line | Los Angeles, CA: As Assistant Site Manager, Dave led a team that achieved on-time acceptance of 74 new, Red Line rail vehicles, worth approximately $100 million. His responsibilities included commissioning, testing, repairs, and new vehicle acceptance. He ensured that all trains met safety and operational requirements and that Metro’s issues and concerns were properly understood, resolved, and documented.

Resumes

R-134 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

John Schlick, PE | OCS

With two decades of experience in the design and construction industry, John Schlick combines hands-on construction management and design experience with proven 20 7 leadership, team-building, and communications skills. He has provided rail systems Years of Years of Metro engineering services in Los Angeles, San Jose, Phoenix, Seattle, Salt Lake City, Jersey Experience Experience City, Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, and Edmonton. Beyond his knowledge of the traction electrification system, he has experience in track, ductbank system, substations, and train Firm signaling. His experience in GC/CM, DB, and DBOM contracts gives him insight into all Parsons facets of railroad projects. He has demonstrated capabilities in AutoCAD and MicroStation. Location Seattle, WA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Education Metro Blue Line Signal System Rehabilitation | Los Angeles, CA: The project MS, Construction Management; includes the design, furnish, install and test of the addition of new interlockings and siding BS, Civil Engineering tracks, installation of OCS, replacement of existing OCS contact wire, modifications to the Professional Credentials existing mainline ATC System, modifications to the train control system in the Metro Blue PE, CA, Civil, 74201 Line Yard, and street improvements on Long Beach Avenue. John is the OCS Design Lead for contact wire replacement of two sections, overhead conductor rail installation in the tunnel to replace existing low-profile OCS, and new crossover and siding OCS design. Metro Crenshaw/ LAX Line | Los Angeles County, CA: This corridor extends approximately 10 miles north from the existing Metro Green Line to improve public transit and mobility with connections to existing and new light rail lines. With six stations, three subway sections, and four aerial structures, power from 10 substations will electrify various overhead arrangements varying from single contact wire to double messenger wire and conductor rail. As Lead OCS Design/Review Engineer, John was responsible for advanced conceptual design of OCS drawings. He was also responsible for reviewing the DB designers’ drawings, specifications, cost proposal, and report submissions for all systems disciplines and various civil works. Metro Mid-City Exposition LRT Segment E2-Storage Yard, Los Angeles, CA | This fast-track project provided final design for a storage yard adjacent to an existing revenue line and city street, including new crossovers from the new storage yard to the existing main line and new crossovers on the existing main line. John was responsible for management of staff, estimating, invoicing, and deliverables. He was also responsible for final design of the OCS drawings. Utah Transit Authority, Airport TRAX Line | Salt Lake City, UT: The project included a new 5.7-mile extension from downtown Salt Lake City to the SLC International Airport, including six new substations. The work included lowering the OCS profile in the airport flight path and raising an OCS profile at a non-standard crossing by a manufacturing plant. John was responsible for complete design of the OCS system. His duties included designing and developing contract documents; structural calculation development and review; quality assurance reviews; coordination with other engineering firms; coordination of all rail systems engineering design disciplines, including substations, traction power, underground raceway, signaling, and communications; field engineering; and inspections.

Resumes

R-135 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Andrew Schultz | train control

Andrew Schultz has eight years of experience as a rail signals design engineer and field engineer. Andrew works with other disciplines to engineer safe and efficient train control 8 operation in Light Rail Transit settings. On previous projects, he designed circuitry at new Years of and existing at-grade crossing bungalows to achieve optimal performance standards, Experience allowing for effective coordination with adjacent bungalows. Andrew has also developed plans to replace or upgrade wayside signals equipment, designed aspect charts, Firm profiles and construction overviews, and created Positive Train Control mapping files to Rani Engineering, Inc. accurately interface Positive Train Control with existing signal systems. He utilizes his Location Industrial Engineering degree to establish efficient workflow which emphasizes effective Minneapolis, MN communication to all necessary parties. Education BS, Industrial Engineering RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Blue Line Extension | Minneapolis and Northwestern Communities, MN: Signal Designer who worked closely with other disciplines to ensure a constructible train control design which ensures the client’s design criteria is engineered. Specific responsibilities include: Placement of wayside signals to minimize headway between trains; Establish track circuit boundaries throughout alignment; Establish safe train control for at-grade highway crossings and at-grade pedestrian crossings; Generate aspect charts as well as route and locking tables; Determine location, size, and quantities of train control bungalows; and Generate detailed typicals pertaining to constructability of encasements/signal equipment. Positive Train Control Upgrade of Subdivision, Commuter and Freight | Multiple Contracts in Western U.S. States: Design Engineer who designed construction plans to replace wayside signals equipment, updated profiles and construction overviews, generated new aspect charts, and created Positive Train Control mapping files to interface Positive Train Control with existing signal systems. Wayside locations were engineered to function with Positive Train Control technology, and new houses with new equipment were designed when this was not feasible. All project documentation reflected the client’s high design standards, including redrawing locations as needed. Andrew distributed Positive Train Control mapping and engineering files to the client. Upgrade of Subdivision (Freight) From Absolute Permissive Block to Centralized Traffic Control | Multiple Contracts in Western U.S. States: Design Engineer who upgraded existing locations in respective subdivisions to interface with new Centralized Traffic Control equipment. Projects included significant modifications to highway crossings due to lengthened approach distances. Re-engineering of crossings was conducted with safety and cost to the client as the driving factors. Control points and intermediate signals were designed to embody fully functional Centralized Traffic Control subdivisions, with profiles, construction overviews, and aspect charts newly generated as necessary. Highway Crossing At-Grade Individual Projects | Multiple Contracts in Western U.S. States: Design Engineer who designed all new at-grade crossing locations, including new remote units and bungalows, to communicate predictor information for relevant crossings. He engineered new data recorder circuits to integrate with existing equipment, replaced motion detectors/predictors with more efficient units, modified crossing engineering to perform optimally under new wayside conditions, replaced gates and flashers to work with existing equipment in bungalows, and engineered crossing operations to account for pedestrian station stops. Andrew also relocated an idle but fully functional bungalow to new location and re-engineered circuits/equipment to function under conditions at new location. Resumes

R-136 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Leslie Schumaker, PMP | scheduling

Leslie has over 35 years of experience in all aspects of project controls and project management including process development, system architecture, system integration, 35 3 curriculum development, personnel training and development, organizational assessments, Years of Years of Metro and general project management consulting. Her project experience covers several Experience Experience industries, including engineering/construction, transportation, energy, software development, manufacturing, pharmaceutical, aerospace, defense and environmental remediation. Firm Intueor Consulting, Inc. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Location EAM PMO Implementation, Enterprise Asset Management Program Management Denver, CO Office, New York Metropolitan Transit Authority (NYMTA) | NY: Leslie is a Senior Education Principal Consultant currently supporting NYMTA’s Program Executive for Enterprise Asset AB, Psychology Management (EAM) with the creation of the Program Management Office (PMO). Chartered Professional Credentials by the CEO, Executive Sponsor and Executive Committee, the NYMTA EAM PMO must PMP #36608; OPM3 Certified build the necessary support structures that enable the successfully delivery of a portfolio Professional Assessor of change programs and projects at and by each of the agencies (NYCT, MTA Bus, LIRR, Metro North, Bridges and Tunnel) and MTA IT. In addition, the EAM PMO is responsible for delivering a portfolio of HQ focused and enterprise-wide projects. This includes one MTA Asset Management System, a common enterprise information system, and a shared culture and approach to asset management across all agencies, levels, and functions. Leslie is supporting the development of the PMO infrastructure and staff, the standardization of a PRINCE2 project delivery frameworks, the development of Standard Operating Procedures for Project Delivery/Project Management, and the configuration of the associated project management tools, systems and templates. California High Speed Rail Authority | CA: Leslie is assisting the Program Delivery and Project Controls teams in re-engineering their current processes; developing Implementation plans and methodologies; developing detail requirements for implementing an integrated Project Management Information System to support Schedule Management, Cost Management, Contract Management, Document Management, Risk Management and, Performance Management. Metro Construction Project Management Best Practices Study | Los Angeles, CA: At the direction of the Office of Inspector General, Intueor was engaged to identify best practices for improving the management and oversight of major capital construction projects at the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The project involved the identification of strengths, challenges and opportunities for improvement. Leslie was a Principal Consultant on Team Intueor that conducted interviews; reviewed and analyzed fundamental information pertaining to Metro’s management and oversight of major capital construction projects; conducted an on-line, anonymous, self-assessment survey to assess the level of awareness and current use of standard project management practices; conducted Project Workshops with select project teams (Project Manager, Construction Manager, Contract Administrator and Project Controls Manager) to capture lessons learned and best practices; and prepared a benchmark of comparable agencies Best Practices. The results of this effort was compiled into a study report that included over 100 recommendations for improvement Metros $42 Billion Capital Program. Organizational and Capital Project Delivery Evaluation – Phase 2, Port of Long Beach | CA: Leslie represented Intueor as Lead Principal Consultant on a project with the Port of Long Beach to assist the port in developing organizational capability (organization design, structure, policies, procedures, business processes, and information technology systems) to deliver a $4.4 billion Capital Program aimed at improving and modernizing the port’s infrastructure (terminals, piers, etc.). Leslie led the Intueor effort to implement the recommendations arising from the Organizational Assessment (Phase 1) such as the development of an Organizational and Operational Model for the Engineering Bureau. Resumes

R-137R-137 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Abdulhaque Shaikh | traction power

Abdulhaque Shaikh joined the Traction Power Engineering Division of Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) in 1988 as a Traction Power Engineer. Over the course of his nearly 30-year 49 career at BART, he moved up from a Traction Power Engineer to manage the entire Traction Years of Power Engineering Division from 2007 to 2016. Prior to BART employment, he worked in the Experience Electrical Power System Industry accumulating a total of 49 years of experience in Electrical Power System engineering, design and construction. Abdulhaque has worked as a Project Firm Manager and dealt with construction management, scheduling, procurement, document Auriga Corporation control, and engineering design. He interfaces with in-house agency staff, contractors, Location vendors and external parties at project level. San Jose, CA Education RELEVANT EXPERIENCE MS, Electrical Engineering Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), Traction Power Engineering Division | San B.E., Electrical Engineering Francisco Bay Area, CA: As Manager, Traction Power Engineering Division, had overall Professional Credentials responsibility for assigned projects, including design, rehabilitation, and construction Professional Engineer activities. Oversaw projects in traction power system rehabilitation, maintenance, and (Electrical): CA #E11072 construction projects to ensure technical and code conformance to established standards. Managed and oversaw traction power engineering projects including consultant contracts; reviews and approves final project plans, specifications, cost estimates, payments, claims, submittals, and correspondence. Managed and participated in the development and implementation of goals, objectives, policies and priorities for assigned programs; recommended and administered policies and procedures. Planned, directed, coordinated, and reviewed the work plan for assigned staff; assigned work activities, projects and programs; reviews and evaluates work products, methods and procedures; meets with staff to identify and resolve problems. Starting from concept development, design, engineering, project management, construction, and integration into BART operations, implemented and completed following major BART renovation projects. The projects were funded by FTA with multi-million dollar yearly grants. BART, Traction Power Substation Replacements | San Francisco Bay Area, CA: Manager, Traction Power Engineering Division, for several Traction Power Substation (TPSS) replacements. Produced design specifications, contract documents, design calculations and analysis for the TPSS (34.5 kV) replacement projects. Managed and planned the new TPSS layouts, including staging of the portable TPSS, Equipment Removal Plan, design of the installation of new TPSS, and design of 34.5kV protection control circuits of the new TPSS. Project included replacement of 34.5kV/780V 5MW failing cast coil traction power transformer with natural oil filled transformers at selected BART traction power substations. Replaced original 34.5kV PIPE & PILC type cables with ethylene propylene rubber (EPR) solid dielectric cable at selected location in the cable system. Replaced original 1000V XLPE cable with EPR cable at selected locations in the 1000V cable system. Replaced original 34.5kV minimum oil circuit breakers with 34.5kV vacuum cylinder circuit breakers at all BART traction power substations and Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) feed stations including improvement of the circuit breaker cubicles. Also included the replacement and improvement of original 1000V GE circuit breakers and cubicles. Replaced original relay/copper wire based control systems with microprocessor/optical cable based traction power equipment control and stray current control systems.

Resumes

R-138 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Andre Shamoon, PE | train control

Andre Shamoon has extensive experience in the design, supervision, inspection, installation, maintenance, commissioning and diagnosis of signaling systems for railroad and 15 5 subway systems and in the management of related projects. He is highly knowledgeable Years of Years of Metro in modern train control systems such as ATS, ATP, ATO. He has solid knowledge in Experience Experience the design, installation and testing of relay and solid-state interlocking and Integrated Signaling CBTC systems (Siemens and Alcatel ESTW L90 5, Nippon Signal, VHLC) and Firm Integrated Signaling systems and crossing controller. Mr. Shamoon has been responsible Mott MacDonald for the coordination / management of multiple engineering and design-build projects Location including research, bill of materials, design, purchasing, factory testing, installation and Los Angeles, CA commissioning. He has strong knowledge of CENELEC, UIC, VDE, JIS standards and is Education familiar with FRA regulation and NEC codes. MS, Electrical and Communications; BS, RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Electrical/Electronics Metro, Regional Connector | Los Angeles, CA: Systems Lead that was responsible Professional Credentials for designing the communications for the project. In this design the Regional Connector Professional Engineer project team provided Metro with communication equipment that included: CTS, SCADA, (Electrical), CA #19906 telephone, fire alarm, gas detection, CCTV, TPIS, IDACS and UPS systems for the three stations and connection to the head end stations and their interfaces to existing stations. Also, RCC provided the communication requirements for other systems and subsystems. Metro Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor | Los Angeles County, CA: Preliminary design of Southwest Yard Signaling System and prepare bid documents for project. Control and check the design of telecommunication, Signaling, OCS and Electrical design of the line. Participate on workshop and design review of the signaling and communication system. LA Streetcar Preliminary Design | Los Angeles, CA: Participated in the preliminary design of signaling and communication project for LA Streetcar in City of Los Angles. This design provided the layout of Signaling system for LA Streetcar and the list of equipment that also included the Communication Systems layouts and equipment list. Also provided cost estimate for project. Metrolink Commuter Rail Simi Valley Corridor Crossing and Signaling Design Project | Ventura, CA: Designed as part of the new Positive Train Control system for Metrolink new 4 GPC4000 crossing controller and VHLC system for modification and replacement of existing crossing controller GPC3000. Reviewed cutover plan and provide comments and recommendation. Metrolink Commuter Rail Aspect Chart Design, Correction and Verification | Los Angeles, CA: Senior Signaling Coordinator for design of Aspect Charts for Metrolinks subdivisions; Orange Valley, Olive, River, Ventura and San Gabriel Subdivisions Responsibilities included reviewing, and verifying existing aspect charts. Reviewed subcontractors design and provided comments. Metrolink Commuter Rail Eastern Maintenance Facility Security | San Bernardino, CA: Senior Communication Designer for camera surveillance system, project installed 48 CCTV cameras, conduit layout, communication backbone, DVR, installation plans, power back up system and preparing installation plans. The communication backbone base utilizes fiber optic media with routers, switches and links to office. Metrolink Commuter Projects MTA Fiber Optic Connection Project | Los Angeles, CA: Participated in design of Fiber Connection project from MTA Union Station communication room to San Bernardino County. In this design Metrolink provided to Metro, 24 single mode fiber from existing 256 fiber cables, for use in their communication network.

Resumes

R-139 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Bruce Shewchuk, PE | constructability review

Bruce has extensive experience in the construction management of bridge, highway and rail projects. Bruce knows how to manage construction and he excels at getting the parties 33 to the table and resolving complex project issues. Bruce has worked for WSP on Caltrans Years of bridge/roadway projects, UPRR / Caltrain / VTA, BATA and local agency projects for the last Experience 25 years and has worked on several projects that have similar elements to your types of PROJECTS. Bruce has supported On-Call projects as both Project Manager and Resident Firm Engineer. He is an expert in bridges and retaining walls constructed to Caltrans standards WSP and he has excellent technical capabilities for falsework and shoring analysis. Bruce has Location been actively involved in constructability / biddability reviews, change order management Antioch, CA and detailed cost estimates. Education BS, Civil Engineering RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Professional Credentials Caltrain 25th Avenue Grade Separation | San Mateo, CA: Resident Engineer on this Professional Engineer: CA (#C- construction of approximately one (1) miles new railroad grade-separation (from Hillsdale 49703) Avenue to SR92 in San Mateo) by partially raising the rails in a lightweight-cellular-concrete filled MSE wall, partially depressing the existing road at 25th Avenue and construction two (2) new road connections at 28th and 31st Avenues. The grade bridges will require the installation of two (2) new concrete precast bridges and one (1) steel bridge. The bridges will be supported by CIDH and CIP abutments and center columns. In addition, the project will construct a new elevated, center-board, Caltrain station, with access from 28th Avenue, as well as from a two-cell CIP pedestrian viaduct. The project will also include grading and drainage improvement, changes to existing traffic lights, additional street and platform lighting, relocation of existing rail signals, and custom made shelters and other amenities at the station. BATA On-Call Construction Management, Bay Area Toll Bridges: Project Manager / Resident Engineer on following key BATA projects: Advanced Toll Collection & Accounting System & Open Road Tolling San Francisco – Bay Bridge Open Road Tolling and Gantry Project San Francisco – Bay Bridge Toll Booth Clock Project Toll Bridges Violation Enforcement System Project Toll Bridges Changeable Message Signs Project Toll Plaza Sites and Approaches (FASTRAK Signs) Project Toll Bridges Signing and Striping Project Dumbarton Bridge CCTV Project Caltrain - California Ave & Palo Alto Underpass and Station Improvement Projects | Palo Alto, CA: Resident Engineer / Railroad Bridge Supervisor. This multi-stage project includes the removal, reconstruction, and relocation of existing facilities; construct pedestrian underpasses, station platforms, ramps and stairs, grade crossings, drainage facilities; track shift, furnish and install station amenities, landscaping, signing and lighting. The project also included six bridge retrofit / replacements of various magnitudes. In general work includes removal and reconstruction of track panels, removal of existing rail top bridge deck, construct drainage facilities and retaining walls. Caltrain - San Bruno Grade Separation Phase 2 – Box Culvert Reconstruction | San Bruno, CA: Resident Engineer. The 500-foot double barrel box culvert that goes under the tracks in two places and runs parallel to the NB main line track and ties into a junction structure was rebuilt to sustain the loading of the temporary shoofly and embankment of the grade separation. Work included shoring along the main line track 15-feet from the centerline of track within the foul zone with railroad protection; demolition of the existing box culvert, subgrade enhancement, box culvert reconstruction; grind and overlay on First Ave. Resumes

R-140 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Sheri Soldatke, PE | rail activation & start-up

Sheri Soldatke is a Senior Project Manager with 23 years of engineering and project management experience ranging from environmental, building commissioning, mechanical 23 10 design, and rail transportation projects. Sheri served as the project manager and mechanical Years of Years of Metro lead overseeing the delivery of design through warranty phase commissioning services Experience Experience for a range of government, university, and corporate clients. She has experience providing commissioning services that allow for various levels of LEED certification through the Firm USGBC. Parsons Location RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Pasadena, CA Metro Purple Line Westside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: As Systems Education Design Manager, Sheri is the Design Unit 6 manager and responsible for overseeing the BS, Civil Engineering design of the systems package for the Westside Subway project. The disciplines include, Professional Credentials track, traction power, train control, communications, corrosion control, conduit design, noise PE, MN, Civil, 42054 and vibration, tunnel electrical, and station and tunnel ventilation. The first phase of the project will lay a 3.9-mile extension from the current terminus to three new stations. Metro Expo Line Phase 2 (DB) | Los Angeles County, CA: As Deputy Design Project Manager, Sheri oversaw the design and was responsible for design-related staffing, budget, change order management, system integration, and project closeout of the $850 million DB project. This project included an 8.6-mile double-track extension to the existing metro system. The construction entailed nine new passenger stations; three of the passenger stations are on elevated structures crossing major arterials. Additionally, a 2,200-foot grade separation under the intersections at Exposition, Flower, and Figueroa streets was constructed to facilitate train operations. The traction power system consists of 750-VDC power from eight traction power substations, distributed to the trains by a low-profile OCS. Other operating systems include train control and grade-crossing warnings, radio, telephone, public address, VMS, CCTV, SCADA, and fare collection. The alignment is heavily landscaped to parkway standards with bike paths and park-and-ride surface lots, along with a 500-space parking structure. Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension 2A | Los Angeles County, CA: As Deputy Design Project Manager, Sheri oversaw the design and was responsible for design-related staffing, budget, and change order management of the DB project. The project included final design and construction of 11.5 miles of track, utilities, crossings, and systems; six passenger stations; 12 new light rail and three new freight railroad bridges; and a 25-acre light rail maintenance facility that includes a storage yard and a full maintenance and repair shop. The facilities design includes a 120,000-square-foot maintenance and operations facility, which is the first facility of its kind in the country to achieve LEED Gold status.

Resumes

R-141 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Gino Spadafore | rail activation & start-up

Gino is a senior supervisory engineer with WSP with more than 36 years of experience in managing construction projects and systems in the transportation industry. His experience 36 includes the supervision and management of engineering and construction staff, utility Years of coordination, contract administration, construction support, project ignition, materials Experience testing, and technical inspection of civil, systems, electrical and architectural construction projects in the transit, facilities and highway sectors. Firm WSP RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Location California High Speed Rail | CA: Systems interface integration manager for program San Francisco, CA management services, including planning, oversight of the environmental review/preliminary Education engineering (30% design), construction management, testing and commissioning for the line BS, Electrical Engineering and every other phase up to revenue service for the high-speed rail connecting San Francisco and Sacramento in Northern California with Los Angeles/Anaheim and San Diego in the south. The 800-mile system will be designed to carry more than 100 million people a year by 2030 and will be the first contemporary high-speed train operating on dedicated right-of-way in the United States. South Valley BART/VTA | South Valley, CA: Field Engineer for the Communications system backbone. Interface the VTA with BART. Survey approximately 15 miles of existing infrastructure in order to design a path for the installation of two new 72 fibers. South Valley Bus Rapid transit (SBRT) Project, South Valley, CA: Perform electrical inspections on the SBRT stations facilities and coordinate service power connections with the local utility. Work with the VTA and City Of San Jose to resolve open and pending Traffic signal issues in order to put the renovated traffic signals into service. Phoenix Valley Metro, Phoenix, AZ: Factory and field testing engineer on six substations, SCADA, train control, track to earth resistance testing and traffic signal / train control systems integration testing. Sacramento Regional Transit | Sacramento, CA: Field testing engineer on three substations, train control, Wi-Fi for system security and SCADA. Silicon Valley Berryessa extension BART Traction Power Substations | Silicon Valley, CA: Represent BART in the pretesting and final testing of seven traction power substations. Observe and document all testing per submitted and approved test procedures as well as repairs and modifications. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) | Santa Clara, CA: Lead senior resident inspector who successfully managed contract administration and inspection teams, both consultant and VTA staff, on various construction contracts to ensure compliance with contract documents. Duties included managing construction inspectors and day-to-day activities on electrical/systems construction projects including but not limited to change order negotiations, claims, records, staffing, and resolving technical issues. Implemented test procedures for light rail projects and traffic signals. Acted as a resource and provided continuous support to designers during design process and during construction to ensure quality design. Vasona Light Rail Project (8 Stations), Santa Clara VTA, Santa Clara, CA: Lead senior inspector and acting principal in charge of all electrical and systems construction, installation, and inspections, factory and field testing, systems integration and rail activation on this major new light rail project (5.2 miles).

Resumes

R-142 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

John Spellman, PE | train control | independent systems integration review

John Spellman, PE is an electrical engineer with 19 years of experience specialized in railway signaling and train control systems. John has been the principal and senior signal 19 17 engineer in domestic projects for Class I freight railroads, commuter rail systems, light Years of Years of Metro rail and transit lines, streetcar authorities, regional and short line railroads as well as for Experience Experience international schemes for Network Rail (formally Railtrack PLC) in the U.K. and the Toronto Transit Commission in Canada. He is a leader in the rail community serving on AREMA Firm Committee 36 and the IRSE, North American Chapter. He is a Partner and Vice President of Innovative Solutions in Signaling ISiS Consultants LLC. Location Louisville, KY RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Education Metro, Metrolink Raymer to Bernson Double Track | Van Nuys-Northridge- BS, Electrical Engineering Chatsworth, CA: Signals Engineer for two new control points, three intermediate signal Professional Credentials locations, rehabilitation of grade crossing warning systems at nine at-grade rail crossings, Professional Engineer and industrial switch in block protection. This will be a “Positive Train Control ready” (Electrical): CA #E17140 wayside signal system. Overall, this project will provide a second 6.4-mile mainline track on the Metrolink Ventura Line. This line is also used by Amtrak’s Intercity Pacific Surfliner and long-distance Coast Starlight corridor as well as UPRR Freight. Port of Los Angeles, Berth 200 Railyard and Track Connections | Los Angeles, CA: Signals Engineer responsible for the new/improved control points and new/rehabilitated at-grade crossing warning systems, twenty-two power assisted track switches installed in non-signaled territory with a radio network that allows switch and route alignment by DTMF command from locomotives or spread-spectrum radio link from the dispatcher at Badger Bridge. Overall for Phase I, the project consisted of construction of a new yard, support tracks for the TraPac and China Shipping/West Basin Container terminals, double-track with improved connections to the Alameda Corridor, and access road improvements. Phase II included track connections on the new yard’s east and west ends to tie-in the Pacific Harbor Line San Pedro mainline, track improvements for the San Pedro mainline, West Basin leads, Pasha Lead and future TraPac lead. Denton County Transportation Authority, A-Train | Denton to Carrolton, TX: Signals Engineering Lead for the new 21-mile commuter rail line with temporal separation and multiple quite zones. The line is also used by Dallas, Garland and Northeastern Railroad (DGNO) for freight service. Work included nine control points, nine intermediate signal locations, grade crossing warning systems at thirty-seven at-grade rail crossings, interfaces to grade crossing warning systems at three at-grade rail crossings in shared corridor with Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART), and industrial switch in block protection.

Resumes

R-143 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Marlene Stevens | project administration

Marlene Stevens has more than 15 years’ experience in a range of project field administration roles. Her assignments include various projects types for both the public sector and private 15 companies, serving both construction management and contractor teams. Marlene’s Years of duties have included project control, cost and change control, document control, software Experience administration and training, RFI and submittal tracking and processing, monthly progress reports development, pay application processing, change order and claim negotiations, Firm tracking and processing, contract administration, scheduling and recovery analysis and LKG-CMC, Inc. cost estimating. In addition, Marlene has developed and monitored schedules, developed Location cost recovery analysis and developed estimates. She has experience with a broad variety San Diego, CA of software including Microsoft Office Professional, Prolog, SharePoint, Timberline, MS Project, Sure Track and Primavera Contract Management.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE SANDAG Mid-Coast Corridor, San Diego River Bridge and Rose Creek Bikeway | San Diego, CA: Construction Field Office Technician that processes, tracks, distributes and files letters, submittals, RFIs, RFPs, change orders, and payment vouchers utilizing a Prolog web-based electronic document management system. She establishes and maintains a categorized system of hard copy files using project filing system and assists with finalizing project records for archiving purposes. Marlene develops and distributes meeting agendas and minutes and prepares and tracks various project reports and forms for the review, approval by the Resident Engineer and submission to the client. She composes and prepares documents and correspondences. Overall, the Mid-Coast Corridor is a CM/GC $2.2 billion 11-mile 9 station trolley extension to the Westfield UTC Transit Center in La Jolla. The.9-mile new double track San Diego River Bridge serves Amtrak and commuter rail. Sanitation Department Grit, City of San Diego, | San Diego, CA: Senior Document Control Manager for this $33 million project included construction of a temporary facility and remodel and expansion of an existing facility. As part of the consultant construction management team, Marlene managed all document control, from initiation to archive, using software and manual techniques. She served as the software database administrator and trained staff to use the system. Marlene assisted in RFI, submittal and schedule reviews and processing; and developed and compiled the client Monthly Progress Report. City and County of San Diego, CA: Internal Project Manager for work that included multiple public works/engineering projects totaling $12 million. As part of the consultant contracting team, Marlene provided oversight of the day-to-day operations and managed the procurement and scheduling of materials, subcontractors and labor for project start-up through completion. She developed and managed cost and document controls and provided critical path scheduling and monitoring. Marlene administered the project schedule, pay application processes, budget, and profit/loss outcome, developed cost recovery analysis, compiled and negotiated disputed or potential claims work and negotiated both owner and subcontractor change orders. Cesar Chavez Middle School, Oceanside School District | Oceanside, CA: Project Engineer. For this $25 million project, Marlene monitored task impacts , planned, earned and actual and provided over/under cost projections and time values on monitored areas of work as part of the contractor team. She analyzed and assembled data for schedule delay fragments and integrated into the master schedule; monitored and tracked RFIs, submittals, inspection requests, and other field engineering processes using Prolog software; and compiled, authored and submitted to the construction manager the monthly Project Narrative; a compilation of the schedule and other noteworthy project activity.

Resumes

R-144 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

David Stewart | train control

David Stewart is skilled Signal Engineer with six years of transit and crossings experience in the railroad industry. David is a former U.S. Air Force Communications, Navigation 6 2 Avionics Specialist extensively trained in electronics technology and utilization of mobile test Years of Years of Metro equipment platforms. His responsibilities now include signal system design engineering of Experience Experience freight, commuter and light rail signal systems. Firm RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Innovative Solutions in Signaling Metro Gold Line | Los Angeles County, CA: Signal Engineering support for Location improvements, new aspect scheme, control line modifications and replacement of vehicle Louisville, KY detection systems. Education LAMTA Metrolink Raymer to Bernson Double Track Expansion |Van Nuys- A.S., Architectural CAD Northridge-Chatsworth, CA: Signal Engineering Support Signals Engineer for two new control points, three intermediate signal locations, rehabilitation of grade crossing warning systems at nine at-grade rail crossings, and industrial switch in block protection. This will be a “Positive Train Control ready” wayside signal system. Overall, this project will provide a second 6.4-mile mainline track on the Metrolink Ventura Line. This line is also used by Amtrak’s Intercity Pacific Surfliner and long-distance Coast Starlight corridor as well as UPRR Freight. Union Pacific Railroad Crossing Design Contract| CA: Train Control Support for the wayside and highway crossing design. Overall, Innovative Solutions has been an approved highway crossing subconsultant for Union Pacific Railroad since 2008. Personnel perform in the neighborhood 100 designs yearly. These designs include plan and schematic views, application of the Siemens GCP-4000 crossing system, revision of existing design to accommodate new designs, and programming of the GCP-4000 systems. Union Pacific’s system includes over 20,000 rail miles with operations throughout the West and Midwest. Crossing design requires designers are familiar not only with the equipment to be applied, but also with FRA crossing regulations, state requirements, and best practices promulgated by AREMA and the MUTCD. Port Authority Trans-Hudson PATH: Design and Implementation of a microprocessor (iVPI) based signal system that would work with the CBTC system being installed. David was also part of the restoration team that was tasked with getting service back online after Hurricane Sandy flooded the tunnels at Hoboken Station it included installation of the iVPI system, testing digicode track circuits, switches and signals. The equipment used included GCP 3000, GCP 4000, PMD, HXP, XP4, VHLC, Electrocode, iVPI, Style C, Wheel Detectors, vehicle detector loops, PLC simulation.

Resumes

R-145 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Stoil Stoilov, PE | traction power

Stoil is a senior supervising electrical engineer with WSP and has extensive experience in all stages of the design and technical analysis of traction electrification systems for rail transit 42 7 projects. He has worked in a variety of roles, such as traction power lead engineer, design Years of Years of Metro engineer, and traction power simulation analysis specialist. Stoil’s main areas of expertise Experience Experience include performing traction power system load flow studies, preparing traction power study reports, and developing traction power system design drawings and technical specifications Firm for light rail and heavy rail projects. WSP Location RELEVANT EXPERIENCE San Francisco, CA Metro Purple Line Westside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: Electrical Education engineering specialist. Performed traction power load flow study to determine the number, Electrical Engineering Diploma ratings and locations of the traction power substations, and prepared related report for the Professional Credentials advanced preliminary engineering phase of the WSE project. Study and report included Professional Engineer: CA (#E- evaluation of the trunk line of the existing heavy-rail system, which is shared by the Red and 12061) Purple Lines. Metro Expo Phase 2 (DB) | Los Angeles County, CA: Electrical engineering specialist. Performed traction power load flow study, with overhead contact system temperature analysis, and prepared related reports for the preliminary engineering and final design stages for the Expo2 project. Responsibilities included supervision of the development of the traction power system’s final design. Metro Regional Connector | Los Angeles County, CA: Electrical engineering specialist. Performed traction power load flow study to determine the number and locations of the traction power substations and overhead contact system conductor configuration, and prepared related report for the advanced preliminary engineering phase of the Regional Connector Project. Metro Blue Line LRT Extension | Minneapolis, MN: Electrical engineering specialist. Performed the load flow study to determine the number, locations and ratings of the traction power substations, and overhead contact system conductor sizes for the preliminary engineering phase of this 13-mile extension of the existing Blue Line. Prepared also the associated traction power load flow study report. The project is ongoing as of early 2017. Lynwood Link Extension LRT Project | Seattle, WA: Electrical engineering specialist. Performed the load flow study for the preliminary engineering phase of the project to determine the number, locations and rating of the traction power substations, including analysis of the rails to ground potentials and overhead contact system temperature. Prepared also the related traction power load flow study report. SANDAG General Engineering | San Diego, CA: WSP is responsible for the AA/DEIS/FEIS/PE for the Mid-Coast light rail line extension project and transit design and planning work for the Low Floor Vehicle Implementation Program on the existing LRT system. For the Blue Line and Orange Line, Stoil’s responsibility was to perform a load flow study to evaluate the existing traction power system with respect to its capability to support future operations with more powerful vehicles and shorter headways. And if needed, determine required system upgrades. On the Mid-Coast Project, his responsibility was to perform a traction power load flow study to determine the number, locations and ratings of the traction power substations, and to supervise the development of the traction power system design. Honolulu High-Capacity Transit Corridor Project, HI: Lead traction power engineer responsible for the overall traction power system design for this 20-mile, elevated fixed- guideway, “light metro” type rail transit project. WSP is providing the environmental impact statement and preliminary engineering for the project. Resumes

R-146 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Lurae Stuart | RAMS | safety certification

Lurae is a senior technical safety and security specialist with more than 30 years of experience in transit operations, maintenance, system safety, and security. Lurae provides 30 knowledge and application of all hazards (safety and security) risk evaluation and Years of management, primarily in public transportation utilizing water, rail, road and the associated Experience infrastructure. She has provided strategic and technical guidance and project management for projects that include safety and security risk strategy and master planning, project design Firm and development, governance, oversight, and system safety and security implementation. WSP Her group facilitation and supervision has provided guidance for the development of industry Location standards in safety and security, public transport modal operation and maintenance, and Portland, OR cyber security. Her international consulting experience includes managing diverse cultural Education projects. BS, Sociology/ Psychology

Lurae applies safety and security methodologies to alternate contract delivery platforms and adapts the safety and security program to emphasize reduced safety and security risk, not prescriptive actions. She balances approach by understanding the client’s risk tolerance and ensures that the program reflects the agency’s safety and security goals. Lurae excels in carefully managing budget, schedule and deliverables to provide the highest level of client satisfaction. Her flexible approach to delivering client requirements ensures that challenges that arise during project delivery are met with grace, good humor and quick solutions

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE California High Speed Rail | CA: Providing security consulting services for the design, engineering and construction of the high-speed rail project in California. Lurae develops safety and security plans, leads security assessments and assists with the safety analysis, develops safety and security certification criteria, teams with system safety in leading the fire/life safety and security activities, and advises the safety and security committees. Security services include the development of the project and system policing models as well as assessment of trespassing, threat and vulnerability assessments for all segments. Luare’s work has also included design review to implement risk mitigation strategies. The program has an integrated safety and security program to ensure the highest level of safety and security for the project. Sound Transit System Safety Program Consulting Services | Seattle, WA: Providing project management general safety consulting services for the commuter rail, bus and light rail operation including update of all system safety plans, hazard analysis and other safety services as required by the Sound Transit Safety and Quality Assurance Division. The projects included system safety plan review and update for Tacoma Link and Sounder, safety and security management plan revision, safety and security certification plan review, and hazard management program update. Lurae also provided training in risk management training to Sound Transit management and provided staff-level training on system safety and security, including safety and security certification. WSDOT Freighthouse Square Amtrak Relocation | Seattle, WA: Provided risk analysis and supported a preliminary hazard assessment for the relocation of Amtrak to the Tacoma Freighthouse Square Sounder Station. The assessment included a grade crossing analysis related to commuter rail, Amtrak and freight service through the crossing. As part of the assessment, Lurae held two workshops with multiple jurisdictions to discuss the hazards and define appropriate mitigations and design considerations. WSDOT Rail Division Cascade Corridor High-Speed Rail Improvements | Olympia, WA: Provided task management and strategic consulting services to update and revise the system safety plan and accompanying hazard management plan for WSDOT high-speed rail improvements on the Cascade Corridor. The project will help prepare for the proposed 49 CFR Part 270 regulation implementation. Resumes

R-147 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Smitesh Sukumar, EIT | communications

Smitesh Sukumar is an experienced Systems Engineer with strong technical and analytical skills. He has been involved in multi-disciplined rail transit systems projects, including 14 both fixed-price and cost reimbursable type contracts. His project background includes both Years of DBB and DB contracts. Smitesh is well advanced in designing multiple communications Experience systems. He has provided construction support in the implementation of large-scale rail systems projects. Having knowledge of codes, standards, and engineering methods, he is Firm proficient in applying design fundamentals and has functional capabilities including team Parsons building, preliminary engineering, design, installation support/oversight, testing, and system Location commissioning. Pasadena, CA Education RELEVANT EXPERIENCE MBA, Entrepreneurship BART General Engineering Services | San Francisco, CA: General engineering Management; ME, Electrical services delivered include overall State of Good Repair upgrades for existing infrastructure, Engineering; BE, Electronics and facilities, and systems including the Oakland 19th Street Station Modernization, Hayward Telecommunications Maintenance Complex upgrades, parking improvements at the Pittsburgh/Bay Point Station, Professional Credentials Traction Power System Study, eBART Tie-in Support, and the Operations Control Center Engineer-in-Training, NY modernization. Smitesh reviewed and commented on the communications systems for the Hayward Maintenance Complex upgrade design drawings and specifications. WSDOT Point Defiance Bypass Positive Train Control Services for Owner’s Representative | Tacoma, WA: The bypass will improve an approximately 14-mile segment of existing Sound Transit-owned track. The project is adding a second track and reconstruct the existing single track. Parsons is providing direction and management assistance services to WSDOT for work related to the implementation of the PTC system for the Point Defiance Bypass project as well as programming, integration, and commissioning. Smitesh is responsible for supporting the design, installation, and testing of network and radio systems for the PTC system. Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority Dulles Corridor Metrorail - Phase 2, Package A (DB) | Fairfax and Loudon Counties, VA: Parsons is lead designer on a DB team, responsible for the design and construction of Phase 2 of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s Silver Line Extension out to Dulles International Airport and beyond. The project includes the design and construction of an 11.4-mile-long segment of double track and systems, six transit stations, and roadway improvements. Smitesh is the lead communications systems engineer managing the communications system design. The design included all equipment and materials, as required, for a complete rail station communication systems, including video surveillance, passenger information display, public address, telephone, local area network, intercommunication, SCADA, mobile radio, fire alarm, and intrusion detection systems.

Resumes

R-148 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Stefan Svensson | train control

Stefan Svensson is an accomplished Signal Engineer, with 21 years of railroad signaling knowledge, including projects execution, as well as quote and proposal activities. He is 21 highly educated in electric power/automation engineering, and experienced in the design Years of and project management of signaling and control system projects, including specifications, Experience requirements, checking and review as required for specific projects. His area of expertise includes: signal project management; intermediate block systems; centralized train control; Firm factory and field testing; interlocking systems; ATP systems; detail checking; level crossing Innovative Solutions in Signaling systems; and train detection Location Louisville, KY RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Education GE Transportation, Vital Harmon Logic Controller Scheme Design | United Diploma, Electric Kingdom: Senior Application Engineer involved in the first VHLC scheme designed in the Power/Automation (Sweden); UK. Other tasks included technical evaluations, cost estimations, subcontractor and client Training: Interlocking, Relay and interfacing, and the introduction of new products. Solid State, Intermediate Block Tvärbanan Tram Extension | Stockholm, Sweden: Project Engineer responsible for the Systems, ATP System delivery of a turn-key signaling system that provided performance specification, consisting of; interlocking, Centralized Traffic Control , transmission system, axle counter, ATP (wayside + on-board). Utah Transit Authority Front Runner E-ATC, North Line | Salt Lake City, UT: Project Engineer responsible for specifying operational speed code scenarios in form of use cases, developing documentation method and the production of the control lines. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, TRE Medical Center, Dallas, TX: Project Engineer for the four-staged turnkey signaling design for four interlocking, and one road crossing required for a road bridge to be replaced in the area. Signaling system configured by Innovative Solutions in Signaling included VHLC, XP4 and Electrocode 4. The interlocking logic was fully checked in VitalSimTM. Sunrail Lake Monroe Draw Bridge | Sanford County, FL: Project Engineer that produced the design for replacing the vital fringe system between the interlocking controlling the area and the bridge control system itself. Signaling system was configured using ElectrologIXS. New Mexico Rail Runner Express | Albuquerque, NM: Project Engineer that helped retire the existing signaling system by using a pole line with a new signaling system, based on Electrocode 4H.

Resumes

R-149 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Dora Terry | corrosion control

Dora Terry has 28 years of experience in design, installation, and testing of cathodic protection (CP) and stray current control for underground metallic structures, hydraulic 28 4 elevators, testing the resistivity, pH, and sulfate levels of soil, grounding systems design, and Years of Years of Metro corrosion control prevention for DC-operated rail transit systems. She has worked on major Experience Experience projects such as the Gold Line Foothill Extension LRT in Los Angeles, Central Phoenix/East Valley Transit, Caltrain Positive Train Control, and Denver FasTracks. Dora has extensive Firm experience involving stray current control and migration on reinforcement concrete structures Parsons associated with heavy and light rail systems, and designing CP systems to protect utilities. Location Her experience also includes developing specifications, evaluating and updating design Richardson, TX criteria’s, establishing test methods and maintenance programs that aid in preventing stray Education currents, and developing CP configurations for buried piping systems. Dora has conducted BS, Electrical Engineer numerous inspections and tests, including coating inspections, rail-to-earth resistance, Professional Credentials pipe-to-reference potentials, CP test and evaluations for underground piping systems, Cathodic Protection Technician pipeline current measurements, In-line inspection, close interval potential surveys, current Cert. No. 66824 NACE requirement tests, electrical isolation design and testing of galvanic and impressed current International CP systems, electrical continuity of bonded structures, stray currents grounding system evaluations, testing hydraulic elevator components, stray current survey, ground resistance Corrosion Specialist in Training, for single and multiple electrode systems, and the evaluation of soil corrosivity by performing NACE International soil resistivity, pH, and soil sulfate test and analyzing the collected data.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension 2A | Los Angeles County, CA: Dora assisted with specifications and designs associated with light rail structures and facilities and adjacent buried utility piping systems. Dora was responsible for incorporating stray current and corrosion control systems into the traction power, structural, and trackwork designs and coordinating cathodic protection requirements for buried piping systems. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Harrisburg Overpass Systems Design and Construction Phase Services | Houston, TX: As Corrosion Control Engineer, Dora was responsible for coordinating and developing stray current and corrosion control designs, answering RFIs, and approving submittals. Her duties included incorporating stray current and corrosion control systems into the traction power, structural, trackwork designs and determining cathodic protection requirements for buried piping systems adjacent to the LRT alignment. City of Chicago, O’Hare International Airport Automatic Transit System Expansion and Modernization | Chicago, IL: As Senior Stray Current & Corrosion Control Designer, Dora performed the baseline stray current survey to determine what levels of stray current were present on the existing system. She designed the grounding system for the structure and test station for monitoring stray current. Dora also analyzed the pH test and sulfate test data to determine how the soil would affect the grounding and what type of rods should be used through-out the project. Dora is responsible for testing verification regarding stray current and corrosion control systems.

Resumes

R-150 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Axel Thibodeau, PE | overhead contact system support

Axel Thibodeau is a Professional Mechanical Engineer with experience in designing mechanical and rail systems, with a focus on Overhead Contact Systems (OCS). He also 7 has experience in developing estimates, contracts and proposals; negotiating contracts; Years of writing reports; and tracking project budget and schedule. Axel has a very strong educational Experience background and excellent customer relations experience. Mr. Thibodeau has experience with software such as Bentley MicroStation, AutoCAD, Microsoft Project, SolidWorks and Firm MATLAB programming. Mott MacDonald Location RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Los Angeles, CA LA Streetcar, Inc., Preliminary Engineering | Los Angeles, CA: Led preliminary Education OCS design for a 15% and 30% design package. Responsibilities included creating design MS, Mechanical Engineering packages complete with technical drawings, master overlap charts, typical layouts and cross BS, Mechanical Engineering sections, preliminary assembly drawings, and the OCS portion of a design basis document to Professional Credentials progress the design in future phases. Professional Engineer Denver Regional Transportation District (RTD), I-225 Light Rail Transit (Mechanical): CA #36844 Corridor | Denver, CO: Performed OCS design calculations for pole (wide flange and tubular) and foundation (pier and gravity) loading. Also performed design of overlaps, sectionalizing, feeding arrangements, coordination with underground and overhead utilities and coordination with bridge and retaining wall disciplines. Additional responsibilities include providing material allocations for all essential OCS equipment and for regular design review and coordination with both the agency and other disciplines. Green Line Southeast Transitway, Calgary Transit | Calgary, AB: Led OCS design for a preliminary design package and report for the Green Line extending from downtown Calgary 22km to the Southeast. Responsibilities included creating a preliminary design package complete with technical drawings, master overlap charts, typical layouts and cross sections, preliminary assembly drawings, and the OCS portion of a design report to progress to the next phase of design. Maintenance and Storage Facility, Metrolinx | Toronto, ON: Led OCS design for a preliminary design package and report for a maintenance and storage facility. Responsibilities included creating a preliminary design package complete with preliminary layouts, assembly drawings, estimates and a design report on three yard arrangements to take to the next phase of design. Ruby Junction Expansion/Maintenance Yard, TriMet | Portland, OR: Assisted OCS lead designer with design verification of the maintenance yard portion of the Ruby Junction Expansion Project. Responsibilities included calculation of applied loads on OCS poles, foundations and hardware; along with verifying suitability of allocated equipment to meeting the required loads and to suit the intended purpose. California High-Speed Train Project (CHSTP): Bakersfield-Palmdale Segment, California High-Speed Rail Authority (CAHSR), Fresno, CA: California High Speed Rail, Palmdale to Los Angeles Segment, California High Speed Rail Authority | CA: Provided CAD and traction power design support to location essential traction power facilities in accordance with agency design criteria. Additional responsibilities included power availability assessments and study of seismic impact zones along the 70 miles alignment segment.

Resumes

R-151 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Ileana Tutos, EIT | specifications

Ileana Tutos has 27 years of experience in the design and management of rail, transit and civil engineering projects. Her experience includes design, project management, planning, 27 7 cost estimating, schedule and budget controls, developing quality control procedures and Years of Years of Metro ensuring implementation. Ms. Tutos’ experience working in Quality Control and Assurance Experience Experience extends over twenty years of her career. Over the years, Ileana has shown her commitment to implement Mott MacDonald’s quality principles on all the projects she was involved with Firm and provide exceptional services and deliverables to all clients. Ileana was for many years the Mott MacDonald Quality Assurance (Mott’s MacDonald’s Integrated Management System) representative for Location the Boston office and she was involved in external audits to obtain ISO Certification. Los Angeles, CA Education RELEVANT EXPERIENCE BS, Civil Engineering Metro, Regional Connector Transit Corridor, Design-Build | Los Angeles Professional Credentials County, CA: Project Controls and Quality Assurance: assisted with preparation of the Engineer-in-Training Project Design Quality Manual and Design Quality Control Procedures, supported the project management with creating, maintaining and controlling the Document Management procedures. Metro, Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor Design-Build | Los Angeles, CA: Project Controls and Quality Assurance: During the Advanced Conceptual and Preliminary Engineering phases, responsible for managing and submitting final deliverables to the client on schedule and on budget and to a high degree of quality. As part of the Quality Assurance team, assisted and supported the project management to ensure that quality procedures were followed as described in the Design Quality Management Plan and quality records maintained. Responsibilities also included preparing and updating the project master schedule, reviewing progress reports and preparing contract changes documentation. This project is an 8.5-mile light rail extension valued at $1.7 billion. The project used design/build contracts. California High Speed Rail, Palmdale to Los Angeles Segment, California High Speed Rail Authority | CA:Project Controls and Quality Assurance: responsible for the preparation of Monthly Progress Reports, Project Schedule using Primavera P-6, Earned Value Analysis and Contract Changes, also assisting with the implementation of the quality control procedures by monitoring the project deliverables review process. The scope of this project includes environmental impact analysis and 15% preliminary engineering of a 62-mile-long segment of high speed rail through both mountainous terrain and highly populated urban areas. Design Services for the Twin Tunnels, Spadina Subway Extension, Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) | Toronto, Ontario: Senior Engineer involved in evaluating the concept of tunnel jacking of a triple track structure to be constructed beneath high voltage overhead electrical transmission cables. This work involved a feasibility study, project schedules, and cost estimates. In-Depth Inventory and Inspection of MBTA Transit Tunnels, Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) | Boston, MA: Senior Engineer and Deputy Project Manager involved with the inspection and inventory of MBTA Subway Tunnels and station structures on the Green, Orange, and Blue lines. These tunnels and associated underground structures included the oldest underground transit structures in the US, some of which were constructed over 100 years ago. Work included inspection and prioritizing repair work needed on all structural elements. Responsible for producing the detailed inventory and inspection reports, including the development of an electronic file management system to aid the database management. Involved in coordination with MBTA and subconsultants.

Resumes

R-152 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Andrew Vallejo | DSDC/office field engineering

Andrew Vallejo has 15 years of experience in systems-related construction oversight and design. Andrew’s transit related experience includes. He also has in-depth knowledge 15 and understanding of light rail safety certification process, preliminary hazard analysis, Years of certifiable check list, transportation plans and specifications, contractor’s compliance with Experience specifications, fire/life safety codes, and regulatory requirements. He is adept at verifying requirements for quality assurance inspections and audits and an experienced leader of field Firm construction work crews and systems integrated testing. Mott MacDonald Location RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Los Angeles, CA Metro, Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor Design-Build | Los Angeles, CA: Systems Education Engineer providing review/ commenting on all subcontractor submittals, as well as verifying A.A., Business Coursework that all comments were addressed prior to approval. Also provided review of additional comments received from other reviewers prior to submitting for disposition from Metro Project Systems Engineer. Exposition Metro Light Rail Transit Mid-City Design-Build, Phase 2, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LA Metro), Los Angeles, CA: Quality Assurance Auditor responsible for conducting field site audits of all aspects of construction, including Structural, Electrical and Utilities. Also responsible for overseeing subcontractors providing system oversight, quality assurance audits, and reviewing system- related RFIs and submittals, and effectively communicated with craft, staff, subcontractors, and owner representatives. Other project roles included serving as Quality Control Manager/Inspector/Quality Assurance Auditor overall responsible for Implementing Quality Control and Quality Assurance Program. Metro Expo Phase 1 | Los Angeles County, CA: Andrew worked with the Start- up and Safety Certification process; duties included reviewing test procedures, backup documentation for the certifiable system checklist for construction and design, Integrated Testing summary write up, insuring systems compliance with the Safety Certification Plan. As Quality Assurance Auditor project responsibilities included conducting field site audits of various aspects of construction: structural, electrical, and utilities. Also responsible for overseeing subcontractors that were providing system oversight, quality assurance audits, and reviewing system-related RFIs and submittals, and effectively communicated with craft, staff, subcontractors, and owner representatives. Metro Gold Line Eastside Extension Phase 1/Phase 2 | Los Angeles County, CA: Systems/Construction Engineer responsible for reviewing/processing subcontractor submittals, and verification of RFIs/submittals being addressed in a timely manner. Additionally responsible for assisting the management of the Safety Certification program, and close-out checklist items for design and prepared submittals to Metro/LAFD for certification. As a Member of the Safety Certification Review Committee, was responsible for developing monthly reports for Safety Certification Review, and chairing the Rail Activation Track Allocation Meetings. SVRT Phase I, Silicon Valley Berryessa Extension (SVBX), San Jose, CA: Andrew developed a high profile Weekly Dashboard for VTA Project Controls Manager. The dashboard consisted of weekly progress for train control, traction power, communications, operation and maintenance training , submittals, RFI’s, NCR, stations percentage of work, milestone, risk and mitigation, punch list items. Andrew also assisted the Contractor with the communication networking system for all TPSS locations. Conducted field inspections of cabling for TPSS MPR, NGD and IPR for testing, trouble shoot issues during testing and wrote discrepancy reports (DR’s). Additional project responsibilities included reviewing drawings and specifications.

Resumes

R-153 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Chintan Varia | electrical

Chintan Varia is a talented young technical professional with six years of progressive experience encompassing various facets of electrical engineering. He has provided electrical 6 engineering services to Sacramento Municipal Utilities District, Southern California Edison, Years of and San Diego Gas & Electric. In addition, he provided engineering services to the City of Experience San Jose. Previously Chintan worked for Hitachi group, India as Team Leader of testing team for Steel Automation drives and dealt directly with the customers. He worked on Firm Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)-based automated test operation bench of automation Auriga Corporation plant for steel automation drives and medium voltage drives ranges from 320volts to Location 11000volts industrial supply. He also developed expertise in the testing and engineering of Los Angeles steel automation drives. Chintan has prepared single-line and three-line drawings for high voltage substations and is proficient in AutoCAD. Education MS, Electrical Engineering RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Southern California Edison (SCE), Integrated Circuit Analysis Project | Pomona, CA: Electrical Engineer working to find the available solutions for SCE to increase their system capacity with currently available resources and infrastructure. Performing in depth study and analysis for each and every available resource, including current power utilization and power generation, to find the best available points on SCE Power network where more generation can be added to increase the capacity. The following are a few work areas for this project: Database creation and validation; Development of network circuit models in CYME (Power System Tool); Development and integration of network substation models; Load and voltage data preparation; Power flow and short circuit analysis; and CYME script and data management. SCE Passons Substation Quality Assurance Review | Pomona, CA: Electrical Engineer providing technical support to the Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) project team, performing a quality assurance (QA) review of the Passons Substation (230/69kV). San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Substation Upgrade | San Diego, CA: Electrical Engineer for this upgrade project. The work included a relay upgrade for breakers, addition of new circuit breakers, and new panels for annunciator and breaker controls. Added new protection relay for the line. Reviewed wiring diagrams for the control circuits of the circuit breakers for substation. Revised and reviewed electrical engineering design drawings that included one-line diagram, three-line schematic, DC schematic, physical layout drawings, wiring/interconnection drawings, annunciation, and remote terminal unit (RTU) function. Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), Database and Asset Management Services | San Francisco, CA: Electrical Engineer working with the atomization of the Clipper database management sent from MTC server on daily basis. Receives data daily in Microsoft Excel, CSV and tab delimiter formats and managing it with SQL web server. Also managing the actual inventory database of the Clipper Card Interface Devices (CIDs) with online system and actual physical counting of the devices for future utilization and planning predictions.

Resumes

R-154 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Angel Velazquez | train control

Angel is a senior technical advisor in the Rail and Signal Design Division of WSP with over 38 years’ experience in the railroad and transit industry as a railroad signal specialist and 38 2 lead designer. As a senior principal technical specialist, he is responsible for the design of Years of Years of Metro cable plans, layout plans, circuits, integration and phasing in preparation for installation and Experience Experience commissioning. Angel also prepares recommendations for contract specifications and all other signal technical issues. Prior to joining WSP, he worked at NYC Transit, and achieved Firm substantial completion and closeout for several high profile new technology projects. WSP His responsibilities included project management, supervising the design, layout and Location construction Orange, CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro Purple Line Westside Extension | Los Angeles County, CA: Senior train control engineer for the design/build contract responsible for the preliminary design of an ATC system including the connections to existing Interlocking and ensuring compatibility and interoperability between the new ATC system and the existing on-board train control equipment is achieved. Prepare an interface plan and contract specifications listing the interface for each element, including system to system, and system to facility. Implementation from planning, design, construction, testing and commissioning. Identify where in the Technical or General Requirements and or Project Definition Drawings the interface is addressed. Prepare charts, drawings, sketches and schedules for coordinating with each phases of the project. Integrate the design of the train control system with the other project design disciplines. Newark Regional Transportation Center | Newark, DE: Senior technical advisor for this feasibility study and development of a categorical exclusion and preliminary engineering. The goal of this feasibility study was the creation of a concept plan for the redevelopment of the existing Newark Train Station on South College Avenue into a Regional Rail Center consistent with the State of Delaware’s transportation and economic development objectives. The study and design produced a final plan that resolves conflicts between freight and commuter rail, and accommodates the expansion of passenger rail services including Amtrak, SEPTA, MARC, as well as future downstate rail service. Forest City Ratner/Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) Vanderbilt Yard Relocation | Brooklyn, NY: Senior technical advisor responsible for design of a fully interlocked yard signal system. The LIRR Vanderbilt Yard at the Atlantic Ave terminal is being relocated so that the air rights can be developed. The new yard will have seven storage tracks, one through track, and will connect to the Atlantic Branch on both the east and west ends of the yard. Design elements include a microprocessor interlocking controlling the 7 rack yard lead, tie-in circuits for two relay based LIRR Main Line interlockings, automatic cab signal test circuits, typical circuits and relay equivalent drawings, procurement specifications and track and cable layout for signal and switch heater cables. Amtrak Keystone Corridor, Zoo to Parkesburg | PA: Senior technical advisor responsible for conceptual engineering and cost estimating for six new and five modified interlockings between Zoo Interlocking and Parkesburg, Pennsylvania. Conceptual engineering included track and signal layouts, cable plans and route and aspect charts to tie in to new Rule 562 cab without wayside signal system. Eagle P3 Commuter Rail Design | Denver, CO: Senior technical advisor responsible for performance documentation for cab without wayside signal system for a new 23-mile commuter rail system. System also includes Federal Railroad Administration mandated positive train control equipment. Worked with operations to define signal system requirements, aspects and indications, set up specification requirements, route and aspect charts, road diagrams and standard installation drawings. Resumes

R-155 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Jack Wang, PE | rail activation & start-up

Jack has 27 years of experience in construction management, program management, project conception, and project design on numerous municipal projects in the San Francisco Bay 27 Area. Jack has worked for a variety of government as well as consulting firms both large and Years of small. This combination of public sector and private sector experiences provides him with Experience a unique background. Jack has the ability to understand and relate to the client, the design consultant, the contractor/builder, and other stakeholders. His past project experiences Firm include general public works civil engineering, maintenance facilities, large airport Cornerstone Concilium, Inc. facilities, municipal office buildings, roadway reconstruction, mechanical stations, electrical Location installations, telecommunications design and construction, water and wastewater systems, Los Angeles, CA light rail, and more. Jack takes pride in the relationships he has developed and maintained in Education the past years based on his honesty and his integrity, resulting in an outstanding reputation BS, Civil Engineering in the industry. While working as a member of the management team at several consulting Professional Credentials firms, his area of responsibilities included operations management, staff supervision, Professional Engineer (Civil): business development, recruiting, and building relationships with clients and industry CA #57004 partners.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), Powell Street Station Ceiling Upgrades | San Francisco, CA: Resident Engineer managing a team of field engineers, office engineer, scheduler, and administrative assistant for this BART station modernization project. Jack is responsible for material, design and construction operations submittals and field engineering/inspection. Project tasks include demolition, hazardous material abatement, relocation of existing utilities, new wet-pipe sprinkler system, CCTV security cameras, fireproofing, LED lighting, and suspended open cell ceiling system. Jack is also responsible for heavy coordination between BART and the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA). BART Traction Power Substation Replacement Projects | Oakland, CA: Interim Resident Engineer for multiple projects for the replacement of four traction power substations – Coliseum, Oakland West, San Leandro, and Transbay Tube East. The material was owner-furnished, and the project was completed as two separate contracts, two substations each. Work also included the installation of portable traction power substations during construction. Jack coordinated the work of the two general contractors, BART maintenance team, design consultants, and operations group. Due to delay in the delivery of owner- furnished material, the Interim RE had to create and negotiate several change orders to the construction contractors. One new transformer did not function properly, resulting in prolonged warranty activities by the supplier, and additional work through change order by the construction contractor. BART Earthquake Safety Program, 4th Street Storage Building Project | Oakland, CA: Resident Engineer that provided onsite management of construction on behalf of client. Administered and monitored construction contract to retrofit an existing wood roof structure, demolish and restore architectural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing components and systems. Provided on-site quality assurance of ongoing construction. Monitored contractor’s work schedule. Administered progress payment to the contractor based on work complete. Coordinated Request for Information from contractor to client and design engineers. Enforced contractual requirements on the part of the contractor to submit shop drawings, material catalog sheets, work plans, safety plans, and quality control plans on time and in compliance with the specified standards. Created deficiency list and punch list; enforced contractual requirements on the part of the contractor to correct deficiencies and complete punch list items. Worked with client’s contracts department to close out contract.

Resumes

R-156 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Vickie Wheeler, PE | specifications

Vickie has over two decades of experience in structural design and analysis, specification preparation, field inspection and construction support services for a variety of projects. These 22 4 projects include bridges, retaining walls, highway design and construction, interchange Years of Years of Metro construction, storm water drainage systems, light rail stations, and an airport expansion. Experience Experience Many of these project involved seismic design and analysis. Vickie has experience in the design and preparation of specifications for various types of structures, including reinforced Firm and prestressed concrete and structural steel and masonry, all using design codes from WSP the Caltrans, AASHTO and Uniform Building Code. She has been responsible for ensuring Location contract compliance, constructability and specification reviews, and claims analysis. Sacramento, CA Furthermore, she has worked for resident engineers and structures representatives inspecting Education construction and retrofitting of reinforced and prestressed concrete structures. BS, Civil Engineering RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Professional Credentials Professional Engineer: CA (#C- Metro Expo Phase 2 (DB) | Los Angeles County, CA: Design engineer responsible 70511) for coordinating and tracking the technical specifications through all phases of the submittal process for all disciplines. Prepared the technical specifications for the bridge structures and MSE walls. SANDAG Mid Coast Corridor Transit | San Diego, CA: Design engineer responsible for coordinating, reviewing, formatting, tracking and preparing the technical specifications through all phases of the submittal process for all disciplines. Metro Eastside Light Rail | Los Angeles County, CA: Prepared contract special provisions in accordance with Caltrans special provisions for the Eastside Underpass LRT (Br. No. 53 2975), a nine-span combination cast-in-place post tensioned and reinforced concrete box girder bridge approximately 1,089 feet long on CIDH concrete pile foundations, for inclusion into a Caltrans U.S. 101 widening contract. 95th Terminal Improvement, Chicago Transit Authority | Chicago, IL: Design engineer responsible for coordinating, reviewing, formatting and preparing the technical specifications through final phases of the submittal process for all disciplines. Regional Transit Station Rehabilitation Project | Sacramento, CA: Design engineer for this project consisting of the rehabilitation of 30 existing light rail passenger stations. Vickie’s responsibilities included site assessment for work required, providing type selection reports to client discussing options to paint and replace and or repair existing structures, furniture, bollards windscreens, electrical, irrigation, etc. She also assisted in the preparation of specifications and bid documents for work to be performed. Florin Grade Separation, Sacramento Regional Light Rail Authority | Sacramento, CA: Design engineer for this consisting of a 6 span 355-foot long cast-in-place post- tensioned box girder bridge carrying two lines of light rail traffic. Vickie was responsible for preparing contract special provisions and item lists in accordance with Caltrans special provisions and local agencies. Caltrans Division of Rail Vehicle on Call Services | CA: Project manager for the Caltrans on-call rail equipment contract. Responsibilities include managing scope, schedule and budget for individual task orders; preparing task orders; managing and hiring staff; and meeting and providing status update to the client.

Resumes

R-157 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Thomas Wieselmann | train control

Thomas Wieselmann has six years of experience working primarily in the field of railroad signal engineering with various train transportation modes such as light rail transit, Class 5 1 Freight rail, heavy rail, and commuter transit for several different State transit agencies as Years of well as private clients. Experience

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Firm Region of Waterloo ION Light Rail Signal Engineering | Ontario, Canada: Thomas Rani Engineering, Inc. served as designer of signal system hardware plans for interlockings and crossings. Location Completed CAD of all new plans for interlockings and at grade crossings. Selected Minneapolis, MN equipment based on standard equipment and location application. Education Metro Blue Line Extension | Minneapolis and Northwestern Communities, MN: BS, Mechanical Engineering CAD operator who was instrumental in developing plan, profile, and schedule drawings for Professional Credentials electrical infrastructure for traction power, communications, and train control systems. Professional Engineer (Electrical): MN #54879 Cascade Mill Parkway/Bravo Co. Boulevard | Yakima, WA: Signal Engineer responsible for warning device plans for a single highway at grade railroad crossing for new road construction. Class I Freight Railroad Signal Engineering | Multiple Contracts in Western U.S. States: Thomas served as Designer completing various roles to assist in the implementation of Positive Train Control and Centralized Traffic Control functionality in various freight railroad subdivisions. Duties included design of wayside and crossing signal locations, location interfacing, Positive Train Control software interfacing, and control panel manufacturing. CAD of signaling project overviews, track profiles and signal system aspect charts UPS battery capacity requirement calculations Electric lock timer and control point approach locking calculations Crossing approach length calculations On track frequency selection for train detection overlay circuits and location-to-location communications overlay circuits Wayside non-vital communications code tables Equipment selection based on standard equipment and location application CAD of plans for all new wayside and grade highway crossing locations and modifications to in service locations Mapping of wayside vital software bits to new Positive Train Control statuses Wayside local control panel assembly, wiring, and testing WMATA ATC Flashing Lunar Aspect Implementation | Washington, D.C.: ATC Engineer who reviewed ATC system modification plans and modification instructions. WMATA Asset Management | Washington, D.C.: ATC Engineer who collects inventory data and assesses conditions of Automatic Train Control Systems.

Resumes

R-158 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Chris Wightman, PE | systems project controls

Chris specializes in transportation program management, final design of underground transit projects and knowledge of the Federal Transit Administration’s funding and grant processes. 10 He previously worked for the New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJ Transit) — America’s Years of largest statewide transit agency — where he worked on the $8.7 billion Trans-Hudson Experience Express (THE) Tunnel as configuration manager, principal engineer, and FTA liaison. Prior to THE Tunnel, he worked under the Secretary to the NJ Transit Board of Directors. In this Firm capacity, he engaged cross-functionally on high-visibility projects in the areas of railroad WSP operations, public outreach, and transportation service planning. Chris has experience Location working for the owner of a large transit line project and, most recently, as a consultant San Francisco, CA providing project controls and developing standards for the systems and operation of the Education California High Speed Rail under the program management contract. MBA Candidate; BS, Mechanical Engineering RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Professional Credentials California High Speed Rail | CA: Deputy project controls manager developed the Professional Engineer: CA (#M- strategy and implemented a program-wide controls system for managing the overall 37065) project budget, scope, schedule, and functionality. The project control system is an integral part of the program’s internal procedures. Chris is also responsible for formally resolving interdisciplinary technical conflicts and leading the engineering team to review and adjudicate all variances to the established project design criteria. The program management consists of overseeing the implementation of the high-speed system from design to commissioning; managing and coordinating the activities of 108 consultant firms; providing the interface between the CHSRA and other transit, rail, and public authorities along the route; developing the criteria and technical standards that will define high-speed train systems and operations; managing NEPA and CEQA analyses; overseeing engineering sufficient to procure system-wide DB contracts; and managing the construction, testing and commissioning of the system through the start-up of revenue service. The first operable section is scheduled to open by 2020. BART District GEC | San Francisco, CA: Deputy project manager to integrate four distinct projects to apply federal funds to improve BART’s core capacity and enhance peak hour service from 12 to 15 trains per hour per hour. Led the prioritization of more than 34 shovel- ready projects worth $115 million cumulatively for BART’s Maintenance and Engineering department in order to accelerate the spending of aged federal funds and better position BART’s eligibility for receiving future grants. NJ Transit THE Tunnel | Newark, NJ: Configuration manager, principal engineer and FTA liaison for four years on this the $8.7 billion project that was ultimately canceled, due to funding. Chris led a consultant team engaged in root-cause analysis and onsite testing of problematic trains in order to develop recommendations for corporate-wide selection of a $57 million electric traction power system; oversaw all critical design changes for the New York Pennsylvania Station Expansion into midtown Manhattan; developed and executed the initiative to obtain a $3.2 billion federal grant for construction; advised NJ Transit’s project chief on negotiation strategies with FTA; and mentored and trained direct report as administrator for cost and schedule control of the project.

Resumes

R-159 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Ryan Williams, PE, CPENG | communications

Ryan Williams is a versatile systems and electrical engineer with experience leading detailed design work for large transportation infrastructure projects. His work has also 18 included electrical and communications design for water, wastewater, industrial and Years of educational facilities. Ryan has led large in-house teams of engineers, planners, architects Experience and environmental specialists in the successful delivery of projects worldwide. With a background in both systems and electrical engineering, Ryan understands the design, Firm installation, operations and maintenance of all systems that support transportation facilities. WSP Location As a project manager, Ryan communicates early and often to keep projects on track. In Portland, OR addition to delivering transportation projects within schedule and budget, Ryan managed Education design and construction of six orphan centers, a school and community infrastructure in Bachelor of Engineering, Botswana. In recognition of his project management skills, Ryan received the highest civilian Electrical and Computer Systems award, the Presidential Order of Meritorious Service. Professional Credentials Professional Engineer: CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE (#E-21541), WA, OR; Chartered California High Speed Rail | San Francisco, CA: Systems and Supervisory Control and Professional Engineer (Electrical Data Acquisition (SCADA) engineer. Ryan developed performance specifications and design and ITEE): Australia criteria for the System of Systems - Integrated Information Management Platform which integrated various systems such as public address/customer information system, traction power, train control, security and intrusion detection, tunnel ventilation control, fire alarm, and mechanical/electrical/plumbing systems. The system of systems will consolidate all systems into a central platform, providing operators with automation across systems and a common operating picture. Ryan is also currently design requirements for station systems including CCTV, fire and life safety, security, radio, and communications. LAX People Mover | Los Angeles, CA: Communications design lead. Ryan led the development of RFP Design Build documentation for the communication systems that will support the new people mover. These systems include structured cabling (fiber optics and CAT 6), network equipment, wireless data, Distributed Antannae System for cellular service, access control system, digital video management system, CCTV cameras, public address, visual paging, telephones, Flight Information Display System, and Train Arrival Display System. Sound Transit East Link Extension | Puget Sound Region, WA: Systems engineer who developed plans, specifications and estimates for WSDOT Intelligent Transport Systems such as closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras, fiber optic based communication network and electronic signage. Ryan also designed the Mt. Baker Tunnel mobile radio system for WSDOT maintenance personnel and facilitated the development of Sound Transit’s station building management system designs. Amtrak Penn Station Fire and Life Safety SCADA Upgrade | New York City, NY: Systems engineer who supervised the design and development of the fire and life safety SCADA system for the Penn Station facilities and tunnels. The system was developed to be highly resilient and provided user-friendly human-machine interfaces and automation to improve operational efficiency. The design included a fiber-optic communication network and a Profibus system for controlling variable speed drives. Designs also included control room operation and sequence of operation. BART Transbay Tube Retrofit | San Francisco, CA: Systems/electrical engineer for the seismic retrofit of the Transbay Tube as part of Bay Area Rapid Transit’s Earthquake Safety Program. Ryan assisted with developing and reviewing the electrical and control system associated with six pump stations through the Transbay Tube. Designs incorporated power supply, lighting, grounding and interface with the SCADA system.

Resumes

R-160 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Jordan Wine | train control

Jordan Wine is a Testing Engineer with experience in installation and testing of the country’s first PTC system for a commuter rail network of more than 500 route miles. His key strengths 5 include technical engineering, software development, database administration, and test Years of procedure analysis. He values the highest degree of ethical excellence and integrity and has Experience demonstrated passion for improvement and continuous learning throughout his professional endeavors. Firm Parsons RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Location Metrolink Positive Train Control System | Los Angeles, CA: This project includes Ontario, CA designing, furnishing, and installing PTC technology on Metrolink’s 512-mile regional commuter rail system. As the prime contractor leading a vendor/integrator team, Parsons managed the overall program and provided design, testing, integration, and commissioning services. Jordan was responsible for the PTC critical field system validation. He supported the design and integration interoperable train control messaging (ITCM) design and integration. He completed locomotive ans wayside functional testing. Jordan supported the messaging security and railroad track database design and integration. He also assisted with back office server integration. Metra, Metra Positive Train Control System Integrator | Chicago, IL: Parsons is responsible for engineering and design documentation, testing reliability and maintainability analyses, manuals, training program, software, licenses, special tools, test equipment, and other deliverables. Parsons will ensure proper interrelation, functioning, and system integration of all aspects of the work related to the PTC system and its relations with the other equipment and systems within Metra’s operating environment. Jordan is supporting the PTC field system testing and validation. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District, NICTD Positive Train Control Systems Integrator | Chicago, IL to South Bend, IN: Jordan is supporting the PTC field system testing and validation. This turnkey project includes the deployment of an interoperable PTC system. NICTD operates a 90-mile-long commuter rail line with service from Chicago, Illinois, to South Bend, Indiana, which also accommodates freight traffic in the region. The 15 miles from Millennium Station in Chicago to Kensington Interlocking is Metra territory; the remaining 75 miles is NICTD-owned territory that will constitute the NICTD subdivision. Parsons’ scope of work includes designing, furnishing, installing, testing, and commission a complete communications-based wayside system and upgrading more than 70 train sets. This PTC project will ensure NICTD’s compliance with the Rail Safety Improvement Act. Parsons is scheduled to be in revenue service demonstration by second quarter of 2018, with interoperability testing with Metra in the same approximate time frame.

Resumes

R-161 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Charles (Charlie) Wright | vehicle interface

Charles has more than 9 years of in-depth and hands-on experience managing and reviewing projects for rail transit equipment and operations, as well as system integration for major 9 2 railroad and transport agencies. Prior to joining WSP, Charles worked for Alstom Transport Years of Years of Metro for 9 years, where he managed the project engineering team, while also moving ahead the Experience Experience engineering effort for the overhaul of Los Angeles Metro’s P2000 fleet of LRVs. He was the bid technical manager of Alstom’s vehicle overhaul tendering team, leading multiple vehicle Firm overhaul technical responses from interpretation of customer requirements, definition of WSP integrated vehicle in addition to each subsystem, technical management of suppliers and Location providing substantiative technical response to customers. Charles has extensive experience Chicago, IL working as a project engineering manager and systems engineer with various rail agencies, Education including Metro, Amtrak High-Speed Rail, Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority, San MS, Engineering Management Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission, (graduate 5/2018); BS, Electrical Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Authority to name a few. Engineering

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Metro P2000 Project Engineering Manager | Naperville, IL: Project engineering manager responsible for entire engineering work package, including vehicle design, system integration, validation and safety assurance, required to complete the mid-life overhaul of 52 light heavy rail vehicles for Metro’s multiple light rail lines. Charles was working with a multitude of system suppliers and other Alstom participating units to provide systems that meet the desired functionality and performance needs defined by Metro’s high-level scope of work document. Also, Charles provided Metro with recommendations and suggestions from vehicle engineers to mitigate technical challenges, schedule impacts, and what alternative approaches could be applied. Caltrans HVAC Carside Modification | Naperville, IL: Project engineering manager/vehicle integration engineer responsible for retrofit of new vehicle-level temperature monitoring/control system and diversion dampers in order to improve temperature regulation benefiting passenger comfort. Charles defined and specified the functionality of electrical controls and software modules to regulate interior temperatures and provide tight regulation of lower and upper level temperatures. Required extensive interaction with 3rd party HVAC unit supplier to match duty-cycling and control setpoints of the HVAC unit’s design criteria. Integrated controller to existing Wi-Fi transreceiver and enterprise system for purposes of providing HVAC system operating data to Caltrans backoffice engineers. Through test and validation, demonstrated the ability to fully meet customer requirements. Amtrak Acela HVAC Overhaul Project Engineering | Naperville, IL: Project engineer for the major mid-life overhaul of the coach and power car HVAC units. This included the development of the supplier technical requirements covering two types of HVAC units. To reduce the number of unit failures post overhaul, Charles reviewed the multitude of in-service failure reports as-well-as supplier completed repair reports to identify areas for reliability improvement. These were proposed to the customer as part of the design review process, implemented on the units and monitored for improvement. Manager of Projects Engineering | Naperville, IL: Engineering manager of mult- domain engineering department performing vehicle engineering for Rocky Mountaineer Silver Leaf Conversion contract. Charles provided mentoring and leadership to assigned project engineering manager in order to recover schedule and meet vehicle delivery dates. In addition to indirect leadership of Rocky Mountaineer project, Charles was the bid technical manager/vehicle integration engineer that prepared Alstom’s proposal to perform the selective system overhaul of Metro’s A650 ‘Option’ fleet of metro cars in addition to Metro’s P2000 fleet of light rail vehicles.

Resumes

R-162 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Ray Wright | communications

Raymond Wright is an experienced engineer and certified project manager who has successfully led several large and high profile automated fare collection (AFC) and toll 34 projects. Ray has 34 years’ experience in design and project management of highway and Years of mass transit projects focusing on automated fare collection, tolls and parking systems. Ray Experience is an expert in AFC systems integration of new electronic payment systems incorporating magnetic and smart card technologies. He is an authority on over-the road (ORT) tolling Firm systems, ticket vending machines, validating farebox technology, testing and system Parsons implementation. He also is experience with factory testing of functional, environmental, Location maintainability and performance requirements in Germany and San Diego, together with Newark, NJ implementation of numerous multi-modal smart card AFC systems throughout North Education America. Basic and Advanced Electronics, Community College of the Air RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Force RCTC SR 91 Corridor Improvement | Riverside County, CA: Parsons developed Radio Color Television Repair, and managed the tolled express lanes project to extend the existing SR 91 tolled express National Radio Institute (NRI) lanes. As Toll Systems Manager, Ray was responsible for the development of the DB Microprocessors, RETS technical requirements, toll systems integrator contract, professional services agreement Technical Center for specialized toll support, management of a multi-discipline team, development of FHWA Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP), Systems Engineering Requirements Form Information Technology (SERF), Concept of Operations (ConOPs), 50 year revenue and non-revenue financing and maintenance requirements, three-party operations and maintenance agreement (ORCOA) and PCM oversight of the DB contractor and toll systems integrator. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Automatic Fare Collection | Boston, MA: The project involves developing a new fare collection system that would revamp its bus, light rail, and subway fare collection systems. Ray is responsible for all aspects of specialty consultant services for the MBTA, including design, testing, installation, inspection, start-up, maintenance oversight, quality assurance, and warranty management. He provides coordination between the client and contractor; manages multiple subcontractors; and supports revenue operations, policies, and procedures. Ray’s responsibilities also include project management, invoicing, plan preparation, and meeting client deadlines. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, PATH Automatic Fare Collection System | Jersey City, NY: The project involved implementation of the new PATH AFC system designed to accommodate the existing ticketing media and extended to accept the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit MetroCard and contactless smart card ticketing. As Technical Advisor, Ray assisted the Port Authority and PATH with the completion of the design review process. He also assisted with the testing and implementation of an accelerated program for the World Trade Center and supported the development of necessary programs and transitional plans.

Resumes

R-163 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Viktoriya Yanitskaya | operations & planning

Viktoriya is a certified project manager with WSP and has extensive experience in analyzing dynamic rail networks and constructing and running simulation models for railroad 22 planning and improvement projects. She is responsible for managing WSP’s rail and transit Years of simulation modeling group and supervises this technical staff on a wide range of planning Experience and design projects. Viktoriya is highly skilled in the analysis of all levels of rail and transit system infrastructure details with complex train movement scenarios, including fixed Firm block or communication-based train control (CBTC) systems, train scheduling, delay and WSP recovery analysis and service planning using the most widely applied simulation modeling Location applications in the rail industry: RailPlan, RAILSIM and the Berkeley Simulation Software Rail Newark, NJ Traffic Controller (RTC). Education PhD, Structural Engineering; RELEVANT EXPERIENCE MS, Urban Planning and Design; California High-Speed Train Project PE & EIR/EIS Phase | CA: Deputy operations BS, Civil Engineering and maintenance manager on this phase of the project for the 800-mile high-speed train system in California. This work involves developing project level preliminary engineering and EIR/EIS. Responsibilities include operations and service planning, dynamic simulation modeling, capacity analysis, rolling stock fleet estimating, O&M cost estimating, conceptual design for yards, terminals and passenger stations, concept development for heavy maintenance facility and central control. California High-Speed Rail, Tier I Programmatic Phase | CA: As task leader, built and calibrated a comprehensive network model for over 900 route miles of very high- speed—220 miles per hour —double track railroad. Developed and analyzed numerous service alternatives for the route from San Diego to San Francisco and Sacramento. In addition, evaluated the feasibility of integrating the proposed high-speed line with existing rail corridors between San Jose and San Francisco and Los Angeles and San Diego. Also this model was used to conduct a detailed analysis of existing commuter and intercity rail operations (Metrolink and Coaster) with the proposed improvements for the Los Angeles to San Diego (LOSSAN) rail corridor to determine the feasibility of potential high-speed train service to share the existing LOSSAN rail line with conventional passenger trains. LOSSAN Rail Corridor Improvements Study, LOSSAN Corridor Strategic Plan and EIS | CA: Performed a series of rail network simulations based on the forecast volume levels provided by the rail service operators in the corridor: intercity (Amtrak), commuter (Metrolink, Coaster) and freight (Burlington Northern-Santa Fe (BNSF)) for the year 2025 to identify infrastructure improvement projects. In addition, the capacity of the corridor was analyzed to identify congestion points and define mitigations that resulted in their project program. Honolulu High Capacity Transit Corridor Project, Honolulu, HI: As task leader using computer simulation modeling, examined the proposed track alignment physical characteristics, different stopping patterns and vehicle performance to comply with the travel time goal and tested the terminal configuration ability to support proposed service headway. This model will be used to develop an operating plan, test signaling system and conduct failure recovery analysis, using parameter randomization and system perturbation methods. California 20-Year Rail System Improvement Plan, Statewide, CA: Contributed to the development of a rail simulation network model encompassing over 1,300 route miles of shared use (freight and passenger) corridors in the state of California.

Resumes

R-164 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Gabrielle (Gabbi) Yates | subcontract administration

Gabrielle began working with WSP in the California Labor Compliance Services department, located in Sacramento. From there, she was assigned as the office administrator for a large 14 7 construction services project. Soon afterward, Gabrielle was assigned as the lead project Years of Years of Metro administrator for the project and put in charge of all WSP’s internal contract and budget Experience Experience management duties. She also took over all office engineering duties when the office engineer left the project. At the completion of the project in 2008, Gabrielle transferred to the Antioch Firm office, where she provided project administration duties on 15 medium-to-large sized WSP projects. She also provided office engineering support for smaller projects as requested. Location In 2010, Gabrielle relocated to the Los Angeles office and is currently performing project Los Angeles administrator and accountant duties on multiple large projects in the Los Angeles office. Education BA, Psychology Gabrielle has strong computer skills and is proficient in the use of web-based document control software, such as ProjectSolve2 and eRoom, ORACLE and E2C/Markview systems, Microsoft Word processing and Excel spreadsheet software, Microsoft Publisher and Microsoft PowerPoint software.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Project Administrator/Accountant, Multiple California Offices: Duties have included, but are not limited to: assisting project manager with preparing cost proposals and cost budgets during negotiation phase of project, administering contracts/amendments and sub-contracts/sub-amendments, preparing cost and revenue budgets, working with PM to establish a project work structure, initiating entire project set up in the ORACLE system, creating and maintaining electronic and hard copy filing systems, updating project data in ProjectSolve2 and ORACLE, preparing monthly invoices to client, processing vendor and subconsultant invoices, monitoring budgets, performing margin analyses, providing regular financial status updates to PM and project team, following up on accounts receivables and initiating closeout of projects within ORACLE and ProjectSolve2 systems. Gabrielle has provided Project Administration and Accounting duties for the following projects: LAWA MapLAX, Joint Venture; T-IDP Project Metro Regional Connector Preliminary and Advanced Preliminary Engineering Metro I-10 and I-110 Express Lanes Metro LAX Airport Connector Metro Sepulveda Trans. and Civil Planning SCAG Various Modeling Support Project Caltrans High Desert Corridor Contra Costa Transportation Authoriy Caldecott Tunnel Improvement Project Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District; Upper Northwest Interceptor, Sections 3&4 Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority; Route 84 Expressway Widening Solano Transportation Authority North Connector, Hwy 80, Various Projects City of Galt Central Galt Interchange Project City of Antioch, Markley Creek, Various Projects Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission Hwy 1 Auxiliary Lanes Project, City of Antioch, Somersville Road Bridge, Mountain House Community Services District, Central Parkway Bridge City of Napa, On-Call Inspection Services, Various Projects

Resumes

R-165 Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128

Nazila Zohadi | corrosion control

Nazila Zohadi has 18 years of experience in Microbiological Induced Corrosion (MIC); failure analysis related to MIC; preparing detection media (Test kits) and analysis for Sulfate 18 Reducing Bacteria (SRB) and Acid Producing Bacteria (APB); and cooling systems MIC Years of corrosion detection, analysis and resolutions bio. Experience

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Firm Universal Corrosion Services, LLC, Various Assignments | Ranco Cucamonga, CA: Universal Corrosion Services, Manager/Administration for several assignments that have included the following tasks: LLC Tesoro Logistic, Long Beach - Completed testing and interpretation of results from Location Microbiological Induced Corrosion (MIC) testing of sludge samples obtained from Rancho Cucamonga, CA oil/product transmission pipelines through In Line Inspection (ILI)/Hydrotest process Education and prepared reports. BS, Microbiology Provide Support on soil sample corrosivity analysis on multiple projects. Provided project support and performed administrative and accounting tasks for multiple clients. Bio-Chem Consulting Services | Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Lab Technician for several assignments that have included the following tasks: Analyzed samples for Environmental Microbiology tests Water testing: Microbial Identification, Total/Fecal Coliforms, SPC (aerobic/anaerobic), HPC, MF, DNB, IRB, APB, SRB Yeast and Mold Identification Bahar Institute of Research and Development | Tehran, Iran: Microbiologist for several assignments that have included the following tasks: Evaluated the quality of the institute’s products with respect to microbiological standards (prepared, analyzed and identified samples under controlled conditions) Prepared all culture media, solutions, chemical materials, reagents and stains used as a daily basis in the lab and for sale Calibrated and maintained lab equipment Provided information, scheduling, and project control Created the standardized Bacteria Antisera Kits for rapid diagnosis and classification of pathogenic bacteria Zang Setizan Shargh Engineering Company | Tehran, Iran: Consulting Microbiologist that performed SRB tests on all CP survey/design projects and assisted with failure analysis projects

Resumes

R-166 Draft Task Order Proposal 1: Gold Line Eastside Phase 2

Metro Contract No. AE47810E0128 Systems Engineering and Support Services Task Order 001: Eastside Phase 2 EIR Support, Engineering and DB Solicitation TASK ORDER PROPOSAL

Version No.: Draft Date: 01.05.18

EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: ACRONYMS

AREMA American Railway Engineering and Maintenance‐of‐Way Association ATP Automatic Train Protection BNSF BNSF Railway CCTV closed circuit television CFR Code of Federal Regulations CPUC California Public Utilities Commission CTS Carrier Transmission System DB Design/Build DEIR/EIS Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement DOT Department of Transportation EBPS Emergency Backup Power Supply EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement ESOC Emergency Security Operations Center ETEL Emergency Telephone ETS Emergency Trip System FAMS Fire Alarm Management System FEIR/EIS Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement F&EM Fire and Emergency Management FEM Facilities Emergency Management FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration GDS Gas Detection System GTEL Gate Telephone HRT Heavy Rail Transit I/O input/output IDS Intrusion Detection System IMP Interface Management Plan IPMO Integrated Project Management Office LA‐RICS Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System LACoFD Los Angeles County Fire Department LADPW Los Angeles Department of Water and Power LAPD Los Angeles Police Department LASD Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, LRT Light Rail Transit LRV light rail vehicle MEP mechanical/electrical/plumbing MOW Maintenance‐of‐Way MRDC Metro Rail Design Criteria

Page 1 of 2 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: ACRONYMS

MTEL Maintenance Telephone NTP Notice to Proceed O&M operations and maintenance OCR overhead conductor rail OCS overhead contact system P3 Public Private Partnership PHA Preliminary Hazard Analysis PIP Project Implementation Plan PTC Positive Train Control PTEL Passenger Telephone PWP Pasadena Water and Power QA/QC quality assurance/quality control RAMS Reliability, Availability and Maintainability ROC Rail Operations Center ROW Right‐of‐way RTC Safety Assurance Program Plan SAPP Systems Assurance Program Plan SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition SCE Southern California Edison SCIL Safety Certifiable Items List SCRRA Southern California Regional Rail Authority SCVR Safety Certification Verification Report SDS Seismic Detection System SOW Scope of Work SSSecPP System Safety & Security Program Plan TC&C Train Control and Communications TPIS Transportation Passenger Information Systems TPSS Traction Power Substation TVA Threat and Vulnerability Analysis TWC Train‐to‐Wayside Communication UFS/UFCS Universal Fare System/Universal Fare Collection System UPRR Union Pacific Railroad UPS Uninterruptable Power Supply WBS Work Breakdown Structure

Page 2 of 2 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

The following is a proposed workplan for the Eastside Phase 2 project. The workplan is developed to take the project from the Final EIS/EIR stage through completion of Engineering and into the commencement of DB solicitation. That is, through the first three phases of our Task Order Flow Matrix.

UNDERSTANDING OF THE EASTSIDE PHASE 2 PROJECT

Eastside Phase 2 is a continuation of Metro’s Gold Line Eastside Extension, a project that WSP led as Metro’s representative for Systems engineering and final design and construction oversight.

Metro completed the Draft EIS/EIR in August 2014, which recommended two light rail alternatives, the “SR-60 LRT Alternative” and the “Washington Boulevard LRT Alternative.” Both alternatives planned extensive use of aerial guideway, with the Washington Boulevard alternative having slightly more than 50% of the alignment as street-running along Washington Boulevard.

Subsequent to the DEIS/EIR, and culminating in a report to the Metro Board in May 2017, the project-recommended alignments have undergone further changes. While the SR60 alternative is largely unchanged, the Washington Boulevard alternative has undergone significant revision, resulting in a recommendation for a 3.2-mile tunnel, running south, then east, from near the existing Atlantic Station to Garfield and Washington. From there, onwards to Lambert, the alignment would be similar to the DEIS/EIR alternative.

A further alternative, mentioned in the Technical Study Report, and recommended by the Metro Board, would be to build both alternatives. This would, of course, lead to further changes to the SR60 alternative, which would transition from an aerial alignment to a tunnel alignment that connects to the Atlantic/Washington alignment below grade. See Exhibit 1.

Exhibit 1: Eastside Phase 2 Project

As these are significant changes to the DEIS/EIR recommendations, Metro is currently developing a revised or supplemental DEIS/EIR, before moving to a Final EIS/EIR.

From a Systems perspective, the project will need to continue use of Metro’s standard 100Hz-based cab signaling system. Traction Power and overhead contact system/overhead conductor rail (OCS/OCR) would continue in a similar vein, with the exception that the

Page 1 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION configuration and capacity of the existing Atlantic Traction Power Substation (TPSS) will need further study. Communications systems can be expanded into the new alignment(s). However, a major Systems project element will be the interface to, and cutover into, the existing Gold Line Eastside Extension. This is especially the case for the potential underground connection under the Atlantic/Washington alternative (whether or not it is combined with the SR60 alternative).

KICK-OFF: SOLIDIFYING THE PROJECT TEAM Major Project Stakeholders: The first task, and one most important in making the project a success, is to meet  Metro Project Team, including Planning with the project team to establish and solidify relationships, lines of communication and Project Delivery and an understanding of the scopes of work (SOWs) of the various entities involved.  Environmental Consultant: CDM Smith/AECOM Our project manager, Michael Harris-Gifford, will introduce our project team,  Facilities Engineer: [TBD] including our corridor manager, Joe Bayat, and lay out our initial workplan. The kick- off meetings enable all project stakeholders to adapt our workplans to form an integrated and collaborative team for complete project delivery.

Specifically, we recognize that Metro has a separate solicitation for Preliminary Engineering and Design Services During Construction for Eastside Phase 2 (Facilities Engineer) and that this consultant will be the lead engineer for tunneling, alignment and trackwork, yard and shop, civil, architectural, station, and MEP. As such, we anticipate that the facilities engineer will be the lead engineer for the overall project and, together with the Metro project management team, will establish an Integrated Project Management Office (IPMO). We anticipate this will include the project document control and management systems, project procedures, CADD manual, QA/QC plan, Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), etc.

Our aim is to fully integrate and immerse our Systems team into the overall Eastside Phase 2 project team.

PROJECT SETUP PHASE

This is the phase during which the project organization is established, and documents and plans are developed to define the project and project workflow. While we anticipate most of the work and deliverables to be led by the facilities engineer, our Systems team will provide critical input:

Project Master WBS and Document Control QA/QC Program: Project Budget Project Management Schedule: System and The SDP team will and Budget Implementation Plan: This document will Procedures: The adopt this system, Breakdown: The Plan (PIP): Led by Led by the facilities provide a WBS and SDP team will adopt which we anticipate SDP team will the facilities engineer, with input comprehensive this system, which will be developed by conform to this engineer, with input from our Systems schedule for the we anticipate will be the facilities project-wide system, from our Systems team to describe the project. We developed by the engineer. which we anticipate team, this document Systems Engineering anticipate this will be facilities engineer. will be developed by will define how the team and scope and led by the facilities the facilities project will be how SDP are engineer, with input engineer. executed, controlled integrated with and from our Systems and monitored. It will into the overall team. also define how project team. progress will be reported.

PROJECT DEFINITION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT PHASE

This is an early phase of the Engineering effort where the facilities engineer and Systems team, together, define the project, and review and develop critical project elements that may directly influence the overall project scope and configuration, and the environmental analysis.

Page 2 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

Review of FEIS and Conceptual Design and Costs We have reviewed the DEIS/EIR and 2017 Technical Study Together with the facilities engineer’s team, we will perform a and have particular areas of concern: comprehensive review of the FEIS, the associated reports, the  Significant fire/life safety challenges associated with an Conceptual Engineering design, and the associated cost estimates. underground junction for the “both alternatives” option  Significant operational challenges associated with the “both Particular areas of focus for the SDP team will include: alternatives” option 1. Configuration of the Wye junction, if the “Combined”  Wayside access for crossovers on aerial structures option is recommended  Accommodation for train control bungalows along the 2. Conceptual-level cutover plans, especially if the alignment Atlantic/Washington or “Combined” option is  Restrictive (single track) yard leads for the maintenance recommended facilities identified thus far 3. Identification of potential traction power substation  Challenging interface and cutover to the existing Gold Line locations especially for the Atlantic/Washington and “Combined” 4. Identification of potential Train Control and options Communications (TC&C) houses, both at stations and elsewhere 5. Identification and location of substations for underground stations, including Emergency Backup Power Supply (EBPS) generator 6. Location of radio antennae for tunnel segment 7. Location and type of crossovers 8. Yard location, layout and accommodation of required facilities 9. Description of planned operations, fleet size, and system security and safety provisions 10. Any environmental commitments affecting Systems, especially related to noise and aesthetics 11. Estimated cost of Systems elements

Establishing an Initial Basis of Design

Building upon the FEIS/EIR and the associated Conceptual Engineering, we will develop and submit for approval the Systems sections of initial Basis of Design report. This report, led by the facilities engineer, will establish the key facilities and systems parameters to guide the continuing design development. Each major system and subsystem will be defined in overall terms.

In addition to more generally establishing Systems Basis of Design parameters, there are some important Systems factors specific to the Eastside Phase 2 Project to be established, including:

 Integration, cutover and phased construction Key Systems Parameters to Confirm: into the existing Metro Gold Line*  The primacy and relevancy of MRDC  Operation of the Wye junction between the  System Operational requirements (if not per MRDC Section 10). Atlantic/Washington and SR60 branches*  Traction Power: Confirmation of standard Metro TPSS configuration;  Maintenance facility location, capacity and tunnel trainway feeder and EBPS; station power drops; yard and shop facilities.** power  Tunnel configuration, underground station  Overhead Catenary: Confirmation of standard OCS (at-grade) and OCR configuration and systems (especially power (tunnel) and communications) support needs.  Train Control: Confirming continuation of Metro’s standard LRT cab *These issues are explored in more detail under signal system; grade crossing requirements; street-running operational “Critical Early Environmental Input.” parameters (Washington option only); yard train control requirements.  Communications: Confirm standard Metro subsystems and ** Of particular concern is that the current configurations, including radio, CTS, CCTV, TPIS, F&EM, SCADA, SDS, Commerce, Santa Fe and Mission Junction yard GDS, IDS and ACS. Confirm maintenance facility requirements. options all have only single yard leads. This is a

Page 3 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

major operations and maintenance (O&M) resiliency risk. If the yard lead is taken out of service, either for maintenance or due to OCS, power, track or signal failure, the fleet could be either unable to return to the yard, or (worse) entirely trapped inside the yard.

Critical Early Environmental Input

There are certain systems design elements that have a major effect upon the project’s environmental impact and are critical early definition elements:

A. Integration, cutover and phased construction into the existing Metro Gold Line B. Operation of the Wye junction between the Atlantic/Washington and SR60 branches C. Conceptual traction power load-flow analysis D. Conceptual preliminary operations analysis/simulation E. Conceptual operations plan F. Yard capacity and requirements

Page 4 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING & DB SOLICITATION

INTEGRATION, CUTOVER AND PHASED CONSTRUCTION INTO THE EXISTING METRO GOLD LINE

The SR60-only option has a relatively straightforward connection to and interface with the existing Gold Line at the Atlantic tail tracks and can be more fully addressed during engineering. However, both the Atlantic/Washington and “Combined” options demand the demolition of the existing Atlantic Station, with the alignment “surfacing” just east of the existing East LA Civic Center (ELACC) station. The concept would, presumably, be to temporarily terminate service at the ELACC. Five key issues arise from this.

1.The nearest crossovers are at Ditman, more than 1½ miles away 2. Train control does not permit turnback of trains at ELACC 5. Communication We have measured the trip time and it is six minutes each way. It will not be possible for Metro to Traffic locking operates between the existing Ditman and Atlantic interlockings. A train turning back Ostensibly, the existing fiber optic ring can be terminated (looped back) at the ELACC station. maintain current peak service levels from this crossover. Indeed, it is doubtful whether Metro will be from ELACC will operate against the traffic direction set on the rails, with the potential of trains However, this would leave the existing parking structure and Atlantic TPSS (if retained in operation able to maintain reliable 12-minute off-peak service levels. being routed toward one another. to feed the parking structure) off-network. SDP’s Solution: Include “Enabling Works” in the project to install a set of crossovers, complete SDP’s Solution: By adding a new interlocking, traffic locking will operate between Ditman and SDP’s Solution: Implement a temporary (commercial) high-speed data network connection for with OCS and train control, immediately west of the ELACC station. This would enable Metro to Mednik interlockings. The remaining tracks through the ELACC platforms can have traffic turned by communications and security needs. maintain current service levels during reconstruction of the Atlantic Station area. Additionally, for the use of Train to Wayside Communication loops to be added in the ELACC platform area as part of the “Combined” option, this crossover could serve as one of the necessary failure-management “Enabling Works” crossovers for the Wye junction. Even for the Atlantic/Washington-only option, a crossover would be needed somewhere in this area to replace the existing Atlantic interlocking and comply with MRDC Section 10 single-tracking requirements. 3. Feeders from Atlantic TPSS will be removed 4. Provision of Tail Tracks It should be noted that the plethora of vertical and horizontal curves between the Maravilla and ELACC stations provides no easy location for crossovers. Atlantic TPSS is located northeast of Atlantic station, adjacent to the parking structure. Its feeders It is likely that reconstruction will lead to the ELACC station being an “interim terminus” for a are in the area to be demolished to accommodate the connection to the underground alignment. significant period. Therefore, Transportation will want to have some form of tail track provision.

SDP’s Solution: Maintain Atlantic TPSS in service as it provides power for the parking structure SDP’s Solution: There is an existing OCS overlap straddling La Verne Avenue. Provided the (unless demolition/abandonment of this structure is part of the project). Traction power to ELACC civil/track reconstruction does not extend to La Verne Avenue, the existing overlap can provide more can be provided by the Arizona TPSS, with adequate resiliency and back-up available from the Sonol than 500 feet of tail track. TPSS. Minor reconfiguration of transfer trip circuits would be needed.

Exhibit 2 - Eastside Cutover Potential Enabling Works

Page 5 of 19 REV: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING & DB SOLICITATION

OPERATION OF THE WYE JUNCTION BETWEEN THE ATLANTIC/WASHINGTON AND SR60 BRANCHES

The 2017 Technical Study Report and associated Metro Board recommendation to analyze the “Combined” option of building both branches introduces the concept of an extensive full Wye junction to enable movements between all three lines (both branches and the core existing system). We would anticipate such an underground junction would approximately encompass the triangle bounded by Atlantic Boulevard, East 3rd Street and Repetto Avenue. Our understanding is that the concept behind this junction is to permit 5-minute peak train service on all three branches, building up from the following 10-minute service patterns:

 10-minute service Downtown LA/Santa Monica to Peck Road (SR60 branch)  10-minute service Downtown LA/Santa Monica to Lambert (Atlantic/Washington branch)  10-minute service Peck Road to Lambert

While ostensibly, this would provide five-minute service without overloading the Regional Connector, five key operational and systems challenges arise from it:

1. Track Speeds 2. Failure Management 3. Fare Policy Alignment design is, of course, primarily in the purview of the facilities designer. However, as Switch and signal failure management provisions are essential for such a high-demand junction. Current Metro policy is that a patron changing trains to a different route is required to “tap” again at Systems designer, we have a duty to maximize alignment speed in coordination with available cab Metro Rail Operations needs the means of mitigating equipment failure, as well as planned outage the transfer point (station). Since all three lines have two train routes operating over them, in signal speed codes. Given the likely available space, curve and turnout speeds in the Wye are likely for maintenance. principle, all stations are potential “transfer” points, and would require platform-located validators to to be 10, 15 or 25 mph. enable patrons to “tap.” SDP’s Solution: We believe that the Wye should be designed to accommodate at least lateral SDP’s Solution: We believe that the Wye should be constructed with crossovers on each of the SDP’s Solution: Early engagement with Metro’s Universal Fare System and Fare Enforcement American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA) #8 turnouts, three branches, located as close as practicable to the junction turnouts. personnel to determine a path forward. providing a cab speed of 15 mph. #10 lateral turnouts may be possible at the western corner of the For the existing Gold Line, we have already identified a need and potential location for crossovers Wye, but are doubtful elsewhere. immediately west of the ELACC station. Crossovers also should be accommodated in the other two Movements through the tangent portion of turnouts should be maximized and made, where possible, branches. compatible with 55 mph operation. 4. Managing Train Movements There is an operational issue that may not be intuitively evident in the proposed operating schedule. Operationally, train movements through the Wye should be scheduled to avoid concurrent conflicting train movements. Additionally, train movements to and from the Wye should be scheduled to preserve 5-minute separation between trains on the TRAIN A same branch in the same direction. These needs are illustrated in Exhibit 3. First, focusing on the need to preserve five-minute train separation: TRAIN B  Train A is scheduled on the 10-minute clock: 0:10, 0:20, 0:30, etc.  Therefore, Train C must be on the 5-minute clock: 0:15, 0:25, 0:35, etc., to operate between “A” trains  Therefore, Train F must be on the 10-minute clock to operate between “C” trains  Therefore, Train B must be on the 5-minute clock to operate between “F” trains Therefore, Train D must be on the 10-minute clock to operate between “B” trains  TRAIN E  Therefore, Train E must be on the 5-minute clock to operate between “D” trains Therefore, there are, minimally, two simultaneous train movements: TRAIN C  Trains A, D and F  Trains B, C and E TRAIN F TRAIN D Movements A, D and F are non-conflicting. Movements B, C and E are all conflicting movements, if tracks are not grade-separated one from another.

Exhibit 3 - Wye Junction Train Operations

Page 6 of 19 REV: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING & DB SOLICITATION

SDP’s Solution: We believe that serious consideration should be made of grade separation of the three track-track crossings. We believe this may be possible because each of the three branches of the Wye will be at different elevations:  Existing Gold Line: At-grade  Atlantic/Washington: Underground  SR60: Aerial For example, the Train C route could be depressed under the Train B and Train E routes. The Train E route could be elevated over the Train B route in the northeast corner of the Wye.

5. Traction Power Sectionalization The traction power system should be sectionalized such that de-energization (whether intentional for maintenance, or unexpected, such as a breaker trip) makes minimal impacts on other train movements.

SDP’s Solution: Please refer to Exhibit 4. This sectionalization scheme ensures that any single-breaker trip would directly affect only one route and not the other two routes. Moreover, if the de-energization is not recoverable within a short time frame, single-tracking could be initiated to enable some level of service to the route that is affected (with lesser impact to the other two routes, depending upon exact crossover placement). It should be noted that Exhibit 4 demonstrates the most robust configuration. The configuration could be simplified by use of load-break switches, or even motorized disconnect switches (MDS). However, this would be at the “cost” of wider loss of power when DC feeder breakers trip and possible delay in partial restoration of power by operation of MDS and load-breaks.

Exhibit 4 - Wye Junction Power Sectionalization

Page 7 of 19 REV: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

Conceptual Traction Power Load-Flow Analysis:

Led by Kwaku Larbi, and using Mott MacDonald’s proprietary load-flow model, the load-flow will be run to confirm the TPSS locations and property takes already identified in the DEIR/S.

Conceptual Preliminary Operations Analysis/Simulation: The need for sidings for bad- To confirm runtimes (critical to ridership analysis, as well as fleet size), crossover locations and terminal track order train storage, arrangements (critical to ensuring sufficient tail track length to support design headways and the need to store short-lining and revenue-ready trains. support of Maintenance-of- Most importantly, the Wye junction needs to be simulated if the “Combined” option is pursued to verify that it Way will also be will support on-time train performance and networking. discussed with Rail Operations. Simulation will be performed by WSP’s Operations Simulation group, using Berkeley Simulation Software’s Rail Traffic Controller (RTC) model. Most recently, WSP developed the outline and scope of a Conceptual Operations Plan: Systemwide LRT O&M Plan resulting from the Regional Connector project, comprising the following 16 chapters: Building upon the operations simulation and the Advanced Chapter 1 - System Description and Characteristics Conceptual Engineering alignment, we will prepare and submit Chapter 2 - Operations Service Plan and Schedule for approval a Conceptual Operations Plan to describe and Chapter 3 - Maintenance/Engineering prescribe the O&M plan and requirements for the Eastside Chapter 4 - Activation Plan (Start-Up and Testing) Phase 2 system, addressing initial and full build-out Chapter 5 - Start-Up requirements. Chapter 6 – Testing Chapter 7: Safety Testing Standards and Procedures Yard Capacity and Requirements: Chapter 8: Operating Rules and Procedures In conjunction with the facilities engineer, and using data from Chapter 9: Training the Conceptual Operations Analysis, our project team will assist Chapter 10: Emergency Operations / Service and Schedule Recovery Procedures with defining the capacity and capabilities required of the Chapter 11: Security Standards and Procedures maintenance facility for the initial and final build-outs (if not the Chapter 12: Fare Collection Plan same). Systems inputs at this stage include fleet size and Chapter 13: Business Management Plan consist needs (driving storage track configuration), traction Chapter 14: Operating and Maintenance Budgets power needs, and yard control requirements. Critically, the Chapter 15: Staffing and Hiring Plan yard/mainline interface will be reviewed to ensure: Chapter 16: Staff Support Functions  Transfer track/lead for trains awaiting permission to enter the main line  Ability of ROC to route trains clear of the main line prior to transfer to yard control  Resiliency (no single points of failure of power or track that would trap the entire fleet in the yard).1

1Critical lesson learned for Metro from an OCS failure at Division 11 some years ago.

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING EFFORTS TO SUPPORT THE FEIS/EIR

The SDP team will develop an Advanced-Conceptual- Engineering-level Systems design for the project. Items critical to the FEIS/EIR support will include:

 Substation locations and footprints: To define property takes.  Crossover locations and configuration: In conjunction with the facilities, to support noise and vibration analysis.

Page 8 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

 Review of Advanced Conceptual Engineering alignment: Particularly SDP ENHANCEMENT - ENGAGING EARLY for review of alignment and curve speeds, both to maximize train speed METRO O&M and to ensure that curve speeds conform with cab signal speeds.  Preliminary size and location of signal and communication houses, Engaging Metro O&M in project development signal bungalows, crossing houses/cases and signal cases: To is critical to success. Key areas of engagement determine and support property takes. include:  Conceptual tunnel power system configuration: In support of • Establishing familiarity with the project substation requirements, including property takes. Identification of EBPS • Discussing and reviewing the O&M plan and generator location(s) (assuming that the tunnel ground is determined to be operations simulation gassy or potentially gassy). • Discussing and reviewing the alignment,  Identification of radio antenna location(s): In support of property needs especially the Wye junction (if the as well as potential visual impact. “Combined” option is selected), crossovers,  Other environmental support efforts: Including defining the visual sidings, tail tracks, station configurations and impact of substations, OCS and signal and communication houses as grade crossing layouts. required, as well as the noise impact of air conditioning and ventilation • Discussing and reviewing the maintenance systems. facility layout, capacity and capabilities  Cost estimates: The SDP team will update the conceptual-level cost • Discussing the infrastructure to support estimates for systems elements for the project in collaboration with the communications with ROC and ROC capacity facilities engineer. Additionally, the SDP team will, in conjunction with to support the project. Metro Rail Operations, develop a conceptual-level O&M budget. • Discussing how Maintenance of Way and OTHER TIME-CRITICAL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING EFFORTS Facilities Maintenance would maintain the project. While the following efforts have lesser impacts to the FEIS/EIR, we believe they • Reviewing needs for bus and rail operator should commence at this stage of project development: layover facilities. Discussing the provisions for cutover of the Electric Utility Coordination: We will work with the facilities engineer and Metro • existing Gold Line, and especially the staff to start the process of coordination with Southern California Edison (SCE), for potential demolition of Atlantic Station and utility feeds for stations, traction power substations and, critically, the tunnel associated alignment. segment. We believe the tunnel to be a critical component of this discussion because of the need for a trainway feeder and because of the likely high power capacity required.

Support Needs Outside of the Alignment: Metro is a mature transportation system and to that end, new rail projects can no longer be developed without any impact to the existing system. Building upon SDP’s intimate knowledge of Metro, we have identified some items for early analysis and decision-making, as these can have a significant impact upon the scope, progress, cost and schedule of the project:

Central Control: Where will Eastside Phase 2 be controlled from? Will the new ESOC be completed and if so will it be built with the facilities to support Eastside Phase 2? Critical ROC functions that need to be addressed include workstations for dispatchers and customer service staff, radio, SCADA, TPIS, CCTV, Fire Alarm Management System and NEXTRIP. Separately, and related to this, is the access control system at Gateway.

Carrier Transmission System (CTS): The existing Eastside CTS system uses a Fujitsu 4500 SONET system and does not conform with current Metro requirements. Also, the existing Eastside fiber comprises two 24-strand fiber cables, rather than the “standard” 144-fiber cables. Discuss whether Eastside Phase 2 CTS will be through-spliced to ROC/ESOC and whether the existing Eastside cables provide sufficient capacity.

While general bus-rail connectivity will be considered as part of the O&M plan, an additional consideration may be for bus layover facilities, especially at the terminal station(s).

Page 9 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

Deliverables

 Review of FEIS and Conceptual Design  Review of Conceptual Systems Cost Estimate  Initial Basis of Design Report  Conceptual Traction Power Load-Flow Analysis  Conceptual Operations Analysis and Simulation  Conceptual Operations Plan  Yard Capacity and Requirements  Advanced Conceptual Systems Engineering  Updated Systems Cost Estimate  Status report on Electric Utility Coordination

ENGINEERING PHASE

For the Engineering Phase of the project, much of the Systems Engineering work will progress in parallel. Our workplan, therefore, is formatted to discuss specific subject areas. The project schedule illustrates how the work is phased, chronologically.

Independent Systems Integration Review

There is one core goal that must and will be our continuous and continuing focus throughout our work: the successful placing of Eastside Phase 2 into revenue service.

Our project manager, Michael Harris-Gifford, lived and breathed O&M at Metro for SDP’S INDEPENDENT SYSTEMS more than eight years. He has seen, and experienced, the consequences of both INTEGRATION REVIEW TEAM: good and bad planning for revenue operation. Therefore, for every project, Michael • Michael Harris-Gifford: Ops, Maintenance will lead a small team of experienced and independent engineers to periodically • Mahesh Patel: Systems Integration review the project design and status and to check for compliance. • John Spellman: Train Control At a minimum, our Systems Integration Review team will review the project, • Arvind Patel and Alan Murphy: Traction Power and OCS including Facilities and MEP, at the following stages: • Phil Collins: Communications  Completion of FEIS/EIR Review and Basis of Design Development  50% completion of design  95% Completion of design  75% Completion of DB Solicitation Development  95% Completion of DB Solicitation Development

Additionally, the Systems Integration Review team will be held on standby for independent troubleshooting at any time Metro requires it.

Systemwide Engineering Plans

Project System Safety and Security Program Plan (SSSecPP): Of course, Metro already has a corporate System Safety and Security Program Plan, compliant with 49 CFR 659 and CPUC General Order 164-D. However, led by Gulzar Ahmed, the SDP team will develop a project-specific SSSecPP, based upon Metro’s Corporate SSSecPP.

Page 10 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

This document will be developed at the start of the PE phase and will SSSecPP Content: record the project organization and key deliverables for system safety 1. INTRODUCTION and security. The project SSSecPP will be developed in coordination 1.1 Goals with, and subject to approval by, Metro Corporate Safety. 1.2 Scope 1.3 Authority Systems Assurance Program Plan (SAPP): Another early 1.4 Applicable Documents deliverable, led by Lurae Stuart, will be the project SAPP. This 2. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION document defines how Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability 2.1 Stations (RAMS) will be incorporated into the project design and contract 2.2 Systems requirements. While this is a systemwide document, we believe the 2.3 Light Rail Vehicles (LRV) Systems Engineering team are best-placed to lead SAPP 2.4 Project Organization development, with support from the Facilities Engineering team. 3. SAFETY PROGRAM ACTIVITIES 3.1 Preliminary Engineering  The SAPP will define the reliability and availability targets 3.2 Final Design for key project elements, including: 3.3 Preliminary Hazards Analysis  Traction power and overhead catenary/OCR 3.4 Safety and Security Certification Program  Train control and grade crossings 3.5 Configuration Management  Communications systems 3.6 Hazard Identification and Resolution Process  Station electrical systems 3.6.1 Categorization of Hazard 3.6.2 Risk Assessment  Tunnel and station ventilation systems 3.7 Fire/Life Safety Committee  Maintenance facility functions 3.8 Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis  Trackwork 3.9 Operating Hazard Analysis Maintainability requirements will be defined for the same seven 3.10 Hazardous Materials Program 3.11 Employee Safety Program elements listed above. Critically, however, the SAPP will specifically 3.12 Safety and Security Certification demand analysis be conducted on how maintenance will be 3.13 Accident/Incident Investigation and Reporting facilitated in context of 24-hour span of service and the impact of the 4. SYSTEM SECURITY PLAN CPUC’s restrictive Wayside Worker Protection regulations, as 5. SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES defined in General Order 175.

As well as defining how and when the DB contractor will conduct RAMS analyses, we will perform analyses upon our own design development at the 95% completion level of Engineering. We intend to request Metro Transportation and MOW staff engagement in this analysis. Michael Harris-Gifford will be a key SDP “independent” RAMS reviewer.

Threat and Vulnerability Analysis (TVA): We anticipate the project TVA will jointly be led by Metro’s Corporate Safety and System Security & Law Enforcement departments. The SDP team will provide support, alongside the Facilities Engineering team. Critical TVA input into the Systems design is security and access control systems, including CCTV, portal intrusion, access control system (card key), and general intrusion detection systems.

Safety Certification Program Plan (SCPP): Led by Gulzar Ahmed, the SDP team will develop a project-specific SCPP. While this is a systemwide SCPP KEY FACTORS FOR SUCCESS:  Clearly define the DB Contractor’s role, document, we believe the Systems Engineering team are best-placed to lead responsibilities and deliverables SCPP development, with support from the Facilities Engineering team.  Clearly define Metro’s role, responsibilities Complying with the SSSecPP and CPUC General Order 164-D, the SCPP will and deliverables define the project safety certification process, organization, and roles and  Define the Safety Certification Review responsibilities from Preliminary Engineering, through to submittal of the final Committee  Demand certification sign-off commence Safety Certification Verification Report to the CPUC no later than 21 calendar upon IFC design and is tracked monthly days prior to the planned start of revenue operations. Key deliverables for the thereafter safety certification process, defined in the SCPP include:

Page 11 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

 Safety Certifiable Items List (SCIL)  Design Certification Checklist (including checklists for Metro-furnished safety items)  Construction Certification Checklist (including checklists for Metro-furnished safety items)  Integrated Testing Certification Checklist (including checklists for Metro-led testing)  Training Certification Checklist (including vendor training and Metro internal training)  Contractor Safety Certification Verification Report  Metro Safety Certification Verification Report (SCVR, including certifications of readiness from Metro Transportation, Security and Maintenance departments)

During the Engineering project phase, the SDP team will develop the SCIL. This is a list of project elements that are safety-critical and must be certified as safe as part of the SCVR.

Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA): Led by Gulzar Ahmed, the SDP team will develop a project-specific PHA, complying with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) guidelines per DOT-FTA-MA-26-5005-00-01. While this is a systemwide document, we believe the Systems Engineering team is best-placed to lead PHA development, with support from the Facilities Engineering team.

The PHA checklist will be organized by system and subsystem and initially be populated with the hazard descriptions, potential cause and effect. Gulzar’s team will work with the Project Engineering team to assess the failure rate and assign an initial hazard risk index. This will then be circulated for review and comment at about the 50% design completion level.

We will then update the matrix and review it with the Project Engineering team to populate the corrective action columns. We will pay particular attention to items that have a hazard classification of IA, IB, IC, IIA, IIB, IIIA, ID, IIC, IID, IIIB, or IIIC, as these are generally classified as unacceptable or undesirable. Our aim will be, where practicable, to mitigate hazards to the “acceptable” level.

Upon completion of populating the corrective actions and classification of as-mitigated hazards, the PHA will be recirculated for review and approval.

Interface Management Plan (IMP): We recommend that the SDP team lead development of the IMP, with input from the facilities engineer. This document will define how interfaces between project elements will be reviewed and tracked, including elements external to Metro, but related to the project.

We will also develop an initial interface matrix to define project element interfaces to the extent these are developed during Engineering.

Risk Management Plan: In common with past Metro projects, we anticipate that the risk management plan and risk matrix will be developed by Metro. The SDP project team, together with the Facilities Engineering team, will support development and population of the risk matrix.

Operations and Maintenance Plan

The SDP team will further define and refine the Eastside Phase 2 O&M Plan. Particular areas of focus will include:

 Updated Operations Analysis/Simulation (using the updated alignment from the Facilities Engineering team)  Connectivity/integration into existing operations  Bus/LRT interface  Service plan/pattern  Headway (normal and single-tracking)  Crossover and siding needs  Fleet size  Yard capacity, function and configuration  Existing system interface and cutover

Page 12 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

Traction Power Load-Flow Analysis and Simulation

We will update the parameters input to our traction power load-flow model, including the updated alignment from the Facilities Engineering team, and rerun the model to confirm substation locations and ratings. The model will also be used to confirm feeder cable and OCS ratings.

Data from the model will be used for the traction power system design and to further discussion with SCE for utility drops.

Systems Engineering

The SDP team will progress the Systems Engineering, including:

Project Basis of Design Report will be updated.

Traction Power Design: Substation capacity, size, locations and layout, tunnel trainway feeder configuration, and maintenance facility substation design.

Overhead Catenary Design and OCR Design, including system configuration and sectionalization.

Train Control Design, including a block and control line design, and route and aspect charts.

Grade Crossing Design. Our plan is to conduct field diagnostics LESSON LEARNED: Our experience with past Metro with Metro Operations, Corporate Safety, the CPUC and the projects indicate the cost and schedule benefits of having jurisdictional DOT, and to submit grade crossing applications completed grade crossing applications before DB toward the end of the Engineering period so that there is sufficient solicitation. The consequences of not having approved time for crossing approval by the CPUC prior to DB NTP. crossing applications is that the project is not approved for Communication System Design, including CTS, CCTV, TPIS, construction. Indeed, negative review by the CPUC can SDS, GDS, SCADA, F&EM/Emergency Management Panels, result in prohibition to construct (with the related delays’ telephone, IDS and ACS. Critically, we will determine what costs) and can even result in grade separation or road infrastructure needs to be completed to facilitate communications closure, triggering reopening of environmental documents. to ROC/ESOC.

Radio Design, including determination of radio antenna locations for the tunnel; SDP ENHANCEMENT: verification of coverage for surface alignment from existing Metro hilltop sites; verification The project alignment is within with Metro fire/life safety of what emergency responder channels are needed (primarily striking distance of Metro’s Division LASD and LACoFD, but possibly also including LA-RICS), and discussion with Metro 4 (1.5 miles). There is opportunity to Operations regarding what operating and maintenance channels are to be used. tie in the Division to the project CTS Yard and Shop systems requirements (traction power, traction electrification, train system. control and communication).

Progress prints of the Systems Engineering will be produced at the 50% and 95% completion levels to facilitate comprehensive review by the Systems and Facilities engineers, Metro, and SDP’s independent Systems Integration Review team. We anticipate the systems design to lag four to six weeks behind the facilities design for us to properly incorporate the facilities design into systems.

Additionally, the SDP team will review MRDC, Fire/Life Safety Design Criteria and Standard Drawings at this time to confirm compliance, and where necessary, draft Design Deviation Requests or Requests for Special Consideration, as applicable, to secure approval of deviations.

Page 13 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

SOLUTION FOR SIGNIFICANT ISSUE: CUTOVER INTO THE EXISTING GOLD LINE

As indicated earlier, there are significant cutover issues to deal with, especially for any option including an Atlantic/Washington alignment. We will devise detailed cutover plans to convey how and when cutover and “Enabling Works” activities need to be promulgated by the DB contractor.

In addition to the major issues already discussed, there are other Systems Engineering cutover issues to deal with, including the existing train control system. This is based upon a GE/Harmon VHLC logic controller. This equipment is already sold only as a “legacy system” by Alstom (which procured the business from GE). It is not unlikely that by the time of systems construction, expansion of the VHLC controller may be difficult to acquire. We will need assess whether to replace it as part of the project.

Also, the existing CTS backbone is based upon Fujitsu 4500 SONET. While still supported, Metro has already transitioned over to a Fujitsu 9500 Native Ethernet topology. It is likely, therefore, that Eastside Phase 2 will need a CTS topology separate from the existing Eastside, but using existing dark fibers (of which, there are sufficient spares). However, there is constraint in fiber availability between Division 20 (to which Eastside is being re-routed under the Regional Connector project) and the 7th and Metro station (from where fiber runs to ROC). This may change, however, with introduction of the new ESOC in the downtown area near Division 20.

Other Project-Specific Issues

 The long aerial structure paralleling the freeway for the SR60 option presents some issues with respect to wayside maintenance access, especially the crossovers.  The lack of allocation of property for the train control bungalows for the crossovers at Washington Boulevard and Keltonyview Drive, at Washington Boulevard and Danby Ave, and at Washington Boulevard and Crowndale Avenue are of concern.  OCS clearance under the I-605 is also of concern, especially with the vertical curve at the western end of the underpass.  The tail tracks behind Lambert Road Station are only 223 feet, which is an issue as it is insufficient to either store, or turn back a three-car train.  The proposed maintenance yard near the UPRR is of concern as it appears to have only one yard lead track. This is a significant single-point-of-failure risk for systems (track, OCS and train control) and requires further study. The same concern arises with the proposed yard next to Allport Avenue.

Page 14 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

ENGAGING OTHER METRO DIVISIONS Engaging other Metro divisions in this process is critical to ensure we account for their needs, as well as facilitating buy-in for the overall process. At the Engineering stage, we need to engage Operations and Maintenance as well as Fire/Life Safety. O&M Fire/Life Safety

 Discuss and review the updated O&M plan and The SDP team believes that engaging Metro Fire/Life safety operations simulation at the Engineering Phase is an important factor in securing successful certification of the Project and approval of an  Discuss and review cutover plans and requirements. Occupancy Permit. Our focus for engagement will be as  Discuss and review the main line systems design, follows: especially with respect to supporting maintenance and  Discuss and review the system assurance and 24/7 operation. safety certification requirements. Discuss and review the maintenance facility systems   Discuss and review system fire/life safety and design, especially with respect to supporting security provisions, especially surveillance, Blue maintenance and 24/7 operation. Light Station, Fire Detection, Emergency  Discuss and review to provision and assignment of Management, and access control provisions. operating and maintenance radio channels

 Discuss the infrastructure to support communications with ROC and ROC capacity to support the Project and any other Metro-furnished facilities.

Civil Design Support and Coordination

The SDP team will perform critical review of the civil design (as well as providing opportunity for the Civil Design team to review the Systems design). Particular areas of focus for the SDP team will include:

 Civil speed restrictions and compatibility with available cab signal codes  Finalization of crossovers and sidings  Property for substations and signal houses  Ductbank and raceway provisions  OCS foundations  Grade crossing layouts  Provisions for signal and communication rooms  Provisions for bus/train layover  Tunnel ventilation design  Yard and shop layout and configuration  TC&C room layout, and heat and power load estimates.

Cost Estimate

The SDP team will develop cost estimates for the systems portions of the project and fold them into the overall cost estimate, led by the Facilities Engineering team. The breakdown of cost elements will conform to the project WBS.

Page 15 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

Deliverables

General:

 Independent Systems Integration Review  SSSecPP  SAPP  Preliminary RAMS analyses  TVA support  SCPP  SCIL  PHA  IMP  Risk Management Plan support  Preliminary O&M Plan  Preliminary Operations Analysis/Simulation  Traction Power Load-Flow Analysis and Simulation  Updated Basis of Design Report  Traction Power Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:  Metro System Standard Drawings  Tunnel segment one-line, metering and relaying diagrams  Emergency Trip System tripping scheme  Traction Power ductbank plans  Site layout plans for each substation  Additional detail and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings  Record of agreements with SCE for electrical power service.  Overhead Catenary/OCR Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:  Metro System Standard Drawings  Master Schematics (main line and yard)  Sectionalization Diagrams (main line and yard)  Additional support and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings  OCS Foundation Drawings, as required by the Facilities Engineering team

Train Control Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

 Metro System Standard Drawings  Typical Single Line Diagram - Power Distribution  Systemwide Ductbank Plan  Route and Aspect Chart for each interlocking  Double Line Track Plans  Cab signal control line diagrams  Block design calculations  Yard route and aspect charts  Yard double line track plans  Additional detail and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings

Communication System Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

 Metro System Standard Drawings  Communications Block Diagram for each station and the maintenance facility

Page 16 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

 TC&C Room Layout  TC&C Room Heat and Power Load Estimates  Typical Cross-passage Equipment Layout  Typical CCTV System - Block Diagram  Telephone System - Block Diagram  TPIS System - Block Diagram  Intrusion Detection and Access - Controlled System Block Diagram  Portal Surveillance System - Block Diagram  Gas Detection System - Block Diagram  Fire Alarm System - Block Diagram  EMP System - Block Diagram  EMP Elevations  Seismic Detection System - Block Diagram  Typical TC&C Room - Cable Riser Diagram  Typical TC&C Room - Power Single Line Diagram  Cable Transmission System - Topology  SCADA System - Block Diagram  UFCS System - Block Diagram  Additional detail and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings

Radio Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

 Metro System Standard Drawings  Tunnel Radio System Configuration  Base Station Schematic Diagram  Additional detail and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings  Record of agreed radio channels for Metro Operations and emergency responders  Preliminary Intermod Analysis  Radio Coverage Analysis  Systems cost estimate

Page 17 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

DESIGN/BUILD SOLICITATION DEVELOPMENT PHASE

The following work plan is presented on the assumption that the Eastside Phase 2 project is solicited as a single DB project. We recognize, of course, that there a number of different ways forward for solicitation, including splitting the project into several solicitations (i.e. main line, tunnels, maintenance facility, and systems), or into different types of solicitation from Build-Build to P3. Whatever configuration of solicitation Metro ultimately selects, the SDP team is ready and able to serve.

We have also assumed that the Task Order extends only into assembly of solicitation documents and not into solicitation support.

Solicitation Outline

We foresee this being led primarily by Metro, with input from the Project Engineering team.

Metro and the Foothill and Expo construction authorities have used a variety of DB solicitation formats with varying degrees of success. We strongly encourage Metro to carefully review past solicitations, the lessons learned from their relative successes, and the applicability of these solicitations to the project.

We further suggest that a small team of senior WSP, Mott MacDonald and PTG personnel, experienced in Metro DB solicitation, be engaged in this outline review and development phase to maximize the probability of success.

Design/Build Solicitation Development

We believe Metro needs to consider carefully the right balance of prescriptive and performance-based requirements for systems. In this respect, we present the following recommendations and work plan:

Scope of Work (SOW): Specific, detailed and mandatory. This document must comprehensively specify what the Contractor must do and when. To the degree it is important to Metro or third parties, the SOW must also specify how the Contractor is to perform certain tasks. Critical to this is the description of the scope, sequence and restrictions upon demolition of existing operating facilities and for cutover of the project into the existing Gold Line.

This section must be a fully integrated and seamless document covering all aspects of the project. This makes it essential that the Facilities and Systems engineers work directly with each other during development.

This section also should discuss, in detail, any Metro-furnished items and activities.

Page 18 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

Division 01 Specifications: While largely derived from Metro standard specifications, each must be thoroughly reviewed to ensure it is tailored to the project, complies with current regulations and standards, and correctly reflects Metro’s current requirements.

Specifically, in the “Constructability, Durability, And Maintainability In Design” section of our proposal, we have indicated some ways in which solicitation documents, especially those in Division 01, can be further improved.

We anticipate development of Division 01 specifications to be a collaborative effort of the combined project team. Specification sections that we anticipate the SDP team to lead include:

01 35 14 - Operating System Interface

01 78 23 - Operation And Maintenance Data

01 78 43 - Spare Parts, Illustrated Parts Catalog, And Replacement Materials

01 78 55 - Safety And Security Certification

01 79 00 - Demonstration And Training

01 91 13 - Project Integration/Commissioning

Divisions 02 through 19: Led by the Facilities Engineering team, with SDP review and support.

We particularly foresee SDP team input to the following sections:

05 60 00 – OCS Steel Poles (SDP lead)

11 11 00 - Vehicle Service Equipment

11 11 26 - Vehicle Wash Equipment

11 11 29 - Shop Equipment

14 45 00 - Vehicle Lifts

Division 20: We anticipate leading development of Section 20 72 35 - Train Control And Communications Raceways, with support from the Facilities Engineering team.

Divisions 21 through 26: Led by the Facilities Engineering team, with SDP review and support.

We particularly foresee SDP team input to the following sections:

26 05 00 - Common Materials And Methods For Electrical Services

26 05 05 - Electrical Design Requirements

26 05 06 - Design Requirements For The Auxiliary Power Distribution System

26 05 19 - Insulated Wires And Cables

26 05 26 - Grounding And Bonding For Electrical Systems

26 05 73 - Arc Flash Hazard Analysis And Short Circuit/Coordination Study

26 08 00 - Commissioning Of Electrical Systems

26 32 13.13 - Standby Generator

26 32 33 - Facilities Uninterruptible AC Power Supply (UPS)

Page 19 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

Division 27: The SDP team will lead all sections, with support from the Facilities Engineering team. We anticipate the following Division 27 specification sections:

27 01 01 - General Communications Requirements

27 01 02 - Communications Manuals

27 01 03 - Communications Training

27 01 04 - Communications Spare Parts And Test Equipment

27 01 05 - Communications Testing And Commissioning

27 01 06 - Communications Uninterruptible AC Power Supply (UPS)

27 01 07 - Communications Facilities Emergency Management (FEM) System

27 05 48 - Communications Seismic Event Detection System

27 13 00 - Communications Cable Transmission System

27 30 00 - Communications Telephone System

27 32 43 - Communications Radio System

27 51 16 - Communications Transit Passenger Information System (TPIS)

Division 28: The SDP team will lead all sections, with support from the Facilities Engineering team. We anticipate the following Division 28 specification sections:

28 16 00 - Communications Intrusion Detection Access Controlled System

28 16 33 - Communications Tunnel Portal Surveillance And Alarm System

28 16 34 - Railroad Intrusion Detection System

28 23 00 - Communications Closed Circuit Television System

28 31 00 - Communications Fire Detection System

28 33 00 - Communications Gas Detection And Alarm System

28 40 00 - Communications Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition Remote Terminal Unit (SCADA RTU)

28 50 00 - System Security

28 60 00 - System Safety And Assurance

Divisions 31 through 33: Led by the Facilities Engineering team, with SDP review and support. However, the SDP team will develop the following specification section:

31 63 32 - OCS Guy Guards

Division 34: The SDP team will lead all sections, except track. We will support track specification development, and the Facilities Engineering team will support our sections. We anticipate leading the following Division 34 specification sections:

34 01 02 - Traction Power Manuals

34 01 03 - Traction Power Spare Parts

Page 20 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

34 01 04 - Traction Power Training

34 21 03 - Traction Power General Requirements

34 21 06 - Traction Power Basic Electrical Materials And Methods

34 21 09 - Traction Power High Voltage AC Power Switchgear

34 21 26 - Traction Power AC-to-DC Conversion Assemblies

34 21 29 - Traction Power Metal-Enclosed Bus And Busways

34 21 31 - Traction Power Blue Light Station (BLS) System

34 21 33 - Traction Power DC Power Switchgear

34 21 34 - Traction Power Shop DC Distribution System

34 21 35 - Traction Power Shop DC Distribution Switchboard

34 21 36 - Traction Power Negative Grounding Device (NGD)

34 21 39 - Traction Power 750 Volt Negative Bus Boxes

34 21 43 - Traction Power Safety And System Assurance

34 21 49 - Traction Power Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)

34 21 53 - Traction Power Cable Terminations

34 21 56 - Traction Power Insulated Wires And Cables

34 21 61 - Traction Power DC Load-Break Devices

34 21 63 - Traction Power DC No-Load-Break Devices

34 21 66 - Traction Power Grounding And Bonding

34 21 76 - Traction Power Supervisory Control Interface Terminal Cabinet (SCITC)

34 21 90 - Traction Power Equipment Installation Requirements

34 21 91 - Traction Power Test Program

34 21 93 - Traction Power Testing And Start-Up

34 23 02 - OCS/ Manuals And Training

34 23 03 - OCS Spare Parts

34 23 04 - OCS General Requirements

34 23 06 - Overhead Conductor Rail

34 23 10 - OCS Grounding And Bonding Systems

34 23 15 - OCS Bare Conductors

34 23 20 - OCS Galvanized Steel Wire And Wire Rope

Page 21 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

34 23 25 - OCS Stainless Steel Wire And Wire Rope

34 23 30 - OCS Assemblies, Fittings, Fasteners, And Hardware

34 23 35 OCS Balance Weight And Midpoint Anchor Assemblies

34 23 40 - OCS Insulator Assembly

34 23 45 - OCS Insulators

34 23 46 - OCS Disconnect Switches

34 23 50 - Overhead Contact System Lightning Protection

34 23 65 - Overhead Contact System Installation

34 23 70 - OCS Special Tools

34 23 71 - OCS Testing And Commissioning

34 23 73 - OCS Cable Terminations

34 23 80 - Pole Identification And Warning Signs

34 42 02 - Train Control Spare Parts And Test Equipment

34 42 03 - Train Control Manuals & Training

34 42 05 - Train Control System Integration, Testing And Acceptance

34 42 06 - Train Control System Safety And Assurance

34 42 13.19 - Train Control General Requirements

34 42 13.23 - Train Control Block Design

34 42 13.26 - Train Control Logic Requirements

34 42 13.46 - Train Control Signal Electrical Work - Basic Requirements

34 42 13.53 - Train Control Track Circuits

34 42 13.56 - Train Control Room Layout

34 42 13.59 - Train Control Power Distribution

34 42 13.63 - Train Control System Grounding

34 42 13.66 - Train Control Relays

34 42 13.69 - Train Control Electrical And Electronic Components

34 42 13.73 - Train Control Switch Machine Layouts

34 42 13.76 - Train Control Signal Layouts

34 42 13.27 - Train Control Train-To-Wayside Communications

34 42 13.96 - Train Control Special Trackwork And Bonding

Page 22 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

34 42 13.97 - Train Control Marking And Tagging

34 42 13.98 - Train Control Drawings

34 42 16.13 - Train Control Interior Wire And Cable

34 42 16.16 - Train Control Exterior Wire And Cable

34 42 19.13 - Train Control Microprocessor Control Systems

34 42 23 - Train Control Yard Control Panel

34 42 23.19 - Train Control Local Control Panel

34 54 00 - Communications Universal Fare Collection (UFCS) Interface

34 76 13 - Grade Crossing Layouts (may need a separate specification for the SCRRA side)

Divisions 41 through 45: Led by the Facilities Engineering team, with SDP review and support.

We plan to submit DB solicitation specifications for formal review at the 75%, 95% and 100% completion levels.

Page 23 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

Design/Build Solicitation Assembly ENGAGING METRO OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE A DB solicitation for a project such as the Eastside Phase 2 project contains a large volume of documents, both contractual and reference. The SDP team Continuing our engagement of Metro Rail Operations anticipates significant effort, as part of the entire project team, to assemble and Maintenance, our focus during the DB Solicitation documents, ensure they are the most current, and to review their proper Development Phase will be as follows: placement within the overall solicitation.  Discuss and review the systems contract Deliverables documents, especially with respect to  Assistance with developing solicitation outline supporting maintenance and 24/7 operation.  SOW and specifications as indicated above  Discuss and review cutover plans and  Assistance with final assembly of solicitation documents requirements.

 Discuss and review the systems assurance requirements.

 Discuss and review the systems testing and rail activation requirements and schedule, including the provision of rolling stock and other items of Metro support.

 Discuss and review the safety certification requirements.

Page 24 of 27 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING & DB SOLICITATION

TASK ORDER PROPOSED ORGANIZATION CHART

METRO Project Manager TBD

Systems PM

M. Harris‐Gifford Corridor Systems Facilities Lead Designer J. Bayat TBD

Project Controls CADD Various Various

Train Control Traction Power Communications System Safety & OCS/OCR Lead General Electrical Ops Modelling Lead Lead Lead Certification P. Minch D. Hetherington A. Thibodeau B. Sam A. Vallejo G. Ahmed V. Yanitskaya

Train Control Traction Power OCS/OCR Communications Yard & Shop TP TP Load Flow RF Engineer RAMS Support Support Support Support R. Hillenbrand P. Mateo R. Godara K. Larbi J. Lau S. Sukumar M. Azhad L. Stuart

Page 25 of 27 REV: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING & DB SOLICITATION

TASK ORDER SCHEDULE

Eastside Phase II Project ‐ System Staff FY 2019 FY 2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 2018 2019 20202021 2022 2023 Plan 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q EARLY TASKS Support Develop Project Management Plans Review of FEIS and Conceptual Design & Costs Initial Basis of Design Conceptual Traction Power Load‐Flow Preliminary Operations Analysis/Simulation Conceptual Operations Plan Yard Capacity and Requirements Advanced Conceptual Systems Engineering Updated Systems Cost Estimate PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PHASE Independent Systems Integration Review System Safety & Security Program Plan Systems Assurance Program Plan Threat & Vulnerability Analysis Safety Certification Program Plan Preliminary Hazard Analysis Interface Management Plan Support Risk Management Plan Operations & Maintenance Plan Update Traction Power Load‐Flow Analysis & Simulation Update Basis of Design Report Traction Power Design OCS/OCR Design Train Control Design Communication System Design Yard and Shop systems design Civil Design Support and Coordination Cost Estimate D/B SOLICITATION DEVELOPMENT PHASE Solicitation Outline Scope of Work Specifications Development Design/Build Solicitation Assembly D/B SOLICITATION PHASE Addenda/RFI Support Proposal Review BAFO Support Conformed Document Production

Page 26 of 27 REV: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EASTSIDE PHASE 2 EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING & DB SOLICITATION

TASK ORDER RESOURCE LOADING CHART

Page 27 of 27 REV: Draft Draft Task Order Proposal 2: Sepulveda HRT

Metro Contract No. AE47810E0128 Systems Engineering and Support Services Task Order 002: Sepulveda HRT EIR Support, Engineering and P3 Solicitation TASK ORDER PROPOSAL

Version No.: Draft Date: 01.05.18

EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

The following is a proposed workplan for the Sepulveda Heavy Rail Transit (HRT) project. The workplan is developed to take the project from the Final EIR/EIS stage through completion of Engineering and into the commencement of P3 solicitation. That is, through the first three phases of our Task Order Flow Matrix.

UNDERSTANDING OF THE SEPULVEDA PROJECT

The Sepulveda HRT project is currently undergoing environmental development, with the likely outcome as a heavy rail subway system similar to Metro’s Red and Purple lines. Currently, the project development is for an independent rail line with no direct physical (i.e., track) connection to the Metro rail system. Therefore, the project will ne to be entirely self-sustaining (other than possibly central control) in terms of O&M facilities.

We are very much aware that Metro has already received proposals to execute this project as a P3 solicitation, and is, therefore, not subject to the same fiscal and design constraints as other Measure M projects. This has the benefit of enabling accelerated execution. However, there are some upfront challenges in terms of defining the project with respect to what continuing operational, maintenance and oversight role Metro will have once the line enters revenue service. A related question is to what degree should the project’s design and construction follow Metro practice, of whether this should be partially or wholly left to the Contractor/Concessionaire’s discretion.

KICK-OFF: SOLIDIFYING THE PROJECT TEAM MAJOR PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS: The first task, and one most important to making the project a success, is to meet with the project team to establish and solidify relationships, lines of  Metro Project team, including Planning communication, and an understanding of the scopes of work (SOWs) of the and Project Delivery  Environmental Consultant: HNTB various entities involved.  Facilities Engineer: [TBD] Our project manager, Michael Harris-Gifford, will introduce our project team, including Guido Eyzaguirre, our corridor manager. and lay out our initial workplan. The kick-off meetings will enable all project stakeholders to adapt our workplans to form an integrated and collaborative team for complete project delivery.

Specifically, we recognize that Metro has identified this project as a candidate P3 solicitation and that key decisions need to be made as to key features of the P3 contract, including:

 Compatibility with existing Metro red line systems  Conformity with Metro Operating and Maintenance practices and rules  Compliance with Metro Rail Design Criteria (MRDC)  Performance requirements for revenue service (peak and off-peak)  Performance requirements for maintenance and overhaul  Entity that controls the railroad. Metro or the Contractor  Entity that provides security  Rights and responsibility for Metro oversight, including safety and audit  Relationship of Contractor with the CPUC  Degree of prescriptive technical requirements (in comparison with DB)

We presume that Metro will, separately, contract for Preliminary Engineering and Design Services During Construction for the lead engineer for tunneling, alignment and trackwork, yard and shop, civil, architectural, station and MEP. As such, we anticipate that the facilities engineer will be the lead engineer for the overall project and, together with the Metro project management team, will establish an Integrated Project Management Office (IPMO). We anticipate this will include the project document control and management systems, project procedures, CADD manual, QA/QC plan, Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), etc.

Our aim is to fully integrate and immerse our Systems team into the overall Sepulveda HRT project team.

Page 1 of 17 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

PROJECT SETUP PHASE

Project Management Plan: Led by the facilities engineer, with input from our Systems team to describe the systems engineering team and scope, and how the SDP team is integrated with and into the overall project team.

Master WBS and Schedule: This document will provide a WBS and comprehensive schedule for the project. We anticipate this will be led by the facilities engineer, with input from our Systems team

Document Control System and Procedures: The SDP team will adopt this system, which we anticipate will be developed by the facilities engineer.

QA/QC program: The SDP team will adopt this system, which we anticipate will be developed by the facilities engineer.

Project Budget and Budget Breakdown: The SDP team will conform to this project-wide system, which we anticipate will be developed by the facilities engineer.

Project Implementation Plan (PIP): Led by the facilities engineer, with input from our Systems team, this document will define how the project will be executed, controlled and monitored. It will also define how progress will be reported.

PROJECT DEFINITION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT PHASE

Review of FEIS and Conceptual Design and Costs

Together with the facilities engineer’s team, we will perform a comprehensive review of the FEIS, the associated reports, the Conceptual Engineering design, and the associated cost estimates.

Particular areas of focus for the SDP team will include:

 Confirmation of potential traction power substation locations and configuration of the trainway feeder, including Emergency Backup Power Supply (EBPS) generator  Location of radio antennae  Location and type of crossovers  Provision of tail tracks  Yard location, layout and accommodation of required facilities  Description of planned operations, fleet size, and system security and safety provisions  Estimated cost of systems elements

Establishing an Initial Basis of Design

Page 2 of 17 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

In addition to the more general establishment of systems KEY SYSTEMS PARAMETERS TO CONFIRM: Basis of Design parameters, there are some important systems factors specific to the Sepulveda HRT project to  The primacy and relevancy of MRDC be established, including:  System Operational requirements (if not per MRDC Section 10).  Traction Power: Confirmation of standard Metro TPSS configuration;  Integration and connectivity with the Metro tunnel trainway feeder and EBPS; station power drops; yard and shop system (now and in the future). power  Maintenance facility location, capacity and  Third Rail: Confirmation of standard configuration and requirements facilities.  Train Control: Key operational decision of what form of ATP system to  Tunnel configuration, underground station deploy and whether platform screen doors will be utilized. This will set configuration and systems (especially power the compatibility of Sepulveda with the red line; yard train control and communications) support needs. requirements.  Communications: Confirm standard Metro subsystems and Critical Early Environmental Input configurations, including radio, CTS, CCTV, TPIS, F&EM, SCADA, There are certain Systems design elements that have a SDS, GDS, IDS and ACS. Confirm maintenance facility requirements. major effect upon the project’s environmental impact and are critical early definition elements:

Conceptual Traction Power Load-Flow Analysis: Led by Stoil Stoilov, and using WSP’s proprietary load-flow model, the load-flow will be run to confirm the traction power substation locations and property takes already identified in the DEIR/EIS.

Conceptual Preliminary Operations Analysis/Simulation: To confirm runtimes (critical to ridership analysis, as well as fleet size), crossover locations (critically, several appear to be missing from the DEIR/EIS alignment, and thus, their noise and vibration impacts and property takes for signal bungalows are not analyzed) and terminal track arrangements (critical to ensuring sufficient tail track length to support design headways and the need to store revenue-ready trains).

Simulation will be performed by WSP’s Operations Simulation group, using Berkeley Simulation Software’s Rail Traffic Controller (RTC) model.

Conceptual Operations Plan: Building upon the operations Most recently, WSP developed the outline and scope of a simulation and the Advanced Conceptual Engineering Systemwide LRT O&M Plan resulting from the Regional alignment, we will prepare and submit for approval a Connector project, comprising the following 16 chapters: Conceptual Operations Plan to describe and prescribe the Chapter 1 - System Description and Characteristics operations and maintenance plan and requirements for the Chapter 2 - Operations Service Plan and Schedule Sepulveda system, addressing initial and full build-out Chapter 3 - Maintenance/Engineering requirements. In particular, this is needed to determine what Chapter 4 - Activation Plan (Start-Up and Testing) performance metrics to impose upon the P3 franchisee. Chapter 5 - Start-Up Yard Capacity and Requirements: In conjunction with the Chapter 6 – Testing facilities engineer, and using data from the Conceptual Chapter 7: Safety Testing Standards and Procedures Operations Analysis, our project team will assist with defining Chapter 8: Operating Rules and Procedures the capacity and capabilities required of the maintenance facility Chapter 9: Training for the initial and final build-outs (if not the same). Systems Chapter 10: Emergency Operations / Service and Schedule Recovery inputs at this stage include fleet size and consist needs (driving Procedures storage track configuration), traction power needs, and yard Chapter 11: Security Standards and Procedures control requirements. Critically, the yard/mainline interface will Chapter 12: Fare Collection Plan be reviewed to ensure: Chapter 13: Business Management Plan Chapter 14: Operating and Maintenance Budgets  Transfer track/lead for trains awaiting permission to Chapter 15: Staffing and Hiring Plan enter the main line Chapter 16: Staff Support Functions  Ability of ROC to route trains clear of the main line prior to transfer to yard control

Page 3 of 17 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

Systems Engineering Efforts to Support the FEIS/EIR

The SDP team will develop an Advanced-Conceptual-Engineering-level Systems design for the project. Items critical to the FEIS/EIR support will include:

 Crossover locations and configuration: In conjunction with the facilities engineer.  Review of Advanced Conceptual Engineering alignment: Particularly for review of alignment and curve speeds, both to maximize train speed and to ensure that curve speeds conform with cab signal speeds.  Conceptual tunnel power system configuration: In support of substation requirements. Identification of EBPS generator location (assuming that the tunnel ground is determined to be gassy or potentially gassy).  Identification of radio antenna location(s): In support of property needs as well as potential visual impact.  Cost estimates: The SDP team will update the conceptual-level cost estimates for systems elements for the project in collaboration with the facilities engineer.

Engaging Metro Operations and Maintenance

While Metro may not be the operator/maintainer under a P3 project, the Operations department still has an interest in the project in terms of supporting the region’s transportation needs, and in terms of securing a usable product when the franchise ends and a valuable resource in verifying the project, as specified, is safe, operable and maintainable.

Our focus for Metro Operations during the Project Definition and Environmental Support Phase will be as follows:

 Establish familiarity with the project  Discuss and review the O&M plan and operations simulation  Discuss and review the alignment, especially crossovers, tail tracks, and station configurations.  Discuss and review the maintenance facility layout, capacity and capabilities  Discuss the infrastructure to support communications with ROC and ROC capacity to support the project (if Metro is to dispatch the railroad).  Review needs for bus and rail operator layover facilities.

Other Time-Critical Systems Engineering Efforts

While the following efforts have lesser impacts on the FEIS/EIR, we believe they should commence at this stage:

Electric Utility Coordination: We will work with the facilities engineer and Metro staff to start the process of coordination with LADWP for utility feeds for stations and traction power substations. We believe the tunnel to be a critical component of this discussion because of the need for a trainway feeder and because of the likely high power capacity required.

Support Needs Outside of the Alignment: Metro is a mature transportation system, and to that end, new rail projects can no longer be developed without any impact to the existing system. Building upon SDP’s intimate knowledge of Metro, we have identified some items for early analysis and decision- making as these can have a significant impact upon to scope, progress, cost and schedule of the project:

1. Central Control: Where will the Sepulveda project be controlled from? Critical ROC functions that need to be addressed include workstations for dispatchers and customer service staff, radio, SCADA, TPIS, CCTV, FAMS and NEXTRIP. Separately, and related to this is the access control system at Gateway.

2. While general bus-rail connectivity will be considered as part of the O&M plan, an additional consideration may be for bus layover facilities, especially at the Sylmar terminal station.

Page 4 of 17 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

Summary of SDP Deliverables During the FEIS/EIR Stage

 Review of FEIS and Conceptual Design  Review of Conceptual Systems Cost Estimate  Initial Basis of Design report  Conceptual Traction Power Load-Flow Analysis  Conceptual Operations Analysis and Simulation  Conceptual Operations Plan  Yard Capacity and Requirements  Advanced Conceptual Systems Engineering  Updated Systems Cost Estimate  Status Report on Electric Utility Coordination

ENGINEERING PHASE

Independent Systems Integration Review

There is a core goal that must and will be our continuous and continuing focus throughout our work: the successful placing of the Sepulveda HRT project into revenue service.

Our project manager, Michael Harris-Gifford, lived and breathed operations and SDP’S INDEPENDENT SYSTEMS maintenance at Metro for more than eight years. He has seen, and experienced, the INTEGRATION REVIEW TEAM: consequences of both good and bad planning for revenue operation. Therefore, for  Michael Harris-Gifford: Ops, every project, Michael will lead a small team of experienced and independent Maintenance engineers to periodically review the project design and status, to ask the following  Mahesh Patel: Systems Integration six key questions and to check for compliance.  John Spellman: Train Control Our Systems Integration Review team will review the project, including facilities  Arvind Patel: Traction Power and and MEP at minimum, at the following stages: Third Rail  Phil Collins: Communications  Completion of FEIS/EIR Review and Basis of Design Development  50% completion of design  95% Completion of design/75% Completion of P3 Solicitation Development  95% Completion of P3 Solicitation Development

Additionally, the Systems Integration Review team will be held on standby for independent troubleshooting at any time Metro requires it.

Systemwide Engineering Plans

Project System Safety and Security Program Plan (SSSecPP): Metro already has a corporate SSSecPP that is compliant with 49 CFR 659 and CPUC General Order 164-D. However, led by Gulzar Ahmed, the SDP team will develop a project-specific SSSecPP, based upon Metro’s Corporate SSSecPP.

Page 5 of 17 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

This document will be developed at the start of the Preliminary SSSecPP Content: Engineering phase and will record the project organization and key 1. INTRODUCTION deliverables for system safety and security. The project SSSecPP will be 1.1 Goals developed in coordination with, and subject to approval by, Metro 1.2 Scope Corporate Safety. 1.3 Authority 1.4 Applicable Documents Threat and Vulnerability Analysis (TVA): We anticipate the project TVA 2. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION will jointly be led by Metro’s Corporate Safety and System Security and 2.1 Stations Law Enforcement departments. The SDP team will provide support, 2.2 Systems alongside the Facilities Engineering team. Critical TVA input into the 2.3 Light Rail Vehicles (LRV) Systems design is security and access control systems, including CCTV, 2.4 Project Organization portal intrusion, access control system (card key) and general intrusion 3. SAFETY PROGRAM ACTIVITIES detection systems. 3.1 Preliminary Engineering Safety Certification Program Plan (SCPP): Led by Gulzar Ahmed, the 3.2 Final Design SDP team will develop a project-specific SCPP. While this is a 3.3 Preliminary Hazards Analysis systemwide document, we believe the Systems Engineering team is best- 3.4 Safety and Security Certification Program placed to lead SCPP development, with support from the Facilities 3.5 Configuration Management Engineering team. 3.6 Hazard Identification and Resolution Process 3.6.1 Categorization of Hazard Complying with the SSSecPP and CPUC General Order 164-D, the SCPP 3.6.2 Risk Assessment will define the project safety certification process, organization, and roles 3.7 Fire/Life Safety Committee and responsibilities from Preliminary Engineering through to submittal of 3.8 Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis the final Safety Certification Verification Report (SCVR) to the CPUC no 3.9 Operating Hazard Analysis later than 21 calendar days prior to the planned start of revenue 3.10 Hazardous Materials Program operations. Key deliverables for the safety certification process, defined in 3.11 Employee Safety Program the SCPP include: 3.12 Safety and Security Certification 3.13 Accident/Incident Investigation and Reporting  Safety Certifiable Items List (SCIL) 4. SYSTEM SECURITY PLAN  Design Certification Checklist (including checklists for any 5. SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES Metro-furnished safety items)  Construction Certification Checklist (including checklists for any Metro-furnished safety items)  Integrated Testing Certification Checklist (including checklists for any Metro-led testing)  Training Certification Checklist  SCVR

During the Engineering Phase, the SDP team will develop the SCIL. This is a list of project elements that are safety-critical and must be certified as safe as part of the SCVR.

Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA): Led by Gulzar Ahmed, the SDP team will develop a project-specific PHA, complying with FTA guidelines per DOT-FTA-MA-26-5005-00-01. While this is a systemwide document, we believe the Systems Engineering team is best- placed to lead PHA development, with support from the Facilities Engineering team.

The PHA checklist will be organized by system and subsystem, and will initially be populated with the hazard descriptions, potential cause and effect. Ahmed’s team will work with the Project Engineering team to assess the failure rate and assign an initial hazard risk index. This will then be circulated for review and comment at about the 50% design completion level.

Page 6 of 17 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

Upon completion of populating the corrective actions and classification of as-mitigated hazards, the PHA will be recirculated for review and approval.

Risk Management Plan: In common with past Metro projects, we anticipate that the risk management plan and risk matrix will be developed by Metro. The SDP team, together with the Facilities Engineering team, will support development and population of the risk matrix.

Operations and Maintenance Plan

The SDP team will further define and refine the Sepulveda O&M Plan. Particular areas of focus will include:

 Updated Operations Analysis/Simulation (using the updated alignment from the Facilities Engineering team)  Connectivity/integration into existing operations  Bus/rail interface  Service plan/pattern  Headway (normal and single-tracking)  Crossover and siding needs WSP’s Michael Harris-Gifford identified and  Fleet size championed the early completion of  Yard capacity, function and configuration facilities on the Foothill Phase 2A project  Existing system interface and cutover for the receipt and testing of P3010 LRVs. While not directly a part of the Systems Engineering scope, we will work with This enabled Metro to receive and Metro’s Vehicle Acquisition team to define the requirements and interfaces for the commission sufficient LRVs for on-time heavy rail vehicles (HRVs) to support this project. Critically, we need to identify opening of Foothill and Expo Phase II within where and when these vehicles would be delivered and commissioned. a few months of each other. It also saved Metro time and money by avoiding potential Traction Power Load-Flow Analysis and Simulation disruption of ongoing revenue O&M. We will update the parameters input to our traction power load-flow model, including the updated alignment from the Facilities Engineering team, and rerun the model to confirm substation locations and ratings. The model will also be used to confirm feeder cable ratings.

Data from the model will be used for the traction power system design and to further discussion with LADWP for utility drops.

Systems Engineering

The SDP team will progress the Systems Engineering to the Engineering-design level, including:

 Project Basis of Design Report will be updated.  Traction Power Design: Substation capacity, size, locations and layout, tunnel trainway feeder configuration, and maintenance facility substation design.  Conductor Rail Design, including system configuration and sectionalization. SDP UNDERSTANDING:  Train Control Design, including a block and control line design, and route and The project alignment provides aspect charts. additional potential CTS routes for  Communication System Design, including CTS, CCTV, TPIS, SDS, GDS, the existing Orange Line and for SCADA, F&EM/EMPs, telephone, IDS and ACS. Critically, we will determine what the East San Fernando Valley LRT infrastructure needs to be completed to facilitate communications to central project. control.  Radio Design, including: determination of radio antenna locations for the tunnel; verification of coverage for surface alignment from existing Metro hilltop sites; verification with Metro fire/life safety of what emergency responder channels are needed (primarily LASD, LAPD and LACoFD, but possibly also including LA-RICS); and

Page 7 of 17 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

discussion with Metro Operations regarding what operating and maintenance channels are to be used (poss ibly including the acquisition of new frequencies for Sepulveda).  Yard and Shop Systems Requirements (traction power, traction electrification, train control and communication).

Progress prints of the Systems Engineering will be produced at the 95% completion level to facilitate comprehensive review by the Systems and Facilities engineers, Metro, and SDP’s independent Systems Integration Review team. We anticipate the systems design to lag three to four weeks behind the facilities design for us to properly incorporate the facilities design into systems.

Additionally, the SDP team will review MRDC, Fire/Life Safety Design Criteria and Standard Drawings at this time to confirm compliance, and, where necessary, draft Design Deviation Requests or Requests for Special Consideration, as applicable, to secure approval of deviations.

Engaging Metro Operations and Maintenance

Continuing our engagement of Metro Rail Operations and Maintenance, our focus during the Engineering Phase will be as follows:

 Discuss and review the updated O&M plan and operations simulation  Discuss and review the main line systems design, especially with respect to supporting maintenance and 24/7 operation.  Discuss and review the maintenance facility systems design, especially with respect to supporting maintenance and 24/7 operation.  Discuss and review to provision and assignment of operating and maintenance radio channels

Engaging Metro Fire/Life Safety

The SDP team believes that engaging Metro Fire/Life Safety at the Engineering Phase is an important factor in securing successful certification of the project and approval of an occupancy permit. Our focus for engagement will be as follows:

 Discuss and review the system assurance and safety certification requirements.  Discuss and review system fire/life safety and security provisions, especially surveillance, Blue Light Station, fire detection, emergency management, and access control provisions.

Civil Design Support and Coordination

 Civil speed restrictions and compatibility with available cab signal codes  Finalization of crossovers and sidings  Ductbank and raceway provisions  Provisions for signal and communication rooms  Provisions for bus/train layover  Tunnel ventilation design  Yard and shop layout and configuration  TC&C room layout, and heat and power load estimates.

Cost Estimate

The SDP team will develop cost estimates for the systems portions of the project and fold them into the overall cost estimate, led by the Facilities Engineering team.

The breakdown of cost elements will conform to the project WBS.

Page 8 of 17 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

Summary of SDP Engineering Phase Deliverables

 Independent Systems Integration Review  SSSecP  TVA support  SCPP  SCIL  PHA  Risk Management Plan support  Preliminary O&M Plan  Preliminary Operations Analysis/Simulation  Traction Power Load-Flow Analysis and Simulation  Updated Basis of Design Report

Traction Power Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

 Metro System Standard Drawings  Tunnel segment one-line, metering and relaying diagrams  Emergency Trip System tripping scheme  Traction Power ductbank plans  Additional detail and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings  Record of agreements with LADWP for electrical power service.

Conductor Rail Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

 Metro System Standard Drawings  Sectionalization Diagrams (main line and yard)  Additional support and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings

Train Control Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

Communication System Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

 Metro System Standard Drawings  Communications Block Diagram for each Station and the maintenance facility

Page 9 of 17 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

 Cable Transmission System - Topology  SCADA System - Block Diagram  UFCS System - Block Diagram  Additional detail and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings

Radio Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

 Metro System Standard Drawings  Tunnel Radio System Configuration  Base Station Schematic Diagram  Additional detail and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings  Record of agreed radio channels for Metro Operations and Emergency Responders  Preliminary Intermod Analysis  Radio Coverage Analysis  Systems cost estimate

P3 SOLICITATION DEVELOPMENT PHASE

The following workplan is presented on the assumption that the Sepulveda HRT project is solicited as a single P3 project. We recognize, of course, that there a number of different ways forward for solicitation, including splitting the project into several solicitations (i.e. mainline, tunnels, maintenance facility, and systems), or into different types of solicitation from Build-Build to P3. Whatever configuration of solicitation Metro ultimately selects, the SDP team is ready and able to serve.

We have also assumed that the Task Order extends only into assembly of solicitation documents and not into solicitation support.

Solicitation Outline

We foresee this being led primarily by Metro, with input from the Project Engineering team. We suggest that a small team of senior WSP, Mott MacDonald and PTG personnel, experienced in Metro solicitation, be engaged in this outline review and development phase to maximize the probability of success.

Page 10 of 17 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

P3 Solicitation Development

We believe Metro needs to consider carefully the right balance of prescriptive and performance-based requirements for systems. In this respect, we present the following recommendations and work plan:

Operation and Maintenance Performance Requirements: Specific, detailed and mandatory. This document must comprehensively specify:

 Performance and reporting requirements and metrics for peak service  Performance and reporting requirements and metrics for off-peak/weekend/night service  Routine maintenance obligations  State of Good Repair, long-term overhaul and replacement obligations and reporting requirements  Roles and measures for independent operations, maintenance and safety assessments  Relationship with, and authority of, Metro  Relationship with, and obligations to, CPUC  Relationship with and obligations to utility companies  Relationship with and obligations to city and county agencies, including emergency responders and law enforcement

This section also should discuss, in detail, any Metro-furnished items and activities.

We anticipate development of Division 01 specifications to be a collaborative effort of the combined project team. Specification sections that we anticipate the SDP team to lead include:

 01 35 14 - Operating System Interface  01 78 23 - Operation And Maintenance Data  01 78 43 - Spare Parts, Illustrated Parts Catalog, And Replacement Materials  01 78 55 - Safety And Security Certification  01 79 00 - Demonstration And Training  01 91 13 - Project Integration/Commissioning

Divisions 02 through 19: Led by the Facilities Engineering team, with SDP review and support.

We particularly foresee SDP team input to the following sections:

 11 11 00 - Vehicle Service Equipment  11 11 26 - Vehicle Wash Equipment

Page 11 of 17 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

 11 11 29 - Shop Equipment  14 45 00 - Vehicle Lifts

Division 20: We anticipate leading development of Section 20 72 35 - Train Control And Communications Raceways, with support from the Facilities Engineering team.

Divisions 21 through 26: Led by the Facilities Engineering team, with SDP review and support.

We particularly foresee SDP team input to the following sections:

 26 05 00 - Common Materials And Methods For Electrical Services  26 05 05 - Electrical Design Requirements  26 05 06 - Design Requirements For The Auxiliary Power Distribution System  26 05 19 - Insulated Wires And Cables  26 05 26 - Grounding And Bonding For Electrical Systems  26 05 73 - Arc Flash Hazard Analysis And Short Circuit/Coordination Study  26 08 00 - Commissioning Of Electrical Systems  26 32 13.13 - Standby Generator  26 32 33 - Facilities Uninterruptible AC Power Supply (UPS)

Division 27: The SDP team will lead all sections, with support from the Facilities Engineering team. We anticipate the following Division 27 specification sections:

 27 01 01 - General Communications Requirements  27 01 02 - Communications Manuals  27 01 03 - Communications Training  27 01 04 - Communications Spare Parts And Test Equipment  27 01 05 - Communications Testing And Commissioning  27 01 06 - Communications Uninterruptible AC Power Supply (UPS)  27 01 07 - Communications Facilities Emergency Management (FEM) System  27 05 48 - Communications Seismic Event Detection System  27 13 00 - Communications Cable Transmission System  27 30 00 - Communications Telephone System  27 32 43 - Communications Radio System  27 51 16 - Communications Transit Passenger Information System (TPIS)

Division 28: The SDP team will lead all sections, with support from the Facilities Engineering team. We anticipate the following Division 28 specification sections:

 28 16 00 - Communications Intrusion Detection Access Controlled System  28 16 33 - Communications Tunnel Portal Surveillance And Alarm System  28 23 00 - Communications Closed Circuit Television System  28 31 00 - Communications Fire Detection System  28 33 00 - Communications Gas Detection And Alarm System  28 40 00 - Communications Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition Remote Terminal Unit (SCADA RTU)  28 50 00 - System Security

Page 12 of 17 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

 28 60 00 - System Safety And Assurance

Divisions 31 through 33: Led by the Facilities Engineering team, with SDP review and support.

Division 34: The SDP team will lead all sections, except track. We will support track specification development, with the Facilities Engineering team supporting our sections. We anticipate leading the following Division 34 specification sections:

 34 01 02 - Traction Power Manuals  34 01 03 - Traction Power Spare Parts  34 01 04 - Traction Power Training  34 21 03 - Traction Power General Requirements  34 21 06 - Traction Power Basic Electrical Materials And Methods  34 21 09 - Traction Power High Voltage AC Power Switchgear  34 21 26 - Traction Power AC-to-DC Conversion Assemblies  34 21 29 - Traction Power Metal-Enclosed Bus And Busways  34 21 31 - Traction Power Blue Light Station (BLS) System  34 21 33 - Traction Power DC Power Switchgear  34 21 34 - Traction Power Shop DC Distribution System  34 21 35 - Traction Power Shop DC Distribution Switchboard  34 21 36 - Traction Power Negative Grounding Device (NGD)  34 21 39 - Traction Power 750 Volt Negative Bus Boxes  34 21 43 - Traction Power Safety And System Assurance  34 21 49 - Traction Power Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)  34 21 53 - Traction Power Cable Terminations  34 21 56 - Traction Power Insulated Wires And Cables  34 21 61 - Traction Power DC Load-Break Devices  34 21 63 - Traction Power DC No-Load-Break Devices  34 21 66 - Traction Power Grounding And Bonding  34 21 76 - Traction Power Supervisory Control Interface Terminal Cabinet (SCITC)  34 21 90 - Traction Power Equipment Installation Requirements  34 21 91 - Traction Power Test Program  34 21 93 - Traction Power Testing And Start-Up  34 24 19.13 - Contact Rail Procurement  34 24 19.16 - Contact Rail System Installation  34 42 02 - Train Control Spare Parts And Test Equipment  34 42 03 - Train Control Manuals & Training  34 42 05 - Train Control System Integration, Testing And Acceptance  34 42 06 - Train Control System Safety And Assurance  34 42 13.19 - Train Control General Requirements  34 42 13.23 - Train Control Block Design  34 42 13.26 - Train Control Logic Requirements  34 42 13.46 - Train Control Signal Electrical Work - Basic Requirements  34 42 13.53 - Train Control Track Circuits

Page 13 of 17 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

 34 42 13.56 - Train Control Room Layout  34 42 13.59 - Train Control Power Distribution  34 42 13.63 - Train Control System Grounding  34 42 13.66 - Train Control Relays  34 42 13.69 - Train Control Electrical And Electronic Components  34 42 13.73 - Train Control Switch Machine Layouts  34 42 13.76 - Train Control Signal Layouts  34 42 13.83 - Program Station Stop  34 42 13.27 - Train Control Train-To-Wayside Communications  34 42 13.96 - Train Control Special Trackwork And Bonding  34 42 13.97 - Train Control Marking And Tagging  34 42 13.98 - Train Control Drawings  34 42 16.13 - Train Control Interior Wire And Cable  34 42 16.16 - Train Control Exterior Wire And Cable  34 42 19.13 - Train Control Microprocessor Control Systems  34 42 23 - Train Control Yard Control Panel  34 42 23.19 - Train Control Local Control Panel  34 54 00 - Communications Universal Fare Collection (UFCS) Interface

Divisions 41 through 45: Led by the Facilities Engineering team, with SDP review and support.

We plan to submit P3 solicitation specifications for formal review at the 95% and 100% completion levels.

Engaging Metro Operations and Maintenance

Continuing our engagement of Metro Rail Operations and Maintenance, our focus during the P3 Solicitation Development Phase will be as follows:

 Discuss and review the systems contract documents, especially with respect to supporting maintenance and 24/7 operation.  Discuss and review the systems assurance requirements.  Discuss and review the systems testing and rail activation requirements and schedule, including the provision of rolling stock.  Discuss and review the safety certification requirements.

P3 Solicitation Assembly

A P3 solicitation for a project such as the Sepulveda project contains a large volume of documents, both contractual and reference. The SDP team anticipate significant effort, as part of the entire project team, to assemble documents, ensure they are the most current, and to review their proper placement within the overall solicitation.

Summary of SDP P3 Solicitation Deliverables

 Assistance with developing solicitation outline  SOW and specifications as indicated above  Assistance with final assembly of solicitation documents

Page 14 of 17 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

TASK ORDER PROPOSED ORGANIZATION CHART

METRO Project Manager TBD

Systems PM

M. Harris‐Gifford Corridor Systems Facilities Lead Designer G. Eyzaguirre TBD

Project Controls CADD Various Various

Train Control Traction Power Communications System Safety & 3rd Rail Lead General Electrical Ops Modelling Lead Lead Lead Certification S. Dwivedi K. Sabherwal L. Mayola A. Le C. Varia G. Ahmed V. Yanitskaya

Train Control Traction Power Communications Yard & Shop TP TP Load Flow 3rd Rail Support RF Engineer RAMS Support Support Support A. Velazquez C. Hill R. Godara S. Stoilov T. Pham M. Butler M. Azhad L. Stuart

Page 15 of 17 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

TASK ORDER SCHEDULE

FY 2019 FY 2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Sepulveda Project ‐ System Staff Plan 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q EARLY TASKS Support Develop Project Management Plans Review of FEIS and Conceptual Design & Costs Initial Basis of Design Conceptual Traction Power Load‐Flow Preliminary Operations Analysis/Simulation Conceptual Operations Plan Yard Capacity and Requirements Advanced Conceptual Systems Engineering Updated Systems Cost Estimate PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PHASE Independent Systems Integration Review System Safety & Security Program Plan Systems Assurance Program Plan Threat & Vulnerability Analysis Safety Certification Program Plan Preliminary Hazard Analysis Interface Management Plan Support Risk Management Plan Operations & Maintenance Plan Update Traction Power Load‐Flow Analysis & Simulation Update Basis of Design Report Traction Power Design OCS/OCR Design Train Control Design Communication System Design Yard and Shop systems design Civil Design Support and Coordination Cost Estimate D/B SOLICITATION DEVELOPMENT PHASE Solicitation Outline Scope of Work Specifications Development Design/Build Solicitation Assembly D/B SOLICITATION PHASE Addenda/RFI Support Proposal Review BAFO Support Conformed Document Production

Page 16 of 17 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: SEPULVEDA HRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

TASK ORDER RESOURCE LOADING CHART

Page 17 of 17 Rev: Draft Draft Task Order Proposal 3: East San Fernando Valley LRT

Metro Contract No. AE47810E0128 Systems Engineering and Support Services Task Order 003: East San Fernando Valley LRT EIR Support, Engineering and DB Solicitation TASK ORDER PROPOSAL

Version No.: Draft Date: 01.05.18

EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

The following is a proposed workplan for the East San Fernando Valley LRT (ESFVLRT) project. The workplan is developed to take the project from the Final EIR/EIS stage through completion of Engineering and into the commencement of design/built solicitation. That is, through the first three phases of our Task Order Flow Matrix.

UNDERSTANDING OF THE ESFVLRT PROJECT

The ESFVLRT project is planned to be a conventional high-level light rail project. The line begins at the Orange Line Van Nuys Station and continues north along the median of Van Nuys Boulevard in street-running operation. The southern terminal of the alignment offers potential for integration with the Orange Line, including possible conversion to light rail, and thus, combined operation. There may also be some interface with the northern terminal of the Sepulveda Line (likely heavy rail tunnel). See Exhibit 1.

Although there has been some analysis of tunnel operation between Sherman Way and Woodman, this configuration is somewhat in doubt due to the need for cost containment. Nevertheless, our approach is to provide staff experienced with Systems design for tunnels in case this option is retained.

North and east of Woodman, the project continues as street-running in the median of Vay Nuys to the Pacoima Station. Thereafter, the alignment transfers to the eastern side of San Fernando Boulevard onto the existing SCRRA Antelope Valley line ROW. The project shares the Metrolink ROW to the northern terminus at Sylmar. The project will operate under Automatic Train Protection (ATP) along the SCRRA ROW.

A number of prospective yard and shop sights have been studied. Currently, the project team appears to be favoring a site west and south of the planned Keswick Station.

Other than a potential link to a converted Orange Line, the project offers no physical connection to any other Metro rail line, and thus, must be entirely self-sustaining, other than central control. Even so, we anticipate the project will be designed for Metro standard light rail rolling stock (to provide maximum flexibility to Metro rail fleet). As there is currently no discussion of P3 operation, it is assumed that the project will remain core to Metro Operations and Maintenance functions.

Systems elements are anticipated to generally follow Metro standard practice.

Page 1 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

Exhibit 1 – ESFVLRT and Potential Connections

Page 2 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

KICK-OFF: SOLIDIFYING THE PROJECT TEAM

The first task, and one most important to making the project a success, is to meet MAJOR PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS: with the project team to establish and solidify relationships, lines of  Metro Project team, including Planning communication, and an understanding of the scopes of work (SOWs) of the (Walt Davis) and Project Delivery various entities involved.  Environmental Consultant: [KOA] Our project manager, Michael Harris-Gifford, will introduce our project team,  Facilities Engineer: [TBD] including our proposed corridor manager, Abbas Sizar, and lay out our initial workplan. The kick-off meetings will enable all project stakeholders to adapt our workplans to form an integrated and collaborative team for complete project delivery.

Specifically, we recognize that Metro has a separate solicitation for Preliminary Engineering and Design Services During Construction for East San Fernando Valley Transit, and that this consultant will be the lead engineer for tunneling, alignment and trackwork, yard and shop, civil, architectural, station, and MEP. As such, we anticipate that the facilities engineer will be the lead engineer for the overall project and, together with the Metro project management team, will establish an Integrated Project Management Office (IPMO). We anticipate this will include the project document control and management systems, project procedures, CADD manual, QA/QC plan, Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), etc.

Our aim is to fully integrate and immerse our Systems team into the overall ESFVLRT project team.

PROJECT SETUP PHASE

Project Management Plan: Led by the facilities, with input from our Systems team to describe the systems engineering team and scope and how we are integrated with and into the overall project team.

Master WBS and Schedule: This document will provide a WBS and comprehensive schedule for the project. We anticipate this will be led by the facilities engineer, with input from our Systems team

Document Control System and Procedures: The SDP team will adopt this system, which we anticipate will be developed by the facilities engineer.

QA/QC program: The SDP team will adopt this system, which we anticipate will be developed by the facilities engineer.

Project Budget and Budget Breakdown: The SDP team will conform to this project-wide system, which we anticipate will be developed by the facilities engineer.

PROJECT DEFINITION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT PHASE

Page 3 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

REVIEW OF FEIS AND CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND COSTS We have reviewed the Draft EIS/EIR (DEIS/EIR) and have Together with the facilities engineer’s team, we will perform a particular areas of concern: comprehensive review of the FEIS, the associated reports, the Conceptual Engineering design, and the associated cost estimates.  The shared corridor does not appear to comply with SCRRA clearance requirements Particular areas of focus for the SDP team will include:  The four-track at-grade crossings are under considerable risk  Confirmation of potential traction power substation of non-cooperation from SCRRA and disapproval by the locations CPUC, especially given that Foothill Phase 2B is headed for  Identification of potential Train Control and mainly (if not all) grade-separated Communications (TC&C) houses, both at stations and  Crossover placement does not appear to comply with MRDC elsewhere Section 10  Identification and location of substations for underground  Lack of tail tracks at Sylmar and omission of SCRRA stations, including Emergency Backup Power Supply expectations for future 2 platforms (EBPS) generator (if a tunnel alignment is retained)  Safety of patrons transferring between the Metro Orange Line  Location of radio antennae for tunnel segment and ESFVLRT  Location and type of crossovers  Lack of property for TC&C rooms or crossing bungalows  Accommodation of shared ROW with SCRRA from  Significant fire/life safety challenges associated with an Pacoima to Sylmar, including double-tracking plans underground junction for the Keswick Yard option (if tunnel  Configuration of shared grade crossings with SCRRA operation is retained)  Yard location, layout and accommodation of required facilities  Integration of ESFV line with Metro Orange Line and with SCRRA at Sylmar  Description of planned operations, fleet size, and system security and safety provisions  Any environmental commitments affecting Systems, especially related to noise and aesthetics  Estimated cost of systems elements

ESTABLISHING AN INITIAL BASIS OF DESIGN

Building upon the FEIS/EIR and the associated Conceptual Engineering, we will develop and submit for approval the systems sections of initial Basis of Design report. This report, led by the facilities engineer, will establish the key facilities and systems parameters to guide the continuing design development. Each major system and subsystem will be defined in overall terms.

In addition to more generally establishing Systems Basis Key Systems Parameters to Confirm: of Design parameters, there are some important systems  The primacy and relevancy of MRDC factors specific to the ESFVLRT Project to be established,  System Operational requirements (if not per MRDC Section 10). including:  Traction Power: Confirmation of standard Metro TPSS  Integration and connectivity with the Metro configuration; tunnel trainway feeder and EBPS; station power system (now and in the future), including drops; yard and shop power possible conversion of the Metro Orange Line  Overhead Catenary: Confirmation of standard OCS (at-grade) and to Light Rail Transit (LRT). OCR (tunnel)  Maintenance facility location, capacity and  Train Control: Key operational decision of what form of ATP system facilities (including consideration of possible to deploy. This will set the compatibility of ESFVLRT with other joint facility with Metro Orange Line LRT). lines, such as Metro Orange Line (if converted to LRT); shared  Coordination with Metro Regional Rail/SCRRA SCRRA/ESFVLRT grade crossings; speed running operational regarding potential double-tracking, track parameters; yard train control requirements. circuit immunity, and joint grade crossing  Communications: Confirm standard Metro subsystems and design. configurations, including radio, CTS, CCTV, TPIS, F&EM, SCADA,  Tunnel configuration, underground station SDS, GDS, IDS and ACS. Confirm maintenance facility configuration and systems (especially power requirements. and communications) support needs.

Page 4 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

CRITICAL EARLY ENVIRONMENTAL INPUT

There are certain Systems design elements that have a major effect upon the project’s The need for sidings for bad-order environmental impact and are critical early definition elements: train storage, short-lining and support of Maintenance-of-Way Conceptual Traction Power Load-Flow Analysis: Led by Stoil Stoilov, and using WSP’s will also be discussed with Rail proprietary load-flow model, the load-flow will be run to confirm the traction power Operations. substation locations and property takes already identified in the DEIR/EIS. Decisions on any connectivity Conceptual Preliminary Operations Analysis/Simulation: To confirm runtimes (critical to with potential Metro Orange Line ridership analysis, as well as fleet size); crossover locations (critically, several appear to be LRT conversion must also be missing from the DEIR/EIS alignment, and thus, their noise and vibration impacts and discussed as these may have property takes for signal bungalows are not analyzed); and terminal track arrangements major impacts upon the (critical to ensuring sufficient tail track length to support design headways and the need to alignment. store revenue-ready trains. Most recently, WSP developed the outline and scope of a Simulation will be performed by WSP’s Operations Systemwide LRT O&M Plan resulting from the Regional Simulation group, using Berkeley Simulation Software’s Rail Traffic Controller (RTC) model. Connector project, comprising the following 16 chapters: Chapter 1 - System Description and Characteristics Conceptual Operations Plan: Building upon the operations Chapter 2 - Operations Service Plan and Schedule simulation and the Advanced Conceptual Engineering Chapter 3 - Maintenance/Engineering alignment, we will prepare and submit for approval a Chapter 4 - Activation Plan (Start-Up and Testing) Conceptual Operations Plan to describe and prescribe the Chapter 5 - Start-Up operations and maintenance plan and requirements for the Chapter 6 – Testing ESFVLRT system, addressing initial and full build-out Chapter 7: Safety Testing Standards and Procedures requirements. Chapter 8: Operating Rules and Procedures Chapter 9: Training Yard Capacity and Requirements: In conjunction with the Chapter 10: Emergency Operations / Service and Schedule Recovery facilities engineer, and using data from the Conceptual Procedures Operations Analysis, our project team will assist with Chapter 11: Security Standards and Procedures defining the capacity and capabilities required of the Chapter 12: Fare Collection Plan maintenance facility for the initial and final build-outs (if not Chapter 13: Business Management Plan the same). Systems inputs at this stage include fleet size and Chapter 14: Operating and Maintenance Budgets consist needs (driving storage track configuration), traction Chapter 15: Staffing and Hiring Plan power needs, and yard control requirements. Critically, the Chapter 16: Staff Support Functions yard/mainline interface will be reviewed to ensure:

 Transfer track/lead for trains awaiting permission to enter the main line  Ability of ROC to route trains clear of the main line prior to transfer to yard control  Resiliency (no single points of failure of power or track that would trap the entire fleet in the yard).1

1Critical lesson learned for Metro from an OCS failure at Division 11 some years ago.

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING EFFORTS TO SUPPORT THE FEIS/EIR

The SDP team will develop an Advanced Conceptual Engineering level systems design for the project. Items critical to the FEIS/EIR support will include:

 Substation locations and footprints: To define property takes.  Crossover locations and configuration: In conjunction with the facilities engineer, to support noise and vibration analysis.

Page 5 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

 Grade crossing layouts and operation: Particularly for the SCRRA corridor. In conjunction with the facilities engineer, to support property takes, noise impact, and traffic analysis.  Review of Advanced Conceptual Engineering alignment: Particularly for review of alignment and curve speeds, both to maximize train speed and to ensure that curve speeds conform with cab signal speeds.  Preliminary size and location of signal and communication houses, signal bungalows, crossing houses/cases and signal cases: To determine and support property takes.  Conceptual tunnel power system configuration: In support of substation requirements, including property takes. Identification of EBPS generator location (assuming that the tunnel ground is determined to be gassy or potentially gassy).  Identification of radio antenna location(s): In support of property needs as well as potential visual impact.  Other environmental support efforts: Including defining the visual impact of substations, OCS and signal and communication houses as required, as well as the noise impact of air conditioning and ventilation systems.  Cost estimates: The SDP team will update the conceptual-level cost estimates for systems elements for the project in collaboration with the facilities engineer. Additionally, the SDP team will, in conjunction with Metro Rail Operations, develop a conceptual-level O&M budget.

ENGAGING METRO OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

The SDP team believes that engaging Metro Operations and Maintenance in project development is critical to success. We must remember that not only is the department (together with the riding public) the ultimate client, but it leads the critical phase of final testing, acceptance and placing into revenue service.

Our focus during the Project Definition and Environmental Support Phase will be as follows:

 Establish familiarity with the project  Discuss and review the O&M plan and operations simulation  Discuss and review the alignment, especially crossovers, sidings, tail tracks, station configurations and grade crossing layouts.  Discuss and review the maintenance facility layout, capacity and capabilities  Discuss the infrastructure to support communications with ROC and ROC capacity to support the project.  Discuss how Maintenance-of-Way and Facilities Maintenance would maintain the project.  Review needs for bus and rail operator layover facilities.

OTHER TIME-CRITICAL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING EFFORTS

While the following efforts have lesser impacts to the FEIS/EIR, we believe they should commence at this stage of project development:

Value Engineering: Value engineering should be promulgated in coordination with the facilities engineer. Indeed, our Systems Engineering team has already conducted some initial value engineering assessments of this project with the SDP team formed to pursue the Facilities Preliminary Engineering solicitation. This exercise has already identified some Systems and Systems-related potential savings:

 Combined mainline, yard and shop substation for the project: Similar to the Gold Line Monrovia substation designed by Michael Harris-Gifford, a combined mainline, yard and shop substation could be provided, and thus, saving systems and property acquisition costs.  At-grade substations for underground stations: Similar to the substations designed by WSP for the Gold Line Eastside Extension, this project provides opportunity to place substations at grade, saving station construction costs.  Sylmar Station Layout: WSP Civil and Systems team members collaborated on a potential new layout of the Sylmar Station to accommodate easy LRT-Metrolink transfer, provide easier access to the parking lot, avoid demolition of Metrolink’s existing station while accommodating double-tracking, and provide tail tracks for LRT operation. See Exhibit 2.

Page 6 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

Exhibit 2: Proposed Sylmar Terminus Configuration

Page 7 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

Electric Utility Coordination: We will work with the facilities engineer and Metro staff to start the process of coordination with LADWP, and possibly SCE, for utility feeds for stations, traction power substations. and critically, the tunnel segment. We believe the tunnel is a critical component of this discussion because of the need for a trainway feeder and the likely high power capacity required.

Support Needs Outside of the Alignment: Metro is a mature transportation system, and to that end, new rail projects can no longer be developed without any impact to the existing system. Building upon SDP’s intimate knowledge of Metro, we have identified some items for early analysis and decision-making, as these can have a significant impact upon the scope, progress, cost and schedule of the project:

1. Central Control: Where will the ESFVLRT project be controlled from? Will the new ESOC be completed and if so will it be built with the facilities to support ESFVLRT? Critical ROC functions that need to be addressed include workstations for dispatchers and customer service staff, radio, SCADA, TPIS, CCTV, FAMS and NEXTRIP. A separate, but related function is the access control system at Gateway.

2. Carrier Transmission System (CTS): The Metro Orange Line CTS system uses a Lucent SONET system and does not conform with current Metro requirements. Discuss whether ESFVLRT CTS will be through-spliced to ROC/ESOC, or integrated into an upgrade to the Metro Orange Line CTS.

3. Fiber Optic Capacity: The Metro Orange Line has only two 18/24-core fiber cables (although we believe this will likely suffice). However, the Red Line fiber is both low on spares, and being up to 25 years old, presents a significant risk to the project.

4. The ESFVLRT project is located some 45 minutes from Metro’s Maintenance of Way (MOW) location (Location 61) even under ideal traveling conditions. Consideration for a satellite MOW facility, possibly within the maintenance facility site, should be considered.

5. While general bus-rail connectivity will be considered as part of the O&M Plan, an additional consideration may be for bus layover facilities, especially at the Sylmar terminal station.

Summary of SDP Deliverables During the FEIS/EIR Stage

ENGINEERING PHASE

Independent Systems Integration Review

There is a core goal that must and will be our continuous and continuing focus throughout our work: the successful placing of the ESFVLRT project into revenue service.

Page 8 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

Our project manager, Michael Harris-Gifford, lived and breathed O&M at Metro for SDP’s Independent Systems Integration more than eight years. He has seen, and experienced, the consequences of both Review Team: good and bad planning for revenue operation. Therefore, Michael will lead a small  Michael Harris-Gifford: Ops, team of experienced and independent engineers to periodically review the project Maintenance design and status, to ask the following six key questions, and to check for  Guido Eyzaguirre: Systems Integration compliance.  John Spellman: Train Control  Abdulhaque Shaikh and Alan Murphy: At a minimum, our Systems Integration Review team will review the project, Traction Power and OCS including facilities and MEP, at the following stages:  Barry Sam: Communications  Completion of FEIS/EIR Review and Basis of Design Development  50% completion of Design  95% Completion of Design  75% Completion of DB Solicitation Development  95% Completion of DB Solicitation Development

Additionally, the Systems Integration Review Team will be on standby for independent troubleshooting at any time Metro requires it.

Systemwide Engineering Plans

Project System Safety and Security Program Plan (SSSecPP): Of course, Metro already has a corporate SSSecPP that is compliant with 49 CFR 659 and CPUC General Order 164-D. However, led by John Cockle, the SDP team will develop a project- SSSecPP Content: specific SSSecPP based upon Metro’s Corporate SSSecPP. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Goals This document will be developed at the start of the Preliminary 1.2 Scope Engineering Phase and record the project organization and key 1.3 Authority deliverables for system safety and security. The project SSSecPP will 1.4 Applicable Documents be developed in coordination with, and subject to approval by, Metro 2. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Corporate Safety. 2.1 Stations 2.2 Systems Systems Assurance Program Plan (SAPP): Another early 2.3 Light Rail Vehicles (LRV) deliverable, led by Lurae Stuart, will be the project SAPP. This 2.4 Project Organization document defines how Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability 3. SAFETY PROGRAM ACTIVITIES (RAMS) will be incorporated into the project design and contract 3.1 Preliminary Engineering requirements. While this is a systemwide document, we believe the 3.2 Final Design Systems Engineering team is best-placed to lead SAPP 3.3 Preliminary Hazards Analysis development, with support from the Facilities Engineering team. 3.4 Safety and Security Certification Program 3.5 Configuration Management The SAPP will define the reliability and availability targets for key 3.6 Hazard Identification and Resolution Process project elements, including: 3.6.1 Categorization of Hazard 3.6.2 Risk Assessment  Traction Power and OCS/OCR 3.7 Fire/Life Safety Committee  Train Control and Grade Crossings 3.8 Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis  Communications Systems 3.9 Operating Hazard Analysis  Station Electrical Systems 3.10 Hazardous Materials Program  Tunnel and Station Ventilation Systems 3.11 Employee Safety Program  Maintenance Facility Functions 3.12 Safety and Security Certification  Trackwork 3.13 Accident/Incident Investigation and Reporting 4. SYSTEM SECURITY PLAN Maintainability requirements will be defined for the seven elements 5. SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES listed above. Critically, however, the SAPP will specifically demand

Page 9 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION analysis be conducted on how maintenance will be facilitated in context of 24-hour span of service and the impact of the CPUC’s restrictive Wayside Worker Protection regulations, as defined in General Order 175.

As well as defining how and when the DB Contractor will conduct RAMS analyses, we will perform analyses upon our own design development at the 95% completion level of design. We intend to request Metro Transportation and MOW staff engagement in this analysis. Michael Harris-Gifford will be a key SDP “independent” RAMS reviewer.

Safety Certification Program Plan (SCPP): Led by John Cockle, the SDP team will develop a project-specific SCPP. While this is a systemwide SCPP Key Factors for Success: document, we believe the Systems Engineering team is best-placed to lead  Clearly define the DB Contractor’s role, SCPP development, with support from the Facilities Engineering team. responsibilities and deliverables  Clearly define Metro’s role, responsibilities Complying with the SSSecPP and CPUC General Order 164-D, the SCPP will and deliverables define the project safety certification process, organization, and roles and  Define the Safety Certification Review responsibilities from Preliminary Engineering, through to submittal of the final Committee Safety Certification Verification Report to the CPUC no later than 21 calendar  Demand certification sign-off commence days prior to the planned start of revenue operations. Key deliverables for the upon IFC design and is tracked monthly safety certification process, defined in the SCPP include: thereafter

 Safety Certifiable Items List (SCIL)  Design Certification Checklist (including checklists for Metro-furnished safety items)  Construction Certification Checklist (including checklists for Metro-furnished safety items)  Integrated Testing Certification Checklist (including checklists for Metro-led testing)  Training Certification Checklist (including vendor training and Metro internal training)  Contractor Safety Certification Verification Report (SCVR)  Metro SCVR Report (including certifications of readiness from Metro Transportation, Security and Maintenance departments)

During the Engineering Phase, the SDP team will develop the SCIL. This is a list of project elements that are safety-critical and must be certified as safe as part of the SCVR.

Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA): Led by John Cockle, the SDP team will develop a project-specific PHA, complying with FTA guidelines per DOT-FTA-MA-26-5005-00-01. While this is a systemwide document, we believe the Systems Engineering team is best- placed to lead PHA development, with support from the Facilities Engineering team.

The PHA checklist will be organized by system and subsystem and will initially be populated with the hazard descriptions, potential cause and effect. John’s team will work with the Project Engineering team to assess the failure rate and assign an initial hazard risk index. This will then be circulated for review and comment at about the 50% design completion level.

Upon completion of populating the corrective actions and classification of as-mitigated hazards, the PHA will be recirculated for review and approval.

Page 10 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

We will also develop an initial interface matrix to define project element interfaces to the extent these are developed during the Engineering Phase.

Operations and Maintenance Plan

Led by Rick Blake, the SDP team will further define and refine the ESFVLRT O&M Plan. Particular areas of focus will include:

 Updated Operations Analysis/Simulation (using the updated alignment from the Facilities Engineering team)  Connectivity/integration into existing operations  Bus/LRT/regional rail interface  Service plan/pattern WSP’s Michael Harris-Gifford identified and  Headway (normal and single-tracking) championed the early completion of  Crossover and siding needs facilities on the Foothill Phase 2A project  Fleet size for the receipt and testing of P3010 LRVs.  Yard capacity, function and configuration This enabled Metro to receive and  Existing system interface and cutover commission sufficient LRVs for on-time

opening of Foothill and Expo Phase II within While not directly a part of the Systems Engineering Scope, we will work with a few months of each other. It also saved Metro’s Vehicle Acquisition team to define the requirements and interfaces for the Metro time and money by avoiding potential LRVs to support this project. Critically, we need to identify where and when these disruption of ongoing revenue O&M. vehicles would be delivered and commissioned.

Traction Power Load-Flow Analysis and Simulation

We will update the parameters input to our traction power load-flow model, including the updated alignment from the Facilities Engineering team, and re-un the model to confirm substation locations and ratings. The model will also be used to confirm feeder cable and OCS ratings.

Data from the model will be used for the traction power system design and to further discussion with LADWP and SCE for utility drops.

Systems Engineering

The SDP team will progress the Systems Engineering, including:

 Project Basis of Design Report will be updated.

 Traction Power Design: Substation capacity, size, locations and layout, tunnel trainway feeder configuration, and maintenance facility substation design. MAJOR DECISION POINT:  Overhead Catenary Design and OCR Design, including system We need to work with SCRRA to configuration and sectionalization. determine how and who is to design manages to the signaling system for the  Train Control Design, including a block and control line design, and mainline railroad, including Positive route and aspect charts. Train Control (PTC)

Page 11 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

 Grade Crossing Design: Our plan is to conduct field diagnostics with Metro Operations, Corporate Safety, SCRRA, the CPUC and the jurisdictional DOT, and to submit grade crossing applications toward the end of the Engineering period so that there is sufficient time for crossing approval by the CPUC prior to DB NTP.

 Critically, design needs to include the LRT and mainline railroad portions of the crossings.

We believe the planned four-track shared LRT/SCRRA grade LESSON LEARNED: Our experience with past Metro crossings at Paxton, Maclay, Brand, Jessie and Hubbard projects indicate the cost and schedule benefits of having present considerable risk of non-acceptance from both the completed grade crossing applications before DB SCRRA and the CPUC. We believe an early and intense effort solicitation. The consequences of not having approved by the combined ESFVLRT Engineering and Project crossing applications is that the project is not approved for Management team is vital to devise an acceptable design. construction. Indeed, negative review by the CPUC can result in prohibition to construct (with the related delays’ Communication System Design, including CTS, CCTV, costs) and can even result in grade separation or road TPIS, SDS, GDS, SCADA, F&EM/Emergency Trip closure, triggering re-opening of environmental documents. Station/System, telephone, IDS and ACS. Critically, we will determine what infrastructure needs to be completed to facilitate communications to ROC/ESOC. Additionally, the closeness of the LRT tracks to the SCRRA Antelope Valley line will certainly trigger the need for extensive intrusion detection between the LRT and mainline railroad tracks. SDP team partner PTG designed such facilities for the Gold Line Foothill Extension.

Radio Design, including: determination of radio antenna locations for the tunnel; verification of coverage for surface alignment from existing Metro hilltop sites; verification with Metro Fire/Life safety of what emergency responder channels are needed (primarily LASD, LAPD and LACoFD, but possibly also including LA-RICS), and discussion with Metro Operations regarding what operating and maintenance channels are to be used (possibly including the acquisition of new frequencies for ESFVLRT).

Yard and Shop systems requirements (traction power, traction electrification, train control and communication).

Additionally, the SDP team will review MRDC, Fire/Life Safety Design Criteria and Standard Drawings at this time to confirm compliance and, where necessary, draft Design Deviation Requests or Requests for Special Consideration, as applicable, to secure approval of deviations.

Engaging Metro Operations and Maintenance

Continuing our engagement of Metro Rail Operations and Maintenance, our focus during the Engineering Phase will be as follows:

 Discuss and review the updated O&M plan and operations simulation  Discuss and review the mainline systems design, especially with respect to supporting maintenance and 24/7 operation.  Discuss and review the maintenance facility systems design, especially with respect to supporting maintenance and 24/7 operation.  Discuss and review to provision and assignment of operating and maintenance radio channels  Discuss the infrastructure to support communications with ROC and ROC capacity to support the project and any other Metro-furnished facilities.

Page 12 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

Engaging Metro Fire/Life Safety

The SDP team believes that engaging Metro Fire/Life Safety at the Engineering Phase is an important factor in securing successful certification of the project and approval of an Occupancy Permit. Our focus for engagement will be as follows:

 Discuss and review the system assurance and safety certification requirements.

 Discuss and review system fire/life safety and security provisions, especially surveillance, Blue Light Station, fire detection, emergency management, and access control provisions.

Civil Design Support and Coordination

Cost Estimate

The SDP team will develop cost estimates for the Systems portions of the project and fold them into the overall cost estimate, led by the Facilities Engineering team.

The breakdown of cost elements will conform to the project WBS.

Summary of SDP Engineering Phase Deliverables

Page 13 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

 Updated Basis of Design Report

Traction Power Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

 Metro System Standard Drawings  Tunnel segment one-line, metering and relaying diagrams  Emergency Trip System tripping scheme  Traction power ductbank plans  Site layout plans for each substation  Additional detail and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings  Record of agreements with LADWP and SCE for electrical power service.

Overhead Catenary/OCR Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

 Metro System Standard Drawings  Master Schematics (main line and yard)  Sectionalization Diagrams (main line and yard)  Additional support and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings  OCS Foundation drawings, as required by the Facilities Engineering team

Train Control and Grade Crossing Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

 Metro System Standard Drawings  Form G Grade Crossing modification application for each gated grade crossing  Typical Single Line Diagram - Power Distribution  Systemwide Ductbank Plan  Grade Crossing Layout for each gated crossing  Route and Aspect Chart for each interlocking  Double Line Track Plans  Cab signal control line diagrams  Block design calculations  Yard route and aspect charts  Yard double line track plans  Additional detail and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings

Communication System Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

 Metro System Standard Drawings  Communications Block Diagram for each Station and the maintenance facility  TC&C Room Layout  TC&C Room Heat and Power Load Estimates  Typical Cross-passage Equipment Layout  Typical CCTV System - Block Diagram  Telephone System - Block Diagram  TPIS System - Block Diagram  Intrusion Detection and Access - Controlled System Block Diagram  Portal Surveillance System - Block Diagram  Gas Detection System - Block Diagram  Fire Alarm System - Block Diagram  EMP System - Block Diagram  EMP Elevations  Seismic Detection System - Block Diagram

Page 14 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

 Typical TC&C Room - Cable Riser Diagram  Typical TC&C Room - Power Single Line Diagram  Cable Transmission System - Topology  SCADA System - Block Diagram  UFCS System - Block Diagram  Additional detail and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings

Radio Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

 Metro System Standard Drawings  Tunnel Radio System Configuration  Base Station Schematic Diagram  Additional detail and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings  Record of agreed radio channels for Metro Operations and Emergency Responders  Preliminary Intermod Analysis  Radio Coverage Analysis  Systems cost estimate

DESIGN/BUILD SOLICITATION DEVELOPMENT PHASE

The following work plan is presented on the assumption that the ESFVLRT project is solicited as a single DB project. We recognize, of course, that there a number of different ways forward for solicitation, including splitting the project into several solicitations (i.e. main line, tunnels, maintenance facility, and systems), or into different types of solicitation from Build-Build to P3. Whatever configuration of solicitation Metro ultimately selects, the SDP team is ready and able to serve.

We have also assumed that the Task Order extends only into assembly of solicitation documents and not into solicitation support.

Solicitation Outline

We foresee this being led primarily by Metro, with input from the Project Engineering team.

Metro, and the Foothill and Expo construction authorities have used a MAJOR DECISION POINT: One of the most important variety of DB solicitation formats with varying degrees of success. We decision points is how to deal with work on and about the strongly encourage Metro to carefully review past solicitations, the SCRRA alignment. There are three major factors: lessons learned from their relative successes, and the applicability of these solicitations to the ESFVLRT project. 1) Safety and wayside worker protection requirements on the active railroad. We further suggest that a small team of senior WSP, Mott MacDonald and 2) The scope of work for modification and/or replacement PTG personnel, experienced in Metro DB solicitation be engaged in this of SCRRA infrastructure, the requirements, and who outline review and development phase to maximize the probability of performs the work. success. 3) SCRRA’s construction phasing requirements and preservation of revenue service. Design/Build Solicitation Development

We believe Metro needs to consider carefully the right balance of prescriptive and performance-based requirements for systems. In this respect, we present the following recommendations and work plan:

Page 15 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

This section also should discuss, in detail, any Metro-furnished items and activities.

Specifically, in the “Constructability, Durability, and Maintainability in Design” section of our proposal, we have indicated some ways in which solicitation documents, especially those in Division 01, can be further improved.

We anticipate development of Division 01 specifications to be a collaborative effort of the combined project team. Specification sections that we anticipate the SDP team to lead include:

Divisions 02 through 19: Led by the Facilities Engineering team, with SDP review and support.

We particularly foresee SDP team input to the following sections:

 05 60 00 – OCS Steel Poles (SDP lead)  11 11 00 - Vehicle Service Equipment  11 11 26 - Vehicle Wash Equipment  11 11 29 - Shop Equipment  14 45 00 - Vehicle Lifts

Division 20: We anticipate leading development of Section 20 72 35 - Train Control And Communications Raceways, with support from the Facilities Engineering team.

Divisions 21 through 26: Led by the Facilities Engineering team, with SDP review and support.

We particularly foresee SDP team input to the following sections:

Division 27: The SDP team will lead all sections, with support from the Facilities Engineering team. We anticipate the following Division 27 specification sections:

 27 01 01 - General Communications Requirements

Page 16 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

 27 01 02 - Communications Manuals  27 01 03 - Communications Training  27 01 04 - Communications Spare Parts And Test Equipment  27 01 05 - Communications Testing And Commissioning  27 01 06 - Communications Uninterruptible AC Power Supply (UPS)  27 01 07 - Communications Facilities Emergency Management (FEM) System  27 05 48 - Communications Seismic Event Detection System  27 13 00 - Communications Cable Transmission System  27 30 00 - Communications Telephone System  27 32 43 - Communications Radio System  27 51 16 - Communications Transit Passenger Information System (TPIS)

Division 28: The SDP team will lead all sections, with support from the Facilities Engineering team. We anticipate the following Division 28 specification sections:

 28 16 00 - Communications Intrusion Detection Access Controlled System  28 16 33 - Communications Tunnel Portal Surveillance And Alarm System  28 16 34 - Railroad Intrusion Detection System  28 23 00 - Communications Closed Circuit Television System  28 31 00 - Communications Fire Detection System  28 33 00 - Communications Gas Detection And Alarm System  28 40 00 - Communications Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition Remote Terminal Unit (SCADA RTU)  28 50 00 - System Security  28 60 00 - System Safety And Assurance

Divisions 31 through 33: Led by the Facilities Engineering team, with SDP review and support. However, the SDP team will develop the following specification section:

 31 63 32 - OCS Guy Guards

Division 34: The SDP team will lead all sections, except track. We will support track specification development, with the Facilities Engineering team will support our sections. We anticipate leading the following Division 34 specification sections:

Page 17 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

 34 21 61 - Traction Power DC Load-Break Devices  34 21 63 - Traction Power DC No-Load-Break Devices  34 21 66 - Traction Power Grounding And Bonding  34 21 76 - Traction Power Supervisory Control Interface Terminal Cabinet (SCITC)  34 21 90 - Traction Power Equipment Installation Requirements  34 21 91 - Traction Power Test Program  34 21 93 - Traction Power Testing And Start-Up  34 23 02 - OCS/ Manuals And Training  34 23 03 - OCS Spare Parts  34 23 04 - OCS General Requirements  34 23 06 - Overhead Conductor Rail  34 23 10 - OCS Grounding And Bonding Systems  34 23 15 - OCS Bare Conductors  34 23 20 - OCS Galvanized Steel Wire And Wire Rope  34 23 25 - OCS Stainless Steel Wire And Wire Rope  34 23 30 - OCS Assemblies, Fittings, Fasteners, And Hardware  34 23 35 OCS Balance Weight And Midpoint Anchor Assemblies  34 23 40 - OCS Insulator Assembly  34 23 45 - OCS Insulators  34 23 46 - OCS Disconnect Switches  34 23 50 - Overhead Contact System Lightning Protection  34 23 65 - Overhead Contact System Installation  34 23 70 - OCS Special Tools  34 23 71 - OCS Testing And Commissioning  34 23 73 - OCS Cable Terminations  34 23 80 - Pole Identification And Warning Signs  34 42 02 - Train Control Spare Parts And Test Equipment  34 42 03 - Train Control Manuals & Training  34 42 05 - Train Control System Integration, Testing And Acceptance  34 42 06 - Train Control System Safety And Assurance  34 42 13.19 - Train Control General Requirements  34 42 13.23 - Train Control Block Design  34 42 13.26 - Train Control Logic Requirements  34 42 13.46 - Train Control Signal Electrical Work - Basic Requirements  34 42 13.53 - Train Control Track Circuits  34 42 13.56 - Train Control Room Layout  34 42 13.59 - Train Control Power Distribution  34 42 13.63 - Train Control System Grounding  34 42 13.66 - Train Control Relays  34 42 13.69 - Train Control Electrical And Electronic Components  34 42 13.73 - Train Control Switch Machine Layouts  34 42 13.76 - Train Control Signal Layouts  34 42 13.27 - Train Control Train-To-Wayside Communications  34 42 13.96 - Train Control Special Trackwork And Bonding  34 42 13.97 - Train Control Marking And Tagging  34 42 13.98 - Train Control Drawings  34 42 16.13 - Train Control Interior Wire And Cable  34 42 16.16 - Train Control Exterior Wire And Cable  34 42 19.13 - Train Control Microprocessor Control Systems  34 42 23 - Train Control Yard Control Panel  34 42 23.19 - Train Control Local Control Panel

Page 18 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

 34 54 00 - Communications Universal Fare Collection (UFCS) Interface  34 76 13 - Grade Crossing Layouts (may need a separate specification for the SCRRA side)

Divisions 41 through 45: Led by the Facilities Engineering team, with SDP review and support.

We plan to submit DB solicitation specifications for formal review at the 75%, 95% and 100% completion levels.

Engaging Metro Operations and Maintenance

Continuing our engagement of Metro rail operations and maintenance, our focus during the DB Solicitation Development Phase will be as follows:

 Discuss and review the systems contract documents, especially with respect to supporting maintenance and 24/7 operation.  Discuss and review the systems assurance requirements.  Discuss and review the systems testing and rail activation requirements and schedule, including the provision of rolling stock and other items of Metro support.  Discuss and review the safety certification requirements.

Design/Build Solicitation Assembly

A DB solicitation for a project such as the ESFVLRT project contains a large volume of documents, both contractual and reference. The SDP team anticipates significant effort, as part of the entire project team, to assemble documents, ensure they are the most current, and review their proper placement within the overall solicitation.

Summary of SDP DB Solicitation Deliverables

 Assistance with developing solicitation outline  SOW and specifications as indicated above  Assistance with final assembly of solicitation documents

Page 19 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

TASK ORDER PROPOSED ORGANIZATION CHART

METRO Project Manager TBD

Systems PM

M. Harris‐Gifford Corridor Systems Facilities Lead Designer A. Sizar TBD

Project Controls CADD Various Various

Train Control Traction Power Communications System Safety & OCS/OCR Lead General Electrical Ops Modelling Lead Lead Lead Certification B. Lemke A. Patel J. Schnurbusch P. Collins J. Marquez J. Cockle V. Yanitskaya

Train Control Traction Power OCS/OCR Communications Yard & Shop TP TP Load Flow RF Engineer RAMS Support Support Support Support A. Schultz C. Margetts R. Godara S. Stoilov S. Adkins H. Pena M. Azhad L. Stuart

Page 20 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

TASK ORDER SCHEDULE

East San Fernando Project ‐ System Staff FY 2019 FY 2020 FY2021 FY2022 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Plan 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q EARLY TASKS Support Develop Project Management Plans Review of FEIS and Conceptual Design & Costs Initial Basis of Design Conceptual Traction Power Load‐Flow Preliminary Operations Analysis/Simulation Conceptual Operations Plan Yard Capacity and Requirements Advanced Conceptual Systems Engineering Updated Systems Cost Estimate PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PHASE Independent Systems Integration Review System Safety & Security Program Plan Systems Assurance Program Plan Threat & Vulnerability Analysis Safety Certification Program Plan Preliminary Hazard Analysis Interface Management Plan Support Risk Management Plan Operations & Maintenance Plan Update Traction Power Load‐Flow Analysis & Simulation Update Basis of Design Report Traction Power Design OCS/OCR Design Train Control Design Communication System Design Yard and Shop systems design Civil Design Support and Coordination Cost Estimate D/B SOLICITATION DEVELOPMENT PHASE Solicitation Outline Scope of Work Specifications Development Design/Build Solicitation Assembly D/B SOLICITATION PHASE Addenda/RFI Support Proposal Review BAFO Support Conformed Document Production

Page 21 of 22 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND DB SOLICITATION

TASK ORDER RESOURCE LOADING CHART

Page 22 of 22 Rev: Draft Draft Task Order Proposal 4: West Santa Ana Branch LRT

Metro Contract No. AE47810E0128 Systems Engineering and Support Services Task Order 004: West Santa Ana

Branch LRT EIR Support, Engineering and P3 Solicitation TASK ORDER PROPOSAL

Version No.: Draft Date: 01.05.18

EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

The following is a proposed workplan for the West Santa Ana Branch LRT (WSAB) project. The workplan is developed to take the project from the Final EIR/EIS stage through completion of Engineering and into the commencement of P3 solicitation. That is, through the first three phases of our Task Order Flow Matrix.

UNDERSTANDING OF THE WSAB PROJECT

The WSAB is planned to be a conventional high-platform light rail system in an approximately north-south orientation. The northern terminus is at Union Station, adjacent (though not physically connected to) the Gold Line tracks. The project development in downtown Los Angeles currently retains several options for the alignment, although all include significant tunnel alignment in the northern portion of this segment.

Further south, the project retains two primary alignment options. The Alameda alignment follows Alameda Street in a mostly aerial alignment, joining the existing Blue Line ROW at Washington Station, and continuing south in aerial alignment to Slauson Station, where the alignment turns east along railroad ROW at-grade along Randolph Street (requiring freight track relocation) to just short of Maywood Avenue. For the Pacific option, the project follows Santa Fe Avenue in underground and then aerial alignment, diverting onto BNSF ROW at 25th street (still in aerial alignment), returning to at-grade alignment at and along Pacific Boulevard to Randolph Street.

The southern portion of the alignment follows railroad TOW at grade (with the freight track relocated), diverting to a southwest alignment at grade in railroad ROW just north of Rosecrans. The project continues in abandoned ROW in a southwesterly direction from Somerset Boulevard to the terminus at Pioneer.

Exhibit 1: West Santa Ana Branch Project Alignment

Page 1 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

We are very much aware that Metro has already received multiple proposals to execute this project as a P3 solicitation, and is, therefore, not subject to the same fiscal constraints as other Measure M projects; that is, funding is not a source of schedule constraint. Understanding this, our workplan is based upon a greatly accelerated schedule to solicitation. Specifically, our plan is to commence engineering during the final year of the environmental process and to commence development of solicitation documents in parallel with completion of engineering.

KICK-OFF: SOLIDIFYING THE PROJECT TEAM

The first task, and one most important to making the project a success, is to meet with the project team to establish and solidify relationships, lines of communication, and an understanding of the scopes of work of the various entities involved.

Our project manager, Michael Harris-Gifford, will introduce our project team, including our corridor manager, Bill Lucci, and lay out our initial workplan. The kick-off meetings will enable all project stakeholders to adapt our workplans to form an integrated and collaborative team for complete project delivery.

Specifically, we recognize that Metro has identified this project as a candidate for MAJOR PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS: P3 solicitation and that key decisions need to be made as to key features of the  Metro Project team, including Planning P3 contract, including: and Project Delivery  Compatibility with existing Metro LRT systems  Environmental Consultant: [WSP, Monica Born]  Conformity with Metro Operating and Maintenance practices and rules  Facilities Engineer: [TBD]  Compliance with Metro Rail Design Criteria (MRDC)  Performance requirements for revenue service (peak and off-peak)  Performance requirements for maintenance and overhaul Entity that controls the railroad; Metro or the Contractor  SDP ENHANCEMENT: PMs Michael  Entity that provides security Harris-Gifford and Monica Born have  Rights and responsibility for Metro oversight, including safety and audit worked closely together on projects,  Relationship of Contractor with the CPUC including the Gold and Expo lines, since 2000.  Degree of prescriptive technical requirements (in comparison with DB)

We presume that Metro will, separately, contract for Preliminary Engineering and Design Services During Construction for the lead engineer for tunneling, alignment and trackwork, yard and shop, civil, architectural, station, and MEP. As such, we anticipate that the facilities engineer will be the lead engineer for the overall project and, together with the Metro project management team, will establish an Integrated Project Management Office (IPMO). We anticipate this will include the project document control and management systems, project procedures, CADD manual, QA/QC plan, Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), etc.

Our aim is to fully integrate and immerse our Systems team into the overall WSAB project team.

PROJECT SETUP PHASE

Project Management Plan: Led by the facilities engineer, with input from our Systems team to describe the systems engineering team and scope, and how we are integrated with and into the overall project team.

Master WBS and Schedule: This document will provide a WBS and comprehensive schedule for the project. We anticipate this will be led by the facilities engineer, with input from our Systems team

Document Control System and Procedures: The SDP systems team will adopt this system, which we anticipate will be developed by the facilities engineer.

Page 2 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

QA/QC program: The SDP systems team will adopt this system, which we anticipate will be developed by the facilities engineer.

Project Budget and Budget Breakdown: The SDP systems team will conform to this project-wide system, which we anticipate will be developed by the Facilities Engineer.

Project Implementation Plan (PIP): Led by the facilities, with input from our Systems team, this document will define how the project will be executed, controlled and monitored. It will also define how progress will be reported.

PROJECT DEFINITION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT PHASE

This is an early phase of the Engineering effort, where the facilities engineer and Systems team, together, define the project, and review and develop critical project elements that may directly influence the overall project scope and configuration and the environmental analysis.

Review of FEIS and Conceptual Design and Costs We have reviewed the current alignment development Together with the facilities engineer’s team, we will perform a drawings and have particular areas of concern: comprehensive review of the FEIS, the associated reports, the Conceptual Engineering design, and the associated cost estimates.  The tunnel alignment in the Arts District area is slow. We will seek opportunity to maximize track/cab speed Particular areas of focus for the SDP team will include:  MOW and emergency access provisions for aerial alignment South of the I-10.  Confirmation of potential traction power substation  UPRR and CPUC approval of crossings shared with the UPRR. locations  Potential lack of ROW where the alignment crosses Somerset  Confirmation of potential Train Control & Communications Boulevard (TC&C) houses, both at stations and elsewhere  Potential lack of property for TC&C rooms or crossing bungalows  Identification and location of substations for underground stations, including Emergency Backup Power Supply (EBPS) generator  Location of radio antennae for tunnel segment(s)  Location and type of crossovers  Provision of tail tracks at Union and Pioneer KEY SYSTEMS PARAMETERS TO CONFIRM: (which the WSP EIR team appear to have done)  The primacy and relevancy of MRDC  Integration with existing Gold Line Union Station,  System Operational Requirements (if not per MRDC Section 10). including service disruption avoidance  Traction Power: Confirmation of standard Metro TPSS configuration;  Accommodation of shared ROW with the UPRR to tunnel trainway feeder and EBPS; station power drops; yard and shop Somerset power  Configuration of shared grade crossings with  Overhead Catenary: Confirmation of standard OCS (at-grade) and UPRR OCR (tunnel)  Yard location, layout and accommodation of  Train Control: Key operational decision of what form of ATP system required facilities to deploy. This will set the compatibility of WSAB with other lines; shared UPRR/WSAB grade crossings; and yard train control Description of planned operations, fleet size, and  requirements. system security and safety provisions  Communications: Confirm standard Metro subsystems and  Any environmental commitments affecting configurations, including radio, CTS, CCTV, TPIS, F&EM, SCADA, Systems, especially related to noise and SDS, GDS, IDS and ACS. Confirm maintenance facility requirements. aesthetics  Estimated cost of systems elements

ESTABLISHING AN INITIAL BASIS OF DESIGN

Page 3 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

Building upon the FEIS/EIR and the associated Conceptual Engineering, we will develop and submit for approval the Systems sections of initial Basis of Design report. This report, led by the facilities engineer, will establish the key facilities and Systems parameters to guide the continuing design development. Each major system and subsystem will be defined in overall terms.

In addition to more generally establishing Systems Basis of Design parameters, there are some important Systems factors specific to the WSAB Project to be established, including:

 Integration and connectivity with the Metro system (now and in the future) at Union Station.  Maintenance facility location, capacity and facilities.  Tunnel configuration, underground station configuration and systems (especially power and communications) support needs.

CRITICAL EARLY ENVIRONMENTAL INPUT

There are certain Systems design elements that have a major effect upon the project’s environmental impact and are critical early definition elements:

Conceptual Traction Power Load-Flow Analysis: Led by Kwaku Larbi, and using Mott The need for sidings for bad-order McDonald’s proprietary load-flow model, the load-flow will be run to confirm the traction train storage, short-lining and power substation locations and property takes already identified in the DEIR/EIS. support of Maintenance-of-Way Conceptual Preliminary Operations Analysis/Simulation: To confirm runtimes (critical will also be discussed with Rail to ridership analysis, as well as fleet size) crossover locations (critically, several appear to Operations. be missing from the DEIR/EIS alignment, and thus, their noise and vibration impacts and property takes for signal bungalows are not analyzed); and terminal track arrangements (critical to ensuring sufficient tail track length to support design headways and the need to store revenue-ready trains).

Simulation will be performed by WSP’s Operations Simulation group, using Berkeley Simulation Software’s Rail Traffic Controller (RTC) model.

Conceptual Operations Plan: Building upon the Most recently, WSP developed the outline and scope of a operations simulation and the Advanced Conceptual Systemwide LRT O&M Plan resulting from the Regional Engineering alignment, we will prepare and submit for Connector project, comprising the following 16 chapters: approval a Conceptual Operations Plan to describe and Chapter 1 - System Description and Characteristics prescribe the operations and maintenance plan and Chapter 2 - Operations Service Plan and Schedule requirements for the WSAB system, addressing initial and Chapter 3 - Maintenance/Engineering full build-out requirements. This is needed to determine Chapter 4 - Activation Plan (Start-Up and Testing) what performance metrics to impose upon the P3 Chapter 5 - Start-Up franchisee. Chapter 6 – Testing Yard Capacity and Requirements: In conjunction with Chapter 7: Safety Testing Standards and Procedures the facilities engineer, and using data from the Conceptual Chapter 8: Operating Rules and Procedures Operations Analysis, our project team will assist with Chapter 9: Training defining the capacity and capabilities required of the Chapter 10: Emergency Operations / Service and Schedule Recovery maintenance facility for the initial and final build-outs (if Procedures not the same). Systems inputs at this stage include fleet Chapter 11: Security Standards and Procedures size and consist needs (driving storage track Chapter 12: Fare Collection Plan configuration), traction power needs, and yard control Chapter 13: Business Management Plan requirements. Critically, the yard/mainline interface will be Chapter 14: Operating and Maintenance Budgets reviewed to ensure: Chapter 15: Staffing and Hiring Plan Chapter 16: Staff Support Functions

Page 4 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

 Transfer track/lead for trains awaiting permission to enter the main line  Ability of Rail Operations Center (ROC) to route trains clear of the main line prior to transfer to yard control  Resiliency (no single points of failure of power or track that would trap the entire fleet in the yard).1

1Critical lesson learned for Metro from an OCS failure at Division 11 some years ago.

Systems Engineering Efforts to Support the FEIS/EIR

The SDP team will develop an Advanced Conceptual Engineering level systems design for the project. Items critical to the FEIS/EIR support will include:

 Substation locations and footprints: To define property takes.  Crossover locations and configuration: In conjunction with the facilities engineer, to support noise and vibration analysis.  Grade crossing layouts and operation: Particularly for the UPRR corridor. In conjunction with the facilities engineer, to support property takes, noise impact, and traffic analyses.  Review of Advanced Conceptual Engineering alignment: Particularly for review of alignment and curve speeds both to maximize train speed and to ensure that curve speeds conform with cab signal speeds.  Preliminary size and location of signal and communication houses, signal bungalows, crossing houses/cases and signal cases: To determine and support property takes.  Conceptual tunnel power system configuration: In support of substation requirements, including property takes. Identification of EBPS generator location (assuming that the tunnel ground is determined to be gassy or potentially gassy).  Identification of radio antenna location(s): In support of property needs as well as potential visual impact.  Other environmental support efforts: Including defining the visual impact of substations, OCS and signal and communication houses as required, as well as the noise impact of air conditioning and ventilation systems.  Cost Estimates: The SDP team will update the conceptual-level cost estimates for systems elements for the project in collaboration with the facilities engineer.

Engaging Metro Operations and Maintenance

While Metro may not be the operator/maintainer under a P3 project, the Operations department still has an interest in the project in terms of supporting the region’s transportation needs, in terms of securing a usable product when the franchise ends, and a valuable resource in verifying the project, as specified, is safe, operable and maintainable.

Our recommendations for Metro Operations to focus on during the Project Definition and Environmental Support Phase will be as follows:

 Establish familiarity with the project  Discuss and review the O&M plan and operations simulation  Discuss and review the alignment, especially crossovers, sidings, tail tracks, station configurations and grade crossing layouts.  Discuss and review the maintenance facility layout, capacity and capabilities  Discuss the infrastructure to support communications with ROC and ROC capacity to support the project (if Metro is to dispatch the railroad).  Review needs for bus and rail operator layover facilities.

Other Time-Critical Systems Engineering Efforts

While the following efforts have lesser impacts on the FEIS/EIR, we believe they should commence at this stage of project development:

Page 5 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

Electric Utility Coordination: We will work with the Facilities Engineer and Metro staff to start the process of coordination with LADWP and SCE for utility feeds for stations, TPSS and, critically, the tunnel segment. We believe the tunnel is a critical component of this discussion because of the need for a trainway feeder and because of the likely high power capacity required.

Support Needs Outside of the Alignment: Metro is a mature transportation system, and to that end, new rail projects can no longer be developed without any impact to the existing system. Building upon SDP’s intimate knowledge of Metro, we have identified some items for early analysis and decision-making, as these can have a significant impact upon to scope, progress, cost and schedule of the project:

1. Central Control: Where will the WSAB project be controlled from? Critical ROC functions that need to be addressed include workstations for dispatchers and customer service staff, radio, SCADA, TPIS, CCTV, FAMS and NEXTRIP. A separate, but related function is the access control system at Gateway.

2. While general bus-rail connectivity will be considered as part of the O&M Plan, an additional consideration may be for bus layover facilities, especially at the Sylmar terminal station.

Summary of SDP Deliverables During the FEIS/R Stage

ENGINEERING PHASE

Independent Systems Integration Review

There is a core goal that must and will be our continuous and continuing focus throughout our work; the successful placing of the WSAB LRT project into revenue service.

Our project manager, Michael Harris-Gifford, lived and breathed O&M at Metro for SDP’S INDEPENDENT SYSTEMS more than eight years. He has seen, and experienced, the consequences of both INTEGRATION REVIEW TEAM: good and bad planning for revenue operation. Therefore, for every project, Michael  Michael Harris-Gifford: Ops, will lead a small team of experienced and independent engineers to periodically maintenance review the project design and status, to ask the following six key questions and to  Guido Eyzaguirre: Systems Integration check for compliance.  John Spellman: Train Control Our Systems Integration Review team will review the project, including facilities  Arvind Patel: Traction Power and MEP, at minimum at the following stages:  Gordon MacDonald: OCS  Barry Sam: Communications 1. Completion of FEIS/R Review and Basis of Design Development 2. 50% completion of Design

Page 6 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

3. 95% Completion of Design/75% Completion of P3 Solicitation Development 4. 95% Completion of P3 Solicitation Development

Additionally, the Systems Integration Review team will be on standby for independent troubleshooting at any time Metro requires it.

Systemwide Engineering Plans

Project System Safety and Security Program Plan (SSSecPP): Metro already has a corporate SSSecPP that is compliant with 49 CFR 659 and CPUC General Order 164-D. However, led by John Cockle, the SDP team will develop a project-specific SSSecPP based upon Metro’s Corporate SSSecPP.

This document will be developed at the start of the Preliminary SSSecPP Content: Engineering phase and will record the project organization and key 1. INTRODUCTION deliverables for system safety and security. The project SSSecPP will be 1.1 Goals developed in coordination with, and subject to approval by, Metro 1.2 Scope Corporate Safety. 1.3 Authority 1.4 Applicable Documents Threat and Vulnerability Analysis (TVA): We anticipate the project TVA 2. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION will be jointly led by Metro’s Corporate Safety and System Security & 2.1 Stations Law Enforcement departments. The SDP team will provide support, 2.2 Systems alongside the Facilities Engineering team. Critical TVA input into the 2.3 Light Rail Vehicles (LRV) Systems design is security and access control systems, including CCTV, 2.4 Project Organization portal intrusion, access control system (card key) and general intrusion 3. SAFETY PROGRAM ACTIVITIES detection systems. 3.1 Preliminary Engineering Safety Certification Program Plan (SCPP): Led by John Cockle, the 3.2 Final Design SDP team will develop a project-specific SCPP. While this is a 3.3 Preliminary Hazards Analysis systemwide document, we believe the Systems Engineering team is best- 3.4 Safety and Security Certification Program placed to lead SCPP development, with support from the Facilities 3.5 Configuration Management Engineering team. 3.6 Hazard Identification and Resolution Process 3.6.1 Categorization of Hazard Complying with the SSSecPP and CPUC General Order 164-D, the SCPP 3.6.2 Risk Assessment will define the project safety certification process, organization, and roles 3.7 Fire/Life Safety Committee and responsibilities from Preliminary Engineering, through to submittal 3.8 Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis of the final Safety Certification Verification Report (SCVR) to the CPUC 3.9 Operating Hazard Analysis no later than 21 calendar days prior to the planned start of revenue 3.10 Hazardous Materials Program operations. Key deliverables for the safety certification process, defined in 3.11 Employee Safety Program the SCPP include: 3.12 Safety and Security Certification 3.13 Accident/Incident Investigation and Reporting  Safety Certifiable Items List (SCIL) 4. SYSTEM SECURITY PLAN  Design Certification Checklist (including checklists for any 5. SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES Metro-furnished safety items)  Construction Certification Checklist (including checklists for any Metro-furnished safety items)  Integrated Testing Certification Checklist (including checklists for any Metro-led testing)  Training Certification Checklist  SCVR

Page 7 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

During the Engineering Phase, the SDP team will develop the SCIL, a list of project elements that are safety-critical and must be certified as safe as part of the SCVR.

The PHA checklist will be organized by system and subsystem and initially be populated with the hazard descriptions, potential cause and effect. We will work with the Project Engineering team to assess the failure rate and assign an initial hazard risk index. This will then be circulated for review and comment at about the 50% design completion level.

We will then update the matrix and review it with the project Engineering team to WSP’s Michael Harris-Gifford identified and populate the corrective action columns. We will pay particular attention to items championed the early completion of facilities that have a hazard classification of IA, IB, IC, IIA, IIB, IIIA, ID, IIC, IID, IIIB, or IIIC as on the Foothill Phase 2A project for the these are generally classified as unacceptable or undesirable. Our aim will be, receipt and testing of P3010 LRVs. This where practicable, to mitigate hazards to the “acceptable” level. enabled Metro to receive and commission sufficient LRVs for on-time opening of Upon completion of populating the corrective actions and classification of as- Foothill and Expo Phase II within a few mitigated hazards, the PHA will be recirculated for review and approval. months of each other. It also saved Metro time Risk Management Plan: In common with past Metro projects, we anticipate that and money by avoiding potential disruption of the risk management plan and risk matrix will be developed by Metro. The SDP ongoing revenue O&M. project team, together with the Facilities Engineering team, will support development and population of the risk matrix.

Operations and Maintenance Plan

The SDP team will further define and refine the WSAB O&M Plan. Particular areas of focus will include:

 Updated Operations Analysis/Simulation (using the updated alignment from the Facilities Engineering team)  Connectivity/Integration into existing operations  Bus/rail interface  Service plan/pattern  Headway (normal and single-tracking)  Crossover and siding needs  Fleet size  Yard capacity, function and configuration  Existing system interface and cutover

While not directly a part of the Systems Engineering Scope, we will work with Metro’s Vehicle Acquisition team to define the requirements and interfaces for the LRVs to support this project. Critically, we need to identify where and when these vehicles would be delivered and commissioned.

Traction Power Load-Flow Analysis and Simulation

Data from the model will be used for the traction power system design and to further discussion with LADWP and SCE for utility drops.

Systems Engineering

The SDP team will progress the Systems Engineering, including:

Page 8 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

 Project Basis of Design Report will be updated.

 Traction Power Design: Substation capacity, size, locations & layout, tunnel trainway feeder configuration, and maintenance facility substation design.

 Overhead Catenary Design and OCR Design, including system configuration and sectionalization.

 Train Control Design, including a block and control line design, and route and aspect charts.

 Grade Crossing Design. Our plan is to conduct field diagnostics with Metro Operations, Corporate Safety, LESSON LEARNED: Our experience with past Metro UPRR, the CPUC and the jurisdictional DOT, and to projects indicates the cost and schedule benefits of having submit grade crossing applications toward the end of completed grade crossing applications before solicitation. the Engineering period so that there is sufficient time for The consequences of not having approved crossing crossing approval by the CPUC prior to P3 NTP. applications is that the project is not approved for construction. Indeed, negative review by the CPUC can  Critically, design needs to include the LRT and freight result in prohibition to construct (with the related delays railroad portions of the crossings. costs) and can even result in grade separation or road closure, triggering reopening of environmental documents.  Communication System Design, including CTS, CCTV, TPIS, SDS, GDS, SCADA, F&EM/EMPs, telephone, IDS and ACS. Critically, we will determine what infrastructure needs to be completed to facilitate communications to central control.

 Additionally, the closeness of the LRT tracks to the UPRR may trigger the need for extensive intrusion detection between the LRT and mainline railroad tracks. SDP partner PTG designed such facilities for the Gold Line Foothill Extension.

 Radio Design, including: determination of radio antenna locations for the tunnel; verification of coverage for surface alignment from existing Metro hilltop sites; verification with Metro fire/life safety of what emergency responder channels are needed (primarily LASD, LAPD and LACoFD, but possibly also including LA-RICS), and discussion with Metro Operations regarding what operating and maintenance channels are to be used (possibly including the acquisition of new frequencies for WSAB).

 Yard and Shop systems requirements (traction power, traction electrification, train control and communication).

Engaging Metro Operations and Maintenance

Continuing our engagement of Metro Rail Operations and Maintenance, our focus during the Engineering Phase will be as follows:

 Discuss and review the updated O&M plan and operations simulation  Discuss and review the mainline systems design, especially with respect to supporting maintenance and 24/7 operation.  Discuss and review the maintenance facility systems design, especially with respect to supporting maintenance and 24/7 operation.  Discuss and review to provision and assignment of operating and maintenance radio channels

Engaging Metro Fire/Life Safety

Page 9 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

The SDP team believes that engaging Metro Fire/Life safety at the Engineering Phase is an important factor in securing successful certification of the project and approval of an Occupancy Permit. Our focus for engagement will be as follows:

Civil Design Support and Coordination

Cost Estimate

The SDP team will develop cost estimates for the systems portions of the project and fold them into the overall cost estimate, led by the Facilities Engineering team.

The breakdown of cost elements will conform to the project WBS.

Summary of SDP Engineering Phase Deliverables

 Independent Systems Integration Review  SSSecPP  TVA support  SCPP  SCIL  PHA  Risk Management Plan support  Preliminary O&M Plan  Preliminary Operations Analysis/Simulation  Traction Power Load-Flow Analysis and Simulation  Updated Basis of Design Report

Traction Power Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

 Metro System Standard Drawings

Page 10 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

 Tunnel segment one-line, metering and relaying diagrams  Emergency Trip System tripping scheme  Traction Power ductbank plans  Site layout plans for each substation  Additional detail and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings  Record of agreements with LADWP and SCE for electrical power service.

Overhead Catenary/OCR Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

 Metro System Standard Drawings  Master Schematics (main line and yard)  Sectionalization Diagrams (main line and yard)  Additional support and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings  OCS Foundation Drawings, as required by the Facilities Engineering team

Train Control and Grade Crossing Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

Communication System Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

 Metro System Standard Drawings  Communications Block Diagram for each Station and the maintenance facility  Train Control & Communications Room Layout  TC&C Room Heat and Power Load Estimates  Typical Cross-passage Equipment Layout  Typical CCTV System - Block Diagram  Telephone System - Block Diagram  TPIS System - Block Diagram  Intrusion Detection & Access - Controlled System Block Diagram  Portal Surveillance System - Block Diagram  Gas Detection System - Block Diagram  Fire Alarm System - Block Diagram  EMP System - Block Diagram

Page 11 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

 EMP Elevations  Seismic Detection System - Block Diagram  Typical TC&C Room - Cable Riser Diagram  Typical TC&C Room - Power Single Line Diagram  Cable Transmission System - Topology  SCADA System - Block Diagram  UFCS System - Block Diagram  Additional detail and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings

Radio Design, comprising the following drawings and documents:

 Metro System Standard Drawings  Tunnel Radio System Configuration  Base Station Schematic Diagram  Additional detail and assembly drawings not otherwise covered by Metro Standard Drawings  Record of agreed radio channels for Metro Operations and Emergency Responders  Preliminary Intermod Analysis  Radio Coverage Analysis  Systems cost estimate

P3 SOLICITATION DEVELOPMENT PHASE

The following work plan is presented on the assumption that the WSAB project is solicited as a single P3 project. We recognize, of course, that there are a number of different ways forward for solicitation, including splitting the project into several solicitations (i.e., mainline, tunnels, maintenance facility, and systems), or into different types of solicitation from Build-Build to P3. Whatever configuration of solicitation Metro ultimately selects, the SDP team are ready and able to serve.

We have also assumed that the Task Order extends only into assembly of solicitation documents and not into solicitation support.

Solicitation Outline

P3 Solicitation Development

We believe Metro needs to consider carefully the right balance of prescriptive and performance-based requirements for systems. In this respect, we present the following recommendations and work plan:

O&M Performance Requirements: Specific, detailed and mandatory. This document must comprehensively specify:

 Performance and reporting requirements and metrics for peak service  Performance and reporting requirements and metrics for off-peak/weekend/night service  Routine maintenance obligations  State of Good Repair, long-term overhaul and replacement obligations & reporting requirements  Roles and measures for independent operations, maintenance and safety assessments  Relationship with, and authority of, Metro  Relationship with, and obligations to, CPUC, Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and UPRR

Page 12 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

 Relationship with and obligations to utility companies  Relationship with and obligations to city and county agencies, including emergency responders and law enforcement

This section also should discuss, in detail, any Metro-furnished items and activities.

We anticipate development of Division 01 specifications to be a collaborative effort of the combined project team. Specification sections that we anticipate the SDP team to lead include:

01 35 14 - Operating System Interface

01 78 23 - Operation And Maintenance Data

01 78 43 - Spare Parts, Illustrated Parts Catalog, And Replacement Materials

01 78 55 - Safety And Security Certification

01 79 00 - Demonstration And Training

01 91 13 - Project Integration/Commissioning

Divisions 02 through 19: Led by the Facilities Engineering team, with SDP review and support.

We particularly foresee SDP team input to the following sections:

05 60 00 – OCS Steel Poles (SDP lead)

11 11 00 - Vehicle Service Equipment

11 11 26 - Vehicle Wash Equipment

11 11 29 - Shop Equipment

14 45 00 - Vehicle Lifts

Division 20: We anticipate leading development of Section 20 72 35 - Train Control And Communications Raceways, with support from the Facilities Engineering team.

Divisions 21 through 26: Led by the Facilities Engineering team, with SDP review and support.

We particularly foresee SDP team input to the following sections:

26 05 00 - Common Materials And Methods For Electrical Services

Page 13 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

26 05 05 - Electrical Design Requirements

26 05 06 - Design Requirements For The Auxiliary Power Distribution System

26 05 19 - Insulated Wires And Cables

26 05 26 - Grounding And Bonding For Electrical Systems

26 05 73 - Arc Flash Hazard Analysis And Short Circuit/Coordination Study

26 08 00 - Commissioning Of Electrical Systems

26 32 13.13 - Standby Generator

26 32 33 - Facilities Uninterruptible AC Power Supply (UPS)

Division 27: The SDP team will lead all sections, with support from the Facilities Engineering team. We anticipate the following Division 27 specification sections:

27 01 01 - General Communications Requirements

27 01 02 - Communications Manuals

27 01 03 - Communications Training

27 01 04 - Communications Spare Parts And Test Equipment

27 01 05 - Communications Testing And Commissioning

27 01 06 - Communications Uninterruptible AC Power Supply (UPS)

27 01 07 - Communications Facilities Emergency Management (FEM) System

27 05 48 - Communications Seismic Event Detection System

27 13 00 - Communications Cable Transmission System

27 30 00 - Communications Telephone System

27 32 43 - Communications Radio System

27 51 16 - Communications Transit Passenger Information System (TPIS)

Division 28: The SDP team will lead all sections, with support from the Facilities Engineering team. We anticipate the following Division 28 specification sections:

28 16 00 - Communications Intrusion Detection Access Controlled System

28 16 33 - Communications Tunnel Portal Surveillance And Alarm System

28 16 34 - Railroad Intrusion Detection System

28 23 00 - Communications Closed Circuit Television System

28 31 00 - Communications Fire Detection System

28 33 00 - Communications Gas Detection And Alarm System

Page 14 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

28 40 00 - Communications Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition Remote Terminal Unit (SCADA RTU)

28 50 00 - System Security

28 60 00 - System Safety And Assurance

Divisions 31 through 33: Led by the Facilities Engineering team, with SDP review and support. However, the SDP team will develop the following specification section:

31 63 32 - OCS Guy Guards

34 01 02 - Traction Power Manuals

34 01 03 - Traction Power Spare Parts

34 01 04 - Traction Power Training

34 21 03 - Traction Power General Requirements

34 21 06 - Traction Power Basic Electrical Materials And Methods

34 21 09 - Traction Power High Voltage AC Power Switchgear

34 21 26 - Traction Power AC-to-DC Conversion Assemblies

34 21 29 - Traction Power Metal-Enclosed Bus And Busways

34 21 31 - Traction Power Blue Light Station (BLS) System

34 21 33 - Traction Power DC Power Switchgear

34 21 34 - Traction Power Shop DC Distribution System

34 21 35 - Traction Power Shop DC Distribution Switchboard

34 21 36 - Traction Power Negative Grounding Device (NGD)

34 21 39 - Traction Power 750 Volt Negative Bus Boxes

34 21 43 - Traction Power Safety And System Assurance

34 21 49 - Traction Power Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)

34 21 53 - Traction Power Cable Terminations

34 21 56 - Traction Power Insulated Wires And Cables

34 21 61 - Traction Power DC Load-Break Devices

34 21 63 - Traction Power DC No-Load-Break Devices

34 21 66 - Traction Power Grounding And Bonding

34 21 76 - Traction Power Supervisory Control Interface Terminal Cabinet (SCITC)

Page 15 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

34 21 90 - Traction Power Equipment Installation Requirements

34 21 91 - Traction Power Test Program

34 21 93 - Traction Power Testing And Start-Up

34 23 02 - OCS/ Manuals And Training

34 23 03 - OCS Spare Parts

34 23 04 - OCS General Requirements

34 23 06 - Overhead Conductor Rail

34 23 10 - OCS Grounding And Bonding Systems

34 23 15 - OCS Bare Conductors

34 23 20 - OCS Galvanized Steel Wire And Wire Rope

34 23 25 - OCS Stainless Steel Wire And Wire Rope

34 23 30 - OCS Assemblies, Fittings, Fasteners, And Hardware

34 23 35 - OCS Balance Weight And Midpoint Anchor Assemblies

34 23 40 - OCS Insulator Assembly

34 23 45 - OCS Insulators

34 23 46 - OCS Disconnect Switches

34 23 50 - Overhead Contact System Lightning Protection

34 23 65 - Overhead Contact System Installation

34 23 70 - OCS Special Tools

34 23 71 - OCS Testing And Commissioning

34 23 73 - OCS Cable Terminations

34 23 80 - Pole Identification And Warning Signs

34 42 02 - Train Control Spare Parts And Test Equipment

34 42 03 - Train Control Manuals & Training

34 42 05 - Train Control System Integration, Testing And Acceptance

34 42 06 - Train Control System Safety And Assurance

34 42 13.19 - Train Control General Requirements

34 42 13.23 - Train Control Block Design

34 42 13.26 - Train Control Logic Requirements

Page 16 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

34 42 13.46 - Train Control Signal Electrical Work - Basic Requirements

34 42 13.53 - Train Control Track Circuits

34 42 13.56 - Train Control Room Layout

34 42 13.59 - Train Control Power Distribution

34 42 13.63 - Train Control System Grounding

34 42 13.66 - Train Control Relays

34 42 13.69 - Train Control Electrical And Electronic Components

34 42 13.73 - Train Control Switch Machine Layouts

34 42 13.76 - Train Control Signal Layouts

34 42 13.27 - Train Control Train-To-Wayside Communications

34 42 13.96 - Train Control Special Trackwork And Bonding

34 42 13.97 - Train Control Marking And Tagging

34 42 13.98 - Train Control Drawings

34 42 16.13 - Train Control Interior Wire And Cable

34 42 16.16 - Train Control Exterior Wire And Cable

34 42 19.13 - Train Control Microprocessor Control Systems

34 42 23 - Train Control Yard Control Panel

34 42 23.19 - Train Control Local Control Panel

34 54 00 - Communications Universal Fare Collection (UFCS) Interface

34 76 13 - Grade Crossing Layouts (may need a separate specification for the UPRR side)

Divisions 41 through 45: Led by the Facilities Engineering team, with SDP review and support.

We plan to submit P3 solicitation specifications for formal review at the 95% and 100% completion levels.

Engaging Metro Operations and Maintenance

Continuing our engagement of Metro rail operations and maintenance, our focus during the P3 Solicitation Development Phase will be as follows:

Page 17 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

P3 Solicitation Assembly

A P3 solicitation for a project such as the WSAB LRT project contains a large volume of documents, both contractual and reference. The SDP team anticipates significant effort, as part of the entire project team, to assemble documents, ensure they are the most current, and to review their proper placement within the overall solicitation.

Summary of SDP P3 Solicitation Deliverables

 Assistance with developing solicitation outline  SOW and specifications as indicated above  Assistance with final assembly of solicitation documents

Page 18 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

TASK ORDER PROPOSED ORGANIZATION CHART

METRO Project Manager TBD

Systems PM

M. Harris‐Gifford Corridor Systems Facilities Lead Designer W. Lucci TBD

Project Controls CADD Various Various

Train Control Traction Power Communications System Safety & OCS/OCR Lead General Electrical Ops Modelling Lead Lead Lead Certification A. Shamoon A. Shaikh D. Pyatt M. Fernando R. Fishburn J. Cockle V. Yanitskaya

Train Control Traction Power OCS/OCR Communications Yard & Shop TP TP Load Flow RF Engineer RAMS Support Support Support Support A. Schultz J. Aguilar C. Margetts K. Larbi A. Mezey P. Bhartiya D. Leung R. Blake

Page 19 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

TASK ORDER SCHEDULE

FY 2019 FY 2020 FY2021 FY2022 WSAB Project ‐ System Staff Plan 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q EARLY TASKS Support Develop Project Management Plans Review of FEIS and Conceptual Design & Costs Initial Basis of Design Conceptual Traction Power Load‐Flow Preliminary Operations Analysis/Simulation Conceptual Operations Plan Yard Capacity and Requirements Advanced Conceptual Systems Engineering Updated Systems Cost Estimate PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PHASE Independent Systems Integration Review System Safety & Security Program Plan Systems Assurance Program Plan Threat & Vulnerability Analysis Safety Certification Program Plan Preliminary Hazard Analysis Interface Management Plan Support Risk Management Plan Operations & Maintenance Plan Update Traction Power Load‐Flow Analysis & Simulation Update Basis of Design Report Traction Power Design OCS/OCR Design Train Control Design Communication System Design Yard and Shop systems design Civil Design Support and Coordination Cost Estimate D/B SOLICITATION DEVELOPMENT PHASE Solicitation Outline Scope of Work Specifications Development Design/Build Solicitation Assembly D/B SOLICITATION PHASE Addenda/RFI Support Proposal Review BAFO Support Conformed Document Production

Page 20 of 21 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH LRT EIR SUPPORT, ENGINEERING AND P3 SOLICITATION

TASK ORDER RESOURCE LOADING CHART

Page 21 of 21 Rev: Draft Draft Task Order Proposal 5: Standard Drawings and Metro Design Criteria

Metro Contract No. AE47810E0128 Systems Engineering and Support Services Task Order 005: Development of Systems Standard Drawings and Updating of Metro Design Criteria TASK ORDER PROPOSAL

Version No.: Draft Date: 01.05.18

EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMS STANDARD DRAWINGS AND UPDATING OF METRO DESIGN CRITERIA

During his tenure with Metro, Michael Harris-Gifford and his Wayside staff saw the need for developing Standard Drawings for Systems and Wayside elements, in a similar manner to what Metro already developed for Civil, Architectural, Wayfinding, Electrical, Mechanical and Plumbing elements. We are aware that Metro Engineering, through the leadership of Michael Ratnasingham, has commenced doing so, but we anticipate that this task l is likely not yet complete. Therefore, we propose Metro consider an early task order to complete development of Systems Standard drawings for light rail, heavy rail and possibly BRT.

Additionally, we feel that the ongoing Crenshaw, Regional Connector and Purple Line projects offer a timely opportunity to revisit Metro Rail Design Criteria (MRDC) and make any small adjustments necessary. The SDP team would be pleased to also assist in that effort.

The following provides an outline of a potential work plan to perform the tasks described above.

INFORMATION GATHERING

This initial phase of the work will require the task team to meet with Metro Project and Departmental stakeholders to: Determine what MRDC revisions are needed, based largely upon  KEY STAKEHOLDER PROJECTS lessons learned from recent projects; and  Regional Connector  Determine what Systems Standard Drawings would be useful to both  Crenshaw Line and Southwest Yard guide and restrain Systems design and construction on future projects.  Purple Line Extension (Sections 1, 2 and 3) Step 1: Poll Key Metro Departments. It is imperative that we meet and have  Blue Line Resignaling discussions with Metro project staff, as well as key departmental stakeholders, to  Division 20 Turnback gain the maximum input.

As explained in our proposal, the SDP team knows the key personnel within Metro to a far greater depth than any other Engineering Consultant. We do not need to KEY STAKEHOLDER DEPARTMENTS “learn” who to talk to, we already know.  Metro Engineering  Metro Construction On the following page, we have provided sample forms we will use to solicit for  Wayside Systems and Engineering and record information. Metro personnel are busy people and we believe that an  Facilities Maintenance off-line electronic survey will fail to obtain full input. Therefore, it is important that  Transportation we have personnel meet face-to-face with project and department personnel to  Rail Fleet Maintenance have an interactive dialogue and take copies of documents at that time.  Metro Security  Corporate Safety

Page 1 of 10 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMS STANDARD DRAWINGS AND UPDATING OF METRO DESIGN CRITERIA METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA PROJECT QUESTIONNAIRE Project: ______Stakeholders Interviewed: Name Role ______Please provide a copy of all approved MRDC Design Deviation Requests for your project: DDR #s received: ______Please indicate which of these you believe to be applicable to future projects: DDR #s (note why applicable): ______Please provide a copy of all approved Fire/Life Safety Requests For Special Consideration for your project: RFSC #s received: ______Please indicate which of these you believe to be applicable to future projects:

RFSC #s (note why applicable!): ______Form Completed By: ______Date: ______

Page 2 of 10 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMS STANDARD DRAWINGS AND UPDATING OF METRO DESIGN CRITERIA

METRO RAIL STANDARD DRAWING QUESTIONNAIRE Department: ______Stakeholders Interviewed: Name Position ______Discuss what standard drawings stakeholder would like to see. Document why this should be a mandatory drawing (will it be equally applicable to all future projects?). Discuss whether this can be better addressed by specification. Is there a particular drawing/project/location that can be used as a model? ______Form Completed By: ______Date: ______

Page 3 of 10 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMS STANDARD DRAWINGS AND UPDATING OF METRO DESIGN CRITERIA

Step 2: Summarize List of Changes and Review with Metro Engineering. After acquiring input from the various projects and Metro departments, we will develop a summary of MRDC changes and Standard Drawing requests. This will then be presented to Metro Engineering for discussion and concurrence before proceeding with development.

IMPLEMENT METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA REVISIONS

This process is relatively straightforward as Metro already has an established Systemwide Baseline Change Notice process that has been in use for several years for MRDC revision identification and approval. We anticipate our primary focus will be on the following MRDC Sections:

Section 9 – Systems:

 Clarify security requirements for parking structures and parking lots  Add time synchronization requirements for train control and possibly for TPSS  Add overhead conductor rail requirements  Update Emergency Management Panel SDP Enhancement: Gas Detection requirements During the Regional Connector project, it became clear that guidelines are  Update public address (PA) speaker needed for placement of methane (CH4) and hydrogen-sulphide (H2S) gas frequency response detectors. We propose to include guidelines on sensor placement as an  Add right side door/berthing detection (if Appendix to Section 9 of the MRDC along the following lines: Corporate Safety’s pilot project is Comply with Los Angeles City Ordinance No. 175790 successful)   Place CH4 or H2S detectors in rooms where no continuous  Add more specific guidance requirements ventilation will exist for gas detector placement  Place CH4 detectors on the ceilings at the highest level of a  Update SCADA input/output (I/O) list stairwell only Section 10 – Operations:  Place H2S sensors at the floor of the lowest level of a stairway adjacent to the HDPE exterior membrane Place CH4 and H2S sensors in rooms with walls or floors  Clarify train speeds and dwells for single-  tracking adjacent to the HDPE exterior membrane  Provide clearer explanation of terminal  In long corridors with walls or floors adjacent to the HDPE dwell exterior membrane, one CH4 sensor at the ceiling (highest point or middle), and one H2S at the floor (lowest point or middle)  Add minimum tail track length  Rooms that are above other rooms that are monitored do not Section 12 – Safety, Security and Systems require sensors, unless they have a wall adjacent to the HDPE Assurance: exterior membrane, in which case a CH4 sensor is needed  All sump pump and ejector rooms require both CH4 and H2S sensors, regardless of location of the HDPE exterior membrane  Check for consistency with Section 9 security requirements  Add platform intrusion detection (if the pilot project is successful)  Incorporate impact of CPUC General Order 175 (Wayside Worker Protection)

However, we feel that review of the following sections, with Systems requirements in mind, is also warranted:

Section 4 (Guideway and Trackwork):

Page 4 of 10 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMS STANDARD DRAWINGS AND UPDATING OF METRO DESIGN CRITERIA

 Clearances to accommodate the requirements of Roadway Worker Protection per General Order 175.  Restrictions on the use of spring frogs

Section 6 (Architectural):

 Incorporation of the most current security requirements  Incorporation of the most current public information system requirements

Section 7 (Electrical):

 Incorporation of utility requirements, including customer service requirements and electric service requirements  Clarify requirements for load-shed circuitry power source  Check that Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) requirements conform with Wayside needs and conform with UPS requirements specified elsewhere, including Section 9.

Section 11 (Yard and Shops):

 Incorporation of the latest train control, traction power and communications requirements

DEVELOPING SYSTEMS STANDARD DRAWINGS

We plan to develop systems standard drawings from existing project drawings, wherever possible, thus minimizing the effort required.

Our meetings with project and departmental stakeholders will confirm what Standard System Drawings are required. However, based upon our in-depth knowledge of Metro, we already anticipate the following:

Traction Power

 Legend and Symbols  Device Function Numbers and Acronyms  Typical TPSS relay and metering one-line diagrams for 34.5kV (LADWP) and 16.34/11 kV (SCE/PWP/ALW) utility supply  Typical Blue Light Station  Typical Emergency Trip Station/System (ETS) De-energization Graphical Diagram  Site and Fence Grounding Details

Overhead Catenary/Overhead Conductor Rail

 General Notes  Acronyms, Legend and Symbols  Conductor Particulars  Typical Sectionalization Schematic  Structure Spacing Charts  Messenger Wire Sag, Along Track Movement and Stagger Correction  Vertical and Radial Loadings  Erection tensions  Pantograph Security  General Arrangement Uninsulated Overlap  General Arrangement Insulated Overlap  General Arrangement Midpoint Anchor  General Arrangement Crossover  Balance Weight Assembly  Fixed Termination Assembly

Page 5 of 10 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMS STANDARD DRAWINGS AND UPDATING OF METRO DESIGN CRITERIA

 Overlap Spans  Anchor Spans for Overlaps  OCR Uninsulated and Insulated Overlaps  OCR Crossover Arrangement  OCR Grounding Point Details  “Standard” OCS Poles: We additionally recommend developing a set of “standard” OCS poles, based upon those that Metro already has, to limit the risk of each project introducing new ones.

Contact Rail

 Legend and Symbols  Typical Splice Joint Assembly  Typical End-Approach Assemblies  Typical Expansion Joint Assembly  Warning Sign Details  Coverboard Assembly  Pot Head Details  Typical Layouts for Standard Heavy Rail Crossovers

Train Control and Grade Crossings

 Symbols and Acronyms  Typical Switch Layouts  Typical Impedance Bond Installation and Details  Typical TWC Loop installation  Bonding Details  Signal Layout  Typical Route and Aspect Chart  Typical Crossing Plan  Crossing Warning System Details  Typical Local Control Panel Layout  Typical Cab Loop Installation

Communications

 Symbols and Acronyms  Typical Communications Block Diagrams for At-Grade, Aerial and Underground Stations  CCTV Installation Details  TPIS Installation Details  ETEL/PTEL/GTEL Details  System Grounding Details  EMP Layout

Exhibits 1 and 2 illustrate project drawings developed by WSP and Mott MacDonald for Metro projects that could easily be adapted for use as Standard Drawings.

All drawings will be signed and sealed, unless Metro elects to do so itself.

Page 6 of 10 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMS STANDARD DRAWINGS AND UPDATING OF METRO DESIGN CRITERIA

Exhibit 1 – Overhead Conductor Rail Uninsulated Overlap

Exhibit 2 – Typical Switch Layout: Direct Fixation Track

Page 7 of 10 Rev: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMS STANDARD DRAWINGS AND UPDATING OF METRO DESIGN CRITERIA

TASK ORDER PROPOSED ORGANIZATION CHART

METRO Project Manager TBD

Systems PM

M. Harris‐Gifford

Task Order Manager A. Patel

Project Controls CADD Various Various

Train Control Traction Power Contact Rail Communications OCS/OCR Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead D. Nguyen A. Shaikh M. Hsaio L. Mayola R. Blake

Train Control Traction Power OCS/OCR Contact Rail Communications RF Engineer Support Support Support Support Support R. Hillenbrand T. Pham A. Mezey T. Pham H. Pena D. Leung

Page 8 of 10 REV: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMS STANDARD DRAWINGS AND UPDATING OF METRO DESIGN CRITERIA

TASK ORDER SCHEDULE

Systems Standard Drawings ‐ System Staff FY 2019 FY 2020 2018 2019 Plan 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q INFORMATION GATHERING Stakeholder meetings Summarize List of Changes and Review with Metro Engineering IMPLEMENT METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA REVISIONS Section 9 – Systems Section 10 – Operations Section 12 – Safety, Security and Systems Assurance Section 4 (Guideway and Trackwork) Section 6 (Architectural) Section 7 (Electrical) Section 11 (Yard and Shops) Fire/Life Safety Criteria DEVELOPING SYSTEMS STANDARD DRAWINGS Traction Power 60% Overhead Catenary/Overhead Conductor Rail 60% Contact Rail 60% Train Control & Grade Crossings 60% Communications 60% Traction Power 90% Overhead Catenary/Overhead Conductor Rail 90% Contact Rail 90% Train Control & Grade Crossings 90% Communications 90% Traction Power 100% Overhead Catenary/Overhead Conductor Rail 100% Contact Rail 100% Train Control & Grade Crossings 100% Communications 100%

Page 9 of 10 REV: Draft EXAMPLE WORKPLAN: DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMS STANDARD DRAWINGS AND UPDATING OF METRO DESIGN CRITERIA

TASK ORDER RESOURCE LOADING CHART

Page 10 of 10 REV: Draft S uriga Epo ine ase irst or ed ine od ine irst ors S egiona urpe ine urpe ine ES it etro ue ine reen ine oyood asadena it etro od ine ooti onnector estside Section estside Section ransit orridor 1980 S arsons S S arsons S arsons 2010 S S S arsons S S 1990 1995 1999 2003 2016 2021 2024 2035 TBD

1993 1996 2000 2009 2012 2019 2023 2026 TBD TBD 1985 ed ine urpe ine ed ine od ine Epo ine rensa irport od ine ooti S range ine arsons S isire estern ort oyood Eastside ase ine onnector S arsons ransit orridor onversion irst ors S arsons S arsons S arsons S arsons S S urpe ine estside Section S S it etro S Completed Projects Future Projects MOS = Minimum Operable Segment Dates shown reflect line openings (source: metro.net)