DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Bank Document The World Bank Report No: ISR9118 Implementation Status & Results Macedonia, former Yugoslav Republic of Municipal Services Improvement (P096481) Operation Name: Municipal Services Improvement (P096481) Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 10 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 26-Dec-2012 Country: Macedonia, former Yugoslav Republic of Approval FY: 2009 Public Disclosure Authorized Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Key Dates Board Approval Date 26-Mar-2009 Original Closing Date 30-Nov-2014 Planned Mid Term Review Date 15-Oct-2011 Last Archived ISR Date 02-Sep-2012 Public Disclosure Copy Effectiveness Date 04-Aug-2009 Revised Closing Date 30-Nov-2017 Actual Mid Term Review Date 05-Oct-2011 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) To improve transparency, financial sustainability and delivery of targeted municipal services in the participating municipalities. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No Public Disclosure Authorized Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Component A: Municipal Investments 64.25 Component B: Capacity Building and Institutional Reform 2.95 Component C: Performance-Based Investment Grants 5.60 Component D: Project Management, Monitoring and Evaluation 2.20 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory Satisfactory Public Disclosure Authorized Overall Risk Rating Moderate Implementation Status Overview Project implementation is progressing well and the Project is on track to achieving its Project Development Objective (PDO). The Additional Financing Loan in the amount of USD50 million equivalent was signed on June 7, 2012 and declared effective on July 10, 2012. More than 20 municipalities have qualified to participate in the Project and are at different Public Disclosure Copy stages of implementation, including tender preparation, bidding, implementation, and fully completed. Based on strong demand from municipalities, there is a healthy sub-project Page 1 of 6 Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Report No: ISR9118 pipeline and the Project Management Unit (PMU) is working closely with municipalities to support project preparation and appraisal. First applications under the Performance-based Investment Grant Component of the Project were submitted, confirming progress in municipalities implementing reforms related to the Project Development Objective (PDO). Locations Country First Administrative Division Location Planned Actual Macedonia Not Entered Skopje Macedonia Opstina Pehcevo Opstina Pehcevo ✔ ✔ Macedonia Opstina Vasilevo Opstina Vasilevo ✔ Macedonia Opstina Bogdanci Opstina Bogdanci ✔ ✔ Public Disclosure Copy Macedonia Opstina Gradsko Opstina Gradsko ✔ Macedonia Opstina Novaci Opstina Novaci ✔ ✔ Macedonia Opstina Mogila Opstina Mogila ✔ Macedonia Opstina Cair Opstina Cair ✔ Macedonia Opstina Dolneni Opstina Dolneni ✔ ✔ Macedonia Opstina Gjorce Petrov Opstina Gjorce Petrov ✔ ✔ Macedonia Opstina Gostivar Opstina Gostivar ✔ Macedonia Opstina Ilinden Opstina Ilinden ✔ ✔ Macedonia Opstina Kavadarci Opstina Kavadarci ✔ Macedonia Opstina Kicevo Opstina Kicevo ✔ ✔ Macedonia Opstina Kisela Voda Opstina Kisela Voda ✔ ✔ Macedonia Opstina Kocani Opstina Kocani ✔ ✔ Macedonia Opstina Krusevo Opstina Krusevo ✔ ✔ Macedonia Opstina Stip Opstina Stip ✔ ✔ Macedonia Opstina Veles Opstina Veles ✔ ✔ Macedonia Opstina Vevcani Opstina Vevcani ✔ ✔ Results Public Disclosure Copy Project Development Objective Indicators Page 2 of 6 The World Bank Report No: ISR9118 Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Current End Target Piped household water connections that are Number Value 11615.00 benefiting from rehabilitation works undertaken Date 17-Dec-2011 12-Dec-2012 30-Nov-2017 by the project Comments Baseline value can be Value for water rehabilitation No target value can be reported only based on actual works in Kocani defined since this is a sub-project investments since demand-driven project with projects are not pre-selected municipal investment projects not pre-selected. Number of people in urban areas provided with Number Value 0.00 240000.00 240000.00 access to regular solid waste collection under Date 14-May-2010 12-Dec-2012 30-Nov-2017 the project Comments Public Disclosure Copy 60,000 households in the City of Skopje will benefit from better waste collection services due distribution of waste bins and purchase of waste collection vehicles Percentage of participating municipalities that Percentage Value 0.00 45.00 100.00 regularly publish benchmarks & sub-project Date 26-Mar-2009 12-Dec-2012 30-Nov-2017 progress information on their municipal or CSE’s websites, and on PMU’s Project portal Comments This indicator was revised by the AF for improved clarity and to reflect that IBNet data submission has become an eligibility criterion for municiplaities to participate. Nb of particip.municip. implementing Number Value 0.00 3.00 10.00 institutional dvpt reforms contributing to PDO, Date 26-Mar-2009 12-Dec-2012 30-Nov-2017 as evidenced by nb of municip. that meet 4 or more of the 7 perform. criteria (ie that qualify Comments This indicator was simplified for perform. grants) by the AF for improved clarity. The target value was increased to 10. Improved financial performance as reflected by Percentage Value 0.00 15.00 60.00 the percentage of participating municipalities Date 26-Mar-2009 12-Dec-2012 30-Nov-2017 achieving increased revenue earnings and/or cost savings in completed sub-project. Comments The indicator was clarified to reflect results measured in ‘completed sub-projects’. The target value was increased to 60%. Public Disclosure Copy Page 3 of 6 The World Bank Report No: ISR9118 Percentage of participating municipalities Percentage Value 0.00 15.00 75.00 achieving targeted improvements in delivery of Date 26-Mar-2009 12-Dec-2012 30-Nov-2017 selected services in completed sub-projects Comments The indicator was clarified to reflect results measured in ‘completed sub-projects’. The target value was increased to 75%. Intermediate Results Indicators Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Current End Target Number of municipalities that qualify for sub- Number Value 0.00 25.00 50.00 Public Disclosure Copy loans (ie meet the eligibility criteria to Date 26-Mar-2009 12-Dec-2012 30-Nov-2017 participate in MSIP) Comments The indicator was revised to better reflect implementation of municipal reforms needed to qualify for Component A. The target valuewas increased to 50. Number of sub-loans signed Number Value 0.00 22.00 35.00 Date 26-Mar-2009 12-Dec-2012 30-Nov-2017 Comments This indicator was introduced by the AF to capture progress of sub-project pipeline preparation. Number of sub-projects successfully completed Number Value 0.00 10.00 30.00 Date 26-Mar-2009 12-Dec-2012 30-Nov-2017 Comments The unit of measurement was changed from percentage to number to better reflect progress. The target value was set at 30. Number of participating CSEs and/or Number Value 0.00 0.00 15.00 municipalities supported by TA activities under Date 26-Mar-2009 12-Dec-2012 30-Nov-2017 Component B Comments The original Intermediate Contracting of the IBNet and Result Indicators for CSE support consultant is Component B were dropped underway and the contract is (to avoid duplication and expected to be signed by July reflect modest changes in 31, 2012. Progress under this Public Disclosure Copy Project design) and replaced Page 4 of 6 The World Bank Report No: ISR9118 by this indicator that captures indicator is expected once the the quantity of TA provided, consultant is on board. whether for sub-project preparation or local capacity building or national level institutional strengthening. The target value is 15. TA contracts supporting national level Text Value No TA available 2 completed satisfactory Satisfactory institutions completed to Client s satisfaction Date 26-Mar-2009 12-Dec-2012 30-Nov-2017 Comments This indicator was clarified to spell out ‘national level institutions’ as beneficiary Public Disclosure Copy Submission and review of studies to concerned Text Value No strategy 2 input studies completed Final report submitted to Ministries, such as development of a Strategy Ministry for review for Financial Intermediation for Municipal Date 26-Mar-2009 12-Dec-2012 30-Nov-2017 Investments Comments Number of applications to access funds Number Value 0.00 3.00 10.00 (performance investment grant) under Date 26-Mar-2009 12-Dec-2012 30-Nov-2017 Component C Comments This indicator was simplified to improve clarity. Number of municipalities receiving a Number Value 0.00 0.00 8.00 performance investment grant Date 26-Mar-2009 12-Dec-2012 30-Nov-2017 Comments This indicator was simplified to improve clarity. Data on Financial Performance (as of 20-Sep-2012) Financial Agreement(s) Key Dates Project Ln/Cr/Tf Status Approval Date Signing Date Effectiveness Date Original Closing Date Revised Closing Date P096481 IBRD-76990 Effective 26-Mar-2009 29-Jun-2009 04-Aug-2009 30-Nov-2014 30-Nov-2014 P096481 IBRD-81580 Effective 10-May-2012 07-Jun-2012 10-Jul-2012 30-Nov-2017 30-Nov-2017 Disbursements (in Millions) Project Ln/Cr/Tf Status Currency Original Revised Cancelled Disbursed Undisbursed % Disbursed P096481 IBRD-76990 Effective USD 25.00 25.00 0.00 11.82 13.44 47.00 P096481 IBRD-81580 Effective USD 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.11 49.88 0.00 Public Disclosure Copy Disbursement Graph Page 5 of 6 The World Bank Report No: ISR9118 Public Disclosure Copy Key Decisions Regarding Implementation n/a Restructuring History Level two Approved on 15-Dec-2011 Related Projects P129996-ADD'L FINANCING - MUNICIPAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Public Disclosure Copy Page 6 of 6.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia in 2018
    ENERGY AND WATER SERVICES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA APRIL 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 201 8 Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia in 2018 ENERGY AND WATER SERVICES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA ___________________________________________________________________ The Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia for 2018 has been prepared in accordance with Article 36 from the Energy Law, which establishes the obligation of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission to submit the Annual Report for its operation during the previous year to the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia, not later than 30th of April of the current year. The Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission for 2018 contains detailed information on the performance of the competences according to the Energy Law and the Law on Setting Prices of Water Services, as well as information on the material-financial operation. The Energy Law also determines that the Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission needs to be submitted to the Government of the Republic of North Macedonia and the Ministry competent for the performance of the assignments within the energy area, so that they could be informed, as well as to the Energy Community Secretariat. The Report contains overview of the activities performed by the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission during 2018, with special review of: − State of the energy markets, − State of the prices and tariffs regulation, − Preparing regulatory acts, − International activities and − Financial Statement of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Analysis for Improved Water Supply in Municipality Of
    Feasibility Analysis for Improved Solid Waste Management in Municipality of Gevgelija FINAL REPORT JULY 2016 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Project Background ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Goals and Objectives of the Feasibility Analysis ....................................................................................... 4 1.3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Project Description and Rationale .................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Gevgelija Municipality ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Geographic location ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.2 Demographic profile ............................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 General Project Description ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.1 Solid Waste Management
    [Show full text]
  • Lions Clubs International Club Membership Register Summary the Clubs and Membership Figures Reflect Changes As of March 2008
    LIONS CLUBS INTERNATIONAL CLUB MEMBERSHIP REGISTER SUMMARY THE CLUBS AND MEMBERSHIP FIGURES REFLECT CHANGES AS OF MARCH 2008 CLUB CLUB LAST MMR FCL YR OB MEMBERSHI P CHANGES TOTAL IDENT CLUB NAME DIST NBR STATUS RPT DATE NEW RENST TRANS DROPS NETCG MEMBERSH 7887 059382 SKOPJE 4 02-2008 28 2 0 0 -3 -1 27 7887 059920 SKOPJE GAZI BABA 4 02-2008 30 0 0 0 -8 -8 22 7887 061610 SKOPJE ST PANTELEMON 4 02-2008 40 0 0 0 -1 -1 39 7887 063553 VARDAR SKOPJE 4 26 0 0 0 0 0 26 7887 065042 SKOPJE IDADIJA 4 03-2008 21 6 0 0 -5 1 22 7887 084017 SKOPJE CENTRE 4 01-2008 21 8 0 0 0 8 29 7887 084018 SKOPJE MACEDONIA NEW CENTURY 4 03-2008 23 3 1 0 -2 2 25 7887 089049 SKOPJE SVETLINA LIGHT 4 02-2008 19 5 0 0 -2 3 22 7887 097275 DENARIUS 4 12-2007 21 9 3 1 -6 7 28 7887 098235 SKOPJE VODNO 4 02-2008 24 4 0 0 -2 2 26 7887 099369 OHRID 4 01-2008 24 0 0 0 0 0 24 7887 099370 SKOPJE ALFA 4 01-2008 25 1 0 0 -1 0 25 7887 099545 BITOLA 4 11-2007 21 8 0 0 0 8 29 7887 099546 STIP 4 03-2008 21 0 0 0 0 0 21 7887 099549 OHRID DESARETI 4 03-2008 26 0 0 0 -2 -2 24 7887 100188 KICEVO 4 03-2008 0 24 0 0 0 24 24 7887 100189 KUMANOVO 4 09-2007 0 23 0 0 0 23 23 7887 100785 BOGDANCI 4 12-2007 0 25 0 0 0 25 25 7887 101005 STRUGA 5 01-2008 0 22 0 0 0 22 22 GRAND TOTALS Total Clubs: 19 370 140 4 1 -32 113 483 Club Status: 4 - Good Standing 5 - Newly Chartered 6 - Cancelled 7 - Status Quo Page 1 of 3 NOTE: No date in the “LAST MMR RPTClub DATE” Status column Changes means, for: thatIDENT the 7887club has not submitted any MMR’s for the currentClub reporting Clubyear, Nameeither by the web site or mail.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologica Macedonica
    UDC 55 In print: ISSN 0352–1206 CODEN – GEOME 2 On line: ISSN 1857–8586 GEOLOGICA MACEDONICA Geologica Macedonica Vol. No pp. Štip 31 1 1–102 2017 Geologica Macedonica . . Geologica Macedonica Vol. No pp. Štip Geologica Macedonica . 31 1 . 1–102 2017 GEOLOGICA MACEDONICA Published by: – : "Goce Delev" University in Štip, Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, Štip, Republic of Macedonia „ “ , , , EDITORIAL BOARD Todor Serafimovski (R. Macedonia, Editor in Chief), Blažo Boev (R. Macedonia, Editor), David Alderton (UK), Tadej Dolenec (R. Slovenia), Ivan Zagorchev (R. Bulgaria), Wolfgang Todt (Germany), acad. Nikolay S. Bortnikov (Russia), Clark Burchfiel (USA), Thierry Augé (France), Todor Delipetrov (R. Macedonia), Vlado Bermanec (Croatia), Milorad Jovanovski (R. Macedonia), Spomenko Mihajlovi (Serbia), Dragan Milovanovi (Serbia), Dejan Prelevi (Germany), Albrecht von Quadt (Switzerland) ! " #" $ %&' ( (. , ), #) # (. , ), (. ), (. ), (. ), ! (" ), . # . ( ), $ ! (%), & (' ), (. ), " ((), ) (. ), " * + (, ), + (, ), - + (" ), %,* ! $ ( ) Language editor . Marijana Kroteva (English) ( ) Georgi Georgievski * *( (Macedonian) (" ) Technical editor * Blagoja Bogatinoski #* # * ( Proof-reader $ Alena Georgievska *( Address % GEOLOGICA MACEDONICA GEOLOGICA MACEDONICA EDITORIAL BOARD +!, Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences ' * P. O. Box 96 /. !* 96 MK-2000 Štip, Republic of Macedonia $-2000 , , Tel. ++ 389 032 550 575 . 032 550 575 E-mail: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Civic Engagement Project Quarterly Report
    CIVIC ENGAGEMENT PROJECT CIVIC ENGAGEMENT PROJECT QUARTERLYQUARTERLY REPORT REPORT #10 #17 Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2020 Reporting period: January 1 – March 31, 2019 Prepared under the USAID’s Civic Engagement Project (CEP) in North Macedonia Contract Number AID-165-C-16-00003 Submitted to: USAID/Macedonia on April 30, 2019 Contractor: East-West Management Institute, Inc. January 30, 2021 This publication was produced by the East-West Management Institute, Inc., for review by the United States Agency for International Development. CIVIC ENGAGEMENT PROJECT QUARTERLY REPORT #17 Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2020 Prepared under the USAID’s Civic Engagement Project (CEP) in North Macedonia Contract Number AID-165-C-16-00003 Submitted to: USAID/North Macedonia on January 30, 2021 Contractor: East-West Management Institute, Inc. Disclaimer This document is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the East-West Management Institute, Inc., and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. USAID’s CIVIC ENGAGEMENT PROJECT - QUARTERLY REPORT #17 - OCTOBER 1 – DECEMBER 31, 2020 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 4 SECTION I: INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7 1.3 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 9 SECTION II: PROJECT ACTIVITIES 9 COMPONENT ONE: STRENGTHEN CSO ALLIANCES ENGAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT OF PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed, Macedonia
    293 A summary of the environmental and socio-economic characteristics of the Crna Reka (Crna River) watershed, Macedonia Zoran Spirkovski Trajce Talevski Dusica Ilik-Boeva Goce Kostoski Odd Terje Sandlund NINA Publications NINA Report (NINA Rapport) This is a new, electronic series beginning in 2005, which replaces the earlier series NINA commis- sioned reports and NINA project reports. This will be NINA’s usual form of reporting completed re- search, monitoring or review work to clients. In addition, the series will include much of the insti- tute’s other reporting, for example from seminars and conferences, results of internal research and review work and literature studies, etc. NINA report may also be issued in a second language where appropriate. NINA Special Report (NINA Temahefte) As the name suggests, special reports deal with special subjects. Special reports are produced as required and the series ranges widely: from systematic identification keys to information on impor- tant problem areas in society. NINA special reports are usually given a popular scientific form with more weight on illustrations than a NINA report. NINA Factsheet (NINA Fakta) Factsheets have as their goal to make NINA’s research results quickly and easily accessible to the general public. The are sent to the press, civil society organisations, nature management at all lev- els, politicians, and other special interests. Fact sheets give a short presentation of some of our most important research themes. Other publishing In addition to reporting in NINA’s own series, the institute’s employees publish a large proportion of their scientific results in international journals, popular science books and magazines.
    [Show full text]
  • See the Article As a PDF
    544 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 19 (No 3) 2013, 544-549 Agricultural Academy TOSPOVIRUSES IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA durinG 1996-2010, OCCURRENCE AND DISTRIBUTION R. RUSEVSKI1, B. KUZMANOVSKA1, K. BANDZO1, M. RISTESKI2 and K. SOTIROVSKI2 1 “Ss.Cyril and Methodius” University, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia 2 “Ss.Cyril and Methodius” University, Faculty of Forestry, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia Abstract RUSEVSKI, R., B. KUZMANOVSKA, K. BANDZO, M. RISTESKI and K. SOTIROVSKI, 2013. Tospoviruses in the Republic of Macedonia during 1996-2010, occurrence and distribution. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 19: 544-549 The research was carried out during the period between 1996 and 2010. The presence of two tospoviruses (TSWV and INSV) in the Republic of Macedonia was confirmed by different serological tests and characterization based on the size of N proteins obtained from different viral isolates. The results showed that the dominant tospovirus in Macedonia is TSWV, with the exception of the sample GV-I, in which the presence of INSV was detected for the first time in the Republic of Macedonia. Key words: tospoviruses, TSWV, INSV Introduction 1995) predicted new taxonomic development within the Tospovirus genus. Thus, according to criteria related to N- The genus Tospovirus is a member of Bunyaviridae, a gene, Impatiens necrotic spot virus (INSV) was a new tospo- family of negative-stranded RNA viruses, which include virus confirmed and located within Tosposerogroup III (Law vector-born viruses (Büchen-Osmond, 2006). Tomato spot- and Moyer, 1990, Avila et al., 1992). In the following period ted wilt virus (TSWV) as a major member of the Tospovirus a representative number of tospovirus-like isolates reached genus is one of the most economically important plant vi- their taxonomic position based on already established crite- ruses (Prins and Kormelink, 1998a).
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Research and Policy Making the Macedonian Experience with CBC Programmes
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Policy Documentation Center Center for Research and Policy Making The Macedonian experience with CBC programmes Occasional Paper N.14 THE MACEDONIAN EXPERIENCE WITH CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMMES By CRPM team Skopje, Macedonia 2007 Introduction 1 Cross - border cooperation programmes in Macedonia 9 with Greece 1.1. Introduction to the programmes 9 1.2. The level of information and the involvement of Macedonian local 18 authorities in the INTERREG funded projects and actions 2 The experience with non – EU donors 24 3 Cross – border cooperation programmes in Macedonia 27 with Bulgaria 4 Main problems and challenges with the Cross – Border 30 Cooperation programme and recommendations www.crpm.org.mk 3 INTRODUCTION The EU and the Western Balkans The stability of the Balkan is an important goal to be achieved and maintained not just by the Balkan countries but also that is from essential meaning for the European Union. EU wants to deal with every potential and current treats over its stability, and the Balkan since the break down of Yugoslavia is seen as the problematic and wild porch of the Union that needs to be “reconstructed”. In that direction the stability of the Balkan region is set as a strategic objective of EU that is also officially proclaimed in the Javier Solana’s paper from 2003 . The EU goal is stability and prosperity of whole European continent, because problems in one part of the continent are seen as a danger for the rest of the continent.
    [Show full text]
  • District 132.Pdf
    LIONS CLUBS INTERNATIONAL CLUB MEMBERSHIP REGISTER SUMMARY THE CLUBS AND MEMBERSHIP FIGURES REFLECT CHANGES AS OF JUNE 2020 CLUB CLUB LAST MMR FCL YR MEMBERSHI P CHANGES TOTAL DIST IDENT NBR CLUB NAME COUNTRY STATUS RPT DATE OB NEW RENST TRANS DROPS NETCG MEMBERS 3675 059382 SKOPJE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA 132 4 06-2020 28 0 1 0 -15 -14 14 3675 059920 SKOPJE GAZI BABAREPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA 132 4 06-2019 19 0 0 0 0 0 19 3675 061610 SKOPJE ST PANTELEMONREPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA 132 4 06-2020 33 1 0 0 -1 0 33 3675 063553 VARDAR SKOPJEREPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA 132 4 06-2020 33 0 0 0 -6 -6 27 3675 084017 SKOPJE CENTREREPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA 132 4 06-2020 34 0 0 0 -21 -21 13 3675 084018 SKOPJE MACEDONIREPUBLICA NEW CENTURY OF NORTH MACEDONIA 132 4 01-2020 17 0 0 0 -4 -4 13 3675 089049 SKOPJE SVETLINREPUBLICA LIGHT OF NORTH MACEDONIA 132 4 03-2020 25 7 0 0 0 7 32 3675 099369 OHRID REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA 132 4 12-2019 20 0 0 0 -5 -5 15 3675 099370 SKOPJE ALFA REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA 132 4 03-2020 24 1 0 0 -5 -4 20 3675 099545 BITOLA REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA 132 4 10-2019 20 0 0 0 -2 -2 18 3675 099549 OHRID DESARETIREPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA 132 4 02-2020 22 1 0 0 -2 -1 21 3675 100189 KUMANOVO REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA 132 4 03-2020 19 1 0 0 -2 -1 18 3675 104069 BITOLA HERAKLEJAREPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA 132 4 12-2019 18 0 0 0 -3 -3 15 3675 104176 PRILEP REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA 132 4 06-2020 15 4 0 0 -4 0 15 3675 104615 GEVGELIJA REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA 132 4 04-2020 14 0 0 0 -2 -2 12 3675 104832 LYCHNIDOS
    [Show full text]
  • BFC SEE Info Sheet
    Ivanec BUSINESS FRIENDLY MUNICIPALITY SOUTH EAST EUROPE Bjelovar Jastrebarsko Ruma Stara Pazova Prijedor Bijeljina Pančevo Crikvenica Banja Luka Bosanska Krupa Šabac Teslić Tešanj Sanski Most Mrkonjić Grad Žepče Goražde Pirot Leskovac Gazi Baba Štip Štip Skoplje Veles Strumica Bogdanci 41o44’N, 22o11’E www.stip.gov.mk Location South East Europe - Republic of Macedonia Population 47.796 Territory 893 km²; 35,5% agricultural land, 11% farmland Budget € 4,89 million, 37,5% capital investments Contact Vasil Glavinov 4b, 2000 Štip, +389 32 226 600, +389 32 226 601, [email protected] Municipality of Štip is located at the Pan-European Vienna (1.100 km) PROXIMITY TO NEAREST Corridor X (E-75 highway), less than 100 km from the EU BORDER CROSSINGS Budapest (840 km) border (Bulgaria). According to Financial Times fDi report Serbia 100 km for 2016/17, Štip is the most cost effective micro city in Bulgaria 94 km Zagreb Europe. Also, Štip is certified as one of the business-friendly (860 km) municipalities in South East Europe, offering good traffic connections (highway, cargo airport), low overhead costs, M Belgrade (472 km) educated and competitive workforce (local University “Goce Milan Delchev” has 12 faculties), free industrial zone and investment (1.500 km) incentives. Rich in natural resources, Štip has geothermal (“Kezhovica”) and tourism potential (mountain Plachkovica). Ecological environment and favorable climate conditions Sarajevo with 280 sunny days makes Štip ideal for organic food (700 km) production. The leading economic sectors are: textile and ŠTIP Sofia (220 km) food processing industry, transport services, wholesale and Skoplje (94 km) retail, wood and metal-processing.
    [Show full text]
  • STEP Macedonia
    National Survey Design Planning Report Skills Toward Employment and Productivity (STEP) Republic of Macedonia This Version: February 26, 2013 PARTIAL LITERACY ASSESSMENT NSDPR Macedonia– February 26, 2013 Table of Contents Introduction: How to Fill Out the NSDPR ................................................................................................................................................... 3 PART 1: World Bank Country Team Plan .................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Time Frame ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2. Rationale for the STEP Survey ..................................................................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.3. Country-specific Survey Objectives ........................................................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.4. Household Questionnaire ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens the Municipality
    MINISTRY OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT CITIZENS & THE MUNICIPALITY DECENTRALIZATION LETíS DECIDE FOR OURSELVES MUNICIPALITIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Area Populated Name of Municipality Population in km2 areas 1 ARACINOVO 11,597 31.30 4 2 BEROVO 13,941 598.07 9 3 BITOLA 95,385 787.95 66 4 BOGDANCI 8,707 114.54 4 5 BOSILOVO 14,260 161.99 16 6 BRVENICA 15,855 164.30 10 7 VALANDOVO 11,890 331.40 29 8 VASILEVO 12,122 230.40 18 9 VEVCANI 2,433 22.80 1 10 VELES 55,108 427.45 29 11 VINICA 19,938 432.67 16 12 VRANESTICA 1,322 109.13 15 13 VRAPCISTE 25,399 157.98 15 14 GEVGELIJA 22,988 483.43 17 15 GOSTIVAR 81,042 513.39 35 16 GRADSKO 3,760 236.19 16 17 DEBAR 19,542 145.67 18 18 DEBARCA 5,507 425.39 30 19 DELCEVO 17,505 422.39 22 20 DEMIR KAPIJA 4,545 311.06 15 21 DEMIR HISAR 9,497 480.13 41 22 DOJRAN 3,426 129.16 13 23 DOLNENI 13,568 412.43 37 24 DRUGOVO 3,249 383.24 28 25 ZELINO 24,390 201.04 18 26 ZAJAS 11,605 161.08 13 27 ZELENIKOVO 4,077 176.95 14 28 ZRNOVCI 3,264 55.82 3 29 ILINDEN 15,894 97.02 12 30 JEGUNOVCE 10,790 176.93 17 31 KAVADARCI 38,741 992.44 40 32 BOGOVINJE 28,997 141.65 14 33 KARBINCI 4,012 229.70 29 34 KICEVO 30,138 49.14 7 35 KONCE 3,536 233.05 14 36 KOCANI 38,092 360.36 28 37 KRATOVO 10,441 375.44 31 38 KRIVA PALANKA 20,820 480.81 34 39 KRIVOGASTANI 6,150 93.57 13 40 KRUSEVO 9,684 190.68 19 41 KUMANOVO 105,484 509.48 48 42 LIPKOVO 27,058 267.82 22 43 LOZOVO 2,858 166.32 11 MAVROVO I 44 ROSTUSA 8,618 663.19 42 2 45 M.
    [Show full text]