Saint Michael the Archangel Orthodox Church
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cyril of Alexandria 11:20 - 13:00 Tuesday, 20Th August, 2019 Room 1 Presentation Type Short Communications
Cyril of Alexandria 11:20 - 13:00 Tuesday, 20th August, 2019 Room 1 Presentation type Short Communications 605 Surpassing Mere Logomachy: Cyril and Theodoret on the Third and Fourth Anathemas Michael Magree, S.J. University of Notre Dame, South Bend, USA Abstract To avoid erroneous evaluations of ancient debates, it is necessary to note the particulars of the arguments in order to see just where the disagreements lay. In the case of Theodoret of Cyrus’s and Cyril of Alexandria’s debates about the twelve anathemas, the exchanges about Philippians 2:5-11 show that each recognized points of agreement in their common opposition to non-Nicene theologies and, more precisely, in their common acceptance both of the Word’s consubstantiality with the Father and of the Word’s consequent immutability and omniscience. Each bishop attempted to use these principles to argue for their respective differing claims about the Word enfleshed. Theodoret said that the union of humanity and divinity cannot be called natural, because this would obscure the distinction of these natures and would make the union involuntary. Cyril had used just such a distinction of nature and will, but he then had to clarify how it applied. Theodoret argued that consubstantiality means that the Word cannot be ignorant, and therefore Jesus Christ can only be ignorant insofar as he is the human subject of ignorance. Cyril said that a true union must entail the ability to say that the incarnate Word is the subject of ignorance, while not ignorant in itself. Cyril’s repetition of the claim that ‘the same one can both suffer and not suffer’ in his later Quod Unus Sit Christusshowed that Theodoret’s attack on this point hit on a claim that Cyril could recognize as difficult to accept. -
The Homilies of John Chrysostom
366 Tsamakda Chapter 25 The Homilies of John Chrysostom Vasiliki Tsamakda The Author and His Work St John Chrysostom (c.347-407) was the most important Father of the Orthodox Church. Archbishop of Constantinople from 398 to 404, he was officially recog- nized as a Doctor of the Orthodox Church by the Council of Chalcedon in 4511 due to his vast and important theological writings.2 He was the most produc- tive among the Church Fathers, with over 1,500 works written by, or ascribed to him. His name was firmly associated with the Liturgy, but above all he was appreciated for his numerous sermons and as an extraordinary preacher. From the 6th century on he was called Chrysostomos, the “golden mouthed”. The fact that over 7,000 manuscripts including his writings exist, attests to the impor- tance and great distribution of his works, many of which were translated into other languages. The great majority of them date after the Iconoclasm. The homilies of John Chrysostom were read during the Service of the Matins (Orthros) mainly in Byzantine monasteries. They were transmitted in various collections or series from which only a few were selected for illustration. Illustrated homilies of John Chrysostom The exact number of illustrated manuscripts containing Chrysostomic ser- mons is unknown,3 but their number is extremely low in view of the very rich 1 The translation of his relics to Constantinople and their deposition in the Church of the Holy Apostles marks the beginning of his cult in Byzantium. The Orthodox Church commemorates him on 27 January, 13 November and also on 30 January together with the other two Cappadocian Fathers, Basil the Great and Gregory of Nazianzus. -
Language and Theology in St Gregory of Nyssa
Durham E-Theses Language and theology in St Gregory of Nyssa Neamµu, Mihail G. How to cite: Neamµu, Mihail G. (2002) Language and theology in St Gregory of Nyssa, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4187/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk University of Durham Faculty of Arts Department of Theology The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Language and Theology in St Gregory of Nyssa Mihail G. Neamtu St John's College September 2002 M.A. in Theological Research Supervisor: Prof Andrew Louth This dissertation is the product of my own work, and the work of others has been properly acknowledged throughout. Mihail Neamtu Language and Theology in St Gregory of Nyssa MA (Research) Thesis, September 2002 Abstract This MA thesis focuses on the work of one of the most influential and authoritative theologians of the early Church: St Gregory of Nyssa (f396). -
The Christological Function of Divine Impassibility: Cyril of Alexandria and Contemporary Debate
The Christological Function of Divine Impassibility: Cyril of Alexandria and Contemporary Debate by David Andrew Graham A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Wycliffe College and the Theological Department of the Toronto School of Theology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Theology awarded by the University of St. Michael's College © Copyright by David Andrew Graham 2013 The Christological Function of Divine Impassibility: Cyril of Alexandria and Contemporary Debate David Andrew Graham Master of Arts in Theology University of St. Michael’s College 2013 Abstract This thesis contributes to the debate over the meaning and function of the doctrine of divine impassibility in theological and especially christological discourse. Seeking to establish the coherence and utility of the paradoxical language characteristic of the received christological tradition (e.g. the impassible Word became passible flesh and suffered impassibly), it argues that the doctrine of divine apatheia illuminates the apocalyptic and soteriological dimension of the incarnate Son’s passible life more effectively than recent reactions against it. The first chapter explores the Christology of Cyril of Alexandria and the meaning and place of apatheia within it. In light of the christological tradition which Cyril epitomized, the second chapter engages contemporary critiques and re-appropriations of impassibility, focusing on the particular contributions of Jürgen Moltmann, Robert W. Jenson, Bruce L. McCormack and David Bentley Hart. ii Acknowledgments If this thesis communicates any truth, beauty and goodness, credit belongs to all those who have shaped my life up to this point. In particular, I would like to thank the Toronto School of Theology and Wycliffe College for providing space to do theology from within the catholic church. -
Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University
Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University Recommended Citation Morgan, Jonathan Stephen, "Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria" (2013). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 277. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/277 CIRCUMCISION OF THE SPIRIT IN THE SOTERIOLOGY OF CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA by Jonathan S. Morgan, B.S., M.A. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2013 ABSTRACT CIRCUMCISION OF THE SPIRIT IN THE SOTERIOLOGY OF CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA Jonathan S. Morgan, B.S., M.A. Marquette University, 2013 In this dissertation I argue that Cyril of Alexandria’s interpretation of “spiritual circumcision” provides invaluable insight into his complex doctrine of salvation. Spiritual Circumcision – or Circumcision by the Spirit -- is a recurring theme throughout his extensive body of exegetical literature, which was written before the Nestorian controversy (428). When Cyril considers the meaning and scope of circumcision, he recognizes it as a type that can describe a range of salvific effects. For him, circumcision functions as a unifying concept that ties together various aspects of salvation such as purification, sanctification, participation, and freedom. Soteriology, however, can only be understood in relation to other doctrines. Thus, Cyril’s discussions of circumcision often include correlative areas of theology such as hamartiology and Trinitarian thought. In this way, Cyril’s discussions on circumcision convey what we are saved from, as well as the Trinitarian agency of our salvation. -
Saint Philomena Parish Lansdowne, Pennsylvania Saint Philomena Saint Cyril of Alexandria Roman Catholic Church Worship Site Founded 1898 Founded 1928
Saint Philomena Parish Lansdowne, Pennsylvania Saint Philomena Saint Cyril of Alexandria Roman Catholic Church Worship Site Founded 1898 Founded 1928 The Most Holy Body and Blood of Christ - June 23, 2019 ! XrrxqhHhrTQuvyrh) #$$ " %#&$'()* ! ! TqhHhr)TQuvyrh) + ,#-, Srp Qh vuPssvpr) .#&$-$#$$-/#$$0 ! "# $ % #&'(' Cy9hsPiyvthvTQuvyrh) Qur)% %!!!#! Vigil 6;00 p.m. ) *+,#'-,..-#.#( %#&$#$$-/0 .#$$ ' ! R* @hvy)uvyrhh vu5 pp ! Xrivr)uvyhp Cy9hvuPiyvthvTQuvyrh) 2+'' TWvprqrQhyTpvr /00 8srvTQuvyrh) Qh vuSrtv hv) 2#&$ ,#$$ /00 2#$$ 2#2, Hv hpyHrqhyIrh 6q hvsur7yrrqThp hr) 1 0 %2 TQuvyrh) IrhvC sT8 vy ,#$$ ) 0 %2 ! @rvtQ hr Wrr hq7rrqvpvsur Qr rhyIrhvu sThvQuvyrh H7yrrqThp hr) ! ! ! ! ! ! ,#&$ Thp hrhyGvsrhq8hrpurv) GrtvsHh 3 ! ! " ! 45 %#-, SAINT PHILOMENA ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, LANSDOWNE, PA Masses for the Week V:`:`1.1QJV`5 !Q1$RQV'$QJV$RV'H`1GV$Q`$RVJV$ .V$!QC7$2%H.:`1' - > .V !""# Eucharist is the source and summit of the Chrisan life. The other sacraments, and indeed all ecclesiascal minis- `1V:`V1Q`@Q` .V:]Q QC: V5:`VGQ%JR%]11 . .V $ Eucharisc and are oriented toward it. For in the blessed !""# ! "#$% Eucharisc is contained the whole spiritual good of the % .%`H.5J:IVC75.`1 .1IVC`5Q%`:H.8?RRRR !""# #%&%#' ! V`VHV10V .VQ%`HV:JR%II1 T that gi of our Savior $& '&( ()& every me that we Celebrate the Eucharist. The readings !""# (' & *&&$ .VC]% QIVV .`1 5=% :G`:.:I1:IV G7 .V !""# @1J$Q`!:CVI5:JR .V7QcV`VR .VG`V:R:JR11JV Q .V $& & $(+ ( Lord. Paul; reminds us that we have the obligaon to hand !""# QJ1.: 1V.:0V`VHV10VRV .V!QJQ`$QRV%.V `%V & $&&# IV:J1J$Q` .V&%H.:`1 8.`1 `VR .V]VQ]CV51JR ,!-,# )% *% strucng the disciples to do the same V=% :1V.:0V .!/"# ! + , % been given the same command through our bapsm and -"!""# %- ! the recepon of the Eucharist. -
Church of Our Lady of Good Counsel - St
Church of Our Lady of Good Counsel - St. Thomas More OLGC - 230 East 90th Street - STM - 65 East 89th Street New York City, New York 10128 OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL PARISH OFFICE (212) 289-1742 FAX (646) 669-7811 E-MAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.OLGCSTM.org ST. THOMAS MORE PARISH OFFICE (212) 876-7718 FAX (212) 831-5756 E-MAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.OLGCSTM.org January 1st, 2017 SUNDAY MASS SCHEDULE - OLGC Saturday Evening: 5:30 p.m. CLERGY Sunday Morning: 9:00 a.m. Rev. Kevin V. Madigan, Pastor 10:15 a.m.- Spanish Mass Msgr. Patrick McCahill, Deaf Ministry 11:30 a.m. - Choral Mass Sunday Evening: 6:00 p.m. Rev. Fernando Caindec, Parochial Vicar Rev. Maximo Villanueva, Parochial Vicar SUNDAY MASS SCHEDULE - STM Saturday Evening: 5:45 p.m. STAFF - OLGC Sunday Morning: 8:30 a.m. 10:00 a.m. - Family Mass Email: [email protected] Sunday Afternoon: 12:00 p.m. - Choral Mass Joan Barton, Director of Music Sunday Evening: 5:45 p.m. Marcelle Devine, Coordinator of Religious Ed. Christopher Gillespie, Dir. Liturgical Music Ed. WEEKDAY MASSES - OLGC Monday thru Friday: 9:00 am and 6:00 pm STAFF - STM Saturday: 9:00 am and 12:00 pm James Siranovich, Interim Director of Music WEEKDAY MASSES - STM [email protected] Monday thru Friday: 8:00 am and 12:15 pm Edward Litcher, Business Manager Saturday: 8:00 am and 12:15 pm [email protected] CONFESSIONS - OLGC Sharon McKenna, Sacristan Monday thru Friday - 5:45 pm Alex Miller, Director of Parish Programs Saturday 4:30 – 5:15 pm [email protected] CONFESSIONS - STM Margaret Peet, Development Monday thru Friday 12:00 pm - 12:10 pm (before Mass) PARISH TRUSTEES Saturday 5:00 – 5:30 pm Christopher Baldwin BAPTISM Paul Saunders OLGC - 12:30 pm on Sunday STM - 1:00 pm on Sunday PARISH COUNCIL PRESIDENT (Arrangements must be made six weeks in advance) Alicia Damley MARRIAGE Arrangements should be made at least six months prior FINANCE COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON to the wedding Michael Poulos VISITS TO HOMEBOUND PARISHIONERS Our clergy are happy to visit. -
A Public Debate on Cyril of Alexandria's Views on The
International Journal of the Classical Tradition https://doi.org/10.1007/s12138-019-00551-1 ARTICLE A Public Debate on Cyril of Alexandria’s Views on the Procession of the Holy Spirit in Seventeenth‑Century Constantinople: the Jesuit Reaction to Nicodemos Metaxas’s Greek Editions Nil Palabıyık1 © The Author(s) 2020 On a September afternoon in 1627, crowds gathered at the library of the Jesuit resi- dence in Constantinople to witness a lively public discussion between two repre- sentatives of the Roman Catholic Church concerning Cyril of Alexandria’s views on the procession of the Holy Spirit.1 It is interesting to see that a ffth-century church father’s writings in the context of a dispute dating back to the sixth century were still considered politically relevant, socially infuential and theologically compelling in seventeenth-century Constantinople. The primary aim of this rather ostentatious gathering was to adopt and promote a diferent (according to Eastern Christians an ‘erroneous’) viewpoint on Cyril of Alexandria’s writings on the procession of the Holy Spirit, and thereby to present a counter-argument to that of the Eastern Church. The Jesuit dispute ultimately targeted the theological stance and the reputation of Cyril Lucaris (1572–1638), the ecumenical patriarch of Constantinople and the of- cial head of the populous Greek Orthodox millet of the Ottoman Empire. 1 Cyril of Alexandria’s opinion on this question is still controversial, but lies beyond the scope of this article. For a succinct overview, see A. E. Siecienski, The Filioque: History of a Doctrinal Controversy, Oxford, 2010, pp. 47–50. -
The Theological and Doxological Reference to the Resurrection And
The theological and doxological reference to the Resurrection and the Pentecost according to the orations of Gregory of Nazianzus XLI and XLV La referencia teológica y doxológica a la Resurrección y al Pentecostés según las oraciones de Gregorio Nacianceno XLI y XLV La referència teològica i doxològica a la Resurrecció i la Pentecosta segons les oracions de Gregori de Nazianz XLI i XLV A referência teológica e doxológica à Ressurreição e ao Pentecostes segundo as orações de Gregório de Nazianzo XLI e XLV Eirini ARTEMI1 Abstract: In the forty-one oration, Gregory of Nazianzus analyzes the divinity of the Holy Spirit, a subject that is developed again with more severe way in his Fifth Theological Oration. Gregory tries to establish the point by quite a different set of arguments from those adopted in the former discourse, none of whose points are here repeated. In the other oration, forty-five, Gregory refers to the importance of the resurrection for the human race. He presents Christ as the new Adam who saved the human from the death and reunites again the man with God. This is a subject that is referred to the oration forty-one, too. In this paper, we will examine the teaching of Gregory of Nazianzus about the divine status of the Holy Spirit and his equality to the other two persons of the Triune God through theological and biblical images. Also, we will present how he connects his teaching for anthropology based on the Christology. In the end we will show how Gregory produced these orations for public festivals within the literarily ripe tradition of pagan festival rhetoric, but he gives to his orations theological content. -
The First Adam-Second Adam Typology in John Chrysostom and Cyril of Alexandria
Perichoresis Volume 12. Issue 2 (2014): 153-162 DOI 10.2478/perc-2014-0009 THE FIRST ADAM-SECOND ADAM TYPOLOGY IN JOHN CHRYSOSTOM AND CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA ASHISH J. NAIDU * Talbot School of Theology, Biola University ABSTRACT. Patristic scholars have commented on the early church ’s common practice of drawing catechetical instructions from the creation account in Genesis. One of the recurring motifs in such dis- cussions is the fathers ’ use of the Adam-Christ typology with its soteriological and sacramental implica- tions. The present study briefly explores this theme in John Chrysostom and Cyril of Alexandria with particular reference to the baptism of Jesus and the theological challenge it posed to the early church: Did Jesus the Lord receive the Spirit at his baptism? Why did he need to be baptized? What is the rela- tionship between the baptism of Jesus and Christian baptism? Both Cyril and Chrysostom make in- sightful use of the Adamic typology in this context as they discuss how Christ ’s work restores fallen humanity from corruption and death that followed Adam ’s sin. First, the study examines how the aforementioned fathers from two distinct traditions view the baptism of Jesus in the recovery of God ’s grace that was lost in Adam ’s fall. Second, the study will demonstrate that both Chrysostom and Cyril had much in common in their understanding of the transforming grace and work of the Spirit in re- fashioning the believer into a new creation at baptism. And third, it will be shown that there was a con- sensus on soteriological and sacramental perspectives among the Alexandrians and the Antiochenes. -
Saint Michael the Archangel Orthodox Church
Saint Michael the Archangel Orthodox Church 146 Third Avenue, Rankin, PA 15104 Pastor: Very Reverend Nicholas Ferencz, PhD Cantor: Professor Jerry Jumba Parish President : Carole Bushak Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory Forever! Slava Isusu Christu! Slava vo v’iki! Rectory Phone: 412 271-2725. E-mail: [email protected] Hall Phone: 412-294-7952 WEB: www.stmichaelsrankin.org FEBRUARY 7, 2021 35TH SUNDAY OF PENTECOST Sun., Feb. 7 35th Sunday after Pentecost. Bishop Gregory of Nazianzus, called the Theologion 9:00 AM Divine Liturgy. Tone 2, pp 99–102. Readings from 31st Sunday of Pentecost: Epistle 1Tim 1: 15–17; Gospel 14th Sunday of Luke Annual Parish Meeting Fri., Feb 12 Three Holy Bishops Basil the Great, Gregory the Theologion and John Chrysostom 9:00 AM Divine Liturgy Sun., Feb. 14 Sunday of Zacchaeus. Martyr Tryphon. Nun Brigid of Kildare 9:00 AM Divine Liturgy. Panachida: George Ferencz, Jr. (32 yrs) and Paul Kovac (26 yrs) by Fr. Nik and Paòi Joanna Oath of Office of the Newly Elected Parish Council Holy Mystery of Confession: I will be available for Confessions after the Divine Liturgy, when the church is more private. Or, you can make an appointment and we will arrange an appropriate time. Please just contact me. PEOPLE STUFF Prayer List: Deceased: Joseph Merlo. Kathy Bonnano Living: Father Joe Cervo. Father George Livanos. Father Patrick. Mother Christophora and the nuns of Holy Transfiguration Monastery. Kristina Anatakis. Dana Andrade. Gloria Andrade. Gregory Michael Aurilio. Georgia B. Chastity and Jeff Bache. David Banosky. Brandon. Walter Bolbat. Donald Bodnar. John Bonnano, Rob & Carol Bonnano. -
09-30 Saint Jerome
Saint Jerome was born in 340, in present day Croatia. His father sent him to Rome to learn classic literature and rhetoric, that is writing based on formal rules of composition. Although his father instructed him in the Christian faith as a youth, Jerome was not baptized until the age of 20. He did this in Rome in 360, being baptized by Pope Liberius.i Jerome was a lifelong learner. As an adult, he studied theology under two excellent teachers and two future saints, Chromatius and Heliodorus. “Jerome undertook to learn Hebrew from a Christian monk who had converted from Judaism. Somewhat unusually for a fourth- century Christian priest, he also studied with Jewish rabbis, striving to maintain the connection between Hebrew language and culture, and the emerging world of Greek and Latin-speaking Christianity.”ii Jerome enjoyed travel to both places of solitude and to intellectual centers bubbling with scholarship. His trips throughout the Holy Land helped him to understand the significance of places made famous by the bible. In Constantinople he met Gregory of Nazianzus. They had much in common and easily made friends with one another. Gregory is one of the four great Greek Doctors of the Churchiii. Jerome became one of the four great Latin Doctors of the Church. Beyond school and travel, he also felt much was to be learned from prayer and study. Having a deep appreciation for monasticism he felt called to a solitary life of a hermit in the desert. Jerome spent the better part of four decades in Bethlehem in the monastery he established so that he could devote his days to study, prayer, and an austere self-discipline.