Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University Recommended Citation Morgan, Jonathan Stephen, "Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria" (2013). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 277. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/277 CIRCUMCISION OF THE SPIRIT IN THE SOTERIOLOGY OF CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA by Jonathan S. Morgan, B.S., M.A. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2013 ABSTRACT CIRCUMCISION OF THE SPIRIT IN THE SOTERIOLOGY OF CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA Jonathan S. Morgan, B.S., M.A. Marquette University, 2013 In this dissertation I argue that Cyril of Alexandria’s interpretation of “spiritual circumcision” provides invaluable insight into his complex doctrine of salvation. Spiritual Circumcision – or Circumcision by the Spirit -- is a recurring theme throughout his extensive body of exegetical literature, which was written before the Nestorian controversy (428). When Cyril considers the meaning and scope of circumcision, he recognizes it as a type that can describe a range of salvific effects. For him, circumcision functions as a unifying concept that ties together various aspects of salvation such as purification, sanctification, participation, and freedom. Soteriology, however, can only be understood in relation to other doctrines. Thus, Cyril’s discussions of circumcision often include correlative areas of theology such as hamartiology and Trinitarian thought. In this way, Cyril’s discussions on circumcision convey what we are saved from, as well as the Trinitarian agency of our salvation. Cyril’s typological interpretation of circumcision also sheds light upon his biblical exegesis. In this study I demonstrate that what Cyril does with circumcision substantiates the thesis that his Scriptural interpretation was shaped, in part, by his relationship with Judaism. Throughout his biblical commentaries, Cyril goes to great lengths to demonstrate that Jewish theology and practice is founded upon the “types and shadows” of the Old Testament instead of the spiritual realities that are fulfilled in Christ and to which they point. A number of scholars have recognized this significant feature of Cyril’s exegesis, and have explored the various “type- reality” relationships present in Cyril’s writings. However, very little attention has been given to the way Cyril’s typological exegesis of circumcision in particular clarifies this aspect of his biblical interpretation. Therefore, my aim is to demonstrate that Cyril’s understanding of true circumcision functions in his exegetical literature as a spiritual symbol that unites his multi- faceted soteriology, and to further strengthen the thesis that Cyril’s treatment of circumcision underscores his “type-reality” hermeneutic. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Jonathan Morgan, B.S., M.A. A doctoral dissertation is never the product of one author. So many people have made important contributions to my intellectual and personal development, that it is impossible to acknowledge everyone in a brief statement. However, I do wish to thank those who played vital roles in making this dissertation possible. Michel Barnes, my director, patiently guided me as the dissertation evolved, and helped clarify my thinking in important ways. I value not only his academic expertise, but his friendship. I also owe a debt of gratitude to Fr. Joe Mueller, who made significant contributions from the beginning stages of this dissertation to its completion. I am thankful also for the other members of my committee, Steve Long and Lewis Ayres, for dedicating their time and assistance in bringing this project to a successful end. I also want to give special acknowledgement to the late Ralph Del Colle. Ralph was an original member of my committee whose probing questions and comments brought clarity and direction to my project while it was in its early stages. His class on soteriology helped build the foundation for this dissertation. During that semester, he modeled the kind of theologian I desire to be. He exhibited theological depth coupled with Christ-like humility and robust faith. Although he passed away before I finished my dissertation, his influence is felt in these pages. A word of thanks also goes to Fr. Alexander Golitzin and Lee Blackburn, who generously checked my Greek translations and made helpful corrections, and Daniel Keating who alerted me to interesting texts in Cyril. I also want to express my gratitude to Matthew Crawford with whom I collaborated on several German sources. ii Collegiality is a necessary part of the graduate student experience. I’m grateful for the genuine friendships I have made throughout my years at Marquette, and thankful for the fellowship, encouragement, and, in some cases, healthy distractions they provided. My thanks especially go to Lee Sytsma, Jackson Lashier, Alex Huggard, Christine Wood, and Phil Anderas. Most of all, I express my deepest appreciation to my family. I thank my parents, Dan and Liz, and my siblings, Stephen and Bethany, who have prayed for me, and provided unconditional love and support throughout my life. Stephen, my brother and academic colleague, has blessed me with a close fraternal friendship and stimulating conversations that have enhanced my intellectual and spiritual life. His visits from Notre Dame also provided times of refreshing when I needed a break from the monotony of academic life. Of course, I am forever indebted to Christy – my wife, companion, and help-mate – whose love, care, and encouragement have sustained and enriched my life in ways no words can express. Her sacrifices and devotion have made this dissertation possible, and it is to her that I dedicate this book. Finally, I praise God who has made every provision and equipped me to fulfill my calling. iii ABBREVIATIONS Series or Major Works ABD Anchor Bible Dictionary ACO Acta Conciliorum Oecumenicorum ACW Ancient Christian Writers ANF Ante-Nicene Fathers CCSL Corpus Christianorum Scriptorum Latinorum CSCO Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium FC Fathers of the Church Series GSC Die griecheschen christlichen Schriftsteller Lampe A Patristic Greek Lexicon LCL Loeb Classical Library LSJ Liddell, Scott, and Jones Greek English Lexicon LXX Septuagint NPNF Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers PG Patrologia Graeca SC Sources Chrétiennes SPCK Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge TLG Thesaurus Linguae Graeca Works of Cyril of Alexandria Chr. Un. On the Unity of Christ Com. Amos Commentary on Amos Com. Hab. Commentary on Habakkuk Com. Hos. Commentary on Hosea iv Com. Is. Commentary on Isaiah Com. Joel Commentary on Joel Com. Mic. Commentary on Micah Com. Mal. Commentary on Malachi Com. Na. Commentary on Nahum Com. Zech. Commentary on Zechariah De ador. De adoratione et cultu in spiritu et veritate FL Festal Letters Glaph. Glaphyra In Jo. Comentary on John TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS......................................................................................................... i ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................. iii CHAPTER INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1 I. CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA IN CONTEXT ............................................................... 12 Cyril’s Doctrine of Salvation in Modern Scholarship: A Brief History ............... 13 Cyril’s Doctrine of Salvation Prior to the Nestorian Controversy ....................... 32 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 49 II. EARLY CHRISTIAN INTERPRETATIONS OF CIRCUMCISION......................... 52 Circumcision in the Scriptures ........................................................................... 53 Circumcision in the Early Christian Era ............................................................. 56 Philo of Alexandria................................................................................. 57 Circumcision in the Christian Alexandrian Tradition.............................. 62 Circumcision in 2nd-3rd century Patristic Sources ................................... 70 Circumcision in 4th-5th century Patristic Sources .................................... 76 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 82 III. CIRCUMCISION OF THE SPIRIT IN CYRIL’S EARLY FESTAL LETTERS ........ 84 Festal Letters One and Six .................................................................................. 87 The Spiritual Value of Circumcision ..................................................... 101 The Role of Christ in Circumcision of the Heart ................................... 107 Festal Letter Nine ............................................................................................. 111 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 117 IV. CIRCUMCISION OF THE SPIRIT IN CYRIL’S OLD TESTAMENT COMMENTARIES ..................................................................................................... 119 Circumcision within the Narrative of Salvation: Israel
Recommended publications
  • Cyril of Alexandria 11:20 - 13:00 Tuesday, 20Th August, 2019 Room 1 Presentation Type Short Communications
    Cyril of Alexandria 11:20 - 13:00 Tuesday, 20th August, 2019 Room 1 Presentation type Short Communications 605 Surpassing Mere Logomachy: Cyril and Theodoret on the Third and Fourth Anathemas Michael Magree, S.J. University of Notre Dame, South Bend, USA Abstract To avoid erroneous evaluations of ancient debates, it is necessary to note the particulars of the arguments in order to see just where the disagreements lay. In the case of Theodoret of Cyrus’s and Cyril of Alexandria’s debates about the twelve anathemas, the exchanges about Philippians 2:5-11 show that each recognized points of agreement in their common opposition to non-Nicene theologies and, more precisely, in their common acceptance both of the Word’s consubstantiality with the Father and of the Word’s consequent immutability and omniscience. Each bishop attempted to use these principles to argue for their respective differing claims about the Word enfleshed. Theodoret said that the union of humanity and divinity cannot be called natural, because this would obscure the distinction of these natures and would make the union involuntary. Cyril had used just such a distinction of nature and will, but he then had to clarify how it applied. Theodoret argued that consubstantiality means that the Word cannot be ignorant, and therefore Jesus Christ can only be ignorant insofar as he is the human subject of ignorance. Cyril said that a true union must entail the ability to say that the incarnate Word is the subject of ignorance, while not ignorant in itself. Cyril’s repetition of the claim that ‘the same one can both suffer and not suffer’ in his later Quod Unus Sit Christusshowed that Theodoret’s attack on this point hit on a claim that Cyril could recognize as difficult to accept.
    [Show full text]
  • The Homilies of John Chrysostom
    366 Tsamakda Chapter 25 The Homilies of John Chrysostom Vasiliki Tsamakda The Author and His Work St John Chrysostom (c.347-407) was the most important Father of the Orthodox Church. Archbishop of Constantinople from 398 to 404, he was officially recog- nized as a Doctor of the Orthodox Church by the Council of Chalcedon in 4511 due to his vast and important theological writings.2 He was the most produc- tive among the Church Fathers, with over 1,500 works written by, or ascribed to him. His name was firmly associated with the Liturgy, but above all he was appreciated for his numerous sermons and as an extraordinary preacher. From the 6th century on he was called Chrysostomos, the “golden mouthed”. The fact that over 7,000 manuscripts including his writings exist, attests to the impor- tance and great distribution of his works, many of which were translated into other languages. The great majority of them date after the Iconoclasm. The homilies of John Chrysostom were read during the Service of the Matins (Orthros) mainly in Byzantine monasteries. They were transmitted in various collections or series from which only a few were selected for illustration. Illustrated homilies of John Chrysostom The exact number of illustrated manuscripts containing Chrysostomic ser- mons is unknown,3 but their number is extremely low in view of the very rich 1 The translation of his relics to Constantinople and their deposition in the Church of the Holy Apostles marks the beginning of his cult in Byzantium. The Orthodox Church commemorates him on 27 January, 13 November and also on 30 January together with the other two Cappadocian Fathers, Basil the Great and Gregory of Nazianzus.
    [Show full text]
  • Language and Theology in St Gregory of Nyssa
    Durham E-Theses Language and theology in St Gregory of Nyssa Neamµu, Mihail G. How to cite: Neamµu, Mihail G. (2002) Language and theology in St Gregory of Nyssa, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4187/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk University of Durham Faculty of Arts Department of Theology The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Language and Theology in St Gregory of Nyssa Mihail G. Neamtu St John's College September 2002 M.A. in Theological Research Supervisor: Prof Andrew Louth This dissertation is the product of my own work, and the work of others has been properly acknowledged throughout. Mihail Neamtu Language and Theology in St Gregory of Nyssa MA (Research) Thesis, September 2002 Abstract This MA thesis focuses on the work of one of the most influential and authoritative theologians of the early Church: St Gregory of Nyssa (f396).
    [Show full text]
  • “Making Church of England Poetical” Ephraim and the Oxford Movement
    Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies, Vol. 2.1, 111–129 © 1999 [2010] by Beth Mardutho: The Syriac Institute and Gorgias Press “MAKING CHURCH OF ENGLAND POETICAL” EPHRAIM AND THE OXFORD MOVEMENT GEOFFREY ROWELL BISHOP OF BASINGSTOKE BISHOPSWOOD END, KINGSWOOD RISE ENGLAND [1] In 1966 Donald Allchin gave a paper at an Oxford symposium entitled “The theological vision of the Oxford Movement,” in which he explored the important unpublished series of lectures by Pusey dating from 1836, entitled “On Types & Prophecies.” A footnote to the published volume of the conference papers acknowledges with gratitude Robert Murray’s comment about the Semitic quality of Pusey’s thought, suggesting that it was reminiscent of the Syrian Fathers, even more than the Greek. Allchin notes there that Father R. M. Benson, a close disciple of Pusey and the founder of the The Society of St. John the Evangelist (“the Cowley Fathers”), the first religious community for men in the Church of England, was also a theologian who “was first of all a Hebraist, and then a patristic scholar.” This same footnote contains the words: “The possibility of a direct influence of St. Ephrem the Syrian on Pusey would be worth investigating.”1 This might be regarded as the starting-point for the present paper. 1 A. M. Allchin, “The theological vision of the Oxford Movement,” in J. Coulson and A.M. Allchin (eds.), The Rediscovery of Newman: An Oxford Symposium, (London, 1967) 50–75, p. 69, note 1. 111 112 Geoffrey Rowell [2] The title, “Making the Church of England poetical,” is an allusion
    [Show full text]
  • The Christological Function of Divine Impassibility: Cyril of Alexandria and Contemporary Debate
    The Christological Function of Divine Impassibility: Cyril of Alexandria and Contemporary Debate by David Andrew Graham A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Wycliffe College and the Theological Department of the Toronto School of Theology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Theology awarded by the University of St. Michael's College © Copyright by David Andrew Graham 2013 The Christological Function of Divine Impassibility: Cyril of Alexandria and Contemporary Debate David Andrew Graham Master of Arts in Theology University of St. Michael’s College 2013 Abstract This thesis contributes to the debate over the meaning and function of the doctrine of divine impassibility in theological and especially christological discourse. Seeking to establish the coherence and utility of the paradoxical language characteristic of the received christological tradition (e.g. the impassible Word became passible flesh and suffered impassibly), it argues that the doctrine of divine apatheia illuminates the apocalyptic and soteriological dimension of the incarnate Son’s passible life more effectively than recent reactions against it. The first chapter explores the Christology of Cyril of Alexandria and the meaning and place of apatheia within it. In light of the christological tradition which Cyril epitomized, the second chapter engages contemporary critiques and re-appropriations of impassibility, focusing on the particular contributions of Jürgen Moltmann, Robert W. Jenson, Bruce L. McCormack and David Bentley Hart. ii Acknowledgments If this thesis communicates any truth, beauty and goodness, credit belongs to all those who have shaped my life up to this point. In particular, I would like to thank the Toronto School of Theology and Wycliffe College for providing space to do theology from within the catholic church.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Movement
    Oxford Movement This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on theLearn talk more The Oxford Movement was a movement of High Church members of the Church of England which eventually developed into Anglo-Catholicism. The movement, whose original devotees were mostly associated with the University of Oxford, argued for the reinstatement of some older Christian traditions of faith and their inclusion into Anglican liturgy and theology. They thought of Anglicanism as one of three branches of the "one holy, catholic, and apostolic" Christian church. By the 1840s many participants decided that the Anglican Church lacked grace, and converted to Roman Catholicism. Edward John Henry Bouverie Newman Pusey The movement's philosophy was known as Tractarianism after its series of publications, the Tracts for the Times, published from 1833 to 1841. Tractarians were also disparagingly referred to as "Newmanites" (before 1845) and "Puseyites" (after 1845) after two prominent Tractarians, John Henry Newman and Edward Bouverie Pusey. Other well-known Tractarians included John Keble, Charles Marriott, Richard Froude, Robert Wilberforce, Isaac Williams and William Palmer. Origins and early period In the early nineteenth century, different groups were present in the Church of England. Many, particularly in high office, saw themselves as latitudinarian (liberal) in an attempt to broaden the Church's appeal. Conversely, many clergy in the parishes were Evangelicals, as a result of the revival led by John Wesley. Alongside this, the universities became the breeding ground for a movement to restore liturgical and devotional customs which borrowed heavily from traditions before the English Reformation as well as contemporary Roman Catholic traditions.[1] The immediate impetus for the Tractarian movement was a perceived attack by the reforming Whig administration on the structure and revenues of the Church of Ireland (the established church in Ireland), with the Irish Church Temporalities Bill (1833).
    [Show full text]
  • Some Scriptural References to the Care and Treatment of Children Ruth G
    The Linacre Quarterly Volume 15 | Number 1 Article 3 1-1-1948 Some Scriptural References to the Care and Treatment of Children Ruth G. Aleman Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq Part of the Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, and the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Aleman, Ruth G. (1948) "Some Scriptural References to the Care and Treatment of Children," The Linacre Quarterly: Vol. 15 : No. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq/vol15/iss1/3 TH�� LINAC)Us Q AllTl,;111.Y 8 THE LINACRE QUARTERLY larger opportunities for the exercise of his profession, the responsibi· lities of the doctor must become intensified so that ethical attitudes must be­ come the dominant attitude of the physician towards his practice. Simi­ SOME SCRIPTURAL REFERENCES 'l'O THE CARE larly there will be outgrowths of the most diversified and intensified kind., AND TREATMENT Oli' CHILDREN* which will embrace ever more and more the whole range of human interests. the man's home and his business, his play and his work, his politics and his religion. All of these at some time or other become the concern of H.uTH G. rlL.isill,U,, M.D. the practicing physician and thereby contribute to the ethical content of medical practice. New Urleans, /,u. But in the Catholic viewpoint, ethical considerations imply more tlrn11 merely questions of basic right. ancl wrong, questions of sin. The injutH' L' 'HOU H we ltear excerpts of the N w Test1. 111ent. read at Ma s t-ion of our Blessed Savior, "Be you, thcl'cforc, perfect as also your _A � G_ � � _ _ � m English every Sunday and many of us studied Bible History 111 Heavenly Fat.he!' is perfect." (Mat.
    [Show full text]
  • Missional Insufflation John 20:19-23, 30-31
    John 20:19-23, 30-31 1 Missional Insufflation John 20:19-23, 30-31 Rev. Stephen H. Wilkins Graves Memorial Presbyterian Church April 19, 2020 So, what do we do with the message of Easter? Easter has come and gone, as it does every year. Granted, it was strangely different this year, as we weren’t able to gather together physically to mark the anniversary of the resurrection of our Lord. But the basic pattern on our calendar wasn’t any different from years past. We went through Lent, with a slow, deliberate 40-day journey toward the cross; at the end of Lent we experienced the fast-paced intense spiritual roller coaster ride through Holy Week with Palm Sunday, Maundy Thursday, and Good Friday. Every year there’s this build-up to Easter, culminating in the glorious proclamation of the victory of Jesus Christ over sin and death, and the eternal implications that his resurrection has for us. But now, what? What do we do with the Easter message? Jesus is risen from the dead. Now, what? Don’t you get the sense that there’s some unfinished business that needs our attention? If you read through all four gospels, you will notice that none of them ends at the empty tomb. Every gospel (even the traditional short ending of the Gospel According to Mark) has some aspect of sending forth of those first witnesses to the resurrection, to proclaim what they had seen. All four gospels remind us that the resurrection of Jesus is not just good news for us to experience; indeed, with the privilege of witnessing and embracing the resurrection comes the responsibility of passing on the Good News to the rest of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • PART TWO Critical Studies –
    PART TWO Critical Studies – David T. Runia - 9789004216853 Downloaded from Brill.com10/05/2021 02:06:05PM via free access David T. Runia - 9789004216853 Downloaded from Brill.com10/05/2021 02:06:05PM via free access . Monique Alexandre, ‘Du grec au latin: Les titres des œuvres de Philon d’Alexandrie,’ in S. Deléani and J.-C. Fredouille (edd.), Titres et articulations du texte dans les œuvres antiques: actes du Colloque International de Chantilly, – décembre , Collection des Études Augustiniennes (Paris ) –. This impressive piece of historical research is divided into three main parts. In a preliminary section Alexandre first gives a brief survey of the study of the transmission of the corpus Philonicum in modern scholarship and announces the theme of her article, namely to present some reflections on the Latin titles now in general use in Philonic scholarship. In the first part of the article she shows how the replacement of Greek titles by Latin ones is part of the humanist tradition, and is illustrated by the history of Philonic editions from Turnebus to Arnaldez– Pouilloux–Mondésert. She then goes on in the second part to examine the Latin tradition of Philo’s reception in antiquity (Jerome, Rufinus, the Old Latin translation) in order to see whether the titles transmitted by it were influential in determining the Latin titles used in the editions. This appears to have hardly been the case. In the third part the titles now in use are analysed. Most of them were invented by the humanists of the Renaissance and the succeeding period; only a few are the work of philologists of the th century.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Cyril of Jerusalem and the Alexandrian Heritage A. A. Stephenson, Sj
    ST. CYRIL OF JERUSALEM AND THE ALEXANDRIAN HERITAGE A. A. STEPHENSON, SJ. GlasgoWy Scotland HE purpose of this article is, first, to show that St. CyriPs sole Tsurviving sermon, the much neglected Sermon on the Paralytic, is characterized by a contemplative warmth and depth, a mystical elan,1 unmistakably in the Alexandrian tradition, and is at the same time one of the most important keys to an understanding of its author; secondly, to show that St. Cyril's great work, the Catecheses, when approached with this clue, reveals important Alexandrian elements as well as striking parallels with the two great masters of the Alex­ andrian School. Evidence will also be adduced pointing, though less certainly, to the conclusion that the Lenten catechetical teaching at Jerusalem, as exemplified by St. CyriPs Catecheses, shows (in spite of obvious and important differences) some remarkable resemblances to * the attempt of Clement and Origen to construct a synthesis of re­ vealed truth,2 and was, in fact, in some degree formally regarded as a gnosis in the Alexandrian manner. It is not here maintained that / St. Cyril was a champion of the particular theological doctrines specially associated with Origen. Since the detection of a marked strain of Alexandrian mystical idealism in the author of the rather pedestrian Catechetical Lectures may cause some surprise,3 it must be premised that from the historical point of view Cyril's contact with the Alexandrian tradition would present no special difficulty. The historical links, indeed, between Alexandria and Palestine are of considerable interest. Origen first 1 The words "mystical" and "contemplation" are used in this article in a fairly wide sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyril of Jerusalem
    CYRIL OF JERUSALEM �t Cyril was probably born about 313, that critical year in the history of the Church when the Emperor Constantine, feeling an attraction to Christianity that to begin with, at least, seems to have been largely superstition, granted Christians the right to practise their religion. This toleration soon developed into favour as the Emperor began to see in Christianity, rather than paganism, the influence he needed to cement together his wide­ spread and diverse subjects. Soon, in 325, he was convening the first Oecumenical Council at Nicaea to restore the unity which the Ariap heresy had shattered. St Cyril grew up in the after­ math of this Council, when the Nicene definition that the· Son was consubsta:ntial with the Father was opposed for a variety of reasons by many different parties. St Cyril tried to steer a middle way through this controversy; but was driven out of Jerusalem three times by the Arians. Soon after the Council of Nicaea, Constantine, with the fervour of a convert and with a propagandist's instinct for what would appealto the people, decided to build a sumptuous church in Jerusalem on what was traditionally held to be the site of the tomb where Jesus had been buried. While the foundations were being excavated, some find was made which was interpreted as miraculous proof that here indeed was the site of the Lord's Passion. By the end of the century there had grown up the legend of the discovery of the true cross by Constantine's mother Helen. A rock hill was also discovered, which was identified as the hill of Calvary; also a tomb cut out from the rock which was taken to be the tomb of Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Christianity in Transjordan
    Tyndale Bulletin 45.1 (1994) 97-117. EARLY CHRISTIANITY IN TRANSJORDAN Bastiaan Van Elderen Summary Considerable archaeological field work is currently being conducted in the area of the Decapolis, including the author’s involvement in the excavations of Abila. This article reviews the few references to northern Transjordan in the New Testament and the references in early Christian literature which suggest that Jewish Christianity flourished in Transjordan in the early Christian centuries. Archaeological evidence indicates a rich floruit of Byzantine Christianity in Transjordan. A study of literary allusions relating to this area and the current archaeological work promise new light on this little-known phase of early Christianity. One of the blank pages in ancient church history is the beginning stages of the movement of Christianity to the east. The movement of Christianity as presented in the Acts of the Apostles was to the west. Nothing is reported about the movement of Christianity to the south apart from the report of the conversion of the Ethiopian eunuch; or of the movement to the east apart from the report of Christians in Damascus whom Saul sought to apprehend. On the other hand, there are some scattered references in the literature of the early church. In view of increasing archaeological work in the Transjordan area it may be useful to assemble some of these data from the literary sources to provide a framework in which to evaluate this current and future archaeological work. Perhaps a word of caution is in order first of all. Archaeological data relating to pre-Constantinian Christianity are extremely limited.
    [Show full text]