DOCSLIB.ORG

Journal of Classical Sociology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Journal of Classical Sociology Journal of Classical Sociology http://jcs.sagepub.com/ This is social science: A 'patterned activity' oriented to attaining objective knowledge of human society Eric Malczewski Journal of Classical Sociology 2014 14: 341 originally published online 22 August 2013 DOI: 10.1177/1468795X13495124 The online version of this article can be found at: http://jcs.sagepub.com/content/14/4/341 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Journal of Classical Sociology can be found at: Email Alerts: http://jcs.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://jcs.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://jcs.sagepub.com/content/14/4/341.refs.html >> Version of Record - Oct 21, 2014 OnlineFirst Version of Record - Aug 22, 2013 What is This? Downloaded from jcs.sagepub.com by guest on October 21, 2014 JCS14410.1177/1468795X13495124Journal of Classical SociologyMalczewski 4951242013 Article Journal of Classical Sociology 2014, Vol. 14(4) 341 –362 This is social science: © The Author(s) 2013 Reprints and permissions: A ‘patterned activity’ sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1468795X13495124 oriented to attaining objective jcs.sagepub.com knowledge of human society Eric Malczewski Harvard University, USA Abstract The aim of this article is to demonstrate that approaching social science as a ‘patterned activity’ draws attention both to the distinctive nature of social science and to its central subject matter – meaningful (symbolically oriented) behavior and theoretical entities based on it – enabling therefore a constructive perspective on the major debate regarding social science’s organizing principles. A patterned activity is defined as a cluster of behavior oriented to a basic (that is, characteristic or defining) goal or aim accorded value; the goal or aim, by which the norms of the patterned activity are bounded, is the satisfaction of a certain appetite, desire, or need. The concept of a patterned activity is rooted in and developed from elements of Max Weber’s methodological writings. This concept is evaluated against Clifford Geertz’s ‘cultural systems’ approach and Robert K. Merton’s view of the norms of science, and the article then addresses the legacy of Talcott Parsons more generally. Lastly, Émile Durkheim’s and Weber’s respective approaches to social science are assessed so as to illuminate their views regarding its central subject matter and to demonstrate a convergence of their views. Keywords Durkheim, Geertz, epistemology, meaning, Merton, methodology, Parsons, patterned activity, Science, social science, theory, Weber The debate concerning social science’s organizing principles and central subject matter has endured for almost two centuries. In the beginning (which is as early as 1813), Claude Henri de Rouvroy, Count of Saint-Simon, offered in his nascent science de l’homme a perspective on this matter that he hoped would not only constitute a coherent approach Corresponding author: Eric Malczewski, Lecturer on Social Studies, The Committee on Degrees in Social Studies, Harvard University, 59 Shepard Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Email: [email protected] Downloaded from jcs.sagepub.com by guest on October 21, 2014 342 Journal of Classical Sociology 14(4) to distinctively human (or ‘social’) phenomena but would also bridge science with the approach of speculative philosophy, resulting in objective knowledge of man and societies (Garnham, 2007; Gouldner, 1958; Saint-Simon, 1952). Saint-Simon’s perspective entailed approaching ideas as positive phenomena – that is, as observed and examined facts – and this approach, in his view, would unify the activities of science and philosophy by sub- jecting systems of ideas to empirical scrutiny and would put an end to what appeared to be science’s and speculative philosophy’s apparently irreconcilable epistemological differ- ences. The intellectual purchase obtained by Saint-Simon’s positively grounded approach entailed the possibility of progress, distinguishing his science de l’homme from the non- constructive modes of thought that he attributed to the philosophes (Harris, 2001: 59; also see Marcuse, 1960 [1941]: 327). Remarking on the thought of this key figure in the history of social science, Émile Durkheim argued that for Saint-Simon it is the idea, or knowledge, that is the positive source of all social life and that is the motive force behind all progress or social change (1958: 90-91; also see 1928): that is to say that positively grounded (that is, empirically established and, therefore, observable) ideas are the characteristic basic set of facts that distinguish Saint-Simon’s science of man and societies from the early nineteenth century’s established sciences of chemistry, astronomy, and physics. This contribution is signal: Saint-Simon sought to define the empirical field of human distinctiveness and to bring to bear on it an approach to explanation capable of producing objective knowledge. Saint-Simon’s approach, as is well known, did not meet with success – and two centuries later the definition of the field of human distinctiveness remains contested (see Abbott, 2004: 41–79; Alexander, 1988; Alexander and Seidman, 1990; Alexander and Smith, 2010; Bunge, 1998; Friedman, 2004; Malczewski, 2013; Pascale, 2010; Sewell, 2005a; Tilly, 2005), leading the sociologist Liah Greenfeld to argue that the paradigm of the social sciences does not focus on humanity (Greenfeld, 2004, 2005b; also see Friedman, 2004: 144) and the historian William H. Sewell, Jr to ask seriously the elementary question ‘What do we mean by the “social” in “social science”?’ (2005a: 318). Contributing to this major debate, the late sociologist Charles Tilly (2005) argued that three types of approaches or metatheories – systemic, dispositional, and transactional (or relational) – account for the several ways in which what is gener- ally recognized as social science has developed (2005; also see Bunge, 1996, 1998, whose individualism–holism–systemism trilemma echoes this in certain ways).1 Tilly sees these three approaches to explanation as contradictory, as building on differing ontological grounds with differing analytical tools: the nature and causes of social processes hence are seen to differ essentially (2005: especially 14–15 and 25–27) – and the definition of social science’s central subject matter and explanatory framework remains in abeyance. Jeffrey Alexander’s extensive analysis (1982, 1987) reveals, moreover, that postwar sociological debate largely does not illuminate the basic pre- suppositions informing theoretical logic in sociology (1982: 1–64), and it suggests that reliance on residual categories masks fundamental problems (such as the lack of a general framework) that derive from a lack of engagement with the level of basic pre- suppositions. What these views demonstrate most strikingly is that what we know as ‘social science’ is a fractured entity, and, what is also striking, the scope of empirical evidence is restricted to such an extent that it is fair to claim that social scientific the- ory in its generality rests on an ad hoc use of evidence. Downloaded from jcs.sagepub.com by guest on October 21, 2014 Malczewski 343 The key to addressing the problem concerning the central subject matter of social sci- ence is discovering an approach that permits a move from proliferating isolated metathe- ories to a general theory that explains the central subject matter of the social sciences. This subject matter, emphatically, first must be defined. I agree with Talcott Parsons (1990: 326) – and Durkheim before him (1937 [1895], 1978b [1909]) – that a definition is at least the prolegomenon of a theory. The elementary condition for a theory that resolves the anomalies manifest in our fractured social science is the specification of the basic or elemental set of facts – for facts never proclaim themselves – that distinguishes ‘social’ science from the other special sciences. My aim here is to take a step forward in the direction of defining the central subject matter of the social sciences by helping to make salient the importance of circumscribing the elemental phenomena against which we can test competing theories: to this end, this article examines social science from the standpoint of a ‘patterned activity’ in order to highlight the essential connection between the aims of social science and the definition of its central empirical phenomena. Understanding the organizing principles of social science from the perspective of a patterned activity can help us to simplify the structures of theories that currently pass under the term ‘social science’ by making clear social sci- ence’s central subject matter, thereby offering a solution to the crisis of identity that has plagued the social sciences. Social science, in this way, can rise unitarily from the same ontological ground. The next section begins with a discussion of the concept of a patterned activity. The difference between this concept and Clifford Geertz’s ‘cultural systems’ is discussed, before the article segues to an assessment of the improvement that the concept of a pat- terned activity offers over Robert K. Merton’s view of the norms of science. The legacy of Parsons is then addressed more generally. A discussion on the necessity of establishing complementarity between scientific claims and their objects follows. Then, I present my argument that social
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE WILLIAM G. STAPLES Department of Sociology University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7556 785.864.9414 [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D., Sociology, University of Southern California, 1987 M.A., Sociology, University of Southern California, 1984 B.S., Sociology, University of Oregon, 1980 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Affiliated Faculty, Center for Global and International Studies, 2009-present Visiting Professor, University of Trento, Trento, Italy, May 2008. Visiting Professor, Ivan Franko University, L’viv, Ukraine, May-June 2005, 2006 Professor of Sociology, University of Kansas, 2000-present Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Kansas, 1994-2000 Affiliated Faculty, American Studies Program, University of Kansas, 1992-present Assistant Professor of Sociology, University of Kansas, 1989-1994 Assistant Adjunct Professor of Sociology, UCLA, 1987-1989 National Institute of Mental Health, Post-Doctoral Fellow, UCLA, 1987-1989 ADMINISTRATIVE APPOINTMENTS Department Chair, Department of Sociology, University of Kansas, 2016- Founding Director, Surveillance Studies Research Center, Institute for Policy & Social Research, University of Kansas, 2013-present Department Chair, Department of Sociology, University of Kansas, 2002-2012 Senior Administrative Fellow, University of Kansas, 2005-2006 Executive Committee, Hall Center for the Humanities, 2002-2004 Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Sociology, 1996-1999 AWARDS AND HONORS 2016-2017 Paul and Hele Waddle Roofe Professor of Sociology 2014-2019 Member, Fulbright Senior Specialists Program 2012 KU College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Craig Anthony Arnold Faculty Innovation Award 2011 Balfour Jeffrey Research Award in Humanities and Social Sciences. One of four Higuchi-KU Endowment Research Achievement Awards, the most prestigious state-wide research honors for faculty at Kansas Board of Regents institutions Curriculum Vitae-William G.
    [Show full text]
  • Durkheim Lulu4 Defdefdef QUATTRO Watermerk
    Chapter 1. A century of commentary and debate around Durkheim and Les Formes Élémentaires de la Vie Religieuse 1.1. Introduction As is to be expected in regard of a ‘Founding Father’ of the social sciences, the international literature around Durkheim is enormous. I cannot be expected to present here a full discussion even of the religiously relevant aspects of that literature. However, some selective treatment is imperative so as to provide the necessary background for the chapters that are to follow. I shall first briefly situate Durkheim in his time and age, with special emphasis on his political views and his ethnic identity as a secularised Jew. Then we turn to Durkheim’s relation with the discipline in which he was originally trained, philosophy, and articulate his transition to sociology. Our focus in the present book is upon Les Formes Élémentaires de la Vie Religieuse , and we shall have a look at that book’s contents and method, before turning to its specific commentators, both shortly after its publication, and then in the course of the 20th c. CE and up to the present. We will conclude with a brief indication of where we will go after this first chapter. 47 1.2. Durkheim against the background of his time and age 1.2.1. Durkheim’s political views Durkheim had a keen eye for the political developments in his native country, France, at the time. During his lifetime (1858-1917) that country went through a period of restored monarchy under Napoleon III, was defeated in the war with Prussia (1870), knew internal turmoil (the Commune de Paris ) which ended in the Third Republic, and after a period of relative prosperity, bliss and colonial expansion in Africa and Asia, was drawn into World War I (1914-1918).
    [Show full text]
  • Systems Theory
    1 Systems Theory BRUCE D. FRIEDMAN AND KAREN NEUMAN ALLEN iopsychosocial assessment and the develop - nature of the clinical enterprise, others have chal - Bment of appropriate intervention strategies for lenged the suitability of systems theory as an orga - a particular client require consideration of the indi - nizing framework for clinical practice (Fook, Ryan, vidual in relation to a larger social context. To & Hawkins, 1997; Wakefield, 1996a, 1996b). accomplish this, we use principles and concepts The term system emerged from Émile Durkheim’s derived from systems theory. Systems theory is a early study of social systems (Robbins, Chatterjee, way of elaborating increasingly complex systems & Canda, 2006), as well as from the work of across a continuum that encompasses the person-in- Talcott Parsons. However, within social work, sys - environment (Anderson, Carter, & Lowe, 1999). tems thinking has been more heavily influenced by Systems theory also enables us to understand the the work of the biologist Ludwig von Bertalanffy components and dynamics of client systems in order and later adaptations by the social psychologist Uri to interpret problems and develop balanced inter - Bronfenbrenner, who examined human biological vention strategies, with the goal of enhancing the systems within an ecological environment. With “goodness of fit” between individuals and their its roots in von Bertalanffy’s systems theory and environments. Systems theory does not specify par - Bronfenbrenner’s ecological environment, the ticular theoretical frameworks for understanding ecosys tems perspective provides a framework that problems, and it does not direct the social worker to permits users to draw on theories from different dis - specific intervention strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Unboxing the Sharing Economy
    March 2018 The Sociological Review Monographs Series | March 2018 Unboxing the Sharing Economy: The Sociological Review Monographs Series Opportunities and Risks of the Era of Collaboration The idea of a rising ‘sharing economy’ is currently a hot topic in an international debate that builds on the emergence of peer-to-peer network exchanges that rely more on access than on property, on relations more than on appropriation, to call into question the sociological understanding of the relationship between the society and the market that goes back to authors such as Polanyi, Marx and Sombart. The aim of this monograph is therefore to bring together a selection Unboxing the of contributions that will help identify the analytical categories and indicators needed to interpret this phenomenon from a sociological perspective on a global scale. Through a collection of original empirical Sharing Economy: research on this topic, from Western and non-Western contexts, by both established and junior scholars and experts, this monograph will make a pivotal contribution to the study of what themes, methods and Opportunities and Risks of the Era issues characterise the rise of ‘sharing’ as a socio-economic model and a new frontier of sociological research. In particular, this monograph of Collaboration aims to answer the following questions: what do we mean with ‘sharing economy’? What kind of positive innovations or possible criticalities might this socio-economic model bring? Does ‘sharing’ really represent an alternative to capitalism, or an example
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Systems Theory?
    What is Systems Theory? Systems theory is an interdisciplinary theory about the nature of complex systems in nature, society, and science, and is a framework by which one can investigate and/or describe any group of objects that work together to produce some result. This could be a single organism, any organization or society, or any electro-mechanical or informational artifact. As a technical and general academic area of study it predominantly refers to the science of systems that resulted from Bertalanffy's General System Theory (GST), among others, in initiating what became a project of systems research and practice. Systems theoretical approaches were later appropriated in other fields, such as in the structural functionalist sociology of Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann . Contents - 1 Overview - 2 History - 3 Developments in system theories - 3.1 General systems research and systems inquiry - 3.2 Cybernetics - 3.3 Complex adaptive systems - 4 Applications of system theories - 4.1 Living systems theory - 4.2 Organizational theory - 4.3 Software and computing - 4.4 Sociology and Sociocybernetics - 4.5 System dynamics - 4.6 Systems engineering - 4.7 Systems psychology - 5 See also - 6 References - 7 Further reading - 8 External links - 9 Organisations // Overview 1 / 20 What is Systems Theory? Margaret Mead was an influential figure in systems theory. Contemporary ideas from systems theory have grown with diversified areas, exemplified by the work of Béla H. Bánáthy, ecological systems with Howard T. Odum, Eugene Odum and Fritj of Capra , organizational theory and management with individuals such as Peter Senge , interdisciplinary study with areas like Human Resource Development from the work of Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrosophic Modeling of Talcott Parsons's Action and Decision-Making Applications for It
    S S symmetry Article Neutrosophic Modeling of Talcott Parsons’s Action and Decision-Making Applications for It Cahit Aslan 1 , Abdullah Kargın 2,* and Memet ¸Sahin 2 1 Department of Sociology, Psychology and Philosophy Teaching, Education Faculty, Çukurova University, Balcali, 01330 Saricam/Adana, Turkey; [email protected] 2 Department of Mathematics, Gaziantep University, 27310 Gaziantep, Turkey; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +90-055-4270-6621 Received: 15 May 2020; Accepted: 3 July 2020; Published: 13 July 2020 Abstract: The grand theory of action of Parsons has an important place in social theories. Furthermore, there are many uncertainties in the theory of Parsons. Classical math logic is often insufficient to explain these uncertainties. In this study, we explain the grand theory of action of Parsons in neutrosociology for the first time. Thus, we achieve a more effective way of dealing with the uncertainties in the theory of Parsons as in all social theories. We obtain a similarity measure for single-valued neutrosophic numbers. In addition, we show that this measure of similarity satisfies the similarity measure conditions. By making use of this similarity measure, we obtain applications that allow finding the ideal society in the theory of Parsons within the theory of neutrosociology. In addition, we compare the results we obtained with the data in this study with the results of the similarity measures previously defined. Thus, we have checked the appropriateness of the decision-making application that we obtained. Keywords: neutrosociology; modeling of grand theory of action of Talcott Parsons; single-valued neutrosophic number; measure of similarity; decision-making applications 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 052165145X - Epistemology and Practice: Durkheim’s The Elementary Forms of Religious Life Anne Warfield Rawls Frontmatter More information Epistemology and Practice In this original and controversial book Professor Rawls argues that Durkheim’s The Elementary Forms of Religious Life is the crowning achievement of his sociological endeavour and that since its publica- tion in English in 1915it has been consistently misunderstood. Rather than a work on primitive religion or the sociology of knowledge, Rawls asserts that it is an attempt by Durkheim to establish a unique epistemo- logical basis for the study of sociology and moral relations. By privileging social practice over beliefs and ideas, it avoids the dilemmas inherent in philosophical approaches to knowledge and morality that are based on individualism and the tendency to treat concepts as the limit of knowl- edge, both tendancies that dominate western thought. Based on detailed textual analysis of the primary text, this book will be an important and original contribution to contemporary debates on social theory and philosophy. Anne Warfield Rawls is Associate Professor of Sociology at Bentley College, Waltham, Massachusetts. She has a background in both sociol- ogy and philosophy and has published extensively on social theory and social justice. © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 052165145X - Epistemology and Practice: Durkheim’s The Elementary Forms of Religious Life Anne Warfield Rawls Frontmatter More information
    [Show full text]
  • Sociological Perspectives on the Ecological Model
    The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Volume 8 Issue 4 December Article 4 December 1981 Sociological Perspectives on the Ecological Model Ronald Mancoske University of Alabama Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw Part of the Social Work Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Mancoske, Ronald (1981) "Sociological Perspectives on the Ecological Model," The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 8 : Iss. 4 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol8/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you by the Western Michigan University School of Social Work. For more information, please contact [email protected]. -710- SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE ECOLOGICAL MODEL Ronald Mancoske University of Alabama ABSTRACT Germain and Siporin have written social work practice texts which seek to integrate diverse material into practice through an ecological model. Part of the integration deals with the issue of micro-macro practice which has been a dichotomous issue throughout social work traditions. Four perspectives which Kemeny used to analyze a similar dichotomy in sociology offer insights and caveats for social work to consider as it uses general systems theory as a framework for practice. The four perspectives are called the competitive, the inclusive, the ex- clusive, and the cumulative. This paper traces similar develop- mental notions in the sociological literature and notes ideas of possible interest to social work. The challange of social work professionalism is to incorpo- rate into practice the skills and knowledge acquired from experience in helping people and also the knowledge base of the social sciences in order to enhance practice effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Goffman, Parsons, and the Negational Self Prof
    Goffman, Parsons, and the Negational Self Prof. James J. Chriss, PhD Department of Sociology and Criminology, Cleveland State University, Ohio, USA Abstract Erving Goffman’s emphasis on impression management in everyday life means that for the most part persons offer only partial or incomplete glimpses of themselves. Indeed, under specifiable conditions self-presentations may take the form of a negational self. If negational selves exist at the person or individual level, then they must also exist at the collective level (that is, if we are to take seriously such notions as the social mind, collective representations, or even culture). Understandings of how this negational self appears and is produced at various analytical levels (micro, meso, and macro) can be anchored via a conceptual schema which merges Goffman’s own identity typology with the three-world model of Jürgen Habermas by way of Talcott Parsons. Keywords: negational self; indentity; Goffman; Parsons; Habermas; self; me and I; three worlds theory Introduction The negational self is a self by default, in that public social encounters rarely afford persons the opportunity to positively affirm their own selves (Chriss 1999a). Rather, for the most part persons are busily framing themselves from view, offering only limited glimpses of a “true” self through indirect and sometimes obfuscatory devices and strategies such as role distance, deference, modesty, accommodation, face and face- saving, and body glosses to name a few. The first part of the paper will summarize the symbolic interactionist perspective on the self. Although many observers suggest that Goffman falls squarely in the Meadian line regarding the social psychology of the self, through this brief survey it will be demonstrated that Goffman’s work is imbued with enough structuralist and functionalist elements to render such an easy alignment with standard social psychology problematic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cybernetic Delirium of Norbert Wiener
    The Cybernetic Delirium of Norbert Wiener Stephen Pfohl June 1997 [M]y delirium assumed the form of a particular mixture of depression and worry... anxiety about the logical status of my... work. It was impossible for me to distinguish among my pain and difficulty in breathing, the flapping of the window curtain, and certain as yet unresolved points of the potential problem on which I was working. I cannot say that the pain revealed itself as a mathematical tension, or that the mathematical tension symbolized itself as a pain : for the two were united too closely to make such a separation significant. However, when I reflected on this matter later, I became aware of the possibility that almost any experience may act as a temporary symbol for a mathematical situation which has not yet been organized and cleared up. I also came to see more definitely than I had before that one of the chief motives driving me to mathematics was the discomfort or even the pain of an unresolved mathematical discord. I even became more and more conscious of the need to reduce such a discord to semipermanent and recognizable terms before I could release it and pass on to something else. -- Norbert Wiener [1] All around me, inside me, flowing through me, between me and others, it is easy to discern signs of the flexible, mass marketing of cybernetic delirium. This is a delirium associated with both cyber-products and cyber- experience. "Cyber-this" and "cyber-that". Its hard to do the ritual of the check-out line these days, without some magnetic cyber-commodity-connectors wrapping their seductive sensors, cheek to cheek, in feedback loops with yours.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Science 597 Contentious Politics1 Fall 2020
    Political Science 597 Contentious Politics1 Fall 2020 Tuesdays 1:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. Zoom Prof. Lee Ann Banaszak Office Hours: W 2 p.m.- 4p.m. Remote only and by appointment E-Mail: [email protected] COURSE DESCRIPTION Social movements, protest, revolutions, contentious politics: despite the differing labels these phenomena are often explored by a cohesive group of scholars. This course explores the nature of these forms of political behavior. We will look at the major theories that sociologists and political scientists have created to explain the mobilization and outcomes of social movements. How do we explain why people participate in protest or other types of social movements? Why is it that some people never revolt although observers would say they are as bad off as others that do? What sorts of factors determine the tactics people will use once they decide something must be done? Can governments repress revolutions or social movements? What determines whether a social movement or revolution is successful? We will also critically assess theories and concepts. Are these theories and concepts well defined? What are the mechanisms by which they operate and the scope conditions where they are found? How can we best assess competing theories? In examining these questions, we will read theoretical works, quantitative studies comparing many different social movements and case studies of particular social movements and revolutions comparatively but also in the United States. By the end of this course, you should have a good grasp of the theoretical debates about social movements, the methods which have been used to study social movements, and you will have cursory knowledge of several different revolutions and social movements ranging from the East German 1989 revolution to the American women’s movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociology of the Body (SOCY 79.6) MWF 11:15-12:20 Silsby 119 Prof
    Sociology of the Body (SOCY 79.6) MWF 11:15-12:20 Silsby 119 Prof. Piper Coutinho-Sledge [email protected] Office Silsby 109 Office Hours M 12:30-1:30, F 10-11, or by appointment Course Description Can social life exist without bodies? How can attention to the body influence our understanding of social processes of subjectivity, interaction, and practice? While the body has long been an "absent presence" in sociology, multiple approaches to theorizing and researching the body have emerged in recent decades. A sociological approach to the body and embodiment provides an opportunity to bridge the gap between everyday experience and analyses of broad social structures which can seem disconnected from daily life. In this course, we will examine the processes by which individual bodies are shaped by and, in turn, shape social life. Key questions to be explored include: how are bodies regulated by social forces; how do individuals perform the body and how does interactional context influence this performance; what is the meaning of the body in social life; and is there a "right" body? Course Requirements This is primarily a reading seminar. All required readings will be available on Blackboard. Some readings my change over the course of the quarter. All changes will be announced in class and on Blackboard. It is your responsibility to check Blackboard for course related announcements. Students are expected to attend each class meeting and should come to each class prepared to discuss the material in depth. Class time will include full and small group discussions.
    [Show full text]