DOCSLIB.ORG

Програмa За Jaвни Инвестиции Вo Рeпублиka Makeдoниja 2011 - 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Програмa За Jaвни Инвестиции Вo Рeпублиka Makeдoниja 2011 - 2013 ВЛАДА НА РЕПУБЛИКА МАКЕДОНИЈА GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA ПРОГРАМA ЗА JAВНИ ИНВЕСТИЦИИ ВO РEПУБЛИKA MAKEДOНИJA 2011 - 2013 PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA 2011 – 2013 СKOПJE, SKOPJE 2011 Програма за јавни инвестиции 2011 - 2013 Public Investment Programme В О В Е Д INTRODUCTION Програмата за јавни инвестиции во Република The Public Investment Programme of the Republic Македонија 2011-2013 е подготвена согласно на of Macedonia 2011-2013 was prepared in accordance Програмата за работа на Владата на Република with the WorK Programme of the Government of the Македонија. Republic of Macedonia. Почнувајќи од 1995 година, вo Министерството за Since 1995, a data base of investment projects in финансии е оформена база на податоци за the public infrastructure of the Republic of Macedonia инвестициони проекти од јавната инфраструктура на was set up in the Ministry of Finance and the concerned Република Македонија, врз основа на податоци што се Ministries and that is continuously innovated. доставуваат од надлежните министерства и кои постојано се иновираат. During the preparation of the Programme, it was При подготвувањето на Програмата се имаше taken into consideration that the undertaken activities предвид дека преземените активности за for intensifying the country's reform processes, and интензивирање на реформските процеси во земјата, а particularly the public sector transformation processes особено трансформационите процеси во јавниот require approach towards application of adequate сектор бараат да се пристапи кон примена на methodology in the public investments planning адекватна методологија во спроведувањето на implementation and their execution monitoring, for which планирањето на јавните инвестиции и следење на the World banK and the European Union through the нивната реализација, за што Светската банка и PHARE Programme provided compliant technical Европската унија преку Програмата PHARE oбезбедија support to the Government of the Republic of соодветна техничка поддршка на Владата на Република Macedonia. Македонија. При подготвувањето на Програмата се имаа When preparing the Programme, sectoral предвид секторските развојни политики и development policies and priority infrastructure projects приоритетните инфраструктурни проекти кои се have been taken into account, which are includet in the содржани во Програмата за работа на Владата на 2008 - 2012 Government Operational Programme. Република Македонија за периодот 2008 - 2012 година. With the Programme 2011-2013 the Government's Сo Програмата 2011-2013 придонесот на Владата contribution in the implementation of the public во спроведувањето на стратегијата за јавни investment strategy will be represented mainly through инвестиции ќе биде изразен, пред сè, преку organization, support, regulation, promotion and организирање, поддржување, регулирање, промовирање stimulation of the development activities in the public и поттикнување на развојните активности во доменот sector domain. на јавниот сектор. 1 Програма за јавни инвестиции 2011 - 2013 Public Investment Programme ПРЕТСТАВУВАЊЕ НА ЗЕМЈАТA COUNTRY IN BRIEF Република Македонија е држава во Југоисточна Европа и го зафаќа Republic of Macedonia is a country in Southeast Europe, in the central централниот дел на Балканскиот полуостров. На север граничи со Република part of the Balkan peninsula. It is bordered by Republic of Serbia and Србија и Република Косово, на југ со Република Грција, на исток со Република Republic of KosoVo on the north, by Republic of Greece on the south, by Бугарија и на запад со Република Албанија. Republic of Bulgaria on the east and by Republic of Albania on the west. 2 Вкупната територија на Република Македонија изнесува 25.713km , што е Territory of Republic of Macedonia coVers total of 25,713km2, equal to еднакво на 6% од територијата на ЕУ-25. Согласно последниот попис од 2002 6% of the territory of EU-25. According to the last census carried out in година, Република Македонија има 2.022.547 жители. Главен град на државата 2002, there are 2,022,547 inhabitants liVing in the Republic of Macedonia. е Скопје и се наоѓа во нејзиниот северен дел. Skopje is the capital, located in the northern part of the country. Република Македонија е независна демократска држава. Политичкиот Republic of Macedonia is an independent democratic country. Political систем на парламентарна демократија е воспоставен со највисокиот закон во system of parliamentary democracy was introduced with 1991 Constitution државата – Уставот на Република Македонија од 1991 година. Власта е of the Republic of Macedonia. There are three branches of goVernment: поделена на законодавна, извршна и судска. legislatiVe, executiVe and judicial. Република Македонија е членка на Организацијата на Обединетите Republic of Macedonia is a member of the United Nations, International Нации, Меѓународниот монетарен фонд, Светската банка, Европскиот совет и Monetary Fund, World Bank, Council of Europe and World Trade Светската трговска организација. Република Македонија од 2005 година е Organization. Since 2005, it is a candidate country for EU membership. Кандидат за членство во Eвропската Унија. EKOНOMСKИ РAЗВOJ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Во современи услови на глобализација, македонскaта економија In conditions of globalization, Macedonian economy functions as an функционира како отворена пазарна економија, во која основните предуслови open market economy, the essential preconditions for deVelopment being за развој се темелат на зголемување на конкурентноста на економијата, based on increase of competitiVeness of the economy, use of high-quality употреба на високо квалификувана работна сила, развој на економската labour force, deVelopment of economic infrastructure of the country and use инфраструктура на земјата и употреба на современа комуникациска и of modern CIT. информатичка технологија. Одржувањето на макроекономската рамнотежа и стабилност на Maintenance of macroeconomic balance and stability of national националната економија, темелена врз зголемена домашна понуда и economy, based on increased domestic supply and sustainable economic остварување на одржлив економски растеж на трајни основи, пред се, преку growth on permanent basis, mainly by stimulating domestic and attracting поттикнување на домашните инвестиции и привлекување на странските foreign inVestments, as well as increased leVel of public inVestments aimed инвестиции, како и на зголемено ниво на јавните инвестиции во функција на at economic deVelopment and increase of competitiVeness of the country, економскиот развој и зголемување на конкурентноста на земјата, останува во remain to be priorities of the GoVernment of the Republic of Macedonia. основните приоритети на Владата на Република Македонија. Стратегиски приоритети и цели на Владата на Република Македонија Strategic priorities and goals of the GoVernment of the Republic of пред се, се: зголемување на економскиот раст и конкурентноста на трајна Macedonia are mainly the following: the economic growth increase and основа, повисока стапка на вработеност, пораст на животниот стандард и competiVeness on a constant basis, higher employment rate, increase of квалитетот на живеење, интеграција во НАТО и ЕУ, подобрување на бизнис both the liVing standard of the quality of life, NATO and EU integration, климата, зголемување на странските и домашните инвестиции и јакнење на business climate improVement, increase of foreign and domestic административните капацитети и координативните структури за преговори со inVestments and strengthened administratiVe capacities and coordinatiVe ЕУ и користење на претпристапните фондови на ЕУ. structures for negotiations with EU and usage of IPA funds. 2 Програма за јавни инвестиции 2011 - 2013 Public Investment Programme Во 2007 и 2008 година, во Република Македонија беа остварени стапки на In 2007 and 2008, Republic of Macedonia realized growth rates of раст од 6,1% и 5,0% респективно. Поради експанзијата и продлабочувањето на 6.1% and 5.0% respectiVely. Due to expansion and deepening of economic економската криза, рецесијата во Европската Унија и САД, како и поради crisis, recession in EU and the USA, as well as deterioration of economic влошувањето на економската активност во земјите oд регионот, потенцијалот actiVity in the countries in the region, growth potential of the economy in за раст на економијата во 2009 година беше значително ограничен. Сепак, и 2009 was significantly limited. HoweVer, despite the worsen conditions, покрај влошените услови Република Македонија во 2010 година успеа да ја Republic of Macedonia managed to maintain macroeconomic stability and задржи макроекономската стабилност и стабилноста на девизниот курс и се exchange rate stability in 2010, and it is expected for 2010 to end with GDP очекува 2010 година да ја заврши со пораст на БДП од околу 2,0% . Во 2011 growth of around 2.0%. In 2011, economy is expected to stabilize and crisis година се очекува стабилизирање на економијата и надминување на кризата to be oVercome, followed with GDP growth of 3,5% and 2% inflation, being со пораст на БДП од 3,5% и инфлација од 3%, што ќе претставува основа за the basis for the economy to recoVer to the potential economic growth rates на среден рок до 2013 година, економијата повторно да се врати на of 5.0% to 6,0% on the medium term by 2013. потенцијалните стапки на економски раст од 5,0 до 6,0%. Макроекономската политика, поддржана од фискалната политика, во In the coming period, macroeconomic policy, supported by fiscal policy, наредниот период ќе биде
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Macedonia: Not out of the Woods Yet
    Update Briefing Europe Briefing N°37 Skopje/Brussels, 25 February 2005 Macedonia: Not out of the Woods Yet I. OVERVIEW the two parties forced a 7 November 2004 referendum vote on the proposed law. Prime Minister Vlado Buckovski and representatives of Although VMRO was a signatory to the original peace his government and the opposition converged in Brussels agreement, it used the pre-referendum period to question on 14 February 2005 to hand over Macedonia's response sharply the government's performance and the general to the European Commission's 3,000-item questionnaire, wisdom of power-sharing among the ethnic communities. the latest stage in the EU membership application, The government worked to reassure its supporters and which was formally submitted almost a year ago. The argued that its plans would guarantee fast track economic occasion was celebrated by a concert starring Macedonian growth, European integration and better governance. musicians at an exclusive Brussels venue. Appropriately The emergence of Albanian paramilitaries on the enough for St. Valentine's Day, the relationship with the outskirts of Skopje increased tensions and gave rise to EU had taken on a new depth, but nuptials are far from concerns that Macedonia's young and fragile multi-ethnic concluded. The considerable progress Macedonia has democracy might be at serious risk. made is still fragile. The crucial decentralisation process requires careful implementation, and the coalition A strategically-timed U.S. decision to recognise the government and its constituent parties should apply a country's official name as "Macedonia" helped to ensure number of confidence building measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Analysis for Improved Water Supply in Municipality Of
    Feasibility Analysis for Improved Solid Waste Management in Municipality of Gevgelija FINAL REPORT JULY 2016 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Project Background ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Goals and Objectives of the Feasibility Analysis ....................................................................................... 4 1.3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Project Description and Rationale .................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Gevgelija Municipality ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Geographic location ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.2 Demographic profile ............................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 General Project Description ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.1 Solid Waste Management
    [Show full text]
  • STATUS REPORT for the Period: January 2009 – October 2011
    United Nations Development Programme PROGRAMME “INTER-MUNICIPAL COOPERATION for BETTER SERVICE PROVISION for EU ACCESSION” FINAL STATUS REPORT For the period: January 2009 – October 2011 1 1. General Project Information Name of organization: UNDP Area/Country Europe/ FYR Macedonia Project title: “Inter-municipal Cooperation for better Service Provision and EU Accession” Project number: MAK-08/032 Recipient: UNDP Co-operation partner(s): Ministry of Local Self-government (MoLSG) 2. Project Expenses Allocated amount (as per the Letters of 1.226.957,86 USD / 887.454,6 EUR Approval and the exchange rates on the transfer dates) Other financing Other contribution (UNDP, local 40,716 USD (35,099 UNDP and 5,617 contribution) municipality of Ilinden) There is parallel funding by the municipalities participating in the grant scheme in 15% of every grant, total 5.574.315 MKD (approximately 120.000 USD) Total Project Expenses 1,267.673,86 USD Amount to be disbursed (funding of on- / going activities) Requested amount / 2 3. Project Description a) Describe the project purpose and objectives, including indicators for measuring performance. If the purpose or objectives were modified, an example must be given. The objective of the Programme “Inter-municipal Cooperation for better Service Provision and EU Accession” (IMC Programme in the further text) was to contribute to the development of inter-municipal cooperation (IMC) in the country in support of the achievement of one of the main objectives of decentralization i.e. the efficient provision of affordable and quality public services to citizens and to ensure the institutional and professional capacities needed. Ultimately, the IMC Programme sought to establish an effective and sustainable system for supporting IMC which would be adopted and expended by the Government through its own policies and resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Sheet Macedonia
    The Country of Return Information Project functions as a network of NGO’s for the collection and transfer of specific information on reintegration possibilities for potential returnees and their counsellors. All questions you may have on reintegration possibilities and on which you don’t find the answer in this country sheet, can be directed to the helpdesk “Country of Return Information and Vulnerable Groups”. E-mail: [email protected] COUNTRY SHEET MACEDONIA The Country of Return Information Project and Vulnerable Groups runs until June 2009 and is funded by the European May 2009 Community. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information provided. Sole responsibility for its content lies with the author. 1 1. Access to the territory ......................................................................... 4 1.1 Documentation ...................................................................................................... 4 1.1.1 Travel documents needed for returnees ................................................... 5 1.1.2 Documents needed to the country of return ............................................ 6 1.1.3 How to obtain necessary documents .......................................................... 6 1.1.4 Price of the necessary documents .............................................................. 7 1.2 Travel to country of origin .................................................................................. 8 1.2.1 By air ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TOURIST INTENSITY in the POLOG REGION 2011-2019 Ilija Zakoski
    GSJ: Volume 9, Issue 5, May 2021 ISSN 2320-9186 1522 GSJ: Volume 9, Issue 5, May 2021, Online: ISSN 2320-9186 www.globalscientificjournal.com TOURIST INTENSITY IN THE POLOG REGION 2011-2019 Ilija Zakoski KeyWords Polog planning region, tourism, tourism development, tourist intensity, tourist stays. ABSTRACT Opportunities for tourism development in the Republic of North Macedonia (RNM) are numerous. The tourist locations attract more and more interest among the foreign tourists, but it is still not enough to say that they have a significant role in the overall economy of the coun- try. This paper aims to analyse the tourist intensity based on realized arrivals and overnight stays of domestic and foreign tourists in the Polog planning region in the period 2011-2019 and to compare them with the tourist intensity at the state level. The tourist intensity in the RNM expressed through realized arrivals and overnight stays is on the rise. The share of domestic tourists in the total tourist intensity is still higher, but the number of foreign tourists is continuously growing as well. The concept of tourism development that has been practiced in recent decades for many years is in crisis whose result is the loss of the in- ternational tourism market. Part of the tourist intensity of the RNM is accounted to the Polog planning region. The realized tourist intensity based on realized arrivals and overnight stays in the period 2011-2019 as well as the perspectives for future development are presented. INTRODUCTION With the adoption of the Law on Territorial Organization of the Local Self-Government in the Republic of Macedonia in 2004 and the new Regulation on the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NTES) by the European Parliament in 2003, the need to har- monize the existing classification with the new circumstances was imposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewership Survey Report New Heroes: a Reality TV Show in North
    Viewership Survey Report New Heroes: A Reality TV Show in North Macedonia Search for Common Ground North Macedonia April 2020 Skopje i Acknowledgements In the planning and preparation of this report tremendous help, support and guidance was provided by the whole Search team of North Macedonia. Additionally, starting from the planning phase of the research and concluding with the finalization of the report, there has been a continuous cooperation between the local M&E Consultant and Shiva K Dhungana, Senior Regional DM&E Specialist for Asia and North Macedonia. Special thanks to the principles of the primary and high schools across the country that have made it possible for parts of this research with primary and high school students to happen as a result of their readiness for cooperation. © Search for Common Ground Disclaimer The opinions and analyses included in the report are generated from the data collection tools used for this research and are interrelated by the researcher. The opinions or analyses do not represent the opinion or stand US Agency for International Development in North Macedonia. ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ii Executive Summary iv 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Background 1 2. Methodology 4 2.1. Watch-Party Discussions 4 2.2. Interviews 5 2.3. TV and YouTube Viewership 5 2.4. 3-R Survey 5 2.4.1. Survey Audience 6 2.4.2. Survey Location 6 2.4.3. Sample Size 6 3. Findings 9 3.1. Watch-Party Discussions 9 3.2. TV and YouTube Viewership 11 3.3. Interviews/Interactions 13 3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Evaluation of Expenditure of DEC Kosovo Appeal Funds Phases I and II, April 1999 – January 2000
    Independent Evaluation of Expenditure of DEC Kosovo Appeal Funds Phases I and II, April 1999 – January 2000 Volume II Peter Wiles Mark Bradbury Manuela Mece Margie Buchanan-Smith Nicola Norman Steve Collins Ana Prodanovic John Cosgrave Jane Shackman Alistair Hallam Fiona Watson Overseas Development Institute In association with Valid International August 2000 ,QGHSHQGHQW(YDOXDWLRQRI([SHQGLWXUH RI'(&.RVRYR$SSHDO)XQGV 3KDVHV,DQG,,$SULO¤-DQXDU\ 7KHHYDOXDWLRQFRQVLVWVRIWKUHHYROXPHVRIZKLFKWKLVLVWKHVHFRQG 9ROXPH,0DLQ)LQGLQJVRIWKH(YDOXDWLRQ 9ROXPH,,6HFWRUDO6HFWLRQV LQFOXGLQJDVHFWLRQRQ:DU$IIHFWHG 3RSXODWLRQVDQG%HQHILFLDULHV 9ROXPH,,,,QGLYLGXDO'(&$JHQF\6XPPDULHV Overseas Development Institute :HVWPLQVWHU %ULGJH 5RDG /RQGRQ 6( -' 7HO )D[ (PDLO KSJ#RGLRUJXN :HEVLWH ZZZRGLRUJXN *UHDW 3RUWODQG 6WUHHW /RQGRQ :1 $+ 7HO )D[ )XUWKHUGHWDLOVDERXWWKLVHYDOXDWLRQFDQEHIRXQGRQWKH'(&ZHEVLWHDW ZZZGHFRUJXN &RYHU'HVWUR\HG0DUNHW6WUHHWLQ'MDNRYD 3KRWRJUDSKWDNHQE\0DUN%UDGEXU\GXULQJWKHHYDOXDWLRQILHOGZRUN0DUFK 'LVDVWHUV(PHUJHQF\&RPPLWWHH Preface Preface This volume of the DEC Kosovo evaluation contains sections on sectoral topics, such as food and nutrition, shelter and psychosocial assistance. It also looks at the experiences of war- affected populations and beneficiaries. This volume should be read in conjunction with Volumes I and III of the report. Volume I contains the main findings of the evaluation, together with overall conclusions and an executive summary. Volume III contains summaries of the agencies’ DEC funded activities. Each agency section
    [Show full text]
  • T E H N O L a B Ltd Skopje
    T E H N O L A B Ltd Skopje Environment, technology, protection at work, nature PO Box.827, Jane Sandanski 113, Skopje tel./fax: ++389 2 2 448 058 / ++389 70 265 992 www. tehnolab.com.mk; e-mail: [email protected] Study on Wastewater Management in Skopje ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) STUDY FINAL REPORT October, 2008 Skopje Part II: A6-43 Tehnolab Ltd.—Skopje EIA Study WWTP, Skopje Ordered by : Japan International Cooperation Agency Study Team Project : Study on Wastewater Management in Skopje File : EIA Study (Main Report and Annexes) Prepared by : Tehnolab Ltd, Skopje Team leader : M.Sc. Magdalena Trajkovska Trpevska (B.Sc. Chemical engineer) Experts involved : Ph. D. Stanislava Dodeva (B.Sc. Civil Hydro engineer), Environmental expert Ljubomir Ivanovski (B.Sc. Energy engineer) - Environmental expert, cooperator of team leader Andrijana Veljanoska (B.Sc. Environmental engineer) (team leader assistant) Borce Aleksov (B.Sc. Chemical engineer) - Environmental expert, co-operator of team leader Ph.D. Vlado Matevski , Expert Biologist (Expert regarding Flora) Ph. D. Sveto Petkovski, Expert Biologist (Expert regarding Fauna) Ph. D. Branko Micevski, Expert Biologist (Expert regarding endemic Bird species) Ph. D. Jelena Dimitrijevic (B.Sc. Techology engineer), Expert regarding social environmental aspects Date: October 2008 "TEHNOLAB" Ltd Skopje Company for technological and laboratory researches projections and services Manager: M.Sc. Magdalena Trajkovska Trpevska chemical engineer Part II: A6-44 Tehnolab Ltd.—Skopje EIA Study
    [Show full text]
  • MCEC IIEP Quarterly Report #8 Oct Dec 2013
    Interethnic Integration in Education Project QUARTERLY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REPORT No. 8 October 1, 2013 – December 31, 2013 Joint student activities Submitted by: Macedonian Civic Education Center (MCEC) under Cooperative Agreement No. AID-165-A-12-00002 USAID Interethnic Integration in Education Project QUARTERLY REPORT #8, October 2013 – December 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Background 3 2. Progress Towards Objectives 4 3. Crosscutting Activities 6 4. Project Activities 10 4.1. Community Outreach 10 4.2. Capacity Building of School Management and Teachers 12 4.3. Demonstration Schools 20 4.4. Providing Incentives to Schools and Communities 25 5. Lessons learned 31 6. Activities to Increase Participation of People with Disabilities (PWDs) 33 7. Activities in the next reporting period 34 8. List of appendices 36 2 USAID Interethnic Integration in Education Project QUARTERLY REPORT #8, October 2013 – December 2013 MACEDONIAN CIVIC EDUCATION CENTER (MCEC) USAID INTERETHNIC INTEGRATION IN EDUCATION PROJECT (IIEP) QUARTERLY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REPORT No. 8 Cooperative Agreement No: AID-165-A-12-00002 Progress Report No: 8 Reporting Period: October 1, 2013 – December 31, 2013 1. BACKGROUND On December 2, 2011, the Macedonian Civic Education Center (MCEC) signed the Cooperative Agreement with USAID agreeing to provide support to USAID’s Interethnic Integration in Education Project (IIEP). IIEP is a four-year, USD 5.2 million initiative targeting all primary and secondary schools in Macedonia. The main objective of IIEP is to build awareness and provide diversity training, technical assistance, and incentives to school boards, principals, teachers, and administration officials in support of interethnic integration in education. It will build broad public understanding on the benefits for all citizens as a result from integrating Macedonia’s education system.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Basis of Article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, No
    On the basis of article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, no. 55/13), the Steering Board of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre has enacted REGULATION FOR THE MANNER OF CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES AND FOR DETERMINING THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES WHICH ARE MAINTAINED IN THE CENTER FOR REC SKOPJE AND THE SECTORS FOR REAL ESTATE CADASTRE IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Article 1 This Regulation hereby prescribes the manner of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, as well as the determining of the cadastre municipalities which are maintained in the Center for Real Estate Cadastre – Skopje and the Sectors for Real Estate Cadastre in Republic of Macedonia. Article 2 (1) For the purpose of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, the Government of Republic of Macedonia shall enact a decision. (2) The decision stipulated in paragraph (1) of this article shall be enacted by the Government of Republic of Macedonia at the proposal of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre (hereinafter referred to as: „„the Agency„„). (3) The Agency is to submit the proposal stipulated in paragraph (2) of this article along with a geodetic report for survey of the boundary line, produced under ex officio procedure by experts employed at the Agency. Article 3 (1) The Agency is to submit a proposal decision for changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities in cases when, under a procedure of ex officio, it is identified that the actual condition/status of the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities is changed and does not comply with the boundaries drawn on the cadastre maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on the Functioning of the Public Internal Financial Control System
    2018 Ministry of Finance Public Internal Financial Control Department 2018 ANNUAL REPORT ON THE FUNCTIONING O F PUBLIC INTERNAL FINANCIAL CONTROL SYSTEM Skopje, July 2019 1 CONTENT Page SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................. 6 1.1. Legal basis for the preparation of the Annual Report ………………....................................................................... 6 1.2. Purpose of the Annual Report….........................................................................................................................................6 1.3. Basis for preparation and scope of the Annual Report ......................................................................................... 7 1.4. Submitted 2018 Annual Financial Reports....................................................................................................................7 1.4. 1. Measures and activities to improve the quality of annual reporting …………………………….….........8 2. REPORT ON THE QUALITY AND STATUS OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL…… 9 2. 1 CURRENT STATE OF PLAY AS REGARDS FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL SYSTEM .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.1.1 State of Play in the Establishment and Staffing of the Financial Affairs Units ……………………...9 2.1.1.1 Measures to Improve the Establishment,
    [Show full text]