Local Systems Practice (Lsp) Activity Local Works Macedonia | Civil Society Organizational Network Analysis (Ona)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
LOCAL SYSTEMS PRACTICE (LSP) ACTIVITY LOCAL WORKS MACEDONIA | CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONAL NETWORK ANALYSIS (ONA) JUNE 2018 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by LINC LLC and local partner, the Macedonian Center for International Cooperation (MCIC). USAID Local Systems Practice June 2018 Prepared by: Craig Hempfling, LINC; Megan McDermott, LINC; Jenna White, LINC; Patrick Sommerville, LINC; Aleksandar Krzalovski, MCIC; Emina Nuredinoska, MCIC; Aleksandra Savevska, MCIC; Boris Ristovski, MCIC; Monika Bozinoska, MCIC; and Jasmina Ristovska, MCIC Front cover: Network map of Macedonian CSOs. Acknowledgements: The author(s) would like to acknowledge all of our LSP consortium partners for their input throughout the process, the valuable assistance of MCIC support staff in ensuring a thorough and timely analysis, as well as all of the organizations who took the time to participate in the Network Analysis survey. These contributions are crucial for advancing our mutual efforts towards improved local development in Macedonia. About Local Systems Practice: Local Systems Practice is a USAID-funded activity that directly assists multiple Missions, partners, and constituents to design and adaptively manage systems-based programs in complex environments. The concept has been designed to aid Missions and partners to overcome four specific challenges to effective Local Systems Practice through: a) Listening; b) Engagement; c) Discovery; and d) Adaptation. The Theory of Change underpinning the activity asserts that the application of systems tools to complex local challenges at multiple intervals throughout the program cycle will enhance the sustainability of programming, resulting in better-informed, measurable interventions that complement and reinforce the systems they seek to strengthen. The LSP team is composed of both development practitioners and research institutions to most effectively explore and implement systems thinking approaches with Missions, local partners and other local stakeholders. The activity is lead by LINC LLC with five sub-implementers: ANSER, the University of Notre Dame, AVSI, the University of Missouri, and Practical Action. For more information on LSP and additional resources, please visit: www.localsystemspractice.org For any questions or comments on the report, please contact: Megan McDermott Program Associate, LINC LLC +1 (202) 640 5462 Ext. 6 [email protected] This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of the award no. AID-OAA-A-16-00077. Disclaimer: The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. USAID Local Systems Practice June 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Background & Objectives ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 Findings & Analysis ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Respondent Profiles ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Network Analysis ................................................................................................................................................ 8 How to Read This Report – Interpreting Network Maps .................................................................................... 9 Overall Network Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 9 Overall Network .............................................................................................................................................. 9 Sector-Based Sub-Networks & Analysis .......................................................................................................... 10 Sector 1: Civil Society Development; Media & IT ....................................................................................... 11 Sector 2: Economic, Agriculture & Sustainable Development; Professional Associations .......................... 13 Sector 3: Democracy & Rule of Law ............................................................................................................ 14 Sector 4: Humanities & Rights...................................................................................................................... 15 Sector 5: Youth, Culture & Education .......................................................................................................... 16 Sector 6: Environment & Health ................................................................................................................... 17 Organizations Excluded Due to Survey Non-Response .................................................................................... 17 Geographic Sub-Networks & Analysis ............................................................................................................. 18 Geography 1: National-Level Actors ............................................................................................................ 20 Geography 2: Regional-Level Actors ........................................................................................................... 21 Geography 3: Region-by-Region Networks .................................................................................................. 22 Local Administrations’ Relationships with Development Actors ..................................................................... 24 Local Administration Linkages with Development Actors ........................................................................... 24 Grantor-Grantee Networks ................................................................................................................................ 25 Grantor-Grantee Relationships ...................................................................................................................... 25 Recommendations Going Forward........................................................................................................................ 27 Recommendations for Local Works Program ................................................................................................... 27 Recommendations for ONA Instrument & Capacity ........................................................................................ 28 Annex 1: SurveyMonkey ONA Survey Annex 2: ONA Roster & Kumu Coding Database Annex 3: Organization Attributes - Sector and Services Provided Annex 4: Organization Attributes - Sources of Funding Annex 5: Additional Organizations Annex 5: LSP Scoping Visit Meetings USAID Local Systems Practice i June 2018 USAID/Macedonia Local Works Organizational Network Analysis Executive Summary This report presents the results of an Organizational Network Analysis (ONA) to support USAID/Macedonia’s Local Works team with insight into Macedonia’s development landscape, key development actors, and how they are networked. This exercise was conducted by USAID’s Local Systems Practice (LSP), led by LINC and supported by a Macedonian partner, Macedonian Center for International Cooperation (MCIC). Our objectives were to analyze local development actors and assess the dynamics, relationships and levels of influence between the actors; identify the most salient organizations with meaningful ties to other actors; inform Local Works strategies to strengthen local networks and build capacity to increase their effectiveness; and strengthen local capacity to track changing network dynamics over time through ongoing ONA. ONA Roster: In line with the Research Plan submitted in March 2018, this ONA included stakeholder groups from civil society, public administration, private sector, media and education sectors. Our methodology relied on numerous resources and references to compile a database of 650 unique development-oriented organizations. Through outreach to all of them via an opt-in survey, we developed a roster of 197 organizations and 34 local administrations to whom we administered online surveys; of these, 139 organizations and 25 local administrations responded. For each of the participating organizations, data was collected and is presented regarding their legal form, human resource levels, services performed, sources of funding, and network linkages with other organizations in the ONA. Sub-Network Analyses: Relying on the survey data, and backed by quantitative data from other sources, this report disaggregates network analyses along four lines: i) Sectoral: Sub-networks based on seven development sectors that consolidate and include 18 formally-recognized CSO sectors; ii) Geographic: