sign in sign up
<<
Home , Social system, Talcott Parsons

THE THEORIES OF THE THEORIES OF TALCOTT PARSONS

The Social Relations of Action

Stephen P. Savage

MACMILLANM PRESS LONOON © Stephen P. Savage 1981

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission

First edition 1981 Reprinted 1983

Published by THE MACMILLAN PRESS L TD London and Basingstoke Companies and representatives throughout the world

ISBN 978-0-333-36165-8 ISBN 978-1-349-06969-9 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-06969-9 To my Parents Contents

Acknowledgements IX List of Abbreviations x Introduction Xl

1 Modes of Critique and the Theoretical Analysis of Discourse 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 The Subject of Discourse as the Object of Critique 5 1.3 The Realist Mode of Critique 10 1.4 Epistemological Modes of Critique 16 1.5 Parsons' Mode of Reading in The Structure of Social Action: the Proof of the Validity of the Action Frame of Reference 24 1.6 Internal Modes of Critique 30 (i) Modes of Internal Critique of Parsons 31 (ii) The Althusserian for a Theory of Theoretical Production 48 1.7 Conclusion: the Concepts for the Analysis of Discourse 57 2 The of 'Analytical Realism' 62 2.1 Analytical Realism: Anti- and Anti- Fictionalism 64 2.2 The Theoretical Component of Analytical Realism 82 2.3 The 'Reality' Component of Analytical Realism 87 2.4 Conclusion 90 3 The Structure of Action: Parsons' Formulation of the Action Frame of Reference 91 3.1 Introduction 91 3.2 The 'Voluntaristic' Nature of Action: the of Free-will and Subjectivity 94 3.3 Action as Meaningful Behaviour: the Role of Values 105 vii Vlll Contents

(i) The Concept of Values: Indeterminacy at the Level of 106 (ii) The Symbolic Level of Culture and its Realis- ation in Action: Indeterminacy of Effectivity 111 3.4 Action as the Relation between the Ideational and Natural: and Contradiction 116 4 Action and the 'Three of Action': the Con- cept of Social Relations 128 4.1 Introduction 128 4.2 Action and 'Systems of Action' 128 4.3 Psychologism and 'Methodological Individualism' 132 4.4 Merton's 'Functional Paradigm' and 'Factor' Theories of Social Phenomena 138 4.5 Parsons' Theory of the Social 145 (i) The Concept of Power 147 (ii) The and its Conditions of Exist- ence: the Personality and Cultural Systems 154 5 The and the Social System 166 5.1 Economic Theory and 167 5.2 The Economy, 'Action' and the Theory of Social Systems 172 5.3 The Concept of Structural Differentiation 179 5.4 The Concept of Functional Subsystems 188 5.5 Conclusion 195 6 The Theory of Social Change and Social 196 6.1 Social Change and Structural-Functionalism 197 6.2 The Development of the Theory of Social Change 199 6.3 Social Change as Social Evolution 208 6.4 Parsons and Darwinism 218 6.5 Social Evolution as Teleology 222 6.6 , Culture and Social Evolution 226

Conclusion 234 Notes 236 Bibliography 251 Index 275 Acknowledgements

I would like to offer special thanks to Barry Hindess for his help prior to and throughout this work, and to all the others who have given useful comments on the various chapters. Thanks also to my wife, Carol, for her encouragement and help with typing the manuscripts.

ix List of Abbreviations

In the following chapters a number of references to Parsons' work have been abbreviated. They refer to the following texts:

SSA The Structure of Social Action Essays Essays in TGTA Toward a General Theory of Action SS The Social System WPTA Working Papers in the Theory of Action ES Economy and TS Theories of Society STMS Sociological Theory and Modern Society Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives SMS The System of Modern Societies PSS and

x Introduction

The chapters that follow constitute an attempt to develop a theoretical reading and critique of the work of Talcott Parsons. For all the acknowledgements regarding Parsons' apparent influence on contemporary (particularly American) sociology, there have been surprisingly few serious attempts to explain the mechanisms of Parsonian analysis. There have been even fewer theoretically-effective critical analyses of Parsons' work, and all too often critical commentaries have resorted to glib dismissal and uninformed polemic. This work aims to go some way to alleviating such a state of affairs. Three areas of necessary investigation stem from this objective. To begin with, some assessment of the achievements of existing criticisms of Parsonian theory must be made. Does, for example, the label 'consensus theorist' and its attendant accusations find support in the actualities of structural-functionalism? Is the claim that Parsonian theory effectively rules out any considera- tion of social change, conflict and deviance substantiable? These are questions which must be decisively approached. The second area of investigation follows on quite closely from the first one. No critical analysis of Parsons' work can ignore the relationship between his work and other major theoretical attempts to conceptualise the respective areas of investigation. Does Parsons, in fact, develop a distinct mode of social analysis or is his theory, as has been implied by some, a mishmash of earlier (incompatible) positions? In the arguments advanced in this volume comparisons between Parsons' theses and both early and subsequent sociological theories are made wherever applicable. The third, and most important, objective is to present a theoretical reading of the primary concepts of Parsonian theory and to offer a number of criticisms which, it is argued, reflect severe theoretical shortcomings. In order to achieve this I have broken Parsons' work down according to the major areas of his theory - the epistemology of analytical realism, the 'action' xi xu Introduction frame of reference, the theory of the social system and social relations, and the theory of social change and social evolution. In addition, I have included a separate chapter on the structural- functionalist theory of the economy, both as an illustration of the major distinctive features of Parsonian analysis and as a vehicle for developing a number of critical points. These three objectives, and particularly the third, constitute, therefore, the primary aim of this work. However, during the course of this study a fourth issue arose which warrants a separate discussion. In addition to questions on the extent to which various criticisms of Parsons (and others) actually find support in his statements, there is a more general issue which concerns critical analysis as a mode. A critique is not simply a number of discrete observations about an author's 'point of view' but a relation between a mode of analysis and the text, or texts, in question. It will be seen that it is possible to decipher a number of modes of analysis of theoretical discourse from the literature, and that not only are these quite often conflated and confused, but that each independently can be shown to induce a number of theoretical problems. Chapter 1 of this book is concerned with tackling the problem of modes of critique of discourse in general and is, in effect, a separate investigation altogether. One point should be made quite clear while discussing this issue. The opening discussion of this book is not intended to be an epistemological outline of the 'method' applied in the chapters that follow. It is not an attempt to define 'my' conception of knowledge as opposed to that maintained by others. In fact, as will be seen, it is not an attempt to define 'knowledge' at all, but is concerned with the (technical) problem of the mode of analysis of theoretical discourse. It aims above all to criticise a number of major modes of investigation of texts which dominate in the area and to present the elements of a mode of analysis which, it is argued, avoids similar traps. It must, therefore, be viewed as an exercise which is, in the final analysis, primarily negative. In the various discussions that follow, it will become apparent that I have chosen the more 'theoretical' components of Parsons' work as objects of investigation. These have been chosen in the main in favour of the many 'empirical' theses developed by Parsons. This is not to imply that the latter are irrelevant or simply expressions of the former, only to argue that the basic Introduction X III concepts and theories of Parsons' discourse must be the major concern of a work of this kind. The concepts of action, social system, functional prerequisites and so on provide the basis on which the empirical theses are maintained, and are therefore of primary importance. However, an analysis of these concepts is not, in itself, exhaustive of Parsons' work and there is a great deal of investigation still to be done in this respect. This is to say that the bias in the following chapters toward Parsons' most abstract arguments is not accidental.