DOCSLIB.ORG

Envisioning a Comprehensive Peace Agreement for Afghanistan for More Information on This Publication, Visit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Envisioning a Comprehensive Peace Agreement for Afghanistan for More Information on This Publication, Visit C O R P O R A T I O N LAUREL E. MILLER, JONATHAN S. BLAKE Envisioning a Comprehensive Peace Agreement for Afghanistan For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2937 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0407-7 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface In this report, we paint a detailed picture of a plausible final com- prehensive peace agreement for Afghanistan. The report includes analysis of realistic compromises, presented in the form of a complete peace agreement text. The authors produced the text on the basis of research on the interests and views of the conflict parties, comparative research on past peace agreements from around the world, and exten- sive consultations with officials, former officials, and experts associated with all the parties and with other interested governments. The work is intended to provide a source of concrete ideas regarding potential outcomes of a peace process for use by conflict party negotiators and others interested in encouraging a negotiated settlement of the war in Afghanistan. This research was sponsored by the government of a U.S. ally and conducted within the International Security and Defense Policy Center of the RAND National Security Research Division (NSRD). NSRD conducts research and analysis for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the defense agencies, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the U.S. Coast Guard, the U.S. Intelligence Community, allied foreign governments, and foundations. For more information on the RAND International Security and Defense Policy Center, see www.rand.org/nsrd/ndri/centers/isdp or contact the center director (contact information is provided on the webpage). iii Contents Preface ............................................................................. iii Summary .......................................................................... ix Abbreviations .................................................................. xxiii CHAPTER ONE Introduction ....................................................................... 1 Why We Present Our Analysis in Peace Agreement Form .................... 5 How We Developed the Peace Agreement ..................................... 7 Structure of This Report .......................................................... 9 CHAPTER TWO Core Substantive Issues to Address in a Peace Agreement for Afghanistan ..................................................................11 What Do the Parties Want? ......................................................12 Issues for the Negotiating Agenda ..............................................14 Ceasefire and Cessation of Hostilities ....................................................15 Foreign Military Presence.......................................................................15 Political Power-Sharing ..........................................................................16 Security Power-Sharing ..........................................................................17 Constitutional Reform ...........................................................................17 Transitional Arrangements .....................................................................18 Monitoring and Verification ...................................................................18 Implementation ......................................................................................19 The Regional Dimension of an Afghan Peace Process .......................19 How Detailed and Comprehensive Should the Peace Agreement Be? ......21 Limitations of a Peace Agreement ............................................. 24 v vi Envisioning a Comprehensive Peace Agreement for Afghanistan CHAPTER THREE A Comprehensive Peace Agreement ......................................... 27 Summary of Key Provisions .................................................... 27 Peace Agreement Text ............................................................31 CHAPTER FOUR Drawing on Past Experience: Comparative Analysis of Peace Agreements .................................................................. 97 Introduction ...................................................................... 97 Scope .................................................................................................... 97 Methodology ......................................................................................... 99 How Previous Agreements Can Inform an Afghan Peace Agreement .... 100 Ceasefire and Cessation of Hostilities ..................................................101 Foreign Military Presence.................................................................... 104 Political Power-Sharing ........................................................................114 Security Power-Sharing ...................................................................... 124 Constitutional Reform ........................................................................ 130 Monitoring and Verification .................................................................135 Implementation ....................................................................................138 Transitional Justice ...............................................................................140 Property and Land Conflicts ................................................................144 Conclusion ...........................................................................................150 CHAPTER FIVE Conclusion and Recommendations ........................................ 153 Does the Agreement Text Satisfy the Parties’ Goals and Avoid Their Redlines? .................................................................... 153 Key Risks of Implementation Failure ......................................... 156 Power-Sharing Could Exacerbate Afghanistan’s Political Fragility ........156 Clear Enough Transitional Security Arrangements Will Be Tough to Achieve ......................................................................................157 Implementation Probably Will Not Be Guaranteed by a Peacekeeping or Peace Enforcement Mission .................................158 Spoilers on All Sides Will Need to Be Contained .................................158 Transitional Government and Security Arrangements Could Become Stuck ................................................................................159 Contents vii Afghanistan Will Remain Vulnerable to the Effects of Contestation Between External Actors ...........................................159 Policy Recommendations ...................................................... 160 Aim for a Substantive Peace Agreement, Not a Process Roadmap ........160 Link the Internal and External Aspects of a Settlement ........................160 Draft Preferred Outcomes Early in the Negotiating Process .................161 Provide Expert Assistance for Shaping Negotiating Positions and Compromises .................................................................................161 Anticipate the Need for Donors to Help Fund Implementation ...........162 References: Peace Agreements and Related Documents ............... 163 References: Secondary Sources ............................................. 169 Summary Despite years of halting attempts to begin negotiating an end to the war in Afghanistan, none of the conflict parties has articulated more than the barest outlines of envisioned outcomes of a negotiation. Even as the prospects of a peace process gaining traction rose during 2019, the parties’ visions of a political settlement remained obscure and under developed. This lack of detailed analysis and policy spelling out the issues likely to arise in a peace process and proposing potential substantive solutions has been one of many obstacles to moving a pro- cess forward. Overcoming resistance on the part of conflict actors who have long been invested in prosecution of the war, or who fear what compromise with the enemy might bring, is made more difficult by the absence of depiction of a plausible political settlement. The pur- pose of the work presented in this report is to paint such a picture for policymakers on all sides of the conflict and for others interested in encouraging negotiations. To show concretely what the outcome of negotiations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Afghanistan, 1989-1996: Between the Soviets and the Taliban
    Afghanistan, 1989-1996: Between the Soviets and the Taliban A thesis submitted to the Miami University Honors Program in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for University Honors with Distinction by, Brandon Smith May 2005 Oxford, OH ABSTRACT AFGHANISTAN, 1989-1996: BETWEEN THE SOVIETS AND THE TALIBAN by, BRANDON SMITH This paper examines why the Afghan resistance fighters from the war against the Soviets, the mujahideen, were unable to establish a government in the time period between the withdrawal of the Soviet army from Afghanistan in 1989 and the consolidation of power by the Taliban in 1996. A number of conflicting explanations exist regarding Afghanistan’s instability during this time period. This paper argues that the developments in Afghanistan from 1989 to 1996 can be linked to the influence of actors outside Afghanistan, but not to the extent that the choices and actions of individual actors can be overlooked or ignored. Further, the choices and actions of individual actors need not be explained in terms of ancient animosities or historic tendencies, but rather were calculated moves to secure power. In support of this argument, international, national, and individual level factors are examined. ii Afghanistan, 1989-1996: Between the Soviets and the Taliban by, Brandon Smith Approved by: _________________________, Advisor Karen L. Dawisha _________________________, Reader John M. Rothgeb, Jr. _________________________, Reader Homayun Sidky Accepted by: ________________________, Director, University Honors Program iii Thanks to Karen Dawisha for her guidance and willingness to help on her year off, and to John Rothgeb and Homayun Sidky for taking the time to read the final draft and offer their feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Mission in the Central African Republic and Chad (MINURCAT) / European Union Force (EUFOR)
    United Nations Mission in the Central African Republic and Chad (MINURCAT) / European Union Force (EUFOR) Short Mission Brief I. Activity Summary: MINURCAT and EUFOR Overview The United Nations Mission in the Central African Republic and Chad (MINURCAT), active from 2007 through 2010, was challenged from the start by the Chadian government’s minimal consent for a UN presence, which precluded the political processes essential to successful peacekeeping and eventually forced the abrupt closure of the mission. Though MINURCAT and the associated European Union Force Chad/CAR (EUFOR Chad/CAR) represent an interesting example of peacekeeping partnerships, their work was limited largely to protection of civilians and security sector training activities, without the ability to address underlying causes of conflict and instability. Regional dynamics and the Chadian government’s adept maneuvering hindered the intervention’s success in protecting vulnerable populations. Background Chad and its political fortunes have been deeply affected by regional actors since its days as a French colony. Since Chad’s independence in 1960, France, Sudan, and Libya have provided patronage, arms, support to rebel groups, and peacekeepers. Chad has hosted around 1,000 French troops in N’Djamena since the end of the colonial regime, maintaining one of three permanent French African military bases in Chad’s capital city. French and Chadian leaders place a premium on their personal relationships with one another to this day. Chad was the first country to host a peacekeeping operation from the African Union’s precursor, the Organization of African Unity, in response to a civil war between the government of President Goukouni Oueddei and the Northern Armed Forces of former Vice President Hissène Habré.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of English in Afghan Language Policy Planning with Its Impact on National Integration (2001-2010)
    ROLE OF ENGLISH IN AFGHAN LANGUAGE POLICY PLANNING WITH ITS IMPACT ON NATIONAL INTEGRATION (2001-2010) By AYAZ AHMAD Area Study Centre (Russia, China & Central Asia) UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR (DECEMBER 2016) ROLE OF ENGLISH IN AFGHAN LANGUAGE POLICY PLANNING WITH ITS IMPACT ON NATIONAL INTEGRATION (2001-2010) By AYAZ AHMAD A dissertation submitted to the University of Peshawar in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (DECEMBER 2016) i AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I, Mr. Ayaz Ahmad hereby state that my PhD thesis titled “Role of English in Afghan Language Policy Planning with its Impact on National Integration (2001-2010)” is my own work and has not been submitted previously by me for taking any degree from this University of Peshawar or anywhere else in the country/world. At any time if my statement is found to be incorrect even after my graduation the University has the right to withdraw my PhD degree. AYAZ AHMAD Date: December 2016 ii PLAGIARISM UNDERTAKING I solemnly declare that research work presented in the thesis titled “Role of English in Afghan Language Policy Planning with its Impact on National Integration (2001-2010)” is solely my research work with no significant contribution from any other person. Small contribution/help wherever taken has been duly acknowledged and that complete thesis has been written by me. I understand the zero tolerance policy of the Higher Education Commission (HEC) and University of Peshawar towards plagiarism. Therefore I as an Author of the above-titled thesis declare that no portion of my thesis has been plagiarized and any material used as a reference is properly referred/cited.
    [Show full text]
  • (O) 617-794-9560 (M) [email protected]
    Curriculum Vitae - Thomas W. Concannon, Ph.D. Page 1 of 17 THOMAS W. CONCANNON, PH.D. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 920, The RAND Corporation, Boston, MA 02116 617-338-2059 x8615 (o) 617-794-9560 (m) [email protected] CURRICULUM VITAE February 2021 ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS AND ACTIVITIES APPOINTMENTS 2012-present Senior Policy Researcher, The RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts 2006-present Assistant Professor, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston Massachusetts 2015-present Co-Director, Stakeholder and Community Engagement Programs, Tufts Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute Boston, Massachusetts 2012-2017 Associate Director, Comparative Effectiveness Research Programs, Tufts Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute Boston, Massachusetts 2009-2010 Visiting Professor, Institute for Social Research, School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California Teaching: Comparative effectiveness research 2004-2006 Pre-Doctoral Fellow, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, 2002-2004 Research Analyst, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Dept. of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Boston, Massachusetts. 1996-2001 Staff Consultant, John Snow, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts. 1992-1996 Client Services Director, North Shore AIDS Health Project, Gloucester, Massachusetts. TRAINING 2006 Doctor of Philosophy in Health Policy. Dissertation: A Cost and Outcomes Analysis of Emergency Transport, Inter-Hospital Transfer and Hospital Expansion in Cardiac Care Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 1991 Master of Arts in Political Science. Concentration: political theory McGill University, Montreal, PQ, Canada 1988 International Study in history and philosophy Universität Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany 1988 Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, cum laude. Concentration: political theory University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA Curriculum Vitae - Thomas W.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Assessment
    AFGHANISTAN ASSESSMENT April 2001 Country Information and Policy Unit 1 CONTENTS I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 - 1.5 II GEOGRAPHY General 2.1 Languages 2.2 – 2.5 Economy 2.6 – 2.8 III HISTORY 1973 Coup d' État 3.1 – 3.2 1978-1992 3.3 – 3.11 1992-1994: Mujahidin Government 3.12 – 3.17 Emergence of the Taliban 3.18 – 3.21 February 1995-June 1996 3.22 – 3.23 September 1996-June 1997 3.24 – 3.31 August 1997-August 1998 3.32 – 3.40 September 1998-December 1999 3.41 – 3.47 January 2000-September 2000 3.48 – 3.52 October 2000-April 2001 3.53 – 3.59 IV INSTRUMENTS OF THE STATE 4.1 POLITICAL SYSTEM Constitution 4.1.1 Government 4.1.2 – 4.1.5 4.2 JUDICIAL SYSTEM Introduction 4.2.1 – 4.2.4 Taliban Territory 4.2.5 – 4.2.7 Northern Alliance Territory 4.2.8 – 4.2.9 4.3 SECURITY General 4.3.1 Taliban Territory 4.3.2 – 4.3.6 Northern Alliance Territory 4.3.7 – 4.3.8 V HUMAN RIGHTS 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5.1.1 – 5.1.4 5.2 GENERAL ASSESSMENT Torture 5.2.1 Detainees 5.2.2 – 5.2.7 Mazar-i-Sharif Massacres 5.2.8 – 5.2.9 Recruitment of Soldiers 5.2.10 – 5.2.11 2 Religious Police 5.2.12 – 5.2.14 5.3 SPECIFIC GROUPS General 5.3.1 – 5.3.2 Religious Minorities - Introduction 5.3.3 – 5.3.6 - Demography 5.3.7 - Shia Muslims 5.3.8 – 5.3.9 - Ismailis 5.3.10 - Sikhs and Hindus 5.3.11 – 5.3.13 Ethnic Groups - Introduction 5.3.14– 5.3.16 - Pashtuns 5.3.17 – 5.3.20 - Tajiks 5.3.21 – 5.3.23 - Hazaras 5.3.24 – 5.3.29 - Uzbeks and Turkomans 5.3.30 – 5.3.31 - Baluchis 5.3.32 - Nuristanis 5.3.33 - Panjsheris 5.3.34 Former Members of the PDPA Regime 5.3.35 – 5.3.42 Women 5.3.43 – 5.3.54
    [Show full text]
  • HIZB UT-TAHRIR Islam’S Political Insurgency
    HIZB UT-TAHRIR Islam’s Political Insurgency Zeyno Baran The Nixon Center December 2004 About the Nixon Center The Nixon Center is a non-partisan public policy institution established by former President Richard Nixon shortly before his death in 1994. Committed to the analysis of policy challenges to the United States through the prism of the American national interest, the Center is a substantively and programmatically independent division of the Richard Nixon Library and Birthplace Foundation. Major programs of The Nixon Center include the Chinese Studies Program, Immigration and National Security Forum, International Security and Energy Program, National Security Program, Regional Strategic Program, and U.S.- Russian Relations Program. Topics addressed by the Center’s programs range from U.S. relations with China and Russia to energy geopolitics in the Persian Gulf and Caspian Basin and European security issues. The Center is supported by the Nixon Library and Birthplace Foundation endowment as well as by foundation, corporate and individual donors. Copyright 2004 The Nixon Center. All Rights Reserved. “Hizb ut-Tahrir: Islam’s Political Insurgency” By Zeyno Baran The Nixon Center 1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 1250 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 887-1000 Fax: (202) 887-5222 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.nixoncenter.org Editing, Layout and Design by Thomas M. Rickers Order from the Richard Nixon Library and Birthplace Foundation 1-800-USA-8865 INTRODUCTORY NOTE This Nixon Center monograph, Hizb ut-Tahrir: Islam’s Political Insurgency, breaks new ground in exploring the danger posed by the spread of radical Islamist ideology. The focus of this monograph is Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islamiyya (The Islamic Party of Liberation), which has successfully sown the seeds of an ideology encouraging a clash of civilizations in over forty countries.
    [Show full text]
  • D-213 Contemporary Issues Collection
    This document represents a preliminary list of the contents of the boxes of this collection. The preliminary list was created for the most part by listing the creators' folder headings. At this time researchers should be aware that we cannot verify exact contents of this collection, but provide this information to assist your research. UC Davis Special Collections D-213 Contemporary Issues Collection * denotes items that were not in folders BOX 1 Movement for Economic Justice US Servicemen’s Fund Leftward Anarchos Liberated Librarians’ Newsletter Social Revolutionary Anarchist Liberation (2 folders) The Catalyst (New Orleans) Liberation Support Movement Counter-Spy Maine Indian Newsletter Esperanto Many Smokes Free Student Union *Missouri Valley Socialists Youth Liberation *Southern Student Organizing Committee *Free Speech Movement National Conference for New Politics The Gate National Strike Information Center Ghetto Cobra The New Voice (Sacramento) New York Federation of Anarchists OCLAE (foldered and loose) Group Research Report Organización Contental Latino-America de Estudiantes Head & Hand Open City Press Funds for Human Rights, Inc. *The Partisan *Independent Socialist *PL Berkeley News *Indians of Alcatraz Predawn Leftist *“International Journal” (Davis) D-213 Copyright ©2014 Regents of the University of California 1 *Radicals in the Professions *The Hunger Project *Something Else! (Formerly “Radicals in *The Town Forum Community Report the Professions”) Topics The Public Eye Underground/Alternative Press The Red Mole Service/Syndicate Agitprop Zephyros Education Exchange Undercoast Oil & Wine Red Spark The Turning Point The Red Worker Tribal Messenger The Republic Twin Cities Northern Sun Alliance Resist Newsletter Time for Answers Revolution The Second Page *Revolutionary Anarchist Second City Revolutionary Marxist Caucus Newsletter Seattle Helix Rights N.E.C.L.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging the Taliban's Quest for International Recognition
    Leveraging the Taliban’s Quest for International Recognition Afghan Peace Process Issues Paper March 2021 By Barnett R. Rubin Summary: As the United States tries to orchestrate a political settlement in conjunction with its eventual military withdrawal from Afghanistan, it has overestimated the role of military pressure or presence and underestimated the leverage that the Taliban’s quest for sanctions relief, recognition and international assistance provides. As the U.S. government decides on how and when to withdraw its troops, it and other international powers retain control over some of the Taliban’s main objectives — the removal of both bilateral and United Nations Security Council sanctions and, eventually, recognition of and assistance to an Afghan government that includes the Taliban. Making the most of this leverage will require coordination with the Security Council and with Afghanistan’s key neighbors, including Security Council members China, Russia and India, as well as Pakistan and Iran. In April 2017, in a meeting with an interagency team on board a military aircraft en route to Afghanistan, U.S. President Donald J. Trump’s new national security advisor, retired Army Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, dismissed the ongoing effort to negotiate a settlement with the Taliban: “The first step, the national security adviser said, was to turn around the trajectory of the conflict. The United States had to stop the Taliban’s advance on the battlefield and force them to agree to concessions in the process .... US talks with the Taliban would only succeed when the United States returned to a position of strength on the battlefield and was ‘winning’ against the insurgency.”1 1 Donati, Jessica.
    [Show full text]
  • Produced by the Human Security Centre Lead Author
    1 Human Security Centre – Written evidence (AFG0019) Produced by the Human Security Centre Lead Author: Simon Schofield, Senior Fellow, In consultation with Rohullah Yakobi, Associate Fellow 2 1 Table of Contents 2. Executive Summary .............................................................................5 3. What is the Human Security Centre?.....................................................10 4. Geopolitics and National Interests and Agendas......................................11 Islamic Republic of Pakistan ...................................................................11 Historical Context...............................................................................11 Pakistan’s Strategy.............................................................................12 Support for the Taliban .......................................................................13 Afghanistan as a terrorist training camp ................................................16 Role of military aid .............................................................................17 Economic interests .............................................................................19 Conclusion – Pakistan .........................................................................19 Islamic Republic of Iran .........................................................................20 Historical context ...............................................................................20 Iranian Strategy ................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Sikhs and Hindus
    Country Policy and Information Note Afghanistan: Sikhs and Hindus Version 5.0 May 2019 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the basis of claim section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment on whether, in general: x A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm x A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) x A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory x Claims are likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and x If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. Decision makers must, however, still consider all claims on an individual basis, taking into account each case’s specific facts. Country of origin information The country information in this note has been carefully selected in accordance with the general principles of COI research as set out in the Common EU [European Union] Guidelines for Processing Country of Origin Information (COI), dated April 2008, and the Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation’s (ACCORD), Researching Country Origin Information – Training Manual, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Pan-Arabism and the United Arab Republic by Michael Habib
    Pan-Arabism and the United Arab Republic by Michael Habib A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Wilkes Honors College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences with a Concentration in History Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University Jupiter, Florida May 2016 Pan-Arabism and the United Arab Republic By Michael Habib This thesis was prepared under the direction of the candidate’s thesis advisor, Dr. Christopher Ely, and has been approved by the members of his supervisory committee. It was submitted to the faculty of The Honors College and was accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences. SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: ___________________________ Dr. Christopher Ely ____________________________ Dr. Douglas McGetchin ______________________________ Dean Jeffrey Buller, Wilkes Honors College ____________ Date i ABSTRACT Author: Michael Habib Title: Pan-Arabism and the United Arab Republic Institution: Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University Thesis Advisor: Dr. Christopher Ely Degree: Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences Concentration: History Year: 2016 This thesis seeks to analyze Pan-Arabism through the lens of the United Arab Republic. I argue that even though the UAR faced many internal issues, it ultimately failed due to external pressures. I argue this to provide a new perspective on the Middle East and the Arab world, by showing how it came to be as it is. I organize my thesis into four chapters: I. Introduction: Arab Unity and its Limits, II. The Marriage of Syria and Egypt, III.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 4 the 1980S: OTHER DOMESTIC
    CHAPTER 4 THE 1980s: OTHER DOMESTIC 06 CHALLENGES -40 GENEVA CONVET\IIIONS COVEM10V, (.0":1:;:`;713\S NO ATTACK ON %sk $sk 1\10 ATIO 0% ,p, cz' r NO aTTACK ON A pi,iFfor;:i,t444:7, ANDPEACE LET LA4 AND PEACE PREVAIL! Demonstration against mass destruction : Snowballers at a Nuclear Base. — Wiltshire Times CHAPTER 4 THE 1980s: OTHER DOMESTIC INITIATIVES 4.1 Introduction In the early 1980s a plethora of citizen organisations, especially strong in the UK, began to focus on nuclear weapons and international law. Although the UK Lawyers for Nuclear Disarmament (LND) helped inspire groups of non-lawyers such as Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), the International Law Against War (INLAW), the Institute of Law and Peace (INLAP) and Pax Legalis to use international law, it did not survive long. MacBride was an early influence on all these groups, and initiated further projects with a final goal of obtaining a request for an International Court of Justice (ICJ) advisory opinion through the UN. A variety of groups in the Netherlands, West Germany, Canada and the US challenged their governments policies in the courts. Inspired by the Greenham Women and the Nuremberg (1983) and London (1985) Tribunals, they worked collectively with lawyers taking creative actions which included the development of legally binding Nuclear Free Zones (NFZs) in cities, ports and states. Over 100 citizen-initiated Tribunals were held in Japan; and several states banned visits by nuclear warships through legislation or their constitutions (see 5.4 and 5.5). This chapter highlights some of these initiatives to illustrate how by the end of the decade the ground was fertile for pursuing the World Court Project (WCP) internationally.
    [Show full text]