DOCSLIB.ORG

Independent Evaluation of Expenditure of DEC Kosovo Appeal Funds Phases I and II, April 1999 – January 2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Independent Evaluation of Expenditure of DEC Kosovo Appeal Funds Phases I and II, April 1999 – January 2000 Independent Evaluation of Expenditure of DEC Kosovo Appeal Funds Phases I and II, April 1999 – January 2000 Volume II Peter Wiles Mark Bradbury Manuela Mece Margie Buchanan-Smith Nicola Norman Steve Collins Ana Prodanovic John Cosgrave Jane Shackman Alistair Hallam Fiona Watson Overseas Development Institute In association with Valid International August 2000 ,QGHSHQGHQW(YDOXDWLRQRI([SHQGLWXUH RI'(&.RVRYR$SSHDO)XQGV 3KDVHV,DQG,,$SULO¤-DQXDU\ 7KHHYDOXDWLRQFRQVLVWVRIWKUHHYROXPHVRIZKLFKWKLVLVWKHVHFRQG 9ROXPH,0DLQ)LQGLQJVRIWKH(YDOXDWLRQ 9ROXPH,,6HFWRUDO6HFWLRQV LQFOXGLQJDVHFWLRQRQ:DU$IIHFWHG 3RSXODWLRQVDQG%HQHILFLDULHV 9ROXPH,,,,QGLYLGXDO'(&$JHQF\6XPPDULHV Overseas Development Institute :HVWPLQVWHU %ULGJH 5RDG /RQGRQ 6( -' 7HO )D[ (PDLO KSJ#RGLRUJXN :HEVLWH ZZZRGLRUJXN *UHDW 3RUWODQG 6WUHHW /RQGRQ :1 $+ 7HO )D[ )XUWKHUGHWDLOVDERXWWKLVHYDOXDWLRQFDQEHIRXQGRQWKH'(&ZHEVLWHDW ZZZGHFRUJXN &RYHU'HVWUR\HG0DUNHW6WUHHWLQ'MDNRYD 3KRWRJUDSKWDNHQE\0DUN%UDGEXU\GXULQJWKHHYDOXDWLRQILHOGZRUN0DUFK 'LVDVWHUV(PHUJHQF\&RPPLWWHH Preface Preface This volume of the DEC Kosovo evaluation contains sections on sectoral topics, such as food and nutrition, shelter and psychosocial assistance. It also looks at the experiences of war- affected populations and beneficiaries. This volume should be read in conjunction with Volumes I and III of the report. Volume I contains the main findings of the evaluation, together with overall conclusions and an executive summary. Volume III contains summaries of the agencies’ DEC funded activities. Each agency section also looks at key issues relating to performance which the evaluation team felt merited comment. i Table of Contents Table of Contents Preface ....................................................................................................................................... i Table of Contents....................................................................................................................iii Figures, Tables and Boxes ....................................................................................................vii Glossary ................................................................................................................................... ix SECTION 1: FOOD AND NUTRITION............................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 General Findings ................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Use of DEC Funds............................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Objectives of Food Aid........................................................................................................ 4 1.5 Quantity and Quality of Food Aid....................................................................................... 5 1.6 Coverage of Vulnerable Groups.......................................................................................... 7 1.7 Cost-effectiveness of Different Rations .............................................................................. 8 1.8 Impact of Food Aid............................................................................................................ 10 1.9 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 11 Annex 1.1: Food and Nutrition Tables .................................................................................... 13 SECTION 2: HEALTH......................................................................................................... 21 2.1 Mortality and Morbidity .................................................................................................... 21 2.2 Surveillance ....................................................................................................................... 21 2.3 Non-communicable Disease.............................................................................................. 22 2.4 Communicable Disease ..................................................................................................... 23 2.5 The Humanitarian Intervention ......................................................................................... 24 2.6 Integrated Public Health Interventions.............................................................................. 25 2.7 Recommendation............................................................................................................... 27 2.8 Rehabilitation .................................................................................................................... 28 2.9 Coverage in Health ............................................................................................................ 28 2.10 Standards and Impartiality............................................................................................... 29 SECTION 3: SHELTER....................................................................................................... 31 3.1 Background........................................................................................................................ 31 3.2 DEC Agency Response ..................................................................................................... 32 3.3 Assistance for Construction............................................................................................... 34 3.4 Great Expectations............................................................................................................. 35 3.5 The Category 5 Question................................................................................................... 36 3.6 Programme Standards........................................................................................................ 36 3.7 Shelter Kits ........................................................................................................................ 38 3.8 Coordination ...................................................................................................................... 38 3.9 Management Issues ...........................................................................................................38 3.10 Continuing Work ............................................................................................................. 39 3.11 Outcomes......................................................................................................................... 39 SECTION 4: WATER AND SANITATION....................................................................... 41 4.1 Background........................................................................................................................ 41 4.2 The DEC Agencies’ Initial Responses .............................................................................. 42 4.3 Preparedness ...................................................................................................................... 43 iii Independent Evaluation of DEC Kosovo Appeal Funds: Volume II, August 2000 4.4 Rehabilitation Phase Water Projects.................................................................................. 44 4.5 Quality Problems ............................................................................................................... 44 4.6 The Sphere Standards ........................................................................................................45 4.7 Outcomes........................................................................................................................... 46 SECTION 5: SCHOOL AND EDUCATION REHABILITATION................................. 47 5.1 The Politics of Education .................................................................................................. 47 5.2 Work in the School Sector................................................................................................. 48 5.3 NOVIB’s Kosovo Education Rehabilitation Project (KERP) ........................................... 49 5.4 The BRCS Schools Rehabilitation Project ........................................................................ 50 5.5 Health and Safety .............................................................................................................. 50 5.6 Gender: Forgotten Again? ................................................................................................. 51 5.7 Separate Development in Albania? ................................................................................... 51 5.8 The Future?........................................................................................................................ 52 5.9 Outcome............................................................................................................................. 53 SECTION 6: HUMANITARIAN MINE ACTION ............................................................ 55 6.1 Background........................................................................................................................ 55 6.2 DEC Agency Responses.................................................................................................... 56 6.3 Prioritisation ...................................................................................................................... 58 6.4
Load more

Recommended publications
  • STATUS REPORT for the Period: January 2009 – October 2011
    United Nations Development Programme PROGRAMME “INTER-MUNICIPAL COOPERATION for BETTER SERVICE PROVISION for EU ACCESSION” FINAL STATUS REPORT For the period: January 2009 – October 2011 1 1. General Project Information Name of organization: UNDP Area/Country Europe/ FYR Macedonia Project title: “Inter-municipal Cooperation for better Service Provision and EU Accession” Project number: MAK-08/032 Recipient: UNDP Co-operation partner(s): Ministry of Local Self-government (MoLSG) 2. Project Expenses Allocated amount (as per the Letters of 1.226.957,86 USD / 887.454,6 EUR Approval and the exchange rates on the transfer dates) Other financing Other contribution (UNDP, local 40,716 USD (35,099 UNDP and 5,617 contribution) municipality of Ilinden) There is parallel funding by the municipalities participating in the grant scheme in 15% of every grant, total 5.574.315 MKD (approximately 120.000 USD) Total Project Expenses 1,267.673,86 USD Amount to be disbursed (funding of on- / going activities) Requested amount / 2 3. Project Description a) Describe the project purpose and objectives, including indicators for measuring performance. If the purpose or objectives were modified, an example must be given. The objective of the Programme “Inter-municipal Cooperation for better Service Provision and EU Accession” (IMC Programme in the further text) was to contribute to the development of inter-municipal cooperation (IMC) in the country in support of the achievement of one of the main objectives of decentralization i.e. the efficient provision of affordable and quality public services to citizens and to ensure the institutional and professional capacities needed. Ultimately, the IMC Programme sought to establish an effective and sustainable system for supporting IMC which would be adopted and expended by the Government through its own policies and resources.
    [Show full text]
  • TOURIST INTENSITY in the POLOG REGION 2011-2019 Ilija Zakoski
    GSJ: Volume 9, Issue 5, May 2021 ISSN 2320-9186 1522 GSJ: Volume 9, Issue 5, May 2021, Online: ISSN 2320-9186 www.globalscientificjournal.com TOURIST INTENSITY IN THE POLOG REGION 2011-2019 Ilija Zakoski KeyWords Polog planning region, tourism, tourism development, tourist intensity, tourist stays. ABSTRACT Opportunities for tourism development in the Republic of North Macedonia (RNM) are numerous. The tourist locations attract more and more interest among the foreign tourists, but it is still not enough to say that they have a significant role in the overall economy of the coun- try. This paper aims to analyse the tourist intensity based on realized arrivals and overnight stays of domestic and foreign tourists in the Polog planning region in the period 2011-2019 and to compare them with the tourist intensity at the state level. The tourist intensity in the RNM expressed through realized arrivals and overnight stays is on the rise. The share of domestic tourists in the total tourist intensity is still higher, but the number of foreign tourists is continuously growing as well. The concept of tourism development that has been practiced in recent decades for many years is in crisis whose result is the loss of the in- ternational tourism market. Part of the tourist intensity of the RNM is accounted to the Polog planning region. The realized tourist intensity based on realized arrivals and overnight stays in the period 2011-2019 as well as the perspectives for future development are presented. INTRODUCTION With the adoption of the Law on Territorial Organization of the Local Self-Government in the Republic of Macedonia in 2004 and the new Regulation on the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NTES) by the European Parliament in 2003, the need to har- monize the existing classification with the new circumstances was imposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewership Survey Report New Heroes: a Reality TV Show in North
    Viewership Survey Report New Heroes: A Reality TV Show in North Macedonia Search for Common Ground North Macedonia April 2020 Skopje i Acknowledgements In the planning and preparation of this report tremendous help, support and guidance was provided by the whole Search team of North Macedonia. Additionally, starting from the planning phase of the research and concluding with the finalization of the report, there has been a continuous cooperation between the local M&E Consultant and Shiva K Dhungana, Senior Regional DM&E Specialist for Asia and North Macedonia. Special thanks to the principles of the primary and high schools across the country that have made it possible for parts of this research with primary and high school students to happen as a result of their readiness for cooperation. © Search for Common Ground Disclaimer The opinions and analyses included in the report are generated from the data collection tools used for this research and are interrelated by the researcher. The opinions or analyses do not represent the opinion or stand US Agency for International Development in North Macedonia. ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ii Executive Summary iv 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Background 1 2. Methodology 4 2.1. Watch-Party Discussions 4 2.2. Interviews 5 2.3. TV and YouTube Viewership 5 2.4. 3-R Survey 5 2.4.1. Survey Audience 6 2.4.2. Survey Location 6 2.4.3. Sample Size 6 3. Findings 9 3.1. Watch-Party Discussions 9 3.2. TV and YouTube Viewership 11 3.3. Interviews/Interactions 13 3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Програмa За Jaвни Инвестиции Вo Рeпублиka Makeдoниja 2011 - 2013
    ВЛАДА НА РЕПУБЛИКА МАКЕДОНИЈА GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA ПРОГРАМA ЗА JAВНИ ИНВЕСТИЦИИ ВO РEПУБЛИKA MAKEДOНИJA 2011 - 2013 PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMME OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA 2011 – 2013 СKOПJE, SKOPJE 2011 Програма за јавни инвестиции 2011 - 2013 Public Investment Programme В О В Е Д INTRODUCTION Програмата за јавни инвестиции во Република The Public Investment Programme of the Republic Македонија 2011-2013 е подготвена согласно на of Macedonia 2011-2013 was prepared in accordance Програмата за работа на Владата на Република with the WorK Programme of the Government of the Македонија. Republic of Macedonia. Почнувајќи од 1995 година, вo Министерството за Since 1995, a data base of investment projects in финансии е оформена база на податоци за the public infrastructure of the Republic of Macedonia инвестициони проекти од јавната инфраструктура на was set up in the Ministry of Finance and the concerned Република Македонија, врз основа на податоци што се Ministries and that is continuously innovated. доставуваат од надлежните министерства и кои постојано се иновираат. During the preparation of the Programme, it was При подготвувањето на Програмата се имаше taken into consideration that the undertaken activities предвид дека преземените активности за for intensifying the country's reform processes, and интензивирање на реформските процеси во земјата, а particularly the public sector transformation processes особено трансформационите процеси во јавниот require approach towards application of adequate сектор бараат да се пристапи кон примена на methodology in the public investments planning адекватна методологија во спроведувањето на implementation and their execution monitoring, for which планирањето на јавните инвестиции и следење на the World banK and the European Union through the нивната реализација, за што Светската банка и PHARE Programme provided compliant technical Европската унија преку Програмата PHARE oбезбедија support to the Government of the Republic of соодветна техничка поддршка на Владата на Република Macedonia.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Activity Report
    UNION OF TURKISH WORLD MUNICIPALITIES (TDBB) 2018 ACTIVITY REPORT ACTIVITY REPORT 2018 ACTIVITY REPORT 2018 TECHNICAL PREPARATION Union of Turkish World Municipalities (TDBB) DESIGN Enveriye Sok. No: 26/2 Üsküdar - İstanbul Tel: (0216) 557 82 87 - Faks: (0216) 557 82 85 PRINTING Seçil Ofset 100. Yıl Mh. Massit Matbaacılar Sitesi 4. Cadde No:77 Bağcılar - İstanbul Tel: (0212) 629 06 15 İstanbul, 2019 Merkez Efendi Mah. Merkez Efendi Cad. (Merkez Efendi Konağı) No: 29 Zeytinburnu - İstanbul Tel: (0212) 547 12 00 - Faks: (0212) 547 12 04 www.tdbb.org.tr • [email protected] twitter.com/tdbbweb • tr-tr.facebook.com/tdbbweb TABLE OF CONTENTS PRESENTATION................................................................................................................................4 I. GENERAL INFORMATION...............................................................................................................7 Mission and Vision......................................................................................................................8 Founding Purpose and Duties of TDBB...................................................................................10 II. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION.............................................................................................13 Physical Structure....................................................................................................................14 Administrative Structure........................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Decentralization and Inter-Ethnic Cooperation
    DECENTRALIZATION AND INTER-ETHNIC COOPERATION: COMPARING MULTIETHNIC MUNICIPALITIES IN MACEDONIA By Olimpija Hristova Submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Carsten Q. Schneider CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2013 Abstract After a small-scale ethnic conflict between the Macedonians and Albanians in 2001, Macedonia adapted power-sharing at the central level of government combined with decentralization in the form of enhanced local self-governance. With its mosaic multiethnic structure, Macedonia belongs to the group of ethnically, culturally and religiously divided societies where decentralized institutions were designed to accommodate increased demands for minority rights and to encourage different ethnic communities to cooperate. Yet whether decentralization serves its goal cannot be observed from the aggregate country level (Varshney 2002, Mehler and Tull 2011). Since decentralization exhibits its impacts at the subnational level, it is crucial to assess whether there is a variety of inter-ethnic cooperation across subnational units. Hence, the research question of this thesis is: What types of inter- ethnic cooperation are there across multiethnic municipalities in Macedonia seven years after the decentralization reforms? To address the research question, I engage in a systematic comparative analysis of nine multiethnic municipalities in Macedonia. The data gathering besides investigation of primary and secondary sources includes exploratory fieldwork through focus group interviews. Employing thematic and fuzzy set ideal type analysis, I derive four types of inter-ethnic cooperation among municipal councilors: dynamic, predominantly informal, pragmatic and minimal cooperation. Out of this analysis I derive hypotheses of the diverse impacts CEU eTD Collection decentralization has across subnational units within the same country.
    [Show full text]
  • 02Noemvriglasilo.Pdf
    Po~ituvani, Të nderuar, Na 19 noewvi, pakovodstvoto na ZELS odp`a spedba so Aw- Më 19 nëntor, kryesia e BNJVL mbajti takim me Am- basadopot na SAD, vo Republika Makedonija N.E Filip Rik- basadorin e SHBA në Republikën e Maqedonisë, E. I. ep. Na spedbata na koja u~estvuvaa ppetsedatelot na ZELS Filip Riker. Në takim në të cilin morrën pjesë kryetari Koce Tpajanovski, kako i potppetsedatelite Nevzat Bejta i BNJVL Koce Trajanovski, si dhe nlnkryetarët Nevzat i Qubowip Janev, be{e potencipano deka ppocesot na de- Bejta dhe Ljubomir Janev, ishte potencuar që proce- centpalizacija nappeduvai pokpaj ppoblewite so koi pealno si i decentralizimit përparon edhe krahas propblemeve se soo~uva, we|u dpugoto i kako pezultat na podp{kata {to me te cilat ballafaqohet realisht, mes tjerash edhe si ZELS ja dobiva od Ppogpawata za pazvoj na Awepikanskata rezultat i përkrahjes të cilën BNJVL e fiton nga Pro- Vlada (YSAID). Vo wowentov ZELS pealizipa eden wnogu va`en grami për zhvillim të Qeverisë Amerikane (USAID). Për ppoekt za op{tinite zaedno so YSAID-,,Baza na podatoci momentin BNJVL realizon një projekt me rëndërsi të za kpeipawe na adekvatni i tewelni finansiski analizi,, madhe për komunat së bashku me USAID ,,Baza e të so {to }e se dobie jasna slika za postoe~kiot sistew za fi- dhënave për krijimin të analizave fianciare adekuate nansipawe na op{tinite. Awbasadopot Rikep od svoja dhe themelore”, me çka do të fitohet fotografi e qartë stpana izpazi zadovolstvo od faktot deka ZELS e për sistemin egzistues për financim të komunave. Am- isklu~itelen ppiwep kade vladee edinstvo nad paptiskite basadori Riker nga ana e tij shprehi kënaqësi nga fak- intepesi.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment Report for Reconstruction and Rehabilitation of the Local Road Network Project in Republic of Macedonia (VII Tender) (Final Draft)
    Environmental Impact Assessment Report for the Reconstruction and Rehabilitation of the Local Road Network Project in Republic of Macedonia (VII tender) REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA PUBLIC ENTERPRICE FOR STATE ROADS Environmental Impact Assessment Report for Reconstruction and Rehabilitation of the Local Road Network Project in Republic of Macedonia (VII tender) (Final draft) Skopje, August 2014 CEI Makedonija AD, Skopje 1 Environmental Impact Assessment Report for the Reconstruction and Rehabilitation of the Local Road Network Project in Republic of Macedonia (VII tender) CONTENTS 1. GENERAL DATA ..................................................................................................... 4 2. TYPE OF REPORT .................................................................................................. 4 3. AGENCY AUTHORIZED FOR APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT ................................................................................................ 5 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ......................................................................... 6 4.1. LOCATION DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................8 4.2.TECHNICAL – TECHNOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTIVITY .............................................................. 10 4.3 RAW MATERIALS AND ADDITIONAL MATERIALS ..................................................................................... 97 5. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT AROUND PROJECTS’
    [Show full text]
  • The FYR of Macedonia
    TThhee FFYYRR ooff MMaacc eeddoonniiaa MMiidd--tteerrmm IImmpplleemmeennttaattiioonn AAsssseessssmmeenntt Mid-term Implementation Assessment: FYR Macedonia Introduction 1. Purpose of the follow-up programme The second and subsequent cycles of the review should focus on, inter alia, the implementation of the accepted recommendations and the development of the human rights situation in the State under review. A/HRC/RES/16/21, 12 April 2011 (Annex I C § 6) The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process takes place every four and half years; however, some recommendations can be implemented immediately. In order to reduce this interval, we have created an update process to evaluate the human rights situation two years after the examination at the UPR. Broadly speaking, UPR Info seeks to ensure the respect of commitments made in the UPR, but also, more specifically, to give stakeholders the opportunity to share their opinion on the commitments. To this end, about two years after the review, UPR Info invites States, NGOs, and National Institutions for Human Rights (NHRI) to share their comments on the implementation (or lack thereof) of recommendations adopted at the Human Rights Council (HRC) plenary session. For this purpose, UPR Info publishes a Mid-term Implementation Assessment (MIA) including responses from each stakeholder. The MIA is meant to show how all stakeholders are disposed to follow through on, and implement their commitments. States should implement the recommendations that they have accepted, and civil society should monitor that implementation. While the follow-up’s importance has been highlighted by the HRC, no precise directives regarding the follow-up procedure have been set until now.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pleasant Fiction: the Human Rights Situation of Roma in Macedonia Introduction
    European Roma Rights Center A Pleasant Fiction The Human Rights Situation of Roma in Macedonia Country Reports Series, No. 7. July 1998 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................6 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7 2. Germany I .....................................................................................................................12 3. Roma Made Stateless by the Act on Citizenship of the Republic of Macedonia ............................................................................................................... 17 3.1. One Year of Simple Procedure .....................................................................19 3.2. Aliens ................................................................................................................. 24 3.3. Stateless ............................................................................................................. 28 4. Ethnic Tensions on the Rise ..................................................................................... 31 5. You Gypsies Don't Know How to Live Properly: Police and Judicial Abuse of Roma in Macedonia ..................................................................................43 5.1. Police Abuse of Roma in Macedonia ...........................................................47 5.1.1. Police Abuse of Roma
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonia a Year After the Ethnic Conflict: the Disintegration of Social Fabric
    INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR MINORITY STUDIES AND INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS (IMIR) MACEDONIA A YEAR AFTER THE ETHNIC CONFLICT: THE DISINTEGRATION OF SOCIAL FABRIC Antonina Zhelyazkova March 2002 Sofia 1303, 55, Antim I St., tel: (+3592) 8323112; fax: 9310-583; e-mail: [email protected]; http://www.imir-bg.org 1 MACEDONIA A YEAR AFTER THE ETHNIC CONFLICT. THE DISINTEGRATION OF SOCIAL FABRIC1 March 2002 Antonina Zhelyazkova Research Methodology The team consisted of six members, each with interdisciplinary training and a specific approach to fieldwork and interviewees: a historian and Balkan studies scholar, an ethnologist-anthropologist, a historian anthropologist, an oriental studies linguist, a journalist, and an interpreter- mediator.* The researchers worked both in a team and individually with persons of different social and age groups and in different localities. The survey was carried out between 18 and 23 March 2002, with the kind support of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation, as the successive stage of IMIR’s three-year long research cycle devoted to the crisis in former Yugoslavia, to the fate and future of Macedonia, Kosovo, Serbia, Albania, and Montenegro in the context of the Albanian national question. The scholars applied the method of anthropological interviews, as well as an adapted and authorized system of questions for semi- standardized sociological interviews and observations. Content-analysis of the daily and weekly press, and of some TV and radio programmes, was made in the course of the expedition. Furthermore, data from some official municipal records were systematized. The aim of the survey was to take a snapshot of the social and political situation in Macedonia, as well as of the respective psychological state of the two major ethnic communities – the Macedonians and the Albanians.
    [Show full text]
  • Skills Gap Analysis in the Gostivar Municipality
    THE EUROPEAN UNION'S CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME THIS PROGRAMME IS FUNDEN BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Report of Skills Gap Analysis in Gostivar Municipality This project is financed by European Union Report of Skills Gap Analysis in Gostivar Municipality This report is a part of “Development of integrated touristic products for sustainable economic growth of Gostivar and Korca regions” 1 Report of Skills Gap Analysis in Gostivar Municipality Prepared by: My Career “This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Municipality of Gostivar and the partners My Career and Center for Mountain development Skopje and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.” January, 2016 2 Content: I. Executive Summary II. Introduction a. Background b. Methodology III. Survey results a. Company profiles b. Current workforce situation c. Cooperation with educational institutions d. Future skills IV. Conclusions and recommendations 3 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The EU Project “Development of integrated touristic products for sustainable economic growth of Gostivar and Korca regions” in Macedonia sought to assist the Gostivar Municipality, in general, and the sector based companies more specifically, so that the can improve the their competitive position in the market. To do this, MyCareer, a local NGO that works in the field of career counseling and internship program, as an implementer of the activi- ty completed the following; (1) undertook qualitative and quantita- tive skills gap assessments in the region, (2) provided recommenda- tions to Municipality of Gostivar for making the educational pro- gram more responsive to the needs of the private sector and (3) improve the cooperation between the academia and the businesses, including establishing a structured internship program.
    [Show full text]