DOCSLIB.ORG

Perek III Daf 9 Amud A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Perek III Daf 9 Amud A Perek III Daf 9 Amud a BACKGROUND Th is is a measure that was used in the past, but no longer in ַה ְי ׁ ָש ָנה. ָא ַמר ַר ִּבי ָיוֹח ָנן: ָה ֵדין ִ ּד ַידן ,Cups were made of various materials, including silver : ּכוֹס – the present. Rabbi Yoĥanan said: Th is is our measure today and Cup gold, glass, and clay. The cup is the smallest drinking vessel and ּהוא, ְו ָל ָּמה ָקֵרי ֵל ּיה ַﬠ ִּת ָיקה ִמן ְּב ִגין .it is not so old. Th e Gemara asks: Why does the tanna of the can hold about a quarter-log of liquid ַ ּד ֲהָוה ְּב ֵיוֹמי? baraita call this measure old when it was still being used in his day? -Th e Gemara answers: Some say that this measure was origi ִאית ְ ּד ָא ְמִרי: ַ ּד ֲהַות ְז ֵﬠ ָירא ְוַר ְּב ְּתָיא, nally small and it was made larger, and some say that aft er ְו ִאית ְ ּד ָא ְמִרי: ְ ּד ַאְז ִﬠ ָירא, ְו ָלא ַאְז ִﬠ ָירא it was enlarged it was again made smaller, but not as small as ְּכ ָמה ַ ּד ֲהַות. it had been originally. Since this measure was not of the same size at all times, the tanna of the baraita was precise when he said that a quarter-log is equal to the old measure of one-eighth. So too, Rabbi Yoĥanan was precise when he said that this was the measure used in his day. Th e Gemara asks: In terms of the measures currently in use, what ַּכ ָּמה ּהוא ׁ ִש ּיעור ׁ ֶשל ּכוֹס? ַר ִּבי ֵיוֹסי B is the measure of a cup that holds a quarter-log? Rabbi Yosei ְּב ׁ ֵשם ַר ִּבי ֵיוֹסי ֶּבן ָּפִזי ְוַר ִּבי ֵיוֹסי ַּבר in the name of Rabbi Yosei ben Pazi and Rabbi Yosei bar ֵּב ָיבי ְּב ׁ ֵשם ַר ִּבי ׁ ְש ּמו ֵאל: ֶא ְצ ָּב ַﬠִיים Beivai in the name of Rabbi Shmuel said: Two fi ngers long by ַﬠל ֶא ְצ ָּב ַﬠִיים ַﬠל ּרום ֶא ְצ ַּבע ּו ֶמ ֱח ָצה two fi ngers wide by the height of one and a half fi ngers and .one-third of a fi nger ּו ׁ ְש ִל ׁיש ֶא ְצ ַּבע. -Th e Gemara previously discussed the measure of wine that de ( ָּת ֵני: ָי ֵב ׁש ְּכַז ִית, ִ ּד ְבֵרי ַר ִּבי ָנ ָתן.) termines liability if one carries it from one domain to another on Shabbat. Th ere, the Gemara discussed wine in liquid form; Glass cups and pitcher from the talmudic period here, the Gemara adds a parallel ruling with regard to congealed In certain places, e.g., on Mount : ַיִין ָק ּרו ׁש – wine. It was taught in a baraita: Th e measure that determines Congealed wine liability for carrying from one domain to another congealed Hermon, wine was covered with snow and allowed to congeal H and freeze. The frozen wine would harden and resemble fig wine is an olive-bulk; this is the statement of Rabbi Natan. cakes in appearance. Wine was frozen in this manner to preserve Th e Rabbis of Caesarea and Rabbi Yosei bar Beivai said in the it both so it would not turn sour and in order to raise its alcohol ַר ָּב ַנן ְ ּד ֵק ָיסִרי ְוַר ִּבי ֵיוֹסי ַּבר ֵּב ָיבי ְּב ׁ ֵשם name of Shmuel: Th ese words of Rabbi Natan follow the opin- content, as when it froze, some of the water separated from the .wine and turned into ice ׁ ְש ּמו ֵאל: ָא ְתָיא ְ ּדַר ִּבי ָנ ָתן ְּכַר ִּבי ׁ ִש ְמעוֹן. ion of Rabbi Shimon in a mishna (Shabbat b). Just as Rabbi ְּכ ָמה ְ ּדַר ִּבי ׁ ִש ְמעוֹן ָא ַמר ִּבְר ִב ִיﬠית – ֵּכן Shimon said there: Th e measure that determines liability for all ָא ַמר ַר ִּבי ָנ ַתן ִּבְר ִב ִיﬠית, ִל ְכ ׁ ֶש ִיּ ָקֵר ׁש liquids, including wine, is a quarter-log, so Rabbi Natan said: -When wine is in liquid form, the measure that determines liabil ִו ֵיהא ּבוֹ ְּכַז ִית. ity for carrying it from one domain to another is a quarter-log; aft er it has congealedB one is liable only if he carries out an olive-bulk, which is equivalent to a quarter-log of wine aft er it has congealed. On a similar matt er, Rabbi Simon said in the name of Rabbi § ַר ִּבי ִסימוֹן ְּב ׁ ֵשם ַר ִּבי ְי ׁ ֻהוֹשﬠ ֶּבן ֵלִוי: Yehoshua ben Levi: An incident is related with regard to the ַמ ֲﬠ ֶׂשה ְּב ִפְרַ ּדת ַר ִּבי ׁ ֶש ֵּמ ָתה ְו ִט ֲה ּרו ֶאת mule of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi that died of a wound, and the Snowy Mount Hermon as seen from Mount Bental N ָ ּד ָמ ּה ִמ ׁש ּום ְנ ֵב ָילה. ְו ׁ ָש ַאל ַר ִּבי ֱא ִל ֶיﬠֶזר Sages deemed its blood ritually pure, i.e., free of the impurity HALAKHA ֶאת ַר ִּבי ִסימוֹן: ַﬠד ַּכ ָּמה? of an unslaughtered animal carcass. Th ey said that the blood of a carcass does not impart ritual impurity as does the carcass itself. The measure for carrying from one domain to another con- The measure that : ָי ֵב ׁש ְּכַז ִית – And Rabbi Eliezer asked Rabbi Simon, who had reported this gealed wine is an olive-bulk determines liability for carrying from one domain to another ruling: Up to how much blood from an animal carcass does not congealed wine on Shabbat is an olive-bulk, in accordance with render one ritually impure? Did they deem it pure because it was the opinion of Rabbi Natan (Rambam Sefer Zemanim, Hilkhot less than a quarter-log, but had it been more than a quarter-log Shabbat 18:2). they would have deemed it impure? NOTES stated in the Torah, and the Sages disagree about the matter ְו ִט ֲה ּרו – And the Sages deemed its blood ritually pure The impurity of an unslaughtered animal carcass in a baraita (Shabbat 77a). According to Beit Hillel, the blood : ֶאת ָ ּד ָמ ּה is mentioned in several places in the Torah, but nowhere imparts ritual impurity, whereas according to Beit Shammai does the Torah specify the minimum measure of a carcass it does not. The Sages discuss whether, even according to the needed to impart impurity. The halakha was established that opinion of Beit Shammai, the blood itself is pure, or whether with regard to imparting ritual impurity, the measure of the it is pure only in the sense that it does not cause other items flesh of a carcass is the same as the measure that determines to be susceptible to impurity. The Sages also consider wheth- liability for eating it, i.e., an olive-bulk. The impurity of the er it is pure in any measure or only when it is less than an blood of an unslaughtered animal carcass is not explicitly olive-bulk. Perek III . 9a 73 . פרק ג׳ דף ט. PERSONALITIES ,Rabbi Simon paid Rabbi Eliezer no att ention and did not answer him ְו ָלא ַא ׁ ְשַּגח ֵּב ּיה ְו ׁ ָש ַאל ְלַר ִּבי ְי ׁ ֻהוֹשﬠ An amora from the third generation so Rabbi Eliezer went and asked Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi, who said :ַרב ֵּב ָיבי – Rav Beivai ֶּבן ֵלִוי, ַו ֲא ַמר ֵל ּיה: ַﬠד ְר ִב ִיﬠית – ָטהוֹר, in Eretz Yisrael, Rav Beivai was primarily a student of Rabbi to him as follows: Up to a quarter-log of blood is pure; more than a ֵיוֹתר ֵמְר ִב ִיﬠית – ָט ֵמא. ּו ָב ַא ׁש ְלַר ִּבי Yoĥanan and Reish Lakish. He had a close relationship quarter-log of blood is impure. Rabbi Elazar was displeased that ֶא ְל ָﬠָזר ַﬠל ְ ּד ָלא ָחַזר ֵל ּיה ַר ִּבי ִסימוֹן -with Rabbi Ami, Rabbi Asi, and Rabbi Abbahu. Accord ing to the Gemara here and elsewhere (see Jerusalem Rabbi Simon had not fully reported the teaching to him, so that he .had to go to Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi to ask about it ׁ ְש ּמו ָﬠ ָתא. Talmud, Shabbat 8:1; see Menaĥot 103b), Rabbi Beivai was desperately poor, to the extent that he claimed that the P Rav Beivai was sitt ing and teaching this case of the mule from ַרב ֵּב ָיבי ֲהָוה ְי ֵתיב ַמ ְת ֵני ָהֵדין ּעו ְבָ ּדא. following verse applied to him: “And your life shall hang Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi’s household, in which the Sages ruled that the ֲא ַמר ֵל ּיה ַר ִּבי ִי ְצ ָחק ַּבר ָּכ ֲה ָנה: ַﬠד in doubt before you; and you shall fear night and day, and blood of a carcass does not render one impure. Rabbi Yitzĥak bar ְר ִב ִיﬠית – ָטהוֹר, ֵיוֹתר ִמ ָּכאן – ָט ֵמא? .(shall have no assurance of your life” (Deuteronomy 28:66 He is sometimes confused with the Babylonian amora’im Kahana wished to clarify the issue and said to him: Up to a quarter- Rav Beivai and Rav Beivai bar Abaye. log of blood is pure, but more than that is impure? Or did the Sages rule that the blood of a carcass is never ritually impure, whatever the BACKGROUND measure may be? The term sidki is usually referring : ִסְד ִקי – [Vendor [sidki -Th e Gemara relates: In response to Rabbi Yitzĥak bar Kahana’s ques ּו ְב ַﬠט ֵּב ּיה. ֲא ַמר ֵל ּיה ַר ִּבי ְזִר ָיקא: to a peddler who sells small, inexpensive notions such tion, Rav Beivai kicked him.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Miriyam Goldman OA Thesis 9Dec20.Pdf (247.7Kb)
    The Living Stone: The Talmudic Paradox of the Seventh Month Gestational Viability vs. the Eighth Month Non-Viability Presented to the S. Daniel Abraham Honors Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Completion of the Program Stern College for Women Yeshiva University December 9, 2020 Miriyam A. Goldman Mentor: Rabbi Dr. Richard Weiss, Biology Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………….…. 4 Background to Pregnancy ……………………………………………………………………… 5 Talmudic Sources on the Dilemma ……………………………………………………………. 6 Meforshim on the Dilemma ……………………………………………………………………. 9 Secular Sources of the Dilemma ………………………………………………………………. 11 The Significance of Hair and Nails in Terms of Viability……………………………….……... 14 The Definition of Nefel’s Impact on Viability ……………………………………………….. 17 History of Premature Survival ………………………………………………………………… 18 Statistics on Prematurity ………………………………………………………………………. 19 Developmental Differences Between Seventh and Eighth Months ……………………….…. 20 Contemporary Talmudic Balance of the Dilemma..…………………………………….…….. 22 Contemporary Secular Balance of the Dilemma .……………………………………….…….. 24 Evaluation of Talmudic Accreditation …………………………………………………..…...... 25 Interviews with Rabbi Eitan Mayer, Rabbi Daniel Stein, and Rabbi Dr. Richard Weiss .…...... 27 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………….…. 29 References…..………………………………………………………………………………..… 34 2 Abstract This paper reviews the viability of premature infants, specifically the halachic status of those born in
    [Show full text]
  • Beitza Rosh Hashana
    NOTES Rav Yosef said to Abaye: Th is is not so; rather, both according to me ֲ אַמר ֵל ּיה: ֵּבין ְלִד ִ ידי ֵּבין ְלַר ָּבה ִאית ָלן Apparently, the : ֶּׁשַיְּחפוֹר ְּבֶדֶקר – and according to Rabba we are of the opinion that the ruling is in Then he digs with a shovel conclusion is that Beit Shammai and Beit Hillel disagree ְּדַר ִּבי זֵ ָ ירא, ְוָהָכא ְּבָהא ָקא ַּ ִמפְלִגינַן: accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Zeira, and here we disagree over whether regular earth in a courtyard is muktze or ַר ָּבה ָסַבר, ִאי ִא ָ ּיכא ָﬠָפר ָּ ְלַמטה – with regard to this matt er: Rabba holds that if there is prepared whether it is considered prepared and may be carried and ִאין, ִאי ָלא – ָלא, ָחְי ׁ ִישינַן ִּדְלָמא earth beneath, yes, in that case one may slaughter an animal, but if used for covering (Rid). It is permitted to use the earth after there is no earth prepared beneath, no, he may not slaughter it at all. the fact, as the positive mitzva by Torah law to cover the ִמְמִל ְיך ְוָלא ָׁשֵחיט. ּוְלִד ִ ידי ( ַאְּדַר ָּבה), Why not? Rabba says: We are concerned that perhaps one will blood overrides the rabbinic prohibition against moving ָהא ֲﬠִד ָ יפא, ְּדִאי ָלא ָׁשֵרית ֵל ּיה ָאֵתי .(reconsider and not slaughter it at all, and he will have dug a hole on muktze objects (Shitta Mekubbetzet ְלִאְמ ּ נוֵﬠי ִּׂ ִמשְמַחת יוֹם טוֹב. וְ הוּא – a Festival unnecessarily. And according to my opinion, on the con- And that is when one has a shovel embedded The mishna alludes to this halakha, as it : ֶׁשֵיּׁש לוֹ ֶּדֶקר נָעוּץ -trary: Th is situation, in which he is permitt ed to dig fi rst, is prefer able, since if you do not permit him to dig in all cases for the pur- does not simply state: He digs and covers the blood, but pose of slaughter, he will be unable to eat meat and will refrain from rather: He digs with a shovel, which indicates that there is a shovel ready for this purpose (Ĥatam Sofer, 2nd ed.).
    [Show full text]
  • The Greatest Mirror: Heavenly Counterparts in the Jewish Pseudepigrapha
    The Greatest Mirror Heavenly Counterparts in the Jewish Pseudepigrapha Andrei A. Orlov On the cover: The Baleful Head, by Edward Burne-Jones. Oil on canvas, dated 1886– 1887. Courtesy of Art Resource. Published by State University of New York Press, Albany © 2017 State University of New York All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission. No part of this book may be stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means including electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission in writing of the publisher. For information, contact State University of New York Press, Albany, NY www.sunypress.edu Production, Dana Foote Marketing, Fran Keneston Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Orlov, Andrei A., 1960– author. Title: The greatest mirror : heavenly counterparts in the Jewish Pseudepigrapha / Andrei A. Orlov. Description: Albany, New York : State University of New York Press, [2017] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016052228 (print) | LCCN 2016053193 (ebook) | ISBN 9781438466910 (hardcover : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781438466927 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Apocryphal books (Old Testament)—Criticism, interpretation, etc. Classification: LCC BS1700 .O775 2017 (print) | LCC BS1700 (ebook) | DDC 229/.9106—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016052228 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 For April DeConick . in the season when my body was completed in its maturity, there imme- diately flew down and appeared before me that most beautiful and greatest mirror-image of myself.
    [Show full text]
  • Moshe Raphael Ben Yehoshua (Morris Stadtmauer) O”H Tzvi Gershon Ben Yoel (Harvey Felsen) O”H
    6 Tishrei 5781 Eiruvin Daf 46 Sept. 24, 2020 Daf Notes is currently being dedicated to the neshamot of Moshe Raphael ben Yehoshua (Morris Stadtmauer) o”h Tzvi Gershon ben Yoel (Harvey Felsen) o”h May the studying of the Daf Notes be a zechus for their neshamot and may their souls find peace in Gan Eden and be bound up in the Bond of life Abaye sat at his studies and discoursed on this subject the ocean? — Rabbi Yitzchak replied: Here we are dealing when Rav Safra said to him: Is it not possible that we are with a case where the clouds were formed on the eve of dealing here with a case where the rain fell near a town the festival. But is it not possible that those moved away and the townspeople relied on that rain? — This, the other and these are others? — It is a case where one can replied, cannot be entertained at all. For we learned: A recognize them by some identification mark. And if you cistern belonging to an individual person is on a par with prefer I might reply: This is a matter of doubt in respect of that individual's feet, and one belonging to a town is on a a Rabbinical law and in any such doubt a lenient ruling is par with the feet of the people of that town, and one used adopted. But why shouldn’t the water acquire its place for by the Babylonian pilgrims is on a par with the feet of any the Shabbos in the clouds? May it then be derived from man who draws the water.
    [Show full text]
  • The Name of God the Golem Legend and the Demiurgic Role of the Alphabet 243
    CHAPTER FIVE The Name of God The Golem Legend and the Demiurgic Role of the Alphabet Since Samaritanism must be viewed within the wider phenomenon of the Jewish religion, it will be pertinent to present material from Judaism proper which is corroborative to the thesis of the present work. In this Chapter, the idea about the agency of the Name of God in the creation process will be expounded; then, in the next Chapter, the various traditions about the Angel of the Lord which are relevant to this topic will be set forth. An apt introduction to the Jewish teaching about the Divine Name as the instrument of the creation is the so-called golem legend. It is not too well known that the greatest feat to which the Jewish magician aspired actually was that of duplicating God's making of man, the crown of the creation. In the Middle Ages, Jewish esotericism developed a great cycle of golem legends, according to which the able magician was believed to be successful in creating a o ?� (o?u)1. But the word as well as the concept is far older. Rabbinic sources call Adam agolem before he is given the soul: In the first hour [of the sixth day], his dust was gathered; in the second, it was kneaded into a golem; in the third, his limbs were shaped; in the fourth, a soul was irifused into him; in the fifth, he arose and stood on his feet[ ...]. (Sanh. 38b) In 1615, Zalman �evi of Aufenhausen published his reply (Jii.discher Theriak) to the animadversions of the apostate Samuel Friedrich Brenz (in his book Schlangenbalg) against the Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • Translating a Midrash-Compilation Some New Considerations
    TRANSLATING A MIDRASH-COMPILATION SOME NEW CONSIDERATIONS by JACOB NEUSNER Brown University The purpose of this paper is to adumbrate a few points of interest in the study of a biblical book. The book at hand is Leviticus. What I want to know is how systematically to analyze the composition of the rabbinical exegeses of passages of that book assembled in the collection known as Leviticus Rabbah. With Leviticus Rabbah we enjoy the results of a truly great scholarly achievement. Mordecai Margulies Midrash Wayyikra Rabbah. A Critical Edition Based on Manuscripts and Genizah Fragments with Variants and Notes (Jerusalem. 1953-1960. 1-V). Margulies placed the study of Leviticus Rabbah on an entirely new foundation. How so? He supplied an authori­ tative account of the two basic issues of any ancien~ document: the text and the principal philological problems. At the same time he left open cer­ tain analytical questions. One of these may be called redactional. This is in two aspects. First. we want to know how to distinguish the distinct components of the composition. The text clearly is composite. Then what are the individ­ ual units out of which the composition was constructed? A glance at the excellent translation by J. lsraelstam and Judah J. Slotki. Midrash Rab­ bah ... Leviticus (London. 1939) shows that differentiation among units of thought stands at a rather primitive stage. lsraelstam and Slotki present us with long paragraphs, not indicating that these paragraphs are made up of numerous individual units of thought. They also do not sys­ tematically tell us which units of thought are shared among other docu­ ments, and which ones represent the contribution of the framers of the text at hand alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Shabbat Volume 1.Indb
    Perek III Daf 36 Amud b NOTES With regard to a stove that was litN on Shabbat eve A stove that was lit – : The early מתניפ ִ ּ כי ָ אה שׁ ֶ ִ ה ִּ ס י ּ ו ָה ַ ּ ב ַ ּ שׁ ִ ּכי ָ אה שׁ ֶ הִ סִּ י ּ ו הָ with straw or with rakings, scraps collected from -Mishna commentaries explained this issue in differ וּבַ ּג אְבָבָ – נֹותְנִים עָלֶ יהָ ּתַבְשׁ ִ ילד בַּ ֶּג ֶ ׳ת the field, one mayplace a pot of cooked food atop it on Shabbat. The fire ent ways. Many of the ge’onim and those who וּבָעֵצִ ים – לֹא ּןֵ יִת דעַ ֶ שׁ ּיִגְ אֹוב, אֹו דעַ ֶ שׁ ּיִ ֵּ תן in this stove was certainly extinguished while it was still day, as both straw adopted their approach state that this mishna : and rakings are materials that burn quickly. However, if the stove was lit and those that follow are not discussing the אֶ ת הָאֵ ֶ׳אד בֵּ ית שׁ ַ ַּ מאי אֹומְ ִ אים, חַ ִּ מין לו .with pomace, pulp that remains from sesame seeds, olives, and the like question of inserting the pot into the stove אֲבָל לֹא ּתַבְשִׁיל וּבֵית הִ ֵלּל אֹומְ ִ אים, after the oil is squeezed from them, and if it was lit with wood,H one may Rather, they are discussing a case where the חַ ִּ מין וְתַבְשׁ ִ ילד בֵּ ית שׁ ַ ַ ּמאי אֹומְ ִ אים, not place a pot atop it on Shabbat until he sweepsN the coals from the pot is suspended over the stove.
    [Show full text]
  • The Temple and Toilet Practices in Rabbinic Palestine and Babylonia
    Journal for the Study of Judaism Journal for the Study of Judaism 43 (2012) 328-368 brill.nl/jsj ‘Their Backs toward the Temple, and Their Faces toward the East:’ The Temple and Toilet Practices in Rabbinic Palestine and Babylonia Rachel Neis University of Michigan [email protected] Abstract This article treats the cultural meaning of rabbinic toilet rules from their Tannaitic instantiation through to later developments in Palestine and Mesopotamia. It argues that these rules draw their corporeal and mental bearings from the Jerusa- lem temple, in inverse and opposite directions to prayer deportment. It shows how the juxtaposition of the sacred (temple) and profane (toilet) triggered the temple in unlikely instances under the guise of prohibition. As such, toilet rules are the underside of a rabbinic mapping project, similar to rules of bodily orienta- tion in prayer. This map, effectively drawn by corporeal direction and orientation, with the (absent) temple at its center, traversed Palestine and the Diaspora, and ignored contemporary religious and imperials maps and limes. Thus developing toilet practices can tell us something about how a minority religious and social formation shaped bodily functions not necessarily in the more predictable terms of disgust and expulsion but rather as devices through which to uphold a lost center. Keywords rabbis, temple, toilet, Jerusalem, sacred, body, prayer My God, you go to the toilet and you sit on ideology!1 A worker at the Religious Council in Lod decorated a wall with pictures of rabbis without realizing that he would stop the disgusting habit of urinating 1) See the lecture presented by Slavoj Žižek, www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJ73hLQ64Ng at 3 minutes and 29 seconds.
    [Show full text]
  • Overviewof the Daf Distictive INSIGHT REVIEW and Remember
    ט"ז שבט תשע “ ו Tuesday, January 26 2016 גיטין מ “ ד OVERVIEW of the Daf Distictive INSIGHT 1) Clarifying the Mishnah (cont.) The penalty for financial misdeeds כוון מלאכתו במועד ומת לא קנסו את בנו אחריו Another resolution to the contradiction between two Beraisos is presented. 2) A slave taken forcibly from a Jew O ur Gemara cites two examples of a person who acted im- A Baraisa rules that a slave taken as payment for a loan or by properly in order to gain financially. One is where a person in order not to , בכור an extortionist does not go free. intentionally inflicted a blemish onto a This ruling is unsuccessfully challenged. have to give the animal to the kohen and thereby keep it for Another unsuccessful challenge to this ruling is presented. himself, and the other is where a person sold his non - Jewish Rav rules that a slave that was sold to a blackmailer goes free. slave to a non - Jew. In both cases, the person is penalized. In The rationale for penalizing the owner is explained. the first case, the owner is not allowed to slaughter the animal 3) Selling a slave to a non - Jew based upon this particular wound, and in the second case, the R’ Yirmiyah asks a series of questions related to the ruling that slave must be redeemed, even at high cost. one who sells his slave to a non - Jew is obligated to set him free. The Mishnah in Moed Kattan (12b) teaches that although The Gemara answers only some of R’ Yirmiyah’s questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Daf Ditty Shekalim 21-Dolabra
    Daf Ditty Shekalim 21:Burial Tools/Dolabra The "Tombs of the Kings", believed to be the tomb of Queen Helene of Adiabene; 19th-century lithograph by William Henry Bartlett رﻮﺒﻗ :Keveri HaMlakhim; Arabic רבק י כלמה םי :The Tombs of the Kings (Hebrew French: Tombeau des Rois) are a rock-cut funerary complex in East ; ﻦﯿطﻼﺴﻟا Jerusalem believed to be the burial site of Queen Helene of Adiabene (died c. AD 50–56). The tomb is mentioned by Josephus who writes about Helena, queen of Adiabene, a small kingdom from Mesopotamia (today part of Kurdistan, northern Iraq) who came to Jerusalem at the end of the Second Temple Period. Her family converted to Judaism and built a palace in the area today known as the City of David. Helena's son Monobaz II had her remains and those of his brother buried "three stadia from Jerusalem." Medieval Europeans mistakenly identified the tomb as belonging to the kings of Judah.1 1 https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium.MAGAZINE-france-orthodox-jews-archaeologists-battle-over-e-j-lem-s-tomB- of-the-kings-1.6766370 1 Halakha 1 · MISHNA The mishna discusses the ritual purity of items found either in the Temple or in Jerusalem and its environs, in continuation of the previous chapter’s discussion of found money, animals, or meat. All the spittle that is found in Jerusalem is ritually pure. Since neither ritually impure people nor gentiles were commonly present in Jerusalem, the Sages decreed an exception to the rule that spittle that is found is ritually impure since it presumably comes from one of those groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Daf Ditty Eruvin 46: the Leniency of Grief (And Eruvin)
    Daf Ditty Eruvin 46: The leniency of Grief (and Eruvin) Under the wide and starry sky, Dig the grave and let me lie. Glad did I live and gladly die, And I laid me down with a will. This be the verse you grave for me: Here he lies where he longed to be; Home is the sailor, home from sea, And the hunter home from the hill. Robert Louis Stevenson 1 Rabbi Ya’akov bar Idi said that Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yoḥanan ben Nuri, that one who was asleep at the beginning of Shabbat may travel two thousand cubits in every direction. Rabbi Zeira said to Rabbi Ya’akov bar Idi: Did you hear this halakha explicitly from Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi, or did you understand it by inference from some other ruling that he issued? Rabbi Ya’akov bar Idi said to him: I heard it explicitly from him. 2 The Gemara asks: From what other teaching could this ruling be inferred? The Gemara explains: From that which Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: The halakha is in accordance with the lenient opinion with regard to an eiruv. The Gemara asks: Why do I need both? Why was it necessary for Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi to state both the general ruling that the halakha is in accordance with the lenient opinion with regard to an eiruv, and also the specific ruling that the halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yoḥanan ben Nuri on this issue? Rabbi Zeira said: Both rulings were necessary, as had he informed us only that the halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yoḥanan ben Nuri, I would have said that the 3 halakha is in accordance with him whether this is a leniency, i.e., that a sleeping person acquires residence and may walk two thousand cubits in every direction, or whether it is a stringency, i.e., that ownerless utensils acquire residence and can be carried only two thousand cubits from that place.
    [Show full text]
  • TORAH SPARKS Obscure Aspect of Psalm 79
    ב׳׳ה (Dvar Torah continued from front page…) In the extended discussion of honor of one’s parents in Babylonian Talmud Kiddushin 31b, Rabbi Abbahu recounts the example of Avimi his son. We’re told in the gemara that not only would Avimi run to his father’s call, even though he himself had five ordained sons (grandsons to R. Abbahu). On one occasion Avimi was called by R. Abbahu to bring water to drink. “Before he brought it, Rabbi Abbahu dozed off. Avimi bent over him until he woke up.” It’s a touching moment that leads to the reward of Avimi being able to interpret an TORAH SPARKS obscure aspect of Psalm 79. The language of the gemara to describe the dozing The sense of the word is slumber, Parashat Toledot .נום of Rabbi Abbahu is namnem from the verb drowsy, even to be dying. Perhaps, the gemara hints, Rabbi Abbahu is edging November 30, 2019 | 2 Kislev 5780 towards the liminal world between life and death. And yet we know this verb well Annual | Bereshit 25:19-28:9 ( Etz Hayim p. 146-161; Hertz p. 93-101 ) ( the guardian of Israel does not slumber. Honoring Triennial Bereshit 25:19-26:22 ( Etz Hayim p. 146-151; Hertz p. 93-96 – הנה לא ינום – from Psalm 121 parents is, after all, akin to honoring the Holy Blessed One. Haftarah | Malachi 1:1-2:7 ( Etz Hayim p. 162-165; Hertz p. 102-105 ) “Yitzhak breathed his last and died, he was gathered to his kin, in ripe old age” (Bereshit 35:29) Yitzhak does not die immediately after the incident with his sons in Parashat D’var Torah: On Aging Toledot.
    [Show full text]