DOCSLIB.ORG

Citizens the Municipality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Citizens the Municipality MINISTRY OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT CITIZENS & THE MUNICIPALITY DECENTRALIZATION LETíS DECIDE FOR OURSELVES MUNICIPALITIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Area Populated Name of Municipality Population in km2 areas 1 ARACINOVO 11,597 31.30 4 2 BEROVO 13,941 598.07 9 3 BITOLA 95,385 787.95 66 4 BOGDANCI 8,707 114.54 4 5 BOSILOVO 14,260 161.99 16 6 BRVENICA 15,855 164.30 10 7 VALANDOVO 11,890 331.40 29 8 VASILEVO 12,122 230.40 18 9 VEVCANI 2,433 22.80 1 10 VELES 55,108 427.45 29 11 VINICA 19,938 432.67 16 12 VRANESTICA 1,322 109.13 15 13 VRAPCISTE 25,399 157.98 15 14 GEVGELIJA 22,988 483.43 17 15 GOSTIVAR 81,042 513.39 35 16 GRADSKO 3,760 236.19 16 17 DEBAR 19,542 145.67 18 18 DEBARCA 5,507 425.39 30 19 DELCEVO 17,505 422.39 22 20 DEMIR KAPIJA 4,545 311.06 15 21 DEMIR HISAR 9,497 480.13 41 22 DOJRAN 3,426 129.16 13 23 DOLNENI 13,568 412.43 37 24 DRUGOVO 3,249 383.24 28 25 ZELINO 24,390 201.04 18 26 ZAJAS 11,605 161.08 13 27 ZELENIKOVO 4,077 176.95 14 28 ZRNOVCI 3,264 55.82 3 29 ILINDEN 15,894 97.02 12 30 JEGUNOVCE 10,790 176.93 17 31 KAVADARCI 38,741 992.44 40 32 BOGOVINJE 28,997 141.65 14 33 KARBINCI 4,012 229.70 29 34 KICEVO 30,138 49.14 7 35 KONCE 3,536 233.05 14 36 KOCANI 38,092 360.36 28 37 KRATOVO 10,441 375.44 31 38 KRIVA PALANKA 20,820 480.81 34 39 KRIVOGASTANI 6,150 93.57 13 40 KRUSEVO 9,684 190.68 19 41 KUMANOVO 105,484 509.48 48 42 LIPKOVO 27,058 267.82 22 43 LOZOVO 2,858 166.32 11 MAVROVO I 44 ROSTUSA 8,618 663.19 42 2 45 M. KAMENICA 8,110 190.37 9 46 MAKEDONSKI BROD 7,141 888.97 51 47 MOGILA 6,710 255.62 23 48 NEGOTINO 19,212 426.46 19 49 NOVACI 3,549 753.53 41 50 NOVO SELO 11,567 237.83 16 51 OSLOMEJ 10,420 121.09 16 52 OHRID 55,749 389.93 29 53 PETROVEC 8,255 201.93 16 54 PEHCEVO 5,517 208.20 7 55 PLASNICA 4,545 54.44 4 56 PRILEP 76,768 1194.44 59 57 PROBISTIP 16,193 325.57 36 58 RADOVIS 28,244 497.48 36 59 RANKOVCE 4,144 240.71 18 60 RESEN 16,825 550.77 44 61 ROSOMAN 4,141 132.90 10 62 SVETI NIKOLE 18,497 482.89 33 63 SOPISTE 5,656 222.10 13 64 STARO NAGORICANE 4,840 433.41 39 65 STRUGA 63,376 483.00 51 66 STRUMICA 54,676 321.49 25 67 STUDENICANI 17,246 276.16 19 68 TEARCE 22,454 136.54 13 69 TETOVO 86,580 261.89 20 70 CENTAR ZUPA 6,519 107.21 23 71 CASKA 7,673 819.45 42 CESINOVO- 72 OBLESEVO 7,490 132.20 14 73 CUCER - SANDEVO 8,493 240.78 12 74 STIP 47,796 583.24 44 75 AERODROM 72,009 21.85 1 76 BUTEL 37,371 54.79 4 77 GAZI BABA 72,617 110.86 13 78 GORCE PETROV 41,634 66.93 6 79 KARPOS 59,666 35.21 2 80 KISELA VODA 57,236 34.24 2 81 SARAJ 35,408 229.06 22 82 CENTAR 45,362 7.52 1 83 CAIR 64,823 3.52 1 84 SUTO ORIZARI 20,800 7.48 1 CITY OF SKOPJE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Population - 506 926 Population - 2 022 547 Area - 571 km2 Area - 25 713 km2 3 CITIZENS HAVE A GUARANTEED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT THE MUNICIPALITY IS A LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT UNIT THE LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA IS TERRITORIAL- LY ORGANISED IN 84 MUNICIPALITIES, OF WHICH 10 ARE IN THE CITY OF SKOPJE. ALL MUNICIPALITIES HAVE EQUAL COMPETENCES THE MUNICIPALITY PERFORMS ITS TASKS THROUGH ORGANS ELECTED DIRECTLY BY THE CITIZENS CITIZENS EXERCISE THEIR RIGHT TO LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT DIRECTLY AND THROUGH THEIR REPRESENTATIVES IN THE ORGANS OF THE MUNICIPALITY THE CITY OF SKOPJE IS A PARTICULAR LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT UNIT WHERE CITIZENS FULFIL THEIR COMMON NEEDS AND INTERESTS ARISING FROM THE CHARACTER OF THE CITY OF SKOPJE AS THE CAPITAL OF REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA 4 KEY FACTS ABOUT THE MUNICIPALITIES • The biggest municipality in the Republic of Macedonia by population is Kumanovo, with 105,484 inhabitants. • Vranestica has the least population, with 1,322 inhabitants and Vevcani, with 2,433 inhabitants. • Prilep is the biggest municipality by territory, 1,198 square kilometres. • The smallest municipality by territory is Vevcani, 23 square kilometres. • Out of the municipalities in the city of Skopje, the biggest municipality by population is Gazi Baba, with 72,617 inhabitants, whereas the smallest one is Suto Orizari, 20,800 inhabitants. • The biggest municipality in Skopje by territory is Saraj, 229 square kilometres, the smallest being Cair, 3.5 square kilometres. Out of 84 municipalities: • there are 16 with less than 5,000 inhabitants; • 16 municipalities, 5,000 - 10,000 inhabitants; • 21 municipalities, 10,000 - 20,000 inhabitants; • 17 municipalities, 20,000 - 50,0000 inhabitants; • 13 municipalities, 50,000 - 100,000 inhabitants; • Only one municipality, Kumanovo, has over 100,000 inhabitants. In the Republic of Macedonia, there is a total of 1,767 populated areas. Bitola is the biggest municipality by the number of populated areas, a total of 66. In 32 municipalities, beside the Macedonian, another official language and alphabet in use is the one of the ethnic community represented by over 20% of the population. • In 28 of these municipalities, both Macedonian and Albanian are official languages, • in 4 municipalities, Macedonian and Turkish, • in 1 municipality, Macedonian and Serbian, and • in one, Macedonian and Roma languages. In 19 of these 32 municipalities, the representatives of the non-majority communities at central level, are represented by over 50%. Those municipalities are: Aracinovo, Brvenica, Vrapciste, Gostivar, Debar, Zelino, Zajas, Bogovinje, Lipkovo, Oslomej, Plasnica, Struga, Studenicani, Tearce, Tetovo, Centar Zupa, Saraj, Cair and Suto Orizari. The regulations related to culture, use of alphabet and languages spoken by less than 20% of the citizens in the municipality, the determining and the use of the coat of arms and the flag of the municipality are adopted by majority of votes from the present Council members, with majority of votes of the present Council members from communities which are not the majority population in the municipality (so-called “Badinter majority”). The so-called “Badinter majority” is used for determining names of streets, squares, and bridges. 5 6 Total number of population of the Republic of Macedonia according to the declared ethnic affiliation, by municipality Name of No. Macedonians Albanians Turks Romas Vlachs Serbs Bosniaks Other municipality Total Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % R. MACEDONIA 2022547 1297981 64.18 509083 25.17 77959 3.85 53879 2.66 9695 0.48 35939 1.78 17018 0.84 20993 1.04 1 ARACINOVO 11597 596 5.14 10879 93.81 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.01 10 0.09 65 0.56 46 0.40 2 BEROVO 13941 13335 95.65 0 0.00 91 0.65 459 3.29 6 0.04 20 0.14 3 0.02 27 0.19 3 BITOLA 95385 84616 88.71 4164 4.37 1610 1.69 2613 2.74 1270 1.33 541 0.57 21 0.02 550 0.58 4 BOGDANCI 8707 8093 92.95 2 0.02 54 0.62 1 0.01 5 0.06 525 6.03 0 0.00 27 0.31 5 BOSILOVO 14260 13649 95.72 0 0.00 495 3.47 24 0.17 0 0.00 8 0.06 0 0.00 84 0.59 6 BRVENICA 15855 5949 37.52 9770 61.62 2 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.00 78 0.49 1 0.01 55 0.35 7 VALANDOVO 11890 9830 82.67 0 0.00 1333 11.21 32 0.27 1 0.01 639 5.37 1 0.01 54 0.45 8 VASILEVO 12122 9958 82.15 0 0.00 2095 17.28 5 0.04 1 0.01 4 0.03 1 0.01 58 0.48 9 VEVCANI 2433 2419 99.42 3 0.12 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.04 3 0.12 0 0.00 7 0.29 10 VELES 55108 46767 84.86 2299 4.17 1724 3.13 800 1.45 343 0.62 540 0.98 2406 4.37 229 0.42 11 VINICA 19938 18261 91.59 0 0.00 272 1.36 1230 6.17 121 0.61 32 0.16 0 0.00 22 0.11 12 VRANESTICA 1322 1033 78.14 10 0.76 276 20.88 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.15 0 0.00 1 0.08 13 VRAPCISTE 25399 1041 4.10 21101 83.08 3134 12.34 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.02 8 0.03 111 0.44 14 GEVGELIJA 22988 22258 96.82 8 0.03 31 0.13 13 0.06 214 0.93 367 1.60 5 0.02 92 0.40 15 GOSTIVAR 81042 15877 19.59 54038 66.68 7991 9.86 2237 2.76 15 0.02 160 0.20 39 0.05 685 0.85 16 GRADSKO 3760 2924 77.77 125 3.32 71 1.89 127 3.38 0 0.00 23 0.61 465 12.37 25 0.66 17 DEBAR 19542 3911 20.01 11348 58.07 2684 13.73 1080 5.53 2 0.01 22 0.11 3 0.02 492 2.52 18 DEBARCA 5507 5324 96.68 153 2.78 2 0.04 0 0.00 1 0.02 8 0.15 0 0.00 19 0.35 19 DELCEVO 17505 16637 95.04 7 0.04 122 0.70 651 3.72 4 0.02 35 0.20 0 0.00 49 0.28 20 DEMIR KAPIJA 4545 3997 87.94 23 0.51 344 7.57 16 0.35 0 0.00 132 2.90 1 0.02 32 0.70 21 DEMIR HISAR 9497 9179 96.65 232 2.44 35 0.37 11 0.12 7 0.07 13 0.14 2 0.02 18 0.19 22 DOJRAN 3426 2641 77.09 17 0.50 402 11.73 59 1.72 3 0.09 277 8.09 2 0.06 25 0.73 23 DOLNENI 13568 4871 35.90 3616 26.65 2597 19.14 13 0.10 0 0.00 16 0.12 2380 17.54 75 0.55 24 DRUGOVO 3249 2784 85.69 155 4.77 292 8.99 1 0.03 0 0.00 8 0.25 0 0.00 9 0.28 25 ZELINO 24390 71 0.29 24195 99.20 2 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 5 0.02 116 0.48 26 ZAJAS 11605 211 1.82 11308 97.44 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 0.05 0 0.00 80 0.69 27 ZELENIKOVO 4077 2522 61.86 1206 29.58 1 0.02 92 2.26 1 0.02 45 1.10 191 4.68 19 0.47 28 ZRNOVCI 3264 3247 99.48 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 13 0.40 2 0.06 0 0.00 2 0.06 29 ILINDEN 15894 13959 87.83 352 2.21 17 0.11 428 2.69 1 0.01 912 5.74 0 0.00 225 1.42 30 JEGUNOVCE 10790 5963 55.26 4642 43.02 4 0.04 41 0.38 0 0.00 109 1.01 1 0.01 30 0.28 31 KAVADARCI 38741 37499 96.79 2 0.01 167 0.43 679 1.75 27 0.07 218 0.56 4 0.01 145 0.37 32 BOGOVINJE 28997 37 0.13 27614 95.23 1183 4.08 5 0.02 0 0.00 1 0.00 9 0.03 148 0.51 33 KARBINCI 4012 3200 79.76 0 0.00 728 18.15 2 0.05 54 1.35 12 0.30 0 0.00 16 0.40 34 KICEVO 30138 16140 53.55 9202 30.53 2430 8.06 1630 5.41 76 0.25 86 0.29 7 0.02 567 1.88 35 KONCE 3536 3009 85.10 0 0.00 521 14.73 0 0.00 0 0.00 3 0.08 0 0.00 3 0.08 36 KOCANI 38092 35472 93.12 1 0.00 315 0.83 1951 5.12 194 0.51 67 0.18 2 0.01 90 0.24 37 KRATOVO 10441 10231 97.99 0 0.00 8 0.08 151 1.45 1 0.01 33 0.32 0 0.00 17 0.16 KRIVA 38 PALANKA 20820 19998 96.05 0 0.00 2 0.01 668 3.21 3 0.01 103 0.49 2 0.01 44 0.21 39 KRIVOGASTANI 6150 6126 99.61 0 0.00 0 0.00 8 0.13 0 0.00 6 0.10 0 0.00 10 0.16 40 KRUSEVO 9684 6081 62.79 2064 21.31 315 3.25 0 0.00 1020 10.53 38 0.39 137 1.41 29 0.30 41 KUMANOVO 105484 63746 60.43 27290 25.87 292 0.28 4256 4.03 147 0.14 9062 8.59 20 0.02 671 0.64 42 LIPKOVO 27058 169 0.62 26360 97.42 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 370 1.37 6 0.02 152 0.56 43 LOZOVO 2858 2471 86.46 35 1.22 157 5.49 0 0.00 122 4.27 27 0.94 34 1.19 12 0.42 MAVROVO I 44 ROSTUSA 8618 4349 50.46 1483 17.21 2680 31.10 10 0.12 0 0.00 6 0.07 31 0.36 59 0.68 45 M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Empirical Relations of Seismic Moment and Earthquake Moment Magnitude to Earthquake Local Magnitude for the Vardar and West Macedonia Seismic Zones
    Prilozi, Odd. mat. teh. nauki, MANU, XXVII–XXVIII, 1‡2 (2006‡2007), str. 93‡115 Contributions, Sec. Math. Tech. Sci., MANU, XXVII–XXVIII, 1–2 (2006–2007), pp. 93–115 ISSN 0351–3246 UDC: ?550.348.436.098.3(497.71) EMPIRICAL RELATIONS OF SEISMIC MOMENT AND EARTHQUAKE MOMENT MAGNITUDE TO EARTHQUAKE LOCAL MAGNITUDE FOR THE VARDAR AND WEST MACEDONIA SEISMIC ZONES Vera Čejkovska A b s t r a c t: Seismic moments (M0) of 79 earthquakes which ed in the Vardar and West Macedonia seismic zones on the territory of the Republic of Macedonia and neighbouring regions within the period 1992–2002 were obtained by inversion of the amplitu- de spectra of the vertical components of the short-period shear Sg and Lg surface waves, digitally recorded on the electromagnetic short-period SS-1 and wide-range WR-1 Kinemetrics seismome- ters at the stations in Skopje (SKO), Ohrid (OHR), Valandovo (VAY), Bitola (BIA) and Kriva Palanka (KPJ). The inversion was done on the Brune dislocation source model and a proper model of the medium. The data used included earthquake local magnitu- des (ML) between 1.5 and 5.2, for the Vardar seismic zone, and between 1.4 and 5.2, for the West Macedonia seismic zone. Mo- ment magnitudes (MW) of the earthquakes were calculated using the Kanamori formula. Empirical M0 – ML and MW – ML relations were obtained, the first of the kind for seismic zones in the territory of the Republic of Macedonia. The results also appointed to a differentiation between classes of small and middle-sized earthquakes at ML = 5.2 and to a change in the scaling law of the small 13 14 earthquakes at ML ≈ 3.0 – 3.5 or M0 ≈ 6·10 – 1.5·10 N·m.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia in 2018
    ENERGY AND WATER SERVICES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA APRIL 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 201 8 Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia in 2018 ENERGY AND WATER SERVICES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA ___________________________________________________________________ The Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia for 2018 has been prepared in accordance with Article 36 from the Energy Law, which establishes the obligation of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission to submit the Annual Report for its operation during the previous year to the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia, not later than 30th of April of the current year. The Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission for 2018 contains detailed information on the performance of the competences according to the Energy Law and the Law on Setting Prices of Water Services, as well as information on the material-financial operation. The Energy Law also determines that the Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission needs to be submitted to the Government of the Republic of North Macedonia and the Ministry competent for the performance of the assignments within the energy area, so that they could be informed, as well as to the Energy Community Secretariat. The Report contains overview of the activities performed by the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission during 2018, with special review of: − State of the energy markets, − State of the prices and tariffs regulation, − Preparing regulatory acts, − International activities and − Financial Statement of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Analysis for Improved Water Supply in Municipality Of
    Feasibility Analysis for Improved Solid Waste Management in Municipality of Gevgelija FINAL REPORT JULY 2016 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Project Background ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Goals and Objectives of the Feasibility Analysis ....................................................................................... 4 1.3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Project Description and Rationale .................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Gevgelija Municipality ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Geographic location ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.2 Demographic profile ............................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 General Project Description ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.1 Solid Waste Management
    [Show full text]
  • Local Systems Practice (Lsp) Activity Local Works Macedonia | Civil Society Organizational Network Analysis (Ona)
    LOCAL SYSTEMS PRACTICE (LSP) ACTIVITY LOCAL WORKS MACEDONIA | CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONAL NETWORK ANALYSIS (ONA) JUNE 2018 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by LINC LLC and local partner, the Macedonian Center for International Cooperation (MCIC). USAID Local Systems Practice June 2018 Prepared by: Craig Hempfling, LINC; Megan McDermott, LINC; Jenna White, LINC; Patrick Sommerville, LINC; Aleksandar Krzalovski, MCIC; Emina Nuredinoska, MCIC; Aleksandra Savevska, MCIC; Boris Ristovski, MCIC; Monika Bozinoska, MCIC; and Jasmina Ristovska, MCIC Front cover: Network map of Macedonian CSOs. Acknowledgements: The author(s) would like to acknowledge all of our LSP consortium partners for their input throughout the process, the valuable assistance of MCIC support staff in ensuring a thorough and timely analysis, as well as all of the organizations who took the time to participate in the Network Analysis survey. These contributions are crucial for advancing our mutual efforts towards improved local development in Macedonia. About Local Systems Practice: Local Systems Practice is a USAID-funded activity that directly assists multiple Missions, partners, and constituents to design and adaptively manage systems-based programs in complex environments. The concept has been designed to aid Missions and partners to overcome four specific challenges to effective Local Systems Practice through: a) Listening; b) Engagement; c) Discovery; and d) Adaptation. The Theory of Change underpinning the activity asserts that the application of systems tools to complex local challenges at multiple intervals throughout the program cycle will enhance the sustainability of programming, resulting in better-informed, measurable interventions that complement and reinforce the systems they seek to strengthen.
    [Show full text]
  • US to North Macedonia March 4-15, 2019
    US to North Macedonia March 4-15, 2019 Exchange Guide This exchange is made possible through a grant from the US Embassy—Skopje. Table of Contents Schedule ............................................................................................................................ 3 Schedule Notes ............................................................................................................... 14 Program Contact Information ...................................................................................... 24 Flight Confirmations and Itineraries .............................................................................. 25 Schedule Monday, March 4, Washington, DC 4:00pm Arrive at and check-in to hotel: Residence Inn by Marriott Dupont Circle 2120 P St NW Washington, DC 20037 5:45pm Meet in hotel lobby 6:15pm Welcome dinner hosted by Mr. Matt Robbins Director of Government Relations, AutoCare Association [Delegation escort, ACYPL Trustee, and alumnus to Argentina and Uruguay 2007] Location: City Tap House, 1250 Connecticut Avenue, NW In attendance will be: Ms. Libby Rosenbaum CEO, ACYPL [Timor Leste 2017] Ms. Jacqueline Harris Outreach & Engagement Director, ACYPL [South Africa and Botswana 2017] Ms. Cameron Schupp Development & Special Projects Director, ACYPL 8:00pm Return to hotel Tuesday, March 5 Washington, DC Attire: Business Breakfast: At the hotel Additional: Please check out and pay for any incidentals. Have your driver’s license accessible for State Department security. 8:30am Meeting in the lobby and load luggage into van 8:45am Depart for first meeting 9:00am Meeting with Mr. Edward Joseph Lecturer, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies 10:15am Depart for next meeting 3 11:00am Meeting at the United States Department of State In attendance will be: Mr. Brent Beemer Program Officer, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs Ms. Jill Dietrich North Macedonia Desk Officer Ms. Heidi Ramsay Public Diplomacy Desk Officer Location: 2201 C Street, NW 12:00pm Depart for next activity 12:30pm Meeting with Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notice for Awarding a Contract for Public Private Partnership for Financing, Designing, Construction, Management, Mainten
    PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP FOR FINANCING, DESIGNING, CONSTRUCTION, MANAGEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IN THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA IN THE FIRST PHASE OF THE COMPETITIVE DIALOGUE Notice number 01/2020 SECTION I: CONTRACTING AUTHORITY I.1) Details on the contracting authority I.1.1) Name of the contracting authority: Ministry of economy of the Republic of North Macedonia I.1.2) Address of the contracting authority: str.Jurij Gagarin, no.15 Town: Skopje Postal code:1000 I.1.3) Contact: Goran Nikolovski and Ismail Luma Telephone: +389 2 30 93 517; +389 2 30 93 430 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Website: www.economy.gov.mk I.2) Type of contracting authority, its main activity: State authorities – Ministry of economy and Ministry of finance SECTION II: SUBJECT MATTER OF CONTRACT II.1. Subject matter of contract: Awarding a contract for public private partnership for financing, designing, construction, management, maintenance and development of the natural gas distribution system in the Republic of North Macedonia. II.2. Type of contract: The contract for public private partnership shall be awarded by applying the procedure for competitive dialogue which shall be conducted in three phases. This call for request to participate refers to the first phase of the competitive dialogue. The duration of the contract for public private partnership is maximum 35 years, from the date of entry into force of the contract for public
    [Show full text]
  • Parties and Elections Macedonia November 2004 ZA4326
    ZA-Archiv Nummer 4326 Parties and Elections Macedonia November 2004 ZA4326 POLL - November 2004 1. If parliamentary elections were held next week, which party would you vote for? (DO NOT READ OUT OPTIONS) 1.Social-Democratic Union of Macedonia 2. VMRO-DPMNE 3. Liberal Democratic Party 4. Liberal Party 5. Democratic Union for Integration 6. The third way 7. VMRO-Peoples party 8. Democratic Party of Albanians 9. Party for Democratic Prosperity 10. other 11. no one 12. do not know 13. no answer 2. Which politician do you trust the most? (DO NOT READ OUT OPTIONS) 1. no one 2. do not know 3. no answer 4. Hari Kostov 5. Vlado Buchkovski 6. Nikola Gruevski 7. Arben Xaferi 8. Ali Ahmeti 9. Radmila Shekerinska 10. Tito Petkovski 11. Nikola Popovski 12. Stevcho Jakimovski 13. Branko Crvenkovski 14. Trifun Kostovski 15. Vasil Tupurkovski 16. Abdulafman Bexeti 17. Rufi Osmani 18. Sashko Kedev 19. Stojan Andov 20. Risto Penov 21. Qubisav Ivanov-Yingo 22. Ganka Samoilova Cvetanovska 23. Ilinka Mitreva 24. Dosta Dimovska 25. Marijan Gjorchev 26. Ljubcho Georgievski 27. Ljupcho Jordanovski 28. Pavle Trajanov 29. other (write who) _______________ 1 ZA4326 3. According to you, who will be the new president of the Social-Democratic Union? 1. Radmila Shekerinska 2. Vlado Buchkovski 3. Nikola Popovski 4. Tito Petkovski 5. Ilinka Mitreva 6. do not know (DO NOT READ OUT) 7. no answer (DO NOT READ OUT) 4. Do you consider that the present Government is corrupted? 1. yes 2. no 3. do not know 4. no answer (DO NOT READ OUT) 2 ZA4326 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RESPONDENT (5) Gender 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Roma in the Republic of Macedonia: Challenges and Inequalities in Housing, Education and Health
    briefing Roma in the Republic of Macedonia: Challenges and Inequalities in Housing, Education and Health Andrea Spitálszky Young girl in Roma settlement, Republic of Macedonia. Andrea Spitalszky, April 2018. Acknowledgements Project: From action to equal rights for Roma. IPA/2015/382006. This project is funded by the European Union. This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Roma Democratic Development Association SONCE and Minority Rights Group International and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Roma Democratic Development Association SONCE Minority Rights Group International The Roma Democratic Development Association SONCE is a Minority Rights Group International (MRG) is a non-governmental organization working at the local, national non-governmental organization (NGO) working to secure and international levels to promote civil integration, democratic the rights of ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities and rights and equal opportunities for Roma in the Republic of indigenous peoples worldwide, and to promote cooperation Macedonia. Founded in 1996 as an informal self-help group for and understanding between communities. Our activities are the Roma community in the Municipality of Tetovo and officially focused on international advocacy, training, publishing and registered in 1999 as a non-profit organization, SONCE has outreach. We are guided by the needs expressed by our implemented more than 50 projects over the past two decades worldwide partner network of organizations, which represent in a range of areas including education, health and social care, minority and indigenous peoples. employment and democratic participation of Roma.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    E2120 EMP Checklist for Construction and Rehabilitation Activities General Guidelines for use of EMP checklist: For low-risk topologies, such as school and hospital rehabilitation activities, the ECA Public Disclosure Authorized safeguards team developed an alternative to the current EMP format to provide an opportunity for a more streamlined approach to preparing EMPs for minor rehabilitation or small-scale works in building construction, in the health, education and public services sectors. The checklist-type format has been developed to provide “example good practices” and designed to be user friendly and compatible with safeguard requirements. The EMP checklist-type format attempts to cover typical core mitigation approaches to civil works contracts with small, localized impacts. It is accepted that this format provides the key elements of an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) or Environmental Management Framework (EMF) to meet World Bank Environmental Assessment requirements under OP 4.01. The intention of this checklist is that it would be applicable as guidelines for the small works contractors and constitute an Public Disclosure Authorized integral part of bidding documents for contractors carrying out small civil works under Bank-financed projects. The checklist has three sections: Part 1 includes a descriptive part that characterizes the project and specifies in terms the institutional and legislative aspects, the technical project content, the potential need for capacity building program and description of the public consultation process. This section could be up to two pages long. Attachments for additional information can be supplemented when needed. Part 2 includes an environmental and social screening checklist, where activities and potential environmental issues can be checked in a simple Yes/No format.
    [Show full text]
  • European Observatory the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
    European Observatory on Health Care Systems The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Health Care Systems in Transition I IONAL B AT AN RN K E F T O N R I WORLD BANK PLVS VLTR R E T C N O E N M S P T R O U L C E T EV ION AND D The European Observatory on Health Care Systems is a partnership between the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, the Government of Norway, the Government of Spain, the European Investment Bank, the World Bank, the London School of Economics and Political Science, and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine in association with the Open Society Institute. Health Care Systems in Transition The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 2000 The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia II European Observatory on Health Care Systems AMS 5012668 (FYM) Target 19 2000 Target 19 – RESEARCH AND KNOWLEDGE FOR HEALTH By the year 2005, all Member States should have health research, information and communication systems that better support the acquisition, effective utilization, and dissemination of knowledge to support health for all. By the year 2005, all Member States should have health research, information and communication systems that better support the acquisition, effective utilization, and dissemination of knowledge to support health for all. Keywords DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE EVALUATION STUDIES FINANCING, HEALTH HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH SYSTEMS PLANS – organization and administration THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA ISSN 1020-9077 ©European Observatory on Health Care Systems 2000 This document may be freely reviewed or abstracted, but not for commercial purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the 2014 Summer Season for Macedonia Compared to 1981-2010 Base Period
    Analysis of the 2014 summer season for Macedonia compared to 1981-2010 base period Temperature Average summer (June, July and August) air temperatures in Macedonia were mainly around normal value for the 1981-2010 base period. During summer 2014, mean air temperature ranged between 15.6.°C in Lazaropole and 25.6°C in Gevgelija. The departure of the mean temperature from the normal for the 1981-2010 base period ranged from -0.6°C in Kriva Palanka to 0.3°C in Gevgelija and Bitola. Station Departure (°C) June July August Summer OHRID -0.4 -0.8 0.8 -0.1 BEROVO -0.2 -0.4 0.4 -0.1 D.KAPIJA -1.0 -0.1 0.4 -0.2 GEVGELIJA 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.3 K.PALANKA -0.7 -0.9 -0.2 -0.6 LAZAROPOLE -0.3 -1.3 0.5 -0.4 PRILEP -0.4 -0.4 0.0 -0.3 SKOPJE -0.8 -0.6 0.1 -0.4 STIP -0.9 -0.6 0.3 -0.4 STRUMICA -0.5 -0.3 0.3 -0.2 BITOLA -0.2 0.1 0.9 0.3 Table 1. Departure of the mean temperature (°C) from the normal for the 1981-2010 base period Three-month course of the mean, maximum and minimum daily air temperature in Kriva Palanka, Gevgelija and Bitola during summer 2014 is shown in figures 1, 2 and 3. Figure 1. Three-month course of the mean, maximum and minimum daily air temperature in Kriva Palanka during summer 2014 Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Quo Report on Accessibility for the Towns of Kavadarci, Negotino, Stip and Veles
    Status – quo Analysis Reports Activity 1 of the Project: Equal Access through Service Learning for Persons with Disabilities Skopje, 2012 Note: The texts herein, in general, are included as originally submitted by the authors, i.e. they were not subject to contextual changes. Status – quo Analysis Reports Activity 1 of the Project: Equal Access through Service Learning for Persons with Disabilities Status Quo R e p o r t for the towns of Kavadarci, Negotino, Stip and Veles Republic of Macedonia Author: Biljana Manevska Veles Skopje/Veles, 2012 2 Table of Contents: Contents Table of Contents: ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Education ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 Public Services ................................................................................................................................................ 16 Banks ............................................................................................................................................................... 27 Sports-Entertainment ....................................................................................................................................... 35 Examples of Good Practice ............................................................................................................................. 38 Transport/Movement
    [Show full text]