DOCSLIB.ORG

1.0 Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1.0 INTRODUCTION This Environmental Project Report assesses the effects of the proposed Downtown Ottawa Transit Tunnel (DOTT) project on the social, physical and natural environments. The City of Ottawa, as proponent, has prepared this Environmental Project Report in accordance with the Province of Ontario’s Transit Project Assessment Process (Regulation 231/08 under the Ontario’s Environmental Assessment Act). This section provides the background and overview of the study including location and rationale for the proposed project, relationship of the proposed project to other transportation-related studies and an outline of the entire report contents. Sections Include: 1.1 Project Description 1.2 Purpose of the Project 1.3 Study Background 1.4 Relationship with Other Studies, Projects and Future Undertakings 1.5 Report Organization 1-1 1.1 Project Description and vehicles to service these lines, as well as bus rapid transit electric light rail transit from Tunney's Pasture Station to Blair Ottawa's Transportation Master Plan (TMP) contains a vision technology and additional bus lanes. Figure 1-1 illustrates the Station along the Transitway and through a tunnel underneath for transit to be developed by 2031. In the first phase, the City planned rapid transit network for the City of Ottawa, out to the the downtown core. of Ottawa will invest in 40 km of new light rail transit (LRT) year 2031. The cornerstone and first phase of this plan is to run Figure 1-1: TMP Rapid Transit Network 1-2 The Downtown Ottawa Transit Tunnel (DOTT): Tunney’s The most important feature of the project involves construction this segment of the City’s rapid transit network to the year 2031 Pasture to Blair Station via a Downtown LRT Tunnel, will see of a new LRT tunnel to replace the existing on-street BRT and beyond. the conversion of part of the current rapid transit system (The operation which uses reserved bus lanes in the Albert and Slater Transitway) serving the City of Ottawa from Bus Rapid Transit Street corridors. The tunnel will allow for improved transit Figure 1-2 illustrates the proposed LRT alignment, station (BRT) to electric Light Rail Transit (LRT) technology. operations by separating transit from other traffic, and provide locations and Maintenance and Storage Facility site. increased transit capacity needed to meet forecasted ridership on Figure 1-2: Study Area and Major Project Features 1-3 1.1.1 LRT Alignment and Stations A detailed description of the planned Maintenance and Storage downtown, such as a tunnel. In the late 1980s a study was The DOTT project is comprised of approximately 12.5 km of Facility is contained in Section 9.0 of this report. undertaken to examine the feasibility of grade separating the new electrified light rail transit, between Tunney's Pasture and Transitway through the Central Area linking the existing Blair Stations, primarily on the existing Transitway corridor. 1.2 Purpose of the Project East/Southeast and West/Southwest Transitways. The study Thirteen (13) LRT stations are planned along this route, The purpose of the project is to improve Ottawa’s existing rapid examined both above and below-ground alternatives as well as including four (4) underground stations serving downtown and transit network by implementing the first priority project alternative alignments and station configurations in the Central the University of Ottawa in a new 3.2 km long LRT tunnel. identified in the City’s TMP. This will provide needed rapid Area. Regional Council decided to continue with further transit capacity through the downtown area to alleviate existing extension of the bus Transitway as the first priority, leaving the The LRT tunnel will run from east of the existing LeBreton bus congestion issues and accommodate forecasted population expensive grade separation of the downtown section until it was Station across the downtown core area until it reaches the area and employment growth to the year 2031 and beyond. The required. Planning for Ottawa’s BRT system also recognized around the Rideau Centre shopping mall. It will then curve conversion of the existing BRT corridor to LRT technology and the likelihood of the eventual need to convert from BRT to LRT south easterly and reach grade at the eastern portal, located the construction of a LRT tunnel under the downtown will bring technology. As such, many elements of the existing Transitway north of the existing Lees Station. East and west of the a faster, more efficient, and environmentally-friendly transit have been designed and constructed to allow future conversion downtown tunnel the existing Transitway will be converted system to Ottawa. to LRT technology, as is currently contemplated. from bus rapid transit to light rail transit technology. Conversion of the existing Transitway represents approximately The existing Bus Rapid Transit service through downtown 1.3.1 Prior Planning Work 9 km of the total 12.5 km length of the alignment. accommodates over 10,000 riders, per direction, during peak On 12 September 2007, Ottawa City Council directed staff to hours. Currently, this transit service is limited to approximately initiate a Planning and Environmental Assessment (EA) study 1-4 A more detailed description of the planned LRT alignment and 180 buses an hour per direction as the on-street BRT operation for the Downtown Ottawa Transit Tunnel (DOTT). This stations is contained in Section 9.0 of this report. in the downtown is limited by the capacity of the signalized decision was based in large part on findings of the Mayor’s Task intersections along the corridor. These intersections must satisfy Force on Transportation, which was formed in 2007 to re-examine 1.1.2 Maintenance and Storage Facility competing demand for buses, traffic, pedestrians and cyclists the City’s public-transit needs and priorities and make recommendations for immediate, short, medium and long-term To support operation of the line, a Maintenance and Storage travelling along and across the corridor. Increasingly, development of an integrated rapid-transit plan for the City. A Facility will be required to: house the new light rail vehicles downtown Ottawa’s transit system is plagued by delays due to downtown transit tunnel was central to the Task Force’s plan, (LRVs) which will run on the line; maintain the LRVs running general traffic conflicts, accidents, inclement weather and special with the recommendation that the City move forward with its on the line, and on future extensions to the City’s LRT network, events. The unreliability of transit downtown ripples through construction as a priority. and; provide maintenance, signalling, communication and the system, causing dissatisfaction as riders are unable to control facilities needed for safe operation of the line and the accurately determine their travel time in advance. Effectively, Subsequently, the Statement of Work for the transit tunnel City’s entire LRT network. the existing rapid transit system has reached its capacity through study was approved at a joint City of Ottawa Transportation the downtown to serve neighbourhoods within the Greenbelt and Transit Committee meeting on 21 November 2007, which The site of the Maintenance and Storage Facility is located and surrounding communities. The system will no longer be identified the scope of the study and the level of effort to immediately south of the proposed LRT alignment, in the able to expand service to meet projected demand beyond 2018. undertake the work. The DOTT Planning and Environmental vicinity of the existing OC Transpo St. Laurent bus maintenance 1.3 Study Background Study was initiated in June 2008. The timing of a downtown and garage complex. A connecting track under Belfast Road and tunnel option was discussed in the context of the TMP and the VIA Rail corridor will be required to link the Maintenance Transit capacity in downtown Ottawa has been a topic of strategic rapid transit network development (See Section 3.0). It and Storage Facility with the DOTT line. discussion for many years. Even during the initial planning for was acknowledged that an electrified light rail transit tunnel was Ottawa’s BRT system in the mid-1970s, the former Regional Municipality of Ottawa-Carleton suggested the eventual need an important component in addressing transit service for a grade separated rapid transit facility through the improvements required now and in the future. Originally, the DOTT study area spanned from Bayview Station project (the Transit Project). The DOTT study is the City’s first network identified in the TMP is the construction of a tunnel through the downtown core, between Wellington Street and project to follow the expedited maximum six-month across downtown Ottawa, which is needed to provide additional Laurier Avenue West, to King Edward Avenue (and Environmental Assessment process for transit projects. Ontario rapid transit capacity for the year 2018 and beyond. Conversion encompassed Lowertown West and the By-ward Market areas), Regulation 231/08 allows proponents to build on past planning of the existing Transitway between Tunney's Pasture and Blair and extended southerly to include Hurdman Station and the decisions (outlined above and discussed further in Section 3.0) to Station from bus to rail technology and construction of the VIA Rail Station. On 19 November 2008 the Joint advance a transit project through an Environmental tunnel is identified as a priority project of the TMP. Transportation and Transit Committee, during its deliberation Assessment. of the draft 2008 TMP, approved a staff recommendation to 1.4.2 Western LRT Corridor extend the study limits to include Tunney’s Pasture Station in During the “project planning phase”, consultation undertaken The TMP update identifies future conversion of the existing the west and Blair Station in the east. This would align the on the study involved over 200 stakeholder groups, including BRT corridor to LRT west and southwest from the DOTT scope of the Study with the light rail transit portion of Phase 1, community organizations, property owners and businesses terminus of Tunney’s Pasture Station to Baseline Station.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix 5 Station Descriptions And

    Appendix 5 Station Descriptions And

    Appendix 5 Station Descriptions and Technical Overview Stage 2 light rail transit (LRT) stations will follow the same standards, design principles, and connectivity and mobility requirements as Stage 1 Confederation Line. Proponent Teams were instructed, through the guidelines outlined in the Project Agreement (PA), to design stations that will integrate with Stage 1, which include customer facilities, accessibility features, and the ability to support the City’s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) goals for public transit and ridership growth. The station features planned for the Stage 2 LRT Project will be designed and built on these performance standards which include: Barrier-free path of travel to entrances of stations; Accessible fare gates at each entrance, providing easy access for customers using mobility devices or service animals; Tactile wayfinding tiles will trace the accessible route through the fare gates, to elevators, platforms and exits; Transecure waiting areas on the train platform will include accessible benches and tactile/Braille signs indicating the direction of service; Tactile warning strips and inter-car barriers to keep everyone safely away from the platform edge; Audio announcements and visual displays for waiting passengers will precede each train’s arrival on the platform and will describe the direction of travel; Service alerts will be shown visually on the passenger information display monitors and announced audibly on the public-address system; All wayfinding and safety signage will be provided following the applicable accessibility standards (including type size, tactile signage, and appropriate colour contrast); Clear, open sight lines and pedestrian design that make wayfinding simple and intuitive; and, Cycling facilities at all stations including shelter for 80 per cent of the provided spaces, with additional space protected to ensure cycling facilities can be doubled and integrated into the station’s footprint.
  • 2.6 Settlement Along the Ottawa River

    2.6 Settlement Along the Ottawa River

    INTRODUCTION 76 2.6 Settlement Along the Ottawa River In spite of the 360‐metre drop of the Ottawa Figure 2.27 “The Great Kettle”, between its headwaters and its mouth, the river has Chaudiere Falls been a highway for human habitation for thousands of years. First Nations Peoples have lived and traded along the Ottawa for over 8000 years. In the 1600s, the fur trade sowed the seeds for European settlement along the river with its trading posts stationed between Montreal and Lake Temiskaming. Initially, French and British government policies discouraged settlement in the river valley and focused instead on the lucrative fur trade. As a result, settlement did not occur in earnest until the th th late 18 and 19 centuries. The arrival of Philemon Source: Archives Ontario of Wright to the Chaudiere Falls and the new British trend of importing settlers from the British Isles marked the beginning of the settlement era. Farming, forestry and canal building complemented each other and drew thousands of immigrants with the promise of a living wage. During this period, Irish, French Canadians and Scots arrived in the greatest numbers and had the most significant impact on the identity of the Ottawa Valley, reflected in local dialects and folk music and dancing. Settlement of the river valley has always been more intensive in its lower stretches, with little or no settlement upstream of Lake Temiskaming. As the fur trade gave way to farming, settlers cleared land and encroached on First Nations territory. To supplement meagre agricultural earnings, farmers turned to the lumber industry that fuelled the regional economy and attracted new waves of settlers.
  • 2019 City Wide Development Charges Background Study

    2019 City Wide Development Charges Background Study

    2019 City-Wide Development Charges Background Study Version for Public Consultation HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d. March 15, 2019 Table of Contents List of Acronyms .......................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ...................................................................................... 2 A. Purpose of 2019 Development Charges (DC) Background Study .. 2 B. City-Wide and Area-Specific DCs Have Been Calculated ............... 3 C. Development Forecast .................................................................... 4 D. Public Transit Ridership Forecast ................................................... 5 E. Calculated Development Charges .................................................. 5 F. Cost of Growth Analysis .................................................................. 6 G. Development Charges Administration & Policy Considerations ...... 7 I Purpose of 2019 Development Charges Background Study ............. 8 A. Introduction and Background .......................................................... 8 B. Legislative Context .......................................................................... 9 C. The 2019 DC Study is Intended to be an Interim Update ................ 9 D. Consultation And Approval Process ................................................ 9 E. Key Steps In Determining DCs for Future Development-Related Projects ......................................................................................... 10 F. Long-Term Capital
  • No. 48, Port Lands Flood Protection and Enabling Infrastructure, Page 54 Credit: Waterfront Toronto/Vid Ingelevics/Ryan Walker

    No. 48, Port Lands Flood Protection and Enabling Infrastructure, Page 54 Credit: Waterfront Toronto/Vid Ingelevics/Ryan Walker

    2021 No. 48, Port Lands Flood Protection and Enabling Infrastructure, Page 54 Credit: Waterfront Toronto/Vid Ingelevics/Ryan Walker Top100 Projects 2021 Changing the Language of Top100 Projects — 2021 An annual report inserted in Infrastructure ReNew Canada’s had an interesting encounter following the release of last January/February 2021 issue year’s report, and I wanted to share in an effort to get I feedback from the rest of the industry. MANAGING Andrew Macklin We had released the 2020 Top100 Projects report and were EDITOR [email protected] getting set for the Key Players and Owners Dinner, which we host every February in Toronto as a celebration of the accomplishments GROUP Todd Latham PUBLISHER of the industry in developing infrastructure megaprojects. I had heard through one of my colleagues that a couple of well-respected PUBLISHER Nick Krukowski members of the industry wanted to chat with me at the event and I should seek them out. So I did. ART DIRECTOR AND Donna Endacott SENIOR DESIGN My first thought was that, not having nearly the expertise as many of you, that I had somehow managed to royally screw something ASSOCIATE Simran Chattha up. Or perhaps they wanted to tell me that I should try a different EDITOR tact to the report? Maybe a new idea for adding a complementary DIGITAL MARKETING Becky Umweni piece for this report? But as it turned out, they wanted to have a COORDINATOR conversation with me about… language. DIGITAL The language of this report has become, to some, quite convoluted. Connie Vitello EDITOR As different jurisdictions use the language familiar to them, it can often mean that, from one project to the next, different words are EVENT Natasha Mawji MANAGER used to describe the same thing.
  • Recommended Plan.Pdf

    Recommended Plan.Pdf

    Blair Station 9-34 Maintenance and Storage Facility Track redundancy within the facility will be provided to ensure The proposed Maintenance and Storage Facility is an integral the ability to move LRVs under vehicle or system failure part of the project, as it will: conditions. • House and service all of the trains needed to operate the The preferred site for the Maintenance and Storage Facility has line been determined based on the following criteria: • Service vehicles to be used on future LRT lines • Site Characteristics (topography, grade, land use compatibility, expansion capability and environmental • House the operations control centre (signalling, considerations) communications) for the line • Facility Operations (turnaround loops, track redundancy, • Be the primary heavy maintenance facility for the LRT layout efficiency and municipal services) network Maintenance of the LRVs is crucial to maintain vehicle • System Operations (connectivity to the line, efficiency and manufacturer's warranties, minimize long term operating costs access to freight rail), and and provide for system safety and reliability. The Maintenance • Relative Costs (capital, operating, maintenance and and Storage Facility will accommodate the following elements property ownership and acquisition) on-site: The proposed Maintenance and Storage Facility for the DOTT 9-35 • Main facility building housing offices, roster areas, meeting project will be located on lands to the west of the existing OC rooms and control equipment Transpo headquarters and bus maintenance facility located on • Storage yard for regular cleaning and minor maintenance the north side of Belfast Road, west of St. Laurent Boulevard and south of the VIA rail corridor. In order to access this • Repair areas for heavy and light maintenance areas for location, a connecting track is required between the DOTT vehicles alignment and the Maintenance and Storage Facility.
  • 1 Report to Rapport Au

    1 Report to Rapport Au

    1 Report to Rapport au: Transit Commission Commission du transport en commun 19 June 2019 / 19 juin 2019 Submitted on June 10, 2019 Soumis le 10 juin 2019 Submitted by Soumis par: John Manconi, General Manager / Directeur général, Transportation Services Department / Direction générale des transports Contact Person Personne ressource: John Manconi, General Manager / Directeur général Transportation Services Department / Direction générale des transports 613-580-2424 ext./poste 52111, [email protected] Ward: CITY WIDE / À L'ÉCHELLE DE LA File Number: ACS2019-TSD-TS-0002 VILLE SUBJECT: Confederation Line: Customer Service Operational Readiness OBJET: Ligne de la Confédération : Préparation opérationnelle du service à la clientèle REPORT RECOMMENDATION That the Transit Commission receive this report for information. RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT Que la Commission du transport en commun prenne connaissance de ce rapport. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The opening of O-Train Line 1, the Confederation Line, will mark an exciting and historic transformation in the way transit service is delivered in the city of Ottawa. OC Transpo has been working with the Rideau Transit Group (RTG) and partners from across the city to transform the current transit service into a world-class multimodal transit system and ensure a positive end-to-end customer experience starting on day one. The opening of Line 1 and the major changes to the bus route network that will follow, will be the largest service change ever for OC Transpo customers. Because our customers are our priority and their experience through and beyond this transitional period is important to us, OC Transpo staff are committed to ensuring that customers are prepared, comfortable and knowledgeable about these changes and the transition period in which they will occur.
  • Line 1 Preparations Continue

    Line 1 Preparations Continue

    Transpo Express FALL 2017_Layout 1 2017-Oct-20 10:42 AM Page 1 TRANSPO express WINTERFall 2017 2019 Line 1 preparations continue 2. Derek Stevens 3. Tony Spinello GARAGE ATTENDANT 1. Tim Wielinga PARA TRANSPO 1. 7150 Brian Ferguson 2. 7313 Hussein Suleiman reparations have been underway for some requirements that come with the transition to that have been created and how they will con- time for the highly anticipated launch a multi-modal transit system, made up of bus, tribute to the success of our new light rail line. PCONVENTIONALof O-Train Line 1. Many positions have diesel rail and light rail. Continue reading on been created and filled to meet the changing page 4 for an in-depth look at some of the roles 1. 2883 Manjit Nagra 2. 5833 Kulwinder Sidhu he 2017 Roadeo competition and weather competition this year. Manjit will compete in the In this issue was HOT! Competitors, spectators, staff and 2018 International Roadeo in Tampa, Florida. He 3. 2643 Terry Claesson Tvolunteers came out on a beautiful will be joined by William Castillo, Derek Stevens September Sunday for this year’s annual Roadeo. and Tony Spinello, who will compete in the Mechanical competition. Another successful OperatorPriority Manjit Seating Nagra, who Cards was runner-up in6 past years, won first place in the Conventional Transit Food Drive! 2 2017 ROADEO cont’d P. 4-5 Transecure stories 7 InThe charter this experience issue 2 Accessible entrances NewTraining Nova - onebuses track at at andNew parking Employee at OC Passes Transpo 7 4 OC Celebrates Ottawa cominga
  • September 2020 Update

    September 2020 Update

    September 2020 Update Transportation Services Department FEDCo September 1, 20201 2 O-Train South Design Progress • The following submissions have been Issued-For- Construction: – Structures throughout the alignment including Rail Bridges at Airport Parkway, Uplands, Leitrim, Bowesville, Earl Armstrong and Lester; and, – Utility Relocations throughout the alignment. 3 O-Train South Design Progress • The City has received construction drawings of the following project elements: – Airport Station; – Guideway for the Airport Link; and, – Structures throughout the alignment including High Road MUP Bridge, Limebank Road Elevated Guideway, Airport Elevated Guideway, VIA Grade Separation, Rideau River Pedestrian Bridge. 4 O-Train South Design Progress • The City has received final design drawings of the following project elements: – Guideway for the South Extension to Limebank; – Guideway for the existing portion of the line; – Landscape design for the existing line and Airport Link; – Dow’s Lake Tunnel, including Tunnel Ventilation; and – Vehicle elements, including the driver’s cab, interior layout and HVAC System. 5 O-Train South Design Progress • The City has received pre-final design drawings of the following project elements: – Walkley Yard Maintenance and Storage Facility (MSF); – Operational Modelling for the Overall System and the MSF; – Signaling and Train Control System; – Greenboro, Carleton, Mooney’s Bay, Gladstone and Walkley Stations; and, – Communication Systems designs for Greenboro and Carleton Stations and interface control documents for several subsystems on the project. 6 O-Train South Construction Progress • Rock excavation started on Gladstone Station; • Walkley Maintenance and Storage Facility structure construction has commenced; • Work has commenced at Ellwood Diamond grade separation. Caisson construction is underway; • Work has begun on Carleton south MUP; and, • Commenced work at South Keys and Bowesville Stations.
  • Boosterism" and Locational Analysis Or One Man's Swan Is Another Man's Goose David Knight

    Boosterism" and Locational Analysis Or One Man's Swan Is Another Man's Goose David Knight

    Document generated on 09/30/2021 10:08 p.m. Urban History Review Revue d'histoire urbaine "Boosterism" and Locational Analysis or One Man's Swan is Another Man's Goose David Knight Number 3-73, February 1974 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1020599ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1020599ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine ISSN 0703-0428 (print) 1918-5138 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Knight, D. (1974). "Boosterism" and Locational Analysis or One Man's Swan is Another Man's Goose. Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, (3-73), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.7202/1020599ar All Rights Reserved © Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 1974 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ 10 "BOOSTERISM" AND LOCATIONAL ANALYSIS OR ONE MAN'S SWAN IS ANOTHER MAN1S GOOSE Why is "something" (be it a railway, government office, factory, housing development, or whatever else) located where it is? This simple question can be explored numerous ways although Geographers generally approach it from the standpoint of location theory in which emphasis is placed on economic factors.
  • Appendix E Detailed Case Studies

    Appendix E Detailed Case Studies

    Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX E DETAILED CASE STUDIES Revised Final Report 2011 Page E-1 Detailed Case Studies Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations TABLE OF CONTENTS Case Study Summary ............................................................................................................................... E-3 Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) .............................................................................................................. E-7 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) ........................................... E-21 Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) ................................................................ E-33 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) ..................................................................... E-41 Metro-North Railroad ............................................................................................................................. E-57 New Jersey Transit (NJT) ....................................................................................................................... E-67 OC Transpo .............................................................................................................................................. E-81 Regional Transit District Denver (RTD) ............................................................................................... E-93 Sound Transit ........................................................................................................................................
  • Robert Bateman School Council Meeting

    Robert Bateman School Council Meeting

    Hunt Club Park Community Association Board of Directors Meeting Minutes January 22, 2020 at 7 pm 2 Lorry Greenberg, 2nd floor, Room 350 Board Members’ Attendance Paul Norris, President & School Liaison Present Connie Ford, Secretary Present Kathy Fisher, Content Editor Absent Louise Pilon, Social Media Present Frank Gualtieri, Treasurer Present Andrew Tomayer, Communications Present (required to leave early) Austin Kattackal Absent Others in attendance Jana Atkinson (Councillor Deans’ Office), Michella Maragoni, Sylvain Bourdeau, Dr. Vineet Sidhu, Theodore Tomayer ITEM SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION Call to order The President called the meeting to order. Five of seven board members were present constituting a quorum and the meeting was declared duly constituted. The agenda for the meeting was approved. 1. Minutes of meeting Paul Norris moved to approve the Board of Director meeting minutes as of October 29, 2019 and December 10, 2019. Frank Gualtieri and Louise Pilon respectively, seconded the motion. All members agreed. 2. Councillor’s Report Diane Deans is doing well. She has completed three rounds of chemotherapy and is recovering from surgery before beginning her second round of chemotherapy. International Women’s Day – The date for Councillor Deans’ Annual International Women’s Day Breakfast is Thursday, March 5, 2020 at the Infinity Convention Centre. Email the Councillor’s office for tickets. LRT Stage 2 Construction Impact Meeting - Councillor Deans has been advised that the City is tentatively planning to host a meeting on February 13 to discuss impacts as a result of construction of Stage 2 of the LRT. Details will be circulated to the association once available. The O-Train is to be shut down as of May for 18 months.
  • Transit Support Division 2009 Operational Plan

    Transit Support Division 2009 Operational Plan

    Network Optimization Final Recommendations Media Briefing April 13, 2011 1 Setting the Stage • On March 23rd we released a draft network optimization proposal designed to achieve $19.5M in annual savings for public input • The public consultation process gave us the valuable customer feedback that has helped us come back with a refined system proposal that better serves the needs of our customers • As a result, over 2/3 of the draft proposal was improved based on this feedback • These recommendations address key issues that were raised during the consultation period while still allowing us to achieve the designated savings of $19.5M annually through network optimization 2 Budget Context • Council approved 2011 Budget, which directed Transit Services to achieve $22M in annualized savings • The 2011 Budget includes free service to seniors Mondays and Fridays from noon onward, continuation of free Wednesdays for seniors and of the U-Pass program, and freezes Community Pass rates at current prices • If network changes are not implemented, our public transit system will demand a property tax increase of at least 5% by 2016 – this represents an additional $145M tax pressure for residents • The 2011 Budget builds on $21M in previous efficiency savings achieved by OC Transpo since 2008 3 Budget Context • Total savings to be realized in 2011 - $7.3M. Total savings on an annualized basis going forward are $22M • Saving of $19.5M annually and $6.5M in 2011 will be achieved as a result of “network optimization” • Savings of $750K will be achieved through internal efficiencies in 2011 • Savings of $2.5M will be realized in 2012 as a result of the purchase of double-decker buses.