Great Wildflowers for Dry Landscapes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Environmental Assessment (EA) Is Tiered to Other Environmental Documents That Are Available for Review at the Lake George Ranger District Office
United States Department of Environmental Agriculture Forest Assessment Service March, 2011 Hog Valley Scrub PALS No. 25932 Lake George Ranger District, Ocala National Forest Marion and Putnam Counties, Florida For Information Contact: Mike Herrin, District Ranger 17147 E. Hwy 40 Silver Springs, FL 34488 352-625-2520 [email protected] The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion. age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………………. 2 Background ………………………………………………………………………………... 2 Purpose and Need for Action …………………………………………………………….... 2 Proposed Action ………………………………………………………………………….... 3 Decision Framework ………………………………………………………………………. 4 Public Involvement ………………………………………………………………………... 4 Issues ………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 ALTERNATIVES ………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Alternatives ……………………………………………………………………………….. -
Lyonia Preserve Plant Checklist
Lyonia Preserve Plant Checklist Volusia County, Florida Aceraceae (Maple) Asteraceae (Aster) Red Maple Acer rubrum Bitterweed Helenium amarum Blackroot Pterocaulon virgatum Agavaceae (Yucca) Blazing Star Liatris sp. Adam's Needle Yucca filamentosa Blazing Star Liatris tenuifolia Nolina Nolina brittoniana Camphorweed Heterotheca subaxillaris Spanish Bayonet Yucca aloifolia Cudweed Gnaphalium falcatum Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium Amaranthaceae (Amaranth) Dwarf Horseweed Conyza candensis Cottonweed Froelichia floridana False Dandelion Pyrrhopappus carolinianus Fireweed Erechtites hieracifolia Anacardiaceae (Cashew) Garberia Garberia heterophylla Winged Sumac Rhus copallina Goldenaster Pityopsis graminifolia Goldenrod Solidago chapmanii Annonaceae (Custard Apple) Goldenrod Solidago fistulosa Flag Paw paw Asimina obovata Goldenrod Solidago spp. Mohr's Throughwort Eupatorium mohrii Apiaceae (Celery) Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia Dollarweed Hydrocotyle sp. Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia Spanish Needles Bidens alba Apocynaceae (Dogbane) Wild Lettuce Lactuca graminifolia Periwinkle Catharathus roseus Brassicaceae (Mustard) Aquifoliaceae (Holly) Poorman's Pepper Lepidium virginicum Gallberry Ilex glabra Sand Holly Ilex ambigua Bromeliaceae (Airplant) Scrub Holly Ilex opaca var. arenicola Ball Moss Tillandsia recurvata Spanish Moss Tillandsia usneoides Arecaceae (Palm) Saw Palmetto Serenoa repens Cactaceae (Cactus) Scrub Palmetto Sabal etonia Prickly Pear Opuntia humifusa Asclepiadaceae (Milkweed) Caesalpinceae Butterfly Weed Asclepias -
Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park
Wekiva River Basin State Parks Approved Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks October 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 7 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 9 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 9 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 9 Management Coordination ................................................................. 10 Public Participation ............................................................................ 10 Other Designations ........................................................................... 10 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 13 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 19 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 19 Topography .................................................................................. 19 Geology ...................................................................................... -
Hybridization in Compositae
Hybridization in Compositae Dr. Edward Schilling University of Tennessee Tennessee – not Texas, but we still grow them big! [email protected] Ayres Hall – University of Tennessee campus in Knoxville, Tennessee University of Tennessee Leucanthemum vulgare – Inspiration for school colors (“Big Orange”) Compositae – Hybrids Abound! Changing view of hybridization: once consider rare, now known to be common in some groups Hotspots (Ellstrand et al. 1996. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 93: 5090-5093) Comparison of 5 floras (British Isles, Scandanavia, Great Plains, Intermountain, Hawaii): Asteraceae only family in top 6 in all 5 Helianthus x multiflorus Overview of Presentation – Selected Aspects of Hybridization 1. More rather than less – an example from the flower garden 2. Allopolyploidy – a changing view 3. Temporal diversity – Eupatorium (thoroughworts) 4. Hybrid speciation/lineages – Liatrinae (blazing stars) 5. Complications for phylogeny estimation – Helianthinae (sunflowers) Hybrid: offspring between two genetically different organisms Evolutionary Biology: usually used to designated offspring between different species “Interspecific Hybrid” “Species” – problematic term, so some authors include a description of their species concept in their definition of “hybrid”: Recognition of Hybrids: 1. Morphological “intermediacy” Actually – mixture of discrete parental traits + intermediacy for quantitative ones In practice: often a hybrid will also exhibit traits not present in either parent, transgressive Recognition of Hybrids: 1. Morphological “intermediacy” Actually – mixture of discrete parental traits + intermediacy for quantitative ones In practice: often a hybrid will also exhibit traits not present in either parent, transgressive 2. Genetic “additivity” Presence of genes from each parent Recognition of Hybrids: 1. Morphological “intermediacy” Actually – mixture of discrete parental traits + intermediacy for quantitative ones In practice: often a hybrid will also exhibit traits not present in either parent, transgressive 2. -
Lyonia Preserve Plant Checklist
I -1 Lyonia Preserve Plant Checklist Volusia County, Florida I, I Aceraceae (Maple) Asteraceae (Aster) Red Maple Acer rubrum • Bitterweed Helenium amarum • Blackroot Pterocaulon virgatum Agavaceae (Yucca) Blazing Star Liatris sp. B Adam's Needle Yucca filamentosa Blazing Star Liatris tenuifolia BNolina Nolina brittoniana Camphorweed Heterotheca subaxillaris Spanish Bayonet Yucca aloifolia § Cudweed Gnaphalium falcatum • Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium Amaranthaceae (Amaranth) Dwarf Horseweed Conyza candensis B Cottonweed Froelichia floridana False Dandelion Pyrrhopappus carolinianus • Fireweed Erechtites hieracifolia B Anacardiaceae (Cashew) Garberia Garberia heterophylla Winged Sumac Rhus copallina Goldenaster Pityopsis graminifolia • § Goldenrod Solidago chapmanii Annonaceae (Custard Apple) Goldenrod Solidago fistulosa Flag Paw paw Asimina obovata Goldenrod Solidago spp. B • Mohr's Throughwort Eupatorium mohrii Apiaceae (Celery) BRa gweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia • Dollarweed Hydrocotyle sp. Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia BSpanish Needles Bidens alba Apocynaceae (Dogbane) Wild Lettuce Lactuca graminifolia Periwinkle Catharathus roseus • • Brassicaceae (Mustard) Aquifoliaceae (Holly) Poorman's Pepper Lepidium virginicum Gallberry Ilex glabra • Sand Holly Ilex ambigua Bromeliaceae (Airplant) § Scrub Holly Ilex opaca var. arenicola Ball Moss Tillandsia recurvata • Spanish Moss Tillandsia usneoides Arecaceae (Palm) • Saw Palmetto Serenoa repens Cactaceae (Cactus) BScrub Palmetto Sabal etonia • Prickly Pear Opuntia humifusa Asclepiadaceae -
Alternatives to Invasive-Exotic Plants
Lake County, Florida GREENER CHOICES Alternatives to invasive-exotic plants An educational pamphlet of the Lake County Department of Public Resources and the Cooperative Invasive Species Management Area (CISMA) of Lake County 1 CALL to ACTION Lake County is under attack and needs your help in preserving its unique environment. Invasive exotic plants threaten to crowd out native species Table of Contents and disrupt Lake County’s distinctive ecosystem processes. • Call to action. .1 According to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation • What you can do to help . 2 Commission (FWC), while some non-natives, such as • Plant Care and Wildlife Benefits . 3 tomato plants, behave nicely and put food on our tables, others, without conditions that control them on their home • Plants . 4 turf, become invasive — growing and spreading rapidly Æ Trees . 4 and aggressively. More than 1.5 million acres of Florida’s Blooming . 4 remaining natural areas have become infested Shade . 6 and overwhelmed with non-native plant species. Fall Color . 7 Invasive plants, such as the Old World climbing fern and Æ Shrubs . 8 Brazilian pepper, cost Floridians millions of dollars annually. Æ Vines . 10 Farmers, ranchers, and golf course owners spend more Æ Groundcovers . 12 than $30 million each year to eradicate exotic weeds. Æ Grasses . 13 The economic costs pale in comparison to the Æ Tropical Plants . 14 ecological ones. Invasive exotic species are often cited as the number two threat to global biodiversity, Æ Wetlands. 16 second only to habitat loss due to land conversion. 2 3 What YOU CAN do to HELP The first step to control the spread of exotic plants (marked with “ ”) is to avoid using them. -
Lake Marion Creek and Reedy Creek Management Area (2016-2026)
Lake Marion Creek and Reedy Creek Management Area General Management Plan 2016-2026 South Florida Water Management District, Land Stewardship Section Intentionally left blank 0 Lake Marion Creek and Reedy Creek Management Area General Management Plan 2016-2026 South Florida Water Management District, Land Stewardship Section Lake Marion Creek and Reedy Creek Management Area Ten-Year General Management Plan (2016-2026) January 2016 Land Stewardship Section South Florida Water Management District 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-4680 Table of Contents List of Maps & Tables------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 List of Appendices ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 Executive Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 2. Introduction and Management Plan Purpose ------------------------- 7 2.1 Management Area Goals and Objectives ---------------------------------------- 7 3. Site History ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 4. Resource Inventory ----------------------------------------------------------- 23 4.1 Hydrology --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23 4.2 Soils ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 1 Lake Marion Creek and Reedy Creek Management Area General Management Plan 2016-2026 South Florida Water Management District, Land Stewardship Section 4.3 Natural Communities ------------------------------------------------------------- -
Florida Scrub Is a Plant Community Easily Recognized
Florida Scrub Including Scrubby Flatwoods and Scrubby High Pine lorida scrub is a plant community easily recognized FNAI Global Rank: G2/G3 by the dominance of evergreen shrubs and frequent FNAI State Rank: S2 Fpatches of bare, white sand. With more than two Federally Listed Species in S. FL: 32 dozen threatened and endangered species dependent upon scrub, the entire community is itself endangered. Recovery State Listed Species in S. FL: 100 of the community and its associated plants and animals will depend upon land acquisition and effective land Florida scrub. Original photograph courtesy of The management. Nature Conservancy. Synonymy Florida scrub in its various phases has been called xeric scrub, sand scrub, big scrub, sand pine scrub, oak scrub, evergreen oak scrub, dune oak scrub, evergreen scrub forest, slash pine scrub, palmetto scrub, rosemary scrub, and rosemary bald. Florida scrubs may be classified as coastal or interior. Scrubs are often named by the dominant plant species, as in rosemary scrub, sand pine scrub, palmetto scrub, or oak scrub. Some authors have confused closed-canopy forests of sand pine trees with scrub. Scrubs that are very recent in origin, usually a result of mans activities, are called pioneer scrubs. Communities intermediate between scrub and pine flatwoods have been called dry or xeric flatwoods but now are referred to as scrubby flatwoods. Communities intermediate between scrub and high pine have been called southern ridge sandhills, hickory scrub, yellow sand scrub, turkey oak scrub, turkey oak barrens, and natural turkey oak barrens, but probably are best referred to as scrubby high pine. -
Feasibility Study Exploring Growth of on Extensive Green Roof
Systems Sustainability Service Learning Project Growth study of Garberia (Garberia heterophylla), Lovegrass (Eragrostis elliottii), and Narrowleaf Silkgrass (Pityopsis graminifolia) on an Extensive Green Roof in a sub-tropical climate Shane Fiondella, LaDai Haywood, Robert Papson, Sarah Parker, and Ben Zand Introduction Green roofs or rooftop gardens are in its simplest form-- roofs covered with a plant and soil layered system. It is known for its ecological, economic, and social benefits when incorporated into an urban environment, such as on a college campus. Even though green roofs are not as widespread in Figure 1. A 16th-century hand-colored engraving of the "Hanging Gardens of Babylon" by Martin Heemskerck. the United States as in Europe, green roofs are not [Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hanging_Gardens_of_Babyl new with one of the oldest and most notable green on.jpg] roofs dating back to 500 B.C.E. with the Hanging Gardens of Babylon where the stone roof held layers of reeds, tar and soil, climbing plants, and trees. Since then green roofs have been adapted to a variety of building structures all over the world (Wanielista et al 2008). As our natural areas are rapidly being developed into urban centers covered with impenetrable concrete surfaces it becomes apparent how important recovering those lost green spaces are for protecting the environment and our overall well-being (Rowe et al. n.d.). However over the years the concept of the green roof has continued to change and evolve. Today contemporary society has altered these ancient roof gardens to meet the needs and limitations of modern architecture and societal needs (Oberndorfer, et al., 2007). -
Rare Plants of St. Lucie County Field Guide
Rare Plants of St. Lucie County Field Guide Steven W. Woodmansee [email protected] October 20, 2007 Submitted by The Institute for Regional Conservation 22601 S.W. 152 Avenue, Miami, Florida 33170 George D. Gann, Executive Director Produced and published for: St. Lucie County Department of Environmental Resources, Fort Pierce, Florida PO Number P2810306 Chapter 1: Rare Plants in St. Lucie County and surrounding area overview Introduction St. Lucie County is comprised of a mosaic of habitats. Since the occupation by early pioneers to the 1970’s much of the habitat was adapted or converted for agricultural practices such as farming as well as cattle raising. Urban development centered mostly in the vicinity of Fort Pierce. Recently urban sprawl has been rampant, especially in the vicinity of Port St. Lucie. With the onslaught of the recent surge of human development and the need for housing combined with exotic pest plant invasions, many of these habitats have become impacted and/or destroyed threatening many of the rare plant species. The intent of this field guide is to provide a quick useful resource for identifying rare state (Florida) listed plants documented within St. Lucie County. Habitats Historically the habitats in St. Lucie County primarily consisted of five types (Figure 1). Dominant habitats were flatwoods and dry prairie throughout most of the County. (Myers and Ewel, 1990; Davis, 1967; Watts and Stankey, 1977). Additional habitats include beach dune, coastal strand, maritime hammock, and tidal swamps on Hutchinson Island on the eastern coast. The Indian River Lagoon region comprised of Atlantic coastal ridge just west of the Lagoon consisting of scrub, scrubby flatwoods, and marshes. -
The Diversity and Floral Hosts of Bees at the Archbold Biological Station, Florida (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 2002 The diversity and floral hosts of bees at the Archbold Biological Station, Florida (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Mark Deyrup Archbold Biological Station, Lake Placid, FL Jayanthi Edirisinghe Department of Zoology, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka Beth Norden National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Deyrup, Mark; Edirisinghe, Jayanthi; and Norden, Beth, "The diversity and floral hosts of bees at the Archbold Biological Station, Florida (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)" (2002). Insecta Mundi. 544. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/544 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI. Vol. 16. No. 1-3. March-Se~tember.2002 8 7 The diversity and floral hosts of bees at the Archbold Biological Station, Florida (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Mark Deyrup Archbold Biological Station P.O. Box 2057 Lake Placid, FL 33862 Jayanthi Edirisinghe Department of Zoology, University of Peradeniya Peradeniya, Sri Lanka Beth Norden Department of Systematic Biology Entomology Section, MRC - 188 National Museum of Natural History Washington, D.C. 20560 Abstract. A list is provided of 113 species of bees and their 157 known floral hosts at the Archbold Biological Station(ABS), a 2105 ha site on the Lake Wales Ridge in Highlands County in south-central Florida. -
Descriptions of Ecological Systems for Modeling of LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings
Descriptions of Ecological Systems for Modeling of LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings Ecological Systems of location MRLC Map Zones 45, 46, 47, 48, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 OR 61; Including Aggregates 06 October 2007 Descriptions provided to TNC and LANDFIRE by NatureServe About this document This document contains brief definitions of the NatureServe terrestrial ecological systems currently identified as occurring in location MRLC Map Zones 45, 46, 47, 48, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 OR 61; Including Aggregates. Terrestrial ecological systems concepts form the basis for three map products from the inter-agency Landfire effort. First, they define the map legend for mapping Existing Vegetation Type (EVT); i.e., the current location of vegetative components of each terrestrial ecological system are mapped in that layer. Second, Environmental Site Potential (ESP) is a spatial model of environments that constrain the possible locations where a given ecological system could occur, without including natural disturbance regime as a factor. Third, Biophysical Settings (BpS) provide another spatial model depicting the probable location of each ecological system type, assuming the inclusion of natural disturbance regimes as a factor. This ecological systems classification has been developed in consultation with many individuals and agencies and incorporates information from a variety of publications and other classifications. Most of the following types will be further described, quantitatively modeled, and mapped for LANDFIRE. Comments and suggestions regarding the contents of this subset may be directed to Mary J. Russo, Central Ecology Data Manager, Durham, NC, <[email protected]>. NatureServe is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing the scientific knowledge that forms the basis for effective conservation.