DOCSLIB.ORG

John Chrysostom 11:20 - 13:00 Tuesday, 20Th August, 2019 Room 7 Presentation Type Short Communications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
John Chrysostom 11:20 - 13:00 Tuesday, 20Th August, 2019 Room 7 Presentation Type Short Communications John Chrysostom 11:20 - 13:00 Tuesday, 20th August, 2019 Room 7 Presentation type Short Communications 277 Adam-Christ Typology in Cyril of Alexandria and John Chrysostom Ashish Naidu Biola University, La Mirada, CA, USA Abstract The biblical narrative of the baptism of Jesus posed a theological conundrum to the early church: how can Jesus the Lord ‘receive’ the Spirit at his baptism and why does he need to be baptized? Some scholars have persuasively shown how Cyril of Alexandria resolves this tension by invoking the theme of kenosis and using Adamic typology. However, scholars have largely marginalized John Chrysostom’s perspective on this thorny subject. I will examine Chrysostom’s treatment of this topic in Matthew and in his Baptismal Instructions against the background of Cyril’s perspective. I hope to show that although Chrysostom employs classical pedagogical methods and rhetorical devices, deeper concerns shape his reading of the texts. Careful examination of the words in scripture must in turn be complemented with precision in spiritual and moral application. The goal of Christian paideia in the early church was to persuade individuals to follow Christ example, and be united to his virtuous life. It is therefore not surprising that although both Chrysostom and Cyril belong to two different traditions and interpret the baptism of Jesus differently, their soteriological and sacramental views overlap significantly. 420 Rhetoric and Therapy in John Chrysostom’s Trinitarian Discourse Pak-Wah Lai Biblical Graduate School of Theology, Singapore, Singapore Abstract Recent studies on Chrysostom’s Trinitarian teachings have shown his indebtedness to Meletius of Antioch, the Eusebians, and Basil of Caesarea. Our present study of Chrysostom’s Homilies Against the Anomeans suggest that, even as a young priest, Chrysostom already had a sophisticated understanding of Trinitarian doctrine. His Trinitarian theology is founded on the premise that God is incomprehensible and can only be known by faith. The Anomeans’ mistake is their failure to grasp this principle. To treat their spiritual madness, they must be persuaded otherwise through philosophical therapy and with gentle kindness. Chrysostom concurs with Meletius and Basil that God’s incomprehensibility imply that He can only be known partially through metaphors and forms. He, recognises, however, that God is not the compound of these different ideas but remain a simple Being. This is why a doctrine of divine simplicity is a necessary component in Trinitarian teachings. Chrysostom argues further that our knowledge of God is only possible because He has accommodated Himself to us. This idea of God’s synkatabasis, we believe, is Chrysostom’s unique contribution to Trinitarian discourse of his time. Judging from his homilies, it is evident Basil’s influence also looms large in other aspects of Chrysostom’s Trinitarian discourse. Like Basil, he distinguishes between the ousia and hypostasis of God. Adopting Basil’s principle of equivalence, he affirms likewise that since the Son and the Spirit share the same knowledge, power, honour and authority with the Father, this must mean that the Three share the same nature. 462 ‘Suddenly We Have Become Saints and Sons’: The Centrality of The Sudden (Ἐξαίφνης) in John Chrysostom's Homilies on Romans Rev. Fr. Michael Tishel Hellenic College, Brookline, USA. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece Abstract The role of the sudden (ἐξαίφνης) has been explored within the realm of both ancient and contemporary philosophy by the likes of Kierkegaard and Heidegger, and by more recent scholars such as John Mannousakis. Furthermore, It has been examined in the realm of patristic theology by scholars such as Andrew Louth and Alexander Golitzin primarily in reference to Denys the Areopagite. In reading John Chrysostom's Homilies on Romans, however, ἐξαίφνης and its terminological and conceptual equivalents play a significant role in Chrysostom's theology. Furthermore, his description of the suddenness, immediacy, and unexpected nature of divine revelation connects him to enduring mystical traditions in both Greek philosophy and Judeo-Christianity. This paper will draw from central passages in Homilies on Romans, in order to demonstrate that Chrysostom's treatment of ἐξαίφνης unlocks a subtle qualitative and mystical element of his theological system that has heretofore often been dismissed as muted and moralizing. 648 Virtue in Leadership: Examining John Chrysostom’s Ideal of the Ascetic Priest Beatrice Victoria Ang New College, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom Abstract This article examines Chrysostom’s ideal of the ascetic priest. It begins by exploring his views on monks as models of Christian virtue in Comparatio regis et monachi. By directing focus entirely on God, Christian asceticism creates persons not easily swayed by wealth, pleasure, and human approval. Such persons gain social relevance, becoming 1) models of good governance; 2) able patrons of the poor; and, 3) effective spiritual intercessors for whole cities. However, the ascetic’s aim to rise above the anxieties of ordinary life can be too individualistic, raising questions about the effectivity of their patronage and mediation. Chrysostom’s priest, in De sacerdotio book 6, fills the gap. Despite sharing many similar roles and ideal qualities with the monk, the priest’s fate is more significantly tied to the public. This is represented in his unique role in the administration of the Eucharist. The asceticism required of the priest takes a different character as it cannot be done in withdrawal..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cyril of Alexandria 11:20 - 13:00 Tuesday, 20Th August, 2019 Room 1 Presentation Type Short Communications
    Cyril of Alexandria 11:20 - 13:00 Tuesday, 20th August, 2019 Room 1 Presentation type Short Communications 605 Surpassing Mere Logomachy: Cyril and Theodoret on the Third and Fourth Anathemas Michael Magree, S.J. University of Notre Dame, South Bend, USA Abstract To avoid erroneous evaluations of ancient debates, it is necessary to note the particulars of the arguments in order to see just where the disagreements lay. In the case of Theodoret of Cyrus’s and Cyril of Alexandria’s debates about the twelve anathemas, the exchanges about Philippians 2:5-11 show that each recognized points of agreement in their common opposition to non-Nicene theologies and, more precisely, in their common acceptance both of the Word’s consubstantiality with the Father and of the Word’s consequent immutability and omniscience. Each bishop attempted to use these principles to argue for their respective differing claims about the Word enfleshed. Theodoret said that the union of humanity and divinity cannot be called natural, because this would obscure the distinction of these natures and would make the union involuntary. Cyril had used just such a distinction of nature and will, but he then had to clarify how it applied. Theodoret argued that consubstantiality means that the Word cannot be ignorant, and therefore Jesus Christ can only be ignorant insofar as he is the human subject of ignorance. Cyril said that a true union must entail the ability to say that the incarnate Word is the subject of ignorance, while not ignorant in itself. Cyril’s repetition of the claim that ‘the same one can both suffer and not suffer’ in his later Quod Unus Sit Christusshowed that Theodoret’s attack on this point hit on a claim that Cyril could recognize as difficult to accept.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The Christology of nestorius and the chalcedonian settlement Fletcher, Stanley P. How to cite: Fletcher, Stanley P. (1972) The Christology of nestorius and the chalcedonian settlement, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9976/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk THE REVEREND STANLEY P. FLETCHER, B.A. THE CHRISTOLOGY OP NESTORIUS AND THE CHALCEDONIAN SETTLEMENT A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. THE GHRISTOLOGY OF NESTORIUS AND THE CHALCEDONIAN SETTLEMENT - ABSTRACT The assessment of Nestorius1 Christology begins with a consideration of his indebtedness to Paul of Samosata, Diodore of Tarsus and Theodore of Mopsuestia.
    [Show full text]
  • "Breaking Ground" a Look at the Impact of the Cappadocian Fathers on the Establishment of the Doctrine of the Holy
    Verbum Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 11 December 2009 "Breaking Ground" A look at the Impact of the Cappadocian Fathers on the Establishment of the Doctrine of the Holy Spirit During the Transition Between the Council of Nigeria (325) and the Council of Constantinople (381). Frederick J. Flo St. John Fisher College Follow this and additional works at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum Part of the Religion Commons How has open access to Fisher Digital Publications benefited ou?y Recommended Citation Flo, Frederick J. (2009) ""Breaking Ground" A look at the Impact of the Cappadocian Fathers on the Establishment of the Doctrine of the Holy Spirit During the Transition Between the Council of Nigeria (325) and the Council of Constantinople (381).," Verbum: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 11. Available at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum/vol7/iss1/11 This document is posted at https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum/vol7/iss1/11 and is brought to you for free and open access by Fisher Digital Publications at St. John Fisher College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "Breaking Ground" A look at the Impact of the Cappadocian Fathers on the Establishment of the Doctrine of the Holy Spirit During the Transition Between the Council of Nigeria (325) and the Council of Constantinople (381). Abstract In lieu of an abstract, below is the essay's first paragraph. "At the center of Christian dogma lies the worship of the Holy Trinity. Naturally, with every central focus comes controversy. Throughout history, the interpretation of the Trinity has created a tremendous amount of debate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christological Function of Divine Impassibility: Cyril of Alexandria and Contemporary Debate
    The Christological Function of Divine Impassibility: Cyril of Alexandria and Contemporary Debate by David Andrew Graham A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Wycliffe College and the Theological Department of the Toronto School of Theology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Theology awarded by the University of St. Michael's College © Copyright by David Andrew Graham 2013 The Christological Function of Divine Impassibility: Cyril of Alexandria and Contemporary Debate David Andrew Graham Master of Arts in Theology University of St. Michael’s College 2013 Abstract This thesis contributes to the debate over the meaning and function of the doctrine of divine impassibility in theological and especially christological discourse. Seeking to establish the coherence and utility of the paradoxical language characteristic of the received christological tradition (e.g. the impassible Word became passible flesh and suffered impassibly), it argues that the doctrine of divine apatheia illuminates the apocalyptic and soteriological dimension of the incarnate Son’s passible life more effectively than recent reactions against it. The first chapter explores the Christology of Cyril of Alexandria and the meaning and place of apatheia within it. In light of the christological tradition which Cyril epitomized, the second chapter engages contemporary critiques and re-appropriations of impassibility, focusing on the particular contributions of Jürgen Moltmann, Robert W. Jenson, Bruce L. McCormack and David Bentley Hart. ii Acknowledgments If this thesis communicates any truth, beauty and goodness, credit belongs to all those who have shaped my life up to this point. In particular, I would like to thank the Toronto School of Theology and Wycliffe College for providing space to do theology from within the catholic church.
    [Show full text]
  • Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University Recommended Citation Morgan, Jonathan Stephen, "Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria" (2013). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 277. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/277 CIRCUMCISION OF THE SPIRIT IN THE SOTERIOLOGY OF CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA by Jonathan S. Morgan, B.S., M.A. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2013 ABSTRACT CIRCUMCISION OF THE SPIRIT IN THE SOTERIOLOGY OF CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA Jonathan S. Morgan, B.S., M.A. Marquette University, 2013 In this dissertation I argue that Cyril of Alexandria’s interpretation of “spiritual circumcision” provides invaluable insight into his complex doctrine of salvation. Spiritual Circumcision – or Circumcision by the Spirit -- is a recurring theme throughout his extensive body of exegetical literature, which was written before the Nestorian controversy (428). When Cyril considers the meaning and scope of circumcision, he recognizes it as a type that can describe a range of salvific effects. For him, circumcision functions as a unifying concept that ties together various aspects of salvation such as purification, sanctification, participation, and freedom. Soteriology, however, can only be understood in relation to other doctrines. Thus, Cyril’s discussions of circumcision often include correlative areas of theology such as hamartiology and Trinitarian thought. In this way, Cyril’s discussions on circumcision convey what we are saved from, as well as the Trinitarian agency of our salvation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Athanasius and the Views of His Character
    The Importance of Athanasius and the Views of His Character J. Steven Davis Submitted to Dr. Jerry Sutton School of Divinity Liberty University September 19, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I: Research Proposal Abstract .............................................................................................................................11 Background ......................................................................................................................11 Limitations ........................................................................................................................18 Method of Research .........................................................................................................19 Thesis Statement ..............................................................................................................21 Outline ...............................................................................................................................21 Bibliography .....................................................................................................................27 Chapter II: Background of Athanasius An Influential Figure .......................................................................................................33 Early Life ..........................................................................................................................33 Arian Conflict ...................................................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Philomena Parish Lansdowne, Pennsylvania Saint Philomena Saint Cyril of Alexandria Roman Catholic Church Worship Site Founded 1898 Founded 1928
    Saint Philomena Parish Lansdowne, Pennsylvania Saint Philomena Saint Cyril of Alexandria Roman Catholic Church Worship Site Founded 1898 Founded 1928 The Most Holy Body and Blood of Christ - June 23, 2019 ! XrrxqhHhrTQuvyrh) #$$ " %#&$'()* ! ! TqhHhr)TQuvyrh) + ,#-, Srp Qh vuPssvpr) .#&$-$#$$-/#$$0 ! "# $ % #&'(' Cy9hsPiyvthvTQuvyrh) Qur)% %!!!#! Vigil 6;00 p.m. ) *+,#'-,..-#.#( %#&$#$$-/0 .#$$ ' ! R* @hvy)uvyrhh vu5 pp ! Xrivr)uvyhp Cy9hvuPiyvthvTQuvyrh) 2+'' TWvprqrQhyTpvr /00 8srvTQuvyrh) Qh vuSrtv hv) 2#&$ ,#$$ /00 2#$$ 2#2, Hv hpyHrqhyIrh 6q hvsur7yrrqThp hr) 1 0 %2 TQuvyrh) IrhvC sT8 vy ,#$$ ) 0 %2 ! @rvtQ hr Wrr hq7rrqvpvsur Qr rhyIrhvu sThvQuvyrh H7yrrqThp hr) ! ! ! ! ! ! ,#&$ Thp hrhyGvsrhq8hrpurv) GrtvsHh 3 ! ! " ! 45 %#-, SAINT PHILOMENA ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, LANSDOWNE, PA Masses for the Week V:`:`1.1QJV`5 !Q1$RQV'$QJV$RV'H`1GV$Q`$RVJV$ .V$!QC7$2%H.:`1' - > .V !""# Eucharist is the source and summit of the Chrisan life. The other sacraments, and indeed all ecclesiascal minis- `1V:`V1Q`@Q` .V:]Q QC: V5:`VGQ%JR%]11 . .V $ Eucharisc and are oriented toward it. For in the blessed !""# ! "#$% Eucharisc is contained the whole spiritual good of the % .%`H.5J:IVC75.`1 .1IVC`5Q%`:H.8?RRRR !""# #%&%#' ! V`VHV10V .VQ%`HV:JR%II1 T that gi of our Savior $& '&( ()& every me that we Celebrate the Eucharist. The readings !""# (' & *&&$ .VC]% QIVV .`1 5=% :G`:.:I1:IV G7 .V !""# @1J$Q`!:CVI5:JR .V7QcV`VR .VG`V:R:JR11JV Q .V $& & $(+ ( Lord. Paul; reminds us that we have the obligaon to hand !""# QJ1.: 1V.:0V`VHV10VRV .V!QJQ`$QRV%.V `%V & $&&# IV:J1J$Q` .V&%H.:`1 8.`1 `VR .V]VQ]CV51JR ,!-,# )% *% strucng the disciples to do the same V=% :1V.:0V .!/"# ! + , % been given the same command through our bapsm and -"!""# %- ! the recepon of the Eucharist.
    [Show full text]
  • A Public Debate on Cyril of Alexandria's Views on The
    International Journal of the Classical Tradition https://doi.org/10.1007/s12138-019-00551-1 ARTICLE A Public Debate on Cyril of Alexandria’s Views on the Procession of the Holy Spirit in Seventeenth‑Century Constantinople: the Jesuit Reaction to Nicodemos Metaxas’s Greek Editions Nil Palabıyık1 © The Author(s) 2020 On a September afternoon in 1627, crowds gathered at the library of the Jesuit resi- dence in Constantinople to witness a lively public discussion between two repre- sentatives of the Roman Catholic Church concerning Cyril of Alexandria’s views on the procession of the Holy Spirit.1 It is interesting to see that a ffth-century church father’s writings in the context of a dispute dating back to the sixth century were still considered politically relevant, socially infuential and theologically compelling in seventeenth-century Constantinople. The primary aim of this rather ostentatious gathering was to adopt and promote a diferent (according to Eastern Christians an ‘erroneous’) viewpoint on Cyril of Alexandria’s writings on the procession of the Holy Spirit, and thereby to present a counter-argument to that of the Eastern Church. The Jesuit dispute ultimately targeted the theological stance and the reputation of Cyril Lucaris (1572–1638), the ecumenical patriarch of Constantinople and the of- cial head of the populous Greek Orthodox millet of the Ottoman Empire. 1 Cyril of Alexandria’s opinion on this question is still controversial, but lies beyond the scope of this article. For a succinct overview, see A. E. Siecienski, The Filioque: History of a Doctrinal Controversy, Oxford, 2010, pp. 47–50.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Adam-Second Adam Typology in John Chrysostom and Cyril of Alexandria
    Perichoresis Volume 12. Issue 2 (2014): 153-162 DOI 10.2478/perc-2014-0009 THE FIRST ADAM-SECOND ADAM TYPOLOGY IN JOHN CHRYSOSTOM AND CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA ASHISH J. NAIDU * Talbot School of Theology, Biola University ABSTRACT. Patristic scholars have commented on the early church ’s common practice of drawing catechetical instructions from the creation account in Genesis. One of the recurring motifs in such dis- cussions is the fathers ’ use of the Adam-Christ typology with its soteriological and sacramental implica- tions. The present study briefly explores this theme in John Chrysostom and Cyril of Alexandria with particular reference to the baptism of Jesus and the theological challenge it posed to the early church: Did Jesus the Lord receive the Spirit at his baptism? Why did he need to be baptized? What is the rela- tionship between the baptism of Jesus and Christian baptism? Both Cyril and Chrysostom make in- sightful use of the Adamic typology in this context as they discuss how Christ ’s work restores fallen humanity from corruption and death that followed Adam ’s sin. First, the study examines how the aforementioned fathers from two distinct traditions view the baptism of Jesus in the recovery of God ’s grace that was lost in Adam ’s fall. Second, the study will demonstrate that both Chrysostom and Cyril had much in common in their understanding of the transforming grace and work of the Spirit in re- fashioning the believer into a new creation at baptism. And third, it will be shown that there was a con- sensus on soteriological and sacramental perspectives among the Alexandrians and the Antiochenes.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Michael the Archangel Orthodox Church
    Saint Michael the Archangel Orthodox Church 146 Third Avenue, Rankin, PA 15104 Pastor: Very Reverend Nicholas Ferencz, PhD Cantor: Professor Jerry Jumba Parish President : Carole Bushak Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory Forever! Slava Isusu Christu! Slava vo v’iki! Rectory Phone: 412 271-2725. E-mail: [email protected] Hall Phone: 412-294-7952 WEB: www.stmichaelsrankin.org JANUARY 24, 2021 SUNDAY AFTER THEOPHANY Sun., Jan. 24 Sunday after Theophany. Monk Thedosius 9:00 AM Divine Liturgy Panachida: George Dorogy 40 Day Memorial Sun, Jan. 31 34th Sunday after Pentecost. 13th Luke. Archbishops Athanasius and Cyril of Alexandria 9:00 AM Divine Liturgy. Panachida: January Perpetuals: (1/4) Sveton Simonoff. (1/10) Michael Lesko, Jr. (1/11) Joseph Zeok. (1/14) Mary Palovcsik. (1/17) Michael Beresh. (1/25) Steve Stegena. (1/31) Michael Hritz, Peter Belinsky. Sun., Feb. 7 35th Sunday after Pentecost. 14th Luke. Bishop Gregory of Nazianzus, called the Theologion 9:00 AM Divine Liturgy. Annual Parish Meeting Fri., Feb 12 Three Holy Bishops Basil the Great, Gregory the Theologion and John Chrysostom 9:00 AM Divine Liturgy Sun., Feb. 14 Sunday of Zacchaeus. Martyr Tryphon. Nun Brigid of Kildare 9:00 AM Divine Liturgy. Oath of Office of the Newly Elected Parish Council Holy Mystery of Confession: I will be available for Confessions after the Divine Liturgy, when the church is more private. Or, you can make an appointment and we will arrange an appropriate time. Please just contact me. PEOPLE STUFF Prayer List: Deceased: George Dorogy. Joseph Merlo. Kathy Bonnano Living: Father Joe Cervo. Father George Livanos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alexandrian and the Cappadocian Fathers of the Church in the Writings of Thomas Aquinas
    The Alexandrian and the Cappadocian Fathers of the Church in the writings of Thomas Aquinas Los Padres alejandrinos y capadocios en los escritos de Tomás de Aquino Leo J. Elders s.v.d. Pontifical Academy of St. Thomas Aquinas Resumen: Santo Tomás considera que los escritos de los Padres están directamente relacionados con las Escrituras ya que fueron escritos bajo la influencia rectora del mismo Espíritu Santo. Existe, pues, una continuidad de pensamiento entre los Padres como re- presentantes de la autoridad de los Apóstoles y la Biblia. Por este motivo, sería bueno re- conocer cuán profundamente santo Tomás se inspira en el pensamiento de los Padres. En esta contribución presentaremos los temas principales dentro de los escritos de los Padres Alejandrinos y Capadocios que han influido en el propio pensamiento de santo Tomás. Palabras clave: Atanasio de Alejandría, Cirilo de Alejandría, Basilio Magno, Gre- gorio Nacianceno, Gregorio de Nisa, Tomás de Aquino. Abstract: St. Thomas considers the writings of the Fathers as directly related to Scrip- ture since these were composed under the guiding influence of the same Holy Spirit. There exists therefore a continuity of thought between the Fathers as representatives of the au- thority of the Apostles and the Bible.1 For this reason, one would do well to recognize how deeply St. Thomas draw upon the thought of the Fathers. In this contribution we will present the main themes within the writings of the Alexandrian and Cappadocian Fathers that have influenced St. Thomas’s own thought.2 Key words: Athanasius of Alexandria, Cyril of Alexandria, Basil the Great, Gregory of Nazianzus, Gregory of Nyssa, Thomas Aquinas.
    [Show full text]
  • Palamism in the Twentieth Century
    Palamism in the Twentieth Century An Examination of the Essence/Energies Distinction in Vladimir Lossky, Kallistos Ware and Dumitru Staniloae Jonas Eklund Supervisor Professor Gösta Hallonsten This Master’s Thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the MA degree at MF Norwegian School of Theology, 2017, autumn, in collaboration with the Newman Institute, Uppsala, Sweden AVH5010: Master's Thesis (60 ECTS) Master of Theology 43 726 words ABSTRACT This Master’s thesis will explicate, analyse and discuss the Orthodox doctrine of the essence/energies distinction in three prominent 20th century theologians, namely, Vladimir Lossky, Kallistos Ware and Dumitru Staniloae. This is urgent because of the central position this doctrine occupies in contemporary Orthodoxy, together with the lack of precision one usually encounters when references are made to this distinction. Methodologically, it will proceed by a careful reading of primary sources in order to explicate and clarify, in each theologian, the most important lines of thought concerning the essence/energies distinction. It will also explicate details which may affect, elucidate, or even put into question, these major lines of thought. As secondary sources, other Orthodox theologians as well as Greek Church fathers will be consulted. Lossky and Staniloae, respectively, present rather clear visions about the relationship between God’s essence and energies. As it turns out their positions are quite far from each other and, at some points, even incommensurable. Ware, on the other hand, affirms traditional and contemporary formulations, yet without providing any clear definition of his own opinion. As regards God’s energies towards creation, the opinions of the three theologians are pretty close; but regarding God’s eternal energies, their differences become apparent.
    [Show full text]