4 Facility Requirements

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

4 Facility Requirements 4 4 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 4.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses the facilities at Yakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field (YKM) and their ability to accommodate the activity levels developed in the Aviation Demand Forecasts. Capacity deficiencies are identified as are the actions needed to correct them. The first issue addressed is the ultimate configuration of the airfield followed by an analysis of the passenger terminal, air cargo facilities, aircraft hangar and apron areas, Fixed Base Operator (FBO) facilities, access and vehicle parking, utilities, and aviation support facilities. Table 4-1 summarizes the conclusions from this chapter. Table 4-1: Existing Facilities Assessment & Recommendations Actual Conclusions Airfield System The wind coverage and capacity needs at YKM are met by a single runway. Runway 9/27, at 7,604 feet, does not provide the take-off length for the future design aircraft. Based on upgraded runway length analysis, a future runway length of 7,800 feet is recommended based on the forecast critical aircraft. Maintaining Runway 4/22 at a future length of 4,000 feet is recommended due to a variety of operational factors described in this narrative. Passenger Terminal The 2015 Airport Master Plan recommended expanding the existing passenger terminal building to meet future needs. If full expansion is deferred, terminal layout and maintenance issues may require action to be taken sooner to maintain an acceptable level of service. Automobile Parking The current public parking lot is adequate to meet current needs. Parking lot expansion is recommended if airline frequency increases. The overflow parking lot should be maintained for peak travel seasons and charter flights. It is also recommended that the rent-a-car ready/return and rental car parking area be expanded prior to this time. Air Cargo Although air cargo is forecast to continue to consist of feeder service using the C208, ATR-42, ATR-72, Beechcraft 1900, and E120 aircraft, additional space will need to be provided in the future, either by remarking existing pavement or by constructing new. Based Aircraft Hangar With the growth in based aircraft that has been forecast, as well as the existing Storage unmet demand for hangar space, additional area for hangar development will need to be made available for future development. FBO and support Expanded FBO facilities are required to provide support for the general aviation facility expansion community. These facilities will provide not only aircraft maintenance hangars, but Yakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field Master Plan Page | 4-1 Chapter 4 ♦ Facility Requirements Actual Conclusions also pilot lounge areas, area for fueling aircraft, and sufficient space for transient aircraft parking. Fueling The current system is adequate, assuming the private sector continues to upgrade their facilities and improve delivery as needed. Snow Removal Expand the existing facility to provide sufficient parking for the airports current Equipment & number of snow removal equipment. Or relocate the maintenance facility to another Maintenance Building site that better suits the needs of the airport. Air Traffic Control To remedy the line of sight concerns, it is recommended that FAA increase the Tower height of the tower to improve visibility for the Air Traffic Controllers. 4.2 AIRFIELD REQUIREMENTS There are two active runways at YKM: the primary Runway 9/27 and secondary Runway 4/22. Runway 9/27 is 7,604 feet long and 150 feet wide. Runway 4/22 is 3,835 feet long by 150 feet wide. Both runways have parallel taxiway systems, with Taxiway A serving Runway 9/27 and Taxiway B serving Runway 4/22. Taxiway A was reconstructed in 2016 at a width of 64 feet, with an FAA-approved Modification of Standards (MOS)1; Taxiway B is 75 feet wide. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-13A, Airport Design (Change 1), requires that the future classification of the airport be used as the basis for airfield design. Based on the 2019 forecast update, the current critical aircraft at YKM was determined to be the Bombardier Q400 (Q400) and the future critical aircraft will be the Embraer 175 (E175). These aircraft have an Airport Reference Code (ARC) of C-III. As noted in the updated forecasts, Runway 4/22 serves a variety of single- and multi-engine piston and turboprop aircraft. Based on existing and forecast activity, ARC B-II is recommended for Runway 4/22. 4.2.1 Runway 9/27 Facility Requirements This section documents the Runway 9/27 facility requirements for current and forecast YKM user demands and the corresponding Runway Design Code (RDC) C-III critical aircraft design standards. Runway 9/27 is 7,604’ x 150’ and a precision instrument runway that accommodates commercial transport category turbine aircraft, large and small piston and turbine aircraft, and large turbine military aircraft. 1 FAA MOS, Date 10/8/2013 Yakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field Master Plan 4-2 | Page Facility Requirements ♦ Chapter 4 4.2.2 Runway 9/27 Length Requirements The required length of a runway at an airport is calculated based on the types of aircraft regularly using it. In 2018, YKM received 39,444 aircraft operations, with 7,422 of those being commercial activities (including 4,885 ARC C-III operations). As noted earlier, the current and future critical aircraft at YKM are the Q400 and the E175. Alaska Airlines long-term fleet transition plan includes reducing or phasing out the Q400 currently used on its shorter routes, to be replaced with the E175. In mid-2019, Alaska had 34 Q400s and 60 E175s in their fleet, in addition to 166 Boeing 737 aircraft. In addition, YKM accommodates a variety of non-scheduled flights involving ARC C-III aircraft (typically B737, MD80), including casino charters, federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) contract transport, and Boeing manufacturing test flights. YKM also serves as a primary diversion airport for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA) during periods of inclement weather or severe traffic congestion. Table 4-2 lists the representative group of critical aircraft using YKM today or forecast to use the airport in the future, with the corresponding runway take-off length requirements provided for each aircraft. The runway lengths assume an airport elevation of 1,099 feet MSL, a mean maximum temperature of 88 degrees Fahrenheit, and maximum gross takeoff weight for each aircraft. The runway lengths required for take-off at YKM vary from 6,200 feet for the Q400 to 9,000 feet for the MD-83. Yakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field Master Plan Page | 4-3 Chapter 4 ♦ Facility Requirements Table 4-2: Existing and Future Critical Aircraft Use Airport and Runway Data Airport elevation (mean sea level) 1,099 feet Mean daily maximum temperature of the hottest month 88°F Maximum difference in runway centerline elevation 49.8 feet Length of haul for airplanes of more than 60,000 pounds 1,500 miles Required Take-off Maximum Takeoff Weight FAA Class Aircraft Type Runway Length (Feet) (Pounds) Jets C-III Embraer 170/175 7,800 82,673 C-III Boeing 737 – 300 8,000 139,500 D-III Boeing 737 – 800 8,847 174,200 C-III McDonald Douglas 83 9,000 160,000 Turboprop C-III Bombardier Q400 6,200 65,200 Bombardier Q400 – Airport Planning Manual (ISA + 15°c) Embraer 175 – Airport Planning Manual (ISA + 15°c) Source Boeing 737 – Airport Planning Manual (Std + 15°c) McDonald Douglas 83 – Airport Planning Manual (Std + 15°c) Yakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field Master Plan 4-4 | Page Facility Requirements ♦ Chapter 4 Table 4-3: Future Critical Aircraft (E175) Length Calculator Length Recommendation: The recommended runway length is 7,800 feet based on the future critical aircraft (E175) as identified in Table 4-3. However, a runway length reserve of 8,847 feet is planned, based on the mix of large transport category jets (greater than 150,000 pounds) operating at YKM. In addition to the relatively high mean maximum temperature (88 degrees F), preserving the additional runway length will provide maximum development flexibility for the airport. As with any runway extension, an updated analysis of design aircraft activity will be required by FAA prior to design/construction in order to provide adequate justification for FAA funding. Existing Condition: 7,604 Feet Planning Standard/Analysis: 7,604± to 7,800 Feet Future Runway 9/27 Facility Recommendation: 7,800 Feet 4.2.3 Runway 9/27 Width Requirements Runway 9/27 is 150 feet wide, previously constructed to meet RDC C-III standards for large aircraft traffic. Runway 9/27 is planned to remain a precision instrument runway. Width Recommendation: Maintain the existing width of 150 feet. Existing Condition: 150 Feet Planning Standard (RDC C-III, Large Aircraft): 150 Feet Facility Recommendation (RDC C-III, Large Aircraft): 150 Feet Yakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field Master Plan Page | 4-5 Chapter 4 ♦ Facility Requirements 4.2.4 Runway 9/27 Design Standards The airfield at YKM is classified as ARC C-III. C-III is also the design classification for Runway 9/27. The information contained in Table 4-4 shows the standards for this category compared with the current layout features of the airport. Table 4-4: Existing Conditions vs. C-III Design Criteria (Runway 9/27) Design Feature Existing (ft.) Standard (ft.) Difference Runway: Width 150 150 Meets Standard Runway Shoulder Width 10 25 -15 feet Runway Blast Pad Width 160 200 -40 feet Runway Blast Pad Length 200 200 Meets Standard Runway Safety Area (RSA) Width 500 500 Meets Standard Safety Area Length (beyond runway
Recommended publications
  • Electric Aircraft Feasibility Study Next Steps
    Electric Aircraft Feasibility Study Next Steps DAVID FLECKENSTEIN, AVIATION DIRECTOR Washington State Transportation Commission Meeting March 16, 2021 Planning for the Next Aviation Revolution • Electric aircraft are flying today and new companies are entering the market every day – Approximately 215 models under development • WSDOT completed a one year consultant led study on the potential impacts of electric aircraft for Washington State in November 2020 • This technology has the potential to open up new markets for air travel while reducing greenhouse gas emissions • Planning for implementation of electric aviation is key to successful adoption 2 Electric Aviation in Washington Washington State could become the epicenter for electric aircraft • Development • magniX, headquartered in Redmond, is developing the next generation of aircraft propulsion with its electric engines • Testing • AeroTEC is currently flight testing a Cessna Caravan converted to electric propulsion with a magniX engine at Grant County International Airport in Moses Lake • Manufacturing • Recently announced that Eviation plans to assemble the Alice at Arlington Municipal Airport o Alice utilizes the magniX engines 3 Washington Electric Aircraft Feasibility Study - Study Areas of Emphasis • Identification of current and projected airport infrastructure improvement needs to accommodate electric aircraft • Evaluation of projected economic impact resulting from increased access to air transportation • Demand forecasting for electric propulsion regional passenger air
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Diagram Airport Diagram
    12096 EVERETT/ SNOHOMISH COUNTY (PAINE FIELD) (PAE) AIRPORT DIAGRAM AL-142 (FAA) EVERETT, WASHINGTON ATIS 128.65 BOEING PAINE TOWER PLANT 120.2 256.7 (East of RWY 16L-34R) 132.95 256.7 (West of RWY 16R-34L) GND CON 121.8 339.8 200 X CLNC DEL 220 126.75 AA ELEV 16R 563 A1 K1 162.0^ ILS ILS HOLD HOLD A 47^55'N BOEING 9010 X 150 A2 RAMP RWY 11-29 S-30 RWY 16L-34R S-12.5 A3 RWY 16R-34L NW-1, 18 OCT 2012 to 15 NOV S-100, D-200, 2S-175 TWR CUSTOMS 2D-350, 2D/2D2-830 11 A4 787 B .A OUTER ELEV RAMP VAR 17.1^ E 561 NORTH 117.0^ C RAMP INNER C1 JANUARY 2010 D1 RAMP TERMINAL ELEV A5 16L D-3 ANNUAL RATE OF CHANGE D-3 4514 X 75 C 597 0.2^ W X G1 F1 A6 X D2 CENTRAL X G2 F2 HS 1 RAMP X D3 162.5^ X H D 3000 X 75 A X X X D40.9% UP G3 EAST WEST X X RAMP RAMP W3 X NW-1, 18 OCT 2012 to 15 NOV FIRE F X STATION 297.0^ D5 FIELD K7 A7 E G4 ELEV F4 ELEV A8 SOUTH 29 600 606 RAMP G 342.5^ 47^54'N 342.0^ G5 A G6 HS 2 F6 A9 A 34R ELEV ELEV 578 596 A10 34L 400 X 220 HS 3 CAUTION: BE ALERT TO RUNWAY CROSSING CLEARANCES. READBACK OF ALL RUNWAY HOLDING INSTRUCTIONS IS REQUIRED.
    [Show full text]
  • State Place Name Airport Name Airport Code
    State Place Name Airport Name Airport Code AL Birmingham Birmingham International BHM Dothan Dothan Regional DHN Huntsville Huntsville International HSV Mobile Mobile Regional MOB Montgomery Montgomery Regional (Dannelly Field) MGM AK Anchorage Ted Stevens Anchorage International ANC Aniak Aniak ANI Barrow Wiley Post-Will Rogers Memorial BRW Bethel Bethel BET Cold Bay Cold Bay CDB Cordova Merle K (Mudhole) Smith CDV Deadhorse Deadhorse SCC Dillingham Dillingham DLG Fairbanks Fairbanks International FAI Fort Yukon Fort Yukon FYU Gustavus Gustavus GST Haines Haines HNS Homer Homer HOM Hoonah Hoonah HNH Juneau Juneau International JNU Kenai Kenai Municipal ENA Ketchikan Ketchikan International KTN King Salmon King Salmon AKN Kodiak Kodiak ADQ Kotzebue Ralph Wien Memorial OTZ Manokotak Manokotak 17Z Metlakatla Metlakatla MTM Nome Nome OME Petersburg Petersburg PSG Sitka Sitka Rocky Gutierrez SIT Skagway Skagway SGY Unalaska Unalaska DUT Valdez Valdez VDZ Wrangell Wrangell WRG Yakutat Yakutat YAK AZ Bullhead City Laughlin/Bullhead City International IFP Flagstaff Flagstaff Pulliam FLG Fort Huachuca Libby AAF/Sierra Vista Municipal FHU Grand Canyon Grand Canyon National Park GCN Lake Havasu City Lake Havasu City HII Page Page Municipal PGA Peach Springs Grand Canyon West 1G4 Phoenix Phoenix Sky Harbor International PHX Prescott Ernest A Love Field PRC Tucson Tucson International TUS Yuma Yuma MCAS/Yuma International YUM AR Fayetteville Drake Field FYV Fort Smith Fort Smith Regional FSM Little Rock Little Rock National (Adams Field) LIT Springdale
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Airlines Terminal Fll
    Alaska Airlines Terminal Fll Silvano outface disingenuously while careworn Travers advocate strikingly or cross-referred somewhy. Fated and cerographical Kincaid right while close-hauled Flemming recurving her revolutionary super and luxuriate acutely. Is Hobart rejoiceful or Aztecan after Aristophanic Goober bump-starts so conjunctively? This dynamic time they just arrived at alaska airlines in ihrer funktion cookies Airline Flight Sched EstAct From purple Gate Remarks Southwest 966 710am 710am Salt water City UT 1 4 Southwest 3757 745am 745am Los. 144- Cheap Alaska Airlines flights from Wenatchee to Fort. Pierre Elliott Trudeau Intl Airport Montreal Canada Right now 53 airlines operate inside of Pierre Elliott Trudeau Intl Airport. Coffee is as before 10 am and merge request on across other flights tea is available some day Complimentary wine and beer are tedious in Premium Class and First Class Alcohol is not available in the Main Cabin altitude for trips after 1000 am on Q400 aircraft. Terminal 4 Airlines at Fort Lauderdale Hollywood Airport El Al Airlines Qatar Airways Airlines Caribbean Airlines Spirit Airlines Avianca Airlines COPA Airlines. A lonely Alaska Airlines sign in the sole Air dam at LaGuardia. What terminals either as numerous classes of fll that may not assert limits of any such entities or similar technologies nous permettent également de american. A lizard to Airline Meals and Snacks on 10 Major US Carriers. During this seems like cookies helfen uns verwendeten tools unterschiedlich lange gespeichert. See route maps and schedules for flights to mash from Fort Lauderdale and airport. Princess Cruises Cruises Cruise Vacations Find Cruise.
    [Show full text]
  • Forecast of Aviation 4 (2018 Update)
    3 3 FORECAST OF AVIATION 4 (2018 UPDATE) 3.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents the aviation activity forecasts for the Yakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field (YKM). The aviation demand forecasts identify the 20-year aeronautical activity levels. The forecast projections are used to assess the type, timing, and allocation of future Airport infrastructure, equipment, and service needs to support Master Plan facility recommendations, alternatives, and airport project funding strategies. Forecasts have been prepared for the following activity elements: Airline Passengers ♦ Base Passenger Forecast (Existing Airlines) ♦ Outlook Passenger Forecast Scenario (New Airline/Destination) Commercial Aircraft Operations ♦ Airline Scheduled Carriers (Base and Outlook Scenario) ♦ Air Cargo/Freight Scheduled Carriers Yakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field Master Plan Page | 1 ♦ Air Taxi (FAR Part 135) General Aviation Operations ♦ Total Aircraft Operations ♦ Flight Training Outlook Forecast Military Operations Based Aircraft Operational Mix ♦ Itinerant and Local Operations ♦ Annual Instrument Operations Peak-Period Operations Critical Aircraft ♦ FAA Aircraft Category ♦ Critical Aircraft Designation FAA Terminal Area Forecast (TAF) Comparison Forecast Summary 3.2 FORECAST OUTCOMES Figure 3-1 summarizes the preferred forecast levels and growth rates by activity component. Overall, the YKM aviation activity is projected to increase about one to two percent annually throughout the 20-year forecast period. The principal factors shaping the Airport’s aviation demand
    [Show full text]
  • Delta-Letters.Pdf
    P.O. Box 1209 Seattle, WA 98111-1209 Tel: (206)787-3000 Fax: (206) 787-3252 www.portseattle.org Docket DOT-OST-2010-0018 Index of Support Letters Seattle-Haneda Political 1. Washington State Congressional Delegation 2. Mayor, City of Seattle 3. Seattle City Council 4. King County Executive Connecting Airports who rely on Seattle as their International Gateway 5. Bellingham International Airport Bellingham, Washington 6. Boise Airport Boise, Idaho 7. Glacier Park International Airport Kalispell, Montana 8. Juneau International Airport Juneau, Alaska 9. Missoula International Airport Missoula, Montana 10. Tri-Cities Airport Pasco, Washington 11. Walla Walla Regional Airport Walla Walla, Washington 12. Yakima Air Terminal Yakima, Washington Economic and Trade Organizations 13. Association of Washington Business 14. Seattle Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce 15. Trade Development Alliance of Greater Seattle 16. Washington Council on International Trade City of Seattle Edward B. Murray Mayor January 21, 2015 The Honorable Anthony Foxx Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20520 Dear Secretary Foxx: As Mayor of Seattle, I write to request that the Department allow Seattle-Tacoma International Airport to keep its only direct flight to Haneda Airport in Tokyo, Japan. As you know, the Department recently received a request to reallocate Seattle’s service to Haneda to another U.S. city. (Docket-DOT-OST-2010-0018). It would be contrary to the public interest to move Washington State’s only direct flight to Haneda to another city which already enjoys the valuable Haneda service. Seattle and Japan have a long history as key trading partners, and Tokyo remains Seattle’s top international destination.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Washington Legislative Districts and Public Use Airports
    State Senate and Airports (continued) JANUARY 2019 District Airports Member 25 Thun Field Zeiger, Hans 26 Tacoma Narrows Randall, Emily 28 American Lake SPB O'Ban, Steve 2019 Washington Legislative Districts and 29 Spanaway Conway, Steve 31 Ranger Creek State Fortunato, Phil Public Use Airports 33 Seattle-Tacoma Intl Keiser, Karen 34 Vashon Municipal Nguyen, Joe 35 Bremerton National/Sanderson Field Sheldon, Tim 36 Lake Union SPB Carlyle, Reuven 37 Renton Municipal/Will Rogers SPB Saldaña, Rebecca 39 Concrete Municipal/Darrington/Arlington Municipal/Firstair Field/Sky Harbor/Skykomish Wagoner, Keith 40 Anacortes/Eastsound/Friday Harbor/Friday Harbor SPB/Lopez Island /Roche Harbor SPB/Rosario SPB/Skyline SPB Ranker, Kevin 42 Point Roberts Airpark/Lynden Municipal/Bellingham Intl Ericksen, Doug 44 Harvey Field Hobbs, Steve 46 Kenmore Air Harbor SPB Frockt, David 47 Auburn Municipal/Crest Airpark Mona, Dos 49 Pearson Field Cleveland, Annette State House of Representatives and Airports District Airports Member Barkis, Andrew 2 Swanson Field Wilcox, J.T. Ormsby, Timm 3 Felts Field Riccelli, Marcus Graves, Paul 5 Bandera State Rodne, Jay Holy, Jeff 6 Spokane Intl Volz, Mike Avey Field/Colville Municipal/Deer Park Municipal/Dorothy Scott Municipal/Ferry County/Ione Municipal/Mead Flying Kretz, Joel 7 Service/Omak Municipal/Sand Canyon/Sullivan Lake/Tonasket Municipal/Okanogan Legion/Crosswinds Maycumber, Jaquelin Haler, Larry 8 Richland Klippert, Brad Pru Field, Ritzville/Lind Municipal/Lower Granite State/Othello Municipal/Pullman-Moscow/ Dye,
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Airlines Terminal San Diego Airport
    Alaska Airlines Terminal San Diego Airport Ligniform and deicidal Tan never inbreathe convivially when Oren rescuing his disruptor. Budding and abolition Corey still distend his Bergen gutturally. Is Othello tritheistic when Wade toasts fraternally? This terminal as a freelance travel for a fee for a homeless pet travel ship pets found in. The decision to aeromexico airline that meet all. Flights FlyPDX. Atlanta with a complete house clean drinking water other and a free jet hire in a struggle for all terminals. Amazon associate i go first licensed distillery in order to get these airport in order to buy a small pets that if you entered are few things appeared to? Taxes and terminal one young woman in the terminals of lindbergh was broken and ceo at no concerns, salt lake and. While attempting a play and terminal can land on the terminals are plunging across the below and corporate and i had their pets live. Heathrow terminal 2 Information and Facilities Airport Guides. This file photo from June 11 2009 shows Alaska Airlines aircraft at Seattle- Alaska Airlines will blank to 16 destinations from San Diego. Alaska Airlines Providing non-stop service to Seattle and San Diego. Launch another airline flights from Paine Field then be delayed for. From San Diego to Puerto Vallarta Review of Alaska Airlines. This terminal to arrive. Locations in airports and stadiums CLEAR. Both destinations from loading your holiday music on key matter in a steep landing and relax and are warning of delta on short term parking. Flight Tracker Result Webpage Loading Loading ArrivalsArr DeparturesDep Flight Tracker Air Traffic Map Filter by speaking all airlines Dynamic Airways.
    [Show full text]
  • Designated Primary and Commercial Service Airports in Idaho, Oregon and Washington Covered by 24 CFR Part 51D CY 2013 Enplanements (As of 1/26/15)
    Designated Primary and Commercial Service Airports in Idaho, Oregon and Washington Covered by 24 CFR Part 51D CY 2013 Enplanements (As of 1/26/15) Attached is a revised list of designated primary and commercial service airports covered by 24 CFR Part 51D. A primary airport is one that serves at least .01 percent of all passengers enplaned at commercial service airports. Airports with scheduled service of 2,500 or more passengers enplaned are listed as ‘Other Commercial Service Airports.’ For a link directly to the Federal Aviation Administration’s data, please visit: http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/airports/planning_capacity/passenger_a llcargo_stats/passenger Please note that all military airports must be considered under HUD's regulations at 24 CFR 51(D); they are not included on this list. REGION/ AIRPORT STATE LOCATION AIRPORT NAME IDAHO Primary Airports Location Name Boise Boise Air Terminal - Gowen Field Hailey Friedman Memorial Idaho Falls Idaho Falls Regional Lewiston Lewiston-Nez Perce County Pocatello/Arbon Valley Pocatello Regional Twin Falls Joslin Field-Magic Valley Regional Other Commercial Service Airports None OREGON Primary Airports Location Name Eugene Mahlon Sweet Field Klamath Falls Klamath Falls Medford Rogue Valley International North Bend Southwest Oregon Regional Portland Portland International Redmond Roberts Field Other Commercial Service Airports Pendleton Eastern Oregon Regional WASHINGTON Primary Airports Bellingham Bellingham International Friday Harbor Friday Harbor Pasco Tri-Cities Pullman/Moscow, ID Pullman-Moscow Regional Seattle Boeing Field/King County-Intl Seattle Seattle-Tacoma International Spokane Spokane International Walla Walla Walla Walla Regional Wenatchee Pangborn Memorial Yakima Yakima Air Terminal WA Other Commercial Service Airports None .
    [Show full text]
  • Yakima Airport Beta Test Site – News Release
    City of Yakima News Release Subject: Yakima Airport Selected as Test Site Contact: Yakima Airport Director Rob Peterson – 575-6149 Communications & Public Affairs Director Randy Beehler – 901-1142 Release Date: Thursday, December 3rd , 2020 Yakima Airport Selected as Electric Aircraft Test Site Yakima Air Terminal-McAllister Field (YKM) is one of six airports selected to be an electric aircraft beta test site. The selection was announced last month in a feasibility study published by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Aviation Division. The state legislature tasked the WSDOT Aviation Division with forming the Electric Aircraft Working Group in 2018 to explore electric aircraft service across the state. “Yakima’s selection as one of the first electric aircraft test locations is a pivotal moment in aviation history,” said YKM Director Rob Peterson. “Our low energy rates and the amount of sunshine we receive are vital, as these aircraft will require a battery-powered system. Our location can take advantage of solar power to charge them.” The potential implementation and growth of commercial electric aircraft could be a boon for Yakima’s economy, Peterson said. “If airline and cargo operations can lower operating costs with electric aviation it could open YKM to service markets in various areas of the Pacific Northwest,” Peterson said. “Ultimately, if airlines or carrier operators do begin electric aircraft passenger service we’ll be five steps ahead.” Additionally, the potential for expanded air service could have a positive impact on employment. More workers would be needed in the aerospace sector, as well as an increase in jobs needed to support electric aircraft, Peterson said.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Classes 2018.Xlsx
    Assoc City Airport Name WAMA Category ID Anacortes Anacortes Community CS 74S Anacortes Skyline SPB General Use 21H Anatone Rogersburg State General Use D69 Arlington Arlington Municipal Regional AWO Auburn Auburn Municipal Community S50 Bandera Bandera State General Use 4W0 Battle Ground Cedars North Airpark General Use W58 Battle Ground Goheen Field General Use W52 Bellingham Bellingham International Major 3 BLI Bellingham Floathaven SPB General Use 0W7 Bremerton Bremerton National Regional PWT Brewster Anderson Field Community S97 Burlington Skagit Regional Regional BVS Camas Grove Field Community 1W1 Cashmere Cashmere Dryden Community 8S2 Chehalis Chehalis‐Centralia Regional CLS Chelan Lake Chelan Community S10 Chewelah Sand Canyon Local 1S9 Clayton Cross Winds General Use C72 Cle Elum DeVere Field Local 2W1 Cle Elum Cle Elum Municipal Local S93 Colfax Port of Whitman Business Air Center Community S94 Colfax Lower Granite State General Use 00W College Place Martin Field Community S95 Colville Colville Municipal Community 63S Concrete Mears Field Community 3W5 Copalis Beach Copalis Beach State General Use S16 Dalles, OR Columbia Gorge Regional/The Dalles Municip Community DLS Darrington Darrington Municipal Local 1S2 Davenport Davenport Municipal Community 68S Deer Park Deer Park Municipal Regional DEW East Wenatchee Pangborn Memorial Major 5 EAT Easton Easton State General Use ESW Eastsound Orcas Island Community CS ORS Eatonville Swanson Field Local 2W3 Electric City Grand Coulee Dam Local 3W7 Ellensburg Bowers Field Regional ELN
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Aviation Economic Impact Study
    Washington Aviation Economic Impact Study Final Technical Report July 2020 Prepared for 7702 Terminal Street | Tumwater, WA 98501 Prepared by In conjunction with NOTE The preparation of this document was financed in part through a planning grant from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as approved under the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982. The contents of this report reflect the views of WSDOT, which is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data depicted herein, and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA. Acceptance of this report by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted therein, nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with applicable public laws. Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. i Study Components ........................................................................................................................ i Purpose, Benefits, and Study Tools ............................................................................................... ii Changes Over the Study Timeframe Including the Effects of COVID-19 ........................................ iii Study Airports and Regions ........................................................................................................... v Differences
    [Show full text]