• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Feasibility Analysis for Improved Solid Waste Management in Municipality of Gevgelija FINAL REPORT JULY 2016 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Project Background ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Goals and Objectives of the Feasibility Analysis ....................................................................................... 4 1.3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Project Description and Rationale .................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Gevgelija Municipality ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Geographic location ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.2 Demographic profile ............................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 General Project Description ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.1 Solid Waste Management in Gevgelija – current situation ........................................................ 6 2.2.2 Waste generation projections ............................................................................................................. 9 2.2.3 Summary of identified problems ..................................................................................................... 10 3. Applied Landfill Site Selection Methodology ................................................................................ 11 3.1 Description of AHP methodology for landfill site selection ............................................................... 11 3.2 Identification of factors influencing the selection of the landfill site ............................................. 11 3.3 Evaluation of spatial criteria for the purpose of applying the AHP for creation of suitability map 13 4. Financial Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 20 4.1 Objective of the analysis ............................................................................................................................... 20 4.2 Assumptions ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.3 Analysis of considered alternatives ........................................................................................................... 20 4.4 Investment cost estimate ............................................................................................................................. 21 5. Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................................. 23 6. References .................................................................................................................................... 25 FA_Gevgelija Solid Waste Management 1 Abbreviations € – Euro (currency) AHP – Analytic hierarchy process EU – European Union FA – Feasibility Analysis GIS – Geographical Information System MKD – Macedonian Denar (currency) O&M – Operation and maintenance PE – Public enterprise SE – Southeast (statistical) region (in Macedonia) SWM – Solid waste management UN – United Nations UNDP – United Nations Development Programme VAT – Value Added Tax FA_Gevgelija Solid Waste Management 2 1. Introduction 1.1 Project Background A massive number of refugees and irregular migrants have transited through Macedonia in 2015. The refugees and migrants by and large originate from war-torn Asian and African countries, and are in search of safety, security and better prospects in the EU. During the summer months of 2015 an estimated 1,000 people crossed the southern border from Greece on a daily basis, seeking to transit the country to Serbia and move on to Germany, Sweden and other EU destinations. In mid- September 2015 the daily totals surged to 5,000-6,000 people. In October daily arrivals peaked at 11,000, before receding to 3,500 in November and December. Although precise numbers are scarce, it is estimated that over 900,000 people have made their way across the country during 2015, following the Western Balkan route to the north. Although the refugee traffic through the country by and large has been a transit flow, it has proved to be a real test, in terms of funds, expertise and human resources, for the responsible Macedonian Government institutions and the two most-affected municipalities – Gevgelija and Kumanovo. The biggest municipal burden is faced by Gevgelija, since migrants need to spend at least several hours at the border for registration. Refugee reception centers have been established at the southern border at Gevgelija and the northern border at Tabanovce. In response to the crisis throughout the year the UN has provided a multifaceted support to the country, addressing the needs of refugees and migrants, ensuring full respect for their human rights and helping to design, build, equip, staff and winterize the reception and transit centers in Gevgelija and Kumanovo. In addition, the UN has recognized that its support needs to go beyond humanitarian aid provision, i.e. towards support to national actors at all levels in enhancing their ability to manage the crisis and in building the resilience of local communities. This is of particular importance for both Gevgelija and Kumanovo, where local authorities need to find solutions and meet increased demand generated by the influx of refugees and migrants regarding waste management, water supply, power provision and other public utilities while delivering on existing responsibilities to local residents. Municipalities in Macedonia have primary responsibility for provision of a number of public services, including for solid waste management (SWM). The extent of waste management service coverage in the country, in terms of covered area and population, varies considerably between municipalities. The service is mainly provided to the areas in and around urban centers leaving the majority of the smaller, rural communities without organized service at all. Further, every community (town and village) has its own landfill or dump, and most of them have several. Current landfilling practices in both in Gevgelija and Kumanovo municipalities are at a very low level. The additional waste quantities generated by the migrant/refugee crisis further exacerbate the situation, imposing an even greater threat to the environment and people’s well-being. Since 2008 the Southeast Planning Region (SE)1 region has been involved in developing and realizing a strategy for improving the SWM service, based on up-to-date waste management practices – in particular regarding landfilling of wastes – and regionalization of the entire service. The concept includes the following: construction of a new regional sanitary landfill compliant with the pertaining EU Directives; the regional landfill will be located in the village of Dobrashinci (Municipality of Vasilevo), i.e. adjacent to the existing Strumica municipal landfill; collection and transport of solid 1 The SE region in Macedonia includes the following 10 municipalities: Radovish, Konche, Valandovo, Strumica, Vasilevo, Bosilovo, Novo Selo, Gevgelija, Bogdanci, and Dojran. FA_Gevgelija Solid Waste Management 3 waste from all 10 municipalities to the regional landfill on a daily basis; closure and reclamation of all existing municipal landfills and illegal village dump sites throughout the entire region; gradual introduction of recycling activities, as the national/local market for recyclables develops. Unfortunately, for a number of reasons the strategy for regionalization of the waste management service in the SE region has not yet been put into operation. UNDP has initiated project activities that address high-priority, urgent needs of affected municipalities, particularly in the area of water and waste management, which are both crucial to refugee well-being and highly sensitive for local host populations. This report is a summary of feasibility analysis related to improvement of the solid waste management service in the municipality of Gevgelija. 1.2 Goals and Objectives of the Feasibility Analysis The task is focused on identification, assessment and costing of a preferred practical and environmentally sound technical SWM solution that would meet both the increased demand imposed by the migrant/refugee crisis and the long-term needs of the local communities, particularly with regard to attaining improved sustainable SWM practices and increased resilience to crisis management. The specific objectives of the FA are to: . Identify and assess possible technical solutions for improved SWM in Gevgelija municipality, and their conformity with the increased needs generated by the migrant/refugee crisis . Assess required investment costs and future operating costs, as a basis for comparison and selection (cost-benefit analysis)

Load more

  27

Copy Link