DOCSLIB.ORG

Preliminary Regeneration and Development Impact Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preliminary Regeneration and Development Impact Assessment SILVERTOWN TUNNEL SUPPORTING TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION PRELIMINARY REGENERATION AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT October 2015 This report sets out how the Scheme would impact on economic activity at a local, sub-regional, and London level. It draws on a number of strands of evidence and analysis to assess the likely economic and regeneration impacts that could result from the Scheme. This report forms part of the Preliminary Outline Business Case (OBC). This report forms part of a suite of documents that support the statutory public consultation for Silvertown Tunnel in October – November 2015. This document should be read in conjunction with other documents in the suite that provide evidential inputs and/or rely on outputs or findings. The suite of documents with brief descriptions is listed below:- Preliminary Case for the Scheme o Preliminary Monitoring and Mitigation Strategy Preliminary Charging Report Preliminary Transport Assessment Preliminary Design and Access Statement Preliminary Engineering Report Preliminary Maps, Plans and Drawings Preliminary Environmental Information Report (PEIR) o Preliminary Non Technical Summary o Preliminary Code of Construction Practice o Preliminary Site Waste Management Plan o Preliminary Energy Statement Preliminary Sustainability Statement Preliminary Equality Impact Assessment Preliminary Health Impact Assessment Preliminary Outline Business Case o Preliminary Distributional Impacts Appraisal o Preliminary Social Impacts Appraisal o Preliminary Economic Assessment Report o Preliminary Regeneration and Development Impact Assessment Preliminary Regeneration and Development Impact Assessment October 2015 Silvertown Tunnel Preliminary Regeneration and Development Impact Assessment THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Page 2 of 141 Silvertown Tunnel Preliminary Regeneration and Development Impact Assessment Silvertown Tunnel Preliminary Regeneration and Development Impact Assessment Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Document Reference: ST150030-PLN-ZZZ-ZZ-RP-PC-0019 Author: Transport for London Rev. Date Approved By Signature Description 1 02/10/2015 David Rowe (TfL Lead For Consultation Sponsor) Richard De Cani (TfL MD Planning) Page 3 of 141 Silvertown Tunnel Preliminary Regeneration and Development Impact Assessment Contents SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 25 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 35 1.1 Purpose of the report .................................................................................. 35 1.2 London’s economic potential ....................................................................... 35 1.3 East London’s economic potential ............................................................... 36 1.4 Transport problems at Blackwall and their economic consequences .......... 37 1.5 The Silvertown Tunnel Scheme .................................................................. 38 1.6 Structure of the report ................................................................................. 39 2. METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................. 41 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 41 2.2 Scenarios .................................................................................................... 42 2.3 Regeneration area definition ....................................................................... 43 2.4 Accessibility assessment ............................................................................ 45 3. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRANSPORT AND DEVELOPMENT .................. 47 3.1 Summary ..................................................................................................... 47 3.2 Introduction ................................................................................................. 48 3.3 Case studies –river crossings generally ...................................................... 52 3.4 Case study – London Docklands ................................................................. 53 3.5 Case study – Tyne Tunnel .......................................................................... 54 4. BASELINE SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND LAND USE CONDITIONS .................... 59 4.1 Summary ..................................................................................................... 59 4.2 Introduction ................................................................................................. 60 4.3 Population and demand for housing ............................................................ 60 4.4 Employment growth .................................................................................... 62 Page 4 of 141 Silvertown Tunnel Preliminary Regeneration and Development Impact Assessment 4.5 Labour market profile .................................................................................. 68 5. BARRIERS AND CONSTRAINTS TO ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AND GROWTH 71 5.1 Summary ..................................................................................................... 71 5.2 Introduction ................................................................................................. 71 5.3 Importance of roads to London ................................................................... 72 5.4 Impact of congestion ................................................................................... 72 5.5 Effects on the freight industry ...................................................................... 73 5.6 Journey time reliability issues ...................................................................... 74 5.7 Access to labour market .............................................................................. 74 5.8 Access to customers and suppliers ............................................................. 79 5.9 Summary of transport constraints ............................................................... 80 5.10 Impacts of transport constraints on business location decisions and property markets ................................................................................................... 80 5.11 Non-transport constraints to economic activity ........................................ 82 6. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL .......................................................................... 85 6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 85 6.2 Development projections and capacity ........................................................ 85 6.3 Summary of development capacity by local area ........................................ 87 6.4 Developer views of the impact of the Scheme on development sites .......... 98 6.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................ 100 7. SCHEME IMPACTS ........................................................................................ 101 7.1 General Scheme impacts .......................................................................... 101 7.2 Congestion ................................................................................................ 101 7.3 Reliability ................................................................................................... 102 7.4 Resilience.................................................................................................. 102 7.5 Public transport links ................................................................................. 102 Page 5 of 141 Silvertown Tunnel Preliminary Regeneration and Development Impact Assessment 7.6 Overall economic impacts ......................................................................... 106 7.7 Accessibility analysis ................................................................................. 108 Access to customers ........................................................................................... 127 7.8 Summary of impacts on accessibility ........................................................ 133 8. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................ 135 8.1 The impact of road schemes and regeneration ......................................... 135 Figures Figure 2-1 20% most deprived areas in London ....................................................... 44 Figure 3-1 Journey time through the Tyne Tunnel January 2010 to May 2012 ........ 55 Figure 4-1 Historic and projected annual population growth 2001-2041 .................. 60 Figure 4-2 Historic and projected household growth 2001-2041 .............................. 61 Figure 4-3 Percentage of economically active population 2011 ............................... 69 Figure 5-1 Origin of those working in Richmond ...................................................... 75 Figure 5-2 Origin of those working in Royal Docks Newham ................................... 76 Figure 5-3 Change in accessibility to jobs 2011-2031 without the Scheme .............. 77 Figure 5-4 Working age population within 45 minutes highway time, 2011 .............. 78 Figure 5-5 Working age population within 45 minutes highway time, 2031 .............. 78 Figure 5-6 Relocation of Olympic businesses .........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical and Contemporary Archaeologies of Social Housing: Changing Experiences of the Modern and New, 1870 to Present
    Historical and contemporary archaeologies of social housing: changing experiences of the modern and new, 1870 to present Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester by Emma Dwyer School of Archaeology and Ancient History University of Leicester 2014 Thesis abstract: Historical and contemporary archaeologies of social housing: changing experiences of the modern and new, 1870 to present Emma Dwyer This thesis has used building recording techniques, documentary research and oral history testimonies to explore how concepts of the modern and new between the 1870s and 1930s shaped the urban built environment, through the study of a particular kind of infrastructure that was developed to meet the needs of expanding cities at this time – social (or municipal) housing – and how social housing was perceived and experienced as a new kind of built environment, by planners, architects, local government and residents. This thesis also addressed how the concepts and priorities of the Victorian and Edwardian periods, and the decisions made by those in authority regarding the form of social housing, continue to shape the urban built environment and impact on the lived experience of social housing today. In order to address this, two research questions were devised: How can changing attitudes and responses to the nature of modern life between the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries be seen in the built environment, specifically in the form and use of social housing? Can contradictions between these earlier notions of the modern and new, and our own be seen in the responses of official authority and residents to the built environment? The research questions were applied to three case study areas, three housing estates constructed between 1910 and 1932 in Birmingham, London and Liverpool.
    [Show full text]
  • HVN Contract Leads
    PLANS APPROVED TENDERS CONTRACTS Projects where Approved projects Approved projects detailed plans have that are at tender at main contract Opportunities been approved stage. awarded stage. but are still at Contract leads pre-tender stage. Midlands/East Anglia Client: Lightsource Renewable Energy STAFFORD £5.7M Common Road, Dunnington, York, Ltd Developer: Lightsource Renewable n Land adjacent to Jubilee YO19 5RZ Tel: 01904 481480 PLANS APPROVED Energy Ltd, 7 33 Holborn, London, Playing Fields, Main Road, ALFRETON £0.55M EC1N 2HT Tel: 0333 200 0755 Great Haywood RICHMOND £0.5M n 17 King Street Planning authority: Stafford Job: n The Old Cinema, Planning authority: Amber Valley Job: CONTRACTS Reserved Matters Granted for 76 houses 2 Queens Road Detail Plans Granted for 11 flats (con- BIRMINGHAM £5.95M Client: Miller Homes (East Midlands) Planning authority: Richmondshire version) Client: Hardwick Nominees n Land at corner of Holliday Agent: Miller Homes (East Midlands), 2 Job: Detail Plans Granted for 10 flats & 1 Ltd Developer: Dennis Rye Ltd, Mans- Street Granville Street Centro Place, Pride Park, Derby, DE24 shop (conversion) Client: Mr. D Garner field Road, Tibshelf, Derby, DE55 5NF Planning authority: Birmingham Job: 8RF Contractor: Miller Homes (East Developer: Malcolm Tempest Ltd, High Tel: 01773 872664 Detail Plans Granted for 119 flats Client: Midlands), 2 Centro Place, Pride Park, Parks, Newton-le-Willows, Bedale, DL8 Seven Capital Plc Agent: K4 Architects, Derby, DE24 8RF Tel: 08703 364400 1TP Tel: 01677 450777 CAMBRIDGE £1M
    [Show full text]
  • Characterisation Study Chapters 3-4.Pdf
    3. BOROUGH WIDE ANALYSIS 3 BOROUGH WIDE ANALYSIS 3.1 TOPOGRAPHY 3.1.1 The topography of Lewisham has played a vital role in influencing the way in which the borough has developed. 3.1.2 The natural topography is principally defined by the valley of the Ravensbourne and Quaggy rivers which run north to south through the centre and join at Lewisham before flowing northwards to meet the Thames at Deptford. The north is characterised by the flat floodplain of the River Thames. 3.1.3 The topography rises on the eastern and western sides, the higher ground forming an essential Gently rising topography part of the borough's character. The highest point to the southwest of the borough is at Forest Hill (105m). The highest point to the southeast is Grove Park Cemetery (55m). Blackheath (45m) and Telegraph Hill (45m) are the highest points to the north. 3.1.4 The dramatic topography allows for elevated views from within the borough to both the city centre and its more rural hinterland. High points offer panoramas towards the city 42 Fig 18 Topography 2m 85m LEWISHAM CHARACTERISATION STUDY December 2018 43 3.2 GEOLOGY 3.2.1 The majority of the borough is underlain by the Thames Group rock type which consists mostly of the London Clay Formation. 3.2.2 To the north, the solid geology is Upper Chalk overlain by Thanet Sand. The overlying drift geology is gravel and alluvium. The alluvium has been deposited by the tidal flooding of the Thames and the River Ravensbourne. River deposits are also characteristic along the Ravensbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2015
    Chatsworth The Secret Garden The Felixstowe Society Newsletter Issue Number 110 September 1 2015 In this issue: Our trip to Chatsworth, Hardwick and Lincoln The Secret Garden of Westmorland Road Society News, Reviews and Research Registered Charity No. 277442 Founded 1978 The Felixstowe Society is established for the public benefit of people who either live or work in Felixstowe and Walton. Members are also very welcome from the Trimleys and the surrounding villages. The Society endeavours to: stimulate public interest in these areas promote high standards of planning and architecture and secure the improvement, protection, development and preservation of the local environment. Contents 3 Notes from the Chairman – Roger Baker 4 Calendar – September to December 2015 5 Can You Help Us? 6 Society News 8 Speaker Evening Report - An Audience with Peter Phillips 9 The Society Dinner 10 Speaker Evening Report - The Home Front in Suffolk 1914-18 11 An Evening at The Hut 12 Beach Clean 13 Society Members’ Feature 14 Felixstowe Youth Society 16 Our Three Day Trip to Derbyshire, South Yorkshire and Lincolnshire 18 Visit to Norwich and Kirstead Hall 19 Felixstowe Walkers 20 The Abbey Grove Challenge 22 Book Reviews 23 The Felixstowe Beach Hut and Chalet Association 24 News from The Felixstowe Museum 25 Research Corner 24 - Felixstowe’s Prefabs 28 Planning Applications March 21 to July 7 2015 30 If you wish to join The Society 32 More pictures from The Secret Garden Notes from the Chairman Welcome back after the summer break. I hope that you are looking forward to the new season of talks and activities – see the list of Speaker Meetings in this issue of the Newsletter.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex F –List of Consultees
    ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Local highway authorities Leicester City Council Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Leicestershire County Council Bath & NE Somerset Council Lincolnshire County Council Bedfordshire County Council Liverpool City Council Birmingham City Council Local Government Association Blackburn & Darwen London Borough of Barking & Dagenham Blackpool Borough Council London Borough of Barnet Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Bexley Borough of Poole London Borough of Brent Bournemouth Borough Council London Borough of Bromley Bracknell Forest Borough Council London Borough of Camden Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Croydon Brighton and Hove City Council London Borough of Ealing Bristol City Council London Borough of Enfield Buckinghamshire County Council London Borough of Greenwich Bury Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hackney Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hammersmith and Cambridgeshire County Council Fulham Cheshire County Council London Borough of Haringey City of York Council London Borough of Harrow Cornwall County Council London Borough of Havering Corporation of London London Borough of Hillingdon County of Herefordshire District Council London Borough of Hounslow Coventry City Council London Borough of Islington Cumbria County Council London Borough of Lambeth Cumbria Highways London Borough of Lewisham Darlington Borough Council London Borough of Merton Derby City Council London Borough of Newham Derbyshire County Council London
    [Show full text]
  • Becoming Collaborative: Enhancing the Understanding of Intra-Organisational Relational Dynamics
    BECOMING COLLABORATIVE: ENHANCING THE UNDERSTANDING OF INTRA-ORGANISATIONAL RELATIONAL DYNAMICS by Eloise Grove A Doctoral Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the Engineering Doctorate (EngD) degree, of Loughborough University July 2018 © by Eloise Grove (2018) Centre for Innovative and Collaborative Engineering (CICE) Department of Architecture, Civil & Building Engineering Loughborough University Loughborough Leics, LE11 3TU Acknowledgements ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank all the people at my Sponsoring organisation who have participated directly and indirectly in this research over the years. Not only have you provided me with the valuable material necessary but you have offered friendship that has made your place of work such an enjoyable place for me to be. Your candid contributions never cease to amaze me and for your trust I am truly grateful. Thanks to my supervisors at Loughborough University for their words of wisdom and encouragement. I’ve been connected to the School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering on and off since 2008. Whilst I’ve never been permanently based there I have always felt like I belong. I therefore extend this thanks to the wider team at ACBE – you make it a special place to learn. Thank you to all my industrial supervisors (there have been many) for their guidance, with special thanks to Lisa for, in her words, being the best industrial supervisor in the history of industrial supervisors. She’s kind of a big deal. For the hours upon hours of proof reading, not only throughout the years of this study but for all the homework, assignments, applications and papers that have got me to this stage in my life.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017
    The London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017 Part of the London Plan evidence base COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority November 2017 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk 2017 LONDON STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT Contents Chapter Page 0 Executive summary 1 to 7 1 Introduction 8 to 11 2 Large site assessment – methodology 12 to 52 3 Identifying large sites & the site assessment process 53 to 58 4 Results: large sites – phases one to five, 2017 to 2041 59 to 82 5 Results: large sites – phases two and three, 2019 to 2028 83 to 115 6 Small sites 116 to 145 7 Non self-contained accommodation 146 to 158 8 Crossrail 2 growth scenario 159 to 165 9 Conclusion 166 to 186 10 Appendix A – additional large site capacity information 187 to 197 11 Appendix B – additional housing stock and small sites 198 to 202 information 12 Appendix C - Mayoral development corporation capacity 203 to 205 assigned to boroughs 13 Planning approvals sites 206 to 231 14 Allocations sites 232 to 253 Executive summary 2017 LONDON STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT Executive summary 0.1 The SHLAA shows that London has capacity for 649,350 homes during the 10 year period covered by the London Plan housing targets (from 2019/20 to 2028/29). This equates to an average annualised capacity of 64,935 homes a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketplace Sponsorship Opportunities Information Pack 2017
    MarketPlace Sponsorship Opportunities Information Pack 2017 www.airmic.com/marketplace £ Sponsorship 950 plus VAT Annual Conference Website * 1 complimentary delegate pass for Monday www.airmic.com/marketplace only (worth £695)* A designated web page on the MarketPlace Advanced notification of the exhibition floor plan section of the website which will include your logo, contact details and opportunity to upload 20% discount off delegate places any PDF service information documents Advanced notification to book on-site meeting rooms Airmic Dinner Logo on conference banner Advanced notification to buy tickets for the Annual Dinner, 12th December 2017 Logo in conference brochure Access to pre-dinner hospitality tables Opportunity to receive venue branding opportunities Additional Opportunities * This discount is only valid for someone who have never attended an Airmic Conference Airmic can post updates/events for you on before Linked in/Twitter ERM Forum Opportunity to submit articles on technical subjects in Airmic News (subject to editor’s discretion) Opportunity to purchase a table stand at the ERM Forum Opportunity to promote MP content online via @ Airmic Twitter or the Airmic Linked In Group About Airmic Membership Airmic has a membership of about 1200 from about 480 companies. It represents the Insurance buyers for about 70% of the FTSE 100, as well as a very substantial representation in the mid-250 and other smaller companies. Membership continues to grow, and retention remains at 90%. Airmic members’ controls about £5 billion of annual insurance premium spend. A further £2 billion of premium spend is allocated to captive insurance companies within member organisations. Additionally, members are responsible for the payment of insurance claims from their business finances to the value of at least £2 billion per year.
    [Show full text]
  • London's Housing Struggles Developer&Housing Association Dec 2014
    LONDON’S HOUSING STRUGGLES 2005 - 2032 47 68 30 13 55 20 56 26 62 19 61 44 43 32 10 41 1 31 2 9 17 6 67 58 53 24 8 37 46 22 64 42 63 3 48 5 69 33 54 11 52 27 59 65 12 7 35 40 34 74 51 29 38 57 50 73 66 75 14 25 18 36 21 39 15 72 4 23 71 70 49 28 60 45 16 4 - Mardyke Estate 55 - Granville Road Estate 33 - New Era Estate 31 - Love Lane Estate 41 - Bemerton Estate 4 - Larner Road 66 - South Acton Estate 26 - Alma Road Estate 7 - Tavy Bridge estate 21 - Heathside & Lethbridge 17 - Canning Town & Custom 13 - Repton Court 29 - Wood Dene Estate 24 - Cotall Street 20 - Marlowe Road Estate 6 - Leys Estate 56 - Dollis Valley Estate 37 - Woodberry Down 32 - Wards Corner 43 - Andover Estate 70 - Deans Gardens Estate 30 - Highmead Estate 11 - Abbey Road Estates House 34 - Aylesbury Estate 8 - Goresbrook Village 58 - Cricklewood Brent Cross 71 - Green Man Lane 44 - New Avenue Estate 12 - Connaught Estate 23 - Reginald Road 19 - Carpenters Estate 35 - Heygate Estate 9 - Thames View 61 - West Hendon 72 - Allen Court 47 - Ladderswood Way 14 - Maryon Road Estate 25 - Pepys Estate 36 - Elmington Estate 10 - Gascoigne Estate 62 - Grahame Park 15 - Grove Estate 28 - Kender Estate 68 - Stonegrove & Spur 73 - Havelock Estate 74 - Rectory Park 16 - Ferrier Estate Estates 75 - Leopold Estate 53 - South Kilburn 63 - Church End area 50 - Watermeadow Court 1 - Darlington Gardens 18 - Excalibur Estate 51 - West Kensingston 2 - Chippenham Gardens 38 - Myatts Fields 64 - Chalkhill Estate 45 - Tidbury Court 42 - Westbourne area & Gibbs Green Estates 3 - Briar Road Estate
    [Show full text]
  • GREATER CARPENTERS NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2019-2028 Submission Version May 2019
    GREATER CARPENTERS NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2019-2028 Submission version May 2019 1 Greater Carpenters Neighbourhood Forum would like to thank the following for their support in helping us to develop our Neighbourhood Plan: London Legacy Development Corporation Planning Officers, Just Space, London Tenants Federation, University College London Engineering Department and Engineering Exchange, UCL engineering and planning students, Locality, Max Fordham and AECOM, for their technical support and the large number of residents and stakeholders who have supported and contributed their local knowledge, views and opinions. We would also like to thank: Trust for London, whose grant funding for London Tenants Federation provided some support from them and Just Space, Locality, for later funding, Julian Cheyne for his photographs of the Greater Carpenters Neighbourhood, students from Bartlett School of Planning who produced all but one of the maps contained in this document and the children from Carpenters Primary School who contributed to a competition to design a logo for the Forum. We found it very difficult to pick just one competition winner so our logo combines several of the best. 2 Content 1. Introduction 2. Vision 3. Objectives 4. Policies Economy and employment Green space, biodiversity and community gardening Homes, refurbishment and sensitive infill Transport connection and movement Community facilities, ownership and empowerment 5. Delivery 3 Greater Carpenters Neighbourhood Area - in the context of the surrounding area. 4 1. Introduction 1.1 Our area: Greater Carpenters Neighbourhood Area is on the border of the Queen Elizabeth Park, Stratford, but is physically separated from it by railway lines. It is adjacent to waterways and green spaces, Stratford Station and Stratford town centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Pamphleteer #2 Regeneration Realities
    Regeneration Realities Urban Pamphleteer 2 p.1 Duncan Bowie# p.3 Emma Dent Coad p.5 Howard Read p.6 Loretta Lees, Just Space, The London Tenants’ Federation and SNAG (Southwark Notes Archives Group) p.11 David Roberts and Andrea Luka Zimmerman p.13 Alexandre Apsan Frediani, Stephanie Butcher, and Paul Watt p.17 Isaac Marrero- Guillamón p.18 Alberto Duman p.20 Martine Drozdz p.22 Phil Cohen p.23 Ben Campkin p.24 Michael Edwards p.28 isik.knutsdotter Urban PamphleteerRunning Head Ben Campkin, David Roberts, Rebecca Ross We are delighted to present the second issue of Urban Pamphleteer In the tradition of radical pamphleteering, the intention of this series is to confront key themes in contemporary urban debate from diverse perspectives, in a direct and accessible – but not reductive – way. The broader aim is to empower citizens, and inform professionals, researchers, institutions and policy- makers, with a view to positively shaping change. # 2 London: Regeneration Realities The term ‘regeneration’ has recently been subjected to much criticism as a pervasive metaphor applied to varied and often problematic processes of urban change. Concerns have focused on the way the concept is used as shorthand in sidestepping important questions related to, for example, gentrification and property development. Indeed, it is an area where policy and practice have been disconnected from a rigorous base in research and evidence. With many community groups affected by regeneration evidently feeling disenfranchised, there is a strong impetus to propose more rigorous approaches to researching and doing regeneration. The Greater London Authority has also recently opened a call for the public to comment on what regeneration is, and feedback on what its priorities should be.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision Shared the Movement for Innovation Second Anniversary Report
    A Vision Shared The Movement for Innovation Second Anniversary Report November 2000 Board & Team Members M4I Board Alan Crane* Chairman Rab Bennetts* Bennetts Associates Ltd. Bill Bolsover Aggregate Industries UK Ltd. Mike Burt European Career Systems Clive Cain Defence Estates Organisation John Connaughton Davis Langdon Consultancy Martin Davis Drake & Scull Eng. Ltd. Deryk Eke OGC Construction Team John Emery Hammerson Plc David Fison* Skanksa Construction Colin Harding George & Harding Ltd. Shonagh Hay* Amey Plc John Hobson DETR Tony Ingle-Finch Railtrack Plc John Kerman The Highways Agency Zara Lamont Construction Best Practice Programme Peter Lobban* Construction Industry Training Board Roderick Macdonald Buro Happold Allan McDougall Shepherd Engineering Services Ltd. Robin Nicholson Edward Cullinan Architects Abena Nsia National Housing Forum Richard Ogden McDonald’s Restaurants Kate Priestley* NHS Estates Robert Shed Bovis Lend Lease Stef Stefanou* John Doyle Group Plc Martin Sykes DETR Brian Thompson Babtie Electrical and Mechanical David Trapnell Etex Group Bob White* Mace Ltd. Andrew Wolstenholme* BAA The M4I Team David Crewe* Executive Director Ian Pannell Deputy Director Adrian Blumenthal Crown House Engineering Wayne Callender Drake & Scull Eng. Ltd. Charles Gjertsen Wates Construction Ali Mafi M4I Team Member John Mead Construction Industry Council Tim Penrose Mace Ltd. Neil Rennison Taylor Woodrow Peter Runacres M4I Team Member Charles Stirling BRE Scotlab Adrian Terry CITB Tim Warren Buro Happold Jane Mitchell Administrator * Members of the Executive Management Group (EMG) Contents Chairman’s Review. 2 Demonstration Projects . 9 • Purpose . 9 • Process . 10 • Regional Clusters . 11 • Performance Measurement . 13 • Statistical Review . 15 A Structured Review of Demonstration Projects (University of Reading Interim Report) .
    [Show full text]