DOCSLIB.ORG

Highlights of the Week

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Highlights of the Week Spotlight on Iran November 2012—Aban 1391 Week of November 6‐13, 2012 Editor: Dr. Raz Zimmt Highlights of the week Iranian reactions to Obama win reflect different voices on United States Restrictions imposed on import of “luxury” products after last week’s export restrictions Flying isn’t cheap anymore: domestic flight costs have gone up by 65% Who is in charge of funds at the Supreme Leader’s office? Iranian blogger’s death in prison sparks controversy Iranian reactions to Obama win represent different voices on United States The Iranian reactions to Barack Obama’s re-election for president of the United States represented the different voices in the Iranian discourse on the United States and the possibility of launching negotiations with it. An official reaction released by Ramin Mehmanparast, the spokesman for the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said that Obama’s re-election is a message from the American people against a radical policy and a manifestation of their demand that Obama fulfill his promises of a fundamental change in American policy and pay more attention to the domestic affairs of the United States and the welfare of its citizens. Public opinion in the Middle East and the Muslim world is still waiting for the U.S. president’s promises to be fulfilled, and believes that it is only by adopting a policy based on non-intervention in the affairs of the region’s countries that the United States can regain some of the prestige it once had among Middle Eastern nations. In the past 33 years Iran has had experience with different presidents from both parties, who have 229-12 2 taken a hostile approach towards the interests of the Iranian people, and it believes that the Iranian people’s distrust of the United States administration can only be lessened if their wishes and rights are respected and if the United States implements a fundamental, practical change in its policy towards Iran, said the announcement released by the speaker of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Fars, November 7). The conservative press, which stressed even before the elections that there is no actual difference between the two presidential candidates, continued to play down the significance of the elections after their results were published. In an editorial published on the eve of the elections, the daily Kayhan said that, whichever way the elections go, it won’t matter much for Iran, and that no change is forthcoming in the overall hostile stance taken by the United States towards Iran. The TV debate between Obama and Romney has proven that both parties in the United States are united in their opinion on the anti-Iranian sanctions, the nuclear program, and Israel’s crimes, and that there is no difference whatsoever between them. Similarly, the election results make no difference for the possibility of a military option against Iran, and in any case such an option is impractical because of the economic crisis and the budget deficit of the United States. Talking about war given the current economic, social, and political situation of the United States is a lie, and both presidents will likely proceed with the anti-Iranian sanctions project. Those who say that Israel will attack Iran’s nuclear facilities in case the candidate it supports wins the elections are also mistaken, and Israel’s choice for the next president of the United States is not at all clear. The struggle between Islamic Iran and the Great Satan is not a tactical issue that can be easily changed, the newspaper concluded, but rather a fundamental struggle that cannot be hidden away (Kayhan, November 6). An article published by the daily after the election results were published said that the elections are not particularly significant because of the persistent weakness of the United States. For American voters, it was a choice between bad and worse, the article said. Kayhan noted the weakness of the United States in contrast to the growing strength of the Muslim world, with Iran at its center, the weakening of the Zionist lobby in the United States, and the increasing differences of opinion between Israel and the United States. Even though Prime Minister Netanyahu congratulated Obama on his victory, the relations between the two countries have reached an unprecedented level of tension this past year. 229-12 3 The daily estimated that, given Obama’s weakness, he will be unable to solve the significant foreign policy challenges, mainly the Palestinian problem, the Islamic awakening, and the Iranian challenge. Obama is currently as weak as former President George Bush, and the United States of 2012 is the same United States of 2001. The crimes committed by the United States during the Obama administration are no less grave than those of the Bush administration, and the United States continues to be involved in crimes perpetrated as part of the regional conflicts in Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Bahrain, Yemen, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia (Kayhan, November 8). The daily Jomhuri-ye Eslami also argued that the election results will have no effect on the policy pursued by the United States towards Iran. In its summary of weekly events, the daily said that, contrary to the considerable interest aroused by the presidential elections inside the United States, the world does not consider them particularly significant and believes the two candidates to be two sides of the same coin. It doesn’t matter who wins the elections, because every president is bound by a predetermined policy and works in accordance with the dictates of “world Zionism” and the imperialist objectives of the United States (Jomhuri-ye Eslami, November 8). Another article published by the daily earlier this week said that the only difference between Romney and Obama is their chosen style of foreign policy. This exterior difference has led some non-U.S. commentators to speculate that Obama’s re-election will bring about a change in the American policy, but the fact is that as long as the American policy is influenced by “Zionist networks” and the rich, it will remain unchanged (Jomhuri-ye Eslami, November 11). 229-12 4 Media affiliated with the pragmatic conservative bloc and with the reformists manifested a more optimistic and positive approach towards Obama’s victory, and noted that several opportunities have been opened up for Iran thanks to his re-election. In an article published by the daily Tehran Emrooz, international affairs commentator Hassan Hanizadeh estimated that, in light of the broad support given by the “Zionist lobby” to Mitt Romney, Obama will likely distance himself from Israel in the next four years and take a more independent approach compared to the past. His drifting away from the “Zionist lobby” gives Iran an opportunity to examine Obama’s foreign policy to have the economic sanctions lifted. Considering the positive signals Obama has sent to Iran these past several years, it is not out of the question that the sanctions will be lifted, even though the international atmosphere in the shadow of the continuing pressure exerted by the West on Iran is not conducive to promoting negotiations with the new American administration (Tehran Emrooz, November 8). Mehdi Mohtashemi, former director of the United States desk in Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, also estimated in an interview given to the Asr-e Iran website that the United States’ policy towards Israel may undergo certain changes in the coming several years because Obama is no longer concerned with being re-elected and may put more pressure on Israel to come back to the negotiating table. The Iranian diplomat estimated, however, that the Obama administration is likely to persist with its current policy towards Iran, particularly the escalation of economic sanctions and providing a possibility for progress in the negotiations between the G5+1 countries and Iran. With Obama, at least Iran knows what it can expect. If Mitt Romney had been elected, however, it would have been difficult to predict his actions (Asr-e Iran, November 7). In an article published by the reformist daily Arman, political commentator Sadegh Zibakalam argued that Romney’s victory would definitely have been worse for Iran than Obama’s victory, considering the former’s statements about Iran during the election campaign. Zibakalam estimated that Obama would continue his current policy towards Iran, adding, however, that this depends to a great deal on how Iran will conduct itself with the American administration. He discussed the gradual change among Iran’s conservatives with regard to possible negotiations with Iran, and expressed his hope that this change will continue and eventually pave the way for negotiations between the two countries that will serve Iran’s national interests (Arman, November 8). Hamid Reza Asefi, who served as spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs during President Khatami’s administration, also argued that the future of Iran-United States 229-12 5 relations depends to a greater extent on the internal developments in Iran than the election results in the United States. Asefi said that there are no significant differences between the two major political parties in the United States as far as foreign policy is concerned, and that the American policy towards Iran reflects a doctrine that does not change between presidents. According to Asefi, the Iranian presidential elections will have a greater impact on the relations between the two countries, which are influenced by Iran’s foreign policy more than they do by the American foreign policy (Arman, November 8). The different approaches prevalent in Iran towards the United States could also be seen on the official website of the Ministry of Intelligence.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iranian Strategy in Syria
    *SBOJBO4USBUFHZJO4ZSJB #:8JMM'VMUPO KPTFQIIPMMJEBZ 4BN8ZFS BKPJOUSFQPSUCZ"&*ŦT$SJUJDBM5ISFBUT1SPKFDUJ/45*565&'035)&456%:0'8"3 .BZ All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ©2013 by Institute for the Study of War and AEI’s Critical Threats Project Cover Image: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad, and Hezbollah’s Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah appear together on a poster in Damascus, Syria. Credit: Inter Press Service News Agency Iranian strategy in syria Will Fulton, Joseph Holliday, & Sam wyer May 2013 A joint Report by AEI’s critical threats project & Institute for the Study of War ABOUT US About the Authors Will Fulton is an Analyst and the IRGC Project Team Lead at the Critical Threats Project at the American Enterprise Institute. Joseph Holliday is a Fellow at the Institute for the Study of War. Sam Wyer served as an Iraq Analyst at ISW from September 2012 until February 2013. The authors would like to thank Kim and Fred Kagan, Jessica Lewis, and Aaron Reese for their useful insights throughout the writing and editorial process, and Maggie Rackl for her expert work on formatting and producing this report. We would also like to thank our technology partners Praescient Analytics and Palantir Technologies for providing us with the means and support to do much of the research and analysis used in our work. About the Institute for the Study of War The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) is a non-partisan, non-profit, public policy research organization. ISW advances an informed understanding of military affairs through reliable research, trusted analysis, and innovative education.
    [Show full text]
  • Blood-Soaked Secrets Why Iran’S 1988 Prison Massacres Are Ongoing Crimes Against Humanity
    BLOOD-SOAKED SECRETS WHY IRAN’S 1988 PRISON MASSACRES ARE ONGOING CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2017 Cover photo: Collage of some of the victims of the mass prisoner killings of 1988 in Iran. Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons © Amnesty International (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: MDE 13/9421/2018 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS GLOSSARY 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 METHODOLOGY 18 2.1 FRAMEWORK AND SCOPE 18 2.2 RESEARCH METHODS 18 2.2.1 TESTIMONIES 20 2.2.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE 22 2.2.3 AUDIOVISUAL EVIDENCE 23 2.2.4 COMMUNICATION WITH IRANIAN AUTHORITIES 24 2.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 25 BACKGROUND 26 3.1 PRE-REVOLUTION REPRESSION 26 3.2 POST-REVOLUTION REPRESSION 27 3.3 IRAN-IRAQ WAR 33 3.4 POLITICAL OPPOSITION GROUPS 33 3.4.1 PEOPLE’S MOJAHEDIN ORGANIZATION OF IRAN 33 3.4.2 FADAIYAN 34 3.4.3 TUDEH PARTY 35 3.4.4 KURDISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF IRAN 35 3.4.5 KOMALA 35 3.4.6 OTHER GROUPS 36 4.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Gestalt Computing and the Study of Content-oriented User Behavior on the Web Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/41b1c1n9 Author Bandari, Roja Publication Date 2013 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/41b1c1n9#supplemental Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California University of California Los Angeles Gestalt Computing and the Study of Content-oriented User Behavior on the Web A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering by Roja Bandari 2013 c Copyright by Roja Bandari 2013 Abstract of the Dissertation Gestalt Computing and the Study of Content-oriented User Behavior on the Web by Roja Bandari Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Vwani P. Roychowdhury, Chair Elementary actions online establish an individual's existence on the web and her/his orientation toward different issues. In this sense, actions truly define a user in spaces like online forums and communities and the aggregate of elementary actions shape the atmosphere of these online spaces. This observation, coupled with the unprecedented scale and detail of data on user actions on the web, com- pels us to utilize them in understanding collective human behavior. Despite large investments by industry to capture this data and the expanding body of research on big data in academia, gaining insight into collective user behavior online has been elusive. If one is indeed able to overcome the considerable computational challenges posed by both the scale and the inevitable noisiness of the associated data sets, one could provide new automated frameworks to extract insights into evolving behavior at different scales, and to form an altogether different perspec- tive of aggregated elementary user actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Succession in the Islamic Republic of Iran: the Rise of the Revolutionary Guards
    Political Succession in the Islamic Republic of Iran: The Rise of the Revolutionary Guards Ali Alfoneh Political Succession in the Islamic Republic of Iran: The Rise of the Revolutionary Guards Ali Alfoneh February 5, 2018 Issue Paper #1 2019 The Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington (AGSIW), launched in 2015, is an independent, nonprofit institution dedicated to providing expert research and analysis of the social, economic, and political dimensions of the Gulf Arab states and how they impact domestic and foreign policy. AGSIW focuses on issues ranging from politics and security to economics, trade, and business; from social dynamics to civil society and culture. Through programs, publications, and scholarly exchanges the institute seeks to encourage thoughtful debate and inform the U.S. policy community regarding this critical geostrategic region. © 2019 Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington. All rights reserved. AGSIW does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AGSIW, its staff, or its board of directors. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from AGSIW. Please direct inquiries to: [email protected] This publication can be downloaded at no cost at www.agsiw.org. Cover Photo Credits: Khamenei.ir/Wikimedia Commons About the Author Ali Alfoneh is a senior fellow at the Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington. He is the author of Iran Unveiled: How the Revolutionary Guards are Transforming Iran from Theocracy into Military Dictatorship, published by AEI Press in April 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Notes March 2021
    THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY MARCH 2021 POLICY NOTES NO. 100 In the Service of Ideology: Iran’s Religious and Socioeconomic Activities in Syria Oula A. Alrifai “Syria is the 35th province and a strategic province for Iran...If the enemy attacks and aims to capture both Syria and Khuzestan our priority would be Syria. Because if we hold on to Syria, we would be able to retake Khuzestan; yet if Syria were lost, we would not be able to keep even Tehran.” — Mehdi Taeb, commander, Basij Resistance Force, 2013* Taeb, 2013 ran’s policy toward Syria is aimed at providing strategic depth for the Pictured are the Sayyeda Tehran regime. Since its inception in 1979, the regime has coopted local Zainab shrine in Damascus, Syrian Shia religious infrastructure while also building its own. Through youth scouts, and a pro-Iran I proxy actors from Lebanon and Iraq based mainly around the shrine of gathering, at which the banner Sayyeda Zainab on the outskirts of Damascus, the Iranian regime has reads, “Sayyed Commander Khamenei: You are the leader of the Arab world.” *Quoted in Ashfon Ostovar, Vanguard of the Imam: Religion, Politics, and Iran’s Revolutionary Guards (2016). Khuzestan, in southwestern Iran, is the site of a decades-long separatist movement. OULA A. ALRIFAI IRAN’S RELIGIOUS AND SOCIOECONOMIC ACTIVITIES IN SYRIA consolidated control over levers in various localities. against fellow Baathists in Damascus on November Beyond religious proselytization, these networks 13, 1970. At the time, Iran’s Shia clerics were in exile have provided education, healthcare, and social as Muhammad Reza Shah Pahlavi was still in control services, among other things.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran and the Gulf Military Balance - I
    IRAN AND THE GULF MILITARY BALANCE - I The Conventional and Asymmetric Dimensions FIFTH WORKING DRAFT By Anthony H. Cordesman and Alexander Wilner Revised July 11, 2012 Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Cordesman/Wilner: Iran & The Gulf Military Balance, Rev 5 7/11/12 2 Acknowledgements This analysis was made possible by a grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation. It draws on the work of Dr. Abdullah Toukan and a series of reports on Iran by Adam Seitz, a Senior Research Associate and Instructor, Middle East Studies, Marine Corps University. 2 Cordesman/Wilner: Iran & The Gulf Military Balance, Rev 5 7/11/12 3 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 5 THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 6 Figure III.1: Summary Chronology of US-Iranian Military Competition: 2000-2011 ............................... 8 CURRENT PATTERNS IN THE STRUCTURE OF US AND IRANIAN MILITARY COMPETITION ........................................... 13 DIFFERING NATIONAL PERSPECTIVES .............................................................................................................. 17 US Perceptions .................................................................................................................................... 17 Iranian Perceptions............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ahmadinejad's Principalist Doctrine: Sovereign Rights to a Nuclear Arsenal
    Ahmadinejad’s Principalist Doctrine: Sovereign Rights to a Nuclear Arsenal Farhad Rezaei Center for Iranian Studies (IRAM), Ankara, Turkey January 2017 Abstract Mahmoud Ahmadinejad won the election in 2005, on behalf of the Principalists, a hardline secular opposition, that considered the clerical establishment corrupt and soft on foreign policy. In particular, the Principalists railed against the NPT, describing it as a product of Western hegemony. Ahmadinejad asserted that Iran, like other nations, had a sovereign right to run a nuclear program. Hinting broadly that Iran would not be dissuaded from weaponizing, Ahmadinejad proceeded to fashion a “civil religion” around the alleged nuclear prowess of Iran. Nuclear Day was celebrated around the country as part of a new secular nationalist identity. But in his customary contradictory and occasionally unpredictable and even bizarre manner, the president also claimed that pursuing the nuclear program is part of his mission ordained by the Mahdi. Ahmadinejad’s “in your face” nuclear diplomacy, coupled with his penchant for messianic visions and denial of the Holocaust, rattled the West. Unsure whether Ahmadinejad spoke for himself or for the regime, the international community became alarmed that Iran crossed the threshold from nuclear rationality to messianic irrationality. The SC reacted by imposing a series of increasingly punitive sanctions on Iran. References: 1. Goodenough, Patrick. 2010. No Sign of International Unity on Iran After Administration’s Latest Deadline Passes. CNS News, January 26. http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/no-sign- international-unity-iran-after-administration-s-latest-deadline-passes 2. Adebahr, Cornelius. 2014. Tehran Calling: Understanding a New Iranian Leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Mullahs, Guards, and Bonyads: an Exploration of Iranian Leadership
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Mullahs, Guards, and Bonyads An Exploration of Iranian Leadership Dynamics David E.
    [Show full text]
  • (UNIVERSITY) Manuscript
    MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION MOSCOW STATE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS (UNIVERSITY) Manuscript KHADEM MAKHSUS HOSSEINI, Leila TRANSFORMATION OF IRANIAN WOMEN’S CULTURAL IDENTITY Specialty: 24.00.01 – Theory and history of culture THESIS For PhD degree in Cultural Studies Scientific supervisor: Elena V. Voevoda, PhD, Doctor Habilitatus (Education) Moscow – 2018 2 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………… 3 CHAPTER 1. THE INFLUENTIAL FACTORS IN CONSTRUCTING IRANIAN WOMEN'S CULTURAL IDENTITY 14 1.1. The concept of cultural identity in the cultural and philosophical aspects ………………………………………………………………... 14 1.2. A comparative analysis of Judith Butler’s views on identity and Anthony Giddens’ structuration theory……………………................. 46 1.3. The role of Islam in constructing Iranian women's cultural identity ……………………………………………………………….. 57 1.4. Historical changes of social and cultural aspects of Iranian women's life ………………………………………………………….. 79 Chapter 1: Findings ………………………………………………….. 99 CHAPTER 2. MANIFESTATION OF TRADITIONAL AND MODERN CULTURAL IDENTITY OF IRANIAN WOMEN …… 103 2.1. Iranian Women's Cultural Identity Represented in their Bodies… 103 2.2. Veiling and Iranian Women's Cultural Identity ………………. 137 2.3. Iranian women's cultural identity in relation to their work and leisure time …………………………………………………………. 172 Chapter 2: Findings ………………………………………………….. 203 CONCLUSIONS ……………………………………………………….. 205 BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………………………………… 216 3 INTRODUCTION Research relevance. In the modern world, women play an increasingly important role in society: they actively participate in the social, economic, political and cultural life of their communities shaping the new image of their country. The issue of change in western women's role and identity during and after industrialization (referred to as one of the defining properties of modernity by A.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC's ART of SURVIVAL
    THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC’S ART of SURVIVAL: Neutralizing Domestic and Foreign Threats Saeid Golkar Policy Focus 125 | June 2013 THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC’S ART OF SURVIVAL: Neutralizing Domestic and Foreign Threats All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2013 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy Published in 2013 in the United States of America by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1050, Washington, DC 20036. Cover photo: Iranian soldiers shout anti-American slogans at a ceremony celebrating the 27th anniversary of the return from exile of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, February 2006. (AP Photo/Hasan Sarbakhshian) Contents About the Author v Acknowledgments vii Executive Summary 1 Introduction 3 1 | Neutralizing Threats from Below 4 2 | Neutralizing Threats from Above 9 3 | Neutralizing External Threats 14 4 | Conclusion 16 Notes 17 About the Author SAEID GOLKAR is a fellow at the Roberta Buffett Center for International and Comparative Studies at Northwest- ern University. Previously, he served as a postdoctoral fellow at the Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law (CDDRL) at Stanford University. His research interests include the politics of authoritarian regimes, state control, and Middle Eastern politics; his most recent analysis has appeared in Politics, Religion & Ideology, Armed Forces & Society, Journal of the Middle East and Africa, Digest of Middle East Studies, and Middle East Quar- terly, among other publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Ballistic Missile Program and Its Foreign and Security Policy Towards
    Iran’s ballistic missile program and its foreign and security policy towards the United States under the Trump Administration El programa de misiles balísticos de Irán y su política exterior y de seguridad hacia los Estados Unidos bajo la Administración Trump MOHAMMAD ESLAMI Research Centre for Political Science (CICP), University of Minho (Portugal) Cómo citar/Citation Eslami, M. (2021). Iran’s ballistic missile program and its foreign and security policy towards the United States under the Trump Administration. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 55, 37-62. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.55.02 Abstract Drawing on the Strategic Culture Theory, this article analyzes Iran’s evolving ballistic missile program (BMP), by focusing especially on the period of the Trump administration (January 2017-January 2021), including both Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) shooting down a US surveillance drone in the Strait of Hormuz in June 2019 and Iran’s attack on the US military bases following the assassination of IRGC General Qasem Soleimani, in January 2020. This work demonstrates the increasing reliance on the ‘revolutionary’, more offensive narrative, which has become additionally reinforced after the assassination of General Qasem Soleimani and Professor Mohsen Fakhrizadeh. This has consolidated the retaliatory aspects in Iran’s foreign and security policy, while it has also marginalized moderated actors willing to engage in negotiations with the US. Keywords: Iran, strategic culture, ballistic missile, JCPOA, Qasem Soleimani,
    [Show full text]
  • Iran-Russia Ties: Never Better but Maybe Not Forever?
    IRAN-RUSSIA TIES: NEVER BETTER BUT MAYBE NOT FOREVER? Ardavan Khoshnood 12 september 2020 Middle East Institute https://www.mei.edu/publications/iran-russia-ties-never-better-maybe-not-forever Nedladdat från: http://www.ardavan.se Iran-Russia ties: Never better but maybe not forever? Ardavan Khoshnood writes about Iran and Russia's increasing cooperation but questions the strength of this alliance long-term. The relationship between Iran and Russia has been strengthened by the rising tensions between Tehran and Washington since Donald Trump took office, and there is no doubt that Iran views Russia as one of its closest allies. The Iranian foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, has traveled to Moscow some 28 times during his tenure, and has stated that relations between the two countries have never been better. Russia is a key player in Iran’s efforts to combat U.S. aspirations in the Middle East and has broad support across the political spectrum in Tehran. Not surprisingly, the joint Iranian-Russian-Chinese naval drill in the Indian Ocean and Gulf of Oman in December 2019 was hailed by both the “reformist” camp and the “conservative” camp within Iran. According to Tehran, Russia and Iran share the same views on various strategic issues in the region, and that serves as a strong motivation to expand its military partnership with the Russians. The feeling is mutual as well: Russia has supported Iran on a variety of important issues and it also views Tehran as an important ally. Russia has vetoed several resolutions against Iran in the UN Security Council, opposed U.S.
    [Show full text]